Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genetic background-dependent effects of murine micro RNAs on circadian clock function

  • Silke Kiessling ,

    silke.kiessling@tum.de

    Affiliations Department of Genes and Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany, Nutrition and Immunology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany

  • Ahmet Ucar,

    Affiliations Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany, University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Clinical and Molecular Cancer Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom

  • Kamal Chowdhury,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany

  • Henrik Oster,

    Affiliations Department of Genes and Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany, Chronophysiology Group, Medical Department I, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

  • Gregor Eichele

    Affiliation Department of Genes and Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany

Genetic background-dependent effects of murine micro RNAs on circadian clock function

  • Silke Kiessling, 
  • Ahmet Ucar, 
  • Kamal Chowdhury, 
  • Henrik Oster, 
  • Gregor Eichele
PLOS
x

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRs) are important regulators of a wide range of biological processes. Antagomir studies suggest an implication of miR-132 in the functionality of the mammalian circadian clock. miR-212 and miR-132 are tandemly processed from the same transcript and share the same seed region. We found the clock modulator miR-132 and miR-212 to be expressed rhythmically in the central circadian clock. Consequently, mRNAs implicated in circadian functions may likely be targeted by both miRs. To further characterize the circadian role we generated mice with stable deletion of the miR-132/212 locus and compared the circadian behavior of mutant and wild-type control animals on two genetic backgrounds frequently used in chronobiological research, C57BL/6N and 129/Sv. Surprisingly, the wheel-running activity phenotype of miR mutant mice was highly background specific. A prolonged circadian free-running period in constant darkness was found in 129/Sv, but not in C57BL/6N miR-132/212 knockout mice. In contrast, in C57BL/6N, but not in 129/Sv miRNA-132/212 knockout mice a lengthened free-running period was observed in constant light conditions. Furthermore, miR-132/212 knockout mice on 129/Sv background exhibited enhanced photic phase shifts of locomotor activity accompanied by reduced light induction of Period gene transcription in the SCN. This phenotype was absent in miRNA-132/212 knockout mice on a C57BL/6N background. Together, our results reveal a strain and light regimen-specific function of miR-132/212 in the circadian clock machinery suggesting that miR-132 and miR-212 act as background-dependent circadian rhythm modulators.

Introduction

24-hour, or circadian, clocks have evolved as an adaptation to daily recurring changes in the environment. In mammals, the central circadian pacemaker is localized in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the ventral hypothalamus [1, 2]. Generation of circadian rhythmicity occurs at the single cell level and is based on interlocked positive and negative transcriptional-translational feedback loops (TTL) of clock genes and their protein products [3].

Light is the major external stimulus that entrains circadian rhythms to the external 24-h light/dark cycle. External light information is perceived by retinal ganglion cells and transmitted through the retino-hypothalamic tract to target neurons in the SCN [4]. In the SCN, photic stimuli are transduced to the molecular clockwork by several signaling pathways (reviewed in [5]) and directly evoke expression of the clock genes Period 1 and Period 2 (Per1/2) [6].

In any cell type, up to 20% of the transcriptome is under circadian control [7]. By this mechanism circadian clocks regulate major cellular and physiological processes, such as energy metabolism [8]. Circadian clock oscillations are regulated at various levels, ranging from transcription and translation to subcellular localization and targeted degradation of clock proteins. Clock proteins appear several hours after their cognate mRNA transcripts [9], suggesting that their translation is tightly regulated, probably including microRNA (miR) -mediated mechanisms [10]. miRs are small (~22-nt) noncoding RNAs which regulate gene expression by influencing the translation of their target mRNAs [11]. Expression of 30% of mammalian genes is regulated by miRs [12] and about 13% of murine hepatic miRs were found to be expressed in a time-of-day-dependent manner [13].

Transcriptome analyses revealed marked variations in the expression level of genes in different mouse strains [14, 15]. Mouse strain-specific differences of miR abundance and function were documented in the brain and peripheral tissues for various miR species [1618]. For example, RT-PCR screens reported expression differences in 11 out of 166 miRs among four inbred mouse strains, A/J, BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J, and DBA/2J [17]. miRs are believed to act as modifiers, for example on disease-causing genes [19], and accumulating evidence suggests that miRs are significant players in regulating various aspects of circadian clock function. For example, miR-192/194 down-regulate Per gene expression in vitro leading to a shortening of the circadian period length [20]. Expression of Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like (Arntl or Bmal1) is down-regulated by miR-494, miR-152 and miR-142/-143 in mice [21]. miR-182 regulates Circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (Clock) gene expression in rats by targeting its untranslated region (UTR) [22]. Recently, the rhythmically expressed miR-17-5p was found to shorten free-running period length by targeting the UTR of Clock mRNA and Nuclear PAS domain protein 2 (Npas2) expression in the SCN [23].

In the present study, we investigate the circadian function of miR-132 and miR-212 in two mouse strains frequently used in chronobiological research. miR-132 and miR-212 are produced from a single transcript encoded by the murine miR-132/212 locus on chromosome 11 [24]. Both share predicted target genes (http://www.microrna.org/; http://www.pictar.org/), which are known modifiers of the circadian clock and expressed in the SCN, such as Mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 (Mapk8) or Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) [25, 26]. Due to their identical “seed” sequence [27] and in order to avoid redundancy effects after targeting of either miR-132 or miR-212 alone, we have used mice lacking both miRs (miR-132-/-/212-/-). Antagomir application had previously identified miR-132 as modulator of light-induced clock gene expression in the SCN and activity resetting [28]. This role for miR-132 as modulator of clock phase shifting was supported by overexpression experiments [29]. However, while overexpression of miR-132 suppressed light-induced Per1 expression consistent with reduced behavioral phase shifts, down regulation of miR-132 by antagomir treatment also caused reduced light induced PER2 expression, in apparent contradiction to an enhanced behavioral phase shifting [28, 29]. Such apparent discrepancies between studies may be caused, at least in part, by genetic background effects on miR-132 function. This prompted us to directly examine whether genetic alterations between different mouse strains contribute to the phenotypic circadian variability in miR mutants. We found that knockout of miR-132/212 affects SCN period length and photic resetting differentially in C57BL/6N and 129S2/SvPasOrlRj (129/Sv) inbred mouse strains.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

All animal experiments were done with prior ethical assessment by and permission from the Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety of the State of Lower Saxony and in accordance with the German Law of Animal Welfare.

Study design

Animals were kept for 2 weeks under LD conditions ("lights on", zeitgeber time (ZT) 0; "lights off", ZT12; light intensities of 100 lux) and then released into constant darkness (DD) for at least 14 days (DD1) to compare the free-running period length. To analyze the resetting ability an activity-delaying 15-min light pulse (LP) of 20 lux was given at circadian time (CT) 15 (3 hours after activity onset) on day 15 during DD1, followed by another period of darkness for 14 days (DD2) and subsequent release into constant light (LL) of 100 lux to compare the free-running period in LL. The color of the fluorescent light bulbs used during all experiment was around 3k Kelvin. Wheel-running activity including behavioral phase shifts were analyzed using ClockLab software (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL, USA).

Experimental animals

For all experiments, 2–3 months old in-house bred WT and homozygous miR-132-/-/212-/- (KO) littermate mice in either of the background strains (C57BL/6N and 129/Sv) were used The miR-212/132 null mouse line has been generated by genomic targeting of the miR-212/132 locus in ES cells that has been derived from inbred wild-type 129/Sv (full name: 129S2/SvPasOrlRj) background. Therefore the mouse line that has been obtained by breeding the founder mice with 129/SV wild-type animals were in pure 129/Sv background, and this line has been maintained at heterozygous state. The founder mice were also bred in parallel with the wildtype C57BL/6N mice and the heterozygote progenies has been subsequently bred with the wildtype C57BL/6N mice for a minimum of 6 generations to obtain miR-212/132 null mouse line in almost pure (>%98, N6) C57BL/6N background. For both mouse lines in 129/Sv and C57BL/6N backgrounds, we have generated the homozygous null mice for analyses via breeding heterozygous animals with each other and have used the wildtype and homozygous mutant littermates in pairs. KO mice were viable in, either, a 129/Sv or a C57BL/6N background and did not show any obvious alterations in behavior, although involvement of both miRs had previously been described for hematopoietic cell development and for endothelial and cardiac functions [3032]. Thus, it was feasible to compare running-wheel performance as a sensitive readout of central circadian clock function in both KO mouse lines. Only male mice were used to avoid additional rhythmic components in females, such as the estrous cycle, which may influence general activity and wheel-running performance [33]. Before experiments mice were bred and housed in small groups of 5 or fewer in the same animal facility under the same LD cycle conditions of 12 hours light, 12 hours dark (LD), with food and water ad libitum. Throughout the experiments animals were kept under constant temperature (20±0.5°C) and humidity (50–60%).

Behavioral analysis

Handling and activity measurements during experiments were performed as described previously [34]. For constant light conditions and light pulse experiments, animals were single-housed in running wheel-equipped cages (33 x 15.5 x 13 cm with a 15-cm diameter wheel) with standard bedding. At least 10 days of wheel-running recordings for each condition were used to determine activity period (tau, calculated using a χ2 periodogram and confirmed by fitting a line to the onsets of activity), phase shifts (difference between regression lines through the onsets of activity before and after the light pulse) and the total amount of activity. Activity profiles have been calculated with the ClockLab software by averaging the data from 10 consecutive days of wheel running activity in each light conditions. Wheel rotations were detected in 6 min intervals and calculated either on a 24 h day or relative to the individual day length of each mouse based on their individual free-running period in DD and LL conditions. The group sizes were as follows: LD profile 129/Sv WT n = 9; KO n = 6; C57BL/6N WT n = 11; KO n = 10; DD profile 129/Sv WT n = 8; KO n = 6; C57BL/6N WT n = 11; KO n = 10; LL profile: 129/Sv WT n = 5; KO n = 6; C57BL/6N WT n = 11; KO n = 10; total activity in DD 129/Sv WT n = 7; KO n = 8; C57BL/6N WT n = 8; KO n = 6; total activity in LL 129/Sv WT n = 5; KO n = 6; C57BL/6N WT n = 10; KO n = 10; period in DD 129/Sv WT n = 15; KO n = 15; C57BL/6N WT n = 12; KO n = 11; period in LL 129/Sv WT n = 6; KO n = 7; C57BL/6N WT n = 10; KO n = 11; phase shift 129/Sv WT n = 8; KO n = 9; C57BL/6N WT n = 11; KO n = 10.

In situ hybridization (ISH)

Circadian profiles of miR-132 and miR-212 expression were determined in the SCN of 129/Sv wildtype mice. Brains were dissected at 6 CTs (CT3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23) during the second day in DD (n = 18 mice; 3 mice per time point) following 2 weeks of LD. Digoxigenin-labelled ISH was performed in 129/Sv and C57BL/6N wildtype mice as previously reported [35] for Per1 and Per2 and signal strength quantified as has been described [36]. For each individual animal, 3–6 sections spanning throughout the SCN were evaluated and a background-subtracted mean value calculated. Mean SCN expression of each miR is represented relative to the averaged expression over the circadian day (set to 1). To measure the induction of gene expression after a light pulse at CT 15 (15 min, 100 lux) (n = 4 per time point and genotype) animals were sacrificed 1 hour later by cervical dislocation (under dim red light during the dark period) and brains were dissected. Tissues were fixed, dehydrated, and paraffin embedded; 8-μm sections were prepared and stored at –80°C. Sections were hybridized with 35S-UTP-labelled antisense RNA probes for clock gene transcripts [37]. Relative quantification of expression levels was performed by densitometric analysis of autoradiograph films using Scion Image software (Scion Corp. Frederick, MD, USA).

Statistical analysis

All statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (Prism, La Jolla, CA, USA) software. Diurnal variation of miR-132 and miR-212 expression data was tested by fitting a cosine wave (equation y = B + (A * cos (2 * π * ((x–Ps) / 24)))) to gene expression data, where B is the baseline, A is the amplitude, Ps is the phase shift, with a fixed 24-hour period; significance was determined by F-test. Two-way ANOVA was performed to detect statistical differences of period length, light pulse period length effects, light-induced phase shifts and gene induction followed by Sidak's multiple comparison post-hoc tests. Paired t-test was used to determine period variability between groups and within animals by comparing the period length in DD before and after a light pulse. Correlation analysis of period length and phase shift was performed by fitting a linear regression. The corresponding p-value was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient, given the correlation value and the sample size. A statistically significant difference was assumed with p-values of less than 0.05. Asterisks indicate significance (* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p < 0.001).

Results

miR-132/212-deficiency differentially affects the free-running period length of locomotor activity in 129/Sv and C57BL background strains

miR-212 and miR-132 are strongly expressed in the SCN of 129/Sv mice (Fig 1A and 1B) and exhibit rhythmic transcription profiles under constant darkness (DD) conditions (Fig 1C and 1D). Both miRs share the same seed sequence and thus may target the same mRNAs. Indeed, the main functions of miR-212 and miR-132 overlap in the context of neuronal or immune functions. Thus, to avoid possible redundancy, we have examined the circadian role of the miR-132/212 family in double knockout mice. To characterize SCN pacemaker function under free-running DD conditions, running-wheel activity of miR-132-/-/212-/- mice on either genetic background was compared against their respective wild-type (WT) littermates. Period length in WT mice varied slightly, but not significantly, between the two background strains, whereas the different KO lines showed a significant difference of about 34 min in their free-running period length (Fig 2A–2D and 2I). MiR-132/212 loss-of-function in the 129/Sv background resulted in a moderate, but statistically significant increase of the circadian period by about 24 min (Fig 2A, 2C and 2I). In contrast, no significant effect on free-running period length was observed in miR-132-/-/212-/- mice in C57BL/6N background (Fig 2B, 2D and 2I). Total activity in mice of both genotypes on 129/Sv background (Fig 2E, 2G and 2J) was higher compared to C57BL/6N (Fig 2F, 2H and 2J). However, total activity within each background strain under LD and DD conditions was indistinguishable between WT and KO mice (Fig 2E–2H).

thumbnail
Fig 1. miR-132 and miR-212 expression in the SCN.

(A, B) Gene expression patterns of miR-132 (A) and miR-212 (B) in the brain of 129/Sv mice measured by ISH. SCNs are indicated by arrows. (C, D) Relative gene expression profiles in constant darkness of miR-132 (C) and miR-212 (D) in the SCN of 129/Sv mice measured by dig-labelled ISH. Significant rhythms are illustrated with fitted cosine curves (Cosine-wave regression, F-test: (C) miR-132: p < 0.01, (D) miR-212: p < 0.05). Scale bar in A and B: 2 mm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176547.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Influence of miR-132/212 deletion on the period length in constant darkness.

(A-D) Representative double-plotted actograms of WT (A, B) and KO (C, D) mice in LD and DD. (E-H) Total activity profiles of WT and KO mice during LD (E, F) and DD (G, H) conditions in 129/Sv (E, G) and C57BL/6N backgrounds (F, H). (I, J) Period length (I) and total activity (J) in constant darkness for all genotypes. Period length: 129/Sv: WT: 23.57 ± 0.08 h, n = 15; KO: 23.96 ± 0.05 h, n = 15; C57BL/6N: WT: 23.32 ± 0.07 h, n = 12; KO: 23.39 ± 0.05, n = 11, two-way ANOVA for interaction F(1, 49) = 5.390, p = 0.0244, Sidak’s post-hoc test for background difference: WT: p > 0.05; KO, p < 0.001, Sidak’s post-hoc test for genotype difference 129/Sv: p < 0.001, C57BL/6N: p > 0.05. Total activity: 129/Sv: WT: 5904 ± 1104 counts, n = 7; KO: 3,921 ± 1,003 counts, n = 8; C57BL/6N: WT: 1,729 ± 376 counts, n = 8; KO: 1679 ± 408, n = 6, two-way ANOVA for genotype F(1, 31) = 1.358, p = 0.2527, two-way ANOVA for background F(1, 31) = 51.34, p < 0.001. Data are represented as mean ± SEM., * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176547.g002

Constant light conditions (LL; 100 lux) increased the period length in both genotypes on 129/Sv (Fig 3A, 3C and 3G) and C57BL/6N (Fig 3B, 3D and 3G) background, consistent with previous reports [38]. Strain dependent alterations in activity profiles were apparent (compare Fig 3E and 3F), but total activity in LL was indistinguishable between the cohorts of both background strains and genotypes (Fig 3H). Similar to results obtained in DD conditions, in LL, WT mice showed background strain dependent differences in period length (Fig 3A–3D and 3G). Loss of miR-132/212 did not affect LL period length in 129/Sv mice (Fig 3A, 3C and 3G), but increased the circadian day length in mice on a C57BL/6N background (Fig 3A–3D and 3G). Total activity in LL was altered neither by genetic background nor genotype (Fig 3H).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Influence of miR-132/212 deletion on the period length in constant light.

(A-D) Representative double-plotted actograms of WT (A, B) and miR-132-/-/212-/- (C, D) mice in constant light conditions. (E, F) Total activity profiles of WT and KO mice in 129/Sv (E) and C57BL/6N backgrounds (F). (G, H) Period length (G) and total activity (H) in constant light of 100 lx for all genotypes. Period length: 129/Sv: WT: 25.47 ± 0.22 h, n = 6; KO: 25.49 ± 0.08 h, n = 7; C57BL/6N: WT: 24.71 ± 0.08 h, n = 10; KO: 25.08 ± 0.08 h, p = 0.0143, n = 11, two-way ANOVA for interaction: F(1, 29) = 4.341, p = 0.0461, Sidak’s post-hoc test for background differences: p < 0.001, Sidak’s post-hoc test for genotype differences 129/Sv: p > 0.05, C57BL/6N: p < 0.05. Total activity: 129/Sv: WT: 2,636 ± 190 counts, n = 5; KO: 3,016 ± 576 counts, n = 6; C57BL/6N: WT: 2,895 ± 499 counts, n = 10; KO: 2,352 ± 319, n = 10,; two-way ANOVA for interaction F(1, 27) = 0.9622, p = 0.3353, two-way ANOVA for background F(1, 27) = 0.185, p = 0.6705, two-way ANOVA for genotype F(1, 27) = 0.02991, p = 0.8640. Data are represented as mean ± SEM., * p < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176547.g003

Taken together, miR-132/212-deficiency lengthened the circadian period of the SCN pacemaker in a strain- and light regimen-dependent way. Loss of miR-132/212 prolonged the free-running period in constant darkness in the 129/Sv background, while increasing the free-running period in constant light conditions in the C57BL/6N strain.

miR-132/212-deficiency differentially affects photic phase shifts in C57BL/6N and 129/Sv strains

Changes in the circadian period length as described above tend to correlate with alterations in the light resetting capability of the SCN pacemaker [39]. To address this in miR-132-/-/212-/- mouse lines more directly, we measured acute phase-shifting of the wheel-running activity rhythm in response to a delaying 15-min light pulse (20 lux) at CT15 on 129/Sv (Fig 4A and 4C) and C57BL/6N background (Fig 4B and 4D; of note, these were the same cohorts of C57BL/6N animals used for the experiments shown in Fig 2A–2D). Indeed, miR-132/212 loss-of-function on a 129/Sv background evoked a marked increase of light pulse-induced behavioral phase delays (Fig 4A, 4C and 4E). In contrast, we found no significant effect on phase-shifting behavior in response to a delaying light pulse in KO mice of C57BL/6N background (Fig 4B, 4D and 4E).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Influence of miR-132/212 deletion on behavioral phase shifts after single light pulses.

(A-D) Representative actograms of WT (A, B) and KO (C, D) mice in constant darkness showing a brief (15-min) light pulse at CT15 of 20 lx which is marked by white stars and separates the free-running phase in two darkness periods (pre and post shift). (E) Magnitudes of phase shifts. 129/Sv: WT: -57.14 ± 4.5 min, n = 8; KO: -114 ± 15.4 min, n = 9; C57BL/6N: WT: -95 ± 12.1 min counts, n = 11; KO: -93.8 ± 8.4 min, n = 10,; two-way ANOVA for interaction F(1, 34) = 6.530, p = 0.0152, Sidak’s post-hoc test for genotype 129/Sv: p < 0.01, C57BL/6N: p > 0.05. Data are represented as mean ± SEM., ** p < 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176547.g004

Increased phase shifts in miR-132/212-deficient 129/Sv mice are accompanied by diminished light induction of Per gene transcription in the SCN

Photic phase shifting involves acute light induction of the core clock genes Per1 and Per2 in the SCN [6]. It has been reported that, miR-132 transcription itself is also light inducible and miR-132 induction inhibits light induced Per1 and Per2 expression [28]. To test whether loss-of-function of miR-132/212 affects light induced Per transactivation in different mouse lines, we examined photic induction of Per1 and Per2 in response to a 15-min light pulse (20 lux) at CT15 in both genotypes and strains by in situ hybridization on SCN-containing sections. In line with the literature [6], Per1 and Per2 mRNA levels were strongly induced by light exposure in the SCN of WT mice of both background strains (Fig 5A, 5C and 5E–5H). Interestingly, miR-132/212-deficiency abolished elevation of Per1 and Per2 mRNA levels after photic stimulation in 129/Sv mice, even though behavioral phase delays were increased (compare Fig 4A, 4C and4E and Fig 5A–5D, 5E and 5G). In contrast, similar Per1 and Per2 induction was found in C57BL/6N WT and KO mice (Fig 5A–5D, 5F and 5H). This is consistent with a similar trend in behavioral resetting observed in WT and KO mice following a phase-delaying light pulse on this background (Fig 4B, 4D and 4E).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Light induced Per gene expression.

Light induced Per1 (A, B) and Per 2 expression (C, D) in the SCN of individual WT (A, C) and KO (B, D) mice in 129/Sv and C57Bl/6N backgrounds after a light pulse (100 lx, 1 h) at CT15 as shown by in situ hybridization. (E-H) Quantification of Per1 (E, F) and Per2 (G, H) mRNA levels in the SCN of WT or KO mice measured by radio-labelled ISH. Per1: 129/Sv: -LP: 25.2 +/- 7; +LP: 83.8 +/- 6.6; KO: -LP: 25.8 +/- 6.6; +LP: 25.8 +/- 2.0; C57BL/6N: -LP: 8.2 +/- 1.1; +LP: 77.5 +/- 9.4; KO: -LP: 9.8 +/- 1.5; +LP: 73.5 +/- 4.8, Per2: 129/Sv: -LP: 16.7 +/- 3.7; +LP: 85.8 +/- 7.6; KO: -LP: 17.1 +/- 2.1; +LP: 35.5 +/- 11.3; C57BL/6N: -LP: 8.9 +/- 1.3; +LP: 76.0 +/- 11.3; KO: -LP: 10.9 +/- 1.7; +LP: 80.2 +/- 5.3; n = 4. 129/Sv: -LP vs. +LP, two-way ANOV for interaction Per1: F(1. 12) = 10.48, p = 0.0071, Sidak’s post-hoc test for light conditions: WT: p < 0.001; KO: p > 0.05, Sidak’s post-hoc test for genotype: -LP: p > 0.05, +LP: p < 0.01; Per2: F(1. 12) = 12.62, p = 0.004, Sidak’s post-hoc test for light conditions: WT: p < 0.001; KO: p > 0.05, Sidak’s post-hoc test for genotype: -LP: p > 0.05, +LP: p < 0.01. C57BL/6N: -LP vs. +LP, two-way ANOVA for interaction Per1: F(1.11) = 0.4042, p = 0.5379; two-way ANOVA for light conditions F(1. 11) = 209.6, p < 0.0001; Per2: two-way ANOVA for interaction F(1.12) = 0.0327, p = 0.8595; two-way ANOVA for light conditions F(1. 12) = 116.4, p < 0.0001. Data are represented as mean ± SEM, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176547.g005

Discussion

Our work highlights strain-specific functions of miR-132/212 in the regulation of the murine SCN pacemaker. Our data confirm previous experiments using miR-132 intra-cerebral antagomir infusion and overexpression in the forebrain showing that miR-132 acts as a negative modulator of light-induced resetting of the SCN pacemaker [28, 29]. Moreover, we show that this effect is restricted to the 129/Sv background and absent in C57BL/6N mice. Our results further suggest a strain and light-regimen specific function of miR-132/212 in the clock machinery itself, as revealed by strain-dependent effects on the free-running period length in DD and LL. These results are summarized in Table 1.

We found the clock modulator miR-132 and miR-212 to be expressed rhythmically in the central circadian clock. miR-212 and miR-132 share the same seed region and they can therefore target the same mRNAs [27]. Indeed, double-targeting of both miRs was demonstrated for mRNAs [40] implicated e.g. in circadian functions [41].

miR-132/212 regulate core clock properties in a background-dependent manner

We found that miR-132/212-deficiency affects SCN clock properties as manifested by lengthening of the free-running period length in both inbred strains examined. Interestingly, neither overexpression nor knockdown of miR-132 had an effect on the core clock mechanism (results from different studies are compared in Table 1). The miR-132/212 gene knockout used in our study results in a complete loss-of-function whereas a knockdown approach might not be as efficient. Our double knockout is also efficiently circumventing a potential miR-132 and miR-212 redundancy. miR-132 and miR-212 show overlapping circadian oscillations in the SCN with slightly different phases. Although they are splice variants from a single locus and thus, likely act synergistically, it is possible that genetic interaction of both miRs could account for the period effects missed in previous studies [28, 29].

Importantly, depending on light conditions, longer periods were found in KO mice of both genetic backgrounds. Such period changes indicate that miR-132/212-deficiency significantly impairs the properties of the endogenous circadian clockwork in both strains. Recall that Per1 mutant mice show a longer period under constant light exposure [42] and period lengthening in constant light has been reported when degradation of PER2 in the SCN is delayed [43]. Modulation of Per gene activity in the SCN of miR-212/132-/- mice may affect the ability of the central clock to respond to light. Importantly, it has been reported that miR-132 target genes Poly(A) binding protein interacting protein 2 (Paip2a) and B-cell translocation gene 2, anti-proliferative (Btg2) dampen basal Per expression and attenuate PER protein translation, and thereby accelerate the inhibition of Per gene transcription [29, 44]. Thus, miR-132/212-deficiency may enhance the free-running period in miR-132-/-/212-/- mice via this mechanism. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude that some of the observed effects might be mediated by miR effects in SCN-afferent tissues such as the retina where miR-132/212 expression has been found [45] or the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Furthermore, baseline differences of clock gene expression in miR-deficient mice between both strains can also influence the circadian phenotype including SCN light responsiveness.

miR-132/212 regulates phase shifts in a background-dependent manner

We tested the prediction that miR-132/212-deficiency influences light sensitivity of the SCN by measuring photic phase shifts of locomotor behavior [46]. Indeed, we found that miR-132/212-deficiency in 129/Sv mice modulates circadian light responses, with respect to resetting and Per gene induction. Additionally, a prolonged period length during constant light as observed in KO C57BL/6N mice further suggests an increased light sensitivity of the SCN [39]. Phase shifting of the circadian clock in response to light stimulation is believed to be mediated by Per induction in the SCN which then triggers a resetting of behavioral activity [6, 47]. In accordance, miR-132 overexpression in C57BL/6 mice resulted in reduction of light-induced PER1/2 levels and photic resetting of behavior [29]. We found that miR-132-/-/212-/- C57BL/6N mice did not exhibit a change in Per expression upon light stimulation, which is consistent with their unaffected behavioral resetting. Interestingly, although light responsiveness of Per1 and Per2 expression in the SCN was completely abolished in miR-132-/-/212-/- 129/Sv mice, they demonstrated enhanced phase-shifting behavior. This is in accordance with previous reports using miR-132 antagomirs in C57BL/6J mice which led to a marked reduction of light induced Per1 gene expression and enhanced phase shifts [28]. Nevertheless, loss-of-function of, both, miR-132 and miR-212 on the 129/Sv background seemed to further enhance the previously described circadian resetting phenotype. Of note, Per1-deficient mice exhibit an increased phase shifting capacity similar to the one documented in miR-132-/-/212-/- 129/Sv mice [48]. However, other mechanisms than Per regulation may play a role in determining resetting in miR-132-/-/212-/- mice, e.g. it can be speculated that the weaker adaptation ability of miR-132-/-/212-/- mice, similar to Per1-deficient mice, may be the result of a weakened circadian oscillator, indicated by reduced circadian pacemaker amplitude, as was also suggested for Clock mutant mice [49].

Contradictory results between knockout, knockdown and overexpression studies (summarized in Table 1) might be explained by parallel, but independent effects of miR-132 and miR-212 on behavioral resetting and Per gene expression in the SCN.

Direct targets of miR-212 and miR-132 in the SCN are known to interact with Per genes [29, 44]. In particular, Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 Mecp2, which is involved in chromatin remodeling and a target of miR-132 and miR-212, activates Per transcription while the miR-132 target genes PAIP2A and BTG2 attenuate PER protein translation, both of which may result in a dampening of light induced Per expression or accelerated PER decay [29, 44], thus, influencing behavioral resetting. This link between Per gene modulation and phase shift regulation by the miR-132/212 family, however, needs to be further examined.

Circadian phenotypes in miR-132-/-/212-/- mice were generally more pronounced in the 129/Sv than in the C57BL/6N strain. These data support the possibility that different mouse strains may carry different genetic modifiers influencing the circadian phenotype. Similarly, a ClockΔ19 modulator gene has recently been identified which accounts for the suppression of the ClockΔ19 mutant circadian phenotype in BALB/cJ mice [50]. Interestingly, miRs act as modifiers [19] and impact on circadian clock function [28] and covariation in miR-212 abundance and function was documented in different background strains, including C57BL/6 [17, 18, 51].

Taken together, we have shown that miR-132/212 are background-dependent modulators of the circadian clock. Future studies are required to identify the miR132/212 targets whose regulation may mediate this effect. Our data further emphasize that, to fully understand the regulatory function of a specific gene or a miR, loss-of-function phenotypes should be analyzed in more than one genetic background strain. The persistence of a phenotype across various strains would underscore a universal function of a specific gene and, thus, suggest a potential significance for humans.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of G.E.'s laboratory for discussions and Dr. Christina Thaller (Max-Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany) for her technical help.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: SK HO GE.
  2. Data curation: SK.
  3. Formal analysis: SK.
  4. Funding acquisition: GE SK.
  5. Investigation: SK.
  6. Methodology: SK HO GE.
  7. Project administration: SK.
  8. Resources: GE AU KC.
  9. Supervision: SK.
  10. Validation: SK.
  11. Visualization: SK.
  12. Writing – original draft: SK.
  13. Writing – review & editing: SK HO AU KC GE.

References

  1. 1. Moore RY, Eichler VB. Loss of a circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat. Brain Res. 1972;42(1):201–6. Epub 1972/07/13. pmid:5047187
  2. 2. Stephan FK, Zucker I. Circadian rhythms in drinking behavior and locomotor activity of rats are eliminated by hypothalamic lesions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1972;69(6):1583–6. Epub 1972/06/01. pmid:4556464
  3. 3. Lowrey PL, Takahashi JS. Genetics of circadian rhythms in Mammalian model organisms. Advances in Genetics. 2011;74:175–230. pmid:21924978
  4. 4. Johnson RF, Morin LP, Moore RY. Retinohypothalamic projections in the hamster and rat demonstrated using cholera toxin. Brain Res. 1988;462(2):301–12. Epub 1988/10/18. pmid:3191391
  5. 5. Hirota T, Fukada Y. Resetting mechanism of central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Zoological Science. 2004;21(4):359–68. Epub 2004/05/01. pmid:15118222
  6. 6. Albrecht U, Sun ZS, Eichele G, Lee CC. A differential response of two putative mammalian circadian regulators, mper1 and mper2, to light. Cell. 1997;91(7):1055–64. Epub 1998/01/15. pmid:9428527
  7. 7. Zhang R, Lahens NF, Ballance HI, Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB. A circadian gene expression atlas in mammals: implications for biology and medicine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(45):16219–24. pmid:25349387
  8. 8. Bass J, Takahashi JS. Circadian integration of metabolism and energetics. Science. 2010;330(6009):1349–54. Epub 2010/12/04. pmid:21127246
  9. 9. Gallego M, Virshup DM. Post-translational modifications regulate the ticking of the circadian clock. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8(2):139–48. pmid:17245414
  10. 10. Chen R, D'Alessandro M, Lee C. miRNAs Are Required for Generating a Time Delay Critical for the Circadian Oscillator. Current Biology. 2013;23(20):1959–68. Epub 2013/10/08. pmid:24094851
  11. 11. Pegoraro M, Tauber E. The role of microRNAs (miRNA) in circadian rhythmicity. Journal of Genetics. 2008;87(5):505–11. Epub 2009/01/17. pmid:19147939
  12. 12. Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120(1):15–20. Epub 2005/01/18. pmid:15652477
  13. 13. Na YJ, Sung JH, Lee SC, Lee YJ, Choi YJ, Park WY, et al. Comprehensive analysis of microRNA-mRNA co-expression in circadian rhythm. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2009;41(9):638–47. Epub 2009/05/30.
  14. 14. Suzuki Y, Nakayama M. Differential profiles of genes expressed in neonatal brain of 129X1/SvJ and C57BL/6J mice: A database to aid in analyzing DNA microarrays using nonisogenic gene-targeted mice. DNA Research: An International Journal for Rapid Publication of Reports on Genes and Genomes. 2003;10(6):263–75.
  15. 15. Kraus P, Xing X, Lim SL, Fun ME, Sivakamasundari V, Yap SP, et al. Mouse strain specific gene expression differences for illumina microarray expression profiling in embryos. BMC Research Notes. 2012;5:232. pmid:22583621
  16. 16. Hazarika S, Farber CR, Dokun AO, Pitsillides AN, Wang T, Lye RJ, et al. MicroRNA-93 controls perfusion recovery after hindlimb ischemia by modulating expression of multiple genes in the cell cycle pathway. Circulation. 2013;127(17):1818–28. Epub 2013/04/06. pmid:23559675
  17. 17. Parsons MJ, Grimm CH, Paya-Cano JL, Sugden K, Nietfeld W, Lehrach H, et al. Using hippocampal microRNA expression differences between mouse inbred strains to characterise miRNA function. Mammalian Genome: Official Journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. 2008;19(7–8):552–60. Epub 2008/07/03.
  18. 18. Zhao E, Keller MP, Rabaglia ME, Oler AT, Stapleton DS, Schueler KL, et al. Obesity and genetics regulate microRNAs in islets, liver, and adipose of diabetic mice. Mammalian Genome: Official Journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. 2009;20(8):476–85. Epub 2009/09/04.
  19. 19. Bandiera S, Hatem E, Lyonnet S, Henrion-Caude A. microRNAs in diseases: from candidate to modifier genes. Clinical Genetics. 2010;77(4):306–13. pmid:20132241
  20. 20. Nagel R, Clijsters L, Agami R. The miRNA-192/194 cluster regulates the Period gene family and the circadian clock. The FEBS Journal. 2009;276(19):5447–55. Epub 2009/08/18. pmid:19682069
  21. 21. Shende VR, Goldrick MM, Ramani S, Earnest DJ. Expression and rhythmic modulation of circulating microRNAs targeting the clock gene Bmal1 in mice. PloS One. 2011;6(7):e22586. Epub 2011/07/30. pmid:21799909
  22. 22. Ding X, Sun B, Huang J, Xu L, Pan J, Fang C, et al. The role of miR-182 in regulating pineal CLOCK expression after hypoxia-ischemia brain injury in neonatal rats. Neuroscience Letters. 2015;591:75–80. pmid:25684245
  23. 23. Gao Q, Zhou L, Yang SY, Cao JM. A novel role of microRNA 17-5p in the modulation of circadian rhythm. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:30070. pmid:27440219
  24. 24. Ucar A, Vafaizadeh V, Jarry H, Fiedler J, Klemmt PA, Thum T, et al. miR-212 and miR-132 are required for epithelial stromal interactions necessary for mouse mammary gland development. Nature Genetics. 2010;42(12):1101–8. Epub 2010/11/09. pmid:21057503
  25. 25. Nakahata Y, Kaluzova M, Grimaldi B, Sahar S, Hirayama J, Chen D, et al. The NAD+-dependent deacetylase SIRT1 modulates CLOCK-mediated chromatin remodeling and circadian control. Cell. 2008;134(2):329–40. pmid:18662547
  26. 26. Zhang EE, Liu AC, Hirota T, Miraglia LJ, Welch G, Pongsawakul PY, et al. A genome-wide RNAi screen for modifiers of the circadian clock in human cells. Cell. 2009;139(1):199–210. pmid:19765810
  27. 27. Remenyi J, Hunter CJ, Cole C, Ando H, Impey S, Monk CE, et al. Regulation of the miR-212/132 locus by MSK1 and CREB in response to neurotrophins. The Biochemical Journal. 2010;428(2):281–91. Epub 2010/03/24. pmid:20307261
  28. 28. Cheng HY, Papp JW, Varlamova O, Dziema H, Russell B, Curfman JP, et al. microRNA modulation of circadian-clock period and entrainment. Neuron. 2007;54(5):813–29. Epub 2007/06/08. pmid:17553428
  29. 29. Alvarez-Saavedra M, Antoun G, Yanagiya A, Oliva-Hernandez R, Cornejo-Palma D, Perez-Iratxeta C, et al. miRNA-132 orchestrates chromatin remodeling and translational control of the circadian clock. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(4):731–51. Epub 2010/12/02. pmid:21118894
  30. 30. Ucar A, Gupta SK, Fiedler J, Erikci E, Kardasinski M, Batkai S, et al. The miRNA-212/132 family regulates both cardiac hypertrophy and cardiomyocyte autophagy. Nature Communications. 2012;3:1078. Epub 2012/09/27. pmid:23011132
  31. 31. Kumarswamy R, Volkmann I, Beermann J, Napp LC, Jabs O, Bhayadia R, et al. Vascular importance of the miR-212/132 cluster. European Heart Journal. 2014;35(45):3224–31. pmid:25217442
  32. 32. Mehta A, Zhao JL, Sinha N, Marinov GK, Mann M, Kowalczyk MS, et al. The MicroRNA-132 and MicroRNA-212 Cluster Regulates Hematopoietic Stem Cell Maintenance and Survival with Age by Buffering FOXO3 Expression. Immunity. 2015;42(6):1021–32. pmid:26084022
  33. 33. Dixon DP, Ackert AM, Eckel LA. Development of, and recovery from, activity-based anorexia in female rats. Physiol Behav. 2003;80(2–3):273–9. pmid:14637226
  34. 34. Jud C, Schmutz I, Hampp G, Oster H, Albrecht U. A guideline for analyzing circadian wheel-running behavior in rodents under different lighting conditions. Biol Proced Online. 2005;7:101–16. Epub 2005/09/02. pmid:16136228
  35. 35. Eichele G, Diez-Roux G. High-throughput analysis of gene expression on tissue sections by in situ hybridization. Methods. 2011;53(4):417–23. pmid:21185383
  36. 36. Carson JP, Eichele G, Chiu W. A method for automated detection of gene expression required for the establishment of a digital transcriptome-wide gene expression atlas. Journal of Microscopy. 2005;217(Pt 3):275–81. Epub 2005/02/24. pmid:15725131
  37. 37. Oster H, Damerow S, Kiessling S, Jakubcakova V, Abraham D, Tian J, et al. The circadian rhythm of glucocorticoids is regulated by a gating mechanism residing in the adrenal cortical clock. Cell Metabolism. 2006;4(2):163–73. Epub 2006/08/08. pmid:16890544
  38. 38. Aschoff J. Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 1960;25:11–28. Epub 1960/01/01. pmid:13684695
  39. 39. Daan S, Pittendrigh C. A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. Journal of Comparative Physiology. 1976;106(3):253–66.
  40. 40. Wanet A, Tacheny A, Arnould T, Renard P. miR-212/132 expression and functions: within and beyond the neuronal compartment. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40(11):4742–53. pmid:22362752
  41. 41. Li Q, Loh DH, Kudo T, Truong D, Derakhshesh M, Kaswan ZM, et al. Circadian rhythm disruption in a mouse model of Rett syndrome circadian disruption in RTT. Neurobiology of Disease. 2015;77:155–64. pmid:25779967
  42. 42. Steinlechner S, Jacobmeier B, Scherbarth F, Dernbach H, Kruse F, Albrecht U. Robust circadian rhythmicity of Per1 and Per2 mutant mice in constant light, and dynamics of Per1 and Per2 gene expression under long and short photoperiods. Journal of Biological Rhythms. 2002;17(3):202–9. pmid:12054191
  43. 43. Munoz M, Peirson SN, Hankins MW, Foster RG. Long-term constant light induces constitutive elevated expression of mPER2 protein in the murine SCN: a molecular basis for Aschoff's rule? Journal of biological rhythms. 2005;20(1):3–14. pmid:15654066
  44. 44. Im HI, Hollander JA, Bali P, Kenny PJ. MeCP2 controls BDNF expression and cocaine intake through homeostatic interactions with microRNA-212. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(9):1120–7. Epub 2010/08/17. pmid:20711185
  45. 45. Karali M, Peluso I, Gennarino VA, Bilio M, Verde R, Lago G, et al. miRNeye: a microRNA expression atlas of the mouse eye. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:715. pmid:21171988
  46. 46. Pittendrigh CS, Daan S. A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents: I. The stability and lability of spontaneous frequency. Journal of Comparative Physiology. 1976;106(3):223–52.
  47. 47. Yan L, Silver R. Differential induction and localization of mPer1 and mPer2 during advancing and delaying phase shifts. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;16(8):1531–40. Epub 2002/10/31. pmid:12405967
  48. 48. Masubuchi S, Kataoka N, Sassone-Corsi P, Okamura H. Mouse Period1 (mPER1) acts as a circadian adaptor to entrain the oscillator to environmental light/dark cycles by regulating mPER2 protein. J Neurosci. 2005;25(19):4719–24. pmid:15888647
  49. 49. Vitaterna MH, Ko CH, Chang AM, Buhr ED, Fruechte EM, Schook A, et al. The mouse Clock mutation reduces circadian pacemaker amplitude and enhances efficacy of resetting stimuli and phase-response curve amplitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103(24):9327–32. pmid:16754844
  50. 50. Shimomura K, Kumar V, Koike N, Kim TK, Chong J, Buhr ED, et al. Usf1, a suppressor of the circadian Clock mutant, reveals the nature of the DNA-binding of the CLOCK:BMAL1 complex in mice. eLife. 2013;2:e00426. pmid:23580255
  51. 51. Parsons MJ, Grimm C, Paya-Cano JL, Fernandes C, Liu L, Philip VM, et al. Genetic variation in hippocampal microRNA expression differences in C57BL/6 J X DBA/2 J (BXD) recombinant inbred mouse strains. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:476. Epub 2012/09/15. pmid:22974136