Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The End of the Cold Loneliness: 3D Comparison between Doto antarctica and a New Sympatric Species of Doto (Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia)

  • Juan Moles ,

    Affiliation Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology, and Environmental Sciences and Biodiversity Research Institute (IrBIO), University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

  • Heike Wägele,

    Affiliation Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany

  • Manuel Ballesteros,

    Affiliation Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology, and Environmental Sciences and Biodiversity Research Institute (IrBIO), University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

  • Álvaro Pujals,

    Affiliation Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology, and Environmental Sciences and Biodiversity Research Institute (IrBIO), University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

  • Gabriele Uhl,

    Affiliation General and Systematic Zoology, Zoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Anklamer Str. 20, 17489 Greifswald, Germany

  • Conxita Avila

    Affiliation Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology, and Environmental Sciences and Biodiversity Research Institute (IrBIO), University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

The End of the Cold Loneliness: 3D Comparison between Doto antarctica and a New Sympatric Species of Doto (Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia)

  • Juan Moles, 
  • Heike Wägele, 
  • Manuel Ballesteros, 
  • Álvaro Pujals, 
  • Gabriele Uhl, 
  • Conxita Avila


Although several studies are devoted to determining the diversity of Antarctic heterobranch sea slugs, new species are still being discovered. Among nudibranchs, Doto antarctica Eliot, 1907 is the single species of this genus described from Antarctica hitherto, the type locality being the Ross Sea. Doto antarctica was described mainly using external features. During our Antarctic research on marine benthic invertebrates, we found D. antarctica in the Weddell Sea and Bouvet Island, suggesting a circumpolar distribution. Species affiliation is herein supported by molecular analyses using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, 16S rRNA, and histone H3 markers. We redescribe D. antarctica using histology, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and 3D-reconstruction of the internal organs. Moreover, we describe a new, sympatric species, namely D. carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp., and provide an anatomical comparison between the two Antarctic Doto species. Egg masses in both species are also described here for the first time. We demonstrate that micro-CT is a useful tool for non-destructive anatomical description of valuable specimens. Furthermore, our high resolution micro-CT data reveal that the central nervous system of both Doto species possesses numerous accessory giant cells, suggested to be neurons herein. In addition, the phylogenetic tree of all Doto species sequenced to date suggests a scenario for the evolution of the reproductive system in this genus: bursa copulatrix seems to have been reduced and the acquisition of a distal connection of the oviduct to the nidamental glands is a synapomorphy of the Antarctic Doto species. Overall, the combination of thorough morphological and anatomical description and molecular analyses provides a comprehensive means to characterize and delineate species, thus suggesting evolutionary scenarios.


Heterobranch sea slugs are worldwide-distributed molluscs with new species being discovered regularly from tropical and temperate areas, while Polar Regions are less explored [1]. Interestingly, basal members of some major Nudipleura and Pleurobranchomorpha linages have an Antarctic origin [24]. Among nudibranchs, the family Dotidae Gray, 1853 is presently considered to be a monophyletic taxon within Cladobranchia [5]. However, the relationships between Dotidae and the other cladobranch families remain undefined [6], although RNAseq analyses of Goodheart et al. [7] indicate a closer relationship to Dendronotida. In fact, Dotidae was traditionally placed into Dendronotida (formerly Dendronotoidea) [8] based on the presence of rhinophoral sheaths, into which the rhinophores can be retracted [9]. A cuticle lining of the stomach and tentacular expansions of the oral veil were lately advocated as additional autapomorphies of Dendronotida [10]. Since these traits are not present in Dotidae, their systematic position within Dendronotida is questionable.

Dotidae comprises four genera: Doto Oken, 1815, Caecinella Bergh, 1870, Miesea Marcus, 1961, and the recently described Kabeiro Shipman & Gosliner, 2015. However, the taxonomic status of the monotypic Caecinella and Miesea is often considered doubtful [9,11]. Doto differs from Miesea in having rhinophoral sheaths [12], and from Kabeiro by the shape and arrangement of the cerata, the pericardium size, and the absence of a penial gland [13]. Doto, with 87 species recognised to date [14] shows a cosmopolitan distribution, and the species are usually defined only on the basis of external characters, i.e., colouration, number and shape of cerata, and shape of the rhinophoral sheath [15]. Lemche [16] took a wider approach including not only body colour pattern, but also food preference and shape of the egg mass. However, information on anatomical characters of the digestive, reproductive, circulatory, nervous, or excretory systems for most Doto species remains poorly known.

Only Doto antarctica Eliot, 1907 has been described from Antarctica to date, based on a single specimen from McMurdo Sound (Victoria Land) [17]. A brightly-yellow coloured species of Doto was recorded from the Davies Sea (eastern Antarctica) and roughly described by Thiele [18]. However, the material was insufficient to properly describe the species. Later, Odhner [19] added details of the external anatomy and radula of D. antarctica from Cape Adare (Victoria Land) but did not provide internal description of the digestive and reproductive systems. Since then, D. antarctica has been found in King George Island (South Shetland Islands) at 160 m [20] and in the Victoria Land (Ross Sea) at 80–500 m depth [21,22]. Additional undetermined species of Doto have been recorded in Bouvet Island [23] and the Ross Sea [22,24].

Here, we use histological and tomographic techniques to explore the organ systems and the egg masses of D. antarctica. In addition, we newly describe a single specimen of Doto carinova n. sp., collected in the Weddell Sea, by 3D reconstruction of micro-CT images. Thereby, we assessed the potential of micro-CT for non-invasive description of singleton type material [25,26]. Moreover, we sequenced D. antarctica from the Weddell Sea and compare it to specimens from the Ross Sea. The aims of this study are thus threefold: (1) to improve species delimitation of the two Antarctic Doto species; (2) to provide a basis for anatomical comparison of the species of Doto; and (3) to disentangle the phylogenetic conundrum of Doto species. We also provide an evolutionary scenario of the changes in Doto anatomy for all the species for which molecular data are available.

Material and Methods

Sample collection

Nudibranch samples were collected in the eastern Weddell Sea (Antarctica) during the ANT XV/3 cruise (1998) [27], and during the ANT XXI/2 cruise (2003–2004) of the R/V Polarstern (Alfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven, Germany). Several specimens of D. antarctica and egg masses were collected at depths ranging from 65 to 433 m at several stations (see Table 1). For D. carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp., only one specimen and its egg masses were collected from station code PS65/276-1. Samples were photographed alive, anaesthetised with 10% magnesium chloride for 1h, and then transferred to 70% ethanol for morphological analysis. One specimen of D. antarctica was preserved in 10% formaldehyde/sea water for histology (PS65/166-1), and two specimens were frozen and then transferred to 100% ethanol for sequencing (48/033). Additional Doto species were also collected from the Mediterranean Sea and sequenced to increase the number of taxa from the ones already available in GenBank (see S1 Table). Antarctic samples were collected with the permission of the Spanish Polar Committee (CPE; Mediterranean samples were collected under the permission issued by the Catalan Government (

Table 1. Sampling stations where D. antarctica and D. carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp. were collected.

Kapp Norvegia is situated in the eastern Weddell Sea.

Morphological analysis

The buccal mass of D. antarctica (48/033) was immersed in potassium hydroxide for up to three hours to dissolve the organic tissues and then rinsed with distilled water. The radula was mounted on metallic stubs with bioadhesive carbon sticky tabs and coated with carbon for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). One specimen of D. antarctica (PS65/166-1), an egg mass (48/033), and the egg mass of D. carinova n. sp. (PS65/276-1) were dehydrated in an ethanol series and embedded in HEMA for histological analysis (Kulzer’s method; see [28]). Serial sections (2.5 μm thick) were stained with Toluidine blue, which specifically stains acid mucopolysaccharides red to violet, and neutral mucopolysaccharides and nucleic acids, as well as proteins in various shades of blue.

For micro-CT analysis, D. antarctica (PS65/280-1) and D. carinova n. sp. (PS65/276-1) specimens (Fig 1) were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, contrasted with 1% iodine metal (I2) dissolved in 100% ethanol (I2E) for 24 h, and transferred to 100% ethanol. Subsequently, each specimen was mounted on a pipette tip containing 100% ethanol, with the specimen arrested, later mounted on a pin with superglue. The microscopic X-ray tomography scan was performed with an XRadia Micro XCT-200 (Carl Zeiss X-ray Microscopy Inc.) using the 4x object lens unit, at 40 kV and 200 μA, with a pixel size of 5.77 and 4.98 μm for D. antarctica and D. carinova n. sp., respectively. Tomography projections were then reconstructed using the software provided by XRadia. For image segmentation the software platform Amira® 5.4. (FEI, Visualization Science Group) was used. Images from micro-CT scans were compared with histological sections (2.5 μm thick) for reciprocal illumination. A graphical 3D PDF reconstruction of both species was performed using Deep Exploration. 3D PDFs can be opened in Adobe Acrobat Reader and activated by clicking on it (see S1 3D PDF and S2 3D PDF).

Fig 1. Photographs of D. antarctica (left column: A,C,E,G) and D. carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp. (right column: B,D,F,H); specimens subjected to micro-CT reconstruction.

A Live animal, where most of the cerata were lost; close up of the cerata. B Live picture right after collection, showing the D. carinova n. sp. spawning on top of the gorgonian Primnoisis antarctica (Isididae). CD Lateral and dorsal view of the preserved animals. EF Ventral view of the preserved animals. GH Lateral view of the preserved egg masses.

Nomenclatural acts

The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix “”. The LSID for this publication is: The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS.

DNA amplification

We sequenced two specimens of D. antarctica (Station code 48/033; see Table 1), but we were not able to sequence D. carinova n. sp. due to inadequate chemical fixation for molecular analyses. Total genomic DNA was extracted from small pieces of foot tissue using DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Molecular markers included two fragments of the mitochondrial genes cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and 16S rRNA, and the nuclear gene histone H3. A fragment of about 593 bp of the mitochondrial protein-encoding gene COI was amplified using the primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 [29]. A fragment of about 383 bp of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer pair 16Sar-L and 16Sbr-H [30]. A fragment of about 310 bp of the protein-encoding gene histone H3 was amplified using the primer pair H3AD5’3’ and H3BD5’3’ [31]. PCR amplifications were carried out in a 10 μL-reaction volume including 5.1 μL of Sigma dH2O, 3.3 μL REDExtract-N-Amp PCR ReadyMix (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 0.3 μL of each primer, and 1 μL of genomic DNA. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) programs for COI and 16S rRNA involve an initial denaturing step (94°C for 5 min) followed 40 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 30 s), annealing (44–50°C for 30 s), and extension (72°C for 30 s), with a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. For histone H3, the initial denaturation step was conducted at 94°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles including denaturation at 94°C for 35 s, annealing at 50°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 15 s, with a final extension step at 72°C for 2 min. Amplified products were purified using microCLEAN (Microzone Ltd., Sussex, UK) and sequenced at the UB Scientific and Technological Centers (CCiT-UB) on an ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).

Phylogenetic analysis

Chromatograms were visualized and sequences were assembled in Geneious Pro 8.1.5 [32]. These were compared against the GenBank nucleotide database with the BLAST algorithm [33] to check for contamination. Alignments were trimmed to a position at which more than 50% of the sequences had nucleotides and missing positions at the ends were coded as missing data. All new sequences have been deposited in GenBank (see S1 Table for accession numbers). We used GBlocks 0.91b on the final trimmed alignment for identifying and excluding blocks of ambiguous data in single, non-codifying gene alignments (16S) with relaxed settings [34].

Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were conducted on the concatenated alignment of the three genes. BI analyses were performed using MrBayes ver. 3.2.5 [35] with a unique GTR model of sequence evolution [36] with corrections for a discrete gamma distribution and a proportion of invariant sites (GTR + Γ + I) [37] specified for each partition, as selected in jModelTest ver. 2.1.7 [38] under the Akaike Information Criterion [39]. Two runs, each with three hot chains and one cold chain, were conducted in MrBayes for 20 million generations, sampling every 2000th generation, using random starting trees. The analysis was performed twice, and 25% of the runs were discarded as burn-in after checking for stationarity with Tracer v.1.6 [40]. The remaining trees were combined to find the maximum a posteriori probability estimate of phylogeny.

ML analyses were conducted using RAxML ver. 8.1.2 [41]. For the maximum likelihood searches, a unique GTR model of sequence evolution with corrections for a discrete gamma distribution (GTR + Γ) [37] was specified for each data partition, and 500 independent searches were conducted. Nodal support was estimated via the rapid bootstrap algorithm (1000 replicates) using the GTR-CAT model [42]. Bootstrap resampling frequencies were thereafter mapped onto the optimal tree from the independent searches.



Cladobranchia Willan & Morton, 1984

Dotidae Gray, 1853

Doto Oken, 1815

Type species: Doris coronata Gmelin, 1791

Doto antarctica Eliot, 1907.

(Figs 14) (See S1 3D PDF of the reconstructed anatomy of the anterior region of the specimen)

Fig 2. Micro-CT reconstructions of the internal organs of D. antarctica (left column) and D. carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp. (right column).

AB Right antero-lateral view of all reconstructed organs. CD Left antero-lateral view of the circulatory, digestive, excretory, and nervous systems. EF Right lateral view of the male reproductive system. GH Left lateral view of the reproductive system (mucus gland is not depicted here since it covers the whole view). am ampulla; adiv ampulla diverticulum; au auricle; bc bursa copulatrix; cis circulatory sinuses; cgl capsule gland; cpg cerebropleural ganglion; dg distal gonoduct; dgdiv digestive gland diverticula; dgl digestive gland (only depicted in D. carinova n. sp.); gc giant cells; gon gonad; ht heart; int intestine; kid kidney; megl membrane gland; mugl mucus gland; oes oesophagus; od odontophore; ot oral tube; ov oviduct; peg pedal ganglion; pen penis; per pericardium; pg proximal gonoduct; pha pharynx; pro prostate; rad radula; rhg rhinophoral ganglion; rhi rhinophore; rhs rhinophoral sheath; sgl salivary gland; sin sinus; sp sphincter; sto stomach; vag vagina; vd vas deferens; ven ventricle.

Fig 3. Histological slides of the glandular structures in D. antarctica.

A Epidermis of the rhinophoral sheath. B Detail of one cerata tubercle showing defensive glandular cells (white punctuation in live animals). C Oral glands. D Giant neurones chain attached to the cerebropleural ganglion; a thin cortex, large nucleus, and nucleolus of each cell can be seen. E Detail of the prostate glandular cells. F Detail of the capsule glandular cells. G Detail of the membrane glandular cells. H Detail of the glandular mucus cells. gc giant cells; lum lumen; muc glandular mucus cell; n nucleus; nu nucleolus; ogl oral glands; pha pharynx; rhn rhinophoral nerve; sin sinus vessel; sgl salivary gland; smc specialised multivacuolised cell; wgc white glandular cells.

Fig 4. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of the radular teeth of D. antarctica.

Material examined: See Table 1. Deposited in SNSB Zoologische Staatssammlung München (Catalog number ZSM Moll 2016115).

Distribution: Ross and Weddell Seas, King George Island (South Shetland Islands), and Bouvet Island.

External morphology: (Fig 1A, 1C and 1E). Body short and bulged dorsally mostly due to reproductive system; young and adult specimens measured 4–9 x 2–5 x 2–3.5 mm (length:width:height). Body and cerata pale brown, intensified in cerata; containing bright white spots (corresponding to huge glandular cells) on tip of rhinophores, edge of rhinophoral sheaths, and each tubercle on cerata. Velum broad and rounded. Tentacular processes absent. Rhinophores transparent, thin, smooth, blunt; rhinophoral sheath 1/3 of rhinophore size, elongated in frontal side (giving resemblance of “calla lily” inflorescence). Six cerata pairs, short, rounded, 2–3 mm high, progressively smaller towards tail, connected to body by narrow connection; 4–5 circlets containing up to 12 short tubercles (largest circlet) close to each other, apex of cerata of same shape. Pseudobranchs absent. Cerata in live specimens easily autotomized upon manipulation, discharging white content of glandular cells. Anal papilla large, placed dorsally in mid-right position. Genital apertures below and in between 1st and 2nd cerata on right side. Foot narrow, linear, rounded anteriorly, tapering posteriorly to short, blunt tail.

Digestive system: (Fig 2A and 2C). Mouth opening ventrally between oral veil and foot; oral tube relatively short and surrounded by follicular, blue-staining, oral glands (Fig 3C). Jaws thin, membranous, without any appreciable ornamentation. Pharynx bulbous, inner lining presenting thin cuticle; posteriorly projected downwards due to odontophore and upwards (suctorial pump). Radular formula 72 x 0.1.0; rachidian arched, pointed tip; bearing five denticles along border, unequal among and within teeth (see Fig 4). Paired, saccular salivary glands leading dorso-posteriorly to pharynx by short duct; attached to posterior part of cerebropleural ganglia; composed by huge granular cells containing high amount of secretory vacuoles (see Fig 3D). Oesophagus opening at upper end of pharynx; widening, connecting to stomach right before location of anal papilla. Stomach widening, becoming flattened; from there, several digestive glandular diverticula reaching into cerata; from anterior part of stomach, two digestive gland ducts reaching into left and right cerata; from posterior part of stomach, one large digestive gland duct opening, composed of several diverticula reaching posterior cerata. Posterior branch and diverticula covered by gonad. Digestive gland containing typical digestive epithelium only present in cerata, here forming rather diffuse, racemose tissue (not depicted in Fig 2). Intestine short, thick, leading through densely ciliated anal papilla to outside.

Reproductive system: (Fig 2E and 2G). Diaulic. Ovotestis occupying whole posterior body region, reaching dorsally far until mid-longitudinal section. Ampulla convoluted; gonoducts connecting to small, globose, bean-shaped ampulla diverticulum placed in proximal part, ending blind; lying dorsally between gonad, mucus and membrane glands; proximally to diverticulum, elongated ampulla narrowing to distal gonoduct, branching into vas deferens and oviduct. Proximal vas deferens widening into prostate, the latter forming a loop in dorso-anterior region of animal, becoming thinner; composed by elongate cells, containing basal nucleus, cytoplasm filled of small, blue-staining granules (Fig 3E). Distal vas deferens after prostatic part decreasing in diameter, connecting to penis. Penis unarmed, conical, relatively short; placed in ovoid penial sheath, which can be sometimes seen through penial pore in preserved specimens. Male and female genital openings in antero-lateral right position.

Oviduct starting with a sphincter, widening, entering distally the vaginal duct, which widens directly into receptaculum seminis (flow through system). This connection separated by a distinct sphincter. At same area oviduct entering nidamental glands.

Receptaculum seminis wide, highly elongated, folded, leading to vagina distally. Bursa copulatrix small, rounded, saccular; placed at middle part of vaginal duct/receptaculum seminis. Vagina flattened, highly ciliated, leading outside by wide aperture; sharing wide atrium with mucus gland. We follow the functional terminology of Klussmann-Kolb [43] for nidamental glands, composed of capsule gland, followed by membrane gland, leading into mucus gland. Capsule gland occupying right antero-lateral region of animal; composed by thin, columnar cells containing small microvilli in apical pole, basal nucleus, cytoplasm entirely composed of bluish granules, which become increasingly pinkish towards end of gland (Fig 3F). Membrane gland lying ventrally under capsule gland, extending further posteriorly under gonad, composed by columnar cells filled with reddish granules (Fig 3G). Mucus gland, the largest part of the nidamental gland, occupying ventrally about 2/3 of body, also extending anteriorly; composed of columnar cells containing basal nucleus, many small, ovoid, violet granules (Fig 3H).

Nervous system: (Fig 2C). Oesophageal nerve ring composed of four ganglia. Cerebral ganglia fused to pleural ganglia into cerebropleural ganglia. Ganglia composed by cortical layer of neurones encircling central neuropil. From neuropil of cerebropleural ganglion one nerve connects to small rhinophoral ganglion, placed right at basal part of each rhinophore. Rhinophoral nerve short leading to top of rhinophore; short optic nerves connecting to eyes. Eyes containing large, spherical lens; retina showing melanin granules. Both cerebropleural ganglia nearly close together, no cerebral commissure visible. Pedal ganglia, interconnected by relatively long commissure, lying close to cerebropleural ganglia with short connectives. From these, one nerve running anteriorly, another down to foot passing through giant cells (GCs) and sinus. A total of 27 GCs measuring 168.7 ± 20.14 μm (mean ± sd) in maximum diameter, seen close to left cerebropleural and pedal ganglia and right salivary gland, extending posteriorly forming a circle in left anterior region of animal; only one GC lying under left pedal ganglion; cytoplasm remains mostly occupied by huge nucleus containing faint bluish fibrillar appearance (appearing shining in micro-CT like the cortical neurons of ganglia); several amoeboid-shaped nucleoli, staining dark blue, apparent (Fig 3D). All GCs contact to each other, close to central hemolymphatic sinus and/or to small vessel-like sinus. The whole GC complex occupying one third of anterior body volume.

Circulatory and excretory systems: (Fig 2C). Pericardium wide, flattened; situated dorsally, behind anal papilla. Auricle connecting to small anterior lying ventricle. Vessel-like structure running from auricle anteriorly to edge of pericardium, reaching cerata. Kidney flattened, connecting ventrally on right side to pericardium; extending far into posterior part of animal, widening notably; nephroduct extending far into anal papilla, leading outside close to anus.

Epithelial glandular structures: Notal epithelium formed by unicellular layer of pinkish multivacuolized cells (specialised vacuolated epithelium), interspersed with mucus glandular cells (Fig 3A). Multivacuolized cells prismatic in shape, having basal nucleus, presenting microvilli all over apical part. Mucus gland cells presenting one huge vacuole occupying whole cytoplasm, containing different shades of homogeneous violet-stained contents (acid mucopolysaccharides); ubiquitously seen in notum, rhinophores, and cerata. Subepithelial clusters of large, bluish, glandular cells observed in rhinophore tips, sheath, and cerata tubercles; probably responsible for whitish appearance in live animals; probably exuded their contents when animal disturbed, thus defensive function is proposed (Fig 3B).

Egg mass: (Fig 1G). Oval, slightly bean-shaped, 3.5–4 x 3.5 x 2 mm (length:heigth:width); enveloped by thick membrane composed of four layers. Outermost layer with maximal width of 3.3 μm measured, blue coloured; following outer layer 53.3 μm, pink, containing profuse wholes; inner layer 40.51 μm, pink; innermost 48.39 μm, purple. Egg mass presenting dorsal keel, of around 0.4 mm, extending far from one side to the other. Whole egg mass attached to substrate by twisted stalk placed in mid-lateral position. Dorsal keel and stalk composed mainly by first three layers. Egg capsules measured 336.95 ± 32.16 μm (mean ± sd); cytoplasm mainly composed by blue-staining protein platelets.

Ecology: The 19 specimens were found in benthic ecosystems at 65–500 m depth. Some specimens were found laying egg masses on two unidentified hydrozoans of the genera Oswaldella Stechow, 1919 (Plumularioidea: Kirchenpaueriidae) and Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, Garcia Carrascosa & Vervoort, 1997 (Sertulariidae).

Doto carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp.

(Figs 1, 2, 5 and 6) (See S2 3D PDF of the reconstructed anatomy of the anterior region of the specimen)

Fig 5. Left antero-lateral view of the micro-CT reconstruction of the nervous system of D. carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp. cpg cerebropleural ganglion; gc giant cells; peg pedal ganglion; rhg rhinophoral ganglion; sin sinus.

Fig 6. Histological slide of outer surface of the egg mass in Doto carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp.

Type locality: Eastern Weddell Sea (71° 6.44’ S; 11° 27.76’ W), 277 m depth.

Material studied: A single specimen collected during the Antarctic cruise ANT XXI/2 (see Table 1). Deposited in SNSB Zoologische Staatssammlung München (Catalog number ZSM Moll 2016114).

External morphology: (Fig 1B, 1D and 1F). Body bulged anteriorly due to reproductive system; live specimen measured 13 mm in length, 10 x 4 x 5 mm (length:width:height) when preserved. Body and cerata creamy coloured; presenting bright white spots (glandular cells) in tip of rhinophores, along edge of rhinophoral sheath, and each tubercle in cerata. Velum short, rounded. Oral tentacular processes absent. Eight long, pointed cerata pairs, 6 mm high, narrow connections to body; apex long, lobulated; elongate tubercles on cerata disposed in 4–5 circlets with maximum of nine per circlet. Pseudobranchs absent. Rhinophores transparent, thin, smooth, blunt; rhinophoral sheath short, cylindrical, narrow (calyciform), slightly expanded anteriorly, being up to 1/2 of rhinophore size. Anal papilla large, placed dorsally in mid-right position. Genital apertures lying under right row of cerata, between 1st and 2nd. Foot narrow, rounded anteriorly, tapering posteriorly to short, blunt tail.

Digestive system: (Fig 2B and 2D). Mouth opening ventrally between oral veil and foot; oral tube relatively short, surrounded by follicular oral glands. Pharynx bulbous, containing thin cuticle. Radula not analysed since the specimen was not dissected. Paired salivary glands leading to middle part of pharynx, entering via long ducts; right one stretching along posterior part of cerebropleural ganglion, not reaching backwards as left one, which extends far posteriorly along oesophagus; both being long, saccular, widening progressively posteriorly (giving pyriform appearance). Oesophagus opening at posterior dorsal side of pharynx; widening, connecting to stomach. Stomach widening, flattening, opening into two digestive gland diverticula, which run into anterior cerata; third (posterior) branch of digestive gland opening posteriorly from stomach, running to posterior part of animal, branching off diverticula which reach into last cerata pairs. Digestive gland diverticula connecting to typical diffuse, racemose digestive gland, situated exclusively in cerata, occupying it almost entirely. Intestine cylindrical in cross section, opening from posterior part of stomach, leading outside by long anal papilla.

Reproductive system: (Fig 2F). Diaulic. Gonad occupying whole posterior body region, reaching far until mid-longitudinal section on dorsal side. Smaller gonoducts uniting into anterior gonoduct, leading into large, elongated ampulla; the latter lying dorsally underneath gonad, close to mucus and membrane glands. From distal part of ampulla thin distal gonoduct extending anteriorly to prostate and oviduct. Prostate long, isodiametric, folded, leading to thin, contorted distal vas deferens, connecting to penis. Penis long, conical, unarmed; placed in ovoid penial sheath; tip of penis seen outside penial pore in preserved specimen. Genital openings lying in antero-right position.

Oviduct starting with a sphincter, widening, branching into distal oviduct, leading directly into nidamental glands and vaginal duct, opening directly into receptaculum seminis (flow through system). Bursa copulatrix attached to widened part of receptaculum seminis. Both placed close to and below prostate; oviduct separated from bursa copulatrix again by additional sphincter. Bursa copulatrix wide, highly elongated, folded, leading distally to vagina. Receptaculum seminis small, rounded, saccular; attached to vaginal canal in middle position. Vagina short, flattened, leading outside by wide aperture; sharing wide atrium with nidamental glands.

Nidamental glands composed of: 1) capsule gland occupying right antero-lateral region, 2) membrane gland placed right under capsule gland, extending further posteriorly below gonad, 3) highly folded mucus gland reaching ventrally far into anterior and posterior part of body.

Nervous system: (Fig 5). Oesophageal nerve ring composed of four ganglia. Cerebral ganglia fused to pleural ganglia into cerebropleural ganglia; standing close without distinct commissure; also standing close to pedal ganglia, the latter interconnected by relatively long commissure. Each cerebropleural ganglion sending one nerve to small rhinophoral ganglion, placed right at bottom of each rhinophore; from there, a short nerve leading to top of rhinophore. From pedal ganglia, one nerve running down to foot, through giant cells (GCs) and sinus. Forty interconnected GCs can be seen (appearing shining in micro-CT like the cortical neurons of ganglia), some close to cerebropleural and pedal ganglia and right salivary gland; extending posteriorly, forming a circle in left anterior region of animal body; only two GCs found under pedal ganglia; all GCs attached to large hemolymphatic sinus; whole GCs complex occupying one third of body volume in anterior part.

Circulatory and excretory systems: (Fig 2D). Pericardium wide, flattened, occupying dorsal part of body right behind anal papilla. Heart composed by large auricle and anterior lying ventricle, both placed in longitudinal axis. Several sinuses connecting to pericardium, eventually to auricle, receiving oxygenated hemolymph from each ceras; running close to digestive gland diverticula (only two at left and one at right side could be seen and depicted in micro-CT reconstruction). Kidney placed ventrally of pericardium; directly connected in anterior right position through small duct; nephroduct leading to anal papilla; nephropore close to anus.

Egg mass: (Fig 1H). Reniform, bean-shaped egg masses measured 5.5–8.4 x 3.5–6 x 2–2.5 mm (length:heigth:width); slightly asymmetrical in transverse section, being bulged in one side; enveloped by thick membrane, composed by four layers. Outermost layer staining blue; 3 μm in width; following outer layer 33.3 μm, pink, containing abundant wholes; inner layer 23.71 μm, pink; innermost 27.7 μm, purple (Fig 6); dorsal keel and stalk only composed by the three outer layers. Dorsal keel measuring 0.8–1 mm in length by 118 μm in width at wider base, running from one side to the other. Whole egg mass attached to substrate by one twisted stalk placed in mid-lateral position. Live egg capsules white, becoming orange when preserved, measuring 357.48 ± 29.8716 μm (mean ± sd); cytoplasm mainly composed by blue-staining protein platelets.

Ecology: Doto carinova n. sp. was collected from muddy bottoms at 277 m depth in a benthic community with abundant gorgonians (Thouarella, Primnoidae), sponges, colonial tunicates, hydrozoans, bryozoans, amphipods, ophiuroids, and molluscs. The animal was found laying an egg mass on the Isididae gorgonian Primnoisis antarctica (Studer, 1878), close to other three additional egg masses.

Etymology: In the name Doto carinova n. sp., the specific epithet is an apposition derived from the words carina (= keel) and ova (= eggs) in Latin, referring to the pronounced keel observed in the egg mass.

Remarks: (Table 2). Externally D. carinova n. sp. differs from the sympatric D. antarctica in having a longer and paler body, a shorter velum, eight (versus six) longer cerata with less and more pronounced tubercles, a short and circular rhinophoral sheath, and a slightly larger anal papilla. The salivary glands differ notably from these of D. antarctica, by being longer, presenting longer salivary ducts, and presenting the right salivary gland reaching far posteriorly. The ampulla is folded and presents a proximal bean-shaped diverticulum in D. antarctica, while it is elongated and isodiametric in D. carinova n. sp. Moreover, the prostate is longer and folded in D. carinova n. sp., while in D. antarctica it is short, wide proximally, and forms a pronounced loop. The penis is also longer in the new species. More GCs (40) can be seen in the new species than in D. antarctica (27).

Table 2. Differential characters among D. carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp. and D. antarctica.

The egg clutches of D. carinova n. sp. are more elongated, slightly asymmetrical in transverse section, and possess a higher dorsal keel (1 mm) than those of D. antarctica. However, there are no histological differences in the mucus layers of the egg masses of the two species. Egg masses of both species were found in different cnidarian substrates, being perhaps different prey items. While D. antarctica was found on hydrozoans of the genera Antarctoscyphus and Oswaldella, D. carinova n. sp. was found on the gorgonian Primnoisis antarctica.

Phylogenetic analysis

The total data set contained 62 species of Doto and 11 outgroup species. The aligned genes comprised 2,283 characters. The maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian (BI) trees are similar (Fig 7). The family Dotidae resulted monophyletic. Kabeiro species are the sister group of all Doto species. Within Doto, D. pinnatifida was sister group to all other species. The two newly sequenced specimens of D. antarctica from the Weddell Sea clustered together and with the specimens from the Ross Sea. Doto antarctica is sister group of Philippine and Papua New Guinea specimens (D. ussi, D. greenmayeri, and other unidentified species). Thus D. antarctica is more closely related to Pacific Doto species than to Atlantic (northern and southern hemispheres) species.

Fig 7. Phylogenetic tree of Doto species based on the combined COI, 16S, and H3 genes using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum-likelihood (ML).

Numbers on nodes indicate posterior probability values (BI) and bootstrap support values (ML). Specimens sequenced are in bold; Doto antarctica specimens are coloured in red. Schematic drawings of the reproductive system of Doto species are depicted (A–D), as well as the unsequenced D. uva Marcus, 1955 (E). bc bursa copulatrix; gd gonoduct; nigl nidamental glands; pen penis; rs receptaculum seminis; vd vas deferens.

Regarding the additional Mediterranean species sequenced herein, all of them clustered with species from the Northern Sea and Eastern North Atlantic. Doto floridicola specimens clustered with the Mediterranean specimen accessed in GenBank [44]. The specimens of D. koenneckeri grouped with the previous Mediterranean and Welsh specimens. However, two supposed D. dunnei specimens (#1 and #3) used in this study clustered also within the D. koenneckeri individuals. An additional D. dunnei (2) from the same locality was not found to be related to the previous specimen sequenced from Wales, but instead clustered with the three Mediterranean specimens of D. coronata sequenced here. However, these latter specimens did not cluster to any D. coronata specimens sequenced from the Netherlands, North Sea, USA, nor Wales. Although D. coronata has been also recorded in the Mediterranean, it is possible that this species is an undescribed species of Doto, since it presents morphological characters that differ from those of the original description (author’s unpub. data). Finally, D. paulinae was found to be closely related to D. eireana, although with low support.


In this study, we added molecular evidence for the circumpolar distribution of D. antarctica, as well as a detailed anatomical and histological description of the species and its egg masses. A thorough anatomical description is highly important since the species of Doto have often been misidentified due to the lack of clear external diagnostic characters. External descriptions available until now for D. antarctica clearly coincide with the description presented herein [17,19]. However, Eliot noted a ridge in front of the rhinophoral sheaths, which might be a fixation artefact [19]. Also, the number of rows of radular teeth in our dissected specimen was smaller than in previous observations [17,19], although this may be an age-dependent character. The shape of the rachidian tooth is consistent with the descriptions within the genus [45]. Since radulae are variable within species and among teeth of the same radula (usually bilaterally asymmetrical), this character is not considered relevant for distinguishing Doto species [9,12].

Histological sections of D. antarctica showed the typical notal epithelium of cladobranchs, composed by multivacuolised cells and mucus glandular cells [46,47]. The former cells protect the slug against cnidocysts [48], the latter are rather typical for Dendronotida [47,49]. Subepithelial clusters of single gland cells staining light blue (white in live specimens) were found in the most exposed parts of the animal, i.e., cerata and rhinophores. We propose a defensive function of these glands due to the strategic location in exposed parts, and because they everted their content when molested. These single glandular cells are commonly suggested to be defensive glandular cells [47,50], where the animal stores defensive compounds obtained from prey or de novo biosynthesised by the slug, such as terpenoids [51].

Doto carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp. was found in sympatry with D. antarctica in the Weddell Sea and firstly described herein. Although sequencing of the new species from chemically fixed material was impossible, morphological characters help to differentiate both species. Externally, D. carinova n. sp. exhibits a paler colouration, a higher number and more elongated cerata, and calyciform rhinophoral sheaths (see remarks above). Remarkably, the egg masses of both species described herein are unique in shape among Doto species. Usually they are ribbon like structures deposited on the substrate in a zig-zag folded way [15,16,5254], whereas in the Antarctic species they have a bean-like shape, possessing a keel, and being attached to the substrate by a twisted stalk. However, the egg mass of D. carinova n. sp. is more pronouncedly reniform and has a wider keel. Furthermore, both species were found on different cnidarian species, albeit being collected from the same locality in the Weddell Sea. Different substrates might represent different food sources for the species, a fact that should be considered as an additional character for distinguishing among species [16]. Descriptions presented herein will be useful to identify the undetermined species of Doto collected in different Antarctic regions [18,22,24], and probably to expand the distribution of D. carinova n. sp.

Regarding the internal anatomy, the shape and arrangement of the salivary glands, ampulla, prostate, and penis are clearly diagnostic among both Antarctic species (see remarks above). A proximal blind diverticulum of the ampulla was only present in D. antarctica. The prostate is shorter and wider in D. antarctica, while it is longer in D. carinova n. sp. Both species present sphincters to separate ampulla, oviduct, and the allosperm vesicles (receptaculum seminis and bursa copulatrix), similarly to D. uva [54] and many other Doto species. The general outline of the reproductive system in D. carinova n. sp. is similar to D. antarctica. The diaulic reproductive system of both Antarctic species presents an oviduct leading into the receptaculum seminis (and bursa copulatrix annexed), which connects into a separate folded area of the nidamental glands (Fig 7C). Although the connection of the oviduct with the nidamental glands lies more internally in the Antarctic species, this arrangement of ducts is very similar to the more closely related D. amyra and D. columbiana (Fig 7B) [12]. A similar arrangement can be found in several other Doto species not included in our phylogenetic analyses (D. bella, D. caramella, D. chica, D. divae, D. doerga, D. ganda, D. japonica, D. kya, D. varians, and D. wara [12,50,55,56]). Another feature in which the Antarctic species differ from the latter species is the distinct bursa copulatrix attached to the vaginal duct.

Doto pinnatifida was recovered basal in our phylogenetic tree, displaying a similar arrangement to the Antarctic species, but with a bursa inserting close to the vaginal opening (Fig 7A) [57]. In addition, a fourth, quite spread, reproductive system is depicted; this displays an oviduct not connected proximally to the receptaculum (Fig 7D). This fourth system is found in a lineage close to D. antarctica and composed by D. greenmayeri and D. ussi [13]. Likewise, a second linage represented by D. africoronata, D. coronata, D. floridicola, D. formosa, D. fragilis, and D. paulinae also presented this system [13,5662]. Additionally, according to Fischer et al. [54] a triaulic reproductive system is present in D. uva (Fig 7E), albeit Marcus [55] considered it similar to that of D. pinnatifida. Summarizing, our phylogenetic analyses show a trend towards the reduction of bursa copulatrix and the separation of the vaginal duct from the oviduct (Fig 7). This implies that the “flow through system” of the oviduct into vaginal duct is changing into a separate outleading duct for eggs and a shift of the fertilization chamber towards the distal part of the female genital system.

Histological analysis revealed gigantic gland cells around the salivary glands of D. bella, D. japonica, and D. uva [50,54]. They have been traditionally considered accessory glandular cells to the salivary glands. In our histological and tomographic analyses these giant cells resemble neuronal cells, similar to ganglionic cortical neurones, but larger in size. Moreover, these are not exclusively located close to the salivary glands but are in close contact to the ganglionic complex (see Fig 2C and 2D). Therefore, we consider them to be giant neurones as recorded in anaspideans and pulmonates [63], as well as in cladobranch and doridacean nudibranchs [64]. They are located in the ganglionic mass (i.e., metacerebral cells), related to external sensory input from the head and considered homologous within these groups [63]. These giant neurones have been found to be polyploid by increasing the DNA content step-wise as the animal grows [65]. This has been suggested to be related to a major hormone secretory function, responsible for behavioural responses such as crawling [64]. However, in D. antarctica and D. carinova n. sp., although being connected to the cerebropleural ganglia, they form a circle extending posteriorly (Fig 5). Since our GCs, like other described giant neurones, possess a huge (active) nucleus, we speculate that neurosecretory hormones might be secreted into the hemolymphatic sinus located within this circle. Our study seems to be the first description of a complex and asymmetrical neuronal/secretory arrangement in heterobranchs. Furthermore, it is possible that the number of GCs could be used as a diagnostic character for discriminating among Doto species. For instance, Antarctic species of Doto have larger (170 μm) and more abundant (27–40) GCs than the South American D. uva (150 μm, N = 12) [54].

The phylogenetic analyses recovered trees with similar topologies than others recently published [13,66]. However, contrary to Pola and Gosliner [6], Pinufius is not part of the Dotidae clade. Doto antarctica specimens from the Weddell Sea were closely related to those from the Ross Sea, as suggested morphologically herein. Contrary to the morphological similitudes mentioned by Eliot [17] when describing D. antarctica, and comparing to D. fragilis (Forbes, 1838), phylogenetic analyses revealed that these species are not closely related. Based on external appearance, Odhner [19] stated later that D. antarctica was more closely related to D. formosa Verrill, 1875. However, in our analyses, D. fragilis and D. formosa were closely related to each other, sharing a similar reproductive system, but were dissimilar to D. antarctica. Once more, descriptions merely based on external characters seem insufficient to establish phylogenetic relationships, or even to identify and describe Doto species. A closer phylogenetic relationship was found among D. antarctica and the Indo-Pacific species, and altogether with the rest of Southern species of Doto. This relationship could be related to the Antarctic origin of the group, and the older origin of the Indo-Pacific species respect to the Atlantic ones. However, the majority of the sequenced species so far are from the northern hemisphere. Thus, there is a need for sequencing more species from the Austral oceans to assess possible phylogeographic relationships among Doto species. Further sampling efforts should be conducted to collect and sequence D. carinova n. sp. and other undetermined species around Antarctica to increase the knowledge of Dotidae, with only two species found in the Southern Ocean to date.

Concluding Remarks

New Dotidae species have been usually described based only on external morphological and radular characters. Nonetheless, internal organ organisation and egg mass structure is desirable for describing Doto species. Micro-CT and histology has demonstrated to be very useful techniques to reconstruct the internal anatomy of these two Doto species. Two new occurrences of D. antarctica were recorded in Bouvet Island and the eastern Weddell Sea. These specimens are morphologically and genetically characterised herein and appeared related to D. antarctica from the Ross Sea, which strongly suggests a circumpolar distribution. We also described D. carinova n. sp. occurring in sympatry with D. antarctica in the Weddell Sea. Although some distinguishing characters can be size-related, the lower number of tubercles on the cerata, the different form of the rhinophoral sheath, the shape and arrangement of the salivary glands, ampulla, and prostate in the large specimen of D. carinova n. sp., as well as differences in the egg masses and cnidarian substrate indicate separate evolutionary lineages.

A phylogenetic hypothesis including various species of Doto from various regions showed a trend towards the reduction of bursa copulatrix and distal connection of oviduct to the nidamental glands with separate pathways for eggs and allosperm. Furthermore, we identified and described the nervous system of Doto species that contains accessory giant cells that might represent neurones with neuronal/secretory function. Future studies may unravel the properties and function of these peculiar giant cells. Moreover, further studies should revisit and check the identification of Doto species collected in former Antarctic cruises, because the present study provides new characters that may allow distinguishing among species.

Supporting Information

S1 3D PDF. Reconstructed anatomy of the anterior region of Doto antarctica.

It can be opened in Adobe Acrobat Reader and activated by clicking on it. Each system and organ can be selected independently.


S2 3D PDF. Reconstructed anatomy of the anterior region of Doto carinova Moles, Avila & Wägele n. sp.

It can be opened in Adobe Acrobat Reader and activated by clicking on it. Each system and organ can be selected independently.


S1 Table. Accession numbers of the species included in the phylogenetic analysis.

Species sequenced in this study are in bold.



We thank Prof W Arntz, T Brey, and the crew of RV Polarstern, for allowing the participation of C Avila in the Antarctic cruise ANT XV/3, and C Avila and M Ballesteros in ANT XXI/2 (AWI, Bremerhaven, Germany). We also thank L Núñez-Pons for the identification of the cnidarian species. A Riesgo is acknowledged for the endless help and support in genetic analyses. We are grateful to G Giribet and J Giménez for revising the manuscript. This paper is part of the AntEco (State of the Antarctic Ecosystem) Scientific Research Programme.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JM HW CA. Performed the experiments: JM HW AP GU. Analyzed the data: JM HW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JM HW MB GU CA. Wrote the paper: JM HW GU CA.


  1. 1. Clarke A, Johnston NM. Antarctic marine benthic diversity. Oceanogr Mar Biol An Annu Rev. 2003;41: 47–114.
  2. 2. Göbbeler K, Klussmann-Kolb A. Out of Antarctica?—New insights into the phylogeny and biogeography of the Pleurobranchomorpha (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Mol Phylogenet Evol. Elsevier Inc.; 2010;55: 996–1007.
  3. 3. Wägele H, Klussmann-Kolb A, Vonnemann V, Medina M. Heterobranchia I. The Opisthobranchia. In: Ponder WF, Lindberg DR, editors. Phylogeny and Evolution of the Mollusca. University of California Press, Berkeley; 2008. pp. 385–408.
  4. 4. Martynov A V., Schrödl M. The new Arctic side-gilled sea slug genus Boreoberthella (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia): Pleurobranchoidean systematics and evolution revisited. Polar Biol. 2009;32: 53–70.
  5. 5. Willan RC, Walsby JR, Morton J, Ballantine WJ. Marine molluscs. Part 2. Opisthobranchia. University of Auckland Marine Laboratory; 1984.
  6. 6. Pola M, Gosliner TM. The first molecular phylogeny of cladobranchian opisthobranchs (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Nudibranchia). Mol Phylogenet Evol. Elsevier Inc.; 2010;56: 931–941.
  7. 7. Goodheart JA, Bazinet AL, Collins AG, Cummings MP. Relationships within Cladobranchia (Gastropoda: Nudibranchia) based on RNA-Seq data: an initial investigation. R Soc Open Sci. 2015;2: 150196. pmid:26473045
  8. 8. Bouchet P, Rocroi J-P. Classification and nomenclator of Gastropod families. Int J Malacol. 2005;47: 397.
  9. 9. Odhner NHJ. Nudibranchia, Dendronotacea; A revision of the system. Mémoires la Musée R l’Histoire Nat Belgique. 1936;2: 1056–1128.
  10. 10. Wägele H, Willan RC. Phylogeny of the Nudibranchia. Zool J Linn Soc. 2000;130: 83–181.
  11. 11. Thiele J. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde. Vol. 1. Erster Ban. Fischer G, editor. Jena; 1931.
  12. 12. Marcus E. Opisthobranch mollusks from California. The Veliger (Suppl). 1961;3: 1–135.
  13. 13. Shipman C, Gosliner T. Molecular and morphological systematics of Doto Oken, 1851 (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia), with descriptions of five new species and a new genus. Zootaxa. 2015;3973: 57–101. pmid:26249713
  14. 14. WoRMS Editorial Board. World Register of Marine Species. Available: at VLIZ. Accessed 5 November 2015.
  15. 15. Ortea JA, Urgorri V. El género Doto (Oken, 1815) en el norte y noroeste de España. Boletín Estac Cent Ecol. 1978;7: 72–92.
  16. 16. Lemche H. New British species of Doto Oken, 1815 (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia). J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 1976;56: 691–706.
  17. 17. Eliot C. Mollusca IV: Nudibranchiata. National Antarctic Expedition 1901–1904. Nat Hist. 1907;2: 1–28.
  18. 18. Thiele J. Die Antarktischen Schnecken und Muscheln. Dtsch Südpolar-Expedition Im auftrage des Reichsamtes des Inn Hrsg von Erich von Drygalski Leiter der Exped. Berlin; 1912;13 Zoologi: 183–286.
  19. 19. Odhner NHJ. The Nudibranchiata of British Antarctic Expedition. British Antarctic (“Terra Nova”) Expedition, 1910. Nat Hist Reports Zool. 1934;7: 229–310.
  20. 20. Lovell LL, Trego KD. The epibenthic megafaunal and benthic infaunal invertebrates of Port Foster, Deception Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr. 2003;50: 1799–1819. Available:
  21. 21. Powell AWD. Antarctic and Subantarctic Mollusca. Rec Auckl Inst Museum. 1960;5: 117–193.
  22. 22. Schiaparelli S, Lörz A-N, Cattaneo-Vietti R. Diversity and distribution of mollusc assemblages on the Victoria Land coast and the Balleny Islands, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Antarct Sci. 2006;18: 615–631.
  23. 23. Arntz WE, Thatje S, Linse K, Avila C, Ballesteros M, Barnes DKA, Cope T, Cristobo FJ, de Broyer C, Gutt J, Isla E, López-González P, Montiel A, Munilla T, Ramos Esplá AA, Raupach M, Rauschert M, Rodríguez E, Teixidó N, Broyer C. Missing link in the Southern Ocean: sampling the marine benthic fauna of remote Bouvet Island. Polar Biol. 2005;29: 83–96.
  24. 24. Ghiglione C, Alvaro MC, Griffiths H, Linse K, Schiaparelli S. Ross Sea Mollusca from the Latitudinal Gradient Program: R/V Italica 2004 Rauschert dredge samples. Zookeys. 2013;341: 37–48. pmid:24146597
  25. 25. Jörger KM, Neusser TP, Haszprunar G, Schrödl M. Undersized and underestimated: 3D visualization of the Mediterranean interstitial acochlidian gastropod Pontohedyle milaschewitchii (Kowalevsky, 1901). Org Divers Evol. 2008;8: 194–214.
  26. 26. Rückert IM, Altnöder A, Schrödl M. Computer-based 3D anatomical reconstruction and systematic placement of the mesopsammic gastropod Platyhedyle denudata Salvini-Plawen, 1973 (Opisthobranchia, Sacoglossa). Org Divers Evol. 2008;8: 358–367.
  27. 27. Gutt J, Arntz WE. The Expedition ANTARKTIS XV/3 (EASIZ II) of RV “Polarstern” in 1998. Berichte zur Polarforsch (Reports Polar Res Bremerhaven, Alfred Wegener Inst Polar Mar Res. 1999;301: 1–229. Available:
  28. 28. Wägele H. Histological investigation of some organs and specialised cellular structures in Opisthobranchia (Gastropoda) with the potential to yield phylogenetically significant characters. Zool Anz. 1997;236: 119–131.
  29. 29. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3: 294–299. pmid:7881515
  30. 30. Palumbi SR, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G. The simple fool’s guide to PCR version 2. In: Department of Zoology and Kewalo Marine Laboratory University [Internet]. 2002 pp. 1–45. Available:
  31. 31. Colgan DJ, McLauchlan A, Wilson GDF, Livingston SP, Edgecombe GD, Macaranas J, Cassis G, Gray MR. Histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences and arthropod molecular evolution. Aust J Zool. 1998;46: 419.
  32. 32. Drummond A, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Duran C, Field M, Heled J, Kearse M, Markowitz S, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Sturrock S, Thierer T, Wilson A. Geneious v5.5. Available: 2010.
  33. 33. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipmann DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI- BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25: 3389–3402. Available: pmid:9254694
  34. 34. Talavera G, Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007;56: 564–577. pmid:17654362
  35. 35. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J, Teslenko M. MrBayes Version 3.2 Manual: Tutorials and Model Summaries. 2011; 1–103.
  36. 36. Tavaré S. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect Math life Sci. 1986;17: 57–86.
  37. 37. Yang Z. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. TRENDS Ecol Evol. 1996;11: 367–372. pmid:21237881
  38. 38. Posada D. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25: 1253–1256. pmid:18397919
  39. 39. Posada D, Buckley TR. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol. 2004;53: 793–808. pmid:15545256
  40. 40. Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ. Tracer v1.6, Available: 2014.
  41. 41. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 1312–1313. pmid:24451623
  42. 42. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol. 2008;57: 758–771. pmid:18853362
  43. 43. Klussmann-Kolb A. The reproductive systems of the Nudibranchia (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia): Comparative histology and ultrastructure of the nidamental glands with aspects of functional morphology. Zool Anzeiger—A J Comp Zool. 2001;240: 119–136.
  44. 44. Wollscheid-Lengeling E, Boore J, Brown W, Wägele H. The phylogeny of Nudibranchia (Opisthobranchia, Gastropoda, Mollusca) reconstructed by three molecular markers. Org Divers Evol. 2001;1: 241–256. Available:
  45. 45. Thompson TE, Cattaneo R, Wong YM. Eastern Mediterranean Opisthobranchia: Dotidae (Dendronotoidea), Arminidae and Madrellidae (Arminoidea). J Molluscan Stud. 1990;56: 393–413.
  46. 46. Moles J, Wägele H, Cutignano A, Fontana A, Avila C. Distribution of granuloside in the Antarctic nudibranch Charcotia granulosa (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Charcotiidae). Mar Biol. 2016;163: 54.
  47. 47. Wägele H, Ballesteros M, Avila C. Defensive grandular structures in opistobranch molluscs—from histology to ecology. Oceanogr Mar Biol An Annu Rev. 2006;44: 197–276.
  48. 48. Greenwood PG. Acquisition and use of nematocysts by cnidarian predators. Toxicon. Elsevier Ltd; 2009;54: 1065–1070.
  49. 49. Affeld S, Kehraus S, Wägele H, König GM. Dietary derived sesquiterpenes from Phyllodesmium lizardensis. J Nat Prod. 2009;72: 298–300. pmid:19173621
  50. 50. Baba K. Anatomical studies on three species of Doto (D. bella, D. japonica and D. pita) from Japan (Nudibranchia: Dendronotoidea: Dotoidae). Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab. 1971;19: 73–79.
  51. 51. Putz A, Kehraus S, Díaz-Agras G, Wägele H, König GM. Dotofide, a guanidine-interrupted terpenoid from the marine slug Doto pinnatifida (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia). European J Org Chem. 2011;2011: 3733–3737.
  52. 52. Kress A. Observations during embryonic development in the genus Doto (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia). J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 1975;55: 691–701.
  53. 53. Picton BE, Brown GH. Four nudibranch gastropods new to the fauna of Great Britain and Ireland including a description of a new species of Doto Oken. Irish Nat J. 1981;20: 261–268.
  54. 54. Fischer MA, Van Der Velde G, Roubos EW. Morphology, anatomy and histology of Doto uva Marcus, 1955 (Opisthobranchia: Nudibranchia) from the Chilean coast. Contrib to Zool. 2006;75: 145–159.
  55. 55. Marcus Er. Lamellariacea und Opisthobranchia. Reports of the Lund University Chile expedition 1948–1949. The Lunds Universitets. Arsskrift. N. F.; 1959. pp. 69–71.
  56. 56. Schmekel R, Portmann A. Opisthobranchia des Mittelmeeres, Nudibranchia und Saccoglossa. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1982.
  57. 57. Schmekel L, Kress A. Die gattung Doto (Gastropoda: Nudibranchia) im Mittelmeer und Armelkanal. mit beschreibung von Doto acuta n. sp. Malacologia. 1977;16: 467–499.
  58. 58. Dreyer TF. A contribution to our knowledge of the reproductive organs of the Nudibranchiata. S Afr J Sci. 1911;VIII: 340–349.
  59. 59. Baba K. Opisthobranchia of Kii, middle Japan. J Dep Agric Kyushu Imp Univ. 1938;6: 1–19.
  60. 60. Marcus E, Marcus E. Opisthobranchs from the Lesser Antilles. Stud Faune Curaçao. 1963;33: 1–129.
  61. 61. Marcus EDR. On some opisthobranchs from Florida. Bull Mar Sci. 1972;22: 284–308.
  62. 62. MacFarland FM. Studies of opisthobranchiate mollusks of the Pacific coast of North America. Mem Calif Acad Sci. 1966;6: 1–546.
  63. 63. Weiss KR, Kupfermann I. Homology of the giant serotonergic neurons (metacerebral cells) in Aplysia and pulmonate molluscs. Brain Res. 1976;117: 33–49. pmid:990936
  64. 64. Newcomb JM, Katz PS. Homologues of serotonergic central pattern generator neurons in related nudibranch molluscs with divergent behaviors. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2007;193: 425–443. pmid:17180703
  65. 65. Boer HH, Groot C, Dejong-Brink M, Cornelisse CJ. Polyploidy in the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis (Gastropoda, Pulmonata). A cytophotometric analysis of the DNA in neurons and some other cell types. Netherlands J Zool. 1970;27: 245–252.
  66. 66. Pola M, Gosliner TM. A new large and colourful species of the genus Doto (Nudibranchia: Dotidae) from South Africa. J Nat Hist. 2015;49: 2465–2481.