There are errors in the reference list. Reference 58 should have been listed as Reference 39. The correct References 39 to 58 are:
39. Meikle DB, Thornton MW. Premating and gestational effects of maternal nutrition on secondary sex ratio in house mice. J Reprod Fertil. 1995; 105: 193–196.
40. Mappes T, Ylönen H. Reproductive effort of female bank voles in a risky environment. Evol Ecol. 1997; 11: 591–598.
41. Myers JH. Sex ratio adjustment under food stress: maximization of quality or numbers of offspring? Am Nat. 1978; 112: 381–388.
42. Olofsson H, Ripa J, Jonzen N. Bet-hedging as an evolutionary game: the trade-off between egg size and number. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276: 2963–2969.
43. König B, Markl H. Maternal care in house mice. I. The weaning strategy as a means for parental manipulation of offspring quality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1987; 20: 1–9.
44. König B, Riester J, Markl H. Maternal care in house mice (Mus musculus). II. The energy cost of lactation as a function of litter size. J Zool. 1988; 216: 195–210.
45. Weber EM, Olsson IAS. Maternal behaviour in Mus musculus sp.: an ethological review. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2008; 114: 1–22.
46. Drummond H, Vázquez E, Sánchez-Colón S, Martínez-Gómez M, Hudson R. Competition for milk in the domestic rabbit: survivors benefit from littermate deaths. Ethology. 2000; 106: 511–526.
47. McNamara JM, Trimmer PC, Eriksson A, Marshall JAR, Houston AI. Environmental variability can select for optimism or pessimism. Ecol Lett. 2011; 14: 58–62.
48. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. II. J Theor Biol. 1964; 7: 1–52.
49. Aloise King ED, Garratt M, Brooks R. Manipulating reproductive effort leads to changes in female reproductive scheduling but not oxidative stress. Ecol Evol. 2013; 3: 4161–4171.
50. Johnson MS, Thomson SC, Speakman JR. Limits to sustained energy intake I. Lactation in the laboratory mouse Mus musculus. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204: 1925–1935.
51. Rauw WM, Luiting P, Beilharz RG, Verstegen MWA, Vangen O. Selection for litter size and its consequences for the allocation of feed resources: a concept and its implications illustrated by mice selection experiments. Livest Prod Sci. 1999; 60: 329–342.
52. Lessells CM. Parentally biased favouritism: why should parents specialize in caring for different offspring? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002; 357: 381–403.
53. Hammond KA, Diamond J. An experimental test for a ceiling on sustained metabolic rate in lactating mice. Physiol Zool. 1992; 65: 952–977.
54. Martin JGA, Festa-Bianchet M. Bighorn ewes transfer the costs of reproduction to their lambs. Am Nat. 2010; 176: 414–423.
55. Schroderus E, Koivula M, Koskela E, Mappes T, Oksanen T, et al. Can number and size of offspring increase simultaneously?—a central life-history trade-off reconsidered. BMC Evol Biol. 2012; 12: 1–7.
56. van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat. 1986; 128: 137–142.
57. Schubert KA, de Vries G, Vaanholt LM, Meijer HAJ, Daan S, et al. Maternal energy allocation to offspring increases with environmental quality in house mice. Am Nat. 2009; 173: 831–840.
58. Skjervold H. The effect of foetal litter size on milk yield: cross fostering experiments with mice. J Anim Breed Genet. 1977; 94: 66–75.
- 1. Dušek A, Bartoš L, Sedláček F (2017) Pre-breeding food restriction promotes the optimization of parental investment in house mice, Mus musculus. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0173985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173985 pmid:28328991
Citation: Dušek A, Bartoš L, Sedláček F (2017) Correction: Pre-breeding food restriction promotes the optimization of parental investment in house mice, Mus musculus. PLoS ONE 12(5): e0178804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178804
Published: May 26, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Dušek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.