Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Is the number of siblings associated with dietary patterns in adolescents? The 1993 birth cohort of Pelotas (Brazil)

  • F. O. Meller ,

    mellerfernanda@gmail.com

    Affiliation Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

  • M. C. F. Assunção,

    Affiliation Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

  • A. A. Schäfer,

    Affiliation Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

  • C. Loret de Mola,

    Affiliation Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

  • D. L. Dahly,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

  • J. S. Vaz,

    Affiliation Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

  • F. C. Barros

    Affiliation Post-Graduate Program in Health and Behavior, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

Is the number of siblings associated with dietary patterns in adolescents? The 1993 birth cohort of Pelotas (Brazil)

  • F. O. Meller, 
  • M. C. F. Assunção, 
  • A. A. Schäfer, 
  • C. Loret de Mola, 
  • D. L. Dahly, 
  • J. S. Vaz, 
  • F. C. Barros
PLOS
x

Abstract

Our study aimed to estimate the association between number of siblings and dietary patterns in adolescents. Prospective longitudinal study was developed using data from the birth cohort of the city of Pelotas, Brazil, which included 5249 participants. At the 18-year-old follow-up, from 4563 individuals located, 4106 were interviewed (follow-up rate 81.3%). Of these, 3751 were included in our principal component analysis of dietary patterns. Regular dietary intake of 45 food groups over the previous year was measured with a food frequency questionnaire. We identified four patterns, which accounted for 40% of the total variance in food group consumption. These were labeled “Protein and fast food”, “Fruit and vegetables”, “Common Brazilian”, and “Sweets, soft drinks, and dairy products”. Crude and adjusted analyses of the association between number of siblings and dietary patterns were performed using linear regression. The number of siblings was positively associated with a higher adherence to each dietary pattern, with the exception of the “Common Brazilian” patterns, for which there was no apparent relationship with number of siblings. The findings showed that a greater number of siblings is related to a more diverse diet in the later adolescence, which may predict better nutrient adequacy and health outcomes.

Introduction

Dietary intake during the adolescence has an important role in both the prevention and treatment of diseases. Also, dietary patterns and habits acquired during adolescence are also likely to persist throughout adulthood [1].

Although dietary intake assessment is challenging [2], and the majority of studies focus on the intake of individual nutrients, foods or food groups [3], dietary patterns have been widely used in nutritional epidemiology to examine the joint effects of multiple dietary components [4]. This approach identifies overall patterns of food intake and their apparent effects on disease risks, allowing us to examine potential synergistic or antagonistic effects between nutrients and/or foods [4].

While previous studies have looked into the role of family structure on dietary intake [57], few have evaluated the effect of number of siblings on adolescent dietary patterns [810]. One of these studies found that individuals with no siblings had a higher daily intakes of nutrients (except carbohydrate and added sugars) compared to individuals with siblings, suggesting that only-children may have a better diet quality [9]. Other studies found that having more than one sibling is associated with higher nutritional risk (according to nutrients intake based on Reference Nutrient Intake) [10], and that additional siblings may decrease the availability of food for each child [8].

Considering the scarce literature on this subject, the aim of the present study was to examine the association between number of siblings and dietary patterns in 18 year-old adolescents from a birth cohort in Southern Brazil.

Materials and methods

Study design and sample

Pelotas is a city in the extreme south of Brazil, near the border of Uruguay, and it currently has approximately 343,000 urban inhabitants. Its main economic activities are rice production, commerce and education. All 1993 hospital-born infants (N = 5249, accounting for over 99% of all city births) whose families lived in urban Pelotas, and agreed to participate, were recruited for a birth cohort study. Cohort members were followed-up at 11, 15 and 18 years of age (in 2004, 2008, and 2011, respectively). The methods of the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study are published elsewhere [11, 12]. For this study we included individuals with information on the exposure at age 15 years (number of siblings) and on the outcome at 18 years (dietary pattern).

Dietary patterns assessment

A semi-quantitative self-reported food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) available in electronic format was administered to adolescents at 18 years of age [13]. This FFQ is an adapted version of the most commonly used FFQ in Brazil [13, 14].

This instrument measures the consumption of 88 food items in the previous 12 months. Response options for each food item were: never or less than once/month, 1 to 3 times/month, once/week, 2 to 4 times/week, 5 to 6 times/week, once/day, 2 to 4 times/day, 5 times/day or more.

Food items were collapsed into 45 foods groups according to their nutritional characteristics (S1 Fig), and a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to identify sets of food groups with correlated intake levels [6, 15].

We considered representative of each component all food items with a factor loading greater than 0.25. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and Bartlett’s test of sphericity were applied to verify whether the PCA assumptions were all met. Varimax rotation was applied to obtain components with a near zero or maximum loading to improve component interpretability. The number of components was based on screeplot of components with eigenvalues greater than 1. Identified dietary patterns were standardised as z-scores and assessed as continuous variables.

Number of siblings

Mothers were asked, “How many times have you ever been pregnant including this pregnancy?” at baseline, and “Have you had any children after [the child enrolled in the birth cohort]?” and “If yes, how many?” at the 15-year-old follow-up. Using these questions we calculated the total number of siblings. The questions included live births only. The main exposure used in the analyses was number of siblings, which had four categories (0; 1; 2; ≥3).

Analytical methods

For descriptive analysis of the variables studied, we presented absolute and relative frequencies of categorical variables, and measures of central tendency and dispersion of continuous variables.

Crude and adjusted analyses of the association between the number of siblings and dietary pattern scores were performed using linear regression. Adjusted models included the following variables to account for potential confounding: family income (in real), maternal education (in completed years), presence of the father (yes/no), maternal skin colour (white/black/other), and maternal age (in years).

Additionally, linear regression analyses were performed to assess the association between number of siblings and energy intake (Kcal) using FFQ data. Adjusted analysis included the variables listed above.

Regression results are reported as point estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 12.1.

Ethical considerations

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medicine School of the Federal University of Pelotas in the official letter numbered 05/11. Adolescents signed the term of free and informed consent in both follow-ups.

Results

Sample characteristics

Of the 5249 infants enrolled into the study at birth, 4563 were located. Of those, 127 refused to participate in the study and 330 were considered losses, totalizing 4106 interviewed at 18 years of age. Added to those known to have died, this represents an 81.3% follow-up rate. Of these, 4052 adolescents had complete data on dietary patterns. After excluding those with inaccurate reports of energy intake (<-2 and >+2 SD), following standard procedures [16], our final sample consisted of 3751 individuals.

There was no difference between the participants included in our analyses and those excluded in relation to the variables studied (number of total siblings, family income, maternal education, presence of the father, maternal skin colour, and maternal age at birth) (data not shown in Table).

Table 1 describes the characteristics of our sample. Most adolescents had the father living in the house when they were born (88.4%) and about one-third of them at the age of 15 had one sibling (31.3%). Regarding the mothers, the average education at birth was near 7 years (SD 3.5) and age at birth was 26 years (SD 6.4). In addition, median family income was 830 reais (interquartile range 420–1500).

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of sample according to the variables studied (n = 3 751).

The 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Brazil.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174087.t001

Dietary patterns

We identified four dietary patterns, which together explained 40% of the total variance in food group consumption. The first pattern, which we called protein and fast food, included fish, processed meat (canned tuna/sardine, salt-cured meat, bacon), hamburger, hot dogs, viscera (heart and liver), fried and roasted chicken, and pork meat. The second pattern, fruits and vegetables, included banana, orange and tangerine, tomato, other fruits, vegetables and legumes. The third one, common Brazilian, included coffee, black beans, white sugar, fat (butter and margarine), white rice, and white bread. Finally, the fourth pattern, called sweets, soft drinks, and dairy products, included chocolate powder, regular sodas, dairy products, sweets, candies and caramels, and ice cream. All food items showed positive loadings (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Four components of dietary pattern of adolescents at 18 years of age (The 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Brazil).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174087.t002

Regression models

Crude and adjusted analyses evaluating the association between number of siblings and dietary pattern scores are presented in Table 3. S2 Fig also shows the crude analyses. Adjusted models showed that individuals with three or more siblings, compared to only-children, had higher adherence to the fruits and vegetables pattern (β = 0.21 z-scores, 95% CI 0.12; 0.29); the sweets, soft drinks, and dairy products pattern (β = 0.40 z-scores, 95% CI 0.30; 0.50); and the protein and fast food pattern (β = 0.10 z-scores, 95% CI 0.05; 0.15). There was no difference in consumption of the common Brazilian pattern according to number of siblings. There was some mild attenuation of effect sizes in the adjusted models, but the results were qualitatively similar to those from the unadjusted models.

thumbnail
Table 3. Crude and adjusted analyses of association between number of siblings and dietary patterns (in z-score) (The 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Brazil).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174087.t003

Additional analyses were performed to assess the association between number of siblings and energy intake. In the adjusted analysis, adolescents with three or more siblings showed an increase of 666.7 Kcal (95% CI 454.5; 878.9) in energy intake compared to those who had no siblings (data not shown).

Discussion

Our findings showed the number of siblings was positively associated with higher adherence to each dietary pattern except the common Brazilian pattern. Corroborating the results of the present study, a British study reported no association between number of siblings (older or younger) and ‘traditional’ diet (based on meat, potatoes and vegetables) at age 7 years. In addition, the authors found that ‘health-conscious’ dietary component (vegetarian style foods, rice, pasta, salad and fruit) was positively associated with the number of older siblings the child had, whereas the ‘junk’ diet component (high-fat and sugar content, processed and convenience foods) was positively associated with the total number of siblings (older or younger) [17]. Similarly, a study carried out in Spain found that having more than one sibling was related to higher nutritional risk [10]. Such finding may be associated with less attention being given to food or individuals in families with a larger number of children [18].

Two previous studies have found that a higher number of siblings was associated with lower average daily intake of total protein, animal protein, calcium, vitamins, and fat; but a higher consumption of carbohydrate and added sugar [9, 19]. The finding that individuals with siblings had a lower intake of all nutrients except carbohydrate and added sugar indicates that they have diets that rely on cheaper nutrients as sources of energy rather than more expensive diets including proteins and fats [19]. One possible explanation is that the greater number of siblings means that the family has less income to spend per family member [20].

Our results showed that a greater number of siblings was associated with a more diverse diet. This finding may be reflecting the nutritional transition occurring in lower and middle income countries [21, 22]. Study including children from eight European countries reported that those from lower socioeconomic status (SES) have higher risk of unhealthy eating [23]. Also, recent review with studies from low and middle-income countries (the majority of them were conducted in Brazil) including adults showed that higher SES was associated with a healthier dietary pattern [24]. Since we observed adherence to varied patterns among individuals with siblings, it may suggest that these adolescents are in the middle of a nutritional transition (i.e. going from a dietary pattern typical from low-income countries, where higher SES is positively associated to unhealthier patterns, to a dietary pattern typical from high-income countries, where higher SES is positively associated to healthier patterns) [25].

A greater dietary variety may predict better nutrient adequacy and health outcomes [26, 27]. Also, it is important to note that dietary variety, food group intakes, and nutrient adequacy are all strongly correlated with energy intake [27].

Some methodological considerations should be highlighted. Due to loss of follow-up, potential selection biases might exist, however we compared the sample participants with the original participants assessed at the baseline and observed no difference in relation to the variables included in our analysis (data not shown). The 12-month recall period for the FFQ may be considered a limitation of our study, since it may generate recall bias. While we adjusted our regression models for a number of potential confounding factors, we cannot exclude the possibility that residual confounding explains the associations we have described. It is also important to emphasize that adherence to a dietary pattern does not, necessarily, exclude the adherence to other patterns, and the dietary patterns we identified may be not generalizable to other populations [28]. Finally, we used the information on the number of siblings at 15-year-old follow-up because we did not have this information at 18 year-old follow-up. Moreover, we do not have the information whether the siblings live together with the adolescent enrolled in the cohort.

Some strengths of this study are its high follow-up rate and its longitudinal design. Also, the four independent dietary components identified in our study explained 40% of the variation in adolescent food group consumption. In other studies which used PCA to analyze dietary patterns, the variance ranged from 15% to 31% [6, 15, 29].

In conclusion, our results showed that the number of siblings is associated with the dietary patterns in later adolescence, even after adjustment for potential confounders. Having siblings is associated to higher adherence to the protein and fast food pattern; the fruits and vegetables pattern; and the sweets, soft drinks, and dairy products pattern, which characterize a diversified diet.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Forty-five food items of the food frequency questionnaire categorized according to nutritional characteristics (The 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Brazil).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174087.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Crude analyses of association between number of siblings and dietary patterns (in z-score) (The 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Brazil).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174087.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

All colleagues and workers who contributed to the study included since its 1st year. This article is based on data from the study "Pelotas Birth Cohort, 1993" conducted by Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology at Universidade Federal de Pelotas with the collaboration of the Brazilian Public Health Association (ABRASCO) and the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq). From 2004 to 2013, the Wellcome Trust supported the 1993 birth cohort study. The European Union, National Support Program for Centers of Excellence (PRONEX), and the Brazilian Ministry of Health supported previous phases of the study.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: FOM MCFA FCB.
  2. Formal analysis: FOM CLdM DLD JSV.
  3. Investigation: FOM AAS CLdM.
  4. Methodology: FOM MCFA AAS CLdM DLD JSV FCB.
  5. Project administration: FOM AAS.
  6. Supervision: FOM MCFA FCB.
  7. Writing – original draft: FOM MCFA AAS CLdM DLD JSV FCB.
  8. Writing – review & editing: FOM MCFA AAS CLdM DLD JSV FCB.

References

  1. 1. Lake AA, Mathers JC, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Adamson AJ. Longitudinal change in food habits between adolescence (11–12 years) and adulthood (32–33 years): the ASH30 Study. J Public Health (Oxf). 2006;28:10–6.
  2. 2. Collins CE, Watson J, Burrows T. Measuring dietary intake in children and adolescents in the context of overweight and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010;34:1103–15.
  3. 3. Cutler GJ, Flood A, Hannan PJ, Slavin JL, Neumark-Sztainer D. Association between major patterns of dietary intake and weight status in adolescents. Br J Nutr. 2012;108:349–56. pmid:22017879
  4. 4. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13:3–9. pmid:11790957
  5. 5. Hanna KL, Collins PF. Relationship between living alone and food and nutrient intake. Nutr Rev. 2015;73:594–611. pmid:26269488
  6. 6. Nascimento S, Barbosa FS, Sichieri R, Pereira RA. Dietary availability patterns of the Brazilian macro-regions. Nutr J. 2011;10:79. pmid:21798035
  7. 7. Ambrosini GL, Oddy WH, Robinson M, O'Sullivan TA, Hands BP, de Klerk NH, et al. Adolescent dietary patterns are associated with lifestyle and family psycho-social factors. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:1807–15. pmid:19161648
  8. 8. Chen AY, Escarce JJ. Family structure and childhood obesity, Early Childhood Longitudinal Study—Kindergarten Cohort. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7:A50. pmid:20394689
  9. 9. Jacoby A, Altman DG, Cook J, Holland WW, Elliott A. Influence of some social and environmental factors on the nutrient intake and nutritional status of schoolchildren. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1975;29:116–20. pmid:1182353
  10. 10. Serra-Majem L, Ribas L, Perez-Rodrigo C, Garcia-Closas R, Pena-Quintana L, Aranceta J. Determinants of nutrient intake among children and adolescents: results from the enKid Study. Ann Nutr Metab. 2002;46 Suppl 1:31–8.
  11. 11. Goncalves H, Assuncao MC, Wehrmeister FC, Oliveira IO, Barros FC, Victora CG, et al. Cohort Profile update: The 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort follow-up visits in adolescence. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:1082–8. pmid:24729426
  12. 12. Victora CG, Araujo CL, Menezes AM, Hallal PC, Vieira Mde F, Neutzling MB, et al. Methodological aspects of the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study. Revista de saude publica. 2006;40:39–46. pmid:16410981
  13. 13. Schneider BC, Santos JVd, Muniz LC, Bielemann RM, Madruga SW, Orlandi SP, et al. Desenho de um questionário de frequência alimentar (QFA) digital autoaplicado para avaliar o consumo alimentar de adolescentes e adultos jovens–Coortes de nascimentos de Pelotas-RS. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. 2015;no prelo:
  14. 14. Sichieri R, Everhart JE. Validity of a Brazilian food frequency questionnaire against dietary recalls and estimated energy intake. Nutrition Research. 1998;18:1649–59.
  15. 15. Richter A, Heidemann C, Schulze MB, Roosen J, Thiele S, Mensink GB. Dietary patterns of adolescents in Germany—associations with nutrient intake and other health related lifestyle characteristics. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:35. pmid:22439777
  16. 16. McCrory MA, McCrory MA, Hajduk CL, Roberts SB. Procedures for screening out inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:873–82. pmid:12633510
  17. 17. Northstone K, Emmett P. Multivariate analysis of diet in children at four and seven years of age and associations with socio-demographic characteristics. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:751–60. pmid:15841093
  18. 18. Gregory J, Lowe S. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young people aged 4–18 years. London: The Stationary Office; 2000.
  19. 19. Cook J, Altman DG, Moore MC, Topp SG, Holland WW, Elliott A. A survey of the nutritional status of schoolchildren. Relation between nutrient intake and socio-economic factors. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1973;27:91–9. pmid:4724649
  20. 20. de Oliveira Meller F, Assuncao MC, Schafer AA, de Mola CL, Barros AJ, Dahly DL, et al. The influence of birth order and number of siblings on adolescent body composition: evidence from a Brazilian birth cohort study. Br J Nutr. 2015;114:118–25. pmid:26074279
  21. 21. Drewnowski A, Popkin BM. The nutrition transition: new trends in the global diet. Nutr Rev. 1997;55:31–43. pmid:9155216
  22. 22. Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 2012;70:3–21. pmid:22221213
  23. 23. Fernandez-Alvira JM, Bammann K, Pala V, Krogh V, Barba G, Eiben G, et al. Country-specific dietary patterns and associations with socioeconomic status in European children: the IDEFICS study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:811–21. pmid:24824009
  24. 24. Mayen AL, Marques-Vidal P, Paccaud F, Bovet P, Stringhini S. Socioeconomic determinants of dietary patterns in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:1520–31. pmid:25411287
  25. 25. Santos LP, Assuncao MC, Matijasevich A, Santos IS, Barros AJ. Dietary intake patterns of children aged 6 years and their association with socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, early feeding practices and body mass index. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1055. pmid:27716197
  26. 26. Oliveira EP, Camargo KF, Castanho GKF, Nicola M, Portero-McLellan KC, Burini RC. Dietary Variety is a Protective Factor for Elevated Systolic Blood Pressure. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2012;98:338–43. pmid:22426991
  27. 27. Foote J.A., Murphy S.P., Wilkens L.R., Basiotis P.P., A. C. Dietary Variety Increases the Probability of Nutrient Adequacy among Adults. The Journal of Nutrition. 2004;134:1779–85. pmid:15226469
  28. 28. Olinto MT. Padrões alimentares: análise dos componentes principais. In: Kag G, Sichieri R, Gigante DP, editors. Epidemiologia nutricional. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz/Atheneu; 2007. p. 213–26.
  29. 29. Olinto MT, Willett WC, Gigante DP, Victora CG. Sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics in relation to dietary patterns among young Brazilian adults. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14:150–9. pmid:20576193