Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Sbg1 Is a Novel Regulator for the Localization of the β-Glucan Synthase Bgs1 in Fission Yeast

  • Reshma Davidson,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Josef A. Pontasch,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Jian-Qiu Wu

    wu.620@osu.edu

    Affiliations Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America, Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

Sbg1 Is a Novel Regulator for the Localization of the β-Glucan Synthase Bgs1 in Fission Yeast

  • Reshma Davidson, 
  • Josef A. Pontasch, 
  • Jian-Qiu Wu
PLOS
x

Abstract

Glucan synthases synthesize glucans, complex polysaccharides that are the major components in fungal cell walls and division septa. Studying regulation of glucan synthases is important as they are essential for fungal cell survival and thus popular targets for anti-fungal drugs. Linear 1,3-β-glucan is the main component of primary septum and is synthesized by the conserved β-glucan synthase Bgs1 in fission yeast cytokinesis. It is known that Rho1 GTPase regulates Bgs1 catalytic activity and the F-BAR protein Cdc15 plays a role in Bgs1 delivery to the plasma membrane. Here we characterize a novel protein Sbg1 that is present in a complex with Bgs1 and regulates its protein levels and localization. Sbg1 is essential for contractile-ring constriction and septum formation during cytokinesis. Sbg1 and Bgs1 physically interact and are interdependent for localization to the plasma membrane. Bgs1 is less stable and/or mis-targeted to vacuoles in sbg1 mutants. Moreover, Sbg1 plays an earlier and more important role in Bgs1 trafficking and localization than Cdc15. Together, our data reveal a new mode of regulation for the essential β-glucan synthase Bgs1 by the novel protein Sbg1.

Introduction

Cell walls protect a cell from environmental stresses, withstand high internal turgor pressure, and maintain cell shape. Cytokinesis in fungi requires the coordination between a constricting actomyosin contractile ring and a growing external cell-wall structure, the septum. The ring is important for the positioning, shaping, and orderly growth of the septum [16]. In many fungal species including the fission yeast Schizosacchromyces pombe, the cell wall and the septum mainly consist of polysaccharide glucans [7,8]. The septum is a trilaminar structure with a primary septum sandwiched by two secondary septa. During cell separation, the primary septum is digested by glucanases and the secondary septa becomes the new cell wall of daughter cells [9].

The main component of the primary septum in fission yeast is the linear β-1,3-glucan synthesized by glucan synthase Bgs1/Cps1 [10,11]. The secondary septum consists of 1,6 branched β-1,3-glucans synthesized by Bgs4, α-1,3-glucans synthesized by Ags1, and β-1,6-glucans [12]. β-1,6-glucans are relatively short polymers of glucose (~350 glucose units) linked by β-1,6-glycosidic linkages [8]. The synthases for β-1,6-glucans have not been definitely identified but Kre6 and Skn1 are important for the elongation of β-1,6-glucan chains in budding yeast cell wall [1315]. The glucan synthases Bgs1, Bgs4, and Ags1 are essential transmembrane proteins delivered to the plasma membrane via secretory pathway [11,1620].

The regulation of glucan synthases is of keen interest as they are essential for cytokinesis and cell-wall formation, making them ideal targets for anti-fungal drugs with minimal side effects on plant and animal cells including humans [21,22]. Several proteins have been documented for regulating glucan synthases in yeast and filamentous fungi. Rho1 GTPase activates β-1,3-glucan synthases as a regulatory subunit [2326]. The α-glucan synthase Ags1 is regulated by Rho1 and Rho2 GTPases via the protein kinase C [27,28]. The F-BAR protein Cdc15 scaffolds several proteins involved in cytokinesis at the division site and maintains the contractile ring stability during anaphase. In cdc15 mutants, Bgs1 trafficking from Golgi to the division site is impeded [1]. Rho-GAP Rga7 plays a role in β-1,3-glucan synthase Bgs4 delivery from Golgi to the cleavage site during cytokinesis [29,30]. The clathrin coat proteins (COPs) were also involved in glucan synthase regulation. In yeast, a mutation in the SOO1 gene, encoding the α-COP protein Soo1, affects β-glucan synthase activity and displays an osmo-sensitive phenotype. Soo1 is likely involved in the transport of proteins involved in β-glucan synthesis from ER to Golgi [31]. In A. nidulans, the α-COP protein SodVICp plays a role in cell wall synthesis and protein secretion by affecting β-glucan synthase activity [32]. Moreover, S. pombe clathrin light chain clc1 deletion mutant is defective in Bgs1 localization [33]. However, none of the multi-functional proteins are essential for Bgs1 or Bgs4 localization.

Here we investigated the roles of the essential protein Sbg1 in cytokinesis and revealed a novel mode of regulation for the β-glucan synthase Bgs1. Sbg1 is a binding partner of Bgs1 and is essential for Bgs1 localization and stability. We also find that Sbg1 has a more important role than the F-BAR protein Cdc15 in Bgs1 trafficking and localization.

Results

sbg1 mutant has abnormally stable contractile rings and fails cytokinesis

We first developed an interest in the uncharacterized protein Sbg1 (SPBP22H7.03) after a genome-wide deletion screen in S. pombe categorized it as an essential gene with putative function in cytokinesis [34]. It was reported that sbg1Δ led to long branched cells and Sbg1 localized to the division site [34,35]. Sbg1 is a small protein (20 kDa) with one recognizable SKN1 domain, which contains a transmembrane helix and is similar to a small portion of β-glucan synthesis associated proteins of SKN1 and KRE6 proteins in yeast (S1A Fig). SKN1 and KRE6 play redundant roles in synthesis and incorporation of β-1,6-glucan in the fungal cell wall [14,15]. The Sbg1 SKN1 homology domain is conserved in SKN1 and KRE6 proteins of many pathogenic fungal species such as Candida and Aspergillus (S1B Fig). All of the homologs have putative roles in β-1,6-glucan synthesis (S1C Fig). However, their roles in regulating other glucan synthases have not been reported.

To determine the role of Sbg1 in cytokinesis and cell-wall formation, we deleted one copy of sbg1 in a diploid strain carrying homozygous tandem dimer Tomato (tdTomato)-tagged myosin regulatory light chain Rlc1 as a contractile-ring marker. The spores separated with a 2:2 ratio with two dead as single cells confirming that Sbg1 is an essential gene. sbg1Δ spores germinated normally but arrested with septa, and some lysed while attempting cytokinesis (Fig 1A, S2A Fig and S1 Movie). sbg1Δ cells that survived longer gradually lost polarity and became swollen (S2A and S2B Fig). Sorbitol partially rescued sbg1Δ cells and sbg1Δ cells germinated on media with sorbitol survived for up to 3 days. However, cytokinesis still failed and cell morphology was defective in these cells, which were elongated, multi-septated, and swollen (Fig 1B and S2 Movie). The cell-lysis phenotype along with the mild rescue by sorbitol suggests that sbg1Δ cells have defective cell wall and/or septum.

thumbnail
Fig 1. sbg1 mutants are defective in contractile-ring constriction and septation.

Germinated spores in (A, F, and H) were imaged 12–24 h after tetrad dissection onto YE5S plates. (A) Time course of a sbg1Δ cell lysed at 180 min. (B) A sbg1Δ cell germinated on YE5S + sorbitol and imaged after 3 d of growth. (C-E) Micrograph (C) and quantifications (D and E) of sbg1 depletion phenotype of strain 81nmt1-mECitrine-sbg1 grown in YE5S + thiamine for 60 h. (D) Cell width at the widest part of the cell perpendicular to cell long axis. In this and other figures, asterisks indicate p < 0.01 in Student’s t-test and error bars are ± 1 SD. (E) Percentage of cells with ≥1 septa. (F and G) Contractile-ring formation and constriction in wt and sbg1 mutants. 81nmt1-sbg1 rlc1-tdTomato and control cells were grown in YE5S + thiamine liquid cultures for 36 h before imaging. Time 0 marks node appearance. (G) Timing of ring formation (node appearance to a compact ring) and constriction (a compact ring to ring constricted to a dot with highest Rlc1 pixel intensity, which includes the ring-maturation stage) in wt and sbg1 mutants. (H and I) Ring anchoring is defective in sbg1 mutants. Ring sliding in (H) sbg1Δ and (I) 81nmt1-sbg1 cells. (I) Cells were grown as in (F). Scale bars (for this and other figures except EM): 5 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.g001

Despite much effort, we could not obtain conditional sbg1 mutants with strong phenotype using marker reconstitution mutagenesis [36], thus we depleted Sbg1 using thiamine repressible nmt1 promotors [37,38]. Under repressing condition, Sbg1 levels were greatly reduced in 81nmt1-mECitrine (monomeric enhanced Citrine)-sbg1 cells and in 41nmt1-mECitrine-sbg1 cells (S2C Fig, arrows). The cells were rounder, multi-septated, or branched (Fig 1C), which were similar to sbg1Δ cells. The 81nmt1-sbg1 cells were wider than wild-type (wt) cells (Fig 1D), but they had no significant difference in cell length (S2D Fig). The mutant cells also had a higher septation index (~50% compared with ~9% in wt; Fig 1E) and ~8% cells were multiseptated, indicating a delay in cytokinesis.

We compared contractile-ring defects in sbg1Δ (using tetrad fluorescence microscopy) and 81nmt1-sbg1 cells using Rlc1-tdTomato as a marker (Fig 1F and 1G and S2B Fig). Ring formation and morphology appeared normal in both sbg1 mutants. However, ring maturation and constriction were severely delayed. In wt cells ring maturation and constriction took 45 ± 8 min, whereas they took 663 ± 173 min in sbg1Δ cells. In 30% sbg1Δ cells (n = 13 cells) the ring did not constrict during the 13 h movies (Fig 1F middle, 1G, S2B Fig and S3 Movie). In 81nmt1-sbg1 cells under repressing conditions for 36 h, ring maturation and constriction were delayed and took 65 ± 21 min (Fig 1F and 1G). The ring was also not properly anchored in some sbg1 mutant cells and slid along the cell long axis (Fig 1H and 1I). Thus, sbg1 mutant phenotype suggests that Sbg1 likely plays a role in polarized growth, septum formation, ring constriction, and ring anchoring.

Sbg1 plays a role in primary septum formation

The cell morphology, lysis, and contractile-ring defects of sbg1 mutants resemble those in β-glucan synthase bgs1 mutants. Defects in septum formation in bgs1 mutants result in delayed contractile-ring constriction [11,39]. We examined cell wall and septum defects in sbg1 mutant cells by Calcofluor staining, which stains the primary septa and growing cell tips [39]. Unlike wt cells, 81nmt1-mECitrine-sbg1 cells showing prominent septal structures in differential interference contrast (DIC) images were not stained well by Calcofluor (S2E Fig), suggesting a primary-septum defect similar to bgs1 mutants [39]. Indeed, EM revealed that the primary septa in 81nmt1-sbg1 cells were discontinuous (Fig 2A, red arrowheads), uneven, and thinner (45 ± 7 nm in wt vs. 31 ± 15 nm in the mutant; Fig 2D). In addition, the septum grew asymmetrically in the mutant cells (Fig 2A, orange arrowheads). Thus, the contractile ring defects and the cytokinetic delay in sbg1 mutants are likely due to failure in forming a fully functional primary septum. The secondary septa as well as the cell wall outside the division site in 81nmt1-sbg1 cells were ~3x and 2x as thick as those in wt (456 ± 52 nm vs. 147 ± 5 nm; Fig 2A–2D and S2F Fig). Taken together, the septum and cell-wall defects in sbg1 depleted cells are similar to those in bgs1 mutants [11,19,39], suggesting Sbg1 works in the same pathway as Bgs1 in primary-septum and cell-wall formation.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Sbg1 plays a role in primary septum formation.

EM micrographs (A-C) and quantification (D) showing septum and cell-wall defects in 81nmt1-sbg1 cells. Double headed arrows indicate septa (white) or cell wall (yellow) thickness. Red arrowheads mark gaps in the primary septum. Orange arrowheads mark asymmetric septation. Scale bars: 1 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.g002

Sbg1 co-localizes and interacts with the β-glucan synthase Bgs1

To test whether Sbg1 and Bgs1 work together, we compared Sbg1 and Bgs1 localizations (Fig 3). Sbg1 localized to the division site, cell tips, and cytoplasmic puncta (Fig 3A and 3B). Using the spindle pole body (SPB) protein Sad1 as a cell-cycle marker, we determined that Sbg1 arrived at the division site during early anaphase B when SPBs were ~4 μm apart (Fig 3B and S3A Fig). Next we examined Sbg1 localization dependencies. Sbg1 partially depended on actin filaments for its localization. When treated with CK-666 (abolishing actin patches nucleated by the Arp2/3 complex) or Latrunculin-A (Lat-A; abolishing all actin filaments), Sbg1 intensity in cytoplasmic puncta decreased, more Sbg1 accumulated at cell tips, and it spread out to a wider region at the division site instead of a compact ring (S3B Fig). Sbg1 depended on the secretory pathway for efficient delivery to the cell tips and division site (S3C and S3D Fig). After Brefeldin-A (BFA) treatment, Sbg1 concentrations at the division site and cell tips were obviously reduced and cytoplasmic puncta mostly disappeared (S3C Fig and S4 Movie). Consistently, Sbg1 localization was affected by the mutation in vesicle-tether exocyst (S3D Fig; [40,41]). The temporal and spatial localization patterns and dependencies of Sbg1 localization are identical to those of Bgs1 [16,40].

thumbnail
Fig 3. Sbg1 co-localizes and interacts with the β-glucan synthase Bgs1.

(A) Sbg1 localization in cytoplasmic puncta, the division site, and cell tips. (B) Time course of arrival and ring formation of Sbg1 at the division site using Sad1 as a cell-cycle marker. (C-E) Micrograph (C), 3-D projection and line scans at the dashed line (D), and time course (E) showing co-localization of Sbg1 and Bgs1. (E) Single focal plane images of a representative cell showing Sbg1 and Bgs1 move together in cytoplasmic puncta (an example marked by white arrows). (F) Sbg1 co-IPs with Bgs1. IP using anti-GFP antibodies and cell lysates of strains expressing GFP-Bgs1, 3Flag-Sbg1, or GFP-Bgs1 3Flag-Sbg1 grown in YE5S for 48 h. The asterisk marks GFP-Bgs1. The smearing and multiple bands are likely caused by post-translational modifications.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.g003

Indeed, Sbg1 and Bgs1 colocalized in cytoplasmic puncta, cell tips, and the division site (Fig 3C and 3D). At the division site, they localized as a disc along the septum but were more concentrated near the leading edge of forming septum (Fig 3D). They traveled together in cytoplasmic puncta (Fig 3E, white arrows and S5 Movie). Thus, Sbg1 and Bgs1 might be delivered together to the division site by the secretory pathway. We also detected partial co-localization of Sbg1 with the other glucan synthases Bgs4 and Ags1 (S3E Fig). However, Sbg1 concentrated in the ring earlier than Bgs4 and Ags1 (S3E Fig, arrows). In addition, Bgs4 and Ags1 lagged behind Sbg1 during septum formation (S3F Fig). Together with the EM data, these results suggest that Sbg1 works together with Bgs1 in primary septum formation.

We used immunoprecipitation (IP) to test whether Sbg1 physically interacts with Bgs1. GFP-Bgs1 could pull down 3Flag-Sbg1 from S. pombe extracts of the strain expressing both proteins (Fig 3F). Thus, Sbg1 and Bgs1 are present in the same protein complex.

Sbg1 and Bgs1 are interdependent for cellular localization

To determine the functional relationship between Sbg1 and Bgs1, we began by testing their localization dependence. Interestingly, Bgs1 localization depended on Sbg1 (Fig 4A and 4B; n = 53). The tip localization of Bgs1 was abolished in all sbg1Δ cells analyzed at different cell cycle stages and Bgs1 localization to the division site was greatly affected. ~70% of cells showed some residual Bgs1 signal in the Rlc1-labeled structures in time-lapse movies (Fig 4A, arrows, S4A Fig and S6 Movie). The residual signal was not bleedthrough from the red channel (S6C Fig). This suggests that some Bgs1 may still bind to the proteins in the contractile ring. However, no Bgs1 signal was seen at the membrane near growing or formed septal structures. The cytoplasm in sbg1 mutants was very bright and GFP signal was seen in patch like structures, which were more obvious with higher imaging laser power (Fig 4B and S4C Fig). These data suggest that Sbg1 plays an important role in Bgs1 localization. In contrast, Sbg1 depletion had no obvious effect on Bgs4 and Ags1 localization (S4D and S4E Fig). To directly test the ability of Sbg1 to recruit Bgs1, we mislocalized Sbg1 to mitochondria using mitochondrial outer membrane protein Tom20 tagged with GFP binding protein (GBP; [42,43]). mEGFP-Sbg1 indeed recruited Bgs1 to the mitochondria (Fig 4C, arrows and S5A Fig). These data reveal that Sbg1 is a novel regulator of Bgs1 localization.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Sbg1 and Bgs1 are interdependent for localization.

(A and B) Bgs1 localization depends on Sbg1. (A) Time course and (B) micrographs (left, maximum intensity projection; right, single focal plane) of sbg1Δ or sbg1+ cells expressing both tagged Bgs1 and Rlc1. (C) Mislocalized Sbg1 by Tom20-GBP recruits Bgs1 to mitochondria (examples marked by arrows). (D) Sbg1 depends on Bgs1 for division-site and cell-tip localization. Cells were grown at 36°C for 4 h. (E) Mislocalized Bgs1 by Tom20-GBP recruits Sbg1 to mitochondria (examples marked by arrows).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.g004

Surprisingly, Sbg1 also depended on Bgs1 for localization to the plasma membrane. In bgs1 temperature-sensitive mutant at the restrictive temperature, Sbg1 appeared to be stuck in the nuclear membrane and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and had no enrichment at the cell tips or the division site (Fig 4D). To test the ability of Bgs1 to recruit Sbg1, we mislocalized Bgs1 to the mitochondria using Tom20-GBP. Bgs1 could recruit Sbg1 to mitochondrial structures (Fig 4E, arrows and S5B Fig). Thus, Sbg1 and Bgs1 are interdependent for localization/targeting to the plasma membrane. Together, Sbg1 and Bgs1 may physically interact and co-transport to the plasma membrane for cell wall and septum synthesis.

Sbg1 is important for Bgs1 stability

To understand how Sbg1 regulates Bgs1, we further analyzed the Bgs1 localization in sbg1 mutants with higher resolution. Unlike in sbg1+ cells, GFP-Bgs1 was absent from the plasma membrane at cell tips and the division site in sbg1 mutants (Fig 5A and 5B). Bright GFP fluorescence signal was seen as patch like structures in the cytoplasm. These were identified as vacuoles, whose membrane was stained with FM4-64 dye, in sbg1Δ and 41nmt1-sbg1 depletion cells (Fig 5A and 5B). We confirmed the vacuolar localization of Bgs1 in 81nmt1-sbg1 depletion cells by staining vacuolar lumen with CMAC dye (S6A Fig; [44]). The GFP signals in vacuoles were not autofluorescence from sick sbg1Δ cells since they were absent in sbg1Δ cells without GFP-Bgs1 (S6B and S6C Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Sbg1 prevents the mistargeting of Bgs1 to vacuoles.

(A and B) Bgs1 accumulates in vacuoles in sbg1 mutants. FM4-64 staining of sbg1Δ and sbg1+ cells from spores germinated on YE5S plates for 24 h (A) or wt and 41nmt1-sbg1 cells grown in YE5S + thiamine for ~60 h (B). (C-E) Bgs1 degrades in sbg1 mutant cells. (C) Western blotting and (D and E) quantifications (n = 6 from 2 independent experiments) of GFP-Bgs1 from cell lysates of GFP-bgs1 and 81nmt1-sbg1 GFP-bgs1 cells grown in YE5S + thiamine for ~36 h.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.g005

The vacuolar fluorescence suggested that Bgs1 secretion to the plasma membrane is defective and/or Bgs1 is unstable without enough Sbg1. We tested whether Sbg1 plays a general role in secretory pathway or more specific to Bgs1 secretion. We detected no obvious defects in secretory pathway as the localizations of Sec8 (S6D Fig), a component of the vesicle tether exocyst complex; and Syb1 (S6E Fig), a v-SNARE on secretory vesicles were not affected in Sbg1 depletion cells. More importantly, the localizations of other secretory cargos Bgs4 and Ags1, two cell-wall glucan synthases, were not affected by Sbg1 depletion (S4D and S4E Fig). Together, these data suggest that Sbg1 plays a specific role in Bgs1 trafficking/stability and does not affect other secreted cargos.

Bgs1 accumulation in vacuoles also suggested Bgs1 destabilization from loss of Sbg1. We therefore tested Bgs1 levels in the sbg1 mutant using Western blotting (Fig 5C–5E). The GFP-Bgs1 level in 81nmt1-sbg1 was reduced by ~60% compared to wt (Fig 5C and 5D). Interestingly, a prominent band at the size of free GFP was detected in the mutant but hardly in wt (Fig 5C). The total amount of GFP present in the mutant was similar to that in wt samples (Fig 5D and 5E). GFP is known to be very stable due to the presence of a stable fluorescence fold [45,46]. This suggests that in the sbg1 mutants, Bgs1 but not the GFP tag was likely degraded. In contrast, the protein levels of Bgs4 and Ags1 were upregulated (S4F Fig). Together, these data suggest that Sbg1 plays an important role in maintaining Bgs1 protein levels and its trafficking.

Sbg1 plays an earlier role than the F-BAR protein Cdc15 in Bgs1 localization

The F-BAR protein Cdc15 is suggested to deliver Bgs1 from Golgi to the plasma membrane. In cdc15 temperature sensitive mutant cells, localization of Bgs1 was affected [1]. Consistently, we found that Sbg1 localization was also affected in cdc15 mutant cells (S6F Fig). We examined whether Sbg1 and Cdc15 play similar roles in Bgs1 trafficking to the plasma membrane. We observed GFP-Bgs1 localization in cdc15Δ cells using tetrad fluorescence microscopy. Unlike in sbg1Δ cells, Bgs1 localized to cell tips in cdc15Δ cells (Fig 6A–6C, yellow arrows; and S7 Movie). After the Rlc1 ring formed, Bgs1 delocalized from cell tips and spread on cell membrane unevenly (Fig 6C, single plane, white arrows). For 27 cdc15Δ cells observed during the ~11 h movies with 10 min interval, 52% cells had no Bgs1 concentration at the division site (Fig 6A); 33% of them had Bgs1 co-localizing with Rlc1 briefly after the ring collapse (Fig 6B, red arrows); the rest had neither Rlc1 nor Bgs1 localization at the division site. In both sbg1Δ and cdc15Δ cells, GFP-Bgs1 global level measured from GFP fluorescence intensity was similar to wt (S4B and S6G Figs). No excess accumulation of GFP signal in vacuoles was seen in cdc15Δ cells (S6H Fig). In sbg1 mutants, Bgs1 cannot localize to cell tips or the plasma membrane (Fig 4A and 4B), which implies that Sbg1 plays a role in Bgs1 delivery to the plasma membrane prior to Cdc15 and Sbg1 has a role independent of Cdc15 and its interacting proteins in regulating Bgs1 localization. Together, Sbg1 plays a more important and earlier role than Cdc15 in Bgs1 delivery or localization.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Roles of the F-BAR protein Cdc15 in Bgs1 localization.

(A and B) Time course and (C) micrographs of Bgs1 localization in cdc15Δ or cdc15+ cells. (B) Time course showing Bgs1 and Rlc1 colocalization (arrows) in ~1/3 cdc15Δ cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.g006

Discussion

In this study we find that Sbg1, a previously uncharacterized protein with a SKN1 domain from the Skn1/Kre6 family, plays a prominent role in regulating the β-glucan synthase Bgs1. Sbg1 binds to Bgs1 and regulates its localization to the cell tips and division site. We also find that Sbg1 is important for Bgs1 stability and trafficking.

Roles of Sbg1 in regulating the glucan synthase Bgs1

The β-glucan synthase Bgs1 is essential for contractile-ring constriction and primary septum formation in fission yeast cytokinesis [16,39,40]. It localizes to the active growth sites: cell tips and the division site [16,40]. Our study reveals a novel mode of regulation on Bgs1 localization. In sbg1Δ cells, Bgs1 is unable to localize to the plasma membranes at cell tips or the division site. Instead, Bgs1 transiently co-localizes with misplaced contractile ring components and accumulates in vacuoles (Figs 4 and 5). This suggests a role for Sbg1 in Bgs1 trafficking.

The secretory pathway plays an important role in Bgs1 trafficking to the plasma membrane. In cells with mutation in Sip1, an accessory protein for the clathrin adaptor protein AP-1, Bgs1 fails to localize to cell tips and is partially accumulated in Golgi or endosomes near the division site and cell tips [41,47], which is different from Bgs1 localization seen in the sbg1 mutants. The sbg1 mutant phenotype is more similar to those of the clathrin light chain clc1Δ and the Rho GTPase cdc42 mutants that compromise vesicle secretion and trafficking [33,48]. In these mutants, Bgs1, but not Bgs4, is mis-localized to the vacuoles. This indicates that Bgs1 and Bgs4 have different trafficking mechanisms, which is consistent with our data. However, in contrast to Clc1 and Cdc42 that are involved in several cellular processes [33], it seems that Sbg1 specifically affects only Bgs1 trafficking. Localizations of exocyst subunit Sec8, v-SNARE Syb1, and vesicle cargos Bgs4 and Ags1 are not obviously affected in sbg1 mutant cells (S4D, S4E, S6D and S6E Figs). Thus, Sbg1 plays essential roles in Bgs1 trafficking and localization but does not affect the localization of secretory pathway components or other cargos tested in this study.

In sbg1 mutants, we observed GFP signals in vacuoles. Western blotting showed majority GFP in Sbg1 depletion cells is free GFP and the level of GFP-Bgs1 dropped accordingly (Fig 5C–5E), suggesting that Bgs1 undergoes degradation. So we propose that Sbg1 may play a role in Bgs1 stability, acting as a chaperone/adaptor that allows successful secretion and function of Bgs1. This function is reminiscent of S. cerevisiae Keg1 that binds and stabilizes Kre6. In keg1 mutant cells, Kre6 level but not its function can be restored by mutations in the vacuolar proteolysis pathway [13,49]. In bgs1-191 mutant cells, no vacuolar localization or obvious loss in Sbg1 fluorescence was seen, Sbg1 was stuck in ER and/or nuclear envelope instead. This phenotype may be allele specific or Sbg1 only helps transport wild-type Bgs1 from ER to the plasma membrane. More studies are needed to distinguish these possibilities. Because Sbg1 remains colocalized with Bgs1 after Bgs1 arrives at its function sites, Sbg1 may also stabilize Bgs1 and its interactions with other proteins at the division site, as recently reported [Ref]. It has been proposed that β-glucan synthases mediated septum growth is mechanosensitive and coupled to contractile ring tension [3,4], so Sbg1 may also play a role in curvature-dependent septum growth.

It has been shown that the F-BAR protein Cdc15 is involved in Bgs1 delivery to the division site [1]. When Cdc15 is depleted, Bgs1 trafficking to the division site is slowed. Here we show that while Bgs1 localization to the division site is severely affected in cdc15Δ cells, Bgs1 can still localize to the membrane at cell tips and on the cell sides (Fig 6). Thus, the main function of Cdc15 may be to stabilize Bgs1 at the division site, to provide the cue for its recruitment through the contractile ring, or to play a role in the late stages of Bgs1 trafficking to the division site. Although it is likely that Bgs1 localization is regulated differently at the division site and cell tips, we propose that Sbg1 is more important for Bgs1 localization and function than Cdc15 for the following reasons. First, failure of Bgs1’s binding to the plasma membranes in sbg1Δ but not cdc15Δ cells indicates that Sbg1 functions earlier than Cdc15 in Bgs1 localization. Second, phenotype and primary-septum defects in bgs1Δ cells are similar to those in sbg1Δ but not in cdc15Δ cells. Third, Sbg1 and Bgs1 localization are interdependent and travel together to the division site. However, Cdc15 arrives at the division site much earlier [50] than Sbg1 (S3A Fig). Together, our data indicates that Sbg1 plays an earlier and more important role than Cdc15 in Bgs1 trafficking or membrane binding.

Skn1/Kre6 family proteins function in glucan synthesis and may serve as potential anti-fungal drug targets

Skn1/Kre6 family proteins are well conserved in fungi including many pathogenic fungal species ([51]; S1 Fig). They were first isolated as mutants defective in the synthesis of β-1,6-glucans [52]. β-1,6-glucans are proposed to be important for the shape and stability of yeast cell wall and for anchoring several mannoproteins to the external cell wall [53]. In the absence of these proteins β-1,6-glucans have significantly reduced levels and are structurally defective [54]. The Skn1/Kre6 family proteins have not previously been shown to regulate β-1,3-glucan synthases. However, our sbg1 mutants show defects consistent with those of bgs1 mutants and Bgs1 fails to localize in sbg1 mutants. Sbg1 only contains a transmembrane domain and part of the SKN1 domain of Skn1/Kre6 proteins. Thus, it is not surprising that Sbg1 has different function from Skn1/Kre6. C-terminal truncations of Sbg1 were inviable (our unpublished data), indicating that the SKN1 domain (and/or the embedded transmembrane domain) is essential for Sbg1 function. Sethi et al. [55] recently showed that a point mutation in the Skn1 domain of Sbg1 leads to decrease in cell wall β-1,3 glucan. Further studies are needed to determine the Sbg1 regions/domains involved in binding with Bgs1.

Orthologues of glucan synthases are absent in animal and plant cells, and thus have been robustly targeted for anti-fungal drug development [21,56]. Echinocandins and several derivatives target β-1,3-glucan synthesis [21,56]. However, recently a mutation hotspot was discovered in yeast β-1,3-glucan synthase Fks1 that confers resistant to echinocandins [12,57]. The mutated residues are conserved in most fungal glucan synthases including S. pombe Bgs4. This necessitates development of new drug targets for anti-fungal therapeutics. Sbg1 is a small protein that has a domain conserved in all known pathogenic fungi (S1C Fig). Thus, our studies on Sbg1 in fission yeast will help us not only understand cytokinesis but also develop a novel drug target.

Materials and Methods

Yeast strains and genetic methods

We used PCR-based gene targeting and standard genetic methods to construct strains [58,59]. All tagged strains are regulated under native promoters and integrated into endogenous chromosomal loci except the strains for Sbg1 depletion that are under the control of thiamine repressible nmt1 promoters [37,38]. To tag Sbg1 at its N-terminus under the control of the sbg1 promoter, we replaced the 3nmt1 promoter in plasmids pFA6a-kanMX6-P3nmt1-mEGFP (monomeric enhanced green fluorescent protein), pFA6a-kanMX6-P3nmt1-mECitrine, and pFA6a-kanMX6-P3nmt1-tdTomato with sbg1 5′UTR plus 200 bps upstream sequences (−329 to +6) at BglII and PacI sites. The resulting plasmids pFA6a-kanMX6-Psbg1-mEGFP (JQW776), pFA6a-kanMX6-Psbg1-mECitrine (JQW775), and pFA6a-kanMX6-Psbg1-tdTomato (JQW774) were then used as templates for PCR amplification and gene targeting at sbg1 chromosomal loci just upstream of the ATG [59]. We tested the functionalities of tagged Sbg1 by growing cells on YE5S and YE5S+ phloxin B plates from 23 to 36°C. The strains expressing mEGFP-Sbg1, mECitrine-Sbg1, and tdTomato-Sbg1 resembled wt under tested conditions. But tdTomato-Sbg1 had slightly different localization. Some tdTomato-Sbg1 was found to be stuck in internal membranes (S5B Fig). Thus, mEGFP-Sbg1 and mECitrine-Sbg1 are fully functional and tdTomato-Sbg1 is partially functional.

To analyze functions of essential genes and to determine protein localization in their absence, we carried out tetrad fluorescence microscopy (see the Microscopy section) or random spore assays. One copy of the essential gene was deleted using pFA6a-kanMX6 from a diploid strain with both copies of the genes for localization analyses tagged with GFP or tdTomato. The resulting heterozygous diploids were sporulated on SPA5S plates at 25°C for 2 d. The tetrads were then dissected on YE5S or YE5S + 1.2 M sorbitol and grown at 25°C for 1–3 d before imaging. Alternatively, sporulated diploids were digested with 0.5% glusulase (Perkin Elmer, NEE154001EA) at 23°C for ~24 h, washed twice with 1 ml YE5S, concentrated by centrifugation, and plated on YE5S agar plates and grew for 12 to 24 h before imaging. Extra spores were kept at 4°C for repeating experiments. Cells from germinated wt spores in the population were used as controls. Because fission yeast diploid cells are not stable for long-term storage, only the genotypes of parent strains are listed in S1 Table.

To mistargeting Sbg1 or Bgs1, strains expressing mEGFP-Sbg1 and GFP-Bgs1 were crossed to strains expressing mitochondrial outer membrane protein Tom20 tagged at its C-terminus with GBP [42,43].

Cellular methods and pharmacological treatments

To depolymerize actin filaments, we treated the cells with DMSO or 100 μM Lat-A (Sigma- L5163) for 10 min as described [60]. We used CK-666 (ChemDiv; [61]) at a final concentration of 100 μM from a 10 mM stock solution in DMSO to inhibit actin assembly for endocytosis. Cells were treated with DMSO or CK-666 for 10 min. To disrupt protein secretion, we treated cells with a final concentration of 10 μM Brefeldin-A (Sigma-B7651) from a 10 mM stock solution in ethanol for 10 min in the dark [62].

To visualize the primary septum, cells were stained with 10 μg/ml Calcofluor for 10 min in the dark. To visualize vacuolar membrane in yeast cells and cells from germinated spores, cells were treated with 16 μM FM4-64 (Molecular probes, T3166) from a 16 mM stock solution in DMSO for 20–30 min before washing with 1 ml YE5S twice and imaging. To visualize vacuolar lumen, we used 100 μM Cell trackerTM Blue CMAC Dye (ThermoFisher Scientific, C2110) from a 10 mM stock solution in DMSO. Cells grown in YE5S + thiamine were washed into EMM5S minimal media (to reduce the background) and then CMAC was added to cells and stained for 30 min. The cells were pelleted, resuspended with 1 ml fresh EMM5S and incubated with shaking for 10 min before imaging. Cells were imaged on bare slides and coverslips after all the treatments mentioned in this section.

Microscopy

Cells were woken up from −80°C stocks (except the ones from germinated spores), restreaked, and grown for 1–2 d on YE5S plates at 25°C and then inoculated into YE5S liquid media. Cells were transferred to YE5S + thiamine medium for indicated times to further repress nmt1 promoters. Cells were grown at exponential phase for ∼48 h at 25°C before microscopy, except where noted. For microscopy, cells were collected by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm, washed once with EMM5S medium to reduce autofluorescence, and once with EMM5S plus 5 μM n-propyl-gallate. Most cells were imaged on EMM5S + 20% gelatin pads with 5 μM n-propyl-gallate as previously described [42,63,64]. For experiments in Fig 3B, S3D and S6F Figs, cells were washed with fresh YE5S medium once, then with YE5S + 5 μM n-propyl-gallate once, and ∼5 μl of concentrated cells were spotted on a 35-mm dish with a glass coverslip bottom (0420041500C; Bioptechs). The cells were then covered with a piece of YE5S agar before imaging. For imaging germinating spores using Tetrad Fluorescence Microscopy [6466], the YE5S or YE5S + 1.2 M sorbitol agar plate with the tetrads was cut out and placed face down on a 35-mm dish with a glass coverslip bottom. The agar piece was then covered by an 18 x 18 mm coverslip to slow down the drying of agar media. The Tetrad Fluorescence Microscopy that combines tetrad dissection with spinning disk confocal microscopy allows us to observe the localization of various proteins in cells with the deletion of essential genes. It also allows us to determine the deletion phenotypes unambiguously during the first several cell division. Typically 4–5 tetrads were imaged simultaneously overnight with automated stages.

Microscopy was carried out at 23.5–25°C except where noted. For imaging at restrictive temperatures of temperature-sensitive mutants, a preheated climate chamber (stage-top incubator INUB-PPZI2-F1 equipped with a UNIV2-D35 dish holder; Tokai Hit, Shizuoka-ken, Japan) was used and cells were prepared in the 35-mm dish and the restrictive temperatures were maintained during sample preparations and imaging.

Plan-Apo objective lenses of 100×/1.4 numerical aperture (NA) were used for all the imaging. For visualizing cell morphology and septum only (including Calcofluor staining), cells were imaged on a Nikon Eclipse Ti inverted microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY) equipped with a Nikon cooled digital camera DS-Ql1. We performed other fluorescence microscopy on two confocal systems as described before [42,63,67]: an UltraVIEW ERS spinning-disk confocal system (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) with 405, 488-, 514-, and 568-nm lasers and an ORCA-AG camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ) with 2 × 2 binning, or a spinning-disk confocal system (UltraVIEW Vox CSUX1 system; Perkin Elmer) with 488-, 515-, and 561-nm solid-state lasers and a back-thinned, electron-multiplying charge-coupled device camera (C9100-13; Hamamatsu) without binning.

Data analysis

Microscopy data were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health [NIH], Bethesda, MD), UltraVIEW, or Volocity (Perkin Elmer) software. Fluorescence images shown in the figures are maximum intensity projections of image stacks at 0.4 to 0.6-μm spacing except where noted. The p values were calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test.

Electron microscopy (EM)

To observe cell wall and septum morphology in wt (JW81) and 81nmt1-mECitrine-sbg1 (JW6581) mutant, cells were grown in YE5S + thiamine medium at exponential phase for ∼48 h at 25°C and fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4 with 0.1 M sucrose) for 1 h. The fixed cells were then rinsed 3× with 0.1 M sucrose in the 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and the pellet was submitted to the Campus Microscopy and Imaging Facility at The Ohio State University for further preparations. The samples were further fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide and embedded in agarose block. Then the sample was dehydrated in a graded series of alcohol and embedded in Epon8 epoxy resin. Thin sections of 70–90 nm were cut using a Leica EM UC6 ultramicrotome. Sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and imaged using a FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope at 80 kV[6870].

EM with higher resolution was also done at the Boulder Electron Microscopy Services at University of Colorado, Boulder as described previously [42,66]. Briefly, cells were grown similarly (in YE5S + thiamine medium at exponential phase at 25°C for ∼48 h) and then collected using Millipore filters and frozen with high pressure freezing with the Wohlwend Compact 02 Freezer. Freeze-substitution was carried out in the presence of 2% osmium tetroxide and 0.1% uranyl acetate in acetone. Cells were embedded in Epon-Araldite epoxy resin and serially sectioned at 70 nm spacing. The samples were then post stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate before observation on a 713 Philips CM100 transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR).

IP and western blotting

We carried out IP assays and Western blotting as previously described [63,7173]. Briefly, GFP-tagged protein expressed at its endogenous level was pulled down from S. pombe cell extracts using protein G covalently coupled Dynabeads (100.04D; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with polyclonal anti-GFP antibodies (NB600-308; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO).

The protein samples were separated on SDS–PAGE and Western blotting was performed using the following monoclonal antibodies: anti-GFP antibody (11814460001, 1:1000 dilution; Roche, Mannheim, Germany); anti-Flag antibody (F1804; 1:500 dilution; Sigma-Aldrich); and TAT1 antibody (1:20,000 dilution) that detects tubulin, the loading control [74]. Anti-mouse secondary antibody was used at 1:5000 to 1:10,000 dilution.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Sbg1 is a conserved protein involved in glucan synthesis.

(A) Schematic of domain organization of Sbg1. (B) Sequence alignment of the SKN1 domain in S. pombe Sbg1 with β-glucan synthesis associated proteins from other fungi. Sp-S. pombe; Bm-Bipolaris maydis; Ca-Candida albicans; Cg-Candida galbrata; An-Aspergillus nidulans; Af-Aspergillus fumigatus; and Cn-Cryptococcus neoformans. Identical and similar (D/E, I/L/V, K/R, N/Q, and S/T) residues compared with Sbg1 are in red and blue, respectively. (C) Cladogram of SKN1 domains from different fungal species. A phylogenetic cladogram with branch length (indicated by the numbers) showing the relationship of the Sbg1 SKN1 domain with homologous β-glucan synthesis associated proteins from other fungal species. Fungal pathogens are in bold. NCBI’s BLAST and EMBL-EBI’s ClustalW2 were used to generate the cladogram.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. sbg1Δ leads to cell lysis and defective ring constriction.

(A and B) Cell lysis (A) and defective ring constriction and disassembly (B) in sbg1Δ cells. sbg1Δ spores were dissected and germinated on YE5S plates for 24 h before imaging. (A) Images from a movie with 10 min intervals showing before and after cell lysis. The scale bars (for this and other supplemental figures except the EM images) represent 5 μm. (C) Protein levels of Sbg1 after depletion using nmt1 promoters. Cell extracts of 81nmt1-mECitrine-sbg1 (left) and 41nmt1-mECitrine-sbg1 (right) cells grown in YE5S + thiamine for indicated times (0 to 72 h) were used to test Sbg1 levels. Lane C, control with mECitrine-Sbg1 expressed from its native promoter. The arrows mark the expected Sbg1 band. Tubulin was used a loading control. (D) Quantification of cell length in wt and 81nmt1-mECitrine-sbg1 cells grown as in Fig 1C. (E) The primary septum is deficient in Sbg1 depletion cells revealed by Calcofluor staining. Cells were grown in YE5S + thiamine for 60 h before staining. (F) Illustration of the measurements of septum and cell-wall thickness on EM images. The septum was measured at three equal distant points (marked by red circles) along the septa. The cell wall was measured at the very cell tip and two sides, which are halfway across the daughter cell (marked by yellow circles). Scale bar represents 1 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s002

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Localization dependencies of Sbg1 and partial colocalization of Sbg1 with glucan synthases Bgs4 and Ags1.

(A) Quantification of arrival and ring formation of Sbg1 at the division site using Sad1 as a cell-cycle marker. (B) Micrographs of mEGFP-sbg1 cells treated with DMSO, CK-666, or Lat-A. (C and D) Sbg1 localization depends on the secretory pathway. (C) Cells were treated with ethanol or BFA. (D) Sbg1 localization in wt and sec8-1 mutant grown at 36°C for 4 h. (E and F) Micrographs (E) and line scans at the dashed lines on the vertical views (F) showing partial colocalization of Sbg1 with glucan synthases Bgs4 and Ags1. Bgs1 was shown for comparison.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s003

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Localization and protein levels of Bgs1, Bgs4, and Ags1 in sbg1 mutants.

(A and B) sbg1Δ spores were germinated on YE5S plates for 24 h before imaging. (A) Time course showing no localization of GFP-Bgs1 in sbg1Δ cells. (B) Quantification of relative GFP-Bgs1 global levels in sbg1Δ compared to wt from the same tetrads. (C) Maximum projection and single plane micrographs of GFP-Bgs1 in wt and 41nmt1-sbg1 cells. (D-F) Maximum projection showing localization of Bgs4 (D) and Ags1 (E) and quantification (F) of their global fluorescence intensity in Sbg1 depletion cells. (C-F) Cells were grown in YE5S + thiamine for 36 h.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s004

(PDF)

S5 Fig.

Controls for Sbg1 (A) and Bgs1 (B) mislocalization experiments in Fig 4. Tom20-GBP recruits GFP but not tdTomato tagged proteins to mitochondria. No signal bleedthrough between 488 and 568-nm channels. Bgs1 and Sbg1 colocalization in the first columns is for comparison.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s005

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Sbg1 is required for trafficking of Bgs1 but not components in the secretory pathway to the plasma membrane and Cdc15 plays a role in Bgs1 localization.

(A, D, E) Cells were grown in YE5S + thiamine for 36 h. (A) Bgs1 accumulates in vacuoles in Sbg1 depletion cells. FM4-64 and CMAC staining of GFP-bgs1 and GFP-bgs1 81nmt1-sbg1 cells. (B and C) sbg1Δ and wt spores from sbg1Δ/sbg1+ diploid cells expressing homozygous Rlc1-tdTomato with (B) and without (C) GFP-Bgs1 were germinated on YE5S agar plate for 24 h before imaging. Micrographs in (B) and (C) were acquired under the same imaging conditions and processed the same way. Arrows indicate sbg1Δ cells. (D and E) Normal localization of the exocyst subunit Sec8 (D) and v-SNARE Syb1 (E) in Sbg1 depletion cells. (F) Sbg1 localization in cdc15-140 cells grown at 36°C for 3 h. (G) Quantification of relative GFP-Bgs1 global levels in cdc15Δ compared to wt from the same tetrads. (H) FM4-64 staining of wt (right cell) and cdc15Δ (left cell) cells from spores germinated on YE5S plate for 24 h.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s006

(PDF)

S1 Table. S. pombe strains used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s007

(PDF)

S1 Movie. Cell lysis in a sbg1Δ cell.

sbg1Δ spores from tetrad with a plasma membrane marker GFP-Psy1 (green) and a contractile-ring marker Rlc1-tdTomato (red) were dissected and germinated on YE5S plate and the resulting cells were imaged 24 h after the tetrad dissection. The cell was imaged with a time interval of 10 min for ~200 min. Time is in h: min. Frame rate: 7 frames per sec (fps).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s008

(AVI)

S2 Movie. Defects in sbg1Δ cells are partially rescued by sorbitol.

sbg1Δ spores with ring marker Rlc1-tdTomato were dissected and germinated on YE5S + 1.2 M sorbitol, imaged 24 h after tetrad dissection with a time interval of 10 min. Time is in h: min. Frame rate: 7 fps.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s009

(AVI)

S3 Movie. sbg1Δ cells are defective in contractile-ring constriction.

sbg1Δ spores with a plasma membrane marker GFP-Psy1 (green) and a ring marker Rlc1-tdTomato (red) were dissected and germinated on YE5S plate and the resulting cells were imaged 24 h after tetrad dissection. The cells were imaged with a time interval of 10 min for >10 h. Time is in h: min. Frame rate: 7 frames per sec (fps).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s010

(AVI)

S4 Movie. Sbg1 depends on the secretory pathway for its trafficking.

Cells expressing mEGFP-Sbg1 were treated with Brefeldin-A (BFA) or its solvent ethanol for ~10 min and imaged on bare slide with a time interval of 1 min. Sbg1 signal in cytoplasmic puncta and cell tips are dramatically reduced. Time is in h: min. Frame rate: 7 fps.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s011

(AVI)

S5 Movie. Sbg1 and Bgs1 co-localize and move together in cytoplasmic vesicles.

The strain expressing mEGFP-Sbg1 (green, left) and tdTomato-Bgs1 (red, middle) was grown in YE5S at exponential phase for 36 h before imaging continuously (1.1 frames/sec) at a single focal plane. Time is in min: sec. Frame rate: 7 frames per sec (fps).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s012

(AVI)

S6 Movie. Bgs1 localization depends on Sbg1.

Wt (top) and sbg1Δ (bottom) spores expressing GFP-Bgs1 (green) and Rlc1-tdTomato (red) were germinated on YE5S plates and imaged 24 h after tetrad dissection. Cells were imaged with a time interval of 10 min for ~10 h. Time is in h: min. Frame rate: 7 fps.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s013

(AVI)

S7 Movie. Bgs1 localization in cdc15Δ cells.

Wt (top) and cdc15Δ (bottom) spores expressing GFP-Bgs1 (green) and Rlc1-tdTomato (red) were germinated on YE5S plates and imaged 24 h after tetrad dissection. Cells were imaged with a time interval of 10 min for ~11 h. Time is in h: min. Frame rate: 7 fps.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167043.s014

(AVI)

Acknowledgments

We thank Juan Carlos Cortes, Mohan Balasubramanian, and Sophie Martin for strains and plasmids; the Stephen Osmani and James Hopper laboratories for sharing equipment; Richard Montione at OSU campus microscopy and imaging facility and Courtney Rae Ozzello and Thomas Giddings Jr. at University of Colorado, Boulder for electron microscopy services; and members of the Wu laboratory for strains and helpful discussion.

Disclaimer

During the review process of our paper, a similar study on characterization of Sbg1 was reported by Sethi et al., PLOS Genetics, 12:e1006383, 2016.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: J-QW RD.
  2. Formal analysis: J-QW RD JAP.
  3. Funding acquisition: J-QW.
  4. Investigation: RD JAP.
  5. Methodology: J-QW RD.
  6. Project administration: J-QW.
  7. Resources: J-QW RD JAP.
  8. Supervision: J-QW.
  9. Validation: J-QW RD JAP.
  10. Visualization: RD.
  11. Writing – original draft: RD.
  12. Writing – review & editing: J-QW RD.

References

  1. 1. Arasada R, Pollard TD. Contractile ring stability in S. pombe depends on F-BAR protein Cdc15p and Bgs1p transport from the Golgi complex. Cell reports. 2014; 8:1533–44. pmid:25159149
  2. 2. Proctor SA, Minc N, Boudaoud A, Chang F. Contributions of turgor pressure, the contractile ring, and septum assembly to forces in cytokinesis in fission yeast. Curr Biol. 2012; 22:1601–8. pmid:22840513
  3. 3. Thiyagarajan S, Munteanu EL, Arasada R, Pollard TD, O'Shaughnessy B. The fission yeast cytokinetic contractile ring regulates septum shape and closure. J Cell Sci. 2015; 128:3672–81. pmid:26240178
  4. 4. Zhou Z, Munteanu EL, He J, Ursell T, Bathe M, Huang KC, et al. The contractile ring coordinates curvature-dependent septum assembly during fission yeast cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2015; 26:78–90. pmid:25355954
  5. 5. Wloka C, Bi E. Mechanisms of cytokinesis in budding yeast. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2012; 69:710–26.
  6. 6. Bi E, Park H-O. Cell polarization and cytokinesis in budding yeast. Genetics. 2012; 191:347–87. pmid:22701052
  7. 7. Manners DJ, Masson AJ, Patterson JC. The structure of a β-(1→ 3)-D-glucan from yeast cell walls. Biochem J. 1973a; 135:19–30.
  8. 8. Manners DJ, Masson AJ, Patterson JC, Bjorndal H, Lindberg B. The structure of a β-(1→6)-D-glucan from yeast cell walls. Biochem J. 1973b; 135:31–6.
  9. 9. Alonso-Nunez ML, An H, Martin-Cuadrado AB, Mehta S, Petit C, Sipiczki M, et al. Ace2p controls the expression of genes required for cell separation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell. 2005; 16:2003–17. pmid:15689498
  10. 10. Humbel BM, Konomi M, Takagi T, Kamasawa N, Ishijima SA, Osumi M, et al. In situ localization of β-glucans in the cell wall of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 2001; 18:433–44. pmid:11255251
  11. 11. Liu J, Wang H, McCollum D, Balasubramanian MK. Drc1p/Cps1p, a 1,3-β-glucan synthase subunit, is essential for division septum assembly in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics. 1999; 153:1193–203. pmid:10545452
  12. 12. Perez P, Cortes JC, Martin-Garcia R, Ribas JC. Overview of Fission Yeast Septation. Cell Microbiol. 2016; 18:1201–7. pmid:27155541
  13. 13. Kurita T, Noda Y, Yoda K. Action of multiple endoplasmic reticulum chaperon-like proteins is required for proper folding and polarized localization of Kre6 protein essential in yeast cell wall β-1,6-glucan synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287:17415–24. pmid:22447934
  14. 14. Montijn RC, Vink E, Muller WH, Verkleij AJ, Van Den Ende H, Henrissat B, et al. Localization of synthesis of β-1,6-glucan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1999; 181:7414–20. pmid:10601196
  15. 15. Roemer T, Delaney S, Bussey H. SKN1 and KRE6 define a pair of functional homologs encoding putative membrane proteins involved in β-glucan synthesis. Mol Cell Biol. 1993; 13:4039–48. pmid:8321211
  16. 16. Cortes JC, Ishiguro J, Duran A, Ribas JC. Localization of the (1,3)β-D-glucan synthase catalytic subunit homologue Bgs1p/Cps1p from fission yeast suggests that it is involved in septation, polarized growth, mating, spore wall formation and spore germination. J Cell Sci. 2002; 115:4081–96. pmid:12356913
  17. 17. Munoz J, Cortes JC, Sipiczki M, Ramos M, Clemente-Ramos JA, Moreno MB, et al. Extracellular cell wall β(1,3)glucan is required to couple septation to actomyosin ring contraction. J Cell Biol. 2013; 203:265–82. pmid:24165938
  18. 18. Cortes JC, Sato M, Munoz J, Moreno MB, Clemente-Ramos JA, Ramos M, et al. Fission yeast Ags1 confers the essential septum strength needed for safe gradual cell abscission. J Cell Biol. 2012; 198:637–56. pmid:22891259
  19. 19. Ishiguro J, Saitou A, Duran A, Ribas JC. cps1+, a Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae FKS genes whose mutation confers hypersensitivity to cyclosporin A and papulacandin B. J Bacteriol. 1997; 179:7653–62. pmid:9401022
  20. 20. Cortes JC, Carnero E, Ishiguro J, Sanchez Y, Duran A, Ribas JC, et al. The novel fission yeast (1,3)β-D-glucan synthase catalytic subunit Bgs4p is essential during both cytokinesis and polarized growth. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118:157–74. pmid:15615781
  21. 21. Basha A, Basha F, Ali SK, Hanson PR, Mitscher LA, Oakley BR, et al. Recent progress in the chemotherapy of human fungal diseases. Emphasis on 1,3-β-glucan synthase and chitin synthase inhibitors. Curr Med Chem. 2013; 20:4859–87. pmid:24295405
  22. 22. Lackner M, Tscherner M, Schaller M, Kuchler K, Mair C, Sartori B, et al. Positions and numbers of FKS mutations in Candida albicans selectively influence in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities to echinocandin treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58:3626–35. pmid:24733467
  23. 23. Arellano M, Duran A, Perez P. Rho1 GTPase activates the (1–3)β-D-glucan synthase and is involved in Schizosaccharomyces pombe morphogenesis. EMBO J. 1996; 15:4584–91. pmid:8887550
  24. 24. Drgonova J, Drgon T, Tanaka K, Kollar R, Chen GC, Ford RA, et al. Rho1p, a yeast protein at the interface between cell polarization and morphogenesis. Science. 1996; 272:277–9. pmid:8602514
  25. 25. Kondoh O, Tachibana Y, Ohya Y, Arisawa M, Watanabe T. Cloning of the RHO1 gene from Candida albicans and its regulation of β-1,3-glucan synthesis. J Bacteriol. 1997; 179:7734–41. pmid:9401032
  26. 26. Beauvais A, Bruneau JM, Mol PC, Buitrago MJ, Legrand R, Latge JP. Glucan synthase complex of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183:2273–9. pmid:11244067
  27. 27. Calonge TM, Nakano K, Arellano M, Arai R, Katayama S, Toda T, et al. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rho2p GTPase regulates cell wall α-glucan biosynthesis through the protein kinase Pck2p. Mol Biol Cell. 2000; 11:4393–401. pmid:11102532
  28. 28. Katayama S, Hirata D, Arellano M, Perez P, Toda T. Fission yeast α-glucan synthase Mok1 requires the actin cytoskeleton to localize the sites of growth and plays an essential role in cell morphogenesis downstream of protein kinase C function. J Cell Biol. 1999; 144:1173–86. pmid:10087262
  29. 29. Arasada R, Pollard TD. A role for F-BAR protein Rga7p during cytokinesis in S. pombe. J Cell Sci. 2015; 128:2259–68. pmid:25977474
  30. 30. Liu Y, Lee I-J, Sun M, Lower CA, Runge KW, Ma J, et al. Roles of the novel coiled-coil protein Rng10 in septum formation during fission yeast cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2016; 27:2528–41. pmid:27385337
  31. 31. Lee DW, Ahn GW, Kang HG, Park HM. Identification of a gene, SOO1, which complements osmo-sensitivity and defect in in vitro β-1,3-glucan synthase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999; 1450:145–54. pmid:10354506
  32. 32. Lee H-H, Park J-S, Chae SK, Maeng PJ, Park HM. Aspergillus nidulans sodVIC1 mutation causes defects in cell wall biogenesis and protein secretion. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002; 208:253–7. pmid:11959445
  33. 33. de Leon N, Sharifmoghadam MR, Hoya M, Curto MA, Doncel C, Valdivieso MH, et al. Regulation of cell wall synthesis by the clathrin light chain is essential for viability in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e71510. pmid:23977061
  34. 34. Hayles J, Wood V, Jeffery L, Hoe KL, Kim DU, Park H-O, et al. A genome-wide resource of cell cycle and cell shape genes of fission yeast. Open Biol. 2013; 3:130053. pmid:23697806
  35. 35. Matsuyama A, Arai R, Yashiroda Y, Shirai A, Kamata A, Sekido S, et al. ORFeome cloning and global analysis of protein localization in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat Biotechnol. 2006; 24:841–7. pmid:16823372
  36. 36. Tang X, Huang J, Padmanabhan A, Bakka K, Bao Y, Tan BY, et al. Marker reconstitution mutagenesis: a simple and efficient reverse genetic approach. Yeast. 2011; 28:205–12. pmid:21360732
  37. 37. Maundrell K. nmt1 of fission yeast. A highly transcribed gene completely repressed by thiamine. J Biol Chem. 1990; 265:10857–64. pmid:2358444
  38. 38. Basi G, Schmid E, Maundrell K. TATA box mutations in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nmt1 promoter affect transcription efficiency but not the transcription start point or thiamine repressibility. Gene. 1993; 123:131–6. pmid:8422997
  39. 39. Cortes JC, Konomi M, Martins IM, Munoz J, Moreno MB, Osumi M, et al. The (1,3)β-D-glucan synthase subunit Bgs1p is responsible for the fission yeast primary septum formation. Mol Microbiol. 2007; 65:201–17. pmid:17581129
  40. 40. Liu J, Tang X, Wang H, Oliferenko S, Balasubramanian MK. The localization of the integral membrane protein Cps1p to the cell division site is dependent on the actomyosin ring and the septation-inducing network in Schizosaccaromyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell. 2002; 13:989–1000. pmid:11907277
  41. 41. Bendezu FO, Martin SG. Actin cables and the exocyst form two independent morphogenesis pathways in the fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2011; 22:44–53. pmid:21148300
  42. 42. Wang N, Lee I-J, Rask G, Wu J-Q. Roles of the TRAPP-II complex and the exocyst in membrane deposition during fission yeast cytokinesis. PLoS Biol. 2016; 14:e1002437. pmid:27082518
  43. 43. Rothbauer U, Zolghadr K, Muyldermans S, Schepers A, Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H. A versatile nanotrap for biochemical and functional studies with fluorescent fusion proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008; 7:282–9. pmid:17951627
  44. 44. Stefan CJ, Blumer KJ. A syntaxin homolog encoded by VAM3 mediates down-regulation of a yeast G protein-coupled receptor. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274:1835–41. pmid:9880567
  45. 45. Heim R, Prasher DC, Tsien RY. Wavelength mutations and posttranslational autoxidation of green fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91:12501–4. pmid:7809066
  46. 46. Corish P, Tyler-Smith C. Attenuation of green fluorescent protein half-life in mammalian cells. Protein Eng. 1999; 12:1035–40. pmid:10611396
  47. 47. Yu Y, Kita A, Udo M, Katayama Y, Shintani M, Park K, et al. Sip1, a conserved AP-1 accessory protein, is important for Golgi/endosome trafficking in fission yeast. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e45324. pmid:23028933
  48. 48. Estravis M, Rincon S, Perez P. Cdc42 regulation of polarized traffic in fission yeast. Commun Integr Biol. 2012; 5:370–3. pmid:23060961
  49. 49. Nakamata K, Kurita T, Bhuiyan MS, Sato K, Noda Y, Yoda K, et al. KEG1/YFR042w encodes a novel Kre6-binding endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein responsible for β-1,6-glucan synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282:34315–24. pmid:17893149
  50. 50. Wu J-Q, Kuhn JR, Kovar DR, Pollard TD. Spatial and temporal pathway for assembly and constriction of the contractile ring in fission yeast cytokinesis. Dev Cell. 2003; 5:723–34. pmid:14602073
  51. 51. Sietsma JH, Wessels JG. Solubility of (1→3)-β-D/(1→6)-β-D-glucan in fungal walls: importance of presumed linkage between glucan and chitin. J Gen Microbiol. 1981; 125:209–12. pmid:6460846
  52. 52. Brown JL, Kossaczka Z, Jiang B, Bussey H. A mutational analysis of killer toxin resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies new genes involved in cell wall (1→6)-β-glucan synthesis. Genetics. 1993; 133:837–49. pmid:8462845
  53. 53. Zlotnik H, Fernandez MP, Bowers B, Cabib E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannoproteins form an external cell wall layer that determines wall porosity. J Bacteriol. 1984; 159:1018–26. pmid:6207165
  54. 54. Boone C, Sommer SS, Hensel A, Bussey H. Yeast KRE genes provide evidence for a pathway of cell wall β-glucan assembly. J Cell Biol. 1990; 110:1833–43. pmid:2186051
  55. 55. Sethi K, Palani S, Cortes JC, Sato M, Sevugan M, Ramos M, et al. A new membrane protein Sbg1 links the contractile ring apparatus and septum synthesis machinery in fission yeast. PLoS Genet. 2016; 12:e1006383. pmid:27749909
  56. 56. Perlin DS. Current perspectives on echinocandin class drugs. Future Microbiol. 2011; 6:441–57. pmid:21526945
  57. 57. Martins IM, Cortes JC, Munoz J, Moreno MB, Ramos M, Clemente-Ramos JA, et al. Differential activities of three families of specific β(1,3)glucan synthase inhibitors in wild-type and resistant strains of fission yeast. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286:3484–96. pmid:21115488
  58. 58. Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 1991; 194:795–823. pmid:2005825
  59. 59. Bähler J, Wu J-Q, Longtine MS, Shah NG, McKenzie A III, Steever AB, et al. Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 1998; 14:943–51. pmid:9717240
  60. 60. Wu J-Q, Bähler J, Pringle JR. Roles of a fimbrin and an α-actinin-like protein in fission yeast cell polarization and cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2001; 12:1061–77. pmid:11294907
  61. 61. Nolen BJ, Tomasevic N, Russell A, Pierce DW, Jia Z, McCormick CD, et al. Characterization of two classes of small molecule inhibitors of Arp2/3 complex. Nature. 2009; 460:1031–4. pmid:19648907
  62. 62. Brazer SC, Williams HP, Chappell TG, Cande WZ. A fission yeast kinesin affects Golgi membrane recycling. Yeast. 2000; 16:149–66. pmid:10641037
  63. 63. Davidson R, Laporte D, Wu J-Q. Regulation of Rho-GEF Rgf3 by the arrestin Art1 in fission yeast cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2015; 26:453–66. pmid:25473118
  64. 64. Davidson R, Liu Y, Gerien KS, Wu J-Q. Real-time visualization and quantification of contractile ring proteins in single living cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2016; 1369:9–23. pmid:26519302
  65. 65. Coffman VC, Sees JA, Kovar DR, Wu J-Q. The formins Cdc12 and For3 cooperate during contractile ring assembly in cytokinesis. J Cell Biol. 2013; 203:101–14. pmid:24127216
  66. 66. Lee I-J, Wang N, Hu W, Schott K, Bähler J, Giddings TH Jr., et al. Regulation of spindle pole body assembly and cytokinesis by the centrin-binding protein Sfi1 in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2014; 25:2735–49. pmid:25031431
  67. 67. Wang N, Wang M, Zhu Y-H, Grosel TW, Sun D, Kudryashov D, et al. The Rho-GEF Gef3 interacts with the septin complex and activates the GTPase Rho4 during fission yeast cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2015; 26:238–55. pmid:25411334
  68. 68. Hayat M. Basic Techniques for Transmission Electron Microscopy. San Diego California: ACADEMIC PRESS, INC.; 1986.
  69. 69. Hayat MA. Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy: Biological Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. xix, 543 p p.
  70. 70. Watanabe S, Sasaki J, Wada T, Tanaka Y, Otsuka N. Low gel temperature agarose encapsulation of small specimens for electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 1988; 37:89–91.
  71. 71. Lee I-J, Wu J-Q. Characterization of Mid1 domains for targeting and scaffolding in fission yeast cytokinesis. J Cell Sci. 2012; 125:2973–85. pmid:22427686
  72. 72. Ye Y, Lee I-J, Runge KW, Wu JQ. Roles of putative Rho-GEF Gef2 in division-site positioning and contractile-ring function in fission yeast cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2012; 23:1181–95. pmid:22298427
  73. 73. Laporte D, Coffman VC, Lee I-J, Wu J-Q. Assembly and architecture of precursor nodes during fission yeast cytokinesis. J Cell Biol. 2011; 192:1005–21. pmid:21422229
  74. 74. Woods A, Sherwin T, Sasse R, MacRae TH, Baines AJ, Gull K. Definition of individual components within the cytoskeleton of Trypanosoma brucei by a library of monoclonal antibodies. J Cell Sci. 1989; 93:491–500. pmid:2606940