Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Change in the Interstitial Cells of Cajal and nNOS Positive Neuronal Cells with Aging in the Stomach of F344 Rats

  • Yong Hwan Kwon,

    Affiliations Departments of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea

  • Nayoung Kim ,

    nayoungkim49@empas.com

    Affiliations Departments of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

  • Ryoung Hee Nam,

    Affiliation Departments of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

  • Ji Hyun Park,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

  • Sun Min Lee,

    Affiliation Departments of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

  • Sung Kook Kim,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea

  • Hye Seung Lee,

    Affiliation Departments of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

  • Yong Sung Kim,

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Disease Research Institute, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea

  • Dong Ho Lee

    Affiliations Departments of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correction

1 Jun 2017: Kwon YH, Kim N, Nam RH, Park JH, Lee SM, et al. (2017) Correction: Change in the Interstitial Cells of Cajal and nNOS Positive Neuronal Cells with Aging in the Stomach of F344 Rats. PLOS ONE 12(6): e0179107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179107 View correction

Abstract

The gastric accommodation reflex is an important mechanism in gastric physiology. However, the aging-associated structural and functional changes in gastric relaxation have not yet been established. Thus, we evaluated the molecular changes of interstitial cell of Cajal (ICC) and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and the function changes in the corpus of F344 rats at different ages (6-, 31-, 74-wk and 2-yr). The proportion of the c-Kit-positive area in the submucosal border (SMB) and myenteric plexus (MP) layer was significantly lower in the older rats, as indicated by immunohistochemistry. The density of the nNOS-positive immunoreactive area also decreased with age in the SMB, circular muscle (CM), and MP. Similarly, the percent of nNOS-positive neuronal cells per total neuronal cells and the proportion of nNOS immunoreactive area of MP also decreased in aged rats. In addition, the mRNA and protein expression of c-Kit and nNOS significantly decreased with age. Expression of stem cell factor (SCF) and the pan-neuronal marker PGP 9.5 mRNA was significantly lower in the older rats than in the younger rats. Barostat studies showed no difference depending on age. Instead, the change of volume was significantly decreased by L-NG63-nitroarginine methyl ester in the 2-yr-old rats compared with the 6-wk-old rats (P = 0.003). Taken together, the quantitative and molecular nNOS changes in the stomach might play a role in the decrease of gastric accommodation with age.

Introduction

Gastric accommodation is defined as the decrease in gastric tone and increase in compliance after the ingestion of meals [1]. Abnormality in this mechanism may explain the pathogenesis of postprandial fullness or early satiation [2]. Several studies reported that non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (NANC) nerves are related to the inhibition of gastrointestinal(GI) smooth muscle [3]. Among these neurotransmitters, nitiric oxide (NO) has been considered as the important inhibitory neurotransmitter in GI tract [46]. Other neurotransmitters e.g., 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) [7, 8], adenosine 50-triphosphate (ATP), and vasointestinal polypeptide (VIP) are also involved in gastric relaxation as co-transmitters of the enteric inhibitory neurons with NO [9]. Previous studies revealed that the aging process has been associated with gastric motility, such as a decrease in the relaxation of the stomach [10]. This change may induce an early satiation in elderly people [10, 11]. As a possible explanation of this change in elderly people, there has been a report that enteric neurodegeneration is related to the loss of excitatory cholinergic neurons [12]. In contrast, nitrergic myenteric neurons have been reported to be selectively spared during aging [1315]. For instance, Philipps et al. suggested that age-related cell loss in the myenteric plexus (MP) did not occur in nitrergic neurons but occurred exclusively in the cholinergic subpopulation of enteric neurons in Fischer 344 rats [11, 14]. However, our group reported a decrease of nitrergic neurons in the colon muscle [16] and gastric mucosa of aged F344 rats [17]. Chapman also suggested that NO plays an important role in the mechanism of satiety, and the decline in the compliance might be caused by decreased production of NO with age [11, 18]. Another quantitative study reported a significant decrease in the number of neurons in the MP with advanced age [19].

In addition to NO, interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) play an important role in gastrointestinal motility. ICC generate a rhythmic pacemaker current, which manifests itself as slow waves in the membrane potential of smooth muscle cells, resulting in rhythmic bowel contractions [20, 21]. However, the role of ICC in the transmission of inhibitory signals from enteric neurons to smooth muscle cells is highly controversial [11, 21]. Recently, Sanders et al. revealed that the inhibitory responses were absent or reduced when ICC-IM were partially or completely lost, providing evidence for the role of ICC-IM in mediating inhibitory neurotransmission in the gastric fundus of W/WV mice [22]. Furthermore, decrease or loss of ICC in the human gut was frequently observed in the diabetic gastroenteropathy [23] or slow transit constipation [24, 25]. ICC express the proto-oncogene c-Kit [26, 27] and stem cell factor (SCF) which is a natural ligand of Kit [28], related to the development and maintenance of ICC [29]. In addition, up-regulation of the enzyme heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), an important player in the cellular defense mechanism against oxidative stress [30, 31], and its product, carbon monoxide, has been reported to protect ICC from oxidative stress in diabetic models [32, 33]. These results suggest that HO-1, in addition to ICC, another important component in regulating gastric accommodation in older animals. However, in the role of nNOS and ICC of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) and electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced internal anal sphincter relaxation, nNOS was the major mediator but ICC were not critical for the RAIR [34].

From this background, we aimed to elucidate the morphological and molecular changes in nNOS and ICC with SCF and HO-1 that could be involved in the gastric accommodation of the corpus in 6-, 31-, 74-wk and 2-yr old F344 rats, (which are equivalent to 5, 30, 60 and 80 years of human age, respectively). In addition, the function of corpus was evaluated using a gastric barostat at these four ages of rats.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Specific pathogen-free, male, F344 rats (four different age groups: 6-, 31-, and 74- wk- and 2 yr-old) were used (Orient Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea). The animals were housed in a cage maintained at 23°C with 12:12-hour light-dark cycles and specific pathogen-free conditions. They were allowed unrestricted intake of food and water. This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of South Korea. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (BA1403-148/012-02). All experiments were performed between 9:00 AM and 6:00 PM. All rats were euthanized by carbon dioxide following experiments as approved by our IACUC Animal Care and Use Protocol.

Tissue preparation and immunohistochemistry for c-Kit and nNOS

Histological analysis of tissue was performed by following the methods of previous reports [16, 17]. Briefly, a one-centimeter length of the proximal glandular stomach (corpus) of rats (Fig 1), not including forestomach, was obtained and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for histology. The specimens were embedded in paraffin, sectioned perpendicularly to the lumen (section thickness, 4 μm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). One H&E-stained slide per rat (n = 6 for each age group) and two fields per slide were randomly selected and checked for whether there was any difference of muscle area depending on age.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Diagram of rat stomach.

The stomach of the rat is divided into the forestomach (pars proventricularis) and glandular stomach (pars glandularis). For this experiment, the proximal glandular stomach of F344 rat was used after removing forestomach. Stomach was opened along the greater curvature and about a one-centimeter length of proximal glandular stomach (corpus) was used for immunohistochemistry (rectangular box in the right side).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.g001

Immunohistochemistry was performed following the methods of the previous report [16]. The sections were incubated with the following primary antibody: anti-c-Kit antibody (dilution 1:100; polyclonal rabbit anti-human CD117, DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and anti-nNOS antibody (dilution 1:500; AB5380 Chemicon Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) after deactivation of endogenous peroxidase with 3% hydrogen peroxide and blocking of nonspecific binding sites. The immunostaining was performed using an automatic immunostainer (BenchMark XT, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An UltraView Universal DAB detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems) was used for the secondary antibody. The negative control for IHC was performed without primary antibodies. The immunostained tissues were examined under a light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) linked to a computer-assisted image analysis system (AxioVision Rel.4.8; Carl Zeiss). Two immunostained slides per each rat (n = 6 for each age group) were prepared, and four to five fields per slide were randomly selected to obtain micrographs at x200. The micrograph was divided into four anatomic regions; submucosal border (SMB); circular muscle (CM); MP and longitudinal muscle (LM) regions [35] using Adobe Photoshop ver. 7.0 (Adobe systems; Mountain View, CA, USA). Finally, quantitative assessment of the c-Kit and nNOS immunoreactivity was performed using the Image-Pro® Plus analysis system (Media Cybernetics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and measurements were expressed as the proportion of immunoreactive area (% of total area). Mast cells, known to express c-Kit, were excluded by their round or oval shape and lack of processes [23, 27, 36]. Ganglia in the myenteric plexus were micrographed at x1,000. The number and proportion of myenteric neurons, which include nuclei, were enumerated. All morphometry experiments were performed blinded to the identity of the samples.

Real-time PCR for c-Kit, SCF, HO-1 and nNOS

c-Kit, SCF and nNOS mRNA levels were measured by real-time PCR according to the method as described in detail previously[16]. Briefly, RNA was extracted from the corpus muscle tissues (Fig 1) devoid of the mucosa, submucosa and preferably serosa using an RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were diluted to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL in RNase-free water and stored at -80°C until use. Synthesis of the cDNA was performed with 1 mg of total RNA with M-MLV reverse transcription reagents (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The 20 μL reverse transcription reaction consisted of 4 μL of first-strand buffer, 500 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate mixture, 2.5 mM oligo (dT) 12–18 primer, 0.4 U/mL ribonuclease inhibitor, and 1.25 U/mL Moloney murine leukemia virus 152 reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). The thermal cycling parameters for the reverse transcription were 10 minutes at 65°C, 50 minutes at 37°C and 15 minutes at 70°C. Real-time PCR amplification and determination were performed using SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The following primers were used: c-Kit forward, TTC CTG TGA CAG CTC AAA CG; c-Kit reverse, AGC AAA TCT TCC AGG TCC AG; SCF forward, CAA AAC TGG CGA ATC TT; SCF reverse, GCC ACG AGG TCA TCC ACT AT; HO-1 forward, AAG AGG CTA AGA CCG CCT TC; HO-1, reverse, GCA TAA ATT CCC ACT GCC AC; nNOS forward, CTA CAA GGT CCG ATT CAA CAG; nNOS reverse, CCC ACA CAG AAG ACA TCA CAG; GAPDH forward, AGG TGA AGG TCG GAG TCA; and GAPDH reverse, GGT CAT TGA TGG CAA. The GAPDH gene was used as an endogenous reference as a control for expression that was independent of sample-to-sample variability. The amplification protocol consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 seconds, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 5 seconds at 95°C and annealing/extension of 33 seconds at 55°C. The relative expression levels of target genes were normalized by dividing the target Ct values by the endogenous Ct values. All equipment was purchased from Applied Biosystems and used according to their protocols. RNA-free water was used in real-time PCR for the no-template control (NTC). After amplification, we performed melting curve analysis using ABI PRISM® 7000 Sequence Detection System software (Applied Biosystems).

Western blotting for c-Kit and nNOS

The corpus muscle tissue devoid of mucosa, submucosa and preferably serosa was homogenized with lysis buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCL (pH 7.4), EGTA (1 mM), DTT (1 mM), leupeptin (10 μg/mL), aprotinin (10 μg/mL), PMSF (1 mM), and Triton X-100 (0.1%), as described in detail previously [18]. Briefly, the proteins (100 μg for each sample) were separated by SDS-PAGE (8% wt/wt gel) and transferred to PVDF membranes. All procedures were performed in Tris buffer (40 mM, pH 7.55) containing 0.3 M NaCl and 0.3% Tween 20. The membranes were then blocked with dried milk (5% wt/vol) and subsequently incubated with antibodies for c-Kit (1:100; rabbit polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), nNOS (1:500; mouse monoclonal IgG2a antibody, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and β-actin (1:1000; rabbit polyclonal antibody, BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight. The blots were incubated with secondary antibody (rabbit polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology for c-Kit (dilution 1:500) and β-actin (dilution 1:1000) and mouse polyclonal antibody (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for nNOS, and an imaging analyzer was used to measure the band densities. For c-Kit immunoblot, the optical densities of the mature (145 kDa) forms were combined into one parameter for the analysis process using densitometry [37].

Gastric barostat study and evaluation of gastric relaxation as a function of age

The rats fasted for 24 hours prior to the experiments but were allowed access to water. The animals were anesthetized by a Zoletil (Virbac, France) and Rompun (Bayer Korea, South Korea) mixture. A pair of polyvinyl tubes attached to a polyethylene bag (Fig 2A & 2B) was introduced through the mouth and passed into the stomach [38]. In a separate group of fasted rats, an electronic barostat (G & J Electronics Inc, Willowdale, Ontario, Canada) was applied to assess gastric accommodation. For full dilatation of intragastric balloon, the initial distention pressure of 15 mm Hg was maintained for one min, there was a 15 min resting period with deflation of balloon, and then, the pressure was increased in a stepwise fashion, without intervening deflation, to 3, 5, 7, and 10 mmHg in 5 min intervals (tonic phase). After this cycle, the pressure was decreased to the minimum distention pressure and maintained for another 20 min. The gastric volume produced at the minimum distention pressure during the first 10 min is referred to as the baseline. After a resting period, L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME) was dissolved in distilled water for injection and administered intravenously to the rat tail vein at a dose of 30 mg/kg (0.1 mL/100 g body weight) 10 min before the barostat study for gastric relaxation [38]. For the measurement of gastric relaxation, the pressure associated volume change and the area under the curve (AUC) of the pressure-dependent volume curve of age group was compared (Fig 3A). In addition, the response to L-NAME was measured by comparing the change in AUC (Δ AUC: AUC 2 –AUC 1) between the L-NAME-induced pressure-dependent volume curve (AUC 2, mL*sec) and the basal pressure-dependent volume curve (AUC 1, mL*sec) in the four F344 rat groups. Fig 3B shows the comparison of pressure dependent volume curve between 6-wk- and 2-yr-old F344 rats.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The intra-gastric balloon.

(A) A polyethylene bag was made by using a 3rd finger-tip of poly-glove (Hanjin, Seoul, Korea). Maximal diameter is 3 cm. (B) The maximum volume of balloon was 6 mL and air was injected into the balloon from one of the balloon tubes with the other side balloon tube closed to allow placement of the balloon within the stomach, after which the balloon tubes were immediately opened to the air.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Measurement of the change in gastric accommodation.

(A) The pressure-dependent volume curve obtained by applying 3, 5, 7, and 10 mmHg at 5 minute intervals was measured in each aged rat group. The change of volume and area under curve (AUC) of the pressure-dependent volume was measured in each group to obtain the pressure-related volume (mL) * time (sec) in the tonic phase. (B) To analyze the gastric accommodation in each aged rat group, we compared with the pressure associated volume change and baseline AUC (mL*sec) of the aged rat groups. Afterwards, we compared the change in AUC (Δ AUC: AUC 2—AUC 1) after administering L-NAME to analyze the response of nNOS activity with age indirectly. The blue and red lines in the graph represent the pressure and volume curves of the 6-wk- and 2-yr-old rats. L-NAME, L-NG-nitroarginine methylester.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.g003

Statistical analyses

All continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Multiple comparisons among different aged rat group were performed using the Tukey test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively. The change of intrabag volume from baseline and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared using ANOVA and Tukey’s posttest. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Influence of aging on the c-Kit-positive area in the rat corpus

The c-Kit-positive area decreased with age (Fig 4A and 4B). In detail, the proportion of the c-Kit-positive area in the SMB of 31-wk-, 74-wk-, and 2-yr-old rats significantly decreased compared to 6-wk-old rats (P = 0.027 vs. 31-wk-old rats; P = 0.018 vs. 74-wk-old rats and P = 0.036 vs. 2-yr-old rats) (Fig 4B). Similarly, in the MP layer, the proportion of the c-Kit-positive area of 74-wk- and 2-yr-old rats significantly was lower than that of the younger age group (P = 0.002, 6-wk- vs. 74-wk-old rats; P < 0.001, 6-wk- vs. 2-yr-old rats and P = 0.002, 31-wk- vs. 2-yr-old rats) (Fig 4B). Additionally, the total proportion of the c-Kit-positive area in the 2-yr-old rats was lower than that of the 6-, 31-, and 74-wk-old rats in all areas (P < 0.001 vs. 6-wk-old rats; P = 0.037 vs. 31-wk-old rats and P = 0.002 vs. 74-wk-old rats) (Table 1).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Analysis of c-Kit immunohistochemistry.

(A) Photomicrograph of c-Kit immunostaining of the proximal rat stomach. Arrows indicate the c-Kit immunoreactive cells (x200 magnification). (B) Comparison of the proportion of the c-Kit immunoreactive area of the SMB, MP, CM and LM in 6-, 31-, 74-wk- and 2-yr-old rats (n = 6 per group). The proportion of the c-Kit immunoreactive area tended to decrease with age. The result was expressed as the c-Kit positive percentage of the total area of each region. Each bar represents the mean ± SE. SMB, submucosal border; MP, myenteric plexus; CM, circular muscle; LM, longitudinal muscle.*P < 0.05 compared with 6-wk-old rats; †P < 0.05 compared with 31-wk-old rats; ‡P < 0.05 compared with 74-wk-old rats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.g004

thumbnail
Table 1. The proportion of the c-Kit positive area in the corpus of four different aged rat stomach (all, n = 6).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.t001

Decrease of c-Kit, SCF and HO-1 mRNA expression with aging

The c-Kit mRNA expression decreased significantly in the 31-, 74-wk-old and 2-yr-old rats compared with the 6-wk-old rats (P = 0.002 vs. 31-wk-old rats and P < 0.001 vs. 74-wk- and 2-yr-old rats) (Fig 5A). Similarly, the SCF mRNA expression of other aged rat group was significantly lower than that of the 6-wk-old rats, respectively (P = 0.004 vs. 31-wk-old rats and P < 0.001 vs. 74-wk- and 2-yr-old rats) (Fig 5B). The HO-1 mRNA expression did not show statistically significant difference in rats of different age group (Fig 5C). The c-Kit protein expression of the 2-yr-old rats was significantly lower than those of the other age groups (P < 0.001 vs. 31-wk-old rats; P = 0.001 vs. 74-wk-old rats and P = 0.009 vs. 2-yr-old rats) (Fig 5D and S1 Fig), respectively.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Expression of c-Kit, SCF, HO-1 mRNA and c-Kit protein.

(A) The expression of c-Kit mRNA by real-time PCR decreased with age. The c-Kit mRNA expression decreased significantly in the 31-, 74-wk-old and 2-yr-old rats compared with the 6-wk-old rats (P = 0.002 vs. 31-wk-old rats and P < 0.001 vs. 74-wk- and 2-yr-old rats): 6-wk-old rat group (n = 10), 31-wk-old rat group (n = 10), 74-wk-old rat group (n = 8) and 2-yr-old rat group (n = 12). (B) The SCF mRNA expression of other aged rat group was significantly lower than that of the 6-wk-old rat (P = 0.004 vs. 31-wk-old rats; P < 0.001 vs. 74-wk- and 2-yr-old rats) (n = 8–12). (C) No statistical difference was showed the HO-1 mRNA expression in different age rat group. (D) The c-Kit protein expression decreased with age. The c-Kit protein expression of 2-yr-old rats was lower than that of the other aged rat groups (P < 0.001 vs. 31-wk-old rats; P = 0.001 vs. 74-wk-old rats and P = 0.009 vs. 2-yr-old rats) (n = 8–12). The results are shown as the mean value of the optical density (OD). The optical densities corresponding to the mature (145 kDa) and immature (120 kDa) forms were combined in the analysis process using densitometry. Each bar represents the mean ± SE. *P < 0.05 compared with 6-wk-old rats. †P < 0.05 compared with 31-wk-old rats; ‡P < 0.05 compared with 74-wk-old rats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.g005

Influence of aging on the nNOS-density in the rat corpus

Similar to c-Kit IHC, a larger proportion of nNOS-positive area was present in the 6-wk-old rats, and it decreased with age in the four layers of the gastric stomach (Table 2 and Fig 6A). In the SMB, the proportion of the nNOS-positive area of the 74-wk-old and 2-yr-old rats was lower than that of the 6- and 31-wk-old rats (P = 0.001 vs. 6-wk-old rats; P = 0.003, 31-wk- vs. 74-wk-old rats and P = 0.007, 31-wk- vs. 2-yr-old rats) (Fig 6B). The nNOS-positive area in CM and MP layer was decreased in aged rat groups compared with 6-wk-old rats (P < 0.001 vs. all other aged rat group in CM layer; P = 0.001 vs. 31-wk-old rats; P = 0.002 vs. 74-wk-old rats and P = 0.001 vs. 2-yr-old rats in MP layer) (Fig 6B). Fig 7A showed the analysis of nNOS neuronal cell in myenteric ganglion. When myenteric ganglion was analyzed, total neuronal cell count did not show statistically significant difference in rats of different age group. However, the percent of nNOS-positive neuronal cell per total neuronal cell of 74-wk- and 2-yr-old rats significantly decreased compared with 6-wk-aged rat (P < 0.001) (Fig 7B). The proportion of nNOS-immunoreactive area of 2-yr-old rats were significantly lower than that of 6-, 31-, and 74-wk-old rats (P < 0.001 vs. 6-wk-old rats; P = 0.002, vs. 31-wk-old rats and P = 0.017, vs. 74-wk-old rats) (Fig 7C). Similarly, the nNOS mRNA expression decreased in the 2-yr-old rats compared with the 6-wk-old rats (P = 0.021) (Fig 8A). The PGP 9.5 mRNA expression of the 74-wk- and 2-yr-old rats was also lower than that of the 6-wk-old rats (P = 0.007, 6-wk- vs. 74-wk-old rats and P = 0.030, 6-wk- vs. 2-yr-old rats), respectively (Fig 8B). The nNOS protein expression was the lowest in 2-yr-old rats and the nNOS protein expression of the 2-yr-old rats was significantly lower than that of the 6-wk-old rats (P = 0.007) (Fig 8C, S1 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Analysis of nNOS immunohistochemistry.

(A) Photomicrograph of nNOS immunostaining of the corpus of rat stomach. Arrows and arrowheads indicate the nNOS-positive nerve fibers and neuronal ganglion, respectively (x200 magnification). (B) Comparison of the nNOS positive area (n = 6 per group). The proportion of the nNOS immunoreactive area decreased with age. Each bar represents the mean ± SE. SMB, submucosal border; MP, myenteric plexus; CM, circular muscle; LM, longitudinal muscle.*P < 0.05 compared with 6-wk-old rats; †P < 0.05 compared with 31-wk-old rats; ‡P < 0.05 compared with 74-wk-old rats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. The enumeration of neuronal cell in myenteric ganglia.

(A) ganglia in the myenteric plexus were micro graphed at x1,000. We enumerated the nNOS-positive (indicated with red line) or -negative (indicated with black line) myenteric neurons, which include nucleus (indicated with asterisk), in the ganglion (contours of the ganglion are indicated by dashed lines). (B) The percent of nNOS positive neuronal cells of total neuronal cells in ganglion of 74-wk-old and 2-yr-old rats was significantly lower than that of 6- and 31-wk-old rats (P = 0.002, 6-wk- vs. 74-wk-old rats; P = 0.002, 6-wk- vs. 2-yr-old rats; P = 0.041, 31-wk- vs. 74-wk-old rats, and P = 0.019, 31-wk- vs 2-yr-old rats). (C) Mean of proportion of nNOS-immunoreactive area in ganglion was also decreased as age increased (P = 0.020, 6-wk- vs. 31-wk-old rats; P = 0.001, 6-wk- vs. 74-wk-old rats; P < 0.001, 6-wk- vs. 2-yr-old rats; P < 0.001, 31-wk- vs. 2-yr-old rats, and P < 0.001, 74-wk- vs 2-yr-old rats). Each bar represents the mean±SE. *P < 0.05 compared with 6 wk of age; †P < 0.05 compared with 31-wk of age; ‡ P < 0.05 compared with 74-wk-old rats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.g007

thumbnail
Fig 8. Expression of nNOS and PGP 9.5 mRNA and nNOS protein.

(A) The expression of nNOS mRNA measured by real-time PCR decreased with age. The nNOS mRNA expression decreased in the 2-yr-old rats compared with the 6- wk-old rats (P = 0.021): 6-wk-old rat group (n = 10), 31-wk-old rat group (n = 10), 74-wk-old rat group (n = 8) and 2-yr-old rat group (n = 12). (B) The PGP 9.5 mRNA expression of the 74-wk-old and 2-yr-old rats was also lower than that of the 6-wk-old rats (P = 0.007, 6-wk- vs. 74-wk-old rats and P = 0.030, 6-wk- vs. 2-yr-old rats), respectively. (C) The nNOS protein expression was the lowest in 2-yr-old rats. That is, the nNOS protein expression of the 2-yr-old rats was significantly lower than that of the 6-wk-old rats (P = 0.007) (n = 8–12 in 6-, 31-, 74-wk- and 2-yr-old rats). The results are shown as the mean value of the optical density (OD). Each bar represents the mean ± SE. *P < 0.05 compared with 6-wk-old rats; †P < 0.05 compared with 31-wk-old rats; ‡P < 0.05 compared with 74-wk-old rats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.g008

thumbnail
Table 2. The proportion of the nNOS positive area in the corpus of four different aged rat stomach (all, n = 6).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.t002

Change in gastric accommodation with age

Among the four different age groups (all, n = 6), there was no statistically significant difference in the pressure dependent volume change (Fig 9A) and AUC (mL*sec) of the pressure-dependent volume curve in tonic phase (Fig 9B). After the administration of L-NAME, ΔAUC in the 2-yr-old rat group (- 1072.6 ± 81.3 mL*sec) decreased significantly compared with the 6-wk-old rat group (- 678.0 ± 180.79 mL*sec) (P = 0.003) (Fig 9C).

thumbnail
Fig 9. Measurement of gastric volume change and influences of L-NAME in different aged rat group.

(A) The graph of pressure dependent volume curve did not show statistical difference in each given pressure (n = 6 per group). (B) Pressure dependent AUC (mL*sec) curve did not show any difference as aging (n = 6 per group). After treatment with L-NAME (10 mg/kg), the delta of the AUC significantly decreased in the 2-yr-old rats compared with the 6-wk-old age rats (P < 0.05). *P < 0.05 compared with 6-wk-old rats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.g009

Discussion

The present study showed a decrease in the immunoreactive density and molecular expression in ICC and in nNOS in the aged F344 rat stomach (corpus area) but our barostat experiment did not show decrease of gastric relaxation in the old rats. Instead, gastric relaxation was significantly decreased in the presence of L-NAME in the 2-yr aged rat group, supporting the role of nNOS in the relaxation of gastric stomach in the old rat.

The changes in gastrointestinal tract motility that occur with advanced age may reflect a selective loss or selective impairment of function involving a subpopulation of neurons [11]. Similarly, the effect of aging on gastric motility has gained attention because functional dyspepsia, such as postprandial discomfort syndrome, has been reported to be common in the aged population [39, 40]. A previous study reported that aging caused a decrease in gastric motility, such as a decline in the compliance of the stomach [11], and its role in the anorexia of aging has been discussed together with antral distension and delayed emptying [2]. However, Philipps et al reported that age-related cell loss in the myenteric plexus does not occur in nitrergic neurons; instead, it occurs exclusively in the cholinergic subpopulation of enteric neurons in Fischer 344 rats [11, 14]. Previously, a definite age-associated decline of the nNOS levels has been reported in gastric mucosa [16] as well as in colon muscle [16, 17, 41]. The decrease in nNOS-immunoreactive neuronal cells which are associated with age might also be related to the damage of nitrergic neurons, such as axonal swelling and the loss of expression of NOS in aged rats [14, 42]. Likewise, we found the decrease of both nNOS-positive neuronal cells per total neuronal cells and the proportion of nNOS-immunoreactive area in the corpus of 2-yr-old-rats in the present study. Decreased ΔAUC means that the relaxation was more inhibited after given L-NAME. Thus, the decrease of nNOS in the aged rat might cause less gastric relaxation at the same dose of L-NAME in comparison to the young aged rat group. Disappointingly, pressure dependent volume curve and AUC did not show proportional change depending on age. Instead, relative decrease in the spontaneous gastric relaxation was found after the L-NAME treatment in the 2-yr-old rats. That is, decrease of nNOS neuron in the aged rat group might cause more suppression of gastric relaxation with the same dose of L-NAME treatment resulting in the decreased ΔAUC in the 2-yr-old rat group. Our functional study suggests that some proportion of the gastric relaxation has been mediated by nNOS inhibitory transmission although nNOS is not the main factor. An additional explanation could be that the decreasing ICC number in the aged rat might influence the gastric relaxation by decreasing transfer neurotransmitter action from neuronal cells. Another possibility is that NO action can be activated more by decrease of ICC cell number in the aged rat. However, these explanations need further experiments. It is well known that the NO is the predominant factor of gastric relaxation [43, 44], and gastric relaxation is regulated by activation of the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-dependent mechanisms [43, 45, 46]. Based on previous studies, ICC is known to be a significant component in the regulation of normal gastrointestinal fuctioning [4749]. Indeed, several human gastrointestinal motility disorders have been associated with ICC depletion [49]. Previously, immunohistochemistry showed Kit adjacently located to the M3 receptor revealed their role in excitatory neurotransmission [50]. In contrast, NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase (NO-GC) was found to be expressed in ICC [5153] and this this expression of NO-GC in ICC was stronger than in surrounding smooth muscle cell (SMC) which revealed the role of ICC in nitrergic inhibitory signaling [51, 52]. However, there is still an unresolved controversy of the primary targets of NO (whether SMC or ICC). Despite the previous in vitro evidence for ICC role in neurotransmission, a study was done on isolated whole stomach of wild-type and W/Wv mice which found that normal gastric distension-induced adaptive relaxation occurred in both mice groups [54].

In another animal study using manometry [55], the lower esophageal sphincter (LOS) in the nNOS-/- mice was elevated and relaxation was decreased compared with W/Wv mice [56]. Previously, Burns et al reported that the reduced NO-dependent inhibitory neuroregulation caused relaxation of smooth muscle tissues in response to exogenous sodium nitroprusside, which means that ICC-IM have an important role in NO-dependent neurotransmission in the stomach [57]. These results negate the role for ICC in neural transmission. In vitro experiment using circular smooth muscle tissue from LOS of wild type and W/Wv mutant mice [58], this study suggested that significant variability was found in the generation of nitrergic neurotransmission in the LOS of W/Wv mutant mice, whereas purinergic and cholinergic neurotransmissions are intact. The purinergic and cholinergic neurotransmissions had altered nitrergic responses that appear to be associated with abnormal Ca2+-dependent signaling which was initiated by spontaneous Ca2+ release from sarcoplasmic reticulum in smooth muscle cells, and so c-Kit-positive ICC are not essential for nitrergic neurotransmission in mouse LOS smooth muscle [58]. Taken together with the present results, it seems that the decreased ICC with aging did not directly affect the relaxation in the stomach. Furthermore, it was found the inhibitory effect of aging on the rat gastric fundus relaxation response is mainly mediated by the nitrergic pathway.

This present study had several limitations. First, we measured the change of nNOS as the proportion of immunoreactive area (% of total area). This method might be valid as a generic indication of changes of neuron. Overall, the way to visualize immunoreactivity is not the most appropriate for quantitation because optical density is less reliable than fluorescence to detect areas of immunoreactivity. Second, we used corpus (proximal glandular stomach) area of rat stomach for the quantitative (morphological) or molecular experiment instead of forestomach. Although many previous studies [22, 38, 44, 59] reported about the experiment of gastric relaxation in murine, there was no definite mention about the precise region of fundus in the murine stomach. The stomach of the rat is divided into the forestomach (pars proventricularis) and glandular stomach (corpus or pars glandularis), which is different from human. Some scientists do not believe the forestomach has muscle as it looks pale and relatively thin. Thus, if the reports do not show the experiment region as a figure as the present study there could be some confusion which part of stomach was analyzed for gastric accommodation experiments. The corpus of rat stomach might not be ideal for comparative analyses for gastric relaxation due to its variability and small contribution to volume changes. In the preliminary study, we found that the layer of forestomach was rather thin and less expansible, not feasible for reflecting the change of gastric relaxation as aging. That is the reason why we selected the area of rat corpus for gastric relaxation experiment in the present study. In addition, gastric accommodation not only involves the proximal part of the stomach, but also the distal part of the stomach by the presence of the antrofundic reflex. Using this corpus area, our present study clearly has shown the age-related changes in the density and molecular expression of ICC and nNOS-positive enteric neurons in the muscle layer of stomach in the four different ages as well as IHC study in the whole area. However, we could not reveal the decreased gastric relaxation associated with aging in the present study. The baseline pressure dependent volume curve did not show any differences among different aged rat groups. Generally, it would be ideal to compare the change of gastric volume before and after meal for the measurement of gastric accommodation in the different aged rat groups. However, our method of balloon insertion status via mouth to stomach made it very difficult to measure gastric relaxation after meals. That is, the rat that suddenly died after ingesting a meal probably died giving the meal ingestion probably due to asphyxia with technical error. After repeated struggle we decided to quit the barostat experiment after eating. Ideally the barostat experiment for evaluation of gastric relaxation should be performed in the different aged human model but it was found in this study to be difficult. Thus we proposed a new setting in the murine for gastric accommodation model in the fasting status, which might not be sufficient. As far as our knowledge, this is the first study which has evaluated the change of gastric relaxation using a functional barostat machine in the different ages of rat model. Furthermore, the response to L-NAME treatment showed a significant change in the 2-yr-old rat group. It could be a similar phenomenon in our previous report in which the proximal colon contractile response to EFS under L-NAME was significantly larger in proximal colon of aged rat [16]. This decreased response to L-NAME in the aged rats might reflect the degeneration of nitrergic neurons. Furthermore, there are many varying factors relating relaxation in GI muscles, except NO, such as choline acetyltransferase, dopamine, VIP related peptide, ATP and 5-HT. Moreover, the association between NO and other neurotransmitter in gastric relaxation mechanism was not fully eludicidated, and our present functional study could present the limited role of NO in gastric relaxation as aging. Thus, the further experiments are needed using other excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters. In conclusion, the morphologic and molecular nNOS changes but not ICC in the stomach might play a role in the decrease of gastric accommodation with age.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. The Western blot analysis of c-Kit in different aged rat group.

The original data of c-Kit protein analysis in different aged rat groups; 6-wk-old rat group (n = 10), 31-wk-old rat group (n = 10), 74-wk-old rat group (n = 8) and 2-yr-old rat group (n = 12).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The Western blot analysis of nNOS in different aged rat group.

The original data of nNOS protein analysis in different aged rat groups; 6-wk-old rat group (n = 10), 31-wk-old rat group (n = 10), 74-wk-old rat group (n = 8) and 2-yr-old rat group (n = 12).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169113.s002

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Prof. Hiroto Miwa and Tadayuki Oshima of the Hyogo College of Medicine for the opportunity given to Yong Hwan Kwon to observe the Barostat experiment in the stomach of Guinea pig in 2014. In addition, Sam Jundler, President of G&J Electronics Inc., helped set up the barostat experiment in our institute. This work was supported by grant no 14-2014-003 from the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: NK.
  2. Data curation: RHN JHP SML.
  3. Formal analysis: YHK RHN JHP.
  4. Investigation: YHK.
  5. Methodology: YHK HSL.
  6. Supervision: NK.
  7. Visualization: RHN JHP SML.
  8. Writing – original draft: YHK.
  9. Writing – review & editing: NK SKK YSK DHL.

References

  1. 1. Villanova N, Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Gastrogastric reflexes regulating gastric tone and their relationship to perception. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:464–9.
  2. 2. Kindt S, Tack J. Impaired gastric accommodation and its role in dyspepsia. Gut. 2006;55:1685–91. pmid:16854999
  3. 3. Olsson C, Holmgren S. The control of gut motility. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2001;128:481–503. pmid:11246040
  4. 4. Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Vagally mediated gastric relaxation induced by intestinal nutrients in the dog. Am J Physiol. 1986;251:727–35.
  5. 5. Coulie B, Tack J, Sifrim D, Andrioli A, Janssens J. Role of nitric oxide in fasting gastric fundus tone and in 5-HT1 receptor-mediated relaxation of gastric fundus. Am J Physiol. 1999;276: 373–7.
  6. 6. Kuiken SD, Vergeer M, Heisterkamp SH, Tytgat GN, Boeckxstaens GE. Role of nitric oxide in gastric motor and sensory functions in healthy subjects. Gut. 2002;51:212–8. pmid:12117882
  7. 7. Tack J, Broekaert D, Coulie B, Fischler B, Janssens J. Influence of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, paroxetine, on gastric sensorimotor function in humans. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:603–8. pmid:12622770
  8. 8. Chial HJ, Camilleri M, Burton D, Thomforde G, Olden KW, Stephens D. Selective effects of serotonergic psychoactive agents on gastrointestinal functions in health. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;284: 130–7.
  9. 9. Curro D, Ipavec V, Preziosi P. Neurotransmitters of the non-adrenergic non-cholinergic relaxation of proximal stomach. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2008;12:53–62. pmid:18924444
  10. 10. Clarkston WK, Pantano MM, Morley JE, Horowitz M, Littlefield JM, Burton FR. Evidence for the anorexia of aging: gastrointestinal transit and hunger in healthy elderly vs. young adults. Am J Physiol. 1997;272: 243–8.
  11. 11. Salles N. Is stomach spontaneously ageing? Pathophysiology of the ageing stomach. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23:805–19. pmid:19942159
  12. 12. Bernard CE, Gibbons SJ, Gomez-Pinilla PJ, Lurken MS, Schmalz PF, Roeder JL, et al. Effect of age on the enteric nervous system of the human colon. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:746–e46. pmid:19220755
  13. 13. Cowen T, Johnson RJ, Soubeyre V, Santer RM. Restricted diet rescues rat enteric motor neurones from age related cell death. Gut. 2000;47:653–60. pmid:11034581
  14. 14. Phillips RJ, Kieffer EJ, Powley TL. Aging of the myenteric plexus: neuronal loss is specific to cholinergic neurons. Auton Neurosci. 2003;106:69–83. pmid:12878075
  15. 15. Wade PR, Cowen T. Neurodegeneration: a key factor in the ageing gut. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16 Suppl 1:19–23.
  16. 16. Jo HJ, Kim N, Nam RH, Kang JM, Kim JH, Choe G, et al. Fat deposition in the tunica muscularis and decrease of interstitial cells of Cajal and nNOS-positive neuronal cells in the aged rat colon. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;306: 659–69.
  17. 17. Kang JM, Kim N, Kim JH, Oh E, Lee BY, Lee BH, et al. Effect of aging on gastric mucosal defense mechanisms: ROS, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and sensory neurons. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;299: 1147–53.
  18. 18. Chapman IM. Endocrinology of anorexia of ageing. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;18:437–52. pmid:15261848
  19. 19. Wiley JW. Aging and neural control of the GI tract: III. Senescent enteric nervous system: lessons from extraintestinal sites and nonmammalian species. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002;283: 1020–6.
  20. 20. Sanders KM. A case for interstitial cells of Cajal as pacemakers and mediators of neurotransmission in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:492–515. pmid:8690216
  21. 21. Klein S, Seidler B, Kettenberger A, Sibaev A, Rohn M, Feil R, et al. Interstitial cells of Cajal integrate excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission with intestinal slow-wave activity. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1630. pmid:23535651
  22. 22. Sanders KM, Salter AK, Hennig GW, Koh SD, Perrino BA, Ward SM, et al. Responses to enteric motor neurons in the gastric fundus of mice with reduced intramuscular interstitial cells of cajal. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;20:171–84. pmid:24840370
  23. 23. Nakahara M, Isozaki K, Hirota S, Vanderwinden JM, Takakura R, Kinoshita K, et al. Deficiency of KIT-positive cells in the colon of patients with diabetes mellitus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:666–70. pmid:12100611
  24. 24. Geramizadeh B, Hayati K, Rahsaz M, Hosseini SV. Assessing the interstitial cells of Cajal, cells of enteric nervous system and neurotransmitters in slow transit constipation, using immunohistochemistry for CD117, PGP9.5 and serotonin. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56:1670–4. pmid:20214215
  25. 25. He CL, Burgart L, Wang L, Pemberton J, Young-Fadok T, Szurszewski J, et al. Decreased interstitial cell of cajal volume in patients with slow-transit constipation. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:14–21. pmid:10611149
  26. 26. Chen H, Redelman D, Ro S, Ward SM, Ordog T, Sanders KM. Selective labeling and isolation of functional classes of interstitial cells of Cajal of human and murine small intestine. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;292:497–507.
  27. 27. Ward SM, Sanders KM. Physiology and pathophysiology of the interstitial cell of Cajal: from bench to bedside. I. Functional development and plasticity of interstitial cells of Cajal networks. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281: 602–11.
  28. 28. Yamamoto T, Watabe K, Nakahara M, Ogiyama H, Kiyohara T, Tsutsui S, et al. Disturbed gastrointestinal motility and decreased interstitial cells of Cajal in diabetic db/db mice. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:660–7. pmid:18341539
  29. 29. Ordog T, Hayashi Y, Gibbons SJ. Cellular pathogenesis of diabetic gastroenteropathy. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2009;55:315–43. pmid:19829287
  30. 30. Abraham NG, Asija A, Drummond G, Peterson S. Heme oxygenase -1 gene therapy: recent advances and therapeutic applications. Curr Gene Ther. 2007;7:89–108. pmid:17430129
  31. 31. Mogami S, Suzuki H, Tsugawa H, Fukuhara S, Hibi T. Impaired heme oxygenase-1 induction in the gastric antrum induces disruption of the interstitial cells of Cajal network in a rat model of streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:609–e465. pmid:23534481
  32. 32. Kashyap PC, Choi KM, Dutta N, Linden DR, Szurszewski JH, Gibbons SJ, et al. Carbon monoxide reverses diabetic gastroparesis in NOD mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;298: 1013–9.
  33. 33. Choi KM, Gibbons SJ, Nguyen TV, Stoltz GJ, Lurken MS, Ordog T, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 protects interstitial cells of Cajal from oxidative stress and reverses diabetic gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:2055–64. pmid:18926825
  34. 34. Terauchi A, Kobayashi D, Mashimo H. Distinct roles of nitric oxide synthases and interstitial cells of Cajal in rectoanal relaxation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;289:291–9.
  35. 35. Wang XY, Huizinga JD, Diamond J, Liu LW. Loss of intramuscular and submuscular interstitial cells of Cajal and associated enteric nerves is related to decreased gastric emptying in streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:1095–e92. pmid:19566589
  36. 36. Gomez-Pinilla PJ, Gibbons SJ, Sarr MG, Kendrick ML, Shen KR, Cima RR, et al. Changes in interstitial cells of cajal with age in the human stomach and colon. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23:36–44. pmid:20723073
  37. 37. D'Allard D, Gay J, Descarpentries C, Frisan E, Adam K, Verdier F, et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors induce down-regulation of c-Kit by targeting the ATP pocket. PLoS One. 2013;8:60961.
  38. 38. Uchida M, Shimizu K. Evaluation of adaptive relaxation of the rat stomach using an orally inserted balloon instead of surgical intervention by demonstrating the effects of capsaicin and Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methylester. J Smooth Muscle Res. 2012;48:97–104. pmid:23095737
  39. 39. Piessevaux H, De Winter B, Louis E, Muls V, De Looze D, Pelckmans P, et al. Dyspeptic symptoms in the general population: a factor and cluster analysis of symptom groupings. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:378–88. pmid:19222761
  40. 40. Jeong JJ, Choi MG, Cho YS, Lee SG, Oh JH, Park JM, et al. Chronic gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in the Korean population. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:6388–94. pmid:19009657
  41. 41. Kim SJ, Park JH, Song DK, Park KS, Lee JE, Kim ES, et al. Alterations of colonic contractility in long-term diabetic rat model. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17:372–80. pmid:22148106
  42. 42. Takahashi T, Qoubaitary A, Owyang C, Wiley JW. Decreased expression of nitric oxide synthase in the colonic myenteric plexus of aged rats. Brain Res. 2000;883:15–21. pmid:11063983
  43. 43. De Man JG, De Winter BY, Herman AG, Pelckmans PA. Study on the cyclic GMP-dependency of relaxations to endogenous and exogenous nitric oxide in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;150:88–96. pmid:17115067
  44. 44. Vetri T, Bonvissuto F, Marino A, Postorino A. Nitrergic and purinergic interplay in inhibitory transmission in rat gastric fundus. Auton Autacoid Pharmacol. 2007;27:151–7. pmid:17584445
  45. 45. Groneberg D, Lies B, Konig P, Jager R, Seidler B, Klein S, et al. Cell-specific deletion of nitric oxide-sensitive guanylyl cyclase reveals a dual pathway for nitrergic neuromuscular transmission in the murine fundus. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:188–96. pmid:23528627
  46. 46. Lies B, Groneberg D, Friebe A. Toward a better understanding of gastrointestinal nitrergic neuromuscular transmission. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(7):901–12. pmid:24827638
  47. 47. Maeda H, Yamagata A, Nishikawa S, Yoshinaga K, Kobayashi S, Nishi K, et al. Requirement of c-kit for development of intestinal pacemaker system. Development. 1992;116:369–75. pmid:1283735
  48. 48. Huizinga JD, Thuneberg L, Kluppel M, Malysz J, Mikkelsen HB, Bernstein A. W/kit gene required for interstitial cells of Cajal and for intestinal pacemaker activity. Nature. 1995;373:347–9. pmid:7530333
  49. 49. Farrugia G. Interstitial cells of Cajal in health and disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20 Suppl 1:54–63.
  50. 50. McKay CM, Huizinga JD. Muscarinic regulation of ether-a-go-go-related gene K+ currents in interstitial cells of Cajal. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;319:1112–23. pmid:16946103
  51. 51. Groneberg D, Konig P, Koesling D, Friebe A. Nitric oxide-sensitive guanylyl cyclase is dispensable for nitrergic signaling and gut motility in mouse intestinal smooth muscle. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1608–17. pmid:21277853
  52. 52. Iino S, Horiguchi K, Nojyo Y. Interstitial cells of Cajal are innervated by nitrergic nerves and express nitric oxide-sensitive guanylate cyclase in the guinea-pig gastrointestinal tract. Neuroscience. 2008;152:437–48. pmid:18280665
  53. 53. Iino S, Horiguchi K, Nojyo Y, Ward SM, Sanders KM. Interstitial cells of Cajal contain signalling molecules for transduction of nitrergic stimulation in guinea pig caecum. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:542–50. pmid:19175750
  54. 54. Dixit D, Zarate N, Liu LW, Boreham DR, Huizinga JD. Interstitial cells of Cajal and adaptive relaxation in the mouse stomach. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;291:1129–36.
  55. 55. Sivarao DV, Mashimo HL, Thatte HS, Goyal RK. Lower esophageal sphincter is achalasic in nNOS(-/-) and hypotensive in W/W(v) mutant mice. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:34–42. pmid:11438492
  56. 56. Yin J, Chen JD. Roles of interstitial cells of Cajal in regulating gastrointestinal motility: in vitro versus in vivo studies. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12(4):1118–29. pmid:18429936
  57. 57. Burns AJ, Lomax AE, Torihashi S, Sanders KM, Ward SM. Interstitial cells of Cajal mediate inhibitory neurotransmission in the stomach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(21):12008–13. pmid:8876253
  58. 58. Zhang Y, Carmichael SA, Wang XY, Huizinga JD, Paterson WG. Neurotransmission in lower esophageal sphincter of W/Wv mutant mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;298:14–24.
  59. 59. Min YW, Ko EJ, Lee JY, Min BH, Lee JH, Kim JJ, et al. Nitrergic Pathway Is the Major Mechanism for the Effect of DA-9701 on the Rat Gastric Fundus Relaxation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;20:318–25. pmid:24920748