Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Global potential distribution of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera, Drosophilidae)

  • Luana A. dos Santos,

    Affiliation Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

  • Mayara F. Mendes,

    Affiliation Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

  • Alexandra P. Krüger,

    Affiliation Pós-Graduação em Fitossanidade, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

  • Monica L. Blauth,

    Affiliation Departamento de Ecologia, Zoologia e Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

  • Marco S. Gottschalk,

    Affiliations Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Departamento de Ecologia, Zoologia e Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

  • Flávio R. M. Garcia

    Affiliations Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Pós-Graduação em Fitossanidade, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Departamento de Ecologia, Zoologia e Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Global potential distribution of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera, Drosophilidae)

  • Luana A. dos Santos, 
  • Mayara F. Mendes, 
  • Alexandra P. Krüger, 
  • Monica L. Blauth, 
  • Marco S. Gottschalk, 
  • Flávio R. M. Garcia


Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) is a species native to Western Asia that is able to pierce intact fruit during egg laying, causing it to be considered a fruit crop pest in many countries. Drosophila suzukii have a rapid expansion worldwide; occurrences were recorded in North America and Europe in 2008, and South America in 2013. Due to this rapid expansion, we modeled the potential distribution of this species using the Maximum Entropy Modeling (MaxEnt) algorithm and the Genetic Algorithm for Ruleset Production (GARP) using 407 sites with known occurrences worldwide and 11 predictor variables. After 1000 replicates, the value of the average area under the curve (AUC) of the model predictions with 1000 replicates was 0.97 for MaxEnt and 0.87 for GARP, indicating that both models had optimal performances. The environmental variables that most influenced the prediction of the MaxEnt model were the annual mean temperature, the maximum temperature of the warmest month, the mean temperature of the coldest quarter and the annual precipitation. The models indicated high environmental suitability, mainly in temperate and subtropical areas in the continents of Asia, Europe and North and South America, where the species has already been recorded. The potential for further invasions of the African and Australian continents is predicted due to the environmental suitability of these areas for this species.


Drosophilidae (Diptera) consists of approximately 4,200 species, but few are considered pests because they preferentially breed in decaying plant material. Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), the spotted wing drosophila (SWD), is a species characterized as a fruit pest due to its unique ability to pierce soft-skinned fruits during egg laying, a polyphagous habit and a preference for fresh fruits [1]. The first recorded occurrence outside Asia was in 1980, in Oahu, Hawaii (USA). Drosophila suzukii was subsequently found on other Hawaiian Islands [2]. Since then, the geographical distribution of D. suzukii has expanded rapidly.

In 2008, D. suzukii reached the North American continent, where it was reported in California, USA [3]. Its distribution in USA has since grown considerably, reaching the Pacific Division and the states of Idaho, Montana and Utah in the Mountain Division of West Region, and the states of Northeast and the South Regions, except Oklahoma and Texas [4]. In Canada, D. suzukii has been recorded in the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland [5]. In 2011, the North American Plant Protection Organization (NAPPO) recorded this species in Mexico [6].

In Europe, D. suzukii was also detected in Spain and Italy in 2008; and soon thereafter, it was reported in France, Austria, Germany, Belgium, Croatia, Slovenia, Ireland, the United Kingdom and Switzerland. In 2012, the species was recorded in the westernmost part of the Iberian Peninsula and in Portugal. The European Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) has estimated that this species is now present in all European countries [7].

The first record of this species in South America occurred in 2013, in the South of Brazil [8]. In 2014, D. suzukii was recorded in the southeastern and central regions of the country [9, 10], approximately 1700 km from its first recorded location in the country.

In view of the broad and rapidly expanding distribution of D. suzukii on most continents, this study aimed to determine its potential worldwide geographic distribution using distribution models derived from the existing occurrence data of the species. The generated models will allow us to predict areas at potential risk for the establishment of this species, based on abiotic conditions [11].

Material and methods

Obtaining records of the occurrence of D. suzukii

Sites with known occurrence were first obtained from the TaxoDros database v.1.04 (dated 2015/03) [12] up to September 2015. An additional literature review was performed to find studies not available in TaxoDros, such as, the records from the Neotropical Region. The reported occurrence sites and geographic coordinates were checked and validated by consulting the original literature sources and entering the geographic coordinates in Google Maps (, thereby avoiding dubious geographic coordinates and uncertain locations. The references used to create the database are listed in the Supporting Information (S1 File).

All coordinates were double-checked to ensure their accuracy in the raster of environmental variables used in the analysis using the QGIS 2.10.1 application (

Obtaining and selecting environmental variables used in the geographical distribution models

The environmental variables used for computer modeling were the Bioclim variables and altitude measurements obtained from the WorldClim Global Climate Database 1.3 ( [13].

To avoid using autocorrelated climatic variables, the variables were standardized, and then, a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed with the 19 variables [14] using the Past 2.17c application [15]. Variables associated with the main components that had eigenvalues greater than 1 were selected. Their associations were checked using a Spearman correlation analyses and those where rs > |0.75| were selected (Supporting Information–S1 and S2 Tables). Finally, ten bioclimate environmental variables were selected: annual mean temperature (Bio-1), mean diurnal range (Bio-2), temperature seasonality (Bio-4), maximum temperature of the warmest month (Bio-5), minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio-6), annual range of temperature (Bio-7), mean temperature of the coldest quarter (Bio-11), annual precipitation (Bio-12), precipitation of the driest quarter (Bio-17) and precipitation of the warmest quarter (Bio-18). In addition, the variable altitude (Alt) was also included (note that Alt was not analyzed for multicollinearity but was included because it is not a climatic variable).

To assess whether the values of the environmental variables in the sites where D. suzukii already occurs were spatially autocorrelated, we calculated the value of Moran’s I [16] for each of the eleven environmental variables previously described using the package Ade4 v.1.7–4 [17] from the R 3.1.3 release ( The test significance was obtained by a Monte Carlo test with 1000 randomizations. No spatial autocorrelation was found for any of the selected variables (Supporting Information–S3 Table).

Algorithms used and the performance evaluation of the models obtained

We used two algorithms: Maximum Entropy Modeling (MaxEnt) and the Genetic Algorithm for Ruleset Production (GARP), both of which require only occurrence data [18]. To conduct the computer modeling, we used a resolution of 5 arc minutes. The predictive performance of the generated models was evaluated by reconstructing 1000 bootstrap replicas. In each replica, 50% of the records randomly selected by the two algorithms were retained as test data. To evaluate each generated model, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was calculated. The AUC value ranges from 0 to 1, where 1 indicates a perfect ability to discriminate between the omission of areas with records and the overlap of occupied areas.

Furthermore, the AUC also serves as a measure for evaluating the independent model at a chosen cut-off threshold [19, 20, 21]. To development the models, we used the software Maximum Entropy Modeling v.3.3.3k (MaxEnt) (available at and openModeller 1.5.0 (available at

Thresholds for defining areas with predicted presence of D. suzukii

For the MaxEnt algorithm, the threshold for defining areas with the presence or absence of D. suzukii was the average of the values of the Minimum Training Presence (MTP) of the 1000 generated models. For the GARP algorithm, the threshold adopted was a 70% probability of presence of the species, as suggested in openModeller.


The database included a total of 407 occurrence sites of D. suzukii (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. Potential distribution of D. suzukii.

(A) Known existing sites of occurrence of D. suzukii used to generate the predictive models. (B) Predictive model of the geographic distribution of D. suzukii generated by the GARP algorithm. (C) Predictive model of the geographic distribution of D. suzukii generated by the MaxEnt algorithm. The legend indicates low (0) and high (1) environmental suitability for D. suzukii.

This species is currently distributed in the Asian, European, and North and South American continents. The models showed optimal performance; the mean AUC value for the GARP algorithm was 0.89, while for MaxEnt it was 0.97.

The projections of the potential distribution of D. suzukii in both models under their respective thresholds were quite similar (Fig 1B and 1C), indicating high reliability in the generated predictions. However, the GARP model was somewhat more restrictive in predicting the potential area for establishment of D. suzukii except in South Africa, where its prediction of the potential distribution area was larger.

In Asia, the endemic area of the species, the countries that have a predicted wider potential distribution of D. suzukii are Japan, North and South Korea, eastern China, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, a narrow stretch of northern India, Pakistan, Nepal, part of Thailand, Myanmar, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Nepal, parts of Yemen and Oman, Tajikistan, eastern Uzbekistan, and countries near the Mediterranean such as Turkey, Georgia, northwest Iran, Azerbaijan and the Mediterranean coasts of Lebanon and Syria. Of these, the regions with the highest suitability in the model developed with the MaxEnt algorithm are the countries in East Asia, including Japan, North and South Korea and the entire coast of China, in addition to Georgia, which lies on the border between Europe and Asia.

Almost all of Europe was identified as an area of potential suitability of this species, except for northern Sweden, Finland, and northwest Russia. The countries with higher suitability in the models developed using MaxEnt and GARP were Portugal, France, Italy, Austria, Budapest, Greece, Albania, Switzerland, southern Germany and extreme northern Spain. Between Asia and Europe there is a north-south range where the models did not predict the presence of the species, delimiting a discontinuity in the potential distribution of D. suzukii.

In North America, the areas for the potential suitability of D. suzukii lie in a wide range along most of the Atlantic coastline and in a narrow range on the Pacific coast, widening toward the northwestern USA and southwestern Canada.

In South America, the potential areas for the distribution of D. suzukii as predicted by the MaxEnt algorithm extend the entire length of the Atlantic coast, which differed from the GARP algorithm. Nevertheless, the models generated by both algorithms indicate that the central region of southern Brazil, the southern half of Paraguay, all of Uruguay and the regions to the east and south of Argentina as potential distribution areas. On the Pacific coast, the entire coastline of Chile is indicated as a potential distribution area of the species. The areas of greatest environmental suitability for D. suzukii are in southern Chile, Uruguay, on the south coast and in southern Brazil, and along small range on the northern coast of Argentina.

To date, there are no records of D. suzukii in Africa or Oceania. However, our models indicate that high environmental suitability for this species exists in some regions of Africa such as eastern and northwestern Madagascar, the southern region and the Lakes region in eastern South Africa, southwest Namibia, a central range of Angola, the coastal region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, northern and southern Gabon, the coastal and central regions of Cameroon and Nigeria, western Ethiopia, southern South Sudan, Uganda, southern and northern Tanzania, northern Mozambique, Zambia, central Zimbabwe, the Mediterranean coastal region and the Atlantic Western Sahara, Morocco, northern Algeria, coastal Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. The area of greatest environmental suitability indicated by the model developed with the MaxEnt algorithm was the coast of Morocco.

A narrow band of Oceania was identified as suitable for the establishment of D. suzukii in southern, northern and eastern Australia. New Zealand was also indicated as environmentally suitable for the establishment of this species. The regions of greater environmental suitability, indicated by the model developed with the MaxEnt algorithm, were the North Island of New Zealand, Tasmania, and a narrow range in the southeast and southwest of Australia. These areas may be more susceptible to future invasions by D. suzukii.

Environmental variables determining the distribution of D. suzukii

The environmental variables that contributed most to the construction of the potential distribution model of D. suzukii with the MaxEnt algorithm were annual precipitation (Bio-12) (27.1%), annual mean temperature (Bio-1) (contribution of 20.9%), maximum temperature of the warmest month (Bio-5) (9.7%) and mean temperature of the coldest quarter (Bio-11) (9.2%). The standard curves of the distribution model of D. suzukii (Fig 2) indicate that the probability of occurrence of this species decreases considerably in regions in which the mean temperature of the coldest quarter is below 10°C and the maximum temperature of the warmest month above 33°C. The probability of occurrence of D. suzukii increases in areas with an annual mean temperature between 5°C and 20°C. Regarding rainfall, the standard curves of the model indicate that the annual precipitation also strongly influences the distribution of the species, and it is more likely to occur in areas that experience annual rainfall of between 500 and 2,500 mm.

Fig 2. Average response curves of the main predictor variables of the distribution model of D. suzukii generated by the MaxEnt algorithm.

(A) Annual precipitation (Bio-12), (B) annual mean temperature (Bio-1), (C) maximum temperature of the warmest month (Bio-5), and (D) mean temperature of the coldest quarter (Bio-11) used to estimate the probability of occurrence of D. suzukii. The red lines show the average of probability values from 1000 iterations using randomized input, and the blue lines show the standard deviations.


The aim of our study was to detect suitable areas of establishment of D. suzukii using inductive distribution modeling and the abiotic variables of the sites where the species was already recorded, assisting the studies with non-inductive approach, carried out with modeling based on physiological information of the species, using an inductive approach. As well discussed by Venette et al. [22], the inductive methods require little knowledge of the biology of the species and the result may suggest complex interactions between species and its environment. The authors also consider that the inductive approach use a statistical methodology to generate a forecast of niche distribution which not always have a biological support since population processes are not considered. We consider the inductive and non-inductive approaches as complementary and below we make some considerations that explain why we adopted the inductive modelling methodology.

An advantage of this approach was that the environmental conditions considered suitable for the species were estimated from the environmental parameters of the locations where the species has already been recorded rather than from the responses in simulated conditions in a laboratory, where the environmental variables tend to be constant throughout the assays. In addition, laboratory assays are usually conducted with one or only a few different fly strains, which can reduce the range of responses from the different populations. However, this advantage may not hold when record occurrences are ephemeral, such as the response to a very specific temporal condition, or stochastic, or when no population is established at a recorded site. An example for Drosophila was of the invasive species D. malerkotliana Parshad and Paika, which was once recorded in Porto Alegre, South Brazil [23]; however, since then, no other record of the species has been made in this location. Because the geo-referencing of some records may not be reliable, the MaxEnt and GARP algorithms excluded 5% of the sites with outlying environmental conditions from the train dataset to increase the model confidence [24].

The use of abiotic variables to generate the distribution modeling was supported by the influence of these factors on the population sizes of some Drosophilidae species [25, 26]. Biological variables such as host plants and competing or predator species, despite their importance for species establishment, need further study for D. suzukii worldwide. Furthermore, regarding the use of the plant hosts, D. suzukii has been shown to be polyphagous and is not restricted to thin-skinned fruit [27, 28], which hinders the use of host plants as a variable for modeling.

Recently, based on life-cycle stages of D. suzukii [29], Benito et al. [30] used temperatures responses established from physiological assays to create a model of distribution with Climex. Their results showed a potential distribution pattern in Brazil that was quite similar to our predictions but became more restricted when cold and heat stress temperatures where used as thresholds (stress temperatures were obtained in laboratory assays suggesting the upper and lower limits to the populations survival [29]). For example, their model excluded the northeast Atlantic coast, where the species has not yet been recorded. When we compared our MaxEnt/GARP global modeling with the global modeling of Benito et al. [30], we observed that their predictions were more restrictive and did not include some areas where the species is already established, such as India and the Pacific coast of the USA. Therefore, the distribution models generated with temperature thresholds based on developmental stages did not agree with the actual distribution of the species. In turn, Gutierrez et al. [31] has generated models of suitability for D. suzukii in USA, Mexico, Europe and northern Africa, using physiological data obtained from different studies and the Physiologically-Based Demographic Model (PBDM) method. The authors has suggested the establishment of the species, where the most suitable areas in the eastern EUA were the southeast of the country and the coast of the Gulf of Mexico; in Mexico, the south, the coast of the Gulf of Mexico and of the Pacific coast of the country; In Europa and north Africa were the Mediterranean coast of Europe and the Atlantic coast of Portugal, Spain, France and the Mediterranean coast of Africa. Our models, especially MaxEnt, have suggested that the distribution of the species covers the eastern EUA, as suggested by Gutierrez et al. [31]. However, the most suitable area, according our models, has been the northeast (Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Pensilvania, Delaware, New York, Rhode Island, Maine, West Virginia and Virginia) and the northwest of the country (California, Oregon and Washington). As well, our models have not indicated high suitable area at Mexico, but Gutierrez et al. [31] did. At Europe and northern of Africa, our models had greater similarities to that generated by Gutierrez et al. [31], however we have suggested higher suitability in Portugal, southern France, center and northern Italy, besides the coast of Adriatic Sea. The western and eastern coast of the Black Sea have had suitable area in both of our models and from Gutierrez et al. [31]. Although our models have shown that temperate and subtropical regions have potential areas of distribution of the species, the temperate region was more suitable, differing from what proposed by Gutierrez et al. [31] which highlighted the subtropical region as the most suitable for the species.

Some physiological parameters of the D. suzukii have been used to predict their distribution by considering not only high environmental suitability but also to establish conditions for managing the species [32]. In this sense, the MaxEnt algorithm can be used to suggest important environmental variables to D. suzukii. In our analysis, the annual precipitation variable had the most influence on the model. Variables associated with hydric stress were not considered in studies of Benites et al. [30], Wiman et al. [32] and Asplen et al. [33], but Tochen et al. [34] verified that in occasions with low relative humidity the sampling of D. suzukii decrease and Gutierrez et al. [31] observed that low relative humidity may be limiting in arid regions. The studies that included physiological traits properly approach the effects of temperature, corroborating the variables that the MaxEnt algorithm indicated as having a high influence in the distribution of D. suzukii: the annual mean temperature, maximum temperature of the warmest month and mean temperature of the coldest quarter. The maximum temperature of the warmest month (values above approximately 33°C) in the areas with higher environmental suitability estimated by the MaxEnt model is similar to the temperature observed as the heat stress threshold for D. suzukii as reported by Asplen et al. [33] (which varied from 29 to 33°C, depending on the biological parameters considered). However, our estimates of the mean temperature of the coldest quarter (lower values of approximately -10°C) are inferior to the temperatures reported by the same authors (which varied from 10 to -2°C). This wide difference can be justified by the ability of the species to enter diapause [35] in regions with temperatures below the reported cold stress temperatures.

Under these circumstances, the potential distribution of D. suzukii predicted by both generated models mainly comprises regions of subtropical or warm temperate climates with high rainfall throughout the whole year or during part of the year. These regions are identified as having a Cf (temperate mesothermal climates without dry seasons) or Df (cold continental climates without dry seasons) climates in the Köppen-Geiger classification—particularly Dfa (hot-summer humid continental climate) and/or Dfb (warm-summer humid continental climate). On the Asian continent, the models indicate that regions with humid subtropical climates have a greater probability of D. suzukii occurrence. These areas are characterized by dry and cold winters alternating with wet summers, where the mean monthly maximum temperature is 20°C and the mean monthly minimum temperature is 0°C [36]. On the Indian subcontinent, the models indicate areas of environmental suitability in regions with a humid subtropical climate in northern India: mountainous areas with extremely humid conditions due to heavy rains [37]. There are also areas predicted for the species in northeast Pakistan, despite the fact that seasons there alternate between periods of drought and heavy rains [38].

Currently, D. suzukii is widely distributed on the European continent [7], which has a temperated prevailing climate with well-defined seasons. The areas of greatest environmental suitability are in the west and south, which are dominated by a temperate Mediterranean climate, with hot, dry summers and wet, unstable winters. Our models support the hypothesis that D. suzukii is distributed across the continent [7].

Drosophila suzukii has a high thermal tolerance and a high potential for colonizing different habitats; it is able to withstand both hot summers in Spain and cold areas, such as mountainous regions in Japan and the Alps [7]. Its occurrence was confirmed in mountainous regions by Tonina et al. [39], and its survival in regions with mean daily temperatures below 11°C shows both its adaptive capacity to cold conditions and its tolerance of wide temperature range typical of mountains.

In North America, again, the areas with greater potential D. suzukii distribution are classified as having Cf and Df climates. These areas extend across down the entire Atlantic coast and along a narrow range in western Canada. Areas that are inadequate or only marginally suitable for the species are those with a semi-arid climate (BSh and BSk, respectively hot semi-arid climate and cold semi-arid climate), where humidity and rainfall are low.

The developed distribution models indicate areas with high environmental suitability in western Mexico, where the presence of D. suzukii was recently confirmed by Lasa and Tadeo [40]. These areas have a humid climate, with average annual temperatures of 20°C, warm winters and rainfall evenly distributed throughout the year.

In recent years, the presence of D. suzukii in South America has become more constant, primarily due to the climatic conditions of Brazil, where a humid subtropical climate predominates, with humid summers, cold winters and abundant rainfall distributed throughout the year [41]. The equatorial and tropical areas of South America do not seem to sustain populations of D. suzukii. Nonetheless, the models indicate potential distribution areas across the eastern extension of the Atlantic coast, including in some northeastern regions of Brazil, despite the semi-arid climate. Some states, such as Rio Grande do Norte, have average annual temperatures above 26.5°C and receive less than 600 mm rainfall annually. In other words, hot, dry regions with scarce rainfall are less suitable for the establishment of the species [41]. As noted by the models, potential distribution areas for D. suzukii extend from central to southern Brazil, confirming the results found by Paula et al. [10] in the Cerrado region of Brazil, and by Bitner-Mathé et al. [9] and Geisler et al. [27] in southern Brazil, where the average temperature varies between 14.8°C and 23.0°C. We also found greater environmental suitability in the models in regions with areas of subtropical Atlantic forest, as was recorded by Deprá et al. [8] for the states of Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul in southern Brazil.

Moreover, there were areas of potential distribution and higher environmental suitability for D. suzukii in eastern and southern Argentina, in accordance with the record of the species in Argentina by Sandatino et al. [42]. We also found areas suitable for the species throughout Uruguay, which is dominated by a subtropical climate with well-defined seasons and an extremely wide annual temperature range: from negative values in the winter to 40°C in the summer. Drosophila suzukii was already been record in southern Uruguay, in the region of Montevideo by González et al. [43]. In addition, our models predict potential distribution areas in the southern half of Paraguay and on the Pacific coast, along the coastline of Chile. The most suitable areas for the species are in southern Chile, where Vilela and Mori [44] suggested its presence, which was confirmed by Medina-Muñoz et al. [45].

The models also show some areas of environmental suitability for D. suzukii in Costa Rica and Ecuador, supporting Hauser [3], who reports the record of the species before 2000 through some personal communications to him. However, to date, there are no voucher specimens of the species collected in these countries.

In general, D. suzukii occupies areas with a wide temperature range and exhibits a gradual process of acclimation, which is an important adaptive characteristic [46]. According to Calabria et al. [47], the optimum temperature for D. suzukii development is between 20°C and 25°C, and temperatures above 30°C cause a reduction in longevity. Kimura [48] reported that temperatures between 32.2°C and 32.7°C have a negative effect on adults of D. suzukii and were lethal to 50% of the individuals studied. However, Tochen et al. [29] found that the optimal developmental temperature for the species was 28.1°C.

The adults of D. suzukii tolerate low temperatures. Our MaxEnt algorithm model suggests that it do not establish in areas with average annual temperatures is below 0°C and with mean temperature of coldest quarter below -10°C, in agreement to some physiological studies. According to Jakobs et al. [49], temperatures below 0°C decrease their reproductive activity and their survivability diminishes. Kimura [48] report that D. suzukii could survive at temperature above -5°C. In contrast, Dalton et al. [46] verified that D. suzukii is unlikely to survive at temperatures below 10°C. The different responses in experimental procedures may be related with the strain of D. suzukii studied, how the strain are reared in laboratory or even when or from where the strain were caught. For D. suzukii, two morphologies associated with summer and winter seasons have been studied, which responds differently to temperature. Shearer et al. [50] found differential expression of genes related with cellular metabolism, synthesis of protein and translation, cell cycle and DNA replication, and chitin and cuticular synthesis when comparing both morphologies. Such differential expression may even be responsible to trigger diapause in the winter morphology. Despite the genetic effect in the response to low temperatures, particularly about the overwinter, it was also suggested the importance of species behavior, suitable refuge sites and suitable food sources for population survival [51].

Potential areas for invasion by D. suzukii

Both distribution models indicate areas with high environmental suitability for the occurrence of D. suzukii in the continents of Oceania and Africa, even though no records of the occurrence of the species exist. Models indicate that the environmental conditions in these areas are conducive to the establishment of the species in the event of a future invasion.

Our models suggest that the central region of Australia, due to the hot desert climate and the high rate of evaporation, is not suitable for the establishment of D. suzukii. However, areas with a subtropical climate with mild, wet summers are favorable for its establishment [36]. In addition, the North Island of New Zealand and Tasmania show high environmental suitability. Given their temperate maritime climates with cool, wet summers and rainfall distributed throughout the year, their provide favorable conditions for the establishment of D. suzukii in these locations. These regions may suffer economic damage from an invasion because they produce grapes, blueberries, blackberries, strawberries, gooseberries (Ribes sp.), figs and other soft-skinned fruits, which have been found to host D. suzukii in other countries [7, 52, 53, 54].

In Africa, our models indicate the areas with potential distribution are in western and eastern regions of South Africa and along a narrow range in the northern region of Africa. The area of highest environmental suitability occurs near the coast of Morocco, which has a temperate Mediterranean climate, with hot dry summers and wet and unstable winters [36]. In the southeastern region of Africa, our models indicate small areas of suitability in Mozambique and Madagascar, which have a tropical climate with high temperatures and rainfall [36].


The models obtained in this study indicate potential areas that could be at risk of invasion by D. suzukii but that could also support national and international plans for pest management, thus avoiding the significant economic damage to fruit production for these continents, countries or states if establishment of this pest were to occur. There was a strong association between the areas of greatest environmental suitability as determined by the projections of the generated distribution models and areas with subtropical climates, because areas with mild temperatures and rainfall throughout the year are favorable to the establishment of D. suzukii.

Supporting information

S1 File. References used to compile the dataset.


S1 Table. Results of the principal components analysis conducted to variables selection to insertion in the modeling.


S2 Table. Correlation between the principal components obtained and the environmental variables values used to select the layers to modeling.


S3 Table. Moran’s I values for the selected environmental variables and the respective standard deviations and p-values of the Monte Carlo tests for spatial autocorrelation.


Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: LAS MLB MSG.
  2. Data curation: LAS MSG.
  3. Formal analysis: LAS MSG.
  4. Funding acquisition: FRMG.
  5. Investigation: LAS APK MFM.
  6. Methodology: LAS MSG.
  7. Project administration: LAS MLB MSG FRMG.
  8. Resources: LAS MSG.
  9. Software: LAS MSG MLB.
  10. Supervision: FRMG.
  11. Validation: LAS MFM APK MLB MSG FRMG.
  12. Visualization: LAS MFM APK MLB MSG FRMG.
  13. Writing – original draft: LAS MLB MDG FRMG.
  14. Writing – review & editing: LAS MFM APK MLB MSG FRMG.


  1. 1. Walton VM, Burrack HJ, Dalton DT, Isaacs R, Wiman N, Ioriatti C. Past, present and future of Drosophila suzukii: Distribution, impact and management in United States berry fruits. 2016. Acta Hortic.; 1117: 87–94.
  2. 2. Kaneshiro KY. Drosophila (Sophophora) suzukii (Matsumura). Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc. 1983; 157–204.
  3. 3. Hauser M. A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilae) in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Manag Sci. 2011; 67: 1352–1357. pmid:21898759
  4. 4. Burrack HJ, Smith JP, Pfeiffer DG, Koeher G, Laforest J. Using Volunteer-Based Networks to Track Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) an Invasive Pest of Fruit Crops. J Integ Pest Mngmt. 2012; 4: 1–5.
  5. 5. Ioriatti C, Stacconi M, Anfor G. Invasive Species Compendium. Datasheet report for Drosophila suzukii (spotted wing drosophila). 2013.
  6. 6. Arriaga JT. Phytosanitary Alert System: Detection of spotted-winged drosophila (Drosophila suzukii Matsumura) in the Municipality of Los Reyes, State of Michoacan, Mexico. North American Plant Protection Organization’s (NAPPO). 2011.
  7. 7. Cini A, Loriatti C, Anfora G. A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bull Insectology. 2012; 65: 149–160.
  8. 8. Deprá M, Poppe JL, Schmitz HJ, De Toni DC, Valente VLS. The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. J Pest Sci. 2014; 87: 379–383.
  9. 9. Bitner-Mathé BC, Victorino J, Faria FS. Drosophila suzukii has been found in tropical Atlantic Rainforest in southeastern Brazil. Drosoph Inf Serv. 2014; 97: 136–137.
  10. 10. Paula MA, Lopes PHS, Tidon R. First record of Drosophila suzukii in the Brazilian Savanna. Drosoph Inf Serv. 2014; 97: 113–115.
  11. 11. Peterson AT, Vieglais DA. Predicting Species Invasions Using Ecological Niche Modeling: New Approaches from Bioinformatics Attack a Pressing Problem. Bioscience. 2001; 51:363–371.
  12. 12. Bächli G. TaxoDros: The Data base on Taxonomy of Drosophilidae. 1.04 v. (2015/03).
  13. 13. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 2005; 25: 1965–1978.
  14. 14. Pearson K. On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space. Philos Mag. 1901; 2: 559–572.
  15. 15. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electronica. 2001; 4: 1–9.
  16. 16. Legendre P, Legendre L. Numerical Ecology, 2a ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998.
  17. 17. Dray S, Dufour A-B. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw. 2007; 22: 1–20.
  18. 18. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 2006; 190: 231–259.
  19. 19. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 2006; 29: 129–151.
  20. 20. Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol. 2001; 38: 921–931.
  21. 21. Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography. 2005; 28: 385–393.
  22. 22. Venette RC, Kriticos DJ, Magarey RD, Koch FH, Baker RH, Worner SP, Raboteaux NNG, Mckenney DW, Dobesberger EJ, Yemshanov D. Pest risk maps for invasive alien species: a roadmap for improvement. BioScience. 2010, 60: 349–362.
  23. 23. Garcia ACL, Gottschalk MS, Audino GF, Rohde C, Valiati VH, Valente VLS. First evidence of Drosophila malerkotliana in extreme South of Brazil (Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). Drosoph Inf Serv.2005; 88: 28–30.
  24. 24. Giannini TC, Siqueira MF, Acosta AL, Barreto FCC, Saraiva AM, Alves-dos-Santos I. Current challenges of species distribution predictive modelling. Rodriguésia. 2012; 63: 733–749.
  25. 25. Tidon R. Relationships between drosophilids (Diptera, Drosophilidae) and the environment in two contrasting tropical vegetations. Journal of the Linnean Society. 2006; 87: 233–247.
  26. 26. Poppe JL, Schmitz J, Valente VLS. Changes in the Structure of Drosophilidae (Diptera) Assemblages Associated With Contrasting Environments in the Pampas Biome Across Temporal and Spatial Scales. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2016; 0: 1–7.
  27. 27. Geisler FCS, Santos J, Holdefer DR, Garcia FRM. Primeiro registro de Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura, 1931) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) para o estado do Paraná, Brasil e de novos hospedeiros. Rev Ciênc Amb. 2015; 9: 125–129.
  28. 28. Poyet M, Roux VL, Gibert P, Meirland A, Prévost G, Eslin P. The Wide Potential Trophic Niche of the Asiatic Fruit Fly Drosophila suzukii: The Key of Its Invasion Success in Temperate Europe? PLoS One. 2015; 10: 1–26.
  29. 29. Tochen S, Dalton DT, Wiman N, Hamm C, Shearer PW, Walton VM. Temperature-related development and population parameters for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) on cherry and blueberry. Environ Entomol. 2014; 43: 501–510. pmid:24612968
  30. 30. Benito NP, Lopes-da-Silva M, dos Santos RSS. Potential spread and economic impact of invasive Drosophila suzukii in Brazil. Pesq agropec bras. 2016; 51: 571–578.
  31. 31. Gutierrez AP, Ponti L, Dalton DT. Analysis of the invasiveness of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) in North America, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. Biol Invasions. 2016; 18: 3647–3663.
  32. 32. Wiman NG, Walton VM, Dalton DT, Anfora G, Burrack HJ, Chiu JC. Integrating Temperature-Dependent Life Table Data into a Matrix Projection Model for Drosophila suzukii population estimation. PLOS One. 2014; 9: 1–14.
  33. 33. Asplen MK, Anfora G, Biondi A, Choi D-S, Chu D, Daane KM. Invasion biology of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii): a global perspective and future priorities. J Pest Sci. 2015; 88: 469.
  34. 34. Tochen S, Woltz JM, Dalton DT, Lee JC, Wiman NG, Walton VM. Humidity affects populations of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberry. J Appl Entomol. 2016; 140: 47–57.
  35. 35. Zhai Y,Lin Q,Zhang J,Zhang F,Zheng L,Yu Y. Adult reproductive diapause in Drosophila suzukii females. J Pest Sci. 2016; 89: 679–688.
  36. 36. Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F. World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z. 2006; 15: 259–263.
  37. 37. Singh BK, Bhatt M. A preliminary report on the Drosophilidae of the Kumaun region with description of two new species and three new records. Orient Insects. 1988; 22: 147–161.
  38. 38. Muhammad AUD, Mazhar K, Haque S, Ahmed M. A preliminary report on Drosophila fauna of Islamabad (Capital,Pakistan). Drosoph Inf Serv. 2005; 88: 6–7.
  39. 39. Tonina L, Mori N, Giomi F, Battisti A. Development of Drosophila suzukii at low temperatures in mountain areas. J pest sci. 2016; 89: 1–12.
  40. 40. Lasa R, Tadeo E. Invasive Drosophilid Pests Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus (Diptera:Drosophilidae) in Veracruz, Mexico. Fla Entomol. 2015; 98: 987–988.
  41. 41. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z. 2013; 22: 711–728.
  42. 42. Sandatino MV, Riquelme Virgala MB, Ansa MA, Bruno M, Di Silvestro G, Lunazzi EG. Primer registro de Drosophila suzukii (Diptera:Drosophilidae) asociado al cultivo de arándanos (Vaccinium spp.) de Argentina. Rev Soc Entomol Argent. 2015; 74: 183–185.
  43. 43. González G, Mary AL, Goñi B. Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) found in Uruguay. Drosoph Inf Serv. 2015; 98: 103–107.
  44. 44. Vilela CR, Mori L. The invasive spotted-wing Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae) has been found in the city of São Paulo (Brazil). Rev Bras Entomol. 2014; 58: 371–375.
  45. 45. Medina-Muñoz MC, Lucero X, Severino C, Cabrera N, Olmedo D, Del Pino F, Alvarez E, Jara C, Godoy-Herrera R. Drosophila suzukii arrived in Chile. Drosoph Inf Serv. 2015; 98: 75.
  46. 46. Dalton DT, Walton VM, Shearer PW, Walsh DB, Caprile J, Isaacs R. Laboratory survival of Drosophila Suzukii under simulated winter conditions of the Pacific Northwest and seasonal field trapping in five primary regions of small and stone fruit production in the United States. Pest Manag Sci. 2011; 67: 1368–1374. pmid:22021034
  47. 47. Calabria G, Máca J, Bächli G, Serra L, Pascual M. First records of the potential pest species Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Europe. J Appl Entomol. 2012; 136: 139–147.
  48. 48. Kimura MT. Cold and heat tolerance of drosophilid flies with reference to their latitudinal distributions. Oecologia. 2004; 140: 442–449. pmid:15221433
  49. 49. Jakobs R, Gariepy TD, Sinclair BJ. Adult plasticity of cold tolerance in a continental-temperate population of Drosophila suzukii. J Insect Physiol. 2015; 79: 1–9. pmid:25982520
  50. 50. Shearer PW, West JD, Walton VM, Brown PH, Svetec N, Chiu JC. Seasonal cues induce phenotypic plasticity of Drosophila suzukii to enhance winter survival. BMC Ecol. 2016; 16: 1–18.
  51. 51. Zerulla FN, Schmidt S, Streitberger M, Zebitz CPW, Zelger R. On the overwintering ability of Drosophila suzukii in South Tyrol. J Berry Res. 2015; 5: 41–48.
  52. 52. Lee JC, Bruck DJ, Dreves AJ, Ioriatti C, Vogt H, Baufeld P. In focus: Spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, across perspectives. Pest Manag Sci. 2011a; 67: 1349–1351.
  53. 53. Lee JC, Bruck DJ, Curry H, Edwards D, Haviland DR, Steenwyk RA. The susceptibility of smann fruits and cherries to the spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Manag Sci. 2011b; 67: 1358–1367.
  54. 54. Walsh DB, Bolda MP, Goodhue RE, Dreves AJ, Lee J, Bruck DJ. Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Invasive pest of ripening soft fruit expanding its geographic range and damage potencial. J Integr Pest Manag. 2011; 2: 1–8.