Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: How Reliable Are Current Data for Assessing the Actual Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

  • Anna Maria Romanelli,
  • Mauro Raciti,
  • Maria Angela Protti,
  • Renato Prediletto,
  • Edo Fornai,
  • Annunziata Faustini
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

There is an error in the “length of longitudinal periods” section of Table 1 in the third column. The correct value is “5yrs.” Please see the corrected Table 1 here.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Algorithm for enrollment of COPD cases and contributing to COPD prevalence, according to prevalence periods and length of longitudinal periods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159222.t001

Reference

  1. 1. Romanelli AM, Raciti M, Protti MA, Prediletto R, Fornai E, Faustini A (2016) How Reliable Are Current Data for Assessing the Actual Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? PLoS ONE 11(2): e0149302. pmid:26901166

Citation: Romanelli AM, Raciti M, Protti MA, Prediletto R, Fornai E, Faustini A (2016) Correction: How Reliable Are Current Data for Assessing the Actual Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? PLoS ONE 11(7): e0159222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159222

Published: July 8, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Romanelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.