Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Intragenic Locus in Human PIWIL2 Gene Shares Promoter and Enhancer Functions

  • Yulia V. Skvortsova ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Yulia V. Skvortsova, Sofia A. Kondratieva

    Affiliation Department of Genomics and Postgenomic Technologies, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

  • Sofia A. Kondratieva ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Yulia V. Skvortsova, Sofia A. Kondratieva

    Affiliation Department of Genomics and Postgenomic Technologies, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

  • Marina V. Zinovyeva,

    Affiliation Department of Genomics and Postgenomic Technologies, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

  • Lev G. Nikolaev,

    Affiliation Department of Genomics and Postgenomic Technologies, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

  • Tatyana L. Azhikina,

    Affiliation Department of Genomics and Postgenomic Technologies, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

  • Ildar V. Gainetdinov

    ildargv@gmail.com

    Affiliation Department of Genomics and Postgenomic Technologies, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

    ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1719-043X

Intragenic Locus in Human PIWIL2 Gene Shares Promoter and Enhancer Functions

  • Yulia V. Skvortsova, 
  • Sofia A. Kondratieva, 
  • Marina V. Zinovyeva, 
  • Lev G. Nikolaev, 
  • Tatyana L. Azhikina, 
  • Ildar V. Gainetdinov
PLOS
x

Abstract

Recently, more evidence supporting common nature of promoters and enhancers has been accumulated. In this work, we present data on chromatin modifications and non-polyadenylated transcription characteristic for enhancers as well as results of in vitro luciferase reporter assays suggesting that PIWIL2 alternative promoter in exon 7 also functions as an enhancer for gene PHYHIP located 60Kb upstream. This finding of an intragenic enhancer serving as a promoter for a shorter protein isoform implies broader impact on understanding enhancer-promoter networks in regulation of gene expression.

Introduction

Regulation of gene expression is a multilayer process, which involves such aspects as promoters, enhancers, transcription factors, chromatin modifications, and spatial organization of the nucleus. All these constituents interact through crosstalk and their complex interplay results in different expression patterns across a range of tissues and cell types [13]. Nevertheless, recent advances in studies of transcription regulation revealed common features specific to sites of active gene expression: colocalization of transcribed genes in transcription factories [4, 5], interaction of several enhancers with several promoters inside topologically associating domains (TADs) [6], similar chromatin modifications within TADs [710], transcription initiated at enhancers (enhancer RNA, eRNA) [11, 12]. Another emerging insight is the common architecture of promoters and enhancers as platforms for initiation of transcription leading to relatively stable protein-coding mRNA and transient eRNA, respectively [1315]. These findings point at the fact that enhancers could potentially act as promoters and vice versa, given the right cellular environment. Among such previously reported instances are enhancers of murine alpha-globin locus located in introns of gene Nprl3 which function as alternative promoters for this gene giving rise to new mRNA products [16]. However, no alternative protein products were detected in this case. Further genome-wide transcriptome analysis revealed that up to 50% of intragenic enhancers initiate transcription of eRNA and almost 10% produce alternative variants of mRNA for the corresponding genes in erythroid cells in mice [16]. Additionally, between 1% and 7.5% of active transcription start sites (TSS) have apparent enhancer chromatin modifications in human cell lines [16].

In this work, we report a set of both indirect and direct evidence to demonstrate a similar setting for the human testis-specific gene PIWIL2, which is a central player in piRNA/PIWI pathway responsible for epigenetic silencing of retrotransposons [17, 18]. Specifically, the previously described alternative promoter of PIWIL2 in exon 7 appears to be able to act as an enhancer for the gene PHYHIP located 60 Kb upstream. Although PHYHIP is highly expressed in brain tissues [19] and was suggested to play a role in the development of neurological abnormalities observed in Down syndrome patients [20], it is also co-expressed with PIWIL2 in testis tissues [21, 22]. Taken together, this observation implies that a switch between enhancer and promoter functions could impact both mRNA and protein expression of some genes.

Methods and Materials

Ethics statement

Seven pairs of testicular germ cell tumor samples and corresponding adjacent normal testicular parenchyma were obtained from orchiectomy specimens. The samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. All patients provided written informed consent according to the federal law, and the study was approved by the ethical committees of the Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences and Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center after reviewing patients’ consent and information forms.

Cell lines

Cell lines used in experiments included TERA1 (ATCC HTB-105, testicular embryonal carcinoma [23]), NT2/D1 (ATCC CRL-1973, pluripotent testicular embryonal carcinoma [24]) and A549 (ATCC CCL-185, lung carcinoma [25]). Cells cultures were purchased from ATCC (USA) and grown in DMEM/F12 (1:1) (Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 10% FCS (Invitrogen, USA). TCam-2 cell line [26] was kindly provided by Prof. Dr. Huebert Schorle (Department of Developmental Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Bonn Medical School, Germany). TCam-2 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 10% FCS (Invitrogen, USA).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

ChIP was performed as described earlier [27, 28] using antibodies to human histone modifications listed in S1 Table. DNA was purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, USA). qPCR was performed using qPCRmix-HS SYBR system (Evrogen, Russia) on Lightcycler 480 (Roche, USA) in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA fragments were amplified for 40 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 60°C for 20 s, 72°C for 20 s. Relative level of chromatin modification was quantified with “input control” serving as the reference. Biological and technical duplicates were used to ensure reproducibility. Primer pairs used in amplification are listed in S2 Table.

qRT-PCR

Total RNA extraction and purification from cell lines, TGCTs and normal testis samples was performed with Trizol (Thermo Scientific, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. First strand cDNA synthesis was carried out with either random hexanucleotide (Promega, USA) or oligo-dT primer (5’-dT20V-3’) and MintReverse Transcriptase (Evrogen, Russia) according to the manufacturers’ protocols. qRT-PCR reactions were performed using qPCRmix-HS SYBR system (Evrogen, Russia) on Lightcycler 480 (Roche, USA) in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA fragments were amplified for 40 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 60°C for 20 s, 72°C for 20 s. Relative level of mRNA was quantified with beta-actin (gene ACTB) mRNA serving as the reference. Technical triplicates were used to ensure reproducibility. Primer pairs used in amplification are listed in S3 Table.

Luciferase reporter vectors, transfection and reporter gene assay

Genomic DNA was extracted from one of the normal testis sample with Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, USA). Genomic regions were amplified using primers listed in S4 Table. PCR products were ligated into pGL4.10[luc2], pGL4.13[luc2/SV40] or pGL4.10mP2 (S1 File) with T4 DNA Ligase (Thermo Scientific, USA): as promoters–between NheI and BglII sites, as enhancers–in either orientation in NotI site. Prior to transfection, the constructs were linearized with PvuI or SalI restriction enzymes for forward and reverse orientation, respectively. “No enhancer” controls were also linearized with the same restriction enzymes. Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) as recommended by the manufacturer. Cells were lysed 24 hours after the transfection and the activity of both firefly and Renilla reniformis luciferases was assessed using DualLuciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, USA) and Tecan GENios Pro Luminometer (MTX Lab Systems, USA) according to the manufacturers’ protocols. Biological and technical duplicates were used to ensure reproducibility.

Results and Discussion

In silico evidence for the regions around PIWIL2 exons 5 and 7 acting as enhancers

PIWIL2 is a testis-specific protein involved in piRNA pathway, which regulates expression of retrotransposons in spermatogenesis [17]. Ye et al have previously reported alternative promoters of PIWIL2 gene, which they identified computationally [29]. Our group has also mapped alternative transcription start sites in PIWIL2 exons 5 and 7 in testicular cancer cell lines TERA1 and NT2D1 using conventional molecular biology approaches [30].

Importantly, alternative promoters in exons 5 and 7 were also identified in non-testicular tissues by FANTOM5 consortium in their CAGE experiments (S1 Fig) [31]. Furthermore, additional evidence was found while analyzing chromatin state tracks based on 127 samples in the Roadmap Epigenomics Project [32]: region around PIWIL2 exon 7 harbors epigenetic marks of a promoter in 10 primary and 4 imputed datasets (S2 and S3 Figs, respectively). Overall, these findings provide additional support for our discoveries of PIWIL2 alternative promoters in testicular cancer cell lines.

However, closer examination of the Roadmap Epigenomics project data revealed that between 6 and 28 primary datasets (S2 Fig) and between 44 and 55 imputed datasets (S3 Fig) displayed combinations of epigenetic marks around PIWIL2 exons 1, 5 and 7 that are characteristic for enhancers. Moreover, ENCODE data also suggests that PIWIL2 alternative promoters both in exons 5 and 7 could function as enhancers [33]. Specifically, peaks of H3K4me1 were found in ENCODE data sets for both Tier 1 and Tier 2 cell lines (S4 and S5 Figs). Additionally, binding sites for proteins typically associated with enhancers, such as CTCF [34, 35] and P300 [36], are also located adjacent to the alternative promoters in exons 5 and 7 (S4 Fig) [3739]. Furthermore, there is a range of putative transcription factor binding motifs around these promoters (S5 Fig) and a significant number of both tissue-specific and ubiquitously expressed transcription factors bound in various cell lines according to ENCODE ChIP-seq experiments (S5 Fig).

We additionally studied ENCODE genome segmentation data tracks which were generated for 6 cell lines using different techniques (S4 Fig, [4043]): at least one technique assigned the region around promoter in exon 7 as an enhancer for all 6 cell lines and for 2 cell lines in case of promoters in exons 1 and 5, respectively (S4 Fig).

Altogether, there is significant amount of evidence to suggest that PIWIL2 promoters in exons 5 and 7 could also function as enhancers. In order to examine whether this is the case in testicular tissues and cell lines, we looked at three properties of enhancers: eRNA production (associated with some enhancers), specific chromatin modifications and ability to increase promoter activity irrespective of orientation [4347].

Chromatin modifications around PIWIL2 alternative promoter in exon 7 are characteristic for active enhancers

Whole-genome studies have attributed certain chromatin modifications to enhancer elements: H3K4me1/H3K27ac for active enhancers and H3K4me1/H3K27me3 for poised/inactive enhancers, unlike H3K4me3 for promoters [48]. To see whether these features are present at PIWIL2 canonical promoter in exon 1 and alternative promoters in exons 5 and 7, we performed ChIP experiments with antibodies to these modifications on three testicular cancer related cell lines (TCam-2 –seminoma derived, TERA1 and NT2D1 –embryonal carcinoma derived) and one lung carcinoma cell line (A549). The promoter of GAPDH (housekeeping gene) was used as a positive control and PIWIL2 intron 8 as well as an intergenic locus on chromosome 1 as negative controls.

Interestingly, though PIWIL2 canonical promoter in exon 1 harbors histone modifications characteristic both for promoters (H3K4me3) and for enhancers (H3K4me1) in all cell lines tested, it is likely to be inactive due to the presence of the silencing H3K27me3 mark (Fig 1). Lack of promoter activity at exon 1 is also supported by previous findings showing that PIWIL2 is expressed as its N-truncated protein isoforms in the majority of cell lines and cancer tissues [29, 30].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Chromatin modifications around PIWIL2 canonical and alternative promoters.

Relative level of H3K4me1 (Histone 3 lysine 4 monomethylated, enhancer mark), H3K4me3 (Histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylated, active promoter mark), H3K27ac (Histone 3 lysine 27 acetylated, active regulatory element mark) and H3K27me3 (Histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylated, facultative heterochromatin mark) histone modifications assessed by ChIP-PCR with two sets of primer pairs around PIWIL2 canonical promoter in exon 1 and alternative promoters in exons 5 and 7. Results are are shown for four cell lines: TERA1 and NT2D1 –embryonal carcinoma, TCam2 –seminoma, and A549 –lung carcinoma. The negative controls are PIWIL2 intron 8 and an intergenic locus on chromosome 1, the positive control is GAPDH promoter. P-value summary of Mann-Whitney non-paired U test is presented for some peaks (ns–non-significant, *—p-value<0.05, **—p-value<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.g001

Further, unlike the genomic region around exon 5, the alternative promoter in exon 7 demonstrates statistically significant enrichment of H3K4me1 mark in comparison with the negative controls in all cell lines except TCam-2 (Fig 1). Moreover, the level of H3K27ac marks around exon 7 is also higher than in the negative control (Fig 1), which suggests that it could be an actively functioning enhancer, at least, in TERA1, NT2D1 and A549 cell lines.

PIWIL2 alternative promoters in exons 5 and 7 produce abundant non-polyadenylated transcripts

Recently, some enhancers were found to be transcribed by Pol II and produce eRNA (enhancer RNA), which are either polyadenylated or non-polyadenylated short transcripts (both spliced and non-spliced) arising around enhancers uni- or bidirectionally [49]. In one of the first studies reporting non-polyadenylated eRNA production, these enhancer associated transcripts were identified by analyzing total RNA [50]. Therefore, we attempted to use a similar approach and assessed the presence of non-polyadenylated transcription around PIWIL2 alternative promoters using qRT-PCR on total RNA and compared it with results on its polyA+ fraction. We designed 15 primer pairs evenly covering the whole length of the PIWIL2 gene and targeting specifically exon-exon junctions in order to minimize the contribution of possible residual genomic DNA in samples. The results were normalized to the efficiency of each primer pair and a ratio of total RNA to polyA+ fraction was calculated. This way we established the transcriptional profile along the gene and the contribution of non-polyadenylated transcripts at each point along PIWIL2 gene.

Results for 7 normal/tumor pairs of testicular cancer samples (both seminomatous and nonseminomatous) are quite heterogeneous (Fig 2 and S6 Fig), which is consistent with previously published data indicating that both normal testis tissues and testicular cancers feature significant variability among individuals [51]. However, the data clearly demonstrate that all tumor samples and some adjacent normal testis tissues feature prominent and statistically significant peaks for some exon junctions, particularly 4–5 and 8–9 (Fig 2 and S6 Fig). A less pronounced but similar picture was observed for TERA1, NT2D1 and A549 cell lines (S7 Fig). This finding apparently points at the presence of a significant fraction of non-polyadenylated transcripts around exons 5 and 7, which could be the eRNA transcripts.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Non-polyadenylated transcription across exon-exon junctions of PIWIL2 gene.

qRT-PCR was used to assess the level of total RNA and its polyA+ fraction and the ratio of total RNA to polyA+ fraction was calculated. Seminoma and nonseminoma testicular cancer samples as well as adjacent normal testis tissues were assayed. P-value summary of Mann-Whitney non-paired U test is presented for 4–5 and 8–9 exon-exon junction peaks (ns–non-significant, ***—p-value<0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.g002

Luciferase reporter assays demonstrate that PIWIL2 alternative promoter in exon 7 can function as an enhancer for PHYHIP gene promoter

Although chromatin modifications and eRNA production are regarded as indirect evidence, the essential property of an enhancer is to increase activity of a promoter in cell type-specific manner [47]. To test whether PIWIL2 canonical and alternative promoters are able to act as enhancers, we cloned them in both orientations into luciferase reporter vectors downstream of the luc gene driven by either SV40 or CMV promoter (Fig 3, S5 Fig and S4 Table) and equimolar quantities of the constructs were probed in two cell lines (TERA1 and NT2D1). Importantly, the genomic regions, which we tested for enhancer properties, were previously shown to possess promoter activity as well. Therefore, in order to distinguish between promoter and enhancer properties, we linearized the luciferase reporter vectors by cutting them downstream (forward orientation) or upstream (reverse orientation) of the site where we placed the candidate enhancers under study (Fig 3). Importantly, after linearization the candidate enhancer will be located either downstream (forward orientation) or upstream (reverse orientation) of the luciferase reporter gene with the promoter (Fig 3). It allows us to test another aspect of enhancer function: ability to increase promoter’s activity regardless of its position (upstream or downstream).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Structure of luciferase reporter vectors used in the assays.

pGL4.10 plasmid was used to construct vectors with luc gene expression driven by various promoters (upper part in brackets) and a candidate enhancer in either orientation (lower part). Because the candidate enhancers also possess promoter activity, to discern between those, the vectors were linearized by cutting at the sites shown with red arrows. Note that after such linearization the candidate enhancer will be located either upstream (reverse orientation) or downstream (forward orientation) of the luc gene and its promoter.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.g003

Interestingly, more than two-fold increase of the activity of only CMV promoter and exclusively in NT2D1 cell line was detected for PIWIL2 genomic region around exon 7 (Fig 4A), which confirms its ability to act as an enhancer.

thumbnail
Fig 4. PIWIL2 alternative promoter in exon 7 acts as an enhancer in luciferase reporter constructs.

Relative promoter activity of SV40 and CMV promoters was assessed in luciferase reporter vectors from Fig 3 in two cell lines: TERA1 and NT2D1 (embryonal carcinoma, panel A). PPP3CC and PHYHIP (panel B) promoters were assessed in luciferase reporter vectors from Fig 3 in four cell lines: TERA1 and NT2D1 –embryonal carcinoma, Tcam2 –seminoma, and A549 –lung carcinoma. P-value summary of Mann-Whitney non-paired U test is presented for peaks showing more than two-fold increase (above horizontal dashed lines) for both forward and reverse orientation of the candidate enhancer compared to “no enhancer” controls (*—p-value<0.05, **—p-value<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.g004

We further wanted to find an in vivo target of this enhancer/alternative promoter in PIWIL2 exon 7. As most enhancers exert their activity within about 100Kb and typically inside a topologically associating domain (TAD) [52], we looked at a recently generated Kilobase-resolution Hi-C map of genomic interactions (S8 Fig, [53]). PIWIL2 is located within the boundaries of a contact domain also containing genes POLR3D (RNA polymerase III subunit [54]) and PHYHIP (Phytanoyl-CoA 2-Hydroxylase Interacting Protein [19]) (S8 Fig). Luciferase reporter vectors with luc gene expression driven by these promoters (S9 Fig) and the genomic region around PIWIL2 exon 7 as a candidate enhancer were designed. Two more control constructs with the candidate enhancer and luc expression driven by promoters of two genes situated outside PIWIL2 containing contact domain were also used (S8 and S9 Figs): KIAA1967 (Cell Cycle And Apoptosis Regulator 2 [55]) and PPP3CC (testis-specific serine/threonine-protein phosphatase [56]).

Surprisingly, PIWIL2 alternative promoter in exon 7 increased activity by more than two-fold of only PHYHIP promoter (Fig 4B), but not POLR3D and the two controls, which exemplifies promoter-specific action of enhancers–one of their intrinsic features. Notably, we could also observe that this enhancer activity was stronger in case of forward orientation. In fact, such instances have been reported earlier and were attributed to the possibility that one or more discrete cis-regulatory elements within the enhancer could confer such orientation dependence [57, 58]. Nevertheless, relying on the most conservative definition of an enhancer, which is increasing promoter activity regardless of its orientation, we could claim that PIWIL2 alternative promoter in exon 7 is able to function as an enhancer only for PHYHIP promoter.

We also examined Polymerase II ChIA-PET data (Chromatin Interaction Analysis by Paired-End Tag Sequencing [59]) from ENCODE [60, 61] and found evidence that PIWIL2 alternative promoter in exon 7 and PHYHIP promoter interact in human K562 cell line (K562 Pol2 ChIA-PET Interactions Rep 1 from ENCODE/GIS-Ruan, chr8:22086341..22087865-chr8:22143618..22145421,2). Although TAD structure is relatively stable across cell types, development stages and even organisms [6264], the specific interaction between PHYHIP promoter and PIWIL2 exon 7 and, in particular, its dynamics should be further explored in follow-up experiments.

Conclusion

Altogether, the data presented here provide both indirect (chromatin modifications and eRNA) and direct (luciferase reporter assays) evidence suggesting that genomic area around exon 7 of PIWIL2 gene acts as an enhancer for PHYHIP promoter. As a byproduct of eRNA transcription, this intragenic enhancer also produces an alternative PIWIL2 mRNA isoform, which, in turn, is translated into a new PIWIL2 protein isoform [30]. Importantly, this short PIWIL2 isoform devoid of N-terminal domain exerts different properties and could promote tumorigenesis unlike its full-length counterpart ([29] and our unpublished data). Although further experiments are necessary to dissect the details and dynamics of PIWIL2 canonical and alternative promoters function, to our knowledge, this is the first report of a regulatory element being transcribed and, concomitantly, giving rise to an mRNA template for an alternative protein isoform.

From a broader perspective, this finding unveils a new form of interplay between intragenic enhancers and gene expression. Possible shift in genomic enhancer landscape in disease could contribute to deregulation of cellular processes through generating novel protein isoforms [65, 66]. Whole-genome and proteome studies are required to provide answers to these questions.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. FANTOM5/ENCODE CAGE data around PIWIL2 gene.

PIWIL2 gene transcript variants are shown as green horizontal bars in the upper panel (equal to Gencode annotations: ENST00000356766.6, ENST00000521356.1, ENST00000454009.2, ENST00000519884.1). FANTOM5 CAGE peaks are depicted as arrows in the middle panel (green–sense strand, purple–antisense strand) and accompanied by either the number of the peak (e.g., p1@PIWIL2) or its exact genomic coordinates (e.g., p@chr8:22140624–22140625). ENCODE CAGE raw signal is shown in the lower panel in TMP (CAGE tags per million reads).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium Data.

Chromatin state learning using ChromHMM, which is based on a multivariate Hidden Markov Model. Core 15-state model (5 marks, 127 epigenomes) based on primary data around PIWIL2 gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s002

(PPTX)

S3 Fig. The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium Data.

Chromatin state learning using ChromHMM, which is based on a multivariate Hidden Markov Model. 25-state model (12 marks, 127 epigenomes) based on imputed data around PIWIL2 gene exons 1–14.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s003

(PPTX)

S4 Fig. Chromatin segmentation based on ENCODE datasets on histone modifications, open chromatin data and specific TF binding data.

Using two different unsupervised machine learning techniques (ChromHMM and Segway), the genome was automatically segmented into disjoint segments. A consensus unified segmentation (Combined) was also generated by reconciling results from the individual segmentations. Layered track of H3K4me1 chromatin modification in ENCODE Tier 1 and Tier 2 cell lines (upper part) and transcription factor ChIP-seq (lower part) are also presented.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s004

(PPTX)

S5 Fig. Canonical and alterative promoter regions of PIWIL2 used in luciferase reporter vector assays.

UCSC Genome Browser view of promoter regions (marked with red arrows) along with layered tracks of H3K4me1, H3K27ac and H3K4me3 chromatin modifications in ENCODE Tier 1 and Tier 2 cell lines (upper part), DNaseI hypersensitivity clusters, transcription factor ChIP-seq and putative transcription factor binding sites (middle part), as well as raw H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac and H3K27me3 ChIP-seq signals for K562, HeLa-S3 and NT2D1 cell lines from ENCODE (lower part, two experiments for K562 cell line performed at different laboratories are shown).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s005

(PPTX)

S6 Fig. Non-polyadenylated transcription across exon-exon junctions of PIWIL2 gene in cancer samples.

qRT-PCR was used to assess the level of total RNA and its polyA+ fraction and the ratio of total RNA to polyA+ fraction was calculated. Seminoma and nonseminoma testicular cancer samples as well as adjacent normal testis tissues were assayed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s006

(PDF)

S7 Fig. Non-polyadenylated transcription across exon-exon junctions of PIWIL2 gene in cell lines.

qRT-PCR was used to assess the level of total RNA and its polyA+ fraction and the ratio of total RNA to polyA+ fraction was calculated. Four cell lines were assayed: TERA1 and NT2D1 –embryonal carcinoma, TCam2 –seminoma, and A549 –lung carcinoma.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s007

(PDF)

S8 Fig. Contact domains around PIWIL2 from the 1 kb resolution Hi-C map (Rao et al, 2014).

The heatmap of the genomic contacts along chr8:21,880,000–22,470,000 (hg19) is presented. The contact domains are depicted as yellow boxes and the positions of PHYHIP, POLR3D, PIWIL2 genes belonging to the same contact domain are shown. PPP3CC and KIAA1967 are also presented in the neighboring contact domain.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s008

(PDF)

S9 Fig. Promoter regions of PHYHIP, POLR3D, PPP3CC and KIAA1967 used in luciferase reporter vector assays.

UCSC Genome Browser view of promoter regions (marked with red arrows) along with layered tracks of H3K4me3 chromatin modification in ENCODE Tier 1 and Tier 2 cell lines (active promoter mark, upper part of each panel) and DNaseI hypersensitivity clusters (lower part of each panel).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s009

(PPTX)

S1 File. Sequence of pGL4.10mP2 construct based on pGL4.10[luc2] with CMV promoter driving expression of luc gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s010

(GB)

S2 Table. Primers used for qPCR to quantitate the level of histone marks.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s012

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Primers used in qRT-qPCR. immunoprecipitation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s013

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Primers used for cloning genomic regions corresponding to PIWIL2 canonical promoter in exon 1, PIWIL2 alternative promoters in exons 5 and 7, and promoters of genes PHYHIP, POLR3D, PPP3CC and KIAA1967.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156454.s014

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Eugene Sverdlov for critical reading of the manuscript, Dr. Dmitry Didych for pGL4.10mP2 construct, Dr. Sergey Akopov for assistance with cell culture work, Dr. Alexey Tryakin (Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center) for assistance with surgical sample collection and histological evaluation.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TLA LGN IVG. Performed the experiments: YVS SAK MVZ IVG. Analyzed the data: YVS SAK IVG. Wrote the paper: IVG.

References

  1. 1. Spitz F, Furlong EE. Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nature reviews Genetics. 2012;13(9):613–26. pmid:22868264.
  2. 2. Benabdallah NS, Bickmore WA. Regulatory Domains and Their Mechanisms. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2015. pmid:26590168.
  3. 3. Vernimmen D, Bickmore WA. The Hierarchy of Transcriptional Activation: From Enhancer to Promoter. Trends Genet. 2015. pmid:26599498.
  4. 4. Deng B, Melnik S, Cook PR. Transcription factories, chromatin loops, and the dysregulation of gene expression in malignancy. Seminars in cancer biology. 2013;23(2):65–71. pmid:22285981.
  5. 5. Feuerborn A, Cook PR. Why the activity of a gene depends on its neighbors. Trends Genet. 2015;31(9):483–90. pmid:26259670.
  6. 6. Matharu N, Ahituv N. Minor Loops in Major Folds: Enhancer-Promoter Looping, Chromatin Restructuring, and Their Association with Transcriptional Regulation and Disease. PLoS genetics. 2015;11(12):e1005640. pmid:26632825.
  7. 7. Sexton T, Yaffe E, Kenigsberg E, Bantignies F, Leblanc B, Hoichman M, et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell. 2012;148(3):458–72. pmid:22265598.
  8. 8. Nora EP, Lajoie BR, Schulz EG, Giorgetti L, Okamoto I, Servant N, et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature. 2012;485(7398):381–5. pmid:22495304; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3555144.
  9. 9. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012;485(7398):376–80. pmid:22495300; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3356448.
  10. 10. Hou C, Li L, Qin ZS, Corces VG. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Molecular cell. 2012;48(3):471–84. pmid:23041285; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3496039.
  11. 11. Orom UA, Shiekhattar R. Long noncoding RNAs usher in a new era in the biology of enhancers. Cell. 2013;154(6):1190–3. pmid:24034243; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4108076.
  12. 12. Kim YW, Lee S, Yun J, Kim A. Chromatin looping and eRNA transcription precede the transcriptional activation of gene in the beta-globin locus. Biosci Rep. 2015;35(2). pmid:25588787; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4370096.
  13. 13. Andersson R, Sandelin A, Danko CG. A unified architecture of transcriptional regulatory elements. Trends Genet. 2015;31(8):426–33. pmid:26073855.
  14. 14. Core LJ, Martins AL, Danko CG, Waters CT, Siepel A, Lis JT. Analysis of nascent RNA identifies a unified architecture of initiation regions at mammalian promoters and enhancers. Nature genetics. 2014;46(12):1311–20. pmid:25383968; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4254663.
  15. 15. Kim TK, Shiekhattar R. Architectural and Functional Commonalities between Enhancers and Promoters. Cell. 2015;162(5):948–59. pmid:26317464; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4556168.
  16. 16. Kowalczyk MS, Hughes JR, Garrick D, Lynch MD, Sharpe JA, Sloane-Stanley JA, et al. Intragenic enhancers act as alternative promoters. Molecular cell. 2012;45(4):447–58. pmid:22264824.
  17. 17. De Fazio S, Bartonicek N, Di Giacomo M, Abreu-Goodger C, Sankar A, Funaya C, et al. The endonuclease activity of Mili fuels piRNA amplification that silences LINE1 elements. Nature. 2011;480(7376):259–63. pmid:22020280.
  18. 18. Czech B, Hannon GJ. One Loop to Rule Them All: The Ping-Pong Cycle and piRNA-Guided Silencing. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2016. pmid:26810602.
  19. 19. Koh JT, Lee ZH, Ahn KY, Kim JK, Bae CS, Kim HH, et al. Characterization of mouse brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1 (BAI1) and phytanoyl-CoA alpha-hydroxylase-associated protein 1, a novel BAI1-binding protein. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001;87(2):223–37. pmid:11245925.
  20. 20. Bescond M, Rahmani Z. Dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphorylated and regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) interacts with the phytanoyl-CoA alpha-hydroxylase associated protein 1 (PAHX-AP1), a brain specific protein. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37(4):775–83. pmid:15694837.
  21. 21. Consortium GT. Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015;348(6235):648–60. pmid:25954001; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4547484.
  22. 22. Mele M, Ferreira PG, Reverter F, DeLuca DS, Monlong J, Sammeth M, et al. Human genomics. The human transcriptome across tissues and individuals. Science. 2015;348(6235):660–5. pmid:25954002; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4547472.
  23. 23. Fogh J, Wright WC, Loveless JD. Absence of HeLa cell contamination in 169 cell lines derived from human tumors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1977;58(2):209–14. pmid:833871.
  24. 24. Andrews PW, Damjanov I, Simon D, Banting GS, Carlin C, Dracopoli NC, et al. Pluripotent embryonal carcinoma clones derived from the human teratocarcinoma cell line Tera-2. Differentiation in vivo and in vitro. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology. 1984;50(2):147–62. pmid:6694356.
  25. 25. Giard DJ, Aaronson SA, Todaro GJ, Arnstein P, Kersey JH, Dosik H, et al. In vitro cultivation of human tumors: establishment of cell lines derived from a series of solid tumors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1973;51(5):1417–23. pmid:4357758.
  26. 26. Mizuno Y, Gotoh A, Kamidono S, Kitazawa S. [Establishment and characterization of a new human testicular germ cell tumor cell line (TCam-2)]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1993;84(7):1211–8. pmid:8394948.
  27. 27. Gushchanskaya ES, Artemov AV, Ulyanov SV, Logacheva MD, Penin AA, Kotova ES, et al. The clustering of CpG islands may constitute an important determinant of the 3D organization of interphase chromosomes. Epigenetics: official journal of the DNA Methylation Society. 2014;9(7):951–63. pmid:24736527; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4143410.
  28. 28. Orlando V. Mapping chromosomal proteins in vivo by formaldehyde-crosslinked-chromatin immunoprecipitation. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2000;25(3):99–104. pmid:10694875.
  29. 29. Ye Y, Yin DT, Chen L, Zhou Q, Shen R, He G, et al. Identification of Piwil2-like (PL2L) proteins that promote tumorigenesis. PloS one. 2010;5(10):e13406. pmid:20975993; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2958115.
  30. 30. Gainetdinov IV, Skvortsova YV, Stukacheva EA, Bychenko OS, Kondratieva SA, Zinovieva MV, et al. Expression profiles of PIWIL2 short isoforms differ in testicular germ cell tumors of various differentiation subtypes. PloS one. 2014;9(11):e112528. pmid:25384072; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4226551.
  31. 31. Consortium F, the RP, Clst , Forrest AR, Kawaji H, Rehli M, et al. A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas. Nature. 2014;507(7493):462–70. pmid:24670764; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4529748.
  32. 32. Roadmap Epigenomics C, Kundaje A, Meuleman W, Ernst J, Bilenky M, Yen A, et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature. 2015;518(7539):317–30. pmid:25693563; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4530010.
  33. 33. Consortium EP. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489(7414):57–74. pmid:22955616; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3439153.
  34. 34. Ong CT, Corces VG. CTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function. Nature reviews Genetics. 2014;15(4):234–46. pmid:24614316; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4610363.
  35. 35. Gomez-Diaz E, Corces VG. Architectural proteins: regulators of 3D genome organization in cell fate. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(11):703–11. pmid:25218583; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4254322.
  36. 36. Panne D. The enhanceosome. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008;18(2):236–42. pmid:18206362.
  37. 37. Gerstein MB, Kundaje A, Hariharan M, Landt SG, Yan KK, Cheng C, et al. Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data. Nature. 2012;489(7414):91–100. pmid:22955619; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4154057.
  38. 38. Wang J, Zhuang J, Iyer S, Lin X, Whitfield TW, Greven MC, et al. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors. Genome research. 2012;22(9):1798–812. pmid:22955990; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3431495.
  39. 39. Wang J, Zhuang J, Iyer S, Lin XY, Greven MC, Kim BH, et al. Factorbook.org: a Wiki-based database for transcription factor-binding data generated by the ENCODE consortium. Nucleic acids research. 2013;41(Database issue):D171–6. pmid:23203885; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3531197.
  40. 40. Hoffman MM, Buske OJ, Wang J, Weng Z, Bilmes JA, Noble WS. Unsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation. Nature methods. 2012;9(5):473–6. pmid:22426492; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3340533.
  41. 41. Hoffman MM, Ernst J, Wilder SP, Kundaje A, Harris RS, Libbrecht M, et al. Integrative annotation of chromatin elements from ENCODE data. Nucleic acids research. 2013;41(2):827–41. pmid:23221638; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3553955.
  42. 42. Ernst J, Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nature methods. 2012;9(3):215–6. pmid:22373907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3577932.
  43. 43. Banerji J, Rusconi S, Schaffner W. Expression of a beta-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences. Cell. 1981;27(2 Pt 1):299–308. pmid:6277502.
  44. 44. Lai F, Shiekhattar R. Enhancer RNAs: the new molecules of transcription. Current opinion in genetics & development. 2014;25:38–42. pmid:24480293.
  45. 45. Plank JL, Dean A. Enhancer function: mechanistic and genome-wide insights come together. Molecular cell. 2014;55(1):5–14. pmid:24996062.
  46. 46. Levine M, Cattoglio C, Tjian R. Looping back to leap forward: transcription enters a new era. Cell. 2014;157(1):13–25. pmid:24679523; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4059561.
  47. 47. Shlyueva D, Stampfel G, Stark A. Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions. Nature reviews Genetics. 2014;15(4):272–86. pmid:24614317.
  48. 48. Zentner GE, Scacheri PC. The chromatin fingerprint of gene enhancer elements. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2012;287(37):30888–96. pmid:22952241; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3438921.
  49. 49. Kim TK, Hemberg M, Gray JM. Enhancer RNAs: a class of long noncoding RNAs synthesized at enhancers. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(1):a018622. pmid:25561718.
  50. 50. Kim TK, Hemberg M, Gray JM, Costa AM, Bear DM, Wu J, et al. Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature. 2010;465(7295):182–7. pmid:20393465; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3020079.
  51. 51. Gainetdinov IV, Kondratieva SA, Skvortsova YV, Zinovyeva MV, Stukacheva EA, Klimov A, et al. Distinguishing epigenetic features of preneoplastic testis tissues adjacent to seminomas and nonseminomas. Oncotarget. 2016. pmid:26843623.
  52. 52. van Arensbergen J, van Steensel B, Bussemaker HJ. In search of the determinants of enhancer-promoter interaction specificity. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(11):695–702. pmid:25160912; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4252644.
  53. 53. Rao SS, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, et al. A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping. Cell. 2014;159(7):1665–80. pmid:25497547.
  54. 54. Kim DH, Saetrom P, Snove O Jr, Rossi JJ. MicroRNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing in mammalian cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(42):16230–5. pmid:18852463; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2571020.
  55. 55. Kim JE, Chen J, Lou Z. p30 DBC is a potential regulator of tumorigenesis. Cell cycle. 2009;8(18):2932–5. pmid:19657230; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2777512.
  56. 56. Muramatsu T, Kincaid RL. Molecular cloning and chromosomal mapping of the human gene for the testis-specific catalytic subunit of calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase (calcineurin A). Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1992;188(1):265–71. pmid:1339277.
  57. 57. Swamynathan SK, Piatigorsky J. Orientation-dependent influence of an intergenic enhancer on the promoter activity of the divergently transcribed mouse Shsp/alpha B-crystallin and Mkbp/HspB2 genes. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277(51):49700–6. pmid:12403771.
  58. 58. Li C, Hirsch M, Carter P, Asokan A, Zhou X, Wu Z, et al. A small regulatory element from chromosome 19 enhances liver-specific gene expression. Gene Ther. 2009;16(1):43–51. pmid:18701910.
  59. 59. Fullwood MJ, Liu MH, Pan YF, Liu J, Xu H, Mohamed YB, et al. An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature. 2009;462(7269):58–64. pmid:19890323; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2774924.
  60. 60. Li G, Ruan X, Auerbach RK, Sandhu KS, Zheng M, Wang P, et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell. 2012;148(1–2):84–98. pmid:22265404; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3339270.
  61. 61. Rosenbloom KR, Sloan CA, Malladi VS, Dreszer TR, Learned K, Kirkup VM, et al. ENCODE data in the UCSC Genome Browser: year 5 update. Nucleic acids research. 2013;41(Database issue):D56–63. pmid:23193274; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3531152.
  62. 62. Dostie J, Bickmore WA. Chromosome organization in the nucleus—charting new territory across the Hi-Cs. Current opinion in genetics & development. 2012;22(2):125–31. pmid:22265226.
  63. 63. Gibcus JH, Dekker J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Molecular cell. 2013;49(5):773–82. pmid:23473598; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3741673.
  64. 64. Ghavi-Helm Y, Klein FA, Pakozdi T, Ciglar L, Noordermeer D, Huber W, et al. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature. 2014;512(7512):96–100. pmid:25043061.
  65. 65. Smith E, Shilatifard A. Enhancer biology and enhanceropathies. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2014;21(3):210–9. pmid:24599251.
  66. 66. Herz HM, Hu D, Shilatifard A. Enhancer malfunction in cancer. Molecular cell. 2014;53(6):859–66. pmid:24656127; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4049186.