Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Is There Any Difference between the In Situ and Systemic IL-10 and IFN-γ Production when Clinical Forms of Cutaneous Sporotrichosis Are Compared?

  • Fernanda N. Morgado,

    Current address: Laboratório de Pesquisa em Leishmaniose, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

    Affiliation Laboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Armando O. Schubach,

    Affiliation VigiLeish-Serviço de Infectologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Maria Inês Pimentel,

    Affiliation VigiLeish-Serviço de Infectologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Marcelo R. Lyra,

    Affiliation VigiLeish-Serviço de Infectologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Érica C. F. Vasconcellos,

    Affiliation VigiLeish-Serviço de Infectologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Claudia M. Valete-Rosalino,

    Current address: Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Institute (IHMT), New University of Lisbon (UNL), Lisbon, Portugal

    Affiliations VigiLeish-Serviço de Infectologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia-Oftalmologia/Faculdade de Medicina/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Fátima Conceição-Silva

    fconcei@ioc.fiocruz.br

    Affiliation Laboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Is There Any Difference between the In Situ and Systemic IL-10 and IFN-γ Production when Clinical Forms of Cutaneous Sporotrichosis Are Compared?

  • Fernanda N. Morgado, 
  • Armando O. Schubach, 
  • Maria Inês Pimentel, 
  • Marcelo R. Lyra, 
  • Érica C. F. Vasconcellos, 
  • Claudia M. Valete-Rosalino, 
  • Fátima Conceição-Silva
PLOS
x

Abstract

Fungus of the Sporothrix schenckii complex can produce skin lesions in humans, commonly lymphocutaneous (LC) and fixed (F) forms of sporotrichosis. Some authors have suggested that clinical forms are influenced by differences in virulence and genetic profile of isolates. But little is known about the role of immune response in determining the clinical outcome of sporotrichosis. To verify the profile of systemic and in situ IFN-γ and IL-10 expression in sporotrichosis patients, and consequently to detect any difference between the two compartments and/or clinical presentation, we quantified the number of IFN-γ and IL-10 producer peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with S. schenckii antigen (Ss-Ag) by Elispot, and quantified cytokines expression by in situ immunohistochemistry in the same patient. Three groups were formed: 1- LC (n = 9); 2- F (n = 10); 3- healthy individuals (n = 14). All sporotrichosis patients produced high amounts of systemic IFN- γ when compared to uninfected individuals. No differences were observed between LC and F groups. Regarding in situ IL-10 expression, a difference between LC and F groups was observed: LC lesions presented higher amounts of IL-10 than F lesions differently from systemic IL-10 which showed similarities. Our data suggests that LC lesions present higher IL-10 expression which could be related to regulatory mechanisms for compensating the tissue injury, however favoring fungal persistence in the lesions. Surprisingly, there were no differences in systemic and in situ IFN- γ expression between CL and F patients, although it was significantly higher expressed in these patients than in healthy individuals.

Introduction

Sporotrichosis is a subcutaneous mycosis caused by fungus of the Sporothrix schenckii complex [13]. Infection occurs by traumatic inoculation of the fungus in individuals working with soil and plants [4] or through the bite or scratch of sick cats [47].

After fungus inoculation, the individual may develop different clinical forms, varying from localized skin lesions (fixed—F) or lymphocutaneous (LC) forms, to systemic disease (extracutaneous form) [4]. About 75% of patients present skin lesions, mainly LC and F forms [4]. The F form is characterized by one lesion (verrucous, ulcerated or plaque-like) on the site of the fungus inoculation without lymphatic involvement. But, the most common form is the LC which is characterized by an involvement of the lymphatic system, accompanied by the occurrence of subcutaneous nodules that may progress to necrosis, liquefaction of their content and ulceration, showing the aspect known as sporotrichoid [48]. Although some authors have suggested that clinical forms are influenced by differences in virulence [9] and genetic profile of isolates [10], little is known about immune response in human SP.

Previously, our group [11] had verified differences in the in situ immune response between LC and F lesions suggesting that the clinical presentation could be influenced by the different profile of the in situ immune response. However, as Sporothrix sp can spread all over the body, the role of systemic immune response in immunopathology of sporothrichosis, particularly cytokine profile, cannot be neglected. Based on these facts and aiming at understanding some aspects of the IFN-γ/IL-10 profile in the different clinical presentations and tissue compartment of human sporotrichosis, we quantified the systemic and in situ IFN-γ and IL-10 expressions by immunohistochemistry and Elispot assay.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

An informed written consent was obtained from all individuals. In the case of minor/children, the written consent was obtained from the next of kin, caretakers or guardians. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional Ethics Committee on Human Research—FIOCRUZ (CEP-INI protocol 014/2001).

Patients

Nineteen sporotrichosis patients treated at the Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas—INI/FIOCRUZ and were grouped as follows: 1- lymphocutaneous form (LC; n = 9); and 2- fixed cutaneous form (F; n = 10). Fourteen healthy donors were included in this study. Peripheral venous blood was collected in heparin from all analyzed individuals and lesion fragments were collected from 14 patients. All samples used in this study were obtained at the moment of diagnosis, so the patients were free of medication. After the sample uptake, the diagnosis was confirmed by fungal isolation in appropriate culture media and according to the diagnosis, they were treated by the medical staff of Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas—Fiocruz.

Antigen preparation (Ss-Ag)

The yeast-like phase of the Sporothrix schenckii (Ss) strain 17629, kindly provided by Dr Zancopé-Oliveira (INI-FIOCRUZ) was cultured in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium as described by Brito et al. [9]. Fungal cells were adjusted to 108 cells/mL and disrupted by cycles of freezing and thawing, followed by ultra-sonication (Lab-line Ultra-Lip Labsonic Systems IL, USA).

Separation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)

PBMC were obtained as previously described [12]. Briefly, PBMC cells were separated by centrifugation over a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient (Histopaque 1077, Sigma, MO, USA) and adjusted to 2x106 cells / mL and 1x106 cells / mL.

IFN-γ and IL-10 Elispot

The Elispot assay was performed as previously described [13]. Briefly, 96-well microplates (Multiscreen Millipore, France) were coated with 5μg/mL of antibodies anti-IFN-γ or anti-IL-10 (Mabtech, OH, USA). A total of 2x105 and 1x105 PBMC were added to the ELISPOT plates in the presence of medium alone (spontaneous cytokine production), Ss-Ag (the equivalent of 106 disrupted fungal cells/well) or Concanavalin A (ConA) (4μg/mL–Sigma). After stimulation, the plates were washed and incubated with either 1μg/mL biotinylated anti-IFN-γ or anti-IL-10 (MabTech). The plates were incubated with streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (MabTech) and revealed with BCIP/NBT (Sigma). The spots were counted in an Immunospot reader [Cellular Technology (CTL) Ltd, OH, USA] using the Immunospot Software Version 3 (CTL).

The results were expressed as spots/10,000 PBMC in the antigen stimulated wells subtracted of the spontaneous expression.

Immunohistochemistry

The in situ inflammation was evaluated by immunoperoxidase staining as described [14]. The primary antibodies used were: rat anti- human IL10 (clone JES3-12G8) and rat anti- human IFN-γ (clone XMG1-2) (BD Biosciences, CA, USA), diluted 1:100 in PBS (phosphate buffered saline). Suppressed primary antibodies was used as negative control. The images were acquired using the Motic Images Plus2.0 program (Motic China Co., China) and light microscopy (Nikon eclipse E200, Japan). The staining intensity was scored in ten microscopic fields (200x magnification) as rare (at least 1 positive area / field), discrete (2–3 positive areas / field), moderate (4–5 positive areas / field) and intense (>5 positive areas / field).

Statistical analysis

The SPSS16 for windows (SPSS, Inc., IL, USA), was used for statistical analysis. Data were reported as median and range and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and Fisher`s exact test were used to compare the LC, F and healthy groups. Spearman test was used for nonparametric correlations. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered as positive.

Results

Patients

Clinical data are described in Table 1 and S1 table.

thumbnail
Table 1. Clinical data of patients with lymphocutaneous (LC) and fixed (F) forms of sporothrichosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162764.t001

Histopathology

Suppurative granulomatous inflammation was the predominant finding (7/9) in fixed lesions; the remaining (2/9) presented only granulomatous inflammation. LC lesions presented suppurative granulomatous inflammation (4/8) and necrotic granulomatous inflammation (4/8). Yeast cells compatible with Sporothrix schenckii complex were observed in three LC and in four F cases. No differences were observed between groups (p>0.05). Histopathological analysis was not possible in 2 patients due to insufficient material.

IFN-γ expression by PBMC

The amount of spontaneous IFN-γ producing cells was lower in the healthy group (median 0.11, 0–3.84) than in LC (median 0.5, 0.1–5.5; p = 0.013) and F patients (median 0.83, 0–5.92; p = 0.026) (Fig 1a and S1 Table). All subjects presented positive response to ConA stimulation (data not shown). Regarding Ss-Ag stimulation, LC (median 14.1, 7–20.3) and F (median 8.8, 3.1–25) patients presented similar quantities of IFN-γ-producer cells (p>0.05), but they were higher than in the healthy group (median 0.65, 0–2, p = 0.0001 and 0.0001, respectively) (Fig 1b). An inverse correlation between spontaneous IFN-γ-producer cells and duration of lesions was observed (r = -0.578; p = 0.008).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Number of IFN-γ and IL-10 producer cells/2 x 105 cells from peripheral blood.

(A) Spontaneous IFN-γ producing cells and (B) IFN-γ producing cells after Ss-Ag stimulation. (C) Spontaneous IL-10 producing cells and (D) IL-10 producing cells after Ss-Ag stimulation. The spontaneous values were subtracted from total spots detected in stimulated cultures. LC—lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis; F- fixed form of sporotrichosis; * p-value = 0.013; **p-value = 0.026; ***p-value = 0.0001 (Mann-Whitney test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162764.g001

IL-10 expression by PBMC

Healthy subjects showed substantial amounts of spontaneous IL-10 expression (median 29.45, 3.3–71.6) and they were similar to LC (median 15.7, 3.5–55.0) and F patients (median 36.45, 1.6–58.7; p>0.05) (Fig 1c and S1 Table).

Ss-Ag was able to stimulate IL-10 expression by PBMC from the majority of subjects (LC: median 5.4, 0–42.7; F: median 14.35, 0–43.4; Healthy: median 10.45, 0–39) (p>0.05) (Fig 1d).

An inverse correlation between spontaneous IL-10 producer cells and the number of lesions was observed (r = -0.542; p = 0.017).

IFN-γ in situ expression

The distribution of the in situ IFN-γ in LC was as follows: three patients with rare, one with discrete, one with moderate and one patient with intense expression. The distribution in F was: three patients with rare, one with discrete and four patients with moderate expression. No difference was observed when groups were compared (p = 0.627; OR = 2.00) (Fig 2a and 2b and Table 2 and S1 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 2. In situ IFN-γ and IL-10 expression in lymphocutaneous and fixed lesions of sporothrichosis.

The in situ IFN-γ and IL-10 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry. The arrows point positive areas (red/AEC– 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole). The intensity of staining was scored in ten microscopic fields (200x magnification) as rare (at least 1 positive area / field), discrete (2–3 positive areas / field), moderate (4–5 positive areas / field) and intense (>5 positive areas / field). Scale bar = 10μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162764.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. In situ IFN-γ expression in lymphocutaneous (LC) and fixed (F) forms of sporotrichosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162764.t002

IL-10 in situ expression

The in situ IL-10 expression was distributed in LC as follows: one patient with rare, two with moderate and three patients with intense expression. The distribution in F was: two patients with rare, five with discrete and one patient with moderate expression. The LC group presented higher IL-10 expression than the F patients (p = 0.03; OR = 0.028) (Fig 2c and 2d and Table 3 and S1 Table). In addition, an association between higher IL-10 in situ expression by cells in LC lesions and necrotic granulomatous inflammation was observed.

thumbnail
Table 3. In situ IL-10 expression in lymphocutaneous (LC) and fixed (F) forms of sporotrichosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162764.t003

Discussion

In the present study, to detect differences in IFN-γ/IL-10 profile in different clinical presentations of human sporotrichosis, we quantified spontaneous and antigen stimulated IFN-γ and IL-10 producer cells from peripheral blood and in skin lesions of patients with lymphocutaneous (LC) and fixed (F) forms of sporotrichosis. Although relevantly expressed, IFN-γ and IL-10 systemic expression cells (peripheral blood) was similar when the two clinical forms were compared. On the other hand, we could detect a higher IL-10 in situ expression by cells in LC lesions, associated with necrotic granulomatous inflammation and a tendency of higher number of lesions, longer duration and longer treatment duration. Our previous data showed that, when compared with F group, LC lesions presented stronger inflammatory profile with higher number of lesions, longer duration and required longer treatment duration, as well as more in situ CD4+ cells, neutrophils, and more intense NOS2 expression [11]. Macrophage concentration was similar and comprised about one third of all cells in sporothrichosis lesions. In this context, the high IL-10 expression now verified could play a role in regulatory mechanisms to control/modulate the tissue injury observed in these lesions. IL-10 can be produced by alternatively activated macrophages (M2) [15]. These diverse physiological functions result from the remarkable plasticity of macrophages, which allows these cells to dramatically change their form and function in response to local environmental signals or tissue damage [16]. Furthermore, the subtype M2b (IL-10 and TNF-α producer) was correlated to increased susceptibility to gastrointestinal candidiasis in murine model [17]. Recently, the in vitro induction of M2 by Sporothrix schenckii’s cell wall molecules was demonstrated [18]. Mice experimentally infected presented high IL-10 which was associated with the apoptotic process induced by the fungal infection [19].

The detection of systemic and in situ IFN-γ production cells in LC and F patients suggested a role of IFN-γ in the inflammation of cutaneous sporotrichosis. The induction of Th1 response along with abundant IFN-γ production in an in vitro study [20] in mice was achieved by fungal isolates from patients presenting cutaneous manifestations. In addition, the resistance of NOS2 knockout mice was related to a higher IFN-γ production and a reduced spontaneous and antigen stimulated IL-10 expression in wild type mice [21]. Altogether, these data suggested that the role of IFN-γ in fungal burden control and development of benign clinical presentations could not be related to macrophage activation via NOS2. Furthermore, the authors also suggested that although NO was an essential mediator to the in vitro killing of S. schenckii by macrophages, NO in vivo could contribute to the immunosuppression and cytokine balance during the early phases of infection [21].

In experimental sporotrichosis and in vitro studies using isolates from visceral and cutaneous origins it was established that Th1 response mostly IFN-ƴ, which is produced by different cells including CD4 T cells, strongly activates macrophages and thereby innate and adaptive immune responses and perhaps determines its clinical manifestations[20,2224]. Herein, we observed a markedly IFN-ƴ expression in active lesions that did not differ between two different cutaneous manifestations, probably suggesting that Th1 cells were predominant at the lesions site. However, other factors could be taking place in LC lesions favoring fungal persistence and dissemination. In this context, intrinsic regulations, as the elevated IL-10 expression observed herein could favor the development of extensive lesions in lymphocutaneous patients. In addition, the possibility of extrinsic regulations such as the use of anti-TNF-alpha monotherapy favoring the lesion severity was described[25].

Zhang et al [26] showed large IL-10 expression induced by components of S. schenckii in rats experimentally infected. An induction of a Th2 profile with IL-10 and IL-4 production by S. schenckii isolated from visceral origins was observed, suggesting that visceral isolates may escape from the host immune response by inducing little Th1-prone responses [20]. The role of Th2 cells was also described by Maia et al (2006)[24]. Maia et al 2006 studied a murine model of disseminated sporotrichosis and observed alternation between Th1 and Th2 responses according to infection evolution. Curiously, they observed that Th2 response coincided with high NO production and NOS2 expression and elevation in fungal burden[24]. Some authors have demonstrated the influence of wall compounds of fungal cells on immune response [2729]. The lipid wall compound was found to inhibit the phagocytosis and to induce high liberation of NO and TNF-α in macrophage cultures [28]. Furthermore, the lipid extract could be recognized by TLR4 which induces IL-10 and TNF expression by peritoneal macrophages, as well as NO production, all associated with clinical worsening [30]. This suggests that S. schenckii could be able to modulate the immune response also by inducing IL-10 production by human cells, probably as a mechanism of immune escape. Maia et al. [19] demonstrated that the ExoAntigen was able to stimulate IL-10 production in in vitro infected mice. We observed that Ss-Ag stimulated IL-10 expression by PBMC from both healthy and patient groups. Thus, IL-10 could influence fungal clearance allowing the antigen persistence and consequently favoring the worsening of the lesion. On the other hand, we cannot exclude the possibility of a cross reaction between Ss-Ag and antigens from other fungal agents, particularly those that compose the normal microbiota like those with similar PAMPs [31,32]. The influence of Candida sp cell wall in the expression of inflammatory and regulatory cytokines has been described [33,34]. β-glucans are frequently observed in cell walls of several fungi [35] including Candida sp and S. schenckii [36] and can induce IL-10 expression causing subversion of immune response [35]. Moreover, the possibility of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination of Ss-Ag can be rejected since PBMC from healthy subjects produced insignificant amounts of IFN-spots under Ss-Ag stimulation.

Spontaneous IFN-γ-producing PBMC from patients were higher than from healthy subjects. The present data supports previous results which indicate that despite the inflammatory activity being concentrated at the lesion site, the immune response can be reflected at the peripheral system as observed in the peripheral blood compartment, and it can be specifically measured. Systemic reactions like erythema nodosum have already been verified in sporothrichosis patients presenting only cutaneous lesions, along with fever, arthralgia and malaise [37]. As fungal cells were not verified in tissues from erythema nodosum, Gutierrez-Galhardo et al. [37] suggested that these systemic reactions could play a protective role, leading to a more benign evolution of the disease.

Although the small number of cases could be considered as a limitation of this study, this is the first publication comparing the in situ and systemic cytokine expressions in human sporotrichosis. Moreover, studies with similar numbers of human cases have been published in the literature[11,14,3841].

In conclusion, our data suggests that: 1- LC lesions present higher IL-10 expression which can be related to regulatory mechanisms for compensating the tissue injury, however favoring fungal persistence in the lesions. 2- Surprisingly, there were no differences in systemic and in situ IFN- γ expression between CL and F patients, although it was significantly higher expressed in these patients than in healthy individuals. 3-S. schenckii is able to modulate the immune response also by inducing IL-10 production by human cells probably using this as a mechanism of immune escape.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Raw data of patients and healthy donors evaluated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162764.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Zancopé-Oliveira for kindly providing the yeast-like phase of the Sporothrix schenckii, Dr Joseli Oliveira-Ferreira for critical review of this manuscript, Dr Josué C. Lima-Junior for helping with the Elispot reader and the Program for Technological Development in Tools for Health—PDTIS-FIOCRUZ for use of its facilities. A.O.S is a recipient of fellowships from CNPq and FAPERJ. C.M.V.R. is a recipient of FAPERJ fellowship.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceived and designed the experiments: FCS FNM.
  2. Performed the experiments: FNM AOS MIP MRL ECFV CMVR FCS.
  3. Analyzed the data: FNM FCS.
  4. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FNM AOS FCS.
  5. Wrote the paper: FNM AOS MIP MRL ECFV CMVR FCS.

References

  1. 1. Rodrigues AM, de Hoog Gs, Zhang Y, de Camargo ZP. Emerging sporotrichosis is driven by clonal and recombinant Sporothrix species. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2014 May; 3(5):e32. pmid:26038739
  2. 2. Rodrigues AM, de Hoog S, de Camargo ZP. Emergence of pathogenicity in the Sporothrix schenckii complex. Med Mycol. 2013 May; 51(4):405–12. pmid:22989196
  3. 3. Oliveira MME, Almeida-Paes R, Muniz MM, Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, Zancope-Oliveira RM. Phenotypic and molecular identification of Sporothrix isolates from an epidemic area of sporotrichosis in Brazil. Mycopathologia. 2011 Oct; 172(4):257–67. pmid:21701792
  4. 4. Barros MB de L, Schubach A de O, do Valle ACF, Gutierrez Galhardo MC, Conceição-Silva F, Schubach TM, et al. Cat-transmitted sporotrichosis epidemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: description of a series of cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Feb 15; 38(4):529–35. pmid:14765346
  5. 5. Schubach TM, Valle AC, Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, Monteiro PC, Reis RS, Zancopé-Oliveira RM, et al. Isolation of Sporothrix schenckii from the nails of domestic cats (Felis catus). Med Mycol. 2001 Feb; 39(1):147–9. pmid:11270404
  6. 6. Schubach A, Barros MB de L, Wanke B. Epidemic sporotrichosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008 Apr; 21(2):129–33. pmid:18317034
  7. 7. Schubach TMP, Schubach A, Okamoto T, Barros MB, Figueiredo FB, Cuzzi T, et al. Evaluation of an epidemic of sporotrichosis in cats: 347 cases (1998–2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004 May 15; 224(10):1623–9. pmid:15154732
  8. 8. Lopes-Bezerra LM, Schubach A, Costa RO. Sporothrix schenckii and sporotrichosis. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2006 jun; 78(2):293–308. pmid:16710567
  9. 9. Brito MMS, Conceição-Silva F, Morgado FN, Raibolt PS, Schubach A, Schubach TP, et al. Comparison of virulence of different Sporothrix schenckii clinical isolates using experimental murine model. Med Mycol. 2007 Dec; 45(8):721–9. pmid:17885952
  10. 10. Almeida-Paes R, de Oliveira MME, Freitas DFS, do Valle AC, Zancopé-Oliveira RM, Gutierrez-Galhardo MC. Sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Sporothrix brasiliensis is associated with atypical clinical presentations. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Sept 18; 8(9):e3094. pmid:25233227
  11. 11. Morgado FN, Schubach AO, Barros MBL, Conceição-Silva F. The in situ inflammatory profile of lymphocutaneous and fixed forms of human sporotrichosis. Med Mycol. 2011 Aug; 49(6):612–20. pmid:21254963
  12. 12. Conceição-Silva F, Dórea RC, Pirmez C, Schubach A, Coutinho SG. Quantitative study of Leishmania braziliensis braziliensis reactive T cells in peripheral blood and in the lesions of patients with American mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1990 Feb; 79(2):221–6. pmid:2311299
  13. 13. Lima-Junior JC, Tran TM, Meyer EVS, Singh B, De-Simone SG, Santos F, et al. Naturally acquired humoral and cellular immune responses to Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein 9 in Northwestern Amazon individuals. Vaccine. 2008 Dec 2; 26(51):6645–54. pmid:18832003
  14. 14. Morgado FN, Schubach A, Rosalino CMV, Quintella LP, Santos G, Salgueiro M, et al. Is the in situ inflammatory reaction an important tool to understand the cellular immune response in American tegumentary leishmaniasis? Br J Dermatol. 2008 Jan; 158(1):50–8. pmid:17944980
  15. 15. Martinez FO, Sica A, Mantovani A, Locati M. Macrophage activation and polarization. Front Biosci. 2008 Jan 1; 13:453–61. pmid:17981560
  16. 16. Ferrante CJ, Leibovich SJ. Regulation of Macrophage Polarization and Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012 Feb; 1(1):10–6.
  17. 17. Lefèvre L, Galès A, Olagnier D, Bernad J, Perez L, Burcelin R, et al. PPARγ ligands switched high fat diet-induced macrophage M2b polarization toward M2a thereby improving intestinal Candida elimination. PLoS ONE. 2010 Sep 20; 5(9):e12828. pmid:20877467
  18. 18. Alegranci P, de Abreu Ribeiro LC, Ferreira LS, Negrini Tde C, Maia DC, Tansini A, et al. The predominance of alternatively activated macrophages following challenge with cell wall peptide-polysaccharide after prior infection with Sporothrix schenckii. Mycopathologia. 2013 Aug; 176(1–2):57–65. pmid:23686275
  19. 19. Maia DCG, Gonçalves AC, Ferreira LS, Manente FA, Portuondo DL, Vellosa JC, et al. Response of Cytokines and Hydrogen Peroxide to Sporothrix schenckii Exoantigen in Systemic Experimental Infection. Mycopathologia. 2015 Apr; 181(3–4):207–15. pmid:26603044
  20. 20. Uenotsuchi T, Takeuchi S, Matsuda T, Urabe K, Koga T, Uchi H, et al. Differential induction of Th1-prone immunity by human dendritic cells activated with Sporothrix schenckii of cutaneous and visceral origins to determine their different virulence. Int Immunol. 2006 Dec; 18(12):1637–46. pmid:17035348
  21. 21. Fernandes KSS, Neto EH, Brito MMS, Silva JS, Cunha FQ, Barja-Fidalgo C. Detrimental role of endogenous nitric oxide in host defence against Sporothrix schenckii. Immunology. 2008 Apr; 123(4):469–79. pmid:18194265
  22. 22. Carlos IZ, Sassá MF, da Graça Sgarbi DB, Placeres MC, Maia DC. Current research on the immune response to experimental sporotrichosis. Mycopathologia. 2009; 168(1):1–10. pmid:19241140
  23. 23. Tachibana T, Matsuyama T, Mitsuyama M. Involvement of CD4+ T cells and macrophages in acquired protection against infection with Sporothrix schenckii in mice. MedMycol.1999;37(6):397–404
  24. 24. Maia DC,Sassá MF,Placeres MC,Carlos IZ. Influence of Th1/Th2 cytokines and nitric oxide in murine systemic infection induced by Sporothrix schenckii. Mycopathologia.2006;161(1):11–9. pmid:16389479
  25. 25. Ursini F, Russo E, Leporini C,Calabria M,Bruno C,Tripolino C, et al. Lymphocutaneous Sporotrichosis during Treatment with Anti-TNF-Alpha Monotherapy.Case Rep Rheumatol.2015; 2015:614504 pmid:25755904
  26. 26. Zhang X, Zhang J, Huang H, Xue R, Hu X, Li M, et al. Taenia taeniaeformis in rat favors protracted skin lesions caused by Sporothrix schenckii infection: Dectin-1 and IL-17 are dispensable for clearance of this fungus. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(12):e52514. pmid:23285072
  27. 27. Carlos IZ, Sgarbi DB, Placeres MC. Host organism defense by a peptide-polysaccharide extracted from the fungus Sporothrix schenckii. Mycopathologia. 1998–1999; 144(1):9–14.
  28. 28. Carlos IZ, Sgarbi DBG, Santos GC, Placeres MCP. Sporothrix schenckii lipid inhibits macrophage phagocytosis: involvement of nitric oxide and tumour necrosis factor-alpha. Scand J Immunol. 2003 Mar; 57(3):214–20. pmid:12641649
  29. 29. Nascimento RC, Almeida SR. Humoral immune response against soluble and fractionate antigens in experimental sporotrichosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005 Feb 1; 43(2):241–7. pmid:15681154
  30. 30. Sassá MF, Saturi AET, Souza LF, Ribeiro LC, Sgarbi DB, Carlos IZ. Response of macrophage Toll-like receptor 4 to a Sporothrix schenckii lipid extract during experimental sporotrichosis. Immunology. 2009 Oct; 128(2):301–9. pmid:19740386
  31. 31. Martínez-Álvarez JA, Pérez-García LA, Flores-Carreón A, Mora-Montes HM. The immune response against Candida spp. and Sporothrix schenckii. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2014 Jan-Mar; 31(1):62–6. pmid:24252829
  32. 32. Hearn VM, Wilson EV, Latgé JP, Mackenzie DW. Immunochemical studies of Aspergillus fumigatus mycelial antigens by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blotting techniques. J Gen Microbiol. 1990 Aug; 136(8):1525–35. pmid:2175766
  33. 33. Ghosh S, Howe N, Volk K, Tati S, Nickerson KW, Petro TM. Candida albicans cell wall components and farnesol stimulate the expression of both inflammatory and regulatory cytokines in the murine RAW264.7 macrophage cell line. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010 Oct; 60(1):63–73. pmid:20618847
  34. 34. Gow NAR, Netea MG, Munro CA, Ferwerda G, Bates S, Mora-Montes HM,et al. Immune recognition of Candida albicans beta-glucan by dectin-1. J Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 15; 196(10):1565–71. pmid:18008237
  35. 35. Nisini R, Torosantucci A, Romagnoli G, Chiani P, Donati S, Gagliardi MC, et al. beta-Glucan of Candida albicans cell wall causes the subversion of human monocyte differentiation into dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2007 Nov; 82(5):1136–42. pmid:17656653
  36. 36. Lopes-Bezerra LM. Sporothrix schenckii Cell Wall Peptidorhamnomannans. Front Microbiol. 2011 Dec 21; 2:243. pmid:22203817
  37. 37. Gutierrez Galhardo MC, de Oliveira Schubach A, de Lima Barros MB, Moita Blanco TC, Cuzzi-Maya T, Pacheco Schubach TM, et al. Erythema nodosum associated with sporotrichosis. Int J Dermatol. 2002 Feb; 41(2):114–6. pmid:11982651
  38. 38. Koga T, Duan H, Urabe K, Furue M. Immunohistochemical localization of activated and mature CD83+ dendritic cells in granulomas ofsporotrichosis.Eur J Dermatol.2001; 11(6):527–9. pmid:11701401
  39. 39. Koga T, Duan H, Furue M. Immunohistochemical detection of interferon-gamma-producing cells in granuloma formation of sporotrichosis.Med Mycol.2002; 40(2):111–4. pmid:12058722
  40. 40. Ferraz R, Cunha CF, Gomes-Silva A, Schubach AO, Pimentel MIF, Lyra MR, et al. Apoptosis and frequency of total and effector CD8+T lymphocytes from cutaneous leishmaniasis patients during antimonial therapy. BMC Infect Dis. 2015; 15: 74. pmid:25870976
  41. 41. Maretti-Mira AC, de Pinho Rodrigues KM, de Oliveira-Neto MP, Pirmez C, Craft N. MMP-9 activity is induced by Leishmania braziliensis infection and correlates with mucosal leishmaniasis. Acta Trop. 2011 Aug;119(2–3):160–4. pmid:21663729