Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Mitochondrial genome evolution in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex

  • Jiangxing Ruan ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Jiangxing Ruan, Jian Cheng

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300308, China, Key Laboratory of Systems Microbial Biotechnology, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China

  • Jian Cheng ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Jiangxing Ruan, Jian Cheng

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    cheng_j@tib.cas.cn (JC); jiang_hf@tib.cas.cn (HJ)

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Systems Microbial Biotechnology, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China

  • Tongcun Zhang,

    Roles Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300308, China

  • Huifeng Jiang

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    cheng_j@tib.cas.cn (JC); jiang_hf@tib.cas.cn (HJ)

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Systems Microbial Biotechnology, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China

Mitochondrial genome evolution in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex

  • Jiangxing Ruan, 
  • Jian Cheng, 
  • Tongcun Zhang, 
  • Huifeng Jiang
PLOS
x

Abstract

Exploring the evolutionary patterns of mitochondrial genomes is important for our understanding of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto (SSS) group, which is a model system for genomic evolution and ecological analysis. In this study, we first obtained the complete mitochondrial sequences of two important species, Saccharomyces mikatae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. We then compared the mitochondrial genomes in the SSS group with those of close relatives, and found that the non-coding regions evolved rapidly, including dramatic expansion of intergenic regions, fast evolution of introns and almost 20-fold higher rearrangement rates than those of the nuclear genomes. However, the coding regions, and especially the protein-coding genes, are more conserved than those in the nuclear genomes of the SSS group. The different evolutionary patterns of coding and non-coding regions in the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes may be related to the origin of the aerobic fermentation lifestyle in this group. Our analysis thus provides novel insights into the evolution of mitochondrial genomes.

Introduction

Mitochondria (MT) are one of the two endosymbiotic organelles with non-nuclear genetic materials found in eukaryotic cells [1]. Although most of the genes from ancestral mitochondria have been transferred into the nuclear genome [2], mitochondrion are essential for cell respiration [3], biosynthesis of certain metabolites [4], ion homeostasis and apoptosis [5]. The Saccharomyces sensu stricto (SSS) group, which includes S. cerevisiae, has been used for a long time to study the evolutionary patterns of mitochondrial genomes [6]. Significantly, members of the SSS group can survive on fermentable carbon sources even in the absence of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) [7], due to the appearance of the aerobic fermentation lifestyle after a whole-genome duplication event (WGD) [8]. The mitochondrial genome size in the SSS group has expanded two- to four-fold compared to close relatives [911], even though they diverged only ~10–20 million years ago (MYA) [12]. The wide diversity of mitochondrial genomes in the SSS group thus provides an excellent case for investigating the mechanisms of genome evolution among (closely-related) species [1316].

Due to the development of next-generation sequencing technologies, several genomes of species from the SSS group are now available [17]. The mitochondrial genome of S. cerevisiae was first sequenced in 1998 [18]. However, the mtDNA sequence of most species in the SSS group is still unclear, with the exception of S. cerevisiae, S. paradoxus [19] and S. uvarum [20]. In this study, we obtained the complete mtDNA sequences of S. mikatae and S. kudriavzevii by high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis to further clarify the evolutionary mechanisms driving mitochondrial genome change in the SSS group. We then analyzed the evolutionary processes governing the intergenic regions, coding genes, introns and genomic structures of these newly sequenced mitochondrial genomes. Our results provide new details on the evolution of mitochondrial genomes in yeasts, and general insights into the mechanisms of genomic evolution in eukaryotes.

Results

Assembly of the MT genomes of S. mikatae and S. kudriavzevii

To investigate the evolution of MT genomes in the SSS group, we first needed to decipher the MT genomes of the species in this clade. The MT genome of S. mikatae IFO1815 was therefore sequenced and assembled (Fig 1A, Materials and Methods). We then obtained the complete mtDNA sequences of S. kudriavzevii IFO1802 by assembling fragments from published data [21] and using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to fill gaps between the fragments (Fig 1B) (see Materials and methods). Similar to the other sequenced species in the SSS group, both mtDNA genomes contained a highly conserved functional gene set, which consists of 35 genes encoding the components of cytochrome oxidase (cox1, cox2 and cox3), cytochrome b (cob), 3 subunits of ATPase (atp6, atp8 and atp9), two ribosomal RNA subunits (rnl and rns), one ribosomal protein gene (var1), the rpm1 gene for the RNA subunit of RNase P, and 24 tRNA genes (S1 Table). Based on a phylogenetic tree of five SSS yeasts and ten yeasts from outside of the SSS group, we found that the MT genome sizes of the SSS group were visibly larger than those of most close relatives (Fig 1C and S2 Table), such as species in the Kazachstania/Naumovozyma (K/N), Candida/Nakaseomyces (C/N) and Lachancea lineages, except for N. bacillisporus in the C/N linage where the genome was enlarged by the invasion of palindromic GC clusters [22]. Mitochondrial genome expansion in the SSS group is mainly caused by the expansion of intergenic regions [6]. A comparison with C. glabrata, which has minimum intergenic regions, showed that the intergenic regions accounted for 95% of the genome size variation (S1A Fig), including intergenic ORFs, origin of replication (ori) sequences, AT spacers and GC clusters (S1A File, S1S3 Figs and S3S5 Tables)[23].

thumbnail
Fig 1.

(A) Sequence and assembly-derived map of the mitochondrial genome of S. mikatae. The proteins and rRNAs are indicated by red and green arrows, respectively, introns are marked with white rectangles and tRNAs with blue bars. (B) Map of the mitochondrial genome of S. kudriavzevii. (C) Evolutionary tree of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto groups and their relatives. The tree was constructed based on the concatenation of eight protein-coding genes in all mtDNAs. The right pane of the histogram shows the size of each MT genome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.g001

Expansion and evolution of introns

In the SSS group, the cox1, cob and rnl genes are interrupted by variable introns [24]. We found that ten intron loci in the cox1 gene are not conserved within the SSS group (Fig 2A), which was consistent with a previous study of 104 S. cerevisiae strains [24]. Three group II introns (1, 2, 10) were only observed in the SSS genomes. Among them, the putative ORFs in intron 1 and intron 2 are highly conserved in two SSS yeasts (amino-acid identity of 99% and 94%, respectively, S7 Table), and intron 10, which does not contain ORFs, also has a high nucleotide identity of 83% in all SSS yeasts. With the exception of introns 3 and 4, all the remaining group I introns (5, 6, 7, 8, 9) contained ORFs. Among them, intron 5 was mainly distributed in the SSS group with a low amino-acid identity of 71%, whereas intron 8 had a high amino-acid identity in both the Lachancea and SSS linages (97% and 95%). Secondly, seven loci in the cob gene were found in fifteen yeasts (Fig 2B). Except for a rare intron (1) which was only observed in K. servazzii, the remaining six loci can be found in the SSS group. Most of the introns in the cob gene had lower identity scores than those in the cox1 gene. Only intron 3, which belongs to group II, had a high degree of nucleotide identity (83%), while intron 5 had a high degree of amino-acid identity in both the Lachancea and SSS linages (95% and 99%, respectively). Lastly, the rnl gene only contained one intron in the SSS, K/N and Lachancea linages, but not in the C/N linage (Fig 2C). Among them, only the intron in S. cerevisiae contained an ORF.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The distribution of introns in mtDNAs.

(A) cox1 gene; (B) cob gene (C) rnl gene. The X axis represents the gene length and the vertical lines indicate the position of introns. The numbers on top represent the relative location of each intron in different yeasts. The rectangular frames indicate Group II introns, which include introns 1, 2 and 10 in cox1, and intron 3 in cob. The triangular frames indicate the Group I introns. The filled frames indicate the introns with embedded ORFs, and the empty frames indicate introns without ORFs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.g002

In summary, seventeen introns were identified in the SSS group, much more than the six in the K/N linage, seven in the C/N linage and ten in the Lachancea genus. Therefore, the expansion of introns appears to have also played an important role in the expansion of MT genomes. Most intron sequences, especially of Group II introns, are highly conserved in the SSS group. However, the presence of introns and their embedded ORFs changed remarkably throughout the group. In addition, a total 221 out of 282 introns (~78%) in the nuclear genome of S. cerevisiae are conserved in the other four species in the SSS group [25]. By contrast, only one out of 12 introns (8%) in the MT genome of S. cerevisiae is conserved in the other four species from the SSS group. The presence of introns in MT genomes thus changed more rapidly than in nuclear genomes.

Rapid evolution of genomic structure

There is high variance in the order of mitochondrial genes among fungi [26]. In comparison with the conserved gene order in the genus Lachancea [13], the gene order displayed considerable diversity in the SSS group [19]. To investigate the evolution of gene order in the SSS group, we divided all 35 genes into seven syntenic orthologous blocks, consisting of fourteen known transcriptional units in S. cerevisiae (S8 Table and Fig 3). In total, we detected 25 rearrangement events, including fourteen transpositions, ten inversions and one inverse transposition across the SSS group, by pairwise comparisons using CREx [27] and UniMoG [28] (S9 Table). Details of the rearrangement scenarios are shown in S1B File. Except for block 7 (atp9 and var1-trnS2), which involved an inner inverse transposition in S. uvarum, the other rearrangement events were block transpositions or inversions. We also found that all of the ori sequences were distributed upstream or downstream of the blocks (Fig 3), and especially, the rearrangement hotspot of block 6 (rns and trnW) had an upstream ori in all SSS yeasts. Therefore, we inferred that the ori sequences may play an important role in gene rearrangements in the SSS group.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Evolution of gene order within the Saccharomyces sensu stricto group.

Block1 includes rnl, tRNAs (T2,C,H,L,Q,K,R1,G,D,S1,R2,A,I,Y,N,M1) and cox2. Block2 includes tRNAs (F,T1,V), and cox3. Block3 includes tRNA (M2), rpm1 and tRNA (P). Block4 includes cox1, atp8 and atp6. Block5 includes tRNA (E) and cob. Block6 includes rns and tRNA (W). Block7 includes atp9, tRNA (S2) and var1. The downward and upward black arrows indicate the ori sequences in the positive and negative strands, respectively. The dashed arrows indicate that the ori sequences contain intervening GC clusters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.g003

We further employed the rate of branch-specific gene order loss (bsGOL) to measure the rearrangement rate by methods developed in previous studies [29, 30] (S10 Table). We found that the rearrangement rate in the SSS group was faster than in other lineages. The gene order in the Lachancea lineage was the most stable (the bsGOL rate was almost 0, except for L. kluyveri), followed by the K/N lineage, and then by C. glabrata and N. delphensis in the C/N lineage (S10 Table). Overall, S. paradoxus had the fastest rearrangement rate, which was about 20 times faster than the rates in the nuclear genomes of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus [30]. The rapid evolution of mitochondrial gene order in this species might be associated with a high abundance of ori sequences in the mtDNA.

High conservation of functional genes in MT genomes

In contrast to the dramatic expansion of intergenic regions and rapid evolution of gene order in the SSS group, most functional genes are highly conserved in MT genomes (Fig 4A)[31]. For example, all 24 tRNAs have nucleotide identities >95% based on multiple sequence alignment within the SSS group. The same pattern is also observed in nuclear tRNAs (S11 Table)[32]. Two rRNAs (rnl and rns), and the rpm1 gene have lower identities compared to other MT genes and the corresponding RNAs in nuclear genomes (S11 Table). Except for var1, which has ~80% nucleotide identity, the other seven protein-coding genes are highly conserved (with identities > 90%). We also found that seven proteins have significantly higher amino-acid identities than the functional proteins in the nuclear genomes or nuclear proteins with mitochondrial functions (Fig 4B)[33]. We furthermore inferred natural selection on these proteins by estimating the ratio of non-synonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) substitution rates (ω = dN/dS) (Fig 4C and S12 Table). In the Saccharomyces linages, all of the proteins were under purifying selection (ω < 1). The SSS group showed stronger purifying selection in cox3 (t-test, p = 1.7e-6) and atp9 (t-test, p = 0.00011) than those in the Lachancea linage [13]. Especially in atp9, no non-synonymous substitutions (dN = 0) were found in the SSS group.

thumbnail
Fig 4.

(A) The nucleotide identities of all mitochondrial genes in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto group. The nucleotide identity was calculated based on the proportion of completely conserved nucleotides in multiple sequence alignments of five SSS yeasts conducted using ClustalOmega. The red bars represent protein-coding genes; the green bar is rRNA; the gray bar is tRNA and the yellow bar is rpm1. (B) Comparison of amino-acid identities among nuclear proteins, nuclear MT proteins and mitochondrial proteins. We identified 3,887 nuclear proteins which are present in all five SSS yeasts. Among them, 618 proteins were located in the mitochondria. The amino-acid identity for each protein was calculated based on the proportion of completely conserved amino-acid residues in the multiple sequences alignment (MSA) results. The dark blue, green and yellow bars represent the distribution of nuclear proteins, nuclear MT proteins and mitochondrial proteins, respectively. The table insert indicates the number of proteins which have identities greater than 90% in three protein sets. The p-values were calculated based on a hypergeometric test whether the number of MT proteins with high identity was significantly greater than those in the other two protein sets. (C) Box-plot comparisons of the dN/dS ratios estimated for the eight MT protein-coding genes between the genus Lachancea and the Saccharomyces sensu stricto linage.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.g004

Discussion

By comparing the MT genomes of the SSS group with their close relatives, we found that there was an expansion of the MT genome size. The expansion was mainly driven by divergence in intergenic regions [6]. Our results also showed that the relative number of GC clusters in intergenic regions accounted for 63% of the genome size variation (S1D Fig).

In contrast to the higher variability of intergenic and intron regions in MT genomes than in nuclear genomes, coding regions are more conserved in MT genomes than in nuclear genomes of the SSS group, which indicates that the mitochondrial genes underwent stronger purifying selection [34, 35]. It is likely that the retained genes in the MT genomes are indispensable for cell respiration [36] and the high AT content of MT genomes (approximately 80%) restricted mutations of mitochondrial genes [37, 38]. Moreover, we speculated that the origin of the aerobic fermentation lifestyle in the SSS group could also be associated with the opposite evolutionary process for coding regions and non-coding regions between MT genomes and nuclear genomes. In rich glucose media, yeast cells can rapidly grow via fermentation without functional mitochondria, and thus mitochondrial genomes possibly could evolve rapidly. However, when the sugar is exhausted, the mitochondria become indispensable for energy generation, and thus the functional mitochondrial genes are subject to very strong selection.

Materials and methods

Strains and DNA preparation

S. mikitae strain IFO1815 and S. kudriavzevii strain IFO1802 used in this study were from Cornell University. Yeast cells were grown in YPD medium (2% glucose, 1% yeast extract, and 2% peptone) at 30°C with 220 rpm overnight. Then 10ml of cell culture was transferred into 800ml of fresh YPG liquid medium (3% glycerol, 1% yeast extract and 2% peptone) [39]. The entire mitochondrial genomic DNAs of S. mikatae and S. kudriavzevii were purified by standard protocol [40].

Sequencing and assembly

The entire S. mikatae mtDNA was sequenced by Illumina sequencing platforms and assembled by SOAPdenovo pipeline [41]. The S. kudriavzevii mtDNA was mainly obtained from the whole genome sequencing of S. kudriavzevii [21], which was downloaded from SGD (http://downloads.yeastgenome.org/sequence/fungi/S_kudriavzevii/IFO1802/). We first assembled five contigs (~71kb) for S. kudriavzevii mtDNA by comparing with the referential mtDNA of S. cerevisiae. Then, the gaps between contigs were filled by PCR. Finally, we combined assembled PCR results with contigs to get the complete sequence of S. kudriavzevii mtDNA. The complete sequences of S. mikatae and S. kudriavzevii mtDNA had been deposited at NCBI under the accessions KX707787 and KX707788.

Gene annotation

The mitochondrial genomes of S. mikatae and S. kudriazevii were annotated based on all mitochondrial genes in S. cerevisiae [19]. The location of tRNAs, rRNAs, and introns were detected by tRNAscan [42], RNAweasel [43] and MFannot [44].

mtDNA sequences

Yeast mtDNA sequences were obtained from NCBI and EMBL. The accession numbers are AJ511533 (Candida glabrata), CM003593 (S. uvarum), KR260476 (S. cerevisiae), JQ862335 (S. paradoxus), AJ430679 (Kazachstania servazzii), AF437291 (Naumovozyma castellii), FM995164 (Nakaseomyces delphensis), FM995165 (Candida castellii), FM995166 (Nakaseomyces bacillisporus), HE664111 (Lachancea kluyveri), AJ634268 (Lachancea thermotolerans), HE983611 (Lachancea dasiensis), and HE983614 (Lachancea meyersii).

The organization architecture of the mitochondrial genomes

To investigate the organization and evolution of the mitochondrial genome in the SSS group, we classified the mitochondrial genome into five parts: the first was gene sequences, including 35 genes (8 proteins, 2 rRNAs, 1 RNase P and 24 tRNAs) for all of SSS group; the second was intron sequences, including 7–14 introns distributed in cox1, cob and rnl; the third was intergenic regions, consisting of 33–35 intergenic sequences within each SSS yeast; the fourth was ori sequences, including 1–8 ori sequences distributed in the intergenic regions; and the last was ORF sequences located between (or at) the intergenic regions.

Constructing phylogenetic tree

The amino acid sequences of eight protein coding genes in the fifteen yeasts were aligned by ClustalOmega [31] separately, trimmed by trimAl (gap-score cutoff 0.5, conservation score 0.5) [45], and then concatenated into a single alignment. Then, a maximum-likelihood tree was constructed by MEGA [46]. All nodes were highly supported by the likelihood ratio test and bootstrap analysis with 100 replications.

Constructing bsGOL rate

Gene order conservation (GOC) was defined as the number of contiguous orthologous pair in two genomes (Northologues, contiguous) divided by the total number of orthologues (Northologues) [29]. All the GOC values between the 15 yeasts were estimated in phylogenetic tree (Fig 1C) as: The gene order loss (GOL) was defined as 1-GOC. Branch-specific GOL (bsGOL) could be obtained by minimizing the sum over 105 pairwise comparisons, of the squared differences between the frequency of the observed GOL and the sum of the predicted bsGOL values, the likelihood function is: where bi,j was a Boolean variable indicating the specific relation for the estimation of a particular bsGOL, GOLi were obtained from the pairwise comparisons (GOLi = 1-GOCi), xj was the actual bsGOL (S10 Table) value apply for minimizing L [30].

Calculating dN/dS ratios

The method for calculating dN/dS ratios was from a previous study [13]. Firstly, the phylogenetic tree based on the concatenation of eight protein coding genes was used as reference tree for estimating dN/dS in PAML package version 4.4b [47]. Secondly, the nucleotide sequence of each protein coding gene was translated to amino acid sequence for multiple sequences alignment (MSA) by ClustalOmega [31], and then the MSA of each nucleotide sequence was produced by MSA amino acid sequence. Lastly, CODEML model was used to estimate the pairwise dN/dS ratios among all linages in our study.

Predicting GC clusters and AT spacers

The GC cluster was first detected with the minimum length 16bp and minimum GC content 0.75. Then, we masked the mtDNA with the detected GC cluster sequences and further detected new GC clusters in the remaining mtDNA sequences with the minimum length 8bp and minimum GC content 0.85. And last, two clusters were joined together if the gap was less than 10bp.

To group the GC clusters in one species, we first conducted a multiple sequence alignment for all GC clusters and their reverse compliment sequences by ClustalOmega. Secondly, we constructed the evolutionary tree based on multiple sequence alignments, and divided GC clusters into different groups based on the tree with a threshold. Thirdly, we filtered the reverse compliment sequence with a GC cluster, if the GC cluster and its reverse compliment sequence existed in the same group. Fourthly, we sorted the groups in descending order of the number in the group, and the groups were successively retained, but some groups was removed if they had an over 80% overlap with the retained groups. And lastly, we aligned the multiple sequence for all groups, and obtained the consensus sequence for each group.

To further detect the intergenic AT spacers in MT genomes, we detected the GC clusters comprising of at least one G/C tetranucleotide (e.g, GCCG, CCGC etc.). After excluding all GC clusters in the intergenic region, the remaining intergenic fragments were considered as AT spacers, if the sequence size >20bp and GC content < 0.1.

Determining intron position

If an intron (list in Fig 2) located at the correct position in the gene sequences, we used two criteria: 1), the introns located at the neighboring positions in different species, and 2), conservation of the 5' and 3' flanking exon sequences around the same intron loci in different species. The latter criteria was more important and the flanking sequences around 5' and 3' region (10bp) for all 18 introns were listed in S6 Table.

Supporting information

S1 Fig.

(A) Scatter plot and line regression of the relationship between the size of MT genome and intergenic regions. (B) The expansion of intergenic region of mtDNA. The intergenic sequences were divided into four types: ORF sequences, ori sequences, AT spacers and GC clusters. The Y axis represented the size of four types of intergenic regions, for detailed data, see the S3 Table. (C) The (AT+TA)/(AA+TT) ratio in the AT spacers of fifteen yeasts. (D) Scatter plot and line regression of the relationship between the MT genome size and the relative number of GC clusters. The scatter plots in red ellipse represented five SSS yeasts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. The distribution of GC clusters in mitochondrial genomes.

The gray color referred to no GC cluster insertion; the blue color referred to fewer GC clusters insertion (1–3); the red color referred to more GC clusters insertion (8–10); the dark red referred to the number of GC clusters is larger than 10. The detailed number of GC clusters was shown in S4 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s002

(PDF)

S3 Fig. The logos Figure of ori sequences for five SSS yeasts.

All 24 ori sequences were aligned with MEGA software [46]. The intervening GC clusters and AT segment in some ori sequences were removed before drawing. The Figure was created by WebLogo[23].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s003

(PDF)

S4 Fig. The number symbol for each evolutionary branch in the phylogenetic tree.

The tree had totally 27 evolutionary branches.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s004

(PDF)

S1 Table. Gene coordinates in mitochondrial genomes of S. mikatae and S. kudriavzevii.

The table showed the coordinates of 35 genes and their introns in S. mikatae and S. kudriavzevii.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s005

(PDF)

S2 Table. The MT genome sizes of fifteen yeasts.

The size of genes, introns and intergenic regions in the mtDNA of L. meyersii (Lmey), L. dasiensis (Ldas), L. thermotolerans (Lthe), L. kluyveri (Lklu), N. bacillisporus (Nbac), C. castellii (Ccas), N. delphensis (Ndel), C. glabrata (Cgla), N. castellii (Ncas), K. servazzii (Kser), S. uvarum (Suva), S. kudriavzevii (Skud), S. mikatae (Smik), S. paradoxus (Spar), and S. cerevisiae (Scer).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s006

(PDF)

S3 Table. The size of ori sequences, ORFs, AT spacers and GC clusters in intergenic region.

The number in the bracket of ‘ORFs’ and ‘Oris’ cols indicated the number of ORFs and ori sequences in different yeasts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s007

(PDF)

S4 Table. The number of GC clusters in fifteen yeasts.

The mitochondrial genomes were divided into ‘Exon’, ‘Introns’ and ‘Intergenic’ regions. The ‘Sum’ col indicated sum of GC clusters in different yeasts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s008

(PDF)

S5 Table. The distribution and characteristic of GC clusters in different yeast linages.

The ‘Num’ col indicated the number of GC clusters in the MT genome of each yeast. The ‘Palindromic’ col indicated the proportion of palindromic-like GC clusters. The ‘FamilyNum’ indicated the number of the main sub-families in each yeast (number > = 8). The ‘Consensus’ and ‘RC Consensus’ cols indicated the consensus sequence and the reverse complementary sequence of each subfamily. In the ‘Features’ col, * = The al and a2 family in de Zamaroczy and Bernardi, 1986; & = GC clusters A, B, C of ori sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s009

(PDF)

S6 Table. The 10 bp 5' and 3' flanking exon sequences of introns.

The number after a series of ‘#’ represented the relative location of each intron in different yeasts. The flanking sequence was named according to ‘Species_Gene_ID_Loc’, where the ‘ID’ indicated the absolute location of the intron in corresponding gene and species, the ‘Loc’ indicated the insert location of the intron in the coding sequence. For example, ‘Smik_COX1_1_168’ represented the first intron of cox1 gene in MT genome of S. mikatae, the intron inserted in the 168th nucleotide of coding sequence. The flanking sequence was shown according to “5’ 10 bp exon sequence-3’ 10 bp exon sequence”, where the ‘-’ represented the insert location of the intron in the coding sequence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s010

(PDF)

S7 Table. The intron identity in four yeast linages.

We first calculated the amino-acid identity of intron ORFs in different linages. We then calculated the nucleotide identity for the introns without ORF. The rows with yellow back color were corresponding to Group II introns. The ‘-’ indicated the intron did not present in the linage, or only present in one species of the linage.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s011

(PDF)

S8 Table. Seven blocks in mitochondria genome of SSS group.

All 35 genes were divided into seven syntenic orthologous blocks constituted by fourteen transcriptional units known in S. cerevisiae. For other SSS yeasts, we predicted transcription initiation site based on the motif WTATAAGTA. The predicted transcriptional units were similar to that in S. cerevisiae (data not shown).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s012

(PDF)

S9 Table. The number of rearrangement events between SSS yeasts.

The upper triangle of the table indicated the number of rearrangement events. The rearrangement scenarios were shown in supplement file (S1B File) in more detail.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s013

(PDF)

S10 Table. Branch-Specific Rates of GOL in fifteen yeasts.

The ‘Branch’ col indicated all evolutional branches in the phylogenetic tree of fifteen yeasts (S4 Fig). The ‘Leaf_Node’ col indicated the branches which included leaf nodes (i.e., fifteen yeasts). The ‘Branch Length’ col indicated the length of each branch in the phylogenetic tree. The ‘MT bsGOL’ indicated the branch-specific GOL of mitochondrial genome based on the pairwise comparisons of GOL. The ‘MT GOL Rate’ indicated the rearrangement rate of gene order in mitochondrial genome which was calculated by the ratio of bsGOL to branch length. The ‘Nuclear GOL Rate’ indicated the GOL rates in the nuclear genome of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus which were from Fischer et al. 2006 [30].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s014

(PDF)

S11 Table. The identity between nucleus and mitochondrial RNA genes.

We first predicted all nucleus tRNAs, rRNAs and RPR1 in other SSS yeasts based on the genes annotation in S. cerevisiae. Then we obtained the orthologous groups for all RNA genes by OrthoMCL [32]. After that, we calculated the nucleotide identity for each orthologous group, if the group included genes in all five SSS yeasts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s015

(PDF)

S12 Table. The dN/dS ratio for all linages.

The ‘Average’ rows in the table indicated the average of the dN/dS ratio of each mitochondria protein between two close relative species in the same lineage. The number in ‘Rank’ rows represent the rank number based on the ‘Average’.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s016

(PDF)

S1 File.

(A) Intergenic regions expansion. (B) The rearrangement scenarios in the SSS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183035.s017

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Pengli Cai, Dr. Wentao Ding, Dr. Xiaoqian Jiang and Dr. Wenwu Wu for reading the manuscript and their helpful comments. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (31501023) to J. C. and (31300077) to H. J. and The Hundred Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to H.J.

References

  1. 1. Dyall SD, Brown MT, Johnson PJ: Ancient invasions: from endosymbionts to organelles. Science 2004, 304(5668):253–257. pmid:15073369
  2. 2. Fritsch ES, Chabbert CD, Klaus B, Steinmetz LM: A genome-wide map of mitochondrial DNA recombination in yeast. Genetics 2014, 198(2):755–771. pmid:25081569
  3. 3. Hatefi Y: The mitochondrial electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation system. Annual review of biochemistry 1985, 54(1):1015–1069.
  4. 4. Tan DX, Manchester LC, Liu X, Rosales‐Corral SA, Dario AC, Reiter RJ: Mitochondria and chloroplasts as the original sites of melatonin synthesis: a hypothesis related to melatonin's primary function and evolution in eukaryotes. Journal of Pineal Research 2013, 54(2):127–138. pmid:23137057
  5. 5. Green DR, Reed JC: Mitochondria and apoptosis. Science 1998, 281(5381):1309. pmid:9721092
  6. 6. Freel KC, Friedrich A, Schacherer J: Mitochondrial genome evolution in yeasts: an all-encompassing view. FEMS yeast research 2015, 15(4):fov023. pmid:25969454
  7. 7. Bulder C: Induction of petite mutation and inhibition of synthesis of respiratory enzymes in various yeasts. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1964, 30(1):1–9.
  8. 8. Piskur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S, Merico A, Compagno C: How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends in genetics: TIG 2006, 22(4):183–186. pmid:16499989
  9. 9. Borneman AR, Pretorius IS: Genomic Insights into the Saccharomyces sensu stricto Complex. Genetics 2015, 199(2):281–291. pmid:25657346
  10. 10. Koszul R, Malpertuy A, Frangeul L, Bouchier C, Wincker P, Thierry A, Duthoy S, Ferris S, Hennequin C, Dujon B: The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the pathogenic yeast Candida (Torulopsis) glabrata. FEBS Lett 2003, 534(1–3):39–48. pmid:12527359
  11. 11. Langkjaer RB, Casaregola S, Ussery DW, Gaillardin C, Piskur J: Sequence analysis of three mitochondrial DNA molecules reveals interesting differences among Saccharomyces yeasts. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31(12):3081–3091. pmid:12799436
  12. 12. Replansky T, Koufopanou V, Greig D, Bell G: Saccharomyces sensu stricto as a model system for evolution and ecology. Trends in ecology & evolution 2008, 23(9):494–501.
  13. 13. Friedrich A, Jung PP, Hou J, Neuveglise C, Schacherer J: Comparative mitochondrial genomics within and among yeast species of the Lachancea genus. PloS one 2012, 7(10):e47834. pmid:23112855
  14. 14. Jung PP, Friedrich A, Reisser C, Hou J, Schacherer J: Mitochondrial genome evolution in a single protoploid yeast species. G3 (Bethesda) 2012, 2(9):1103–1111.
  15. 15. Freel KC, Friedrich A, Hou J, Schacherer J: Population genomic analysis reveals highly conserved mitochondrial genomes in the yeast species Lachancea thermotolerans. Genome biology and evolution 2014, 6(10):2586–2594. pmid:25212859
  16. 16. Bernt M, Braband A, Schierwater B, Stadler PF: Genetic aspects of mitochondrial genome evolution. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 2013, 69(2):328–338. pmid:23142697
  17. 17. Cherry J, Adler C, Ball C, Chervitz S, Dwight S, Hester E, Jia Y, Juvik G, Roe T, Schroeder M: SGD: Saccharomyces genome database. Nucleic acids research 1998, 26(1):73. pmid:9399804
  18. 18. Foury F, Roganti T, Lecrenier N, Purnelle B: The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 1998, 440(3):325–331. pmid:9872396
  19. 19. Prochazka E, Franko F, Polakova S, Sulo P: A complete sequence of Saccharomyces paradoxus mitochondrial genome that restores the respiration in S. cerevisiae. FEMS yeast research 2012, 12(7):819–830. pmid:22830625
  20. 20. Baker E, Wang B, Bellora N, Peris D, Hulfachor AB, Koshalek JA, Adams M, Libkind D, Hittinger CT: The genome sequence of Saccharomyces eubayanus and the domestication of lager-brewing yeasts. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2015, 32(11):2818–2831. pmid:26269586
  21. 21. Scannell DR, Zill OA, Rokas A, Payen C, Dunham MJ, Eisen MB, Rine J, Johnston M, Hittinger CT: The awesome power of yeast evolutionary genetics: new genome sequences and strain resources for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto genus. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 2011, 1(1):11–25.
  22. 22. Bouchier C: Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of three Nakaseomyces species reveal invasion by palindromic GC clusters and considerable size expansion. FEMS yeast research 2009, 9(8):1283–1292. pmid:19758332
  23. 23. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE: WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome research 2004, 14(6):1188–1190. pmid:15173120
  24. 24. Wolters JF, Chiu K, Fiumera HL: Population structure of mitochondrial genomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC genomics 2015, 16(1):1.
  25. 25. Lopez PJ, Séraphin B: YIDB: the yeast intron database. Nucleic acids research 2000, 28(1):85–86. pmid:10592188
  26. 26. Aguileta G, de Vienne DM, Ross ON, Hood ME, Giraud T, Petit E, Gabaldón T: High variability of mitochondrial gene order among fungi. Genome biology and evolution 2014, 6(2):451–465. pmid:24504088
  27. 27. Bernt M, Merkle D, Ramsch K, Fritzsch G, Perseke M, Bernhard D, Schlegel M, Stadler PF, Middendorf M: CREx: inferring genomic rearrangements based on common intervals. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(21):2957–2958. pmid:17895271
  28. 28. Hilker R, Sickinger C, Pedersen CN, Stoye J: UniMoG—a unifying framework for genomic distance calculation and sorting based on DCJ. Bioinformatics 2012, 28(19):2509. pmid:22815356
  29. 29. Rocha EP: Inference and analysis of the relative stability of bacterial chromosomes. Molecular Biology & Evolution 2006, 23(3):513–522.
  30. 30. Fischer G, Rocha EP, Brunet F, Vergassola M, Dujon B: Highly variable rates of genome rearrangements between hemiascomycetous yeast lineages. PLoS Genetics 2006, 2(3):e32. pmid:16532063
  31. 31. Sievers F, Higgins DG: Clustal Omega, accurate alignment of very large numbers of sequences. Multiple sequence alignment methods 2014:105–116.
  32. 32. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS: OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome research 2003, 13(9):2178–2189. pmid:12952885
  33. 33. Reinders J, Zahedi RP, Pfanner N, Meisinger C, Sickmann A: Toward the complete yeast mitochondrial proteome: multidimensional separation techniques for mitochondrial proteomics. Journal of proteome research 2006, 5(7):1543–1554. pmid:16823961
  34. 34. Stewart JB, Freyer C, Elson JL, Larsson N-G: Purifying selection of mtDNA and its implications for understanding evolution and mitochondrial disease. Nature Reviews Genetics 2008, 9(9):657–662. pmid:18695671
  35. 35. Kawahara Y, Imanishi T: A genome-wide survey of changes in protein evolutionary rates across four closely related species of Saccharomyces sensu stricto group. Bmc Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7(2):: 9.
  36. 36. Taanman J-W: The mitochondrial genome: structure, transcription, translation and replication. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics 1999, 1410(2):103–123.
  37. 37. Bernt M, Machné R, Sahyoun AH, Middendorf M, Stadler PF: Mitochondrial genome evolution. eLS 2013.
  38. 38. Grivell LA: Nucleo-mitochondrial interactions in yeast mitochondrial biogenesis. In: EJB Reviews 1989. Springer; 1989: 47–63.
  39. 39. Daum G, Bohni PC, Schatz G: Import of Proteins into Mitochondria—Cytochrome-B2 and Cytochrome-C Peroxidase Are Located in the Intermembrane Space of Yeast Mitochondria. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1982, 257(21):3028–3033.
  40. 40. Glick BS, Pon LA: Isolation of highly purified mitochondria from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Genetics, Pt A 1995, 260:213–223.
  41. 41. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Qi P, Liu Y: SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012, 1(1):1–6.
  42. 42. Lowe TM, Eddy SR: tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Research 1997, 25(5):955–964. pmid:9023104
  43. 43. Beck N, Lang B: RNAweasel, a webserver for identification of mitochondrial, structured RNAs. Montreal (Quebec): University of Montreal 2009.
  44. 44. Beck N, Lang B: MFannot, organelle genome annotation websever. In.; 2010.
  45. 45. Capella-Gutirrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldn T: trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(15):1972–1973.
  46. 46. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S: MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology & Evolution 2013, 30(12):2725–2729.
  47. 47. Yang Z: PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular biology and evolution 2007, 24(8):1586. pmid:17483113