Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Epidemiology of Blood Stream Infection due to Candida Species in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Japan over 12 Years: Importance of Peripheral Line-Associated Candidemia

  • Masahiro Ishikane ,

    ishikanemasahiro@gmail.com

    Affiliations Department of Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Division of Global infectious diseases, Department of Infection and Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan

  • Kayoko Hayakawa,

    Affiliation Department of Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

  • Satoshi Kutsuna,

    Affiliation Department of Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

  • Nozomi Takeshita,

    Affiliation Department of Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

  • Norio Ohmagari

    Affiliation Department of Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Epidemiology of Blood Stream Infection due to Candida Species in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Japan over 12 Years: Importance of Peripheral Line-Associated Candidemia

  • Masahiro Ishikane, 
  • Kayoko Hayakawa, 
  • Satoshi Kutsuna, 
  • Nozomi Takeshita, 
  • Norio Ohmagari
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Candidemia is an important cause of mortality in healthcare settings. Peripheral lines are a source of candidemia, yet few studies have reported on the clinico-epidemiological features of candidemia due to peripheral-line associated blood stream infection (PLABSI).

Methods

We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study of all patients with candidemia between 2002 and 2013. PLABSI was defined as the presence of at least one of the following: the presence of phlebitis or the resolution of clinical symptoms after peripheral-line withdrawal, with careful exclusion of an alternative explanation for bacteraemia. We described the epidemiology of candidemia and assessed predictive factors of PLABSI due to Candida spp., peripheral line-associated candidemia (PLAC), compared with non-PLAC.

Results

A total of 301 episodes of candidemia, including 37 of PLAC, were diagnosed during the study period. Central-line associated blood stream infection, intra-abdominal infection, and infection of unknown source accounted for the remaining 233, 14, and 17 cases, respectively. The overall incidence rate of candidemia was 0.11/1000 patient-days. In multivariate analysis, cephalosporin exposure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.22, 95% CI 1.04–4.77), polymicrobial bacteraemia/fungaemia (OR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.02–8.10), and ID specialist consultation (OR = 2.40, 95% CI 1.13–5.13) were identified as independent predictors of PLAC. Although non-PLAC had a higher mortality, the length of hospital stay after candidemia was similar between the two groups and candidemia duration was longer in the PLAC group.

Conclusion

PLACs are an important cause of candidemia in hospitalized patients. Appropriate identification and management of PLAC are crucial.

Introduction

Candida is an important pathogen causing bloodstream infections in healthcare settings [15]. Candidemia is serious infection and its morbidity and mortality rates are high, with a reported overall mortality rate ranging from 25–60% [68]. In addition, candidemia is associated with prolonged hospitalization, resulting in substantially increased health care costs [68].

Central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) is recognized as the main source of infection [9]; a central venous catheter (CVC) is present in at least 70% of non-neutropenic patients with candidemia at the time that the diagnostic blood culture is obtained [1012]. CVCs pose a greater risk for vascular catheter-related bloodstream infections than short-term peripheral lines [13, 14]. In Japan, patients who require intravenous treatment are hospitalized. However, CVCs are not widely used and many patients receive parenteral solutions via peripheral lines [1517]. Several previous studies show that peripheral line-associated blood stream infections (PLABSI) are caused not only by Staphylococcus aureus but also by Candida spp. [1520]. The proportion of PLABSI secondary to Candida spp. is reported to range from 8.1% (5/62) to 14.7% (20/136) in Japan [1519] and 0.2% to 1.1% in England [20]. Worldwide, there is a paucity of data on detailed clinical and epidemiological features of PLABSI, such as predictive factors. Moreover, studies on the epidemiology of candidemia in Asian countries, especially in Japan, are limited [2123].

Therefore, we conducted this retrospective cohort study, which covered a 12-year period, to describe the epidemiology of candidemia in a tertiary care hospital in Japan, and to assess the epidemiology of PLABSI due to Candida spp.

Materials and Methods

Hospital setting and study design

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all episodes of candidemia from January 2002 to December 2013 (12-year period). The setting was the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM), that has more than 800 inpatient beds and serves as a tertiary referral hospital for metropolitan Tokyo. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the NCGM (approval no: NCGM-G-001589-00) and was implemented in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patient information was anonymized and deidentified prior to analysis, ant the need for patient consent was waived. This study was institutional review board-approved and patient consent was exempted because of retrospective nature.

Data collection

All cases of candidemia were identified through the microbiological laboratory database. The parameters retrieved from patient records included the following: (i) demographics; (ii) immunosuppressive status (e.g. neutropenia at onset of candidemia, the use of immunosuppressive agents [including chemotherapy or steroid therapy], radiation therapy, transplantation; (iii) background and comorbid conditions (including Charlson’s scores [24]); (iv) recent healthcare-associated exposures (e.g. residence in a long term care facility [LTCF], previous hospitalization, invasive procedure and/or surgery in the 3 months preceding candidemia, the presence of a urinary catheter [≥ 2 days] and/or CVC [≥ 2 days] at the onset of candidemia, haemodialysis, intensive care unit stay during the current hospitalization episode prior to the onset of candidemia, and transfusion in the month preceding candidemia; (v) infection-related characteristics, including source of infection; (vi) recent exposure to antibiotic and antifungal therapy (for ≥ 3 days) within one month prior to the isolation of Candida spp.; (vii) the severity of illness, such as sepsis levels according to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria [25] and haematogenous dissemination; (viii) antifungal therapy against candidemia, including empirical or definitive antifungal therapy and source control; and (ix) outcome, including clinical failure, persistent candidemia for ≥ 3 days after initiation of antifungal therapy, in-hospital and 30-day/90-day mortality, discharged to a LTCF after being admitted from home, additional hospitalization within 6 months of completing candidemia therapy, and length of hospital stay after candidemia (excluding those who died), and duration candidemia. In addition, we reviewed referrals to an infectious disease (ID) specialist for management of candidemia or to an ophthalmology specialist for examination for endophthalmitis.

Definitions of candidemia episode and other variables

An episode of candidemia was defined as isolation of Candida spp. from at least one peripherally taken blood culture in a patient with clinical signs and symptoms of infection [9]. Episodes were considered to be separate if they were caused by different species or occurred at least 30 days apart, with resolution of clinical features of infection and at least one negative blood culture in the intervening period [26]. Episodes detected within 48 hours of hospital admission were excluded as they were considered not to be hospital acquired, and it would be difficult to determine important parameters such as duration of candidemia.

CLABSI and intra-abdominal infection were defined according to the National Healthcare Safety Network Surveillance definition and the guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America [27, 28]. Bloodstream infections related to peripherally inserted central catheters and port catheters were considered as CLABSI [9]. PLABSI was defined as the presence of at least one of the following conditions: (1) the presence of phlebitis, and/or (2) resolution of clinical symptoms after short-term peripheral line withdrawal with a careful exclusion of another focus of bacteraemia [15, 17, 18]. Phlebitis was diagnosed by the presence of at least two of the following signs on examination of the catheter insertion site: erythema, swelling, tenderness or pain, or warmth [18]. Peripheral line-associated candidemia (PLAC) was defined as PLABSI due to Candida spp. and non-PLAC as a source of infection other than other PLABSI (such as CLABSI, intra-abdominal infection, and unknown). Central line-associated candidemia was defined as CLABSI due to Candida spp. as described elsewhere [11].

Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 × 109 cells/L. Sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock were defined according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines [25]. Empiric therapy was defined as administration of systemic antifungal drugs within 72 hours of the onset of candidemia, and definitive therapy was defined according to guideline of Infectious Diseases Society of America [9]. The time to antifungal therapy was determined as the time from when blood cultures which subsequently became positive for Candida spp. were obtained to the time of effective antifungal therapy initiation. Adequate source control was defined as removal of any pre-existing central or peripheral vein catheter or documented surgical or radiologic procedures to drain abscesses or other fluid collections (which were thought to be the source of candidemia) within 24 hours of the onset of candidemia. Time to central or peripheral vein catheter removal was determined based on medical record review. CVC removal was further classified into early removal (within 48 hours of candidemia) and replacement (removal with immediate re-insertion). Clinical failure was defined based on the presence of at least one of the followings: persistence of the clinical signs and symptoms of candidemia in the absence of another cause, and/or the same Candida spp. persistently detected on repeat blood cultures [29].

Microbiological methods

Candida spp. were isolated from blood specimens using an automated broth microdilution system (MicroScan WlkAway; Siemens AG, Germany) [30] and identified using standard techniques. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using the commercially prepared colorimetric microdilution panel (ASTY; Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial Co., Ltd.). During the study period, there were no changes to the microbiological identification and susceptibility testing process.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or the median with interquartile range (Q1–Q3). Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, whereas Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were applied for continuous variables. The number of episodes, distribution of the source of candidemia, and isolated Candida spp. were described.

Using logistic regression univariate analysis with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), we compared demographic characteristics, clinical predictive factors, and outcomes between PLAC and non-PLAC cases. Potential predictive factors with a P value of < 0.10 in the univariate analysis or that were hypothesized a priori to be clinically or epidemiologically important were considered for inclusion in a multivariate model for predictive factors. Throughout the text, each of the percentages displayed represents the “valid percentage,” calculated with missing data excluded from the denominator. Statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided p-value of < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Epidemiological description of candidemia between 2002 and 2013

A total of 301 episodes of candidemia from 293 patients were included. During the 12-year study period, the annual number of episodes ranged from 11 in 2002 to 37 in 2006. The overall incidence rate of episodes between 2005 and 2013 was 0.11/1000 patient-days and 1.74/1000 hospital admissions. The overall 30-day all-cause mortality was 26.9% (81/301). For source of infection, CLABSI, PLABSI, intra-abdominal infection, and unknown source consisted of 233 (77.4%), 37 (12.3%), 14 (4.7%), and 17 (5.6%), respectively. There was no patient identified who had both a CVC and peripheral episode of candidemia. The annual proportion of PLABSI ranged from 2.7% in 2006 to 21.4% in 2013. Although not statistically significant, the annual proportion of PLABSI tended to increase from 2010 to 2013 with a rate of increase of 68.5% (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Number of episodes and distribution of source for candidemia, 2002–2013 (n = 301).

The number of episodes of candidemia is indicated by solid lines. Bars express proportion of source for candidemia: black indicates PLABSI; white, CLABSI; grey, intra-abdominal infection; and dotted, unknown source.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165346.g001

During this study period, a total of 316 Candida spp. were collected from the 301 episodes of candidemia, including 15 episodes of polymicrobial bacteraemia/fungaemia due to different species of Candida spp. and 14 due to pathogens other than Candida spp. There were 140 (44.3%) isolates of C. albicans, 81 (25.6%) of C. glabrata, 46 (14.6%) of C. parapsilosis, 31 (9.8%) of C. tropicalis, and 18 (5.7%) of other Candida spp., including C. krusei (n = 4), C. guilliermondii (n = 3), C. lusitaniae (n = 2), C. dubliniensis (n = 1), and unclassified (n = 8). The annual proportion of C. albicans reached its peak in 2008 (68.8%), and then showed a downward trend. The annual proportion of C. parapsilosis followed the same pattern (2006 peak, 30.8%), but tended to increase after 2010. While the annual proportion of C. tropicalis and C. glabrata peaked in 2004 (30.0%) and in 2007 (46.9%), respectively, then subsided, both showed a trend toward increasing after 2012 (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Distribution of isolated of Candida spp., 2002–2013 (n = 316).

* * Includes 15 episodes of polymicrobial bacteraemia/fungaemia Bars express proportion of Candida spp.: black indicates C. albicans; white, C. glabrata; shaded, C. parapsilosis; dotted, C. tropicalis; and grey, others.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165346.g002

Analysis of patients with PLAC and non-PLAC

The mean age of the study cohort was 69.9 ± 16.1 years and 204 (67.8%) were male. Although the patients in the two groups had a similar profile of chronic conditions, patients in the PLAC group tended to have more solid-organ cancers and chronic heart disease. The non-PLAC group had significantly more healthcare-associated exposures, such as urinary catheter insertion, CVC insertion, and transfusion. While there was no significant difference in previous exposure to antibiotic drugs overall or to antifungal drugs in particular, cephalosporin exposure was higher in the group with PLAC. No difference of isolated Candida spp. was observed in two groups, but the PLAC group had significantly more episodes of polymicrobial bacteraemia/fungaemia than the non-PLAC group. Non-PLAC episodes had a tendency to increase with severe sepsis, and were associated with acute renal failure.

Regarding treatment, no difference was observed in empirical/definitive regimens and treatment duration between the two groups. ID consultations were more frequent in the PLAC than in the non-PLAC group. The in-hospital and 30-day/90-day mortality of non-PLAC was higher than that of PLAC (P = 0.017). The length of hospital stay after candidemia was similar between the two groups (41 days in PLAC vs 36 days in non-PLAC), while the duration of candidemia was longer in PLAC (9 days in PLAC vs 6 days in non-PLAC). Patients with PLAC tended to be discharged to an LTCF after being admitted from home (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Univariate analysis of candidemia: PLAC versus non-PLAC, 2002–2013 (n = 301).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165346.t001

Predictive factors of PLAC and non-PLAC

In the univariate analysis, PLAC was significantly negatively associated with the presence of urinary catheters or transfusion, and was significantly associated with polymicrobial bacteraemia/fungaemia and ID consultations required. Independent predictive factors for PLAC identified on multivariate analysis were previous cephalosporins exposure (P = 0.040; OR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.04–4.77), polymicrobial bacteraemia/fungaemia (P = 0.046; OR = 2.87; 95% CI = 1.02–8.10), and ID consultations obtained (P = 0.023; OR = 2.40; 95% CI = 1.13–5.13). In contrast, urinary catheters (P = 0.040; OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.21–0.96) and transfusions (P = 0.039; OR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.20–0.96) were significantly negatively associated with PLAC (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Multivariate analysis for predictive factors of PLAC compared to non-PLAC, 2002–2013 (n = 301).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165346.t002

Discussion

Our study showed that the overall incidence rate of candidemia was 0.11/1000 patient-days and 1.74/1000 hospital admissions. Our incidence rate was higher than those reported in recent studies conducted in Italy (1.19–1.50/1000 hospital admissions) [2, 31], Turkey (0.95/1000 hospital admissions) [32], Spain (0.92/1000 hospital admissions) [33], Finland (0.026–0.03/1000 hospital admissions) [34], the USA (0.16–0.33/1000 hospital admissions), and Australia (0.23/1000 hospital admissions) but lower than that reported in Brazil (0.54/1000 patient-days) [3537]. Unlike in Western European countries, where there is an observed trend toward increased incidence rates of candidemia, our incidence rate did not significantly increase over the study period.

Although Candida spp. was not reported as a causative organism of PLABSI in Spain [18], a study from England showed that the proportion of Candida spp. among PLABSI was 0.2% in non-teaching hospitals and 1.1% in teaching hospitals [20]. However, some studies in Japan showed more frequent isolation of Candida spp. among PLABSI (8.1% to 14.7%) [1519]. This result might reflect the difference in practice of using peripheral lines, not CVCs, to administer parenteral solutions in Japan. Consistent with other previous studies [38, 39], the annual proportion of C. albicans showed a decreasing trend in our study, and C. albicans was isolated as frequently as C. glabrata in 2013 (i.e. 34.4%). As a previous study pointed out, different frequencies of isolation of each Candida spp. depend on local factors, such as the population involved, geographical region, and previous anti-fungal exposure [40]. As our hospital is a tertiary referral center, patients’ population comprised mixed patients such as patients admitted through emergency room, patients with sold and hematological malignancies, and patients undergoing surgeries. Our trend is similar to trend of the previous nation-wide survey in Japan conducted in 14 various hospitals [41]. Therefore, our results might reflect the trend of mixed patients’ population in Japan.

While no difference of Candida spp. was observed between the two groups, PLAC had more episodes of polymicrobial bacteraemia/fungaemia than non-PLAC. This may be due to heavier contamination of peripheral lines than central lines. Peripheral lines were frequently inserted in the emergency department, or in hospital wards where nurses and trainees occasionally inserted peripheral lines without adequate infection control procedures. These issues might have contributed to PLAC. The United States Centers for Disease Control and prevention recommend that peripheral lines inserted in emergency situations should be removed or changed in hospital wards within the first 48 hours of admission and every 72–96 hours thereafter, irrespective of the presence of infection [42]. In our hospital, only 70% ethanol (not chlorhexidine gluconate) was used as antiseptic skin preparation, and the exchange of peripheral lines was performed at least every 96 hours or earlier if phlebitis developed. This practice did not change over this study period.

PLAC episodes were more strongly associated with cephalosporin exposure than non-PLAC. These results might reflect the difference of severity of illness among the two groups. Although we used severity of sepsis as an indicator of severity [25], non-PLAC had a tendency to increase with severe sepsis and acute renal failure. Further, a greater proportion of patients who developed non-PLAC received broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, such as a carbapenem (133/254: 50.4% in non-PLAC vs 18/37: 48.6% in PLAC). In fact, the presence of urinary catheters and having received a transfusion were associated with non-PLAC; these results indicate that non-PLAC was more serious than PLAC. Remarkably, ID consultation was requested more frequently in PLAC than non-PLAC. This might reflect the difficulty of diagnosing PLAC, and need for the consultation of ID specialists. The increasing number of PLAC episodes since 2010 might reflect the strengthened ID consulting system since 2011 (e.g. increasing the number of ID specialists).

Although in-hospital and 30-day/90-day mortality of non-PLAC was higher than that of PLAC, length of hospital stay after candidemia was similar between the two groups, and duration of candidemia in PLAC was longer. These results indicate that PLAC was clinically important, and early detection and treatment of PLAC could save health care costs in hospital settings.

As a limitation, the present study was conducted only at a single centre. Therefore, our results might be influenced by the local clinical management practices and infection control policies. However, the candidemia incidence rate reported in the present study is similar to that reported in a multicentre analysis in Japan [43]. In addition, due to the retrospective nature of the study, we were unable to collect information such as duration of peripheral line insertion.

In conclusion, our study is the first epidemiological study related PLAC to reveal that peripheral lines are an important source of candidemia. We found that PLAC was associated with ID consultation requests, polymicrobial bacteraemia/fungaemia, and exposure to cephalosporins. Although the recent rise in PLAC may be due to enhanced detection by ID specialists, this study has led to a better understanding of candidemia and highlights the potential problem in hospital setting: that not only central lines but also peripheral lines may be source of candidemia. Also, the high hospital mortality (27.0%), long length of hospital stay after candidemia, and long duration of candidemia associated with PLAC are clinically important. Further studies are warranted to investigate the current situation and impact of candidemia worldwide, as appropriate identification of PLAC should lead to effective and efficient control systems to prevent the spread of candidemia.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the clinical staff at the NCGM for their dedicated clinical practice and patient care.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: MI KH SK NT NO.
  2. Formal analysis: MI KH NO.
  3. Funding acquisition: KH NO.
  4. Investigation: MI KH.
  5. Methodology: MI KH.
  6. Project administration: KH NO.
  7. Supervision: KH NO.
  8. Visualization: MI KH NO.
  9. Writing – original draft: MI KH SK NT NO.
  10. Writing – review & editing: MI KH SK NT NO.

References

  1. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections—United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;60: 243–8.
  2. 2. Barchiesi F, Orsetti E, Gesuita R, Skrami E, Manso E; Candidemia Stduy Group. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome of candidemia in a tertiary referral center in Italy from 2010 to 2014. Infection. 2016;44: 205–13. pmid:26410297
  3. 3. Cornely OA, Bassetti M, Calandra T, Garbino J, Kullberg BJ, Lortholary O, et al. ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18 (Suppl 7): 19–37. pmid:23137135
  4. 4. Lionakis MS, Netea MG. Candida and host determinants of susceptibility to invasive candidiasis. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003079. pmid:23300452
  5. 5. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39: 309–317. pmid:15306996
  6. 6. Zaoutis TE, Argon J, Chu J, Berlin JA, Walsh TJ, Feudtner C. The epidemiology and attributable outcomes of candidemia in adults and children hospitalized in the United States: a propensity analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41: 1232–1239. pmid:16206095
  7. 7. Tortorano AM, Kibbler C, Peman J, Bernhardt H, Klingspor L, Grillot R. Candidemia in Europe: epidemiology and resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;27: 359–366. pmid:16647248
  8. 8. Hassan I, Powell G, Sidhu M, Hart WM, Denning DW. Excess mortality, length of stay and cost attributable to candidemia. J Infect. 2009;59: 360–365. pmid:19744519
  9. 9. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62: e1–50. pmid:26679628
  10. 10. Walsh TJ, Rex JH. All catheter-related candidemia is not the same: assessment of the balance between the risks and benefits of removal of vascular catheters. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34: 600–602. pmid:11810604
  11. 11. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49: 1–45. pmid:19489710
  12. 12. Sherertz RJ, Raad II, Belani A, Koo LC, Rand KH, Pickett DL, et al. Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28: 76–82. pmid:2405016
  13. 13. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 to June 2002, issued August 2002. Am J Infect Control. 2002;30: 458–475. pmid:12461510
  14. 14. Vonberg RP, Behnke M, Geffers C, Sohr D, Ruden H, Dettenkofer M, et al. Device-associated infection rates for non-intensive care unit patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27: 357–361. pmid:16622812
  15. 15. Kurai H, Kawamura I, Hosokawa N, Abe M, Kimura M, Araoka H, et al. Pathogenesis and clinical outcome of peripheral line-associated bloodstream infections in Japan. 24nd Annual Conference, ECCMID 2014, Barcelona, Spain 11 May 2014.
  16. 16. Morikane K. Evaluation of peripheral line-associated bloodstream infections and phlebitis through surveillance. 42nd Annual Conference, APIC 2015, Nashville, TN June 2015.
  17. 17. A. Sato, I. Nakamura, T. Fujii, T. Matsumoto. Peripheral line associated blood stream infection. 55th Annual Conference ICAAC/ICC 2015, San Diego, California, USA 19 Sep 2015.
  18. 18. Pujol M, Hornero A, Saballs M, Argerich MJ, Verdaguer R, Cisnal M, et al. Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections at a university-affiliated hospital. J Hosp Infect. 2007;67: 22–29. pmid:17719678
  19. 19. Austin ED, Sullivan SB, Whittier S, Lowy FD, Uhlemann AC. Peripheral intravenous catheter placement is an underrecognized source of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016;3: ofw072. pmid:27191005
  20. 20. Coello R, Charlett A, Ward V, Wilson J, Pearson A, Sedgwick J, et al. Device-related sources of bacteraemia in English hospitals—opportunities for the prevention of hospital-acquired bacteraemia. J Hosp Infect. 2003;53: 46–57. pmid:12495685
  21. 21. Hirai Y, Asahata S, Ainoda Y, Goto A, Fujita T, Totsuka K. Nosocomial Candida parapsilosis candidemia: risk factors, antifungal susceptibility and outcome. J Hosp Infect. 2014;87: 54–58. pmid:24698737
  22. 22. Giri S, Kindo AJ. A review of Candida species causing blood stream infection. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2012;30: 270–278. pmid:22885191
  23. 23. Ding X, Yan D, Sun W, Zeng Z, Su R, Su J. Epidemiology and risk factors for nosocomial non-Candida albicans candidemia in adult patients at a tertiary care hospital in North China. Med Mycol. 2015;53: 684–690. pmid:26229153
  24. 24. Hall WH, Ramachandran R, Narayan S, Jani AB, Vijayakumar S. An electronic application for rapidly calculating Charlson comorbidity score. BMC Cancer. 2004;4: 94. pmid:15610554
  25. 25. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41: 580–637. pmid:23353941
  26. 26. Fernández-Ruiz M, Aguado JM, Almirante B, Lora-Pablos D, Padilla B, Puig-Asensio M, et al. Initial use of echinocandins does not negatively influence outcome in Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infection: a propensity score analysis. Clin Infect Dis.2014;58: 1413–1421. pmid:24642553
  27. 27. National Healthcare Safety Network. Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) and non-central line-associated Bloodstream Infection. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/clabsi/. Accessed 01 July 2016
  28. 28. Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, Rodvold KA, Goldstein EJ, Baron EJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50: 133–164. pmid:20034345
  29. 29. Kontoyiannis DP, Vaziri I, Hanna HA, Boktour M, Thornby J, Hachem R, et al. Risk factors for Candida tropicalis fungemia in patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33: 1676–81. pmid:11568858
  30. 30. Hayakawa K, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Kirikae T, Nagamatsu M, Shimada K, Mezaki K, et al. Molecular and epidemiological characterization of IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacter cloacae in a large tertiary care hospital in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58: 3441–3450. pmid:24709261
  31. 31. Tortorano AM, Prigitano A, Lazzarini C, Passera M, Deiana ML, Cavinato S, et al. A 1-year prospective survey of candidemia in Italy and changing epidemiology over one decade. Infection. 2013;41: 655–662. pmid:23559357
  32. 32. Alp S, Arikan-Akdagli S, Gulmez D, Ascioglu S, Uzun O, Akova M. Epidemiology of candidemia in a tertiary care university hospital: 10-year experience with 381 candidemia episodes between 2001 and 2010. Mycoses. 2015;58: 498–505. pmid:26155849
  33. 33. Pemán J, Cantón E, Quindós G, Eraso E, Alcoba J, Guinea J, et al. Epidemiology, species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of fungaemia in a Spanish multicentre prospective survey. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67: 1181–1187. pmid:22351683
  34. 34. Poikonen E, Lyytikäinen O, Anttila VJ, Koivula I, Lumio J, Kotilainen P, et al. Secular trend in candidemia and the use of fluconazole in Finland, 2004–2007. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10: 312. pmid:21029444
  35. 35. Oud L. Secular Trends in Utilization of Critical Care Services Among Candidemia-Associated Hospitalizations: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J Clin Med Res. 2016 Jan;8(1):40–3. pmid:26668681
  36. 36. Playford EG, Nimmo GR, Tilse M, Sorrell TC. Increasing incidence of candidaemia: long-term epidemiological trends, Queensland, Australia, 1999–2008. J Hosp Infect. 2010 Sep;76(1):46–51. pmid:20382444
  37. 37. Moretti ML, Trabasso P, Lyra L, Fagnani R, Resende MR, de Oliveira Cardoso LG, et al. Is the incidence of candidemia caused by Candida glabrata increasing in Brazil? Five-year surveillance of Candida bloodstream infection in a university reference hospital in southeast Brazil. Med Mycol. 2013 Apr;51(3):225–30. pmid:22920712
  38. 38. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20: 133–163. pmid:17223626
  39. 39. Yapar N. Epidemiology and risk factors for invasive candidiasis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014;10: 95–105. pmid:24611015
  40. 40. Antinori S, Milazzo L, Sollima S, Galli M, Corbellino M. Candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults: A narrative review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jul 6. pii: S0953-6205(16)30198-4. pmid:27394927
  41. 41. Yamaguchi Hideyo, Uchida Katsuhisa, Nishiyama Yayoi and the Japan Antifungal Surveillance Program Group. Species distribution and in vitro susceptibility to three antifungal triazoles of clinical Candida isolates from a five-year nation-wide survey in Japan. Medical Mycology Research. 2012;1: 17–26.
  42. 42. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(RR-10): 1–29. pmid:12233868
  43. 43. Nagao M. A multicentre analysis of epidemiology of the nosocomial bloodstream infections in Japanese university hospitals. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19: 852–858. pmid:23176224