Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Association of eNOS and Cav-1 gene polymorphisms with susceptibility risk of large artery atherosclerotic stroke

  • Hann-Yeh Shyu,

    Affiliations Section of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Taoyuan General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Institute of Biology and Anatomy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Ming-Hua Chen,

    Affiliations Section of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Taoyuan General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Department of Neurology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Yi-Hsien Hsieh,

    Affiliation Institute of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Jia-Ching Shieh,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Ling-Rong Yen,

    Affiliation Section of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Taoyuan General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  • Hsiao-Wei Wang,

    Affiliations Institute of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Clinical Laboratory, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Chun-Wen Cheng

    cwcheng@csmu.edu.tw

    Affiliations Institute of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Clinical Laboratory, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Abstract

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is localized in caveole and has important effects on caveolar coordination through its interaction with caveolin-1 (Cav-1), which supports normal functioning of vascular endothelial cells. However, the relationship between genotypic polymorphisms of e-NOS and Cav-1 genes and ischemic stroke (IS) remains lesser reported. This hospital-based case-control study aimed to determine the genetic polymorphisms of the eNOS (Glu298Asp) and Cav-1 (G14713A and T29107A) genes in association with susceptibility risk in patients who had suffered from a large artery atherosclerotic (LAA) stroke. Genotyping determination for these variant alleles was performed using the TaqMan assay. The distributions of observed allelic and genotypic frequencies for the polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in healthy controls. The risk for an LAA stroke in the Asp298 variant was 1.72 (95% CI = 1.09–2.75) versus Glu298 of the eNOS. In the GA/AA (rs3807987) variant, it was 1.79 (95% CI = 1.16–2.74) versus GG and in TA/AA (rs7804372) was 1.61 (95% CI = 1.06–2.43) versus TT of the Cav-1, respectively. A tendency toward an increased LAA stroke risk was significant in carriers with the eNOS Glu298Asp variant in conjunction with the G14713 A and T29107A polymorphisms of the Cav-1 (aOR = 2.03, P-trend = 0.002). A synergistic effect between eNOS and Cav-1 polymorphisms on IS risk elevation was significantly influenced by alcohol drinking, heavy cigarette smoking (P-trend<0.01), and hypercholesterolemia (P-trend < 0.001). In conclusion, genotypic polymorphisms of the eNOS Glu298Asp and Cav-1 14713A/29107A polymorphisms are associated with the elevated risk of LAA stroke among Han Chinese in Taiwan.

Introduction

Despite the growing optimism due to recent advances in stroke therapy, strokes remain a major leading cause of disability and the third-leading cause of death among ethnic Chinese in Taiwan. An ischemic stroke (IS) is the most prevalent type of stroke, accounting for more than 80% of all stroke cases [1]. IS pathogenesis is believed to be multi-factorial, influenced by smoking, alcohol intake, hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and environmental factors as well as interactions with genetic components [24]. Recent progress in the understanding of the mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of cardiomyopathy has led to the discovery of therapeutic targets of nitric oxide (NO) with hopeful optimism [5]. Hence, gaining insight into the identification of genetic factors regarding NO has become an important issue to predict risk susceptibility and improve prevention strategies to reduce the human and economic burden of strokes.

Vascular endothelial NO synthesis is produced by the action of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), whose encoded gene is located on chromosome 7q35. Endothelium-derived NO plays several predominant roles in arteries, including inhibition of the adhesion of platelets and leukocytes, vasodilation in the endothelium, and the reduction of the genesis of oxidized low-density lipoprotein to prevent atherogenesis [68]. In recent, eNOS has been reported to occur specifically in the subdomain within caveolin-1, encoded by the Cav-1 gene, which assembles as a coat and scaffolding protein in caveolae and is responsible for the multiple phenotypes in vascular endothelial cells. Membrane caveolae consists of caveolins, a cholesterol-binding family with 21–24 kDa integral membrane proteins [911]. Binding affinity of eNOS/Cav-1 has multifunctional signaling in NO release which may account for the modified effect of Cav-1 in association with eNOS activity on vasodilation [12].

An individual vulnerability of eNOS and Cav-1 polymorphisms to the pathogenesis among cardiovascular diseases has been studied [1317], yet the correlation between genotypic polymorphisms of these two genes and the synergistic interaction of eNOS/Cav-1 on susceptible risk of large artery atherosclerotic (LAA) stroke has never been reported. Thus, this hospital-based case-control study aimed to determine the comparative distribution of eNOS (G894T) and Cav-1 (G14713A and T29107A) polymorphisms in patients who had undergone an LAA stroke and control subjects free of neurological diseases. In addition, the modified effects of the traditional risk factors, such as hypercholesterolemia, alcohol drinking, and heavy cigarette smoking on the genetic predisposition to have a stroke were evaluated.

Materials and methods

Study population

The sample size that was required in this hospital-based case-control study was computed by using “Genetic Power Calculator” (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/) under the assumption of 80% statistical power, 5% variant allele frequency, 1:1 case/control ratio, and 5% error rate in an allelic test. The present study consisted of 229 consecutive patients who had undergone an LAA stroke and 243 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. IS was defined according to the World Health Organization definition as “rapidly developing clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function lasting more than 24 hours with no apparent cause other than of vascular origin.” Any patients with atypical symptoms, including transient ischemic attacks, intracranial hemorrhage, post seizure palsy, brain trauma, brain tumors and younger stroke (<50 years old) were excluded from the study. The age at onset is defined as the age at which the first symptom of IS become evident by patient recollection. IS patients underwent at least one brain imaging (CT and/or MRI) study. Based on the clinical features and the information from brain imaging, echocardiography, ultrasonography of extracranial and intracranial arteries, and angiography (MRA or conventional angiography), these IS patients were sub-classified according to the TOAST classification system [18, 19]. The healthy control group was recruited from the same hospital in the health examination clinic during the same study period, and each of these controls was chosen on the basis that they have no evidence of any cerebrovascular disorders. Informed consent from each individual was obtained prior to specimen acquisition and the study design was approved by the Ethics Committee of Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital (TY101-11), Taipei, Taiwan.

Data collection

The information collected included demographic characteristics (ethnic background, residence area, and educational level) and age at diagnosis. The definitions of hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM) followed guidelines of Hypertension Management Guide for Doctors [20] and guided by Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus of American Diabetes Association [21], respectively. Patients with hypertension or DM were assured by the presence of an actual diagnosis as well as received antihypertensive/antidiabetic medication. History of alcoholism (defined as alcohol abuse disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) [22]), a current habit of daily cigarette smoking (heavy smokers consumed ≧10 cigarettes daily for at least 10 years), and the categorization of hypercholesterolemia as demonstrated in our previous report [23].

DNA extraction and genotype analysis

A sample of 10-ml of peripheral blood, collected in acetate-citrate dextrose, was obtained from a fasting venous blood sample drawn from each patient and control subject. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes using a QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (QIAGEN Inc., Chatsworth, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol and stored at -20°C for subsequent genotype determination. These variant genotypes of interest were chosen for genotyping based on the following criteria: (i) the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) resulted in an amino acid substitution; (ii) the frequency of the variant allele was greater than five percent in the general population. Polymorphisms in the Cav-1 G14713A (rs3807987) and T29107A (rs7804372), and e-NOS Glu298Asp (rs1799983) genes were selected based on the information in the Chinese population arranged in the HapMap database (http://www.hapmap.org/). DNA sequences of probes and primers for the genotyping assays were chosen using the TaqMan Assays-by-Design supplied by Applied Biosystems (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA). Genotype analyses for these variant alleles were performed using the TaqMan assay and PCR amplification conditions on ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For quality assurance, independent positive and negative control samples were included and analyzed on each 96-well plate in each batch. To ensure that the observed polymorphisms were specific and not the result of experimental variations, all uncertain genotypic results were subjected to a repeating assay for confirmation.

Statistical analyses

The means and standard deviations or frequency and percent were calculated for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine socioeconomic statuses and risk factors for IS. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed using a chi-square test. The allelic and genotypic frequencies of each polymorphism for these four genes were compared between the cases and the control subjects using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between polymorphisms in the Cav-1 and eNOS genes and LAA IS risk were estimated considering age and gender in multivariate logistic regression analysis. All statistical tests were performed with SPSS version 19.0 based on a 2-tailed probability and P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics of cases and control subjects are summarized in Table 1. There was no significant difference between the two groups in their age (stroke patients and controls were 73.2 ± 9.9 and 72.8 ± 7.9 years old, respectively) and gender. An increased LAA stroke risk was associated with risk factors, including hypertension (aOR = 3.17; 95% CI = 2.15–4.65), diabetes (aOR = 2.80; 95% CI = 1.83–4.28), hypercholesterolemia (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.01–2.08) using multiple logistic regression analysis after adjusting for age and sex. Besides, a significant risk elevation of a stroke was observed for patients with a cigarette smoking habit (aOR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.62–3.94) (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Demographic data for the LAA stroke patients and control subjects.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174110.t001

The allelic and genotypic frequencies of e-NOS (G894T) and Cav-1 (G14713A and T29107A) polymorphisms are shown in Table 2. The frequencies of observed alleles and genotypes for these polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg proportions in the controls. On the basis of inferred phenotypic manifestations [10, 2426], subjects who carried rare alleles of the eNOS 894T (coded for Aspartate), Cav-1 14713A, and 29107A were grouped together and considered a risk genotype in the following statistical analysis. For subjects who carried the homozygous eNOS GG genotype as a reference, a LAA stroke risk elevation was significant in carriers of combined GT/TT variant genotypes (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.09–2.75). For those subjects who carried the homozygous Cav-1 14713GG genotype as a reference, we found aORs of 1.71 (95% CI = 1.08–2.69) for GA, 2.34 (95% CI = 0.90–5.92) for AA, and 1.79 (95% CI = 1.16–2.74) for the combined GA/AA genotypes in the multiple logistic regression model. Similar to the Cav-1 T29107A polymorphism, the combined TA/AA genotype was correlated, showing a significant association with an increased IS risk (aOR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.06–2.43) compared to the TT genotype (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Genetic polymorphisms of eNOS and Cav-1 genes in association with LAA stroke risk.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174110.t002

We evaluated interactions between the variant alleles and atherosclerotic factors by determining the genotype frequency of the polymorphisms among the LAA stroke patients and the controls. As summarized in Table 3, a greater proportion of the eNOS 894GT and TT variants was seen in cases, showing a 3.23-fold risk increase in patients with hypercholesterolemia (95% CI = 1.70–6.12) and a 3.50-fold risk in patients with a long-term habit of heavy cigarette smoking (95% CI = 1.75–6.99). Besides, carriers with the Cav-1 G14713A polymorphism showed an elevated IS risk among those subjects within the same categorization of the clinical parameters, including hypercholesterolemia (aOR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.42–4.27) and heavy cigarette smoking (aOR = 3.46, 95% CI = 1.75–6.84), Similarly, observations of the effects of hypercholesterolemia and heavy cigarette smoking on LAA stroke risk elevation were statistically significant in patients with the Cav-1T29107A variant genotype (TA/AA) (P < 0.05) (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Effect of clinical variables on individual genotypic polymorphisms in elevated risk of LAA stroke disease.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174110.t003

The eNOS/Cav-1 combination has been suggested to play a key function in endothelial hyperpermeability, and our hypothetic mechanism underlying ischemic contracture is attributed to Cav-1 acting on vascular hyperpermeability through eNOS inhibition to reduce NO levels, leading to vasoconstriction and ischemic damages of the vascular system. Support for this hypothesis came from the observation that multiple interactions of genes on LAA stroke risk elevation were present in patients carrying a combination of the susceptible genotypes. By using a dummy variable coding scheme [27], an increased IS risk was shown in individuals who carried eNOS Glu894Asp variants together with the Cav-1 allelic variants of G14713A and T29107A (aOR = 4.20, 95% CI = 1.66–10.63). A significant trend toward LAA stroke risk elevation was found in patients carrying one additional risk genotype measured by the β estimation (Ptrend = 0.002) (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Gene-to-gene interactions of eNOS and Cav-1 polymorphisms in association with LAA stroke.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174110.t004

Based on the hypothetic mechanism that these high-risk genotypes were associated with an increasing risk of stroke disease by mimicking ischemic contracture on reduced vascular hyperpermeability to inhibit NO generation, the modified effects of hypercholesterolemia, alcohol drinking, and heavy cigarette smoking on LAA stroke risk would be more significant in carriers of high-risk genotypes of eNOS and Cav-1. We thus examined the possible interaction between the eNOS Glu894Asp and Cav-1 G14713A and T29107A polymorphisms in conjunction with the clinical features using the joint and stratified methods. As a result, among eNOS Glu894Asp carriers, individuals having variant alleles of the Cav-1 G14713A and T29107A variants were associated with an increasing LAA stroke risk when compared to those who carried the homozygous genotype of 14713GG and 29107TT. Moreover, the combined effect of the interaction between eNOS and Cav-1 polymorphisms on the LAA stroke risk elevation was shown in those diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia (aOR = 12.26, 95% CI = 2.39–62.95), alcoholism (aOR = 4.97, 95% CI = 0.96–25.7), and heavy cigarette smoking (aOR = 8.61, 95% CI = 1.74–42.50); the P-value for the trend test in eNOS 894Asp carriers with one additional Cav-1 polymorphism was significant, as measured by the β estimates from the regression model (Table 5).

thumbnail
Table 5. Risk elevation of an LAA stroke in individuals with the eNOS 894Asp variant genotype in combination with Cav-1 polymorphisms stratified by hypercholesterolemia, alcoholism, or heavy cigarette smoking.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174110.t005

Discussion

In this hospital-based case-control study, we carried out a comparative analysis of the frequency distribution of the 894T allele in the eNOS gene in our control subjects with the reported frequency and confirmed a rare prevalence of the variant T allele, similar to the documented frequencies among Asian populations, including ethnic Taiwanese [2830]. Our observation that a positive association between the eNOS Glu298Asp variant and LAA stroke is consistent with the findings that the eNOS Glu298Asp polymorphism is in association with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction among different ethnic cohorts, including Korean, Italian, North Indian, Turkish, and Han-Chinese population [3135]. These results provide justification of the mutated 894T allele playing an independent risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis [25]. Further, because NO molecule derived from eNOS conversion in the vascular endothelium has the vasoprotective effects through elimination of superoxide radicals, reduction of platelet aggregation, anti-inflammation, and limiting the oxidation of atherogenic low-density lipoproteins [36]; thus, dysfunction of the endothelial NOS activity has an impact of oxidative stress on vascular endothelium in healthy smokers [37]. Therefore, our findings that individuals carried eNOS Glu298Asp genotype with hypercholesterolemia and with habits of drinking alcohol and heavy smoking cigarettes are interpreted by the presence of an individual impairment in the vasoprotective capability causally linked to the eNOS polymorphism.

The caveolar coordination of eNOS, more specifically its interaction with Cav-1, plays a key role in normal eNOS activity to generate vascular NO, which is a bioavailable controller of shear-dependent NO release [38]. Knockdown experiments of Cav-1 have been shown to cause cardiohypertrophy, diabetes, and pulmonary and focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury [3941]. Recent genome wide association reports have shown for that Cav-1 SNPs are associated with stroke disease and that the Cav-1 G14713A elevates risk of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction [24, 4244]. However, some results are conflicting regarding the association between the Cav-1 polymorphisms and the risk of atrial fibrillation in cardiac arrhythmias [45]. In this study, we screened two SNPs, the G14713A and T29107A polymorphisms of the Cav-1 gene and examined their genotypic association with LAA stroke susceptibility (Table 2). Remarkably, based on a combinatorial study with genetic-environmental consideration, our findings provide realistic data regarding the risk susceptibility of an LAA stroke modified by gene-to-gene interactions; the two-locus risk genotype 14713A/T29107A at the Cav-1 showed the highest odds ratio in combination with the eNOS Glu298Asp genotype (Table 4). It is likely that polymorphisms in the Cav-1 gene increase high plasma triglyceride levels, resulting in endothelial function abnormality and ischemia [46]. It was reported that caveolae and caveolin-1 reverse cholesterol transport in atherosclerosis [47], and that the integration of eNOS and caveolin-1 principally participates in cholesterol trafficking, lipid homeostasis, and transmembrane signaling. An observation in vitro also indicated that the eNOS Glu298Asp variant alters caveolar localization in the microdomain of endothelial cells and function deficit in this eNOS corresponding enzyme casually linking Cav-1 highlights the relevance of interaction between eNOS and Cav-1 in reducing vasoprotection in arterial disease [43]. Therefore, molecular evidence of the interaction between eNOS and Cav-1 polymorphisms, such as 14713A, T29107A and 12759A alleles, on risk predisposition in LAA strokes in carriers who have hypercholesterolemia should be required to provide support in justifying our current association reports.

Notably, future molecular studies are required to reveal the important roles of eNOS Glu298Asp and Cav-1 14713A/29107A regarding the development of the coronary atrial disease. In the genomic era of personalized medicine, population-based genotyping association studies that are precise can be done if individual data with consideration of the traditional vascular risk factors [48], including hypertension, atrial fibrillation, obesity, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hyperuricemia, alcoholism, and heavy cigarette smoking, are available. In conclusion, individuals’ susceptibility to an LAA stroke is influenced by genetic variants in caveolar genes in association with stroke-related risk factors. This study demonstrated that the eNOS Glu298Asp in combination with 14713A/29107A at the Cav-1 locus was associated with a significant risk of an LAA stroke.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Demographical characteristics (age, gender, presence of hypertension, history of alcoholism and cigarette smoking) and polymorphism data of stroke patients and control subjects.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174110.s001

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

Our sincere appreciation goes to all of the study participants for their help in the department of pathology and laboratory medicine of Taoyaun Armed Forces General Hospital. This study was supported by the research grant_10207 from the Armed Forces Taoyuan General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: HYS CWC.
  2. Formal analysis: YHH JCS CWC.
  3. Investigation: HYS JCS CWC.
  4. Methodology: HYS YHH CWC MHC LRY HWW.
  5. Resources: HYS CWC MHC YHH JCS.
  6. Supervision: CWC.
  7. Validation: HYS CWC.
  8. Visualization: HYS CWC.
  9. Writing – original draft: HYS CWC.
  10. Writing – review & editing: HYS CWC.

References

  1. 1. Kuklina EV, Tong X, George MG, Bansil P. Epidemiology and prevention of stroke: a worldwide perspective. Expert review of neurotherapeutics. 2012; 12(2):199–208. pmid:22288675
  2. 2. von Sarnowski B, Putaala J, Grittner U, Gaertner B, Schminke U, Curtze S, et al. Lifestyle risk factors for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack in young adults in the Stroke in Young Fabry Patients study. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2013; 44(1):119–125.
  3. 3. Rubattu S, Giliberti R, Volpe M: Etiology and pathophysiology of stroke as a complex trait. American journal of hypertension. 2000; 13(10):1139–48. pmid:11041170
  4. 4. Torpy JM, Burke AE, Glass RM. JAMA patient page. Coronary heart disease risk factors. Jama. 2009; 302(21):2388. pmid:19952328
  5. 5. Gorressen S, Stern M, van de Sandt AM, Cortese-Krott MM, Ohlig J, Rassaf T, et al. Circulating NOS3 modulates left ventricular remodeling following reperfused myocardial infarction. PloS one. 2015; 10(4):e0120961. Epub 2015/04/16. pmid:25875863
  6. 6. Davignon J, Ganz P. Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004; 109(23 Suppl 1):III27–32. pmid:15198963
  7. 7. Napoli C, Paolisso G, Casamassimi A, Al-Omran M, Barbieri M, Sommese L, et al. Effects of nitric oxide on cell proliferation: novel insights. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013; 62(2):89–95. pmid:23665095
  8. 8. Rudic RD, Shesely EG, Maeda N, Smithies O, Segal SS, Sessa WC. Direct evidence for the importance of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in vascular remodeling. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1998; 101(4):731–6. pmid:9466966
  9. 9. Yang B, Rizzo V. Shear Stress Activates eNOS at the Endothelial Apical Surface Through beta1 Containing Integrins and Caveolae. Cellular and molecular bioengineering. 2013; 6(3):346–54. pmid:23956799
  10. 10. Mineo C, Shaul PW. Regulation of eNOS in caveolae. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2012; 729:51–62. pmid:22411313
  11. 11. Goligorsky MS, Li H, Brodsky S, Chen J. Relationships between caveolae and eNOS: everything in proximity and the proximity of everything. American journal of physiology Renal physiology. 2002; 283(1):F1–10. pmid:12060581
  12. 12. Bernatchez PN, Bauer PM, Yu J, Prendergast JS, He P, Sessa WC. Dissecting the molecular control of endothelial NO synthase by caveolin-1 using cell-permeable peptides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005; 102(3):761–6. pmid:15637154
  13. 13. Vecoli C. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms in cardiovascular disease. Vitamins and hormones. 2014, 96:387–406. pmid:25189395
  14. 14. Szabo GV. The role and importance of gene polymorphisms in the development of atherosclerosis. Interventional medicine and applied science. 2013; 5(1):46–51. pmid:24265890
  15. 15. Hu CJ, Wang CH, Lee JH, Hsieh CM, Cheng CC, Chang SC, Chang CJ. Association between polymorphisms of ACE, B2AR, ANP and ENOS and cardiovascular diseases: a community-based study in the Matsu area. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2007; 45(1):20–5. pmid:17243909
  16. 16. Martin RI, Babaei MS, Choy MK, Owens WA, Chico TJ, Keenan D, et al. Genetic variants associated with risk of atrial fibrillation regulate expression of PITX2, CAV1, MYOZ1, C9orf3 and FANCC. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology. 2015; 85:207–14. pmid:26073630
  17. 17. Balakumar P, Kathuria S, Taneja G, Kalra S, Mahadevan N. Is targeting eNOS a key mechanistic insight of cardiovascular defensive potentials of statins? Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology. 2012; 52(1):83–92. pmid:21968328
  18. 18. Madden KP, Karanjia PN, Adams HP Jr., Clarke WR. Accuracy of initial stroke subtype diagnosis in the TOAST study. Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Neurology. 1995; 45(11):1975–9. pmid:7501144
  19. 19. Adams HP Jr., Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3rd: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 1993; 24(1):35–41.
  20. 20. The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Archives of internal medicine. 1988; 148(5):1023–38. pmid:3365073
  21. 21. American Diabetes A: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes care. 2004; 27 Suppl 1:S5–S10.
  22. 22. Grant BF, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Huang B, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, et al. Sociodemographic and psychopathologic predictors of first incidence of DSM-IV substance use, mood and anxiety disorders: results from the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Molecular psychiatry. 2009; 14(11):1051–66. pmid:18427559
  23. 23. Shyu HY, Shieh JC, Ji-Ho L, Wang HW, Cheng CW. Polymorphisms of DNA repair pathway genes and cigarette smoking in relation to susceptibility to large artery atherosclerotic stroke among ethnic Chinese in Taiwan. Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2012; 19(4):316–25. pmid:22277767
  24. 24. Chen S, Wang X, Wang J, Zhao Y, Wang D, Tan C, Fa J, Zhang R, Wang F, Xu C et al. Genomic variant in CAV1 increases susceptibility to coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis. 2016; 246:148–56. pmid:26775120
  25. 25. Lembo G, De Luca N, Battagli C, Iovino G, Aretini A, Musicco M, Frati G, Pompeo F, Vecchione C, Trimarco B. A common variant of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (Glu298Asp) is an independent risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2001; 32(3):735–40.
  26. 26. Pojoga LH, Underwood PC, Goodarzi MO, Williams JS, Adler GK, Jeunemaitre X, et al. Variants of the caveolin-1 gene: a translational investigation linking insulin resistance and hypertension. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2011; 96(8):E1288–92. pmid:21613355
  27. 27. Ueki M, Tamiya G: Ultrahigh-dimensional variable selection method for whole-genome gene-gene interaction analysis. BMC bioinformatics. 2012; 13:72. pmid:22554139
  28. 28. Yao YS, Chang WW, Jin YL, He LP. An updated meta-analysis of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene: three well-characterized polymorphisms with ischemic stroke. Gene. 2013; 528(2):84–92. pmid:23845784
  29. 29. Men C, Tang K, Lin G, Li J, Zhan Y. ENOS-G894T polymorphism is a risk factor for essential hypertension in China. Indian journal of biochemistry & biophysics 2011; 48(3):154–7.
  30. 30. Lin NT, Lee MJ, Lee RP, Hong AI, Chen HI. Analysis of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms with cardiovascular diseases in eastern Taiwan. The Chinese journal of physiology 2008; 51(1):42–7. pmid:18551994
  31. 31. Luo M, Li J, Sun X, Lai R, Wang Y, Xu X, Sheng W. Interactions among Candidate Genes Selected by Meta-Analyses Resulting in Higher Risk of Ischemic Stroke in a Chinese Population. PloS one. 2015; 10(12):e0145399. pmid:26710338
  32. 32. Park KW, You KH, Oh S, Chae IH, Kim HS, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB. Association of endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism with acute coronary syndrome in Koreans. Heart. 2004; 90(3):282–5. pmid:14966047
  33. 33. Srivastava K, Biswas UK, Narang R, Varghese JJ, Das N. Prevalence of eNOS Glu298Asp polymorphism in healthy volunteers from a region of Northern India. Community genetics. 2005; 8(3):180–3. pmid:16113535
  34. 34. Cam SF, Sekuri C, Tengiz I, Ercan E, Sagcan A, Akin M, Berdeli A. The G894T polymorphism on endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with premature coronary artery disease in a Turkish population. Thrombosis research. 2005; 116(4):287–92. pmid:16038712
  35. 35. Hassan A, Gormley K, O'Sullivan M, Knight J, Sham P, Vallance P, Bamford J, Markus H. Endothelial nitric oxide gene haplotypes and risk of cerebral small-vessel disease. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2004; 35(3):654–9.
  36. 36. Forstermann U, Munzel T. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular disease: from marvel to menace. Circulation. 2006; 113(13):1708–14. pmid:16585403
  37. 37. Leeson CP, Hingorani AD, Mullen MJ, Jeerooburkhan N, Kattenhorn M, Cole TJ, Muller DP, Lucas A, Humphries SE, Deanfield JE. Glu298Asp endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism interacts with environmental and dietary factors to influence endothelial function. Circulation research. 2002; 90(11):1153–8. pmid:12065317
  38. 38. Chai Q, Wang XL, Zeldin DC, Lee HC. Role of caveolae in shear stress-mediated endothelium-dependent dilation in coronary arteries. Cardiovascular research. 2013; 100(1):151–9. pmid:23787000
  39. 39. Murata T, Lin MI, Huang Y, Yu J, Bauer PM, Giordano FJ, Sessa WC. Reexpression of caveolin-1 in endothelium rescues the vascular, cardiac, and pulmonary defects in global caveolin-1 knockout mice. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2007; 204(10):2373–82. pmid:17893196
  40. 40. Gu Y, Zheng G, Xu M, Li Y, Chen X, Zhu W, Tong Y, Chung SK, Liu KJ, Shen J. Caveolin-1 regulates nitric oxide-mediated matrix metalloproteinases activity and blood-brain barrier permeability in focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury. Journal of neurochemistry. 2012; 120(1):147–56. pmid:22007835
  41. 41. Fujita T, Toya Y, Iwatsubo K, Onda T, Kimura K, Umemura S, Ishikawa Y. Accumulation of molecules involved in alpha1-adrenergic signal within caveolae: caveolin expression and the development of cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiovascular research. 2001; 51(4):709–16. pmid:11530104
  42. 42. Chen S, Wang C, Wang X, Xu C, Wu M, Wang P, Tu X, Wang QK. Significant Association Between CAV1 Variant rs3807989 on 7p31 and Atrial Fibrillation in a Chinese Han Population. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2015; 4(5).
  43. 43. Testa A, Spoto B, Sanguedolce MC, Parlongo RM, Pisano A, Tripepi G, et al. eNOS and caveolin-1 gene polymorphisms interaction and intima media thickness: a proof of concept study in ESRD patients. American journal of hypertension. 2012; 25(1):103–8. pmid:21976276
  44. 44. Holm H, Gudbjartsson DF, Arnar DO, Thorleifsson G, Thorgeirsson G, Stefansdottir H, et al. Several common variants modulate heart rate, PR interval and QRS duration. Nature genetics. 2010; 42(2):117–22. pmid:20062063
  45. 45. Li G, Zhang R, Gao L, Zhang S, Dong Y, Yin X, Chang D, Yang Y, Xia Y. Lack of association between rs3807989 in cav1 and atrial fibrillation. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology. 2014; 7(7):4339–44. pmid:25120818
  46. 46. Sonveaux P, Martinive P, DeWever J, Batova Z, Daneau G, Pelat M, et al. Caveolin-1 expression is critical for vascular endothelial growth factor-induced ischemic hindlimb collateralization and nitric oxide-mediated angiogenesis. Circulation research. 2004; 95(2):154–61. pmid:15205364
  47. 47. Qin L, Zhu N, Ao BX, Liu C, Shi YN, Du K, Chen JX, Zheng XL, Liao DF. Caveolae and Caveolin-1 Integrate Reverse Cholesterol Transport and Inflammation in Atherosclerosis. International journal of molecular sciences. 2016; 17(3):429. pmid:27011179
  48. 48. O'Donnell MJ, Chin SL, Rangarajan S, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, et al. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study. Lancet. 2016; 388(10046):761–75. pmid:27431356