Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Effects of dietary inclusion of high concentrations of crude glycerin on meat quality and fatty acid profile of feedlot fed Nellore bulls

  • Eric H. C. B. van Cleef ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Iturama, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Affiliation São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil


  • André P. D'Áurea,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Vanessa R. Fávaro,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Flavia O. S. van Cleef,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Robson S. Barducci,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Marco T. C. Almeida,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Otávio R. Machado Neto,

    Roles Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Jane M. B. Ezequiel

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil

Effects of dietary inclusion of high concentrations of crude glycerin on meat quality and fatty acid profile of feedlot fed Nellore bulls

  • Eric H. C. B. van Cleef, 
  • André P. D'Áurea, 
  • Vanessa R. Fávaro, 
  • Flavia O. S. van Cleef, 
  • Robson S. Barducci, 
  • Marco T. C. Almeida, 
  • Otávio R. Machado Neto, 
  • Jane M. B. Ezequiel


Crude glycerin, the main by-product of biodiesel production, can replace dietary energy sources, such as corn. The objective of this study was to evaluate the inclusion of up to 30% of crude glycerin in dry matter (DM) of the total diets, and its effects on meat quality parameters of feedlot Nellore bulls. Thirty animals (227.7 ± 23.8 kg body weight; 18 months old) were housed in individual pens and fed 5 experimental diets, containing 0, 7.5, 15, 22.5 or 30% crude glycerin (DM basis). After 103 d (21 d adaptation) animals were slaughtered and the Longissimus muscle was collected. The characteristics assessed were chemical composition, fatty acid profile, cholesterol, shear force, pH, color, water-holding capacity, cooking loss and sensory properties. The increasing inclusion of crude glycerin in the diets did not affect the chemical composition of the Longissimus muscle (P > 0.10). A quadratic effect was observed when levels of crude glycerin were increased, on the concentration of pentadecanoic, palmitoleic and eicosenoic fatty acids in meat (P < 0.05), and on the activity of the delta-9 desaturase 16 and delta-9 desaturase 18 enzymes (P < 0.05). The addition of crude glycerin increased the gamma linolenic fatty acid concentration (P < 0.01), and altered the monounsaturated fatty acids in Longissimus muscle of animals (Pquad. < 0.05). Crude glycerin decreased cholesterol content in meat (P < 0.05), and promoted higher flavor score and greasy intensity perception of the meat (P < 0.01). The inclusion of up to 30% crude glycerin in Nellore cattle bulls`diets (DM basis) improves meat cholesterol and sensory attributes, such as flavor, without affecting significantly the physical traits, the main fatty acid concentrations and the chemical composition.


Nowadays, there is a growing interest in manipulating the carcass quality and fatty acid composition of livestock`s meat, in order to produce meat with higher acceptance by the market, especially in terms of reduced content of saturated fatty acids (SFA), which are directly related to human diseases associated with modern life [12]. Several studies were recently conducted in order to obtain healthy animal products for human consumption, keeping or increasing nutritional value of meat and not encumbering the animal production systems.

The intensification of livestock production leads to the search for alternatives to reduce the costs of feedstuff, such as the inclusion of by-products to replace conventional feed ingredients. Crude glycerin is a by-product of the biodiesel industry widely used in diets for ruminants, as it has great potential for replacing energetic ingredients, such as corn grain [345]. The glycerol (main constituent of crude glycerin) can be converted to glucose by the liver and kidneys to provide energy for cellular metabolism. In ruminants, the glycerol is fermented in the rumen into short chain fatty acids, mainly to propionic and butyric [6]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the inclusion of this by-product has effects on carcass grade [47], increases the intramuscular fat and oleic acid content [8], decreases myristic, palmitic and stearic acids in Longissimus muscle [9], increases the monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) content and conjugated linoleic acid content [10], decreases saturated fatty acid and increases unsaturated and odd-chain fatty acid contents [4]. However, in other studies the effects of crude glycerin on carcass and meat traits were neglected [111213].

Nevertheless, to date there is no study, evaluating high inclusions of crude glycerin in feedlot Nellore cattle diets and its effects on meat quality. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the inclusion of up to 30% of crude glycerin in DM of the diets, on meat quality parameters of feedlot Nellore bulls.

Material and methods

Ethical approval

The Animal Welfare and Ethics Commission from São Paulo State University approved all the procedures involving animals (Protocol Number 010707).

Animal housing, management and experimental diets

This study was carried out at the Animal Unit of Digestive and Metabolic Studies, and at the Meat Technology Laboratory from São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.

Thirty Nellore bulls (227.7 ± 23.8 kg body weight; 18 months old) were individually weighed, tagged, dewormed, supplemented with vitamins A, D, E and K, vaccinated, and housed in individual semi-roofed pens (10 m2), equipped with individual feed bunks and waterers. Animals were blocked by initial body weight, and randomly assigned to one of five treatments.

Five diets (Table 1) were formulated with similar concentrations of crude protein (12.2%, DM basis) and metabolizable energy (2.5 Mcal/kg DM), according to recommendations of NRC [14]. Animals received the diets as total mixed rations twice daily (0700 and 1700 h) at a concentrate:roughage ratio of 70:30. Treatments consisted of increasing inclusion of crude glycerin, which mainly replaced dietary corn grain and soybean hulls. Experimental diets were labeled as: G0 = control diets with no crude glycerin addition; G7.5 = with 7.5% crude glycerin in diet DM; G15 = with 15% crude glycerin in diet DM; G22.5 = with 22.5% crude glycerin in diet DM and G30 = with 30% crude glycerin in diet DM.

Table 1. Percentage of feed ingredients and nutrient composition of experimental diets.

The crude glycerin used in the current study was soybean-based and composed of 5% water, 86% glycerol, 6% salts (98% NaCl) and less than 0.01% methanol. This by-product was weighed at the time of feeding, top-dressed on corn silage, and manually mixed at the feed bunks.

Animals were submitted to a 21-d adaptation period to experimental facilities, handling and diets, in which animals received four step-up diets containing increasing levels of concentrate and crude glycerin, and to an 82-d finishing period.

Slaughter and meat collection

At the end of the feedlot period (d 82) animals were transported to a commercial abattoir located at Barretos, Brazil (100 km away from the research facility), and were submitted to a 16-h solid fast period with free access to water prior to harvesting. After 24-h chill period, samples of Longissimus muscle were collected from the left side of the carcass (from 13th rib), cut in four 2.54 cm-thick steaks, vacuum packed into polyethylene bags (water vapor permeability < 10 g/m2/24 h at 38°C and oxygen permeability < 40 mL/m2/24 h at 25°C), and transported to the Meat Technology Laboratory at Unesp and stored at -20°C.

Meat centesimal composition

One steak of each animal was thawed at room temperature, cut in small cubes and freeze-dried for 72 h. After the lyophilization process, samples were ground and the centesimal composition was evaluated. Moisture content was determined using a 105°C oven for 16 h [15] (method 967.03); crude protein was estimated using N value from micro-Kjeldahl method [15] (method 920.87), and multiplied by 6.25; ether extract was obtained using the Soxhlet apparatus with petroleum ether as solvent [16] (method 960.39), and mineral fraction was obtained incinerating the samples using a muffle furnace at 600°C [15] (method 942.05).

Meat and subcutaneous fat color and meat pH

The color parameters of meat and subcutaneous fat were evaluated as described by Houben et al. [17], using a colorimeter (Minolta Chroma Meter CR-300, Osaka, Japan) with aperture of 8 mm, illuminant D65, 10° standard observer, open cone. The calorimeter calibration was performed, at room temperature (25°C), before readings using a pure white standard (100% reflection) and a black box (zero reflection). The parameters evaluated were: lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*) which were assessed by the CIE L* a* b* color system [18]. Approximately 30 min before color readings, the muscle`s myoglobin was exposed to oxygen. The color was read at three different points, and the averages were calculated. The device calibration was performed before the readings with white and black standards. The pH was then measured also at three different locations across the surface, using a digital pH-measuring instrument (Testo, model 205).

Water holding capacity, cooking loss and Warner–Bratzler shear force

The water holding capacity (WHC) was measured submitting approximately 2 g of meat to 10 kg pressure for 5 min. The difference between the meat weight before and after the procedure was used to calculate WHC, expressed as % [19].

For cooking loss (CL) determination, one steak of each animal was thawed at room temperature, weighed, grilled at 200°C pre-heated clamshell grill. When the center of the steak reached 71°C (monitored with a thermometer), the grilling was interrupted and the steaks were reweighed after reaching room temperature. The difference of steaks`weight before and after grilling was considered the CL. The same steaks used for CL determination were used for evaluation of Warner–Bratzler shear force (SF). Round cores (1.27 cm diameter) of meat, free of visible fat and connective tissue, were cut from each steak, parallel to the long axis of the muscle fibers [20], and each core was sheared perpendicularly to the fiber direction using a Warner–Bratzler shear apparatus (G-R Manufacturing Company, Manhattan, KS, USA). The equipment was set to have a crosshead speed of 200 mm/min using a Texture Analyzer TA–XT2i (Stable Micro Systems Ltd., UK). Shear force values were recorded in kgf, and then converted to Newtons (N).

Meat and subcutaneous fat cholesterol and fatty acid profile

Cholesterol analysis were performed according to Al-Hasani et al. [21], involving alcoholic KOH saponification of the samples, extraction of the non-saponifiable fraction with hexane, and injection of concentrated extract into the gas chromatograph (model 14-B, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

The fatty acids were extracted according to methodology proposed by Bligh et al. [22] with some modifications. Approximately 3 g of freeze-dried meat samples (without subcutaneous fat) were transferred to a 125-mL Erlenmeyer, and 10 mL of chloroform, 20 mL of ethanol, and 8 mL of distilled water were added. The reactants were mixed for 30 min in a horizontal shaker (model SL-0031, Solab, Piracicaba, Brazil), and then 10 mL of chloroform and 10 mL of 1.5% sodium sulfate solution were added for another agitation for 2 min. All content was filtered with a quantitative filter paper and transferred to 50-mL Falcon® flasks. After separation, the upper layer was discarded, and 10 mL was transferred to glass beakers previously tarred. The recipient was placed into a 55°C forced air oven, for 24 h, in order to evaporate solvent. After cooling, beakers were reweighed and fat content calculated by difference.

For the trans esterification of triglycerides, approximately 50 mg of lipids were transferred to 15-mL Falcon flasks, and 2 mL of heptane were added. The mixture was agitated until complete fat dissolution, and then 2 mL of KOH (2 mol/L methanol) were added. The new mixture was vigorously agitated for 5 min. After phase separation, 1 mL of upper layer, composed of heptane and fatty acids methyl esters (FAME) was transferred to 1.5-mL microtubes and frozen at -18°C until analyses.

Fatty acid profile analyses were performed using a gas chromatograph (model 14-B, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), along with fused silica capillary column, type Omewax250 (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) Cat. No. 24136-Supelco, with the following analytical conditions and programing: 100°C for 2 min; heating 4°C/min up to 220°C and maintaining this temperature for 25 min; detector temperature of 280°C; injector temperature of 250°C; carrier gas velocity (H2) of 1 mL/min; SPLIT 1:100; injection volume of 1 μL; using flame ionization detector. The flux of gases was 23, 50 and 180 kPa, respectively for synthetic air, H2 and N2. The FA profile of TMR was determined using the same gas chromatograph and procedures. Individual fatty acids were identified by comparison of the retention times with standards (Supelco 37 components FAME Mix, USA).

The Δ9 desaturase (16 and 18) and elongase activities were estimated according to Malau-Aduli et al. [23], and the atherogenicity index was estimated according to Ulbricht et al. [24]. The equations used were:

Sensory analysis

Two 2.54 cm thick steaks were cooked in an electric oven at 175°C, until the geometric center reached 71°C. Cooked steaks were cut in cubes (2 cm3), wrapped in aluminum foil and offered to 9 trained panellists, which scored from 1 (minimum acceptance) to 9 (maximum acceptance), according to Meilgaard et al. [25], in two sessions (morning and afternoon). Panellists tested 4 samples of each treatment (total of 20 samples), and evaluated the following meat attributes: appearance, odor intensity, flavor intensity, tenderness, juiciness, greasy intensity and overall acceptance.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed as a completely randomized block design using the MIXED procedure of SAS 9.1 (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC). Animals were blocked by initial body weight and each animal was considered an experimental unit. Model effects included treatment (fixed effect) and block (random effect), according to the equation: where:

Yij = observed measurement, μ = overall mean; τi = inclusion level of crude glycerin (i = 0, 7.5, 15, 22.5, 30%); βj = effect of block (j = 1 to 6); and εij = experimental error.

The model for sensory analysis included the fixed effect of treatment and the random effects of panel session (morning or afternoon), panellist, and sample order. Orthogonal contrasts were used to determine the linear and quadratic effects of glycerin, and 0% glycerin × glycerin treatment. Means of treatments were obtained with the LSMEANS option. Significance was declared as P ≤ 0.05 and tendency as P < 0.10.


Feeding Nellore feedlot cattle up to 30% crude glycerin (DM of the diet) for 103d did not change performance of the animals (P > 0.10, Table 2).

Table 2. Dry matter intake and performance of Nellore bulls (n = 30) fed diets containing up to 30% crude glycerin.

Meat centesimal composition

The increasing inclusion of crude glycerin in diets did not affect the chemical composition of the Longissimus muscle of Nellore bulls (P > 0.10, Table 3).

Table 3. Centesimal composition of Longissimus muscle of Nellore cattle fed diets containing up to 30% crude glycerin.

Meat and subcutaneous fat color and meat pH

The only color parameter (a*, b* and L*), measured both in meat and subcutaneous fat, which was affected by the inclusion of crude glycerin in cattle diets, was the luminosity index of fat. The L* of fat was greater when glycerin was fed at either 0 or 30% of the diet (64.46 vs. 63.40), however intermediate inclusions of glycerin (7.5, 15 and 22.5%) reduced L* of fat to 61.61, 58.63 and 60.55, respectively (P Quad. < 0.05; Table 4). No treatment effect was observed in terminal pH of meat (Table 4).

Table 4. Qualitative characteristics of Longissimus muscle and subcutaneous fat from Nellore cattle fed diets containing up to 30% crude glycerin.

Water holding capacity, cooking loss and Warner–Bratzler shear force

Differences were not observed (P > 0.10) for WHC, CL and SF in meat from animals fed crude glycerin (Table 4).

Meat and subcutaneous fat cholesterol and fatty acid profile

The use of crude glycerin produced slight changes in the fatty acids profile of Longissimus muscle and did not affect the fatty acid profile of subcutaneous fat (Tables 5 and 6). A quadratic effect was observed when increasing levels of crude glycerin on the concentration of pentadecanoic acid (C15:0), which was greater for treatment containing 15% of crude glycerin (P < 0.01). The same behavior was observed for palmitoleic acid (C16:1cis9, P < 0.05). The concentration of the gamma linolenic fatty acid was also affected by increasing the levels of glycerin (P < 0.01). Moreover, it was observed a quadratic effect of the inclusion of crude glycerin on concentration of eicosenoic acid in the animal muscle (P < 0.05).

Table 5. Fatty acid profile of Longissimus muscle from Nellore cattle fed diets containing up to 30% crude glycerin.

Table 6. Fatty acid profile of subcutaneous fat from Nellore cattle fed diets containing up to 30% crude glycerin.

Regarding the enzymatic activity indexes, a quadratic effect was observed of dietary treatments on the enzymes delta-9 desaturase 16 and delta 9 desaturase 18 (P < 0.05, Table 7).

Table 7. The Δ9 desaturase and elongase enzyme activity indices, and atherogenicity index of Longissimus muscle and subcutaneous fat from Nellore cattle fed diets containing up to 30% crude glycerin.

Among total concentration of SFA, MUFA, and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids in Longissimus muscle of animals submitted to different treatments, only MUFA was significantly altered (P < 0.05, Table 8). However, the total concentrations of oleic acid, the main monounsaturated fatty acid of Longissimus muscle was not significantly affected by the treatments and the trend observed for their concentration was similar to other monounsaturated fatty acids.

Table 8. Total saturated fatty acids (SFA), unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), and unsaturated:Saturated ratio (UFA:SFA) of Longissimus muscle and subcutaneous fat from Nellore cattle fed diets containing up to 30% crude glycerin.

Sensory attributes

The trained evaluators identified that the inclusion of crude glycerin increased the score of flavor and greasy intensity of the meat (P Lin. < 0.01, Table 9). It was also observed greater tenderness in the meat of animals fed 15% crude glycerin (PQuad. < 0.05). The top scores for juiciness were awarded to meat from animals fed treatments containing crude glycerin compared to the control diet (0 × Gly, P < 0.05), with the highest score given to treatments with 30% crude glycerin.

Table 9. Average scores (scale from 0 to 9 points) for sensory attributes of meat from Nellore cattle fed up to 30% crude glycerin.


Meat centesimal composition

The analysis of the chemical composition of food aims to gather up to date and reliable information of the final product in order to establish a true nutritional labeling, so consumers really know what they will consume. The proper verification of the nutritional value allows establishing diets and nutritional goals for a better quality of life of humans [26].

In this study, the chemical composition of the Longissimus muscle was not altered by the increasing inclusion of crude glycerin in cattle diets. The lack of significant differences among treatments allows us to state that the nutritional quality of meat was maintained without any prejudice for the composition of the final product. The average values of moisture, protein, fat and mineral matter, for all the treatments, were respectively 75.68, 21.85, 23.02 and 0.96%, very similar to those reported by Prado et al. [27], Fernandes et al. [28] and Françozo et al. [29]. Thus, despite the metabolism of glycerol and its conversion to propionate in the rumen, there was not an increased intramuscular fat deposition, which might be expected.

Meat and subcutaneous fat color and meat pH

The diet is a potential tool used to manipulate the meat quality, such as the color [30]. Therefore, differences in the rate of tissue deposition and use of glycogen can influence the final color. For other color indicators measured, the level of inclusion of crude glycerin in the diets was not enough to promote changes in pH and meat color, similarly reported by others studies, in that color was not influenced by glycerol feeding [13293132]. On the other hand, Carvalho et al. [8] reported that the inclusion of crude glycerin in beef cattle diets (up to 18% of diet`s dry matter) positively affected the meat color. The average values of L*, a*, and b* for meat, found in the present study, are very close to those reported by Muchenje et al. [33], who observed values of 33 to 41 for L*, 11.1 to 23.6 for a*, and 6.1 to 11.3 for b*.

The appearance of the meat regarding to color and brightness is an important aspect of quality that influences the attractiveness of meat to consumers at the time of the purchase [34]. Consumers are increasingly demanding for quality and variety of products [35]. This way, the appearance of meat, such as color, has a decisive impact on the choice and consumer acceptance [3637].

Water holding capacity, cooking loss and Warner–Bratzler shear force

Recent studies have shown that the addition of crude glycerin in diets does not change WHC, CL and SF [132931]. In ruminants, approximately 80% of glycerol is transformed in the rumen into volatile fatty acids, suggesting a low absorption of the unchanged glycerol molecule, then unchanged cell osmotic pressure, the intracellular water content and the water holding capacity [11]. Furthermore, the feeding used in the production system is an important factor in the tenderness of the meat, since it is involved in the storage of glycogen and modulation of final pH [38]. As the diets had similar energy levels, they had no dietary effect on postmortem glycolysis and the final pH. The obtained SF results with 15%, 22.5% and 30% of crude glycerin used in diet (< 45.1 N) ensured a tenderness that should result in high consumer acceptance [39].

Meat and subcutaneous fat cholesterol and fatty acid profile

Cholesterol of meat decreased for cattle fed 7.5 and 30% crude glycerin (30.62 vs. 26.97), but treatments G0, G15 and G22.5 increased cholesterol of meat to 36.81, 39.87 and 34.40, respectively (P Lin. < 0.01; P Quad.< 0.05; Table 4). However, the cholesterol levels in this study were generally lower than those considered normal for different bovine cuts (58.3–83.4 mg/100 g), according to Werdi Pratiwi et al. [40]. It can be inferred that young, non-castrated Zebu cattle fed diets with low ether extract content, reduces meat cholesterol concentration. These animals are likely using cholesterol, during this stage of their development, to produce hormones. Furthermore, the muscle cholesterol concentrations vary, depending on the needs and functions of cell membranes, increasing its solubility when large proportions of saturated fatty acids are present [4142]. Details of cholesterol metabolism in ruminants are not fully elucidated, despite the extensive knowledge in other species [43]. An increased meat deposition of cholesterol can be associated with a lower deposition of C18:0 in muscle. This suggests that C18:0, which is one of the final products of fatty acid synthesis, either desaturated into C18:1 cis-9, or acting as a modulator of cholesterol synthesis [44].

Because high cholesterol consumption by humans may be related to high incidence of cardiovascular diseases and certain types of cancer [4546], cattle fed crude glycerin could be advantageous to consumers wishing to lower their dietary cholesterol intake, while continuing to consume beef.

The pentadecanoic acid is a fatty acid synthesized by ruminal bacteria and found in low concentration in bovine muscle. Vahmani et al. [47] evaluated the lipid profile of Canadian beef and the pentadecanoic acid represented about 0.45% of total fatty acids. Whereas the experimental diets had relatively similar fatty acids concentrations, therefore it cannot be concluded that its increase is due to the presence in the diet.

The rumen environment may have become more suitable to microbial growth at 15% of crude glycerin, since greater levels of crude glycerin promoted reductions on the concentration of C15:0, and replacing corn by glycerin may have contributed to this achievement, as the reduction can be considered significant. The diet of the control group, with no crude glycerin contained 35% of ground corn while the diet with 15% crude glycerin, only 18% corn.

Palmitoleic acid is a monounsaturated fatty acid that is produced almost exclusively via desaturation of palmitic acid by the delta-9 desaturase (SCD-1), and the effects of diets on the activity index of the delta-9 desaturase 16 support it. According to Duckett et al. [48], there are few dietary sources of this fatty acid, which has been related to insulin sensitivity and intramuscular adipogenesis. Authors had conducted an infusion of C16:1 for 28 days in sheep and verified a reduction in the daily weight gain, the size of intramuscular adipocytes and the total content of lipids. Furthermore, according to them, palmitoleic acid causes changes in the expression of genes that regulate glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation in muscles. Regarding the stearic acid, a quadratic effect was observed due to the increasing levels of crude glycerin, explained by its effects on the enzyme Δ-9 desaturase 16. Despite the increasing of the concentration of this fatty acid is important in quantitative terms, the stearic acid has no impact on the greatest levels of serum LDL. Around 90% of stearic acid available in the diet can be absorbed in the intestine, and its rapid conversion to oleic acid would prevent the negative effects on the serum concentration of LDL. This rapid conversion does not occur with palmitic acid, because there is no adverse effect on the LDL, once it needs to be lengthened to stearic acid and subsequently desaturated [49].

The gamma linolenic acid (18:3n6), by promoting the activation of the PPAR, can be essential in the transcription of genes involved in lipid and glucose homeostasis [5051]. Moreover, the ingestion of fatty acids through beef during pregnancy is of great importance, because its constraint may result in increased risk for obesity, insulin resistance and elevated serum cholesterol concentrations in adulthood [52].

The concentration of eicosenoic acid (C20:1n9) was altered in present study treatments, therefore it cannot be concluded that the increase in its concentration is a direct effect of the increase in its intake or intestinal absorption. According to Vahmani et al. [47], regarding the fatty acids in beef, it appears that eicosenoic acid, in quantitative terms, is the twenty-seventh fatty acid found in greater quantities in a total of eighty-five fatty acids, with an average concentration of 0.21% which is close to the results found in some of the treatments of this research.

The enzymes delta-9 desaturase 16 and delta 9 desaturase 18 can be inhibited by linoleic and linolenic acids, as reported by Daniel et al. [53]. In the present study, diets containing increased levels of glycerin also showed increasing levels of linolenic acid, which could explain the reduction in enzyme activities indexes.

Changes observed in MUFA reflect the changes found for palmitoleic and eicosenoic fatty acids.

Sensory attributes

Sensory analysis is of great importance in controlling and maintaining the quality of end products. The profile of meat with desirable attributes is usually established by the consumer, and involves characteristics measured by sight, touch, smell, taste and hearing.

In this study, the sensory analysis showed that the increasing inclusion of crude glycerin in diets promoted improvement in sensory characteristics of the meat. Increasing scores were assigned by trained evaluators for flavor intensity (Table 9). This may be directly related to juiciness of the meat, attribute that also received notes as increasing inclusion of crude glycerin in diets, with greater scores for treatments G15, G22.5 and G30. However, despite the absence of significant differences among treatments for moisture and fat composition, the trained evaluators had a perception to greasy intensity. This fact may have induced psychologically tasters for a greater perception of tasty and juicy meat, reflecting the final grade of sensory analysis. The greatest tenderness of the meat observed with the inclusion of 15% crude glycerin agrees with the lower numerical value of shear force observed for the same treatment (Table 4).

The lack of effects among the treatments on the a* and b* of Longissimus muscle could be explained by the muscle fatty acid profile. The oxidation of oxymyoglobin to metmyoglobin can be accelerated by the products of the lipid oxidation. It is possible that the generation of these products from PUFA had occurred similarly among treatments, as the muscle concentrations of PUFA, which are more susceptible to oxidation, were similar among treatments.


The meat quality can be changed with the inclusion of high concentrations of crude glycerin in diets for Nellore bulls (up to 30% of total DM), such as the cholesterol content and sensory attributes. This by-product has the potential to change ruminal fermentation, resulting in changes in odd-chain fatty acid concentration in meat, and fatty acids correlated with meat flavor (MUFA) and human health (C18:3n6).


Authors thank Caramuru Alimentos S/A and Animal Scientist Marcelo Ladeira for providing part of the ingredients used in this research.


  1. 1. Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, Nute GR, Sheard PR, Richardson RI, et al. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci. 2008;78(4):343–58. pmid:22062452.
  2. 2. Gilmore LA, Walzem RL, Crouse SF, Smith DR, Adams TH, Vaidyanathan V, et al. Consumption of high-oleic acid ground beef increases HDL-cholesterol concentration but both high- and low-oleic acid ground beef decrease HDL particle diameter in normocholesterolemic men. J Nutr. 2011;141(6):1188–94. pmid:21525253.
  3. 3. van Cleef EHCB, Ezequiel JMB, D'Aurea AP, Favaro VR, Sancanari JBD. Crude glycerin in diets for feedlot Nellore cattle. Rev Bras Zootecn. 2014;43(2):86–91.
  4. 4. Carvalho VB, Leite RF, Almeida MT, Paschoaloto JR, Carvalho EB, Lanna DP, et al. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of lambs fed high concentrations of crude glycerin in low-starch diets. Meat Sci. 2015;110:285–92. pmid:26319309.
  5. 5. Almeida MTC, Ezequiel JMB, Paschoaloto JR, Perez HL, de Carvalho VB, Castro Filho ES, et al. Effects of high concentrations of crude glycerin in diets for feedlot lambs: feeding behaviour, growth performance, carcass and non-carcass traits. Anim Prod Sci.
  6. 6. van Cleef EHCB, Sancanari JBD, Silva ZF, D'Aurea AP, Favaro VR, van Cleef FOS, et al. High concentrations of crude glycerin on ruminal parameters, microbial yield, and in vitro greenhouse gases production in dairy cows. Can J Anim Sci. 2016;96(4):461–5.
  7. 7. Elam NA, Eng KS, Bechtel B, Harris JM, Crocker R. Glycerol from biodiesel production: Considerations for feedlot steers. In Proceedings of the Southwest Nutrition Conference, AZ–USA, 2008; 21.
  8. 8. Carvalho JR, Chizzotti ML, Ramos EM, Machado Neto OR, Lanna DP, Lopes LS, et al. Qualitative characteristics of meat from young bulls fed different levels of crude glycerin. Meat Sci. 2014;96(2 Pt A):977–83. pmid:24231675.
  9. 9. Eiras CE, Marques Jde A, Prado RM, Valero MV, Bonafe EG, Zawadzki F, et al. Glycerine levels in the diets of crossbred bulls finished in feedlot: carcass characteristics and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2014;96(2 Pt A):930–6. pmid:24211551.
  10. 10. Lage JF, Berchielli TT, San Vito E, Silva RA, Ribeiro AF, Reis RA, et al. Fatty acid profile, carcass and meat quality traits of young Nellore bulls fed crude glycerin replacing energy sources in the concentrate. Meat Sci. 2014;96(3):1158–64. pmid:24334035.
  11. 11. Mach N, Bach A, Devant M. Effects of crude glycerin supplementation on performance and meat quality of Holstein bulls fed high-concentrate diets. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(2):632–8. pmid:18952726.
  12. 12. Gunn PJ, Neary MK, Lemenager RP, Lake SL. Effects of crude glycerin on performance and carcass characteristics of finishing wether lambs. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(5):1771–6. pmid:20154165.
  13. 13. Egea M, Linares MB, Garrido MD, Villodre C, Madrid J, Orengo J, et al. Crude glycerine inclusion in Limousin bull diets: animal performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2014;98(4):673–8. pmid:25089793.
  14. 14. NRC. National research council Nutrient requirement of beef cattle. 70th ed. Washington, DC: Academy Press; 2000.
  15. 15. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1990.
  16. 16. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1995.
  17. 17. Houben JH, van Dijk A, Eikelenboom G, Hoving-Bolink AH. Effect of dietary vitamin E supplementation, fat level and packaging on colour stability and lipid oxidation in minced beef. Meat Sci. 2000;55(3):331–6. pmid:22061291.
  18. 18. CIE. (International Comission on Illumination). Colorimetry: Technical Report. Central Bureau of the CIE; 2004.
  19. 19. Hamm R. Functional properties of themiofibrilar system and their measurement. In: Bechtel P J, editor. Muscle as Food. Orlando: Academic Press; 1986. pp 135–199.
  20. 20. AMSA. (American Meat Science Association). Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation and tenderness measurements of fresh meat. 1st ed. Chicago: National Livestock and Meat Board, IL; 1995.
  21. 21. al-Hasani SM, Hlavac J, Carpenter MW. Rapid determination of cholesterol in single and multicomponent prepared foods. J AOAC Int. 1993;76(4):902–6. pmid:8374334.
  22. 22. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37(8):911–7. pmid:13671378.
  23. 23. Malau-Aduli AEO, Siebert BD, Bottema CDK, Pitchford WS. A comparison of the fatty acid composition of tryacilglycerols in adipose tissue from Limousin and Jersey cattle. Aust J Agric Res. 1997; 48: 715–722.
  24. 24. Ulbricht TL, Southgate DA. Coronary heart disease: seven dietary factors. Lancet. 1991;338(8773):985–92. pmid:1681350.
  25. 25. Meilgaard MC, Carr BT, Civille GV. Sensory evaluation techniques. 2nd ed. FL: CRC Press Inc; 1991.
  26. 26. Torres EAFS, Campos NC, Duarte M, Garbelotti M, Philippi ST, Rodrigues RSM. Composição centesimal e valor calórico de alimentos de origem animal. Food Sci. Technol (Campinas). 2000; 20: 145–150.
  27. 27. Prado IN, Ito RH, Prado JM, Prado IM, Rotta PP, Matsushita M, et al. The influence of dietary soyabean and linseed on the chemical composition and fatty acid profile of the Longissimus muscle of feedlot-finished bulls. J Anim Feed Sci. 2008;17(3):307–17.
  28. 28. Fernandes ARM, Sampaio AAM, Henrique W, Tullio RR, de Oliveira EA, da Silva TM. Chemical traits and fatty acids composition of beef from young bulls, steers and heifers fed corn silage and concentrate or sugarcane and concentrate with sunflower grains. Rev Bras Zootecn. 2009;38(4):705–12.
  29. 29. Francozo MC, do Prado IN, Cecato U, Valero MV, Zawadzki F, Ribeiro OL, et al. Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality of Finishing Bulls Fed Crude Glycerin-Supplemented Diets. Braz Arch Biol Techn. 2013;56(2):327–36.
  30. 30. Joo ST, Kim GD, Hwang YH, Ryu YC. Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Science. 2013;95(4):828–36. pmid:23702339
  31. 31. Mach N, Bach A, Velarde A, Devant M. Association between animal, transportation, slaughterhouse practices, and meat pH in beef. Meat Science. 2008;78(3):232–8. pmid:22062275
  32. 32. Vito ES, Lage JF, Ribeiro AF, Silva RA, Berchielli TT. Fatty acid profile, carcass and quality traits of meat from Nellore young bulls on pasture supplemented with crude glycerin. Meat Science. 2015;100:17–23. pmid:25290759
  33. 33. Muchenje V, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, Strydom PE, Hugo A, Raats JG. Some biochemical aspects pertaining to beef eating quality and consumer health: A review. Food Chem. 2009;112(2):279–89.
  34. 34. Maw SJ, Fowler VR, Hamilton M, Petchey AM. Physical characteristics of pig fat and their relation to fatty acid composition. Meat Science. 2003;63(2):185–90. pmid:22062178
  35. 35. Bermingham EN, Roy NC, Anderson RC, Barnett MPG, Knowles SO, McNabb WC. Smart Foods from the pastoral sector—implications for meat and milk producers. Aust J Exp Agr. 2008;48(6–7):726–34.
  36. 36. Bass PD, Scanga JA, Chapman PL, Smith GC, Tatum JD, Belk KE. Recovering value from beef carcasses classified as dark cutters by United States Department of Agriculture graders. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;86(7):1658–68. pmid:18344305
  37. 37. Thornton KJ, Welch CM, Davis LC, Doumit ME, Hill RA, Murdoch GK. Bovine sire selection based on maintenance energy affects muscle fiber type and meat color of F1 progeny. J Anim Sci. 2012;90(5):1617–27. pmid:22147475.
  38. 38. Immonen K, Kauffman RG, Schaefer DM, Puolanne E. Glycogen concentrations in bovine longissimus dorsi muscle. Meat Sci. 2000;54(2):163–7. pmid:22060612.
  39. 39. Shackelford SD, Morgan JB, Cross HR, Savell J W. Identification of threshold levels for Warner–Bratzler shear force in beef top loin steaks. J Muscle Foods. 1991; 2: 289–296.
  40. 40. Werdi Pratiwi NM, Murray PJ, Taylor GD. Total cholesterol concentrations of the muscles in castrated Boer goats. Small Ruminant Res. 2006;64(1–2):77–81.
  41. 41. Wheeler TL, Davis GW, Stoecker BJ, Harmon CJ. Cholesterol concentration of longissimus muscle, subcutaneous fat and serum of two beef cattle breed types. J Anim Sci. 1987;65(6):1531–7. pmid:3443573.
  42. 42. Oliveira EA, Sampaio AAM, Henrique W, Pivaro TM, Rosa BL, Fernandes ARM, et al. Quality traits and lipid composition of meat from Nellore young bulls fed with different oils either protected or unprotected from rumen degradation. Meat Science. 2012;90(1):28–35. pmid:21680103
  43. 43. Viturro E, Koenning M, Kroemer A, Schlamberger G, Wiedemann S, Kaske M, et al. Cholesterol synthesis in the lactating cow: Induced expression of candidate genes. J Steroid Biochem. 2009;115(1–2):62–7.
  44. 44. Faria PB, Bressan MC, Vieira JO, Vicente-Neto J, Ferrao SP, Rosa FC, et al. Meat quality and lipid profiles in crossbred lambs finished on clover-rich pastures. Meat Sci. 2012;90(3):733–8. pmid:22127146.
  45. 45. NRC. Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk Committee on Diet and Health. 1st ed. Washington, DC: Academy Press; 1989.
  46. 46. Scollan N, Hocquette JF, Nuernberg K, Dannenberger D, Richardson I, Moloney A. Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Science. 2006;74(1):17–33. pmid:22062713
  47. 47. Vahmani P, Mapiye C, Prieto N, Rolland DC, McAllister TA, Aalhus JL, et al. The scope for manipulating the polyunsaturated fatty acid content of beef: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2015;6(1):29. pmid:26199725;
  48. 48. Duckett SK, Volpi-Lagreca G, Alende M, Long NM. Palmitoleic acid reduces intramuscular lipid and restores insulin sensitivity in obese sheep. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014;7:553–63. pmid:25429233;
  49. 49. Grundy SM. Influence of Stearic-Acid on Cholesterol-Metabolism Relative to Other Long-Chain Fatty-Acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;60(6):986s–90s.
  50. 50. Xu HE, Lambert MH, Montana VG, Parks DJ, Blanchard SG, Brown PJ, et al. Molecular recognition of fatty acids by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Mol Cell. 1999;3(3):397–403. pmid:10198642.
  51. 51. Gervois P, Torra IP, Fruchart JC, Staels B. Regulation of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism by PPAR activators. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000;38(1):3–11. pmid:10774955.
  52. 52. Geppert J, Demmelmair H, Hornstra G, Koletzko B. Co-supplementation of healthy women with fish oil and evening primrose oil increases plasma docosahexaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid and dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid levels without reducing arachidonic acid concentrations. Br J Nutr. 2008;99(2):360–9. pmid:17678567.
  53. 53. Daniel ZC, Wynn RJ, Salter AM, Buttery PJ. Differing effects of forage and concentrate diets on the oleic acid and conjugated linoleic acid content of sheep tissues: the role of stearoyl-CoA desaturase. J Anim Sci. 2004;82(3):747–58. pmid:15032431.