Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

CONSTANS-Like 9 (OsCOL9) Interacts with Receptor for Activated C-Kinase 1(OsRACK1) to Regulate Blast Resistance through Salicylic Acid and Ethylene Signaling Pathways

  • Hao Liu,

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China


  • Shuangyu Dong,

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

  • Dayuan Sun,

    Affiliation Plant Protection Research Institute Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of High Technology for Plant Protection, Guangzhou, 510640, China

  • Wei Liu,

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

  • Fengwei Gu,

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

  • Yongzhu Liu,

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

  • Tao Guo,

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

  • Hui Wang,

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

  • Jiafeng Wang , (JW); (ZC)

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

  • Zhiqiang Chen (JW); (ZC)

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

CONSTANS-Like 9 (OsCOL9) Interacts with Receptor for Activated C-Kinase 1(OsRACK1) to Regulate Blast Resistance through Salicylic Acid and Ethylene Signaling Pathways

  • Hao Liu, 
  • Shuangyu Dong, 
  • Dayuan Sun, 
  • Wei Liu, 
  • Fengwei Gu, 
  • Yongzhu Liu, 
  • Tao Guo, 
  • Hui Wang, 
  • Jiafeng Wang, 
  • Zhiqiang Chen


In a previous transcriptome analysis of early response genes in rice during Magnaporthe oryzae infection, we identified a CONSTANS-like (COL) gene OsCOL9. In the present study, we investigated the functional roles of OsCOL9 in blast resistance. OsCOL9 belonged to group II of the COL protein family, and it contained a BB-box and a C-terminal CCT (CONSTANS, COL and TOC1) domain. OsCOL9 was found in the nucleus of rice cells, and it exerted transcriptional activation activities through its middle region (MR). Magnaporthe oryzae infection induced OsCOL9 expression, and transgenic OsCOL9 knock-out rice plants showed increased pathogen susceptibility. OsCOL9 was a critical regulator of pathogen-related genes, especially PR1b, which were also activated by exogenous salicylic acid (SA) and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylicacid (ACC), the precursor of ethylene (ET). Further analysis indicated that OsCOL9 over-expression increased the expressions of phytohormone biosynthetic genes, NPR1, WRKY45, OsACO1 and OsACS1, which were related to SA and ET biosynthesis. Interestingly, we found that OsCOL9 physically interacted with the scaffold protein OsRACK1 through its CCT domain, and the OsRACK1 expression was induced in response to exogenous SA and ACC as well as M. oryzae infection. Taken together, these results indicated that the COL protein OsCOL9 interacted with OsRACK1, and it enhanced the rice blast resistance through SA and ET signaling pathways.


During their coevolution with pathogens, plants have developed multiple layers of sophisticated mechanisms against invading pathogens. The first layer of defense is PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI), which relies on recognition of microbial or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs or PAMPs) through interaction with their cognate pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [1]. The second layer of defense functions via recognition of variable pathogen-derived effector molecules [avirulence (AVR) proteins] by effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [2]. ETI facilitates more rapid and stronger immune responses than PTI, efficiently inhibiting and limiting pathogen spreading.

PTI and ETI usually activate a similar set of defense responses, including ROS production, anion channel opening, MAPK activation, phytoalexin production and defense gene expression. Signal transduction and fine-tuning of gene expression are required to regulate these defense mechanisms [3]. A number of transcription factors, such as WRKY, NAC and bZIP, from different plant species play important roles in host-pathogen interactions [46]. These transcription factors function either as positive or negative regulators in defense responses. For example, transgenic plants over-expressing OsWRKY13, OsWRKY31, OsWRKY45 or OsWRKY53 show enhanced basal resistance to M. oryzae, indicating their important roles in blast resistance [710]. OsWRKY45 regulates rice blast resistance of the CC-NB-LRR protein Pb1 through protein-protein interactions, indicating that OsWRKY45 may function in both ETI and PTI [11]. Furthermore, ANAC019 and ANAC055 are crucial regulators of the phytohormone-induced expression of defense genes [12]. This evidence indicates that transcription factors regulate and fine-tune defense-related gene expression as well as metabolite synthesis during pathogen attack.

CONSTANS-like (COL) genes contain two conserved domains [BB-box and CCT (CONSTANS, COL and TOC1)] that play key roles in photoperiodic flowering, abiotic stress and biotic stress [1315]. Global expression profiling analysis indicates that COL9 is involved in fungal defense and COL4 is involved in the jasmonic acid (JA) and abscisic acid (ABA) metabolic pathways [16,17]. For instance, MaCOL1 expression in Arabidopsis is induced by pathogen infection stress [18]. This suggests a possible role of the COL genes in response to pathogen attack. However, the biological functions of these COL genes in disease resistance remain unknown.

In this study, we characterized the role of OsCOL9 in rice blast resistance. We found that OsCOL9 was a nuclear protein and functioned as a transcriptional activator through its MR domain. OsCOL9 expression was increased upon pathogen infection, and its over-expression enhanced the resistance against M. oryzae. Finally, OsCOL9 interacted with OsRACK1 and modulated phytohormone biosynthetic genes expression. These results provided evidence that OsCOL9 was a transcriptional activator that regulated rice blast resistance by phytohormone biosynthesis. This study further extended our understanding of the role of COL genes in disease resistance.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and treatments

The Oryza sativa japonica Pik-H4 near isogenic lines (Pik-H4 NILs) were used as wild-type (WT) plants in this study. These plants contain the Pik-H4 resistance gene allelic at the Pik locus [19]. In addition, a susceptible O. sativa japonica Lijiangxintuanheigu (LTH) strain was used as control. For fungal infections, we isolated the M. oryzae race GDR2 from diseased nurseries and fields at Yangjing city(111.95°E, 21.85°N) by Dayuan Sun, there is no specific permission was required and this work was supported by the Plant Protection Research Institute Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Guangdong Provincial key Laboratory of High Technology for Plant Protection. This M. oryzae race is friendly to human and animals, which is just compatible with the rice strain that not contains the resistance gene Pik-H4.

For inoculation of rice blast fungus, we used fourth-leaf-stage rice seedlings grown under natural light in a greenhouse at 26°C. Freshly prepared M. oryzae conidia (1×105 conidia/ml, containing 0.02% v/v gelatin) were sprayed onto the rice leaves using an air sprayer. Inoculated plants were kept in a humidity chamber at 28°C and rice leaves were harvested for extraction of RNA at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h after inoculation. The concentrations of JA (100 μM), SA (100μM), ACC (1 mM) and ABA (100μM) were applied to whole rice plants at the fourth-leaf stage. The treated plants were immediately covered with a transparent lid and the leaves were collected after treatments [20].

Subcellular localization analysis

The full-length OsCOL9 cDNA insert lacking a stop codon was amplified by PCR using GFP-F/R primers (S1 Table). Amplified fragments were XbaI/BamHI digested and cloned between the CaMV35S promoter and GFP sites of pUC-GFP, a pUC18 derivative [21]. The resulting GFP fusion constructs and the nuclear localization marker [22] were then transiently co-expressed in rice protoplasts [23] which were then examined by laser-scanning confocal microscopy (LSM 780, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Excitation/emission wavelengths were 514/535 590 nm for GFP and 543/565 615 nm for the mCherry construct.

Determination of transcriptional activity and the activation domain of OsCOL9

The OsCOL9 protein has three conserved COL domains. To determine its transcriptional activity and map its transcriptional activation domain, various regions of the OsCOL9 protein coding sequence, including the BB-box domain (amino acids 1–150), the CCT domain (amino acids 301–422), the middle region (MR) (amino acids 151–300) and the full-length OsCOL9 were amplified by PCR with specific primers (S1 Table) and cloned into NdeI/BamHI-digested pGBKT7 vector. The resulting vectors, the positive control OsBIHD1, and the negative control pGBKT7 (empty vector) were transformed into yeast strain Y2H Gold strain. Positive transformants were grown on SD/-Trp plates and SD/-Trp/-His/-Ade plates (with 100 mM 3-AT) for 3 days at 30°C. X-α-gal was used to identify the transcription activation activity of the OsCOL9 protein domains.

Total RNA extraction, quantitative real-time PCR analysis of gene expression

Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of fourth-leaf-stage rice seedlings with TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, Beijing, China) and reversed-transcribed into cDNA using PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reverse transcribed cDNA samples were used for real-time PCR on an ABI Step One plus real-time PCR detection system. The specific primers used for quantitative real-time PCR analysis are shown in S2 Table. Quantitative real-time PCR reactions were performed in a 25 μl volume containing 12.5 μl of SYBR Premix ExTaq (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Differences in gene expression, expressed as fold change relative to control, were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method. Each measurement was carried out in triplicate, and the error bars represent SE of the mean of fold changes for the three biological replicates.

Generation of the OsCOL9-OX and oscol9-ko transgenic plants

The full-length OsCOL9 cDNA was isolated by RT-PCR from the leaves of fourth-leaf-stage rice plants using the cDNA primers encompassing translation start and stop codons (S1 Table). This cDNA insert digested with Hind I and BamHI was then cloned between the maize ubiquitin promoter and the Nos terminator of the plant expression vector pOX [24] containing the hygromycin resistance gene as selection maker. CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to generate oscol9-ko plants. As reported by Ma et al [25], a 20 bp DNA fragment (including PAM) of the first exon of the OsCOL9 nucleotide sequence was fused with U6a-gRNA box. The resulting DNA insert was digested with BsaI and inserted into the pYLCRISPR/Cas9PUbi-H vector. pOX-OsCOL9 and pYLCRISPR/Cas9-OsCOL9 were then introduced into agrobacterium strain EHA105 and transformed into wild-type (Pik-H4 NILs) calli as described previously by Hiei [26]. Transgenic rice plants were regenerated from the transformed calli in selection media containing 50 mg L-1 hygromycin and 250 mg L-1 cefotaxime. OsCOL9 expression in the transgenic rice plants was confirmed by target site sequencing and qRT-PCR.

Yeast-two hybrid assay

The OsCOL9 BBOX1-150aa and CCT301-422aa were cloned into the BD plasmid pGBKT7 by homologous recombination in yeast strain AH109. Yeast cells containing the resulting constructs were used as bait to screen the interacting-proteins from a rice yeast two-hybrid c-DNA library, according to the manufacturer’s instructions of Clontech yeast two-hybrid handbook. The transformed yeast cells were cultured on SD/-Trp/-Leu and SD/-Trp/-Leu/-His+3AT plates and results were scored after 3 days incubation at 30°C.

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay

For BiFC assays, the coding regions of OsCOL9 and OsRACK1 were cloned into the NheI /AgeI sites of the BiFC vectors pUC-NE1L2L-nsI and pUC-CE1RL2R-nsI to generate OsRACK1-nYFP and OsCOL9-cYFP constructs, respectively. The recombinant constructs in pairs were co-transfected into rice protoplasts, and fluorescent signals were examined by confocal microscopy Carl Zeiss LSM780.

GST pull down assay

Full-length domains of the OsCOL9 CCT cDNA sequence with stop codon and the full length OsRACK1cDNA were cloned into BamHI/EcoRI sites of pGEX6p-1 and pET28, respectively. OsCOL9 CCT-GST and OsRACK1-His fusion proteins expression were induced using 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) for 12 h at 37°C in Escherichia coli strain BL21. His-tagged proteins were incubated with GST-COL9 CCT or GST alone bound to glutathione beads. After 4 h of incubation at 4°C, the beads were washed four times with GST binding buffer (PBS, pH 7.2). Components bound to the beads were eluted by boiling in SDS sample buffer and were then separated on an SDS-PAGE gel and immunoblotted with anti-His and anti-GST antibodies.


OsCOL9 is localized to the nucleus and activates transcription through its MR domain

OsCOL9 belonged to subgroup II of COL gene family in O. sativa and contained one BB-box and one CCT domain (S1 Fig). To determine the subcellular localization of OsCOL9, the protein was fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the constitutive CaMV35S promoter. The resulting vectors (35S:OsCOL9-GFP, 35S:GFP) and a nuclear localization marker OsMADS3-mCherry were transiently co-transfected into rice protoplast cells with the PEG-mediated procedure. The OsCOL9-GFP fusion protein and the nuclear localization marker signals merged in the nucleus of the rice protoplasts. The signals of control 35S-GFP were observed throughout the cells, including the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig 1A). These results indicated that OsCOL9 was localized to the nucleus.

Fig 1. Nuclear localization and transcriptional activity of OsCOL9.

(A) Subcellular localization of OsCOL9 in rice protoplast cells. 35S:GFP served as control and 35S:OsMADS3-mCherry served as a nuclear marker. Cell fluorescence was observed using confocal microscope at 12 h post-transformation. OsCOL9-GFP signals are green, and the nuclear signals are red. Merged images of GFP, mCherry and bright-fields are shown. Scale bar is 5 μm. (B) Transcriptional activation analysis of OsCOL9 and three truncated mutants (B-box, MR and CCT) fused with the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain. Full-length OsCOL9 and the truncated mutants were fused with pGBKT7, and the constructs were transformed into Y2H Gold yeast cells. Transcriptional activation activity was determined according to the ability to activate the expression of His, Ade and X-α-Gal reporter genes in yeast. BD-OsCOL9 and BD-MR transformants were selected on SD/-Trp/-His/-Ade plates containing X-α-Gal and 100 mM 3-AT. OsCOL9 and its MR domain contained the transcriptional activity by a positive (+) reaction in the X-α-Gal assay.

To further examine whether OsCOL9 had transcriptional activation activity and which part of OsCOL9 protein held the activity in vivo, we examined constructs containing various regions of the OsCOL9 protein using a yeast two-hybrid assay (Fig 1B). These regions included the BB-box domain (amino acids 1–150), the CCT domain (amino acids 301–422), the middle region (MR) (amino acids 151–300) and the full-length OsCOL9. These regions were respectively fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain in the pGBKT7 vector, and then transformed into Y2H Gold yeast cells. All the transformants containing pGBKT7-OsCOL9 or pGBKT7-MR grew well on SD/-Trp and SD/-Trp/-Ade/-His +100 mM 3-AT +X-gal plates, and these yeast cells were stained with blue in X-gal solution. In contrast, the yeast cells containing pGBKT7-BB-box, pGBKT7-CCT or the negative control pGBKT7 grew only on SD/-Trp plates (Fig 1B). These results demonstrated that OsCOL9 held the transcriptional activation activity through its MR domain.

M. oryzae up-regulates OsCOL9 expression

We originally determined from transcriptome analysis that OsCOL9 was a member of early response genes during M. oryzae infection (our unpublished data). Therefore, we examined the OsCOL9 expression patterns over a time course of 72 h after M. oryzae inoculation using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The expression of OsCOL9 was increased at 6 h, and it peaked at 24 h. The expression was maintained at high level to 48 h (Fig 2). These results indicated that OsCOL9 was involved in response to M.oryzae invasion.

Fig 2. OsCOL9 expression is up-regulated by M. oryzae infection. Relative expression of OsCOL9 in the wild-type line at 72 h after M. oryzae inoculation.

H2O treatment was used as control. Values shown are means±SD from three independent experiments. Error bars indicate the SD and asterisks indicate a significant difference according to the t-test (*P<0.05) compared with the control group.

Generation of OsCOL9 transgenic plants

In the present study, we attempted to obtain detailed information concerning OsCOL9 expression during rice blast development. Therefore, we generated the OsCOL9 over-expression and CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out plants, in which OsCOL9 was placed under the control of the ubiquitin promoter via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in wild-type plants (Fig 3A). The knock-out OsCOL9 transgenic plants (osclol9-ko) were screened using target DNA sequencing (Fig 3B), and the OsCOL9 level of transgenic rice plants OsCOL9-OX and oscol9-ko was monitored using qRT-PCR (Fig 3C and 3D). We obtained more than 10 independent OsCOL9 over-expression transgenic plants (OsCOL9-OX) and one OsCOL9 CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out plant.

Fig 3. Identification of OsCOL9 transgenic plants.

(A) Schematic structure of transgenic vector construction. (B) Target sequence alignment of OsCOL9 CRISPR/Cas9 splice sites. The blue sequence of wild-type is the PAM sequence, and the red sequence is a paired gRNA binding site compared with wild-type. Blue and red regions were spliced by the CRISPR/CAs9 endonuclease in the OsCOL9 genome sequence. (C) Expression analysis of OsCOL9 in over-expression and knock-out lines was measured by RT-PCR and compared with the wild-type line. Values shown are means±SD from three independent experiments (**P<0.01). (D) Morphologies of wild-type, OsCOL9-OX (left) and oscol9-ko (right). The photograph was taken 50 days after heading of transgenic plants (T1 generation) and wild-type plants. The scale bar is 8 cm.

OsCOL9 knock-out plants have reduced blast resistance

To elucidate the molecular basis of OsCOL9 in disease resistance in rice, we examined resistance of the transgenic rice lines to M. oryzae infection. Disease symptoms in plants were quantified at 8 days after inoculation. OsCOL9-OX lines exhibited enhanced resistance to M. oryzae as compared with the wild-type lines, while the oscol9-ko lines were more susceptible compared with the wild-type controls (Fig 4A and 4B). This result indicated that OsCOL9 acted as a positive regulator of the defense response in rice.

Fig 4. Disease resistance evaluation of OsCOL9-OX lines infected with the M. oryzae race GDR2.

(A) A representative photograph taken at 8 days after inoculation. OsCOL9-OX plants showed enhanced resistance to M. oryzae race GDR2, while oscol9-ko became more susceptible compared with the wild-type line. (B) Lesion areas from 10 independent OsCOL9-OX plants. The columns shown are means±SD, and asterisks indicate a significant difference according to the t-test (*P <0.05, **P<0.01) compared with the wild-type (Pik-H4 NILs). (C), (D) and (E) show the expressions of PR genes (PR1a, PR1b and PR10) in wild-type, OsCOL9-OX, and oscol9-ko plants, respectively. Values shown are means±SD from three independent experiments. Error bars indicate the SD and asterisks indicate a significant difference according to the t-test (*P<0.05) compared with the wild-type plants.

Previous studies have shown that the appearance of disease symptoms correlates with the expressions of pathogen-related (PR) genes to resist M. oryzae invasion. Therefore, we determined the expressions of three PR genes, PR1a [27], PR1b [28] and PR10 [29], using qRT-PCR. All three genes were up-regulated in the OsCOL9-OX plants as compared with wild-type and oscol9-ko plants under the normal growth conditions (Fig 4C, 4D and 4E). Therefore, over-expression of OsCOL9 induced the expressions of PR genes in the absence of a blast infection.

OsCOL9 expression in response to exogenous SA and ET treatments

In the present study, we found that OsCOL9 over-expression triggered expressions of PR genes, which could be associated with hormone defense responses. To determine whether OsCOL9 was a direct regulator of hormone signaling pathways, plants were treated with phytohormones ABA, SA, JA and ACC for 48 h.

The expression of OsCOL9 at the mRNA level was increased and peaked at 12 h and 24 h after ACC and SA treatments, respectively (Fig 5). There were no significant increases after ABA or JA treatment (Fig 5). These results revealed that OsCOL9 induced the resistance of rice against M. oryzae infection through the SA and ET signaling pathways.

Fig 5. Response of OsCOL9 to exogenous hormone treatments.

(A), (B), (C) and (D) represents the expression of OsCOL9 in fourth-leaf-stage H4 seedlings over a time course of 48 h after treated with 100 μM ABA, 100 μM JA, 1 mM ACC and 100 μM SA, respectively. H2O was used as control. Values shown are means±SD from three independent experiments. Error bars indicate the SD, and asterisks indicate a significant difference according to the t-test (*P<0.05) compared with the wild-type line.

OsCOL9 modulates the expression of phytohormone-related genes

Previous results implicated OsCOL9 in SA- and ET-mediated defense. Because NPR1 [30] and WRKY45 are important modulators of PR1a and PR1b involved in the SA pathway, we determined their expression levels in OsCOL9-OX and oscol9-ko lines.

OsCOL9 over-expression modulated the expressions of NPR1 and WRKY45 compared with the controls (Fig 6A). However, the expressions of OsACO1 [31] and OsACO2 [32] involved in restricting ACC synthesis significantly accumulated in OsCOL9-OX lines. OsACS1 and OsACO7 [33] did not change significantly in OsCOL9-OX lines, but their expressions were decreased in an oscol9-ko background (Fig 6B). These results demonstrated that OsCOL9 over-expression could increase plant defense by regulating the expression of phytohormone-related genes, indicating that OsCOL9 regulated disease resistance through the SA and ET pathways.

Fig 6. The expression of SA and ET pathway-related genes in OsCOL9-OX and oscol9-ko lines.

(A) The relative expressions of NPR1 and WRKY45 in OsCOL9-OX, oscol9-ko and wild-type plants. (B) Gene expressions of enzymes that restrict ACC synthesis: OsACS1, OsACO2, OsACO7 and OsACO1. Values shown are means±SD from three independent experiments. Error bars indicate the SD and asterisks indicate a significant difference according to the t-test (*P<0.05) compared with the wild-type plants.

OsCOL9 interacts with OsRACK1 (rice receptor for activated C kinase 1)

To illustrate the molecular mechanism of OsCOL9 in blast resistance, we performed a yeast two-hybrid assay using OsCOL9 as bait to identify the interacting proteins of OsCOL9 from a rice AD-cDNA library. Because OsCOL9 modulated transcription through its MR domain (151-300aa), we used the BB-box1-150aa and CCT301-422aa domains of OsCOL9 that lacked transcription activity to screen interacting proteins.

Yeast two-hybrid results demonstrated that CCT301-422aa physically interacted with the OsRACK1 that encodes the WD40 repeat domain containing protein (Fig 7A) [34,35]. To further confirm this interaction between OsCOL9 CCT301-422aa and OsRACK1, we performed a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay. The BiFC assay indicated that rice protoplast cells co-transformed with the OsRACK1:nYFP and CCT301-422aa:cYFP constructs displayed green fluorescence, indicating that they interacted in vivo, which was consistent with the Y2H assay (Fig 7B). This interaction was also observed between OsCOL9 and OsRACK1 in a GST-pull down assay in vitro (Fig 7C).

Fig 7. Identification of OsCOL9 and OsRACK1 interactions.

(A). Yeast two-hybrid assay showed interaction between OsCOL9 CCT domain and OsRACK1. (B). Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays showed the interaction between OsCOL9 and OsRACK1 in rice protoplasts. Scale bars are 5 μm. C. In vitro pull-down assay suggested the direct interaction between the OsCOL9 CCT domain and OsRACK1.

Furthermore, we investigated the subcellular localization of OsRACK1. Compared with the empty GFP vector, the rice protoplast cells transformed with the OsRACK1-GFP+OsMADS3-mCherry constructs displayed green fluorescence in the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig 7D). These results suggested that OsCOL9 and OsRACK1 interacted in the nucleus.

OsRACK1 expression is induced by M. oryzae, SA and ACC

The expression of OsRACK1 at the mRNA level can be induced by multiple plant hormones, including JA, IAA and ABA [35]. Therefore, we examined the OsRACK1 expression in wild-type rice plants infected with M. oryzae race GDR2 or treated with the exogenous addition of SA and ACC. The expression of OsRACK1 was increased after inoculation with M. oryzae (Fig 8A) as well as SA and ACC treatments (Fig 8B and 8C). The expression of OsRACK1 was up-regulated in OsCOL9 over-expression plants (Fig 8D). These data indicated that OsCOL9 positively regulated the expression of OsRACK1 at the mRNA level.

Fig 8. Expression of OsRACK1 when induced by M. oryzae infection as well as SA and ACC treatments.

(A), (B) and (C) represents the relative expression of OsRACK1 treated by M. oryzae, SA and ACC after 48 h, respectively. H2O was used as control. Values shown are means±SD from three independent experiments. (D), Quantitative real-time PCR analyses of OsRACK1 expression in WT and OsCOL9 transgenic plants. Error bars indicate the SD and asterisks indicate a significant difference according to the t-test (*P<0.05) compared with the corresponding controls.


In this study, we demonstrated that OsCOL9, a COL protein, could be a pathogen-responsive transcription factor in rice. The transgenic rice plants over-expressing OsCOL9 showed markedly enhanced resistance to blast, while oscol9 knock-out rice plants became more susceptible (Fig 4A), indicating the importance of OsCOL9 in rice blast resistance. Many transcription factors, such as WRKY, NAC and bZIP, play important roles in the host-pathogen interactions [3638]. However, no COL proteins have been previously found to function in this defense pathway in rice. COL genes have major roles in photoperiodic control of flowering time [39], whereas their other roles, such as disease defense, remain unexplored.

In the present study, we described that the rice COL9 protein, OsCOL9, functioned as a pathogen-inducible transcription factor during biotic stress. Sequence analysis revealed that OsCOL9 possessed a B-box zinc finger type domain at the N-terminal region and a common C-terminal CCT domain (S1 Fig). The B-box ZF domain was assumed to be the protein–protein interaction domain, because the CCT domain is important for the nuclear localization and mediation of DNA interactions [40]. Griffiths et al. [41] identified OsCOL9 as a member of group II of the COL protein family. In the rice genome, there are 16 COL genes, suggesting that they may have other roles besides photoperiod flowering.

According to the results of the X-alpha galactosidase assay, OsCOL9 protein had transcriptional activation activity, which was mediated through its MR domain (Fig 1B). Like other transcription factors when transiently-expressed, OsCOL9-GFP fusion protein was localized to the nucleus of rice protoplast cells (Fig 1A). Furthermore, OsCOL9 expression was significantly induced by M. oryzae in an incompatible wild-type strain, but not in a susceptible strain. This suggested that OsCOL9 played an essential role in R gene-mediated resistance.

Previous studies have shown that blast resistance mediated through Pb1 and the transcription factor WRKY45 occurs through protein-protein interactions. Therefore, we tested whether the interaction between Pik-H4 and OsCOL9 existed, and we found that only amino acids 1–266 of the Pik1-H4 protein interacted with OsCOL9 (S2 Fig). Previous studies have also indicated that Pik1-H4 can be localized in the nucleus [42]. Therefore, the defense signals derived from the recognition between Pik1-H4 and Avr-Pik may transfer the signals downstream depending on OsCOL9. In addition, over-expression of OsCOL9 could delay the flowering time, suggesting that OsCOL9 mediated cross-talk between flowering time and blast resistance in rice.

Fig 5C and 5D illustrate that OsCOL9 was sensitive to exogenous SA or ET treatment in the incompatible rice Pik-H4 NILs (WT), suggesting a role of OsCOL9 in the SA- and ET-related signaling pathways. Most transcription factors play crucial roles in the regulation of hormone signaling pathways. For example, AtWRKY53 and AtWRKY70 play a positive role in SA-mediated resistance to P. syringae infection [43,44], and OsWRKY45 acts in the SA signaling pathway independently of NPR1. Our results showed that the expression levels of NPR1 and WRKY45 were reduced in oscol9-ko plants, indicating that OsCOL9 possibly acted upstream of NPR1 (Fig 6A). The expressions of the PR genes PR1a and PR1b were high in OsCOL9-OX lines, implying that the expressions of these two genes were dependent on OsCOL9. These data indicated that OsCOL9 acted in SA-mediated resistance to M.oryzae upstream of NH1, PR1a and PR1b.

ET has been also implicated as a vital player in regulation of defense networks by activating or suppressing the expressions of downstream defense genes [45]. Over-expression of transcription factors of the ERF subfamily, such as AtERF2, AtERF14 and OsBIERF3, enhances resistance to several pathogens by regulating transcription of defense genes [4648]. Our results showed that the OsCOL9 expression could be significantly induced by exogenous addition of the ET precursor ACC. ACC synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO) genes contribute to ET biosynthesis in blast fungus-infected rice plants [49], and the expression levels of these genes are increased. Compared with the wild-type plants, the expressions of OsACO1 and OsACO2 were significantly increased in OsCOL9-OX lines, while the expressions of OsACO7 and OsACS1 were decreased in oscol9-ko plants. Such different expression patterns in these two different transgenic rice plants suggested a complicated role of OsCOL9 in the regulation of ET biosynthesis. These results indicated that the OsCOL9 most likely acted in defense pathways through indirect regulation of ET synthesis.

OsRACK1 has been previously reported as an interacting partner of Rac1 that modulates blast resistance and is involved in ABA and H2O2 signaling pathways to regulate seed germination. The OsRACK1 protein contains a seven WD40-repeat domain that is highly conserved in eukaryotic organisms, and it contains several tandemly repeated subunits that function in multiple pathways [50]. Our results suggested that OsCOL9 was associated with OsRACK1 to enhance rice blast resistance, which was most likely involved in SA and ET signaling pathways. Previous studies have determined that the WD40-containing protein DACF acts as a substrate-recognition receptor for CULLIN4-based E3 ubiquitin ligases, and it interacts with DDB1 to mediate the COP9 signalosome degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana [51]. Therefore, we thought that OsRACK1 interacts with OsCOL9 and probably recruits E3 ligase complex to mediate degradation via the ubiquitin proteasome system [52]. There is clear evidence that RACK1 induces the RANKL-dependent activation of p38 MAPK ubiquitin pathway, which is in agreement with our hypothesis [53]. However, the mechanism of OsRACK1 up-regulation in OsCOL9 transgenic plants remains still unclear.

In conclusion, our results suggested that OsCOL9 could control the blast resistance through the regulation of SA- and ET-mediated signaling pathways in rice. Previous studies have indicated that most COL genes exhibit diverse roles, including flowering, circadian rhythm and root growth, in plant development [54,55]. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the precise function of OsCOL9 during plant development in future studies. Furthermore, the analysis of OsCOL9-induced crosstalk between the disease resistance and plant development will offer a novel insight into COL-protein-mediated physiological and biochemical response in rice.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Exon/intron structure of OsCOL9, alignment and phylogenetic analysis of OsCOL9 with other COL amino acid sequences.


S2 Fig. Physical interactions between the Pik-H4 and OsCOL9 detected in yeast two-hybrid assay.


S3 Fig. Expression patterns of OsCOL9 in different plant tissues.


S4 Fig. ABA and JA synthetic l gene expression in OsCOL9 transgenic and wildtype plants.


S5 Fig. Relative expression of OsCOL9 in the susceptible cultivar LTH at 72 h after M. oryzae inoculation.


S1 Table. Primers used in vector construction.



The authors thank Prof. Yaoguang Liu (South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China) for providing the plant binary vector pOX and pYLCRISPR/Cas9PUbi-H.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: HL.
  2. Data curation: HW YL.
  3. Funding acquisition: ZC JW.
  4. Investigation: HL TG WL.
  5. Methodology: HL SD.
  6. Project administration: ZC.
  7. Resources: JW DS.
  8. Software: FG.
  9. Supervision: JW.
  10. Writing – original draft: HL ZC.
  11. Writing – review & editing: HL ZC.


  1. 1. Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. ANNU REV PLANT BIOL. 2009;60:379–406. pmid:19400727
  2. 2. Andolfo G, Ercolano M R. Plant Innate Immunity Multicomponent Model. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2015;6:987. pmid:26617626
  3. 3. Buscaill P, Rivas S. Transcriptional control of plant defence responses. CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL. 2014;20:35–46. pmid:24840291
  4. 4. Mao G, Meng X, Liu Y, Zheng Z, Chen Z, Zhang S. Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by two pathogen-responsive MAPKs drives phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. PLANT CELL. 2011;23(4):1639–1653. pmid:21498677
  5. 5. Alves M S, Dadalto S P, Goncalves A B, De Souza G B, Barros V A, Fietto L G. Plant bZIP transcription factors responsive to pathogens: a review. INT J MOL SCI. 2013;14(4):7815–7828. pmid:23574941
  6. 6. Bu Q, Jiang H, Li C B, Zhai Q, Zhang J, Wu X, et al. Role of the Arabidopsis thaliana NAC transcription factors ANAC019 and ANAC055 in regulating jasmonic acid-signaled defense responses. CELL RES. 2008;18(7):756–767. pmid:18427573
  7. 7. Qiu D, Xiao J, Ding X, Xiong M, Cai M, Cao Y, et al. OsWRKY13 mediates rice disease resistance by regulating defense-related genes in salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent signaling. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007;20(5):492–499. pmid:17506327
  8. 8. Zhang J, Peng Y, Guo Z. Constitutive expression of pathogen-inducible OsWRKY31 enhances disease resistance and affects root growth and auxin response in transgenic rice plants. CELL RES. 2008;18(4):508–521. pmid:18071364
  9. 9. Tao Z, Kou Y, Liu H, Li X, Xiao J, Wang S. OsWRKY45 alleles play different roles in abscisic acid signalling and salt stress tolerance but similar roles in drought and cold tolerance in rice. J EXP BOT. 2011;62(14):4863–4874. pmid:21725029
  10. 10. Chujo T, Takai R, Akimoto-Tomiyama C, Ando S, Minami E, Nagamura Y, et al. Involvement of the elicitor-induced gene OsWRKY53 in the expression of defense-related genes in rice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1769(7–8):497–505. pmid:17532485
  11. 11. Inoue H, Hayashi N, Matsushita A, Xinqiong L, Nakayama A, Sugano S, et al. Blast resistance of CC-NB-LRR protein Pb1 is mediated by WRKY45 through protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(23):9577–9582. pmid:23696671
  12. 12. Zhu X, Chen J, Xie Z, Gao J, Ren G, Gao S, et al. Jasmonic acid promotes degreening via MYC2/3/4- and ANAC019/055/072-mediated regulation of major chlorophyll catabolic genes. PLANT J. 2015;84(3):597–610. pmid:26407000
  13. 13. Putterill J, Robson F, Lee K, Simon R, Coupland G. The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. CELL. 1995;80(6):847–857. pmid:7697715
  14. 14. Gangappa S N, Botto J F. The BBX family of plant transcription factors. TRENDS PLANT SCI. 2014;19(7):460–470. pmid:24582145
  15. 15. Strayer C, Oyama T, Schultz T F, Raman R, Somers D E, Mas P, et al. Cloning of the Arabidopsis clock gene TOC1, an autoregulatory response regulator homolog. SCIENCE. 2000;289(5480):768–771. pmid:10926537
  16. 16. Cheng X F, Wang Z Y. Overexpression of COL9, a CONSTANS-LIKE gene, delays flowering by reducing expression of CO and FT in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLANT J. 2005;43(5):758–768. pmid:16115071
  17. 17. Min J H, Chung J S, Lee K H, Kim C S. The CONSTANS-like 4 transcription factor, AtCOL4, positively regulates abiotic stress tolerance through an abscisic acid-dependent manner in Arabidopsis. J INTEGR PLANT BIOL. 2015;57(3):313–324. pmid:25073793
  18. 18. Chen J, Chen J Y, Wang J N, Kuang J F, Shan W, Lu W J. Molecular characterization and expression profiles of MaCOL1, a CONSTANS-like gene in banana fruit. GENE. 2012;496(2):110–117. pmid:22285923
  19. 19. Xiao W, Yang Q, Wang H, Guo T, Liu Y, Zhu X, et al. Identification and fine mapping of a resistance gene to Magnaporthe oryzae in a space-induced rice mutant. MOL BREEDING. 2011;28(3):303–312.
  20. 20. Agrawal G K, Jwa N S, Rakwal R. A novel rice (Oryza sativa L.) acidic PR1 gene highly responsive to cut, phytohormones, and protein phosphatase inhibitors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;274(1):157–165. pmid:10903912
  21. 21. Yang J W, Fu J X, Li J, Cheng X L, Li F, Dong J F, et al. A Novel Co-immunoprecipitation Protocol Based on Protoplast Transient Gene Expression for Studying Protein–protein Interactions in Rice. PLANT MOL BIOL REP. 2014;32(1):153–161.
  22. 22. Gao H, Jin M, Zheng X M, Chen J, Yuan D, Xin Y, et al. Days to heading 7, a major quantitative locus determining photoperiod sensitivity and regional adaptation in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(46):16337–16342. pmid:25378698
  23. 23. Zhang Y, Su J, Duan S, Ao Y, Dai J, Liu J, et al. A highly efficient rice green tissue protoplast system for transient gene expression and studying light/chloroplast-related processes. PLANT METHODS. 2011. pmid:21961694
  24. 24. Luo D, Xu H, Liu Z, Guo J, Li H, Chen L, et al. A detrimental mitochondrial-nuclear interaction causes cytoplasmic male sterility in rice. NAT GENET. 2013;45(5):573–577. pmid:23502780
  25. 25. Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, et al. A Robust CRISPR/Cas9 System for Convenient, High-Efficiency Multiplex Genome Editing in Monocot and Dicot Plants. MOL PLANT. 2015;8(8):1274–1284. pmid:25917172
  26. 26. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. PLANT J. 1994;6(2):271–282. pmid:7920717
  27. 27. Mitsuhara I, Iwai T, Seo S, Yanagawa Y, Kawahigasi H, Hirose S, et al. Characteristic expression of twelve rice PR1 family genes in response to pathogen infection, wounding, and defense-related signal compounds (121/180). MOL GENET GENOMICS. 2008;279(4):415–427. pmid:18247056
  28. 28. Agrawal G K, Rakwal R, Jwa N S. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) OsPR1b gene is phytohormonally regulated in close interaction with light signals. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;278(2):290–298. pmid:11097833
  29. 29. Kim S G, Kim S T, Wang Y, Yu S, Choi I S, Kim Y C, et al. The RNase activity of rice probenazole-induced protein1 (PBZ1) plays a key role in cell death in plants. MOL CELLS. 2011;31(1):25–31. pmid:21110127
  30. 30. Yuan Y, Zhong S, Li Q, Zhu Z, Lou Y, Wang L, et al. Functional analysis of rice NPR1-like genes reveals that OsNPR1/NH1 is the rice orthologue conferring disease resistance with enhanced herbivore susceptibility. PLANT BIOTECHNOL J. 2007;5(2):313–324. pmid:17309686
  31. 31. Iwamoto M, Baba-Kasai A, Kiyota S, Hara N, Takano M. ACO1, a gene for aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase: effects on internode elongation at the heading stage in rice. PLANT CELL ENVIRON. 2010;33(5):805–815. pmid:20040065
  32. 32. Chae H S, Cho Y G, Park M Y, Lee M C, Eun M Y, Kang B G, et al. Hormonal cross-talk between auxin and ethylene differentially regulates the expression of two members of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLANT CELL PHYSIOL. 2000;41(3):354–362. pmid:10805599
  33. 33. Iwai T, Miyasaka A, Seo S, Ohashi Y. Contribution of ethylene biosynthesis for resistance to blast fungus infection in young rice plants. PLANT PHYSIOL. 2006;142(3):1202–1215. pmid:17012402
  34. 34. Nakashima A, Chen L, Thao N P, Fujiwara M, Wong H L, Kuwano M, et al. RACK1 functions in rice innate immunity by interacting with the Rac1 immune complex. PLANT CELL. 2008;20(8):2265–2279. pmid:18723578
  35. 35. Zhang D, Chen L, Li D, Lv B, Chen Y, Chen J, et al. OsRACK1 is involved in abscisic acid- and H2O2-mediated signaling to regulate seed germination in rice (Oryza sativa, L.). PLOS ONE. 2014;9(5):e97120. pmid:24865690
  36. 36. Rushton P J, Somssich I E, Ringler P, Shen Q J. WRKY transcription factors. TRENDS PLANT SCI. 2010;15(5):247–258. pmid:20304701
  37. 37. Olsen A N, Ernst H A, Leggio L L, Skriver K. NAC transcription factors: structurally distinct, functionally diverse. TRENDS PLANT SCI. 2005;10(2):79–87. pmid:15708345
  38. 38. Thurow C, Schiermeyer A, Krawczyk S, Butterbrodt T, Nickolov K, Gatz C. Tobacco bZIP transcription factor TGA2.2 and related factor TGA2.1 have distinct roles in plant defense responses and plant development. PLANT J. 2005;44(1):100–113. pmid:16167899
  39. 39. Shrestha R, Gomez-Ariza J, Brambilla V, Fornara F. Molecular control of seasonal flowering in rice, arabidopsis and temperate cereals. Ann Bot. 2014;114(7):1445–1458. pmid:24651369
  40. 40. Crocco C D, Botto J F. BBX proteins in green plants: insights into their evolution, structure, feature and functional diversification. GENE. 2013;531(1):44–52. pmid:23988504
  41. 41. Griffiths S, Dunford R P, Coupland G, Laurie D A. The evolution of CONSTANS-like gene families in barley, rice, and Arabidopsis. PLANT PHYSIOL. 2003;131(4):1855–1867. pmid:12692345
  42. 42. Zhai C, Zhang Y, Yao N, Lin F, Liu Z, Dong Z, et al. Function and interaction of the coupled genes responsible for Pik-h encoded rice blast resistance. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(6):e98067. pmid:24896089
  43. 43. Sun Y, Yu D. Activated expression of AtWRKY53 negatively regulates drought tolerance by mediating stomatal movement. PLANT CELL REP. 2015;34(8):1295–1306. pmid:25861729
  44. 44. Jiang C H, Huang Z Y, Xie P, Gu C, Li K, Wang D C, et al. Transcription factors WRKY70 and WRKY11 served as regulators in rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156-induced systemic resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis. J EXP BOT. 2016;67(1):157–174. pmid:26433201
  45. 45. van Loon L C, Geraats B P, Linthorst H J. Ethylene as a modulator of disease resistance in plants. TRENDS PLANT SCI. 2006;11(4):184–191. pmid:16531096
  46. 46. Onate-Sanchez L, Anderson J P, Young J, Singh K B. AtERF14, a member of the ERF family of transcription factors, plays a nonredundant role in plant defense. PLANT PHYSIOL. 2007;143(1):400–409. pmid:17114278
  47. 47. Cao Y, Song F, Goodman R M, Zheng Z. Molecular characterization of four rice genes encoding ethylene-responsive transcriptional factors and their expressions in response to biotic and abiotic stress. J PLANT PHYSIOL. 2006;163(11):1167–1178. pmid:16436304
  48. 48. Nakano T, Nishiuchi T, Suzuki K, Fujimura T, Shinshi H. Studies on transcriptional regulation of endogenous genes by ERF2 transcription factor in tobacco cells. PLANT CELL PHYSIOL. 2006;47(4):554–558. pmid:16452120
  49. 49. Singh R P, Shelke G M, Kumar A, Jha P N. Biochemistry and genetics of ACC deaminase: a weapon to "stress ethylene" produced in plants. FRONT MICROBIOL. 2015;6:937. pmid:26441873
  50. 50. Ouyang Y, Huang X, Lu Z, Yao J. Genomic survey, expression profile and co-expression network analysis of OsWD40 family in rice. BMC GENOMICS. 2012;13:100. pmid:22429805
  51. 51. Chen H, Huang X, Gusmaroli G, Terzaghi W, Lau O S, Yanagawa Y, et al. Arabidopsis CULLIN4-damaged DNA binding protein 1 interacts with CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC1-SUPPRESSOR OF PHYA complexes to regulate photomorphogenesis and flowering time. PLANT CELL. 2010;22(1):108–123. pmid:20061554
  52. 52. Holm M, Hardtke C S, Gaudet R, Deng X W. Identification of a structural motif that confers specific interaction with the WD40 repeat domain of Arabidopsis COP1. EMBO J. 2001;20(1–2):118–127. pmid:11226162
  53. 53. Lin J, Lee D, Choi Y, Lee S Y. The scaffold protein RACK1 mediates the RANKL-dependent activation of p38 MAPK in osteoclast precursors. SCI SIGNAL. 2015;8(379):a54. pmid:26038599
  54. 54. Zhang L, Li Q, Dong H, He Q, Liang L, Tan C, et al. Three CCT domain-containing genes were identified to regulate heading date by candidate gene-based association mapping and transformation in rice. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7663. pmid:25563494
  55. 55. Johansson M, Staiger D. Time to flower: interplay between photoperiod and the circadian clock. J EXP BOT. 2015;66(3):719–730. pmid:25371508