Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

In Vivo Imaging Demonstrates That Borrelia burgdorferi ospC Is Uniquely Expressed Temporally and Spatially throughout Experimental Infection

  • Jonathan T. Skare,

    Affiliation Department of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, College of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan/College Station, Texas, United States of America

  • Dana K. Shaw,

    Current address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, College of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan/College Station, Texas, United States of America

  • Jerome P. Trzeciakowski,

    Affiliation Department of Medical Physiology, College of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan/College Station, Texas, United States of America

  • Jenny A. Hyde

    jshyde@medicine.tamhsc.edu

    Affiliation Department of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, College of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan/College Station, Texas, United States of America

In Vivo Imaging Demonstrates That Borrelia burgdorferi ospC Is Uniquely Expressed Temporally and Spatially throughout Experimental Infection

  • Jonathan T. Skare, 
  • Dana K. Shaw, 
  • Jerome P. Trzeciakowski, 
  • Jenny A. Hyde
PLOS
x

Abstract

Borrelia burgdorferi is a spirochetal bacterium transmitted by the Ixodes tick that causes Lyme disease in humans due to its ability to evade the host immune response and disseminate to multiple immunoprotective tissues. The pathogen undergoes dynamic genetic alterations important for adaptation from the tick vector to the mammalian host, but little is known regarding the changes at the transcriptional level within the distal tissues they colonize. In this study, B. burgdorferi infection and gene expression of the essential virulence determinant ospC was quantitatively monitored in a spatial and temporal manner utilizing reporter bioluminescent borrelial strains with in vivo and ex vivo imaging. Although expressed from a shuttle vector, the PospC-luc construct exhibited a similar expression pattern relative to native ospC. Bacterial burden in skin, inguinal lymph node, heart, bladder and tibiotarsal joint varied between tissues and fluctuated over the course of infection possibly in response to unique cues of each microenvironment. Expression of ospC, when normalized for changes in bacterial load, presented unique profiles in murine tissues at different time points. The inguinal lymph node was infected with a significant B. burgdorferi burden, but showed minimal ospC expression. B. burgdorferi infected skin and heart induced expression of ospC early during infection while the bladder and tibiotarsal joint continued to display PospC driven luminescence throughout the 21 day time course. Localized skin borrelial burden increased dramatically in the first 96 hours following inoculation, which was not paralleled with an increase in ospC expression, despite the requirement of ospC for dermal colonization. Quantitation of bioluminescence representing ospC expression in individual tissues was validated by qRT-PCR of the native ospC transcript. Taken together, the temporal regulation of ospC expression in distal tissues suggests a role for this virulence determinant beyond early infection.

Introduction

Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiological agent of Lyme disease, causes a multistage infection resulting in cardiac, neurologic and arthritic symptoms [13]. Borrelial infection is mediated through the Ixodes vector that transmits the pathogen to susceptible mammals, including humans, during a prolonged blood meal [4]. Infected humans may develop a painless bull’s-eye rash, known as erythema migrans, at the site of the tick bite and experience flu-like symptoms. Early antibiotic intervention is an effective treatment for clearance of infection, but when left untreated B. burgdorferi disseminates and colonizes distal immunoprotective niches resulting in severe and sustained morbidity. In 2013, the CDC reported that approximately 300,000 cases of Lyme disease occur in the United States each year, suggesting this is a significant emerging disease [5].

B. burgdorferi requires complex genetic regulation to adapt to the myriad of environmental signals it detects within the mammalian host [4,6]. B. burgdorferi alters gene expression when changes occur in temperature, pH, metals, oxygen, CO2, and osmotic stress; however, these environmental cues do not account for all adaptations observed from borrelial cells cultivated in implanted dialysis membrane chambers (DMC), indicating that unknown host signals also influence the response observed [720]. Borrelial virulence determinants needed for mammalian infection are induced through the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory system, as well as through BosR, which is required for RpoS production [2136]. This complex regulatory response is mediated during the tick blood meal and within the mammalian host during infection [3742].

OspC, a well-characterized borrelial lipoprotein, is an RpoS-regulated virulence determinant and important for the establishment of early localized infection [25,35]. B. burgdorferi ospC is required for the colonization of the mammalian dermis since ospC mutants are cleared from the inoculation site within 48 hours after infection [25,35,4346]. Strains in which ospC is constitutively expressed are not able to maintain localized or persistent infection without the ability to regulate expression similar to wild-type B. burgdorferi, suggesting that the expression of ospC needs to be tightly coordinated to promote the successful colonization of B. burgdorferi [47,48]. Tilly et al. demonstrated infection and dissemination of a host-adapted ospC mutant strain suggesting this virulence determinant is exclusively required for early stages of mammalian infection [44]. The role of ospC in dissemination and persistent infection in the distal tissues is not fully understood, but studies have shown a potential role for OspC beyond localized infection [4952]. Transcripts of ospC increase in the heart over the course of infection, but this increase may in part be due to changes in bacterial burden [50]. Phage-display experiments showed that OspC peptides localized to the murine heart and tibiotarsal joint more so than other tissues [49], suggesting that OspC is needed at distal sites for optimal infection. Although deciphering the role of OspC during mammalian infection and its unique function has been a challenge, evidence suggests a potential role in ligand binding and/or immune evasion [5260]. A specific example of ligand binding is the ability of OspC to bind plasminogen, although the exact binding site has yet to be identified [55,56]. Carrasco et al. showed that OspC has an anti-phagocytic role and may be involved in protecting B. burgdorferi from macrophage clearance [61]. The importance of ospC for infection and its presence in all borrelial strains has made it an enticing vaccine candidate, but the high degree of sequence heterogeneity and strain specific protection have historically been stumbling blocks for its further development [6265]. Characterizing ospC expression in vivo temporally and spatially in mice would provide a modality to track the dynamic regulation of this important borrelial virulence determinant throughout experimental infection.

In vivo imaging technology enables the tracking of infectious pathogens in a non-invasive manner over time and locale [6674]. The mouse model is an important tool to understand borrelial pathogenesis and genetic responses in the host environment that can not be addressed by in vitro modalities. To this end, B. burgdorferi was transformed with a constitutively expressed, codon optimized firefly luciferase (PflaB-luc) on a shuttle vector that is designed to be maintained throughout infection [75,76]. Our previous work compared the infectivity pattern of bioluminescent borrelial bbk32 and dbpA mutant strains relative to wild-type B. burgdorferi [75]. From this analysis we determined that a bbk32 mutant was incapable of establishing a strong localized infection relative to wild-type B. burgdorferi, but was able to disseminate and persist, albeit at lower levels, consistent with our prior qualitative assessment of the bbk32 mutant [75]. This powerful approach provides the ability to track subtle, but significant, phenotypic differences seen between mutant strains during active infection in a manner not achieved by traditional endpoint studies. This technology has also been applied in other bacterial systems to evaluate changes in gene expression during the course of infection, thus providing insight regarding genetic mechanism employed in response to interaction with the host environment [77,78]. Implementing the same strategy during borrelial murine infection may provide important insight into how specific B. burgdorferi genes are regulated throughout the stages of experimental Lyme borreliosis.

In this study, we evaluated expression of ospC utilizing a bioluminescent reporter driven by the ospC promoter in a temporal and spatial context. The goal was to develop a borrelial in vivo reporter system to observe how ospC expression occurred during infection within host microenvironments of tissues following B. burgdorferi dissemination. The data presented herein is the first demonstration monitoring B. burgdorferi ospC gene expression with bioluminescence as a readout over time in live mice. Although we predicted that ospC expression would be limited to early stages of infection, surprisingly, ospC displayed unique expression patterns in various tissues at distinct time points throughout infection. The infectious load of B. burgdorferi differed between distal sites and across time points. Our results indicate that high-level ospC expression is not required for localized infection, but instead, low-level ospC expression is sufficient for colonization. Furthermore, continued ospC expression was observed in distal sites later in infection, suggesting a potential new role for OspC in secondary colonization or persistence.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

E. coli strains were grown in Lysogeny broth (LB) media under aerobic conditions at 37°C (Table 1). Concentrations of antibiotics used in E. coli for selective pressure are as follows: kanamycin, 50 μg/ml and spectinomycin, 50 μg/ml. B. burgdorferi strains were grown in BSK-II media supplemented with 6% normal rabbit serum (Pel-Freez Biologicals, Rogers, AR), referred to as complete BSKII, under conventional microaerobic conditions (1% CO2, 32°C) (Table 1) [79,80]. Borrelial strains were grown under antibiotic selective pressure when appropriate with kanamycin at 300 μg/ml. The Institute Biosafety Committee at Texas A&M University approved the use of infectious B. burgdorferi described in this study.

Generated constructs and modification of B. burgdorferi

A bioluminescent ospC reporter shuttle vector, pJH410, was generated through the PCR amplification of the native ospC promoter including 250 bp upstream from the ATG start codon for ospC and borrelial codon optimized luc (Table 1) [36,81]. Primers for cloning are listed in Table 2. PospC was amplified with NcoI restriction sites, cloned into pCR2.1 TOPO, and then transformed into Mach-I E. coli cells (Life Technologies). PospC was cloned into pJSB161 [76] at the NcoI site, transformed into Mach-I E. coli cells and screened for insert and orientation, resulting in pBS103. PospC-luc was PCR amplified with PstI restriction sites and cloned into pCR8/GW/TOPO (Life Technologies), resulting in pJH409. The vectors were screened by restriction enzyme digest and verified through dideoxy sequencing. PospC-luc was ligated into pBBE22 at the PstI to yield the final pJH410 construct. B. burgdorferi strain ML23 was made competent and transformed with pJH410 as described previously [82,83]. Transformants were selected for resistance to kanamycin and all putative isolates were screened for PospC-luc shuttle vector and plasmid content by PCR followed by in vitro luminescence assay [75,76].

A construct for quantification of ospC expression was generated by amplifying a region of cp26 containing ospC, cloning into pCR2.1 TOPO (Life Technologies), and transforming this construct into Mach-I E. coli cells (Tables 1 & 2). The resulting plasmid was designated pOspC (Table 2).

Western immunoblot analysis

Borrelial cells were pelleted and resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a PVDF membrane for Western analysis as previously described [7,8,84]. Protein production was assessed using mouse monoclonal antisera to B. burgdorferi OspC (generously provided by Richard Marconi, Virginia Commonwealth University) and flagellum (Affinity BioReagents, Golden, CO) or goat polyclonal antisera to Firefly luciferase (AbCam Inc., Cambridge, MA), followed by incubation with rabbit anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or rabbit anti-goat IgG HRP, respectively [52,75]. The membrane bound immune complexes were visualized using the Western Lightning Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus detection system (Perkin Elmer).

In vitro bioluminescence assays

B. burgdorferi was grown to mid-log phase at pH 7 or pH 8 and concentrated to 108 cells/ml for ML23 pBBE22luc (PflaB-luc) and ML23 pJH410 (PospC-luc). Cells were serially diluted from 107 to 100 cells/ml and 100 μl of each sample was transferred to a white flat-bottom microtiter 96 well plate. Luminescence was measured using 2104 EnVision Multilabel Reader (Perkin Elmer, Inc., Waltham, MA) as previously described [75]. The different cell concentrations of each strain were treated with a final concentration of 667 μM D-luciferin (Research Products International Corp., Mt. Prospect, IL) in PBS and immediately measured for luminescence [75,69]. Cell samples for each strain from three independent cultures were measured for luminescence (photons/sec), averaged, and standard error calculated.

In vivo and ex vivo bioluminescence studies and luminescence quantitation

Six to eight week old female Balb/c mice (Charles Rivers) were infected with 105 ML23 pBBE22luc or ML23 pJH410 by ventral intradermal injection. Balb/c mice are the preferred strain for in vivo imaging due to the lack of melanin in the skin and fur, but have a distinct pathology and higher ID50 in response B. burgdorferi infection relative to C3H mice [85]. An inoculum dose of 105 was used for this study due to maximize the measurable bioluminescence signal from PospC-luc infected mice. Mice were treated with 5 mg D-luciferin dissolved in 100 μl PBS by intraperitoneal injection 10 minutes prior to imaging with an IVIS Spectrum live animal imaging system (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). As a negative control for background luminescence, one infected mouse in each group did not receive D-luciferin [75]. Mice were randomly selected and in vivo imaging was performed 1 h and 4, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days after infection with the abovementioned borrelial strains using the methods previously described [69,82]. Luminescence was measured using 1 and 10 min exposures to obtain images for quantification and visual representation, respectively. Images were analyzed using Living Image Software from Perkin Elmer. Regions of interest (ROI) tool were selected to measure the luminescence in photons/second [p/s] from exposure images with 600–600,000 counts using an equal area of the whole body for all mice in all experiments. Background luminescence was subtracted from luminescence values for normalization. Luminescence of D-luciferin treated mice was averaged and standard error determined after normalization. All images from the 10 min exposures were treated equally when corrected for background and depicted by the radiance scale.

Housing, diet, and care of mice were under standard ABSL-2 parameters under the supervision of a Texas A&M University veterinarian. Mice were monitored daily and evaluated for general health and activity. Throughout the 21 day infection no illnesses or unexpected deaths occurred and efforts were made to minimize any discomfort to the mice. Isoflurane was utilized as an anesthetic for IVIS imaging. At designated time points mice were euthanized in accordance with guidelines of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and as approved by the Texas A&M University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

To maximize bioluminescence during ex vivo imaging of infected tissues, mice were given a double bolus of D-luciferin by intradermal injection that then circulated for 10 minutes. Mice were individually sacrificed for tissues to be harvested in a timely manner to determine tissue localization of bioluminescence observed during in vivo imaging that measures through various tissues simultaneously. Harvested tissues were transferred to a 4 mM D-luciferin and 2 mM ATP soak for 3 minutes. Ex vivo bioluminescent tissues were imaged for 1 and 10 minutes, similar to in vivo imaging. Quantitation of tissue bioluminescence was determined by radiance (p/sec/cm2/sr) to account for the area difference of each tissue. Following imaging, tissues were stored in RNAlater (Life Technologies) at -80°C until isolation of total RNA. Skin samples were processed for qPCR.

DNA and RNA extraction of B. burgdorferi from infected tissues

DNA was extracted from skin samples using Roche High Pure PCR template preparation kit as previously described [84]. RNA was extracted from infected tissue by phase separation with Trizol per manufacture instructions (ThermoFisher). RNAlater stored tissues were homogenized on ice in Trizol. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes, then 200 μl of chloroform per ml of Trizol was added to each sample, and incubated at room temperature for 3 minutes. Phase separation occurred by centrifuging samples at 12,000 x g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The RNA-containing upper aqueous layer was precipitated with an equal volume of cold 100% isopropanol and washed twice with 75% EtOH to remove salt. 30 μg of total RNA was treated with 5 units of Roche recombinant DNase (RNase-free) per the manufacture instructions to remove contaminating DNA and purified by standard phenol-chloroform-isoamyl extraction followed by ethanol precipitation with 10 μg of glycogen per sample.

Quantitative PCR and RT-PCR analysis

The Applied Biosystems ABI 7500 real time PCR system (ThermoFisher) was used to determine genomic equivalents as previously described [86]. Borrelial genomic equivalents were evaluated using primers nTM17FrecA and nTM17RrecA to B. burgdorferi recA and mouse β-actin copies were detected using primers Bactin_F and Bactin_R1 as previously described (Table 2). The numbers of recA and β-actin copies were calculated by establishing a Ct standard curve of known amount of each gene for comparison to the Ct values of the experimental samples. 100 ng of each experimental sample was measured in triplicate and values are displayed as copies of B. burgdorferi recA per 106 mouse β-actin.

Borrelial mRNA were converted to cDNA with 3 μg DNase treated total RNA with Superscript-II Reverse Transcriptase in a 20 μl reaction as per the manufacturers instructions (ThermoFisher). Transcripts of ospC were quantified using PowerUp Sybr Mastermix using 2.5 μl cDNA and primers listed in Table 2 [7]. The numbers of transcript copies were calculated by establishing a Ct standard curve of known amount ospC for comparison to the Ct values of the experimental samples. All samples were measured in triplicate and values are displayed in copies of ospC for the entire tissue.

Statistical analyses

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the significance of the main effects and interactions among variables to determine statistical significance in PflaB-luc or as represented by photons/sec (in vivo) or radiance (ex vivo) through IVIS imaging using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, CA). Bioluminescence value for each individual mouse or tissue in a group and time point was utilized for ANOVA analysis to determine significant changes over the course of the 21 day infection. Mann-Whitney one-tail test compared medians of two groups to determine significance. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant for all statistical analyses. Correlation between PospC-luc radiance and qRT-PCR native ospC was also calculated using GraphPad Prism. In permutation tests, we computed the sampling distributions, also referred to as random distribution, of the differences in PospC-luc/PflaB-luc radiance ratios across time or between set time points. To calculate these distributions, individual PospC-luc and PflaB-luc radiance values were randomly shuffled (10,000 times) to form new ratios that were then differenced between time points. The distribution these random differences estimates the null hypothesis of no significant change in the ratio with time. The difference in the ratio actually observed was compared against this null distribution to determine the probability that a difference as great as, or greater than, the observed difference could occur by chance. Permutation tests were performed using R, a freely available language and environment for statistical computing and graphics (ver. 3.2.3; https://cran.r-project.org/).

Ethics statement

Animal experiments were performed in accordance to National Institute of Health (NIH) Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Animal experiments also followed the guidelines of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). Approval for animal procedures was given by the Texas A&M University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Mice were euthanized in manner that conforms to the guidelines put forth by the AVMA and was approved by the Texas A&M University IACUC.

Results

Evaluation of the ospC reporter in cultivated B. burgdorferi

Previous studies utilized a codon optimized firefly luciferase (luc) in B. burgdorferi as an in vitro transcriptional reporter and for detection of live B. burgdorferi during experimental infection [75,76]. The high level of sensitivity observed in vivo with the constitutively expressed luc gene indicated that the system might be adapted to characterize the temporal and spatial expression patterns of specific borrelial genes in the mammalian model. To test this, we chose to track the expression of ospC due to its importance in the infectious process of B. burgdorferi. To this end, we fused the ospC promoter (PospC) to the luc reporter and assessed its signal relative to light generated from luc linked to the constitutively expressed flaB promoter (PflaB). The B. burgdorferi bioluminescent reporter strains to monitor ospC and flaB will be referred to as PospC-luc and PflaB-luc for this study. To test whether the bioluminescence driven by the PospC reporter construct corresponded with the known in vitro expression patterns for ospC in response to environmental changes, PospC-luc was grown microaerophilically at 32°C, pH 8 or pH 7 (Fig 1) [13]. Serving as a negative control, ML23 pBBE22luc, referred to in this study as the PflaB-luc strain, was cultivated under the same conditions. As expected, PflaB-luc bioluminescence did not change in response to pH while the PospC-luc was 4.6-fold higher at pH 7 relative to pH 8 (Fig 1A). Western analysis of the native OspC in PospC-luc and PflaB-luc B. burgdorferi demonstrated higher levels of protein production at the lower pH as expected (Fig 1B). Antibody against the Firefly luciferase (Luc) protein showed an increase in Luc at pH 7 when linked to PospC, but equal production in the PflaB-luc strain independent of pH demonstrating that PospC-luc regulates bioluminescence and Luc production in the same manner as native ospC/OspC in response to an environmental cue (Fig 1B) [13].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Characterization of a bioluminescent B. burgdorferi PospC reporter strain.

The response of borrelial ospC reporter strain to pH was assessed to determine the validity of PospC-luc relative to native OspC production. PflaB-luc and PospC-luc B. burgdorferi strains were grown at pH 7 and pH 8 to mid-log phase to assess in vitro luminescence assay and protein production via Western blot analysis. (A) PflaB-luc and PospC-luc cultures were serial diluted from 106 to 10 cells, treated with D-luciferin, and luminescence was measured in photons/sec. PflaB-luc pH 7 (red squares) and PflaB-luc pH 8 (black circles) did not differ in bioluminescence. PospC-luc pH 7 (blue squares) induces greater luminescence relative to PospC-luc pH 8 (green circles). Values represent three independent cultures that were normalized to background and averaged. Error bars represent standard error. (B) Differential protein production of Luc in PospC-luc reporter strain in response to pH reflects changes observed for the native OspC in PflaB-luc and PospC-luc. Cell lysates of PflaB-luc and PospC-luc at pH 7 or pH 8 were immunoblotted and probed with anti-sera against OspC, FFluc and FlaB that served as a loading control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162501.g001

Temporal evaluation of in vivo borrelial infection and ospC expression

We evaluated in vivo ospC expression during experimental infection utilizing the PospC-luc reporter strain and, based on our prior work [75], compared this to constitutively expressed PflaB-luc levels. As observed in previous studies, a strong localized infection developed 4 days following infection with the PflaB-luc strain around the site of inoculation followed by spread throughout the skin evident at day 7 and out to day 21 with fluctuations in overall emission and regions of bioluminescent intensity (Figs 2A & 3A) [75]. PflaB-luc radiance was significantly different (p = 0.0132) over the 21 days monitored indicating bacterial load fluctuates during the course of infection (Figs 2A & 3A). Bioluminescence emitted from PospC-luc infected mice is substantially lower than the constitutively expressed luciferase at all time points except shortly after inoculation (Figs 2 & 3). For example, luminescence driven by PflaB is 16.98-fold and 30.63-fold higher than PospC on day 4 and 14 post-inoculation, respectively (Fig 3A). PospC-luc radiance is the same as PflaB-luc at the time of infection (Day 0) and likely represents ospC expression under in vitro cultivation conditions (Fig 3A). To accurately access ospC expression changes, as represented by bioluminescence, borrelial burden was taken into account by determining the ratio of PospC-luc light emission relative to PflaB-luc bioluminescence (Fig 3B). The data show that following infection, light from the PospC-luc reporter declines at day 4 relative to the overall population of B. burgdorferi as assessed by PflaB-luc expression. The PospC-luc peaks at day 7 with 2.25x106 photons/sec (p/s) representing 36% of the signal relative to PflaB-luc. PospC-luc emits significantly lower luminescence relative to PflaB-luc throughout the 21 day infection with the lowest luminescence observed at day 14 coincident with possible antibody class switching (Figs 2B & 3A) [80]. The PospC-luc/PflaB-luc ratio reaches the highest level at day 7 followed by a decrease on day 10 and 14 then increases again on day 21. Permutation analysis of the PospC-luc/PflaB-luc values between time points indicated a statistical difference for all possible comparisons with p-values ranging from 0.0121 to 0.0465, except when day 4 is compared relative to day 21 (p-value = 0.0927). Taken together, the expression of ospC over an extended period, as represented by PospC-luc throughout a 21 day infection, suggests that B. burgdorferi expresses this lipoprotein at distal sites, albeit at low levels within the total population. Furthermore, this spatial expression pattern suggests that OspC is needed for more than just initial colonization and, as such, may play an additional putative role in borrelial persistence.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Temporal monitoring of PflaB-luc and PospC-luc expressing B. burgdorferi during experimental infection.

Balb/c mice were infected with PflaB-luc (A) or PospC-luc (B) reporter strains at 105 by ventral intradermal infection, treated with D-luciferin and imaged by IVIS at 0, 4, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days post-infection. A background control mouse was included in each group that was infected with luminescent B. burgdorferi but not treated with D-luciferin; such mouse is shown in the far left position of each image. D-luciferin treatment or the lack thereof is designated by a + or -, respectively. A 10 minute exposure was utilized to obtain images. Normalization to subtract background was performed per strain for all time points displayed in the color spectrum position under the images. PflaB-luc and PospC-luc images are set on individual scales to display the full spectrum of bioluminescence. (A) PflaB-luc images were normalized to radiance range of 6.95x103-1.83x105 p/sec/cm2/sr. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test was performed to determine significant difference resulting in a p-value of 0.0132. A p-value < 0.05 is considered significant. (B) PospC-luc images were normalized to radiance range of 2.38x103-1.1x105 p/sec/cm2/sr. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test was performed to determine significant difference resulting in a p-value of 0.0009. A p-value < 0.05 is considered significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162501.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Quantitation of PflaB-luc and PospC-luc expressing B. burgdorferi using bioluminescent readout.

Five Balb/c mice were infected with 105 PflaB-luc or PospC-luc containing B. burgdorferi and 4 mice treated with D-luciferin for imaging 0, 4, 7, 10, 14, and 21 days post-inoculation for bioluminescent imaging. (A) Quantitation of 1 minute exposures was performed. At all time points the whole mouse was measured to obtain a measurement in photons/sec, representing total flux. Bioluminescence from the 4 mice treated with D-luciferin was normalized by subtracting the measurement from the no D-luciferin control and averaged. Blue circles represent PflaB-luc and red squares PospC-luc. Error bars represent standard error. One-way ANOVA analysis resulted in statistical significance for PflaB-luc and PospC-luc with a p-value of 0.0132 and 0.0262, respectively. (B) To assess the expression of ospC independent of changes in borrelial load, the ratio differential of PospC-luc and PflaB-luc was calculated and represented on the y-axis. Permutation analyses comparing time points to each other found statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between all comparisons, except between day 4 and day 21.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162501.g003

Quantification of bacterial load of PospC-luc and PflaB-luc infected tissue

To determine whether the PospC-luc and PflaB-luc strains infected mice equivalently, flank skin samples were taken from near the inoculation site to quantify bacterial load. Total DNA from day 10 and 21 post-infection murine skin samples was evaluated for copies of B. burgdorferi recA per 106 murine β-actin by qPCR (Fig 4). Bacterial loads were not significantly different between PospC-luc and PflaB-luc skin samples at day 10 and 21 post-infection with p-values of 0.22 and 0.94, respectively. These results indicate PospC-luc and PflaB-luc infected mice contain similar number of borrelial cells; therefore, differences in luminescence do not reflect a differential in B. burgdorferi presence but instead expression from the reporter utilized.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Validation of equivalent bacterial load of PflaB-luc and PospC-luc infected Balb/c mice.

Skin samples from adjacent to the inoculation site of Balb/c mice infected with 105 PflaB-luc or PospC-luc on day 10 (A) or day 21 (B) following inoculation were harvested for qPCR analysis of borrelial genomes (recA) per copies of 106 β-actin. Horizontal bars denotes average copies of recA per 106 β-actin and error bars represent standard error. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney test indicated a lack of significance between the PflaB-luc and PospC-luc at day 10 and 21 post-infection with p-values of 0.2222 and 0.9444, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162501.g004

ospC expression is elevated in the skin and heart during early disseminated infection

Localization of bioluminescent B. burgdorferi to track infection or evaluate gene expression has its limitations in vivo due to the dispersal of borrelial cells to numerous tissues and the maintenance of the spirochetes in the murine dermis that cloaks the light generated in underlying tissues inhibiting the ability to draw conclusions regarding the localization of B. burgdorferi or ospC expression in deeper tissues. As such, it was necessary to perform ex vivo imaging of specific tissues to attribute quantitative bioluminescent signal to individual sites. The evaluation of temporal and tissue specific bacterial burden and ospC expression was performed by ex vivo bioluminescence imaging and quantitation of tissues following in vivo assessment of mice (Fig 5 & S1 Fig). Skin, inguinal lymph node, heart, bladder, and tibiotarsal joint were harvested at day 4, 7, 10, 14, and 21 post-infection. Images were normalized to background for all time points for each tissue and strain (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Temporal and spatial expression of B. burgdorferi containing PflaB-luc and PospC-luc in murine tissues.

Skin, inguinal lymph node, heart, bladder, and tibiotarsal joint, from PflaB-luc or PospC-luc infected Balb/c mice were quantitatively assessed for bioluminescent emission at 4, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days post-infection. Four of the five mice were treated with a double bolus of D-luciferin and the remaining mouse served as a background control for normalization of ex vivo tissues. The—represents the no luciferin control and + designates the tissues treated with D-luciferin. Tissues were evaluated for bacterial load or ospC expression as represented by PflaB-luc and PospC-luc, respectively. Normalization to subtract background was performed per strain for all time points displayed in the color spectrum position under the images. PflaB-luc and PospC-luc images are set on individual scales to display the full spectrum of bioluminescence over the experimental time course. Measurable radiance above background is detectable on all days evaluated in all tissues with the exception of PospC-luc infected inguinal lymph node that emits minimal luminescence. Graphs for each tissue display the ratio of PospC-luc/PflaB-luc to depict the expression of ospC as measured by PospC-luc relative to bacterial load (scored by PflaB-luc) for a given time point. The PospC-luc/PflaB-luc ratio underwent permutation analyses comparing all time points to determine statistical significance. (A) The radiance range of skin at the site of inoculation for both strains is 4.9e3-1.83e5 p/sec/cm2/sr. All comparisons have a p-value < 0.05. (B) Heart radiance for PflaB-luc is 4.3e2-1.1e4 and PospC-luc is 3.92e2-3.9e3 p/sec/cm2/sr. Two comparisons, day 4 versus day 21 and day 7 versus day 14, were not statistically significant. Remaining comparisons were significantly different (p-value<0.05). (C) Inguinal lymph node radiance for PflaB-luc is 1.1e3-1.1e4 and PospC-luc is 8.32e2-1.5e3 p/sec/cm2/sr. Comparisons were statistically significant with p-values of 0.0160 or less, except day 10 versus day 21. (D) Bladder radiance for PflaB-luc is 1.1e3-5e4 and PospC-luc is 3.78e2-1.1e4 p/sec/cm2/sr. There is statistical difference between early time points (day 4, 7, & 10) and late time points (day 14 & 21) with p-values no greater than 0.0305. (E) Tibiotarsal joint radiance for PflaB-luc is 1.15e3-1.15e5 and PospC-luc is 4.95e2-1.1e4 p/sec/cm2/sr. All comparisons were statistically different (p-value < 0.05), except for day 4 versus day 21.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162501.g005

Skin from mice infected with PflaB-luc reached the highest level of radiance (1.1x105 p/sec/cm2/sr) and thus bacterial load on day 4 (Fig 5A & S1A Fig). One-way ANOVA analysis of PflaB-luc skin radiance indicated statistically significant changes in bacterial burden over the 21 day infection (p = 0.0082). PospC-luc emission in skin flank peaked at day 7 with 1.1x104 p/sec/cm2/sr and displayed the lowest luminescence on day 14, but continued to demonstrate low-level expression of ospC throughout the 21 day infection (Fig 5A & S1A Fig). The ratio of PospC-luc/PflaB-luc representing ospC expression relative to the overall borrelial infection reached 0.82 on day 7, followed by a dramatic absence of detectable PospC-luc at day 14, and partial recovery by day 21 to a ratio of 0.073 (Fig 5A). Permutation analyses, comparing all combinations PospC-luc/PflaB-luc randomly for each time point, indicated all were significantly different across all time points with p-values ranging from 0.0001 to 0.0151. Taken together, these data show that the expression of ospC and B. burgdorferi burden in the skin varies over time and are maintained after dissemination from the inoculation site.

Previous studies have detected ospC transcript in the heart of mice up to two weeks following infection using endpoint analyses [37,50]. Furthermore, phage display that presented OspC peptides localized to the heart [49]. The presence of B. burgdorferi in the murine heart increases dramatically and significantly during the 21 day infection (p = 0.0008), specifically at day 14 and 21 relative to earlier time points as observed in PflaB-luc infected hearts (Fig 5B & S1B Fig). Over the course of infection PospC-luc radiance increases along with PflaB-luc intensifying that reaches maximum bioluminescence at day 21 (S1B Fig). The higher ratio of PospC-luc/ PflaB-luc seen as 1.35, 0.65, and 0.92 is observed during day 4, 7, and 10 of infection, respectively, and are not significantly different (Fig 5B). At day 14 and 21, normalizing the PospC-luc radiance for the dramatic increase of B. burgdorferi in the heart results in a ratio of 0.45 and 0.63 for PospC-luc/PflaB-luc that is significantly lower than early time points (Fig 5B), suggesting that the previously observed increased ospC transcription in the heart was due to an elevated bacterial load and not increased ospC expression [37,50]. Our data suggest B. burgdorferi induces ospC expression in the heart during the first 10 days following infection, which is contrary to previously reported data that did not take into account the B. burgdorferi load within the heart [37,50].

Inguinal lymph node colonization and induction of ospC expression

B. burgdorferi disseminates to the inguinal lymph node and remains colonized in this tissue throughout infection despite the presence of numerous cells involved in host immunity (Fig 5C & S1C Fig) [80,87]. Bioluminescence of PflaB-luc is highest in the inguinal lymph node at day 4 and 21 post-infection and signal was reduced at day 7, 10, and 14 (S1C FIg). Bacterial burden differed significantly (p = 0.0381) throughout the 21 day period with the most dramatic decrease in load occurring between day 4 and 7 post inoculation. PospC-luc bioluminescence was the lowest in the inguinal lymph node relative to other evaluated tissues in this study, but above the threshold of detection necessary for quantitation, and remains at a similar level of radiance throughout infection. When bacterial burden is taken into account, the PospC-luc/PflaB-luc ratio is the highest at day 7 at 0.44 due to a significant reduction of borrelial cells, but stays relatively low at the remaining time points with a PospC-luc/PflaB-luc ratio of 0.12 or less (Fig 5C). Permutation analysis determined that the PospC-luc/PflaB-luc ratio at day 10 and 21 was not statistically significant, but all other comparisons had a p-value less than or equal to 0.016. We conclude that the inguinal lymph node is readily colonized by B. burgdorferi with moderate changes in bacterial load after 7 days of infection. The low level expression of ospC in B. burgdorferi cells colonizing the inguinal lymph node suggesting a minimal or inhibitory role for OspC in this locale.

Expression of ospC persists following secondary colonization of the bladder and tibiotarsal joint

Previous work suggests that OspC is important for early infection, but not for late infection in the murine model, while other studies suggest OspC plays a role as a dissemination facilitating factor [4345,51,88]. We evaluated PospC-luc in distal niches, e.g., the bladder and tibiotarsal joint, to determine the expression of ospC in these tissues. The PflaB-luc strain initially emits low radiance of 242.32 p/sec/cm2/sr in the bladder at day 4, peaks at day 7 post-infection, and then steadily declines out to day 21 with radiance of 3,799 and 1,918 p/sec/cm2/sr, respectively (S1D Fig). One-way ANOVA analysis of PflaB-luc infected bladders indicated a significant difference (p = 0.0056) when comparing all time points. The expression of PospC-luc in the bladder is low relative to PflaB-luc with the highest bioluminescence observed on day 10 and 21 (S1D Fig). Normalization of bladder PospC-luc expression relative to bacterial load demonstrates peaks in the overall ospC expression ranging from 0.07–0.14 on day 4, 10, and 21 following infection. The ratio of PospC-luc/PflaB-luc radiance in the murine bladder is significantly different between all time points by permutation analysis, with p-values range ranging from 0.0126 to 0.0149, with the exception of the day 7 and day 14 comparison (p-value = 0.7528; Fig 5D).

Mice infected with the PflaB-luc B. burgdorferi strain reached a higher average bacterial load within tibiotarsal joints over the course of infection that differed from the bladder with the radiance increasing significantly to 20,053.1 p/sec/cm2/sr by day 14 (p<0.05), followed by a 42% reduction at day 21 (S1E Fig). Joints infected with the PflaB-luc strain showed significant changes in radiance during infection (p = 0.0009) by one-way ANOVA analysis. The murine bladder and tibiotarsal joint share a similar PospC-luc bioluminescence pattern with peaks at day 4, 10, and 21 and valleys at day 7 and 14 when normalized to borrelial burden (Fig 5D & 5E). When normalized for bacterial burden, expression of ospC is slightly increased in the joint relative to the bladder such that a similar expression pattern is seen with ratios of 0.21 on day 4, 0.05 on day 10, and 0.13 on day 21 post-infection (Fig 5E). Tibiotarsal joint PospC-luc/PflaB-luc is essentially the same at day 4 and 21, but statistically significantly different between the other time points with p-values no greater than 0.0163. Gene expression patterns of ospC, in the murine bladder and tibiotarsal joint, as assessed by PospC-luc bioluminescence, suggest a role for this lipoprotein in later stages of infection in addition to its known role in the early infectious process [4345].

Correlation of ex vivo bioluminescence and ospC expression in PospC-luc infected tissues

The representation of ospC expression by ex vivo bioluminescence B. burgdorferi PospC-luc reporter strain was tested to determine if the light detected correlated with native ospC transcript levels within mammalian tissues. Hyde et al. previously demonstrated a strong correlation between PflaB-luc bioluminescence and B. burgdorferi genomic copies in murine skin, suggesting that bioluminescence accurately depicts borrelial burden [75]. To determine if bioluminescence driven by PospC also approximates native gene expression of ospC in infectious B. burgdorferi, total RNA was isolated from tissue samples and analyzed by qRT-PCR. Total ospC transcript from tissues infected with B. burgdorferi expressing PospC-luc was calculated for skin, heart, bladder and tibiotarsal joint harvested day 10 and 21 post-infection (S2 FIg). Radiance measured through ex vivo imaging was correlated with the total ospC transcript from each PospC-luc infected tissue (Fig 6). All tissues displayed strong correlation between bioluminescence and quantitative molecular analysis. Specifically, the skin, heart, bladder, and joint resulted in correlation values of 0.9438, 0.9609, 0.8543, and 0.8117, respectively. The correlation of the bioluminescent PospC-luc signal and ospC transcripts indicates that the borrelial in vivo PospC-luc reporter accurately represents the tissue-specific expression of native ospC in the mammalian model and shows that the placement of the reporter construct within the shuttle vector did not disproportionally skew the bioluminescent emission spectra detected.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Correlation of ospC radiance and quantitation measure of ospC transcript in mammalian tissues.

PospC-luc infected tissues from day 10 and 21 post-infection were evaluated for radiance (p/sec/cm2/sr) relative to total ospC transcript for the whole tissue sample. Skin (A), heart (B), bladder (C), and tibiotarsal joint (D) had r values of 0.944, 0.961, 0.854, and 0.812, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162501.g006

In vivo expression of ospC during localized mammalian infection

The role of OspC in colonization of the murine dermis has primarily been characterized with B. burgdorferi strains using ospC mutants to evaluate the presence of the pathogen and the associated localized immune response [44,89]. To further understand the role of ospC at an early stage of disease, PospC-luc or PflaB-luc were monitored for bioluminescent emission during the first 96 hours (Fig 7). The post-infection luminescence is equally emitted from PospC-luc and PflaB-luc infected mice out to 24 hours (Fig 7). Between 24 and 48 there is a dramatic increase in PflaB-luc luminescence that continues through 96 hours post-inoculation in a manner that is statistically significant by one-way ANOVA analysis (Fig 7; p<0.0001). Quantitation of PflaB-luc shows a 2.33-fold increase between 24 hour to 48 hours post-infection, indicating the bacterial load dramatically increased, but, based on the PospC-luc reporter, ospC expression did not increase with the replication of B. burgdorferi (Fig 7B). Localized infection levels increase 9.87-fold and 32.44-fold at 72 hours and 96 hours for PflaB-luc expression relative to PospC-luc, respectively, when compared to 24 hour luminescence levels. Differences in bioluminescence emissions between PflaB-luc and PospC-luc were statistically significant at 48, 72, and 96 hour with p-values of 0.0332, 0.0350, and 0.0195, respectively. Cultivation of PospC-luc and PflaB-luc infected skin, inguinal lymph node, and tibiotarsal joint harvested at the end point resulted in outgrowth of cells from all tissues from both groups (data not shown). Unexpectedly, PospC-luc light emission showed no statistically significant change during the first 96 hours indicating that the localized expansion of B. burgdorferi does not require a corresponding upsurge in ospC expression.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Evaluation of ospC expression as represented by PospC-luc expressing B. burgdorferi during early infection.

Balb/c mice infected by ventral intradermal injection with 105 PospC-luc and PflaB-luc B. burgdorferi for the quantitation of ospC relative to bacterial load during the 96 hours following needle inoculation. (A) Mice were treated with D-luciferin and imaged 2, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours with the exception of one no D-luciferin background control at each time point. Ten minute exposures were used to obtain images and were normalized to radiance range of 6.95x103-1.83x105 p/sec/cm2/sr. (B) Quantification of bioluminescence was determined from 1 minute exposure images. Values represent flux (photon/sec) normalized to background and the averaged value from four mice treated with D-luciferin. PospC-luc is represented by red squares and PflaB-luc is represented by blue circles. Error bars represent standard error. An asterisk represents p < 0.05, indicating significant differences in bioluminescence between PospC-luc and PflaB-luc containing B. burgdorferi. There was no significant difference in PospC-luc radiance during the first 96 hours. One-way ANOVA of PflaB-luc radiance had a of p-value < 0.0001 indicating a statistically significant change in luminescence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162501.g007

Discussion

The ability of B. burgdorferi to infect, disseminate, and colonize various tissues in the mammalian host is dependent on its ability to adapt to temporal pressures within specific microenvironments [4,6]. It is well known that B. burgdorferi undergoes dynamic gene regulation as it traverses through the Ixodes vector to the mammalian dermis, but the necessary expression of important borrelial virulence determinants in a temporal and tissue specific manner have not been fully characterized in the murine model [19]. B. burgdorferi avoids clearance by the innate immune response during early infection, hematogenously disseminates, and colonizes distal sites such as the heart, bladder, and tibiotarsal joint. Although not formally proven, it is evident that these tissues provide a permissible environment for borrelial adaptation and it is likely that unique proteins are needed to establish and maintain infection at these disparate sites [13]. To begin to directly address this possibility, we utilized bioluminescent B. burgdorferi to track infection in real time, as well as tissue specific expression of genes, using ospC as a model for in vivo regulation relative to the constitutively expressed flaB gene. Although we assumed that ospC expression would be restricted to early time points, our results show that the PospC-luc reporter, as well as ospC transcripts, was detectable later in the infectious process in various tissues, suggesting a role for OspC later in the infectious process.

Lipoproteins are abundantly represented in the B. burgdorferi envelope and diversely regulated in response to environmental changes in temperature, pH, oxidative stress, CO2, O2, metals, and other yet to be identified host cues [4,6,90]. B. burgdorferi mammalian-specific virulence determinants are induced by the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory pathway [4,25,26,36]. In response to a mammalian blood meal the response regulator, Rrp2, is phosphorylated and forms a complex with RpoN for the transcriptional activation of rpoS [27,28,34,38]. A member of the RpoS regulon is the surface lipoprotein OspC, which is important for the colonization of the mammalian dermis and the development of early localized disease as evidenced by the non-infectious phenotype of ospC mutants in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice [25,35,4347,53,88]. The presence of ospC in B. burgdorferi is important for mammalian infection and is tightly regulated as ectopic and dysregulated overexpression of ospC can result in the clearance of B. burgdorferi from immunocompetent mice [44,47].

The elements potentially involved in regulation in the ospC promoter, -35 sequence and inverted repeats, have been examined in several studies in the context of single copy representation or multiple copies when PospC-ospC is encoded on a shuttle vector with differing results [35,36,48,81]. Mutational analyses of the non-coding inverted repeats of ospC were examined in trans using E. coli as a surrogate system and directly in B. burgdorferi [35,36]. The results indicated that these sequences were not required for the regulation of ospC; however, their ability to affect mammalian infection was not addressed [35,36]. More recently, Drecktrah et al. performed site-directed mutagenesis of the ospC inverted repeats at its native locus on cp26 and found that these sequences were required for temperature and pH regulation of ospC [81]. Xu et al. evaluated the role of the inverted repeats during mammalian infection utilizing trans expression of ospC [48]. Here, the inverted repeats were required for repression of ospC and avoidance of antibody clearance in the murine model [48]. While we were restricted to the use of a PospC-luc encoded on a shuttle vector, which has the potential to skew the expression pattern under cultivation conditions, Xu et al. suggest it can appropriately represent ospC regulation in the murine model.

Ideally, we would design these studies with PospC-luc encoded in single copy so that copy number of the promoter would not represent an experimental variable, but the limitations of the technology, specifically the intensity of light emission, prevents this from being a viable option. Single copy luc under the control of a constitutive borrelial promoter, such as PflaB, produces substantially less light emission relative to multicopy PflaB-luc. Further, the single copy construct was slightly above background level and lacked the sensitivity to detect significant changes in signal intensity (Hyde, unpublished results & [91]). Further development of additional and brighter bioluminescent genes compatible with B. burgdorferi is needed to achieve this goal.

To ensure that regulation of PospC-luc was faithful to the native ospC configuration, these operator sequences were included in the PospC-luc reporter construct used in this study (Tables 1 & 2) [36,48,81]. The B. burgdorferi PospC-luc strain was able to regulate bioluminescence and Luc in response to pH corresponding to that of native OspC observed in this and previous studies (Fig 1) [13,16]. The encoding of the PospC-luc reporter cassette on a shuttle vector did not alter the expression or production patterns under the tested conditions thereby providing confidence the PospC-luc strain would faithfully represent in vivo expression of ospC in the murine model. Furthermore, the changes in ospC gene expression in PospC-luc infected mice observed both in vivo and ex vivo, rather than constitutive expression if regulation was not occurring, strongly supports our contention that the shuttle vector PospC-luc reporter appropriately reflects the native expression of ospC. PospC-luc bioluminescence was further validated by qRT-PCR of the ospC transcript (Fig 6 & S2 Fig). Here, the strong correlation seen between the PospC-luc shuttle vector expression profile and native ospC transcript levels suggest that similar regulatory patterns exist between these constructs (Fig 6 & S2 Fig).

The function of OspC during mammalian infection has been an elusive area of research with data suggesting potential ligand binding capabilities and/or immune evasion. Specifically, OspC is a homodimer in the outer membrane that is purported to bind plasminogen, as well as the tick salivary protein, Salp15 [46,52,55,56,60,62]. While OspC may bind to host factors, its requirement during the initiation of mammalian infection suggests it plays a role in combating the innate immune response [4345,47,48,61]. A recent study attributed an anti-phagocytic activity to OspC, whereby the clearance of B. burgdorferi lacking ospC by mononuclear phagocytes was substantially more than that observed for wild type B. burgdorferi [61].

The characterization of in vivo ospC expression at different times and in distinct niches may provide insight into the utilization of this lipoprotein by B. burgdorferi. As a part of this study we evaluated in vivo expression of ospC during the first 96 hours of infection and found that an increase in borrelial load was not accompanied by a proportional rise in ospC expression, suggesting limited ospC expression in the population is sufficient for colonization of mammalian dermal tissue (Fig 7). Following the first 96 hours of infection, PospC-luc bioluminescence peaks in the skin in vivo and ex vivo 7 days post-infection indicating colonization has occurred (Figs 2, 3 and 5A & S1A Fig). It was expected that PospC-luc would generate the observed levels of light emission comparable or greater than PflaB-luc during the initial steps of colonization considering the essential nature of ospC during early infection, but together these results indicate that low level ospC expression is sufficient in the skin to establish infection and that increased levels of expression are not observed until one week post-inoculation. A possible drawback to the study herein is the route of infection by needle inoculation rather than by tick transmission. However, this methodology ensures the inoculation of a known number of B. burgdorferi. The lack of tick transmission excludes the inhibitory activity that the salivary tick proteins afford as well as their potential effect on borrelial gene expression. The strong correlation between luminescence and quantitated copies of ospC transcripts in the skin, and other analyzed tissues, indicates that the PospC-luc reporter faithfully mirrors native expression (Fig 6). It is important to note that transcription does not always translate into protein production levels and, at this time, we are unable to quantify OspC production in tissues.

Carditis is a potential complication of Lyme disease making the heart a tissue of interest in the examination of borrelial infection and pathogenesis [1]. Experiments utilizing phage-displayed OspC peptides were localized to heart and joint tissues, suggesting a potential role for OspC in dissemination and colonization within these tissues [49]. Previous studies that evaluated the expression of B. burgdorferi antigens within the heart of immunocompetent and immunodeficient C3H mice showed increased bacterial burden and ospC expression, particularly in the absence of the humoral immune response [47,48]. Ouyang et al. detected ospC transcript in the heart out to 21 days with a peak at 7 days post infection; however, no time point prior to one week were assessed [37]. In addition, Hodzic et al. observed ospC transcripts in the base of the murine heart out to 8 weeks with an increase in expression observed at day 7 post-infection as well [50]. However, in these studies the quantification of ospC transcripts was not normalized to B. burgdorferi load within a given tissue; as such, it is not possible to determine if changes in ospC expression could be attributed solely to changes in bacterial burden. One novel finding herein indicates that ospC is expressed most in the heart during the first 10 days of infection, when borrelial burden is its lowest in this tissue, thereby supporting the prior notion that OspC promotes colonization of the heart (Fig 5C) [49,50].

We also evaluated the expression of ospC within the inguinal lymph node. Despite their important role in host defense, B. burgdorferi readily colonizes the inguinal lymph node and remains viable throughout the course of experimental infection, as seen with the consistent detection of bioluminescence from the PflaB-luc construct (Fig 5B & S1B Fig). Even though borrelial cells are present, PospC-luc B. burgdorferi emitted low level bioluminescence in inguinal lymph node throughout the 21 days of infection, suggesting that the expression of ospC, and presumably the production of OspC, is deleterious to B. burgdorferi in this locale (Fig 5B & S1B Fig). Recent work showed that a B. burgdorferi ospC mutant strain was able to colonize murine skin when monocytes were depleted, suggesting that OspC aids in the avoidance of phagocytic clearance during early infection [61]. Furthermore, ospC overexpression resulted in decreased uptake by murine macrophages. Considering the abundance of phagocytic cells that cycle through the lymph node, the lack of ospC expression could be interpreted as contrary to the ability of OspC to inhibit phagocytosis in macrophages [61]. However, the aforementioned study focused on the survival of B. burgdorferi solely in the skin. Macrophages and B. burgdorferi are detected in several tissues in the murine model and are thus not limited to the skin. Therefore, it would seem that OspC might be needed elsewhere to combat the ongoing assault by macrophages. Additional studies are necessary to clarify the role of OspC in this context.

To our surprise, ospC was expressed during later stages of the infection, particularly within the bladder and joint (Fig 5 & S1 Fig). The murine bladder and tibiotarsal joint share the most similar ospC expression pattern; that is, following an initial peak at day 4, a decrease is observed at day 7 and 14, with a subsequent increase again at day 21, albeit at a low level relative to the overall bacterial burden of these tissues (Fig 5). These findings are distinct from Ouyang et al. observed peak ospC expression in the bladder at day 7 and very little transcript out to day 21; however, this study did not take changes in borrelial burden into account [37]. Hodzic et al. was also able to detect ospC in joints during late stage infection (out to 8 weeks), although the number of culture positive mice and the copy number of ospC transcript reduced over time [50]. A possible reason for the sustained expression of ospC observed here could be due to joints being an immunoprotective niche that reduces the exposure of the pathogen to immune pressure [92]. Both the bladder and the joint are rich in extracellular matrices that are favored by B. burgdorferi and present potential binding ligands for several lipoproteins, including DbpA and BBK32 [75,79,84,9395]. The increase in ospC expression after the colonization of distal tissues may indicate a need for OspC to maintain infection and evade the mammalian immune response. Two studies by Tilly et al. used a B. burgdorferi ospC mutant that encoded an unstable copy of ospC, complemented on a shuttle vector, to evaluate the requirement for ospC during later stages of disease [44,88]. Interestingly, their results posited that OspC is not needed later in the infectious process, following colonization and dissemination [45]. The same group demonstrated that passive transfer via the tissue transplant of a host adapted B. burgdorferi, due to the loss of the unstable shuttle vector encoding the only copy of ospC, resulted in positive serology in the first study and 40–67% infectivity in the second [44,88]. These studies showed the importance of ospC for early colonization of murine dermis, but the conflicting outcomes from the passive transfer of a borrelial ospC mutant are curious given the purported role for OspC in dissemination or secondary colonization. Since B. burgdorferi is a metabolically limited organism that must successfully scavenge resources from the host environment to meet basic housekeeping necessities [96], we speculate that it would not be in the best interest of B. burgdorferi to randomly express ospC uniquely in tissues if it was not of benefit for borrelial infectivity and resulting pathology.

Natural B. burgdorferi infection occurs with a diversity of strains and bottlenecks occur at several steps of the lifecycle, reducing the heterogeneity of the population [97,98]. A clonal borrelial infection also contains a heterogenic population with cells presenting different lipoprotein compositions during transmission from the tick midgut through the salivary glands to the mammalian dermis [99]. This heterogeneous profile likely continues throughout the spread of the pathogen and is seen by the bioluminescence data presented here in representing ospC expression relative to the total borrelial population. It is likely that further studies will find similar heterogeneity of other borrelial genes. Furthermore, it has been previously speculated that the bottleneck during early mammalian infection eliminates B. burgdorferi lacking ospC [44,45,61]. If this was the case, we would expect to observe a greater reduction of B. burgdorferi in the first few days considering that the low level expression of ospC does not increase with borrelial burden (Fig 6). Our work further suggests dynamic gene regulation is occurring during murine infection within a clonal B. burgdorferi population, here in the form of ospC expression, given that ospC appears to be expressed only in a fraction of the borrelial population.

Conclusion

The data presented herein indicates that bacterial burden and gene expression of ospC can be evaluated in a temporal and spatial manner utilizing bioluminescent B. burgdorferi in the murine experimental model of infection. The ex vivo analysis allowed for a relative quantitative assessment of differential borrelial burden in murine tissues that fluctuate over time as the infection progressed. The requirement for ospC during early localized infection was not observed within the first few days following needle inoculation. The unique expression of ospC in the heart and joint, for example, using the in vivo bioluminescence reporter system relative to traditional qRT-PCR molecular techniques suggest different requirements for OspC to establish and maintain infection. Further studies are needed to determine the role of ospC and other borrelial genes in persistence. Overall, this work supports a potential additional function for OspC beyond its role in initial colonization.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Radiance of PflaB-luc and PospC-luc in infected murine tissues.

Bioluminescence of Balb/c tissues infected with 105 PflaB-luc or PospC-luc B. burgdorferi were evaluated for bacterial load and ospC expression, respectively. Harvested tissues were exposed for a length of time that allowed 600–60,000 counts to be obtained for quantification. Four tissues were normalized to background control tissues lacking D-luciferin treatment and averaged for radiance (p/sec/cm2/sr). Error bars represent standard error. The following tissues were evaluated for bacterial load (PflaB-luc) and ospC expression (PospC-luc). PflaB-luc radiance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA to determine statistical significance and displayed in [] for each tissue. (A) skin [P = 0.0082)]; (B) heart [P = 0.0008)]; (C) inguinal lymph node [P = 0.0381)]; (D) bladder [P = 0.0056)]; and (E) tibiotarsal joint [P = 0.0009)].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162501.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Quantitation of native ospC transcript by qRT-PCR.

Quantitative RT-PCR shows the total native ospC transcript of individual B. burgdorferi infected murine tissues. Four mouse skin, heart, bladder and tibiotarsal joints from day 10 (dark circles) and 21 (open squares) post-infection were evaluated for the total number of ospC transcripts for each tissue sample based on a standard curve. qRT-PCR for each sample and mouse was performed in triplicate and averaged. The error bars indicate standard error.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162501.s002

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Bonnie Seaburg, Cynthia Ortiz, and Elizabeth Saputra. We thank Rich Marconi for providing antiserum against OspC used in this study. We also acknowledge Michael Norgard and Jon Blevins for the B. burgdorferi codon optimized luc gene utilized for in vivo and ex vivo imaging. We also extend our gratitude to Geoffery Kapler and Raquel Sitcheran for generously sharing equipment and resources necessary to accomplish this study.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: JAH JTS.
  2. Formal analysis: JAH JPT.
  3. Funding acquisition: JAH.
  4. Investigation: JAH.
  5. Methodology: JAH JTS.
  6. Project administration: JAH.
  7. Resources: JAH JPT JTS.
  8. Supervision: JAH.
  9. Validation: JAH DKS.
  10. Visualization: JAH.
  11. Writing – original draft: JAH.
  12. Writing – review & editing: JAH JTS DKS JPT.

References

  1. 1. Shapiro ED. Clinical practice. Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;370: 1724–1731. pmid:24785207
  2. 2. Steere AC, Coburn J, Glickstein L. The emergence of Lyme disease. J Clin Invest. 2004;113: 1093–101. pmid:15085185
  3. 3. Stanek G, Wormser GP, Gray J, Strle F. Lyme borreliosis. Lancet. 2012;379: 461–473. pmid:21903253
  4. 4. Radolf JD, Caimano MJ, Stevenson B, Hu LT. Of ticks, mice and men: understanding the dual-host lifestyle of Lyme disease spirochaetes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10: 87–99. pmid:22230951
  5. 5. Mead PS. Epidemiology of Lyme disease. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29: 187–210. pmid:25999219
  6. 6. Samuels DS. Gene regulation in Borrelia burgdorferi. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65: 479–499. pmid:21801026
  7. 7. Hyde JA, Trzeciakowski JP, Skare JT. Borrelia burgdorferi alters its gene expression and antigenic profile in response to CO2 levels. J Bacteriol. 2007;189: 437–45. pmid:17098904
  8. 8. Seshu J, Boylan JA, Gherardini FC, Skare JT. Dissolved oxygen levels alter gene expression and antigen profiles in Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 2004;72: 1580–6. pmid:14977964
  9. 9. Akins DR, Bourell KW, Caimano MJ, Norgard MV, Radolf JD. A new animal model for studying Lyme disease spirochetes in a mammalian host-adapted state. J Clin Invest. 1998;101: 2240–50. pmid:9593780
  10. 10. Lybecker MC, Samuels DS. Temperature-induced regulation of RpoS by a small RNA in Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol. 2007;64: 1075–89. pmid:17501929
  11. 11. Obonyo M, Munderloh UG, Fingerle V, Wilske B, Kurtti TJ. Borrelia burgdorferi in tick cell culture modulates expression of outer surface proteins A and C in response to temperature. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37: 2137–41. pmid:10364575
  12. 12. Ojaimi C, Brooks C, Casjens S, Rosa P, Elias A, Barbour A, et al. Profiling of Temperature-Induced Changes in Borrelia burgdorferi Gene Expression by Using Whole Genome Arrays. Infect Immun. 2003;71: 1689–1705. pmid:12654782
  13. 13. Carroll JA, Garon CF, Schwan TG. Effects of environmental pH on membrane proteins in Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 1999;67: 3181–7. pmid:10377088
  14. 14. Carroll JA, Cordova RM, Garon CF. Identification of 11 pH-regulated genes in Borrelia burgdorferi localizing to linear plasmids. Infect Immun. 2000;68: 6677–84. pmid:11083781
  15. 15. Troxell B, Yang XF. Metal-dependent gene regulation in the causative agent of Lyme disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3: 79. pmid:24298449
  16. 16. Yang X, Goldberg MS, Popova TG, Schoeler GB, Wikel SK, Hagman KE, et al. Interdependence of environmental factors influencing reciprocal patterns of gene expression in virulent Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37: 1470–9. pmid:10998177
  17. 17. Ramamoorthy R, Scholl-Meeker D. Borrelia burgdorferi Proteins Whose Expression Is Similarly Affected by Culture Temperature and pH. Infect Immun. 2001;69: 2739–2742. pmid:11254645
  18. 18. Schwan TG, Piesman J, Golde WT, Dolan MC, Rosa PA. Induction of an outer surface protein on Borrelia burgdorferi during tick feeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92: 2909–13. pmid:7708747
  19. 19. Iyer R, Caimano MJ, Luthra A, Axline D, Corona A, Iacobas DA, et al. Stage-specific global alterations in the transcriptomes of Lyme disease spirochetes during tick feeding and following mammalian host adaptation. Mol Microbiol. 2015;95: 509–538. pmid:25425211
  20. 20. Bontemps-Gallo S, Lawrence K, Gherardini FC. Two Different Virulence-Related Regulatory Pathways in Borrelia burgdorferi Are Directly Affected by Osmotic Fluxes in the Blood Meal of Feeding Ixodes Ticks. PLOS Pathog. 2016;12: e1005791. pmid:27525653
  21. 21. Hyde JA, Shaw DK, Smith R, Trzeciakowski JP, Skare JT. Characterization of a Conditional bosR Mutant in Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 2010;78: 265–274. pmid:19858309
  22. 22. Hyde JA, Shaw DK, S R III, Trzeciakowski JP, Skare JT. The BosR regulatory protein of Borrelia burgdorferi interfaces with the RpoS regulatory pathway and modulates both the oxidative stress response and pathogenic properties of the Lyme disease spirochete. Mol Microbiol. 2009;74: 1344–1355. pmid:19906179
  23. 23. Ouyang Z, Kumar M, Kariu T, Haq S, Goldberg M, Pal U, et al. BosR (BB0647) governs virulence expression in Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol. 2009;74: 1331–1343. pmid:19889086
  24. 24. Ouyang Z, Deka RK, Norgard MV. BosR (BB0647) Controls the RpoN-RpoS Regulatory Pathway and Virulence Expression in Borrelia burgdorferi by a Novel DNA-Binding Mechanism. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7: e1001272. pmid:21347346
  25. 25. Hubner A, Yang X, Nolen DM, Popova TG, Cabello FC, Norgard MV. Expression of Borrelia burgdorferi OspC and DbpA is controlled by a RpoN-RpoS regulatory pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U A. 2001;98: 12724–9.
  26. 26. Ouyang Z, Blevins JS, Norgard MV. Transcriptional interplay among the regulators Rrp2, RpoN and RpoS in Borrelia burgdorferi. Microbiol Read Engl. 2008;154: 2641–58.
  27. 27. Yang XF, Alani SM, Norgard MV. The response regulator Rrp2 is essential for the expression of major membrane lipoproteins in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U A. 2003;100: 11001–6.
  28. 28. Smith AH, Blevins JS, Bachlani GN, Yang XF, Norgard MV. Evidence that RpoS (sigmaS) in Borrelia burgdorferi is controlled directly by RpoN (sigma54/sigmaN). J Bacteriol. 2007;189: 2139–44. pmid:17158681
  29. 29. Ouyang Z, Zhou J, Norgard MV. Synthesis of RpoS is dependent on a putative enhancer binding protein Rrp2 in Borrelia burgdorferi. PloS One. 2014;9: e96917. pmid:24810170
  30. 30. Yin Y, Yang Y, Xiang X, Wang Q, Yang Z-N, Blevins J, et al. Insight into the Dual Functions of Bacterial Enhancer-Binding Protein Rrp2 of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 2016;198: 1543–1552. pmid:26977110
  31. 31. Groshong AM, Gibbons NE, Yang XF, Blevins JS. Rrp2, a prokaryotic enhancer-like binding protein, is essential for viability of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 2012;194: 3336–3342. pmid:22544267
  32. 32. Ouyang Z, Haq S, Norgard MV. Analysis of the dbpBA upstream regulatory region controlled by RpoS in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 2010;192: 1965–1974. pmid:20118265
  33. 33. Blevins JS, Xu H, He M, Norgard MV, Reitzer L, Yang XF. Rrp2, a sigma54-dependent transcriptional activator of Borrelia burgdorferi, activates rpoS in an enhancer-independent manner. J Bacteriol. 2009;191: 2902–5. pmid:19201806
  34. 34. Burtnick MN, Downey JS, Brett PJ, Boylan JA, Frye JG, Hoover TR, et al. Insights into the complex regulation of rpoS in Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65: 277–93. pmid:17590233
  35. 35. Yang XF, Lybecker MC, Pal U, Alani SM, Blevins J, Revel AT, et al. Analysis of the ospC regulatory element controlled by the RpoN-RpoS regulatory pathway in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 2005;187: 4822–9. pmid:15995197
  36. 36. Eggers CH, Caimano MJ, Radolf JD. Analysis of promoter elements involved in the transcriptional initiation of RpoS-dependent Borrelia burgdorferi genes. J Bacteriol. 2004;186: 7390–402. pmid:15489451
  37. 37. Ouyang Z, Narasimhan S, Neelakanta G, Kumar M, Pal U, Fikrig E, et al. Activation of the RpoN-RpoS regulatory pathway during the enzootic life cycle of Borrelia burgdorferi. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12: 44. pmid:22443136
  38. 38. Fisher MA, Grimm D, Henion AK, Elias AF, Stewart PE, Rosa PA, et al. Borrelia burgdorferi sigma54 is required for mammalian infection and vector transmission but not for tick colonization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U A. 2005;102: 5162–7.
  39. 39. Boardman BK, He M, Ouyang Z, Xu H, Pang X, Yang XF. Essential role of the response regulator Rrp2 in the infectious cycle of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 2008;76: 3844–53. pmid:18573895
  40. 40. Dunham-Ems SM, Caimano MJ, Eggers CH, Radolf JD. Borrelia burgdorferi requires the alternative sigma factor RpoS for dissemination within the vector during tick-to-mammal transmission. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8: e1002532. pmid:22359504
  41. 41. Caimano MJ, Eggers CH, Gonzalez CA, Radolf JD. Alternate sigma factor RpoS is required for the in vivo-specific repression of Borrelia burgdorferi plasmid lp54-borne ospA and lp6.6 genes. J Bacteriol. 2005;187: 7845–52. pmid:16267308
  42. 42. Caimano MJ, Iyer R, Eggers CH, Gonzalez C, Morton EA, Gilbert MA, et al. Analysis of the RpoS regulon in Borrelia burgdorferi in response to mammalian host signals provides insight into RpoS function during the enzootic cycle. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65: 1193–217. pmid:17645733
  43. 43. Grimm D, Tilly K, Byram R, Stewart PE, Krum JG, Bueschel DM, et al. Outer-surface protein C of the Lyme disease spirochete: A protein induced in ticks for infection of mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U A. 2004;101: 3142–7.
  44. 44. Tilly K, Krum JG, Bestor A, Jewett MW, Grimm D, Bueschel D, et al. Borrelia burgdorferi OspC protein required exclusively in a crucial early stage of mammalian infection. Infect Immun. 2006;74: 3554–3564. pmid:16714588
  45. 45. Tilly K, Bestor A, Jewett MW, Rosa P. Rapid clearance of Lyme disease spirochetes lacking OspC from skin. Infect Immun. 2007;75: 1517–9. pmid:17158906
  46. 46. Pal U, Yang X, Chen M, Bockenstedt LK, Anderson JF, Flavell RA, et al. OspC facilitates Borrelia burgdorferi invasion of Ixodes scapularis salivary glands. J Clin Invest. 2004;113: 220–30. pmid:14722614
  47. 47. Xu Q, Seemanapalli SV, McShan K, Liang FT. Constitutive expression of outer surface protein C diminishes the ability of Borrelia burgdorferi to evade specific humoral immunity. Infect Immun. 2006;74: 5177–5184. pmid:16926410
  48. 48. Xu Q, McShan K, Liang FT. Identification of an ospC operator critical for immune evasion of Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol. 2007;64: 220–31. pmid:17376084
  49. 49. Antonara S, Chafel RM, LaFrance M, Coburn J. Borrelia burgdorferi adhesins identified using in vivo phage display. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66: 262–276. pmid:17784908
  50. 50. Hodzic E, Feng S, Freet KJ, Barthold SW. Borrelia burgdorferi population dynamics and prototype gene expression during infection of immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice. Infect Immun. 2003;71: 5042–5055. pmid:12933847
  51. 51. Seemanapalli SV, Xu Q, McShan K, Liang FT. Outer surface protein C is a dissemination-facilitating factor of Borrelia burgdorferi during mammalian infection. PloS One. 2010;5: e15830. pmid:21209822
  52. 52. Earnhart CG, Leblanc DV, Alix KE, Desrosiers DC, Radolf JD, Marconi RT. Identification of residues within ligand-binding domain 1 (LBD1) of the Borrelia burgdorferi OspC protein required for function in the mammalian environment. Mol Microbiol. 2010;76: 393–408. pmid:20199597
  53. 53. Stewart PE, Wang X, Bueschel DM, Clifton DR, Grimm D, Tilly K, et al. Delineating the requirement for the Borrelia burgdorferi virulence factor OspC in the mammalian host. Infect Immun. 2006;74: 3547–3553. pmid:16714587
  54. 54. Tilly K, Bestor A, Rosa PA. Lipoprotein succession in Borrelia burgdorferi: similar but distinct roles for OspC and VlsE at different stages of mammalian infection. Mol Microbiol. 2013;89: 216–227. pmid:23692497
  55. 55. Lagal V, Portnoï D, Faure G, Postic D, Baranton G. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto invasiveness is correlated with OspC-plasminogen affinity. Microbes Infect Inst Pasteur. 2006;8: 645–652.
  56. 56. Önder Ö, Humphrey PT, McOmber B, Korobova F, Francella N, Greenbaum DC, et al. OspC is potent plasminogen receptor on surface of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Biol Chem. 2012;287: 16860–16868. pmid:22433849
  57. 57. Eicken C, Sharma V, Klabunde T, Owens RT, Pikas DS, Hook M, et al. Crystal structure of Lyme disease antigen outer surface protein C from Borrelia burgdorferi. J Biol Chem. 2001;276: 10010–5. pmid:11139584
  58. 58. Kumaran D, Eswaramoorthy S, Luft BJ, Koide S, Dunn JJ, Lawson CL, et al. Crystal structure of outer surface protein C (OspC) from the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. EMBO J. 2001;20: 971–978. pmid:11230121
  59. 59. Anguita J, Ramamoorthi N, Hovius JW, Das S, Thomas V, Persinski R, et al. Salp15, an Ixodes scapularis salivary protein, inhibits CD4(+) T cell activation. Immunity. 2002;16: 849–59. pmid:12121666
  60. 60. Earnhart CG, Rhodes DVL, Smith AA, Yang X, Tegels B, Carlyon JA, et al. Assessment of the potential contribution of the highly conserved C-terminal motif (C10) of Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface protein C in transmission and infectivity. Pathog Dis. 2014;70: 176–184. pmid:24376161
  61. 61. Carrasco SE, Troxell B, Yang Y, Brandt SL, Li H, Sandusky GE, et al. Outer surface protein OspC is an antiphagocytic factor that protects Borrelia burgdorferi from phagocytosis by macrophages. Infect Immun. 2015;83: 4848–4860. pmid:26438793
  62. 62. Earnhart CG, Rhodes DVL, Marconi RT. Disulfide-mediated oligomer formation in Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface protein C, a critical virulence factor and potential Lyme disease vaccine candidate. Clin Vaccine Immunol CVI. 2011;18: 901–906. pmid:21525304
  63. 63. Bockenstedt LK, Hodzic E, Feng S, Bourrel KW, de Silva A, Montgomery RR, et al. Borrelia burgdorferi strain-specific OspC-mediated immunity in mice. Infect Immun. 1997;65: 4661–7. pmid:9353047
  64. 64. Lagal V, Postic D, Ruzic-Sabljic E, Baranton G. Genetic diversity among Borrelia strains determined by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of the ospC gene and its association with invasiveness. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41: 5059–5065. pmid:14605139
  65. 65. Seinost G, Golde WT, Berger BW, Dunn JJ, Qiu D, Dunkin DS, et al. Infection with multiple strains of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto in patients with Lyme disease. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135: 1329–33. pmid:10566830
  66. 66. Contag CH, Contag PR, Mullins JI, Spilman SD, Stevenson DK, Benaron DA. Photonic detection of bacterial pathogens in living hosts. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18: 593–603. pmid:8817482
  67. 67. Francis KP, Joh D, Bellinger-Kawahara C, Hawkinson MJ, Purchio TF, Contag PR. Monitoring bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus infections in living mice using a novel luxABCDE construct. Infect Immun. 2000;68: 3594–3600. pmid:10816517
  68. 68. Francis KP, Yu J, Bellinger-Kawahara C, Joh D, Hawkinson MJ, Xiao G, et al. Visualizing pneumococcal infections in the lungs of live mice using bioluminescent Streptococcus pneumoniae transformed with a novel gram-positive lux transposon. Infect Immun. 2001;69: 3350–3358. pmid:11292758
  69. 69. Kong Y, Shi Y, Chang M, Akin AR, Francis KP, Zhang N, et al. Whole-body imaging of infection using bioluminescence. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2011;2.
  70. 70. Chang MH, Cirillo SLG, Cirillo JD. Using luciferase to image bacterial infections in mice. J Vis Exp JoVE. 2011;
  71. 71. Bacconi M, Haag AF, Torre A, Castagnetti A, Chiarot E, Delany I, et al. A stable luciferase reporter plasmid for in vivo imaging in murine models of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;
  72. 72. Massey S, Johnston K, Mott TM, Judy BM, Kvitko BH, Schweizer HP, et al. In vivo Bioluminescence Imaging of Burkholderia mallei Respiratory Infection and Treatment in the Mouse Model. Front Microbiol. 2011;2: 174. pmid:21904535
  73. 73. Burns SM, Joh D, Francis KP, Shortliffe LD, Gruber CA, Contag PR, et al. Revealing the spatiotemporal patterns of bacterial infectious diseases using bioluminescent pathogens and whole body imaging. Contrib Microbiol. 2001;9: 71–88. pmid:11764723
  74. 74. Rhee K-J, Cheng H, Harris A, Morin C, Kaper JB, Hecht G. Determination of spatial and temporal colonization of enteropathogenic E. coli and enterohemorrhagic E. coli in mice using bioluminescent in vivo imaging. Gut Microbes. 2011;2: 34–41. pmid:21637016
  75. 75. Hyde JA, Weening EH, Chang M, Trzeciakowski JP, Höök M, Cirillo JD, et al. Bioluminescent imaging of Borrelia burgdorferi in vivo demonstrates that the fibronectin-binding protein BBK32 is required for optimal infectivity. Mol Microbiol. 2011;82: 99–113. pmid:21854463
  76. 76. Blevins JS, Revel AT, Smith AH, Bachlani GN, Norgard MV. Adaptation of a luciferase gene reporter and lac expression system to Borrelia burgdorferi. Appl Env Microbiol. 2007;73: 1501–13.
  77. 77. La Rosa SL, Leanti La Rosa S, Casey PG, Hill C, Diep DB, Nes IF, et al. In vivo assessment of growth and virulence gene expression during commensal and pathogenic lifestyles of luxABCDE-tagged Enterococcus faecalis strains in murine gastrointestinal and intravenous infection models. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79: 3986–3997. pmid:23603680
  78. 78. Méndez J, Guijarro JA. In vivo monitoring of Yersinia ruckeri in fish tissues: progression and virulence gene expression. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013;5: 179–185. pmid:23757147
  79. 79. Seshu J, Esteve-Gassent MD, Labandeira-Rey M, Kim JH, Trzeciakowski JP, Hook M, et al. Inactivation of the fibronectin-binding adhesin gene bbk32 significantly attenuates the infectivity potential of Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59: 1591–601. pmid:16468997
  80. 80. Labandeira-Rey M, Seshu J, Skare JT. The absence of linear plasmid 25 or 28–1 of Borrelia burgdorferi dramatically alters the kinetics of experimental infection via distinct mechanisms. Infect Immun. 2003;71: 4608–13. pmid:12874340
  81. 81. Drecktrah D, Hall LS, Hoon-Hanks LL, Samuels DS. An inverted repeat in the ospC operator is required for induction in Borrelia burgdorferi. PloS One. 2013;8: e68799. pmid:23844242
  82. 82. Hyde JA, Weening EH, Skare JT. Genetic transformation of Borrelia burgdorferi. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2011;Chapter 12: Unit 12C.4. pmid:21400675
  83. 83. Samuels DS. Electrotransformation of the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. 1995.
  84. 84. Weening EH, Parveen N, Trzeciakowski JP, Leong JM, Hook M, Skare JT. Borrelia burgdorferi lacking DbpBA exhibits an early survival defect during experimental infection. Infect Immun. 2008;76: 5694–705. pmid:18809667
  85. 85. Barthold SW, Beck DS, Hansen GM, Terwilliger GA, Moody KD. Lyme borreliosis in selected strains and ages of laboratory mice. J Infect Dis. 1990;162: 133–8. pmid:2141344
  86. 86. Liveris D, Wang G, Girao G, Byrne DW, Nowakowski J, McKenna D, et al. Quantitative detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in 2-millimeter skin samples of erythema migrans lesions: correlation of results with clinical and laboratory findings. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40: 1249–53. pmid:11923340
  87. 87. Labandeira-Rey M, Skare JT. Decreased infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi strain B31 is associated with loss of linear plasmid 25 or 28–1. Infect Immun. 2001;69: 446–55. pmid:11119536
  88. 88. Tilly K, Bestor A, Dulebohn DP, Rosa PA. OspC-independent infection and dissemination by host-adapted Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 2009;77: 2672–82. pmid:19398538
  89. 89. Antonara S, Ristow L, McCarthy J, Coburn J. Effect of Borrelia burgdorferi OspC at the site of inoculation in mouse skin. Infect Immun. 2010;78: 4723–4733. pmid:20696825
  90. 90. Kenedy MR, Lenhart TR, Akins DR. The role of Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface proteins. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012;66: 1–19. pmid:22540535
  91. 91. Chan K, Alter L, Barthold SW, Parveen N. Disruption of bbe02 by Insertion of a Luciferase Gene Increases Transformation Efficiency of Borrelia burgdorferi and Allows Live Imaging in Lyme Disease Susceptible C3H Mice. PloS One. 2015;10: e0129532. pmid:26069970
  92. 92. Liang FT, Yan J, Mbow ML, Sviat SL, Gilmore RD, Mamula M, et al. Borrelia burgdorferi changes its surface antigenic expression in response to host immune responses. Infect Immun. 2004;72: 5759–67. pmid:15385475
  93. 93. Lin Y-P, Benoit V, Yang X, Martínez-Herranz R, Pal U, Leong JM. Strain-specific variation of the decorin-binding adhesin DbpA influences the tissue tropism of the Lyme disease spirochete. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10: e1004238. pmid:25079227
  94. 94. Shi Y, Xu Q, McShan K, Liang FT. Both decorin-binding proteins A and B are critical for the overall virulence of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 2008;76: 1239–46. pmid:18195034
  95. 95. Lin Y-P, Chen Q, Ritchie JA, Dufour NP, Fischer JR, Coburn J, et al. Glycosaminoglycan binding by Borrelia burgdorferi adhesin BBK32 specifically and uniquely promotes joint colonization. Cell Microbiol. 2015;17: 860–875. pmid:25486989
  96. 96. Gherardini F, Boylan J, Lawrence K, Skare J. Metabolism and Physiology of Borrelia. In: Samuels D, Radolf J, editors. Borrelia: Molecular Biology, Host Interaction and Pathogenesis. Norfolk: Caister Academic Press; 2010. pp. 103–138.
  97. 97. Troy EB, Lin T, Gao L, Lazinski DW, Camilli A, Norris SJ, et al. Understanding barriers to Borrelia burgdorferi dissemination during infection using massively parallel sequencing. Infect Immun. 2013;81: 2347–2357. pmid:23608706
  98. 98. Rego ROM, Bestor A, Stefka J, Rosa PA. Population bottlenecks during the infectious cycle of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. PloS One. 2014;9: e101009. pmid:24979342
  99. 99. Ohnishi J, Piesman J, de Silva AM. Antigenic and genetic heterogeneity of Borrelia burgdorferi populations transmitted by ticks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U A. 2001;98: 670–5.
  100. 100. Purser JE, Lawrenz MB, Caimano MJ, Howell JK, Radolf JD, Norris SJ. A plasmid-encoded nicotinamidase (PncA) is essential for infectivity of Borrelia burgdorferi in a mammalian host. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48: 753–64. pmid:12694619
  101. 101. Shaw DK, Hyde JA, Skare JT. The BB0646 protein demonstrates lipase and haemolytic activity associated with Borrelia burgdorferi, the aetiological agent of Lyme disease. Mol Microbiol. 2012;83: 319–334. pmid:22151008
  102. 102. Wu J, Weening EH, Faske JB, Höök M, Skare JT. Invasion of eukaryotic cells by Borrelia burgdorferi requires β(1) integrins and Src kinase activity. Infect Immun. 2011;79: 1338–1348. pmid:21173306