Background and Purpose
To investigate the clinical and morphological characteristics associated with risk factors for the rupture of bifurcation-type middle cerebral artery aneurysms (MCAAs).
A total of 169 consecutive patients with 177 bifurcation-type MCAAs were reviewed from August 2011 to January 2016. Based on the clinical and morphologic characteristics findings, the risk factors of aneurysm rupture were assessed using statistical methods.
Age, cerebral atherosclerosis, no hypertension, hypertension grade 2 and coronary artery disease (CAD) were negatively correlated with aneurysm rupture. The mean diameter (MD) of the parent and two daughter arteries was negatively correlated with rupture. Aneurysms with irregularity, depth, width, maximum size, aspect ratio, depth-to-width ratio, bottleneck factor, and size ratio were positively correlated with rupture. The multivariate logistic regression model revealed that irregular shape (odds ratio (OR) 2.697) and aspect ratio (OR 3.723) were significantly and positively correlated with rupture, while cerebral atherosclerosis (OR 0.033), CAD (OR 0.080), and MD (OR 0.201) were negatively correlated with rupture. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the threshold value of the aspect ratio and MD were 0.96 and 2.43 mm, respectively.
Citation: Wang G-x, Yu J-y, Wen L, Zhang L, Mou K-j, Zhang D (2016) Risk Factors for the Rupture of Middle Cerebral Artery Bifurcation Aneurysms Using CT Angiography. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0166654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166654
Editor: Gustavo Pradilla, Emory University School of Medicine, UNITED STATES
Received: July 21, 2016; Accepted: November 1, 2016; Published: December 15, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is estimated to be 2%-10% of the general population . The increased use of neuroimaging has led to an increase in the number of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) found by chance. Most IAs do not rupture , and the use of microsurgical clipping or endovascular coiling for UIAs has risks. The decision to treat incidental UIAs is still a controversial topic in neurosurgery. Thus, the ability to predict the risk of rupture for UIAs would be of enormous clinical value. Previous studies indicated that the location was not associated with increased rupture risk after a long period of follow-up [3–6]. The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) showed that the treatment decision regarding UIAs is based mainly on the size and location . Some studies showed that the risk factors for UIAs differ by their location [8–11]. Therefore, the natural history of UIAs may be studied individually for each different location.
Middle cerebral artery aneurysms (MCAAs) are common, accounting for 18% to 40% of all IAs , and are responsible for up to 55% of all aneurysm-related hematomas . MCAAs are divided into 3 groups according to the location of the aneurysm neck: proximal, bifurcation, and distal aneurysms [12,14], and most MCAAs belong to the bifurcation type [12,14,15]. However, only a few studies have focused on the patterns of MCAAs, and these works studied all groups and included sidewall aneurysms, which may confound the characteristics that are associated with a specific location [12,14,16]. Hence, this study was conducted to identify the relationships between personal factors and image characteristics and the rupture of bifurcation-type MCAAs.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study was approved by our institutional ethics committee (Xinqiao hospital, 2011071/2016031). Signed written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the examination. A total of 22378 consecutive patients who underwent head computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations were enrolled from August 2011 to January 2016. Out of 1176 (5.2%) patients with IAs, 220 (18.9%) presented MCAAs. Aneurysms belonging to the bifurcation type were selected, excluding proximal (n = 23) and distal aneurysms (n = 11). Subjects who had mycotic (n = 1), traumatic (n = 2), reoperated (n = 3), or fusiform aneurysms (n = 3), cases associated with arteriovenous malformations (n = 3) and poor image quality (n = 5) were also excluded. Finally, 169 patients (67 ruptured and 102 unruptured) with 177 IAs (67 ruptured and 110 unruptured) were available for analysis. Sixty-three ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) were managed with both treatment (coiling or clipping), and four patients died before surgery. Seventy UIAs were managed because of clinical symptoms (e.g., headache, dizziness), and 40 UIAs were observed with no growth or rupture signs.
The clinical data for the study were extracted from the hospital medical records by KJ Mou, who was the only person to faithfully recorded clinical data like patients with cerebral atherosclerosis or without, and blinded to the rupture or unrupture status. Cerebral atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease (CAD), and diabetes mellitus were recorded as either present or absent. Cerebral atherosclerosis was defined as diffuse atherosclerosis of the brain, luminal stenosis and small vessel occlusion, the diagnosis was made on the basis of CTA, transcranial ultrasound, or MRA. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mm Hg, a diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg, or the use of antihypertensive agents. Hypertension was divided into the following 4 grades: a systolic BP <140 mm Hg or a diastolic BP<90 mm Hg as no hypertension; a systolic BP (140–159 mm Hg) or a diastolic BP (90–99 mm Hg) as grade 1; a systolic BP ≥180 mm Hg or a diastolic BP ≥110 mm Hg as grade 3; and a BP in between as grade 2. Alcohol consumption and smoking were classified as never, former and current. The history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) was defined as a history of rupture of aneurysm at another location. In cases with multiple aneurysms, the ruptured aneurysm was determined based on the location of the hemorrhage on computed tomography (CT), angiographic or operative findings.
CTA and Image analysis
MCAAs were evaluated with CTA using a 64-slice CT machine (GE LightSpeed VCT; GE Healthcare, WI, USA). All of the images were transferred to the GE Advantix workstation (Advantage Windows 4.5) to generate 3D reconstructions and morphological measurements.
Two categorical morphological variables included the shape of the aneurysm (simple lobed or irregular shape) and the neck types. An aneurysm with lobular or daughter sacs was defined as having an irregular shape . The neck types were divided according to the location of the aneurysm neck into two types: the neck located on the extension of the midline axis of the parent artery (type C) or the neck deviated from the midline axis of the parent artery (type D) [18,19].
All measurements were performed by two observers and the average value was calculated for statistical analysis. Twelve continuous morphological variables such as aneurysm depth, width, neck width, maximum size (Dmax), aspect ratio (AR), depth-to-width ratio (DW), bottleneck factor (BF), size ratio (SR), daughter artery ratio (DAR), mean diameter (MD) of the parent and two daughter arteries, flow angle, and lateral angle ratio (LAR) were examined. These variables have already been defined and are depicted clearly in the literature [1,4,10,14,16,17,18,20].
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, IL, USA, version 17.0). Kappa consistence test was used for the inter-observer reliability of numerical measurements. The variables were expressed as the means ± standard deviation or number of patients (%). Independent t test was used for continuous data, and chi-squared test was used for categorical data. All variables with a P value less than 0.2 were entered into a logistic regression model. The features that achieved univariate analysis significance (P<0.05) were further analyzed using forward multiple logistic regression to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the likelihood of aneurysm rupture. Then, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the sensitivity and specificity using the area under the curve (AUC).
The clinical characteristics of the 169 patients are shown in Table 1. The patients’ ages ranged from 29 to 91 years, with a mean age of 60.2±12.7 years: 58.1±13.2 years for males (range, 29–91 years), 61.6±12.2 years for females (range, 33–87 years), 64.9±11.3 years for the unruptured group (range, 33–91 years) and 53.3±11.2 years for the ruptured group (range, 29–82 years). Sixty years was chosen to dichotomize the sample because the mean patient age was 60.2 years. Based on the chi-squared test, patient age, cerebral atherosclerosis, and CAD were correlated with the risk of aneurysm rupture.
The level of agreement between the two observers for numerical measurements was satisfactory, with κ coefficients of 0.89 (p<0.0001). The morphological characteristics of bifurcation-type MCAAs are listed in (Table 2). Irregular shape, depth, width, Dmax, AR, DW, BF, SR and MD were associated with rupture risk.
Univariate and Multivariate analysis
Twenty-two independent variables (P≤0.2) were entered into a univariate logistic regression model to determine the risk factors for aneurysm rupture. Of these variables, 13 independent variables were associated with aneurysm rupture (P≤0.05). Then, these variables were entered into a forward conditional multiple logistic regression model (Table 3). The model showed that cerebral atherosclerosis (OR 0.033), CAD (OR 0.080), and MD (OR 0.201) were associated with a decreased risk of aneurysm rupture. On the contrary, aneurysms with an irregular shape (OR 2.697) and AR (OR 3.723) increased the risk of aneurysm rupture. The threshold values of the AR and MD were 0.96 and 2.43 mm, respectively (Figs 1 and 2), and the AUC values were 0.774 and 0.675, respectively (Table 4).
The cut-off point for the aspect ratio is 0.96, the sensitivity is 76.1%, and the specificity is 70.0%.
Clinical and morphologic characteristics affect aneurysm rupture. Bifurcation areas of arteries are known to be vulnerable sites where the wall is weak and hemodynamic stress changes . The hemodynamics of bifurcation aneurysms may be different than those of sidewall aneurysms. Additionally, different vessel diameters may have various hemodynamics. Hence, we excluded proximal and distal MCAAs to identify risk factors related to bifurcation aneurysm rupture in this study. Our results showed that cerebral atherosclerosis and CAD are protective factors against rupture of bifurcation-type MCAAs, while aneurysms with an irregular shape, a high aspect ratio and a small MD are risk factors for rupture.
The clinical characteristics were believed to be important factors for aneurysm rupture. However, previous studies have obtained different results. For example, patient age was reportedly positively correlated with aneurysm rupture , while other studies have reported that patients with RIAs were younger than those with UIAs [22,23]. The present study also had similar findings: the patients with RIAs were younger, although this factor was not significant upon multiple analysis. With increasing age, the risk of cerebral atherosclerosis is increased, and cerebral atherosclerotic or calcified walls decreased the risk of IA rupture . The reason may be that cerebral atherosclerotic or calcified walls slow the flow rates entering the aneurysm and reduce wall shear stress . Many studies have reported that hypertension increases the risk of aneurysm rupture [11,23,26]; however, others studies have reported that hypertension was not associated with aneurysm rupture [21,24,27]. In this study, we divided hypertension into 4 grades, and found that patients with no hypertension and grade 2 were associated with aneurysm rupture, but there was no significant difference upon multiple logistic regression. A recent study reported that CAD was a protective factor against the presence of IAs . In the present study, CAD was found to be a protective factor against rupture, which is consistent with the report that patients with heart disease had a decreased risk of rupture, which may be related to restriction of strenuous physical activity . In this study, risk factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption were not significantly associated with rupture. The reason may be that most patients did not have these habits, and smoking was more prominent in women than in men .
An aneurysm with lobular or daughter sacs was classified as having an irregular shape . A previous studies reported that an irregular shape was associated with a higher risk of aneurysm rupture [6,10,14,29]. The present results also showed that irregular aneurysms are more prone to rupture, possibly because the irregular shape leads to instability of the blood flow pattern.
The ISUIA and American Heart Association/American Stroke Association showed that the treatment decision regarding UIAs is based mainly on the size and location [7,30]. A larger IA is believed to be more prone to rupture than a smaller one. The ISUIA showed a near-zero rupture risk for aneurysms less than 10 mm in diameter . In fact, our study and previous studies reported that RIAs were larger than UIAs [9–11,14,16–18], but the size was not always significantly different between the ruptured and unruptured groups [16,17], which confirms the size is not a risk factor for aneurysm rupture. AR has been widely studied and shown to correlate with the rupture of IAs [1,4,16,18,20,30]; however, there is no consensus regarding a common threshold value in MCAAs by far. The present data showed that the threshold value of AR was 0.96, which is smaller than most in Caucasian populations .
Many previous studies reported that a larger SR was associated with aneurysm rupture [17,31–34]. Lin et al reported that SR is associated with anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture  but not with MCAAs , but these results also showed different risk factors for different locations. In this study, the SR was found to be higher in the ruptured aneurysms, whereas it exhibited no relationship upon multiple analysis. AR and SR may be correlated with larger diameter MCA branches . We found that MD was an independent predictor of rupture status in bifurcation-type MCAAs, indicating that a smaller artery is associated with a higher risk of rupture. The aneurysm arising from a small artery has a thinner wall and would experience greater wall tension [31,34].
The study had several limitations. Firstly, the RIAs were evaluated after rupture, the shape or size of the RIAs might have changed owing to the rupture. Although Rahman et al.  reported that aneurysms size don’t shrink after rupture. It is the best to prospectively investigate the IAs rupture. Secondly, UIAs may grow and evolve grossly (formation of blebs and lobes, etc.), and may rupture in the future, it is the best to dynamic observe the size and the morphological changes. But it’s very difficult to collect the serial follow-up imaging data due to the following reasons: (1) ethical issue must be taken into consideration, for example, we follow up a patient with aneurysm, and find the aneurysm become larger in size and irregular in shape, it may be rupture at any time. If we don’t treat the aneurysm, the patient maybe die due to rupture; if we do it, this case must be excluded. (2) most aneurysms do not rupture during the course of a patient’s lifetime. (3) patients with aneurysms may cause significant stress and anxiety, and want to remove the “bomb”. Lastly, although the most common site for familial IAs was the MCAA distribution , family history was not used in this study because the data were not recorded for many patients, especially in the elder patients.
In the future, we will need to accurately evaluate the rupture risk of aneurysms. High resolution contrast-enhanced MRI could clearly show the aneurysms wall. The rupture risk may be evaluated through measuring the MRI enhancement degree and thickness of aneurysms wall. In addition, the wall of RIAs has higher metalloproteinas-9 (MMP-9) expression than that of UIAs. We plan to synthesize the MRI probe targeted to MMP-9. Based on the enhancement degree of the aneurysms wall after injection of the probe, the rupture risk may be evaluated. All these are under our investigation.
Based on the clinical records and CTA findings from patients with bifurcation-type MCAAs, we find that cerebral atherosclerosis and CAD are likely protective factors against aneurysm rupture. On the other hand, since aneurysms with an irregular shape, a high AR and a small MD are more prone to rupture; more attention should be paid to the aneurysm with these characteristics during our clinical practice.
S1 Table. Patient characteristics with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.
CAD, coronary artery disease; Bleeding history, history of ruptured aneurysm in other locations. †Variables showing significant difference by univariate analysis (P< 0.05).
S2 Table. The morphological characteristics of aneurysms.
DAR, daughter artery ratio; LAR, lateral angle ratio. †Variables showing significant difference by univariate analysis (P< 0.05).
S3 Table. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for aneurysms rupture.
CI, Confidence intervals; CAD, coronary artery disease; β, partial regression coefficient.
S4 Table. Area under the curve for aspect ratio and mean diameter.
Sen, sensitivity, the chances of false negatives; Spe, specificity, the chance of false positives; CI, confidence intervals; Threshold value, the cut off for the aspect ratio and mean diameter.
S1 Checklist. PLOS ONE Clinical Studies Checklist.
The authors thank American Journal Experts (AJE) for assisting in the preparation of this paper.
- Conceptualization: DZ.
- Data curation: LW.
- Investigation: JY LZ KM.
- Methodology: DZ.
- Writing – original draft: GW.
- 1. Nader-Sepahi A, Casimiro M, Sen J, Kitchen ND. Is aspect ratio a reliable predictor of intracranial aneurysm rupture? Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1343–7. pmid:15157290
- 2. Ujiie H, Sato K, Onda H, Oikawa A, Kagawa M, Takakura K, et al. Clinical analysis of incidentally discovered unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 1993;24: 1850–6. pmid:8248967
- 3. Juvela S, Porras M, Poussa K. Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: probability of and risk factors for aneurysm rupture. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:1052–60. pmid:18447733
- 4. You SH, Kong DS, Kim JS, Jeon P, Kim KH, Roh HK, et al. Characteristic features of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: predictive risk factors for aneurysm rupture. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:479–84. pmid:19726404
- 5. Villablanca JP, Duckwiler GR, Jahan R, Tateshima S, Martin NA, Frazee J, et al. Natural history of asymptomatic unruptured cerebral aneurysms evaluated at CT angiography: growth and rupture incidence and correlation with epidemiologic risk factors. Radiology. 2013;269:258–65. pmid:23821755
- 6. Mehan WA Jr, Romero JM, Hirsch JA, Sabbag DJ, Gonzalez RG, Heit JJ, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms conservatively followed with serial CT angiography: could morphology and growth predict rupture? J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:761–6. pmid:24275611
- 7. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–10. pmid:12867109
- 8. Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD Jr, Morita A, Juvela S, Yonekura M, et al. Development of the phases score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: A pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014; 13:59–66. pmid:24290159
- 9. Heit JJ, Gonzalez RG, Sabbag D, Brouwers HB, Ordonez Rubiano EG, Schaefer PW, et al. Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: a 10-year multidetector CT angiography experience in a large center. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
- 10. Kang H, Ji W, Qian Z, Li Y, Jiang C, Wu Z, et al. Aneurysm Characteristics Associated with the Rupture Risk of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Self-Controlled Study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142330. pmid:26540158
- 11. Kang HG, Kim BJ, Lee J, Kim MJ, Kang DW, Kim JS, et al. Risk Factors Associated With the Presence of Unruptured Intracranial. Stroke. 2015;46:3093–8. pmid:26451026
- 12. Elsharkawy A, Lehečka M, Niemelä M, Billon-Grand R, Lehto H, Kivisaari R, et al. A new, more accurate classification of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: computed tomography angiographic study of 1,009 consecutive cases with 1,309 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:94–102.
- 13. Prat R, Galeano I. Early surgical treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms associated with intracerebral haematoma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007;109: 431–5. pmid:17449171
- 14. Elsharkawy A, Lehečka M, Niemelä M, Kivelev J, Billon-Grand R, Lehto H, et al. Anatomic risk factors for middle cerebral artery aneurysm rupture: computed tomography angiography study of 1009 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:825–37. pmid:24141397
- 15. Dashti R, Rinne J, Hernesniemi J, Niemelä M, Kivipelto L, Lehecka M, et al. Microneurosurgical management of proximal middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2007;67:6–14. pmid:17210285
- 16. Lin N, Ho A, Gross BA, Pieper S, Frerichs KU, Day AL, et al. Differences in simple morphological variables in ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:913–9. pmid:22957531
- 17. Baharoglu MI, Lauric A, Gao BL, Malek AM. Identification of a dichotomy in morphological predictors of rupture status between sidewall- and bifurcation-type intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:871–81. pmid:22242668
- 18. Sadatomo T, Yuki K, Migita K, Taniguchi E, Kodama Y, Kurisu K. Morphological differences between ruptured and unruptured cases in middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;62:602–9. pmid:18301349
- 19. Sadatomo T, Yuki K, Migita K, Taniguchi E, Kodama Y, Kurisu K. Evaluation of relation among aneurismal neck, parent artery, and daughter arteries in middle cerebral artery aneurysms, by three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. Neurosurg Rev. 2005;28:196–200. pmid:15772870
- 20. Ryu CW, Kwon OK, Koh JS, Kim EJ. Analysis of aneurysm rupture in relation to the geometric indices: Aspect ratio, volume, and volume-to-neck ratio. Neuroradiology. 2011;53:883–9. pmid:21107548
- 21. Wermer MJ, van der Schaaf IC, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Risk of rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in relation to patient and aneurysms characteristics: anupdated meta-analysis. Stroke. 2007;38:1404–10. pmid:17332442
- 22. Matsukawa H, Uemura A, Fujii M, Kamo M, Takahashi O, Sumiyoshi S. Morphological and clinical risk factors for the rupture of anterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2013;118:978–83. pmid:23240701
- 23. Nahed BV, DiLuna ML, Morgan T, Ocal E, Hawkins AA, Ozduman K, et al. Hypertension, age, and location predict rupture of small intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:676–83. pmid:16239879
- 24. Inagawa T. Risk factors for the formation and rupture of intracranial saccular aneurysms in shimane, japan. World Neurosurg. 2010;73:155–64. pmid:20860953
- 25. Castro MA, Putman CM, Sheridan MJ, Cebral JR. Hemodynamic patterns of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a possible association with rupture. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30:297–302. pmid:19131411
- 26. Bacigaluppi S, Piccinelli M, Antiga L, Veneziani A, Passerini T, Rampini P, et al. Factors affecting formation and rupture of intracranial saccular aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev. 2014; 37: 1–14. pmid:24306170
- 27. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms—risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. International study of unruptured intracranial aneurysms investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1725–33. pmid:9867550
- 28. Lindekleiv H, Sandvei MS, Njolstad I, Lochen ML, Romundstad PR, Vatten L, et al. Sex differences in risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A cohort study. Neurology. 2011;76:637–43. pmid:21321337
- 29. Lall RR, Eddleman CS, Bendok BR, Batjer HH. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and the assessment of rupture risk based on anatomical and morphological factors: Sifting through the sands of data. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;26:E2.
- 30. Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S, Broderick JP, Cockroft KM, Connolly ES Jr, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2015;46: 2368–2400. pmid:26089327
- 31. Yu J, Wu Q, Ma FQ, Xu J, Zhang JM. Assessment of the risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms using three-dimensional cerebral digital subtraction angiography. J Int Med Res. 2010;38(5):1785–94. pmid:21309494
- 32. Rahman M, Smietana J, Hauck E, Hoh B, Hopkins N, Siddiqui A, et al. Size ratio correlates with intracranial aneurysm rupture status: A prospective study. Stroke. 2010;41:916–20. pmid:20378866
- 33. Lin N, Ho A, Charoenvimolphan N, Frerichs KU, Day AL, Du R. Analysis of morphological parameters to differentiate rupture status in anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Plos One. 2013;8:e79635. pmid:24236149
- 34. Dhar S, Tremmel M, Mocco J, Kim M, Yamamoto J, Siddiqui AH, et al. Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:185–96. pmid:18797347
- 35. Rahman M, Ogilvy CS, Zipfel GJ, Derdeyn CP, Siddiqui AH, Bulsara KR, et al. Unruptured cerebral aneurysms do not shrink when they rupture: multicenter collaborative aneurysm study group. Neurosurgery 2011;68:155–60. pmid:21150760
- 36. Mackey J, Brown RD Jr, Moomaw CJ, Sauerbeck L, Hornung R, Gandhi D, et al. FIA and ISUIA Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the Familial Intracranial Aneurysm and International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms cohorts: differences in multiplicity and location. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:60–4. pmid:22540404