Two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus 1 non-NRTI (nNRTI) remain the preferred or alternative combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) for antiretroviral-naive HIV-positive patients in Taiwan. The three most commonly used nNRTIs are nevirapine (NVP), efavirenz (EFV) and rilpivirine (RPV). This study aimed to determine the incidences of hepatotoxicity and skin rashes within 4 weeks of initiation of cART containing 1 nNRTI plus 2 NRTIs.
Between June, 2012 and November, 2015, all antiretroviral-naive HIV-positive adult patients initiating nNRTI-containing cART at 8 designated hospitals for HIV care were included in this retrospective observational study. According to the national HIV treatment guidelines, patients were assessed at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks of cART initiation, and subsequently every 8 to 12 weeks. Plasma HIV RNA load, CD4 cell count and aminotransferases were determined. The toxicity grading scale of the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2014 was used for reporting clinical and laboratory adverse events.
During the 3.5-year study period, 2,341 patients initiated nNRTI-containing cART: NVP in 629 patients, EFV 1,363 patients, and RPV 349 patients. Rash of any grade occurred in 14.1% (n = 331) of the patients. In multiple logistic regression analysis, baseline CD4 cell counts (per 100-cell/μl increase, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.125; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.031–1.228) and use of NVP (AOR, 2.443; 95% CI, 1.816–3.286) (compared with efavirenz) were independently associated with the development of skin rashes. Among the 1,455 patients (62.2%) with aminotransferase data both at baseline and week 4, 72 (4.9%) developed grade 2 or greater hepatotoxicity. In multiple logistic regression analysis, presence of antibody for hepatitis C virus (HCV) (AOR, 2.865; 95% CI, 1.439–5.704) or hepatitis B surface antigen (AOR, 2.397; 95% CI, 1.150–4.997), and development of skin rashes (AOR, 2.811; 95% CI, 1.051–7.521) were independently associated with the development of hepatotoxicity.
The baseline CD4 cell counts and use of NVP were associated with increased risk of skin rashes, while hepatotoxicity was independently associated with HCV or hepatitis B virus coinfection, and development of skin rashes in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-positive Taiwanese patients within 4 weeks of initiation of nNRTI-containing regimens.
Citation: Wu P-Y, Cheng C-Y, Liu C-E, Lee Y-C, Yang C-J, Tsai M-S, et al. (2017) Multicenter study of skin rashes and hepatotoxicity in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-positive patients receiving non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor plus nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0171596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171596
Editor: Luis Menéndez-Arias, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid Centro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa, SPAIN
Received: September 28, 2016; Accepted: January 23, 2017; Published: February 21, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Centers for Disease Control, Taiwan (MOHW104-CDC-C-114-000301 to C.H.).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
In recent practice guidelines of first-line antiretroviral treatment of HIV infection, the preferred or alternative combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens include a combination of two nucleo(t)side reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF] and emtricitabine or lamivudine) plus an active drug from one of the following classes: integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) [1–3], non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nNRTI) (efavirenz [EFV]  or rilpivirine [RPV]). The World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines 2015 recommend either nevirapine (NVP) or EFV as a part of first-line antiretroviral therapy . Other than efficacy, the choice of first-line therapy is determined based on various considerations, which include safety, drug tolerability, transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 in the untreated population, coinfections, such as tuberculosis  and viral hepatitis, pregnancy, comorbidities, concurrent medications, or availability of antiretroviral agents. The cost of antiretroviral therapy is also an important factor to consider, especially in countries with limited resources .
The antiretroviral regimens containing the first-generation nNRTIs, EFV and NVP, have been shown to be efficacious and safety in different populations [7, 8]. In patients co-infected with HIV infection and tuberculosis, EFV remains the preferred nNRTI to be combined with rifampicin-containing anti-tuberculous therapy [5, 9]; however, neuropsychiatric symptoms are common adverse effects of EFV [10, 11]. In contrast, NVP is the preferred nNRTI in the first-line antiretroviral regiments in pregnancy because of substantial clinical experience in pregnant women and its proven efficacy in reducing mother-to-child transmission [12, 13]; however, higher incidences of rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and hepatotoxicity have been associated with NVP than EFV [7, 14–17].
The frequency of elevation of liver enzymes in patients on EFV-containing regimens ranges from 1 to 8% [7, 8, 18–20], whereas in patients treated with NVP-containing regimens, it ranges from 4 to 18% [8, 16, 18–22]. NVP-related hepatotoxicity occurs almost exclusively during the first 6 weeks of treatment, which is more likely to develop in women with CD4 cell counts >250 cells/μl and in men with CD4 cell counts >400 cells/μl [23, 24], In previous studies, the associated factors with EFV-related hepatotoxicity were hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection and excessive alcohol use [25, 26]; moreover, skin rash has been reported to be associated with symptomatic hepatitis .
The second-generation nNRTIs, RPV, has demonstrated antiviral efficacy similar to that of EFV in antiretroviral-naïve adults with baseline plasma HIV RNA load (PVL) ≦100,000 copies/ml over 96 weeks in phase 3 clinical trials (ECHO and THRIVE) [27–29]. Compared with EFV, RPV was associated with a significantly lower incidence of skin rash (4% vs. 9%) and treatment-emergent elevation of aminotransferase levels (6% vs. 10–11%) .
In Taiwan, the three most commonly used nNRTIs among antiretroviral-naive patients are NVP, EFV, and RPV. A higher prevalence of chronic viral hepatitis B or C among HIV-positive patients in Taiwan [30, 31] and pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral therapy  has raised our concerns about the potential risks of hepatotoxicity and skin rashes related to the use of nNRTIs as the first-line antiretroviral therapy . This multicenter, retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the incidences of skin rashes and hepatotoxicity within the first 4 weeks of initiation of nNRTI-containing antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected adult patients in Taiwan.
Study population and setting
This retrospective observational study was conducted at 8 designated hospitals for HIV care around Taiwan (National Taiwan University Hospital, Tri-Service General Hospital, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan General Hospital, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Changhua Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital and Chi Mei Hospital). We included all HIV-positive patients aged 20 years or greater who were antiretroviral-naive and initiated nNRTI-containing cART between 1 June, 2012 and 31 November 2015. All patients were followed until 31 January, 2016, death or loss to follow-up, whichever occurred first. The study was approved by the research ethics committee of each participating hospital and informed consent was waived.
HIV care, including cART and monitoring of CD4 cell count and PVL, has been provided free-of-charge since cART became available in Taiwan in April 1997. Due to financial constraints on the provision of free-of-charge access to cART, the Centers of Disease Controls (CDC) in Taiwan implemented regulations on the prescription of cART to antiretroviral-naive HIV-positive patients who received their first-line cART on 1 June 2012. Four categories of cART were defined: the first category consisted of NVP, RPV or EFV plus zidovudine/lamivudine (coformulated); the second category, NVP or EFV plus abacavir/lamivudine (coformulated); or TDF/emtricitabine (coformulated) or TDF and lamivudine; the third category, zidovudine/lamivudine plus protease inhibitors (PIs) or raltegravir; and the fourth category, TDF/emtricitabine, TDF and lamivudine, or abacavir/lamivudine plus PIs or raltegravir. Patients could start antiretroviral regimens in the first three categories, but initiation of regimens in the fourth category required approval before prescription. Raltegravir was not available in clinical use for antiretroviral-experienced patients until 2009; and in 2012, it was available for antiretroviral-naïve patients to be combined with 2 NRTIs. RPV was not available until January 2014. In patients with chronic HBV infection, TDF-containing regimens were recommended and RPV was recommended only for patients with baseline PVL <100,000 copies/ml.
Before initiation of cART, baseline assessment included hemogram, CD4 count, PVL, serologic markers of syphilis and hepatitis A, B, and C viruses, urinalysis, and serum biochemistry, including total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and lipid profiles. Transmitted drug resistance mutations of HIV-1 to NRTIs, nNRTIs, PIs, and INSTIs were not routinely determined before cART was initiated; genotypic resistance testing was only performed retrospectively for the purposes of surveillance [34, 35].
After initiation of cART, patients were mandatorily enrolled in case management program implemented by Taiwan CDC and patients were usually seen 2 weeks after initiation of cART to assess the adverse effects and tolerability of the regimens prescribed. Aminotransferases and hemogram were determined. Patients returned for reassessment of virological and immunological responses and adverse effects at week 4 of cART, and subsequently every 8 to 12 weeks. At these visits, physical examination was performed and PVL, CD4 cell count, serum chemistries, including total bilirubin, AST, ALT, and lipid profiles, were determined to assess the clinical and laboratory adverse events. A standardized case record form was used to collect information on demographic and clinical characteristics and immunological and virological responses.
We assessed the incidence of skin rashes within 4 weeks of cART initiation. Hepatotoxicity grading was based on ALT and AST levels, which was defined in accordance with the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table) , in the following manner: grade 1, 1.25–2.4 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) (upper normal values, 31–41 U/L for AST and 41–44 U/L for ALT, depending on the ULN values of each participating hospital); grade 2, 2.5–4.9 × ULN; grade 3, 5.0–9.9 × ULN; and grade 4, ≧10 × ULN, for those patients with normal aminotransferase levels at baseline. For patients with abnormal aminotransferase levels at baseline, hepatotoxicity was defined as a 2-fold or greater increase from baseline levels . The skin rashes was graded according to the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table) .
HCV infection was defined as presence of antibodies for HCV, while hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was defined as presence of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg).
Categorical variables were analyzed by using X2 test and continuous variables were compared using Student’s t test. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All P values were two-tailed. Variables with P<0.10 or those of biological significance in the univariate analyses were entered into a multivariate logistic analyses. Association between hepatotoxicity and skin rash and clinical characteristics were assessed in logistic regression analysis. Variables included in these analyses were age, gender, HIV risk group, baseline CD4 cell count, baseline PVL, and baseline AST and ALT. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (Version 9.3).
Clinical characteristics of the patients
A total of 2,341 antiretroviral-naïve patients started cART between June 2012 and November 2015; 629 patients received NVP plus 2 NRTIs, 1,363 patients EFV plus 2 NRTIs, and 349 patients RPV plus 2 NRTIs. Their baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Overall, the great majority (95.8%) of the patients were male, with a mean age of 33 years, and men who have sex with men and injection drug users accounted for 77.7% and 16.7% of the patients, respectively. While the mean PVL was 4.7 log10 copies/mL, most of the patients initiated cART late with a mean CD4 count 279 cells/μl and only 29.8% initiated cART with a baseline CD4 count of 350 cells/μl or greater (data not shown). HBsAg was determined in 2,291 patients (97.9%) with 275 (12.0%) testing positive, while anti-HCV antibody was determined in 2,286 patients (97.7%) with 437 (19.1%) testing positive.
Not unexpectedly, clinical characteristics differed significantly among the patients initiating cART with 3 different regimens consisting of nNRTIs plus 2 NRTIs because of the regulations on prescription of the first-line antiretroviral therapy in antiretroviral-naïve patients, a higher prevalence of chronic HBV infection that required cART containing TDF, and injection drug users who often had low PVL and higher CD4 counts at baseline than other risk groups owing to infections with defective HIV-1 subtype CRF 07_BC in Taiwan . Therefore, a higher proportion of patients who initiated RPV plus 2NRTIs were injection drug users than those who initiated EFV or NVP plus 2 NRTIs (24.3% vs 15.3% and 15.2%, respectively) (Table 1). Compared with patients initiating EFV or NVP plus 2 NRTIs, patients initiating RPV plus 2 NRTIs had a lower mean PVL (4.3 vs 4.8 log10 copies/ml) and higher CD4 count (388 vs 281 and 214 cells/μl, respectively).
Within the first 4 weeks of cART, the percentage of patients who discontinued nNRTIs due to any adverse events was 55.4%. Of the patients discontinuing nNRTIs, 67.1% were due to skin rash, 23.2% due to neuropsychiatric symptoms, 5.6% due to gastrointestinal upset, 5.3% due to hepatitis, and 1.1% due to depression.
Skin rashes: Incidence and associated factors
Within 4 weeks of cART, rash of any grade occurred in 331 (14.1%) of the patients: 149 (23.7%) in NVP group, 180 (13.2%) in EFV group, and 2 (0.6%) in RPV group. The mean interval between initiation of cART and development of skin rashes was longer for the NVP group than EFV group (22 vs 16 days, P = 0002). Of the 149 patients who received NVP with skin rash, the proportions of HBV coinfection did not differ between those who discontinued and those who continued NVP (10.6% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.756), and neither did the proportions of HCV coinfection (19.2% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.749). Likewise, of the 180 patients who received EFV with rash, the proportions of HBV coinfection did not differ between those who discontinued and those who continued EFV (10.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.131), and neither did the proportions of HCV coinfection (14.2% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.311) (data not shown).
Table 2 shows the results of univariate analyses of factors associated with skin rash for all patients after initiation of nNRTI-containing regimens within the first 4 weeks. In univariate analysis, patients who initiated NVP plus 2 NRTIs had a higher risk of developing skin rashes (P<0.0001), while those who initiated RPV plus 2 NRTIs had a lower risk. In multiple logistic regression analysis among patients who received NVP or EFV, we found a higher baseline CD4 cell counts (per 100-cell/μl increase, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.125; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.031–1.228) and use of NVP plus 2 NRTIs (AOR, 2.443; 95% CI, 1.816–3.286) were independently associated with the development of skin rashes (Table 3).
For each of nNRTI-containing regimen, the results of multivariate analysis of associated factors with skin rashes are shown in S1 Table. In NVP group, we found that baseline CD4 cell count (P = 0.05) and age (P = 0.04) were associated with developing skin rashes in univariate analysis (data not shown), while in multiple logistic regression analysis, we were not able to identify any factor statistically significantly associated with developing skin rashes. In EFV group, developing skin rashes was associated with older age (P = 0.02) and baseline CD4 cell count≧350 cells/μl (P = 0.004) in univariate analysis (data not shown). In multiple logistic regression analysis, only baseline CD4 cell count ≧350 cells/μl (AOR, 2.326; 95% CI, 1.211–4.466) was independently associated with the development of skin rashes.
Hepatotoxicity: Incidence and associated factors
Baseline aminotransferase levels available for patients initiating EFV-, NVP-, and RPV-containing regimens are shown in Table 1. Among the 1,455 patients (62.2%) with both baseline and follow-up data of aminotransferases at week 4, 72 (4.9%) patients developed hepatotoxicity of grade 2 or greater: 37 (4.4%) in EFV group, 24 (6.9%) in NVP group and 11 (4.1%) in RPV group. In patients with treatment-emergent hepatic laboratory abnormalities, there was a higher incidence of grade 2 or more AST and ALT elevation in the patients with normal baseline levels of aminotransferase in the NVP group than in the EFV and RPV groups at week 4 (Fig 1).
Of the 24 patients who received NVP with hepatotoxicity, the proportions of HBV coinfection did not differ between those who discontinued and those who continued NVP (7.7% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.084), and neither did the proportions of HCV coinfection (23.1% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.247). Of the 37 patients who received EFV with hepatotoxicity, the proportions of HBV coinfection did not differ between those who discontinued and those who continued EFV (27.3% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.662), and neither did the proportions of HCV coinfection (36.4% vs. 36.0%, P = 0.983) (data not shown).
Univariate analyses of factors associated with hepatotoxicity for all patients are shown in Table 4. We found that older age (P = 0.0038), anti-HCV positivity (P<0.0001), HBsAg positivity (P = 0.0007), and development of skin rashes within 4 weeks of cART (P = 0.0008) were associated with hepatotoxicity of grade 2 or greater. In multiple logistic regression analysis, anti-HCV positivity (AOR, 2.865; 95% CI, 1.439–5.704), the development of skin rash (AOR, 2.811; 95% CI, 1.051–7.521) and HBsAg positivity (AOR, 2.397; 95% CI, 1.150–4.997) were independently associated with the development of hepatotoxicity (Tables 5 and 6). Other variables analyzed such as male gender, HIV transmission category, baseline CD4 count and baseline PVL were not statistically significantly associated with hepatotoxicity.
The results of multivariate analysis for each nNRTI-containing regimen are shown in S2 Table. In univariate analysis in NVP group (data not shown), we found that baseline CD4 cell count (P = 0.002), HBsAg positivity (P = 0.04) and development of skin rash within 4 weeks of cART (P<0.001) were associated with hepatotoxicity of grade 2 or greater. In multiple logistic regression analysis, a higher baseline CD4 cell count (per 100-cell/μl increase, AOR, 1.705; 95% CI, 1.187–2.449) and development of skin rashes (AOR, 4.704; 95% CI, 1.537–14.394) were independently associated with the development of hepatotoxicity.
In univariate analysis in EFV group (data not shown), we found that that older age (P = 0.02), anti-HCV-positivity (P = 0.02), and HBsAg positivity (P = 0.02) were associated with hepatotoxicity of grade 2 or greater. In multiple logistic regression analysis (S2 Table), anti-HCV positivity (AOR, 5.342; 95% CI, 1.865–15.302) and HBsAg positivity (AOR, 3.598; 95% CI, 1.353–9.570) were independently associated with the development of hepatotoxicity. For the patients in RPV group, we were not able to identify any factor statistically significantly associated with hepatotoxicity in either univariate analysis or multiple logistic regression analysis.
In this study conducted in a country where cART comprising 1 nNRTI plus 2 NRTIs remains the preferred regimen for antiretroviral-naïve HIV-positive patients, we found that the overall incidence of hepatotoxicity and skin rashes within 4 weeks of initiation was 4.9% and 14.1%, respectively. HCV coinfection and development of skin rash were independently associated with hepatotoxicity of grade 2 or greater. On the other hand, a higher baseline CD4 cell count and use of NVP plus 2 NRTIs were independently associated with the development of skin rashes.
The rate of skin rashes among HIV-positive patients receiving regimens containing first-generation nNRTIs ranges from 3.8 to 21.6% [7, 17, 28, 33, 38, 39]. In our study, the overall incidence of skin rashes in patients initiating nNRTI-containing regimens was 14.1% (331/2341), which was significantly higher in patients starting NVP-containing regimens (23.7%) than that in those starting EFV-containing regimens (13.2%) and RPV-containing regimens (0.6%). In addition, a higher baseline CD4 count and use of NVP were associated with the development of skin rashes. According to the systematic review and meta-analysis by Shubber et al , severe skin rash was more likely to develop among patients on NVP than those on EFV (OR 3.9; 95% CI, 2.5–5.4). In contrast, skin rash was rare in patients receiving RPV in our study, which was similar to the findings observed in the ECHO and THRIVE studies . The mechanism of NVP-associated hypersensitivity is unclear, but several HLA alleles have been found to be associated with NVP hypersensitivity [40, 41]. In our study, the mean onset time of rashes was 18 days among nNRTI users and 22 days among NVP users, which are also consistent with what have been described in the previous reports (8–13 days among nNRTI users [15, 38] and 14–30 days among NVP users) [33, 39].
Hepatotoxicity is observed in 1.1–25.5% of HIV-positive patients treated with cART [7, 14–16, 20–22, 33, 39, 42]. The wide range of hepatotoxicity rates among patients receiving cART may be related to different study designs and populations (age, gender, races, and body weight), prevalence of HBV or HCV coinfection, definitions of hepatotoxicity used, follow-up duration, CD4 counts (particularly in pregnant patients with CD4 >250 cell/μl receiving nevirapine for the prevention of mother-to-children transmission) , and antiretroviral regimens initiated. For example, the overall rate of hepatotoxicity, defined as grade 4, was 7.9% in a retrospective cohort study of 560 HIV-positive patients in the Netherlands  while the rate of severe hepatotoxicity, defined as grade 3, was 5% in another prospective cohort study of 820 HIV-positive women in 3 countries .
The findings that patients on NVP are more likely to develop hepatotoxicity than those on EFV in our study are consistent with those in several studies [10, 14, 15, 18, 25]. Our study also found the baseline CD4 counts and the development of rashes were associated with hepatotoxicity among the patients starting NVP-containing regimens. Likewise, a review of 17 randomized clinical trials of NVP shows rash and other possibly immune-mediated events (most often fever) occurred concurrently with hepatic events in 2.2% of NVP-treated patients, and approximately 46% of symptomatic hepatic events were associated with rash . The key risk factors of this unique rash-associated hepatotoxicity were treatment with NVP, almost exclusively within the first 6 weeks of NVP, and higher baseline CD4 cell counts . Additionally, a 2-fold or greater increase of aminotransferases from the ULN levels was associated with developing rashes in Taiwanese patients receiving NVP-containing regimens . Thus, baseline assessment of liver function is needed in patients who are scheduled to initiate NVP-containing regimens. It is prudent to carefully monitor when NVP-containing regimens is chosen or avoid use of NVP in those who have elevated aminotransferases at baseline.
Higher baseline levels of AST/ALT have been shown to be associated with cART-associated hepatotoxicity [21, 23, 39]. We also found the rate of hepatotoxicity at week 4 was higher in patients with abnormal baseline levels of AST/ALT than that in those with normal baseline levels of AST/ALT (AST, 5.3 vs. 2.6%; ALT, 7.2 vs.3.7%) (data not shown). Chronic viral hepatitis, particularly HCV coinfection, has been recognized a risk factor for hepatotoxicity [16, 18, 21, 23, 25, 26]. Our findings in HIV-positive Taiwanese are in line with the findings of these studies. The mechanism of increased antiretroviral-associated hepatotoxicity in patients with chronic viral hepatitis is not clearly known, but is more likely to be multifactorial. While initiation of antiretroviral therapy containing lamivudine with or without TDF could suppress replication of HBV, previous studies have suggested that hepatic injury may be caused by enhanced HCV replication and cytotoxic T-cell activity during cART-associated immune reconstitution [18, 44, 45]. However, our findings of similar increases of CD4 count within 4 weeks of cART may not support this hypothesis of immune reconstitution-related hepatotoxicity (data not shown).
Our findings may have clinical implications in the management of HIV infection in patients who start cART containing nNRTIs. Monitoring of AST/ALT levels every 2 weeks during the first month of therapy may identify early, and potentially reversible, drug-induced hepatotoxicity, particularly in patients with chronic HCV infection. The appearance of a rash, nausea, or fever during the first 4 weeks of therapy should prompt closer monitoring and assessment.
There are several limitations in this study and interpretation of our findings should be cautious. First, the patients were not randomly assigned to any of the regimens in this cohort and primary care physicians might take into consideration risk behaviors for HIV transmission, baseline liver function, hepatitis coinfection, and immunological as well as virological status of the patients before prescribing any of the 3 nNRTI-containing regimens on an individual basis, which may introduce significant bias or confounding factors. For example, other than the CD4 count cut-offs that are associated with risks for hepatotoxicity related of NVP, we previously found that elevated aminotransferase values at baseline were associated with NVP-associated skin rashes in HIV-positive patients in Taiwan . Clinicians might tend not to prescribe NVP to patients with chronic viral hepatitis or patients who were injection drug users; instead, RPV plus 2 NRTIs was more likely to be used in such populations given the findings that RPV plus 2 NRTIs was associated with lower incidence of hepatotoxicity than EFV in ECHO/THRIVE trials.
Second, we did not have data on exposure to other hepatotoxins (e.g. alcohol and chronic aflatoxin exposure) or agents that might cause hepatotoxicity or skin rashes (e.g. anti-tuberculous agents, fluconazole, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) . Third, because of concerns about the long-term impact of other chronic viral hepatitis, fatty liver and other medications, we limited the observation duration to 4 weeks with an attempt to assess the short-term tolerability of the nNRTI-containing regimens. Such a short observation duration may have underestimated the overall incidence of hepatic and dermatologic complications related to cART in our patients and precluded us from identifying factors associated with chronic elevations of transaminase, such as ongoing exposure to regimens containing ddI, d4T and TDF and short-term exposure to NVP, EFV, FTC and ATV . Fourth, the data regarding the percentages of HBsAg-positive patients with HBeAg-positive and/or detectable HBV DNA and these of HCV-positive patients with detectable HCV RNA were not available. These data might be essential to understanding the role of active replication of HBV or HCV as an underlying cause of hepatotoxicity. Lastly, the case number of patients receive RPV plus 2 NRTIs was much smaller than that of the other two groups (349 patients receiving RPV; 1363 receiving EFV; 629 receiving NVP)
In conclusion, our study among a large treatment-naive HIV-positive population receving nNRTI- containing regimens in Taiwan reveals that the overall rate of hepatotoxicity within 4 weeks of cART initiation was low (4.9%). HCV or HBV coinfection and development of skin rash were independently associated with the development of hepatotoxicity, whereas higher baseline CD4 counts and use of NVP were independently associated with skin rashes within 4 weeks of cART initiation.
S1 Table. Multivariate analyses for factors associated with skin rash after initiation of nNRTI-containing regimens within the first 4 weeks.
S2 Table. Multivariate analyses for factors associated with hepatotoxicity after initiation of nNRTI-containing regimens within the first 4 weeks.
- Conceptualization: HS HT CH.
- Data curation: PW.
- Formal analysis: PW.
- Funding acquisition: CH.
- Investigation: CC CL Yi-Chien Lee CY MT SC SL DL NW Yi-Chieh Lee HS HT CH.
- Methodology: PW HS HT CH.
- Project administration: HS HT CH.
- Resources: CC CL Yi-Chien Lee CY MT SC SL DL NW Yi-Chieh Lee HS HT CH.
- Software: PW.
- Supervision: HS HT CH.
- Validation: HS HT CH.
- Visualization: PW HS HT CH.
- Writing – original draft: PW HS HT CH.
- Writing – review & editing: PW HS HT CH.
- 1. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS); 2015.
- 2. European Guidelines for treatment of HIV-infected adults in Europe. European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS)October 2015.
- 3. British HIV association guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-positive adults with antiretroviral therapy 2015. British HIV association (BHIVA) 2015.
- 4. WHO. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: what's new. World health organization; November 2015.
- 5. Luetkemeyer AF, Rosenkranz SL, Lu D, Marzan F, Ive P, Hogg E, et al. Relationship between weight, efavirenz exposure, and virologic suppression in HIV-infected patients on rifampin-based tuberculosis treatment in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5221 STRIDE Study. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2013;57(4):586–93. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3719885.
- 6. Bendavid E, Grant P, Talbot A, Owens DK, Zolopa A. Cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral regimens in the World Health Organization's treatment guidelines: a South African analysis. Aids. 2011;25(2):211–20. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3071983. pmid:21124202
- 7. van Leth F, Phanuphak P, Ruxrungtham K, Baraldi E, Miller S, Gazzard B, et al. Comparison of first-line antiretroviral therapy with regimens including nevirapine, efavirenz, or both drugs, plus stavudine and lamivudine: a randomised open-label trial, the 2NN Study. Lancet. 2004;363(9417):1253–63. pmid:15094269
- 8. Manfredi R, Calza L, Chiodo F. Efavirenz versus nevirapine in current clinical practice: a prospective, open-label observational study. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2004;35(5):492–502. pmid:15021314
- 9. Lee KY, Lin SW, Sun HY, Kuo CH, Tsai MS, Wu BR, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic study of HIV-infected ethnic Chinese receiving efavirenz-containing antiretroviral therapy with or without rifampicin-based anti-tuberculous therapy. PloS one. 2014;9(2):e88497. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3925114. pmid:24551111
- 10. Shubber Z, Calmy A, Andrieux-Meyer I, Vitoria M, Renaud-Thery F, Shaffer N, et al. Adverse events associated with nevirapine and efavirenz-based first-line antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aids. 2013;27(9):1403–12. pmid:23343913
- 11. Gazzard B, Balkin A, Hill A. Analysis of neuropsychiatric adverse events during clinical trials of efavirenz in antiretroviral-naive patients: a systematic review. AIDS reviews. 2010;12(2):67–75. pmid:20571601
- 12. Moodley D, Moodley J, Coovadia H, Gray G, McIntyre J, Hofmyer J, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of nevirapine versus a combination of zidovudine and lamivudine to reduce intrapartum and early postpartum mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2003;187(5):725–35. pmid:12599045
- 13. McKoy JM, Bennett CL, Scheetz MH, Differding V, Chandler KL, Scarsi KK, et al. Hepatotoxicity associated with long- versus short-course HIV-prophylactic nevirapine use: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the Research on Adverse Drug events And Reports (RADAR) project. Drug safety. 2009;32(2):147–58. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2768573. pmid:19236121
- 14. Rivero A, Mira JA, Pineda JA. Liver toxicity induced by non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2007;59(3):342–6. pmid:17255142
- 15. Sanne I, Mommeja-Marin H, Hinkle J, Bartlett JA, Lederman MM, Maartens G, et al. Severe hepatotoxicity associated with nevirapine use in HIV-infected subjects. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2005;191(6):825–9. pmid:15717255
- 16. Law WP, Dore GJ, Duncombe CJ, Mahanontharit A, Boyd MA, Ruxrungtham K, et al. Risk of severe hepatotoxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy in the HIV-NAT Cohort, Thailand, 1996–2001. Aids. 2003;17(15):2191–9. pmid:14523276
- 17. Sarfo FS, Sarfo MA, Norman B, Phillips R, Chadwick D. Incidence and determinants of nevirapine and efavirenz-related skin rashes in West Africans: nevirapine's epitaph? PloS one. 2014;9(4):e94854. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3984248. pmid:24728406
- 18. Sulkowski MS, Thomas DL, Mehta SH, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Hepatotoxicity associated with nevirapine or efavirenz-containing antiretroviral therapy: role of hepatitis C and B infections. Hepatology. 2002;35(1):182–9. pmid:11786975
- 19. Martin-Carbonero L, Nunez M, Gonzalez-Lahoz J, Soriano V. Incidence of liver injury after beginning antiretroviral therapy with efavirenz or nevirapine. HIV clinical trials. 2003;4(2):115–20. pmid:12671779
- 20. Martinez E, Arnaiz JA, Podzamczer D, Dalmau D, Ribera E, Domingo P, et al. Substitution of nevirapine, efavirenz, or abacavir for protease inhibitors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;349(11):1036–46. pmid:12968087
- 21. Martinez E, Blanco JL, Arnaiz JA, Perez-Cuevas JB, Mocroft A, Cruceta A, et al. Hepatotoxicity in HIV-1-infected patients receiving nevirapine-containing antiretroviral therapy. Aids. 2001;15(10):1261–8. pmid:11426070
- 22. Chu KM, Boulle AM, Ford N, Goemaere E, Asselman V, Van Cutsem G. Nevirapine-associated early hepatotoxicity: incidence, risk factors, and associated mortality in a primary care ART programme in South Africa. PloS one. 2010;5(2):e9183. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2822855. pmid:20174653
- 23. Dieterich DT, Robinson PA, Love J, Stern JO. Drug-induced liver injury associated with the use of nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2004;38 Suppl 2:S80–9.
- 24. Stern JO, Robinson PA, Love J, Lanes S, Imperiale MS, Mayers DL. A comprehensive hepatic safety analysis of nevirapine in different populations of HIV infected patients. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2003;34 Suppl 1:S21–33.
- 25. Ena J, Amador C, Benito C, Fenoll V, Pasquau F. Risk and determinants of developing severe liver toxicity during therapy with nevirapine-and efavirenz-containing regimens in HIV-infected patients. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2003;14(11):776–81.
- 26. Nunez M, Lana R, Mendoza JL, Martin-Carbonero L, Soriano V. Risk factors for severe hepatic injury after introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2001;27(5):426–31. pmid:11511818
- 27. Molina JM, Clumeck N, Orkin C, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Stevens M, et al. Week 96 analysis of rilpivirine or efavirenz in HIV-1-infected patients with baseline viral load </ = 100 000 copies/mL in the pooled ECHO and THRIVE phase 3, randomized, double-blind trials. HIV medicine. 2014;15(1):57–62. pmid:23980523
- 28. Cohen CJ, Molina JM, Cassetti I, Chetchotisakd P, Lazzarin A, Orkin C, et al. Week 96 efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1 patients in two Phase III randomized trials. Aids. 2013;27(6):939–50. pmid:23211772
- 29. Nelson M, Amaya G, Clumeck N, Arns da Cunha C, Jayaweera D, Junod P, et al. Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection enrolled in the Phase III randomized, double-blind ECHO and THRIVE trials. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2012;67(8):2020–8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4643643. pmid:22532465
- 30. Sun HY, Ko WC, Tsai JJ, Lee HC, Liu CE, Wong WW, et al. Seroprevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection among taiwanese human immunodeficiency virus type 1-positive persons in the era of nationwide hepatitis B vaccination. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2009;104(4):877–84. pmid:19259078
- 31. Sun HY, Cheng CY, Lee NY, Yang CJ, Liang SH, Tsai MS, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus among adults at high risk for HIV transmission two decades after implementation of nationwide hepatitis B virus vaccination program in Taiwan. PloS one. 2014;9(2):e90194. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3935970. pmid:24587275
- 32. Lee YC, Lin SW, Chen MY, Chang SY, Kuo CH, Sheng WH, et al. Presence of Tablet Remnants of Nevirapine Extended-Release in Stools and Its Impact on Virological Outcome in HIV-1-Infected Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study. PloS one. 2015;10(10):e0140574. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4605833. pmid:26465325
- 33. Tseng YT, Yang CJ, Chang SY, Lin SW, Tsai MS, Liu WC, et al. Incidence and risk factors of skin rashes and hepatotoxicity in HIV-infected patients receiving nevirapine-containing combination antiretroviral therapy in Taiwan. International journal of infectious diseases: IJID: official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2014;29:12–7.
- 34. Lai CC, Liu WC, Fang CT, Yang JY, Chang LH, Wu PY, et al. Transmitted drug resistance of HIV-1 strains among individuals attending voluntary counselling and testing in Taiwan. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2016;71(1):226–34. pmid:26404079
- 35. Lai CC, Hung CC, Chen MY, Sun HY, Lu CL, Tseng YT, et al. Trends of transmitted drug resistance of HIV-1 and its impact on treatment response to first-line antiretroviral therapy in Taiwan. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2012;67(5):1254–60. pmid:22302562
- 36. Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events. National Institutes of Health. 2014.
- 37. Lin PH, Lai CC, Yang JL, Huang HL, Huang MS, Tsai MS, et al. Slow immunological progression in HIV-1 CRF07_BC-infected injecting drug users. Emerging microbes & infections. 2013;2(12):e83. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3880871.
- 38. Manosuthi W, Thongyen S, Chumpathat N, Muangchana K, Sungkanuparph S. Incidence and risk factors of rash associated with efavirenz in HIV-infected patients with preceding nevirapine-associated rash. HIV medicine. 2006;7(6):378–82. pmid:16903982
- 39. Peters PJ, Stringer J, McConnell MS, Kiarie J, Ratanasuwan W, Intalapaporn P, et al. Nevirapine-associated hepatotoxicity was not predicted by CD4 count >/ = 250 cells/muL among women in Zambia, Thailand and Kenya. HIV medicine. 2010;11(10):650–60. pmid:20659176
- 40. Chantarangsu S, Mushiroda T, Mahasirimongkol S, Kiertiburanakul S, Sungkanuparph S, Manosuthi W, et al. HLA-B*3505 allele is a strong predictor for nevirapine-induced skin adverse drug reactions in HIV-infected Thai patients. Pharmacogenetics and genomics. 2009;19(2):139–46. pmid:19104471
- 41. Likanonsakul S, Rattanatham T, Feangvad S, Uttayamakul S, Prasithsirikul W, Tunthanathip P, et al. HLA-Cw*04 allele associated with nevirapine-induced rash in HIV-infected Thai patients. AIDS research and therapy. 2009;6:22. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2774340. pmid:19845952
- 42. Wit FW, Weverling GJ, Weel J, Jurriaans S, Lange JM. Incidence of and risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity associated with antiretroviral combination therapy. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2002;186(1):23–31. pmid:12089658
- 43. Ford N, Calmy A, Andrieux-Meyer I, Hargreaves S, Mills EJ, Shubber Z. Adverse events associated with nevirapine use in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aids. 2013;27(7):1135–43. pmid:23299174
- 44. John M, Flexman J, French MA. Hepatitis C virus-associated hepatitis following treatment of HIV-infected patients with HIV protease inhibitors: an immune restoration disease? Aids. 1998;12(17):2289–93. pmid:9863871
- 45. Ragni MV, Bontempo FA. Increase in hepatitis C virus load in hemophiliacs during treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1999;180(6):2027–9. pmid:10558963
- 46. Yang JJ, Huang CH, Liu CE, Tang HJ, Yang CJ, Lee YC, et al. Multicenter study of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-related hepatotoxicity: incidence and associated factors among HIV-infected patients treated for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. PloS one. 2014;9(9):e106141. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4153565. pmid:25184238
- 47. Kovari H, Sabin CA, Ledergerber B, Ryom L, Reiss P, Law M, et al. Antiretroviral Drugs and Risk of Chronic Alanine Aminotransferase Elevation in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Monoinfected Persons: The Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs Study. Open forum infectious diseases. 2016;3(1):ofw009. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4767274. pmid:26925429