Elevated carboxylesterase activity contributes to the lambda-cyhalothrin insensitivity in quercetin fed Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)

Chengyu Chen; Ying Liu; Xueyan Shi; Nicolas Desneux; Peng Han; Xiwu Gao

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183111

Abstract

Quercetin as one of the key plant secondary metabolite flavonol is ubiquitous in terrestrial plants. In this study, the decrease in sensitivity to lambda-cyhalothrin was observed in quercetin-fed Helicoverpa armigera larvae. In order to figure out the mechanisms underlying the decreased sensitivity of H. armigera larvae to lambda-cyhalothrin by quercetin induction, the changes in carboxylesterase activity and in-vitro hydrolytic metabolic capacity to lambda-cyhalothrin were examined. The LC₅₀ value of quercetin-fed H. armigera larvae to lambda-cyhalothrin showed 2.41-fold higher than that of the control. S, S, S-Tributyl phosphorotrithioate (DEF) treatment showed a synergism effect on lambda-cyhalothrin toxicity to quercetin-fed H. armigera. Moreover, the activity of carboxylesterase was significantly higher in quercetin-fed H. armigera larvae after fed on quercetin for 48 h. The in-vitro hydrolytic metabolic capacity to lambda-cyhalothrin in quercetin-fed H. armigera larvae midgut was 289.82 nmol 3-PBA/mg protein/min, which is significant higher than that in the control group (149.60 nmol 3-PBA/mg protein/min). The elevated CarE enzyme activity and corresponding increased hydrolytic metabolic capacity to lambda-cyhalothrin in quercetin-fed H. armigera contributed to the enhanced tolerance to lambda-cyhalothrin.

Citation: Chen C, Liu Y, Shi X, Desneux N, Han P, Gao X (2017) Elevated carboxylesterase activity contributes to the lambda-cyhalothrin insensitivity in quercetin fed Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). PLoS ONE 12(8): e0183111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183111

Editor: Xinghui Qiu, Institute of Zoology Chinese Academy of Sciences, CHINA

Received: April 9, 2017; Accepted: July 28, 2017; Published: August 17, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by financial assistance from Natural Science Foundation of China (http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/) 31330064 and National Key Research and Development Program of China, 2017YFD0201204. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Co-author Prof. Nicolas Desneux is a PLOS ONE Editorial Board member. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and samples.

Introduction

In plant-insect interactions, some plant secondary metabolites exert the defensive roles by interfering basic metabolic, biochemical, physiological functions of herbivorous insects [1]. Many kinds of plant secondary metabolites have been shown resistant to the herbivorous insects from several orders: Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Hemiptera, by acting as feeding deterrents, growth inhibitors or toxins [2–5].

However, insects do not act as passive victims. It has been extensively documented that detoxification enzyme systems in insects played key roles in coping with plant defensive secondary metabolites [6–8]. Besides cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450s) in insects can detoxify plant secondary metabolites [9], carboxylesterase (CarE), as one of the important detoxification enzymes in insects, is also known to be induced by plant secondary metabolites. For example, CarE activity is significantly induced in Lymantria dispar after being exposed to phenolic glycoside [10]. A higher CarE activity was found in Sitobion avenae which fed on high indole alkaloid content during vegetative growth of wheat [11].

The detoxification enzyme system of insects that involved in detoxification metabolism of plant secondary metabolites also could metabolize and detoxify insecticides. Thus, the changes in insect detoxification enzyme activity in response to plant secondary metabolites may result in variations in insecticides sensitivity. It is known that the sensitivity of insect to insecticide could be affected by pre-treating with plant secondary metabolites. For example, when the generalist two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae shifts host plant from their common host Phaseolus vulgaris (kidney beans) to a more challenging and less accepted host Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), the insecticidal activity of acaricide decreased due to different characteristics of secondary metabolites in the two host plants [12]. Cross-resistance to α-cypermethrin after xanthotoxin ingestion was also observed in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [13]. Quercetin, as plant secondary metabolite flavonol, is ubiquitous in terrestrial plants. In addition to the deleterious effects of quercetin on the development and survival of H. armigera [14,15] and other lepidopterous insects [16, 17], the effect of dietary quercetin on the CarE activity in silk worm was also observed [18]. However, the influence of quercetin on insecticides sensitivity and related metabolic capacity of insects has been rarely documented.

To examine how the insecticide sensitivity of insects is affected by oral exposure to host plant secondary metabolites [19, 20], we investigate the effects of quercetin intake on the H. armigera larvae sensitivity to lambda-cyhalothrin. H. armigera is one of the most important polyphagous pest insect, which attacks more than 200 plant species throughout the world. Thus, various plant secondary metabolites including quercetin were inevitably ingested by H. armigera through feeding on various host plants, such as cotton and solanaceous vegetable etc [21, 22]. Meanwhile, many insecticides including pyrethroid insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin are still widely used to control H. armigera [23]. Therefore, clarifying the effects of quercetin intake on H. armigera larvae sensitivity to lambda-cyhalothrin is important for the IPM of this pest insect.

Materials and methods

Insects

The cotton bollworm H. armigera (Hübner) colony was built by collecting the adults from Handan, Hebei Province, China, permitted by the local agricultural sector. They were reared on an artificial diet without exposure to any insecticides for more than 70 generations, in a conditioned room maintained at 25±1°C, 70–80% relative humidity, with a 16:8 (L:D) photoperiod. Adults were held under the same conditions and supplied with a 10% sugar solution. The rearing method was referred to Liu et al [24].

Chemicals

Quercetin, α-Naphthyl acetate (α-NA), Tributyl phosphorotrithioate (DEF) and fast blue B salt were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Lambda–cyhalothrin was obtained from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Company with greater than 98% purity. Triton X-100 was from Amresco. 3-Phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA) was from Alfa Aesar. All other chemicals and solvents used were analytical reagent grade.

Bioassays and synergism experiment

A leaf-dipping bioassay was used to evaluate the toxicity of lambda–cyhalothrin to the third-instar larvae of H. armigera [25].

The effects of quercetin intake on lambda-cyhalothrin sensitivity of H. armigera larvae were assayed using the following protocols. The treatment group of H. armigera larvae were fed on artificial diet incorporated with 0.1% quercetin (g/g artificial diet) for 48 h, while the control group fed on the artificial diet without quercetin. Lambda-cyhalothrin was dissolved in acetone and diluted to a series of concentrations (150, 180, 210, 240 and 270 mg/L for treatment group; 60, 85, 110, 135 and 160 mg/L for control group) with distilled water containing 0.1% Triton X-100. Cabbage Brassica oleracea L. leaf was cleaned using distilled water and cut into discs. The cabbage leaf discs were dipped into the above-mentioned insecticide solutions for 10 s and placed in shade to air dry, and then transferred to 12-well tissue-culture plates containing 2% agar covered with filter paper. Bioassay was carried out by inoculation of 36 third instar larvae of H. armigera to lambda-cyhalothrin treated leaves for each concentration (12 per well and three replicates for each concentration). The control was treated with leaves dipped in distilled water containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1% acetone.

Synergist DEF can inhibit the activity of carboxylesterase in insect [26]. Insecticide toxicity in the presence or absence of synergist DEF was evaluated on both the quercetin-fed and the control H. armigera larvae described above. DEF was dissolved in acetone, and 12 μg of DEF solution was topically delivered onto the prothorax notum of each H. armigera. After 4 h, the DEF-treated H. armigera larvae were used for evaluating the toxicity of lambda–cyhalothrin (80, 95, 110, 125 and 140 mg/L for quercetin-treated group; 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 mg/L for control group). The synergism was determined to be significant (P ≤0.05) when the 95% CLs for the LC₅₀ values for the treatment with insecticide alone did not overlap with those for the treatment with synergist and insecticide [27]. The synergism ratio was calculated by dividing the LC₅₀ value of insecticide alone by the LC₅₀ value of insecticide with a synergist. Each experiment was repeated in triplicates. The mortality of bioassays and synergism experiment were assessed after lambda–cyhalothrin application for 48h.

Carboxylesterase enzyme activity assay

The third-instar larvae of H. armigera with uniform size starved for 4 h and then transferred to artificial diet which incorporated with 0.1% (g/g artificial diet) quercetin.

The midguts of H. armigera were collected and then used for carboxylesterase enzyme activity assay for both quercetin and control group at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 120 h, respectively. The carboxylesterase enzyme activity of H. armigera larvae midguts was assayed by using the method described previously with some modification [24]. Briefly, the midguts of two-day-old third instar larvae of H. armigera were obtained by dissection on ice. The midguts was gently shaken to free of its contents and rinsed in an ice-cold 1.15% (m/v) potassium chloride aqueous solution. The homogenization buffer for CarE assay was phosphate buffer (0.04 M, pH 7.0). Ten midguts of H. armigera larvae were homogenized on ice with 1.5 mL of homogenization buffer, and then centrifuged at 10,800g for 20 min at 4°C. The homogenate was collected for CarE assay.

Carboxylesterase activity of these midgut homogenates was determined with α-naphtyl acetate (α-NA) as the substrate [28]. The enzyme reaction mixture for CarE activity assay contained 50 μL of enzyme preparation, 450 μL of 0.04 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.0, and 3.6 mL of α-NA solution (0.3 mM). The reaction was terminated by adding 0.9 mL of stop solution (two parts of 1% fast blue B and five parts of 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate) after incubation at 30°C for 15 min. The color was allowed to develop for another 15 min at room temperature, and the absorbance of the hydrolysis product, α-naphthol, was measured at 600 nm. Each sample was analyzed in triplicates. Determination of protein concentration was carried out using bovine serum albumin as the standard protein [29].

In-vitro hydrolytic metabolism of lambda–cyhalothrin by H. armigera larvae midgut homogenate

3-Phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA), as a major metabolite of 3-phenoxybenzyl pyrethroids or α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl pyrethroids, the metabolism of cypermethrin catalyzed by crude homogenates of both rat and human liver microsomes, and the metabolism of β-cypermethrin by H. armigera homogenates were successfully evaluated by quantifying the production of 3-PBA [30, 31]. Hence, the in-vitro metabolism of lambda-cyhalothrin in midgut homogenates of H. armigera larvae via hydrolytic metabolism system was investigated by quantifying the production of 3-PBA.

Thirty midguts of H. armigera larvae were homogenized, on ice, in 3 mL of homogenization buffer (0.04 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.0). The homogenate was centrifuged at 4°C, 10800 g for 15 min. The supernatant was filtered through glass wool and collected into a clean ice-cold Eppendorf tube, and used immediately for in- vitro lambda–cyhalothrin metabolism assay.

The in-vitro hydrolytic metabolism reactions of lambda-cyhalothrin catalyzed by the homogenates of H. armigera larvae midguts was performed in a total volume of 2 mL at 30°C for 120 min in a water bath with occasional shaking. The incubation mixture consisted of 0.04 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 and 0.1 mM lambda–cyhalothrin. After the reaction mixtures were pre-incubated for 5 min, metabolic reactions were initiated by adding 0.5 mL of enzyme preparation (about 2 mg of proteins). After 120 min incubation, metabolic reactions were terminated by extracting with 2.5 mL mixture of ice-cold ethyl acetate/n-hexane (2:1, v/v) containing 0.1% phosphoric acid. Another 1.5 mL and 1 mL of ice cold ethyl acetate/n-hexane (2:1) mixture was added to extract the remaining metabolites, respectively. The organic fraction of three extracts was combined together and evaporated to dryness under a gentle nitrogen stream. The residue was re-dissolved in 200μL of acetonitrile and a 20-μL filtered solution was injected for High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Metabolic reactions were performed in triplicates. Additionally, control incubations (without enzyme samples) and blank incubations (without substrates) were prepared in order to differentiate between metabolites originating from the enzyme samples and possible metabolites from the incubation procedure. Determination of protein concentration was done as described above. The metabolic pathways of lambda–cyhalothrin were shown in Fig 1.

Download:

Fig 1. The metabolic pathways of lambda–cyhalothrin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183111.g001

High performance liquid chromatography (hplc) analysis system

HPLC-DAD analysis of lambda–cyhalothrin and its metabolites was performed on an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Company, USA) combined with a quaternary pump, online degasser, diode array detector (DAD), 7725i injection valve equipped with a 20-μL loop, and column thermostat, using a ZORBAX SB-C18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm i.d., 5μm, Agilent, USA). The mobile phases used were solvent A (acetonitrile), B (methanol), and C (H₂O, adjusted to pH 2.1 with 85% phosphoric acid). The analytes were eluted with the following gradient program (linear increase): 0 min (0% A, 5% B, 95% C), 15 min(37% A, 5% B, 58% C), 25 min (60% A, 5% B, 35% C), 50 min (85% A,5% B, 10% C), 51 min (95% A, 5% B, 0% C), 56 min (95% A, 5% B, 0%C), and 61 min (0% A, 5% B, 95% C), at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Metabolite 3-PBA was detected at 230 nm. Under these chromatographic conditions, 3-PBA eluted at 27.1 min.

The metabolite of lambda–cyhalothrin, 3-PBA was identified by spiking the authentic compounds in the metabolic reaction sample, and by comparing with the control without substrate and the control without enzyme. Data collection and analysis were conducted using ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE).

The quantification of 3-PBA as metabolite of lambda–cyhalothrin was conducted by using the standard curve methods. The linearity between the peak area (Y) and the concentration of 3-PBA (c, μmol/L) were investigated by using a series concentrations of 3-PBA. For 3-PBA, the linear regression equation used was Y = 24.38c+1.55, with R² = 0.998.

Data analyses and statistics

LC₅₀ values were calculated by probit analysis using SPSS software. For analysis of the enzymatic activity and metabolism experiment, the data were presented as means (±S.E.) of three replicates. Difference analysis was performed by using student t tests with SPSS software. A value of p< 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Lambda–cyhalothrin toxicity to H. armigera larvae and synergism assessment

The effects of quercetin intake on the sensitivity of H. armigera larvae to lambda–cyhalothrin were listed in Table 1. Lambda–cyhalothrin showed lower toxicity to the treatment group of H. armigera larvae, which had fed on the artificial diet incorporated with 0.1% (g/g artificial diet) quercetin, compared with the control group. The LC₅₀ value of lambda–cyhalothrin to the treatment group was 190.83 mg/L while this value was 79.10 mg/L for the control. Despite that DEF treatment exerted low synergism to lambda–cyhalothrin in the control group, such a treatment effectively synergized lambda–cyhalothrin efficacy in quercetin-fed H. armigera larvae with a synergism ratio of 1.76 (Table 1).

Download:

Table 1. The influences of quercetin intake and synergism effect of DEF on the lambda–cyhalothrin toxicity to H. armigera larvae.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183111.t001

The influence of quercetin on carboxylesterase activity in the H. armigera larvae

The treatment group exhibited significant higher carboxylesterase activity (p<0.05) than the control group at 48, 72 and 120 h, respectively (Fig 2 and S1 Table). The highest CarE activity in the treatment group was observed at 120 h, which reached 1.65-fold higher than that of the control.

Download:

Fig 2. The effect of quercetin intake on carboxylesterases activity at different treatment time.

Data in the figure are the mean ± SE. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences within same treatment time at the 0.05 level.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183111.g002

In-vitro metabolism of lambda–cyhalothrin

The metabolite 3-PBA of lambda–cyhalothrin was markedly detected with the retention time at 27.1 min (Fig 3). Moreover, the hydrolytic metabolism activity was significantly induced after H. armigera larvae fed on quercetin for 48 h (Fig 4). The hydrolytic metabolic activity to lambda–cyhalothrin was 289.82±28.59 nmol 3-PBA/mg protein/min for the treatment group while this value was 149.60±26.90 nmol 3-PBA/mg protein/min for the control.

Download:

Fig 3. HPLC chromatograms of in-vitro hydrolytic metabolism of lambda–cyhalothrin by the crude homogenates of H. armigera larvae midguts.

Metabolite 3-PBA of lambda–cyhalothrin is pointed out with arrow. (A) Indicates metabolism of lambda–cyhalothrin catalyzed by midguts homogenates from the treatment group of H. armigera larvae with 0.1% quercetin for 72 h, (B) indicates metabolism of lambda–cyhalothrin catalyzed by midguts homogenates from the control group of H. armigera larvae.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183111.g003

Download:

Fig 4. In-vitro hydrolytic metabolism of lambda–cyhalothrin by crude homogenates of H. armigera larvae midguts.

Asterisks (*) indicate significantly different between treatment and the control (untreated) group at the 0.05 level.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183111.g004

Discussion

Our data demonstrated that the H. armigera larvae which fed on artificial diets incorporated with 0.1% quercetin exhibited higher tolerance to lambda–cyhalothrin than the larvae that feed on the diet without quercetin. This finding enriched the growing body of literatures showing that plant secondary metabolites in host plant could affect insecticide sensitivity of herbivorous insects. Such a hypothesis may apply to the insects from various feeding guilds. For example, after being exposed to xanthotoxin, Helicoverpa zea caterpillars displayed enhanced tolerance to α-cypermethrin (16% mortality) in comparison with the control caterpillars (40% mortality) [32]. Long-term induction of host plants for B-biotype Bemisia tabaci also influenced their susceptibilities to several insecticides [33]. Quercetin showed antagonistic effect to Cry1Ac toxicity in H. armigera [34]. In addition, incorporation of quercetin into diet significantly enhanced the tolerance of bees Apis mellifera to tau-fluvalinate [35].

One of the mechanisms underlying the impacts of secondary metabolites on insect susceptibility to insecticide is the role of detoxification system in the insect. CarE is one of the major classes of detoxification enzymes involved in detoxification of xenobiotics including plant secondary metabolite and insecticides. In this study, we found that the tolerance to lambda–cyhalothrin in quercetin-fed H. armigera larvae was associated with the quercetin induced elevation of CarE enzyme activity. The CarE activity in H. armigera larvae midgut showed a significant increase after they fed on 0.1% quercetin for 48 h (Fig 2), in addition to the increased tolerance to lambda–cyhalothrin of quercetin-fed H. armigera larvae. Moreover, the synergist DEF showed significant synergism effect on the toxicity of lambda-cyhalothrin to the quercetin-fed H. armigera (Table 1). Several previous studies also showed that CarE activity in insects could be affected after plant secondary metabolites exposure. For example, the CarE activity in H. armigera was significant induced after they were fed with rutin, quercetin or 2- tridecanone for several generations [36]. Specific CarE activity was also significantly induced in H. armigera treated with methyl jasmonate [37].

Despite the potential role of CarE enzyme activity in H. armigera physiology, the contribution of the increased detoxification enzyme activity to the detoxification metabolic capacity of insecticide is still unknown. Therefore, we further explored the influences of quercetin intake on the in-vitro lambda-cyhalothrin hydrolytic metabolism by H. armigera larvae midgut homogenates. As expected, we found quercetin intake by H. armigera larvae induced more production of nontoxic metabolite 3-PBA from hydrolysis of lambda–cyhalothrin, and this indicated that quercetin-fed H. armigera larvae midgut exhibited more hydrolytic metabolic capacity to lambda–cyhalothrin, compared to the control. It is well-known that CarE mediated hydrolytic metabolism contributed to the cleavage of ester linkage of pyrethroids to give acid moiety and alcohol moiety 3-phenoxy-benzylalcohol (3-PBAlc). 3-PBAlc was further oxidized into 3-phenoxybenzylaldehyde (3-PBAld), 3-PBA, and 4′-OH-3-PBA [38–41]. Therefore, the elevated CarE activity in quercetin-fed H. armigera larvae could hydrolyze more lambda-cyhalothrin and generate more 3-PBA in the treatment group finally.

Though clear evidences were obtained on the elevated hydrolytic metabolic capacity mediated by CarE resulted in enhanced tolerance to lambda-cyhalothrin in quercetin-fed H. armigera. The detoxification metabolism of lambda-cyhalothrin through P450s and GSTs may also contribute to the lambda-cyhalothrin tolerance in quercetin-fed H. armigera, because the metabolic pathways of pyrethroids in insects also include the P450s-mediated oxidation and the conjugation of pyrethroids metabolites to GSH catalyzed by GSTs [42–46]. Therefore, the contribution of P450s and GSTs to lambda-cyhalothrin tolerance after quercetin intake needs to be investigated in further works, with the aim to fully understand the roles of detoxification enzyme system of insects played in adaption to host plant and insecticides tolerance.

Based on the results in this study, exposure of H. armigera larvae to quercetin could deteriorate pyrethroid insecticides toxicity. Thus, special caution needs to be taken when spraying lambda-cyhalothrin in the quercetin-rich crops, since the management of H. armigera may fail. Be unaware of this reason, the farmers may readily carry out repeated applications of pyrethroid insecticides which are not only costly and labor-intensive, but also pose significant risks to non-target beneficial arthropods in the field. More broadly, if the adjacent non-crop plants are rich in quercetin or other secondary metabolites which could help H. armigera to “resist” the insecticide toxicity, then the IPM programs should consider removing those non-crop plants surrounding crop fields. At the same time, this phenomenon could also provide valuable information on transgenic plant. Through interfering key detoxification enzyme gene which responds to both plant secondary metabolites and insecticides by expressing double-stranded RNA, it is possible to reduce the adverse effects of plant secondary metabolites on insecticidal effects.

In summary, the enhanced hydrolytic metabolism capacity of lambda–cyhalothrin after quercetin intake resulted in efficiently detoxification metabolism of lambda–cyhalothrin, thus enhanced the tolerance to lambda–cyhalothrin of H. armigera larvae. As a result, the elevated carboxylesterase activity contributes to lambda-cyhalothrin insensitivity in quercetin fed H. armigeralarvae.

Supporting information

S1 Table. The effects of quercetin intake on carboxylesterases activity at different treatment time.

Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences within same treatment time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183111.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the insect keeper who participated in this work.

References

1. Alon M, Elbaz M, Ben-Zvi MM, Feldmesser E, Vainstein A, Morin S. Insights into the transcriptomics of polyphagy: Bemisia tabaci adaptability to phenylpropanoids involves coordinated expression of defense and metabolic genes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2012; 42: 251–263. pmid:22212826
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Elliger CA, Wong Y, Chan BG, Waiss AC. Growth inhibitors in tomato (Lycopersicon) to tomato fruitworm (Heliothis zea). J Chem Ecol. 1981; 7: 753–758. pmid:24420689
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Lattanzio V, Arpaia S, Cardinali A, Di VD, Linsalata V. Role of endogenous flavonoids in resistance mechanism of Vigna to aphids. J Agric Food Chem. 2000; 48: 5316–5320. pmid:11087479
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Nyman T, Julkunen-Tiitto R. Manipulation of the phenolic chemistry of willows by gall-inducing sawflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000; 97: 13184–13187. pmid:11078506
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Salunke BK, Kotkar HM, Mendki PS, Upasani SM, Maheshwari VL. Efficacy of flavonoids in controlling Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), a post-harvest pest of grain legumes. Crop Prot. 2005; 24: 888–893.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Francis F, Vanhaelen N, Haubruge E.Glutathione S-transferases in the adaptation to plant secondary metabolites in the Myzus persicae aphid. Arch Insect Biochem. 2005; 58: 166–174.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Zhang MX, Fang TT, Pu GL, Sun XQ, Zhou XG, Cai QN. Xenobiotic metabolism of plant secondary compounds in the English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (F.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2013; 107: 44–49. pmid:25149234
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Giraudo M, Hilliou F, Fricaux T, Audant P, Feyereisen R, Le Goff G. Cytochrome P450s from the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda): responses to plant allelochemicals and pesticides. Insect Mol Biol.2015; 24: 115–128. pmid:25315858
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Mao WF, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR. Disruption of quercetin metabolism by fungicide affects energy production in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017; 114:2538–2543. pmid:28193870
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Lindroth RL. Adaptations of quaking aspen for defense against damage by herbivores and related environmental agents. USDA Forest Service Proceedings. 2001; RMRS-P-18: 273–284.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Cai QN, Zhang QW, Cheo M. Contribution of indole alkaloids to Sitobion avenae (F.) resistance in wheat. J Appl Entomol. 2004; 128: 517–521.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Dermauw W, Wybouw N, Rombauts S, Menten B, Vontas J, Grbic M, et al. A link between host plant adaptation and pesticide resistance in the polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110: E113–E122. pmid:23248300
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Li XC, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA. Molecular cloning and expression of CYP6B8: a xanthotoxin-inducible cytochrome P450 cDNA from Helicoverpa zea. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2000; 30: 75–84. pmid:10646973
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Jadhav DR, Mallikarjuna N, Rathore A, Pokle D. Effect of some flavonoids on survival and development of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Spodoptera litura (Fab) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Asian J Agric Environ Sci. 2012; 4: 298–307.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Liu D, Yuan Y, Li M, Qiu X. Effects of dietary quercetin on performance and cytochrome P450 expression of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Bull Entomol Res. 2015; 105: 771–777. pmid:26440448
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Perić-Mataruga V, Hackenberger B K, Vlahović M, Ilijin L, Mrdaković M. Potential improvement of Lymantria dispar L. management by quercetin. Arch Biol Sci. 2014; 66: 1125–1129.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Selin-Rani S, Senthil-Nathan S, Thanigaivel A, Vasantha-Srinivasan P, Edwin ES, Ponsankar A, et al. Toxicity and physiological effect of quercetin on generalist herbivore, Spodoptera litura Fab. and a non-target earthworm Eisenia fetida Savigny. Chemosphere. 2016; 165: 257–267. pmid:27657818
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Zhang YE, Ma HJ, Feng DD, Lai XF, Chen ZM, Xu MY, et al. Induction of detoxification enzymes by quercetin in the silkworm. J Econ Entomol. 2012; 105: 1034–1042. pmid:22812145
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Yu GH, An G. Regulatory roles of benzyl adenine and sucrose during wound response of the ribosomal protein gene, rpL34. Plant Cell Environ. 2000; 23:1363–1371.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Tao XY, Xue YX, Huang YP, Chen XY, Mao YB. Gossypol-enhanced P450 gene pool contributes to cotton bollworm tolerance to a pyrethroid insecticide. Mol Ecol.2012; 21: 4371–4385. pmid:22515600
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Sharma HC, Pampapathy G, Dhillon MK, Ridsdillsmith JT. Detached leaf assay to screen for host plant resistance to Helicoverpa armigera. J Econ Entomol. 2005; 98: 568–576. pmid:15889750
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Wu KM, Mu W, Liang GM, Guo YY. Regional reversion of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is associated with the use of Bt cotton in northern China. Pest Manage Sci. 2005; 61: 491–498.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Karaagaç SU, Konus M, Büyük M. Determination of susceptibility levels of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) strains collected from different regions to some insecticides in Turkey. J Entomol Res Soc. 2013; 15: 37–45.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Liu XN, Liang P, Gao X, Shi XY. Induction of the cytochrome P450 activity by plant allelochemicals in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2006; 84: 127–134.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Moores GD, Gao XW, Denholm I, Devonshire AL. Characterisation of insensitive acetylcholinesterase in insecticide-resistant cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). Pestic Biochem Physiol. 1996; 56: 102–110.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Pan Y, Guo H, Gao X. Carboxylesterase activity, cDNA sequence, and gene expression in malathion susceptible and resistant strains of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii. Comp Biochem Physiol, Part B: Biochem Mol Biol.2009; 152: 266–270.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Ahmed MAI, Vogel CFA. Synergistic action of octopamine receptor agonists on the activity of selected novel insecticides for control of dengue vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquito. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2015; 120: 51–56. pmid:25987220
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Cao CW, Zhang J, Gao X W, Liang P, Guo HL. Overexpression of carboxylesterase gene associated with organophosphorous insecticide resistance in cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii (Glover). Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2008; 90: 175–180.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248–254. pmid:942051
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Godin SJ, Scollon EJ, Hughes MF, Potter PM, DeVito MJ, Ross MK. Species differences in the in vitro metabolism of deltamethrin and esfenvalerate: differential oxidative and hydrolytic metabolism by humans and rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006; 34: 1764–1771. pmid:16855054
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Ai GM, Zou DY, Shi XY, Li FG, Liang P, Song DL, et al. HPLC assay for characterizing α-Cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl pyrethroids hydrolytic metabolism by Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) based on the quantitative analysis of 3-Phenoxybenzoic acid. J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 58: 694–701.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Li XC, Zangerl AR, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR. Cross-resistance to α-cypermethrin after xanthotoxin ingestion in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol. 2000; 93: 18–25. pmid:14658506
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Xie W, Wang SL, Wu QJ, Feng YT, Pan HP, Jiao XG, et al. Induction effects of host plants on insecticide susceptibility and detoxification enzymes of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pest Manage Sci. 2011; 67: 87–93.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Li Z, Guan X, Michaud J P, Zhang QW, Liu XX. Quercetin interacts with Cry1Ac protein to affect larval growth and survival of Helicoverpa armigera. Pest Manage Sci. 2016; 72: 1359–1365.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Johnson RM, Mao WF, Pollock HS, Niu GD, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR. Ecologically appropriate xenobiotics induce cytochrome P450s in Apis mellifera. PloS one. 2012; 7: e31051. pmid:22319603
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Gao XW, Zhao Y, Wang X, Dong XL, Zheng BZ. Induction of carboxylesterase in Helicoverpa armigera by insecticide and plant allelochemicals. Acta Entomol Sin. 1998; 41: 7–13.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Yang S, Wu H, Xie J, Rantala MJ. Depressed performance and detoxification enzyme activities of Helicoverpa armigera fed with conventional cotton foliage subjected to methyl jasmonate exposure. Entomol Exp Appl. 2013; 147: 186–195.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Casida JE, Ruzo LO. Metabolic chemistry of pyrethroid insecticides. Pestic Sci. 1980; 11: 257–69.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Crow JA, Borazjani A, Potter PM, and Ross MK. Hydrolysis of pyrethroids by human and rat tissues: examination of intestinal, liver and serum carboxylesterases. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007; 221: 1–12. pmid:17442360
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Chen CY, Shi XY Gao XW. Mechanism of insect metabolic resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Chin J Pestic Sci. 2016; 05: 545–555.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Wang X, Martínez MA, Dai MH, Chen DM, Ares I, Romero A, et al. Permethrin-induced oxidative stress and toxicity and metabolism. A review. Environ Res. 2016; 149: 86–104. pmid:27183507
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Casida JE, Ruzo LO. Metabolic chemistry of pyrethroid insecticides. Pest Manage Sci. 1980; 11: 257–269.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Müller P, Warr E, Stevenson BJ, Pignatelli PM, Morgan JC, Steven A, et al. Field-caught permethrin-resistant Anopheles gambiae overexpress CYP6P3, a P450that metabolises pyrethroids. PLoS Genet. 2008; 4: e1000286. pmid:19043575
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Stevenson BJ, Bibby J, Pignatelli P, Muangnoicharoen S, O’Neill PM, Lian LY, et al. Cytochrome P450 6M2 from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae metabolizes pyrethroids: sequential metabolism of deltamethrin revealed. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2011; 41: 492–502. pmid:21324359
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Konus M, Koy C, Mikkat S, Kreutzer M, Zimmermann R, Iscan M, et al. Molecular adaptations of Helicoverpa armigera midgut tissue under pyrethroid insecticide stress characterized by differential proteome analysis and enzyme activity assays. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D. 2013; 8: 152–162.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Chen CY, Kang ZJ, SHI XY, Gao XW. Metabolic adaptation mechanisms of insects to plant secondary metabolites and their implications for insecticide resistance of insects. Acta Entomol Sin.2015; 10: 1126–1139.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Alon M, Elbaz M, Ben-Zvi MM, Feldmesser E, Vainstein A, Morin S. Insights into the transcriptomics of polyphagy: Bemisia tabaci adaptability to phenylpropanoids involves coordinated expression of defense and metabolic genes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2012; 42: 251–263. pmid:22212826
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Elliger CA, Wong Y, Chan BG, Waiss AC. Growth inhibitors in tomato (Lycopersicon) to tomato fruitworm (Heliothis zea). J Chem Ecol. 1981; 7: 753–758. pmid:24420689
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Lattanzio V, Arpaia S, Cardinali A, Di VD, Linsalata V. Role of endogenous flavonoids in resistance mechanism of Vigna to aphids. J Agric Food Chem. 2000; 48: 5316–5320. pmid:11087479
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Nyman T, Julkunen-Tiitto R. Manipulation of the phenolic chemistry of willows by gall-inducing sawflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000; 97: 13184–13187. pmid:11078506
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Salunke BK, Kotkar HM, Mendki PS, Upasani SM, Maheshwari VL. Efficacy of flavonoids in controlling Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), a post-harvest pest of grain legumes. Crop Prot. 2005; 24: 888–893.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Francis F, Vanhaelen N, Haubruge E.Glutathione S-transferases in the adaptation to plant secondary metabolites in the Myzus persicae aphid. Arch Insect Biochem. 2005; 58: 166–174.
View Article
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Zhang MX, Fang TT, Pu GL, Sun XQ, Zhou XG, Cai QN. Xenobiotic metabolism of plant secondary compounds in the English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (F.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2013; 107: 44–49. pmid:25149234
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] PubMed/NCBI

[26] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Giraudo M, Hilliou F, Fricaux T, Audant P, Feyereisen R, Le Goff G. Cytochrome P450s from the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda): responses to plant allelochemicals and pesticides. Insect Mol Biol.2015; 24: 115–128. pmid:25315858
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] PubMed/NCBI

[30] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Mao WF, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR. Disruption of quercetin metabolism by fungicide affects energy production in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017; 114:2538–2543. pmid:28193870
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] PubMed/NCBI

[34] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Lindroth RL. Adaptations of quaking aspen for defense against damage by herbivores and related environmental agents. USDA Forest Service Proceedings. 2001; RMRS-P-18: 273–284.
View Article
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Cai QN, Zhang QW, Cheo M. Contribution of indole alkaloids to Sitobion avenae (F.) resistance in wheat. J Appl Entomol. 2004; 128: 517–521.
View Article
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Dermauw W, Wybouw N, Rombauts S, Menten B, Vontas J, Grbic M, et al. A link between host plant adaptation and pesticide resistance in the polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110: E113–E122. pmid:23248300
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Li XC, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA. Molecular cloning and expression of CYP6B8: a xanthotoxin-inducible cytochrome P450 cDNA from Helicoverpa zea. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2000; 30: 75–84. pmid:10646973
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Jadhav DR, Mallikarjuna N, Rathore A, Pokle D. Effect of some flavonoids on survival and development of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Spodoptera litura (Fab) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Asian J Agric Environ Sci. 2012; 4: 298–307.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Liu D, Yuan Y, Li M, Qiu X. Effects of dietary quercetin on performance and cytochrome P450 expression of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Bull Entomol Res. 2015; 105: 771–777. pmid:26440448
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Perić-Mataruga V, Hackenberger B K, Vlahović M, Ilijin L, Mrdaković M. Potential improvement of Lymantria dispar L. management by quercetin. Arch Biol Sci. 2014; 66: 1125–1129.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Selin-Rani S, Senthil-Nathan S, Thanigaivel A, Vasantha-Srinivasan P, Edwin ES, Ponsankar A, et al. Toxicity and physiological effect of quercetin on generalist herbivore, Spodoptera litura Fab. and a non-target earthworm Eisenia fetida Savigny. Chemosphere. 2016; 165: 257–267. pmid:27657818
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Zhang YE, Ma HJ, Feng DD, Lai XF, Chen ZM, Xu MY, et al. Induction of detoxification enzymes by quercetin in the silkworm. J Econ Entomol. 2012; 105: 1034–1042. pmid:22812145
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] PubMed/NCBI

[66] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Yu GH, An G. Regulatory roles of benzyl adenine and sucrose during wound response of the ribosomal protein gene, rpL34. Plant Cell Environ. 2000; 23:1363–1371.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Tao XY, Xue YX, Huang YP, Chen XY, Mao YB. Gossypol-enhanced P450 gene pool contributes to cotton bollworm tolerance to a pyrethroid insecticide. Mol Ecol.2012; 21: 4371–4385. pmid:22515600
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Sharma HC, Pampapathy G, Dhillon MK, Ridsdillsmith JT. Detached leaf assay to screen for host plant resistance to Helicoverpa armigera. J Econ Entomol. 2005; 98: 568–576. pmid:15889750
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Wu KM, Mu W, Liang GM, Guo YY. Regional reversion of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is associated with the use of Bt cotton in northern China. Pest Manage Sci. 2005; 61: 491–498.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Karaagaç SU, Konus M, Büyük M. Determination of susceptibility levels of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) strains collected from different regions to some insecticides in Turkey. J Entomol Res Soc. 2013; 15: 37–45.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Liu XN, Liang P, Gao X, Shi XY. Induction of the cytochrome P450 activity by plant allelochemicals in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2006; 84: 127–134.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Moores GD, Gao XW, Denholm I, Devonshire AL. Characterisation of insensitive acetylcholinesterase in insecticide-resistant cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). Pestic Biochem Physiol. 1996; 56: 102–110.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Pan Y, Guo H, Gao X. Carboxylesterase activity, cDNA sequence, and gene expression in malathion susceptible and resistant strains of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii. Comp Biochem Physiol, Part B: Biochem Mol Biol.2009; 152: 266–270.
View Article
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Ahmed MAI, Vogel CFA. Synergistic action of octopamine receptor agonists on the activity of selected novel insecticides for control of dengue vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquito. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2015; 120: 51–56. pmid:25987220
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Cao CW, Zhang J, Gao X W, Liang P, Guo HL. Overexpression of carboxylesterase gene associated with organophosphorous insecticide resistance in cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii (Glover). Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2008; 90: 175–180.
View Article
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248–254. pmid:942051
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Godin SJ, Scollon EJ, Hughes MF, Potter PM, DeVito MJ, Ross MK. Species differences in the in vitro metabolism of deltamethrin and esfenvalerate: differential oxidative and hydrolytic metabolism by humans and rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006; 34: 1764–1771. pmid:16855054
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Ai GM, Zou DY, Shi XY, Li FG, Liang P, Song DL, et al. HPLC assay for characterizing α-Cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl pyrethroids hydrolytic metabolism by Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) based on the quantitative analysis of 3-Phenoxybenzoic acid. J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 58: 694–701.
View Article
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Li XC, Zangerl AR, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR. Cross-resistance to α-cypermethrin after xanthotoxin ingestion in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol. 2000; 93: 18–25. pmid:14658506
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Xie W, Wang SL, Wu QJ, Feng YT, Pan HP, Jiao XG, et al. Induction effects of host plants on insecticide susceptibility and detoxification enzymes of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pest Manage Sci. 2011; 67: 87–93.
View Article
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Li Z, Guan X, Michaud J P, Zhang QW, Liu XX. Quercetin interacts with Cry1Ac protein to affect larval growth and survival of Helicoverpa armigera. Pest Manage Sci. 2016; 72: 1359–1365.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Johnson RM, Mao WF, Pollock HS, Niu GD, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR. Ecologically appropriate xenobiotics induce cytochrome P450s in Apis mellifera. PloS one. 2012; 7: e31051. pmid:22319603
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Gao XW, Zhao Y, Wang X, Dong XL, Zheng BZ. Induction of carboxylesterase in Helicoverpa armigera by insecticide and plant allelochemicals. Acta Entomol Sin. 1998; 41: 7–13.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Yang S, Wu H, Xie J, Rantala MJ. Depressed performance and detoxification enzyme activities of Helicoverpa armigera fed with conventional cotton foliage subjected to methyl jasmonate exposure. Entomol Exp Appl. 2013; 147: 186–195.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Casida JE, Ruzo LO. Metabolic chemistry of pyrethroid insecticides. Pestic Sci. 1980; 11: 257–69.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Crow JA, Borazjani A, Potter PM, and Ross MK. Hydrolysis of pyrethroids by human and rat tissues: examination of intestinal, liver and serum carboxylesterases. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007; 221: 1–12. pmid:17442360
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Chen CY, Shi XY Gao XW. Mechanism of insect metabolic resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Chin J Pestic Sci. 2016; 05: 545–555.
View Article
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Wang X, Martínez MA, Dai MH, Chen DM, Ares I, Romero A, et al. Permethrin-induced oxidative stress and toxicity and metabolism. A review. Environ Res. 2016; 149: 86–104. pmid:27183507
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Casida JE, Ruzo LO. Metabolic chemistry of pyrethroid insecticides. Pest Manage Sci. 1980; 11: 257–269.
View Article
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Müller P, Warr E, Stevenson BJ, Pignatelli PM, Morgan JC, Steven A, et al. Field-caught permethrin-resistant Anopheles gambiae overexpress CYP6P3, a P450that metabolises pyrethroids. PLoS Genet. 2008; 4: e1000286. pmid:19043575
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Stevenson BJ, Bibby J, Pignatelli P, Muangnoicharoen S, O’Neill PM, Lian LY, et al. Cytochrome P450 6M2 from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae metabolizes pyrethroids: sequential metabolism of deltamethrin revealed. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2011; 41: 492–502. pmid:21324359
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Konus M, Koy C, Mikkat S, Kreutzer M, Zimmermann R, Iscan M, et al. Molecular adaptations of Helicoverpa armigera midgut tissue under pyrethroid insecticide stress characterized by differential proteome analysis and enzyme activity assays. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D. 2013; 8: 152–162.
View Article
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Chen CY, Kang ZJ, SHI XY, Gao XW. Metabolic adaptation mechanisms of insects to plant secondary metabolites and their implications for insecticide resistance of insects. Acta Entomol Sin.2015; 10: 1126–1139.
View Article
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Insects

Chemicals

Bioassays and synergism experiment

Carboxylesterase enzyme activity assay

In-vitro hydrolytic metabolism of lambda–cyhalothrin by H. armigera larvae midgut homogenate

High performance liquid chromatography (hplc) analysis system

Data analyses and statistics

Results

Lambda–cyhalothrin toxicity to H. armigera larvae and synergism assessment

The influence of quercetin on carboxylesterase activity in the H. armigera larvae

In-vitro metabolism of lambda–cyhalothrin

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Table. The effects of quercetin intake on carboxylesterases activity at different treatment time.

Acknowledgments

References