Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Placoderm Assemblage from the Tetrapod-Bearing Locality of Strud (Belgium, Upper Famennian) Provides Evidence for a Fish Nursery

  • Sébastien Olive , (SO); (VD)

    Affiliations OD Earth and Life History, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium, Evolution & Diversity Dynamics Lab, Department of Geology, Liège University, Liège, Belgium

  • Gaël Clément,

    Affiliation Centre de Recherche sur la Paléobiodiversité et les Paléoenvironnements, UMR CR2P 7207, Sorbonne Universités, MNHN, CNRS, UPMC-Paris6, Muséum national d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France

  • Edward B. Daeschler,

    Affiliation Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Vincent Dupret (SO); (VD)

    Current address: Research School of Physics and Engineering, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia

    Affiliation Subdepartment of Evolution and Development, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Placoderm Assemblage from the Tetrapod-Bearing Locality of Strud (Belgium, Upper Famennian) Provides Evidence for a Fish Nursery

  • Sébastien Olive, 
  • Gaël Clément, 
  • Edward B. Daeschler, 
  • Vincent Dupret


The placoderm fauna of the upper Famennian tetrapod-bearing locality of Strud, Belgium, includes the antiarch Grossilepis rikiki, the arthrodire groenlandaspidid Turrisaspis strudensis and the phyllolepidid Phyllolepis undulata. Based on morphological and morphometric evidence, the placoderm specimens from Strud are predominantly recognised as immature specimens and this locality as representing a placoderm nursery. The Strud depositional environment corresponds to a channel in an alluvial plain, and the presence of a nursery in such environment could have provided nutrients and protection to the placoderm offspring. This represents one of the earliest pieces of evidence for this sort of habitat partitioning in vertebrate history, with adults living more distantly from the nursery and using the nursery only to spawn or give live birth.


The Strud quarry (Namur Province, Belgium) is one of the few localities in the world that has yielded Devonian tetrapod remains [1]. The tetrapod remains were found in association with very abundant flora [2], a putative insect [35], continental crustaceans [69] as well as sarcopterygian [1012] and as yet undescribed acanthodian and actinopterygian fishes. The placoderm assemblage has been recently described and includes the antiarch Grossilepis rikiki, the groenlandaspidid Turrisaspis strudensis and the phyllolepidid Phyllolepis undulata [13,14].

In modern ecosystems, a nursery is defined as an area nearly exclusively inhabited by immature individuals [15]. A few Upper Palaeozoic localities, such as the Carboniferous chondrichthyan locality of Mazon Creek, USA [16] or the Famennian coelacanth locality of Waterloo Farm, South Africa [17], were described as nurseries. Others were hypothesized as such because they are dominated by immature individuals [18]. Carr [19] suggested the presence of a nursery from the Devonian of Merriganowry, Australia, based on a complete range of ontogenetic stages of the placoderm Cowralepis, but he did not mention any ratio of immature to adult forms. He also suggested the presence of a placoderm nursery in the Cleveland Shales (Famennian, Ohio), based on the discovery of egg cases, but to our knowledge this hypothesis has never been tested. Consequently, both localities constitute uncertain records of placoderm nurseries in the Devonian. Other localities, such as the Frasnian localities of Miguasha, Canada [20] and Lode, Latvia [21,22], include immature specimens in large numbers. However, because these localities display all ontogenetic stages, and not nearly exclusively immature individuals, they cannot be considered as nursery sites. A more convincing record is provided by the Upper Devonian locality of Tioga County, Pennsylvania, in which some assemblages are dominated by very young Bothriolepis specimens [23].

This article characterizes the ontogenetic composition of the placoderm material from Strud and considers the ecological implications for placoderms in this unique Upper Devonian site, interpreted here as a placoderm nursery.

Material and Methods

The fossiliferous strata of the Strud quarry belong to the Upper Devonian Evieux Formation and are late Famennian in age [24]. Placoderm remains are found throughout lithologic unit 7, with the exception of its uppermost part [13].

A morphometric analysis of Phyllolepis [13] is used herein to characterize the ontogenetic composition of the Phyllolepis material from Strud (Fig 1A and 1B, S1 Table). The ontogenetic stages of Grossilepis rikiki are determined from morphological characteristics previously determined for immature bothriolepidids (Fig 1C). The material of Turrisaspis strudensis is compared to the more complete and extensive material of Turrisaspis elektor from Red Hill, Pennsylvania [25] to infer ontogenetic stages of the Belgian material (Fig 1D, S2 Table). In the case of small data sets, as is the case for the sample of anterior ventrolateral plates of Phyllolepis from Pennsylvania and the sample of median dorsal plates of Turrisaspis strudensis from Belgium, a test of significance for normality may not be sufficient to detect the deviation of the variable from normality.

Fig 1. Graphical and anatomical elements characterizing the immature nature of the Strud placoderm material.

(A) length vs. width graph of anterior ventrolateral plates of Phyllolepis undulata from Belgium. (B) length vs. width graph of anterior ventrolateral plates of Phyllolepis undulata from Belgium and Pennsylvania (number of specimens from Pennsylvania non-statistically valid). (C) anterior median dorsal plate of Grossilepis rikiki (IRSNB P.9254). (D) length vs. height graph of median dorsal plates of Turrisaspis elektor from Pennsylvania and T. strudensis from Belgium (number of specimens from Belgium non-statistically valid). The red dashed lines represent assumed limits between immature and adult specimens. (A)-(B) modified from [2], (C) modified from [4], (D) modified from [5].

The placoderm material from Belgium studied here is housed in the following Belgian institutions: Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique (IRSNB, Brussels), Université de Liège (ULg) and Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve (UCL). The placoderm material from Pennsylvania is housed at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP), USA.

Specimen numbers are listed in S1 and S2 Tables. All specimens are accessible in permanent repositories of the above cited institutions. All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations. The Gesves municipality, administrator of the Strud locality, gave us all authorizations for excavations and material collection.


The life cycle of a fish is divided into five ontogenetic stages: embryonic, larval, juvenile, adult and senescent [2627]. Even in extant fishes, characters permitting the discrimination between these different stages are sometimes problematic. It is thus more complicated on fossil material, in which a large part of the morphological information is lost [20]. In this paper, the term “immature” is used to characterize embryonic, larval and juvenile stages, because discriminating stages in the fossil record is difficult [20], and size is used as a proxy for age [28] when morphological data do not permit assessment of the growth stage of our specimens.

Immature and adult stages are easily distinguishable in bothriolepidid antiarch placoderms because some sensory line grooves visible in immature forms are not visible on adults. In previous work, no precise growth studies have been performed on phyllolepidid and groenlandaspidid placoderms; it is therefore difficult, based on morphological characters, to distinguish immature and adult/senescent specimens in our material. Morphometric analyses on growth series can thus prove useful. In our study, upper size limits for immature specimens are assumed for Phyllolepis undulata and Turrisaspis elektor as made in previous studies [28].

Antiarch placoderms

Grossilepis rikiki remains are extremely scarce at Strud; only four isolated bones have been found: two anterior median dorsal plates, one ventral central plate and one plate of the lateral marginal series of the pectoral appendage ([14], Fig 5B-D, F). Because Grossilepis is the sister group of Bothriolepis [29], it is assumed that both genera followed the same ontogenetic sequence. Immature characters that have clearly been identified for the anterior median dorsal plate of Bothriolepis [23,30,31] include: thin bone, nodose ornamentation, narrow shape, dorsal median ridge well-developed, presence of the anterior oblique dorsal sensory line grooves on the dorsal surface, posterior median process strongly developed, and well-pronounced fossae, grooves and thickenings in internal view. Both anterior median dorsal plates are thus interpreted as immature plates. The lateral spines of the lateral marginal plate 2 from Strud are numerous and sharp, and characterize immature material accordingly to a study on the ontogeny of the antiarch Asterolepis [21,22]. In addition, the nodose ornamentation of the ventral central plate 1 is also characteristic of immature material.

Phyllolepidid placoderms

A recent morphometric analysis of centronuchal and anterior ventrolateral plates of Phyllolepis from different localities of Belgium and Pennsylvania demonstrated the presence of a single species at these Euramerican sites: P. undulata [13]. The cluster of plots of anterior ventrolateral plates of Phyllolepis undulata from Belgium (Fig 1A) along the lower part of the regression line indicates that a greater proportion of smaller individuals, interpreted as immature individuals, are present at Strud compared to larger individuals interpreted as adults. Addition of the specimens from Pennsylvania (Fig 1B), which show a uniform distribution, confirms the greater proportion of smaller individuals in Belgium and thus the greater proportion of immature individuals. It is assumed that small specimens (under a width of 26.5 mm) represent immature specimens, and large specimens (over a width of 26.5 mm) are considered to be adult.

Groenlandaspidid placoderms

Specimens of Turrisaspis elektor from Red Hill, Pennsylvania, USA, have provided new information on the growth of the median dorsal plate of this taxon [25]. The lengths and widths of 29 median dorsal plates from this locality were plotted to clarify whether the variation in size and shape were due to interspecific, intraspecific and/or ontogenetic changes [25]. The continuous distribution argued for interpretation of the Red Hill sample as a single species with different ontogenetic stages [25]. In order to determine the ontogenetic nature of Turrisaspis strudensis material, its median dorsal plate measurements were plotted with those of the species from Pennsylvania (Fig 1D). The median dorsal plates from Strud plot along the lower part of the growth line, with the T. elektor specimens interpreted as being from immature individuals (specimens under a width of 20 mm are considered as immature). However, it does not necessarily mean that specimens from Strud are immature specimens as adult specimens of T. strudensis could be much smaller than the adults of T. elektor; this is the case for Incisoscutum ritchiei and I. sarahae [32].

Ontogenetic features for groenlandaspidid placoderms have never been the scope of a dedicated study, thus it is rather difficult to assign an ontogenetic stage to the few scattered remains from Strud. However, it was noticed for Africanaspis doryssa [33], that immature median dorsal plates were narrow (almost twice as high as long) and this is also observable for Turrisaspis elektor [25]. This character is recognized in the material from Strud, as such it is cautiously attributed to immature material.


Reproductive strategies in placoderms

Placoderms had various reproductive strategies. Some placoderms gave birth to live young [3436] whereas others laid eggs [19,37]. Neither eggs nor egg sacs have been recorded in Strud. The reproductive strategy of Grossilepis can be assumed, because internal fertilization has been suggested as the general mode of reproduction in Antiarchi [38]. No information is available regarding the reproductive strategy of Turrisaspis, nor that of other groenlandaspidid placoderms, despite internal fertilization and viviparity being known within various groups of arthrodires [39]. The reproductive strategy of Phyllolepis is also unknown, but there is evidence of internal fertilization in its close relative Austrophyllolepis youngi [35]. It cannot currently be determined whether Phyllolepis was an egg layer or gave live birth to live young, despite being a close relative of Cowralepis mclachlani, which seemed to have been an egg layer [37]. Although the present study does not bring information on the reproductive strategies of these vertebrates, it provides a better understanding of the postnatal strategies used by these three placoderm taxa.

A placoderm nursery in Strud

Siliciclastic strata of the Strud quarry represent the filling of a channel in an alluvial plain [24]. The disarticulated nature of all vertebrate remains found at Strud suggests some post mortem transport. However, the excellent preservation of numerous small and fragile pieces, e.g. spinelets of the median dorsal plates of Turrisaspis, parasphenoid, basihyal and ceratohyals of Phyllolepis [13], argues for transport over a very short distance and a lack of reworking. The presence of rare adult placoderm remains and the abundance of large plant remains and large isolated sarcopterygian bones indicate the absence of size sorting. The effective presence, although very rare, of remains of adult placoderms also argues for an absence of taphonomic bias, because if there was sorting then adult and immature specimen remains would not co-occur. It was demonstrated that embryos and juveniles are often absent or underrepresented in a locality given the fragile nature of their dermal plates [40]. This argues for the fact that there were more immature specimens in the Strud ecosystem than estimated on the total number of collected fossil remains, which is in agreement with the nursery hypothesis. On the other hand, the sampling bias was strongly reduced, because Strud has been extensively excavated from 2004 to 2015 with all found placoderm dermal plates collected. Thus, the Late Devonian placoderm assemblage of the Strud locality likely represents a life assemblage. It is characterized by a placoderm community of nearly exclusively immature specimens and is here considered as a placoderm nursery.

Strud is not the first record of a placoderm nursery in the fossil record. The Bothriolepis nurseries noted from the Famennian of Tioga County, Pennsylvania [23] were interpreted as the hatchings from large numbers of eggs that were laid and then fertilized, although recent discoveries argue for internal fertilization in antiarchs [38], which produced eggs already fertilized in the case of the egg layer strategy. Moreover, Strud also represents the first occurrence of a placoderm nursery used at the same time by several placoderm taxa.

The Red Hill locality in Pennsylvania also produced Turrisaspis and Phyllolepis in association [25], but no antiarch remains were recovered. Contrary to observations made in Strud, placoderm material from Red Hill represents a wider range of ontogenetic stages ([13], fig 9; Fig 1B and 1D). The palaeoenvironment of Red Hill is interpreted as a meandering stream system with frequent avulsion events [41]. A complex depositional history of cut and fill may have reworked placoderm remains and mixed up ontogenetic stage distribution within the many facies represented there. Additionally, the steep outcrop at Red Hill does not often allow for excavation of single bedding planes, and thus the collection itself is an average of ontogenetic stages across the large site. For these reasons, no placoderm nursery pattern has ever been recognized in this locality.

The palaeoecology of the Strud nursery suggests a placoderm life history similar to that deduced from other fossil [23,42,43] and modern fishes [15], laying eggs or giving live birth in nearshore or in shallow continental environments. In those Devonian environments, shallow waters offer appropriate seasonal conditions with a minimized flow velocity [44] and could offer protection against large predators because of the numerous large, hard and sometimes spiny vegetal remains. The Strud nursery thus also implies the partitioning of the Strud placoderm habitat (Fig 2). A similar pattern was discussed for a freshwater Triassic selachian fauna [45]. Adult placoderms may have used the nursery of Strud only to lay eggs and/or give live birth and would have generally lived far from the nursery, in deeper waters.

Fig 2. Reconstruction of the immature placoderms and diagrammatic model of the Strud nursery.

Immature placoderms (from top to bottom) Turrisaspis strudensis (left lateral view), Grossilepis rikiki (dorsal view), Phyllolepis undulata (dorsal view). Diagrammatic model of the Strud nursery displaying the habitat partitioning: on the left, shallow waters of the nursery with immature placoderms inside and Rhacophyton plant on the bank; on the right, deeper area with the placoderm adults. Scale bars equal 2 cm. Animal and environmental reconstructions by J. Jacquot Haméon (MNHN, Paris).

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Anterior ventro-lateral plate length and width measurements of Phyllolepis undulata from Strud (Belgium) and Red Hill (USA).


S2 Table. Median dorsal plate height and length measurements of Turrisaspis elektor from Red Hill (USA) and Turrisaspis strudensis from Strud (Belgium).



We thank J. Downs (ANSP, Philadelphia) for discussions on placoderm ontogenies and nurseries. A. Folie and A. Dreze (IRSNB, Brussels, Belgium) granted access to the collection of the IRSNB and provided technical support. E. Poty (ULg) granted access to the collection of the ULg and M.-C. Van Dyck (UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) to the collection of the University of Louvain-la-Neuve. We thank the Gesves local council staff for providing technical support and excavation permission in Strud. We are indebted to Strud fieldworkers, who succeeded each other since 2004. The authors thank the editor and the reviewers for their fruitful remarks. The photographs were made by W. Miseur (IRSNB) and Philippe Loubry (CNRS/MNHN/UPMC-Paris 6, Paris, France). We are indebted to J. Jacquot-Haméon (MNHN, Paris) who produced Fig 2.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: SO.
  2. Formal analysis: SO VD.
  3. Funding acquisition: SO GC EBD VD.
  4. Methodology: SO.
  5. Writing – original draft: SO GC EBD VD.
  6. Writing – review & editing: SO GC EBD VD.


  1. 1. Clément G, Ahlberg PE, Blieck A, Blom H, Clack JA, Poty E, et al. Palaeogeography: Devonian tetrapod from western Europe. Nature. 2004;427(6973): 412–413. pmid:14749820
  2. 2. Prestianni C, Streel M, Thorez J, Gerrienne P. Strud: old quarry, new discoveries. Preliminary report. In: Steemans P, Javaux E, editors. Recent Advances in Palynology. Carnets Géologie/Notebooks on Geology, Brest, Memoir 2007/01. 2007;1: 43–47
  3. 3. Garrouste R, Clément G, Nel P, Engel MS, Grandcolas P, D’Haese C, et al. A complete insect from the Late Devonian period. Nature. 2012;488(7409): 82–85. pmid:22859205
  4. 4. Hörnschemeyer T, Haug JT, Bethoux O, Beutel RG, Charbonnier S, Hegna TA, et al. Is Strudiella a Devonian insect? Nature. 2013;494(7437): E3–E4. pmid:23426326
  5. 5. Garrouste R, Clément G, Nel P, Engel MS, Grandcolas P, D’Haese C, et al. Garrouste et al. reply. Nature. 2013;494(7437): E4–E5.
  6. 6. Gueriau P, Charbonnier S, Clément G. First decapod crustaceans in a Late Devonian continental ecosystem. Palaeontology. 2014;57(6): 1203–1213.
  7. 7. Gueriau P, Charbonnier S, Clément G. Angustidontid crustaceans from the Late Devonian of Strud (Namur Province, Belgium): insights into the origin of Decapoda. Neues Jahrb Für Geol Paläontol-Abh. 2014;273(3): 327–337.
  8. 8. Lagebro L, Gueriau P, Hegna TA, Rabet N, Butler AD, Budd GE. The oldest notostracan (Upper Devonian Strud locality, Belgium). Palaeontology. 2015;58(3): 497–509.
  9. 9. Gueriau P, Rabet N, Clément G, Lagebro L, Vannier J, Briggs DEG, et al. A 365-million-year-old freshwater community reveals morphological and ecological stasis in branchiopod crustaceans. Curr Biol. 2016;26(3): 383–390. pmid:26776738
  10. 10. Lohest M. Recherches sur les poissons des terrains paléozoïques de Belgique. Poissons des Psammites du Condroz, Famennien supérieur. Ann Société Géologique Belg Mém. 1888;15: 112–203
  11. 11. Leriche M. Les poissons famenniens de la Belgique. Les faciès du Famennien dans la région gallo-belge. Les relations entre les formations marines et les formations continentales du Dévonien supérieur sur la bordure méridionale du Continent Nord-Atlantique. Mém Académie R Belg Cl Sci. 1931;10(5): 1–72
  12. 12. Clément G, Boisvert CA. Lohest’s true and false “Devonian amphibians”: evidence for the rhynchodipterid lungfish Soederberghia in the Famennian of Belgium. J Vertebr Paleontol. 2006;26(2): 276–283.
  13. 13. Olive S, Clément G, Daeschler EB, Dupret V. Characterization of the placoderm (Gnathostomata) assemblage from the tetrapod-bearing locality of Strud (Belgium, upper Famennian). Palaeontology. 2015;58(6): 981–1002.
  14. 14. Olive S. Devonian antiarch placoderms from Belgium revisited. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 2015;60(3): 711–731.
  15. 15. Heupel MR, Carlson JK, Simpfendorfer CA. Shark nursery areas: concepts, definition, characterization and assumptions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2007;337: 287–297.
  16. 16. Sallan LC, Coates MI. The long-rostrumed elasmobranch Bandringa Zangerl, 1969, and taphonomy within a Carboniferous shark nursery. J Vertebr Paleontol. 2014;34(1): 22–33.
  17. 17. Gess RW, Coates MI. Fossil juvenile coelacanths from the Devonian of South Africa shed light on the order of character acquisition in actinistians. Zool J Linn Soc. 2015;175(2): 360–383.
  18. 18. Carpenter DK, Falcon-Lang HJ, Benton MJ, Henderson E. Carboniferous (Tournaisian) fish assemblages from the Isle of Bute, Scotland: systematics and palaeoecology. Palaeontology. 2014;57(6): 1215–1240.
  19. 19. Carr RK. Placoderm reproductive strategies. J Vertebr Paleontol Abstr Programme A. 2010;70
  20. 20. Cloutier R, Béchard I, Charest F, Matton O. La contribution des poissons fossiles de Miguasha à la biologie évolutive du développement. Nat Can. 2009;133: 84–95
  21. 21. Upeniece I. Palaeoecology and juvenile individuals of the Devonian placoderm and acanthodian fishes from Lode site, Latvia. Doc. Thesis. University of Latvia. 2011. Available:
  22. 22. Upeniece I, Upenieks J. Young Upper Devonian antiarch (Asterolepis) individuals from the Lode quarry, Latvia. In: Mark-Kurik E, editor. Fossil Fishes as Living Animals. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of Estonia; 1992. pp. 167–176
  23. 23. Downs JP, Criswell KE, Daeschler EB. Mass mortality of juvenile antiarchs (Bothriolepis sp.) from the Catskill Formation (Upper Devonian, Famennian Stage), Tioga County, Pennsylvania. Proc Acad Nat Sci Phila. 2011;161(1): 191–203.
  24. 24. Denayer J, Prestianni C, Gueriau P, Olive S, Clément G. Stratigraphy and depositional environments of the Late Famennian (Late Devonian) of Southern Belgium and characterization of the Strud locality. Geol Mag. 2016;153(1): 112–127.
  25. 25. Daeschler EB, Frumes AC, Mullison CF. Groenlandaspidid placoderm fishes from the Late Devonian of North America. Rec Aust Mus. 2003;55(1): 45–60.
  26. 26. Balon EK. Saltatory processes and altrical to precocial forms in the ontogeny of fishes. Am Zool. 1981;21: 573–596.
  27. 27. Urho L. Characters of larvae-what are they? Folia Zool. 2002;51: 161–186
  28. 28. Trinajstic K, Hazelton M. Ontogeny, phenotypic variation and phylogenetic implications of arthrodires from the Gogo Formation, Western Australia. J Vertebr Paleontol. 2007;27: 571–583.
  29. 29. Zhu M. The phylogeny of the Antiarcha (Placodermi, Pisces), with the description of early Devonian antiarchs from Qujing, Yunnan, China. Bull Muséum Natl Hist Nat Paris 4ème Sér. 1996;18: 233–347
  30. 30. Stensiö EA. On the Placodermi of the Upper Devonian of East Greenland. II Antiarchi: subfamily Bothriolepinae—with an attempt at a revision of the previously described species of that subfamily. Palaeozoologica Groenlandica. 1948;2: 1–622
  31. 31. Werdelin L, Long JA. Allometry in the placoderm Bothriolepis canadensis and its significance to antiarch evolution. Lethaia. 1986;19(2): 161–169.
  32. 32. Trinajstic K, Dennis-Bryan K. Phenotypic plasticity, polymorphism and phylogeny within placoderms. Acta Zool-Stockholm. 2009;90: 83–102.
  33. 33. Long JA, Anderson ME, Gess R, Hiller N. New placoderm fishes from the Late Devonian of South Africa. J Vertebr Paleontol. 1997;17: 253–268.
  34. 34. Long JA, Trinajstic K, Young GC, Senden T. Live birth in the Devonian period. Nature. 2008;453(7195): 650–652. pmid:18509443
  35. 35. Long JA, Trinajstic K, Johanson Z. Devonian arthrodire embryos and the origin of internal fertilization in vertebrates. Nature. 2009;457(7233): 1124–1127. pmid:19242474
  36. 36. Ahlberg P, Trinajstic K, Johanson Z, Long J. Pelvic claspers confirm chondrichthyan-like internal fertilization in arthrodires. Nature. 2009;460(7257): 888–889. pmid:19597477
  37. 37. Ritchie A. Cowralepis, a new genus of phyllolepid fish (Pisces, Placodermi) from the late Middle Devonian of New South Wales, Australia. Proc Linn Soc New South Wales. 2005;126: 215–259
  38. 38. Long JA, Mark-Kurik E, Johanson Z, Lee MS, Young GC, Zhu M, et al. Copulation in antiarch placoderms and the origin of gnathostome internal fertilization. Nature. 2015;517(7533): 196–199. pmid:25327249
  39. 39. Trinajstic K, Boisvert C, Long J, Maksimenko A, Johanson Z. Pelvic and reproductive structures in placoderms (stem gnathostomes). Biol Rev. 2015;90(2): 467–501. pmid:24889865
  40. 40. Johanson Z, Trinajstic K. Fossilized ontogenies: the contribution of placoderm ontogeny to our understanding of the evolution of early gnathostomes. Palaeontology. 2014;57: 505–516.
  41. 41. Daeschler EB, Cressler WL. Late Devonian paleontology and paleoenvironments at Red Hill and other fossil sites in the Catskill Formation of north-central Pennsylvania. Geol Soc Am Field Guide. 2011;20: 1–16.
  42. 42. Cloutier R. The fossil record of fish ontogenies: insights into developmental patterns and processes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21: 400–413 pmid:19914384
  43. 43. Schultze HP. The fossil record of the intertidal zone. In: Intertidal fishes: life in two worlds. Horn MH, Martin KC, Chotowski MA. San Diego: Academic Press; 1999. p. 373–392.
  44. 44. Groot C, Margolis L. Pacific salmon life histories. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press; 1991. 564 p.
  45. 45. Fischer J, Voigt S, Schneider JW, Buchwitz M, Voigt S. A selachian freshwater fauna from the Triassic of Kyrgyzstan and its implication for Mesozoic shark nurseries. J Vertebr Paleontol. 2011;31(5): 937–953.