Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Clinical and genetic analysis of recurrent adult-type granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: Persistent preservation of heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation

  • Satoshi Yanagida ,

    yanagi@jikei.ac.jp

    Affiliations Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6699-4528

  • Michael S. Anglesio,

    Affiliations Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Tayyebeh M. Nazeran,

    Affiliations Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Amy Lum,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Agency Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Momoko Inoue,

    Affiliation Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

  • Yasushi Iida,

    Affiliation Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

  • Hirokuni Takano,

    Affiliation Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

  • Takashi Nikaido,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, Kosei General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

  • Aikou Okamoto,

    Affiliation Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

  • David G. Huntsman

    Affiliations Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Agency Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Clinical and genetic analysis of recurrent adult-type granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: Persistent preservation of heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation

  • Satoshi Yanagida, 
  • Michael S. Anglesio, 
  • Tayyebeh M. Nazeran, 
  • Amy Lum, 
  • Momoko Inoue, 
  • Yasushi Iida, 
  • Hirokuni Takano, 
  • Takashi Nikaido, 
  • Aikou Okamoto, 
  • David G. Huntsman
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Adult-type granulosa cell tumors of the ovary (aGCTs) are rare tumors that represent 2–5% of ovarian malignancies. The prognosis of this tumor is favorable, and it is characterized by slow progression. 10–30% of these tumors recur after 4–7 years of the primary surgery and the 5-year survival rate from the first recurrence is 55%, for the incompletely resected patients. At this time, complete resection is the only prognostic factor for better outcome, and establishing a novel strategy for identification and/or treatment of recurrent tumors is crucial. After the discovery of heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutations in 97% of cases of aGCT, much effort has been made to find the role of the mutation on the pathogenesis of aGCT, however, little is known about the role of the mutation in disease progression.

Methods

We analyzed the clinical data of 56 aGCT patients to find a marker of recurrence. In particular, we compared the FOXL2 status in 5 matched primary and recurrent samples by immunohistochemistry, and TaqMan allelic discrimination assay to address the role of FOXL2 in potential mechanisms of recurrence.

Results

The clinical data analysis was consistent with complete resection as an indicator of disease eradication, though the sample size was limited. The genetic analysis showed all the samples, including recurrent tumor samples up to 14 years after the primary surgery, expressed heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation and the FOXL2 protein expression.

Conclusion

This report describes the preservation of heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation in recurrent aGCTs. This finding adds further credence to the concept that the c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation is oncogenic and integral to this disease.

Introduction

Granulosa Cell Tumor of the ovary (GCTs) is the most clinically significant type of sex-cord stromal tumor of the ovary and accounts for 2–5% of overall ovarian malignancies[13]. GCT are divided into two distinct histologic subtypes, adult type (aGCTs) (95%), and juvenile type (5%) by histologic features. aGCTs are defined in most cases by the presence of a specific c.402C>G missense mutation in the forkhead transcription factor FOXL2 [4][5].

This tumor is characterized by its relatively indolent behavior, compared to epithelial ovarian cancers. Prior to the finding of the c.402C>G mutation in FOXL2 and use of a molecular definition of this disease[4][5], literature reports suggested a recurrence rate of 10–30% and a median time to the first recurrence of 4–7 years [1][6][7], whereas most of the epithelial ovarian cancers recur within two years after primary surgery. A major issue in research on aGCTs is the difficulty of accumulating the number of samples because of its rarity and indolent behavior. Because of these characteristics, this tumor requires especially long term follow up [6][8].

Despite the challenge of collecting sufficient patient cohorts, many researchers have attempted to define prognostic factors of this tumor and suggest treatments to prevent the recurrence. In studies with larger cohorts[1][6][7][9][10], 80–90% of the tumors were diagnosed in early stage and the 10-year survival rates were 94.8%[7]. The initial stage, complete resection of tumor, mitotic rate, and nuclear atypia were the predominant prognostic factors[6][7][9][10]. The efficiency of the chemotherapy is controversial, but platinum-based chemotherapy such as BEC-regimen (bleomycin, etoposide, and carboplatin) or paclitaxel-carboplatin have been used for incompletely resected advanced patients [1][6][10][11]. A recent analysis of clinicopathological markers from Farkkila and colleagues showed that high expression of GATA4 and HER2 were prognostic of shorter disease-free survival in low-stage aGCTs [12]. Colin and colleagues also showed reduced β-catenin expression in primary tumors correlated with increased risk of recurrence [13].

Despite an overall favorable 10-years survival rate for aGCT, the prognosis after relapse is still poor. In previous studies, 30% (3/10) [1] and 25.7% (9/35) [9] of recurrent patient died of disease, and the 5-year overall survival rate from the first recurrence for patients, with or without residual tumor at the secondary debulking surgery, was 55.6% and 87.4% [9]. Examination of recurrent patients after debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy suggests only the absence of the residual tumor is prognostic and the effectiveness of the platinum-based chemotherapy is unclear [6][7][9]. Anecdotal case reports suggest some efficacy for aromatase inhibitors and Cytochrome P17 Inhibitor [1416], while Xia and colleagues showed Bevacizumab therapy yielded the response rate of 38% and a clinical benefit of 63% [17]. Clarifying and validating a novel strategy for treatment of recurrent tumors is critical.

In 2009 Shah et al. described the somatic c.402C>G missense mutation in the FOXL2 gene in 97% of aGCTs tumors, this strongly implied a driver potential for this mutation in aGCT[4]. Since then, many researchers have attempted to describe the molecular functions or target genes of this mutant transcription factor and its effect on tumorigenesis [1826]. However, the impact of this mutation on mechanisms of recurrence amongst aGCTs has not been addressed.

The aim of this study is to analyze prognostic clinicopathological variables and investigate the FOXL2 status in primary and recurrent tumors to better understand the function of this gene in recurrence. This is the first report describing the c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation is maintained even in exceptionally late-recurrence tumors.

Material and methods

Patient and samples

This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research of the Jikei Institutional Review Board, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Each patient provided written informed consent for this research. All investigations were performed in accordance with a protocol approved by the ethic committee at BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.

The clinical data of 56 patients who underwent surgical treatment for aGCTs at Jikei University and related hospital in Japan between 1990 to 2014 were included in this analysis. Tumors were staged in accordance with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) system (1988).

For patients with recurrent tumors, we obtained available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded(FFPE) tumor tissues from cytoreductive surgeries for both primary and recurrent tumors at the Department of Pathology, Jikei University Hospital (19 samples from 5 patients: one or more specimens from the initial/primary tumor, plus metastatic sites if available, and at least one recurrent tumor specimen per patient). Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated as months from the date of previous cytoreductive surgery to the following surgery.

Pathological review

The hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of all recurrent patients were independently reviewed by two specialist gynecologic pathologists (TMN, TN) before mutational analysis. Pathologists were blinded to genomic data.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

FOXL2 IHC was done using primary goat polyclonal FOXL2-antiserum (1:200; Imgenex, San Diego, CA, USA) and a secondary antibody (unconjugated rabbit anti-goat, Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA, USA) at 1:300. Scoring of FOXL2 IHC was performed by specialist gynecological pathologist (TMN) as described previously [4][27]. Tumors were divided into 4 groups; no staining (no positive cells: score 0), weak staining (0–30% of positive cells: score 1), moderate staining (30%-80% positive cells: score 2), and strong staining (80%< positive cells: score 3). IHC for p53 was performed using standard methods described previously and where abnormal staining patterns (absent/0 and strong/2) correlate near perfectly with mutation status[28][29][30].

DNA isolation

Tumor areas were enriched by manual macro-dissection with a scalpel from 30μm thick sliced FFPE sections to remove non-tumor tissues; a pathologist-marked serial H&E-stained section was used as a guide. Samples were deparaffinized and genomic DNA was purified using QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

TaqMan allelic discrimination assay

TaqMan real-time PCR based allelic discrimination assay was performed according to procedural guidelines outlined previously [27] to genotype the FOXL2 c.402C>G mutation using primers: 5’-GCGCAAGGGCAACTACTG-3’ (forward) and 5’-CGGTAGTTGCCCTTCTCGAA-3’ (reverse), along with wild type specific probe (5’-FAM dye- CATGTCTTCCCAGGCCG-NFQ (non-fluorescent quencher)) and mutation specific probe (5’-VIC dye-CATGTCTTCGCAGGCCG-NFQ) included in the genotyping master mix. Reactions were performed in a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Reaction volume of 5 μl was used for each replicate well including 2.5 μl 2X TaqMan master mix (Life Technologies), 0.125 μl (40 ×) custom synthesized allelic discrimination primer/probe mix (Life Technologies), 1 μl DNA (standard input of 20 ng was adjusted), and water. After denaturation at 95°C for 10minutes, DNA was amplified over 40 cycles (95°C 15seconds, 60°C 1minute) [4][27]. DNA from molecularly diagnosed aGCT sample in the preceding study[4] was used as a positive control and the distilled water as a negative control. Each sample were duplicated.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using Stat Mate V software (ATMS, Tokyo, Japan). P<0.05 was defined as statistically significant; all tests were 2-tailed. The survival curves were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the resulting curves were compared using the log-rank test. The multivariate analysis was performed using Cox’s regression model. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparing IHC scores.

Results

Patient characteristics and the predictive marker for recurrence

The clinical information of all the patients are summarized in S1 Table. The median age of all patients was 46.5 years old (range 30–88 years old) (Table 1). Fifty-two patients (92.8%) were FIGO stage I, 1 patient (1.8%) stage II, and 3 patients (5.3%) stage III at diagnosis. All patients had received initial surgery: 33 patients (58.9%) had total abdominal hysterectomy and 8 patients (14.2%) had lymphadnectomy, one (1.8%) of them presented with residual tumor after surgery. All the 4 stage II or III patients (7.1%) had undergone platinum-based chemotherapy whereas none of stage I patient had. The median follow-up period was 86.9 months (range 1.2–285 months). No deaths were recorded among these patients and only 7 were lost to follow up.

There were 7 recurrent patients (12.5%) during follow up (Table 2). The median age of recurrent patients was 50 years (range 32–66 years old). Five patients were FIGO stage I (5/52, 9.6%), and two were stage III (2/3, 66.7%) at initial surgery. One of the stage III patients had residual tumor. The median time to relapse was 112 months (range 31–172 months). Pelvis was the most common site of recurrence.

Age, stage, residual tumor, type of surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor size were examined as prognostic markers of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curve (S1 Fig) and Univariate (Table 3) analysis revealed the residual tumor at the primary surgery was predictive of recurrence. Consistent with previous reports [6][8], multivariate analysis also showed residual tumor was the only predictive marker for the recurrence (Table 4).

Protein expression and genotyping of FOXL2

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) on recurrent GCTs.

All the tumors were diagnosed as aGCTs (Figs 1a, 2a and 2b). IHC of recurrent tumors revealed all samples to be moderately to strongly positive for FOXL2 expression (Fig 1b). The samples from patient #1–4 showed normal p53 staining (Fig 1c), but all samples from patient #5 showed strong/abnormal tp53 nuclear accumulation (Fig 2c). This strong/abnormal p53 staining has been shown to be a highly accurate predictor of TP53 mutation in ovarian carcinomas [29][30]. The mean FOXL2 IHC score revealed no significant difference between primary and recurrent tumors, and between p53 normal and abnormal/strong staining tumors (Table 5, S2 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 1. The expression of FOXL2 and p53.

(a) H&E: The histological findings of aGCTs including small bland cells with the central round nuclei. The typical coffee bean nuclei with nuclear groove is seen. (b) FOXL2 was expressed in the nuclei of GCTs that were heterozygous c.402 C>G mutation. (c) No p53 staining was found in the sample of Pt #1-#4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178989.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Histological finding and p53 expression of Pt #5.

(a) The primary tumor of the Pt #5 revealed the bland tumor cells with variably nuclear grooves and a predominant diffuse pattern with minor trabecular and insular pattern which compatible with aGCTs. The mitotic activity was inconspicuous. (b) The recurrent tumor of the Pt #5 showed the similar histological findings as the primary tumor, though the mitotic activity was slightly higher compared to the primary tumor. (c) Primary and recurrent samples from patient #5 showed the moderate to strong p53 staining in the nucleus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178989.g002

Allelic discrimination assay.

All tumors showed similar ratio of signal from both wild type (WT) and mutational (mut) allele in keeping with samples being heterozygous for the c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation (Fig 3, S2 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 3. TaqMan based allelic discrimination assay.

All samples gave fluorescent signal from both WT and mutant probes consistent with heterozygous c.402 C>G FOXL2 mutation. Each sample was duplicated and the black dot represents the negative control (H2O).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178989.g003

FOXL2 status in recurrent aGCTs.

The clinical characteristics and the FOXL2 status in each recurrent patient and each sample are summarized in Table 5.

Discussion

The rarity and slow progression of aGCTs has made it difficult to analyze large number of the patients and run clinical trials. Whilst initial stage, complete resection of tumor, mitotic rate, and nuclear atypia are the predominant prognostic factors for aGCT, no effective treatments, especially for recurrent tumors and aside from complete resection, have been established. For premenopausal women, fertility sparing surgery, defined as the preservation of the uterus and one ovary, is an option [1][7]. In a recent publication, we demonstrated among patients with a primary histologic diagnosis of aGCT almost 75% of deaths within the first five years occurred in patients who were misdiagnosed and never had this cancer[5]. Nevertheless, as the 5-years and 10-year survivals of molecularly defined aGCTs after relapse are 76.4% and 53.6% respectively, better management strategies for recurrent aGCTs are still needed [5] and research is needed to better understand such tumors.

Though intratumoral heterogeneity is seen in epithelial ovarian cancers[3136], relatively little is known about the recurrent aGCT[37]. It is possible that less heterogeneity will be seen in aGCTs as they are cytogenetically simple and clinicopathologically homogenous [4] and not all aGCT patient undergo post-surgical platinum-based chemotherapy which is potentially mutagenic [38]. A recent publication by Zannoni and colleagues showed the c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation was found in 89% (33/37) of primary and 80% (4/5) of metastatic aGCTs [37], albeit perfect concordance with mutant status between primary and metastasis (i.e. the 4 cases with c.402C>G in the primary also showed mutation in the metastatic lesion). However, to date no report has examined persistence or heterogeneity of FOXL2 status in recurrent aGCTs. Understanding heterogeneity in the context of recurrent aGCTs is important, herein consistent preservation of the heterozygous mutation in primary and recurrent lesions supports a view that c.402C>G FOXL2 is indeed a driver gene for aGCT and this tumor retains dependence on the functions of the mutant protein.

The finding of pathognomonic c.402C>G FOXL2 driver mutations in aGCTs has changed the way this cancer is viewed and opened opportunities to better understand its pathogenesis [1826]. Herein we have shown the persistence of this mutation across the course of disease which suggests that this mutant protein or the as yet unknown pathways it abrogates could be useful targets for the management of metastatic aGCT.

In our study, the analysis of 56 aGCT patients (maximum following up time 24 years) revealed the recurrence rate was 12.5% (7/56) and the mean and median time to the first recurrence were 106 and 112 months. No deaths were found amongst recurrent patients.

The univariate and multivariate analysis supports the residual tumor after primary surgery as the only predictive marker for recurrence. These results are concordant with previous studies [5,6], however in our cohort this residual disease is apparent only in a single patient and confirmation on larger sample cohorts are needed. Overall, the importance of complete resection at the primary surgery cannot be understated.

c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation is critical for the tumorigenesis of aGCTs

To elucidate the role of FOXL2 in the mechanism of recurrence, we stepped further and investigated the FOXL2 status by comparing 19 samples from 5 patients, including multiple recurrences and metastatic lesions (Table 5).

All the primary tumor samples showed moderate to strong expression of FOXL2 in IHC, and heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation in the allelic discrimination assay. These finding is in agreement with the recent publication by McConechy and colleagues showing the diagnosis of aGCTs can be challenging and the frequency of FOXL2 mutation in aGCT series should be over 90% [5]. With respect to p53: primary and recurrent samples from only patient #5 showed abnormal/strong expression, a pattern associated with TP53 mutation[29][30]. Patient #5 was diagnosed as aGCT and had somatic c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation, but was clinically unique due to an exceptionally short time to recurrence (3 months), despite being apparently low stage Ia. Whether this unusually aggressive course was related to the p53 abnormalities is unknown.

All the recurrent samples also showed similar FOXL2 level of staining and heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation, between primary and recurrence, even in with late recurrence 14 years after primary surgery. One patient had three distinct recurrence events, with consistent results (FOXL2 IHC and mutation) in all specimens. No previous reports have focused on the FOXL2 status in pairs of primary-recurrent tumors, however our result is concordant with the finding that 3 of 4 index cases and 16 of 69 in first series in original description of c.402C>G FOXL2 by Shah and colleagues[4] were in fact recurrent tumors, and all of which expressed this mutation. Two of those series were matched samples though the time to the recurrence was not presented. In the present study, patient #2 and #3 had metastatic tumors in the primary surgery. These patients expressed heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation both in the primary and metastatic lesions, matching findings of Zannoni and colleagues [37]. The finding that heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation and the FOXL2 protein expression were preserved in all evaluated primary, metastatic lesions, and recurrent samples is consistent with this mutation being critical for long-term maintenance of aGCTs, as opposed to strictly tumor initiation, and may also reflect the genetically stable characteristics of aGCTs.

Conclusions

This is the first report to identify heterozygous c.402C>G FOXL2 mutation as an apparent driver of aGCT in primary and matched recurrent tumors. The importance of the complete resection is evident in our cohort, despite its limited sample size. Larger cohorts, long term follow up and molecular analysis will be required to better this disease.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Summary of the clinical background of all patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178989.s001

(TIFF)

S2 Table. Summary of Allelic discrimination assay.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178989.s002

(TIFF)

S1 Fig. Kaplan-Meier curve of the patients with and without residual tumor.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178989.s003

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all who supported this project; Janine Senz and Julie Ho for assisting experiments;

Dr. Jiro Suzuki, Misato Saito and the member of the pathology department in Jikei University and Kosei General hospital for tissue sample preparation; all the patients who participated in this study.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: SY MA AO DH.
  2. Data curation: SY MI YI AL.
  3. Formal analysis: YI TN TMN HT.
  4. Funding acquisition: DH.
  5. Investigation: SY MA DH.
  6. Methodology: SY MA DH.
  7. Project administration: SY DH.
  8. Resources: AL HT TN.
  9. Supervision: AO DH.
  10. Validation: MA DH.
  11. Visualization: SY.
  12. Writing – original draft: SY.
  13. Writing – review & editing: SY.

References

  1. 1. Lee IH, Choi CH, Hong DG, Song JY, Kim YJ, Kim KT, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of granulosa cell tumors of the ovary: A multicenter retrospective study. J Gynecol Oncol. Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy; 2011;22: 188–195. pmid:21998762
  2. 2. Kent SW, Mckay DG. Primary cancer of the ovary An analysis of 349 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960;80: 430–8. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14408555 pmid:14408555
  3. 3. Schweppe KW, Beller FK. Clinical data of granulosa cell tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1982;104: 161–9. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7130243 pmid:7130243
  4. 4. Shah SP, Köbel M, Senz J, Morin RD, Clarke BA, Wiegand KC, et al. Mutation of FOXL2 in Granulosa-Cell Tumors of the Ovary. N Engl J Med. 2009; 26: 2719–2729. pmid:19516027
  5. 5. McConechy MK, Färkkilä A, Horlings HM, Talhouk A, Unkila-Kallio L, van Meurs HS, et al. Molecularly Defined Adult Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Ovary: The Clinical Phenotype. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108: djw134. pmid:27297428
  6. 6. Sun HD, Lin H, Jao MS, Wang KL, Liou WS, Hung YC, et al. A long-term follow-up study of 176 cases with adult-type ovarian granulosa cell tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124: 244–9. pmid:22019525
  7. 7. Bryk S, Färkkilä A, Butzow R, Leminen A, Heikinheimo M, Anttonen M, et al. Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with an adult-type ovarian granulosa cell tumor: a 56-year single-center experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25: 33–41. pmid:25347095
  8. 8. Mangili G, Ottolina J, Gadducci A, Giorda G, Breda E, Savarese A, et al. Long-term follow-up is crucial after treatment for granulosa cell tumours of the ovary. Br J Cancer. Nature Publishing Group; 2013;109: 29–34. pmid:23756859
  9. 9. Mangili G, Sigismondi C, Frigerio L, Candiani M, Savarese A, Giorda G, et al. Recurrent granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of the ovary: A MITO-9 retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. Elsevier Inc.; 2013;130: 38–42. pmid:23623833
  10. 10. Park JY, Jin KL, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim KR, et al. Surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of patients with adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125: 80–6. pmid:22210469
  11. 11. Homesley HD, Bundy BN, Hurteau JA, Roth LM, Ayhan A, Tuncer Z, et al. Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin Combination Therapy of Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors and Other Stromal Malignancies: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. Elsevier; 1999;72: 131–137. pmid:10021290
  12. 12. Färkkilä A, Andersson N, Butzow R, Leminen A, Heikinheimo M, Anttonen M, et al. HER2 and GATA4 are new prognostic factors for early-stage ovarian granulosa cell tumor-a long-term follow-up study. Cancer Med. 2014;3: 526–536. pmid:24687970
  13. 13. Stewart CJR, Doherty D, Guppy R, Louwen K, Leung YC. β-Catenin and E-cadherin expression in stage I adult-type granulosa cell tumour of the ovary: Correlation with tumour morphology and clinical outcome. Histopathology. 2013;62: 257–266. pmid:22958082
  14. 14. Freeman SA, Modesitt SC. Anastrozole therapy in recurrent ovarian adult granulosa cell tumors: A report of 2 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103: 755–758. pmid:16870240
  15. 15. Lamm W, Schiefer A, Nobauer I, Horvat R, Speiser P, Kostler W. Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy As Effective Rescue in a Patient With Tamoxifen- Refractory Metastatic Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Ovary Case. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34.
  16. 16. Garcia-Donas J, Hurtado A, García-Casado Z, Albareda J, López-Guerrero JA, Alemany I, et al. Cytochrome P17 inhibition with ketoconazole as treatment for advanced granulosa cell ovarian tumor. J Clin Oncol. 2013; pmid:23358981
  17. 17. Tao X, Sood AK, Deavers MT, Schmeler KM, Nick AM, Coleman RL, et al. Anti-angiogenesis therapy with bevacizumab for patients with ovarian granulosa cell tumors. Gynecol Oncol. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;114: 431–436. pmid:19524286
  18. 18. Fleming NI, Knower KC, Lazarus K a., Fuller PJ, Simpson ER, Clyne CD. Aromatase is a direct target of FOXl2: C134W in granulosa cell tumors via a single highly conserved binding site in the ovarian specific promoter. PLoS One. 2010;5. pmid:21188138
  19. 19. Geiersbach KB, Jarboe EA, Jahromi MS, Baker CL, Paxton CN, Tripp SR, et al. FOXL2 mutation and large-scale genomic imbalances in adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary. Cancer Genet. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;204: 596–602. pmid:22200085
  20. 20. Kim JH, Yoon S, Park M, Park HO, Ko JJ, Lee K, et al. Differential apoptotic activities of wild-type FOXL2 and the adult-type granulosa cell tumor-associated mutant FOXL2 (C134W). Oncogene. 2011;30: 1653–1663. pmid:21119601
  21. 21. Oseto K, Suzumori N, Nishikawa R, Nishikawa H, Arakawa A, Ozaki Y, et al. Mutational analysis of FOXL2 p.C134W and expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 in Japanese patients with granulosa cell tumor of ovary. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40: 1197–204. pmid:24689977
  22. 22. Kim JH, Kim YH, Kim HM, Park HO, Ha NC, Kim TH, et al. FOXL2 posttranslational modifications mediated by GSK3β determine the growth of granulosa cell tumours. Nat Commun. 2014;5: 2936. pmid:24390485
  23. 23. Anttonen M, Pihlajoki M, Andersson N, Georges A, L’Hot̂e D, Vattulainen S, et al. FOXL2, GATA4, and SMAD3 co-operatively modulate gene expression, cell viability and apoptosis in ovarian granulosa cell tumor cells. PLoS One. 2014;9. pmid:24416423
  24. 24. Cheng JC, Chang HM, Qiu X, Fang L, Leung PCK. FOXL2-induced follistatin attenuates activin A-stimulated cell proliferation in human granulosa cell tumors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Elsevier Inc.; 2014;443: 537–542. pmid:24332943
  25. 25. Suh DS, Oh HK, Kim JH, Park S, Shin E, Lee K, et al. Identification and Validation of Differential Phosphorylation Sites of the Nuclear FOXL2 Protein as Potential Novel Biomarkers for Adult-Type Granulosa Cell Tumors. J Proteome Res. 2015;14: 2446–2456. pmid:25871347
  26. 26. Caburet S, Anttonen M, Todeschini AL, Unkila-Kallio L, Mestivier D, Butzow R, et al. Combined comparative genomic hybridization and transcriptomic analyses of ovarian granulosa cell tumors point to novel candidate driver genes. BMC Cancer.???; 2015;15: 1–11.
  27. 27. Kommoss S, Anglesio MS, Mackenzie R, Yang W, Senz J, Ho J, et al. FOXL2 molecular testing in ovarian neoplasms: diagnostic approach and procedural guidelines. Mod Pathol. 2013;26: 860–7. pmid:23348906
  28. 28. Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, McKinney S, Mehl E, Palmer C, et al. Ovarian Carcinoma Subtypes Are Different Diseases: Implications for Biomarker Studies. Narod S, editor. PLoS Med. IARCPress-WHO; 2008;5: e232. pmid:19053170
  29. 29. Köbel M, Piskorz AM, Lee S, Lui S, LePage C, Marass F, et al. Optimized p53 immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of TP53 mutation in ovarian carcinoma. J Pathol Clin Res. Wiley-Blackwell; 2016;2: 247–258. pmid:27840695
  30. 30. Yemelyanova A, Vang R, Kshirsagar M, Lu D, Marks MA, Shih IM, et al. Immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 can serve as a surrogate marker for TP53 mutations in ovarian carcinoma: an immunohistochemical and nucleotide sequencing analysis. Mod Pathol. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;24: 1248–1253. pmid:21552211
  31. 31. Bell D, Berchuck A, Birrer M, Chien J, Cramer DW, Dao F, et al. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;474: 609–615. pmid:21720365
  32. 32. Bayani J, Marrano P, Graham C, Zheng Y, Li L, Katsaros D, et al. Genomic instability and copy-number heterogeneity of chromosome 19q, including the kallikrein locus, in ovarian carcinomas. Mol Oncol. NIH Public Access; 2011;5: 48–60. pmid:20800559
  33. 33. Mota A, Triviño JC, Rojo-Sebastian A, Martínez-Ramírez Á, Chiva L, González-Martín A, et al. Intra-tumor heterogeneity in TP53 null High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma progression. BMC Cancer. BioMed Central; 2015;15: 940. pmid:26620706
  34. 34. Bai H, Cao D, Yang J, Li M, Zhang Z, Shen K. Genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancer and the clinical implications for molecular targeted therapy. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20: 581–593. pmid:26800494
  35. 35. Konecny GE, Winterhoff B, Wang C. Gene-expression signatures in ovarian cancer: Promise and challenges for patient stratification. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;141: 379–385. pmid:26827964
  36. 36. Paracchini L, Mannarino L, Craparotta I, Romualdi C, Fruscio R, Grassi T, et al. Regional and temporal heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancer tumor biopsies: implications for therapeutic strategies. Oncotarget. Impact Journals; 2016;5.
  37. 37. Zannoni G, Improta G, Petrillo M, Pettinato A, Scambia G, Fraggetta F. FOXL2 molecular status in adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary: A study of primary and metastatic cases. Oncol Lett. Spandidos Publications; 2016;12: 1159–1163. pmid:27446412
  38. 38. Lambrechts S, Smeets D, Moisse M, Braicu EI, Vanderstichele A, Zhao H, et al. Genetic heterogeneity after first-line chemotherapy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;53: 51–64. pmid:26693899