Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

LuxCDE-luxAB-based promoter reporter system to monitor the Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 gene expression in vivo

  • Elif Bozcal,

    Affiliations Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Basic and Industrial Microbiology Section, Istanbul, Turkey, Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Basic and Industrial Microbiology Section, Izmir, Turkey, Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Medicum, and Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

  • Melih Dagdeviren,

    Affiliations Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, General Biology Section, Izmir, Turkey, Ege University, Center for Drug Research and Development and Pharmacokinetic Applications, Izmir, Turkey

  • Atac Uzel,

    Affiliation Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Basic and Industrial Microbiology Section, Izmir, Turkey

  • Mikael Skurnik

    Affiliations Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Medicum, and Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Helsinki University Hospital, HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland


LuxCDE-luxAB-based promoter reporter system to monitor the Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 gene expression in vivo

  • Elif Bozcal, 
  • Melih Dagdeviren, 
  • Atac Uzel, 
  • Mikael Skurnik


It is crucial to understand the in vitro and in vivo regulation of the virulence factor genes of bacterial pathogens. In this study, we describe the construction of a versatile reporter system for Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:3 (YeO3) based on the luxCDABE operon. In strain YeO3-luxCDE we integrated the luciferase substrate biosynthetic genes, luxCDE, into the genome of the bacterium so that the substrate is constitutively produced. The luxAB genes that encode the luciferase enzyme were cloned into a suicide vector to allow cloning of any promoter-containing fragment upstream the genes. When the obtained suicide-construct is mobilized into YeO3-luxCDE bacteria, it integrates into the recipient genome via homologous recombination between the cloned promoter fragment and the genomic promoter sequence and thereby generates a single-copy and stable promoter reporter. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) O-antigen (O-ag) and outer core hexasaccharide (OC) of YeO3 are virulence factors necessary to colonization of the intestine and establishment of infection. To monitor the activities of the OC and O-ag gene cluster promoters we constructed the reporter strains YeO3-Poc::luxAB and YeO3-Pop1::luxAB, respectively. In vitro, at 37°C both promoter activities were highest during logarithmic growth and decreased when the bacteria entered stationary growth phase. At 22°C the OC gene cluster promoter activity increased during the late logarithmic phase. Both promoters were more active in late stationary phase. To monitor the promoter activities in vivo, mice were infected intragastrically and the reporter activities monitored by the IVIS technology. The mouse experiments revealed that both LPS promoters were well expressed in vivo and could be detected by IVIS, mainly from the intestinal region of orally infected mice.


The bacterial genus Yersinia has three species known to cause human infections: Yersinia enterocolitica, Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. pestis. Y. enterocolitica has been divided into six biotypes, biotype 1A includes the non-pathogenic strains and biotypes 1B, 2, 3, 4, and 5 include the pathogenic strains. The biotype 1B to 5 strains usually carry a 70 kb Yersinia virulence plasmid (pYV) that encodes several well-characterized virulence determinants [1]. The chromosomally encoded virulence factors include Ail (attachment and invasion locus), invasin, Yersinia stable toxin and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [24]. Most pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains that cause human yersiniosis belong to bioserotypes 1B/O:8, 2/O:5,27, 2/O:9, 3/O:3, 4/O:3 [5]. Yersiniosis is generally a self-limiting food-borne enteric infection with diarrhea, and occurs mostly in young children. The infection may be followed by sequelae such as reactive arthritis or erythema nodosum [6]. Y. enterocolitica mainly colonizes the Peyer’s patches (PPs) in the small intestine (INT), the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), and sometimes also disseminates to deeper tissues such as spleen (SP) and liver (LI) in mice [7, 8].

LPS, also known as endotoxin, is an important bacterial surface antigen used by the host immune system in recognition of the pathogen. In Y. enterocolitica O:3 (YeO3) different structural parts of LPS are virulence factors and play a role immediately after the entry to the host [9, 10]. LPS is a large molecule consisting of a lipid A (LA) covalently linked to a polysaccharide composed in inner core (IC), outer core (OC) and O-antigen (O-ag) or O-polysaccharide (OPS). YeO3 does not produce the conventional Gram-negative LA-IC-OC-O-ag type LPS molecules but has two types of LPS molecules; LA-IC substituted either with O-ag or with OC but not by both, i.e., LA-IC-O-ag or LA-IC-OC [11, 12]. In addition to the biological activity of LA as endotoxin, in some bacteria O-ag is also significant for colonization of host tissues, resistance to complement mediated killing and for initial interactions between the bacterium and the host. The rough, i.e., O-ag–lacking, strains of Y. enterocolitica serotypes O:3 and O:8 are 50–100 times less virulent than wild type strain in orally infected mice [13, 14]. OC of YeO3 is required for full virulence and strongly suggested that it provides resistance against host defense mechanisms [10].

Several virulence factors of Yersinia species are temperature-regulated; however, the regulation mechanisms are poorly understood and need to be studied further. For instance, the stable enterotoxin of Yersinia (Yst) is optimally produced at 22–25°C, however, the surface adhesins e.g., Ail and YadA are produced at 37°C [15]. Moreover, in vitro, the production of LPS OC and O-ag is temperature-regulated, i.e., bacteria grown at 22°C produce more OC and O-ag than bacteria grown at 37°C [9, 12]. Furthermore, in Y. enterocolitica serotype O:8 absence of O-ag affected the expression of other virulence factors [16]. On the other hand, in YeO3, abundant O-ag production blocked the Ail protein and thereby affected the complement resistance of the bacteria underlining the importance of proper regulation of the LPS components to functionality of other virulence factors [17, 18]. Finally, it has been speculated that during infection the O-ag expression might be repressed after the colonization to deeper tissues to allow proper exposure of other surface-located virulence factors [19].

Bioluminescence imaging makes it possible to follow the progression of the infection in animal models [20] for example after a reporter gene has been cloned under the control of a bacterial promoter. As bacteria mostly respond to changes through transcriptional regulation virulence gene promoter reporters can be used to monitor the infection process in vivo to elucidate how bacteria respond to environmental changes [21]. The in vivo imaging system (IVIS) is an efficient approach to study bacterial infections at real time in live animals [20, 22]. IVIS can be used with various reporter systems including the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and bacterial luciferase encoded by the luxAB genes. While the GFP produces fluorescence upon UV-light illumination, the luciferase requires the (exogenous) aldehyde substrate for the light emission [23]. This requirement is overcome by the employment of the whole luxCDABE operon where the luxCDE genes encode the enzymes of the fatty acid reductase complex to generate the tetradecanal substrate for the bioluminescence reaction [24, 25]. Both GFP and bacterial luxAB reporters have been used to study Yersinia infections in mice [25].

In light of the above information, to understand the regulation of the YeO3 O-ag and OC gene clusters in vitro and in vivo we constructed a versatile promoter reporter system for YeO3. The YeO3 reporter system was constructed by integrating the luxCDE genes into the genome of the bacterium to constitutively supply the bacteria with the luciferase substrate. To avoid the potential hazards of the copy number effects of plasmid-carried promoter reporters, a promoterless luxAB suicide vector was constructed for promoter cloning. The latter allows the integration of the promoter reporter as a single-copy into the bacterial genome via homologous recombination. To demonstrate the utility of the system the LPS OC and O-ag gene cluster promoter reporters were constructed.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. Bacteria were grown aerobically in Lysogeny Broth (LB) [26] or on Yersinia selective agar (CIN) (Oxford, UK) at either 37°C or at room temperature (RT, ca. 22°C). LB plates were prepared by adding 1.5 g of Bacto agar (Difco) to 1 L of LB. Antibiotics were used when needed at the following concentrations: streptomycin (Str) 50 μg/ml, chloramphenicol (Clm) 100 μg/ml, ampicillin (Amp) 50 μg/ml.

Construction of genomic luxCDE integration vectors

We first removed the MfeI restriction site from pSW23T (Table 1) by blunting the 5’-overhangs of the MfeI-digested plasmid with T4 DNA polymerase followed by self-ligation and the obtained suicide vector was named pSW23T-ΔM. The Y11_01511 –Y11_01531 region of YeO3 genome was amplified by PCR using primers 1521-F1M and 1521-R1 (Table 2) to generate a 1485 bp fragment with BamHI restriction sites. This fragment was digested with BamHI and ligated with BamHI digested and phosphatase-treated pSW23T-ΔM. The ligation mixture was electroporated into E. coli Sy327λpir and obtained ClmR transformants were screened by colony PCR using the primers 1521-F1M and 1521-R1. Plasmid DNA was isolated from a few PCR-positive clones and digested with BamHI to confirm the insert. The obtained 3,302 bp plasmid was named pEfB4. To introduce an MfeI site (compatible with EcoRI) in the middle of the inserted fragment between the Y11_01511 `–Y11_01531 genes, pEfB4 was amplified by plasmid PCR with MfeI site carrying primers 1521-F3 and 1521-R3. The obtained 3.3 kb PCR fragment was digested with MfeI, self-ligated, transformed into E. coli Sy327λpir and the resulting plasmid was named pEfB5.

Plasmid pTetLux1 carrying the luxCDABE operon was used as a template in plasmid PCR using primers Lux1F and Lux1R. The PCR linearizes the plasmid without the luxAB genes. The fragment was self-ligated to close the gap between luxD and luxE and the generated plasmid was named pTetLuxCDE. The luxCDE cassette was carried in it within a 4.8 kb EcoRI fragment. The latter was released from pTetLuxCDE with EcoRI digestion and ligated with MfeI-digested pEfB5. The ligation mixture was transformed into E. coli Sy327λpir and ClmR transformants were screened by PCR using luxC-specific primers LuxC-F and LuxC-R (Table 2). Plasmids from luxC-positive clones were isolated, analysed by restriction digestions, and two of the obtained plasmids were called pEfB6-a and pEfB6-b as in them the luxCDE cassette had been ligated in opposite orientations between the Y11_01521 and Y11_1531 genes.

Finally, the Y11_01521-luxCDE-Y11_01531 fragments of pEfB6-a and pEfB6-b were cloned as BamHI-fragments into suicide vector pKNG101 (Table 1) that carries the sacB gene to facilitate the positive selection of allelic exchange. The ligation mixtures were transformed into Sy327λpir, StrR transformants were screened by colony PCR, the insertion of the correct fragment was confirmed by digestion of the isolated plasmids with BamHI, and the obtained plasmids were named pEfB7-a and pEfB7-b.

Construction of promoter-luxAB integration vectors.

The luxAB genes were amplified by PCR with primers Lux2-F and Lux2-R (Table 2) that include BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites, respectively, using plasmid pTetlux1 as template. The amplified luxAB fragment was digested with EcoRI and BamHI and ligated with similarly digested suicide vector pSW23T. The ligation mixture was transformed into E. coli S17λpir and ClmR transformants were selected. Plasmids from the transformants carrying the luxAB fragment in correct orientation were identified by colony PCR and digestion with BamHI and EcoRI, and one of the obtained plasmids was named as pEfB1. PCR was used to amplify ca. 400 bp fragments carrying the promoter regions of the YeO3 OC and O-ag gene clusters (designated as Poc and Pop1, respectively). These promoters are located upstream of genes Y11_ 19991 and Y11_16781 of strain Y11, respectively (accession number: FR729477). The primer pairs were O3ocP-fS and O3ocP-rE, and O3op1-fS and O3op1-rE (Table 2) for Poc and Pop1, respectively, and YeO3 genomic DNA was used as template. The primers introduced SalI and EcoRI restriction sites up- and down-stream of the promoters, respectively. The SalI and EcoRI digested promoter fragments were ligated with similarly digested pEfB1 and transformed into E. coli S17λpir. ClmR transformants were selected. Plasmids from the transformants carrying the promoter fragments in the correct orientation were identified using PCR and restriction digestions with NsiI. The resulting Poc and Pop1 promoter-fragment carrying plasmids were named as pEfB2 and pEfB3, respectively.

Mobilization of suicide vectors by conjugation and screening for mutant strains.

The suicide constructs pEfB7-a and pEfB7-b were mobilized from E.coli SM10λpir (StrR) to YeO3 wild type strain 6471/76 by conjugation. The donor bacteria were grown aerated overnight at 37°C in 5 ml of LB supplemented with Str. The YeO3 bacteria were grown with shaking overnight in 5 ml of LB at RT. The donor and recipient cultures were centrifuged (1500 ×g, 15 min), the pellets washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), and resuspended into PBS to an OD600 ~1. Mating mixtures containing 50 μl aliquots of the donor and recipient suspensions were mixed (2:1) on LB plates. After 24 h mating at RT, the bacteria were collected into 1 ml of PBS. To select merodiploid YeO3 transconjugants in which the suicide construct had integrated via homologous recombination into the bacterial genome, aliquots of the suspensions and dilutions thereof were spread on CIN-Str plates. Bacteria from 10 individual StrR colonies from both matings (i.e., of pEFB7-a or pEFB7-b with YeO3) were pooled and grown in LB without any antibiotics for three passages at 25°C to complete the allelic exchange via a second site recombination. The culture from the last passage was 1:5 diluted with fresh LB supplemented with 5% sucrose and incubated at RT for 3 h. The recombinants that had lost the sacB gene along with the suicide vector would survive the incubation with sucrose were screened for StrS luxC-positive clones. From both matings a representative clone was selected and named YeO3-LuxCDE-1 and YeO3-LuxCDE-2 carrying the luxCDE genes transcriptionally fused to the Y11_1521 and Y11_1531 genes, respectively. In both, the exchange of the Y11_01521-Y11_01531 fragment to the Y11_01521-luxCDE-Y11_01531 fragment was confirmed by PCR using primers 1521-F1M and 1521-R1 (Table 2).

Construction of the promoter reporter strains.

The Poc and Pop1 promoter suicide vectors pEfB2 and pEfB3 were mobilized into YeO3-LuxCDE-1 and YeO3-LuxCDE-2 by conjugation as described above. ClmR merodiploid transconjugants were selected carrying in the bacterial genome the luxAB cassette integrated by homologous recombination under the OC and O-ag gene cluster promoters. PCR using primers Lux2-F and Lux2-R (Table 2) was used to check that the suicide vector had integrated into the recipient strains. While we failed to isolate pEfB3 transconjugants in YeO3-LuxCDE-2, the three other reporter strains YeO3-LuxCDE-1::pEfB2 (called hereafter YeO3-Poc::luxAB), YeO3-LuxCDE-1::pEfB3 (called hereafter) YeO3-Pop1::luxAB, and YeO3-LuxCDE-2::pEfB2 were isolated (Table 1). Light production in both YeO3-LuxCDE-1/pEfB2 and YeO3-LuxCDE-2/pEfB2 was identical, therefore only the former strain was used in further studies.

Bioluminescence and growth phase.

The reporter strains YeO3-Poc::luxAB and YeO3-Pop1::luxAB were inoculated in LB medium supplemented with Clm and grown for 15 hr at RT and 37°C. Bacteria were diluted to OD600 of 0.2 in a total volume of 50 ml of fresh medium pre-incubated to respective temperature, and grown aerated for 24 hr at RT and 37°C. Culture samples were harvested in triplicate at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hr time points to determine OD600 and measure bioluminescence (as relative light units, RLU). The bioluminescence values were measured using Chameleon plate reader (HIDEX, Turku, Finland). Experiments were performed with at least 3 biologial and 3 technical replicates.

Sensitivity of the lux reporter detection.

Overnight cultures of the reporters were diluted 1:100 (OD600 ~0.03) in LB-Clm and grown at RT and 37°C until OD600 reached 0.2 (~108 cfu/ ml). The cultures were serially diluted in PBS (pH 7.45) down to ~102 cfu/ml and 0.2 ml aliquots were transferred in triplicate to a 96-well plate. The bioluminescence at both temperatures was measured using the Chameleon plate reader (HIDEX). The corresponding bacterial counts were determined by plating serial dilutions on LA-Clm plates. The RLU from wells with 0.2 ml PBS without bacteria was used as the background value that was subtracted from the RLU values produced by the bacteria.

Growth curves.

The growth curves of the bacterial strains were determined using the Bioscreen C incubator (Growth Curves Ab Ltd). Overnight (ca. 16 hr) cultures of the bacteria were diluted with fresh LB medium to an OD600 of 0.2. Aliquots of 200 μl were distributed into honeycomb plate wells and grown for 15 hr at RT and 37°C with continuous shaking. The OD600 of the wells was measured every 15 min. The averages were calculated from values obtained for the bacteria grown in 6 parallel wells. Experiments were performed with at least 3 experimental and 6 technical replicates.


Immunoblotting was performed as described earlier [17] with minor modifications. Briefly, bacteria were grown overnight in 5 ml LB at RT and 37°C by shaking at 200 rpm. The OD600 of the culture was adjusted to ~1 with LB, bacteria from a 500 μl aliquot were centrifuged, resuspended into 100 μl SDS sample lysis buffer and heated at 100°C for 10 minutes. After cooling the samples on ice, 10 μl aliquots were separated in gel electrophoresis using the Hoefer miniVE Vertical Electrophoresis System (Amersham, Biosciences) with 12% resolving and 5% stacking polyacrylamide gels. The separated samples were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes by semi-dry transfer apparatus (Blot module; Amersham Biosciences) using the recommended transfer buffer. The membrane was blocked with blocking buffer including 5% fat-free milk. The membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAb) specific for O-ag (Tom A6) and OC (2B5) [35], diluted 1:25 and 1:10, respectively. The horse radish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibodies (P0447, dilution 1:2000, DAKO) were used as secondary antibodies. The bound HRP was detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) developing solution applied onto the membrane followed by exposure of an X-ray film. This experiment was performed with 2 biological replicates.

The IVIS experiment.

Mouse experiments at University of Helsinki were under the ethical permission granted by the Animal Experiment Board in Finland (Decision No:ESAVI/5893/04.10.03/2012), and at Ege University under the permit (No: 2015–004) from the Animal Experiment and Ethics Committee of Ege University. Female BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks old, 18.65±0.20 g), were purchased from Kobay A.S. (Ankara-Turkey), and were kept in quarantine for one week after arrival from the supplier. Handling of each mouse during the experiments was carried out according to the European Communities Council directives (86/609/EEC). The mice were kept under standard colonial conditions (4/5 mice per cage, 21±1°C, 12 hr day/night cycle), standard mouse pellet (except saline/desferal injection day) and tap water were available ad lib. One day before the bacterial infections, 10 mg of the iron chelator desferrioxamine (Desferal, Novartis®) dissolved in 100 μl sterile dH2O was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) into half of the mice; the remaining mice formed the saline-treated (SLN) group. Desferal (DSF) enhances the virulence of Y. enterocolitica [10, 36]. The bacteria for the infection experiments were prepared as described earlier [10]. The presence of the Yersinia virulence plasmid (pYV) in each strain was verified by the autoagglutination of the bacteria when grown at 37°C in MedECa medium as described [17, 37]. The actual bacterial concentrations in each experiment were determined by plating serial dilutions of the inocula. The mice were kept without solid food for 12 h before bacterial challenge [10]. Saline was injected to control mice to eliminate the difference of injection stress.

The mice were inoculated i.g. via gavage with 100 μl of the bacterial suspension in PBS (pH 7.45). The inocula were 1.1×109 CFU and 2×109 CFU for YeO3-Poc::luxAB and YeO3-Pop1::luxAB, respectively. For the imaging, the mice were anesthetized with ketamine (50 mg/kg)–xylazine (10 mg/kg) and images were captured on day 1 and 5 post-infection using the IVIS Spectrum device (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton-MA). The best imaging results were achieved using high resolution and a 5 min exposure time. The results, reported as radiance (p/sec/cm2/sr), were acquired by a computer using the Living Image Software (PerkinElmer, USA). The images were stored and analyzed with the connected computer. On day 5 post-infection, after capturing the images by IVIS, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation while still under anesthesia. Piece of LI, the INT, the MLNs and the SP of each animal were placed on a Petri dish and images were captured with IVIS using a 1 min exposure time. The PPs were then prepared from the small intestines, and all the tissues were weighted and stored frozen in 20% glycerol at -20°C overnight. Identical tissues of each mouse group were combined and homogenized in ice cold PBS (3 ml/g of tissue) with Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer on ice. 500 μl aliquots of the homogenate were recovered from each group for bacterial counts. Two 20 μl aliquots of serially diluted homogenates were plated immediately on CIN-Clm plates to determine the bacterial numbers in the homogenates by the drop test described earlier [38, 39].


GraphPad Prism 5.0 (SanDiego, CA, USA) program was used for statistical analysis. One way ANOVA and Student’s t-tests were performed and post-hoc tests were applied when needed. P- values 0.05 were considered significant.


The design of the reporter strains

In this work, we engineered a bacterial luxCDABE operon-based promoter reporter system for YeO3 such way that the luciferase encoding luxAB genes and the substrate biosynthetic enzymes encoding luxCDE genes were separated. In addition, we wanted to incorporate both the luxCDE and luxAB genes into the bacterial genome to avoid possible copy-number effects associated in plasmid-borne reporter systems. To generate a versatile system able to generate reporters to any chosen promoter, a strain expressing the luxCDE genes from a non-relevant location in the genome was needed. To this end, we first identified from the YeO3 genome a constitutively transcribed locus where the luxCDE genes could be transcriptionally fused. For this we utilized the RNA-seq data of YeO3 grown both at 22°C and 37°C [40]. Based on the RNA-seq data the genes Y11_01521 and Y11_01531 (YeO3 strain Y11, accession number: FR729477) are both expressed constitutively and at moderate level. The gene Y11_01531 encodes for a bifunctional tRNA-methyltransferase MnmC, and the gene Y11_01521, for a hypothetical protein. The genes appropriately face each other being the last genes in their operons (Fig 1). Thus, we reasoned that insertion of the luxCDE genes between the genes would generate a transcriptional fusion irrespective the luxCDE orientation. In this line, the strains YeO3-LuxCDE-1 and YeO3-LuxCDE-2 were constructed to produce constitutively the luciferase substrate biosynthetic enzymes (Fig 1). Upon introduction of the luxAB genes into these strains, light should be produced proportional to the promoter strength upstream the luxAB genes. As a tool to integrate the luxAB genes into the YeO3 genome we constructed a promoter cloning suicide vector pEfB1. Any promoter of YeO3 can be cloned to the cloning site upstream the promoterless luxAB genes in pEfB1 (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Construction of the luciferase reporter system for YeO3.

The promoterless luxCDE genes were introduced between the Y11_01521 and Y11_01531 (nmnC) genes of the wild type (WT) strain to obtain the strain YeO3-LuxCDE-1 with the luxCDE genes transcriptionally fused to Y11_01521. In strain YeO3-LuxCDE-2 (not shown) the luxCDE genes are in opposite direction and transcriptionally fused to Y11_01531. The LuxC, LuxD and LuxE proteins are the transferase, synthetase, and reductase to produce from fatty acids the long-chain aldehyde substrate for the LuxAB luciferase. The luxAB genes were cloned into the suicide vector pSW23T between the EcoRI and BamHI sites to obtain pEfB1. Cloning of any YeO3 promoter fragment into the pEfB1 promoter cloning site produces a promoter-luxAB suicide construct. When the promoter suicide construct is mobilized into strain YeO3-LuxCDE-1, it will via homologous recombination generate a reporter strain where the promoter activity translates into LuxAB expression that can be detected as bioluminescence. The organization of the Photorhabdus luminescens luxCDABE operon is depicted at the bottom.

Reporter strain fitness and sensitivity

The YeO3-Poc::luxAB and YeO3-Pop1::luxAB reporter strains (Table 1) were constructed to allow monitoring the LPS OC and O-ag gene cluster gene expression, respectively. To verify that the merodiploid situation with the promoter-pEfB1 plasmid integrated into the host genome did not disturb the expression of the target gene clusters, the O-ag and OC production in the YeO3-Poc::luxAB and YeO3-Pop1::luxAB reporter strains was compared to that of the wild type strain by immunoblotting (Fig 2A). Both strains produced O-ag and OC identical to the wild type strain, furthermore, the growth curves of the reporter strains were identical to that of the wild type strain (Fig 2B) indicating that the reporter systems did not influence the fitness of the bacteria. To determine the minimal number of bacteria required to produce light above the background, light was measured from different numbers of reporter bacteria grown to logarithmic phase at 22°C and 37°C (Table 3). 102 and 103 CFU per well already produced RLU values slightly above the PBS background (~10 RLU), 104 CFU produced RLU values clearly above the background.

Fig 2. Characterization of the influence of promoter reporter constructions on the LPS expression and fitness of the Y. enterocolitica O:3 reporter strains.

(A). Western blotting analysis of LPS expression profiles in wild type and reporter strain bacteria grown at 22°C. The O-antigen and OC specific mAbs Tom A6 and 2B5, respectively, were used as primary antibodies (B). Growth curves of wild type and promoter reporter bacteria in LB at 37°C and 22°C.

Table 3. Light detection using the Chameleon plate reader from different numbers of Y. enterocolitica O:3 OC and O-ag gene cluster promoter reporter bacteria.

Next we studied whether the growth phase and/or the temperature influence the Poc and Pop1 activities. To this end, bacterial cultures were adjusted to OD600 = ~0.2, incubated at 22°C and 37°C, and the RLU/OD600 values were determined at different time points during the incubation (Fig 3). At 37°C both promoters appeared to be most active during the exponential growth phase which would be logical as that is the phase where new LPS molecules are synthesized [9], however, the two promoters behaved differently at RT. In contrast to Pop1, the Poc reporter was not active at RT during log phase. When the bacteria grown at RT reached the early stationary phase at 8–10 hr, both promoter activities were relatively low, however, both were more active at 24 hr at RT than in early stationary phase (8–10 hr). On the other hand, at 37°C, both promoters were very active during the log phase but almost completely repressed at 24 hr.

Fig 3. The in vitro OC and O-ag gene cluster expression profiles of the Y. enterocolitica O:3.

reporter bacteria YeO3-Poc::luxAB (Poc) and YeO3-Pop1::luxAB (Pop1) during growth in 50 ml LB at 22°C and 37°C. The data points show averages of three replicates and the bars above the data points show the +SD values. RLU, relative light units.

In vivo expression studies

The reporter strains YeO3-Poc::luxAB and YeO3-Pop1::luxAB were used in mouse infection experiments. In a preliminary experiment carried out with a few mice it was established that the reporter bacteria produced detectable amount of light in vivo (data not shown). This allowed us to carry out IVIS experiments on experimentally infected mice. Altogether 37 mice were used in the in vivo imaging experiments. Traditionally, in LD50 experiments with YeO3, to enhance the pathogenicity of the bacteria, the mice are pre-treated with the iron-chelating compound DSF [10, 36]. To ascertain the detectability of the bacteria by IVIS, half of the mice were given DSF and the other half was pre-treated with 0.9% NaCl (SLN). Altogether four experimental groups were generated: OC-SLN (n = 8), OC-DSF (n = 9), OA-SLN (n = 10) and OA-DSF (n = 10). The groups infected with YeO3-Poc::luxAB were designated as OC-SLN and OC-DSF, and those with YeO3-Pop1::luxAB, as OA-SLN and OA-DSF. The in vivo reporter activities were monitored as light emission on days 1 and 5 post-infection.

On day one in both the OC-SLN and OA-SLN-infected mice the light emission was detected from 1–3 spots located at the intestinal region except in two mice where the spot close to the caecum (Fig 4, the OC-SLN mouse #10, Fig 5, the OA-SLN mouse #8). On day five, in both groups more intense but still spotwise light emission was detected from the intestinal region. Only in the OC-SLN mice #10 light emissions also occurred from the location close to the thyroid gland.

Fig 4. IVIS monitoring of the Y. enterocolitica O:3 OC gene cluster promoter activity in BALB/c mice infected i.g. with YeO3-Poc::luxAB reporter bacteria.

The progress of the infection was monitored in DSF- and SLN-treated mice. The color bars beside each IVIS image indicate the intensity of radiance (p/sec/cm2/sr). Note that the scale range varies between the images due to different sensitivity settings used. The bioluminescence signals from live mice were monitored at 1 and 5 days post-infection. The images were acquired using a 5-min exposure with IVIS (Living Image®Software).

Fig 5. IVIS monitoring of the Y. enterocolitica O:3 O-ag gene cluster promoter activity in BALB/c mice infected i.g. with the YeO3-Pop1::luxAB reporter bacteria.

The progress of the infection was monitored in DSF- and SLN-treated mice. The color bars beside each IVIS image indicate the intensity of radiance (p/sec/cm2/sr). Note that the scale range varies between the images due to different sensitivity settings used. The bioluminescence signals from live mice were monitored at 1 and 5 days post-infection. The images were acquired using a 5-min exposure with IVIS (Living Image®Software).

The picture on day one in the OC-DSF and OA-DSF groups was similar to that of the day one SLN-groups, i.e., light emission was detected from spots in the intestinal region. On day five, in contrast to the SLN-mice, the intestinal region light emission was almost absent, present only in four of the 20 mice (Figs 4 and 5). Instead, nine of the 20 mice had light emission from external parts of the body. Six of the DSF-group mice showed luminescence around the anus demonstrating that bacteria were secreted in the feces. All the nine DSF-mice had very likely developed diarrhea as they had soiled their external parts with the reporter bacteria-contaminated feces as the light emission was located in the front and hind paws, and around the snout.

On day 5 post-infection all the mice were sacrificed via cervical dislocation under anesthesia., the different tissues were recovered, light emission monitored by IVIS (Fig 6), and the bacterial loads in pooled tissues determined by colony counts (Table 4). In most mice clear light emission was detected from the Peyer’s patches of the excised intestines and especially in the DSF-group mice also from spleens and livers (Fig 6). The light emission from the spleen of the OA-DSF mouse #2 was strong enough to be detected also from the live mouse (Figs 5 and 6).

Fig 6. Representative images of light emission from excised mouse organs on day 5 post-infection captured by IVIS.

The mouse numbering is the same as in Figs 4 and 5. Abbreviations: INT, intestine; SP, spleen; LN, mesenteric lymph node; PP, Peyer’s Patches; LI, Liver. The images were acquired using a 1-min exposure with IVIS (Living Image®Software).

Table 4. Average bacterial loads in the pooled tissues of the IVIS experiment mice.

Identical tissues of each mouse group were combined and homogenized for bacterial counts.

The major differences in the bacterial loads between the SLN and DSF groups were detected in spleen and liver. Clearly, DSF facilitated the bacterial colonization of these tissues. At the same time, no significant difference was detected in the colonization of the intestine and actually the bacterial loads in PPs were smaller in the DSF group (Table 4) reflecting well the strong light emission from the intestinal region of the OA-SLN and OC-SLN mice on day 5 (Figs 4 and 5).

IVIS detected strong light emission from excised spleens and livers of some mice (Fig 6). We did not determine the individual bacterial loads for the IVIS mice tissues, however, the average bacterial loads in the spleens and livers of the DSF-group mice were high (Table 4) explaining the strong signals from these organs.


In this work, we constructed a genome integrated and stable luciferase-based promoter reporter system for YeO3 that can be applied to direct in vivo imaging without need of administration of any substrate or antibiotics during infection. The luxCDE-carrying strain produces constitutively the luciferase substrate and will allow monitoring the activities of any promoter cloned upstream the promoterless luxAB genes. As a proof of principle, we introduced the LPS O-ag and OC gene cluster promoters into the luxCDE-strain and demonstrated that the reporter system is functional both in vitro and in vivo.

Various reporter systems have been developed to understand gene expression in different conditions [24, 41]. For instance, promoterless chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene (cat) has been used to study promoter activity, however, while the cat reporter shows high sensitivity, the stability of the Cat protein is a disadvantage preventing research on rapid dynamic changes in expression [42]. The green fluorescent protein (GFP) and its derivatives are used as reporter although it is sometimes occluded by cellular autofluorescence [43]. Our chromosomally integrated luxCDE and luxAB genes allow self-sustainable production of the luciferase substrate and in vivo applications with continuous monitoring of gene expression. The merodiploid promoter construct appears to be stable in vivo as demonstrated by our preliminary mouse experiment where we infected mice either with wild type or reporter bacteria. The results demonstrated that the reporter bacteria (enumerated using Clm-plates) and the wild type bacteria colonized the mice to comparative levels, for example, the PPs were colonized equally to ca. 105 cfu/gr (data not shown). If the reporter strains had been unstable, one would expect significantly less Clm-resistant colonies. As this was not the case, one can only conclude that the reporters are stable and as virulent as the wild type bacteria. The genome-integrated reporter plasmids are more stable than autonomously replicating reporter plasmids and, as in this work, can be used without feeding antibiotics to infected animals. While luxCDABE-carrying reporter strains have earlier been constructed for Yersinia, [25, 4446] our system is the first one where the luxAB and the luxCDE genes have been separated.

The OC and O-ag gene cluster promoters are predicted to be most active in vitro during the exponential growth phase coinciding with strong need for new LPS molecules [9]. This was confirmed in this study. The promoters behaved differently at RT during the log phase where the Poc promoter activity was very low while that of Pop1 was higher (Fig 3). Previous reports using late log or stationary phase Y.enterocolitica bacteria demonstrated that O-Ag production is abundant in bacteria grown at RT while it is partially repressed at 37°C [47]. Regulation of many virulence factors in Y. enterocolitica is temperature depended. LPS is a significant virulence factor of Y. enterocolitica O:3 and both the OC and O-ag of LPS are required for full virulence [10, 14]. However, no experimental data of the regulation of the LPS biosynthesis of YeO3 in vivo is available. Our reporter constructs can be used to monitor tissue-specific expression of the OC and O-ag gene cluster promoters during in vivo conditions provided that the mice are killed to measure the luciferase activity and the bacterial loads of the infected organs. In order to use IVIS for that purpose, a dual-reporter system should be designed where a constitutively expressed reporter, for example GFP, would be used to normalize the luciferase activity to the number of bacterial cells colonizing the different tissues.

The reporter strains YeO3-Poc::luxAB and YeO3-Pop1::luxAB produced light during the in vivo experiments providing a proof of concept that the reporter system works in vivo. The Poc and Pop1 promoters were active throughout the intestinal region (Figs 4 and 5). The IVIS experiment showed that both promoter activities could be detected in the mice irrespective the DSF-treatment; however, DSF clearly influenced the course of infection. As a general observation, the DSF-group mice suffered from a more severe infection. This was also supported by the finding that light was detected from the excised liver and spleen tissues of OC-DSF and OA-DSF but never from the SLN-mice (Fig 6). This nicely reflected the fact that the bacterial loads in the DSF-treated mouse livers and spleens was much higher than in the SLN-treated mouse organs (Table 4).


The authors would like to acknowledge the Center for Drug Research and Development and Pharmacokinetic Applications unit of Ege University for carrying out the IVIS experiments. Part of the study was presented in a poster at the 4th European Congress of Immunology, September 6–9, 2015, in Vienna, Austria.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: EB MD AU MS.
  2. Formal analysis: EB MD AU.
  3. Funding acquisition: AU MS.
  4. Investigation: EB MD MS.
  5. Methodology: EB MD MS.
  6. Project administration: AU MS.
  7. Resources: AU MS.
  8. Supervision: AU MS.
  9. Validation: EB MS.
  10. Visualization: EB MS.
  11. Writing – original draft: EB MS.
  12. Writing – review & editing: EB MD AU MS.


  1. 1. Drummond N, Murphy BP, Ringwood T, Prentice MB, Buckley JF, Fanning S. Yersinia enterocolitica: a brief review of the issues relating to the zoonotic pathogen, public health challenges, and the pork production chain. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012 Mar;9(3):179–89. pmid:22217012
  2. 2. Schaake J, Drees A, Gruning P, Uliczka F, Pisano F, Thiermann T, et al. Essential Role of Invasin for Colonization and Persistence of Yersinia enterocolitica in Its Natural Reservoir Host, the Pig. Infect Immun. 2014 Mar;82(3):960–9. pmid:24343656
  3. 3. Beutler B. LPS in microbial pathogenesis: promise and fulfilment. J Endotoxin Res. 2002;8(5):329–35. pmid:12537691
  4. 4. Trcek J, Fuchs TM, Trulzsch K. Analysis of Yersinia enterocolitica invasin expression in vitro and in vivo using a novel luxCDABE reporter system. Microbiol-Sgm. 2010 Sep;156:2734–45.
  5. 5. Rahman A, Bonny TS, Stonsaovapak S, Ananchaipattana C. Yersinia enterocolitica: Epidemiological Studies and Outbreaks. J Pathog. 2011;2011:1–11.
  6. 6. Bottone EJ. Yersinia enterocolitica: the charisma continues. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Apr;10(2):257–76. pmid:9105754
  7. 7. Handley SA, Dube PH, Revell PA, Miller VL. Characterization of oral Yersinia enterocolitica infection in three different strains of inbred mice. Infect Immun. 2004 Mar;72(3):1645–56. pmid:14977972
  8. 8. Oellerich MF, Jacobi CA, Freund S, Niedung K, Bach A, Heesemann J, et al. Yersinia enterocolitica infection of mice reveals clonal invasion and abscess formation. Infect Immun. 2007 Aug;75(8):3802–11. pmid:17562774
  9. 9. Skurnik M, Bengoechea JA. The biosynthesis and biological role of lipopolysaccharide O-antigens of pathogenic Yersiniae. Carbohydrate research. 2003 Nov 14;338(23):2521–9. pmid:14670713
  10. 10. Skurnik M, Venho R, Bengoechea JA, Moriyon I. The lipopolysaccharide outer core of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O: 3 is required for virulence and plays a role in outer membrane integrity. Mol Microbiol. 1999 Mar;31(5):1443–62. pmid:10200964
  11. 11. Pinta E, Li Z, Batzilla J, Pajunen M, Kasanen T, Rabsztyn K, et al. Identification of three oligo-/polysaccharide-specific ligases in Yersinia enterocolitica. Mol Microbiol. 2012 Jan;83(1):125–36. pmid:22053911
  12. 12. Muszynski A, Rabsztyn K, Knapska K, Duda KA, Duda-Grychtol K, Kasperkiewicz K, et al. Enterobacterial common antigen and O-specific polysaccharide coexist in the lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O: 3. Microbiol-Sgm. 2013 Aug;159:1782–93.
  13. 13. Zhang L, Radziejewska-Lebrecht J, Krajewska-Pietrasik D, Toivanen P, Skurnik M. Molecular and chemical characterization of the lipopolysaccharide O-antigen and its role in the virulence of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:8. Molecular microbiology. 1997 Jan;23(1):63–76. pmid:9004221
  14. 14. Alhendy A, Toivanen P, Skurnik M. Lipopolysaccharide-O Side-Chain of Yersinia enterocolitica O-3 Is an Essential Virulence Factor in an Orally Infected Murine Model. Infect Immun. 1992 Mar;60(3):870–5. pmid:1311707
  15. 15. Kasperkiewicz K, Swierzko AS, Bartlomiejczyk MA, Cedzynski M, Noszczynska M, Duda KA, et al. Interaction of human mannose-binding lectin (MBL) with Yersinia enterocolitica lipopolysaccharide. Int J Med Microbiol. 2015 Sep;305(6):544–52. pmid:26188838
  16. 16. Bengoechea JA, Najdenski H, Skurnik M. Lipopolysaccharide O antigen status of Yersinia enterocolitica O: 8 is essential for virulence and absence of O antigen affects the expression of other Yersinia virulence factors. Mol Microbiol. 2004 Apr;52(2):451–69. pmid:15066033
  17. 17. Biedzka-Sarek M, Venho R, Skurnik M. Role of YadA, Ail, and Lipopolysaccharide in Serum Resistance of Yersinia enterocolitica Serotype O:3. Infect Immun. 2005 Apr;73(4):2232–44. pmid:15784567
  18. 18. Najdenski H, Golkocheva E, Vesselinova A, Bengoechea JA, Skurnik M. Proper expression of the O-antigen of lipopolysaccharide is essential for the virulence of Yersinia enterocolitica O: 8 in experimental oral infection of rabbits. Fems Immunol Med Mic. 2003 Sep 22;38(2):97–106.
  19. 19. Bengoechea JA, Zhang LH, Toivanen P, Skurnik M. Regulatory network of lipopolysaccharide O-antigen biosynthesis in Yersinia enterocolitica includes cell envelope-dependent signals. Molecular microbiology. 2002 May;44(4):1045–62. pmid:12010497
  20. 20. Munder A, Wolbeling F, Klockgether J, Wiehlmann L, Tummler B. In vivo imaging of bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an acute murine airway infection model. Pathog Dis. 2014 Oct;72(1):74–7. pmid:24833236
  21. 21. Campbell-Valois FX, Sansonetti PJ. Tracking bacterial pathogens with genetically-encoded reporters. FEBS Lett. 2014 Aug 1;588(15):2428–36. pmid:24859085
  22. 22. Kong Y, Shi Y, Chang M, Akin AR, Francis KP, Zhang N, et al. Whole-body imaging of infection using bioluminescence. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2011:960–6.
  23. 23. Ulitzur S, Hastings JW. Evidence for tetradecanal as the natural aldehyde in bacterial bioluminescence. Proc Nati Acad Scd USA. 1979;76(1): 265–7.
  24. 24. Bron PA, Monk IR, Corr SC, Hill C, Gahan CG. Novel luciferase reporter system for in vitro and organ-specific monitoring of differential gene expression in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Apr;72(4):2876–84. pmid:16597994
  25. 25. Sun YW, Connor MG, Pennington JM, Lawrenz MB. Development of Bioluminescent Bioreporters for In Vitro and In Vivo Tracking of Yersinia pestis. Plos One. 2012 Oct 11;7(10).
  26. 26. Bertani G. Lysogeny at mid-twentieth century: P1, P2, and other experimental, systems. J Bacteriol. 2004 Feb;186(3):595–600. pmid:14729683
  27. 27. Skurnik M. Lack of Correlation between the Presence of Plasmids and Fimbriae in Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. J Appl Bacteriol. 1984;56(3):355–63. pmid:6146593
  28. 28. De Lorenzo V, Timmis KN. Analysis and construction of stable phenotypes in gram-negative bacteria with Tn5- and Tn10-derived minitransposons. Methods Enzymol. 1994;235:386–405. pmid:8057911
  29. 29. Miller VL, Mekalanos JJ. A Novel Suicide Vector and Its Use in Construction of Insertion Mutations—Osmoregulation of Outer-Membrane Proteins and Virulence Determinants in Vibrio Cholerae Requires Toxr. J Bacteriol. 1988 Jun;170(6):2575–83. pmid:2836362
  30. 30. Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria. Nat Biotechnol. 1983;1:784–91.
  31. 31. Babic A, Guerout AM, Mazel D. Construction of an improved RP4 (RK2)-based conjugative system. Res Microbiol. 2008 Sep-Oct;159(7–8):545–9. pmid:18638548
  32. 32. Korpela MT, Kurittu JS, Karvinen JT, Karp MT. A recombinant Escherichia coli sensor strain for the detection of tetracyclines. Anal Chem. 1998 Nov 1;70(21):4457–62. pmid:9823708
  33. 33. Demarre G, Guerout AM, Matsumoto-Mashimo C, Rowe-Magnus DA, Marliere P, Mazel D. A new family of mobilizable suicide plasmids based on broad host range R388 plasmid (IncW) and RP4 plasmid (IncPalpha) conjugative machineries and their cognate Escherichia coli host strains. Res Microbiol. 2005 Mar;156(2):245–55. pmid:15748991
  34. 34. Kaniga K, Delor I, Cornelis GR. A wide-host-range suicide vector for improving reverse genetics in gram-negative bacteria: inactivation of the blaA gene of Yersinia enterocolitica. Gene. 1991 Dec 20;109(1):137–41. pmid:1756974
  35. 35. Pekkola-Heino K, Viljanen MK, Stahlberg TH, Granfors K, Toivanen A. Monoclonal antibodies reacting selectively with core and O-polysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 lipopolysaccharide. APMIS. 1987 Feb;95(1):27–34.
  36. 36. Robins-Browne RM, Prpic JK. Effects of iron and desferrioxamine on infections with Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect Immun. 1985 Mar;47(3):774–9. pmid:3972453
  37. 37. Skurnik M, el Tahir Y, Saarinen M, Jalkanen S, Toivanen P. YadA mediates specific binding of enteropathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica to human intestinal submucosa. Infect Immun. 1994 Apr;62(4):1252–61. pmid:8132332
  38. 38. Miles AA, Misra SS, Irwin JO. The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J Hyg (Lond). 1938 Nov;38(6):732–49.
  39. 39. Hedges AJ. Estimating the precision of serial dilutions and viable bacterial counts. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002 Jun 25;76(3):207–14. pmid:12051477
  40. 40. Leskinen K, Varjosalo M, Li ZL, Li CM, Skurnik M. Expression of the Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 LPS O-antigen and outer core gene clusters is RfaH-dependent. Microbiol-Sgm. 2015 Jun;161:1282–94. English.
  41. 41. Atosuo J, Lehtinen J, Vojtek L, Lilius EM. Escherichia coli K-12 (pEGFPluxABCDEamp): a tool for analysis of bacterial killing by antibacterial agents and human complement activities on a real-time basis. Luminescence. 2013 Sep;28(5):771–9. pmid:23129448
  42. 42. Niehus E, Ye F, Suerbaum S, Josenhans C. Growth phase-dependent and differential transcriptional control of flagellar genes in Helicobacter pylori. Microbiology. 2002 Dec;148(Pt 12):3827–37. pmid:12480886
  43. 43. Cormack BP, Valdivia RH, Falkow S. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene. 1996;173(1 Spec No):33–8. pmid:8707053
  44. 44. Pan NJ, Brady MJ, Leong JM, Goguen JD. Targeting Type III Secretion in Yersinia pestis. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 2009 Feb;53(2):385–92.
  45. 45. Uliczka F, Pisano F, Kochut A, Opitz W, Herbst K, Stolz T, et al. Monitoring of Gene Expression in Bacteria during Infections Using an Adaptable Set of Bioluminescent, Fluorescent and Colorigenic Fusion Vectors. Plos One. 2011 Jun 3;6(6):1–12.
  46. 46. Gonzalez RJ, Weening EH, Frothingham R, Sempowski GD, Miller VL. Bioluminescence imaging to track bacterial dissemination of Yersinia pestis using different routes of infection in mice. Bmc Microbiol. 2012 Jul 24;12.
  47. 47. Reines M, Llobet E, Llompart CM, Moranta D, Perez-Gutierrez C, Bengoechea JA. Molecular basis of Yersinia enterocolitica temperature-dependent resistance to antimicrobial peptides. J Bacteriol. 2012 Jun;194(12):3173–88. pmid:22505678