Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Gastrointestinal parasite infections and self-medication in wild chimpanzees surviving in degraded forest fragments within an agricultural landscape mosaic in Uganda

  • Matthew R. McLennan ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Anthropology Centre for Conservation, Environment and Development, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom, Bulindi Chimpanzee and Community Project, Hoima, Uganda


  • Hideo Hasegawa,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Infectious Disease Control, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama, Yufu, Oita, Japan, Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama, Yufu, Oita, Japan

  • Massimo Bardi,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, Virginia, United States of America

  • Michael A. Huffman

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan

Gastrointestinal parasite infections and self-medication in wild chimpanzees surviving in degraded forest fragments within an agricultural landscape mosaic in Uganda

  • Matthew R. McLennan, 
  • Hideo Hasegawa, 
  • Massimo Bardi, 
  • Michael A. Huffman


Monitoring health in wild great apes is integral to their conservation and is especially important where they share habitats with humans, given the potential for zoonotic pathogen exchange. We studied the intestinal parasites of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) inhabiting degraded forest fragments amid farmland and villages in Bulindi, Uganda. We first identified protozoan and helminth parasites infecting this population. Sixteen taxa were demonstrated microscopically (9 protozoa, 5 nematodes, 1 cestode, and 1 trematode). DNA sequence analysis enabled more precise identification of larval nematodes (e.g. Oesophagostomum stephanostomum, O. bifurcum, Strongyloides fuelleborni, Necator sp. Type II) and tapeworm proglottids (genus Bertiella). To better understand the ecology of infections, we used multidimensional scaling analysis to reveal general patterns of association among parasites, climate, and whole leaf swallowing–a prevalent self-medicative behaviour at Bulindi linked to control of nodular worms (Oesophagostomum spp.). Prevalence of parasites varied with climate in diverse ways. For example, Oesophagostomum sp. was detected in faeces at higher frequencies with increasing rainfall but was most clearly associated with periods of low temperature. Certain parasites occurred together within chimpanzee hosts more or less frequently than expected by chance. For example, the commensal ciliate Troglodytella abrassarti was negatively associated with Balantidium coli and Oesophagostomum sp., possibly because the latter taxa make the large intestine less suitable for T. abrassarti. Whole leaves in faeces showed independent associations with the prevalence of Oesophagostomum sp., Strongyloides sp., and hookworm by microscopic examination, and with egestion of adult O. stephanostomum by macroscopic inspection. All parasites identified to species or genus have been reported in wild chimpanzees inhabiting less-disturbed environments than Bulindi. Nevertheless, several disease-causing taxa infecting these chimpanzees are potentially transmissible between apes and humans (e.g. rhabditoid and strongyle nematodes), underscoring the importance of identifying and reducing risks of pathogen exchange in shared landscapes.


Non-human primates worldwide are increasingly found in modified and degraded habitats in proximity to humans and their domestic animals [13]. Understanding how anthropogenic habitat disturbance including farming, fragmentation and logging influence the gastrointestinal parasite faunas of wild primates consequently has strong relevance for conservation [4,5], with some studies reporting general links between disturbance and changes to host–parasite dynamics of primates (e.g. 610]; but see [11,12]). At the same time, growing contact between people and non-human primates (hereafter referred to as ‘primates’) calls for improved understanding of the risks of zoonotic pathogen transmission in shared habitats (e.g. [1318]).

Like many primates, great apes are severely threatened by habitat loss for agriculture [19]. Unless heavily hunted or persecuted, however, populations of great apes can survive in degraded forests, plantation landscapes and forest–farm ecotones near human settlements [2023]. The close phylogenetic relationship between humans and great apes results in a high potential for pathogen exchange in such habitats, raising concerns over public health [2426] and great ape conservation [27]. Therefore, parasitological surveys of apes sharing habitats with people are useful for understanding the possible consequences of close human–ape coexistence by identifying taxa with pathogenic and zoonotic potential (e.g. [24,2832]).

Parasitological surveys of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have been made in various habitats across tropical Africa including lowland rainforest [33,34], mid-altitude forest [3538], forest–woodland [3941] and savanna-woodland [4245], mostly at sites with low to moderate human disturbance. The few studies explicitly made in more disturbed habitats, e.g. forest fragments where spatial overlap and interactions with local humans is high, report parasite faunas which are overall comparable to other chimpanzee populations [30,46]. However, Sá et al. [30] found the highest prevalence of Giardia intestinalis in chimpanzees inhabiting fragmented parts of Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau, which they attributed to greater contact with humans and livestock. Cibot et al. [32] compared two chimpanzee groups in Kibale National Park, Uganda, and found that those with a home range more heavily impacted by human activities had a higher prevalence and load of hookworm-like eggs.

Many common parasites of chimpanzees are non-pathogenic (e.g. commensal protozoa which aid digestion [47,48]) or have unclear clinical significance, but several have strong pathogenic potential. For example, heavy infections of nodular worms (Oesophagostomum spp.) are associated with morbidity and mortality in some chimpanzee populations (i.e. Mahale [39] and Gombe [49], both in Tanzania). These strongyle nematodes are transmissible among humans, chimpanzees and other sympatric primates in some environments (e.g. Kibale National Park, Uganda: [16,32]). Additionally, O. stephanostomum specifically has been shown to be the primary target of medicinal plant use (bitter pith chewing and rough leaf swallowing) by chimpanzees at Mahale [39,5052] There, bitter pith chewing resulted in the rapid decline in O. stephanostomum infection intensity (eggs per gram faeces) within 24 hours [51]. Swallowing rough or bristly leaves increases gut motility causing expulsion of adult worms, which disrupts the nematode’s life cycle and likely reduces worm burdens [53]. Thus, whole undigested leaves occurred in association with adult Oesophagsotomum in chimpanzee faeces at Mahale [52] and also at Bulindi, Uganda [54]. A similar relationship between leaf swallowing and tapeworm (Bertiella sp.) infection was reported from Kibale [55] and Budongo, Uganda [56], but was not apparent at Bulindi [54].

Temporal or seasonal variation in infections occur, reflecting climatic influences on parasite life cycles, changes in host diet or habitat use, and/or methodological differences among studies for observable effects [36,39,40,56,57]. At Mahale, for example, Oesophagostomum infection intensity increases rapidly following the onset of the wet season, during which leaf swallowing occurs most frequently [39]. Co-infection of chimpanzee hosts by multiple parasites, measured as species richness, is routinely observed in wild populations (e.g. [37,40,45,52]). To date, few studies have considered patterns of association among parasites of chimpanzees, including specific within-host associations, although such interactions are well-established in other species [5860]. In one study, Ebbert et al. [45] found that some pairs of taxa (e.g. Trichuris sp. and Balantidium sp.) occurred together in chimpanzee faeces at Mt. Assirik, Senegal, more often than expected by chance.

We examined the intestinal parasites of chimpanzees in Bulindi, Uganda, using coproscopic and molecular methods. In Bulindi, chimpanzees inhabit small degraded forest fragments on agricultural land in remarkably close contact with humans and domestic animals [6163]. An earlier study reported an unusually high frequency of whole leaf swallowing among Bulindi chimpanzees compared to reported frequencies elsewhere [54], potentially suggesting heightened vulnerability to certain pathogens. Moreover, a relationship between egestion of adult Oesophagostomum sp. and the presence of whole leaves in the chimpanzees’ faeces was found [54]. However, data from microscopic and molecular analysis were not available at that time. Thus, in the present study we:

  1. Identified gastrointestinal parasites (protozoa and helminths) infecting Bulindi chimpanzees via coproscopic examination and molecular analysis of nematode larvae and macroscopic parasites.
  2. Evaluated climatic influences on temporal patterns of parasite infections at Bulindi.
  3. Examined temporal associations among parasites infecting the chimpanzee community, as well as associations of parasites within chimpanzee hosts.
  4. Evaluated the relationship between leaf swallowing and infections with potentially pathogenic parasites including Oesophagostomum, assayed by both microscopic and macroscopic examination.
  5. Identified parasites infecting the chimpanzees that have zoonotic and pathogenic potential to assess public health risk in this location of markedly close human–great ape contact.

Materials and methods

Study site

Bulindi (1°29′N, 31°28′E) is located in western Uganda’s Hoima District. Chimpanzees at Bulindi are among multiple chimpanzee groups (‘communities’) inhabiting degraded forest fragments on farmland across an area exceeding 600 km2 [61,6466]. In 2014 the human population density in Hoima District exceeded 150 persons per km2 [67]. During 2012–2013, when this survey was made, the Bulindi chimpanzee community comprised 19 individuals: 6 adult females, 3 adult males, a subadult female and subadult male, and 8 juveniles and infants. Their home range (c. 20 km2) comprises narrow fragments of riverine forest amid agricultural gardens and village settlements, and is dissected by a main road (Fig 1). Common trees in fragments include the palm Phoenix reclinata, Pseudospondias microcarpa, Funtumia africana, and members of the Moraceae family, including Trilepisium madagascariensis, Antiaris toxicaria and figs Ficus spp. [68]. Chimpanzees in Bulindi are sympatric with black and white colobus monkeys (Colobus guereza), tantalus monkeys (Chlorocebus tantalus), and olive baboons (Papio anubis). Solitary or small groups of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) and red-tailed monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius) have occasionally been seen.

Fig 1. Home range and habitat of chimpanzees in Bulindi, Hoima District, Uganda.

(a) Map adapted from Landsat imagery courtesy of USGS/NASA Landsat. The most commonly used portion of the home range is indicated by the yellow oval. Dark green areas are fragments of riverine forest, Cyperus papyrus swamp, regenerating bush and woodland; the surrounding matrix comprises smallholder farmland, homes and trading centres. The thin line at centre is a main road connecting Hoima and Masindi towns. (b) Typical view of narrow riverine forest dominated by tall Phoenix reclinata palms; a chimpanzee is visible in a small tree above the water. (c) Two adult males of the Bulindi community travelling across farmland while a local farmer (visible between the two chimpanzees) tends to his garden.

Rainfall in the region is bimodal. March–May and August–November are usually wet (>100 mm rainfall monthly), December–February are dry (≤50 mm rainfall monthly), while June–July are ‘transient’ (51–100 mm rainfall), following the classification scheme used by Newton-Fisher [69] and Huffman et al. [56] for western Uganda. However, some inter-annual variation in rainfall distribution occurs. Highest maximum and lowest minimum temperatures generally occur in January–March.

This survey was undertaken concurrent with major habitat disturbance in Bulindi: beginning c.2000 all forest within the chimpanzees’ range was logged [63,68] and most forest was converted to farmland (c. 80% loss during 2006–2014). The chimpanzees frequently enter gardens to feed on agricultural crops [70,71] and they encounter villagers and domestic animals daily (including cattle, chickens, pigs, goats, dogs and cats) [62] (Fig 1). Villagers sometimes defecate outdoors at garden edges and in the forest, and chimpanzee knuckle prints have been seen in fresh human faeces [54]. Conversely, chimpanzees defecate in gardens and by homes when travelling and foraging between forest fragments. Villagers collect water from streams within forest fragments. Thus, there is a risk of mutual parasite transmission in Bulindi.

Sample collection

Chimpanzee faecal samples were collected in two survey periods: September–November 2012 (period 1) and February–April 2013 (period 2). Samples were collected non-invasively in the first half of the day (between 0700–1300) from fresh faeces deposited that morning. While chimpanzees were individually identifiable, they were not habituated to close observation. Thus, samples were collected from anonymous individuals at recently vacated nest sites and during tracking. The Bulindi community is small and cohesive, and individuals presumably had an equal chance of being sampled each day. In total, 432 samples were collected for microscopic examination. At collection, c.1 g faeces was placed in 5 mL tubes prefilled with 10% formalin solution and shaken vigorously.

Additionally, 406 faeces were inspected macroscopically for proglottids and adult nematodes, and undigested whole leaves indicative of self-medication (period 1 = 164; period 2 = 242), including 362 for which a sample was also collected for coproscopic analysis. The discrepancy in number of faeces examined microscopically and macroscopically is because some faeces collected for coproscopy were too small for visual inspection (e.g. when only small pieces of faeces were recovered below a tree), while some faeces were judged potentially older than 6 h (our limit for coproscopic analysis) and were collected for visual inspection only. All macroscopic parasites were fixed in ≥99% ethanol.

In April 2013, 38 faecal samples were subjected to the modified Harada–Mori filter paper culture [72], irrespective of presence of adult worms. After 7–14 days, larva-positive water was transferred to a 5 mL tube and fixed in ≥99% ethanol [73]. All samples were transported to the Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Japan for analyses.

Laboratory analysis

Fifty samples were examined initially via simple sedimentation and formalin–ether sedimentation methods [74]. In the former method, processing of faeces was the same as in formalin–ether sedimentation except sedimentation was done without adding ether, after which the supernatant was discarded and the sediment was spread under the cover slip and examined. Simple sedimentation performed marginally better (mean species richness was 3.4 by simple sedimentation versus 3.2 by formalin–ether). Thereafter samples were examined solely via simple sedimentation and only results from this method are reported. The gauze used for straining faeces was inspected for worm bodies such as pinworms (Enterobius sp.) following Hasegawa [72]. Microscopic identification was made with reference to Hasegawa et al. [75] and Modrý et al. [76].

DNA sequence analysis was performed for (i) tapeworm proglottids and adult nematodes found in faeces, and (ii) nematode larvae from coprocultures. From each proglottid, a small fragment (about 1 mm3) was resected using a sterilized disposable scalpel blade, and washed in sterilized distilled water. Then, the fragment was homogenised in 100 μL of sterilised distilled water in a sterilised Eppendorf tube using a sterilised pestle. Five μL of the solution was mixed with 50 μL of the liquid phase of Dexpat (Takara Bio. Inc., Otsu, Shiga, Japan) in a 200 μL PCR tube, heated at 100°C for 20 min, and cooled on ice to prepare a template solution. Subsequently, 15 μL of the template solution was added to the 60 μL PCR mixture containing 1 μL of KOD-Neo polymerase (Toyobo Co., Tokyo, Japan). PCR was performed using a thermal cycler (PC-801, ASTEC Co., Ltd., Fukuoka, Japan). The primer sets used for amplification of ITS1 and ITS2 were BerITS1-F (forward: 5’-CTGCGGAAGGATCATTACAC-3’) and BerITS1-R2 (reverse: 5’-GCAGTCTGCGATTCACATTA-3’), and BerITS2-F2 (forward: 5’-TAATGTGAATCGCAGACTGC-3’) and BerITS2-R2 (reverse: 5’-CGCCGTTACCAAGGGAATC-3’), respectively. Methods for DNA extraction and PCR for nematodes were described previously [73,77].

PCR was carried out with an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 20 cycles of 98°C for 10 sec, 50°C for 1 min, 68°C for 1 min, 20 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, 68°C for 1 min, and a post-amplification extension at 68°C for 7 min. The PCR products were mixed with EzVision Three DNA Dye (Amresco, Solon, Ohio, USA) and electrophoresed in a 1.5% agarose gel. Following electrophoresis, DNA bands were extracted from the gel and purified with SUPREC-01 column (Takara Bio Inc.). Products were then subjected to direct sequencing using the BigDyeTerminator cycle sequencing kit v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA), and an automated genetic analyzer ABI-PRISM 3130 (Applied Biosystems). DNA sequences obtained were registered in DDBJ (DNA Data Bank of Japan)/EMBL-Bank/GenBank (accession numbers: LC185219–LC185221, LC185224–LC185229).

Molecular features of nematodes in the genera Oesophagostomum, Strongyloides and Necator from Bulindi chimpanzees are reported elsewhere [73,78,79]. Here, additional molecular analysis of larvae from coprocultures and proglottids recovered from their faeces is presented. The programs FASTA version 36.3.7b [80] at EBI (European Bioinformatics Institute) and BLAST version 2.2.26 [81] at DDBJ were used to identify sequences with high similarity to DNA sequences obtained from the proglottids and larvae.

Data analysis

The sample prevalence (proportion or frequency of faecal samples positive for a given parasite taxa) was used as a proxy for individual prevalence. Because we did not measure the intensity of samples (eggs per gram faeces) and chimpanzee’s identity of each sample was unknown, our analysis is intended to reveal only general patterns of parasite infection in the Bulindi community. Since individual chimpanzees contributed multiple samples, non-independency might have been a problem in our dataset. We therefore ran autocorrelation function (ACF) tests to detect autocorrelation and partial correlation in all parasite taxa detected microscopically. AFC tests return the correlation coefficients between two values (faecal samples) of the same variable (any given parasite) at times Xi and Xi+k. Given measurements, Y1, Y2,…, YN at time X1, X2,…, XN, the lag k autocorrelation function is defined as:

Although the time variable, X, is not used in the formula for autocorrelation, the assumption is that the observations are equally spaced. When the autocorrelation is used to detect non-randomness, only the first few lag autocorrelations are usually of interest [82]. Only a single point of significant autocorrelation (p<0.05) was detected in the whole dataset (136 points in total), indicating that autocorrelation was not a concern in our dataset.

Chi-square tests were used to assess if our measure of prevalence differed (i) between survey periods and (ii) between faecal samples from months classified as ‘wet’ (n = 262) versus ‘dry’ or ‘transient’ months (n = 170); samples collected in dry or transient months were lumped because relatively few samples were available from February, the only dry month in the survey. We did not adjust for multiple tests since this initial chi-square analysis was exploratory and p-values were not used to make inferences about seasonality of infections (see below). In other analyses, survey months were divided into first and second halves, giving ten ‘biweekly periods’ (samples were collected in one half of the month only in September 2012 and February 2013). Parasite prevalence and climate variables (cumulative rainfall, mean relative humidity, and mean minimum and maximum temperature) were calculated for each biweekly period. Spearman rank correlations were used to assess associations between climate variables during August 2012–April 2013, i.e. 9 months beginning 1 month prior to period 1 through to the last month of period 2, giving 18 biweekly periods.

To examine seasonality of infections in more detail, we conducted a multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis to provide a model of independent associations among the biweekly prevalence of different parasites and corresponding climatic conditions. Parasites selected for inclusion in the model were those that differed in prevalence between survey periods, as indicated by exploratory chi-square analysis, suggesting a possible influence of climate. Unlike some other multivariate techniques, MDS does not require linear and unimodal distributions of data (i.e. parasite taxa) along gradients—a condition not satisfied in our dataset. MDS is a data-reduction technique used to uncover a “hidden structure” to a set of data, which is not possible with standard parametric statistical techniques [83]. The MDS output returns a model that provides a spatial representation of the similarity among response variables (e.g. prevalence of individual parasites) and predictors (climatic variables). Using matrices built on Euclidean distances among variables, the proximities can be displayed in a two or higher dimensional space (i.e. a map of proximities). Within the map, the closer two or more variables are, the more likely they covary independently of other points on the map. Conversely, the farther apart they are, the less likely the predictors (e.g. climate variables) can explain the response variable (parasite prevalence). The underlying dimensions are thought to “explain” the perceived similarity among variables. Since this function is often conceived of as a weighted sum of the similarity across individual variables, where the weights reflect the importance (saliency) and direction (negative or positive weights) of the variable, the location of variables in the map depend on these weights. In other words, close similarities can be attributed to both positive and negative covariations among variables.

This approach has proven particularly useful in studies of ecological diversity and species prevalence [84,85]. In order to map all variables into a desired space (two dimensional or greater), a certain lack of fit—i.e. uncertainty around points in the map—has to be accepted. This lack of fit is referred to as “s-stress’”. The values of s-stress range from 0 (perfect fit) to 1 (worst possible fit). The aim of MDS is to find a map of the variables that minimizes the s-stress for a given number of dimensions. Stress values below 0.15 (15%) are typically deemed acceptable. At the same time, MDS attempts to maximize the variance explained by the model (R2), as is the case with any regression analysis. Typically, R2 values of 0.8 (80%) or higher are desirable. Finally, one must pick a solution based on interpretability of the dimensions. Parsimony is crucial to interpreting the associations among predictors and response variables. The number of dimensions can be likened to the number of latent underlying factors in the dataset. Thus, when choosing the number of dimensions to represent the data, one must consider (i) the number of variables in the model, (ii) the lack of fit (s-stress value) given the number of dimensions, (iii) an index of fit of the model (R2), and (iv) interpretability of the dimensions.

A second MDS model was used to reveal the reciprocal, independent associations among parasites most commonly detected in faecal samples (>5% of samples) in biweekly periods. We also ran chi-square tests to identify pairs of parasites that occurred together within chimpanzee hosts (i.e. within the same faecal samples) more or less often than expected by chance. When an expected cell frequency was <5, we used Fisher’s exact test instead. To control for multiple tests we applied a Holm–Bonferroni sequential adjustment to the P-values [86].

A third MDS model was used to reveal the independent associations among the frequency of whole leaves in faeces and prevalence of six parasites of known or likely pathogenicity, including Oesophagostomum sp. Rainfall was also entered into the model since leaf swallowing occurred most frequently during wet seasons at some sites [39,87]. Because samples were not identified to individual chimpanzees we were unable to test specific relationships between leaf swallowing and parasite infections within individuals. We used Fisher’s exact test to determine if whole leaves and egested adult Oesophagostomum worms occurred together in faecal samples more often than expected. The analysis was performed using SPSS Version 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All probabilities reported are two-tailed.

Ethics statement

This research involving wild chimpanzees was entirely non-invasive and adhered strictly to the legal requirements of Uganda, and to ethics guidelines detailed by the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour (UK) and the American Society of Primatologists Principles for the Ethical Treatment of Nonhuman Primates. Ethical approval was granted by the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, the President’s Office, the Uganda Wildlife Authority, and Oxford Brookes University Research Ethics Committee.


Parasite diversity and species identification

At least 16 distinct parasite taxa were identified by coproscopy (Table 1) including 9 protozoa (Balantidium coli, Blastocystis sp., Chilomastix mesnili, Entamoeba coli, Entamoeba sp., Giardia intestinalis, Iodamoeba buetschlii, Troglocorys cava, Troglodytella abrassarti; Fig 2a), 5 nematodes (hookworm, Oesophagostomum sp., Probstmayria gombensis, Strongyloides sp., Spirurida fam. gen. sp.), 1 cestode (Bertiella sp.) and 1 trematode (Dicrocoeliidae gen. sp.) (Fig 2b). Cysts assigned to Entamoeba sp. potentially comprised plural Entamoeba species with morphologically indistinguishable cysts [88] and also included cysts resembling Endolimax nana by having light reflective nuclei. Pinworms (Enterobius sp.) were not observed in the samples.

Table 1. Prevalence of microscopic and macroscopic gastrointestinal parasite taxa in faeces of chimpanzees in Bulindi, Uganda, during the two survey periods (1 = Sep–Nov 2012; 2 = Feb–Apr 2013).

Fig 2. Gastrointestinal parasites and symbionts found from coproscopic analysis of faeces of chimpanzees in Bulindi, Uganda.

(a) Protozoa: 1. Troglodytella abrassarti; 2. Balantidium coli (trophozoite); 3. Balantidium coli (cyst); 4. Troglocorys cava; 5. Entamoeba coli; 6. Entamoeba sp.; 7. Iodamoeba buetschlii; 8. Giardia intestinalis; 9. Chilomastix mesnili; 10. Blastocystis sp. (b) Helminths: 11. Dicrocoeliidae gen. sp.; 12. Bertiella sp.; 13. Spiruridae gen. sp.; 14. Hookworm; 15. Oesophagostomum sp.; 16. Strongyloides sp. (egg); 17. Strongyloides sp. (larva); 18. Probstmayria gombensis (adult).

One or more parasite taxa were detected in 99% of the samples examined microscopically. Mean species richness (number of different taxa per sample) was 3.3 (range 0–9).

DNA sequence analysis enabled more precise identification of nematodes. As reported previously (see Table 2), larval Oesophagostomum were assigned to O. stephanostomum and O. bifurcum, with the former being predominant. All adult worms observed macroscopically were O. stephanostomum (Table 1). Strongyloides larvae were assigned to S. fuelleborni, and hookworm larvae were assigned to ‘Necator sp.’–probably N. gorillae. A trichostrongyloid with filariform larva comparable in size to that of Necator sp. was additionally demonstrated in four cultures by agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products (Table 2). Sequencing was attempted for five larvae, and a sequence with 506 base pairs (bp) covering partial ITS1 (111 bp), whole 5.8S rDNA (153 bp), and whole ITS2 (242 bp) was obtained (accession numbers LC185219 to LC185221). While some undetermined nucleotides were scattered in the sequences, a consensus sequence (506 bp) could be formed. By both FASTA and BLAST similarity analyses, it aligned closest to Libyostrongylus douglassi (sequence identities 93–94%), followed by Libyostrongylus dentatus (identity 92%).

Table 2. Summary of DNA sequence analysis of larval nematodes from coprocultures (n = 38).

DNA sequence analysis was performed on three proglottids observed macroscopically in three different faecal samples (labelled ‘D421’, ‘D422’, and ‘D455’, respectively). The partial ITS1 sequences of two proglottids were composed of 652 bp (LC185227, LC185228), while 608 bp lacking 44 bp at 5’ side of the longer sequence was sequenced in the remaining one (LC185229). Only one substitution (T with A) was found at the 30th position of the longer sequences. The full length of ITS2 with 638 bp was successfully sequenced for one proglottid (D455) (LC185224). For the other two, sequences were apparently the same in length with that of D455 although 3 and 65 nucleotides remained undetermined for the D422 (LC185225) and D421 (LC185226) proglottids, respectively. Between the D455 and D422 proglottids, a nucleotide substitution (T with A) was observed at the 195th and 318th positions. By FASTA similarity analysis, the ITS1 sequence aligned closest to Bertiella studeri sequences from two humans in Japan (AB586127, AB586128) (identities 79% in 563 nucleotides), followed by Bertiella satyri from a Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii) (EU908290) (85% in 341 nucleotides). Conversely, by BLAST analysis, the ITS1 sequence aligned closest to B. satyri from the Sumatran orangutan, followed by the two sequences of B. studeri from Japanese humans. By FASTA analysis, the ITS2 sequence of the D455 proglottid aligned closest to Bertiella sp. from a Ugandan chimpanzee (JQ771097) (identity 99% in 619 nucleotides), followed by Anoplocephala cf. gorillae from Gorilla beringei in Rwanda (JQ771100) (97% in 629 nucleotides), Bertiella sp. from Gorilla gorilla of Central African Republic (JQ771099) and B. mucronata from Callicebus oenanthe of Peru (JQ771096) (90% in 619 nucleotides in both cases), B. studeri from a Spanish human (JQ771094) (79% in 482 nucleotides), Bertiella sp. from a Brazilian human (JQ771093) and B. satyri from an Indonesian orangutan (JQ771195) (76% in 375 nucleotides in both cases), B. studeri from the two Japanese humans (AB586129, AB586130) (73% in 309 nucleotides), and Bertiella sp. from a sanctuary chimpanzee in Kenya (72% in 365 nucleotides). A similarity search of the ITS2 sequence by BLAST analysis gave almost the same order of homology to that found by FASTA analysis.

Parasite prevalence

The highest prevalence was found for an entodiniomorphid ciliate Troglodytella abrassarti (80% of samples examined microscopically) (Table 1). Three pathogenic nematodes also occurred at a relatively high prevalence: eggs and/or larvae of Strongyloides sp. (58%), and eggs of Oesophagostomum sp. (48%) and hookworm (44%). Cysts assigned to ‘Entamoeba sp.’ were detected in 39% of all samples. All other parasites were detected at a low prevalence by coproscopy (<20% samples) including cysts of potentially pathogenic protozoa Balantidium coli and Giardia intestinalis, and Bertiella sp. eggs. Three taxa were detected in only one sample (0.2%): eggs of a Dicrocoelium-like fluke and a Spirurid-like nematode, and cysts of a flagellate Chilomastix mesnili. Several parasites were detected at a notably higher frequency in one of the two survey periods (Table 1).


The climate was more variable in survey period 2 compared to period 1 (Fig 3). Period 1 consisted of all wet months (September–November 2012) and was preceded by a wet month (August). In contrast, period 2 (February–April 2013) consisted of one dry (February), one ‘transient’ (March) and one wet (April) month, and was preceded by a dry month (January). Thus, period 2 was transitional between dry and wet seasons. Average daily temperatures and relative humidity were relatively constant throughout period 1. However, humidity dropped markedly in January (dry) through March (transient) when daily temperatures were hottest (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Variation in parasite prevalence in relation to rainfall, temperature and humidity.

Climate data are shown for the period August 2012–April 2013, spanning both survey periods and beginning one month prior to period 1. Top: Biweekly mean daily maximum and minimum temperature and % relative humidity (RH); Middle: Biweekly rainfall and % faecal samples positive for nematodes (hookworm, Oesophagostomum sp., Probstmayria gombensis and Strongyloides sp.). Bottom: Biweekly rainfall and % faecal samples positive for protozoan parasites (Balantidium coli, Blastocystis sp., Entamoeba coli, Entamoeba sp., Troglocorys cava, Troglodytella abrassarti). The patterning of rainfall bars indicate whether biweekly periods were in months classified as wet (solid), transient (hatched) or dry (vertical lines); see Methods. Only parasites detected in >5% of samples (n = 432) are shown; for the number of faecal samples analysed per biweekly period, see Supporting Information S1 Data File.

Mean daily maximum and minimum temperatures were not correlated across biweekly periods during August 2012–April 2013 (rs = -0.037, n = 18, p = 0.88). However, mean maximum temperature was negatively correlated with mean relative humidity (rs = -0.890, p <0.001), while rainfall correlated positively with mean relative humidity (rs = 0.641, p = 0.004). Mean minimum temperature correlated positively with rainfall (rs = 0.522, p = 0.026).

The prevalence of most parasites did not differ markedly between samples collected during wet months (September–November 2012 and April 2013) and dry or transient months (February–March 2013) (Table 3). However, Blastocystis sp. and particularly Oesophagostomum sp. were detected at a notably higher frequency in wet months.

Table 3. Parasite prevalence in wet months (>100 mm rainfall) and dry and transient months (≤100 mm rainfall) compared.

Fig 3 plots biweekly parasite prevalence in relation to climate. The variables selected for the MDS model of independent associations among parasites and climate included the 4 climate predictors and the 6 parasite taxa that differed in prevalence between survey periods, as indicated by chi-square tests (see Table 1): Blastocystis sp., Entamoeba coli, Troglocorys cava, Oesophagostomum sp., Probstmayria gombensis and Strongyloides sp. The selection of these parasites from the 16 taxa identified by coproscopy was essential to satisfy the parsimony requirement of MDS for a two-dimensional output. The matrix of stimulus coordinates is presented in Fig 4; the matrix of optimal scaled distances is shown in Supporting Information S1 Table. The MDS returned a stress of 0.081 and an R2 = 0.967, indicating an excellent resolution of the hidden structure of the data for the selected variables. The good fit of the model showed an optimal R2 (0.908) for nonlinear fit in the data.

Fig 4. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) model of independent associations among parasites and climate.

The first-order dimension represents a stronger association than the second-order dimension. The first dimension represents a combination of high rainfall and humidity (on the positive scores) and high temperature (negative scores) while the second represents a combination of high and low temperatures. The closer two or more variables are, the more likely they covary independently of other points on the map. Colours differentiate groups of variables that show some degree of association in relation to other variables in the map. Only parasite taxa that showed a significant difference in prevalence between survey periods were selected for the model (see Table 1).

The first dimension of the MDS discriminated primarily between high (right quadrants) and low (left quadrants) rainfall and humidity (Fig 4). The second dimension discriminated primarily between high (the top two quadrants) and low (lower two quadrants) temperatures. MDS revealed a clear association between biweekly periods of low temperature and increased prevalence of Oesophagostomum sp. and Entamoeba coli in samples. Troglocorys cava and Strongyloides sp. were also more prevalent in periods of low temperature (although not as low as for Oesophagostomum sp. and Entamoeba coli) as well as low rainfall and low relative humidity. Finally, Blastocystis sp. and Probstmayria gombensis were independently associated with high temperature, with increased prevalence during periods of higher precipitation and humidity for Blastocystis (as suggested by its position to the right on the first dimension) and lower rainfall and humidity for Probstmayria (positioned to the left on the first dimension) (Fig 4).

Associations among parasites

The second MDS model revealed three major clusters of parasites that showed temporal associations in prevalence (stress = 0.013 and R2 = 0.998) (Fig 5; the matrix of optimal scaled distances is shown in Supporting Information S2 Table). In the first cluster, on the right part of the diagram, Blastocystis sp. was associated with the nematode Probstmayria gombensis (with both taxa increasing in prevalence during the transitional period 2; Fig 3), and with three other protists: Balantidium coli, Troglocorys cava and Entamoeba coli. These taxa had similar overall prevalence (Table 1). In the second cluster, represented in the bottom part of the diagram, Entamoeba sp. and Oesophagostomum sp. showed an association. The final cluster, on the left side of the diagram, revealed a weak association among the commensal ciliate Troglodytella abrassarti and nematodes Strongyloides sp. and hookworm.

Fig 5. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) model of independent associations among parasites.

The first-order dimension represents a stronger association than the second-order dimension. The closer two or more variables are, the more likely they covary independently of other points on the map. Colours differentiate groups of variables that show some degree of association in relation to other variables in the map. Only parasites detected in >5% of faecal samples were included in the model.

Several pairs of parasites occurred together within chimpanzee hosts (i.e. in the same faecal samples) significantly more or less often than expected (Table 4). The commensal ciliates Troglodytella abrassarti and Troglocorys cava were positively associated in samples. Troglodytella—the most commonly detected taxa—was negatively associated with two parasites with strong pathogenic potential: Balantidium coli and Oesophagostomum sp. Conversely, Troglodytella co-occurred in samples with Strongyloides sp. eggs and larvae more often than expected. Strongyloides sp. was negatively associated with Balantidium coli cysts and trophozoites, but had a positive association with Blastocystis sp. Two nematodes, hookworm and Oesophagostomum sp., showed a positive association within chimpanzee hosts.

Table 4. Within-host associations among parasites in chimpanzee faecal samples in Bulindi a.

Leaf swallowing and Oesophagostomum infection

Of the 406 faeces inspected visually, 11.8% (n = 48) contained folded unchewed leaves. The mean number of individual leaves distinguishable in faeces was 8.5 ± 10.6 SD (range: 1–46). In 96% of the cases (n = 46), the leaves were of the herb Aneilema nyasense (Fig 6). One faeces contained whole leaves of Lantana camara, an exotic invasive shrub; another contained an unidentified hispid grass blade, while three faeces contained a mixed use of A. nyasense with L. camara leaves (once) and A. nyasense with Desmodium velutinum leaves (twice) (S1 Data File).

Fig 6. Chimpanzees in Bulindi commonly swallow whole bristly leaves of Aneilema nyasense C.B. Clarke (Commelinaceae).

(a) A. nyasense growing in riverine forest in Bulindi. (b) 30 undigested and unchewed leaves of A. nyasense recovered from one chimpanzee faecal specimen; the leaves are passed in faeces folded one or more times, but have been unfolded manually here for identification. No adult worms were observed together with the leaves in this faecal sample.

Whole leaves occurred in faeces in nine of the ten biweekly periods (the exception being late September), in months classified as wet, dry and transient (Fig 7). The proportion of biweekly faeces containing whole leaves varied widely, ranging from 0–43%, with the highest proportion occurring in February, the end of a two month dry period. Fig 7 also shows the mean number of infections per sample (from coproscopy) with known or potential pathogenicity (i.e. Balantidium coli, Giardia intestinalis, Bertiella sp., hookworm, Oesophagostomum sp. and Strongyloides sp.) in each biweekly period. The mean number varied between 1.3 and 2.0 and showed no discernible fluctuation associated with changes in frequency of leaf swallowing or rainfall (Fig 7).

Fig 7. Temporal variation in leaf swallowing in relation to parasite infections and rainfall during the two survey periods.

Top: bars show the biweekly mean (± SD) number of infections by different parasites with pathogenic potential, determined by coproscopy (see text). Bottom: Lines show the % biweekly faeces containing wholly swallowed leaves and the biweekly prevalence in samples of potentially pathogenic nematodes (Oesophagostomum sp., Strongyloides sp. and hookworm); bars show biweekly rainfall. The patterning of rainfall bars indicate whether biweekly periods were in months classified as wet (solid), transient (hatched) or dry (vertical lines); see Methods. The number of faecal samples inspected per biweekly period (microscopically; macroscopically): Period 1 –Sep.2 (33; 28), Oct.1 (46; 43), Oct.2 (30; 30), Nov.1 (32; 33), Nov.2 (31; 30); Period 2 –Feb.2 (14; 21), Mar.1 (91; 81), Mar.2 (65; 61), Apr.1 (55; 46), Apr.2 (35; 33).

The third MDS model revealed the independent associations among the frequency of whole leaves in faeces in biweekly periods and prevalence of potentially pathogenic parasites. (The matrix of optimal scaled distances is shown in Supporting Information S3 Table). Prevalence of each of the three nematodes–Oesophagostomum sp., Strongyloides sp., and hookworm—showed an association with temporal increases in leaf swallowing (stress = 0.058; R2 = 0.981; Fig 8), which was independent of rainfall as well as prevalence of other potentially pathogenic infections. Among nematodes, Oesophagostomum and Strongyloides had higher overall associations with whole leaves relative to hookworm.

Fig 8. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) model of independent associations among whole leaf swallowing, rainfall, and six parasites with known or likely pathogenicity.

The first-order dimension represents a stronger association than the second-order dimension. The closer two or more variables are, the more likely they covary independently of other points on the map. Colours differentiate groups of variables that show some degree of association in relation to other variables in the map.

Concerning macroscopic parasites, adult Oesophagostomum stephanostomum were found in 10 faeces (2.5% faeces examined macroscopically; Table 1). In four of these, ≥1 adult worms were found together with whole leaves. For example, one faeces collected in April 2013 (the wettest month in the survey, and when 6 of the 10 faeces with adult worms were collected) contained seven adult worms and 23 whole leaves of Aneilema nyasense (S1 Data File). Whole leaves and adult O. stephanostomum occurred together in faeces more often than expected (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.021). Of three faeces containing a Bertiella sp. proglottid (0.7% faeces), one also had a whole A. nyasense leaf.


This study used coproscopy and molecular analyses to examine intestinal helminths and protozoa of wild chimpanzees inhabiting degraded forest amid farmland and villages in Bulindi. The number of distinct taxa detected microscopically (n = 16) was relatively high compared to most previous surveys of chimpanzee parasites, e.g. Assirik, n = 6 [42]; Lopé, n = 11 [33]; Mahale, n = 9 [39]; Kanyawara, Kibale, n = 15 [35]; Gombe, n = 10 [89]; Kanyawara, Kibale, n = 12 [36]; Ngogo, Kibale, n = 12 [37]; Gombe, n = 8 [90]; Rubondo, n = 12 [38]; Fongoli, n = 12 [43]; Mahale, n = 9 [41]; Cantanhez, n = 13 [30]; Budongo, n = 13 [46]; Ugalla, n = 8 [44]; Assirik, n = 11 [45], though it was lower than reported in a recent survey at Gombe (n = 17 [40]). However, variation in parasite diversity among sites and studies may be influenced as much by differences in sample size, survey duration and microscopic method(s) used, as actual differences in parasite faunas.

Parasites most frequently detected in chimpanzee faeces at Bulindi are also commonly found in populations elsewhere [56]. For example, Troglodytella abrassarti (80% faecal samples) is a non-pathogenic symbiont of wild apes thought to aid hindgut fermentation [47,48]. A second, less-frequently detected ciliate in our survey, Troglocorys cava, may provide similar digestive benefits [91]. Nematodes of the genera Strongyloides, Oesophagostomum, and Necator commonly parasitize wild apes (except in dry savanna habitats where conditions are less conducive to survival and transmission of parasites with free-living stages [44]). At Bulindi, their prevalence was relatively high (44–58% samples), although comparable, or higher, prevalence has been reported in some other East African chimpanzee populations, e.g. Gombe [40], Mahale [39,41,56], and Budongo [46,56]. The Bulindi chimpanzees were apparently devoid of certain nematodes reportedly found in some other populations of wild chimpanzees, i.e. whipworms, pinworms and ascarids [29,34,38,40,43,46,56].

Nevertheless, as noted above, cross-site comparisons are hindered by differences in diagnostic techniques used [35,56]. In general, prevalence and within-host richness (multiple infections) increases when >1 microscopic technique is used [36,40,92], and when individual infection rates are calculated from repeated sampling of known individuals, because samples from infected individuals do not always test positive [39]. Here, it was only possible to examine the full set of (anonymous) samples by simple sedimentation. However, 50 samples were examined initially by formalin–ether sedimentation as well. The mean number of parasite taxa detected in these 50 samples was 4.2 compared to 3.4 by simple sedimentation alone, which captured on average 79% of taxa detected with both methods. Further, samples that were positive for Oesophagostomum, Strongyloides or Necator by culture were sometimes negative for the same taxa by microscopy. Similarly, faeces containing adult Oesophagostomum stephanostomum did not always yield eggs, while none of three faeces with proglottids were positive for Bertiella eggs. Consequently, species richness in samples and prevalence was underestimated. The superior sensitivity of PCR-based methods for detecting parasites of primates has been demonstrated in several studies, e.g. Blastocystis sp. [93], Entamoeba spp. [88] and Oesophagostomum spp. [16,94].

DNA sequence analysis enabled more precise identification of helminths than was possible by microscopy. Molecular features of strongyle and rhabditoid nematodes in Bulindi chimpanzees are reported elsewhere (Table 2). An additional trichostrongyloid raised from culture aligned closest to the genus Libyostrongylus by similarity analysis. However, morphological studies of adults are also required to identify this nematode conclusively; thus we assign it to ‘Trichostrongyloidea fam. gen. sp.’ for the time being. This nematode was not identified by microscopy. However, trichostrongyle eggs are similar to those of Oesophagostomum sp. Thus, a small proportion of trichostrongyle eggs may have been misassigned to Oesophagsotomum sp. in our sample. If so, it is unclear if these are conspecific with the trichostrongyloid identified by culture. Notably, a related trichostrongyloid, Paralibyostrongylus kalinae, was described morphologically from Gorilla beringei in Uganda [95].

ITS1 sequences of the proglottids aligned most closely with those of Bertiella studeri and B. satyri (by FASTA and BLAST analysis, respectively), while ITS2 sequences were closest to ‘Bertiella sp.’ Thus, species-level identification could not be made with confidence. Doležalova et al. [96] reported a high variability of Bertiella isolates from human and non-human primates with little obvious geographical or host-related patterns, calling for revision of this cestode group using molecular and morphological data. A previous morphological examination of a larger sample of proglottids from Bulindi suggested a second cestode, tentatively identified as Raillietina sp., also infected the chimpanzees [54]. We found no evidence of this second putative species in the present study.

Where climatic conditions are conducive, infections of soil-transmitted helminths including Oesophagostomum, Strongyloides and Necator increase after the onset of wet months ([32,36,39,40, 56]; cf. [38,57]). At Bulindi, Oesophagostomum was detected in faecal samples at a higher frequency in wet compared to dry or transient months (Table 3). However, multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis revealed that an increase in Oesophagostomum infection was most clearly associated with periods of low temperature rather than rainfall. Nevertheless, the frequency of positive samples rose steadily after the January–February dry season (Fig 3). Thus, there was a general pattern for Oesophagostomum prevalence to increase with increasing rainfall, which accords with the expected increase in reinfection preceding the onset of rains reported at Mahale [39]. Furthermore, the seasonal distribution of rainfall is dissimilar enough between Bulindi and Mahale to expect variation in the overall patterns observed. Univariate analysis suggested no difference in prevalence of Strongyloides sp. between wet and dry–transient months (Table 3). However, an association between periods of increased Stronglyoides infection and lower temperature and rainfall was revealed by MDS (Fig 4).

Protists multiply within hosts and once established can persist for long periods, regardless of climatic conditions. Even so, several protists (Blastocystis sp., Entamoeba coli and Troglocorys cava) and Probstmayria gombensis, a non-pathogenic nematode, were detected most frequently in samples in the transition from the dry season (February) to the onset of heavy rains in April (Fig 3). MDS revealed these infections were associated with climate in different ways. For example, Blastocystis and Probstmayria gombensis were both more commonly detected in periods of high temperature. But whereas Blastocystis was also associated with higher rainfall and humidity, the opposite was true of Probstmayria. Some association patterns revealed by MDS defy obvious explanation (e.g. the temporal separation of Troglodytella abrassarti and Entamoeba sp. from other protists in Fig 5). Interpreting seasonal infection patterns including temporal associations among parasites is problematic without a firm understanding of the ecology of the individual organisms and close monitoring and evaluation of microclimatic and annual fluctuation in climatic conditions. Variation among parasite taxa and between sites will reflect climatic and ecological influences on the lifecycle of parasites, as well as potential changes in diet and ranging of chimpanzee hosts. Longer-term monitoring—including more sampling in the dry season than was possible here—is inevitably needed to better evaluate causes of temporal variation in infections within and among taxa at Bulindi.

Several pairs of parasites occurred together within chimpanzee hosts more or less often than expected by chance. Experimental and field studies in other species confirm that parasite associations (positive or negative) arise from complex interactions mediated by host immune responses and competition among co-infecting parasites (for a review, see [59]). For example, in this study the commensal ciliate Troglodytella abrassarti was strongly negatively associated with both Balantidium coli and Oesophagostomum sp. (though these pathogenic taxa were not themselves associated). Possibly, infection with Balantidium or Oesophagostomum makes the large intestine less suitable for Troglodytella (i.e. interference competition). Conversely, the positive association of Troglodytella with Strongyloides sp. within chimpanzee hosts is difficult to explain because both inhabit different parts of the intestine. For other pairs, similar climatic influences on parasite life cycles (e.g. soil-transmitted nematodes) are probably also drivers of these interactions. Interestingly, while hookworm and Oesophagostomum were positively associated within chimpanzee hosts, these nematode infections did not cluster together temporally (Fig 5). As noted above, however, some infections were likely underestimated by microscopic examination. Thus, these results should be regarded as indicating general patterns only.

Almost 12% of faeces contained unchewed whole leaves resulting from leaf swallowing. This is consistent with our earlier study [54], which reported a higher occurrence of whole unchewed leaves in chimpanzee faeces in Bulindi (10.4% faeces), compared to other sites (≤4% faeces). In both of our studies, separated by four years, Bulindi chimpanzees mainly swallowed leaves of Aneilema nyasense. Fruth et al. [97] observed that since bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees usually swallow leaves early in the morning and pass them in faeces later in the day, analysis of faeces deposited throughout the day should reveal a higher occurrence of unchewed leaves compared to faeces deposited early in the morning. At Bulindi, however, this does not explain the higher proportion of faeces with whole leaves found in this study, since faeces were collected in the first half of the day only.

Leaf swallowing at Bulindi occurred in every biweekly period of this study except one (late September), suggesting no strong seasonality, which may be related to the fact that Oesophagostomum infections were also noted in every biweekly period (Fig 7), albeit with some variation as discussed above. In fact, temporal variation in the frequency of leaf swallowing was independently associated with all three pathogenic nematodes–Strongyloides sp. and hookworm (presumably Necator sp.), as well as Oesophagostomum sp.–with Strongyloides and Oesophagostomum showing strongest associations (Fig 8). However, since we did not measure infection intensity (eggs per gram faeces) we could not differentiate between severe or mild infections, and faecal samples were not individually identified. Thus, we were unable to draw conclusions about specific relationships between leaf swallowing behaviour and levels of Oesophagostomum infection or other pathogenic nematodes in individuals. Understanding this relationship better will require tracking infection levels and leaf swallowing behaviour in individual chimpanzees over time.

Nevertheless, as in the earlier study [54], whole leaves occurred together with adult Oesophagostomum stephanostomum in faeces more often than expected by chance, indicating a link between leaf swallowing and expulsion of adult nodular worms at Bulindi (as also demonstrated at Mahale: [39,52,53]). Wrangham [55] and Huffman et al. [56] also found associations between leaf swallowing and Bertiella sp. infection in Ugandan chimpanzees at Kibale and Budongo, respectively, because the leaves presumably stimulate gravid segment apolysis, which is a natural part of the cestode’s life cycle. In this study, a low prevalence of Bertiella infection was suggested both by microscopy and the rare incidence of proglottids in faeces. Proglottids appeared more frequently in the earlier study (2.5% faeces compared to 0.7% in this study), but were not associated with whole leaves [54]. However, the lack of an association at Bulindi could be due to a low level of detection. Cyclophyllid cestodes do not oviposit eggs inside the host’s intestine. Rather, the eggs found in faeces are shed by gravid segments [98]. Thus, actual prevalence may be much higher than suggested by faecal examination. At Mahale too, Bertiella proglottids or eggs were extremely rare (0.7% of 1769 faeces examined macroscopically or microscopically), and only once were leaves and proglottids found together, along with an adult Oesophagostomum stephanostomum worm [56]. Currently, however, our data does not support the hypothesis that leaf swallowing at Bulindi is related to the control of tapeworm infection [54], or that of Strongyloides and hookworm nematodes.

The high frequency of leaf swallowing at Bulindi remains difficult to explain by climatic factors and frequency of infections at the community level, without data on intensity of individuals’ infections. Possibly, it is a generalised response to gastrointestinal discomfort caused by multiple infections and relatively constant levels of infection (Fig 7), while still functioning to reduce Oesophagostomum worm burdens through the expulsion of adult worms. Additional unknown factors may be involved, warranting further investigation. An understanding of the reasons behind the unusually high frequency of leaf swallowing at this site, may lead to a broader understanding of the behaviour in great apes and indeed other species that also exhibit this behaviour [99101].

Pathogenicity and zoonotic potential

Many parasites demonstrated in this survey are non-pathogenic (e.g. the commensal ciliates and other protists like Chilomastix mesnili, Entamoeba coli and Iodamoeba buetschlii). Others have strong potential pathogenicity, especially the rhabditoid and strongyle nematodes, and Balantidium coli and Giardia intestinalis. However, their potential to cause disease in wild chimpanzees is in most cases inferred on the basis that they (or closely related taxa) cause disease in humans, captive apes or other primates [26,102]. With the exception of Oesophagostomum infection, for which severe clinical symptoms (e.g. weight loss, lethargy, enteritis, diarrhea) have been documented at Mahale [39] and Gombe [49] the rarity of overt clinical signs of disease linked to specific intestinal parasites in wild apes suggests many species infections are tolerated. At the time of this study, chimpanzees in Bulindi were insufficiently habituated to observe such clinical signs. More recently, however, intestinal lesions consistent with multinodular oesophagostomiasis (cf. [49,103]) were noted in a well-nourished adult female at Bulindi that died after colliding with a vehicle [104]. While enteritis was also noted at necropsy, no overt behavioural indicators of sickness were observed in this female in the month prior to death. This might suggest that in most cases, Oesophagostomum spp. infections are tolerated and/or mediated by self-medicative behaviours like leaf swallowing. Nevertheless, certain gastrointestinal infections detected in this survey including Oesophagostomum spp. might cause chronic low-intensity infections that reduce host fitness, in the absence of overt clinical symptoms.

All parasites identified to genus or species in our sample have been reported in wild chimpanzees living in less disturbed environments and with less contact with local people and livestock [56]. Aside from Giardia intestinalis, which could have resulted from contact with human or livestock faeces, but which was detected at a low prevalence, we did not identify any infections attributable to the degraded, human-dominated habitat at Bulindi per se. Even so, several disease-causing parasites infecting the chimpanzees are potentially transmissible among great apes and humans, especially soil-transmitted nematodes and species of pathogenic protozoa that spread via faecal–oral transmission. Molecular analysis of parasites from both apes and humans sharing environments—and domestic animals where applicable—are required to evaluate host specificity and establish if zoonotic exchange occurs (e.g. [16,17,32,77,78,105,106]). The remarkable close contact between wild chimpanzees and villagers in Bulindi and throughout the wider region [6166] underscores the importance of further studies of pathogens harboured by coexisting apes, local humans and livestock—including bacterial and viral pathogens—to more fully evaluate threats to chimpanzee and public health, and to aid development of strategies to reduce risks.

Supporting information

S1 Data File. Spreadsheet containing raw data on which all statistical analyses in this paper are based on.


S1 Table. Matrix of stimulus coordinates for the MDS model of independent associations among parasites and climate.


S2 Table. The matrix of stimulus coordinates for the MDS model of independent associations among common parasites.


S3 Table. The matrix of stimulus coordinates for the MDS model of independent associations among leaf swallowing and pathogenic parasites.



We are grateful to the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, the President’s Office, and the Uganda Wildlife Authority for permission to study the chimpanzees of Bulindi. Fieldwork was carried out with assistance from Tom Sabiiti. Meteorological records were generously provided by the Bulindi Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute. Professor Naoya Arizono (Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine) kindly provided information on the primers for Bertiella. For helpful comments on the manuscript we thank Marie Cibot and the anonymous reviewers.


  1. 1. Estrada A, Raboy BE, Oliveira LC. Agroecosystems and primate conservation in the tropics: a review. Am J Primatol. 2012; 74: 696–711. pmid:22605526
  2. 2. McKinney T. A classification system for describing anthropogenic influence on nonhuman primate populations. Am J Primatol. 2015 77: 715–726. pmid:25809676
  3. 3. McLennan MR, Spagnoletti N, Hockings KJ. The implications of primate behavioral flexibility for sustainable human–primate coexistence in anthropogenic habitats. Int J Primatol. 2017; 38: 105–121.
  4. 4. Chapman CA, Gillespie TR, Goldberg TL. Primates and the ecology of their infectious diseases: how will anthropogenic change affect host–parasite interactions? Evol Anthropol. 2005; 14: 134–144.
  5. 5. Huffman MA, Chapman CA, editors. Primate parasite ecology: the dynamics and study of host–parasite relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
  6. 6. Gillespie TR, Chapman CA, Greiner EC. Effects of logging on gastrointestinal parasite infections and infection risk in African primates. J Appl Ecol. 2005; 42: 699–707.
  7. 7. Gillespie TR, Chapman CA. Prediction of parasite infection dynamics in primate metapopulations based on attributes of forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol. 2006; 20: 441–448. pmid:16903105
  8. 8. Mbora DNM, McPeek MA. Host density and human activities mediate increased parasite prevalence and richness in primates threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation. J Anim Ecol. 2009; 78: 210–218. pmid:19120603
  9. 9. Hussain S, Ram MS, Kumar A, Shivaji S, Umapathy G. Human presence increases parasitic load in endangered lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) in its fragmented rainforest habitats in southern India. PLoS One 2013; 8: e63685. pmid:23717465
  10. 10. Wenz-Muecke A., Sithithaworn P., Petney T. N., & Taraschewski H. Human contact influences the foraging behaviour and parasite community in long-tailed macaques. Parasitology 2013; 140: 709–718. pmid:23363557
  11. 11. Gaetano TJ, Danzy J, Mtshali MS, Theron N, Schmitt CA, Grobler JP, et al. Mapping correlates of parasitism in wild South African vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops). S Afr J Wildl Res. 2014; 44: 56–70.
  12. 12. Young H, Griffin RH, Wood CL, Nunn CL. Does habitat disturbance increase infectious disease risk for primates? Ecol Lett. 2013; 16: 656–663. pmid:23448139
  13. 13. Muriuki SMK, Murugu RK, Munene E, Karere GM, Chai DC. Some gastro-intestinal parasites of zoonotic (public health) importance commonly observed in old world non-human primates in Kenya. Acta Trop. 1998; 71: 73–82. pmid:9776144
  14. 14. Johnston AR, Gillespie TR, Rwego IB, McLachlan TLT, Kent AD, Goldberg TL. Molecular epidemiology of cross-species Giardia duodenalis transmission in western Uganda. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010; 4: e683. pmid:20485494
  15. 15. Kowalewski MM, Salzer JS, Deutsch JC, Raño M, Kuhlenschmidt MS, Gillespie TR. Black and gold howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya) as sentinels of ecosystem health: patterns of zoonotic protozoa infection relative to degree of human–primate contact. Am J Primatol. 2011; 73: 75–83. pmid:20084672
  16. 16. Ghai RR, Chapman CA, Omeja PA, Davies TJ, Goldberg TL. Nodule worm infection in humans and wild primates in Uganda: cryptic species in a newly identified region of human transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014; 8: e2641. pmid:24421915
  17. 17. Parsons MB, Travis D, Lonsdorf EV, Lipende I, Roellig DMA, Kamenya S, et al. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in humans, wild primates, and domesticated animals in the greater Gombe ecosystem, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9: e0003529. pmid:25700265
  18. 18. Sricharern W, Inpankaew T, Keawmongkol S, Supanam J, Stich RW, Jittapalapong S. Molecular detection and prevalence of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. among long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in Thailand. Infect Genet Evol. 2016; 40: 310–314. pmid:26892616
  19. 19. Arcus Foundation. State of the apes: industrial agriculture and ape conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
  20. 20. Hockings KJ, McLennan MR. From forest to farm: systematic review of cultivar feeding by chimpanzees—management implications for wildlife in anthropogenic landscapes. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33391. pmid:22509256
  21. 21. Ancrenaz M, Oram F, Ambu L, Lackman I, Ahmad E, Elahan H, et al. Of Pongo, palms and perceptions: a multidisciplinary assessment of Bornean orang-utans Pongo pygmaeus in an oil palm context. Oryx 2015; 49: 465–472.
  22. 22. Hockings KJ, McLennan MR, Carvalho S, Ancrenaz M, Bobe R, Byrne RW, et al. Apes in the Anthropocene: flexibility and survival. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015; 30: 215–222. pmid:25766059
  23. 23. Garriga RM, Marco I, Casas-Díaz E, Amarasekaran B, Humle T. Perceptions of challenges to subsistence agriculture, and crop foraging by wildlife and chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus in unprotected areas in Sierra Leone. Oryx 2017;
  24. 24. Krief S, Vermeulen B, Lafosse S, Kasenene JM, Nieguitsila A, Berthelemy M, et al. Nodular worm infection in wild chimpanzees in western Uganda: a risk for human health? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010; 4: e630. pmid:20300510
  25. 25. Calvignac‐Spencer S, Leendertz SAJ, Gillespie TR, Leendertz FH. Wild great apes as sentinels and sources of infectious disease. Clinical Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18: 521–527.
  26. 26. Keita MB, Hamad I, Bittar F. Looking in apes as a source of human pathogens. Microb Pathog. 2014; 77: 149–154. pmid:25220240
  27. 27. Gilardi KV, Gillespie TR, Leendertz FH, Macfie EJ, Travis DA, Whittier CA, et al. Best practice guidelines for health monitoring and disease control in great ape populations. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group; 2015.
  28. 28. Ashford RW, Reid GD, Butynski TM. The intestinal faunas of man and mountain gorillas in a shared habitat. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1990; 84: 337–340. pmid:2260897
  29. 29. Lilly AA, Mehlman PT, Doran D. Intestinal parasites in gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans at Mondika research site, Dzanga-Ndoki National Park, Central African Republic. Int J Primatol. 2002; 23: 555–573.
  30. 30. Sá RM, Petrášová J, Pomajbíková K, Profousová I, Petrželková KJ, Sousa C, et al. Gastrointestinal symbionts of chimpanzees in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea‐Bissau with respect to habitat fragmentation. Am J Primatol. 2013; 75: 1032–1041. pmid:23776090
  31. 31. Narat V, Guillot J, Pennec F, Lafosse S, Grüner AC, Simmen B, et al. (2015). Intestinal helminths of wild bonobos in forest-savanna mosaic: risk assessment of cross-species transmission with local people in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. EcoHealth 2015; 12: 621–633. pmid:26369331
  32. 32. Cibot M, Guillot J, Lafosse S, Bon C, Seguya A, Krief S. Nodular worm infections in wild non-human primates and humans living in the Sebitoli area (Kibale National Park, Uganda): do high spatial proximity favor zoonotic transmission? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9: e0004133. pmid:26451592
  33. 33. Landsoud-Soukate J, Tutin CEG Fernandez M. Intestinal parasites of sympatric gorillas and chimpanzees in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1995; 89: 73–79. pmid:7741597
  34. 34. Drakulovski P, Bertout S, Locatelli S, Butel C, Pion S, Mpoudi-Ngole E, et al. Assessment of gastrointestinal parasites in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) in southeast Cameroon. Parasitol Res. 2014; 113: 2451–2550.
  35. 35. Ashford RW, Reid GD, Wrangham RW. Intestinal parasites of the chimpanzee Pan troglodytes in Kibale Forest, Uganda. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2000; 94: 173–179. pmid:10827872
  36. 36. Krief S, Huffman MA, Sévenet T, Guillot J, Bories C, Hladik CM, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of the health of Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii in the Kibale National Park, Uganda. Int J Primatol. 2005; 26: 467–490.
  37. 37. Muehlenbein MP. Parasitological analyses of the male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Am J Primatol. 2005; 65: 167–179. pmid:15706587
  38. 38. Petrželková KJ, Hasegawa H, Appleton CC, Huffman MA, Archer CE, Moscovice LR, et al. Gastrointestinal parasites of the chimpanzee population introduced onto Rubondo Island National Park, Tanzania. Am J Primatol. 2010; 72: 307–316. pmid:20014274
  39. 39. Huffman MA, Gotoh S, Turner LA, Hamai M, Yoshida K. Seasonal trends in intestinal nematode infection and medicinal plant use among chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. Primates 1997; 38: 111–125.
  40. 40. Gillespie TR, Lonsdorf EV, Canfield EP, Meyer DJ, Nadler Y, Raphael J, et al. 2010. Demographic and ecological effects on patterns of parasitism in eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010; 143: 534–544. pmid:20623606
  41. 41. Kooriyama T, Hasegawa H, Shimozuru M, Tsubota T, Nishida T, Iwaki T. Parasitology of five primates in Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates 2012; 53: 365–375. pmid:22661394
  42. 42. McGrew WC, Tutin CEG, Collins DA, File SK. Intestinal parasites of sympatric Pan troglodytes and Papio spp. at two sites: Gombe (Tanzania) and Mt. Assirik (Senegal). Am J Primatol. 1989; 17: 147–155.
  43. 43. Howells ME, Pruetz J, Gillespie TR. Patterns of gastro‐intestinal parasites and commensals as an index of population and ecosystem health: the case of sympatric western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) and Guinea baboons (Papio hamadryas papio) at Fongoli, Senegal. Am J Primatol. 2011; 73: 173–179. pmid:20853397
  44. 44. Kalousová B, Piel AK, Pomajbíková K, Modrý D, Stewart FA, Petrželková KJ. Gastrointestinal parasites of savanna chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in Ugalla, Tanzania. Int J Primatol. 2014; 35: 463–475.
  45. 45. Ebbert MA, McGrew WC, Marchant LF. Differences between chimpanzee and baboon gastrointestinal parasite communities. Parasitology 2015; 142: 958–967. pmid:25731985
  46. 46. Zommers Z, Macdonald DW, Johnson PJ, Gillespie TR. Impact of human activities on chimpanzee ground use and parasitism (Pan troglodytes). Conserv Lett. 2013; 6: 264–273.
  47. 47. Pomajbíková K, Petrželková KJ, Profousová I, Petrášová J, Kišidayová S, Varádyová Z, et al. A survey of entodiniomorphid ciliates in chimpanzees and bonobos. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010; 142: 42–48. pmid:19845028
  48. 48. Profousová I, Mihaliková K, Laho T, Váradyová Z, Petrželková KJ, Modrý D, et al. The ciliate, Troglodytella abrassarti, contributes to polysaccharide hydrolytic activities in the chimpanzee colon. Folia Microbiol. 2011; 56: 339–343.
  49. 49. Terio KA, Lonsdorf EV, Kinsel MJ, Raphael J, Lipende I, Collins A, et al. Oesophagostomiasis in non‐human primates of Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Am J Primatol. 2016; pmid:27309976
  50. 50. Huffman MA, Seifu M. Observations on the illness and consumption of a possibly medicinal plant Vernonia amygdalina (Del.) by a wild chimpanzee in the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates 1989; 30: 51–63.
  51. 51. Huffman MA, Gotoh S, Izutsu D, Koshimizu K, Kalunde MS. Further observations on the use of the medicinal plant, Vernonia amygdalina (Del). by a wild chimpanzee, its possible effect on parasite load, and its phytochemistry. Afr Study Monogr. 1993; 14: 227–240.
  52. 52. Huffman MA, Page JE, Sukhdeo MVK, Gotoh S, Kalunde MS, Chandrasiri T, et al. Leaf swallowing by chimpanzees: a behavioral adaptation for the control of strongyle nematode infections. Int J Primatol. 1996; 17: 475–503.
  53. 53. Huffman MA, Caton JM. Self-induced increase of gut motility and the control of parasitic infections in wild chimpanzees. Int J Primatol. 2001; 22: 329–346.
  54. 54. McLennan MR, Huffman MA. High frequency of leaf swallowing and its relationship to intestinal parasite expulsion in “village” chimpanzees at Bulindi, Uganda. Am J Primatol. 2012; 74: 642–650. pmid:22644578
  55. 55. Wrangham RW. Relationship of chimpanzee leaf‐swallowing to a tapeworm infection. Am J Primatol. 1995; 37: 297–303.
  56. 56. Huffman MA, Pebsworth P, Bakuneeta C, Gotoh S, Bardi M. Chimpanzee–parasite ecology at Budongo Forest (Uganda) and the Mahale Mountains (Tanzania): influence of climatic differences on self-medicative behavior. In: Huffman MA, Chapman CA, editors. Primate parasite ecology: the dynamics and study of host–parasite relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. pp. 331–350.
  57. 57. Masi S, Chauffour S, Bain O, Todd A, Guillot J, Krief S. Seasonal effects on great ape health: a case study of wild chimpanzees and western gorillas. PLoS One 2012; 7: e49805. pmid:23227152
  58. 58. Lello J, Boag B, Fenton A, Stevenson IR, Hudson PJ. Competition and mutualism among the gut helminths of a mammalian host. Nature 2004; 428: 840–844. pmid:15103373
  59. 59. Pedersen AB, Fenton A. Emphasizing the ecology in parasite community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007; 22: 133–139. pmid:17137676
  60. 60. Telfer S, Lambin X, Birtles R, Beldomenico P, Burthe S, Paterson S, et al. Species interactions in a parasite community drive infection risk in a wildlife population. Science 2010; 330: 243–246. pmid:20929776
  61. 61. McLennan MR. Beleaguered chimpanzees in the agricultural district of Hoima, western Uganda. Primate Conserv. 2008; 23: 45–54.
  62. 62. McLennan MR, Hill CM. Troublesome neighbours: changing attitudes towards chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in a human-dominated landscape in Uganda. J Nat Conserv. 2012; 20: 219–227.
  63. 63. McLennan MR, Hill CM. Changing agricultural practices and human–chimpanzee interactions: tobacco and sugarcane farming in and around Bulindi, Uganda. In: Arcus Foundation, editors. State of the apes: industrial agriculture and ape conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. pp. 29–31.
  64. 64. McLennan MR, Hyeroba D, Asiimwe C, Reynolds V, Wallis J. Chimpanzees in mantraps: lethal crop protection and conservation in Uganda. Oryx 2012; 46: 598–603.
  65. 65. McCarthy MS, Lester JD, Howe EJ, Arandjelovic M, Stanford CB, Vigilant L. Genetic censusing identifies an unexpectedly sizeable population of an endangered large mammal in a fragmented forest landscape. BMC Ecol. 2015; 15: 21. pmid:26303656
  66. 66. McCarthy MS, Lester JD, Stanford CB. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) flexibly use introduced species for nesting and bark feeding in a human-dominated habitat. Int J Primatol. 2017; 38: 321–337. pmid:28546652
  67. 67. Uganda Bureau of Statistics. National population and housing census 2014: provisional results. Kampala, Uganda: Uganda Bureau of Statistics; 2014.
  68. 68. McLennan MR, Plumptre AJ. Protected apes, unprotected forest: composition, structure and diversity of riverine forest fragments and their conservation value in Uganda. Trop Conserv Sci. 2012; 5: 79–103.
  69. 69. Newton-Fisher NE. The diet of chimpanzees in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda. Afr J Ecol. 1999; 37: 344–354.
  70. 70. McLennan MR. Diet and feeding ecology of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Bulindi, Uganda: foraging strategies at the forest–farm interface. Int J Primatol. 2013; 34: 585–614.
  71. 71. McLennan MR, Hockings KJ. Wild chimpanzees show group differences in selection of agricultural crops. Sci Rep. 2014; 4: 5956. pmid:25090940
  72. 72. Hasegawa H. Methods of collection and identification of minute nematodes from the feces of primates, with special application to coevolutionary study of pinworms. In: Huffman MA, Chapman CA, editors. Primate parasite ecology: the dynamics and study of host–parasite relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. pp. 29–46.
  73. 73. Ota N, Hasegawa H, McLennan MR, Kooriyama T, Sato H, Pebsworth PA, et al. Molecular identification of Oesophagostomum spp. from ‘village’ chimpanzees in Uganda and their phylogenetic relationship with those of other primates. R Soc Open Sci. 2015; 2: 150471. pmid:26716002
  74. 74. Beaver PC, Jung RC, Cupp EW. Clinical parasitology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1984.
  75. 75. Hasegawa H, Chapman CA, Huffman MA. Useful diagnostic references and images of protozoans, helminths, and larval nematodes commonly found in wild primates. In: Huffman MA, Chapman CA, editors. Primate parasite ecology: the dynamics and study of host–parasite relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. pp. 507–513.
  76. 76. Modrý D, Petrželková KJ, Kalousová B. Hasegawa H, editors. Parasites of African great apes: atlas of coproscopic diagnostics. Brno: University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences; 2015.
  77. 77. Hasegawa H, Modrý D, Kitagawa M, Shutt KA, Todd A, Kalousová B, et al. Humans and great apes cohabiting the forest ecosystem in Central African Republic harbour the same hookworms. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014; 8: e2715. pmid:24651493
  78. 78. Hasegawa H, Kalousova B, McLennan MR, Modry D, Profousova-Psenkova I, Shutt-Phillips KA, et al. Strongyloides infections of humans and great apes in Dzanga-Sangha Protected Areas, Central African Republic and in degraded forest fragments in Bulindi, Uganda. Parasitol Int. 2016; 65: 367–370. pmid:27180094
  79. 79. Hasegawa H, Shigyo M, Yanai Y, McLennan MR, Fujita S, Makouloutou P, et al. Molecular features of hookworm larvae (Necator spp.) raised by coproculture from Ugandan chimpanzees and Gabonese gorillas and humans. Parasitol Int. 2017; 66:12–15. pmid:27840196
  80. 80. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 2444–2448. pmid:3162770
  81. 81. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res. 1997; 25: 3389–3402. pmid:9254694
  82. 82. Box GE, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC, Ljung GM. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
  83. 83. Kruskal JB, Wish M. Multidimensional scaling. London: Sage; 1978.
  84. 84. Cruz García LM, Arreola-Lizarraga JA, Mendoza-Salgado RA, Galina-Tessaro P, Beltrán-Morales LF, Ortega-Rubio A. Applying ecological diversity indices with ecosystem approach at ecoregional level and prioritizing the decree of new protected natural areas. Interciencia 2015; 40: 179–184.
  85. 85. Kuglerová L, Dynesius M, Laudon H, Jansson R. Relationships between plant assemblages and water flow across a boreal forest landscape: a comparison of liverworts, mosses, and vascular plants. Ecosystems 2016; 19: 170–184.
  86. 86. Abdi H. Holm’s sequential Bonferroni procedure. In: Salkind N, editors. Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2010. pp. 573–577.
  87. 87. Fowler A, Koutsioni Y, Sommer V. Leaf-swallowing in Nigerian chimpanzees: evidence for assumed self-medication. Primates 2013; 48: 73–76.
  88. 88. Jirků-Pomajbíková K, Čepička I, Kalousová B, Jirků M, Stewart F, Levecke B, et al. Molecular identification of Entamoeba species in savanna woodland chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Parasitology 2016; 143: 741–748. pmid:26935395
  89. 89. Murray S, Stem C, Boudreau B, Goodall J. Intestinal parasites of baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Gombe National Park. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2000; 31: 176–178. pmid:10982128
  90. 90. Bakuza JS, Nkwengulila G. Variation over time in parasite prevalence among free-ranging chimpanzees at Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Int J Primatol. 2009; 30: 43–53.
  91. 91. Pomajbíková K, Petrželková KJ, Petrášová J, Profousová I, Kalousová B, Jirků M, et al. Distribution of the entodiniomorphid ciliate Troglocorys cava Tokiwa, Modrý, Ito, Pomajbíková, Petrželková, & Imai, 2010, (Entodiniomorphida: Blepharocorythidae) in wild and captive chimpanzees. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2012; 59: 97–99. pmid:22092556
  92. 92. Kouassi RYW, McGraw SW, Yao PK, Abou-Bacar A, Brune J, Pesson B, et al. Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in seven non-human primates of the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire. Parasite 2015; 22: 1. pmid:25619957
  93. 93. Petrášová J, Uzlíková M, Kostka M, Petrželková KJ, Huffman MA, Modrý D. Diversity and host specificity of Blastocystis in syntopic primates on Rubondo Island, Tanzania. Int J Parasitol. 2011; 41: 1113–1120. pmid:21854778
  94. 94. Makouloutou P, Mbehang Nguema P, Fujita S, Takenoshita Y, Hasegawa H, Yanagida T, et al. Prevalence and genetic diversity of Oesophagostomum stephanostomum in wild lowland gorillas at Moukalaba-Doudou National Park, Gabon. Helminthologia 2014; 51: 83–93.
  95. 95. Durette-Desset MC, Chabaud AG, Ashford RW, Butynski T, Reid GDF. Two new species of the Trichostrongylidae (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea), parasitic in Gorilla gorilla beringei in Uganda. Syst Parasitol. 1992; 23: 159–166.
  96. 96. Doležalová J, Vallo P, Petrzelkova KJ, Foitová I, Nurcahyo W, Mudakikwa A. et al. Molecular phylogeny of anoplocephalid tapeworms (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) infecting humans and non-human primates. Parasitology 2015; 142: 1278–1289. pmid:26046952
  97. 97. Fruth B, Ikombe NB, Matshimba GK, Metzger S, Muganza DM, Mundry R, et al. New evidence for self‐medication in bonobos: Manniophyton fulvum leaf‐and stemstrip‐swallowing from LuiKotale, Salonga National Park, DR Congo. Am J Primatol. 2014; 76: 146–158. pmid:24105933
  98. 98. Stunkard HW. The morphology and life history of the cestode, Bertiella studeri. Am J Trop Med. 1940; 20: 305–333.
  99. 99. Huffman MA. Current evidence for self-medication in primates: a multidisciplinary perspective. Yearb Phys Anthropol. 1997; 40: 171–200.
  100. 100. Su H, Su Y, Huffman MA. Leaf swallowing and parasitic infection of the Chinese lesser civet Viverricula indica in northeastern Taiwan. Zool Studies 2013; 52: 22.
  101. 101. Barelli C, Huffman MA. Leaf swallowing and parasite expulsion in Khao Yai white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar), the first report in an Asian ape species. Am J Primatol. 2017; 79: e22610.
  102. 102. Kaur T, Singh J. Primate–parasitic zoonoses and anthropozoonses: a literature review. In: Huffman MA, Chapman CA, editors. Primate parasite ecology: the dynamics and study of host–parasite relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. pp. 199–230.
  103. 103. Krief S, Jamart A, Mahé S, Leendertz FH, Mätz-Rensing K, Crespeau F, et al. Clinical and pathologic manifestation of oesophagostomosis in African great apes: does self-medication in wild apes influence disease progression? J Med Primatol. 2008; 37: 188–195. pmid:18331558
  104. 104. McLennan MR, Asiimwe C. Cars kill chimpanzees: case report of a wild chimpanzee killed on a road at Bulindi, Uganda. Primates 2016; 57: 377–388. pmid:26960418
  105. 105. Graczyk TK, Bosco-Nizeyi J, Ssebide B, Thompson RCA, Read C, Cranfield MR. Anthropozoonotic Giardia duodenalis genotype (assemblage) A infections in habitats of free-ranging human-habituated gorillas, Uganda. J Parasitol. 2002; 88: 905–909. pmid:12435128
  106. 106. Hogan JN, Miller WA, Cranfield MR, Ramer J, Hassell J, Noheri JB, et al. Giardia in mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei), forest buffalo (Syncerus caffer), and domestic cattle in Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda. J Wildl Dis. 2014; 50: 21–30. pmid:24171566