Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Mechanism for generation of left isomerism in Ccdc40 mutant embryos

  • Kelsey F. Sugrue,

    Affiliations Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America, Center for Neuroscience Research, Children's Research Institute, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America

  • Irene E. Zohn

    Affiliation Center for Neuroscience Research, Children's Research Institute, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America


Mechanism for generation of left isomerism in Ccdc40 mutant embryos

  • Kelsey F. Sugrue, 
  • Irene E. Zohn


Leftward fluid flow in the mouse node is generated by cilia and is critical for initiating asymmetry of the left-right axis. Coiled-coil domain containing-40 (Ccdc40) plays an evolutionarily conserved role in the assembly of motile cilia and establishment of the left-right axis. Approximately one-third of Ccdc40lnks mutant embryos display situs defects and here we investigate the underlying mechanism. Ccdc40lnks mutants show delayed induction of markers of the left-lateral plate mesoderm (L-LPM) including Lefty1, Lefty2 and Nodal. Consistent with defective cilia motility compromising fluid flow across the node, initiation of asymmetric perinodal Cerberus like-2 (Cerl2) expression is delayed and then randomized. This is followed by delayed and then randomized asymmetric Nodal expression around the node. We propose a model to explain how left isomerism arises in a proportion of Ccdc40lnks mutants. We postulate that with defective motile cilia, Cerl2 expression remains symmetric and Nodal is antagonized equally on both sides of the node. This effectively reduces Nodal activation bilaterally, leading to reduced and delayed activation of Nodal and its antagonists in the LPM. This model is further supported by the failure to establish Nodal expression in the left-LPM with reduced Nodal gene dosage in Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutants causing a predominance of right not left isomerism. Together these results suggest a model where cilia generated fluid flow in the node functions to ensure robust Nodal activation and a timely left-sided developmental program in the LPM.


Vertebrates have a conserved asymmetric arrangement of visceral organs along the left-right body axis. Organs such as the heart, liver, spleen, stomach and intestine form in the midline and become asymmetrically positioned during their morphogenesis, whereas, other structures such as the lungs acquire distinct right versus left morphologies. Failure to properly specify this axis results in laterality defects where the asymmetric organization of the viscera is altered [13]. Heterotaxia syndromes include right isomerism, left isomerism and other discordant asymmetries of the viscera, whereas the complete reversal of the left-right axis results in situs inversus [46]. In humans, laterality defects occur in approximately 1 out of every 10,000 live births resulting in defects in development of the gastrointestinal tract, spleen and heart [1, 7, 8].

In the mouse, the first known left-right asymmetry occurs around the node during late gastrula stages where overlapping positive and negative feedback loops amplify initial asymmetries in gene expression. Initially, Nodal, Wnt and their antagonist Cerberus like-2 (Cerl2) are symmetrically expressed in perinodal crown cells [912]. Initiation of leftward fluid flow across the node results in increased intracellular calcium in perinodal crown cells on the left and triggers degradation of Cerl2 mRNA [13, 14]. Decreased Cerl2 releases inhibition of Wnt and Nodal [12, 14]. Subsequently, Wnt signaling on the left further inhibits Cerl2 expression and Nodal positively regulates its own expression amplifying initial asymmetries [12, 14, 15]. Other signaling pathways also participate in regulation of this gene network including Notch, which is required for the initial induction of Nodal, is regulated by Wnt, involved in ciliogenesis and utilizes cilia for signaling [1621].

Asymmetric perinodal Nodal signaling is transmitted to the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) [9, 2224]. In the left-LPM (L-LPM), Nodal positively regulates its own expression and induces expression of its antagonists Lefty1 and Lefty2 to limit Nodal activity [9, 15, 2228]. Lefty1 expression is also induced in the midline creating a barrier to the transfer of Nodal to the right LPM (R-LPM) [27, 29]. During subsequent development, these initial asymmetries are stabilized and propagated to direct asymmetric growth of the visceral organs. Bilateral Nodal expression in the LPM results in the formation of two left sides or left isomerism [2931]. By contrast, when Nodal signaling is deficient, Nodal and Lefty1/2 expression is not established in the LPM on either side leading to specification of two right sides or right isomerism [9, 24, 32].

The initial bias in perinodal Cerl2 expression depends on the leftward fluid flow generated by movement of cilia in the node [14]. The first indication that cilia were important for specifying the orientation of the left-right axis came from the observation that laterality defects were often associated with Kartagener Syndrome (later renamed Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia—PCD) characterized by chronic bronchiectasis, rhinitis, sinusitis and otitis media [33, 34]. Identification and study of numerous mutant mouse models with defects in cilia formation and/or movement and left-right axis formation provide compelling support for the idea that cilia are important for generation of leftward fluid flow in the node to specify the left-right axis [33, 34]. For example, mice mutant for left-right dynein (Lrdiv), have immotile nodal cilia, are unable to generate nodal flow and exhibit laterality defects [3537]. Reversal of flow by mechanical intervention can invert the left-right axis in wild type embryos and artificial generation of leftward flow can rescue situs defects in Lrdiv mice [35].

Cilia exist as one of two main types: motile cilia or primary/immotile cilia. Primary cilia play essential roles in receiving and transducing signals from the extracellular environment to the cell body and disruption of primary cilia affects multiple signaling pathways [38, 39]. Both motile and sensory/primary cilia have a basic structure of nine peripheral microtubule doublets arranged around the axoneme periphery [38, 40, 41]. While most motile cilia also have a central pair of microtubule doublets (9+2), motile cilia in the node lack the central pair (9+0) allowing generation of rotational rather than planar movement of 9+2 cilia [40]. Inner and outer dynein arms (IDA and ODA, respectively) connect peripheral doublets and function as force generators to drive beating movements of the cilia. Radial spokes radiate from the center of the axoneme and nexin links connect peripheral doublets, providing the structural support necessary for coordinated beating of the cilia. These ciliary components are preassembled within the cytoplasm by distinct assembly complexes and transported along the axoneme by intraflagellar transport (IFT) [41]. For example, nexin-dynein regulatory complexes (N-DRC) attach IDAs and nexin links to microtubules [41]. Disruption of N-DRC complexes does not affect ODAs but result in disorganization of microtubule doublets and abnormal beating of motile cilia without affecting the signaling functions of primary cilia [40]. In contrast to motile cilia, primary cilia do not contain IDAs, ODAs or nexin links and are generally unaffected by disturbance of N-DRC assembly [42]. Mutation of molecules involved in IFT affects transport of structural components of the cilia resulting in malformed, nonfunctional and/or absent motile and primary cilia and abnormal signal transduction [43].

Of the multiple signaling pathways that require cilia for transduction, Sonic hedgehog (Shh) is best characterized [39, 4447]. Since Shh is required for expression of Lefty1 in the midline, in many mouse mutants with defective cilia not only is fluid flow in the node affected but also the midline barrier is dysfunctional, resulting in a high proportion of mutant embryos exhibiting left isomerism [46, 4850]. This is in contrast to the randomization of left isomerism, situs inversus and normal situs observed in mutants with immotile cilia [32, 51]. Because of their essential role in signal transduction in multiple pathways, disruption of genes involved in formation of primary cilia also cause a spectrum of developmental malformations, respiratory, fertility and situs defects, cystic kidneys, obesity and intellectual disability [52]. In contrast, phenotypes associated with disruption of cilia motility result in PCD and are largely limited to respiratory, fertility and situs defects [40].

Our previous studies demonstrated that the Coiled-coil domain containing-40 (Ccdc40) gene plays an evolutionarily conserved role in assembly of motile cilia and establishment of the left-right axis [53]. The Ccdc40lnks mutant mouse line harbors an ENU-induced nonsense mutation truncating the 1,192 amino acid CCDC40 protein at amino acid 792 disrupting a highly conserved coiled-coil domain. A similarly localized nonsense mutation was identified in zebrafish lok (locke) mutants where pronephron cilia beat abnormally [53, 54]. Comparable altered beating pattern of cilia was also observed in nasal brush biopsies from human patients with null mutations in CCDC40 [53]. Analysis of axonemal structure in zebrafish and human cells revealed disorganized microtubule doublets and defective assembly of IDAs and nexin links [53]. Additional analysis of cilia in nasal brush biopsies implicates disruption of N-DRC assembly complexes in these defects [53]. These findings along with the lack of developmental malformations associated with loss of signaling functions of primary cilia in both the mouse mutant and humans with null mutation in CCDC40 suggest that CCDC40 is required for preassembly of N-DRC complexes in motile cilia but not cilia formation itself [53].

Here we present evidence suggesting that Ccdc40lnks mutants with defects in motile cilia develop left isomerism by a distinct mechanism from mutants with defective IFT. When cilia generated flow is defective, Cerl2 fails to downregulate and Nodal activity is antagonized equally on both sides. This effectively reduces activation of this pathway resulting in reduced and delayed activation of Nodal and its antagonists in the LPM. This model is supported by the failure to establish Nodal expression in the left-LPM in Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutants resulting in a predominance of right not left isomerism. Together these results suggest a model where flow generated by motile cilia is required to ensure robust Nodal pathway activation on the left side of the node initiating the robust and timely left-sided developmental program in the LPM.

Materials and methods

Analysis of mutant mouse phenotype

All animal work was conducted according to protocols approved by the Children’s National Medical Center IACUC protocol #000-30-300. The Ccdc40lnks mouse line and Nodaltm1Robv (NodalLacZ) are described previously [10, 53]. Whole-mount in situs were performed as described [55, 56] using the following probes: Nodal, Cerl2 [57], Lefty2 [58], Sonic hedgehog (Shh) [59], Brachyury (T) [60] and Lefty1 was synthesized from Image clone 3985141. β-galactosidase staining and fluorescent immunocytochemistry were preformed as described [61, 62] using the indicated antibodies obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank. Statistical significance was determined by the Chi2 test (


Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutant embryos show delayed and reduced expression of L-LPM markers

Almost one-third of Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos displayed laterality defects as assessed by lung lobation patterns that include situs inversus (9%; 14/151) and left (21%; 32/151) but not right isomerism [53]. During specification of the left-right axis, Ccdc40 is expressed in the ciliated nodal pit cells but not perinodal crown cells in addition to the midline [53]. To understand the developmental mechanisms leading to laterality phenotypes in Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutants with defective motile cilia, the expression of LPM markers were examined. As previously demonstrated [29], Lefty2 is transiently expressed in the L-LPM in 100% of wild type embryos between the 3- and 7-somite stages (Fig 1A, 1B and 1I). By contrast, Lefty2 expression was either absent (4/17; 24%) or bilaterally expressed (6/17; 35%) in the L-LPM in over half of Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos (Fig 1C, 1D and 1I). Interestingly, when broken down by somite stage, all of the mutants with absent expression of Lefty2 were between 3- to 4-somite stages (wild type compared to mutant: Chi2 = 11.0, df = 1, p = 0.001). By the 5- to 7-somite stages, Lefty2 expression in Ccdc40lnks mutants was randomized between left-sided and bilateral (Chi2 = 8.81, df = 1, p = 0.003). While the intensity of Lefty2 expression in mutants with normal situs was comparable to wild type littermates (not shown), expression levels in mutants with bilateral expression were consistently reduced (Fig 1B versus 1D).

Fig 1. Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos show delayed then randomized expression of Lefty2 and Lefty1.

Lefty2 (A-D) and Lefty1 (E-H) expression in wild type (A, B, E, F) and Ccdc40lnks/lnks (C, D, G, H) embryos at the 3- to 4- (A, C, E, G) and 5- to 7- (B, D, F, H) somite stages. Lefty1 and Lefty2 is expressed in the L-LPM in wild type embryos at both stages and Lefty1 is also expressed in the midline. In Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos, expression of Lefty1 and Lefty2 is not detected in the LPM at the 3- to 4-somite stages and expression is randomized between left-sided and bilateral at 5- to 7-somite stages. All embryos with bilateral expression of Lefty1 and Lefty2 showed weaker expression in the LPM. Expression of Lefty1 is weak in the midline of mutants at the 3- to 4-somite stage and mutants with bilateral Lefty1 expression show reduced expression in the midline. (I.) Quantitation of the number and percentage of embryos with absent (grey), left-sided (blue) and bilateral (magenta) Lefty1 or Lefty2 expression in the LPM. Left (L) and Right sides are labeled in panel A.

Similar results were observed with expression of Lefty1. 100% (n = 24) of wild type embryos between the 3- and 7-somite stages showed left-sided expression of Lefty1 (Fig 1E, 1F and 1I), while Lefty1 was detected in the L-LPM in only 8% (1/12) of Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos, 42% (5/12) showed bilateral expression and 50% (6/12) of mutant embryos showed no detectable expression in the LPM (Fig 1G, 1H and 1I). As with Lefty2, all mutants with absent Lefty1 expression in the LPM were between 3- and 4-somites stages (Chi2 = 21.0, df = 1, p = 0.000) and by 5- to 7-somite stages, expression was randomized (Chi2 = 11.2, df = 1, p = 0.001). As with Lefty2, expression of Lefty1 in the LPM and midline was reduced in mutants with left isomerism (Fig 1H versus 1F). These results suggest a delayed and reduced initiation of midline and LPM Lefty1/2 expression in Ccdc40lnks mutants.

Expression of Lefty2 and Lefty1 in the LPM is induced by Nodal [9, 22, 24, 25, 27]. To determine if Nodal expression in the LPM was similarly reduced and delayed, expression was examined in 0- to 7-somite stage embryos (Fig 2). As previously reported, Nodal expression in the LPM of wild type embryos is transiently increased by the 2-somite stage then extinguished by the 5- to 7-somite stages (Fig 2A–2E and 2K and [10, 32]. Expression in the LPM of wild type embryos is weak at the 2-somite stage and localized posteriorly (Fig 2B). The intensity of Nodal expression increases in 3-somite stage embryos where it becomes expressed throughout the LPM (Fig 2C and 2D). In 4-somite stage embryos, expression becomes reduced and by 5-somite stages, staining is absent (Fig 2D and 2E). In contrast, none of the Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos examined showed LPM expression at the 2-somite stage (n = 7, Fig 2G and 2K; Chi2 = 17.0, df = 1, p = 0.000). 3-somite stage Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos show either robust expression in the L-PM (not shown) or weak bilateral posteriorly localized expression (Fig 2H and 2K; Chi2 = 4.84, df = 1, p = 0.028). 4-somite stage Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos show primarily weak bilateral expression in the anterior LPM (Fig 2I and 2K; Chi2 = 14.3, df = 2, p = 0.001). Together these results indicate that induction of LPM gene expression is delayed in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos and once established, expression is randomized between robust expression in the L-LPM or weak bilaterally expression.

Fig 2. LPM expression of Nodal is delayed and then randomized in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos.

Nodal expression in wild type (A-E) and Ccdc40lnks/lnks (F-J) embryos at the indicated somite stages. Expression of Nodal in the LPM begins at the 2-somite stage in wild type embryos, increases in 3-somite stage embryos and becomes reduced in 4-somite stage followed by extinction in 5- to 7-somite stage embryos. In Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutant embryos, expression is not detected at the 2-somite stage. Bilateral and weak expression is observed in some embryos at the 3-somite stage. (K.) Quantitation of the number and percentage of embryos with absent (grey), weak left-sided (light blue), strong left-sided (dark blue) or weak bilateral (magenta) Nodal expression in the LPM. Left (L) and Right sides are labeled in panel A.

Lefty1 expression in the midline is reduced in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos

In addition to its expression in the L-LPM, Lefty1 is expressed in the floorplate providing a barrier to prevent Nodal signaling from crossing the midline [29]. Interestingly, all Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos identified with bilateral Lefty1 expression (n = 5) exhibited either absent Lefty1 expression in the midline or reduced expression compared to wild type littermates (Fig 1H and 1I and Fig 3B). In contrast, the single Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutant identified with asymmetrical expression of Lefty1 in the L-LPM showed robust expression in the midline (Fig 3A). Yet, the midline is specified in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos evident by the expression of Brachyury in mutant embryos with bilateral Lefty2 expression (Fig 3C and 3D).

Fig 3. Midline signaling in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos.

A, B. Expression of Lefty1 in the midline is reduced in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos with bilateral (B) compared to L-LPM (A) expression of Lefty1. C-F. Double in situ hybridizations showing normal expression levels of Lefty2 (LPM) with either Brachyury (C, D) or Shh (E, F) in the midline of wild type (C, E) or Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutant embryos with left isomerism (D, F). G-R. Fluorescent immunocytochemistry demonstrating similar dorsal-ventral distribution of the indicated antigens in the spinal neural tube of wild type (G, I, K, M, O, Q) and Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutants (H, J, L, N, P, R). Data are representative of 2–3 embryos per genotype. Left (L) and Right sides are labeled in panel A.

Lefty1 expression in the mouse midline requires Shh signaling [63]. Primary cilia are required for signal transduction of multiple ligands including Shh signaling [38, 39, 4447]. While the preponderance of data suggest mutation of CCDC40 affects motile but not primary cilia and Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos do not exhibit other hallmarks of Shh dysfunction including polydactyl, neural tube defect or other gross morphological defects, abnormalities in the morphology of nodal cilia were observed in Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutants and Ccdc40 is expressed in the node and midline during specification of the left-right axis [53]. Thus to rule out an effect on Shh signal transduction in primary cilia we examined dorsal-ventral patterning of the spinal cord in Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutants, a sensitive readout of Shh signaling [64, 65]. Robust expression of Shh was detected in the midline of Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos with bilateral expression of Lefty2 (Fig 3E and 3F). Furthermore, expression of a panel of dorsal-ventral patterning markers were unaltered in the spinal cord of Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutants (Fig 3G–3R). These results confirm that Ccdc40 is required for cilia motility but not the signaling functions of primary cilia, at least with respect to Shh signaling in the midline during dorsal-ventral patterning of the spinal cord. Thus, reduced Lefty1 expression in the midline is not likely due to decreased Shh signaling.

Randomized perinodal expression of Cerl2 and Nodal in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos

Since Nodal expression in the LPM is downstream of initial asymmetries in perinodal Nodal expression [9, 2224], we examined expression of Nodal around the node. As previously described [10, 11, 14, 32, 66], higher levels of perinodal Nodal expression are found on the left side of the node in 1- to 3-somite stage wild type embryos (n = 27; Fig 4A–4C and 4M). In contrast, biased left-sided expression of perinodal Nodal was found in only half of Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutants examined (11/22; Fig 4D–4F and 4M; Chi2 = 17.4, df = 2, p = 0.000). Biased Nodal expression in the perinodal region is initiated by downregulation of the Nodal antagonist Cerl2 on the left side and requires cilia generated fluid flow in the node [11, 13, 22, 67]. In 1-somite stage wild type embryos, Cerl2 expression is asymmetric with higher levels on the right side of the node (n = 5; Fig 4B and 4N). Biased expression continues through the 3-somite stage (n = 18; Fig 4H, 4I and 4N). In contrast, expression of Cerl2 in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos remains symmetrical at the 1-somite stage (n = 4; Fig 4J and 4N; Chi2 = 9.0, df = 1, p = 0.003) and then becomes randomized in 2–3 somite stage mutants (n = 9; Fig 4K and 4L; Chi2 = 18.2, df = 2, p = 0.000). These results indicate that laterality defects in Ccdc40lnks mutants originate from delayed and then randomized Cerl2 expression, consistent with defective fluid flow in the node of in Ccdc40lnks mutants.

Fig 4. Asymmetric perinodal expression of Cerl2 and Nodal is delayed and then randomized in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos.

Nodal (A-F) and Cerl2 (G-L) expression around the node of wild type (A-C, G-I) or Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos (D-F, J-L) at the indicated somite stages. M, N. Quantitation of the number and percentage of embryos with right > left (green), left > right (blue) or unbiased (left = right, L = R, magenta) perinodal Nodal (Q) or Cerl2 (R) expression. Left (L) and Right sides are labeled in panel A.

Ccdc40lnks/lnks interacts with NodalLacZ/+

Our data demonstrate that mutant embryos with left-isomerism show reduced expression of Nodal and Nodal-induced transcripts in the LPM and midline. Failure to bias Nodal and Cerl2 expression around the node could have the effect of reducing the robustness of the Nodal signal transmitted to the LPM. If Nodal activation were suboptimal in Ccdc40lnks/lnks embryos, further reducing Nodal activity would compound this deficit resulting in inadequate Nodal expression in the L-LPM to initiate the left-sided developmental program. To test this model we crossed Ccdc40lnks/+ with the NodalLacZ mutant mouse where the Nodal gene is disrupted by insertion of a LacZ cassette [10]. In NodalLacZ/+ embryos, Beta-galactosidase (β-gal) activity is detected in the L-LPM (Fig 5A and 5E). In contrast, β-gal activity was detected on the left side in only one-fifth of Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ embryos (2/10) and the remainder showed no staining in the LPM (Fig 5B and 5E; Chi2 = 31.6, df = 1, p = 0.000). Consistent with our hypothesis, bilateral staining was not detected in any of the Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ embryos examined. Similar to Nodal-LacZ expression, one-third of Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ embryos exhibited left-sided expression of Lefty2 (7/19) and the remainder did not express Lefty2 in either the L- or R-LPM (Fig 5C, 5D and 5F; Chi2 = 42.8, df = 1, p = 0.000).

Fig 5. Modification of the Ccdc40 mutant laterality phenotype with reduced Nodal gene dosage.

A, B. Beta-galactosidase activity in E8.5 NodalLacZ/+ (A) or Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ (B) mutant embryos. Wild type embryos (A) show staining in the left (L) but not right (R) LPM indicating normal situs. (B) Beta-galactosidase staining in the LPM of the majority of Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutant embryos was undetectable even with intense perinodal staining. C, D. Lefty2 is expressed in the L-LPM of E8.5 Ccdc40+/+;NodalLacZ/+ embryos but the majority of Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutant embryos (D) fail to express Lefty2 in the LPM. E, F. Quantitation of Nodal-LacZ (E) and Lefty2 (F) expression in LPM of wild type and Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutant embryos. Normal left-sided expression (Blue) and absent expression (Grey) in the LPM. G-J. Lungs dissected from E11.5 Ccdc40lnks mutant embryos. G. Normal situs in a Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutant with a single lobe of the left lung and four lobes of the right. I. Left isomerism in a Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutant showing bilateral single lobed lungs. The majority of Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutant lungs showed either normal situs (not shown) or right isomerism (J). A small percentage of Ccdc40lnks/lnks (not shown) and Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ (H) mutants showed situs inversus. K. Quantitation of the number and percentage of lungs showing normal situs (NS, blue), left isomerism (LI, magenta), right isomerism (RI, grey) or situs inversus (SI, green) in E11.5–15.5 Ccdc40lnks/lnks and Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutants.

Our analysis of Nodal-lacZ and Lefty2 expression indicates that the majority of Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutant embryos would exhibit right isomerism instead of the left isomerism observed in Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutants. To test if this were the case, we examined the morphology of lungs from Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutants at later stages of development when lung lobation patterns could be assessed. The majority of Ccdc40lnks/lnks mutant lungs showed normal situs with a single lobe of the left lung and four lobes on the right (105/151; 70%; Fig 5G and 5K). One quarter of the mutant lungs showed left isomerism (32/151; 21%) and a small percentage situs inversus (14/151; 9%; Fig 5I and 5K and not shown). In contrast, almost half of the Ccdc40lnks/lnks;NodalLacZ/+ mutant lungs examined exhibited right isomerism (19/45; 45%), a small percentage situs inversus (4/45; 10%) and the remaining normal situs (19/45; 45%; Fig 5H–5K; Chi2 = 80.2, df = 3, p = 0.000). These results indicate that in many embryos, reduction of Nodal gene dosage reduces pathway activation below the threshold required to activate the left-sided developmental program.


In this study we characterized the developmental mechanisms leading to laterality defects in Ccdc40lnks mutant embryos. Mutants show delayed induction then randomization of L-LPM markers. Interestingly, in mutant embryos with bilateral expression of L-LPM markers, expression of Nodal and its antagonists Lefty1 and Lefty2 are delayed and reduced, as is Lefty1 expression in the midline. Around the node, biased expression of Cerl2 and Nodal is also delayed then randomized. Our data suggest a model (Fig 6) where if no asymmetry is generated, as when flow is disrupted in Ccdc40 mutants, robust activation of the Nodal pathway does not occur. With symmetrical expression of Cerl2, Nodal activity is reduced on both sides of the node, as is the transfer of Nodal to the LPM. This results in delayed and reduced induction of Nodal and Lefty1/2 expression in the LPM and Lefty1 in the midline. We tested this model by crossing Ccdc40lnks with a Nodal mutant line, revealing that reduction of Nodal gene dosage on a Ccdc40lnks mutant background results in failure to establish left-sided gene expression and right isomerism.

Fig 6. Model for Generation of Left Isomerism in Ccdc40 versus Shh pathway mutants.

In 1-somite stage wild type embryos, Cerl2 expression (green) becomes asymmetric with reduced expression on the left side of the node in response to fluid flow. With reduced expression of its antagonist on the left, Nodal activity and expression (dark blue) increases on the left side and decreases on the right. In 2-somite stage wild type embryos, Nodal induce Nodal expression in the L-LPM and by the 3-somite stage robust expression of Nodal along with Lefty1 and Lefty2 (light blue) is detected in the L-LPM and Lefty1 in the midline (light blue). In 4-somite stage embryos Nodal expression is reduced but Lefty1 and Lefty2 are strongly expressed in the L-LPM. Lefty1 expression in the midline and Cerl2 around the node inhibits Nodal signaling in the R-LPM. With lack of nodal flow in Ccdc40lnks and other cilia mutants with intact Shh signaling, Cerl2 and Nodal expression remains symmetric. Continued Cerl2 mediated antagonism of Nodal results in reduced Nodal signaling around the node and Nodal and Lefty1/2 expression in the LPM is delayed till the 3- and 4-somite stages, respectively. In a proportion of embryos where symmetry is not broken, Nodal signaling is reduced and bilateral. This is in contrast to IFT mutants with defects in Shh signaling. In these embryos, Nodal signaling is robustly induced bilaterally compounded by failure to activate the midline barrier.

During establishment of left-right axis in the mouse, Ccdc40 is expressed exclusively in the nodal pit cells and midline [53]. Though not formally shown in the node, CCDC40 is required for movement of cilia, suggesting that fluid flow in the node is likely also disrupted in Ccdc40lnks mutants. Human patients as well as zebrafish mutants and morphants with mutations in CCDC40 show situs inversus and heterotaxia [53]. Nodal cilia in Ccdc40 mouse mutants are shorter [53] and pronephric cilia in zebrafish lok mutants show motility defects [54]. Importantly, high speed video microscopy analysis of respiratory cilia from nasal brush biopsies obtained from Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) patients with CCDC40 mutations demonstrate abnormal beat patterns and rigid appearance [53]. Further analysis revealed that CCDC40 is required for assembly of motile cilia [53]. Cilia assembly occurs at the base of the cilium in the cytoplasm with recruitment of protein complexes that preassemble ciliary structures such as IDAs, ODAs, nexin and radial spokes [41]. After pre-assembled in the cytoplasm, these structures are then transported from the basal body to functional assembly sites along the axonome [41]. Ultrastructural analysis reveals multiple defects in both human and zebrafish cilia mutant for CCDC40 [53]. These include structural defects in the organization of axonemes such as duplicated or misplaced microtubule doublets. While ODAs appeared normal, IDAs are missing or reduced in number and radial spoke and nexin links were affected. In fact, CCDC40 and the related CCDC39 account for the vast majority of PCD cases with these characteristic cillary ultrastructural defects [53, 6870].

How other negative and positive feedback loops that regulate left-right axis formation are altered in Ccdc40 mutants remains to be determined. Interestingly, Cerl2 expression was consistently increased in perinodal crown cells in Ccdc40 mutants. In addition to Nodal, Cerl2 also antagonizes Wnt signaling and Wnt signaling in turn inhibits Cerl2 expression [12, 14]. Thus it is possible that failure to downregulate Cerl2 results in increased antagonism of Wnt, further increasing Cerl2 expression. Dysregulation of Wnt and other positive and negative feedback loops downstream of motile cilia in the node could also contribute to the observed laterality defects.

We found an interesting genetic interaction of Ccdc40lnks with Nodal and similar genetic interactions are reported in other studies [57, 71]. For example, mutation of left-right dynein (Lrd) in the Lrdiv line results in defective nodal flow and these mutants show a similar interaction with the Nodal pathway resulting in right instead of left isomerism [36, 37, 49, 51]. Cillary defects in Lrdiv mice are well characterized, demonstrating immotile cilia in the node that are unable to generate nodal flow resulting in approximately half of Lrdiv/iv mutants showing situs defects [36, 37, 49]. However, loss of a single copy of a Nodal receptor (ActRIIB) on the Lrdiv/iv mutant background transforms the predominant phenotype of Lrdiv/iv;ActRIIB-/+ compound mutant embryos to right instead of left isomerism [71]. Similar genetic interactions were found in Arl13bhnn/hnn;NodalLacZ/+ compound mutants that do not display alterations in Shh signaling during specification of the left-right axis [57]. Yet, it remains unknown if mutation of Arl13b results in defects in generation or detection of Nodal flow [57]. Interestingly, transformation of the phenotype with genetic interaction of Ccdc40lnks, Arl13bhnn or Lrdiv with the Nodal pathway is fundamentally different than what is seen in cilia mutants affecting the Shh pathway that also develop left isomerism. Bilateral Nodal expression is observed in Shh pathway mutants at early somite stages due to failure to induce Lefty1 in the midline and left isomerism still predominates in these mutants with reduced Nodal gene dosage [44, 46, 57, 63]. While Ccdc40lnks mutants with left isomerism show reduced Lefty1 in the midline, Lefty1 is expressed at low levels in the midline and other midline markers and indicators of Shh signaling appear normal. Thus we suggest that the developmental mechanism leading to left isomerism in Ccdc40lnks, Arl13bhnn and Lrdiv mutants is different than that observed with disruption of the Shh pathway (Fig 6). We propose that when cilia generated flow is defective, Cerl2 is not downregulated and Nodal activity is antagonized equally on both sides. This effectively reduces activation of this pathway resulting in reduced and delayed activation of Nodal and its antagonists in the LPM. Thus cilia function to ensure robust asymmetric Nodal pathway activation needed to initiate a proper and timely developmental program in the L-LPM.


We are grateful to Dr. Lee Niswander for support in the early days of this project and Andrew Pollock, Samer Nuwayhid and Julia Sabatino for technical support. Antibodies used were developed by Thomas M. Jessell and Jane Dodd and obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, created by the NICHD of the NIH and maintained at The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: KFS IEZ.
  2. Data curation: KFS IEZ.
  3. Formal analysis: KFS IEZ.
  4. Funding acquisition: IEZ.
  5. Investigation: KFS IEZ.
  6. Methodology: KFS IEZ.
  7. Project administration: IEZ.
  8. Resources: IEZ.
  9. Supervision: IEZ.
  10. Validation: KFS IEZ.
  11. Visualization: KFS IEZ.
  12. Writing – original draft: IEZ.
  13. Writing – review & editing: KFS IEZ.


  1. 1. Brueckner M. Heterotaxia, congenital heart disease, and primary ciliary dyskinesia. Circulation. 2007;115(22):2793–5. Epub 2007/06/06. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699256. pmid:17548739
  2. 2. Hamada H, Meno C, Watanabe D, Saijoh Y. Establishment of vertebrate left-right asymmetry. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(2):103–13. doi: 10.1038/nrg732. pmid:11836504
  3. 3. Raya A, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Left-right asymmetry in the vertebrate embryo: from early information to higher-level integration. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(4):283–93. Epub 2006/03/18. doi: 10.1038/nrg1830. pmid:16543932
  4. 4. Sutherland MJ, Ware SM. Disorders of left-right asymmetry: heterotaxy and situs inversus. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2009;151C(4):307–17. Epub 2009/10/31. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30228. pmid:19876930
  5. 5. Aylsworth AS. Clinical aspects of defects in the determination of laterality. Am J Med Genet. 2001;101(4):345–55. Epub 2001/07/27. pmid:11471158
  6. 6. Casey B. Two rights make a wrong: human left-right malformations. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7(10):1565–71. Epub 1998/09/15. pmid:9735377
  7. 7. Ramsdell AF. Left-right asymmetry and congenital cardiac defects: getting to the heart of the matter in vertebrate left-right axis determination. Dev Biol. 2005;288(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.07.038. pmid:16289136
  8. 8. Peeters H, Devriendt K. Human laterality disorders. Eur J Med Genet. 2006;49(5):349–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2005.12.003. pmid:16461029
  9. 9. Brennan J, Norris DP, Robertson EJ. Nodal activity in the node governs left-right asymmetry. Genes Dev. 2002;16(18):2339–44. Epub 2002/09/17. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC187443. doi: 10.1101/gad.1016202. pmid:12231623
  10. 10. Collignon J, Varlet I, Robertson EJ. Relationship between asymmetric nodal expression and the direction of embryonic turning. Nature. 1996;381(6578):155–8. doi: 10.1038/381155a0. pmid:8610012
  11. 11. Marques S, Borges AC, Silva AC, Freitas S, Cordenonsi M, Belo JA. The activity of the Nodal antagonist Cerl-2 in the mouse node is required for correct L/R body axis. Genes Dev. 2004;18(19):2342–7. Epub 2004/10/07. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC522983. doi: 10.1101/gad.306504. pmid:15466485
  12. 12. Kitajima K, Oki S, Ohkawa Y, Sumi T, Meno C. Wnt signaling regulates left-right axis formation in the node of mouse embryos. Dev Biol. 2013;380(2):222–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.05.011. pmid:23707899
  13. 13. Yoshiba S, Shiratori H, Kuo IY, Kawasumi A, Shinohara K, Nonaka S, et al. Cilia at the node of mouse embryos sense fluid flow for left-right determination via Pkd2. Science. 2012;338(6104):226–31. Epub 2012/09/18. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3711115. doi: 10.1126/science.1222538. pmid:22983710
  14. 14. Nakamura T, Saito D, Kawasumi A, Shinohara K, Asai Y, Takaoka K, et al. Fluid flow and interlinked feedback loops establish left-right asymmetric decay of Cerl2 mRNA. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1322. Epub 2012/12/29. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2319. pmid:23271656
  15. 15. Norris DP, Brennan J, Bikoff EK, Robertson EJ. The Foxh1-dependent autoregulatory enhancer controls the level of Nodal signals in the mouse embryo. Development. 2002;129(14):3455–68. Epub 2002/07/02. pmid:12091315
  16. 16. Krebs LT, Iwai N, Nonaka S, Welsh IC, Lan Y, Jiang R, et al. Notch signaling regulates left-right asymmetry determination by inducing Nodal expression. Genes Dev. 2003;17(10):1207–12. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC196059. doi: 10.1101/gad.1084703. pmid:12730124
  17. 17. Przemeck GK, Heinzmann U, Beckers J, Hrabe de Angelis M. Node and midline defects are associated with left-right development in Delta1 mutant embryos. Development. 2003;130(1):3–13. pmid:12441287
  18. 18. Raya A, Kawakami Y, Rodriguez-Esteban C, Buscher D, Koth CM, Itoh T, et al. Notch activity induces Nodal expression and mediates the establishment of left-right asymmetry in vertebrate embryos. Genes Dev. 2003;17(10):1213–8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC196060. doi: 10.1101/gad.1084403. pmid:12730123
  19. 19. Lopes SS, Lourenco R, Pacheco L, Moreno N, Kreiling J, Saude L. Notch signalling regulates left-right asymmetry through ciliary length control. Development. 2010;137(21):3625–32. doi: 10.1242/dev.054452. pmid:20876649
  20. 20. Ezratty EJ, Stokes N, Chai S, Shah AS, Williams SE, Fuchs E. A role for the primary cilium in Notch signaling and epidermal differentiation during skin development. Cell. 2011;145(7):1129–41. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3135909. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.030. pmid:21703454
  21. 21. Leitch CC, Lodh S, Prieto-Echague V, Badano JL, Zaghloul NA. Basal body proteins regulate Notch signaling through endosomal trafficking. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 11):2407–19. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4038940. doi: 10.1242/jcs.130344. pmid:24681783
  22. 22. Kawasumi A, Nakamura T, Iwai N, Yashiro K, Saijoh Y, Belo JA, et al. Left-right asymmetry in the level of active Nodal protein produced in the node is translated into left-right asymmetry in the lateral plate of mouse embryos. Dev Biol. 2011;353(2):321–30. Epub 2011/03/23. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4134472. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.03.009. pmid:21419113
  23. 23. Oki S, Hashimoto R, Okui Y, Shen MM, Mekada E, Otani H, et al. Sulfated glycosaminoglycans are necessary for Nodal signal transmission from the node to the left lateral plate in the mouse embryo. Development. 2007;134(21):3893–904. Epub 2007/10/05. doi: 10.1242/dev.009464. pmid:17913787
  24. 24. Saijoh Y, Oki S, Ohishi S, Hamada H. Left-right patterning of the mouse lateral plate requires nodal produced in the node. Dev Biol. 2003;256(1):160–72. pmid:12654299
  25. 25. Saijoh Y, Adachi H, Sakuma R, Yeo CY, Yashiro K, Watanabe M, et al. Left-right asymmetric expression of lefty2 and nodal is induced by a signaling pathway that includes the transcription factor FAST2. Mol Cell. 2000;5(1):35–47. pmid:10678167
  26. 26. Meno C, Takeuchi J, Sakuma R, Koshiba-Takeuchi K, Ohishi S, Saijoh Y, et al. Diffusion of nodal signaling activity in the absence of the feedback inhibitor Lefty2. Dev Cell. 2001;1(1):127–38. Epub 2001/11/13. pmid:11703930
  27. 27. Yamamoto M, Mine N, Mochida K, Sakai Y, Saijoh Y, Meno C, et al. Nodal signaling induces the midline barrier by activating Nodal expression in the lateral plate. Development. 2003;130(9):1795–804. Epub 2003/03/19. pmid:12642485
  28. 28. Nakamura T, Mine N, Nakaguchi E, Mochizuki A, Yamamoto M, Yashiro K, et al. Generation of robust left-right asymmetry in the mouse embryo requires a self-enhancement and lateral-inhibition system. Dev Cell. 2006;11(4):495–504. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.08.002. pmid:17011489
  29. 29. Meno C, Shimono A, Saijoh Y, Yashiro K, Mochida K, Ohishi S, et al. lefty-1 is required for left-right determination as a regulator of lefty-2 and nodal. Cell. 1998;94(3):287–97. pmid:9708731
  30. 30. Litingtung Y, Lei L, Westphal H, Chiang C. Sonic hedgehog is essential to foregut development. Nat Genet. 1998;20(1):58–61. doi: 10.1038/1717. pmid:9731532
  31. 31. Motoyama J, Liu J, Mo R, Ding Q, Post M, Hui CC. Essential function of Gli2 and Gli3 in the formation of lung, trachea and oesophagus. Nat Genet. 1998;20(1):54–7. doi: 10.1038/1711. pmid:9731531
  32. 32. Lowe LA, Yamada S, Kuehn MR. Genetic dissection of nodal function in patterning the mouse embryo. Development. 2001;128(10):1831–43. Epub 2001/04/20. pmid:11311163
  33. 33. Basu B, Brueckner M. Cilia multifunctional organelles at the center of vertebrate left-right asymmetry. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;85:151–74. Epub 2009/01/17. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)00806-5. pmid:19147005
  34. 34. Pennekamp P, Menchen T, Dworniczak B, Hamada H. Situs inversus and ciliary abnormalities: 20 years later, what is the connection? Cilia. 2015;4(1):1. Epub 2015/01/16. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4292827. doi: 10.1186/s13630-014-0010-9. pmid:25589952
  35. 35. Nonaka S, Shiratori H, Saijoh Y, Hamada H. Determination of left-right patterning of the mouse embryo by artificial nodal flow. Nature. 2002;418(6893):96–9. doi: 10.1038/nature00849. pmid:12097914
  36. 36. Okada Y, Nonaka S, Tanaka Y, Saijoh Y, Hamada H, Hirokawa N. Abnormal nodal flow precedes situs inversus in iv and inv mice. Mol Cell. 1999;4(4):459–68. pmid:10549278
  37. 37. Supp DM, Brueckner M, Kuehn MR, Witte DP, Lowe LA, McGrath J, et al. Targeted deletion of the ATP binding domain of left-right dynein confirms its role in specifying development of left-right asymmetries. Development. 1999;126(23):5495–504. pmid:10556073
  38. 38. Fliegauf M, Benzing T, Omran H. When cilia go bad: cilia defects and ciliopathies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(11):880–93. doi: 10.1038/nrm2278. pmid:17955020
  39. 39. Goetz SC, Anderson KV. The primary cilium: a signalling centre during vertebrate development. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(5):331–44. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3121168. doi: 10.1038/nrg2774. pmid:20395968
  40. 40. Praveen K, Davis EE, Katsanis N. Unique among ciliopathies: primary ciliary dyskinesia, a motile cilia disorder. F1000Prime Rep. 2015;7:36. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4371376. doi: 10.12703/P7-36. pmid:25926987
  41. 41. Becker-Heck A, Loges NT, Orman H. Dynein dysfunction as a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia and other ciliopathies. In: King SM, editor. Dyneins: structure, biology and disease. Amsterdam; Boston: Academic Press; 2012.
  42. 42. Satir P, Christensen ST. Overview of structure and function of mammalian cilia. Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:377–400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.040705.141236. pmid:17009929
  43. 43. Scholey JM, Anderson KV. Intraflagellar transport and cilium-based signaling. Cell. 2006;125(3):439–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.013. pmid:16678091
  44. 44. Huangfu D, Anderson KV. Cilia and Hedgehog responsiveness in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(32):11325–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505328102. pmid:16061793
  45. 45. Huangfu D, Anderson KV. Signaling from Smo to Ci/Gli: conservation and divergence of Hedgehog pathways from Drosophila to vertebrates. Development. 2006;133(1):3–14. doi: 10.1242/dev.02169. pmid:16339192
  46. 46. Huangfu D, Liu A, Rakeman AS, Murcia NS, Niswander L, Anderson KV. Hedgehog signalling in the mouse requires intraflagellar transport proteins. Nature. 2003;426(6962):83–7. doi: 10.1038/nature02061. pmid:14603322
  47. 47. Eggenschwiler JT, Anderson KV. Cilia and developmental signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2007;23:345–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123249. pmid:17506691
  48. 48. Takeda S, Yonekawa Y, Tanaka Y, Okada Y, Nonaka S, Hirokawa N. Left-right asymmetry and kinesin superfamily protein KIF3A: new insights in determination of laterality and mesoderm induction by kif3A-/- mice analysis. J Cell Biol. 1999;145(4):825–36. pmid:10330409
  49. 49. Nonaka S, Tanaka Y, Okada Y, Takeda S, Harada A, Kanai Y, et al. Randomization of left-right asymmetry due to loss of nodal cilia generating leftward flow of extraembryonic fluid in mice lacking KIF3B motor protein. Cell. 1998;95(6):829–37. pmid:9865700
  50. 50. Murcia NS, Richards WG, Yoder BK, Mucenski ML, Dunlap JR, Woychik RP. The Oak Ridge Polycystic Kidney (orpk) disease gene is required for left-right axis determination. Development. 2000;127(11):2347–55. pmid:10804177
  51. 51. Oh SP, Li E. Gene-dosage-sensitive genetic interactions between inversus viscerum (iv), nodal, and activin type IIB receptor (ActRIIB) genes in asymmetrical patterning of the visceral organs along the left-right axis. Dev Dyn. 2002;224(3):279–90. Epub 2002/07/12. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10103. pmid:12112458
  52. 52. Hildebrandt F, Benzing T, Katsanis N. Ciliopathies. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(16):1533–43. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3640822. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1010172. pmid:21506742
  53. 53. Becker-Heck A, Zohn IE, Okabe N, Pollock A, Lenhart KB, Sullivan-Brown J, et al. The coiled-coil domain containing protein CCDC40 is essential for motile cilia function and left-right axis formation. Nat Genet. 2011;43(1):79–84. Epub 2010/12/07. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3132183. doi: 10.1038/ng.727. pmid:21131974
  54. 54. Sullivan-Brown J, Schottenfeld J, Okabe N, Hostetter CL, Serluca FC, Thiberge SY, et al. Zebrafish mutations affecting cilia motility share similar cystic phenotypes and suggest a mechanism of cyst formation that differs from pkd2 morphants. Dev Biol. 2008;314(2):261–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.11.025. pmid:18178183
  55. 55. Holmes G, Niswander L. Expression of slit-2 and slit-3 during chick development. Dev Dyn. 2001;222(2):301–7. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.1182. pmid:11668607
  56. 56. Liu A, Joyner AL, Turnbull DH. Alteration of limb and brain patterning in early mouse embryos by ultrasound-guided injection of Shh-expressing cells. Mech Dev. 1998;75(1–2):107–15. pmid:9739117
  57. 57. Larkins CE, Long AB, Caspary T. Defective Nodal and Cerl2 expression in the Arl13b(hnn) mutant node underlie its heterotaxia. Dev Biol. 2012;367(1):15–24. Epub 2012/05/05. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.04.011. pmid:22554696
  58. 58. Meno C, Ito Y, Saijoh Y, Matsuda Y, Tashiro K, Kuhara S, et al. Two closely-related left-right asymmetrically expressed genes, lefty-1 and lefty-2: their distinct expression domains, chromosomal linkage and direct neuralizing activity in Xenopus embryos. Genes Cells. 1997;2(8):513–24. pmid:9348041
  59. 59. Echelard Y, Epstein DJ, St-Jacques B, Shen L, Mohler J, McMahon JA, et al. Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity. Cell. 1993;75(7):1417–30. pmid:7916661
  60. 60. Rashbass P, Cooke LA, Herrmann BG, Beddington RS. A cell autonomous function of Brachyury in T/T embryonic stem cell chimaeras. Nature. 1991;353(6342):348–51. doi: 10.1038/353348a0. pmid:1922339
  61. 61. Hogan B, Beddington RS, Costantini F, Lacy E. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo, a Laboratory Manual: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1994.
  62. 62. Zohn IE, Li Y, Skolnik EY, Anderson KV, Han J, Niswander L. p38 and a p38-interacting protein are critical for downregulation of E-cadherin during mouse gastrulation. Cell. 2006;125(5):957–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.048. pmid:16751104
  63. 63. Tsukui T, Capdevila J, Tamura K, Ruiz-Lozano P, Rodriguez-Esteban C, Yonei-Tamura S, et al. Multiple left-right asymmetry defects in Shh(-/-) mutant mice unveil a convergence of the shh and retinoic acid pathways in the control of Lefty-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(20):11376–81. pmid:10500184
  64. 64. Wilson L, Maden M. The mechanisms of dorsoventral patterning in the vertebrate neural tube. Dev Biol. 2005;282(1):1–13. Epub 2005/06/07. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.02.027. pmid:15936325
  65. 65. Caspary T, Anderson KV. Patterning cell types in the dorsal spinal cord: what the mouse mutants say. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(4):289–97. doi: 10.1038/nrn1073. pmid:12671645
  66. 66. Oki S, Kitajima K, Marques S, Belo JA, Yokoyama T, Hamada H, et al. Reversal of left-right asymmetry induced by aberrant Nodal signaling in the node of mouse embryos. Development. 2009;136(23):3917–25. Epub 2009/11/13. doi: 10.1242/dev.039305. pmid:19906859
  67. 67. Shinohara K, Kawasumi A, Takamatsu A, Yoshiba S, Botilde Y, Motoyama N, et al. Two rotating cilia in the node cavity are sufficient to break left-right symmetry in the mouse embryo. Nat Commun. 2012;3:622. Epub 2012/01/12. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1624. pmid:22233632
  68. 68. Merveille AC, Davis EE, Becker-Heck A, Legendre M, Amirav I, Bataille G, et al. CCDC39 is required for assembly of inner dynein arms and the dynein regulatory complex and for normal ciliary motility in humans and dogs. Nat Genet. 2011;43(1):72–8. Epub 2010/12/07. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3509786. doi: 10.1038/ng.726. pmid:21131972
  69. 69. Blanchon S, Legendre M, Copin B, Duquesnoy P, Montantin G, Kott E, et al. Delineation of CCDC39/CCDC40 mutation spectrum and associated phenotypes in primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Med Genet. 2012;49(6):410–6. Epub 2012/06/14. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100867. pmid:22693285
  70. 70. Antony D, Becker-Heck A, Zariwala MA, Schmidts M, Onoufriadis A, Forouhan M, et al. Mutations in CCDC39 and CCDC40 are the major cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia with axonemal disorganization and absent inner dynein arms. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(3):462–72. Epub 2012/12/21. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3630464. doi: 10.1002/humu.22261. pmid:23255504
  71. 71. Oh SP, Li E. The signaling pathway mediated by the type IIB activin receptor controls axial patterning and lateral asymmetry in the mouse. Genes Dev. 1997;11(14):1812–26. Epub 1997/07/15. pmid:9242489