Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Chemical Composition, an Antioxidant, Cytotoxic and Microbiological Activity of the Essential Oil from the Leaves of Aeollanthus suaveolens Mart. ex Spreng

Chemical Composition, an Antioxidant, Cytotoxic and Microbiological Activity of the Essential Oil from the Leaves of Aeollanthus suaveolens Mart. ex Spreng

  • Rosany Lopes Martins, 
  • Ranggel Carvalho Simões, 
  • Érica de Menezes Rabelo, 
  • Ana Luzia Ferreira Farias, 
  • Alex Bruno Lobato Rodrigues, 
  • Ryan da Silva Ramos, 
  • João Batista Fernandes, 
  • Lourivaldo da Silva Santos, 
  • Sheylla Susan Moreira da Silva de Almeida
PLOS
x

Abstract

Aeollanthus suaveolens species popularly known as catinga de mulata belongs to the Lamiaceae family. In the Amazon region, it is used in folk medicine for the treatment of gastritis, convulsions of epileptic origin, stomach pain and diarrhea in the form of tea and juice. Essential oils have analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activity. This study evaluated the chemical composition of the A. suaveolens essential oil, and its cytotoxic, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity on Artemia salina Leach. The plant species was collected in Fazendinha district in the city of Macapa-AP. The essential oil obtained from the process was performed by hydrodistillation and identification of components by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometer. The antioxidant activity was evaluated by the kidnapping method of 2,2- diphenyl -1-picrilhidrazil radical, while the cytotoxic activity was assessed using saline A. and the microbiological activity was carried out by microdilution method with Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp. and Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. In a chromatographic analysis, the major constituents found in the essential oil of A. suaveolens were (E) -β-farnesene (37.615%), Linalool (33.375%), α-Santalene (3.255%) and linalyl acetate (3.222%). The results showed that the Escherichia coli and Salmonella sp. bacteria were more susceptible to MIC 50 mg.mL-1 when compared with the Staphylococcus aureus bacterium MIC 100 mg.mL-1. With respect to MBC concentration of 100 mg.mL-1 it was sufficient to inhibit the growth of E. coli. The essential oil did not show antioxidant activity, however, has a high cytotoxic activity against the A. salina, LC50 8.90 μg.mL-1.

Introduction

The use of natural products as raw material for synthesis of bioactive substances, especially drugs, has been widely reported over the time [1]. It is estimated that approximately 80% of the world often employs indigenous or traditional medicines for their primary health care needs, especially those that use therapies that involve the use of herbal medicines. Brazil has a huge biodiversity, where much of the native plant species has not been studied. It is estimated that about 3000 essential oils are known, of which about three hundred are commercially important, intended mainly for the fragrance market [2, 3].

Essential oils are organic compounds of heterogeneous chemical structure that are widely distributed in higher plants. The constituents of the essential oils may belong to several classes of compounds, but terpenes and phenylpropenes are the most commonly compounds found. Terpenes found more frequently in essential oils are monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes minor constituents of essential oils [4].

The Lamiaceae family comprises 240 genders and 7200 species of nearly cosmopolitan distribution. In Brazil, there are 46 native genera and about 524 species [5]. In folk medicine, the Lamiaceae family ranks third in order of importance, with many species with biologically active substances [6].

The species A. suaveolens popularly known as catinga de mulata, belongs to the Lamiaceae family. It is an herb with about 40 cm tall, circular stem branched, petiolate leaves, coated with trichomes with aromatic essence in its pre-flowering and valve. It has metaclamideas flowers type bisexual, trimerous. Its androecium has didynamous stamens, spherical pollen grains, with supero and unilocular carpels. It has its ovarian in a gynobasic type supero, and the inflorescence racemes [7].

In folk medicine, A. suaveolens is used to control epileptic seizures, combat fever, headache, the onset of stroke, "quebranto" (it is a kind of bad enchantment). Its sheet is utilized in form of tea and juice [7]. In riverine community of the Solimões River in Amazonas, the species is used to treat gastritis, stomach pain, and diarrhea. Their baths are used to relieve symptoms in victims of "mau-olhado" (it is also a kind of bad enchantment) [8].

Few studies have been reported on a cytotoxic, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of essential oil species of this family. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the chemical composition, antimicrobial activity (against gram-negative and gram-positive), toxicity (compared to the larvae of Artemia salina), and antioxidant activity of the essential oil obtained from the leaves of A. suaveolens.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

The leaves of A. suaveolens were collected from Fazendinha district (00° 02'23 "S and 51° 06'29" W) in the Municipality of Macapa, Amapá. Two samples of plant species have been deposited in the Herbarium Amapaense (HAMAB) of the Institute of Scientific Research and Technology of the State of Amapá (IEPA) under the registration No M.R.L. 001. The study was conducted on private land with the permission and consent of the owner to carry out the study on site.

Essential oil obtaining

The essential oil (EO) was obtained by hydrodistillation process using the Clevenger type apparatus, using 30 g of dried and crushed leaves of A. suaveolens for a period of 2 h at a temperature of approximately 100°C [9]. The essential oil was removed with the aid of a pasteur pipette, and then packaged in the amber bottle wrapped in aluminum foil and kept under refrigeration (4°C) for later analysis.

Essential oil constituents of identification

The identification of essential oil components was performed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using Shimadzu equipment, MEGCs QP-2010 Plus model. Column DB-5 HT, Mark J & W Scientific, 30 m long, 0.32 mm diameter, 0.10 micron Indicated film thickness, and nitrogen as carrier gas. The gas chromatograph operating conditions were: an Internal pressure of 56.7 kPa column, split ratio 1:20, the column gas flow of 1.0 mL / min. (210°C), injector temperature 220°C, the temperature detector or the interface (GC-MS) 240°C. The initial column temperature was 60°C, followed by an increase of 3°C/min. up to 240°C and maintained constant for 30 min. The mass spectrometer was programmed to perform readings in a range of 29–400 Da 0.5s, intervals with ionization energy of 70 eV. It was injected 1μL of each sample at a concentration of 10,000 ppm dissolved in hexane. The identification of the components was based on the comparison of their Kovats index (KI) and mass spectra of each substance with the literature data.

Antioxidant activity

The quantitative evaluation of antioxidant activity was based on the methodology proposed by Sousa et al. [10], Lopes-Lutz et al. [11] and Andrade et al. [12] before the use of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hidrazila (DPPH) with some adjustments to laboratory conditions.

A methanolic solution of DPPH was prepared (stock solution) at a concentration of 40 μg.mL-1, which was kept under the light. The essential oils were diluted in methanol at concentrations of 5, 2.5, 1, 0.75, 0.50 and 0.25 mg.mL-1. For the evaluation, there were added into a test tube 2.7 mL of the stock solution of DPPH, followed by addition of 0.3 mL of the essential oil solution. The white of the solution was prepared, this being a mixture of 2.7 mL methanol and 0.3 mL of a methanolic solution of each EO concentration evaluated. After 30 min. on a spectrophotometer (Biospectro SP-22), readings were performed at a wavelength of 517 nm [13]. The assay was performed in triplicate and the calculation of percentage of antioxidant activity (% AA) was calculated with the following equation:

%AA—percentage of antioxidant activity

Abssample—Absorbance sample

Abswhite—White Absorbance

Abscontrol—Control Absorbance

Cytotoxic activity with Artemia salina leachg

The cytotoxicity assay against A. salina Leach was based on the technique of Araujo et al. [14] and Lobo et al. [15], with adaptations. an aqueous solution of synthetic sea salt was prepared (35.5 gL-1) for the incubation of 25 mg of A. salina eggs, which were placed in the dark for 24 h to larvae hatching (nauplius), then the nauplius were exposed to artificial light in 24 hour period to reach metanauplius stage. The mother solution was prepared to contain 54 mg of essential oil added 22.5 mL of synthetic sea salt solution and 4.5 mL of 5% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to facilitate solubilization of it.

The metanauplius were selected and divided into 7 groups of 10 subjects in each test tube, held in triplicate. Each group received aliquots of the stock solution (2500, 1250, 625, 250, 25 and 2.5 uL), which were then completed to 5 mL volume with a synthetic sea salt solution to yield final solutions with the following concentrations 1000, 500, 250, 100, 10 and 1 μg.mL-1. Tests were performed in triplicates. To the test control, it was used a saline solution. After 24 hours it was counted the number of dead. The lethal concentration that causes 50% mortality in the population (LC50) was determined by probit analysis using the software SPSS [version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA].

Antimicrobial activity

Microorganisms.

The evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of essential oil obtained from the leaves of A. suaveolens was tested against two gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli ATCC25922, Salmonella sp. ATCC14028) and two gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6538). Microorganisms were provided by the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ). The bacteria were initially reactivated from stock cultures, maintained on Mueller-Hinton broth (MHC) for 18 h at 37°C.

Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (mic) and minimum bactericidal concentration (mbc).

The MIC determination was performed by diluting technical microplate (96 wells) according to the protocol established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [16], with some adjustments.

The bacteria were initially taken from the stock cultures maintained on Mueller-Hinton broth (MHC) for 18 h at 37°C. After bacterial growth, an inoculum in 0.9% saline solution was prepared for each colony, adjusted to 0.5 McFarland scale, further diluted in MHC and tested in concentration 1,5 x107 Colony forming unit (CFU/mL).

To determine the MIC, the EO was diluted in dimethylsulfoxide (4% DMSO). The orifices of the microplate were filled with 50 μL NaCl and 50 μL of solution OE A. suaveolens. Then serial dilutions were made from 100 to 0.048 μg.mL-1. Additionally, 50 μL was distributed suspensions of microorganisms in each well of the microplate. As a positive control, it was used amoxicillin (50 μL.mL-1). There were performed the control of the culture medium, EO control and the negative control (4% DMSO). The microplates were incubated at 37°C for 24h. The experiments were performed in triplicate. The MIC was considered the lowest concentration of EO which was not displayed microbial growth. The presence of turbidity in the wells indicated microbial growth and therefore there was no antimicrobial activity.

Determination MBC was performed based on the results obtained in testing the MIC. The wells of microplates of microbial growth were replicated in Muller-Hinton agar and incubated at 37°C for 24h. The MBC was considered as the lowest concentration of essential oil in which, there was no growth of microorganisms in the Petri dishes, and there was an elimination of microorganisms.

Statistical analysis

The data analysis was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test to identify significant differences using BioEstat program [17]. The differences that showed lower levels of probability and equal to 5% (p = 0.05) were considered statistically significant. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Results and Discussion

Identification of chemical compounds by GC-MS of the A. suaveolens essential oil

The chemical composition of the essential oil from A. suaveolens was determined using GC-MS identification of major constituents present in this oil (Table 1) (S1 Fig). The chemical constituents detected in the oil extracted from the leaves, 1.57% are monoterpenes hydrocarbons, 39.65% are oxygenated monoterpenes, 43.56% are sesquiterpenes hydrocarbon, and 2.87% are lactones. As the major components (E) -β-farnesene (37.615%), linalool (33.375%), α-santalene (3.255%) and linalyl acetate (3.222%) (S2 Fig) (S3 Fig). These results corroborate the Tucker et al. [18] that link these compounds as the main major components of the essential oil of A. suaveolens [19].

thumbnail
Table 1. Chemical composition of the Aeollanthus suaveolens essential oil.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166684.t001

The chemical composition of essential oils varies according to edaphic factors of soil and weather the chemotype of species and by human action. However, a refined phytochemical screening of the EOs by GC-MS provide the chemical profile of the species, as well as contribute to the prediction of biological activities. According to Almeida et al. [20], linalool and the δ- decalactone has proven anticonvulsant activity, which may indicate a potential use of EOs of A. suaveolens.

Essential antioxidant activity from Aeollanthus suaveolens essential oil by the DPPH radical capture method

The antioxidant capacity of natural products is related to its composition of phenolic compounds, and the effect of these is to interrupt the chain of free radicals in the initiation stage of the oxidative process [21].

The results obtained after the determination of the OE antioxidant activity at different concentrations are shown in Table 2. The OE reached its maximum antioxidant activity (43.5%) at a concentration of 5 mg.mL-1.

The correlation between antioxidant activity (%) and the concentration of the OE showed a high IC50 value of 6.26 mg.mL-1, when compared with the standards, vitamin C and flavonoids rutin, with IC50 of 6.13 μg.mL-1 6.71 μg.mL-1 and respectively [22]. According to Nascimento et al. [23], the greater the consumption of DPPH in a sample, the lower its IC 50 and the greater its antioxidant activity.

For Beatović et al. [24], the OE antioxidant capacity is related to their major compounds, but this study has not observed the antioxidant activity. Studies with Ocimun basilicum species, and linalool as major compound showed strong antioxidant capacity [25]. On the other hand, Lu and Foo [26] believe that most compounds act synergistically together producing a broad spectrum of antioxidant properties and thus create an effective defense against free radicals.

Toxicity on Artemia salina essential Aeollanthus suaveolens oil

The toxicity test on A. salina L. is widely used in bioassay due to be fast, reliable, and low cost. Furthermore, the A. salina toxicity, shows good correlation with antitumor activities [27], pesticide [28] and anti-Trypanosoma cruzi [29] for substances LC50 <1000 μg.mL-1.

Amarante [30] classified both organic extracts and aqueous extracts, as nontoxic because the LC50 is above 1000 μg.mL-1, with low toxicity if the LC50 exceeds 500 μg.mL-1, with slight toxicity is the LC50 100 to 500 μg.mL-1 and very toxic to LC 50 is less than 100 μg.mL-1.

Table 3 shows the mean mortality readings held in the 24 hour period the cytotoxic activity of essential oil from A. suaveolens sheet. The results showed that the essential oil from A. suaveolens showed high toxicity against the A. salina, LC50 8.90 μg.mL-1 (Table 3) and correlation coefficient (R2 0.93), p <0.0000.

thumbnail
Table 3. Essential oil toxicity of Aeollanthus suaveolens front of the larvae of A. salina.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166684.t003

There is not report in the literature about cytotoxic activity of the essential oil of A. suaveolens front of A. salina. However, the high toxicity observed (8.90 μg.mL-1) can be related to the synergism between monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, present in the essential oil from A. suaveolens. Studies pro Boscardin et al. [31] on cytotoxic activity of volatile oil Eucalyptus benthamii in four tumor lines showed that the essential oil showed better results than the single compounds (α-pinene and γ-terpinene) to Jurkat, HeLa, and B16F10 cells.

Burt [32] believes that the mechanism of action of monoterpene and sesquiterpene compounds can be related to the displacement of these compounds toward the aqueous phase to the membrane structure causing toxic effects on both the structure and function of cell membranes.

Microbiological activity of the essential Aeollanthus suaveolens oil

The discovery of new natural products with antibiotic potential is of considerable interest due to the growing resistance of many bacteria to antibiotics currently used for the treatment of infections [33].

Table 4 refers to a microbial activity of essential oil from A. suaveolens. The results showed that gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella were more susceptible to the essential oil from A. suaveolens, with MIC 50 mg.mL-1 when compared with the gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus MIC 100 mg.mL-1. With respect to MBC, the OE concentration equivalent to 100 A. suaveolens mg.mL-1 was sufficient to inhibit the growth of E. coli.

thumbnail
Table 4. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the essential oil Aeollanthus suaveolens.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166684.t004

Studies by Simionatto et al. [34] with isolated compounds from A. suaveolens analyzed by bioautography showed that the lactone monoterpene massoialactona exhibited excellent antibacterial property to Salmonella Setubal and Bacillus subtilis microorganisms, being active in the minimum concentration that was tested (3.125 μg.mL-1). In this study, however, the A. suaveolens EO showed better bacteriostatic activity (50 mg.mL-1) for E. coli and Salmonella sp. and bactericidal activity (100 mg.mL-1) only for E. coli. This may be due to the low yield of massoialactona (2.496%) compared with other compounds identified in this study.

The lipophilic character of monoterpene compounds and sesquiterpene present in this oil can explain the mechanism of action of antimicrobial activity of A. suaveolens in the essential oil. Since these compounds can cause damage to the cell membrane which subsequently affects the balance and homeostasis of pH and inorganic ions [35, 36].

Unlike what was observed in the EO, the cytotoxic activity of A. suaveolens, where the synergistic effect of monoterpene compounds and sesquiterpene appears to potentiate the toxicity against the larvae of A. salina, the antimicrobial isolates proved to be the most isolated active compounds (massoialactona) of all the essential oil components [34]. However, it is important to note that synergistic or antagonistic effects should not be excluded from antimicrobial activity [37].

Conclusion

The essential oil obtained from the leaves of Aeollanthus suaveolens were chemically analyzed and determined the antioxidant, cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity. With regard to chemical analysis, the major compounds identified were (E) -β-farnesene, Linalool, α-Santalene, and linalyl acetate. The antimicrobial activity showed that the essential oil from A. suaveolens showed better bacteriostatic potential for gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Salmonella) than to gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) and potential bactericidal for gram-negative bacteria (E. coli). The essential oil showed little antioxidant activity by DPPH radical capture method when compared with standard vitamin C and rutin. However, it showed high Cytotoxic activity on Artemia salina. The data show the importance of preliminary bioassays as a screening of the biological potential of plant products, as well as the importance of these products as a source of bioactive compounds.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Chromatogram obtained by CG of essential A. suaveolens oil.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166684.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Phytochemical Profile of EO from A. suaveolens.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166684.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. Spectrum of mass from essential Aeollanthus suaveolens oil, obtained by GC-MS in comparison with equipment library spectrum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166684.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

When applied Microbiology Laboratory (LEMA) under the responsibility of Prof. Aldo Proietti Aparecido Júnior.

Federal University of Amapá—Unifap/Propesg

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: SSMSA RLM.
  2. Formal analysis: RLM ÉMR ABLR RSR SSMSA.
  3. Funding acquisition: SSMSA LSS JBF.
  4. Investigation: RLM ÉMR ABLR ALFF RCS SSMSA.
  5. Methodology: SSMSA RLM ÉMR ABLR RCS.
  6. Project administration: SSMSA LSS JBF.
  7. Resources: JBF LSS SSMSA.
  8. Supervision: SSMSA LSS JBF.
  9. Validation: RLM ÉMR RCS ABLR ALFF SSMSA.
  10. Visualization: RLM ÉMR ABLR SSMSA.
  11. Writing – original draft: RLM ÉMR SSMSA.
  12. Writing – review & editing: RLM ÉMR SSMSA.

References

  1. 1. Barreiro EJ, Fraga CAM, Araújo JX JR. O uso de produtos naturais vegetais como matérias-prima vegetais para a síntese e planejamento de fármacos. In: Simões CMO, Schenkel PE, Gosmann G, Mello PCJ, Mentz AL, Petrovick RP. Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento. 6 ed. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS; Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC; 2007. p. 147–209.
  2. 2. Henriques AT, Simões-Pires CA, Apel MA. Óleos Essenciais: Importância e perspectivas terapêuticas. In: Yunes RA, Cechinel Filho V. Química de produtos naturais, novos fármacos e a moderna farmacognosia. 1 ed. Itajaí: Univali; 2007. p. 209–235.
  3. 3. Franz CM. Essential oil research: pass, present and future. Flavour Fragr J. 2010; 25: 112–113.
  4. 4. Ootani AM, Aguiar WR, Ramos CCA, Brito RD, Silva BJ, Cajazeira PJ. Use of Essential Oils in Agriculture. J Biotec Biodivers. 2013; 4: 162–175.
  5. 5. Harley RM, Pastore JFB. A generic revision and new combinations in the Hyptidinae (Lamiaceae), based on molecular and morphological evidence. Phytotaxa. 2012; 58: 1–55.
  6. 6. Harley RM, Atkins S, Budantsev AL, Cantino PD, Conn BJ, Grayer R, et al. Labiatae. In: Kadereit JW. The families and genera of vascular plants. Nova York: Springer Verlag. 2004; 7: 167–275.
  7. 7. Oliveira ASC, Favacho AC, Sousa ELC, Nascimento ME. 2003. Estudo Morfológico da Catinga de Mulata (Aeollanthus suaveolens—Mart. ex. K. Spreng). <http://www.botanica.org.br/trabalhos-cientificos/54CNBot/R1096-1.pdf>. Acessado em: 27 de agosto de 2016.
  8. 8. Azevedo MV, Kruel FSV. Plantas medicinais e ritualísticas vendidas em feiras livres no Município do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil: estudo de caso nas zonas Norte e Sul. Acta bot bras. 2007; 21: 263–275.
  9. 9. Farmacopéia Brasileira. 5 ed. ANVISA. Brasília, 2010.
  10. 10. Sousa CMM, Silva RH, Vieira MG Jr., Ayres CCM, Costa SLC, Araújo SD, et al. Fenóis totais e atividade antioxidante de cinco plantas medicinais. Quim Nova. 2007; 30: 351–355.
  11. 11. Lopes-Lutz D, Alviano DS, Alviano CS, Kolodziejczyk PP. Screening of chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Artemisia essential oils. Phytochem. 2008; 69: 1732–1738.
  12. 12. Andrade MA, Cardoso GM, Batista RL, Mallet TCA, Machado FMS. Óleos essenciais de Cymbopogon nardus, Cinnamomum zeylanicum e Zingiber officinale: composição, atividades antioxidante e antibacteriana. Rev Ciênc Agron. 2012; 43: 399–408.
  13. 13. Tepe B, Sokmen M, Sokmen M, Akpulat AH, Sokmen A. In vitro antioxidant activities of the methanol extracts of four Helichrysum species from Turkey. Food Chemistry J. 2005; 90: 685–689.
  14. 14. Araújo MGF, Cunha WR, Veneziani RCS. Estudo fitoquímico preliminar e bioensaio toxicológico frente a larvas de Artemia salina Leach. de extrato obtido de frutos de Solanum lycocarpum A. St.-Hill (Solanaceae). Rev Ciênc Farm Básica Apl. 2010; 31: 205–209.
  15. 15. Lôbo KMS, Athayde ACR, Silva AMA, Rodrigues FFG, Lôbo IS, Bezerra DAC, et al. Avaliação da atividade antibacteriana e prospecção fitoquímica de Solanum paniculatum Lam. e Operculina hamiltonii (G. Don) D. F. Austin & Staples, do semiárido paraibano. Rev bras pantas med. 2010; 12: 227–233.
  16. 16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Seventh Informational Supplement CLSI document M100-S17, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA, 2007.
  17. 17. Ayres M, Ayres M, Ayres DL, Santos AS. BioEstat; 2008: 5.0: aplicações estatísticas nas áreas de ciências biológicas e médicas. Belém: Sociedade Civil Mamirauá; Brasília: CNPq. 272p.
  18. 18. Tucker OA, Maciarello JM, Alkire B. Essential Oil of Aeollanthus suaveolens Mart. Ex Spreng. (Lamiaceae). J Essent Oil Res. 2001; 3: 198–199.
  19. 19. Adams RP. Identification Of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry, 4th edition. Allured Business Media, Carol Stream, IL, 2012. p. 469.
  20. 20. Almeida NR, Agra FM, Maior SNF, Sousa PD, Essential Oils and Their Constituents: Anticonvulsant Activity. Molecules. 2011; 16: 2726–2742. pmid:21441872
  21. 21. Freitas CR, Azevedo SRR, Souza OIL, Rocha MJT, Santos FA. Avaliação da atividade antimicrobiana e antioxidante das espécies Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) e Mentha x villosa (Huds.). Rev Ciênc Farm Básica Apl. 2014; 35: 113–118.
  22. 22. Godói AA, Ishikawa BR, Porto ARK, Roel RA, Xavier NCP, Yano M. Avaliação da atividade antioxidante, antibacteriana e citotóxica de Urera aurantiaca. Rev Bras de Farm. 2011; 92; 198–202.
  23. 23. Nascimento CJ, Lage OFL, Camargos DRC, Amaral CJ, Costa ML, Sousa NA, et al. Determinação da atividade antioxidante pelo método DPPH e doseamento de flavonóides totais em extratos de folhas da Bauhinia variegata L. Rev Bras Farm. 2011; 92; 327–332.
  24. 24. Beatović D, Krstić-Milošević D, Trifunović S, Šiljegović J, Glamoćlija J, Ristić M, et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the essential oils of twelve Ocimum basilicum L. cultivars grown in Serbia. Rec Nat Prod. 2015; 9: 62–75.
  25. 25. Trevisan MTS, Silva MGV, Pfundstein B, Spiegelhalder B, & Owen RW. Characterization of the volatile pattern and antioxidant capacity of essential oils from different species of the genus Ocimum. J Agric Food Chem. 2006; 54: 4378–4382. pmid:16756370
  26. 26. Lu F, Foo V, Antioxidant activities of polyphenol from sage (Salvia officinalis). Food Chem. 2001; 75: 197–202.
  27. 27. Meyer BN, Ferrigni NR, Putnam JE, Jacobsen LB, Nichols DE, McLaughlin JL. Brine shrimp: A convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta Med. 1982; 45: 31–34.
  28. 28. Mclaughlin JL, Saizarbitori TC, Anderson JE. Tres bioensayos simples para quimicos de productos naturales. Rev Soc Venez Quim. 1995; 18: 13–18.
  29. 29. Alves TMD, Silva FA, Brandão M, Grandi MST, Asmânia FE, Smânia A Júnior, et al. Biological screening of Brazilian medicinal plants. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000; 95: 367–373. pmid:10800195
  30. 30. Amarante CB, Müller AH, Póvoa MM, Dolabela MF. Estudo fitoquímico biomonitorado pelos ensaios de toxicidade frente à Artemia salina e de atividade antiplasmódica do caule de aninga (Montrichardia linifera). Acta Amaz. 2011; 41: 431–434.
  31. 31. Boscardin DMP, Sartoratto A, Maia SNLHB, Paula PJ, Nakashima T, Farago VP, et al. In Vitro Cytotoxic Potential of Essential Oils of Eucalyptus benthamii and Its Related Terpenes on Tumor Cell Lines. Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2012; 2012: 342–652.
  32. 32. Burt S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—a review. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004; 94: 223–253. pmid:15246235
  33. 33. Rashed NK, Ćirić A, Glamočlija J, Calhelha CR, Ferreira RFCI, Soković M. Antimicrobial Activity, Growth Inhibition of Human Tumour Cell Lines, and Phytochemical Characterization of the Hydromethanolic Extract Obtained from Sapindus saponaria L. Aerial Parts Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013: 2–9.
  34. 34. Simionatto E, Porto C, Stüker ZC, Dalcol II, Silva FU. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from Aeolanthus suaveolens MART. ex spreng. Quim Nova. 2007; 30: 1923–1925.
  35. 35. Cristani M, D'Arrigo M, Mandalari G, Trombetta D. Interaction of four monoterpenes contained in essential oils with model membranes: Implications for their antibacterial activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2007; 55: 6300–6308. pmid:17602646
  36. 36. Silveira MS, Luciano BF, Fronza N, Cunha A, Scheuermann NG, Vieira WRC. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of Laurus nobilis essential oil towards foodborne pathogens and its application in fresh Tuscan sausage stored at 7°C. Food Sci Technol. 2014; 59: 86–93.
  37. 37. Donsi F, Ferrari G. Essential oil nanoemulsions as antimicrobial agents in food. J Biot. 2016; 233: 106–120.