Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Beyond Oncolytics: E1B55K-Deleted Adenovirus as a Vaccine Delivery Vector

  • Michael A. Thomas , (MAT); (MRG)

    Current address: Department of Biology, Howard University, Washington, D. C., United States of America

    Affiliation Section on Immune Biology of Retroviral Infection, Vaccine Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America

  • Tinashe Nyanhete,

    Current address: Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America

    Affiliation Section on Immune Biology of Retroviral Infection, Vaccine Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America

  • Iskra Tuero,

    Affiliation Section on Immune Biology of Retroviral Infection, Vaccine Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America

  • David Venzon,

    Affiliation Biostatistics and Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America

  • Marjorie Robert-Guroff (MAT); (MRG)

    Affiliation Section on Immune Biology of Retroviral Infection, Vaccine Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America

Beyond Oncolytics: E1B55K-Deleted Adenovirus as a Vaccine Delivery Vector

  • Michael A. Thomas, 
  • Tinashe Nyanhete, 
  • Iskra Tuero, 
  • David Venzon, 
  • Marjorie Robert-Guroff


Type 5 human adenoviruses (Ad5) deleted of genes encoding the early region 1B 55-kDa (E1B55K) protein including Onyx-015 (dl1520) and H101 are best known for their oncolytic potential. As a vaccine vector the E1B55K deletion may allow for the insertion of a transgene nearly 1,000 base pairs larger than now possible. This has the potential of extending the application for which the vectors are clinically known. However, the immune priming ability of E1B55K-deleted vectors is unknown, undermining our ability to gauge their usefulness in vaccine applications. For this reason, we created an E1B55K-deleted Ad5 vector expressing full-length single chain HIVBaLgp120 attached to a flexible linker and the first two domains of rhesus CD4 (rhFLSC) in exchange for the E3 region. In cell-based experiments the E1B55K-deleted vector promoted higher levels of innate immune signals including chemokines, cytokines, and the NKG2D ligands MIC A/B compared to an E1B55K wild-type vector expressing the same immunogen. Based on these results we evaluated the immune priming ability of the E1B55K-deleted vector in mice. The E1B55K-deleted vector promoted similar levels of Ad5-, HIVgp120, and rhFLSC-specific cellular and humoral immune responses as the E1B55K wild-type vector. In pre-clinical HIV-vaccine studies the wild-type vector has been employed as part of a very effective prime-boost strategy. This study demonstrates that E1B55K-deleted adenoviruses may serve as effective vaccine delivery vectors.


To facilitate the goal of an effective preventative HIV vaccine, we are developing an approach involving priming with replicating adenovirus (Ad) recombinants and boosting with envelope protein. This approach has elicited potent transgene-specific humoral and cellular immune responses [1] capable of affording protection against HIV, SIV, and simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) challenges in rhesus macaque and chimpanzee models [27]. Based on these results, a prime-boost approach involving replicating Ad sub-type 4 (Ad4ΔE3) is being developed for both HIV and influenza vaccines [810]. Replicating Ad5 with deletions in addition to the E3 region have other clinical uses. In Ad5 where the E1B55K gene is deleted a defect allows the vector to replicate in and selectively kill cancer cells. Thus E1B55K-deleted vectors such as Onyx-015 (dl1520) have made it to phase 3 clinical trials in the US as cancer therapeutics. A similar vector (H101) has been released to treat cancer in China [11, 12]. E1B55K-deleted vectors may be suited for vaccine delivery purposes as well. Such vectors may permit the insertion of larger transgenes and/or immune modulators not currently possible with the E1B55K wild-type vector, however their immune priming ability remains unknown. To address this, we created a replication-competent E1B55K-/E3-deleted Ad5 host-range mutant (Ad5hr)-recombinant encoding full-length single chain HIVBaLgp120 attached to a flexible linker and the first two domains of rhesus CD4 (rhFLSC). This rhFLSC HIV immunogen was previously described [13] and used in the E1B55K wild-type vector for immunization of mice and nonhuman primates [14, 15]. These experiments showed the wild-type vector to be very effective at promoting HIVgp120 and rhFLSC-specific immune responses. Therefore, if an E1B55K-deleted vector were able to promote similar specific immune responses as the wild-type vector, then it might stand as a better vaccine delivery vector.


The E1B55K-deleted vector promotes higher levels of innate immune signals than the E1B55K wild-type

Ad5 E1B55K is reported to control expression of immune response genes [16]. Therefore, a vector bearing an E1B55K deletion may display innate immune signals that differ from an E1B55K wild type vector. In Fig 1, as in most of our results, we anchor our experiments to HeLa cells as most of what is known about Ad is in the context of this cell line. The multiplex ELISA experiments show differences in levels of individual chemokines/cytokines produced by Ad5-infected A549 (Fig 1A), HeLa (Fig 1B), and the HCT116 cells lacking p53 (p53-/-; Fig 1C). Overall, the levels of chemokines/cytokines were consistently higher in all three cell lines infected with the E1B55K-deleted virus compared to those infected with the E1B55K wild-type virus.

Fig 1. E1B55K-deleted Ad5 vector promotes higher levels of chemokines/cytokines than the E1B55K wild-type vector.

Multiplex ELISA assay using (A) A549 (B) HeLa or (C) p53- HCT116 cells following mock- or Ad-infection. An MOI 50 for each virus was used to infect the A549, and 200 for HeLa and p53-HCT116 for 24–48 hours. The ratio of values obtained after subtraction of the background from the virus infections relative to those obtained for the mock-infected cells are shown.

Ad5 infections stimulate surface expression of NKG2D ligands

Ad5 E1A has been reported to enhance the expression of NKG2D ligands in human and mouse cells [17]. Yet an activity of the E319K protein (not in our vectors) is dedicated to preventing its surface expression [18]. This can only imply that the expression of NKG2D ligands occurs as an unintended outcome of the action of E1A. NKG2D is an activating receptor found on the surface of innate system cells including natural killer (NK) cells, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, some CD4+ T cells and γδ T cells [19]. To determine the effects of the E1B55K deletion on NKG2D ligands we infected HeLa cells that are known to express MIC A/B with MAd5rhFLSC or ΔE1B55KrhFLSC. At early times post-infection Ad5 seems to repress surface expression of MIC A/B. By 48 hours post infection (hpi) surface expression levels of MIC A/B increased in a fraction of ΔE1B55KrhFLSC-infected cells to above that observed for both mock and MAd5rhFLSC-infected cells (Fig 2 row 1). Expression levels of the ligands continued to increase at 72 and 96 hpi (Fig 2 rows 2 and 3). From these experiments it appears that in addition to E319K, E1B55K may function, in part, to stave off the enhanced expression of NKG2D ligands in Ad-infected cells. Thus, in ΔE1B55KrhFLSC-infected cells, loss of E1B55K may lead to a variety of signals that alert the immune system to a virus infection.

Fig 2. Ad5 increases the expression of NKG2D ligands in infected cells.

HeLa cells were mock-infected (open histogram) or infected with equal concentrations of MAd5rhFLSC (MAd5, black histogram) or ΔE1B55KrhFLSC (ΔE1B55K, dark gray histogram) for 48, 72 or 96 hours. Cells were surface stained with an isotype control (light gray histogram) or anti-human MIC A/B antibodies. Gates based on the positive mock-infection were copied to the other histograms to obtain percent MIC A/B positive cells. Results are representative of 4 to 5 independent experiments.

The E1B55K-deleted vector promotes lower levels of late viral proteins, progeny virions and HIV transgene than an E1B55K wild-type vector

We used PCR to confirm the E1B55K deletion. Because the primers spanned the E1B region, an 827 base pair (bp) band was observed in lanes containing DNA from the ΔE1B55KrhFLSC vector and a 1759 bp band in lanes containing DNA from the MAd5rhFLSC vector (Fig 3A). The E1B55K product is required for efficient late viral mRNA cytoplasmic accumulation [20, 21]. For that reason cells infected with vectors devoid of E1B55K produce lower levels of late viral proteins [2022] as shown here (Fig 3B). Levels of progeny virions were also significantly lower (over 2.0 logs, p = 0.019) in the ΔE1B55KrhFLSC-infected HeLa cells compared to those infected with the E1B55K wild-type virus, MAd5rhFLSC (Fig 3), consistent with results obtained with E1B55K-deleted vectors shown elsewhere [2123].

Fig 3. DNA, Ad5 protein and virus yield of the E1B55K-deleted vector ΔE1B55KrhFLSC.

(A) DNA isolated from infected HeLa cells 18, 36, or 54 hpi yielded a 1759 base pair PCR fragment in MAd5rhFLSC-infected cells that was reduced to 827 base pairs in ΔE1B55KrhFLSC infected cells. (B) Western blot analysis using anti-Ad5 antibody shows that MAd5rhFLSC-infected HeLa cells produce higher levels of late viral proteins 24 hpi than those infected by the ΔE1B55KrhFLSC virus. The figure is representative of 4 experiments. (C) Media from part (A) were diluted and used in plaque assays. The geometric mean values of two independent infections performed in duplicate for each time point were compared using the stratified Wilcoxon rank sum test. * = p value <0.02.

We further assessed the contribution of the E1B55K deletion on expression levels of the HIV rhFLSC immunogen. Differences in levels of rhFLSC and gp120 were very noticeable in lysate from ΔE1B55KrhFLSC-infected HeLa and TC1 cells but less so in lysate from infected A549, CV-1 and LA4 cells (Fig 4). More apparent were differences in protein levels secreted into the media as shown here for the infected CV-1 cells and both mouse cell lines (Fig 4). It is not surprising that the levels of HIV rhFLSC/gp120 mirror those of Ad5 late proteins since expression of this immunogen is most likely governed like the Ad5 late proteins[14]. From these results, E1B55K-deleted Ad5-vectors promote lower levels of the HIV transgene than the E1B55K-wild type vector.

Fig 4. Transgene expression profiles of the E1B55K-deleted vector ΔE1B55KrhFLSC.

(A) HeLa, A549, CV-1, (B) TC1 and LA4 cells were mock-infected or infected with MAd5rhFLSC or ΔE1B55KrhFLSC at various MOI ranging from 5–200 for either 24 or 48 hours. The cells were lysed by boiling in 1X protein sample buffer and equivalent amounts were analyzed by western blot using anti-CD4 (for rhFLSC), anti-gp120, anti-p53 or anti-actin as indicated. Cell growth media collected from (A) CV-1, (B) TC1 and LA4 cells were boiled in 1X protein sample buffer and equivalent amounts were analyzed by western blot using anti-CD4 (for rhFLSC). The figure shows a representative result of 2–4 experiments with actin-normalized fold increases.

The E1B55K-deleted vaccine vector induces cytokine producing HIVgp120 and rhFLSC-specific memory T-cells

The increased levels of innate system signals seen in ΔE1B55KrhFLSC-infected cells suggested that this vector might be more immunogenic than Ad5 vectors wild-type for the E1B55K gene. In spite of the differences in rhFLSC expression levels we next assessed the potential contributions of the E1B55K deletion on Ad5 and HIV-transgene immunogenicity in immunized Balb/C mice as described previously [14]. In these experiments we used flow cytometry to interrogate splenocytes and thereafter compared frequencies of intracellular cytokine positive cells producing IFNγ, IL-2, TNFα and IL-4 in response to stimulation with HIVBalgp120 peptides. Among CD44high CD4+ cells, the proportions of cells expressing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 were similar for the immunized groups, both of which exhibited significantly higher levels than the controls. (Fig 5A). One of the animals in the MAd5rhFLSC immunized group consistently had a greater percentage of cytokine-positive cells for reasons that are not understood. Similar results were observed for CD44high CD8+ cells (Fig 5B). This was not the case for IL-4, where levels were negligible for all the groups (Fig 5A & 5B bottom row).

Fig 5. Mice immunized with an E1B55K-deleted vaccine vector produce similar levels of cytokine producing cells as those immunized with an E1B55K-containing vector.

(A-B) Intracellular cytokine staining of splenocytes for Env-specific CD8 and CD4 central and effector memory T cells secreting IFNγ, IL-2, TNFα, and IL-4. (A) No differences were observed between the means of the two immunized groups for IFNγ, IL-2, or TNFα cytokine producing CD4 central and effector memory T cells. (B) No differences were observed between the means of the two immunized groups for IFNγ, IL-2, or TNFα cytokine producing CD8 central and effector memory T cells. The values for the control mice were zero for CD4 and CD8 IFNγ, IL-2, and TNFα producing central and effector memory T cells. (A-B) For IL-4 no differences were seen in the means of all three groups. Mean values are plotted with error bars indicating SEM. Differences were measured by Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test.

Attempts at measuring Ad5 fiber-specific T cell responses yielded only background values (not shown). In our previous study we observed only very low levels of Ad5-specific T cells in mice immunized with the MAd5rhFLSC vector [14]. Thus these results are consistent with our prior report.

The E1B55K-deleted vaccine vector induced binding antibodies against Ad-, HIVgp120 and the rhFLCS-immunogen

To determine the effects of E1B55K deletion on the levels of IgG binding antibodies induced against the vector and the HIV immunogen, sera from immunized mice were evaluated by ELISA. Both the ΔE1B55KrhFLSC and MAd5rhFLSC vectors induced high-titered binding antibodies against rhFLSC and the HIVBaLgp120 subunit (Fig 6 rows 1 & 2). The mean rhFLSC and gp120 endpoint titers of sera from both groups of immunized mice were significantly higher than the controls which were essentially zero. Higher binding (p < 0.01) to HIVBaLgp120 at intermediate serum concentrations was seen in the MAd5rhFLSC-immunized mice (Fig 6, row 2, left-hand panel). IgG binding antibodies against Ad5 elicited in the immunized mice were assessed by ELISA using plates coated with viral particles. No significant difference was observed between the endpoint titers of the two immunization groups (Fig 6, last row, right-hand panel) even though binding differed (p < 0.001) at higher serum concentrations (1:100 to 1:2700 serum dilutions; Fig 6, last row, left-hand panel). Overall, mice inoculated with MAd5rhFLSC and the ΔE1B55KrhFLSC vector elicited similar levels of antibodies.

Fig 6. Mice immunized with an E1B55K-deleted vaccine vector develop similar IgG antibody titers to the transgene and Ad5 vector as those immunized with an E1B55K-containing vector.

Sera collected from immunized mice were diluted and used in ELISA assays to determine binding to rhFLSC protein, HIVBaLgp120 protein or Ad5 particles. OD450 and endpoint titers for each mouse were plotted. No differences in IgG endpoint titers were observed between MAd5rhFLSC and the ΔE1B55KrhFLSC viruses for rhFLSC protein, HIVBaLgp120 protein or Ad5 particles. Higher binding induced by MAd5rhFLSC immunization against HIVBaLgp120 at intermediate serum concentrations (*, p<0.01) and against Ad5 at higher serum concentrations (**, p<0.001) was observed. Each experiment was performed in duplicate and repeated up to 4 times. Mean values plus SEM are plotted.

Indistinguishable levels of HIV- and Ad5-specific Ig isotypes

The specific IgG subtype induced against a pathogen may influence immunological function and determines whether it persists or is quickly cleared from the system [24]. Therefore, we investigated whether immunization with the ΔE1B55KrhFLSC vector may have altered levels of specific IgG subtypes elicited against rhFLSC, HIVBaLgp120, or Ad5 particles. In these experiments IgG1 predominated against both the HIV transgene and the Ad5 vector (Fig 7). This is in contrast to a previous report suggesting that IgG2a predominates against viral infectious agents [24]. Appreciable levels of IgG2a were also produced against the HIV transgene and the Ad5 vector but titers were approximately 10-fold less than those of IgG1 (Fig 7 row 2). Other Ig(s), IgM and IgA, were also detectable but at lower levels. It is interesting to note that no serum IgA was elicited against Ad5 antigens (Fig 7). It is possible that the IgA may have translocated to mucosal sites not evaluated in this study.

Fig 7. Ig-subtypes induced in mice immunized with ΔE1B55KrhFLSC.

Sera collected from immunized mice were diluted and used in ELISA assays to examine IgG1 and IgG2a subtypes and Ig-isotypes produced against rhFLSC protein, HIVBaLgp120 protein or Ad5 particles. Mean endpoint titers plus SEM for each mouse are shown. No differences in endpoint titers were observed between MAd5rhFLSC and the ΔE1B55KrhFLSC viruses for rhFLSC protein, HIVBaLgp120 protein or Ad5 particles by ANOVA. Each experiment was performed in duplicate and repeated 1 to 4 times.


Our interest in the E1B55K deletion stems from a desire to generate additional carrying capacity in our replicating Ad5 vaccine vector. When added to the already deleted E3 region and considering that Ad5 can stably package up to 105% of its genome [25], an E1B55K/E3-deleted vector should carry transgenes nearly 5.5kb in size. This would allow us to insert larger genes and/or immune modulators currently not possible with the E1B55K wild-type vector. An added benefit of E1B55K-deleted Ad5 is that they have been shown in numerous clinical trials to be safe for use in the human population [11, 12]. In fact, E1B55K-deleted vectors such as dl1520/Onyx-015 and H101 are recognized for their oncolytic potential [11, 12]. H101 is also presently used to treat cancer [11, 12]. Here we demonstrate yet another use for these viruses—that of vaccine delivery vectors.

It is possible that levels of rhFLSC promoted by the two vectors contributed to the outcome we observed in the immunized mice. An Ad5 immunogen engages the immune system in three ways: 1) by binding of the inoculum virus to B-cells, macrophages and or dendritic cells; 2) by viral proteins produced and secreted into the surrounding milieu; 3) by the uptake of infected dead or dying cells by surrounding cells. All of these lead to processing and antigen presentation. The transgene by contrast, only engages the immune system by the latter two mechanisms. Consequently, there might be a limit beyond which immunogen expression levels make no immunological difference. In that case the different levels of rhFLSC promoted by the two vectors (Fig 4) would not be expected to influence the immune responses we observed in the immunized mice. Alternatively, differences in virus-host cell interactions produced by the E1B55K deletion might have stimulated Ad- and HIV-specific innate and adaptive immune responses that compensated for the increased levels of immunogen promoted by the wild-type virus. Indeed, differences in peptide and protein immunogen concentrations as little as 3- to 5-fold have led to detectable changes in immune responses [26, 27]. For that reason, we expected the E1B55K wild-type vector to produce measurably higher immune responses in the immunized mice. That it did not supports the latter possibility. This possibility is strengthened by the fact that in cluster analysis genes encoding immune responses were enriched in E1B-mutant viruses [16] supporting a role for the E1B55K protein in inhibiting Ad-induced inflammation [28]. While the link between E1B55K and transgene immunogenicity remains to be further explored, it is worth pointing out that here the mouse model used removed the replicative property of the vectors. Thus any differences observed were solely a consequence of the viral gene products. In a species permissive for Ad5 replication, it is possible that the greater replicability of the E1B55K wild-type virus might offset the greater immunogenicity of E1B55K-deleted vectors. This remains to be explored.

We noted differences in binding of IgG to HIVBaLgp120 and Ad5 in the immunized mice (Fig 6, rows 2 and 3, left panels). This suggested possible differences in one or all of the specific Ig-subtypes and/or isotypes induced against the transgene or Ad5 vector. However, our results (Fig 7) showed no differences in titer of the 4 subtypes/isotypes evaluated. We were not able to assess IgG2b or IgG3 due to insufficient sera. Therefore, it remains possible that the quality of the antibodies produced by the two vectors differed.

Finally, even while our demonstration of the transgene-specific immune priming ability of E1B55K-deleted Ad5 vectors was shown using an HIV immunogen, there is no reason why the transgene could not be replaced by a cancer or another disease-specific immunogen. Henceforth we anticipate that E1B55K-deleted Ad5 will be increasingly recognized as a vaccine delivery vector.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol (Protocol # VB-005) was approved by the NCI-Bethesda Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC). All efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Cell culture

All cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Cervical carcinoma-derived HeLa cells, human embryonic kidney-derived 293 cells, human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial derived A549 cells, and African green monkey kidney-derived CV-1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies). Mouse lung epithelial cells TC1 and LA4 were maintained in RPMI (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum (HyClone Laboratories). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.


The MAd5rhFLSC virus (wild-type with respect to E1B55K) is described elsewhere [14]. To create ΔE1B55KrhFLSC, BamHI digested, gel isolated pBRAd5hrΔE3 (TPL-rhFLSC-pA) shuttle plasmids [14] were used as the right-hand part of the virus. The larger fragment of DNA isolated from EcoRI digested dl1520 [23] served as the left-hand part. The left- and right-hand fragments were co-transfected with lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) into QBI 293 cells, incubated at 37°C and monitored for the presence of cytopathic effects (CPE). Viral DNA was isolated using a QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and the resulting ΔE1B55KrhFLSC recombinant candidates were screened by PCR using the following forward and reverse primer pairs: TTTTCTGCTGTGCGTAACTT; ATCTTCATCGCTAGAGCCAA. This yielded a 1759 base pair fragment in the wild-type but an 827 base pair fragment in viruses lacking E1B55K (Fig 3A). Expression of Ad5 late proteins (Fig 3B) and the transgene rhFLSC (including the gp120 component) (Fig 4) was evaluated by Western blot. The recombinant viruses were further purified by three rounds of plaque purification. Aliquots of each pure viral stock were amplified on 293 cells and purified twice by cesium gradient centrifugation. The concentrations of the viral stocks were determined by optical density (OD) and plaque forming units (PFU) by plaque assays (SAIC, Fredrick, MD). The particle/PFU ratio for the E1B55K-deleted virus (6.0x1010 particles/5.0x1010 PFU) was 1.2 and for MAd5rhFLSC 1.3.

Virus yield

Viral progeny yields (Fig 3C) were determined by plaque assay as described previously [22]

Gel electrophoresis and western blot

Gel electrophoresis and western blot were performed as previously described [14] with the exception of those performed using cell growth media where cells were infected at a range of MOIs from 5 to 200. After 24 or 48 hours 50–100 uL growth media was collected and diluted in protein sample buffer (1X SDS Gel Loading Dye, 10% BME). Equal amounts of samples were run on 4–20% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Life Technologies) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using the iBlot Western Blot System (Life Technologies). Blots were blocked in PBS with 0.02% Tween 20 and 5% milk for 2 hours and thereafter exposed to a 10% milk buffer containing one of the following primary antibodies at 4° overnight or for 2 hours at room temperature: anti-actin (Sigma-Aldrich); anti-p53 (BD Biosciences); anti-HIV-1 gp120 (Meridian Life Sciences); anti-hCD4 (R&D Systems); and anti-Ad type 5 (Abnova). Subsequently, the blots were washed and exposed to an HRP conjugated secondary antibody, either anti-mouse IgG, anti-human IgG, anti-rabbit IgG, or anti-goat IgG (KPL) as dictated by the primary isotype. Chemiluminescent detection was performed using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or LumiGLO Chemiluminescent Substrate System (KPL).

Animals and vaccination

Six- to eight-week-old female BALB/c mice were housed and maintained in a pathogen-free environment according to the standards of the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care at the NIH (Bethesda, MD). The animal protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee prior to implementation. Mice (NCI Frederick, 5 per group) were inoculated intraperitoneally at weeks 0 and 4 with 5.0x108 PFU of MAd5rhFLSC or ΔE1B55KrhFLSC per mouse. Two naïve mice served as controls. Spleens and blood were collected at week 6 after cervical dislocation as previously described [14].

Intracellular cytokine staining

Splenocytes (2 × 106) were treated and stained as previously described [14] except here the CD4+ and CD8+ populations, were subdivided into CD44high cells. This gating groups the central memory (CM) and effector memory (EM) cells as previously described [29]. The percentage of cytokine-secreting cells in the combined memory cell subset in response to stimulation with HIVBalgp120 peptides was determined following subtraction of the values obtained with non-stimulated samples.

Antibody binding titers

Antibody binding titers were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ninety-six well plates were coated with 1.0x109 PFU Ad5hr or 100ng per well of either HIVBaLgp120 (ABL) or rhFLSC (Profectus BioSciences). The plates were exposed to 1% BSA blocking solution (KPL) for 2 hours at room temperature. The serum samples were serially diluted and applied in duplicate to the 96-well plates and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. The plates were washed with PBS–Tween, exposed to either peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L), IgM, IgA, or rat anti-mouse IgG1 or IgG2a, and thereafter incubated for another hour. After washing the plates were developed with TMB (3, 3’, 5, 5’-tetramethylbenzidine) peroxidase substrate solution. The reaction was stopped by adding 1M H3PO4 and the plates were read at 450nm within 30 min. Endpoint titers were defined as two times the OD corresponding to the background value of the plate as the cutoff.

Chemokine/Cytokine ELISAs

Cells were infected in serum free media, lysed with RIPA buffer (Life Technologies), and chemokines/cytokines were captured using a 25-plex Multiplex ELISA according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Life Technologies). The plates were read and analyzed using a Bio-Plex 100 instrument and software (BioRad).

Surface staining for MIC A/B

HeLa cells were infected at a MOI of 50 for 48, 72 or 96 hours. The cells were washed twice with PBS and surface stained for 30 min at RT with an isotype control or MIC A/B-APC antibodies (Biolegend) at concentrations determined by titration, and resuspended in 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Approximately 20,000 cells were acquired for analysis using a FACS Calibur Cytometer. Data were analyzed using FlowJo version 9.5.2 (Tree-Star Inc.) and graphs and statistics were obtained using Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc.).

Statistical analysis

Initial statistics were obtained using Prism v6.0 (GraphPad) and confirmed using SAS/STAT Softward version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc.). Differences between measures were assessed using either a Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon paired test or one-way ANOVA. Logarithmic or arcsine transformation of raw data was applied when needed for consistency with distributional assumptions.


We thank Dr. Barbara Felber (NCI), for the codon-optimized rhFLSC expression plasmid; Dr. Timothy Fouts (Profectus BioSciences, Inc.) for rhFLSC protein, and Dr. David Ornelles (Wake Forest University) for the dl1520 virus and comments during the manuscript preparation. This work was supported by a Pathway to Independence Award (K99) Grant Number 1K99AI114379–01 to MAT and by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute to MRG.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MAT. Performed the experiments: MAT TN IT. Analyzed the data: MAT IT DV MRG. Wrote the paper: MAT MRG.


  1. 1. Patterson LJ, Robert-Guroff M. Replicating adenovirus vector prime/protein boost strategies for HIV vaccine development. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008;8(9):1347–63. pmid:18694354; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2538611.
  2. 2. Lubeck MD, Natuk R, Myagkikh M, Kalyan N, Aldrich K, Sinangil F, et al. Long-term protection of chimpanzees against high-dose HIV-1 challenge induced by immunization. Nat Med. 1997;3(6):651–8. pmid:9176492.
  3. 3. Robert-Guroff M, Kaur H, Patterson LJ, Leno M, Conley AJ, McKenna PM, et al. Vaccine protection against a heterologous, non-syncytium-inducing, primary human immunodeficiency virus. J Virol. 1998;72(12):10275–80. pmid:9811775; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC110613.
  4. 4. Patterson LJ, Malkevitch N, Venzon D, Pinczewski J, Gomez-Roman VR, Wang L, et al. Protection against mucosal simian immunodeficiency virus SIV(mac251) challenge by using replicating adenovirus-SIV multigene vaccine priming and subunit boosting. J Virol. 2004;78(5):2212–21. pmid:14963117; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC369221.
  5. 5. Malkevitch NV, Patterson LJ, Aldrich MK, Wu Y, Venzon D, Florese RH, et al. Durable protection of rhesus macaques immunized with a replicating adenovirus-SIV multigene prime/protein boost vaccine regimen against a second SIVmac251 rectal challenge: role of SIV-specific CD8+ T cell responses. Virology. 2006;353(1):83–98. pmid:16814356.
  6. 6. Demberg T, Florese RH, Heath MJ, Larsen K, Kalisz I, Kalyanaraman VS, et al. A replication-competent adenovirus-human immunodeficiency virus (Ad-HIV) tat and Ad-HIV env priming/Tat and envelope protein boosting regimen elicits enhanced protective efficacy against simian/human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6P challenge in rhesus macaques. J Virol. 2007;81(7):3414–27. pmid:17229693; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1866031.
  7. 7. Bogers WM, Davis D, Baak I, Kan E, Hofman S, Sun Y, et al. Systemic neutralizing antibodies induced by long interval mucosally primed systemically boosted immunization correlate with protection from mucosal SHIV challenge. Virology. 2008;382(2):217–25. pmid:18947849.
  8. 8. Alexander J, Ward S, Mendy J, Manayani DJ, Farness P, Avanzini JB, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of a replication-competent recombinant adenovirus serotype 4 vaccine expressing influenza H5 hemagglutinin. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31177. pmid:22363572; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3281928.
  9. 9. Gurwith M, Lock M, Taylor EM, Ishioka G, Alexander J, Mayall T, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an oral, replicating adenovirus serotype 4 vector vaccine for H5N1 influenza: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013. pmid:23369412.
  10. 10. Alexander J, Mendy J, Vang L, Avanzini JB, Garduno F, Manayani DJ, et al. Pre-clinical development of a recombinant, replication-competent adenovirus serotype 4 vector vaccine expressing HIV-1 envelope 1086 clade C. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82380. pmid:24312658; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3849430.
  11. 11. Garber K. China approves world's first oncolytic virus therapy for cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(5):298–300. pmid:16507823.
  12. 12. Crompton AM, Kirn DH. From ONYX-015 to armed vaccinia viruses: the education and evolution of oncolytic virus development. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2007;7(2):133–9. pmid:17346104.
  13. 13. Fouts TR, Tuskan R, Godfrey K, Reitz M, Hone D, Lewis GK, et al. Expression and characterization of a single-chain polypeptide analogue of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120-CD4 receptor complex. J Virol. 2000;74(24):11427–36. pmid:11090138.
  14. 14. Thomas MA, Song R, Demberg T, Vargas-Inchaustegui DA, Venzon D, Robert-Guroff M. Effects of the deletion of early region 4 (E4) open reading frame 1 (orf1), orf1-2, orf1-3 and orf1-4 on virus-host cell interaction, transgene expression, and immunogenicity of replicating adenovirus HIV vaccine vectors. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76344. pmid:24143187; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3797075.
  15. 15. Thomas MA, Tuero I, Demberg T, Vargas-Inchaustegui DA, Musich T, Xiao P, et al. HIV-1 CD4-induced (CD4i) gp120 epitope vaccines promote B and T-cell responses that contribute to reduced viral loads in rhesus macaques. Virology. 2014;471–473:81–92. pmid:25461534; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4312258.
  16. 16. Miller DL, Rickards B, Mashiba M, Huang W, Flint SJ. The adenoviral E1B 55-kilodalton protein controls expression of immune response genes but not p53-dependent transcription. J Virol. 2009;83(8):3591–603. pmid:19211769; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2663238.
  17. 17. Routes JM, Ryan S, Morris K, Takaki R, Cerwenka A, Lanier LL. Adenovirus serotype 5 E1A sensitizes tumor cells to NKG2D-dependent NK cell lysis and tumor rejection. J Exp Med. 2005;202(11):1477–82. pmid:16314433; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2213342.
  18. 18. McSharry BP, Burgert HG, Owen DP, Stanton RJ, Prod'homme V, Sester M, et al. Adenovirus E3/19K promotes evasion of NK cell recognition by intracellular sequestration of the NKG2D ligands major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related proteins A and B. J Virol. 2008;82(9):4585–94. pmid:18287244; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2293069.
  19. 19. Champsaur M, Lanier LL. Effect of NKG2D ligand expression on host immune responses. Immunol Rev. 2010;235(1):267–85. pmid:20536569; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2885032.
  20. 20. Babiss LE, Ginsberg HS, Darnell JE Jr. Adenovirus E1B proteins are required for accumulation of late viral mRNA and for effects on cellular mRNA translation and transport. Mol Cell Biol. 1985;5(10):2552–8. pmid:2942759; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC366989.
  21. 21. Goodrum FD, Ornelles DA. Roles for the E4 orf6, orf3, and E1B 55-kilodalton proteins in cell cycle-independent adenovirus replication. J Virol. 1999;73(9):7474–88. pmid:10438837; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC104274.
  22. 22. Thomas MA, Broughton RS, Goodrum FD, Ornelles DA. E4orf1 limits the oncolytic potential of the E1B-55K deletion mutant adenovirus. J Virol. 2009;83(6):2406–16. pmid:19129452.
  23. 23. Barker DD, Berk AJ. Adenovirus proteins from both E1B reading frames are required for transformation of rodent cells by viral infection and DNA transfection. Virology. 1987;156(1):107–21. pmid:2949421.
  24. 24. Coutelier JP, van der Logt JT, Heessen FW, Warnier G, Van Snick J. IgG2a restriction of murine antibodies elicited by viral infections. J Exp Med. 1987;165(1):64–9. pmid:3794607; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2188250.
  25. 25. Bett AJ, Prevec L, Graham FL. Packaging capacity and stability of human adenovirus type 5 vectors. J Virol. 1993;67(10):5911–21. pmid:8371349; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC238011.
  26. 26. Qiu F, Bi S, Wang Y, Guo M, Yi Y, Chen S, et al. Hepatitis C virus-specific cellular and humoral immune responses following immunization with a multi-epitope fusion protein. Int J Mol Med. 2012;29(1):12–7. pmid:21956746.
  27. 27. Tanghe A, D'Souza S, Rosseels V, Denis O, Ottenhoff TH, Dalemans W, et al. Improved immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a tuberculosis DNA vaccine encoding Ag85 by protein boosting. Infect Immun. 2001;69(5):3041–7. pmid:11292722; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC98258.
  28. 28. Schaack J, Bennett ML, Colbert JD, Torres AV, Clayton GH, Ornelles D, et al. E1A and E1B proteins inhibit inflammation induced by adenovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(9):3124–9. pmid:14976240; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC365754.
  29. 29. Dutt S, Baker J, Kohrt HE, Kambham N, Sanyal M, Negrin RS, et al. CD8+CD44(hi) but not CD4+CD44(hi) memory T cells mediate potent graft antilymphoma activity without GVHD. Blood. 2011;117(11):3230–9. pmid:21239702; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3062320.