Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

PnLRR-RLK27, a novel leucine-rich repeats receptor-like protein kinase from the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans, positively regulates salinity and oxidation-stress tolerance

  • Jing Wang,

    Affiliation School of Life Science and National Glycoengineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China

  • Shenghao Liu,

    Affiliation Marine Ecology Research Center, The First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao, China

  • Chengcheng Li,

    Affiliation School of Life Science and National Glycoengineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China

  • Tailin Wang,

    Affiliation School of Life Science and National Glycoengineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China

  • Pengying Zhang ,

    Affiliations School of Life Science and National Glycoengineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Glycobiology, Jinan, China


  • Kaoshan Chen

    Affiliation School of Life Science and National Glycoengineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China

PnLRR-RLK27, a novel leucine-rich repeats receptor-like protein kinase from the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans, positively regulates salinity and oxidation-stress tolerance

  • Jing Wang, 
  • Shenghao Liu, 
  • Chengcheng Li, 
  • Tailin Wang, 
  • Pengying Zhang, 
  • Kaoshan Chen


Leucine-rich repeats receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs) play important roles in plant growth and development as well as stress responses. Here, 56 LRR-RLK genes were identified in the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans transcriptome, which were further classified into 11 subgroups based on their extracellular domain. Of them, PnLRR-RLK27 belongs to the LRR II subgroup and its expression was significantly induced by abiotic stresses. Subcellular localization analysis showed that PnLRR-RLK27 was a plasma membrane protein. The overexpression of PnLRR-RLK27 in Physcomitrella significantly enhanced the salinity and ABA tolerance in their gametophyte growth. Similarly, PnLRR-RLK27 heterologous expression in Arabidopsis increased the salinity and ABA tolerance in their seed germination and early root growth as well as the tolerance to oxidative stress. PnLRR-RLK27 overproduction in these transgenic plants increased the expression of salt stress/ABA-related genes. Furthermore, PnLRR-RLK27 increased the activities of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers and reduced the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and ROS. Taken together, these results suggested that PnLRR-RLK27 as a signaling regulator confer abiotic stress response associated with the regulation of the stress- and ABA-mediated signaling network.


Land plants are constantly challenged by environmental stresses such as drought, salinity and extreme temperature, which can cause irreversible damage to plants intracellular structures by severe dehydration [1]. Plant internal alterations in response to environmental signals mostly depend on a sophisticated signaling network. Membrane anchored receptor-like kinases (RLKs) are the key regulators to active such signaling pathways by perceiving and processing external stimuli to cellular signaling molecules [2]. So far, 610 RLKs in Arabidopsis and 1100 RLKs in rice were identified, making up over 2% of each genome, and the significant expansion of this family has been believed to be crucial for plant-specific adaptations [34]. However, only a few RLKs have been identified to play roles in plant growth and development, pathogens defense and abiotic stress [2,5]. Knowledge about RLKs-mediated signal transduction may lead to continued development of rational breeding and transgenic strategies to improve stress tolerance [4].

The leucine-rich repeats protein kinases (LRR-RLKs), which are the largest subgroup of the RLK family with more than 235 members in Arabidopsis and 309 members in rice, contain the N-terminal leucine-rich repeats domain, a single transmembrane domain and a C-terminal kinase domain [3,58]. The LRR-RLKs are the primary regulatory in perception and processing of extracellular stimuli finally leading to the expression of the stress-responsive target genes to generate the adaptive molecular mechanism [9]. Generally, they perceive extracellular signals through the LRR domain and transmitted the signals via their Ser/Thr kinase domains [10]. The data collected so far indicates that LRR-RLKs from monocots and dicotyledons participated in diverse signaling processes, including plant meristems size regulation, organ growth, pathogen defense and hormone perception [1118]. In addition, the LRR-RLKs have also been found to play important roles in regulating plants responses to abiotic stress. Several LRR-RLKs involved in plants abiotic stress responses have been identified in the molecular levels. The Medicago truncatula Srlk was identified to improve plants roots salt stress tolerance by accumulating fewer sodium ions and reducing the expression level of several salt-responsive genes [19]. The OsSIK1 transgenic rice overexpression plants showed higher tolerance to salt and drought stresses by activating the antioxidative system, and displayed less stomatal density in leaves [20]. The GsLRPK possessed kinase activity in the presence of cold stress and enhanced the resistance to cold stress by increasing the expression of cold responsive genes [21]. Furthermore, the latest identified LP2 functioned as a negative regulator of drought stress by directly regulating the drought-related transcription factor DST and interacting with the drought-responsive aquaporin proteins, while overexpressing LP2 in rice reduced the H2O2 levels and inhibited the stomatal closure in leaves [22].

Mosses, the dominate Antarctic vegetation, are found in ice-free areas where sufficient summer snowmelt occurs [23]. To survive and adapt to the extreme climates, mosses have established a variety of adaptive strategies to protect them from various stresses. For example, people found that the Antarctic mosses have some fascinating abilities to well adapt to high light stress and low environmental temperatures by protection of its photosystems using the xanthophyll cycle [24]. The soluble carbohydrates in the Antarctic mosses function as osmoprotectors in response to water stress; the content of the non-structural carbohydrates or the raffinose family oligosaccarides decreased during desiccation and increased during rehydration [25]. Furthermore, cell wall-bound insoluble phenylpropanoids as a more passive UV-screening mechanism also will increase the tolerance of Antarctic mosses to high ultraviolet radiation [26]. In addition, the Antarctic mosses usually produces more secondary metabolites such as UV-B absorbing flavonoids and carotenoids, which act as antioxidants and stimulator of DNA repair processes, to protect their biological systems against UV radiation [27]. However, the signaling networks that how the Antarctic mosses sense the extreme environment and transfer signals to intracellular signaling molecules are still unclear.

In this study, we isolate a LRR-RLK gene (PnLRR-RLK27) from the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans. PnLRR-RLK27 overexpression in bryophyte physcomitrella patens and heterologous expression in Arabidopsis enhanced the tolerance to salt stress. This effect appears to operate through the regulation of ROS and ABA signaling pathways.

Materials and methods

Plant materials, growth conditions and stress treatments

The Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans was collected from the terrane near the Great Wall Station on King George Island (S62°13.260′, W58°57.291′). Accoding to The Antarctic Treaty, no specific permissions were required for collecting samples on this location. The Antarctic moss samples (a few shoots and roots with soil matrix) were placed in vacuum-sealed plastic bags, stored at 4°C for transportation. Our field studies (i.e. moss sample collection) did not involve any endangered or protected species. The mosses were then cultured in the pots soil with the mixture of Base Substrate (Klasmann-Deilmann, Geeste, Germany) and local soil (1:1) in a greenhouse at 16°C, 70 μmol·m-2·s-1 light and 70% relative humidity. The aerial portions of mosses cultivated under this condition were used as control. For cold stress, mosses were treated at 4°C for the indicated times. For salt, dehydration and abscisic acid (ABA) stress, mosses were sprayed with 200 mM NaCl, 20% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 6000 solution (PEG) or 50 μM ABA for the indicated times, respectively.

Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia, Col-0) plants used for transformation were grown in the chamber at 22°C under 16 h light, light intensity of 80 μE·m-2·s-1, and 60% relative humidity in the growth phase. After the growth of 4 weeks with 8 h light, they were transfered to the long light greenhouse with 16 h light for the plants transformation and maturation.

Physcomitrella patens were grown on BCD medium at 25°C with 16 h light [28]. After 2 weeks, gametophyte tissues were uniformly cut by a tissue homogenizer and then evenly distributed on cellophane overlaid BCD medium supplemental with 5 mM diammonium (+) tartrate to form protonema. The new protonema was used for the plants transformation.

Isolation and bioinformatics characterization of PnLRR-RLK27 gene

Previously, we performed the Antarctic moss P.nutans tanscriptome sequencing by the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform and analyzed the gene expression profile of P.nutans after salt stress (data not shown). To fetch LRR-RLK proteins, the HMMER program was used to search the P. nutans transcriptome [29]. All of the retrieved LRR-RLK proteins were then subjected to BLAST and SMART databases for annotation of the domain structure. Only candidate (Hmmsearch E-value<1.0 e-10) containing at least a LRR domain and one protein kinase domain was identified as a “true” LRR-RLK.

The protein structure was predicted by the SMART web site ( [30]. Homology searches were subjected to BLAST ( against the non-redundant protein databases (nr). Multiple alignments were generated with the Clustal W program. The phylogenetic trees were performed using the Mega 4.0 software with the neighbor-joining method and 1000 bootstrap replicates [31].

RNA extraction and real-time quantitative PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from moss gametophyte tissues or Arabidopsis seedlings using CTAB method and Trizol reagent (Takara), respectively [32]. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using 5 μg of total RNA by Easy Script RT-PCR kit (abm, Canada). Real-time PCR reactions were performed using the Bestar® SybrGreen qPCR mastermix (DBI Bioscience). The cycling regime was composed of a denaturation step of 94°C/2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C/20 s, 56°C/30 s, 72°C/20 s. A melting-curve analysis was performed over the range 65°C to 95°C at 0.5°C intervals. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the comparative Ct (2−ΔΔCt) method [33]. The primers used in Real-time PCR are presented in S1 Table.

Subcellular localization analysis of the PnLRR-RLK27 protein in Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis

The full-length sequence of PnLRR-RLK27 without the stop codon was amplified with the pair primers (S1 Table). Then the pBI221:p35S:PnLRR-RLK27:GFP or/and pBI221:p35S: H+-ATPase:RFP was constructed and transfected into the protoplasts isolated from 5 day-old wild-type P. patens protonema or 4 week-old wild-type Arabidopsis Col-0, respectively [3435]. Meanwhile, the pBI221:p35S:GFP or/and pBI221:p35S:H+-ATPase:RFP vector was transformed as a control. The transformed P. patens and Arabidopsis protoplasts were incubated in the dark at 22°C for 2 d and 10 h, respectively. GFP signal was observed with a confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM700, Carl Zeiss, Shandong University) at excitation wavelengths of 488 nm. Chlorophyll autofluorescence and RFP signal were obtained with an excitation at 647 nm and 543 nm, respectively.

Generation of PnLRR-RLK27 transgenic Physcomitrella patens and transgenic Arabidopsis plants

To generate the transgenic forms of P. patens, the PnLRR-RLK27 sequence was inserted into the pTFH15.3 vector (obtained from Drs.Tomoaki Nishiyama and Mitsuyasu Hasebe) according to the method described by Yin [36]. The protoplasts were isolated according to the protocol of Cove with some modification [28]. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated DNA uptake was used for transformation of the moss (P. patens) protoplasts with some key modification [37]. Briefly, 30 μg of linearized pTFH15.3:PnLRR-RLK27 homologous recombinant vector were mixed with 300 μL protoplast solution and 300 μL PEG solution (40% PEG 4000 and 0.1 M Ca(NO3)2·4H2O in 3M medium, pH 5.6). The mixture was heated in a water bath at 45°C for 5 min and immediately transfered to metal bath at 20°C with gentle shaking for 5 min. After gradient diluted with 8% D-mannitol solution, the transformed mixture was dispensed to the cellophane covered PRMB agar medium. After incubated at 25°C for 7 d in the 16 h light, the cultures were transferred to selection BCD solid medium containing 25 μg·mL-1 G418 (Sigma) for 2 weeks, followed by a release period of 10 d on standard medium and two addtional selection period with 50 μg·mL-1 or 100 μg·mL-1 G418 for 2 weeks. Plants surviving the third round of selection were counted as stable transformants, and confirmed by RT-PCR analysis using specific gene primers (S1 Table).

To construct the transgenic PnLRR-RLK27 Arabidopsis plants, the full-length PnLRR-RLK27 sequence was ligated into the XbaI and KpnI cloning sites of the modified binary pROK2 vector. The vector was introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105, and then transformed into Arabidopsis Col-0 plants by floral-dip method [38]. Transformants were selected based on their resistance to kanamycin. Homozygous T3 or T4 transgenic seedlings were used for phenotype and gene expression analysis.

Abiotic stress tolerance analysis of PnLRR-RLK27 transgenic Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis plants

For phenotype analysis of transgenic P. paten, gametophytes of three PnLRR-RLK27 transgenic plants and wild type plants were growth for 30 d in a climate chamber at 25°C. Then the same size stem tip were cut and placed on BCD solid medium containing different concentrations of NaCl or ABA. After cultured 4 weeks at 25°C with 16 h light, the plants size was measured and the visual phenotypes were photographed. The experiments were replicated three times.

For phenotype analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis, seeds surface-sterilized with 70% (v/v) ethanol for 5 min and 95% (v/v) ethanol for 25 s were plated on 1/2 MS solid medium supplemented with different concentrations of NaCl, ABA and H2O2, kept in the dark at 4°C for 2 d to break dormancy, and subsequently transferred to a 16 h photoperiod at 22°C. The seedlings roots length was measured. A germination assay was conducted by plating surface-sterilized seeds on 1/2 MS solid medium containing various concentrations of NaCl and ABA. After stratification at 4°C in dark for 2 d, the seeds were incubated at 22°C under light to allow germination. The emergence of an open green cotyledons was taken as representing a successfully germination seeds. Germination rates were expressed as the proportion of seeds that had successfully germinated. The experiments were replicated three times.

Stomatal aperture assays of PnLRR-RLK27 transgenic Arabidopsis

The rosette leaves of 3 week-old Arabidopsis plants were floated in the solution containing 10 mM KCl, 50 μM CaCl2, 10 mM MES, pH 6.15, and exposed to light for 2.5 h to make the stomata completely open. Subsequently, 0 or 50 μM ABA was added to the solution for stomatal closing. After ABA treatment for 2.5 h, the epidermal strips were peeled from the rosette leaves using a thin-tipped forceps and fixed by coverslip. Stomatal apertures in epidermal peels were photographed by the microscope and the width of stomatal apertures was measured with the Image J [3940]. Each sample was replicated three times.

Measurement of H2O2, MDA, proline content and enzyme SOD and POD activities

H2O2 level was detected via DAB staining as described previously [41]. The leaves of 4 week-old wild type and transgenic plants were irrigated with 200 mM NaCl solution for 24 h. Then the leaves of them were isolated and immersed in 1 mg·mL-1 DAB with 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer solution (pH 3.8) at 22°C in dark until appearing a clearly reddish brown spots. Finally, the leaves were bleached and the brown spots were fixed and visualized with 95% ethanol solution by boiling bath. The brown spots were characteristic of DAB reacting with H2O2.

In addition, SOD and POD activities were assayed according to the method as described in references [4243]. Briefly, plants were treated with 200 mM NaCl for 24 h and 0.5 g of the same layered leaves were ground in an ice-cold mortar using 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). After 13 000 g centrifugation at 4°C for 20 min, the supernatant was used for detecting SOD and POD activities.

The content of MDA (malondialdehyde) was tested for indirect calculating lipid peroxidation using thiobarbituric acid method described by Hodges [44]. 0.5 g of seedlings were ground and extracted with 5 mL of 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged at 10 000 g for 10 min. 1 mL of the supernatant was added with 2 mL of thiobarbituric acid solution (0.5% (w/v) in 20% TCA). The mixture was incubated at 100°C for 10 min, then cooled in ice and centrifuged at 10 000 g for 15 min. The absorbance of plants supernatant extract was measured at 450, 532 and 600 nm wavelength. The concentration of MDA was calculated using the following equation: concentration (μmol·L-1) = 6.45 × (OD532 − OD600) 0.56 × OD450, where OD represents optical density. The experiment was repeated three times.

Proline contents were measured as described in Bates et al [45]. Briefly, 0.5 g of 2 week-old seedlings were weighed and extracted in 5 mL of 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid at 100°C for 10 min. After 10 000 g centrifugation for 10 min, a 1:1:1:2 (v/v/v/v) solution of plant extract, distilled water, glacial acetic acid and 2.5% (w/v) acid-ninhydrin was incubated at 100°C for 1 h. The reaction was then cooled at normal temperature and the proline was extracted with 2:1 (v/v) solution of toluene and plant extract. The mixture was vortexed for 20 s to extract red products and their absorbance was measured at 520 nm wavelength. Standard curve of different concentration of proline was prepared using the same method to measure proline content of the samples. The content of proline on a fresh weight was calculated using the following equation: content (μg·g-1) = (wstandard proline × v total sample extract) / (wsample × v experimental sample extract). The experiment was repeated three times.

Statistical analysis

The data of PnLRR-RLK27 transcriptional levels, seedling root length, seed germination and related genes expression were subjected to Student’s t test analysis using a one-way ANOVA. Error was measured by Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) and significant difference was set at P<0.05.


Identification of PnLRR-RLK gene family and phylogenetic analysis of PnLRR-RLK27

A total of 56 putative LRR-RLK genes were identified from the Antarctic moss P. nutans transcriptome (Fig 1). These LRR-RLK genes were sequential named from PnLRR-RLK1 to PnLRR-RLK56 by their E-value of the Protein kinase domain (PF00069) which generated by Hmmsearch program (Fig 1). These genes had been submitted to the Genebank, and the accession numbers were listed in S2 Table. According to the differential expression analysis of the Antarctic moss P. nutans transcriptome, 4 LRR-RLK genes were upregulated and 10 were downregulated after salt treatment (S2 Table). Among them, PnLRR-RLK27, which has the largest 3.18-fold change of transcription level after salt treatment, was selected for further study.

Fig 1. The relationships between PnLRR-RLK protein kinases with other eukaryotic genomes.

The kinase domain amino acid sequences of PnLRR-RLKs genes and LRR-RLK kinases family representatives from Arabidopsis, Oryza sativa and human were used for generating the neighboring-joining tree with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The PnLRR-RLKs family forms a close relationship to Arabidopsis, Oryza sativa kinases and Homo sapiens receptor Tyr kinase HsMLK1.

Plant LRR-RLKs belong to a monophyletic gene family that distinct from other families of eukaryotic protein kinases [6]. Kinase domains of RLKs are very conserved, and used to distinguish the subfamilies of the diverse LRR-RLKs [3,7]. To study the evolutionary relationships and obtain the functional data of PnLRR-RLK members, a phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the kinase domains sequence. The phylogenetic tree showed that these PnLRR-RLKs could be classified into 11 major subgroups (LRR I-XIII) according to the Arabidopsis homologues (Fig 1). In which, the PnLRR-RLK27 was relatively close to Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa LRR II family proteins which were reported to be induced by various stresses (Fig 1) [46]. Furthermore, to further understand the potential functions of the PnLRR-RLK genes, all putative motifs of these proteins were investigated using the BLAST and SMART databases. As shown in Fig 1, 45 PnLRR-RLKs had the signal peptides, leucine-rich repeat domain, transmembrane domain and kinase domain, while 11 PnLRR-RLKs (PnLRR-RLK10, 11, 13, 18, 22, 33, 38, 40, 41, 45 and 48) missed signal peptides and PnLRR-RLK41 missed TM domain. PnLRR-RLK27 contained a signal peptide (SP) at the N-terminal portion (amino acids 1–28), 6 tandem copies of 36- or 23-amino acid leucine-rich repeat (amino acids 32–170) in the extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain (TM) (amino acids 233–255) and a serine/threonine protein kinase domain (KD) (amino acids 295–570) with I-XI conserved subdomains in the C-terminal cytoplasmic region (Fig 1) [30,47]. Moreover, the protein kinase domain of PnLRR-RLK27 possessed the conserved ATP binding site and active site suggested that PnLRR-RLK27 might functions as a potential kinase.

The expression of PnLRR-RLK27 was induced by multiple abiotic stress

In the Antarctic environment, moss can be exposed to freezing temperatures (below -7°C) while in full sunlight, particularly in the late summer months when the snow cover has melted [48]. Real-time PCR analysis showed that the expression levels of PnLRR-RLK27 reached maximum value at 1 h, but then declined at 3 h after cold treatment (Fig 2A). Salinity levels can also affect the growth of vegetation, as many species grow near the Antarctic coast. Real-time PCR analysis confirmed that PnLRR-RLK27 transcript accumulated significantly after 200 mM NaCl treatment for 1 h (Fig 2B). High salinity also can cause osmotic stress [49]. In the presence of 20% polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG6000) to simulate osmotic stress, the expression levels of PnLRR-RLK27 were significantly increased at 1 h (Fig 2C). Abiotic stresses could cause the production of plant hormone ABA and then mediate downstream stress-related signaling pathways [50]. The PnLRR-RLK27 expression were also induced by ABA treatment and it reached the highest levels with the ABA treatment for 1 h, but then showed a significant decrease after 1 h ABA treatment (Fig 2D). These results implied that PnLRR-RLK27 might involve in salt, ABA, cold, drought and possibly other osmotic stress signaling pathways, and serve as a regulator in the abiotic stress response.

Fig 2. Expression patterns of PnLRR-RLK27 in the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans in response to different stress treatments analyzed by real-time PCR.

(A) 200 mM NaCl treatment; (B) Cold treatment (4°C); (C) 20% PEG6000 treatment for simulated drought stress; (D) 50 μM abscisic acid (ABA) treatment. In each stress treatment, the different time point samples were all from the same plant pot cultures. Vertical bars indicate mean ±SE of three replicates of the sample. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences with the control group at P<0.05.

Multiple sequence alignment and subcellular localization of the PnLRR-RLK27

The identity of PnLRR-RLK27 amino acid sequence with other species LRR-RLKs varied from 56.0% to 65.8%. It shared homology with P. patens subsp. patens PpSERK2 (65.8%), Arabidopsis AtSERK2 (56.0%), Oryza sativa OsSERK1 (57.0%) and Zea mays ZmSERK3 (57.0%) (Fig 3A). The subcellular localization of the PnLRR-RLK27 protein was investigated using P. patens protoplasts and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts with constructs expressing the pBI221:p35S:PnLRR-RLK27:GFP fusion. In the control pBI221 vector transformed protoplasts, GFP proteins distributed evenly in the cell membrane, the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig 3B to 3GV). However, in the pBI221:p35S: PnLRR-RLK27:GFP transformed protoplasts, GFP proteins was only found in the plasma membrane (Fig 3B to 3GI). Consistently, the pBI221:p35S:PnLRR-RLK27:GFP proteins colocalized with both the lypophilic dye N-(3-triethylammoniumpropyl)-4-(6-(4-(diethylamino) phenyl) hexatrienyl) pyridinium dibromide (FM4-64) (Fig 3D to 3EI and 3EII) and plasma membrane marker H+-ATPase-RFP protein [51] in the plasma membrane (Fig 3F to 3GI and 3GII). These results clearly indicated that the PnLRR-RLK27 protein localized on the plasma membrane.

Fig 3. Sequence alignment and subcellular localization of PnLRR-RLK27 in Physcomitrella patens.

(A) Amino acid sequence alignment between PnLRR-RLK27 and other LRR-RLK family members Physcomitrella patens subsp. patens (PpSERK2), Arabidopsis thaliana (AtSERK2), Oryza sativa (OsSERK1), Zea mays (ZmSERK3). Multiple sequence alignments were conducted using ClustalW. Black boxes show identical amino acid residues, and gray shades show similar residues. Deletions are indicated by dashes to allow maximum alignment. (B and C) The localization of p35S:PnLRR-RLK27:GFP in Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis protoplasts. (D and F) The localization of p35S:PnLRR-RLK27:GFP in Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis protoplasts in the presence of FM4-64. (E and G) The colocalization of p35S:PnLRR-RLK27:GFP and H+-ATPase:RFP in Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis protoplasts. (B to G I and V) Green fluorescence of PnLRR-RLK27-GFP fusion protein or GFP protein; (B to C II and VI) Red autofluorescence of chloroplasts. (D to F II and VI) Red autofluorescence of plasma membrane in the presence of FM4-64. (E to G II and VI) Red autofluorescence of H+-ATPase:RFP fusion protein. (B to G III and VII) Merged image of green fluorescence, bright field, and red autofluorescence. (B to C IV and X) The protoplast in bright field. Bar 10 μm.

Overexpression of the PnLRR-RLK27 in Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis enhanced plant tolerance to salinity

To further elucidate the role of PnLRR-RLK27 in response to abiotic stress, it was transformed into moss plant P. patens and into Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia (Col-0). Three independent transgenic plants P. patens (#2, #3 and #4) were identified by RT-PCR using gene specific primers (Fig 4A). The same size stem tips of control and transgenic gametophytes were placed on BCD medium containing 0 or 125 mM NaCl. On standard BCD medium, the transgenic P. patens plants and the wild-type plants grew equally well, and their seedling phenotypes were indistinguishable (Fig 4B). However, the growth rates of the three transgenic gametophytes were significantly higher than the WT plants on 125 mM NaCl medium. The clone size of three transgenic gametophytes (#2, #3 and #4) were 10.2, 11.1 and 11.4 mm respectively, while the WT plants was 4.7 mm at 7 weeks on 125 mM NaCl medium (Fig 4C).

Fig 4. PnLRR-RLK27 contributes to the salt tolerance in transgenic Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis.

(A) RT-PCR analysis revealed that the PnLRR-RLK27 was successfully transcribed in Physcomitrella patens. (B) The size of transgenic Physcomitrella patens gametophyte plants was significantly larger than that of the wild type under salt stress conditions (4-week-old plants). (C) Statistical analysis of gametophyte size as shown in (B). (D) RT-PCR analysis revealed that the PnLRR-RLK27 was successfully transcribed in Arabidopsis. Tubulin gene was used as internal references. (E) The seed germination rate of transgenic seedlings was significantly higher than that of the wild type under salt stress conditions (6 days' seed germination). (F) Statistical analysis of seed germination rates as shown in (E). Seed germination rates were calculated by counting the proportion of the WT plants and the transgenic seedlings bearing open green cotyledons. (G) PnLRR-RLK27 promotes the growth of Arabidopsis seedling after salinity treatment. (H) Measurement of root length of salinity-stressed Arabidopsis seedlings shown in (G). Vertical bars are presented as means ±SE, and asterisks (*) indicate significant differences of means between the transgenic lines and the WT plants at P<0.05. Bar 10 mm.

The Arabidopsis transgenic PnLRR-RLK27 plants (#10 and #23) were identified by RT-PCR using gene specific primers (Fig 4D). There was no obvious phenotypic difference between two transgenic plants (#10 and #23) and the WT plants. However, on 1/2 MS solid medium containing 100 or 125 mM NaCl, the germination rate of two over-expressing lines was significantly higher than the WT plants (Fig 4E). The germination rates of the two transgenic plants (#10 and #23) were 49.1% and 51.6% after 3 d compared to 20.0% of the WT plants at the 125 mM NaCl (Fig 4F). The root length assays showed that the two transgenic plants (#10 and #23) did not have obvious phenotypic difference when compared to the WT plants on 1/2 MS solid medium. However, in the presence of 100 or 125 mM NaCl, the two transgenic plants (#10 and #23) were more tolerant than the WT plants, forming longer primary roots (1.4-fold longer at 100 mM NaCl and 1.3-fold longer at 125 mM NaCl) (Fig 4G and 4H).

Overexpression of the PnLRR-RLK27 decreased the sensitivity to ABA

Salt stress usually induces plant to increase the levels of endogenous ABA [52]. Thereafter, the increased ABA may inhibit seed germination and plant development. As shown in Fig 5A, the transgenic P. patens plants (#2, #3 and #4) were highly insensitive to the provision of exogenous ABA. The clone size of the transgenic P. patens plants (#2, #3 and #4) were higher than the control plants when exposed to 10 or 15 μM ABA. At the BCD solid medium containing 10 μM ABA, the gametophyte sizes of the transgenic P. patens plants was 1.6-fold larger than that of the WT plants at 10 μM ABA, while 1.8-fold larger at 15 μM ABA (Fig 5B). In Arabidopsis, root resistance assays showed that two transgenic plants (#10 and #23) were also insensitive to ABA, forming the longer primary roots. The root length of the transgenic plants was 2.2-fold longer than that of the WT plants at 0.5 μM ABA, while 10-fold longer at 0.75 μM ABA (Fig 5C and 5D). The germination rate assays also showed that two transgenic plants (#10 and #23) were insensitive to ABA (Fig 5E). The germination rates of two transgenic plants were 52.5% and 68.3% compared to 22.9% in the WT plants at 0.25 μM ABA, while the germination rates of two transgenic plants were 22.3% and 28.0% compared to 10.8% in the WT plants at 0.5 μM ABA (Fig 5F).

Fig 5. PnLRR-RLK27 reduces the ABA sensitivity in transgenic Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis.

(A) The size of transgenic Physcomitrella patens gametophyte plants was significantly larger than that of the wild type after ABA treatment (4 week-old plants). (B) Statistical analysis of gametophyte size as shown in (A). (C) Seed germination of transgenic lines were significantly higher than that of the wild type under different concentrations of ABA (4 days' seed germination). (D) Statistical analysis of the transgenic Arabidopsis seedling greening shown in (C). (E) PnLRR-RLK27 promotes the growth of Arabidopsis seedling after ABA treatment. (F) Statistical analysis of the root length in transgenic Arabidopsis shown in (E). Vertical bars are means ±SE, and asterisks (*) indicate significant differences of means between the transgenic lines and the WT plants at P<0.05. Bar 10 mm.

PnLRR-RLK27 affected the stomatal movement under ABA treatment

Stomatal movement was mostly controlled by ABA, thereafter to improve plant adaptation to environmental stress [53]. The stomatal apertures were no obvious difference between 4 week-old transgenic Arabidopsis plants (#10 and #23) and the WT plants under the normal conditions. However, after 50 μM ABA treatment, the transgenic Arabidopsis plants (#10 and #23) exhibited significantly wider of stomatal aperture in comparison with the control plants (Fig 6A). The stomatal aperture were average 3.2 μm in the transgenic plants and about 1.7 μm in the WT plants after 50 μM ABA treatment (Fig 6B). Several genes such as AtCPK3, AtCPK6, AtCPK10 and AtSLAC1 play an important role in regulating stomatal movement [5455]. The expression levels of these genes in the transgenic plants were also lower in comparison with the WT plants after ABA treatment (Fig 6C, 6D, 6E and 6F). These results confirmed that PnLRR-RLK27 decreased the sensitivity of transgenic plants to ABA.

Fig 6. PnLRR-RLK27 reduced ABA-mediated stomatal movement in transgenic Arabidopsis.

(A) Stomatal closure of the three lines after 50 μM ABA treatment for 2.5 h. (B) Statistical analysis of the three lines stomatal aperture shown in (A). (C, D, E and F) The expression levels of stomatal movement related genes in 2-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings after 50 μM ABA treatment for 2 h. Bar 10 μm.

PnLRR-RLK27 increased antioxidant capacity in Arabidopsis

Salinity stress usually causes the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and lead to oxidative stress. Therefore, tolerance to salinity stress has frequently been associated with tolerance to oxidative stress [20]. Results showed that the overexpression of PnLRR-RLK27 in Arabidopsis improved resistance to H2O2 stress (Fig 7). The transgenic Arabidopsis plants (#10 and #23) exhibited longer primary roots in comparison with the WT plants in the presence of 0.5 and 1.0 μM H2O2 (Fig 7A). The root length of the transgenic plants was averagely 1.6-fold longer than that of the WT plants at 0.5 μM H2O2, while 1.4-fold longer at 0.75 μM H2O2 (Fig 7B). Meanwhile, the lateral root numbers in the transgenic Arabidopsis plants (#10 and #23) were averagely 1.7-fold more than the WT plants at 0.5 μM H2O2, while 1.6-fold more at 0.75 μM H2O2 (Fig 7C). The levels of ROS were also measured. After 200 mM NaCl treatment, the transgenic Arabidopsis plants (#10 and #23) exhibited lower H2O2 level, forming fewer brown H2O2 spots in leaves visualized by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining (Fig 7D). PnLRR-RLK27 reduced the H2O2 levels possibly via activating scavengers. SOD and POD are such antioxidative enzymes to eliminate of H2O2. After 200 mM NaCl treatment, the activities of SOD and POD were significantly higher in the transgenic Arabidopsis plants (#10 and #23) than that in the WT plants (Fig 7E and 7F). Furthermore, the expression levels of ROS scavenging enzymes (such as AtAPX1, AtAPX2, AtCAT2 and AtZAT10) were significantly increased in transgenic Arabidopsis plants (#10 and #23) after salt treatment (Fig 7I, 7J, 7K and 7L). The content of malondialdehyde (MDA), an indicator of intracellular ROS damage, in the transgenic Arabidopsis plants (#10 and #23) was 33.8% less than in the WT plants (Fig 7G). The content of proline in the transgenic Arabidopsis plants (#10 and #23) was about 1.35-fold higher than that in the WT plants (Fig 7H).

Fig 7. PnLRR-RLK27 enhances the oxidative tolerance and salt tolerance by promoting ROS-scavenging capacity and the expression levels of antioxidative-responsive genes in transgenic Arabidopsis.

(A) The main root of transgenic lines were significantly longer than that of the control plants after 0.5 μM and 1.0 μM H2O2 treatment (10 days' seed germination). (B) Statistical analysis of the transgenic Arabidopsis seedling root length shown in (A). (C) Statistical analysis of the transgenic Arabidopsis seedling lateral root numbers shown in (A). (D) H2O2 levels of Arabidopsis by DAB staining in 4-week-old Arabidopsis plants after 200 mM NaCl treatment for 24 h. (E)and (F) POD and SOD activities in 4 week-old Arabidopsis plants after 200 mM NaCl treatment for 24 h. (G) the MDA levels in plants in 4-week-old Arabidopsis plants after 200 mM NaCl treatment for 24 h. (H) The content of proline in 2-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings after 200 mM NaCl treatment for 2 h. (I, J, K and L) The expression levels of antioxidative-responsive genes in 2-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings after 200 mM NaCl treatment for 2 h. Data are presented as means ±SE, and asterisks (*) indicate significant differences of means between the transgenic lines and the WT plants (P<0.05). Bar 10 mm.

PnLRR-RLK27 increased the expression of stress related genes in transgenic Arabidopsis and Physcomitrella patens

To further elucidate the molecular mechanism of PnLRR-RLK27 increasing the salinity resistance in transgenic plants, the expression of several abiotic stress-related genes was measured by real-time PCR. After 2 h treatment with 200 mM NaCl, the transcription levels of salt tolerance genes AtHKT1 and AtSOS3, stress-responsible genes AtMYB2, AtABF3, AtDREB2A, AtRD22, AtRD29A, AtRD29B, AtKIN1 and AtCOR47 in transgenic Arabidopsis were all significantly higher in transgenic plants (Fig 8). Meanwhile, the transcription levels of salt tolerance genes PpENA2, PpSHP1 and PpSHP2, ABA-related genes PpABI3a, PpABI3b, and stress-responsible genes PpDBF1, PpCOR47 and PpCORTMC-AP3 in transgenic P. patens were also significantly increased in transgenic plants (Fig 8). Therefore, when plants were subjected to salt stress environment, PnLRR-RLK27 may enhance salt tolerance by upregulating several stress related genes.

Fig 8. The stress-responsive genes expression pattern in PnLRR-RLK27 transgenic Arabidopsis and Physcomitrella patens.

The expression levels of several abiotic stress/ABA-related genes were measured by qPCR analysis using the SYBR Green master mix (DBI). The Arabidopsis actin gene and Physcomitrella patens tubulin gene were served as normalization (S1 Table). Gene expression was analyzed using comparative Ct (2-ΔΔCt) method. The reactions were performed in triplicate.


Plant leucine-rich repeats receptor-like protein kinases (LRR-RLKs) play important roles in the signal perception, amplification and transduction to abiotic stress [2]. LRR-RLKs were mainly identified based on the whole-genome sequences of Arabidopsis and rice, but only a small part of them had been verified to possess clear functions [10, 5659]. For example, the Arabidopsis LRR-II type RLK genes were induced by many environmental stresses, such as gravity, cold, high light, osmotic stress, auxin and abscisic acid, suggesting that they may participate in the general abiotic stress response [56]. The expression of rice LRR-RLKs (OsSIK1, OsGIRL1, OsLP2) were regulated by salt, drought, abscisic acid, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid or H2O2 stresses, indicating that rice LRR-RLKs might be involved in multiple signaling pathways regulating developmental and stress processes [4,20,22, 60]. In this study, through the tanscriptome sequencing, we identified 56 LRR-RLK genes from the Antarctic moss P. nutans. Of them, the expression of PnLRR-RLK27 gene were induced by high salinity, cold, drought and ABA stresses, suggesting that it might be involved in the processes of the Antarctic moss P. nutans adopting to abiotic stresses (Fig 2). In Arabidopsis and rice, AtSERK and OsSERK family genes (the Arabidopsis and rice orthologs of PnLRR-RLK27) play important roles in plant somatic embryogenesis, development, BR signaling, stomatal patterning, plant immunity defense and senescence, but their functions in abiotic stresses were not well documented [6164].

The Antarctica, with its almost pristine ecosystem and relatively simple vegetation, offers unique habitat for investigating the influence of environmental events on species performance [65]. Mosses are the dominant vegetation in ice-free coastal Antarctica. The importance of mosses for the research of the effects of abiotic stresses (such as cold, desiccation and UV-B radiation) on terrestrial plants has been well established and further propeled, since Physcomitrella patens genome was sequenced [6667]. Recently, the advanced experimental tools support highly efficient and accurate gene targeting through homologous recombination in P. patens [68]. It makes us better understand the degree of evolution and conservation of plants. Furthermore, as a link between green algae with seed plants, the stress-associated signaling pathways in P. patens are functionally conserved, such as ABA signaling pathway, membrane proteins, molecular chaperones, redox-related functions and stomatal closure with the seed plants [6870]. P. patens is highly resistance to drought, salinity and UV-B stresses, but their inherent molecular mechanism were mainly clarified at transcriptome levels [69,71]. Previously, a high-throughput Illumina high-throughput sequencing was used to analyze the gene expression profiles of P. nutans after cold treatment. Differential gene expression analysis indicated that 42-upregulated and 33-downregulated putative receptor-like kinases from P. nutans were response to cold stress [72]. Furthermore, we reported that a cytoplasmic-type RLKs (PnRLK-1) from the Antarctic moss P. nutans couldincrease salt and oxidative stress tolerance [32]. In addition, we also reported that a leucine-rich repeats RLKs (PnLRR-RLK) from the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans, which belongs to LRR XI-type subfamily proteins, could improve salt and ABA stress tolerance [73]. In this study, through the overexpression in bryophyte P. patens and heterologous expression in Arabidopsis, we found that PnLRR-RLK27 might be as a signaling regulator enhancing plant tolerance to salt and oxidative stress associated with the positive regulation of the ABA-mediated signaling network.

Salinity levels adversely affect the growth and development of Antarctica mosses, as many plant species grow near the Antarctic coast. High salinity also causes both hypotonic and hyperosmotic stress and can lead to plant death, which has comprehensively restrained the crop production [74]. So, identifying novel genes and exploring their functions in stress adaptation are the basis for effective strategies to improve plants tolerance to salt stress. Interestingly, it is well known that the LRR-RLKs are one of important regulator for plant response to salt stress [19,22,58,75]. In this study, the expression of PnLRR-RLK27 was induced by abiotic stresses (Fig 2). Transgenic phenotypic analysis showed that PnLRR-RLK27 improved tolerance to salt stress with larger clone size in transgenic P. patens, higher seeds germination rates and longer primary roots in Arabidopsis (Fig 4). Salt resistance is highly correlated with their ability to reduce the accumulation of sodium ions in the shoot [76]. AtHKT1 is a salt tolerance determinant that controls Na+ entry and high affinity K+ uptake [49]. The Arabidopsis salt tolerance gene SOS3 (for salt overly sensitive 3) encodes a calcium-binding protein function through the notable SOS pathway [76]. HKT1 and SOS3 both play a key role in the ionic transport [77]. In this study, the expression levels of AtHKT1 and AtSOS3 were significantly higher in transgenic plants (Fig 8). In addition, the P. patens sodium ATPase (PpENA2) are transmembrane transport proteins that mediate Na+ efflux and K+ influx into cells and play important role in maintaining cellular ion homeostasis in salt environments [78]. PpSHP1 and PpSHP2, AtRCI homology protein, are involved in the salt responses by avoiding over-accumulation of Na+ and K+ ions [7980]. In this study, the expression levels of PpENA2, PpSHP1 and PpSHP2 were significantly higher in transgenic P. patens (Fig 8). Proline is a major organic osmolytes that can accumulate in plants in response to abiotic stresses (salinity, cold and drought) [81]. In this study, the contents of proline in transgenic Arabidopsis were higher than that in WT plants (Fig 7H). Thus, the up-regulated expression of these stress-responsive genes and accumulation of osmolytes in PnLRR-RLK27 overexpression plants might be one of the reasons for the improvement of plants salt resistance.

Plants have evolved the ability to survive under high salinity by developing highly systematic signaling networks, in which ABA is one of the important regulators in improving plant tolerance to salt stress [82]. In this study, the transgenic Arabidopsis was highly insensitive to the provision of exogenous ABA (Fig 5D to 5G). In comparison with accumulated knowledge about ABA signaling pathway in higher plants, the ABA signaling components that response to stress tolerance were still not well characterized in bryophytes [83]. In this study, when gametophytes grew on BCD medium supplementted with 0.25 μM, 0.5 μM or 1 μM ABA, there were no obvious differences between the transgenic P. patens and the wild-type plants. However, the growth rates of three transgenic gametophytes were significantly higher than the WT plants on 10 μM or 15μM ABA medium (Fig 5A and 5B). Previously, 10, 50 or 100 μM ABA were also used to detect desiccation tolerance of Physcomitrella patens abi3 mutants [8485], suggesting that mosses have a relatively higher resistance to ABA treatment. In addition, ABA negatively regulates the stomatal aperture by controling ion fluxes in guard cells. Typically, ABA activates kinases SnRK2s (OST1) and Ca2+-dependent protein kinase (CPK): CPK3/6/10, which phosphorylates the anion channel SLAC1, and finally leads to stomatal closing [54,86]. Moreover, the Arabidopsis SERKs could negatively regulate stomatal development by ligand-induced heteromerization and transphosphorylation with the ER and ERL1 receptors downstream of the EPF1 and EPF2 ligands and upstream of the YDA-MKK4/MKK5-MPK3/ MPK6 cascade [63]. The rice LP2 increased drought sensitivity by enhancing stomatal opening and stomatal density [22]. Arabidopsis GHR1 increased ABA- and H2O2- induction of stomatal closure by directly interacting with SLAC1, and GHR1, OST1 and CPKs coordinately regulated SLAC1 activity [39]. In this study, after ABA treatment, the stomatal aperture in transgenic Arabidopsis was significantly wider; the expression levels of AtCPK3, AtCPK6, AtCPK10, AtSLAC1 in the transgenic plants were also lower in comparison with the WT plants (Fig 6). Thus, PnLRR-RLK27 involved in regulating the ABA signaling pathway.

The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is one of the most common plant responses to different stresses, representing a point at which various signaling pathways come together [87]. Its excess accumulation will result in oxidative damage of membrane lipids, DNA, proteins and carbohydrates, and causes toxic substance MDA production [8889]. During evolution, plants cells have acquired different antioxidants and ROS-scavenging enzymes to cope with the increased levels of ROS [90]. ROS-scavenging mechanism of P. patens is less researched and its antioxidant system mainly includes chloroplast peroxidases and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, lipoxygenase (LOXs), 2-Cys peroxiredoxin and peroxiredoxin [9193]. However, ROS-scavenging system of Arabidopsis is clear studied, and it has a complex and systematic ROS-scavenging mechanism [90]. ROS-scavenging system in Arabidopsis includes antioxidant molecules and antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) [9495]. In this study, PnLRR-RLK27 in transgenic Arabidopsis obviously enhanced the resistance to H2O2, and the levels of H2O2 were lower visualized by DAB staining (Fig 7D). The reactive aldehyde such as MDA is considered to reflect the degree of ROS-induced lipid peroxidation [96], thus the decreased MDA content in transgenic Arabidopsis suggested that PnLRR-RLK27 could alleviate ROS-induced damage (Fig 7G). Plants have evolved a complex antioxidant system to detoxify ROS, in which ROS scavenging enzymes play essential roles in detoxifying stress-induced ROS [9798]. SOD and POD are a group of these enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of many substrates at the expense of H2O2, finally lead to reduce of H2O2 [99100]. AtAPX1, AtAPX2 and AtCAT2 are the antioxidant enzymes that can increase the plant resistance to oxidative stress [9798]. AtZAT10 is a C2H2-zinc finger protein in Arabidopsis that can improve the expression of reactive oxygen-defense transcripts and enhance plants tolerance to salinity, heat and osmotic stress [101]. In this study, the activities of SOD and POD enzymes in transgenic Arabidopsis were higher than that in WT plants; the transcription levels of AtAPX1, AtAPX2, AtZAT1 and AtCAT1 were also significantly increased in transgenic Arabidopsis (Fig 7E, 7F, 7I, 7J, 7K and 7L). Therefore, these results suggested PnLRR-RLK27 could activate ROS scavenger to protected cells from ROS-induced lipid peroxidation.

Many salinity-inducible genes have been reported, and most of them are regulated within ABA signaling pathway [102]. ABF3 is a master transcription factor that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent gene expression for ABA signaling under conditions of water stress [103]. DREB2A is a trans-acting activator of AP2/ERF transcription factor that can interact with AREB/ABF proteins to regulate the expression of stress- and ABA-inducible genes in Arabidopsis [104]. MYB2 is a trans-acting protein of R2R3-type MYB transcription factor that activates the dehydration- and ABA-inducible expression of the RD22 gene in Arabidopsis [105]. ABF3, DREB2A and MYB2 are upregulated by ABA, dehydration and high-salinity stresses [106]. The expression of several stress-induced genes (RD22, RD29A, RD29B, COR47 and KIN1) was regulated by above transcription factors, and were activated when plants suffered by cold, drought, salt and ABA [107108]. In this study, we found that the expression of PnLRR-RLK27 markedly increased the transcripts of the major transcription factor (ABF3, DREAB2A and MYB2) and the stress-related genes (AtRD22, AtRD29A, AtRD29B, AtKIN1 and AtCOR47) after salt treatment (Fig 8). In P. patens, PpDBF1, an AtDREB homolog, its expression enhanced higher tolerance to salt, drought and cold stresses [109]. PpCOR47 and PpCOR TMC-AP3 proteins are induced by drought, osmotic, salt and ABA stress in P. patens [68]. In this study, we found that the PnLRR-RLK27 expression markedly increased the transcripts of the major transcription factor PpDBF1 and the stress-related genes (PpCOR47 and PpCORTMC-AP3) after salt treatment (Fig 8). Recent studies also suggested that RLKs participate in ABA-related signal pathway and enhance stress tolerance [2,110]. For example, the Glycine soja GsCBRLK enhanced plant tolerance to ABA and high salinity by increasing the expression pattern of stress marker genes (RD22, RD29A, KIN1, COR15A and NCED3) in response to ABA and high salt [111]. In other family of genes, there is evidence that some genes confer salt stress tolerance and insensitivity to ABA. For example, OsbZIP71 (a bZIP transcription factor) overexpressing rice significantly improved salt, drought and PEG osmotic stresses tolerance and insensitivity to ABA with upregulating the expression of abiotic stress-related genes (OsHKT6, COR413-TM and OsMyb4) [112]. The abo3 (a WRKY transcription factor) mutant was less drought tolerance and hypersensitive to ABA in both seeds germination and seedling growth by downregulating the expression of ABF2/AREB1, RD29A and COR47 [113]. Thus, our results suggested that PnLRR-RLK27 also involved in plant tolerance to salinity stress by interacting with ABA-mediated signal and gene expression.

Since the first plant RLK gene (ZmPK1 from maize) was cloned in 1993, the researchs on the ligand and downstream components of RLKs have been extensively concerned. Several LRR-RLKs (i.e., RLK7, BAK1, SOBIR1, GHR1 and RDK1) had been found to mediate plant immunity [114116], stomatal movement [39] and ABA sensitivity [117] by phosphorylating downstream components (prePIP1 peptide, BIR2, RLP, SLAC1 or ABI1). Therefore, to further clarify the PnLRR-RLK27 mediated stress signaling pathway in the P. nutans, identification of the extracellular ligand(s) and downstream components (ion channel, active polypeptide or transcription factor) were recommended. This will facilitate the improvements of abiotic stress tolerance in plant through genetic manipulation. In conclusion, our study provides a new insight that LRR-RLK participates in the process of P. nutans adapting and acclimating to the Antarctic adverse environments.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primers for gene clone, plasmid construction and real-time PCR analysis.


S2 Table. PnLRR-RLKs transcriptional levels after salt treatment for 1 h.



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41206176 and 41476174), Basic Scientific Fund for National Public Research Institutes of China (2014T04), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2014DQ012) and Excellent Creative Team Fund of Jinan. We thank Dr. Tomoaki Nishiyama and Dr. Mitsuyasu Hasebe (NIBB, Japan) for providing the pTFH15.3 vector.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: JW PZ SL KC.
  2. Data curation: JW PZ SL.
  3. Formal analysis: JW PZ SL KC.
  4. Funding acquisition: PZ SL KC.
  5. Investigation: JW CL TW PZ SL.
  6. Methodology: JW PZ SL.
  7. Project administration: PZ SL KC.
  8. Resources: PZ SL KC.
  9. Software: JW CL.
  10. Supervision: PZ SL KC.
  11. Validation: JW PZ SL KC.
  12. Visualization: JW PZ SL.
  13. Writing – original draft: JW.
  14. Writing – review & editing: JW PZ SL.


  1. 1. Tougane K, Komatsu K, Bhyan SB, Sakata Y, Ishizaki K, Yamato KT, et al. Evolutionarily conserved regulatory mechanisms of abscisic acid signaling in land plants: characterization of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE1-like type 2C protein phosphatase in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Physiol. 2010;152(3):1529–1543. pmid:20097789
  2. 2. Osakabe Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K, Tran LS. Sensing the environment: key roles of membrane-localized kinases in plant perception and response to abiotic stress. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(2):445–458. pmid:23307915
  3. 3. Shiu SH, Bleecker AB. Expansion of the receptor-like kinase/Pelle gene family and receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;132(2):530–543. pmid:12805585
  4. 4. Gao LL, Xue HW. Global analysis of expression profiles of rice receptor-like kinase genes. Mol Plant. 2012;5(1):143–153. pmid:21765177
  5. 5. Shiu SH, Karlowski WM, Pan R, Tzeng YH, Mayer KF, Li WH. Comparative analysis of the receptor-like kinase family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Cell. 2004;16(5): 1220–1234 pmid:15105442
  6. 6. Shiu SH, Bleecker AB. Plant receptor-like kinase gene family: diversity, function, and signaling. Sci STKE. 2001a;(113):re22.
  7. 7. Shiu SH, Bleecker AB. Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001b;98:10763–10768.
  8. 8. Sun X, Wang GL. Genome-wide identification, characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the rice LRR-kinases. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e16079. pmid:21408199
  9. 9. Dievart A, Perin C, Hirsch J, Bettembourg M, Lanau N, Artus F, et al. The phenome analysis of mutant alleles in leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase genes in rice reveals new potential targets for stress tolerant cereals. Plant Sci. 2016;242:240–249. pmid:26566841
  10. 10. Morillo SA, Tax FE. Functional analysis of receptor-like kinases in monocots and dicots. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9(5):460–469. pmid:16877029
  11. 11. Kinoshita A, Betsuyaku S, Osakabe Y, Mizuno S, Nagawa S, Stahl Y, et al. RPK2 is an essential receptor-like kinase that transmits the CLV3 signal in Arabidopsis. Development. 2010;137(22):3911–3920. pmid:20978082
  12. 12. Uchida N, Lee JS, Horst RJ, Lai HH, Kajita R, Kakimoto T, et al. Regulation of inflorescence architecture by intertissue layer ligand-receptor communication between endodermis and phloem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(16):6337–6342. pmid:22474391
  13. 13. Kim TW, Wang ZY. Brassinosteroid signal transduction from receptor kinases to transcription factors. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:681–704. pmid:20192752
  14. 14. Roux M, Schwessinger B, Albrecht C, Chinchilla D, Jones A, Holton N, et al. The Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases BAK1/SERK3 and BKK1/SERK4 are required for innate immunity to hemibiotrophic and biotrophic pathogens. Plant Cell. 2011;23(6):2440–2455. pmid:21693696
  15. 15. Shpak ED, McAbee JM, Pillitteri LJ, Torii KU. Stomatal patterning and differentiation by synergistic interactions of receptor kinases. Science. 2005;309(5732):290–293. pmid:16002616
  16. 16. Li J, Wen J, Lease KA, Doke JT, Tax FE, Walker JC. BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRR receptor-like protein kinase, interacts with BRI1 and modulates brassinosteroid signaling. Cell. 2002;110(2):213–222. pmid:12150929
  17. 17. Koller T, Bent AF. FLS2-BAK1 extracellular domain interaction sites required for defense signaling activation. PloS One. 2014;9(10):e111185. pmid:25356676
  18. 18. Huault E, Laffont C, Wen J, Mysore KS, Ratet P, Duc G,et al. Local and systemic regulation of plant root system architecture and symbiotic nodulation by a receptor-like kinase. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(12):e1004891. pmid:25521478
  19. 19. de Lorenzo L, Merchan F, Laporte P, Thompson R, Clarke J, Sousa C, et al. A novel plant leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase regulates the response of Medicago truncatula roots to salt stress. Plant Cell. 2009;21(2):668–680. pmid:19244136
  20. 20. Ouyang SQ, Liu YF, Liu P, Lei G, He SJ, Ma B, et al. Receptor-like kinase OsSIK1 improves drought and salt stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa) plants. Plant J. 2010;62(2):316–329. pmid:20128882
  21. 21. Yang L, Wu K, Gao P, Liu X, Li G, Wu Z. GsLRPK, a novel cold-activated leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase from Glycine soja, is a positive regulator to cold stress tolerance. Plant Sci. 2014;215–216:19–28. pmid:24388511
  22. 22. Wu F, Sheng P, Tan J, Chen X, Lu G, Ma W, et al. Plasma membrane receptor-like kinase leaf panicle 2 acts downstream of the DROUGHT AND SALT TOLERANCE transcription factor to regulate drought sensitivity in rice. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(1):271–281. pmid:25385766
  23. 23. Wasley J, Robinson SA, Lovelock CE, Popp M. Some like it wet-biological characteristics underpinning tolerance of extreme water stress events in Antarctic bryophytes. Funct Plant Biol. 2006;33(5):443–455.
  24. 24. Schroeter B, Green T, Kulle D, Pannewitz S, Schlensog M, Sancho L. The moss Bryum argenteum var. muticum Brid. is well adapted to cope with high light in continental Antarctica. Antarct Sci. 2012;24(03):281–291.
  25. 25. Zuniga-Gonzalez P, Zuniga GE, Pizarro M, Casanova-Katny A. Soluble carbohydrate content variation in Sanionia uncinata and Polytrichastrum alpinum, two Antarctic mosses with contrasting desiccation capacities. Biol Res. 2016;49:6. pmid:26823072
  26. 26. Clarke LJ, Robinson SA. Cell wall-bound ultraviolet-screening compounds explain the high ultraviolet tolerance of the Antarctic moss, Ceratodon purpureus. New Phytol. 2008;179(3):776–783. pmid:18513223
  27. 27. Pereira BK, Rosa RM, da Silva J, Guecheva TN, Oliveira IM, Ianistcki M, et al. Protective effects of three extracts from Antarctic plants against ultraviolet radiation in several biological models. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2009;96(2):117–129. pmid:19464923
  28. 28. Cove DJ, Perroud PF, Charron AJ, McDaniel SF, Khandelwal A, Quatrano RS. Isolation and regeneration of protoplasts of the moss Physcomitrella patens. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2009a;(2):5140.
  29. 29. Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:29–37.
  30. 30. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:229–232.
  31. 31. Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform. 2008;9(4):299–306. pmid:18417537
  32. 32. Zhang P, Zhang Z, Wang J, Cong B, Chen K, Liu S. A novel receptor-like kinase (PnRLK-1) from the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans enhances salt and oxidative stress tolerance. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2015;33(4):1156–1170.
  33. 33. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4): 402–408. pmid:11846609
  34. 34. Schaefer D, Zryd JP, Knight CD, Cove DJ. Stable transformation of the moss Physcomitrella patens. Mol Gen Genet. 1991;226(3):418–424. pmid:2038304
  35. 35. Yoo SD, Cho YH, Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(7):1565–1572. pmid:17585298
  36. 36. Yin J, Zhu H, Xia L, Ding X, Hoffmann T, Hoffmann M, et al. A new recombineering system for Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(6):36.
  37. 37. Cove DJ, Perroud PF, Charron AJ, McDaniel SF, Khandelwal A, Quatrano RS. Transformation of the moss Physcomitrella patens using direct DNA uptake by protoplasts. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2009b;(2):5143.
  38. 38. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–743. pmid:10069079
  39. 39. Hua D, Wang C, He J, Liao H, Duan Y, Zhu Z, et al. A plasma membrane receptor kinase, GHR1, mediates abscisic acid- and hydrogen peroxide-regulated stomatal movement in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24(6):2546–2561. pmid:22730405
  40. 40. Pei ZM, Kuchitsu K, Ward JM, Schwarz M, Schroeder JI. Differential abscisic acid regulation of guard cell slow anion channels in Arabidopsis wild-type and abi1 and abi2 mutants. Plant Cell. 1997;9(3):409–423. pmid:9090884
  41. 41. Osakabe Y, Mizuno S, Tanaka H, Maruyama K, Osakabe K, Todaka D, et al. Overproduction of the membrane-bound receptor-like protein kinase 1, RPK1, enhances abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:(12) 9190–9201. pmid:20089852
  42. 42. Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977;59(2):309–314. pmid:16659839
  43. 43. Maehly AC, Chance B. The assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Biochem Anal. 1954;1:357–424. pmid:13193536
  44. 44. Lv WT, Lin B, Zhang M, Hua XJ. Proline accumulation is inhibitory to Arabidopsis seedlings during heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(4):1921–1933. pmid:21670222
  45. 45. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39(1):205–207.
  46. 46. Wu Y, Xun Q, Guo Y, Zhang J, Cheng K, Shi T, et al. Genome-wide expression pattern analyses of the Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases. Mol Plant. 2016;9(2):289–300. pmid:26712505
  47. 47. Hanks SK, Quinn AM, Hunter T. The protein kinase family: conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. Science. 1988;241(4861):42–52. pmid:3291115
  48. 48. Lovelock CE, Jackson AE, Melick DR, Seppelt RD. Reversible photoinhibition in Antarctic moss during freezing and thawing. Plant Physiol. 1995;109(3):955–961. pmid:12228644
  49. 49. Rus A, Yokoi S, Sharkhuu A, Reddy M, Lee BH, Matsumoto TK, et al. AtHKT1 is a salt tolerance determinant that controls Na(+) entry into plant roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(24):14150–14155. pmid:11698666
  50. 50. Yoshida T, Mogami J, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Curr Opin Plant biol. 2014;21:133–139. pmid:25104049
  51. 51. Li CL, Wang M, Wu XM, Chen DH, Lv HJ, Shen JL, et al. THI1, a thiamine thiazole synthase, interacts with Ca2+-dependent protein kinase CPK33 and modulates the S-Type anion channels and stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2016;170(2):1090–1104. pmid:26662273
  52. 52. Raghavendra AS, Gonugunta VK, Christmann A, Grill E. ABA perception and signalling. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(7):395–401. pmid:20493758
  53. 53. Kim TH, Bohmer M, Hu H, Nishimura N, Schroeder JI. Guard cell signal transduction network: advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2, and Ca2+ signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:561–591. pmid:20192751
  54. 54. Brandt B, Munemasa S, Wang C, Nguyen D, Yong T, Yang PG, et al. Correction: Calcium specificity signaling mechanisms in abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis guard cells. eLife. 2015;4:10328.
  55. 55. Vahisalu T, Kollist H, Wang YF, Nishimura N, Chan WY, Valerio G, et al. SLAC1 is required for plant guard cell S-type anion channel function in stomatal signalling. Nature. 2008;452(7186):487–491. pmid:18305484
  56. 56. Chae L, Sudat S, Dudoit S, Zhu T, Luan S. Diverse transcriptional programs associated with environmental stress and hormones in the Arabidopsis receptor-like kinase gene family. Mol Plant. 2009;2(1):84–107. pmid:19529822
  57. 57. De Smet I, Voss U, Jurgens G, Beeckman T. Receptor-like kinases shape the plant. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(10):1166–1173. pmid:19794500
  58. 58. Hwang SG, Kim DS, Jang CS. Comparative analysis of evolutionary dynamics of genes encoding leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase between rice and Arabidopsis. Genetica. 2011;139(8):1023–1032. pmid:21879323
  59. 59. Dievart A, Gilbert N, Droc G, Attard A, Gourgues M, Guiderdoni E, et al. Leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases are sporadically distributed in eukaryotic genomes. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:367. pmid:22185365
  60. 60. Park S, Moon JC, Park YC, Kim JH, Kim DS, Jang CS. Molecular dissection of the response of a rice leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK) gene to abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol. 2014;171(17):1645–1653. pmid:25173451
  61. 61. Aan den Toorn M, Albrecht C, de Vries S. On the origin of SERKs: bioinformatics analysis of the somatic embryogenesis receptor kinases. Mol Plant. 2015;8(5):762–782. pmid:25864910
  62. 62. van Esse W, van Mourik S, Albrecht C, van Leeuwen J, de Vries S. A mathematical model for the coreceptors SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE1 and SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE3 in BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-mediated signaling. Plant Physiol. 2013;163(3):1472–1481. pmid:24072582
  63. 63. Meng X, Chen X, Mang H, Liu C, Yu X, Gao X, et al. Differential function of Arabidopsis SERK family receptor-like kinases in stomatal patterning. Curr Biol. 2015;25(18):2361–2372. pmid:26320950
  64. 64. Chen X, Zuo S, Schwessinger B, Chern M, Canlas PE, Ruan D, et al. An XA21-associated kinase (OsSERK2) regulates immunity mediated by the XA21 and XA3 immune receptors. Mol Plant. 2014;7(5):874–892. pmid:24482436
  65. 65. Schlensog M, Green TG, Schroeter B. Life form and water source interact to determine active time and environment in cryptogams: an example from the maritime Antarctic. Oecologia. 2013;173(1):59–72. pmid:23440504
  66. 66. Pressel S. The illustrated moss flora of Antarctica. Ann Bot. 2009;104(1):vi–vii.
  67. 67. Quatrano RS, McDaniel SF, Khandelwal A, Perroud PF, Cove DJ. Physcomitrella patens: mosses enter the genomic age. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007;10(2):182–189. pmid:17291824
  68. 68. Cuming AC, Stevenson SR. From pond slime to rain forest: the evolution of ABA signalling and the acquisition of dehydration tolerance. New Phytol. 2015;206(1):5–7. pmid:25711244
  69. 69. Frank W, Ratnadewi D, Reski R. Physcomitrella patens is highly tolerant against drought, salt and osmotic stress. Planta. 2005;220(3):384–394. pmid:15322883
  70. 70. Chater C, Gray JE, Beerling DJ. Early evolutionary acquisition of stomatal control and development gene signalling networks. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16(5):638–646. pmid:23871687
  71. 71. Wolf L, Rizzini L, Stracke R, Ulm R, Rensing SA. The molecular and physiological responses of Physcomitrella patens to ultraviolet-B radiation. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(3):1123–1134. pmid:20427465
  72. 72. Liu S, Wang N, Zhang P, Cong B, Lin X, Wang S, et al. Next-generation sequencing-based transcriptome profiling analysis of Pohlia nutans reveals insight into the stress-relevant genes in Antarctic moss. Extremophiles. 2013;17(3):391–403. pmid:23532411
  73. 73. Wang J, Zhang P, Liu S, Cong B, Chen K. A leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase from the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans confers salinity and ABA stress tolerance. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2016:1–10.
  74. 74. Lee BH, Zhu JK. Phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis mutants: germination rate under salt/hormone-induced stress. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010;(4):4969.
  75. 75. Shi CC, Feng CC, Yang MM, Li JL, Li XX, Zhao BC, et al. Overexpression of the receptor-like protein kinase genes AtRPK1 and OsRPK1 reduces the salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2014;217–218:63–70. pmid:24467897
  76. 76. Zhu JK. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2002;53:247–273. pmid:12221975
  77. 77. Mickelbart MV, Hasegawa PM, Bailey-Serres J. Genetic mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance that translate to crop yield stability. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16(4):237–251. pmid:25752530
  78. 78. Lunde C, Drew DP, Jacobs AK, Tester M. Exclusion of Na+ via sodium ATPase (PpENA1) ensures normal growth of Physcomitrella patens under moderate salt stress. Plant Physiol. 2007;144(4):1786–1796. pmid:17556514
  79. 79. Kroemer K, Reski R, Frank W. Abiotic stress response in the moss Physcomitrella patens: evidence for an evolutionary alteration in signaling pathways in land plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2004;22(11):864–870. pmid:15034746
  80. 80. Wang X, Liu Z, He Y. Responses and tolerance to salt stress in bryophytes. Plant Signal Behav. 2008;3(8):516–518. pmid:19513243
  81. 81. Ashraf M, Foolad M. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot. 2007;59(2):206–216.
  82. 82. Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR. Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:651–679. pmid:20192755
  83. 83. Tougane K, Komatsu K, Bhyan SB, Sakata Y, Ishizaki K, Yamato KT, et al. Evolutionarily conserved regulatory mechanisms of abscisic acid signaling in land plants: characterization of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE1-like type 2C protein phosphatase in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Physiol. 2010;152(3):1529–1543. pmid:20097789
  84. 84. Khandelwal A, Cho SH, Marella H, Sakata Y, Perroud PF, Pan A, et al. Role of ABA and ABI3 in desiccation tolerance. Science. 2010;327(5965):546. pmid:20110497
  85. 85. Yotsui I, Serada S, Naka T, Saruhashi M, Taji T, Hayashi T, et al. Large-scale proteome analysis of abscisic acid and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3- dependent proteins related to desiccation tolerance in Physcomitrella patens. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;471(4):589–595. pmid:26869511
  86. 86. Hauser F, Waadt R, Schroeder JI. Evolution of abscisic acid synthesis and signaling mechanisms. Curr Biol. 2011;21(9):346–355.
  87. 87. Sewelam N, Kazan K, Schenk PM. Global plant stress signaling: reactive oxygen species at the cross-road. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:187. pmid:26941757
  88. 88. Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7(9):405–410. pmid:12234732
  89. 89. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, Van Breusegem F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(10):490–498. pmid:15465684
  90. 90. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Suzuki N, Miller G, Tognetti VB, Vandepoele K, et al. ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16 (6):300–309. pmid:21482172
  91. 91. Pitsch NT, Witsch B, Baier M. Comparison of the chloroplast peroxidase system in the chlorophyte Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens, the lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii and the seed plant Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:133. pmid:20584316
  92. 92. Lunde C, Baumann U, Shirley NJ, Drew DP, Fincher GB. Gene structure and expression pattern analysis of three monodehydroascorbate reductase (Mdhar) genes in Physcomitrella patens: implications for the evolution of the MDHAR family in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;60(2):259–275. pmid:16429263
  93. 93. Wang X, Yang P, Gao Q, Liu X, Kuang T, Shen S, et al. Proteomic analysis of the response to high-salinity stress in Physcomitrella patens. Planta. 2008;228(1):167–177. pmid:18351383
  94. 94. Wrzaczek M, Brosche M, Kangasjarvi J. ROS signaling loops-production, perception, regulation. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16 (5):575–582. pmid:23876676
  95. 95. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, Van Breusegem F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(10):490–498. pmid:15465684
  96. 96. Nankivell BJ, Tay YC, Boadle RA, Harris DC. Dietary protein alters tubular iron accumula-tion after partial nephrectomy. Kidney Int. 1994;45(4):1006–1013. pmid:8007569
  97. 97. Perez-Lopez U, Robredo A, Lacuesta M, Sgherri C, Munoz-Rueda A, Navari-Izzo F, et al. The oxidative stress caused by salinity in two barley cultivars is mitigated by elevated CO2. Physiol Plant. 2009;135(1):29–42. pmid:19121097
  98. 98. Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(12):909–930. pmid:20870416
  99. 99. Alscher RG, Erturk N, Heath LS. Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J Exp Bot. 2002;53(372):1331–1341. pmid:11997379
  100. 100. Noctor G, Veljovic-Jovanovic S, Foyer CH. Peroxide processing in photosynthesis: antioxidant coupling and redox signalling. Philos Trans R Soc Lon B Biol Sci. 2000;355(1402):1465–1475. pmid:11128000
  101. 101. Mittler R, Kim Y, Song L, Coutu J, Coutu A, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, et al. Gain- and loss-of-function mutations in Zat10 enhance the tolerance of plants to abiotic stress. FEBS Lett. 2006;580(28–29):6537–6542. pmid:17112521
  102. 102. Kamei A, Seki M, Umezawa T, Ishida J, Satou M, Akiyama K, et al. Analysis of gene expression profiles in Arabidopsis salt overly sensitive mutants sos2-1 and sos3-1. Plant Cell Environ. 2005;28(10):1267–1275.
  103. 103. Yoshida T, Fujita Y, Sayama H, Kidokoro S, Maruyama K, Mizoi J, et al. AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent ABA signaling involved in drought stress tolerance and require ABA for full activation. Plant J. 2010;61(4):672–685. pmid:19947981
  104. 104. Lee SJ, Kang JY, Park HJ, Kim MD, Bae MS, Choi HI, et al. DREB2C interacts with ABF2, a bZIP protein regulating abscisic acid-responsive gene expression, and its overexpression affects abscisic acid sensitivity. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(2):716–727. pmid:20395451
  105. 105. Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell. 2003;15(1):63–78. pmid:12509522
  106. 106. Park HJ, Kim WY, Yun DJ. A new insight of salt stress signaling in plant. Mol Cells. 2016;39(4):447–59.
  107. 107. Fujita Y, Fujita M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. ABA-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to osmotic stress in plants. J Plant Res. 2011;124(4):509–525. pmid:21416314
  108. 108. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:781–803. pmid:16669782
  109. 109. Liu N, Zhong NQ, Wang GL, Li LJ, Liu XL, He YK, et al. Cloning and functional characterization of PpDBF1 gene encoding a DRE-binding transcription factor from Physcomitrella patens. Planta. 2007;226(4):827–838. pmid:17541631
  110. 110. Osakabe Y, Maruyama K, Seki M, Satou M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase1 is a key membrane-bound regulator of abscisic acid early signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17(4):1105–1119. pmid:15772289
  111. 111. Yang L, Ji W, Zhu Y, Gao P, Li Y, Cai H, et al. GsCBRLK, a calcium/calmodulin-binding receptor-like kinase, is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to salt and ABA stress. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(9):2519–2533. pmid:20400529
  112. 112. Liu C, Mao B, Ou S, Wang W, Liu L, Wu Y, et al. OsbZIP71, a bZIP transcription factor, confers salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2014;84(1-2):19–36. pmid:23918260
  113. 113. Ren X, Chen Z, Liu Y, Zhang H, Zhang M, Liu Q, et al. ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010;63(3):417–429. pmid:20487379
  114. 114. Hou S, Wang X, Chen D, Yang X, Wang M, Turra D, et al. The secreted peptide PIP1 amplifies immunity through receptor-like kinase 7. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(9):1004331.
  115. 115. Halter T, Imkampe J, Mazzotta S, Wierzba M, Postel S, Bucherl C, et al. The leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase BIR2 is a negative regulator of BAK1 in plant immunity. Curr Biol. 2014;24(2):134–143. pmid:24388849
  116. 116. Liebrand TW, van den Berg GC, Zhang Z, Smit P, Cordewener JH, America AH, et al. Receptor-like kinase SOBIR1/EVR interacts with receptor-like proteins in plant immunity against fungal infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(24):10010–10015. pmid:23716655
  117. 117. Kumar D, Kumar R, Baek D, Hyun TK, Chung WS, Yun DJ, et al. An Arabidopsis thaliana RECEPTOR DEAD KINASE1 (RDK1) gene functions as a positive regulator in plant responses to ABA. Mol Plant. 2016.