Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Highly mutable tandem DNA repeats generate a cell wall protein variant more frequent in disease-causing Candida albicans isolates than in commensal isolates

Highly mutable tandem DNA repeats generate a cell wall protein variant more frequent in disease-causing Candida albicans isolates than in commensal isolates

  • Zhuo Zhou, 
  • Zoe Jordens, 
  • Shuguang Zhang, 
  • Ningxin Zhang, 
  • Jan Schmid
PLOS
x

Abstract

During adaptation to host environments, many microorganisms alter their cell surface. One mechanism for doing so is variation in the number of amino acid repeats in cell surface proteins encoded by hypermutable DNA tandem repeats. In the yeast Candida albicans, an opportunistic human pathogen, the gene SSR1 encodes a GPI-anchored cell wall protein with a structural role. It contains two regions consisting of tandem repeats, almost exclusively encoding the amino acid pair Ser-Ala. As expected, the repeat regions make SSR1 highly mutable. New SSR1 alleles arose with a frequency of 1.11×10−4 per cell division in serially propagated cells. We also observed a large number (25) of SSR1 alleles with different repeat lengths in a survey of 131 isolates from a global strain collection. C. albicans is diploid, and combinations of these allele generated 41 different SSR1 genotypes. In both repeat regions, nonsynonymous mutations were largely restricted to one particular repeat unit. Two very similar allele combinations were largely restricted to one clade, clade 1. Each combination was present in ~30% of 49 infection-causing clade 1 strains, but one was rare (2%), the other absent in 46 infection-causing strains representing the remainder of the species (P < 0.00018 and 0.00004; Fisher’s exact test). These results indicate that both repeat regions are under selection and that amino acid repeat length polymorphisms generate Ssr1 protein variants most suitable for specific genetic backgrounds. One of these two allele combinations was 5.51 times more frequent, the other 1.75 times less frequent in 49 clade 1 strains that caused disease than in 36 commensal clade 1 strains (P = 0.0105; Chi2 test). This indicates that insertion and deletion of repeats not only generates clade-optimized Ssr1p variants, but may also assist in short-term adaptation when C. albicans makes the transition from commensal to pathogen.

Introduction

Bacterial and eukaryotic pathogens use the high frequency of insertions and deletions in tandem repeat (TR) DNA in so–called contingency genes to rapidly and transiently adapt to specific host niches or to avoid the host’s immune response by altering expression or the amino acid sequences of the encoded proteins [1,2]. The genome of the yeast Candida albicans, an important opportunistic human pathogen [3], contains thousands of ORFs (TR-ORFs) in which DNA tandem repeats encode amino acid repeats [4,5]. Repeat number variation in TR-ORFs generates large numbers of alleles, and the resulting protein variants are functionally different, as inferred either from the nonrandom distribution of alleles or from direct functional analysis [617]. However, at least the vast majority of TR-ORFs do not seem to act as contingency genes. Specific alleles or allele combinations (C. albicans is diploid) are not typically associated with the niche from which a strain is isolated, but rather with specific clades, i.e. genetic backgrounds, [610,16,17]. Individual clades are generally not confined in distribution to specific geographical regions, body sites or types of candidiasis [18,19]. Thus these findings suggest that repeat number variation assists predominantly in long-term adaptation, optimizing proteins for a genetic background, plus possibly in increasing the overall rate of evolution of the proteome [5,16].

There is only very limited evidence suggesting possible associations of different TR-ORF alleles with different niches, such as commensalism versus disease [20]. Allele changes that are correlated with the transition from commensal to pathogen would be of great interest, not only because they would improve our understanding of this transition, but also because these could potentially assist in predicting the onset of candidiasis and thus early diagnosis of the disease, an important determinant of survival of life-threatening C. albicans bloodstream infections [3].

Many known contingency genes encode cell surface proteins [1,2]. To expand the search for C. albicans contingency genes we investigated the TR-ORF of a surface protein-encoding gene, SSR1, encoding a GPI-anchored cell wall protein, that plays a role in cell wall stability [21].

Materials and methods

Strains and culture methods

The set of strains used in this study represents a collection of 131 isolates, including 86 clade 1 isolates from 6 countries plus 46 isolates from the remainder of the species [18,2225] (S1 Table; permission for use of these C. albicans isolates had been granted by the Massey University Human Ethics Committee; the table also lists an additional strain, the laboratory strain Sc5314, but this was not used in our analyses). All strains had only been cultured briefly before being stored at -80°C and were not extensively cultured as part of this work. The exception was one RIHO30 clone, which was serially transferred for 300 generations in YPD medium. The number of transfers required was calculated based on the increase in optical density at 600 nm measured with a spectrophotometer (NOVA TECH). This was followed by plating on YPD plates at ~100 CFU/plate, from which 60 single colonies were chosen to determine SSR1 allele sizes by genotyping.

Bioinformatic search for SSR1 ORFs sequenced in other Candida strains and for conserved domains within Ssr1p

SSR1 ORFs sequenced in other C. albicans strains and in C. dubliniensis were identified in a BLASTP search against the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence database, using the Ssr1p amino acid sequence lab strain SC5314 as a query. The same sequence was used to search for conserved domains in Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org).

Molecular biology methods

SSR1 repeat regions were PCR-amplified [26] using as a template a single colony either directly or 1 μl of a solution prepared by boiling the colony in 15μl of water for 4 minutes and removing debris and cells by spinning the mixture in the cold for 1 min at 13,000 x g [27]. Polymerase chain reactions contained, in a volume of 20μl (colony) of 25μl (boiled supernatant) [26] 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics, Auckland, New Zealand), 200 μM of each dNTP (Roche), 10 pmol of each primer (Invitrogen/Gibco BRL) and 4 μl of Q-buffer (Qiagen Pty Ltd, Clifton Hill Vic, Australia). Primer sequences and PCR conditions are listed in Table 1 (positions of primers are also shown in Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. SSR1 ORF as present in the SC5314 genome.

Locations of the two repeat regions and a likely CFEM domain identified by us are indicated. Grey arrows indicate primers used (listed in Table 1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.g001

Repeat region lengths were determined by genotyping of amplicons, using primers listed in Table 1 (positions shown in Fig 1.) and product sizes were determined by the Genotyping for Microsatellite Analysis Service at the Alan Wilson Centre Genome Services (Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand), using a 3730 Genetic Analyzer, using the size standard 500 LIZc (Applied Biosystems) and software Peak Scanner (Applied Biosystems). For SSR1-heterozygous C. albicans strains, the repeat unit sizes were inferred by generating PCR products containing both repeat regions as well as individual regions (Table 1, Fig 1). Genotyping-derived fragment sizes were converted into 6bp repeat numbers based on sequencing of select SSR1 ORFs (Peak Scanner’s estimates of the size of a 6 bp unit inferred from these comparisons were close to theoretical expectations, namely 6.03± 0.02 bp).

For determining the sequences of entire SSR1 ORFs, these were amplified using primers SSR1-6 and SSR1-7 (Table 1) and ligated into the pLUG®-Multi TA cloning vector (iNtRON). The constructs were used to transform E. coli DH5α [26]. The inserts were amplified using vector sequences M13F and M13R (Table 1) on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer Alan Wilson Centre Genome Services (Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand). All nucleotide sequences have been submitted to GenBank (Accession numbers KY569347 to KY569357).

Results and discussion

The SSR1 ORF contains two highly variable tandem repeat regions encoding amino acid repeats that are under selection

The C. albicans gene SSR1 encodes a GPI-anchored cell wall protein with a CFEM domain, (a cysteine-containing domain common to fungal surface proteins; InterPro IPR008427), that plays a role in cell wall stability [21]. In the SC5314 reference genome (http://www.candidagenome.org/), the SSR1 ORF contains two tandem repeat regions, separated by 200 bp of nonrepetitive DNA. Both repeat regions encode a series of amino acid pairs, mainly Ser/Ala (Fig 1). Both regions were also present in all of 131 strains from an international collection of infection-causing and commensal isolates that we tested (S1 Table), and in 18 C. albicans SSR1 sequences in Genbank (S2 Table), but the length of the regions varied. By genotyping, sequencing and analyzing published Genbank sequences we identified 8 different lengths of repeat region A (range 6–13 repeats) and 13 different lengths of repeat region B (range 4–31 repeats), generating 32 alleles (S1 and S2 Tables). C. albicans is diploid [28] and the 25 different alleles we identified in the 131 isolates from our collection combined into 41 different allele combinations (S1 Table).

This diversity was not unexpected, given the high mutation rate of repetitive DNA [29], which we confirmed directly for the SSR1 repeats by serially propagating one of the strains, RIHO30. RIHO30 is homozygous for an SSR1 allele with 6 repeat units in region A and 31 units in region B. After 300 generations in two of sixty colonies tested, one allele had undergone a region B expansion (from 31 to 32 repeats; Fig 2) This is equivalent to a mutation rate, in strain RIHO30, of 1.11×10−4 mutations in SSR1 per cell division, 5.5×10−5 mutations per allele, 2.7×10−5 mutations per repeat region and 1.5 x 10−6 mutations per base pair in repeat regions (6 bp addition to 6 x 37 x 2 base pairs in 1/30 cells after 300 generations). This rate exceeds the estimated frequency of point mutations of ~3 x 10−10 per bp per division [30,31] by several orders of magnitude.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Genotyping of repeat region B showing mutant alleles after 300 generations.

(A) Size of one of the original repeat region B amplicons in strain RIHO30 (31 repeats) as displayed by the software Peak Scanner. (B),(C) Repeat region B amplicons, increased in size by 6 bp (by 1 repeat unit, to 32 repeats), from 2 different colonies after serial propagation of the strain for 300 generations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.g002

Aside from length polymorphisms in published alleles and in 14 alleles we sequenced, we observed point mutations that distinguished repeat units from each other. However nonsynonymous point mutations were distributed in a nonrandom fashion, being almost completely restricted to the second-to-last repeat unit in region A and the second repeat unit in region B (Fig 3). This indicates that the amino acid repeats are under selection, i.e. that these regions are phenotypically relevant, as does the retention of these regions after the divergence of C. albicans and C. dublinensis (Fig 3). They might contribute to the functionality of the Ssr1 protein or to cell-surface mediated interactions with the host environment.

thumbnail
Fig 3. SSR1 allele region structures.

Predicted amino acid sequences of repeat regions of 23 different SSR1 alleles and the repeat region from the C. dubliniensis CD36 ortholog. Different shadings of repeat units indicate different versions of DNA and amino acid repeats, with colored units representing nonsynonymous mutations, leading to amino acid pairs other than SER/ALA. Alleles of stains CLB49, YASM 42, OD9014, Var1.4vag (both alleles), RIHO30, HUN64, Au11, CH42, Var1.5vag, OTG6, Au19, RIHO16, and HUN91 were sequenced as part of this study, while the other alleles were from the C. albicans genome database (http://www.candidagenome.org/) or were identified by BLAST searches.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.g003

High prevalence of specific allele combinations in clade 1 strains

We assessed if among isolates belonging to the genetically most homogeneous C. albicans clade, clade 1 [18,32], particular allele combinations were overrepresented, relative to the remainder of the species. We did this initially for the 95 disease-causing isolates (since the set of strains we had chosen to analyse included commensal isolates only from clade 1). We identified two very similar allele combinations that were very frequent in clade 1 and rare in other strains. One (6+6/9+4; one allele with 6 repeats in regions A and B, one with 9 in A and 4 in B) was present in 15 out of 49 disease-causing clade 1 isolates but only in 1/46 other isolates (P = 0.00018; Fisher’s exact test) and another (6+6/10+4) was present in 14 out of 49 clade 1 isolates and in 0/46 other isolates (P = 0.00004; Fisher’s exact test; Fig 4). The most likely explanation of this result is that clade1 genetic background selects for these alleles since their frequency was similar regardless of geographical region, the site of isolation, age or sex of patients for which clade 1 isolates had been obtained (S1 Table). Given the mutation rate of the repeat regions and the time of divergence of clades [33], it is unlikely that the uniform increased frequency of these allele combinations in clade 1 was merely generated by genetic drift.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Frequency of SSR1 genotypes in disease-causing isolates.

Allele combinations are labeled with repeat numbers in allele 1 (Region A + Region B) followed by repeat numbers in allele 2 (Region A + Region B); alleles are sorted so that allele 1 is the smaller allele (when alleles are of the same size the allele with the larger region A precedes the allele with the smaller region A). Genotypes for 49 disease-causing clade 1 isolates and 46 other disease-causing isolates are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.g004

The frequency of allele combinations differs between disease-causing and commensal clade 1 isolates

The genetically fairly homogeneous clade 1 strains also provided an opportunity to explore if, within a given genetic background, different interactions with the host might select for different SSR1 alleles. Indeed, while jointly the allele combinations 6+6/9+4 and 6+6/10+4 accounted for a similar percentage (60%) of SSR1 genotypes in commensal isolates and disease-causing clade 1 isolates (55.6% and 59%, respectively), the allele combination 6+6/9+4 was 5.51 times more frequent in 49 clade 1 strains that caused disease than in 36 commensal clade 1 strains, and the combination 6+6/10+4 was1.75 times less frequent (P = 0.0105; Chi2 test; Fig 5). No other patient or isolate characteristics were associated with significant differences in in the frequencies of these two alleles (S1 Table). Also, while the size of subsamples was too small to establish statistical significance, the observed frequency of the 6+6/9+4 allele type was higher in pathogenic clade 1 isolates from both males and females (S1 Fig), and when only adults age 20–69 were considered (S2 Fig). It was comparable between clade 1 isolates from nonsterile and sterile sites of infection (S3 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Frequency of genotypes in 36 commensal and 49 disease-causing clade 1 isolates.

Allele combinations are labeled with repeat numbers in allele 1 (Region A + Region B) followed by repeat numbers in allele 2 (Region A + Region B) alleles are sorted so that allele 1 is the smaller allele (when alleles are of the same size the allele with the smaller region A precedes the allele with the larger region A).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.g005

In summary, our results support a role of the high frequency of mutation of the SSR1 repeats in the generation of clade-specific variants of the Ssr1 protein. An asymmetric distribution of nonsynonymous mutations and an association of some Ssr1 variants with clade 1, in spite of the high mutation rate of SSR1 TR repeats, indicates that the TR-encoded amino acid repeats are under selection and thus phenotypically relevant. Presumably the amino acid repeats optimize the protein for different genetic backgrounds, as is also that case for many other amino acid repeat-containing proteins [16]. Our data indicate that, in addition, commensal and pathogenic interaction with the human host may lead to selection of different SSR1 alleles. Disease-causing strains do not represent separate genetic lineages [18,34] and candidiasis is often caused by endogenous commensal strains[35,36]. Thus our data suggest that alterations in proteins encoded by repeat-containing genes such as SSR1 may be part of the transition of C. albicans from commensal to pathogen. If so, changes in SSR1 would not necessarily play a primary role in pathogenesis, but could be a secondary adaptation to disease-related changes in the physiology of the host or C. albicans or mutational changes in other C. albicans TR-ORFs.

Unfortunately the functional significance of changes in SSR1 in human disease cannot be demonstrated directly by transforming a laboratory strain with the 6+6/9+4 and other allele combinations and assessing if the former increases its virulence in an animal model, for a number of reasons. One is that the results of C. albicans virulence assessments in animal models conflict with outcomes in humans[37], and that different strain types (and thus alleles) are favoured by selection in animals compared to humans [38]; thus virulence differences between SSR1 alleles in the animal model (or their absence) would be difficult to interpret in the context of human disease, even if changes in SSR1 did play a primary role in human disease. Secondly, which TR-ORF alleles are selectively advantageous depends on the genetic background of the strain (this study,[16,39]); thus the 6+6/9+4 allele combination may not necessarily be compatible with the genetic background of a given laboratory strain, especially since such strains’ genomes differ from those of natural isolates[10,16,40]. Lastly, given the large number of TR-ORFs in the C. albicans genome [4,5], it seems likely that mutational changes in TR-ORFs during pathogenesis are not restricted to SSR1, and that changes in SSR1 or indeed any given TR-ORF are only advantageous if they are matched with compatible changes in other TR-ORFs.

If the latter is correct, the significance of changes in TR-ORFs in pathogenesis may however be verifiable in the future by whole genome and amplicon sequencing of large numbers of TR-ORFs in commensal and disease-causing isolates, in particular of colonizing and blood stream isolates from the same patients. Such analyses would then reveal a limited number of sets of concerted changes in multiple TR-ORFS correlated with the transition from commensalism to pathogenesis. Since such correlations involving multiple TR-ORFs would be extremely unlikely to arise by chance they would represent strong, albeit indirect evidence that mutational change in TR-ORFs is part of C. albicans’ transition from commensal to pathogen.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Frequency of SSR1 genotypes in disease-causing and commensal clade 1 isolates in males and females.

Numbers in brackets are the numbers of isolates in each category.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.s001

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Frequency of SSR1 genotypes in disease-causing and commensal clade 1 isolates in patients of different age; teens, adults aged 20–69 and patients older than 69.

Numbers in brackets are the numbers of isolates in each category.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.s002

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Frequency of SSR1 genotypes in disease-causing clade 1 isolates from sterile and nonsterile sites.

Numbers in brackets are the numbers of isolates in each category.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.s003

(TIFF)

S1 Table. Isolates and their SSR1 repeat region size combinations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.s004

(DOCX)

S2 Table. SSR1 repeat region sizes in published sequences from other strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180246.s005

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust and the Massey University Research Fund for their financial support of this work.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: ZZ JS.
  2. Data curation: ZZ JS.
  3. Formal analysis: ZZ JS.
  4. Funding acquisition: JS.
  5. Investigation: ZZ JS.
  6. Methodology: ZZ JS SZ NZ.
  7. Project administration: JS.
  8. Resources: JS.
  9. Supervision: JS ZJ.
  10. Validation: ZZ JS.
  11. Visualization: ZZ JS.
  12. Writing – original draft: ZZ JS ZJ.
  13. Writing – review & editing: ZZ JS.

References

  1. 1. Zhou K, Aertsen A, Michiels CW (2014) The role of variable DNA tandem repeats in bacterial adaptation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38: 119–141. pmid:23927439
  2. 2. Deitsch KW, Lukehart SA, Stringer JR (2009) Common strategies for antigenic variation by bacterial, fungal and protozoan pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 493–503. pmid:19503065
  3. 3. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ (2007) Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 20: 133–163. pmid:17223626
  4. 4. Braun BR, van het Hoog M, d'Enfert C, Martchenko M, Dungan J, Kuo A, et al. (2005) A human-curated annotation of the Candida albicans genome. PLoS Genet 1: 36–57. pmid:16103911
  5. 5. Schmid J, Wilkins M, Zhang N, Bradshaw R, Cox M, Cannon R, et al. (2012) Why do so many fungal open reading frames contain repeats? Mycoses 55: 67–68.
  6. 6. Lott TJ, Holloway BP, Logan DA, Fundyga R, Arnold J (1999) Towards understanding the evolution of the human commensal yeast Candida albicans. Microbiology 145: 1137–1143. pmid:10376829
  7. 7. Oh S-H, Cheng G, Nuessen JA, Jajko R, Yeater KM, Zhao X, et al. (2005) Functional specificity of Candida albicans Als3p proteins and clade specificity of ALS3 alleles discriminated by the number of copies of the tandem repeat sequence in the central domain. Microbiology 151: 673–681. pmid:15758214
  8. 8. Zhao X, Oh S-H, Jajko R, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Pujol C, et al. (2007) Analysis of ALS5 and ALS6 allelic variability in a geographically diverse collection of Candida albicans isolates. Fungal Genet Biol 44: 1298–1309. pmid:17625934
  9. 9. MacCallum DM, Castillo L, Nather K, Munro CA, Brown AJ, Gow NA, et al. (2009) Property differences among the four major Candida albicans strain clades. Eukaryot Cell 8: 373–387. pmid:19151328
  10. 10. Zhang N, Harrex AL, Holland BR, Fenton LE, Cannon RD, Schmid J (2003) Sixty alleles of the ALS7 open reading frame in Candida albicans: ALS7 is a hypermutable contingency locus. Genome Res 13: 2005–2017. pmid:12952872
  11. 11. Hoyer L (2001) The ALS gene family of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol 9: 176–180. pmid:11286882
  12. 12. Rauceo JM, De Armond R, Otoo H, Kahn PC, Klotz SA, Gaur NK, et al. (2006) Threonine-rich repeats increase fibronectin binding in the Candida albicans adhesin Als5p. Eukaryot Cell 5: 1664–1673. pmid:16936142
  13. 13. Staab JF, Bahn YS, Tai CH, Cook PF, Sundstrom P (2004) Expression of transglutaminase substrate activity on Candida albicans germ tubes through a coiled, disulfide-bonded N-terminal domain of Hwp1 requires C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol modification. J Biol Chem 279: 40737–40747. Epub 42004 Jul 40715. pmid:15262971
  14. 14. Sumita T, Yoko-o T, Shimma Y-i, Jigami Y (2005) Comparison of cell wall localization among Pir family proteins and functional dissection of the region required for cell wall binding and bud scar recruitment of Pir1p. Eukaryot Cell 4: 1872–1881. pmid:16278454
  15. 15. Li F, Palecek SP (2008) Distinct domains of the Candida albicans adhesin Eap1p mediate cell-cell and cell-substrate interactions. Microbiology 154: 1193–1203. pmid:18375812
  16. 16. Zhang N, Cannon RD, Holland B, Patchett M, Schmid J (2010) Impact of genetic background on allele selection in a highly mutable Candida albicans gene, PNG2. PLoS ONE 5: e9614. pmid:20231904
  17. 17. Sampaio P, Nogueira E, Loureiro A, Delgado-Silva Y, Correia A, Pais C (2009) Increased number of glutamine repeats in the C-terminal of Candida albicans Rlm1p enhances the resistance to stress agents. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 96: 395–404. pmid:19484503
  18. 18. Schmid J, Herd S, Hunter PR, Cannon RD, Yasin MSM, Samad S, et al. (1999) Evidence for a general-purpose genotype in Candida albicans, highly prevalent in multiple geographic regions, patient types and types of infection. Microbiology 145: 2405–2414. pmid:10517593
  19. 19. Odds FC, Bougnoux ME, Shaw DJ, Bain JM, Davidson AD, Diogo D, et al. (2007) Molecular phylogenetics of Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 6: 1041–1052. pmid:17416899
  20. 20. Al-Aidan AW, Goessens W, Toom NL-d, Al-Ahdal M, Belkum Av (2007) Microevolution in genomic short sequence repeats of Candida albicans in non-neutropenic patients. Yeast 24: 155–160. pmid:17351906
  21. 21. Garcerá A, Martínez AI, Castillo L, Elorza MV, Sentandreu R, Valentín E (2003) Identification and study of a Candida albicans protein homologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ssr1p, an internal cell-wall protein. Microbiology 149: 2137–2145. pmid:12904553
  22. 22. Schmid J, Voss E, Soll DR (1990) Computer- assisted methods for assessing strain relatedness in Candida albicans by fingerprinting with the moderately repetitive sequence Ca3. J Clin Microbiol 28: 1236–1243. pmid:2199493
  23. 23. Schmid J, Odds FC, Wiselka MJ, Nicholson KG, Soll DR (1992) Genetic similarity and maintenance of Candida albicans strains from a group of AIDS patients, demonstrated by DNA fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol 30: 935–941. pmid:1572980
  24. 24. Schmid J, Rotman M, Reed B, Pierson CL, Soll DR (1993) Genetic similarity of Candida albicans strains from vaginitis patients and their partners. J Clin Microbiol 31: 39–46. pmid:8417030
  25. 25. Schmid J, Tay YP, Wan L, Carr M, Parr D, McKinney W (1995) Evidence for nosocomial transmission of Candida albicans obtained by Ca3 fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol 33: 1223–1230. pmid:7615732
  26. 26. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Smith JA, Seidman JG, et al. (2014) Current protocols in molecular biology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  27. 27. Holmes DS, Quigley M (1981) A rapid boiling method for the preparation of bacterial plasmids. Anal Biochem 114: 193–197. pmid:6269464
  28. 28. Odds FC (1988) Candida and candidosis. London: Bailliere Tindall.
  29. 29. Jansen A, Gemayel R, Verstrepen KJ (2012) Unstable microsatellite repeats facilitate rapid evolution of coding and regulatory sequences. Genome Dyn 7: 108–125. pmid:22759816
  30. 30. Lynch M, Sung W, Morris K, Coffey N, Landry CR, Dopman EB, et al. (2008) A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 9272–9277. pmid:18583475
  31. 31. Gomez-Raja J, Larriba G (2013) Comparison of two approaches for identification of haplotypes and point mutations in Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Microbiol Methods 94: 47–53. pmid:23631908
  32. 32. Tavanti A, Davidson AD, Fordyce MJ, Gow NAR, Maiden MCJ, Odds FC (2005) Population structure and properties of Candida albicans, as determined by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 43: 5601–5613. pmid:16272493
  33. 33. Lott TJ, Fundyga RE, Kuykendall RJ, Arnold J (2005) The human commensal yeast, Candida albicans, has an ancient origin. Fungal Genet Biol 42: 444–451. pmid:15809008
  34. 34. Xu J, Boyd CM, Livingston E, Meyer W, Madden JF, Mitchell TG (1999) Species and genotypic diversities and similarities of pathogenic yeasts colonizing women. J Clin Microbiol 37: 3835–3843. pmid:10565893
  35. 35. Brillowska-Dabrowska A, Bergmann O, Jensen IM, Jarlov JO, Arendrup MC (2010) Typing of Candida isolates from patients with invasive infection and concomitant colonization. Scand J Infect Dis 42: 109–113. pmid:19902993
  36. 36. Reagan DR, Pfaller MA, Hollis RJ, Wenzel RP (1990) Characterization of the sequence of colonization and nosocomial candidemia using DNA fingerprinting and a DNA probe. J Clin Microbiol 28: 2733–2738. pmid:2177750
  37. 37. Schmid J, Tortorano AM, Jones G, Lazzarini C, Zhang N, Bendall MJ, et al. (2011) Increased mortality in young candidemia patients associated with presence of a Candida albicans general-purpose genotype. J Clin Microbiol 49: 3250–3256. pmid:21775553
  38. 38. Edelmann A, Schmid J, Krüger M (2005) Genetic relationships between human and animal isolates of Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol 43: 6164–6166. pmid:16333121
  39. 39. Zhang N, Upritchard JE, Holland BR, Fenton LE, Ferguson MM, Cannon RD, et al. (2009) Distribution of mutations distinguishing the most prevalent disease-causing Candida albicans genotype from other genotypes. Infect, Genet Evol 9: 493–500.
  40. 40. Selmecki A, Bergmann S, Berman J (2005) Comparative genome hybridization reveals widespread aneuploidy in Candida albicans laboratory strains. Mol Microbiol 55: 1553–1565. pmid:15720560