Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Surviving anoxia in marine sediments: The metabolic response of ubiquitous benthic foraminifera (Ammonia tepida)

Surviving anoxia in marine sediments: The metabolic response of ubiquitous benthic foraminifera (Ammonia tepida)

  • Charlotte LeKieffre, 
  • Jorge E. Spangenberg, 
  • Guillaume Mabilleau, 
  • Stéphane Escrig, 
  • Anders Meibom, 
  • Emmanuelle Geslin


High input of organic carbon and/or slowly renewing bottom waters frequently create periods with low dissolved oxygen concentrations on continental shelves and in coastal areas; such events can have strong impacts on benthic ecosystems. Among the meiofauna living in these environments, benthic foraminifera are often the most tolerant to low oxygen levels. Indeed, some species are able to survive complete anoxia for weeks to months. One known mechanism for this, observed in several species, is denitrification. For other species, a state of highly reduced metabolism, essentially a state of dormancy, has been proposed but never demonstrated. Here, we combined a 4 weeks feeding experiment, using 13C-enriched diatom biofilm, with correlated TEM and NanoSIMS imaging, plus bulk analysis of concentration and stable carbon isotopic composition of total organic matter and individual fatty acids, to study metabolic differences in the intertidal species Ammonia tepida exposed to oxic and anoxic conditions. Strongly contrasting cellular-level dynamics of ingestion and transfer of the ingested biofilm components were observed between the two conditions. Under oxic conditions, within a few days, intact diatoms were ingested, degraded, and their components assimilated, in part for biosynthesis of different cellular components: 13C-labeled lipid droplets formed after a few days and were subsequently lost (partially) through respiration. In contrast, in anoxia, fewer diatoms were initially ingested and these were not assimilated or metabolized further, but remained visible within the foraminiferal cytoplasm even after 4 weeks. Under oxic conditions, compound specific 13C analyses showed substantial de novo synthesis by the foraminifera of specific polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as 20:4(n-6). Very limited PUFA synthesis was observed under anoxia. Together, our results show that anoxia induced a greatly reduced rate of heterotrophic metabolism in Ammonia tepida on a time scale of less than 24 hours, these observations are consistent with a state of dormancy.


Benthic foraminifera are eukaryote unicellular protists and ubiquitous in marine sediments from shallow water estuaries to the deep ocean [1]. Representing up to 50% of top sediment biomass, they constitute an important part of benthic meiofauna [2,3] and may play a significant role in the carbon and nitrogen cycles, depending on the habitat, species assemblage, and feeding patterns [47]. The broad spectrum of conditions under which marine foraminifera live includes zones of O2-depletion [811], deep-sea sulphidic habitats [12], hydrocarbon seeps [13,14], and intertidal environments [15]. Of particular interest here is the striking capability of some benthic foraminifera to adapt to a sudden decrease in the availability of O2. Hypoxic and anoxic events strongly and more frequently affect benthic ecosystems, in particular on continental shelves and in coastal areas where renewal of bottom water is slow and/or organic input is high [1618]. During such events, large fractions of the benthic meio- and macrofauna (size range >1 mm) can die off [1922]. However, foraminifera are consistently among the most resistant species [9,23,24]. High survival rates of foraminifera under low O2 conditions have been documented both in-situ [2529] and in laboratory experiments [30,31] and ascribed, in part, to relatively low rates of O2-respiration compared to other meiofauna species [32]. Experimental studies of Ammonia sp. combining TEM and NanoSIMS observations suggest higher global metabolic activity in hypoxia than in anoxia [33]. Various anaerobic pathways have been suggested as alternative metabolic strategies to achieve resistance to low-O2 conditions, including symbiosis with ectobionts [12,34] or endobionts [35], and sequestered chloroplasts [36,37]. It has been demonstrated that some species are capable of nitrate respiration (denitrification) under anoxia [3840]. Bernard et al. [41] observed a decrease of the adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) pool in foraminifera Bulimina marginata, Stainforthia fusiformis and Adercotryma glomeratum from Drammensfjord (Norway) exposed to anoxia, and suggested that this might indicate a state of dormancy. Indeed, dormancy or quiescence, defined as reduced or suspended metabolic activity in response to exogenous factors, might be a more widespread adaptation strategy of benthic foraminifera to environmental stress than previously acknowledged [42]. Even during periods with normal oxic conditions in bottom waters, foraminifera and other benthic meiofauna species can be (and frequently are) exposed to low O2 levels simply because bioturbation mechanically moves them deeper into the sediments [43,44]. Ammonia tepida, for example, which is among the most abundant species in intertidal sediments [15] is normally residing in the top few centimeters of the sediments, where O2 concentration is high. Here, it grazes on algal biofilm [45]. However, A. tepida is also regularly found alive at depths of 4 to 26 cm, i.e. below the O2 penetration depth, as a result of bioturbation [46,47]. These observations raise questions about the mechanism(s) that enable foraminifera to survive sudden changes to anoxia, often for extended periods of time.

In this study, we present results of two experiments: Experiment I aimed to determine the survival and growth rates of algae-fed A. tepida under anoxia, compared with oxic conditions. Experiment II aimed to investigate the metabolism of A. tepida following a sudden shift to anoxic conditions. In the latter experiment, using 13C-enriched diatom-containing biofilm and a combination of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and NanoSIMS isotopic imaging, we have visualized and quantified with subcellular resolution (in situ, ex vivo) the incorporation and transfer of isotopically labeled heterotrophic compounds, under both oxic and anoxic conditions. These subcellular-level observations were combined with concentrations and stable carbon isotopic analysis by isotope ratio mass spectrometry of total organic carbon (TOC) and individual fatty acids. Our results are discussed in context of previous experiments using 13C-labeled food, which have already yielded important insights into the metabolism of foraminifera under a variety of environmental conditions [4855].


Experiment I: Survival and growth rate of A. tepida under oxic and anoxic conditions

After 13 days of incubation, the survival rates of fed adult or juvenile specimens of A. tepida were indistinguishable (p>0.05) between oxic and anoxic conditions (S1 Fig): 95±11% and 87±12% for adults and 84±2% and 83±8% for juveniles, respectively. The average growth rate of juvenile specimens was significantly (p<0.05) higher under oxic (1.3±0.7% per day) compared with anoxic (0.2±0.1% per day) conditions (S2 Fig). The growth rate under anoxic conditions was not significantly different from zero (t-test, p>0.05).

Experiment II: Feeding behavior of A. tepida under oxic and anoxic conditions

Under anoxic conditions the foraminifera rapidly (within around 24 hours) ceased to move. At the end of the incubation there was still diatom biofilm left in the vials in the anoxic aquarium, while the biofilm had been completely consumed by the foraminifera in the oxic aquarium.

Under oxic conditions, the average total organic carbon (TOC) content per cell of the A. tepida specimens increased during the first 7 days from 0.65±0.06 to 1.29±0.14 μg C×ind-1 (Fig 1A). At this point it was observed that all the biofilm had been ingested. After 14 days, the TOC content had decreased to 1.10±0.18 μg C×ind-1 and continued to decrease to reach a value of 0.94±0.05 μg C×ind-1 at the end of the experiment (i.e. Day 28). Under anoxia the TOC content showed a modest increase during the first 3 days of the incubation, reaching maxima of 1.0±0.1 μg C×ind-1. At Day 7, the TOC had dropped to 0.8 ±0.1 μg C×ind-1 and this level was maintained for the rest of the experiment (p>0.05) (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. TOC concentration and 13C atomic fraction of A. tepida under oxic and anoxic conditions.

(A) Average total organic carbon (TOC in μg C×ind-1) concentration and (B) 13C atomic fraction of the TOC (x(13C)TOC in %), both as a function of time. Continuous lines: oxic conditions, dotted lines: anoxic conditions. Error bars are ±1 SD (n = 3).

Average 13C atomic fractions in TOC (x(13C)TOC in %) as a function of time are shown in Fig 1. Under both oxic and anoxic conditions, a sharp 13C-enrichment indicating an uptake of 13C-enriched diatoms occurred at the beginning of the experiment, reaching plateaus on different time scales. Under oxic conditions, a sharp increase in x(13C)TOC up to 1.86±1.16% occurred during the Day 1, followed by a slower increase to 2.24±1.22% on Day 7, after which x(13C)TOC stabilized (p>0.05). Under anoxia, x(13C)TOC increased to 1.41±1.18% during the Day 1, after which no statistically significant changes were observed (p >0.05). The final 13CTOC-enrichment was about 4 times higher under oxic than anoxic conditions.

Average carbonate uptake (calculated as the difference in C content of the shells in individuals from Day 28 and control specimens) and the enrichment in 13C of the shells from Day 28 over that of control samples are given in S1 Table. Under oxic conditions, an average of 4.9±1.8 μg C×ind-1 was added to the shells over 28 days and their average x(13C)car was 0.05% higher than the unlabeled control samples. Under anoxia, the specimens did not add new carbonate to their shells and therefore no significant 13Ccar-enrichment was observed (p>0.05), consistent with a growth rate statistically indistinguishable from zero (Fig 1B).

Results of TEM and NanoSIMS analyses are presented in Figs 2 and 3. S3 Fig exhibits typical cellular structures in the antepenultimate chamber of an A. tepida specimen collected directly from the mudflat that provided samples for Experiment II. Recognizable structures include lipid droplets, residual bodies, and diatomic frustules. The presence of mitochondria and the integrity of intact double membranes and crests indicated vitality at the time of the chemical fixation; all observed specimens exhibited these ultrastructures. Time sequences of TEM and NanoSIMS isotopic images permit to follow the ingestion and metabolism of isotopically enriched diatom biofilm components under oxic and anoxic conditions (Figs 2 and 3). Fig 4 shows the relative surface areas occupied by diatoms, lipid droplets, and residual bodies in a representative cytoplasm area, with the corresponding average 13C atomic fractions for each structural component.

Fig 2. Time-evolution of 13C uptake and transfer within the cytoplasm of A. tepida under oxic conditions.

A, D, G, J and M: TEM images; C, F, I, L and O: NanoSIMS images of corresponding 13C/12C distributions. B, E, H, K, and N: Direct correlation of TEM and NanoSIMS images. d*: Intact diatoms; d: frustules without their original contents; *: diatomic material free in the foraminiferal cytoplasm; li: lipid droplets; ol: organic lining; p: pores; r: residual bodies. Arrowheads show aperture of opened diatom frustules. Circles are drawn around a few organelles to facilitate their visualization on the different images: white circles: lipid droplets, dotted circles: residual bodies. Scale bars: 2 μm.

Fig 3. Time-evolution of 13C uptake and transfer within the cytoplasm of A. tepida under anoxic conditions.

A, D, G, J and M: TEM images; C, F, I, L and O: NanoSIMS images of corresponding 13C/12C distributions. B, E, H, K, and N: Direct correlation of TEM and NanoSIMS images d*: Intact diatoms; d: frustules without their original contents; *: diatomic material free in the foraminiferal cytoplasm; li: lipid droplets; ol: organic lining; p: pores; r: residual bodies. Arrowheadsshow aperture of opened diatom frustules. Circles are drawn around a few organelles to facilitate their visualization on the different images: white circles: lipid droplets, dotted circles: residual bodies. Scale bars: 2 μm.

Fig 4. Percentages of cytoplasmic occupation and 13C atomic fraction of key cell ultrastructures.

Percentage of occupation of cytoplasm area (A, C and E) and 13C atomic fraction (x(13C) in %; B, D and F) over time for key components in A. tepida: A, B: diatoms; C, D: lipid droplets; E, F: residual bodies. Errors bars are ±1 SD (n = 3).

Under oxic conditions, abundant diatoms with frustules were visible after Day 1 as free-floating objects (i.e. not surrounded by vesicles/vacuoles) that occupied about 30% of the cytoplasm area (Figs 2A and 4A). About 75% of these ingested diatoms still held their original cellular matrix, which was clearly distinguishable by strong 13C enrichment; the remaining 25% had lost their content to the foraminiferal cytoplasm (Fig 2A–2C, Table 1). After Day 3, diatom frustules were still clearly observable (Fig 2D), but ca. 83% of them had lost their original content of cellular matrix (Fig 2D–2F, Table 1). After Day 7, frustules were no longer observed (Fig 2G, 2J and 2M). However 13C-enriched lipid droplets (not observed before Day 7) were numerous (Fig 4C). Between Day 7 and 14, lipid droplets were present in roughly constant abundance (ca. 10%; Fig 4C) with x(13C) of approximately 1.65% (Fig 4D). After Day 28 only a few lipid droplets were observed in the cytoplasm of the foraminifera (Figs 2M and 4C). In contrast, 13C-enriched residual bodies appeared after Day 14 (Figs 2J and 4F) occupying about 5% of the cytoplasm area with an average 13C atomic fraction around 1.70% (Fig 4E and 4F); this did not significantly change before the end of the experiment (p>0.05). In 5 out of 15 observed foraminifera cells, the organic lining (i.e. the thick membrane between the plasma membrane and the calcite shell) was enriched in 13C (Fig 2E, 2F, 2K and 2L); two of these had the 13C-enrichment of their organic lining concentrated in the vicinity of pores in the shell.

Table 1. Percentage of intact diatoms (frustule containing cytoplasm) in the foraminiferal cytoplasm.

Percentage of the diatoms present in the cytoplasm of A. tepida still holding their original cellular contents, as a function of time for both experimental conditions (n = 3).

Under anoxic conditions, the content of the foraminifera cytoplasm after Day 1 was essentially identical to that observed at the same time under oxic conditions (Fig 3A). No lipid droplets or residual bodies were visible, and the cytoplasm was occupied by 13C-labeled intact diatoms (i.e. diatomic material surrounded by the silica frustule; roughly 30% of the imaged area) (Figs 3A–3C and 4A–4B). However, the fraction of ingested diatoms still containing their original 13C-labeled material was higher under anoxic conditions (roughly 91% vs. 75%; Table 1). After Day 3 diatoms were still observed in the cytoplasm (Fig 3D) with about 75% of them containing original cellular materials; i.e., 4 times more than under oxic conditions at the same time point (Table 1). The proportion of diatoms in the foraminifera cytoplasm remained roughly constant between Days 3 and 28, in the range from 3 to 12% (Fig 4A). Among these, the proportion containing original 13C-labeled material decreased to ca. 30% between Days 3 and 7, and then did not significantly change until the end of the experiment (p>0.05; Table 1). Lipid droplets appeared after Day 3 under anoxic conditions, in contrast to Day 7 under oxic conditions (Fig 3D and 3C). Their proportion in the cytoplasm varied between 4% and 19% with corresponding average 13C atomic fractions between 1.27% and 1.38%; i.e. 2 to 3 times less 13C-enrichment than under oxic conditions (Fig 4C and 4D). Residual bodies, which were observed only in specimens sampled on Day 28, and only in 2 out of 3 imaged foraminifera, were much less abundant (4±4%) than under oxic conditions (Figs 3M and 4E). Most of these residual bodies were only slightly enriched, with an average x(13C) of 1.20±0.03% compared to 1.69±0.14% under oxic conditions (Fig 4F).

Fatty acids (FAs) studied here included triglycerides, phospholipid and free acids, as well as other acid lipids extracted from diatom and foraminifera samples. In the following, FAs are abbreviated as x:y(z) where ‘x’ is the number of carbon atoms, ‘y’ the number of double bonds and ‘z’ the position of the double bond relative to the terminal methyl group. The main saturated FAs in the labeled diatom biofilm were 14:0 and 16:0, with relative abundances of 7.4% and 28.2%, respectively (Fig 5A). The mono-unsaturated FAs 16:1 and 18:1 (isomers) were observed in relative abundances of 42.0 and 3.8%, respectively (Fig 5A). The sums of all the positional (mainly n-9, n-7and n-5) and geometric (cis and trans) isomers of hexadecenoic and octadecenoic acid were included in the designations 16:1 and 18:1. The main polyunsaturated FAs (PUFA) were 20:5(n-3) (9.6%) with trace amount of 20:4(n-6) and 22:5(n-3) and 22:6(n-3), which accounted for less than 0.2% of the total FAs.

Fig 5. Relative abundances (%) of the dominant fatty acids extracted from the biofilm of diatoms and in A. tepida endoplasm.

Relative abundances (expressed in %) of the eight dominant FAs extracted from the biofilm of diatoms and in A. tepida individuals incubated under oxic (B) and anoxic (C) conditions, respectively. White: control specimens; grey: after Day 7 and black: after Day 28. Error bars are ±1 SD (n = 3).

All analyzed foraminifera samples showed roughly similar FAs distributions in the C14 to C22 range. The observed small quantities of odd-chain and traces or complete absence of branched-chain FAs indicate minimal bacterial contamination. In the control foraminifera, the most abundant saturated FAs were 14:0, 16:0 and 18:0, with a preference for 16:0 (Table 2 and Fig 5B and 5C). The most abundant monounsaturated FA was 16:1 and the most abundant PUFAs were 20:4(n-6) and 20:5(n-3) (Table 2 and Fig 5).

Under oxic conditions, the FA content in foraminifera increased during the first 7 days from 322±22 to 408±33 ng×ind-1 (p<0.05), and then decreased to 344±32 ng×ind-1 after Day 28 (p<0.1 between 7 and 28 days) (Table 2). Under anoxia, the total foraminifera FA content continuously increased during the experiment from 322±22 up to 380±13 ng×ind-1 (p<0.05) (Table 2). Under oxic conditions, the relative abundances of 16:0 and 18:1 isomers increased between 0 and 7 days (p<0.05), and remained stable between Day 7 and 28 (Fig 5B). The relative abundances of 14:0 and 16:1(n-7) decreased between Days 0 (control) and 7 (p<0.05). Between Days 7 and 28, the relative abundance of 14:0 remained constant, while that of 16:1(n-7) continued to decrease. The abundance of 20:5(n-3) first decreased between Days 0 (control) and 7, and then increased to its highest level at Day 28 (p<0.05) (Fig 5B). Despite being present in small amounts in the diatom biofilm, the PUFAs 20:4(n-6) and 22:5(n-3) significantly increased in relative abundance along the experiment (p<0.05); most pronounced for 20:4(n-6) from 8.1% in the control to 17.1% (Fig 5A–5B). Significant variation in the abundance of 22:6(n-3) was not observed during the experiment (p>0.05).

Under anoxia, the relative variations in the abundance of individual FAs with time were significantly smaller than those observed under oxic conditions (Fig 5C). Only the abundance of 14:0 decreased slightly during the experiment, with a trend similar to that observed under oxic conditions. No significant changes (p>0.05) were observed in the contents of 16:0, 22:5(n-3), and 22:6(n-3) during the experiment. 16:1(n-7) first increased slightly, then decreased from Day 7 to Day 28 (p<0.05). 18:1 abundance first decreased at Day 7 (p<0.05), and stabilized (p>0.05). 20:4(n-6) was the only FA that showed a significant, albeit minor increase (from 8.1±0.1 to 10.2±0.4%; p<0.05) along the experiment.

The 13C atomic fraction of FAs (x(13C)FA in %) are shown in Table 3. These 13C-enrichments were significantly higher after Day 7 of incubation (p<0.05) under both conditions and in general FAs 13C-enrichments were higher under oxic than anoxic conditions.

Table 3. 13C atomic fraction of dominant fatty acids in the cytoplasm of A. tepida.


Survival and growth

No significant difference was observed between the survival rate of fed A. tepida specimens incubated for 13 days under oxic and anoxic conditions (S1 Fig). This is in line with results of previous laboratory experiments showing that A. tepida is capable of surviving under strong hypoxia and anoxia for extended time periods, up to 60 days [31,56]. Growth of A. tepida under anoxia was assessed by three different methods: (i) measurement of juvenile shell size before and after incubation (S2 Fig), (ii) quantification of the carbonate content in shells of adult specimens, and (iii) shell 13C-enrichment (S1 Table). The results consistently showed that on average A. tepida grew and added at least one chamber under oxic conditions, whereas only minimal, if any growth took place under anoxia. A previous study using incubation with calcein labeled foraminifera to detect chamber formation showed that among adult A. tepida living under anoxic conditions for 60 days, only 5% were able to add one chamber [31]. These observations clearly indicate that a strong perturbation of normal physiological processes results from a shift to anoxia.

Feeding and metabolism: Bulk data

Under oxic conditions, the TOC and its 13C-fraction increased by almost 100%, within the first 7 days in fed, adult A. tepida (Fig 1). Similar TOC values are reported in the literature quantifying the rate of ingestion of diatoms [50], indicating an important role for benthic foraminifera in the organic carbon cycle in shallow, O2-rich marine sediments. After Day 7 under oxic conditions, the TOC began to decrease steadily while its 13C-enrichment remained constant (Fig 1), consistent with the visual observation that the food source had been exhausted. From this point onward, the TOC values decreased (i.e. cells lost weight), as their reserves of organic C (mainly in the form of lipid droplets) were metabolized and respired. This metabolic consumption of organic matter did not change the 13C content of the residual TOC, indicating that no preferential respiration or preservation of organic compounds with different isotopic composition took place.

Under anoxia A. tepida ingested 13C-enriched diatom biofilm only during Day 1. During this time, the 13C-enrichment of the TOC increased by about 30% and the average of TOC content per cell increased from the control value of 0.65 μg C×ind-1 to about 0.9 μg C×ind-1 (Fig 1). In contrast to the results from the corresponding oxic experiment, neither the TOC nor its 13C-enrichment changed substantially after Day 1, consistent with the visual observation that feeding stopped, i.e. left over biofilm was not further consumed. Furthermore, the TOC per cell did not decrease (Fig 1), providing strong indication that metabolic loss of carbon was minimal after Day 1.

Recent studies with ingestion of phytodetritus under strong hypoxia (O2 levels around 0.02 mL/L) have documented both ingestion and metabolism in species from the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zones (OMZ) [48,49]. The fact that foraminifera metabolism seems relative insensitive to hypoxic conditions might be due to their low rate of oxic respiration compared to other benthic meiofauna [32]. A picture emerges of benthic foraminifera capable of maintaining an efficient metabolism even under strong hypoxia, while complete anoxia leads to a shutdown of aerobic metabolic processes on a timescale of less than 24 hours.

Feeding and metabolism: Subcellular observations

Key sub-cellular structures of A. tepida involved in ingestion and metabolism include the ingested diatoms, residual bodies, and lipid droplets (S3 Fig), the latter representing the principal form of carbon storage [5759]. Fully intact diatoms (i.e. with the diatom cell-material still contained in its silica frustule) were directly integrated into the cytoplasm by the foraminifera during the first day under both conditions (Figs 2A–2C and 3A–3C), consistent with previous observations of feeding A. tepida [60] and a number of other species [6062]. Nevertheless, the density in the cytoplasm of ingested diatoms observed in our study was substantially higher than previously reported in the literature, with ca. 30% of the cytoplasm area occupied by intact diatoms after Day 1 under both conditions. This might be ascribed to the fact that the foraminifera had been fasting during the 6 days between the initial collection on the mudflat and the start of the feeding experiment, thus they grazed quickly on the available biofilm at the beginning of the incubation.

Following the efficient ingestion of intact diatoms during Day 1, the sub-cellular TEM and NanoSIMS observations for oxic and anoxic conditions diverged dramatically (Figs 2 and 3). Under oxic conditions, the intact diatom frustules were all emptied and their 13C-enriched contents incorporated into other subcellular components before Day 7. On Day 7, the silica frustules had almost entirely disappeared (Figs 2G and 4A). The process by which the foraminifera break down the frustules remains unknown. Exocytosis of the empty frustules was not observed, nor frustules being degraded.

Part of the organic diatomic material was converted into fatty acids stored in clearly 13C-labeled lipid droplets (Figs 2G–2I, 4C and 4D). After Day 7, the 13C-labeled diatomic material had become part of the metabolic pathways and 13C-enrichment had spread into most components of the cytoplasm (Fig 2I, 2L, 2O). Consistent with the observed decrease in TOC after Day 7 (Fig 1A), once the entire diatom biofilm had been ingested, the foraminifera began to metabolize their lipid reserves. As a result, lipid droplets had disappeared at Day 28 (Fig 4C). In contrast, residual bodies with clear 13C-enrichment appeared in the cytoplasm at Day 14 (Figs 2J, 4E and 4F). These heterogeneous vacuoles are believed to hold metabolic waste and recycled organelles [58,63]. The rapid ingestion, catabolism, and anabolism of the 13C-enriched diatom biofilm in A. tepida under oxic conditions (Fig 2) is consistent with the bulk observations discussed above and the evolution of the fatty acid composition discussed below. The observation of labeled organic lining in 5 of the foraminifera incubated in oxic conditions is likely to be linked with chamber formation, because the organic lining is thought to play a key role in initiating calcite formation [58,64]. Consistent with this, no 13C-labeled organic lining was observed in the specimens from anoxic conditions, which did not grow new chambers.

Under anoxic conditions, the metabolism was very different (Fig 3). Following the initial ingestion of diatoms during Day 1, there was substantially less redistribution of 13C-enriched material in the foraminifera cells until the experiment ended. On Day 28, diatoms with their frustules were still present in the cytoplasm with their original content of strongly 13C-labeled material (Fig 3M–3O). Nevertheless, some early metabolism/redistribution did occur, resulting e.g. in the appearance of 13C-enriched lipid droplets from Day 3 (Fig 4C). The density of lipid droplets remained constant after Day 3, consistent with the observation of constant average TOC levels (Fig 1A). The formation of lipid droplets earlier in anoxic (Day 3) than in oxic conditions (Day 7) might be attributed to the stressful conditions: faced with a lack of oxygen the foraminifera were first storing carbon in lipid droplets instead of using it for the cell metabolism. A qualitatively similar increase of lipid droplet abundance was observed in Ammonia beccarii specimens submitted to stress from Cu contamination [65]. Such a response does not seem to be specific to foraminifera; it has also been observed in marine dinoflagellates [66]. Mildly 13C-enriched residual bodies did not appear until between Day 21 and 28 (Figs 3M–3O and 4E–4F).

Fatty acid composition and synthesis

Fatty acids 14:0, 16:0, 16-1(n-7), and specifically the 20:5(n-3) (Fig 5A, Table 2) are biomarkers of marine diatoms [6769]. These FAs had already been observed in algae feeding experiments with foraminifera under both oxic [70] and hypoxic conditions [49,52]. In our study, the observed increase during the first 7 days of 16:0 under oxic conditions and of 16:1(n-7) under anoxic conditions is ascribed to the ingestion of diatoms. The decreases of 14:0 under both conditions and of 16:1(n-7) under oxic conditions at Day 7 suggest lipolysis and fatty acid catabolism (their β-oxidation to C2 units). Part of the degradation products were probably used for de novo synthesis of long chain fatty acid intermediates for the production of PUFAs, i.e. 20:4(n-6), 20:5(n-3), and 22:5(n-3) under oxic conditions (Fig 5B). Under oxic conditions, the relative abundance of 20:5(n-3) first decreased and then increased. This suggests that this PUFA was first consumed (by metabolic breakdown or used for the synthesis of 22:5) and then formed by desaturation and C2 elongation of short-chain precursors. The relative increase in 20:5(n-3) cannot be explained by an ingestion of diatoms, because there were completely ingested after Day 7 under oxic conditions. This supports de novo synthesis of eicosapentaenoic acid 20:5(n-3) by the foraminifera.

20:4(n-6) and 22:5(n-3) were present only in small abundances in the diatom biofilm (Fig 5A), but in higher concentrations in A. tepida cytoplasm under both oxic and anoxic conditions (Fig 5B and 5C and Table 2). This can be explained by either a selective uptake of these PUFAs [70], or by de novo biosynthesis following a pathway similar to that for 20:5(n-3). A similar high increase in 20:4(n-6) content was observed in other foraminiferal feeding experiment with microalgae [49,7173]. The observed concentration increase, combined with significant 13C-enrichment (Fig 5B and 5C and Table 2), strongly suggest de novo synthesis of this arachidonic acid, as hypothesized in other publications [49,73].

A. tepida is also able to graze on bacteria [55]. The increase in the relative abundance of 18:1, which is a bacterial biomarker in marine environments [74], during the first 7 days under oxic conditions (Fig 5B) suggests that bacteria developed during the beginning of the experiment, assimilating 13C by degrading the de-frozen diatom biofilm (Fig 5B and Table 3). Further support for ingestion of bacteria is provided by the presence of small amounts of other bacterial FAs (15:0, 15:1, 17:0, and 17:1) in the foraminiferal cells (Table 2).

Finally, under anoxic conditions, the foraminifera assimilated clearly less 13C labeled fatty acids from the diatom biofilm than under oxic conditions (Table 3, Fig 5B and 5C), and they produced less new fatty acids. Between Days 7 and 28, only the relative abundances of the FAs 16:1(n-7) and 20:4(n-6) varied, indicating some, albeit strongly reduced metabolism compared to oxic conditions.

Together, our observations under anoxia indicate that food digestion and metabolic redistribution took place at a much-reduced rate compared to oxic conditions. Nevertheless, anabolic processes did initially take place, conceivably driven by the ‘oxic metabolic machinery’ still available to the cell during the first hours after establishment of anoxic conditions. The reduced state of metabolism seems consistent with a state of dormancy or quiescence, defined as a suspension of active life, arrested development, and reduced or suspended metabolic activity [42], in our case due to the sudden onset of anoxic conditions. Consistent with a state of dormancy/quiescence is the fact that no obvious ultrastructural damage to the cells was observed, indicating that capability to return to a state of normal vitality once oxic conditions are reestablished.


Benthic foraminifera Ammonia tepida are ubiquitous in coastal marine sediments, where they are often exposed to hypoxia or completely anoxic conditions. In order to survive such anoxic conditions for longer time periods they must either rely on alternative, anaerobic metabolism, which would allow them to produce energy and thus maintain a certain level of activity, or enter a state of dormancy that minimizes energy consumption. With a broad suite of observations we show here that these single cell organisms respond to anoxic conditions by a radical reduction in their heterotrophic metabolism. This, combined with the observation of arrested calcification and the complete absence of physical movements upon exposure to anoxia (movement is restored when oxygen is returned to the environment [75]), indicates that these species do not have access to an alternative metabolic mechanism allowing them to maintain, even approximately, their level of physical activity under oxic conditions. Therefore, we propose that, upon exposure to anoxia, the A. tepida organism enters into a state of dormancy/quiescence, with strongly reduced metabolic requirements that make them capable of withstanding anoxic conditions for unusually long time intervals (here up to 28 days), compared with other benthic meiofauna.

Material and methods

Experiment I: Survival and growth rate of A. tepida

Superficial (top 2 cm) sediment was collected at low tide on January 15, 2013, from the intertidal mudflat of l’Aiguillon Bay (France). Living foraminifera were picked out of sieved sediment of two size fractions: >150 μm (adults) and 100–150 μm (juveniles).

Experiment I took place at the LPG-BIAF laboratory (Angers, France). For determination of the survival rate 300 adult foraminifera were checked for their vitality using 2 criteria: presence of yellow brownish cytoplasm in the shell and detection of movement of the foraminifera [56]. For determination of growth rate, 150 juveniles at a growth stage with 8 ±1 chambers were selected using the same criteria as for adults.

Incubation was carried out in two glass aquaria (33×21×19 cm3) containing 10 liters ASW (RedSea Salt, salinity of 35 psu), under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Each aquarium contained eighteen 10 mL glass vials (h = 45 mm, ø = 22 mm), 15 vials holding 10 adult individuals and 3 vials holding 25 juvenile individuals, with each vial representing a replicate in subsequent calculations. Before the start of the experiment, a thin layer of freeze-dried Chlorella algae was added, forming a biofilm on the vial bottom (14.3 μg chlorophyll×cm-2). Each vial was then covered with a 100 μm mesh net, the aquaria were covered with Plexiglas lids to minimize evaporation and avoid changes in salinity and the lid of the anoxic aquarium was sealed with plastic tape to prevent gas leakage/exchange. Each aquarium was bubbled continuously with air using a standard aquarium pump to maintain oxic conditions, or with a mixture of N2 and 0.04% CO2 (Air liquide, France, 99.999% N2, 99.99% CO2) to produce anoxic conditions. Bubbling began immediately after the foraminifera were placed inside. The incubation started on the 12th of February 2013 and lasted 13 days. Oxygen concentrations, temperature, salinity and pH were measured continuously (oxygen and temperature) or at the beginning and end of the experiment (salinity and pH) using dedicated sensors (details in S2 Table). O2 contents were between 4.0 to 4.5 mL×L-1, and below 0.007 mL×L-1 (detection limit) in the oxic and anoxic aquaria, respectively. Temperature was between 17.5 and 19.5°C, salinity 35.2±0.2 psu and pH 8.1±0.1. After 13 days, the incubation was stopped and the vials with the foraminifera taken out of the aquaria.

To determine survival rates, individuals were immediately incubated with 10 μM FDA (fluorescein diacetate) solution [56]. After rinsing, fluorescence of the foraminifera was immediately observed with an epifluorescence stereomicroscope (Olympus SZX16, LPG-BIAF laboratory) equipped with a fluorescent light source (Olympus U-RFL-T). Foraminifera with less than 3 chambers not fluorescing (terminal chambers) were considered to be alive. The average size of all juveniles was measured before (t0) and after (t1) the incubation using an automatic particle analyzer (LPG-BIAF laboratory) equipped with an automated incident light microscope system; a Leica CLS100X ring light source mounted on a monocular Leica Z16PO microscope. A camera (SIS CC12) recorded images and the size of individuals was determined with the software analySIS FIVE (SIS/Olympus) [76]. The growth rate (in % size change) was calculated as: .

Experiment II: Feeding behavior of A. tepida under oxic and anoxic conditions

Superficial (top 2 cm) sediment was collected at low tide on March 27, 2014, on the intertidal mudflat of the Bay of Bourgneuf (France). Living foraminifera were picked out from sieved sediment and transported to LGB laboratory (EPFL, Switzerland).

The diatom Navicula salinicola (CCAP, strain 1050/10) was grown for one week in F2 medium enriched with 2 mM of 13C-enriched sodium bicarbonate (13C fraction of 99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland). The F2 medium was made with non-decarbonated water with an original concentration of ~2 mM sodium bicarbonate. Thus the addition of 2 mM of 13C-enriched sodium bicarbonate resulted in a labeling of roughly 50% of the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). The microalgae were harvested by centrifugation (1500 g, 10 min), washed 3 times with artificial seawater (RedSea Salt, salinity of 35 psu) to remove the excess NaH13CO3, and frozen at –20°C until use in the experiment.

Starting on April 2nd, 2014 (six days after collection on the mudflat and one day before the feeding experiment began), living A. tepida specimens were selected under a binocular microscope, with the same criteria as in Experiment I. A total of about 6000 individuals were distributed in 93 10 mL glass vials (h = 45 mm, ø = 22 mm), so that each vial contained ca. 65 specimens. 39 vials with foraminifera were placed in each aquarium. Fifteen vials containing foraminifera were used as control material for the subsequent analyses: 3 for TEM-NanoSIMS and total organic carbon (TOC) quantification and stable isotope analysis; 12 for fatty acid analysis. These were placed overnight in ASW (RedSea Salt, salinity of 35 psu) under oxic conditions without feeding and were sampled on Day 1, i.e. during the first sampling of foraminifera.

Incubation was performed as in Experiment I in oxic and anoxic aquarium. After 4 hours of bubbling with the mixture of N2 and 0.04% CO2 (Carbagas AG, Switzerland), enough to allow the complete depletion of O2 in the anoxic aquarium, the experiment started. All the foraminifera were fed by adding 13C-enriched diatoms (ca. 578 mg C×m-2) to all vials (i.e. in both oxic and anoxic aquaria) over a timespan of a few minutes. Anoxic and oxic conditions, were maintained from this point onwards. Oxygen concentrations were in the range of 4.1–4.8 mL×L-1 and below 0.007 mL×L-1 in the oxic and anoxic aquaria, respectively. Throughout the experiment, temperature was between 23 and 24°C, salinity 32 psu and pH 8.3.

For TEM-NanoSIMS and TOC quantification and stable isotope analysis, 3 vials were harvested at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days from each aquarium. In addition, 12 vials were harvested from each aquarium for fatty acid analyses at Day 7 and Day 28, respectively. Immediately upon removal from the aquaria, the foraminifera were incubated for 3 h at room temperature in the dark with FDA to a concentration of 100 μM [77]. Vitality was assessed under an epifluorescent stereomicroscope (Leica M165C equipped with SFL100 LED fluorescence module; GFP green). Only living specimens were selected for further analysis. After rinsing with ASW, individuals for TEM-NanoSIMS analysis were immediately processed, those for TOC and fatty acid analysis were stored in cleaned and pre-heated 5 mL glass vials at –20°C until required.

TEM and NanoSIMS analysis.

After incubation with FDA, specimens were immediately fixed and prepared for TEM imaging using standard procedures (details can be found in S1 Text) and observed with a transmission electron microscope (TEM, Philips 301 CM100, 80 kV) at the Electron Microscopy Platform of the University of Lausanne. Ultra-thin sections observed with TEM were subsequently imaged with a NanoSIMS ion microprobe [78]. Areas of interest for NanoSIMS imaging were selected based on TEM observations permitting direct correlation of ultrastructural (TEM) and isotopic images. Our observations systematically focused on the antepenultimate chamber of the foraminifera, i.e. the third chamber counting from the aperture. NanoSIMS imaging followed established procedures [7981], as detailed in S1 Text. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn with the software Look@NanoSIMS [82] to estimate the percentage of cytoplasmic occupation and to quantify mean 13C enrichments of different sub-cellular structures of a given foraminifera. 13C enrichments were reported as 13C atom fraction in %: x(13C) = 13C/(13C+12C)×100.

Fatty acids.

Foraminifera from oxic and anoxic conditions sampled at Days 7 and 28, respectively, plus a sample of the 13C-labeled diatomic biofilm were analyzed for their fatty acids (FAs) composition using procedures adapted from [83]. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate, and the mean value was used for further calculations. For each analysis, lipids were extracted from 200 water-washed and dried specimens by sonication with mixture of methanol and dichloromethane of decreasing polarity. An aliquot of internal standard solution of deuterated carboxylic acids was added to permit quantification. The carboxylic acids were obtained by alkaline hydrolysis of the organic extract and were methylated with BF3/MeOH to obtain fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). Chemical characterization of the fatty acids (as FAMEs) was performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and quantification by gas chromatography/flame ionization detection (details in S2 Text).

Stable isotope analyses by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).

Compound specific stable C isotopic composition of fatty acids was measured by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The standard deviation for repeatability of the 13C atomic fraction, x(13C)FA in %, ranged between ±0.01% and ±0.06%. The lipid-free foraminifera carbonate shell were analyzed for their 13C atomic fraction, x(13C)car, using a carbonate preparation device (GasBench II, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) and isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The measured shell 13C atom fractions, x(13C)car, had a precision of ±0.01% (2 SD). The average carbonate content (in μg C×ind-1) of the shells was determined from the peak area of the major ions, ±0.02 μg C×ind-1 for TOC content. The 13C atom fraction of the total organic matter, x(13C)TOC, of decalcified foraminifera were determined by continuous flow elemental analysis/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. For each analysis, 30 previously decalcified specimens were used. The total organic carbon (TOC) content was determined from the peak area of the major isotopes and expressed in microgram per individual cell (μg C×ind-1). Reproducibility and accuracy were better than ±0.01% for x(13C)TOC (2 SD) and ±0.02 μg C×ind-1 for TOC content. For each analysis, 30 specimens were used (details in S3 Text).

Statistical analysis.

Data were analyzed using the R software. Univariate ANOVA tests were performed to compare the effects of the time and experimental conditions (i.e. oxic vs. anoxic). To determine the significance between two time points or two conditions at the same time point, the Tukey post-hoc test was carried out following the ANOVA. For the fatty acid abundance data, two-sample t-tests were performed to investigate significance of variations between time points for a given condition. Variances of the data were checked with a F-test prior the t-tests. The used significance level for all the tests was α = 0.05.

Access to both sampling sites did not required any specific permissions, and the work did not involve endangered or protected species

Supporting information

S3 Fig. Typical cellular structures of Ammonia tepida cytoplasm.


S1 Table. Carbonate uptake and shell 13C-enrichment.


S2 Table. Sensors used in Experiment I and II.


S2 Text. Detailed protocol of fatty acid analysis.


S3 Text. Detailed protocol of stable isotope analyses by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).



Florence Manero from the SCIAM platform at the University of Angers (France) is thanked for help with sample treatment and electron microscopy. The electron microscopy platform at the University of Lausanne is thanked for access and technical assistance.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: CL JS AM EG.
  2. Data curation: CL JS SE.
  3. Formal analysis: CL.
  4. Funding acquisition: AM EG.
  5. Investigation: CL JS.
  6. Methodology: CL JS GM AM EG.
  7. Project administration: AM EG.
  8. Resources: JS GM SE.
  9. Supervision: AM EG.
  10. Validation: CL JS SE GM AM EG.
  11. Visualization: CL.
  12. Writing – original draft: CL.
  13. Writing – review & editing: JS AM EG.


  1. 1. Murray JW. Ecology and applications of benthic foraminifera. Cambridge University Press. 2006.
  2. 2. Gooday AJ, Levin LA, Linke P, Heeger T. The Role of Benthic Foraminifera in Deep-Sea Food Webs and Carbon Cycling. In: Rowe GT, Pariente V, editors. Deep-Sea Food Chains and the Global Carbon Cycle. Springer Netherlands; 1992. p. 63–91.
  3. 3. Snider LJ, Burnett BR, Hessler RR. The composition and distribution of meiofauna and nanobiota in a central North Pacific deep-sea area. Deep Sea Res Part Oceanogr Res Pap. 1984;31(10):1225–1249.
  4. 4. Gooday AJ, Nomaki H, Kitazato H. Modern deep-sea benthic foraminifera: a brief review of their morphology-based biodiversity and trophic diversity. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ. 2008;303(1):97–119.
  5. 5. Gooday AJ, Turley CM, Allen JA. Responses by Benthic Organisms to Inputs of Organic Material to the Ocean Floor: A Review [and Discussion]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Math Phys Eng Sci. 1990;331(1616):119–138.
  6. 6. Moodley L, Steyaert M, Epping E, Middelburg JJ, Vincx M, van Avesaath P, et al. Biomass-specific respiration rates of benthic meiofauna: Demonstrating a novel oxygen micro-respiration system. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2008;357(1):41–47.
  7. 7. Woulds C, Cowie GL, Levin LA, Andersson JH, Middelburg JJ, Vandewiele S, et al. Oxygen as a control on sea floor biological communities and their roles in sedimentary carbon cycling. Limnol Oceanogr. 2007;52(4):1698–1709.
  8. 8. Caulle C, Koho KA, Mojtahid M, Reichart G-J, Jorissen FJ, others. Live (Rose Bengal stained) foraminiferal faunas from the northern Arabian Sea: faunal succession within and below the OMZ. Biogeosciences. 2014;11(4):1155–1175.
  9. 9. Gooday AJ, Bernhard JM, Levin LA, Suhr SB. Foraminifera in the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone and other oxygen-deficient settings: taxonomic composition, diversity, and relation to metazoan faunas. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr. 2000;47(1):25–54.
  10. 10. Høgslund S, Revsbech NP, Cedhagen T, Nielsen LP, Gallardo VA. Denitrification, nitrate turnover, and aerobic respiration by benthic foraminiferans in the oxygen minimum zone off Chile. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2008;359(2):85–91.
  11. 11. Mallon J, Glock N, Schönfeld J. The Response of Benthic Foraminifera to Low-Oxygen Conditions of the Peruvian Oxygen Minimum Zone. In: Altenbach AV, Bernhard JM, Seckbach J, editors. Anoxia: Evidence for Eukaryote Survival and Paleontological Strategies. Springer Netherlands; 2012. p. 305–322.
  12. 12. Bernhard JM. Potential symbionts in bathyal foraminifera. Science. 2003;299(5608):861–861. pmid:12574621
  13. 13. Sen Gupta BK, Platon E, Bernhard JM, Aharon P. Foraminiferal colonization of hydrocarbon-seep bacterial mats and underlying sediment, Gulf of Mexico slope. J Foraminifer Res. 1997;27(4):292–300.
  14. 14. Sen Gupta BK, Aharon P. Benthic foraminifera of bathyal hydrocarbon vents of the Gulf of Mexico: Initial report on communities and stable isotopes. Geo-Mar Lett. 1994;14(2–3):88–96.
  15. 15. Debenay J-P, Guillou J-J, Redois F, Geslin E. Distribution Trends of Foraminiferal Assemblages in Paralic Environments. In: Martin RE, editor. Environmental Micropaleontology. Springer US; 2000. p. 39–67.
  16. 16. Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R. Spreading Dead Zones and Consequences for Marine Ecosystems. Science. 2008;321(5891):926–929. pmid:18703733
  17. 17. Helly JJ, Levin LA. Global distribution of naturally occurring marine hypoxia on continental margins. Deep Sea Res Part Oceanogr Res Pap. 2004;51(9):1159–1168.
  18. 18. Rabalais NN, Diaz RJ, Levin LA, Turner RE, Gilbert D, Zhang J. Dynamics and distribution of natural and human-caused hypoxia. Biogeosciences. 2010;7(2):585–619.
  19. 19. Bianchi TS, Johansson B, Elmgren R. Breakdown of phytoplankton pigments in Baltic sediments: effects of anoxia and loss of deposit-feeding macrofauna. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2000;251(2):161–183. pmid:10960613
  20. 20. Josefson AB, Widbom B. Differential response of benthic macrofauna and meiofauna to hypoxia in the Gullmar Fjord basin. Mar Biol. 1988;100(1):31–40.
  21. 21. Stachowitsch M. Anoxia in the Northern Adriatic Sea: rapid death, slow recovery. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ. 1991;58(1):119–129.
  22. 22. Wetzel MA, Fleeger JW, Powers SP. Effects of Hypoxia and Anoxia on Meiofauna: A Review with New Data from the Gulf of Mexico. In: Rabalais NN, Turner RE, editors. Coastal Hypoxia: Consequences for Living Resources and Ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C. 2001. p. 165–184.
  23. 23. Levin LA, Ekau W, Gooday AJ, Jorissen F, Middelburg JJ, Naqvi SWA, et al. Effects of natural and human-induced hypoxia on coastal benthos. Biogeosciences. 2009;6(10):2063–2098.
  24. 24. Moodley L, Van der Zwaan GJ, Herman PMJ, Kempers L, Van Breugel P. Differential response of benthic meiofauna to anoxia with special reference to Foraminifera (Protista: Sarcodina). Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1997;158:151–163.
  25. 25. Bernhard JM, Gupta BKS. Foraminifera of oxygen-depleted environments. In: Gupta BKS, editor. Modern Foraminifera. Springer Netherlands; 2003. p. 201–216.
  26. 26. Bernhard JM, Reimers CE. Benthic foraminiferal population fluctuations related to anoxia: Santa Barbara Basin. Biogeochemistry. 1991;15(2):127–149.
  27. 27. Glud RN, Thamdrup B, Stahl H, Wenzhoefer F, Glud A, Nomaki H, et al. Nitrogen cycling in a deep ocean margin sediment (Sagami Bay, Japan). Limnol Ocean. 2009;54(3):723–734.
  28. 28. Kitazato H, Ohga T. Seasonal changes in deep-sea benthic foraminiferal populations: results of long-term observations at Sagami Bay, Japan. Biogeochem Process Ocean Flux West Pac. 1995;331–342.
  29. 29. Langlet D, Geslin E, Baal C, Metzger E, Lejzerowicz F, Riedel B, et al. Foraminiferal survival after long-term in situ experimentally induced anoxia. Biogeosciences. 2013;10(11):7463–7480.
  30. 30. Heinz P, Geslin E. Ecological and biological response of benthic foraminifera under oxygen-depleted conditions: evidence from laboratory approaches. In: Altenbach AV, Bernhard JM, Seckbach J, editors. Anoxia: Evidence for Eukaryote Survival and Paleontological Strategies. Springer Netherlands; 2012. p. 287–303.
  31. 31. Nardelli MP, Barras C, Metzger E, Mouret A, Filipsson HL, Jorissen F, et al. Experimental evidence for foraminiferal calcification under anoxia. Biogeosciences. 2014;11(3):4029–4038.
  32. 32. Geslin E, Risgaard-Petersen N, Lombard F, Metzger E, Langlet D, Jorissen F. Oxygen respiration rates of benthic foraminifera as measured with oxygen microsensors. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2011;396(2):108–114.
  33. 33. Nomaki H, Bernhard JM, Ishida A, Tsuchiya M, Uematsu K, Tame A, et al. Intracellular Isotope Localization in Ammonia sp. (Foraminifera) of Oxygen-Depleted Environments: Results of Nitrate and Sulfate Labeling Experiments. Aquat Microbiol. 2016;163.
  34. 34. Bernhard JM, Goldstein ST, Bowser SS. An ectobiont-bearing foraminiferan, Bolivina pacifica, that inhabits microxic pore waters: cell-biological and paleoceanographic insights. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(8):2107–2119. pmid:21966906
  35. 35. Nomaki H, Chikaraishi Y, Tsuchiya M, Toyofuku T, Ohkouchi N, Uematsu K, et al. Nitrate uptake by foraminifera and use in conjunction with endobionts under anoxic conditions. Limnol Oceanogr. 2014;59(6):1879–1888.
  36. 36. Bernhard JM, Bowser SS. Benthic foraminifera of dysoxic sediments: chloroplast sequestration and functional morphology. Earth-Sci Rev. 1999;46(1–4):149–165.
  37. 37. Grzymski J, Schofield OM, Falkowski PG, Bernhard JM. The function of plastids in the deep-sea benthic foraminifer, Nonionella stella. Limnol Oceanogr. 2002;47(6):1569–1580.
  38. 38. Kamp A, Høgslund S, Risgaard-Petersen N, Stief P. Nitrate Storage and Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction by Eukaryotic Microbes. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1492. pmid:26734001
  39. 39. Piña-Ochoa E, Hogslund S, Geslin E, Cedhagen T, Revsbech NP, Nielsen LP, et al. Widespread occurrence of nitrate storage and denitrification among Foraminifera and Gromiida. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(3):1148–1153. pmid:20080540
  40. 40. Risgaard-Petersen N, Langezaal AM, Ingvardsen S, Schmid MC, Jetten MSM, Op den Camp HJM, et al. Evidence for complete denitrification in a benthic foraminifer. Nature. 2006;443(7107):93–96. pmid:16957731
  41. 41. Bernhard JM, Alve E. Survival, ATP pool, and ultrastructural characterization of benthic foraminifera from Drammensfjord (Norway): response to anoxia. Mar Micropaleontol. 1996;28(1):5–17.
  42. 42. Ross BJ, Hallock P. Dormancy in the Foraminifera: A Review. J Foraminifer Res. 2016 Oct 1;46(4):358–368.
  43. 43. Bouchet VMP, Sauriau P-G, Debenay J-P, Mermillod-Blondin F, Schmidt S, Amiard J-C, et al. Influence of the mode of macrofauna-mediated bioturbation on the vertical distribution of living benthic foraminifera: First insight from axial tomodensitometry. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2009;371(1):20–33.
  44. 44. Jorissen FJ. Benthic foraminiferal microhabitats below the sediment-water interface. In: Gupta BKS, editor. Modern foraminifera. Springer; 1999. p. 161–179.
  45. 45. Pascal P-Y, Dupuy C, Richard P, Haubois A-G, Niquil N. Influence of environment factors on bacterial ingestion rate of the deposit-feeder Hydrobia ulvae and comparison with meiofauna. J Sea Res. 2008;60(3):151–156.
  46. 46. Alve E, Murray JW. Temporal Variability in Vertical Distributions of Live (stained) Intertidal Foraminifera, Southern England. J Foraminifer Res. 2001;31(1):12–24.
  47. 47. Thibault de Chanvalon A, Metzger E, Mouret A, Cesbron F, Knoery J, Rozuel E, et al. Two-dimensional distribution of living benthic foraminifera in anoxic sediment layers of an estuarine mudflat (Loire estuary, France). Biogeosciences. 2015;12(20):6219–6234.
  48. 48. Enge AJ, Witte U, Kucera M, Heinz P. Uptake of phytodetritus by benthic foraminifera under oxygen depletion at the Indian margin (Arabian Sea). Biogeosciences. 2014;11(7):2017–2026.
  49. 49. Larkin KE, Gooday AJ, Woulds C, Jeffreys RM, Schwartz M, Cowie G, et al. Uptake of algal carbon and the likely synthesis of an “essential” fatty acid by Uvigerina ex. gr. semiornata (Foraminifera) within the Pakistan margin oxygen minimum zone: evidence from fatty acid biomarker and 13C tracer experiments. Biogeosciences. 2014;11(14):3729–38.
  50. 50. Linshy VN, Nigam R, Heinz P. Response of Shallow Water Benthic Foraminifera to a 13C-Labeled Food Pulse in the Laboratory. In: Kitazato H, Bernhard JM, editors. Approaches to Study Living Foraminifera. Tokyo: Springer Japan; 2014. p. 115–31.
  51. 51. Moodley L, Boschker HT, Middelburg JJ, Pel R, Herman PM, De Deckere E, et al. Ecological significance of benthic foraminifera: 13C labelling experiments. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser. 2000;202:289–295.
  52. 52. Nomaki H, Ohkouchi N, Heinz P, Suga H, Chikaraishi Y, Ogawa NO, et al. Degradation of algal lipids by deep-sea benthic foraminifera: An in situ tracer experiment. Deep Sea Res Part Oceanogr Res Pap. 2009;56(9):1488–1503.
  53. 53. Nomaki H, Heinz P, Nakatsuka T, Shimanaga M, Ohkouchi N, Ogawa NO, et al. Different ingestion patterns of 13C-labeled bacteria and algae by deep-sea benthic foraminifera. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser-. 2006;310:95–108.
  54. 54. Nomaki H, Heinz P, Nakatsuka T, Shimanaga M, Kitazato H. Species-Specific Ingestion of Organic Carbon by Deep-Sea Benthic Foraminifera and Meiobenthos: In Situ Tracer Experiments. Limnol Oceanogr. 2005;50(1):134–146.
  55. 55. Pascal P-Y, Dupuy C, Richard P, Niquil N. Bacterivory in the common foraminifer Ammonia tepida: Isotope tracer experiment and the controlling factors. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2008;359(1):55–61.
  56. 56. Geslin E, Barras C, Langlet D, Nardelli MP, Kim J-H, Bonnin J, et al. Survival, Reproduction and Calcification of Three Benthic Foraminiferal Species in Response to Experimentally Induced Hypoxia. In: Kitazato H, Bernhard JM., editors. Approaches to Study Living Foraminifera. Tokyo: Springer Japan; 2014. p. 163–193.
  57. 57. Hottinger L. Larger foraminifera, giant cells with a historical background. Naturwissenschaften. 1982;69(8):361–71.
  58. 58. Hottinger L, Dreher D. Differentiation of protoplasm in Nummulitidae (foraminifera) from Elat, Red Sea. Mar Biol. 1974;25(1):41–61.
  59. 59. Pawlowski J, Swiderski Z, Lee JJ. Observations on the ultrastructure and reproduction of Trochammina sp. (Foraminiferida). In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on agglutinated foraminifera, Krak′ow, Poland, September 12–19, 1993. 1995. p. 233.
  60. 60. Goldstein ST, Corliss BH. Deposit feeding in selected deep-sea and shallow-water benthic foraminifera. Deep Sea Res Part Oceanogr Res Pap. 1994;41(2):229–241.
  61. 61. Bé AWH, Hemleben C, Anderson OR, Spindler M, Hacunda J, Tuntivate-Choy S, et al. Laboratory and Field Observations of Living Planktonic Foraminifera. Micropaleontology. 1977;23(2):155–179.
  62. 62. McEnery ME, Lee JJ. Cytological and Fine Structural Studies of Three Species of Symbiont-Bearing Larger Foraminifera from the Red Sea. Micropaleontology. 1981;27(1):71–83.
  63. 63. Leutenegger S. Ultrastructure de foraminifères perforés et imperforés ainsi que de leurs symbiontes. Cah Micropaléontologie. 1977;3:1–52.
  64. 64. Angell RW. The test structure and composition of the foraminifer Rosalina floridana. J Protozool. 1967;14(2):299–307.
  65. 65. Le Cadre V, Debenay J-P. Morphological and cytological responses of Ammonia (foraminifera) to copper contamination: Implication for the use of foraminifera as bioindicators of pollution. Environ Pollut. 2006;143(2):304–317. pmid:16442682
  66. 66. Prevot P, Soyer MO. Action du cadmium sur un Dinoflagellé libre: Prorocentrum micans E.: croissance, absorption du cadmium et modifications cellulaires. CR Acad Sci Paris. 1978;287:833–836.
  67. 67. Dunstan G, Volkman J, Barrett S, Leroi J-M, Jeffrey SW. Essential polyunsaturated fatty acids from 14 species of diatom (Bacillariophyceae). Phytochemistry. 1993;35(1):155–161.
  68. 68. Graeve M, Kattner G, Hagen W. Diet-induced changes in the fatty acid composition of Arctic herbivorous copepods: Experimental evidence of trophic markers. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1994;182(1):97–110.
  69. 69. Zhukova NV, Aizdaicher NA. Fatty acid composition of 15 species of marine microalgae. Phytochemistry. 1995 May;39(2):351–356.
  70. 70. Ward JN, Pond DW, Murray JW. Feeding of benthic foraminifera on diatoms and sewage-derived organic matter: an experimental application of lipid biomarker techniques. Mar Environ Res. 2003;56(4):515–530. pmid:12860436
  71. 71. Suhr S, Alexander S, Gooday A, Pond D, Bowser S. Trophic modes of large Antarctic Foraminifera: roles of carnivory, omnivory, and detritivory. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2008;371:155–164.
  72. 72. Suhr SB, Pond DW, Gooday AJ, Smith CR. Selective feeding by benthic foraminifera on phytodetritus on the western Antarctic Peninsula shelf: evidence from fatty acid biomarker analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2003;262:153–162.
  73. 73. Würzberg L, Peters J, Brandt A. Fatty acid patterns of Southern Ocean shelf and deep sea peracarid crustaceans and a possible food source, foraminiferans. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr. 2011;58(19–20):2027–2035.
  74. 74. Sargent JR, Parkes RJ, Mueller-Harvey I, Henderson RJ. Lipid biomarkers in marine ecology. Microbes Sea. 1987;119–138.
  75. 75. Maire O, Barras C, Gestin T, Nardelli MP, Romero-Ramirez A, Duchêne J-C, et al. How does macrofaunal bioturbation influence the vertical distribution of living benthic foraminifera? Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 561:83–97.
  76. 76. Bollmann J, Quinn PS, Vela M, Brabec B, Brechner S, Cortés MY, et al. Automated particle analysis: calcareous microfossils. In: Francus P., editor. Image Analysis, Sediments and Paleoenvironments. Springer; 2004. p. 229–252.
  77. 77. Bernhard JM, Newkirk SG, Bowser SS. Towards a Non-Terminal Viability Assay for Foraminiferan Protists. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1995;42(4):357–67.
  78. 78. Hoppe P, Cohen S, Meibom A. NanoSIMS: Technical Aspects and Applications in Cosmochemistry and Biological Geochemistry. Geostand Geoanalytical Res. 2013;37(2):111–154.
  79. 79. Kopp C, Domart-Coulon I, Escrig S, Humbel BM, Hignette M, Meibom A. Subcellular Investigation of Photosynthesis-Driven Carbon Assimilation in the Symbiotic Reef Coral Pocillopora damicornis. mBio. 2015;6(1):e02299–14. pmid:25670779
  80. 80. Kopp C, Pernice M, Domart-Coulon I, Djediat C, Spangenberg JE, Alexander DTL, et al. Highly Dynamic Cellular-Level Response of Symbiotic Coral to a Sudden Increase in Environmental Nitrogen. mBio. 2013;4(3):e00052–13. pmid:23674611
  81. 81. Pernice M, Meibom A, Van Den Heuvel A, Kopp C, Domart-Coulon I, Hoegh-Guldberg O, et al. A single-cell view of ammonium assimilation in coral–dinoflagellate symbiosis. ISME J. 2012;6(7):1314–1324. pmid:22222466
  82. 82. Polerecky L, Adam B, Milucka J, Musat N, Vagner T, Kuypers MMM. Look@NanoSIMS–a tool for the analysis of nanoSIMS data in environmental microbiology. Environ Microbiol. 2012 Apr 1;14(4):1009–1023. pmid:22221878
  83. 83. Spangenberg JE, Ferrer M, Jacomet S, Bleicher N, Schibler J. Molecular and isotopic characterization of lipids staining bone and antler tools in the Late Neolithic settlement, Zurich Opera Parking, Switzerland. Org Geochem. 2014;69:11–25.