Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Molecular Characterization of a Lysozyme Gene and Its Altered Expression Profile in Crowded Beet Webworm (Loxostege sticticalis)

  • Hailong Kong,

    Affiliation College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Wenhui East Road, NO. 48, Yangzhou, 225009, China

  • Min Lv,

    Affiliation Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Lixiahe District in Jiangsu Province, Yangzijiang Road, NO. 568, Yangzhou, 225007, China

  • Nian Mao,

    Affiliation College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Wenhui East Road, NO. 48, Yangzhou, 225009, China

  • Cheng Wang,

    Affiliation College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Wenhui East Road, NO. 48, Yangzhou, 225009, China

  • Yunxia Cheng,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road, NO. 2, Beijing, 100193, China

  • Lei Zhang,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road, NO. 2, Beijing, 100193, China

  • Xingfu Jiang ,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road, NO. 2, Beijing, 100193, China

  • Lizhi Luo

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road, NO. 2, Beijing, 100193, China

Molecular Characterization of a Lysozyme Gene and Its Altered Expression Profile in Crowded Beet Webworm (Loxostege sticticalis)

  • Hailong Kong, 
  • Min Lv, 
  • Nian Mao, 
  • Cheng Wang, 
  • Yunxia Cheng, 
  • Lei Zhang, 
  • Xingfu Jiang, 
  • Lizhi Luo


There is growing evidence that insects living in high-density populations exhibit an increase in immune function to counter a higher risk of disease. This phenomenon, known as density-dependent prophylaxis, has been experimentally tested in a number of insect species. Although density-dependent prophylaxis is especially prevalent in insects exhibiting density-dependent phase polyphenism, the molecular mechanism remains unclear. Our previous study demonstrated that the antibacterial activity of lysozyme is important for this process in the beet webworm Loxostege sticticalis. In this study, a lysozyme cDNA from L. sticticalis was cloned and characterized. The full-length cDNA is 1078 bp long and contains an open reading frame of 426 bp that encodes 142 amino acids. The deduced protein possesses structural characteristics of a typical c-type lysozyme and clusters with c-type lysozymes from other Lepidoptera. LsLysozyme was found to be expressed throughout all developmental stages, showing the highest level in pupae. LsLysozyme was also highly expressed in the midgut and fat body. Elevated LsLysozyme expression was observed in L. sticticalis larvae infected by Beauveria bassiana and in larvae reared under crowding conditions. In addition, the expression level of LsLysozyme in infected larvae reared at a density of 10 larvae per jar was significantly higher compared to those reared at a density of l or 30 larvae per jar. These results suggest that larval crowding affects the gene expression profile of this lysozyme. This study provides additional insight into the expression of an immune-associated lysozyme gene and helps us to better understand the immune response of L. sticticalis under crowding conditions.


The immune system is very important to host defense against pathogens and parasites. Insects lack acquired immunity and thus are dependent innate immunity, which involves cellular and humoral immune responses [1]. The humoral immune response is based on antimicrobial peptides such as attacin, lysozyme, defensin and aecropin [2]. Lysozyme was the first antimicrobial peptide to be purified and was reported to play a critical role in the host immune response [3]. Lysozyme enzymes are a type of hydrolase that digests bacterial cell walls by cleaving the beta-1,4-glycosidic linkage between N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid and hydrolyzes the β-1,4-linkage of chitooligosaccharides in fungal cell walls [4, 5]. There are six major lysozymes types reported to date, including chicken (c-type), goose (g-type), inverterbrate-type (i-type), plant, phage and bacterial [6].

Lysozyme plays a major role in insect defense against microorganisms, and several of these genes have been identified by global gene expression analysis after microbial challenge. For example, in the coleopteran Tribolium castaneum, mRNA levels for two lysozyme genes increased markedly following microbial challenge [7]. In the lepidopteran Bombyx mori, lysozyme genes are constitutively expressed but are up-regulated upon bacterial infection [8]. The antimicrobial activity of a recombinant lysozyme protein from the cricket Gryllotalpa orientalis, order Orthoptera, has been demonstrated by radial diffusion methods and minimal inhibitory concentrations [9]. In addition, immunological challenge resulted in increased levels of lysozyme activity in the fat body, hemocyte and hemolymph plasma of naïve and immunologically challenged desert locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) [10].

The beet webworm Loxostege sticticalis L. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) is a primary insect pest of agriculture and livestock forage in northern China [11, 12], as well as in northern Asia, North America and Eastern Europe [13, 14], and outbreaks have seriously threatened agriculture and stockbreeding in the former [15, 16, 17, 18]. A characteristic of this species is periodic heavy outbreaks alternating with more or less long periods of high population density [19]. Insects living in high-density populations have evolved adaptive prophylaxis mechanisms to cope with pathogens and parasites [20], and due to facultative physiological resource allocation to defense mechanisms, species living under crowded conditions are predicted to be more resistant to natural enemies than those under low-density conditions. As this phenomenon, termed “density-dependent prophylaxis” [20], strongly affects host-parasite dynamics [21], understanding this response mechanism of a species is essential for characterizing its population dynamics and the potential for its control using natural enemies.

Our previous research suggested that L. sticticalis larvae exhibit density-dependent prophylaxis and that larval density could significantly enhance the antimicrobial activity of a larval lysozyme [22]. Previous research has demonstrated that the activity of lysozyme is significantly elevated in crowded populations [23]. Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether larval density can influence lysozyme at the transcriptional level and whether the lysozyme gene has a role in insect density-dependent prophylaxis. In this study, a full-length lysozyme cDNA from L. sticticalis was cloned and characterized, and mRNA expression was examined during the entire life cycle and in fifth-instar larvae reared under different population densities. The results advance our knowledge of immune-associated lysozyme gene expression and the density-dependent prophylactic response in L. sticticalis.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Loxostege sticticalis individuals were initially collected in 2007 Siziwangqi, Inner Mongolia, China; a colony has been maintained in a room at the Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. No specific permit was required for the described field collection, and the location is not privately owned or protected in any way. Species of the family Crambidae are common agricultural pests and are not included in the ‘list of Protected Animals in China’.

Experimental insect colony

A laboratory colony of L. sticticalis was initiated using diapausing larvae collected in 2007 in Siziwangqi, Inner Mongolia, China. The larvae were reared on Chenopodium album L. leaves at 22±1°C and 70% relative humidity, with an L: D photoperiod of 16: 8 h. When the larvae stopped feeding, sterilized soil containing 10% water was added to the cages to a depth of 10 cm to provide a substrate for cocoon formation, pupation, and adult emergence. Adult L. sticticalis individuals were placed in a 2-l-capacity plastic cage equipped with a cotton pad soaked in 10% glucose solution (w/v) and allowed to oviposit on the nylon gauze lining the page.

Molecular cloning of lysozyme cDNA

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, total RNA was extracted from fifth-instar larvae of L. sticticalis using a Trizol Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and first-strand cDNA was synthesized using an oligo(dT)15 primer (Tiangen Biotech, China). Two primers (Lys-F1: 5’-TATCTGGAACAGGCCGTAGTC-3’; Lys-R1: 5’- TGCGCTAAGAAGATCTTCAAGCGCCAC-3’) were designed based on a highly conserved amino acid sequence (DYGL/IFQI) and (CAKKIF/YKRH) found in several insect c-type lysozymes. Using these primers and a 3’ anchor R (5’-GA), PCR amplification was carried out as follows: one cycle at 95°C for 3 min, 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C 45 s, and an additional extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified using a gel purification kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Shenergy Biocolor, Shanghai, China), followed by ligation into the pMD-18T vector (Takara, Dalian, China) and transformation into competent DH5α cells. Positive recombinants were identified by blue-white color selection on ampicillin-containing LB plates, and PCR screening was carried out using the two primers described above. Positive clones were sequenced by Sangon Company (Shanghai, China).

To obtain the full-length cDNA sequence, 3’ and 5’ RACE reactions were performed using the primers including Lys-F1 and poly-T primer: 5’-GCGAATTCGTCGACAAGC(T)17−3’ and Lys-R1 and T-amp primer: 5’-GCGAATTCGTCGACAAGC-3’. Both PCR cycling parameters were 95°C for 3 min, 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C 45 s, and an additional extension at 72°C for 20 min.

Bioinformatic analysis

Sequence comparisons were carried out using the BLAST software ( The nucleotide sequence was translated into the amino acid sequence using the ExPaSy software ( SignalP was employed for signal peptide prediction ( To investigate the phylogenetic relationship between LsLysozyme and lysozymes from other insect species, the amino acid sequences were aligned using the cluster algorithm ClustalW ver. 1.8, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on alignment by MEGA 4 [24].

Development stage and tissue expression profiles

Total RNA was extracted from different development stages and different tissues of L. sticticalis using a Trizol Kit, as described above. The fat body, midgut and epithelial layer from five one-day-old fifth-instar larvae were dissected in DEPC-treated water. The hemolymph was collected from first abdominal proleg using a syringe. The hemolymph from twenty larvae was pooled together as one sample and immediately centrifuged at 800 × g and 4°C for 10 min for hemocyte collection. The epithelial layer, fat body and midgut were isolated, washed, and homogenized in an ice-bath using a Dounce homogenizer. After centrifugation (10, 000 ×, 10 min, 4°C), the supernatant was kept at -70°C for later use. The purified RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to remove the genomic DNA. The concentration of the purified RNA was measured using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using an Oligo(dT)15 primer (Tiangen Biotech, China) and 1μg of total RNA as the template in a final volume of 10 μl. cDNA prepared from total RNA was used as the template for real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) with an ABI PRISM 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems Foster, CA, USA). LsLysozyme primers (F: 5’-TTTGGTTGGAGAGTGATGCT-3’; R: 5’-CGTGGTTCTACCGCTTTCAT-3’) were designed; 18 S RNA gene was selected as the reference gene (F: 5’- GCCGTTCTTAGTTGGTGGAG-3’; R:5’-AGTGAGTTGCGTGACAGAGC-3’).

Three biological replications were used for qPCR analysis using a 20 μl total reaction system containing 0.1 μg total RNA, 0.8 μl primer mix containing 10 μM of each forward and reverse gene-specific primers, 0.4 μl ROX Reference Dye-II (50×), 2 μl cDNA, 10 μl SYBR Premix EX TaqTM II and 6 μl H2O, following the One Step SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II Kit instructions (Takara Biotechnology Dalian Co., Ltd). The thermal cycling conditions were 15 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s and elongation at 72°C for 35 s. Relative quantifications were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method [25].

Expression profiles at different densities and after entomopathogenic fungus challenge

Expression of the lysozyme gene was evaluated in L. sticticalis larvae reared at different densities. After hatching, larvae were reared at three density treatments of 1, 10 and 30 larvae per 650-ml-capacity jar (diameter 10 cm). The number of larvae for the two higher density treatments was maintained at a constant level throughout the feeding period. Excess food was provided by adding fresh leaves every morning. All insects were maintained under the same condition as described above the colony population. The hemolymph was collected as described above when most of the larvae at a given density had developed to the second day of the fifth instar, and the samples collected from groups of 20 larvae per density were pooled as one replicate. Three replicates were employed for each density. RNA isolation, first-strand cDNA synthesis, and qPCR were performed as described above.

The expression profiles of the lysozyme gene were also evaluated in L. sticticalis larvae reared at different densities and exposed to the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana obtained from Shenwei Biological Company (Yancheng, Jiangsu, China). Fungal spores were suspended in sterile 0.1% Tween 80 solution (polysorbate), and the final concentration was adjusted to 1.6 × 107 conidia ml-1 for infection. When most of the larvae at a given density had developed to the fifth instar, a group of ten larvae per treatment was exposed to the fungus by dipping them together in the spore solution for 5 s followed by air-drying at room temperature. A corresponding control group was dipped in the same way in sterile 0.1% Tween 80 solution only. After dipping, all exposed and control larvae were individually maintained in small glass jars under the same environmental conditions as described above. After 24 h, the larvae were used for hemolymph collection. Three replicates were employed for each density. The hemolymph treatment and qPCR procedure were the same as described above.

Statistical analysis

Data for developmental stage and tissue and density-dependent lysozyme gene expression were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data for lysozyme gene expression before and after treatment with B. bassiana were subjected to Student’s t test. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 10.0.


Molecular cloning of LsLysozyme

The c-type LsLysozyme cDNA amplified from L. sticticalis is 1096 bp long and contains an open reading frame (ORF) of 426 bp that encodes a protein of 141 amino acids. The ATG start codon is found at base pairs 76–78 and the in-frame TGA stop codon at 499–501, followed by the polyadenylation signal sequence “AATTAAAA” and poly(A) at the 3’-untranslated region (Fig 1). The ORF was composed of 21 residues at the N terminal side predicted as a signal peptide and 120 residues as a mature peptide. The molecular mass of mature LsLysozyme protein (amino acids 22 through 141) is predicted to be 13.6 kDa, with a calculated isoelectric point of 9.19. A search of the Pfam database revealed that the L. sticticalis lysozyme homolog contains a typical alpha-lactalbumin/lysozyme C domain from position 22 to 141 (

Fig 1. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of L. sticticalis lysozyme.

The nucleotides are numbered on the left from the first base of the cDNA. The deduced amino acid sequence is shown below the nucleotide sequence in single-letter code. The codons for initiation, termination, polyadenylation and the poly (A) tail are indicated in bold-italic.

Comparison of the LsLysozyme amino acid sequence with those of lysozymes from other insects

Using a BLAST search, LsLysozyme was shown to have high identity with other lepidopterans (Fig 2). For example, the protein exhibits the following similarity: 77% with Manduca sexta lysozyme; 76% with Agrius convolvuli lysozyme, Ostrinia furnacalis lysozyme 6 and Ostrinia nubilalis lysozyme; 74% with Pieris rapae lysozyme II; 70% with Pseudoplusia includens lysozyme; and 71% with Spodoptera exigua lysozyme.

Fig 2. Multiple sequence alignment of beet webworm lysozyme C with other Lepidoptera insect lysozymes.

The star symbols (☆) mark conserved cysteine residues; The 11 residues that compose the lysozyme catalytic cleft on the conserved LYZ1 domain are indicated with triangle (△). The two major residues, Glu53 and Asp71, responsible for the puptative lysozyme catalytic site on conserved LYZ1 domain are marked with numbersign (#). Asterisks (*) indicate Ca2+ binding site on conserved domain LYZ1.

Multiple sequence alignment of mature LsLysozyme amino acid sequence of beet webworm with twelve mature lysozymes from other Lepidoptera insects was presented in Fig 2. According to the results, LsLysozyme has 8 conserved cysteine residues (Fig 2 ☆) (Cys6, Cys26, Cys62, Cys72, Cys76, Cys90, Cys110, Cys120). And it posses all features of a c-type lysozyme, for example, the two key residues, Glu53 and Asp71 of the catalytic site (Fig 2 #), other 11 residues Asn52, Glu53, Gly55, Gly62, Gln76, Asn78, Tyr81, Ile116, Arg118, Ala123, and Trp124 which formed the lysozyme catalytic cleft (Fig 2, △), and the resuides Thr102, Lys107, and Ala108 which were Ca2+ binding site (Fig 2, *).

A phylogeny tree was constructed in MEGA 4.0 using the amino acid sequences of c-type lysozymes from different Insecta orders and Gallus gallus was used as out-group (Fig 3). As shown, the insect c-type lysozymes are distributed in three main clades corresponding to Lepidoptera and Orthoptera lysozymes on one branch, and other insects (Hemiptera, Coleoptera and Hymenoptera) on the other branch. In addition, a group of lysozymes of cyclorrhaphan Diptera is also present. The LsLysozyme belong to the lysozyme of in the Lepidoptera and Orthoptera branch.

Fig 3. Phylogenetic tree of amino acid sequences of c-type lysozymes from different Insecta orders (Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Orthoptera and Diptera) was constructed by MEGA 4.0.

Gallus gallus lysozyme was used as the out-group. Bootstrap values are indicated in maximum evolution and minimum likelihood for each root, respectively. L. sticticalis lysozyme is written italic letters.

Development and tissue expression analysis

The results of qPCR assay showed that LsLysozyme was expressed during all L. sticticalis developmental stages, with lower expression during the embryonic stage. LsLysozyme became up-regulated (P < 0.01) at the first instar, and this high level was maintained through the fifth instar before declining in the prepupal stage and then increasing again in the pupal stage (Fig 4A).

Fig 4. Expression patterns of LsLysozyme during life stages and in different tissues.

The expression profiles of LsLysozyme during developmental stages are depicted in (A). L1-L5, 1st to 5th-instar larvae. The tissue expression distribution of LsLysozyme is shown in (B). Data are shown as the mean ± SE, n = 3. Different letters indicate significant difference at P < 0.01.

The expression level of LsLysozyme was highest in the fat body (P < 0.01), at approximately 6.82-, 1.08-, and 9.22-fold higher than that in the cuticle, midgut and hemolymph, respectively (Fig 4B).

Expression analysis of LsLysozyme from larvae reared under different densities before and after infection with the entomopathogenic fungus B. bassiana

The expression level of LsLysozyme differed significantly among the three densities and was highest in larvae reared at a density of 30 larvae per jar (Fig 5A). Conversely, there was no significant difference in lysozyme expression between individually reared larvae and those reared at a density of 10 larvae per jar. When the larvae were infected by B. bassiana, the expression pattern of LsLysozyme among the three densities changed (Fig 5B). Infected larvae reared at the density of 10 larvae per jar displayed the highest expression level. The expression level of infected larvae reared at the density of 10 larvae per jar was significantly higher than that of larvae reared at a density of l or 30 larvae per jar, though there was no significant difference between the latter two treatments. The expression level of LsLysozyme in larvae increased significantly at 24 h after B. bassiana infection (Fig 5C).

Fig 5. The relative gene expression of LsLysozyme among larvae reared at densities of 1, 10 and 30 larvae per jar and before and after treatment with B. bassiana are shown in A and B, respectively.

The relative gene expression of LsLysozyme in fifth-instar larvae infected with B. bassiana is shown in C. Data are presented as the mean±SE, n = 3. Different characters denote significant difference at P < 0.01.


A c-type lysozyme cDNA was amplified from an important agricultural pest, the beet webworm L. sticticalis. The mature LsLysozyme contains an ORF of 426 bp that encodes a 121-amino acid protein (from amino acids 22 to 141). The alignment multiple sequences between the L. sticticalis and other Lepidoptera mature c-type lysozyme amino acid shows that LsLysozyme is highly conserved in these Lepidoptera c-type lysozymes including the 8 cysteine residues. The high conservation cysteine residues indicate their importance in the formation of disulfide bridges and three dimensional structure of the molecule. There are three features in a typical c-type lysozyme. For example, Glu53 and Asp71 of the catalytic site, 11 residues Asn52, Glu53, Gly55, Gly62, Gln76, Asn78, Tyr81, Ile116, Arg118, Ala123, and Trp124 which formed the catalytic cleft, and the resuides Thr102, Lys107, and Ala108 which were the Ca2+ binding site (Fig 2). Especially, Glu53 and Asp71 of the catalytic site were fundamental for the biological activity of the lysozymes [26]. One major difference in the active site residues in terms of hydrophobicity between LsLysozyme and the other two Orthoptera insects lysozymes occurs at Ala100 (hydropathy index: 1.8) of LsLysozyme, which is Gly (hydropathy index: -0.4) in two Orthoptera insects lysozymes.

The active site of HEWL included 6 subsites from A to F which are able to bind 6 sugar residues [27, 28]. These subsites are present in the LsLysozyme as Asn31, Gly34, Tyr60, Trp61, Arg97, and Trp103(Fig 2) and are forecasted to interact with sugar rings placed in the subsites E, F, B, C, A and D, respectively. The substitution of the conserved residues with others was supposed to modulate the lysozyme activity. For example, when Asn37 and Trp62 of HEWL were replaced by Gly33 and Tyr59 of S. gregaria, respectively, exhibited about 2–3 fold higher bacteriolytic activity than HEWL [29]. As a matter of fact, such substitution also occurred naturally in LsLysozyme, since the sequence of LsLysozyme also contains a Gly in positon 34 and a Tyr in position 60, an enhanced bacteriolytic activity may be observed in L. sticticalis than HEWL.

One 7-peptide motif (GI/LF/YQIND/N) and two 3-peptide motifs (N/DGS, Y/FWC) are conserved among C-type lysozymes [5], and they are also found in the lysozyme from L. sticticalis. Together, these sequence motifs as well as the alignment and phylogenetic results confirm that L. sticticalis lysozyme belongs to the C-type lysozyme family of proteins. C-type lysozymes are divided into two major types, non-calcium binding and calcium binding, and L. sticticalis lysozyme C appears to belong the latter.

Lysozyme was found to be constitutively expressed during the entire life cycle of L. sticticalis, and the expression level increased constantly during the larval stage, which was accord with the expression pattern in Anopheles dirus [27] [30]. A similar expression profile of lysozyme was also reported for the housefly Musca domestica [5]. Lysozyme expression in L. sticticalis was detected at lower levels in prepupae, medium levels in larvae and higher levels in adults, peaking in pupae. The highest expression level during the pupal stage was also found in Helicoverpa armigera [28] [31]. Such significant changes in lysozyme expression may be partially explained by the complete reorganization of body tissues during the transition from larva to adult. However, the needs to be elucidated by further study.

L. sticticalis lysozyme is expressed in all tissues, with high mRNA levels in the fat bodies and midgut and low mRNA levels in the epidermis and hemolymph. This expression pattern is similar to Ostrinia nubilalis lysozymes, which are also expressed in the epidermis, fat body, midgut and hemolymph [32]. Except for its role in antimicrobial defense, lysozyme has been reported to have a digestion role in some Diptera and Hemiptera [32, 33]. The phylogenetic analysis based on the deduced amino acid sequences showed that lysozyme from L. sticticalis is grouped with those molecules from Lepidoptera, and far from that of the cyclorrhaphan Diptera. Both maximum evolution and minimum likelihood analysis supported the above results. Lysozymes from Lepidoptera are immune-related, however, those from cyclorrhaphan Diptera are of digestive function [29, 34]. Therefore, LsLysozyme gene might play an important role in immunity rather than in digestive functions.

As expression of the L. sticticalis lysozyme gene was up-regulated when larvae were challenged with B. bassiana (Fig 5C), this enzyme may play an important role in L. sticticalis larval defense against this fungus. Prior to infection with B. bassiana, the expression level of the gene in larvae reared at the density of 30 larvae per jar was significantly higher than that in larvae reared at densities of 1 and 10 larvae per jar. The results of our previous study on the antimicrobial activity of lysozyme in L. sticticalis larvae also showed significantly higher activity in larvae at a density of 30 larvae per jar compared to larvae reared individually [22]. This expression pattern may be caused by larval crowding. Prophylaxis in Anticarsia gemmatalis larvae is reported to be triggered by the presence of conspecifics [35], and when the larval density reached 30 larvae per jar, the crowded conditions up-regulated lysozyme expression, increasing prophylaxis.

After larvae were infected by B. bassiana, the expression level of LsLysozyme of larvae reared at a density of 10 larvae per jar was significantly higher than that of larvae reared at densities of 1 and 30 larvae per jar. However, this pattern is different from the expression pattern of non-immunized larvae before infection. The difference may be related to variation in LsLysozyme gene expression in infected versus non-infected larvae, as expression was significantly increased when the larvae were infected with B. bassiana (Fig 5C). Transcripts of lysozyme c-1 and c-2 genes were also significantly increased after immune challenge with Escherichia coli or Micrococcus luteus [36]. Therefore, infection with B. bassiana may have influenced the expression pattern of the lysozyme gene in larvae reared at the three different densities.

We identified significant transcriptional up-regulation of lysozyme expression in the larval hemolymph in response to larval rearing density. And increased phenoloxidase activity, total haemocyte count and lysozyme activity were found in the crowded L. sticticalis [22]. So, defense strategy for enhancing specific effectors (such as lysozyme) by activate the entire immune pathways might be taken in the Lepidoptera L. sticticalis. However, this defense strategy may be different from the Orthoptera Locusta migratoria. Wang et al. (2013) [37] found that gregarious (crowded) migratory locusts exhibited high level of circulation PRPs but not AMPs, and there were no significantly differences in the PO activity, encapsulation response, and total hemocyte count between gregaria and solitaria locusts [23]. These results suggested a selection of other tolerance strategy for inhibiting pathogen spread and for increasing the “distance” between infected and susceptible individuals that together improved the immune defense of gregarious locusts [37].

This is the first report of the isolation and characterization of a c-type lysozyme from L. sticticalis. These results suggest that larval crowding could increase lysozyme gene expression. Therefore, larvae may use crowding as a cue to induce lysozyme expression to protect against possible infection. To better understand the immune function of LsLysozyme among larvae reared at different densities, the activity and expression of the protein in response to infection should be further analyzed. Additional research involving functional characterization of population density-regulated genes would reveal the precise gene pathways and regulatory mechanism of density stress at the molecular level.


This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31201503, 31373947, 31301656), State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests (SKLOF201512), the National Department of Public Benefit Research Foundation (201403031), International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (2014DFR31250), and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (6142017).

Author Contributions

  1. Data curation: HK CW NM XJ.
  2. Formal analysis: CW NM.
  3. Funding acquisition: HK XJ.
  4. Investigation: CW NM LZ YC.
  5. Methodology: HK CW NM ML.
  6. Project administration: HK XJ LZ YC.
  7. Resources: HK XJ LL.
  8. Software: HK.
  9. Validation: XJ.
  10. Writing – original draft: HK XJ.
  11. Writing – review & editing: HK.


  1. 1. Imler JK, Bulet P. Antimicrobial peptides and activation of immune response in Drosophila: structures, activities and gene regulation. Chemical Immunology and Allergy. 2005; 86: 1–21.
  2. 2. De Gregorio E, Spellman PT, Rubin GM, Lemaitre B. Genome-wide analysis of the Drosophila immune response by using oligonucleotide microarrays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United State of America. 2001; 98: 12590–12595.
  3. 3. Powning RF, Davidson WJ. Studies on insect bacteriolytic enzymes-II. Some physical and enzymatic properties of lysozyme from haemolymph of Galleria mellonella. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry. 1976; 55: 221–228.
  4. 4. Jolles P, Jolles J. What’s new in lysozyme research? Always a model system, today as yesterday. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 1984; 63: 165–189. pmid:6387440
  5. 5. Ren Q, Zhao XF, Wang JX. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of a chicken-type lysozyme gene from housefly (Musca domestica). Journal Genetics and Genomics. 2009; 36: 7–16.
  6. 6. Prager EM, Jolles P. Animal Lysozymes C and G All Overview. Experientia Supplementum. 1996; 75: 9–31.
  7. 7. Zou Z, Evans JD, Lu Z, Zhao P, Williams M, Sumathipala N, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the Tribolium immune system. Genome Biology. 2007; 8: 177.
  8. 8. Tanaka H, Ishibashi J, FujitaK N Y, Sagisaka A, Tomimoto K, Suzuki N, et al. A genome-wide analysis of genes and gene families involved in innate immunity of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2008; 38: 1087–1110. pmid:18835443
  9. 9. Kwon H, Bang K, Lee M, Cho S. Molecular cloning and characterization of a lysozyme cDNA from the mole cricket Gryllotalpa orientalis (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Molecular Biology Reports. 2014; 41: 5745–5754. pmid:24929538
  10. 10. Mohamed AA, Elmogy M, Dorrah MA, Yousef HA, Bassal TTM. Antibacterial activity of lysozyme in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera: Acrididae). European Journal of Entomology. 2013; 110: 559–565.
  11. 11. Yue ZD, Zhang C, Yuan YJ, Zhong L, Xu SY. Reports on outbreak and control of beet webworm at Jilin province. Jilin Agriculture Science. 1983; 8: 64–67.
  12. 12. Luo LZ, Li GB. The threshold temperature, thermal constant and division of generation regions of meadow moth (Loxostege sticticalis L.) in China. Acta Entomologica Sinica. 1993; 36: 332–339.
  13. 13. Pepper JH. The effect of certain climatic factors on the distribution of the beet webworm (Loxostege sticticalis L.) in North America. Ecology. 1938; 4: 565–571.
  14. 14. Knor IB, Bashev AN, Alekseev AA, Kirov EI. Effect of population density on the dynamics of the meadow moth Loxostege sticticalis L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie. 1993; 72: 268–274.
  15. 15. Qu XF, Shao ZR, Wang JQ. Analysis of periodic outbreak of meadow moth in agricultural and pastoral area of North China. Entomological Knowledge. 1999; 36: 11–14.
  16. 16. Luo LZ. The first generation of meadow moth will be outbreak in China in 2004. Plant Protection. 2004; 30: 86–88.
  17. 17. Luo LZ, Qu XF. Analysis of the occurrence characters of beet webworm, Loxostege sticticalis Linnaeus in 2004 and occurrence tendency of its first generation in 2005. Plant Protection. 2005; 31: 69–71.
  18. 18. Luo LZ, Huang SZ, Jiang XF, Zhang L. Characteristics and causes for the outbreaks of beet webworm, Loxostege sticticalis in northern China during 2008. Plant Protection. 2009; 35: 27–33.
  19. 19. Frolov AN, Malysh YM, Tokarev YS. Biological features and population density forecasts of the beet webworm Pyrausta sticticalis L. (Lepidoptera, Pyraustidae) in the period of low population density of the pest in Krasnodar Territory. Entomological Review. 2008; 88: 666–675.
  20. 20. Wilson K, Reeson AF. Density-dependent prophylaxis: Evidence from Lepidoptera-baculovirus interactions? Ecological Entomology. 1998; 23: 100–101.
  21. 21. White KAJ, Wilson K. Modelling density-dependent resistance in insect—pathogen interactions. Theoretical Population Biology. 1999; 56: 163–181. pmid:10544067
  22. 22. Kong HL, Cheng YX, Luo LZ, Sappington TW, Jiang XF, Zhang L. Density-dependent prophylaxis in crowded BeetWebworm, Loxostege sticticalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae to a parasitoid and a fungal pathogen. International Journal of Pest Management. 2013; 59: 174–179.
  23. 23. Wilson K, Thomas MB, Blanford S, Doggett M, Simpson SJ, Moore SL. Coping with crowds: Density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United State of America. 2002; 99: 5471–5475.
  24. 24. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007; 24: 1596–1599. pmid:17488738
  25. 25. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research. 2001; 29: e45. pmid:11328886
  26. 26. Prager EM, Jolles P. Animal lysozymes c and g: an overview. In: Jolles P (Ed.). Lysozymes: Model Enzymes in Biochemistry and Physiology, 1996. vol. 75. Birkhauser, Basel, pp. 9–31.
  27. 27. Kumagai I, Sunada F, Takeda S, Miura K. Redesign of the substrate-binding site f hen egg white lysozyme based on the molecular evolution of C-type lysozymes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1992; 267: 4608–4612. pmid:1537843
  28. 28. Maenaka K, Matsushima M, Song H, Sunada F, Kumagai I. Dissection of protein—carbohydrate interactions in mutant hen egg-white lysozyme complexes and their hydrolytic activity. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1995; 247: 281–293. pmid:7707375
  29. 29. Mohamed AA, Zhang L, Dorrah MA, Elmogy M, Yousef HA, Bassal TT, et al. Molecular characterization of a c-type lysozyme from the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Development and Comparative Immunology. 2016; 61: 60–69.
  30. 30. Lapcharoen P, Komalamisra N, Rongsriyam Y, Wangsuphachart V, Dekumyoy P, Prachumsri J, et al. Investigations on the role of a lysozyme from the malaria vector Anopheles dirus during malaria parasite development. Development and Comparative Immunology, 2012; 36: 104–111.
  31. 31. Zhang Y, Huang JH, Zhou B, Zhang CL, Liu WB, Miao XX, et al. Up-regulation of lysozyme gene expression during metamorphosis and immune challenge of the Cotton Bolloworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 2009; 70: 18–29. pmid:18615707
  32. 32. Khajuria C, Buschman LL, Chen MS, Zurek L, Zhu KY. Characterization of six antibacterial response genes from the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) larval gut and their expression in response to bacterial challenge. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2011; 57: 345–355. pmid:21167833
  33. 33. Regel R, Matioli SR, Terra WR. Molecular adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster lysozymes to a digestive function. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 1998; 28: 309–319. pmid:9692234
  34. 34. Wang WX, Wang YP, Deng XJ, Dang XL, Tian JH, Yi HY, et al. Molecular and functional characterization of a c-type lysozyme from the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis. Journal of Insect Science.2009; 9: 1–13.
  35. 35. Silva FWS, Viol DL, Faria SV, Lima E, Valicente FH, Eliot SL. Two’s crowd: phenotypic adjustments and prophylaxis in Anticarsia gemmatalis larvae are triggered by the presence of conspecifics. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: 1–10.
  36. 36. Li B, Calvo E, Marinotti O, Jame AA, Paskewitz SM. Characterization of the c-type lysozyme gene family in Anopheles gambiae. Gene. 2005; 360: 131–139. pmid:16137842
  37. 37. Wang YD, Yang PC, Cui F, Kang L. Altered immunity in crowded locust reduced fungal (Metarhizium anisopliae) pathogenesis. Plos Pathogens. 2013; 9: e1003102. pmid:23326229