Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

High School Students Residing in Educational Public Institutions: Health-Risk Behaviors

High School Students Residing in Educational Public Institutions: Health-Risk Behaviors

  • Priscilla Rayanne e Silva Noll, 
  • Nusa de Almeida Silveira, 
  • Matias Noll, 
  • Patrícia de Sá Barros
PLOS
x

Abstract

Although several health-risk behaviors of adolescents have been described in the literature, data of high school students who reside at educational institutions in developing countries are scarce. This study aimed to describe behaviors associated with health risks among high school students who reside at an educational public institution and to associate these variables with the length of stay at the institution. This cross-sectional study was conducted during the year 2015 and included 122 students aged 14–19 years at a federal educational institution in the Midwest of Brazil; students were divided into residents of <8 months and those of >20 months. Information concerning the family socioeconomic status and anthropometric, dietary and behavioral profiles was investigated. Despite being physically active, students exhibited risk-associated behaviors such as cigarette and alcohol use and risky sexual behaviors that were exacerbated by fragile socioeconomic conditions and distance from family. A longer time in residence at the institution was associated with an older age (p ≤ 0.001), adequate body mass index (BMI; p = 0.02), nutritional knowledge (p = 0.01), and less doses of alcohol consumption (p ≤ 0.01) compared with those with shorter times in residence. In conclusion, the students exhibited different health-risk behaviors, and a longer institutional residence time, compared with a shorter time, was found to associate with the reduction of health-risk behaviors.

Introduction

During adolescence, an intense transition phase associated with maturation, a high prevalence of various health-risk behaviors such as cigarette, alcohol, and illicit drug use, poor eating habits, insufficient physical activity, and risky sexual behavior, all of which contribute to adulthood behaviors, is observed among students [13]. Health-risk conditions and socioeconomic inequalities, which are intensified in socioeconomically weak environments, remain neglected issues with respect to youth [47].

The right to housing is conferred upon teenagers who attend high school at some educational institutions; this is considered a subsidy policy and exists in the context of other public programs and policies for this age group [8,9]. According to the literature, such housing benefits are associated with student retention and better school performance [8,10,11]. In all states of Brazil, the Federal Professional Scientific and Technological Education Network provides professional and technological education in different teaching modalities, thus encouraging the integration and verticalization of basic education to professional and higher education and strengthening clusters as well as social and local cultures [12]. On average, this network offers 500,000 annual vacancies for high school students, and approximately 15% of these vacancies are linked with a housing benefit in an attempt to reduce socioeconomic disparities [9], as observed in other countries.

Studies of college students who reside at educational institutions have described health-risk behaviors often associated with distance from family; similar behaviors were observed in one of the few studies involving adolescent students in Israel [13]. The use of alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana, risky sexual behaviors, insufficient physical activity, and poor eating habits were mentioned most frequently [1419], and these were found to associate with an increased time of residence in institutional housing [1,14,17].

Our investigation was motivated by the scarcity of studies of high school students who reside at educational institutions [8,20] in developing countries (e.g., Latin America), as well as the importance of knowledge about health risk factors [3,21] in terms of the evaluation of public programs and policies aimed at planning health promotion and disease prevention activities. In light of this gap in the literature, which exists despite the presence of institutions with housing, we aimed to (1) describe the profiles of high school students who reside at an educational institution with respect to health-risk behaviors and (2) correlate these variables with the length of stay at the institution.

Materials and Methods

Design, population and sample

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2015 and involved students residing at a federal public educational institution located in the Midwestern region of Brazil. In this federal institution, vacancies are open annually through public tenders, allowing interested candidates to sign up from several states of Brazil; admission is granted to those who pass the entrance exam. Among the total number of students in the institution (n = 1440), institutional housing is intended for students with lower socioeconomic status, through selection of applicants. All resident students at the institution (n = 134) from seven states of Brazil were invited to participate in the study. The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: being regularly enrolled in high school; being resident students; being 14–19 years of age; and being without cognitive deficit. As 12 students (8.9%) refused to participate, the final sample comprised 122 students (82% male, n = 100; 18% female, n = 22).

Measurements

We collected the following information related to adolescent health-risk behaviors [22]: family socioeconomic status, anthropometric profile, eating habits, physical activity, use of cigarettes, alcohol and drugs, and risky sexual behavior.

Questionnaire

A self-administered questionnaire was developed [23] and validated [24] for use in the National Student Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar, PENSE), developed by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) [23]. Our research used the following question blocks: demographic (age, sex, place of origin [urban or rural zone]); socioeconomic (ethnicity/race, education level of legal guardians [elementary school, high school, higher education) and monthly family income relative to the minimum wage in Brazil in 2015 [<1 salary, <R$788.00; 1–3 salaries, R$788–2364.00; >3 salaries, >R$2364.00]; nutrition (consumption of healthy and unhealthy dietary items) and behavioral (physical activity, use of cigarettes, alcohol, and/or illicit drugs, and sexual and reproductive health).

A healthy diet score was obtained by summing of scores of items from the above classifications of markers at five weekly frequency levels (Table 1), ranging from 0 to 44 points [25]. The internal consistency of the score was assessed by correlating the items and by calculating Cronbach's coefficient, which yielded a value of 0.68.

Regarding physical activity, we assessed the average time in physical activity participation from students’ reports. We considered students who participated in ≥60 minutes daily to be active [26]. The use of substances (cigarettes, alcohol, and illicit drugs) was considered relevant for students who reported having consumed them in the last 30 days [2,27]. We also evaluated the number of doses of alcohol consumed on any occasion. The responses were grouped into three categories (≤1 dose, 2–4 doses, or ≥5 doses). Sexual behavior was assessed according to reports of an active sex life, number of sexual partners, and age at first intercourse. We also verified the use of contraceptives and sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention methods in addition to previous adherence to guidelines related to sexual and reproductive health in the school environment.

Anthropometry

The anthropometric assessment consisted of measurements of body mass, height, and waist and neck circumferences. We calculated the body mass index (BMI), which is considered predictive of body fat, relative to age using the z-score: normal weight (-2 SD <BMI z-score <1 SD), overweight (1 SD < BMI z-score <2 SD), or obese (BMI Z-score >2 SD), based on the World Health Organization’s Growth Reference [28]. Students were instructed to wear light clothes at the time of data collection and to remain in the indicated proper position [29]. The data collection team was previously trained.

Waist and neck circumferences were measured using a strong, flexible, non-elastic, tape measure with an accuracy of 0.1 cm [29]. Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest, with the subject in a standing position [30]; this was classified as “increased risk of cardiovascular disease” when in the ≥90th percentile, adjusted for age and sex for students until 18 years of age [31], and as “increased risk of cardiovascular disease” (increased and substantially increased) when >94 cm, for male students and >80 cm for female students older than 18 years [31]. Neck circumference was measured in a horizontal plane at the level of the most prominent portion, the thyroid cartilage [32]. Neck circumference was classified as adequate or indicative of overweight, according to specific cut-off values with respect to age and sex [3234]. All measurements were taken with the subjects standing upright, with the face directed toward, and shoulders relaxed.

Nutritional knowledge

The Nutritional Knowledge Scale Questionnaire, which was psychometrically translated, adapted and validated from the instrument published by National Health Interview Survey Cancer Epidemiology [35], consists of 12 questions divided into 3 parts: 1) 4 questions about the relationship between diet and disease; 2) 7 questions about the fiber and lipid contents of foods; and 3) 1 question about the number of servings of fruits and vegetables that should be eaten. We asked each student to mark only 1 answer to each questions, and each correct answer received a score of 1.0. At the end, each student’s nutritional knowledge was classified as low (0–6 points), moderate (7–10 points), or high (>10 points).

Statistical analysis

Students were grouped according to those who were freshmen in 2015 (Group 1, <8 months in the educational institution) and those who were freshmen in 2014 (Group 2, >20 months in the institution) for comparisons of variables relative to the time in residence at the institution. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the chi-square association test (bivariate analysis); time at the institution was set as the dependent variable, and demographic, socioeconomic, anthropometric, nutritional and behavioral factors were set as the independent variables. The analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the significance level was set at p = 0.05.

Ethical considerations

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee on Research with Human Beings for the Federal University of Goiás, Brazil (Opinion no. 1.003.926). Students were told that they could leave the study at any time if they chose not to participate in any of the procedures. Prior to participation, the students were asked to read and voluntarily sign the study consent form; the legal guardians of minor participants also read and signed this form.

Results

Details of the demographic and socioeconomic data are presented in Table 2.

thumbnail
Table 2. Demographic and socioeconomic data of the population studied (n = 122).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161652.t002

The results demonstrated that age, nutritional knowledge, and BMI were associated with timing of arrival at the institution (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Association between freshmen in 2015 and freshmen up to 2014 with the independent variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161652.t003

Discussion

The main results show that students, who were socioeconomically vulnerable, reported high levels of exposure to risk factors such as cigarette and alcohol consumption, risky sexual behavior and unhealthy diet. However, most of the students were physically active. Regarding the length of stay at the institution, students who had spent longer time at the institution presented with decreases in some unhealthy parameters, such as consumption of less alcohol, appropriate BMI and more nutritional knowledge when compared with those who spent less time at the institution.

The sample is composed mostly of male students. This is a characteristic of institutions of the Federal Education Network, which have basically offered agrarian courses in recent decades, and that attract predominantly male students for enrolment [12]. Although this reality is shifting with a greater variety of courses being offered and higher enrolment of women, the physical structure of the housing does not follow these changes and still offers more vacancies for men.

Fragile socioeconomic conditions are categorized according to the income level, a low level of education among legal guardians, and high prevalence of brown and black ethnicities/races. These data are consistent with the criteria used to select students who will benefit from housing at the institution and the inclusion of socioeconomic factors as a major health determinant worldwide [5]. Another factor that contributes to the students’ health risk is the distance from family, as the family is an important means of support in terms of protection and health promotion during adolescent development [13,15,36]. Studies have reported that a stronger familial bond is related to a later onset of sexual activity, reduced consumption of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana [5,15], and a better emotional state, welfare [10,36], and diet [15,16]. At universities, the existence of institutional housing and/or private residences is a common alternative intended to enable the student to stay at the educational institution in an attempt to encourage a better school performance [19]. However, this transition has been identified as an aggravating factor with respect to health-risk behaviors, as a consequence of the increased freedom caused by distance from the family [17]. It is noteworthy that little research has been conducted regarding residences at high school institutions, although institutional housing for high school students is a common situation [8] that is mainly associated with private schools [20]. However, we speculate that the students in our study underwent the same transition upon transferring to student housing, although this aggravating factor was encountered at an earlier age.

Therefore, the importance of assistance from the accommodating institution with respect to minimizing behaviors associated with socioeconomic vulnerability [1,37], enabling educational success and employment during adulthood, and breaking the vicious cycle of weaknesses by providing more favorable future prospects is evident [38]. Of note, adolescents in countries with higher socioeconomic differences (e.g., developing countries) are reported to have worse health conditions [38], an earlier onset of smoking [1] and alcohol and drug abuse, more risky sexual behavior [38], and inappropriate eating behaviors [6].

Our findings regarding substance use indicate that cigarettes and other drugs were used by a minority of the students; ideally, however, no consumption would be reported, especially given the ages of the studied adolescents. The percentage of students who currently smoked was 13.1%, similar to the prevalence rates reported in other studies [4,3941] and greater than that reported by PENSE (6.1%) [27] and another Brazilian multicenter study of adolescents (5.7%) [42]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), adolescents understand the act of smoking as an "adult behavior", and such behaviors are usually established in adolescence [43]. Cigarette smoking is a major cause of preventable death worldwide and is associated with the ingestion and consumption of other substances, such as drugs and alcohol [43], in addition to early sexual initiation [4,39,40].

Marijuana was the only reported drug (2.5%), and it is possible that the low reported drug consumption rate is due to a fear of confessing the consumption of illegal substances, even though the researchers ensured data confidentiality. PENSE reported similar 30-day consumption rates (3.1% of male and 2% of female subjects) [23]. In many countries worldwide, the use of drugs, especially marijuana, usually begins before 18 years of age [1,4,23,40] and thus comprises a public health problem with deep psychological and social consequences [39].

Regarding alcohol consumption by adolescents, studies have reported lower frequencies [4,23,39,44] than that observed in the present study, in which almost half of the students reported alcohol use during the last month. Another concern is the high consumption (≥5 doses) verified in the present study. We believe that distance from the family enhances the freedom of consumption, similar to the findings of studies of college students living at educational institutions [1,1416].

As observed by other authors, the sexual behavior of students in this study is also indicative of this greater freedom associated with distance from the family [1416]. Although most of the students used methods to prevent pregnancy and STDs and participated in educational activities about sexual and reproductive health, most reported multiple sexual partners; in addition, the age at first intercourse, another health risk factor, was lower than the ages reported in previous literature. Both risk behaviors are related to other problems and school performance. In this sense, a decline in the age at first intercourse and an increased rate of STDs have been perceived [4,45].

Most of the students had healthy diet scores of ≤30 points (below 70% of adequacy), indicating inadequate food intake. Previous reports have demonstrated that in adolescence, a diet rich in calories and sweetened beverages [46] and deficient in fibers, whole grains, vegetables, milk, dairy products, and unsaturated fat [47,48] is characteristic of a high consumption of unhealthy foods and insufficient consumption of healthy foods [4,47,49].

Regarding the new classification of food according to industrial processing [50], the consumption of natural or minimally processed foods has decreased within families, and the consumption of ultraprocessed foods has increased worldwide [5153]. This change has resulted in many public health challenges, as these ultraprocessed foods are dense in energy, trans fats, sugars, sodium, and chemical additives [52,53] and have been associated with overweightness and cardiovascular disease in the Brazilian population [47,54], including adolescents [55]. Foods listed by PENSE as markers of a healthy diet are basically natural or minimally processed, whereas ultraprocessed foods are unhealthy markers. Although most students had a low healthy diet score when eating behavior was assessed as a whole, an analysis of individual food consumption revealed that students regularly consumed (≥5 times/week) of beans (89.4%), raw salad (60.6%), and milk and dairy products (51.6%) and infrequently consumed (≤5 times/week) fried snacks (96.7%), sausages (99.2%), sweet cookies (78.7%), sweets and desserts (73.8%), and soda (86.1%). Regarding the intake of other foods, our data corroborate the literature with respect to a high frequency of inadequate intake (i.e., low consumption of fruits and cooked vegetables). Therefore, although the students did not have ideal eating habits, as determined by the diet scores, adolescents who resided at the analyzed institution consumed a more adequate diet, according to the literature [47,56], than did other students of similar ages, as reported in a survey conducted in 43 countries in Europe and North America [4,4649]. Another study of students residing at an educational institution indicated a reduced consumption of sweets in comparison to other young people [13].

To ensure a healthy diet, some universities with residential accommodations require students to purchase a meal plan in their first year, thus creating an incentive for them to eat meals on campus [14]. At the institution studied herein, four free daily meals are offered, and each includes meat, milk, eggs, and some vegetables, thus enhancing local sustainable production and the use of raw or minimally processed foods as recommended by the Food Guide for the Brazilian Population (Guia Alimentar para a População Brasileira) [56]. A healthy diet should be planned in the context of individual, cultural, social, economic, and sustainable aspects, and Brazil is among the first countries to include sustainability as a guideline in its food guide [57]. Although meals are mostly prepared in the institution's dining room, the students have access to unhealthy foods outside of the dining room; for example, these can be purchased at the cafeteria, brought from home, or exchanged among peers.

In terms of physical activity, most of the students were physically active. This finding contrasted the results of other studies of adolescents, which reported high percentages (≥60%) of insufficient physical activity in this age group [4,58]. A study of 105 countries worldwide found that 80% of adolescents were insufficiently active [59]. At the institution studied herein, the students have access to a court, soccer field, sand field, running track, swimming pool, and gymnasium, which help them to meet the physical activity recommendations. Also, teachers are available to practice some sports at counter-shift times, and students have access to all of these places on the weekend, along with assistants.

Given the presented context, educational institutions must effectively fulfill their role in the holistic education of students (i.e., physical, social, emotional, and spiritual development), especially when the institution is also the students' home [60]. The WHO notes that the existence of public policies and programs to promote the health and protect the rights of adolescents, who are at a vulnerable stage, is fundamental [61]. In this regard, international organizations such as the WHO and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) should recommend policies and prevention programs that countries can use to support and promote the health of adolescents [62]. A review of national public health policy documents from 109 countries found that 84% gave some type of attention to adolescents, with focuses on sexual and reproductive health, followed by tobacco, alcohol use, mental health and, less frequently, considerations of injuries, nutrition, and physical activity [61,62].

In Brazil, two major programs that target students are the School Health Program (Programa Saúde na Escola, PSE) and the National School Meal Program (Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar, PNAE). PSE represents a link between the school and the primary health care network that aims to promote health and a culture of peace by focusing on the prevention of health problems and working to ensure appropriate conditions for comprehensive education, among others [63]. PNAE aims to contribute to biopsychosocial growth and development, school performance, and healthy eating habits [64], which are rights guaranteed by the Statute of Children and Adolescents (Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente, ECA). Despite the existence of these programs, our research highlights the fragility of their implementation at the institution in question.

In addition, the National Student Assistance Program (Programa Nacional de Assistência Estudantil, PNAES) aims to ensure the permanence of adolescents and young people in education in order to democratize permanence during academic life, minimize social and regional inequalities, and promote of social inclusion through education through subsidies targeting housing, food, and transportation [9]. However, this program does not incorporate a health-related theme or avoidance of risky behaviors, which should be included in all public policies and programs [7].

Regarding the time of residence at the public institution, students with a longer time of residence (Group 2) were older. This finding was expected, as most students begin residing at the institution during the first year of high school and remain in residence during the three years of school, even though they must compete for accommodation in any of the three years. The students also exhibited a higher prevalence of nutritional knowledge and BMI adequacy, in contrast to other studies that indicated decreases in these parameters with a longer institutional residence time, including a longitudinal study that monitored college students for 14 consecutive days during seven semesters [1,2,14]. Nutritional knowledge suggests that this subject might permeate the school curriculum, thus providing the recommended knowledge and skills related to the student [65], including nutritional education, which were sporadically performed. The appropriate BMI percentage might be related to the high participation in physically activity. In addition, students who had a longer length of stay at the institution consumed lower alcohol doses on any occasion. This result contradicts those of several surveys conducted among students that point to an increase in consumption during adolescence [40,66].

Given the presented perspective, despite the decreases in some unhealthy parameters being associated with a longer institutional stay, public policies and programs aim to improve student permanence and reduce socioeconomic vulnerabilities, but are weak with respect to health care and risky behaviors, when they should have health promotion and disease prevention as foundation. Possibly, the short duration of residence at the institution is not sufficient to change previous behaviors related to various factors, such as the family socioeconomic status. Therefore, it is important to provide conditions that will allow students to remain at the institution, as well as to develop dialogue mechanisms between public policy leaders and programs to ensure the well-being and health of this population. We suggest the development of activities from school admission (i.e., by conducting an individual assessment) to promote health education specific to the reality of the school. We also suggest the implementing of periodic actions, such as encouraging the students to engage in sports; increasing leisure and cultural options such as theater and dance; and promoting moments of family interaction inside the institution. These aspects could contribute to students making healthier decisions, thereby reducing the risk of behaviors negatively contributing to health.

In conclusion, high school students who reside at public educational institutions are exposed to health-risk behaviors that are aggravated by distance from their families. Nevertheless, a longer residence time is associated with some aspects such as better nutritional knowledge, an improved BMI and fewer consumed doses of alcohol.

Study Limitations and Future Directions

This research is highly relevant because the amount of research related to the risk behaviors of high school students residing as educational public institutions is very limited. However, our results should be interpreted in light of certain restrictions. First, evaluations based on self-administered questionnaires have limitations such as biases toward socially desirable responses that might lead to an underestimation or overestimation of the problem. Second, we conducted the study at a single institution, which may cause bias. For this reason, additional studies conducted in other cultural and social settings (i.e., through longitudinal study) are needed because a cross-sectional study does not provide information about the nature of the risk behaviors. Third, at the assessed institution there are some peculiarities, such as an offering of several spaces for the students to play different sports; this may have contributed to our results, and because of this, our findings should be extrapolated with caution. Future research should investigate aspects such as school environment and social and public health policy and their influence on health-risk behaviors.

Supporting Information

S1 Dataset. Health-risk behaviors: Datasets of participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161652.s001

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Nara Rezende Moreira Marinho, Pammela Munique Vilela, João Luiz Ribeiro Neto, Vanessa Nunes Leal, Jaqueline de Souza Silva, Carlos Henrique Pereira Bento, Angelo Rodrigues da Silva Neto, and Edivan dos Santos Moreira for their contributions during data collection. We also thank the Goiano Federal Institute for providing us with space and materials throughout the experimental period.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: PRSN NAS MN PSB.
  2. Data curation: PRSN NAS MN PSB.
  3. Formal analysis: PRSN NAS MN PSB.
  4. Investigation: PRSN NAS MN PSB.
  5. Methodology: PRSN NAS MN PSB.
  6. Project administration: PRSN NAS MN PSB.
  7. Resources: PRSN NAS MN PSB.
  8. Writing – original draft: PRSN NAS MN PSB.
  9. Writing – review & editing: PRSN NAS MN PSB.

References

  1. 1. Spring B, Moller AC, Coons MJ. Multiple health behaviours: overview and implications. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2012;34: i3–i10.
  2. 2. Leatherdale ST, Rynard V. A cross-sectional examination of modifiable risk factors for chronic disease among a nationally representative sample of youth: are Canadian students graduating high school with a failing grade for health? BMC Public Health. 2013;13: 569–577. pmid:23758659
  3. 3. World Health Organization. Health behavior in school-aged children [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available: http://www.hbsc.org/
  4. 4. Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, de Looze M, Roberts C, et al. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. WHO Reg Off Eur. Copenhagen; 2012; 272.
  5. 5. Viner RM, Ozer EM, Denny S, Marmot M, Resnick M, Fatusi A, et al. Adolescence and the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2012;379: 1641–1652. pmid:22538179
  6. 6. Fismen A-S, Samdal O, Torsheim T. Family affluence and cultural capital as indicators of social inequalities in adolescent’s eating behaviours: a population-based survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12: 1036. pmid:23190697
  7. 7. Kumanyika SK. Five Critical Challenges for Public Health. Heal Educ Behav. 2014;41: 5–6.
  8. 8. Martin AJ, Papworth B, Ginns P, Liem GAD. Boarding School, Academic Motivation and Engagement, and Psychological Well-Being: A Large-Scale Investigation. Am Educ Res J. 2014;51: 1007–1049.
  9. 9. Ministério da Educação. Decreto no 7.234/2010: Dispõe sobre o Programa Nacional de Assistência Estudantil—PNAES. 2010. pp. 1–5.
  10. 10. Araujo P, Murray J. Estimating the effects of dormitory living on student performance. Econ Bull. 2010;30: 866–878.
  11. 11. Brilhantes RA, Aga NB, Tipace FC, Adegue CA, Perez MP, Aya-Ay AM, et al. The Living Conditions of University Students in Boarding Houses and Dormitories in Davao City, Philippines. Int Peer Rev J. 2012;1: 66–85.
  12. 12. Ministério da Educação. Portal da Rede Federal de Educação Profissional, Científica e Tecnológica [Internet]. 2016. Available: http://institutofederal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=2
  13. 13. Agmon M, Zlotnick C, Finkelstein A. The relationship between mentoring on healthy behaviors and well-being among Israeli youth in boarding schools: a mixed-methods study. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15: 11. pmid:25884174
  14. 14. Small M, Bailey-Davis L, Morgan N, Maggs J, Manuscript A, Activity P, et al. Changes in eating and physical activity behaviors across seven semesters of college: living on or off campus matters. Heal Educ Behav. 2013;40: 435–441.
  15. 15. Lawman HG, Wilson DK. A Review of Family and Environmental Correlates of Health Behaviors in High-Risk Youth. Obesity. 2012;20: 1142–1157. pmid:22282044
  16. 16. Schmied E a., Parada H, Horton L a., Madanat H, Ayala GX. Family Support Is Associated With Behavioral Strategies for Healthy Eating Among Latinas. Heal Educ Behav. 2013;41: 34–41.
  17. 17. Fromme K, Corbin WR, Kruse MI. Behavioral risks during the transition from high school to college. Dev Psychol. 2008;44: 1497–1504. pmid:18793080
  18. 18. Papadaki A, Hondros G, A. Scott J, Kapsokefalou M. Eating habits of University students living at, or away from home in Greece. Appetite. 2007;49: 169–176. pmid:17368642
  19. 19. Willoughby BJ, Carroll JS. The impact of living in co-ed resident halls on risk-taking among college students. J Am Coll Heal. 2009;58: 241–246.
  20. 20. Hodges J, Sheffield J, Ralph A. Home away from home? Boarding in Australian schools. Aust J Educ. 2013;57: 32–47.
  21. 21. World Health Organization. Inequalities in Young People’s Health. World Health. 2006; 1–224.
  22. 22. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2 Nov 2015]. Available: http://www.who.int/topics/adolescent_health/en/
  23. 23. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. Pesquisa nacional de saúde do escolar 2012. Rio de Janeiro; 2013. 256 p.
  24. 24. Tavares LF, Castro IRR de, Levy RB, Cardoso LO, Passos MD dos, Brito FDSB. Validade relativa de indicadores de práticas alimentares da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar entre adolescentes do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30: 1029–1041. pmid:24936819
  25. 25. Souza ADM, Bezerra IN, Cunha DB, Sichieri R. Avaliação dos marcadores de consumo alimentar do VIGITEL (2007–2009). Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2011;14: 44–52. doi: 10.1590/S1415-790X2011000500005
  26. 26. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Global; 2010. p. 60.
  27. 27. Barreto SM, Giatti L, Oliveira-Campos M, Andreazzi MA, Malta DC. Experimentation and use of cigarette and other tobacco products among adolescents in the Brazilian state capitals (PeNSE 2012). Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2014;17: 62–76. pmid:25054254
  28. 28. World Health Organization. Growth reference data for 5–19 years [Internet]. 2007 [cited 15 Mar 2016]. Available: http://www.who.int/growthref/en/
  29. 29. Lohman T G; Roche A F; Martorell R. Anthropometrics standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1988.
  30. 30. World Health Organization. Waist circumference and waist–hip ratio: report of a WHO expert consultation. Geneva; 20111: 47. Available: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/ejcn.2009.139
  31. 31. Fernández JR, Redden DT, Pietrobelli A, Allison DB. Waist circumference percentiles in nationally representative samples of African-American, European-American, and Mexican-American children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2004;145: 439–444. pmid:15480363
  32. 32. Hatipoglu N, Mazicioglu MM, Kurtoglu S, Kendirci M. Neck circumference: An additional tool of screening overweight and obesity in childhood. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169: 733–739. pmid:19936785
  33. 33. World Health Organization, Consultation WHOE. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio Report of a WHO Expert Consultation. World Health. Geneva; 2008;1: 47. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.139
  34. 34. Ben-Noun L, Laor A. Relationship of neck circumference to cardiovascular risk factors. Obes Res. 2003;11: 226–231. pmid:12582218
  35. 35. Scagliusi FB, Polacow VO, Cordás TA, Coelho D, Alvarenga M, Philippi ST, et al. Tradução, adaptação e avaliação psicométrica da Escala de Conhecimento Nutricional do National Health Interview Survey Cancer Epidemiology. Rev Nutr. 2006;19: 425–436.
  36. 36. Gerard JM, Booth MZ. Family and school influences on adolescents’ adjustment: The moderating role of youth hopefulness and aspirations for the future. J Adolesc. 2015;44: 1–16. pmid:26177519
  37. 37. Plenty S, Mood C. Money, Peers and Parents: Social and Economic Aspects of Inequality in Youth Wellbeing. J Youth Adolesc. 2016;45: 1294–1308. pmid:26847325
  38. 38. Hale DR, Bevilacqua L, Viner RM. Adolescent health and adult education and employment: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2015;136: 1–20.
  39. 39. Momtazi S, Rawson R. Substance abuse among Iranian high school students. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010;23: 221–226. pmid:20308905
  40. 40. MacArthur GJ, Smith MC, Melotti R, Heron J, MacLeod J, Hickman M, et al. Patterns of alcohol use and multiple risk behaviour by gender during early and late adolescence: The ALSPAC cohort. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2012;34: 20–30.
  41. 41. Alcalá HE, Albert SL, Ortega AN. E-cigarette use and disparities by race, citizenship status and language among adolescents. Addict Behav. 2016;57: 30–34. pmid:26835605
  42. 42. Figueiredo VC, Szklo AS, Costa LC, Kuschnir MCC, Silva TLN da, Bloch KV, et al. ERICA: prevalência de tabagismo em adolescentes brasileiros. Rev Saude Publica. 2016;50: 1–10. doi: 10.1590/S01518-8787.2016050006741
  43. 43. World Health Organization. WHO Report On The Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2009: Implementing smoke-free environments. 2009; 568.
  44. 44. Coutinho ESF, Franca-Santos D, Magliano E da S, Bloch KV, Barufaldi LA, Cunha C de F, et al. ERICA: patterns of alcohol consumption in Brazilian adolescents. Rev Saude Publica. 2016;50 Suppl 1: 1–9.
  45. 45. Madkour AS, Farhat T, Halpern CT, Godeau E, Gabhainn SN. Early adolescent sexual initiation as a problem behavior: A comparative study of five nations. J Adolesc Heal. Elsevier Ltd; 2010;47: 389–398.
  46. 46. Chan TF, Lin WT, Huang HL, Lee CY, Wu PW, Chiu YW, et al. Consumption of Sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with components of the metabolic syndrome in adolescents. Nutrients. 2014;6: 2088–2103. pmid:24858495
  47. 47. World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. Geneva; 2003. p. 160.
  48. 48. Rauber F, Campagnolo PDB, Hoffman DJ, Vitolo MR. Consumption of ultra-processed food products and its effects on children’s lipid profiles: A longitudinal study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;25: 116–122. pmid:25240690
  49. 49. Tavares LF, Castro IRR de, Levy RB, Cardoso L de O, Claro RM. Dietary patterns of Brazilian adolescents: results of the Brazilian National School-Based Health Survey (PeNSE). Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30: 2679–2690. pmid:26247996
  50. 50. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB. NOVA. The star shines bright. World Nutr. 2016;7: 28–38.
  51. 51. Fardet A, Rock E, Bassama J, Bohuon P, Prabhasankar P, Monteiro C, et al. Current Food Classifications in Epidemiological Studies Do Not Enable Solid Nutritional Recommendations for Preventing Diet-Related Chronic Diseases: The Impact of Food Processing. Adv Nutr. 2015;6: 629–638. pmid:26567188
  52. 52. Moubarac J, Claro RM, Baraldi LG, Levy RB, Martins APB, Cannon G, et al. International differences in cost and consumption of ready-to-consume food and drink products: United Kingdom and Brazil, 2008–2009. Glob Public Health. 2013;8: 845–856. pmid:23734735
  53. 53. Monteiro CA, Cannon G. The Impact of Transnational “Big Food” Companies on the South: A View from Brazil. PLoS Med. 2012;9: 1–5.
  54. 54. Swinburn B, Vandevijvere S, Kraak V, Sacks G, Snowdon W, Hawkes C, et al. Monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments: a proposed Government Healthy Food Environment Policy Index. Obes Rev. 2013;14: 24–37. pmid:24074208
  55. 55. Fortin B, Yazbeck M. Peer effects, fast food consumption and adolescent weight gain. J Health Econ. 2015;42: 125–138. pmid:25935739
  56. 56. Ministério da Saúde. Guia alimentar para a população brasileira. 2nd ed. Brasília; 2014. 158 p.
  57. 57. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac J-C, Martins APB, Martins CA, Garzillo J, et al. Dietary guidelines to nourish humanity and the planet in the twenty-first century. A blueprint from Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18: 2311–2322. pmid:26205679
  58. 58. Belton S, O’ Brien W, Meegan S, Woods C, Issartel J. Youth-Physical Activity Towards Health: evidence and background to the development of the Y-PATH physical activity intervention for adolescents. BMC Public Health. BMC Public Health; 2014;14: 122. pmid:24499449
  59. 59. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380: 247–257. pmid:22818937
  60. 60. Keller S, Maddock JE, Hannöver W, Thyrian JR, Basler H-D. Multiple health risk behaviors in German first year university students. Prev Med (Baltim). 2008;46: 189–195.
  61. 61. World Health Organization. Health for the World’s adolescents A second chance in the second decade. In: WHO [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2 Nov 2015]. Available: http://apps.who.int/adolescent/second-decade/section8/page2/national-health-policies.html
  62. 62. Catalano RF, Fagan AA, Gavin LE, Greenberg MT, Irwin CE, Ross DA, et al. Worldwide application of prevention science in adolescent health. Lancet. 2012;379: 1653–1664. pmid:22538180
  63. 63. Brasil. Decreto no 6.286, de 5 de dezembro de 2007. Institui o Programa Saúde na Escola—PSE, e dá outras providências [Internet]. Brasília; 2007 pp. 1–3. Available: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2007/decreto/d6286.htm
  64. 64. Ministério da Educação. Resolução No 26 de 17 de junho de 2013 [Internet]. Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar (Pnae) Brasília; 2013 44 p. Available: http://www.fnde.gov.br/fnde/legislacao/resolucoes/item/4620-resolução-cd-fnde-no-26,-de-17-de-junho-de-2013
  65. 65. World Health Organization. School policy framework: implementation of the WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Production. 2008; 53. Available: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/SPF-en-2008.pdf
  66. 66. Grigsby TJ, Forster M, Unger JB, Sussman S. Predictors of alcohol-related negative consequences in adolescents: A systematic review of the literature and implications for future research. J Adolesc. 2016;48: 18–35. pmid:26871952