The ECF sigma factor, PSPTO_1043, in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 is induced by oxidative stress and regulates genes involved in oxidative stress response

Bronwyn G. Butcher; Zhongmeng Bao; Janet Wilson; Paul Stodghill; Bryan Swingle; Melanie Filiatrault; David Schneider; Samuel Cartinhour

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180340

Abstract

The bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae adapts to changes in the environment by modifying its gene expression profile. In many cases, the response is mediated by the activation of extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors that direct RNA polymerase to transcribe specific sets of genes. In this study we focus on PSPTO_1043, one of ten ECF sigma factors in P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (DC3000). PSPTO_1043, together with PSPTO_1042, encode an RpoE_Rsp/ChrR-like sigma/anti-sigma factor pair. Although this gene pair is unique to the P. syringae group among the pseudomonads, homologous genes can be found in photosynthetic genera such as Rhodospirillum, Thalassospira, Phaeospirillum and Parvibaculum. Using ChIP-Seq, we detected 137 putative PSPTO_1043 binding sites and identified a likely promoter motif. We characterized 13 promoter candidates, six of which regulate genes that appear to be found only in P. syringae. PSPTO_1043 responds to the presence of singlet oxygen (¹O₂) and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBOOH) and several of the genes regulated by PSPTO_1043 appear to be involved in response to oxidative stress.

Citation: Butcher BG, Bao Z, Wilson J, Stodghill P, Swingle B, Filiatrault M, et al. (2017) The ECF sigma factor, PSPTO_1043, in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 is induced by oxidative stress and regulates genes involved in oxidative stress response. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0180340. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340

Editor: Eric Cascales, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille Université, FRANCE

Received: September 28, 2016; Accepted: June 14, 2017; Published: July 12, 2017

This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Data Availability: All files are available from NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (#SRR1583166).

Funding: This work was fully funded by appropriated USDA-ARS funds.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Pseudomonas syringae is a diverse species complex with more than 50 described pathovars causing speck, fleck, spot, blight and canker diseases on a wide range of hosts [1]. However, individual isolates typically have a narrow host range. The organism is often present as an epiphyte but can enter the plant via stomata or wound sites, proliferate in intercellular spaces, and eventually cause disease. P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (DC3000) [2] causes bacterial speck on tomato plants and Arabidopsis thaliana and is a model organism for the study of plant pathogen interactions (reviewed in [3]).

Bacteria employ diverse strategies for responding to stressful changes in the environment. One important mechanism is mediated by extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors [4], which are typically co-transcribed with anti-sigma factors that limit their activity until a specific signal occurs. The sigma factor is released from or is activated by the anti-sigma factor and directs RNA polymerase to express genes that are required by the cell to adapt to the new environment. A subset of genes regulated in this fashion is referred to as a regulon.

The DC3000 genome encodes ten ECF-type sigma factors [5], five of which are FecI-type iron responsive sigma factors [6–8]. The remaining five ECF sigma factors include HrpL, which activates expression of the Hrp/Hrc type III secretion system, various effector proteins [9–11], and AlgU, which is responsible for regulating genes involved in alginate production [12] and components of the Hrp type III secretion system [13].

Here we present an analysis of PSPTO_1043 and PSPTO_1042. We show that these two genes are homologous to RpoE_Rsp (RSP1093) and ChrR(RSP1092), a sigma factor/anti-sigma factor regulatory system found in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, and similar genes in other bacteria. We use the “Rsp” subscript to reinforce that we are referring to the gene in R. sphaeroides and not the well-studied gene with the same name (σ^E) in E. coli. RpoE_Rsp/ChrR is [14] involved with response to singlet oxygen (¹O₂) in R. sphaeroides. In this paper, we show that the PSPTO_1043/1042 system in DC3000 responds to the presence of ¹O₂, produced by Rose Bengal, and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBOOH). These conditions were chosen to stimulate an oxidative stress response, although the precise identity of the signaling species have not been determined.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The strains, plasmids and primers used for this study are listed in S1 Table. DC3000 was cultured in King’s B medium (KB) [15] or modified Luria broth (LM) [16] at 28°C. Our formulation of LM is (per liter) 10g Bacto tryptone, 6g yeast extract, 0.6g NaCl, 0.4g MgSO₄⋅7H₂O, and 1.5g K₂HPO₄.

Construction of strains overexpressing PSPTO_1043

The PSPTO_1043 coding region was amplified with primers oSWC01724 and oSWC01725 (S1 Table) using the Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche). PCR fragments were gel purified using the Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research) and cloned into pENTR/SD/D (Invitrogen) by directional TOPO cloning to create pBB36. The pBB45 expression construct (where PSPTO_1043-FLAG is expressed under control of the constitutive nptII promoter) was constructed by performing an LR reaction with the pBS46 expression vector [6] using LR Clonase II Enzyme Mix (Invitrogen). The resulting plasmid was sequenced to confirm structure and was then transformed into DC3000 by electroporation to create strain BBPS21.

A strain overexpressing wild-type (WT) (untagged) PSPTO_1043 was similarly constructed using primers oSWC07 and oSWC08 (S1 Table) creating an entry plasmid (pBS5), which was used to construct the overexpression plasmid, pBS163. This was transformed into DC3000 by electroporation creating BBPS55.

ChIP-Seq

The P. syringae PSPTO_1043-FLAG expression strain (BBPS21) was grown overnight at 28°C in LM medium containing 5 μg/ml gentamicin and was used to inoculate 100 ml LM medium at an optical density at 600nm (OD₆₀₀) of approximately 0.05. Cells were grown with shaking at 28°C to mid-log (OD₆₀₀ approximately 0.5). Expression of the FLAG tagged PSPTO_1043 under these conditions was confirmed by Western blotting with monoclonal anti-FLAG M2-alkaline phosphatase antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed as previously described [7]. Briefly, cell proteins were cross-linked by adding formaldehyde at 1% concentration to the medium. After quenching the reaction with 0.36 mM glycine, the cells were lysed and sonication was used to shear the DNA to fragments with an average approximate length of 400bp. Centrifugation was used to extract supernatant fluid, a portion of which was set aside as the lysate control. Commercially available anti-FLAG biotinylated M2 antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were used to isolate the DNA-protein complexes containing the FLAG-tagged sigma factors from the remaining supernatant. The isolated complexes were used as the IP samples. The DNA for both the lysate and IP samples was purified by reversing the cross-link reaction, applying pronase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to digest the protein, and QIAquick PCR purification (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

The purified DNA was subjected to library preparation and high throughput sequencing using the Illumina GA II platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA) by the Cornell University Life Sciences Core Laboratories Center. The FASTQ files returned by the sequencing facility were deposited in NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (#SRR1583166).

Analysis of ChIP-Seq data

The sequenced reads were used to construct genomic profiles following the method described in [17]. Version 2.20 of the SOAP2 alignment package [18] was used. Regions enriched by immunoprecipitation, here referred to as peaks, were identified computationally using CSDeconv [19] version 1.02, as described in [20] (with parameters llr = 3 and alpha = 1000). Several peaks fell within the PSPTO_1043 gene. Since these were probably artifacts due to DNA recovered from the multicopy PSPTO_1043 overexpression plasmid, they were removed from the list of identified peak regions. Next, sequences that fell within each identified peak region or within 50 bps of either side of the peak boundary were extracted, and motif discovery was performed using MEME [21] 4.10.0 (patch 1) with the parameters,

-revcomp -minw 18 -maxw 40 -nmotifs 5 -mod zoops -maxsites 137 -dna

RNA isolation and real-time PCR (RT-PCR)

DC3000 cells overexpressing either PSPTO_1043 or FLAG-tagged PSPTO_1043, along with DC3000 containing the empty vector, pBS60, were grown under conditions identical to those used for the ChIP-Seq experiments. Samples (1 mL) were withdrawn from each culture and centrifuged to obtain cell pellets. Pellets were stored at -80°C. RNA was isolated from cells using the Qiagen RNeasy kit as previously described [22]. Real-time PCR was performed as previously described [22] and changes in expression between the PSPTO_1043 overexpressing strains versus those carrying the empty vector control were calculated using the ΔΔCt method (ΔCt_sample - ΔCt_reference) where the housekeeping gene, gap-1 (PSPTO_1287), is used as the reference.

Creation of PSPTO_1043/1042 double mutant

The DC3000 ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 double mutant strain was constructed using marker exchange mutagenesis as described in [23]. Regions flanking the PSPTO_1043/1042 locus were amplified by PCR using the primer pairs oSWC2022/2024 and oSWC2025/2026 (S1 Table) with DC3000 genomic DNA as template to generate 1.1 and 1.0-kb products corresponding to the regions upstream of PSPTO_1042 and downstream of PSPTO_1043, respectively. Products were gel purified and used as templates in a SOEing PCR reaction [24] with oSWC2023/2027 (S1 Table), which joined the PSPTO_1043/1042 flanks and introduced XmaI sites at both ends of the product. The approximately 2.0 kb product was gel purified, digested with XmaI and ligated to pK18mobsacB [25] cut with the same restriction enzyme to produce pZB30. The structure of the pZB30 plasmid insert was confirmed by restriction digest and Sanger sequencing. The pZB30 deletion construct was introduced into DC3000 by electroporation and plasmid integration events were selected on KB medium containing 50 μg/ml kanamycin. Clones that had subsequently lost the pK18mobSacB sequences containing sacB were selected on medium containing 10% sucrose. Sucrose resistant ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 clones were screened by PCR and positive clones were confirmed by sequencing.

Creation of lux fusions with putative PSPTO_1043 controlled promoters

Predicted promoter regions upstream of PSPTO_1043, phrB (PSPTO_1121), katG (PSPTO_4530) and PSPTO_1900 were amplified with primers shown in S1 Table using Premix Ex Taq (Takara). The PCR products were purified using the DNA Clean and Concentrator kit (Zymo Research) and cloned using the pENTR/D-TOPO cloning kit (Invitrogen) to generate entry clones pBB56, pBB57, pBB58 and pBB59, respectively. The lux fusions were created by LR reaction between the entry clones and a destination vector, pBS58 [6], using LR clonase II (Invitrogen). The resulting plasmids were sequenced to confirm structure and transformed by electroporation into DC3000, BBPS32, BBPS21, BBPS55, and BBPS12, creating strains shown in S1 Table.

Expression of genes in response to PSPTO_1043 overexpression

Strains carrying the promoter fusions (see above) as well as the plasmid overexpressing PSPTO_1043 (pBB45) or the empty vector (pBS60 [6]) were grown overnight in LM with the appropriate antibiotics at 28°C. Each strain was diluted to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.3 in fresh LM and 200μl of culture was aliquoted into three wells of a 96 well plate, and incubated at room temperature for 6 hrs. Luminescence was measured with a Tecan GENios microplate reader, using Magellan Data Analysis software. Relative luminescence was calculated as luminescence/OD₆₀₀. Technical replicates were averaged, and each experiment was performed three times.

Growth and expression in presence of ¹O₂

¹O₂ was generated using the photosensitizer Rose Bengal. Overnight cultures of strains carrying the promoter fusions (grown in LM) were diluted to OD₆₀₀ of approximately 0.2 and 200μl aliquoted into wells of a 96 well plate. Rose Bengal at a final concentration of 2.5μM was added to the wells. Half of the plate was covered with adhesive foil seal (over the lid of the plate) to create “dark” conditions in which little or no ¹O₂ is produced. Wells without Rose Bengal (in both the light and dark sections of the plate) were used as controls. The plate was then incubated with shaking at room temperature in the light and OD₆₀₀ and luminescence measured every 30 minutes using a Synergy 2 Microplate reader (Biotek). Relative luminescence was calculated as luminescence/OD₆₀₀. Technical replicates were averaged, and each experiment was performed three times. We confirmed production of ¹O₂ under these conditions using 5 μM of the ¹O₂ sensor green reagent (Molecular probes, Life technologies) and measuring fluorescence in the Biotek plate reader using excitation/emission wavelengths of 485/516 nm.

Growth and expression in presence of tBOOH

Cultures of DC3000 and mutant derivatives grown overnight in LM were diluted to OD₆₀₀ of approximately 0.1 in fresh LM and 200μl aliquoted into wells of 96 a well plate. tert-Butyl hydroperoxide (tBOOH) at a final concentration of 0.1mM was added to the wells. The plate was then incubated at 28°C with shaking and OD₆₀₀ and luminescence measured every 1 hour using a Biotek Synery Microbplate reader (Biotek). Relative luminescence was calculated as luminescence/OD₆₀₀. Technical replicates were averaged, and each experiment was performed three times.

Results

PSPTO_1043/1042 are specific to the P. syringae group of pseudomonads

PSPTO_1043 was previously described as encoding a P. syringae specific sigma factor [5] after a survey of a small number of Pseudomonas genome sequences. Because many more complete and partially-sequenced genomes became available, we reexamined the distribution of the PSPTO_1043 sigma factor and its cognate anti-sigma factor (PSPTO_1042) genes by aligning their predicted amino acid sequences against the non-redundant protein sequences (NR) database using NCBI’s BLAST server [26]. Homologs to both were identified in P. syringae strains. as well as unrelated Rhodanobacter species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Table 1A). The later two are naturally found in soil and subsurface environments and S. maltophilia is also a common nosocomial multi-drug-resistant pathogen in immune-compromised patients. More distant homologs of the PSPTO_1043/1042 proteins are also found in many photosynthetic bacteria species such as those in the Rhodospirillum, Thalassospira, Phaeospirillum and Parvibaculum genera (Table 1A).

Download:

Table 1. Distribution of PSPTO_1043/1042 orthologs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.t001

Examining some of these species more closely, PSPTO_1043 and PSPTO_1042 showed 32-40% identity to the RpoE_Rsp-ChrR systems in the bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides [14], Caulobacter crescentus [27], Azospirillum brasilense [28] and Roseobacter denitrificans [29] (Table 1B). These systems respond to ¹O₂ and the corresponding regulons in all but Azospirillum have been studied.

In order to test whether the PSPTO_1043/1042 system is unique within the Pseudomonadales to the P. syringae species group, we performed a systematic comparative analysis of 1028 closed and draft Pseudomonadales genomes downloaded from GenBank (S2 Table). While genes with sequence similarity to PSPTO_1043 were found in many bacteria (including all Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains used in this analysis), the homologs to PSPTO_1042 were found primarily in P. syringae strains and other closely related species (P. avellanae, P. savastanoi and P. viridiflava).

Identification of PSPTO_1043 binding sites

ECF sigma factor activity usually requires a specific signal that results in release of the sigma factor from its anti-sigma factor. Since the identity of the signal for the PSPTO_1043/1042 system was not yet known in DC3000, we expressed a FLAG tagged version of the sigma factor from a constitutive nptII promoter on a multicopy plasmid and performed ChIP-Seq to identify putative targets. Cells were collected at the mid-log phase of growth. Following immunoprecipitation, samples were subjected to high throughput sequencing and the sequence data aligned to the genome as described in the Methods. The “sinister” and “naive” profiles of the sequence reads aligned to the DC3000 chromosome (NC_004578.1) can be found in S1 and S2 Datasets respectively.

Regions with an large number of reads, or “peaks”, were readily observed by examining the genomic profiles using the Artemis genome browser [30], as illustrated in S1 Fig. As described in the Methods, we used CSDeconv to computationally identify peaks. 142 peaks were identified. Five peaks fell within the PSPTO_1043 gene. Because these signals are probably artifacts due to DNA recovered from the multicopy PSPTO_1043 overexpression plasmid, they were removed. The remaining 137 peaks (S3 Dataset) were examined further.

As described in the Methods, MEME [21] was used to perform a motif-discovery analysis on the sequences associated with them. Two such regions are shown in S1 Fig.

Only one significant motif was detected (Fig 1), and it was found within 87 of the 137 peaks. This motif closely resembles the RpoE_Rsp-controlled promoter region identified in Rhodobacter [14] and Caulobacter crescentus [27]. A more in-depth comparison of the motifs appears in S2 Text. Of these 87 peaks, 54 were located within annotated coding regions and another 12 were arranged antisense to a coding region. The remaining 21 were located upstream of annotated open reading frames in locations typical for promoters. One peak is immediately upstream of the PSPTO_1043 gene itself, suggesting that, like many ECF sigma factors, this gene is autoregulated (S1(A) Fig).

Download:

Fig 1. Promoter motif identified by MEME using the peaks identified by CSDeconv.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.g001

A previous study [14] used computational methods to predict a core regulon for the RpoE_Rsp-ChrR system across many bacteria based on the presence of an RpoE_Rsp promoter motif upstream from orthologous genes. The core regulon was predicted to contain six genes (in addition to rpoE_Rsp and chrR) and in Rhodobacter sphaeroides these are arranged in three loci. Orthologs for all six genes are present in the DC3000 genome (31-39% identity) (Table 2). Five are found in one locus (from PSPTO_1123—PSPTO_1115). We observed PSPTO_1043 binding upstream of PSPTO_1121 (phrB) within its neighbor PSPTO_1122 (S1(B) Fig). No PSPTO_1043 binding was observed upstream of the sixth ortholog (PSPTO_2515).

Download:

Table 2. Orthologs in DC3000 of the core RpoE_Rsp-ChrR regulon [14].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.t002

In the remainder of our experiments, we focused attention on 18 promoters that were located in regions typical for promoter regions, are predicted to control expression of genes homologous to members of the RpoE_Rsp regulon, and /or are predicted to control genes conserved in other Pseudomonas syringae strains. This set includes the promoter located upstream from phrB (within PSPTO_1122). The list of candidate promoters and the genes they potentially regulate can be found in Table 3.

Download:

Table 3. PSPTO_1043 promoters examined in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.t003

Expression of putative PSPTO_1043 controlled genes

The ChIP-Seq experiment detects PSPTO_1043 binding but does not demonstrate transcription of downstream regions. To examine gene expression directly, RNA was isolated from cells grown under the same conditions as used in the ChIP experiment. RNA levels were determined by qRT-PCR and normalized using expression from the PSPTO_1043-independent gene gyrA. We examined genes associated with 17 of the 18 identified promoters (all but PSPTO_1043) and found increased expression for 13 of them when PSPTO_1043 was overexpressed (Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. PSPTO_1043-dependent expression in DC3000.

Seventeen putative PSPTO_1043-controlled genes and one housekeeping gene (gyrA) were evaluated and the fold change in expression between strains overexpressing PSPTO_1043 and those carrying the empty vector was calculated as described in the methods (normalized to the housekeeping gene gap-1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.g002

In order to study PSPTO_1043-dependent expression more closely, we cloned the putative promoters for four genes (phrB, PSPTO_1043, katG and PSPTO_1900) upstream from a lux reporter gene and tested whether overexpression of PSPTO_1043 affected lux expression (Fig 3). Expression from all four promoters was reduced in a PSPTO_1043/1042 double mutant compared to WT strains (two-tailed t-test, p < 0.05) (Fig 3A). Expression in trans of PSPTO_1043 was sufficient to complement the PSPTO_1043/1042 deletion. Addition of the PSPTO_1043 overexpression construct increased expression from all four promoters significantly (two-tailed t-test, p < 0.05) (Fig 3B) with the phrB promoter as the most responsive (100-fold change in the ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 strain and 70-fold change in the WT strain).

Download:

Fig 3. PSPTO_1043-dependent promoter activity.

Candidate promoter-containing regions were fused to the lux reporter gene in a plasmid. Lux expression was monitored after 6hr in WT or ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 strains carrying either the plasmid overexpressing PSPTO_1043 (PnptII-1043) or an empty vector. (A) A slight decrease in expression was observed in strains lacking PSPTO_1043/1042 (green bars) compared to WT (red bars) when no PSPTO_1043 was overexpressed. (B) Overexpression of PSPTO_1043 in both WT (green bars) and ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 (blue bars) results in increased expression from all the tested promoter fusions compared to strains lacking the overexpression construct (red bars).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.g003

PSPTO_1043 responds to the presence of ¹O₂ and tBOOH

The assays described above detected an increase in expression from cloned promoters under conditions where the PSPTO_1043 sigma factor was artificially overexpressed. Because overexpression can generate artifacts, we attempted to identify conditions in which the sigma factor can be induced from its native context. Given the similarities between PSPTO_1043/1042 and RpoE_Rsp-ChrR, and that RpoE_Rsp-ChrR responds to ¹O₂, we used the lux promoter fusions to investigate whether DC3000 responds to ¹O₂. Expression from these promoters was monitored in WT and PSPTO_1043/1042 deletion strains following exposure to Rose Bengal in the absence (no ¹O₂ produced) or presence (¹O₂ produced) of light. Expression from the PSPTO_1043 and phrB promoters was increased in the presence of ¹O₂ and was dependent on PSPTO_1043 (Fig 4A and 4B). The katG promoter was also induced in the presence of ¹O₂ but showed less dependence on PSPTO_1043, suggesting that the cloned promoter region for this gene contains additional (PSPTO_1043 independent) promoters (Fig 4C). Because expression in these experiments depends on the presence of Rose Bengal, the response is not due to light exposure itself. No induction was observed from the PSPTO_1900 promoter (Fig 4D).

Download:

Fig 4. Expression from candidate PSPTO_1043 promoters in the presence of ¹O₂.

WT (blue and red) or ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 (green or purple) strains carrying promoter-lux fusions were grown in the presence of 2.5μM Rose Bengal under light (red and purple) or dark (blue and green) conditions. In the presence of light ¹O₂ is produced. As a control WT cells were grown in the presence of light, but without Rose Bengal (grey).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.g004

The RpoE_Rsp-ChrR system in other bacteria has also been shown [27] to respond to other chemical such as tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBOOH). The response of DC3000 to this compound was also investigated. The PSPTO_1043 and phrB promoters were induced in the presence of tBOOH (Fig 5A and 5B). Again, the katG promoter responded to tBOOH but was independent of PSPTO_1043 (Fig 5C). The PSPTO_1900 promoter was unresponsive (Fig 5D).

Download:

Fig 5. Expression from candidate PSPTO_1043 promoters in the presence of tBOOH.

WT (blue and red) or ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 (green and purple) strains carrying promoter-lux fusions were grown in the presence (red and purple) or absence (blue and green) of 0.1mM tBOOH.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.g005

We also tested whether or not the presence of ¹O₂ and tBOOH or differential light exposure produced non-specific (PSPTO_1043-independent) changes in gene expression or altered the growth of the WT or ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 strains, and thus indirectly affect the expression of the regulon genes. No differences in bacterial growth or expression from the gap-1 housekeeping gene promoter were detected (S3 Text).

Identification of the PSPTO_1043 “core regulon” in P. syringae strains

A simple BLAST search against the NR database suggests that PSPTO_1043 and PSPTO_1042 are specific to P. syringae strains (Table 1). In order to study the conservation of the PSPTO_1043/1042 and its regulon in more detail, we searched for the PSPTO_1043 promoter motif upstream of orthologs of the members of PSPTO_1043/1042 regulon in other sequenced Pseudomonadales genomes. To do this, we first found all potential orthologs of the DC3000 regulon (based on protein sequence) then searched for the PSPTO_1043 promoter motif upstream of the coding sequence. The results of this analysis can be found in S2 Table and the full details of the analysis can be found in S1 Text.

These results suggest that PSPTO_1043 is part of a six-gene core regulon whose genes are conserved within P. syringae strains. These six genes do not appear to have homologs in other pseudomonads, such as P. fluorescens and P. stutzeri, suggesting that these genes and their regulation are adapted to provide functions necessary specifically for P. syringae’s lifestyle. The six genes (PSPTO_1043, phrB, diguanylate cyclase PSPTO_2591, putative glyoxalase PSPTO_3893, the tctD response regulator PSPTO_4231 and esterase/lipase/thioesterase family protein PSPTO_4843) are found in more than 80% of the P. syringae strains and closely related genomes (more than 100 out of 121) (Table 3). Six additional genes are conserved in the closely related tomato, thea, avellanae and actinidiae pathovars (Table 3). These genes encode an acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (PSPTO_0744), multidrug resistance protein (PSPTO_2593), GAF domain protein (PSPTO_2615), catalase (katG, PSPTO_4530) and two hypothetical proteins (PSPTO_3907 and PSPTO_4335).

Conservation of the other genes in the putative DC3000 regulon appear more variable (S2 Table). Homologs of PSPTO_2853 can be found in a number of P. aeruginosa and P. putida strains but do not appear to be preceded by a PSPTO_1043 promoter motif. Homologs of PSPTO_4702 without PSPTO_1043 promoter motifs can be found in some P. aeruginosa strains. Homologs of PSPTO_4723 are found in tomato pathovars, but do not appear to be preceded by a PSPTO_1043 promoter motif. The absence of 1043 promoter motif in species lacking 1043 homologs is consistent with the acquisition of this system in syringae after they diverged from the other pseudomonads. Homologs of hopAA1-1 (PSPTO_1372) and PSPTO_4675 are found in various P. syringae strains, but they do not have an associated PSPTO_1043 promoter motif except in the other tomato pathovars. Finally, although several P. fluorescens strains have homologs of phrB that are preceded by a putative PSPTO_1043 binding site, they do not appear to encode a PSPTO_1043 homolog. These promoter motifs may be recognized by a different sigma factor or have been conserved for other reasons.

Discussion

In this report, we describe the ECF sigma factor, PSPTO_1043, which is predicted to be co-transcribed with PSPTO_1042, a likely anti-sigma factor. PSPTO_1043 and PSPTO_1042 are homologous to the RpoE_Rsp-ChrR genes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides [31] and Azospirillum brasilense [32]. The RpoE_Rsp-ChrR system [14, 28] responses to the presence of ¹O₂, which is produced during photosynthesis, and may play an important role in protecting these photosynthetic bacteria from its harmful effects. A homologous system in Caulobacter crescentus, a free-living bacterium found in nutrient-poor aquatic environments, also responds to the presence of ¹O₂ and also cadmium [27].

¹O₂ is a toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can be produced by photo-activation of oxygen by energy transfer from excited photosynthetic pigments during photosynthesis or by certain biochemical reactions involving peroxides and epoxides [33]. ¹O₂ is an oxidizing agent that can react with a variety of compounds in biological systems including unsaturated lipids, the side chains of the amino acids, Trp, Tyr, His, Met and Cys, cellular thiols such as glutathione, DNA bases and secondary metabolites such as terpenes [34]. Therefore mechanisms to quench ¹O₂ and protect against its effects are found in many organisms. In addition, plants use ¹O₂ to defend themselves from pathogens [34, 35]. Since P. syringae is not a photosynthetic bacterium, the presence of this sigma factor may be related to its specific lifestyle as a plant pathogen.

The DC3000 ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 strain is slightly inhibited in growth in Arabidopsis seedlings at early stages of infection, but the difference was no longer apparent 4 days post-inoculation (S4 Text). Despite the effect on bacterial growth at early stages of infection, no difference in symptoms was observed when tomato plants were infected with WT or the PSPTO_1043/1042 double mutant strains. We speculate that PSPTO_1043/1042 is important at early stages of infection or colonization and less so at later stages.

Thakur et al. [36] have studied Psyr_0892, the PSPTO_1043 ortholog in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a. They have found that ΔPsyr_0892 mutants appear to be equality sensitive as the WT strain to the presence of H₂O₂ on agar plates. However, they did not directly measure changes in the expression of Psyr_0892 to presence of H₂O₂ nor did they perform their assaying using either ¹O₂ or tBOOH.

In previous work [14], homologs of the rpoE_Rsp-chrR gene pair in Rhodobacter sphaeroides from 73 bacterial genomes were analyzed. The authors found that a phylogenetic tree based on the amino acid sequences of rpoE_Rsp and chrR generally mirrored a tree based upon the sequences of ruvB, rpoD and gyrB, except for P. syringae and Oceanospirillum spp. The same study proposed a core regulon of eight genes (including rpoE_Rsp and chrR) that is conserved in 45 of 73 species analyzed. The authors of this study speculate the the genes in this regulon provide functions to both prevent and repair damage from oxidative stress. Members of this regulon encode phrB, a deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase, cfaS, a cyclopropane fatty acyl-phospholipid synthetase, RSP1087, a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase, and RSP1091, a flavin-containing oxidoreductases.

Homologs for all eight genes are present in DC3000 (with about 30-40% identity) and are found in three loci (Table 2). The first locus is composed of PSPTO_1043 and PSPTO_1042. The second locus is composed of PSPTO_1121(phrB)-PSPTO_1116(cfa). In P. aeruginosa and P. syringae, phrB has been shown to be involved with RNA repair from UV-B damage in photo-reactivating conditions [37]. cfa is annotated as a cyclopropane-fatty-acyl-phospholipid synthase, which is part of the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway. The other genes in this locus are less well characterized, and their putative functions are shown in Table 2. The third locus consists of a single gene, PSPTO_2515, of unknown function. A PSPTO_1043 promoter motif was observed upstream of the first and second, but not the third locus.

We used a ChIP-Seq approach to identify putative PSPTO_1043 binding sites in cells where the sigma factor was constitutively expressed. This approach yielded 137 enriched regions or peaks. Using these regions, we identified a putative PSPTO_1043 promoter motif (Fig 1) associated with 87 of the 137 peaks. The motif closely resembles the putative RpoE_Rsp promoter identified in Rhodobacter and Caulobacter (S2 Text). Many of these sites were located in non-canonical positions, such as within annotated coding regions or in orientations that would support antisense transcription. These results must be interpreted cautiously because ChIP-based experiments are susceptible to false positive results and by themselves do not demonstrate promoter functionality [38]. In addition, because our experiments relied on the overexpression of PSPTO_1043, binding may have occurred at lower affinity sites that are not biologically relevant.

Table 3 summarizes the results of both our molecular and computational experiments. Of the three transcriptional units identified in DC3000 as containing homologs of the previously reported RpoE_Rsp-ChrR core regulon, we observed PSPTO_1043 binding upstream of PSPTO_1043 and PSPTO_1121 (phrB), but failed to detect binding upstream of PSPTO_2515.

Additionally, our results strongly support the addition of at least four more P. syringae specific transcription units to the PSPTO_1043 regulon. PSPTO_2591 encodes a predicted diguanylate cyclase and is likely to generate cyclic-di-GMP, an intracellular messenger molecule [39]. In concert with phosophodiesterases, this protein regulates the level of c-di-GMP present in the bacterial cell and controls functions such as motility, biofilm formation, and virulence gene expression [39]. Further experiments will be needed to determine whether or not PSPTO_1043/1042 regulates any of these functions. PSPTO_3893 encodes a putative glyoxylase and PSPTO_4843 encodes a protein belonging to the esterase-lipase superfamily. PSPTO_4231 and PSPTO_4230 encode a two-component system with homology to the TctDE tricarboxylic acid transporter two-component regulatory system. In Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, the causal agent of bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper, TctDE was found to influence the expression of citH (encoding a citrate transporter), which is important for growth of this pathogen in tomato plants [40].

We also identified an additional seven promoters in DC3000 that are predicted to regulate genes with varying homology across P. syringae strains. PSPTO_1900 does not appear to be induced in the presence of ¹O₂ or tBOOH in a manner similar to PSPTO_1043, phrB or katG. It is possible that this behavior is consistent with the relatively small ChIP-Seq enrichment signal associated with PSPTO_1900. Nevertheless, expression of this gene is up-regulated when PSPTO_1043 is overexpressed (Fig 2), and its promoter is induced in the lux assay (Fig 3), so we have included it in the expanded regulon.

PSPTO_4530 (katG), which encodes the major housekeeping catalase, KatG, is involved in detoxifying exogenous H₂O₂ [41]. Together with KatB, KatG was found to be a major catalase involved in virulence of DC3000 [41]. We show that although expression of katG is affected by PSPTO_1043, there is still significant expression in a PSPTO_1043/1042 double mutant suggesting that at least one other promoter acts to control expression of this gene. In P. aeruginosa [42] and P. syringae [43], OxyR has been shown to induce katG, but the OxyR binding consensus sequence was not found upstream of katG. Taken together, this might explain why Thakur et al. [36] did not observe a difference between ΔPsyr_0892 and WT B728a in the the presence of H₂O₂. Further experiments are needed to determine the relationship between PSPTO_1043, oxyR and katG.

An additional five genes regulated by PSPTO_1043 are conserved in the closely related tomato, thea, avellanae and actinidiae pathovars. These genes encode an acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (PSPTO_0744), multidrug resistance protein (PSPTO_2593), GAF domain protein (PSPTO_2615) and two hypothetical proteins (PSPTO_3907 and PSPTO_4335). In the Conserved Domain Database [44], PSPTO_3907 is annotated with a WbqC-like protein family (pfam08889), which may be involved in O-antigen production. PSPTO_4335 is annotated with a PilZ domain (cl01260), which is a c-di-GMP binding domain that may be involved with flagellar torque generation.

While we have demonstrated that PSPTO_1043/1042 gene expression is induced in the presence of ¹O₂ and tBOOH, additional work is needed to determine whether PSPTO_1043/1042 is directly induced by either. It is possible that the presence of these reactive oxygen species produce reactions whose products are the direct inducers of PSPTO_1043/1042. However, taken together our results show PSPTO_1043/1042 responds to the presence of these chemicals and that PSPTO_1043 controls transcription of genes whose homologs are found in the RpoE_Rsp-ChrR regulons and that have been shown to be involved in oxidative stress response of other bacteria. In addition, the sigma factor controls expression of a P. syringae specific set of genes whose function in DC3000 is largely unstudied. It is possible that these genes play a role in survival of the bacteria within the plant (e.g., citrate utilization, H₂O₂ defense and modulation of c-diGMP levels that may alter motility or biofilm formation) and further studies will be required to test these hypotheses.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Examples of ChIP-Seq peaks upstream of selected targets.

(A) Peak upstream of the PSPTO_1043/1042 locus. (B) Peak upstream of phrB and other homologs of the RpoE_Rsp-ChrR core regulon. The genomic profiles shown can be found in S2 Dataset.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s001

(TIFF)

S1 Table. Strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Orthologs of the PSPTO_1043 regulon in the sequenced Pseudomonadales.

Reciprocal Best BLAST Hits (RBBH’s) were computed between DC3000 and 1028 genomes from the order Pseudomonadales and then used to identify orthologs of the genes in the PSPTO_1043 regulon. Once families of orthologous genes were identified, the regions upstream of each gene were extracted and scanned for the PSPTO_1043 motif. This table includes the results for each of the analyzed genomes, grouped according to their taxonomy. For each genome, the orthologs found are reported together with FIMO score of any PSPTO_1043 motif found.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s003

(XLSX)

S1 Text. A description of the method used to compute S2 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s004

(DOCX)

S2 Text. A detailed discussion of the claim that the PSPTO_1043 binding sequence closely resembles the RpoE_Rsp binding sequence identified in Rhodobacter and Caulobacter crescentus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s005

(DOCX)

S3 Text. Assays to measure the effect of ¹O₂ and tBOOH on wildtype and ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s006

(DOCX)

S4 Text. Assays to measure growth of wildtype and ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis seedlings.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s007

(PDF)

S1 Dataset. The “sinister” profile of the PSPTO_1043 ChIP-Seq reads that align to the DC3000 chromosome sequence.

Sinister profiles and file format is described in [17].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s008

(ZIP)

S2 Dataset. The “naive” profile of the PSPTO_1043 ChIP-Seq reads that align to the DC3000 chromosome sequence.

Naive profiles and file format is described in [17].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s009

(ZIP)

S3 Dataset. The 137 regions of enrichment identified by CSDeconv in GFF format (https://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/software/gff/spec.html).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180340.s010

(GFF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Jens Glaeser for helpful email communication leading to the use of Rose Bengal to produce ¹O₂ and the ¹O₂ sensor to detect the presence of ¹O₂.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purposes of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA.

References

1. Tarkowskia P, Vereecke D. Threats and opportunities of plant pathogenic bacteria. Biotechnology Advances. 2014;31(1):215–229.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Buell CR, Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Selengut J, Paulsen IT, Gwinn ML, et al. The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100(18):10181.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Xin XF, He SY.Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000: a model pathogen for probing disease susceptibility and hormone signaling in plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2013;51:473–498. pmid:23725467
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Helmann JD. The extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors. Adv Microb Physiol. 2002;46:47–110. pmid:12073657
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Oguiza JA, Kiil K, Ussery DW. Extracytoplasmic function sigma factors in Pseudomonas syringae. Trends in Microbiology. 2005;13(12):565–568.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Swingle B, Thete D, Moll M, Myers CR, Schneider DJ, Cartinhour S. Characterization of the PvdS-regulated promoter motif in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 reveals regulon members and insights regarding PvdS function in other pseudomonads. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68(4):871–89. pmid:18363796
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Markel E, Maciak C, Butcher BG, Myers CR, Stodghill P, Bao Z, et al. An Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Factor-Mediated Cell Surface Signaling System in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Regulates Gene Expression in Response to Heterologous Siderophores. Journal of Bacteriology. 2011;193(20):5775–5783. pmid:21840980
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Markel E, Butcher BG, Myers CR, Stodghill P, Cartinhour S, Swingle B. Regulons of Three Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Iron Starvation Sigma Factors. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2013;79(2):725–727. pmid:23124242
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Ferreira AO, Myers CR, Gordon JS, Martin GB, Vencato M, Collmer A, et al. Whole-genome expression profiling defines the HrpL regulon of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, allows de novo reconstruction of the Hrp cis element, and identifies novel coregulated genes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19(11):1167–1179. pmid:17073300
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Vencato M, Tian F, Alfano JR, Buell CR, Cartinhour S, DeClerck GA, et al. Bioinformatics-enabled identification of the HrpL regulon and type III secretion system effector proteins of Pseudomonas syringae pv.phaseolicola 1448A. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19(11):1193–206. pmid:17073302
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Lam HN, Chakravarthy S, Wei HL, BuiNguyen H, Stodghill PV, Collmer A, et al. Global Analysis of the HrpL Regulon in the Plant Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Reveals New Regulon Members with Diverse Functions. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e106115. pmid:25170934
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Keith LM, Bender CL. AlgT (sigma22) controls alginate production and tolerance to environmental stress in Pseudomonas syringae. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(23):7176–7184. pmid:10572118
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Markel E, Stodghill P, Bao Z, Myers C, Swingle B. AlgU Controls Expression of Virulence Genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Journal of Bacteriology. 2016;198(17):2330–44. pmid:27325679
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Dufour YS, Landick R, Donohue TJ. Organization and Evolution of the Biological Response to Singlet Oxygen Stress. J Mol Biol. 2008;383:713–730. pmid:18723027
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. King E, Ward M, Raney D. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med. 1954;44.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Hanahan D. Studies on Transformation of Escherichia coli with Plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983;166(4):557–580. pmid:6345791
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Filiatrault MJ, Stodghill PV, Bronstein PA, Moll S, Lindeberg M, Grills G, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Pseudomonas syringae identifies new genes, noncoding RNAs, and antisense activity. Journal of bacteriology. 2010;192(9):2359. pmid:20190049
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1966–7. pmid:19497933
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Lun DS, Sherrid A, Weiner B, Sherman DR, Galagan JE. A blind deconvolution approach to high-resolution mapping of transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-seq data. Genome Biol. 2009;10(12):R142. pmid:20028542
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Butcher BG, Bronstein PA, Myers CR, Stodghill PV, Bolton JJ, Markel EJ, et al. Characterization of the Fur Regulon in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Journal of Bacteriology. 2011;193(18):4598. pmid:21784947
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW. MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Web Server issue):W369–73. pmid:16845028
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Park SH, Bao Z, Butcher B, D’Amico K, Xu Y, Stodghill P, et al. Analysis of the small RNA spf in the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000. Microbiology. 2014;160(part 5):941–953. pmid:24600027
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Wei CF, Kvitko BH, Shimizu R, Crabill E, Alfano JR, Lin NC, et al. A Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 mutant lacking the type III effector HopQ1-1 is able to cause disease in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. 2007;51:32–46. pmid:17559511
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Horton RM, Hunt HD, Ho SN, Pullen JK, Pease LR. Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene. 1989;77:61–68. pmid:2744488
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Schafer A, Tauch A, Jager W, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G, Puhler A. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene. 1994;145:69–73. pmid:8045426
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A, Ma N, et al. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013; pmid:23609542
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Lourenço RF, Gomes SL. The transcriptional response to cadmium, organic hydroperoxide, singlet oxygen and UV-A mediated by the σ^E-ChrR system in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol Microbiol. 2009;72(5):1159–1170. pmid:19400803
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Mishra MN, Kumar S, Gupta N, Kaur S, Gupta A, Tripathi AK. An extracytoplasmic function sigma factor cotranscribed with its cognate anti-sigma factor confers tolerance to NaCl, ethanol and methylene blue in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. Microbiology. 2011;157(Pt 4):988–999. pmid:21233159
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Berghoff BA, Glaeser J, Nuss AM, Zobawa M, Lottspeich F, Klug G. Anoxygenic photosynthesis and photooxidative stress: a particular challenge for Roseobacter. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13(3):775–791. pmid:21108722
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Carver T, Berriman M, Tivey A, Patel C, Böhme U, Barrell BG, et al. Artemis and ACT: viewing, annotating and comparing sequences stored in a relational database. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(23):2672–6. pmid:18845581
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Anthony JR, Newman JD, Donohue TJ. Interactions between the Rhodobacter sphaeroides ECF sigma factor, σ^E, and its anti-sigma factor, ChrR. J Mol Biol. 2004;341(2):345–360. pmid:15276828
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Gupta Namrata, M NM, Kumar Santosh, Tripathi AK. A constitutively expressed pair of rpoE2–chrR2 in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 is required for survival under antibiotic and oxidative stress. Microbiology. 2013;159(Pt. 2):205–218. pmid:23059974
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M. Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Damage, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism in Plants under Stressful Conditions. Journal of Botany. 2012;2012:1–26.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Triantaphylidès C, Havaux M. Singlet oxygen in plants: production, detoxification and signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14(4):219–228. pmid:19303348
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Flors C, Nonell S. Light and singlet oxygen in plant defense against pathogens: phototoxic phenalenone phytoalexins. Acc Chem Res. 2006;39(5):293–300. pmid:16700528
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Thakur PB, Vaughn-Diaz VL, Greenwald JW, Gross DC. Characterization of Five ECF Sigma Factors in the Genome of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a. PLOS One. 2013;8(3):e58846. pmid:23516563
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Kim JJ, Sundin GW. Construction and Analysis of Photolyase Mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas syringae: Contribution of Photoreactivation, Nucleotide Excision Repair, and Mutagenic DNA Repair to Cell Survival and Mutability following Exposure to UV-B Radiation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2011;67(4):1405–1411.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Schindler D, Waldminghaus T. “Non-canonical protein-DNA interactions identified by ChIP are not artifacts”: response. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:638. pmid:24053571
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Römling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77(1):1–52. pmid:23471616
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Tamir-Ariel D, Rosenberg T, Burdman S. The Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria citH gene is expressed early in the infection process of tomato and is positively regulated by the TctDE two-component regulatory system. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011;12(1):57–71. pmid:21118349
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Guo M, Block A, Bryan CD, Becker DF, Alfano JR.Pseudomonas syringae catalases are collectively required for plant pathogenesis. J Bacteriology. 2012;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Wei Q, Le Minh PN, Dotsch A, Hildebrand F, Panmanee W, Elfarash A, et al. Global regulation of gene expression by OxyR in an important human opportunistic pathogen. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40(10):4320–4333. pmid:22275523
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Ishiga Y, Ichinose Y. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato OxyR Is Required for Virulence in Tomato and Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2016;29(2):119–131. pmid:26554736
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He J, Lanczycki CJ, Lu S, et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;45(D1):D200–D203. pmid:27899674
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Tarkowskia P, Vereecke D. Threats and opportunities of plant pathogenic bacteria. Biotechnology Advances. 2014;31(1):215–229.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Buell CR, Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Selengut J, Paulsen IT, Gwinn ML, et al. The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100(18):10181.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Xin XF, He SY.Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000: a model pathogen for probing disease susceptibility and hormone signaling in plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2013;51:473–498. pmid:23725467
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] PubMed/NCBI

[10] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Helmann JD. The extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors. Adv Microb Physiol. 2002;46:47–110. pmid:12073657
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] PubMed/NCBI

[14] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Oguiza JA, Kiil K, Ussery DW. Extracytoplasmic function sigma factors in Pseudomonas syringae. Trends in Microbiology. 2005;13(12):565–568.
View Article
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Swingle B, Thete D, Moll M, Myers CR, Schneider DJ, Cartinhour S. Characterization of the PvdS-regulated promoter motif in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 reveals regulon members and insights regarding PvdS function in other pseudomonads. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68(4):871–89. pmid:18363796
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Markel E, Maciak C, Butcher BG, Myers CR, Stodghill P, Bao Z, et al. An Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Factor-Mediated Cell Surface Signaling System in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Regulates Gene Expression in Response to Heterologous Siderophores. Journal of Bacteriology. 2011;193(20):5775–5783. pmid:21840980
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Markel E, Butcher BG, Myers CR, Stodghill P, Cartinhour S, Swingle B. Regulons of Three Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Iron Starvation Sigma Factors. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2013;79(2):725–727. pmid:23124242
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Ferreira AO, Myers CR, Gordon JS, Martin GB, Vencato M, Collmer A, et al. Whole-genome expression profiling defines the HrpL regulon of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, allows de novo reconstruction of the Hrp cis element, and identifies novel coregulated genes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19(11):1167–1179. pmid:17073300
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Vencato M, Tian F, Alfano JR, Buell CR, Cartinhour S, DeClerck GA, et al. Bioinformatics-enabled identification of the HrpL regulon and type III secretion system effector proteins of Pseudomonas syringae pv.phaseolicola 1448A. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19(11):1193–206. pmid:17073302
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Lam HN, Chakravarthy S, Wei HL, BuiNguyen H, Stodghill PV, Collmer A, et al. Global Analysis of the HrpL Regulon in the Plant Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Reveals New Regulon Members with Diverse Functions. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e106115. pmid:25170934
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Keith LM, Bender CL. AlgT (sigma22) controls alginate production and tolerance to environmental stress in Pseudomonas syringae. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(23):7176–7184. pmid:10572118
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Markel E, Stodghill P, Bao Z, Myers C, Swingle B. AlgU Controls Expression of Virulence Genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Journal of Bacteriology. 2016;198(17):2330–44. pmid:27325679
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Dufour YS, Landick R, Donohue TJ. Organization and Evolution of the Biological Response to Singlet Oxygen Stress. J Mol Biol. 2008;383:713–730. pmid:18723027
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. King E, Ward M, Raney D. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med. 1954;44.
View Article
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Hanahan D. Studies on Transformation of Escherichia coli with Plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983;166(4):557–580. pmid:6345791
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Filiatrault MJ, Stodghill PV, Bronstein PA, Moll S, Lindeberg M, Grills G, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Pseudomonas syringae identifies new genes, noncoding RNAs, and antisense activity. Journal of bacteriology. 2010;192(9):2359. pmid:20190049
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1966–7. pmid:19497933
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Lun DS, Sherrid A, Weiner B, Sherman DR, Galagan JE. A blind deconvolution approach to high-resolution mapping of transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-seq data. Genome Biol. 2009;10(12):R142. pmid:20028542
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Butcher BG, Bronstein PA, Myers CR, Stodghill PV, Bolton JJ, Markel EJ, et al. Characterization of the Fur Regulon in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Journal of Bacteriology. 2011;193(18):4598. pmid:21784947
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW. MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Web Server issue):W369–73. pmid:16845028
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Park SH, Bao Z, Butcher B, D’Amico K, Xu Y, Stodghill P, et al. Analysis of the small RNA spf in the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000. Microbiology. 2014;160(part 5):941–953. pmid:24600027
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Wei CF, Kvitko BH, Shimizu R, Crabill E, Alfano JR, Lin NC, et al. A Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 mutant lacking the type III effector HopQ1-1 is able to cause disease in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. 2007;51:32–46. pmid:17559511
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Horton RM, Hunt HD, Ho SN, Pullen JK, Pease LR. Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene. 1989;77:61–68. pmid:2744488
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Schafer A, Tauch A, Jager W, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G, Puhler A. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene. 1994;145:69–73. pmid:8045426
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A, Ma N, et al. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013; pmid:23609542
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Lourenço RF, Gomes SL. The transcriptional response to cadmium, organic hydroperoxide, singlet oxygen and UV-A mediated by the σ^E-ChrR system in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol Microbiol. 2009;72(5):1159–1170. pmid:19400803
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Mishra MN, Kumar S, Gupta N, Kaur S, Gupta A, Tripathi AK. An extracytoplasmic function sigma factor cotranscribed with its cognate anti-sigma factor confers tolerance to NaCl, ethanol and methylene blue in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. Microbiology. 2011;157(Pt 4):988–999. pmid:21233159
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Berghoff BA, Glaeser J, Nuss AM, Zobawa M, Lottspeich F, Klug G. Anoxygenic photosynthesis and photooxidative stress: a particular challenge for Roseobacter. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13(3):775–791. pmid:21108722
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Carver T, Berriman M, Tivey A, Patel C, Böhme U, Barrell BG, et al. Artemis and ACT: viewing, annotating and comparing sequences stored in a relational database. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(23):2672–6. pmid:18845581
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Anthony JR, Newman JD, Donohue TJ. Interactions between the Rhodobacter sphaeroides ECF sigma factor, σ^E, and its anti-sigma factor, ChrR. J Mol Biol. 2004;341(2):345–360. pmid:15276828
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Gupta Namrata, M NM, Kumar Santosh, Tripathi AK. A constitutively expressed pair of rpoE2–chrR2 in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 is required for survival under antibiotic and oxidative stress. Microbiology. 2013;159(Pt. 2):205–218. pmid:23059974
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M. Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Damage, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism in Plants under Stressful Conditions. Journal of Botany. 2012;2012:1–26.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Triantaphylidès C, Havaux M. Singlet oxygen in plants: production, detoxification and signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14(4):219–228. pmid:19303348
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Flors C, Nonell S. Light and singlet oxygen in plant defense against pathogens: phototoxic phenalenone phytoalexins. Acc Chem Res. 2006;39(5):293–300. pmid:16700528
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Thakur PB, Vaughn-Diaz VL, Greenwald JW, Gross DC. Characterization of Five ECF Sigma Factors in the Genome of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a. PLOS One. 2013;8(3):e58846. pmid:23516563
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Kim JJ, Sundin GW. Construction and Analysis of Photolyase Mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas syringae: Contribution of Photoreactivation, Nucleotide Excision Repair, and Mutagenic DNA Repair to Cell Survival and Mutability following Exposure to UV-B Radiation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2011;67(4):1405–1411.
View Article
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Schindler D, Waldminghaus T. “Non-canonical protein-DNA interactions identified by ChIP are not artifacts”: response. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:638. pmid:24053571
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Römling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77(1):1–52. pmid:23471616
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Tamir-Ariel D, Rosenberg T, Burdman S. The Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria citH gene is expressed early in the infection process of tomato and is positively regulated by the TctDE two-component regulatory system. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011;12(1):57–71. pmid:21118349
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Guo M, Block A, Bryan CD, Becker DF, Alfano JR.Pseudomonas syringae catalases are collectively required for plant pathogenesis. J Bacteriology. 2012;
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Wei Q, Le Minh PN, Dotsch A, Hildebrand F, Panmanee W, Elfarash A, et al. Global regulation of gene expression by OxyR in an important human opportunistic pathogen. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40(10):4320–4333. pmid:22275523
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Ishiga Y, Ichinose Y. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato OxyR Is Required for Virulence in Tomato and Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2016;29(2):119–131. pmid:26554736
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He J, Lanczycki CJ, Lu S, et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;45(D1):D200–D203. pmid:27899674
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Construction of strains overexpressing PSPTO_1043

ChIP-Seq

Analysis of ChIP-Seq data

RNA isolation and real-time PCR (RT-PCR)

Creation of PSPTO_1043/1042 double mutant

Creation of lux fusions with putative PSPTO_1043 controlled promoters

Expression of genes in response to PSPTO_1043 overexpression

Growth and expression in presence of 1O2

Growth and expression in presence of tBOOH

Results

PSPTO_1043/1042 are specific to the P. syringae group of pseudomonads

Identification of PSPTO_1043 binding sites

Expression of putative PSPTO_1043 controlled genes

PSPTO_1043 responds to the presence of 1O2 and tBOOH

Identification of the PSPTO_1043 “core regulon” in P. syringae strains

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Examples of ChIP-Seq peaks upstream of selected targets.

S1 Table. Strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study.

S2 Table. Orthologs of the PSPTO_1043 regulon in the sequenced Pseudomonadales.

S1 Text. A description of the method used to compute S2 Table.

S2 Text. A detailed discussion of the claim that the PSPTO_1043 binding sequence closely resembles the RpoERsp binding sequence identified in Rhodobacter and Caulobacter crescentus.

S3 Text. Assays to measure the effect of 1O2 and tBOOH on wildtype and ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

S4 Text. Assays to measure growth of wildtype and ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis seedlings.

S1 Dataset. The “sinister” profile of the PSPTO_1043 ChIP-Seq reads that align to the DC3000 chromosome sequence.

S2 Dataset. The “naive” profile of the PSPTO_1043 ChIP-Seq reads that align to the DC3000 chromosome sequence.

S3 Dataset. The 137 regions of enrichment identified by CSDeconv in GFF format (https://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/software/gff/spec.html).

Acknowledgments

References

Growth and expression in presence of ¹O₂

PSPTO_1043 responds to the presence of ¹O₂ and tBOOH

S2 Text. A detailed discussion of the claim that the PSPTO_1043 binding sequence closely resembles the RpoE_Rsp binding sequence identified in Rhodobacter and Caulobacter crescentus.

S3 Text. Assays to measure the effect of ¹O₂ and tBOOH on wildtype and ΔPSPTO_1043/1042 Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.