Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Propionibacterium avidum as an Etiological Agent of Prosthetic Hip Joint Infection

Propionibacterium avidum as an Etiological Agent of Prosthetic Hip Joint Infection

  • Peter Wildeman, 
  • Holger Brüggemann, 
  • Christian F. P. Scholz, 
  • Andreas Leimbach, 
  • Bo Söderquist
PLOS
x

Abstract

Propionibacterium acnes is well-established as a possible etiologic agent of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Other Propionibacterium spp. have occasionally been described as a cause of PJIs, but this has not previously been the case for P. avidum despite its capacity to form biofilm. We describe two patients with prosthetic hip joint infections caused by P. avidum. Both patients were primarily operated with an anteriorly curved skin incision close to the skin crease of the groin, and both were obese. Initial treatment was performed according to the DAIR procedure (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention). In case 1, the outcome was successful, but in case 2, a loosening of the cup was present 18 months post debridement. The P. avidum isolate from case 1 and two isolates from case 2 (obtained 18 months apart) were selected for whole genome sequencing. The genome of P. avidum obtained from case 1 was approximately 60 kb larger than the genomes of the two isolates of case 2. These latter isolates were clonal with the exception of SNPs in the genome. All three strains possessed the gene cluster encoding exopolysaccharide synthesis.

P. avidum has a pathogenic potential and the ability to cause clinically relevant infections, including abscess formation, in the presence of foreign bodies such as prosthetic joint components. Skin incision in close proximity to the groin or deep skin crease, such as the anteriorly curved skin incision approach, might pose a risk of PJIs by P. avidum, especially in obese patients.

Introduction

A modern technology to replace worn-out joints with artificial implants has significantly improved the quality of life for many people, and is one of the major technical progresses in medicine during the 1900s [1]. In the United States 300,000 patients are operated annually and more than 1 million worldwide. Although total hip replacement is considered a safe procedure, there are a few major complications that may occur in relation to the surgery, and prosthetic joint infection is one of the most feared, with significant costs in both monetary and personal terms. The outcome after a prosthetic joint infection depends on several factors; one factor of major importance is which type of bacteria causes the infection [2].

Propionibacterium spp. are slow growing Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria. They are usually rod-shaped and pleomorphic, and are regarded as skin commensals with low or no pathogenic potential. However, P. acnes in particular has the ability to act as an opportunistic pathogen [3] and several reports indicate that this species may also be the etiological agent of severe infections such as infective endocarditis, bone and joint infections, and infections of the central nervous system, predominantly when foreign bodies are present [4]. Infections of orthopedic prosthetic devices and other implants are significant medical problems [5]. These infections related to foreign materials are generally difficult to treat, since the bacteria associated with the infections produce biofilm that reduces the penetration of antibiotics and counteracts the human immune defense mechanisms [6]. Furthermore, the clinical presentation of infections caused by low-virulence microorganisms is often insidious and gradual, resulting in symptoms and signs of infection several months after surgery.

P. acnes is now well-established as a possible etiologic agent of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) [7,8], especially prosthetic shoulder joint infections [9]. Other Propionibacterium spp., such as Propionibacterium granulosum, has also occasionally been described as a cause of PJIs [10]. Propionibacterium avidum has been reported as a cause of soft tissue infections, such as various abscesses [1113] and of bone and joint infections in at least three cases [14], but has not previously been associated with PJIs. Data regarding P. avidum is scarce. First analysis of a P. avidum genome has revealed the presence of an exopolysaccharide (EPS) biosynthesis gene cluster and electron and atomic force microscopy studies have confirmed the presence of an EPS-like structure surrounding cells of P. avidum [15].

We here report two patients with prosthetic hip joint infections caused by P. avidum, and present genomic insight in this largely unexplored species.

Case 1

An 84-year-old woman with a history of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis, obstructive lung disease, and obesity (BMI 38) underwent bilateral cemented total hip arthroplasty due to coxarthrosis in 2009 for the left hip and in 2011 for the right hip. The surgery of the left hip was performed with the Moore (dorsolateral) approach, and functional outcome was good. Current medication was low dose oral and inhaled corticosteroids. In December 2013, she had an accidental fall and dislocated her left hip; this was followed by recurrent dislocations of the left hip replacement. Closed reduction was performed a total of six times.

In May 2014 she was admitted to the hospital because of dislocation, and a decision was made to perform revision surgery of the left hip. A cup revision was performed with a cemented constrained tripolar cup, using a muscle-sparing Watson-Jones approach [16,17] with an anteriorly curved skin incision (Fig 1). Chlorhexidine was used as skin antisepsis and cloxacillin 2g*3 (-30 min, 2h and 6h) as antibiotic prophylaxis. Perioperative bleeding totaled 1165 mL of blood, and the operation time was 98 minutes. The patient received blood transfusions, but was feeling well postoperatively. The wound did not show any signs of infection at discharge from hospital 8 days after surgery.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Anteriorly curved skin incision approach.

Case 1 left hip and. Red line indicates the anterior skin incision.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158164.g001

Approximately 3 weeks after surgery the patient was readmitted to the hospital with acute onset of redness and intense pain from the hip. Her C-reactive protein (CRP) was 155 mg/L and her leukocyte count was elevated (16.3 x 109), but no fever was present. She received a total of three doses of cloxacillin (2 g each) intravenously. Ultrasonography indicated abscess formation anterior to the left hip. Cloxacillin was discontinued, and an incision and thorough soft tissue debridement including arthrotomy and synovectomy was performed the following day. Pus was detected, and fatty necrosis was excised. The wound was aggressively irrigated and closed over two drains. The prosthesis was assessed as stable. A total of two aspirations of synovial fluid and five tissue biopsies were collected. The samples were cultured on Difco GC Medium Base (BD Diagnos- tic Systems) supplemented with 1% haemoglobin powder, 10% horse serum (SVA, Uppsala, Sweden) and 1% IsoVitalex Enrichment (BD Diagnostic Systems) at 36°C under 5% CO2 for 2 days and on anaerobe agar medium (Fastidious anaerobe agar (Acumedia; Neogen Corporation, Lansing, MI, USA) supplemented with 5% horse blood (SVA)) at 36°C anaerobically for up to 5 days, as well as in enrichment broth (29.7% fastidious anaerobic broth (Lab M, Bury, UK) supplemented with 10% D-glucose (J. T. Baker, Deventer, The Nether- lands)) for 7 days. Cloxacillin was reinstituted, but was discontinued when all cultures showed solely growth of P. avidum. Species identification was performed by Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Microflex LT and Biotyper 3.1, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern is shown in Table 1. Treatment was changed to orally administered clindamycin 300 mg three times per day and rifampicin 600 mg once per day. At follow-up approximately 4 weeks after debridement, the patient’s CRP was 26 mg/L and the wound had healed with no signs of infection. Treatment was changed to phenoxymethylpenicillin, administered orally 2 g three times per day for 2 months. CRP was normalized at 1.9 mg/L at a control visit 2 months after debridement. The total treatment time was 3 months. Follow-up for 1 y has been uneventful.

Case 2

A 75-year-old man with hypertension and obesity (BMI 37) received a cemented cup and uncemented stem hip prosthesis due to femoral head necrosis in April 2013. The surgery was performed with a muscle-sparing Watson-Jones approach using an anteriorly curved skin incision (Fig 2). He had a Paprosky 2B [18] acetabular defect, and a bone autograft was transplanted as support for the superior rim of the acetabulum. Chlorhexidine was used as skin antisepsis and cloaxcillin 2g*3 (-30 min, 2h and 6h) as antibiotic prophylaxis. Perioperative bleeding totaled 810 mL of blood, and the operating time was 90 minutes. The wound did not show any signs of infection at discharge from hospital 5 days after surgery.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Anteriorly curved skin incision approach.

Case 2 right hip. Red line indicates the anterior skin incision.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158164.g002

Approximately 3 weeks after surgery, the patient was readmitted to the hospital with a wound showing secretion and redness. His CRP was 64 mg/L, but no fever was present. A superficial wound culture showed growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci, alpha-hemolytic streptococci, and Propionibacterium spp. 4 days later incision, thorough soft tissue debridement including arthrotomy, synovectomy and aggressive irrigation. There was a newly formed sinus tract that was excised together with the infected tissue. Six biopsies and an aspiration of synovial fluid were taken; all showed growth of Propionibacterium spp., later determined to species level as P. avidum by MALDI-TOF MS. The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern is shown in Table 1.

The patient was treated intravenously with clindamycin 600 mg three times per day until discharge from hospital 1 week later. At discharge, treatment was changed to oral administration of clindamycin 300 mg three times per day for 5 weeks. Follow-up 4 months postoperatively including X-ray was uneventful, but no blood samples were examined.

However, 18 months after debridement the patient was referred to the primary hospital because of a sudden increase of pain and discomfort in the hip. Plain X-ray revealed loosening of the cup.

The patient was then referred to the university hospital for hip revision surgery. At the preoperative visit, he had severe pain in the hip and CRP of 180 mg/L. Septic loosening was suspected. Aspiration from the hip was performed, and culture showed growth of P. avidum. Leukocyte cell count from synovial fluid was 47.2 109/L (93% poly vs. 7% mono). A CT scan showed abscess formation below the acetabular floor inside the pelvis, and a Paprosky 3A acetabular defect. The stem was well fixed. The hip prosthesis was extracted the following day in a process which included draining of the abscess, thorough soft tissue debridement, and locally administered gentamicin. This was the first stage in a two-stage hip revision surgery approach for the infected hip arthroplasty. A total of one aspiration and seven tissue biopsies were collected. Treatment was initiated with piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/0.5 g) three times daily. All cultures showed growth of P. avidum as before, and the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was almost identical to the previous findings Table 1. After 8 days, treatment was changed to benzyl-penicillin 1g intravenously three times daily.

After 3 weeks, the patient experienced increased hip pain, and a CT scan showed multiple abscesses around the Girdlestone hip. Another reoperation with debridement, locally administered gentamicin, and drainage was performed. A total of one aspiration and ten biopsies were collected; these showed growth of P. avidum (n = 4), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 7; two different antibiotic susceptibility patterns), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 1). Treatment was initially piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/0.5 g three times daily and vancomycin 1.5 g twice daily and later changed to trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole 160 mg/800 mg orally three times daily. Six weeks after admission, the patient could be discharged from the hospital. At follow-up the patient had only minor pain from the hip, but CRP was still not normal after 6 weeks of oral therapy; amoxicillin 1 g three times daily was therefore added to the treatment. The patient was treated with trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole and amoxicillin orally for 6 months. At discontinuation of treatment, the patient’s CRP was 9.3 mg/L and his erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 8 mm/h. The second-stage surgery was performed 10 months after the first-stage revision, and one aspiration of hip fluid and six tissue biopsies did not show any growth.

Results

Genome Sequencing of P. avidum Isolates

The P. avidum isolate from case 1 obtained in 2014 (designated P. avidum T14) and two P. avidum isolates from case 2 were selected for whole genome sequencing. For the latter, the initital isolate from 2013 (P. avidum T13) and the isolate obtained 18 months later (P. avidum T15) were both sequenced in order to see if these isolates represented the same clone. Illumina sequencing resulted in draft genomes consisting of 15, 9, and 14 contigs for P. avidum T13, T14, and T15, respectively. All three genomes had an identical G+C content (63.4%). The genome of P. avidum T14 is approximately 60 kb larger than the genomes of T13 and T15 (2,522,071 bp vs. 2,463,971 bp and 2,462,788 bp, respectively). This can be explained by the presence of a prophage in P. avidum T14 with high sequence similarity to prophage regions in the genomes of different species of Corynebacterium (C. resistens, C. diphtheriae, and C. atypicum). Previously published P. avidum genomes have displayed sizes slightly larger or comparable to P. avidum T14 (2,526,138 bp for P. avidum 44067 and 2,533,496 bp for P. avidum ATCC 25577). Using RAST [19], the number of identified coding sequences (CDS) is 2292, 2350, and 2288 for T13, T14 and T15, respectively. Each genome contains 49 RNAs. Interestingly, T13 and T15 are clonal. T15 is identical to T13, with the exception of the introduction of 331 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

In order to address the question about the presence and nature of species-specific traits, a detailed genome comparison of P. avidum and representative genomes of P. acnes, P. humerusii and P. granulosum was conducted (Fig 3). This analysis shows an overall genome synteny between cutaneous Propionibacteria. It also reveals P. avidum -specific sequences, i.e. genomic regions that are only present in P. avidum and lack in other cutaneous Propionibacteria (Fig 3 and Table A1-3 in S1 File.). One such region (island 14 in Fig 3) is a gene cluster encoding exopolysaccharide (EPS) synthesis; the EPS is likely to be responsible for strong adherence [15]. The 35 kbp EPS regions in strains T13 and T15 are identical on the nucleotide level, and 96% identical to the EPS region in strain T14. In addition to the EPS locus, other larger (> 5kb) genomic regions are found in P. avidum genomes that are absent from selected genomes of P. acnes (Fig 2 and Table A1 in S1 File.). Gene content comparison using ProteinOrtho [20] revealed 283 and 211 CDS specific for P. avidum and P. acnes, respectively (Table A2 and A3 in S1 File.). Diverse fitness, survival and defense functions are encoded in the P. avidum-specific regions, including a variety of transporters of the ABC-type predicted to be specific for the transport of sugars, amino acids (methionine, glutamine) and iron or hemin. Other loci harbor genes for a type I restriction-modification system and for arsenic resistance. Two toxin-antitoxin systems are found in one genomic locus, a HigA/HigB system and two genes with homology to the death-on-curing (DOC) system of some bacteriophages.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Genome comparison of P. avidum and other cutaneous Propionibacteria.

P. avidum strain T13 was used as the reference genome. The most inner rings represent GC content and GC skew variation. Other P. avidum genomes (rings from inside to outside) are added according to their similarity to the reference genomes, i.e. T15 is most similar and HGH0353 is most dissimilar to T13. The comparison of P. avidum genomes with representative genomes of P. acnes/P. humerusii/P. granulosum shows overall genome synteny but also revealed P. avidum-specific genomic regions. These islands are numbered (1–20); gene content of the islands is shown in Table A1 in S1 File. Island 14 is the locus encoding EPS biosynthesis. The BRIG program was used to generate the figure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158164.g003

Several of the P. avidum-specific genomic regions seem to be acquired by horizontal gene transfer, including the EPS locus. They are flanked with tRNA genes, which are known to frequently serve as integration sites for mobile genetic elements. A phylogenetic analysis of the P. avidum strains sequenced so far showed that the strains T13, T14, and T15 cluster closely with each other and also with strain 44067 [21], a clinical isolate from an abscess (Fig 4). The phylogenetic analysis showed that three different clusters are distinguishable within the P. avidum population. Gene content analysis revealed 12, 29 and 72 cluster-specific CDS for cluster A (strains T13, T14, T15 and 44067), cluster B (strains ATCC25577, KPL2000 and KPL2005) and cluster C (strains KPL1852 and KPL1838), respectively (Table A1-3 in S2 File.). This shows that different types of P. avidum can be found on the human body.

thumbnail
Fig 4. A phylogenetic analysis of sequenced P. avidum strains and their relation to other cutaneous Propionibacteria.

The analysis is based on the shared core genome of the depicted organisms. T13, T14, and T15 cluster closely not only with each other, but also with strain 44067 (14), another clinical isolate from an abscess. Some strains (KPL2000, KPL2005, KPL1852, KPL1838) are currently not correctly assigned to P. avidum in the public databases. The population of P. avidum can be divided into three (phylogenetic) clusters: cluster A: T13, T14, T15, 44067; cluster B: ATCC25577, KPL2000, KPL2005, TM16; cluster C: KPL1852, KPL1838). Their gene content differences are shown in Table B1-3 in S2 File.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158164.g004

Discussion

These are, to our knowledge, the first reported cases of P. avidum as the etiological agent of deep periprosthetic infections. Both cases had a subacute onset of symptoms that developed during the first couple of weeks after primary hip arthroplasty. Case 1 saw a successful outcome following a DAIR [22] procedure (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), but in case 2 the DAIR failed. The patient was feeling well and the wound healed properly, but the infection remained dormant until a complete septic loosening of the acetabular component and loss of bone stock was present. The two patients were both obese and primarily operated with an anteriorly curved skin incision approach close to the skin crease of the groin. The most common surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasties are the posterolateral and the direct lateral approaches [23,24]. In these approaches, the skin incision is distant to the groin. However, there is a trend towards performing more arthroplasty surgery using anteriorly placed incisions [25,26] with or without mini-incision. The main advantage of anteriorly based approaches is that they are tissue sparring by avoiding cutting major muscles and reduces the dislocation rate [2731]. Surgery with mini-incision technique is thought to reduce the tissue damage even more and promote faster recovery [32,33].

Propionibacterium spp. are the main constituents of the anaerobic microbiota of the skin, and are predominantly found in oily, sebaceous-rich areas. P. acnes are the most prevalent Propionibacterium spp. on human skin; it primarily colonizes sebaceous skin follicles. In contrast, P. avidum is often isolated from moist areas of the skin such as the nares, axilla, rectum, and groin [34]. Incisions closer to or in the groin area, such as the anteriorly curved skin incision approach, may result in an increased risk of contamination of the surgical wound area with skin commensals present in the moist milieu of the groin, and thus emergence of P. avidum as a cause of infections following total hip arthroplasty surgery.

Strains of P. avidum have been shown to be surrounded by an EPS-like structure [15]. This structure could play a role in adherence and biofilm formation and thus may contribute to pathogenicity and subsequently to the emergence of chronic foreign body infections. EPS production could also reduce the susceptibility of the strain to antibiotic treatment. The present study confirms that the gene cluster encoding EPS biosynthesis is–among the cutaneous propionibacterial species- unique to P. avidum; it was identified in all three newly sequenced isolates.

The putative biofilm forming ability of P. avidum is relevant regarding the optimal antimicrobial treatment of foreign body infections caused by P. avidum. The present isolates of the two cases showed low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin G, and were susceptible to several additional antimicrobials with the exception of metronidazole. Thus, the MIC values do not differ from what has been reported for P. acnes isolated from implant-related infections [35].

In Sweden, cloxacillin is the drug of choice for prophylaxis during prosthetic joint surgery. However, since P. acnes has been recognized as an important etiological agent in shoulder PJIs [36]there is a discussion and also a trend today towards adding benzyl-penicillin to the routine prophylaxis for shoulder prosthetic surgery. The MIC values of benzyl-penicillin of P. acnes are in general very low. However, the MIC values for oxacillin is also low [37]. The timing of the routine prophylaxis is equally important issue [38]. Further studies to investigate if there should be a change in the antibiotic prophylaxis, e.g. by adding benzyl-penicillin, for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with an anterior skin incision approach is however warranted. Furthermore, to determine the MIC values of Propionibacterium spp. isolated from PJIs to beta-lactam antibiotics, since no current data are available [37].

The optimal antibiotics for the treatment of PJIs caused by P. acnes have not been fully determined. Both beta-lactam antibiotics [39,40] and rifampicin in combination with, for example, moxifloxacin have been proposed [7]. According to in vitro and in vivo animal experimental studies, rifampicin containing combinations of antimicrobial agents were favorable for eradication of P. acnes biofilms [41]. The fact that the P. avidum isolates obtained from the patients in the present case report harbored genes encoding EPS biosynthesis may be considered when deciding long-term treatment. The present P. avidum isolates were both fully susceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics, fluoroquinolones, and rifampicin. Case 1 was successfully treated with debridement and rifampicin in combination with clindamycin for approximately 1 month and then an additional 2 months of antimicrobial therapy with phenoxymethylpenicillin. The final outcome of case 2 was a two-stage exchange intervention of the hardware due to loosening, despite early debridement. In this case, antibiotic treatment with clindamycin was administered as monotherapy for about 6 weeks. At re-operation 18 months later the isolate was still fully susceptible to clindamycin.

The re-isolation of the same strain in case 2 underlines the persistence and long-term colonization capacity of P. avidum. The observed SNPs between the original strain and the strain isolated 18 months later might give interesting insights into the evolution of P. avidum during colonization of the human host.

Only very limited genomic and phenotypic information about the species P. avidum is currently available. Our data indicates that the P. avidum population can be dived in at least three different phylogenetic clusters. However, the number of sequenced strains is currently very low, making it difficult to evaluate if disease-associated strains of P. avidum can be distinguished phylogenetically from health-associated ones and whether disease-associated strains possess an elevated pathogenic potential.

Conclusions

The two cases presented here indicate that P. avidum has a pathogenic potential and the ability to cause clinically relevant infections including abscess formation when foreign bodies, such as prosthetic joint components, are present. We recommend increased awareness for Propionibacterium spp. infection in hip arthroplasty if the skin incision is in close proximity to the groin or a deep skin crease. Consequently, obese patients might be at higher risk.

Material and Methods

Ethics Statement

The study material in this case report is bacterial isolates. Therefore, an ethical approval has not been obtained. However, written informed consent for publication has been obtained from both patients and personal identifiers has been removed to give confidentiality.

Bacterial Cultivation

The three clinical P. avidum isolates T13, T14 and T15 obtained in this study were cultivated on Reinforced Clostridial Agar (Oxoid) plates for 3 days at 37°C under anaerobic conditions using the Gas-Pak™ system (Oxoid). For liquid cultures, brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Sigma-Aldrich) was used and cultures were grown for 24 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions.

Building a P. avidum Core Genome Phylogenetic Tree

Genome sequences of publicly available P. avidum strains were used to build a phylogenetic tree based on all sequences shared with (one representative strain of) the species P. acnes, P. granulosum and “P. humerusii”. Genomes were downloaded from NCBI Genome and WGS databases, with the exception of strains T13, T14 and T15 that were sequenced for this study. In total, 11 P. avidum genomes were used. The core genome was identified by slicing the genome sequence of strain P. avidum 44067 into fragments of 200 bp which were used as query sequences in blastn (Blast+) [42] to extract homologous sequences from the other genomes. Default parameters of blastn were used together with a 65% cut-off on coverage. Homologous sequences of each fragment were aligned using Muscle [43] and subsequently all fragments were concatenated into one sequence (397,681 bp) per strain using a python script. The core genome phylogenetic tree was built in Mega v6 [44] using the minimal-evolution algorithm with complete deletion.

Genome Sequencing

Genomic DNA from cultures of P. avidum T13, T14 and T15 was isolated using the MasterPure Gram-positive DNA Purification Kit (EpiCentre MGP04100) according to the manufacturer´s instructions. The purity and quality of the gDNA were assessed on a 1% agarose gel and with a nanodrop apparatus (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington USA). Extracted DNA was used to prepare Nextera XT shotgun libraries for the Genome Analyzer II (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with a 112-bp paired-end sequencing run. Libraries were prepared according to the manufacturer protocol at the Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Germany. Raw reads were quality controlled with FastQC v0.11.2 (http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) and subsequently trimmed using Trimmomatic 0.32 (http://www.usadellab.org/cms/?page=trimmomatic) to remove sequences with quality scores lower than 20 (Illumina 1.9 encoding) and remaining adaptor sequences. De novo assembly was done using the SPAdes v3.5 software [45]. Key features of the assembly are as follows: T13: 15 contigs with a total of 2,463,971 bp; the final assembly had a N50 value of 486,392 bp and a N90 value of 89,725 bp with a 50.4-fold coverage (excluding 16S rRNA operons). T14: 9 contigs with a total of 2,522,071 bp; the final assembly had a N50 value of 802,850 bp and a N90 value of 278,150 bp with a 53-fold coverage (excluding 16S rRNA operons). T15: 14 contigs with a total of 2,462,788 bp; the final assembly had a N50 value of 289,009 bp and a N90 value of 97,503 bp with a 21-fold coverage (excluding 16S rRNA operons). The GenBank accession numbers of the draft genome sequences are LLJH00000000 (T13), LLJI00000000 (T14) and LLJJ00000000 (T15).

Gene Prediction, Annotation and Comparative Genome Analysis

For P. avidum strains T13, T14 and T15 open reading frames (ORFs) and tRNAs were identified and annotated using the RAST server [19]. For comparative genome analysis, the programs ACT (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/science/tools/artemis-comparison-tool-act) and BRIG [46] were used, resulting in the identifciation of P. avidum and P. acnes-specific islands, respectively. The following genomes of Propionibacteria were taken from GenBank to build a BRIG genome comparison: P. avidum: 44067 [BioProject: PRJNA157751], ATCC 25577 [BioProject: PRJNA64741], and TM16 [BioProject: PRJNA189036]; other P. avidum genomes from strains that are currently (insufficiently) designated as Propionibacterium sp.: KPL2005 [BioProject: PRJNA170373], KPL2000 [BioProject: PRJNA170369], KPL1852 [BioProject: PRJNA169465], and KPL1838 [BioProject: PRJNA169461]; P. humerusii: P08 [BioProject: PRJNA64551]; P. acnes: 266 [BioProject: PRJNA56091], KPA171202 [BioProject: PRJNA12460], and PMH7 [BioProject: PRJNA292394].

Gene Content Analysis

In order to compare the gene content between P. avidum and P. acnes genomes and within the P. avidum isolates we extracted all annotated proteins (CDS) with the script cds_extractor.pl (v0.7.1) (https://github.com/aleimba/bac-genomics-scripts). The software Proteinortho (v5.11) was used to identify orthologs and cluster the proteins into orthologous groups (OGs) with a 70% identity and coverage cutoff and options “-selfblast” and “-singles” for BLASTP+ [20,42]. Additionally, BLASTP+ was run with an E-value of 1 x 10−5, a final Smith-Waterman alignment (option “-use_sw_tback”) and without SEG filtering (option “-seg no”) [47].

The script po2group_stats.pl (v0.1.2) (https://github.com/aleimba/bac-genomics-scripts) was used to identify species-specific OGs between P. avidum (44067, T13, T14, T15, ATCC 25577, KPL2000, KPL2005, KPL1838, and KPL1852) and P. acnes genomes (266 (IA), 12.1.R1 (IA), KPA171202 (IB), CCUG33950 (II), and PMH7 (III)). Additionally, we sought to identify OGs specific for different subgroups of P. avidum genomes based on the phylogeny (Fig 4). Again po2group_stats.pl was used to identify these group-specific OGs between P.avidum subcluster A (strains 44067, T13, T14 and T15), subcluster B (strains ATCC25577, KPL2000 and KPL2005), and subcluster C (strains KPL1852 and KPL1838).

Supporting Information

S1 File.

P. avidum-Specific genomic regions (>5kb) that are absent from selected genomes of P.acnes types 1A,1B,1C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158164.s001

(XLSX)

S2 File.

CDS specific to subcluster A, B and C of P. avidum (compared to the other subclusters A, B and C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158164.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Bengt Hellmark, PhD for the help with the laboratory analysis and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions to improve this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PW HB BS. Performed the experiments: HB CS AL BS. Analyzed the data: PW HB CS AL BS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HB CS AL BS. Wrote the paper: PW HB AL BS.

References

  1. 1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1508–19. pmid:17964352
  2. 2. Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(2):302–45. pmid:24696437
  3. 3. Perry AL, Lambert PA. Propionibacterium acnes. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006;42(3):185–8. pmid:16478502
  4. 4. Perry A, Lambert P. Propionibacterium acnes: infection beyond the skin. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9(12):1149–56. pmid:22114965
  5. 5. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1645–54. pmid:15483283
  6. 6. Zimmerli W, Moser C. Pathogenesis and treatment concepts of orthopaedic biofilm infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012;65(2):158–68. pmid:22309166
  7. 7. Lutz MF, Berthelot P, Fresard A, Cazorla C, Carricajo A, Vautrin AC, et al. Arthroplastic and osteosynthetic infections due to Propionibacterium acnes: a retrospective study of 52 cases, 1995–2002. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;24(11):739–44. pmid:16328558
  8. 8. Zeller V, Ghorbani A, Strady C, Leonard P, Mamoudy P, Desplaces N. Propionibacterium acnes: an agent of prosthetic joint infection and colonization. J Infect. 2007;55(2):119–24. pmid:17418419
  9. 9. Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Cofield RH, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Osmon DR, et al. Microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection by use of implant sonication. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(6):1878–84. pmid:19261785
  10. 10. Nystrom LM, Wyatt CM, Noiseux NO. Arthroplasty infection by Priopionibacterium granulosum treated with reimplantation despite ongoing purulent-appearing fluid collection. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(1):198 e5–8. pmid:22552222
  11. 11. Panagea S, Corkill JE, Hershman MJ, Parry CM. Breast abscess caused by Propionibacterium avidum following breast reduction surgery: case report and review of the literature. J Infect. 2005;51(5):e253–5. pmid:15908006
  12. 12. Vohra A, Saiz E, Chan J, Castro J, Amaro R, Barkin J. Splenic abscess caused by Propionibacterium avidum as a complication of cardiac catheterization. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(3):770–1. pmid:9524868
  13. 13. Janvier F, Delacour H, Larreche S, Abdalla S, Aubert P, Merens A. Abdominal wall and intra-peritoneal abscess by Propionibacterium avidum as a complication of abdominal parietoplasty. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2013;61(5):223–5.
  14. 14. Million M, Roux F, Cohen Solal J, Breville P, Desplaces N, Barthas J, et al. Septic arthritis of the hip with Propionibacterium avidum bacteremia after intraarticular treatment for hip osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75(3):356–8. pmid:18329936
  15. 15. Mak TN, Schmid M, Brzuszkiewicz E, Zeng G, Meyer R, Sfanos KS, et al. Comparative genomics reveals distinct host-interacting traits of three major human-associated propionibacteria. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:640. pmid:24053623
  16. 16. Bertin KC, Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004(429):248–55. pmid:15577495
  17. 17. Muller M, Tohtz S, Springer I, Dewey M, Perka C. Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(2):179–89. pmid:20490520
  18. 18. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9(1):33–44. pmid:8163974
  19. 19. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. pmid:18261238
  20. 20. Lechner M, Findeiss S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:124. pmid:21526987
  21. 21. Ordogh L, Hunyadkurti J, Voros A, Horvath B, Szucs A, Urban E, et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Propionibacterium avidum Strain 44067, Isolated from a Human Skin Abscess. Genome announcements. 2013;1(3).
  22. 22. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Adeli B. Periprosthetic joint infection: treatment options. Orthopedics. 2010;33(9):659. pmid:20839679
  23. 23. Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R, Salai M, Amar E. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(11):1595–600. pmid:23912418
  24. 24. Petis S, Howard JL, Lanting BL, Vasarhelyi EM. Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. Can J Surg. 2015;58(2):128–39. pmid:25799249
  25. 25. Leunig M, Faas M, von Knoch F, Naal FD. Skin crease 'bikini' incision for anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(7):2245–52. pmid:23412730
  26. 26. Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino CM, Sabbadini DD. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011;12(3):123–9. pmid:21748384
  27. 27. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(9):1295–306. pmid:7142237
  28. 28. Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002(405):46–53. pmid:12461355
  29. 29. Lindgren V, Garellick G, Karrholm J, Wretenberg P. The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty: a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hipreplacements with 3 different cemented prostheses. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(6):559–65. pmid:23116440
  30. 30. Tsukada S, Wakui M. Lower Dislocation Rate Following Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach than via Posterior Approach: Five-Year-Average Follow-Up Results. Open Orthop J. 2015;9:157–62. pmid:26157532
  31. 31. Connolly KP, Kamath AF. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Comparative outcomes and contemporary results. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2016;7(2):94–101. pmid:26925380
  32. 32. Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, Benke MT, Graeter JH, Holmes AS, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):1392–8. pmid:21915544
  33. 33. Xu CP, Li X, Song JQ, Cui Z, Yu B. Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2013;8(11).
  34. 34. McGinley KJ, Webster GF, Leyden JJ. Regional variations of cutaneous propionibacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978;35(1):62–6. pmid:623473
  35. 35. Khassebaf J, Hellmark B, Davidsson S, Unemo M, Nilsdotter-Augustinsson A, Soderquist B. Antibiotic susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes isolated from orthopaedic implant-associated infections. Anaerobe. 2015;32:57–62. pmid:25541476
  36. 36. Wang B, Jessamine P, Desjardins M, Toye B, Ramotar K. Direct mecA polymerase chain reaction testing of blood culture bottles growing Gram-positive cocci and the clinical potential in optimizing antibiotic therapy for staphylococcal bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;75(1):37–41. pmid:23102997
  37. 37. Wang WL, Everett ED, Johnson M, Dean E. Susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes to seventeen antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977;11(1):171–3. pmid:836012
  38. 38. Stefansdottir A, Robertsson O, A WD, Kiernan S, Gustafson P, Lidgren L. Inadequate timing of prophylactic antibiotics in orthopedic surgery. We can do better. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(6):633–8. pmid:19995312
  39. 39. Bayston R, Nuradeen B, Ashraf W, Freeman BJ. Antibiotics for the eradication of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms in surgical infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60(6):1298–301. pmid:17959732
  40. 40. Sendi P, Zimmerli W. Antimicrobial treatment concepts for orthopaedic device-related infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(12):1176–84. pmid:23046277
  41. 41. Furustrand Tafin U, Corvec S, Betrisey B, Zimmerli W, Trampuz A. Role of rifampin against Propionibacterium acnes biofilm in vitro and in an experimental foreign-body infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(4):1885–91. pmid:22252806
  42. 42. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. pmid:20003500
  43. 43. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7. pmid:15034147
  44. 44. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9. pmid:24132122
  45. 45. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19(5):455–77. pmid:22506599
  46. 46. Alikhan NF, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:402. pmid:21824423
  47. 47. Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Latimer K. Choosing BLAST options for better detection of orthologs as reciprocal best hits. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(3):319–24. pmid:18042555