Hexaploid triticale is an important forage crop and a promising energy plant. Some forms were previously reported for developing the hexaploid triticale, such as crossing tetraploid wheat or hexaploid wheat with rye, crossing hexaploid triticale and/or hexaploid wheat with octoploid triticale, and spontaneously appearing in the selfed progenies of octoploid triticale. In the present study, we developed an effective method for production of diverse types of hexaploid triticale via wheat—rye—Psathyrostachys huashanica trigeneric hybrid. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) karyotyping revealed that D genome chromosomes were completely eliminated and the whole A, B, and R genome chromosomes were retained in three lines. More interestingly, the composite genome of the line K14-489-2 consisted of complete A and B genomes and chromosomes 1D, 2R, 3R, 4R, 5R, 6R, and 7R, that of line K14-491-2 was 12 A-genome (1A-6A), 14 B-genome (1B-7B), 12 R-genome (1R-3R, 5R-7R), and chromosomes 1D and 3D, and that of the line K14-547-1 had 26A/B and 14R chromosomes, plus one pair of centric 6BL/2DS translocations. This finding implies that some of D genome chromosomes can be spontaneously and stably incorporated into the hexaploid triticale. Additionally, a variety of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) compositions were detected in the six hexaploid triticale lines, respectively. Besides, compared with its recurrent triticale parent Zhongsi828, these lines showed high level of resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, Pst) pathogens prevalent in China, including V26/Gui 22. These new hexaploid triticales not only enhanced diversification of triticale but also could be utilized as valuable germplasm for wheat improvement.
Citation: Kang H, Wang H, Huang J, Wang Y, Li D, Diao C, et al. (2016) Divergent Development of Hexaploid Triticale by a Wheat – Rye –Psathyrostachys huashanica Trigeneric Hybrid Method. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0155667. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155667
Editor: Aimin Zhang, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, CHINA
Received: January 14, 2016; Accepted: May 1, 2016; Published: May 16, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Kang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31501311), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 program, No. 2011AA100103), and the Science and Technology Bureau and Education Bureau of Sichuan Province. HYK and LLX received the fundings. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: CTAB, Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide; FISH, Fluorescence in situ hybridization; GISH, Genome in situ hybridization; HMW-GS, High-molecular-weight glutenin subunits; LMW-GS, Low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits; PMC, Pollen mother cell; Pst, Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici; SDS-PAGE, Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis
The small grain cereal triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack), a man-made wheat—rye hybrid, is considered a promising crop due to its high genetic variation for several traits of agronomic importance. It is intended to combine the high productivity and nutritional qualities of wheat with the growth vigor and environmental tolerance possessed by rye [1–2]. Triticale is widely adapted to abiotic stress conditions such as aluminum toxicity, drought, salinity, and acidic or waterlogged soils, and also to biotic stresses including powdery mildew, leaf rust, stripe rust, stem rust, Fusarium head blight, scald, and leaf and glume blotch [3–7]. Originally, triticale is mainly used for forage or fodder in animal feed, serving as a good source of protein, lysine, B vitamins, and readily digested starch [8–9]. However, ongoing research indicates that triticale has some potential for use in human food consumption and remarkable improvement has been made on bread making quality during the last decades [10–11]. In recent times, environmental awareness has aroused interest in the use of triticale within bio-energy and bio-fuel production owing to its high biomass and grain yield [12–14]. Moreover, the use of triticale in the brewing industry has gained much attention [15–16].
Since the first octoploid triticale (2n = 8x = 56, AABBDDRR) has been developed by chromosome doubling of hybrids between common wheat and rye , thousands of primary triticale lines with a variety of ploidy levels and chromosome constitutions, including octoploid triticale (× Triticosecale rimpaui Wittm., AABBDDRR), hexaploid triticale (× Triticosecale neoblaringhemii A. Camus, AABBRR), and tetraploid triticale (× Triticosecale semisecale (MacKey) K. Hammer et A. Filat., DDRR) have been successfully produced [18–21]. On account of their superior meiotic stability and fertility, hexaploid triticale is deemed to be more successful than octoploid and tetraploid triticale [22–24]. Hexaploid triticale is primarily derived from direct crosses of tetraploid wheat with rye. Secondary hexaploid triticale was also synthesized by hybridizing hexaploid triticale and/or hexaploid wheat with an octoploid triticale . Furthermore, many hexaploid derivatives can spontaneously emerge in the selfed progenies of octoploid triticale, with the elimination of the wheat D genome chromosomes [26–28]. Recently, Hao et al.  reported that some hexaploid triticale lines with complete 28 intact A/B and 14 R chromosomes and other chromosome constitutions could be rapidly produced by hybridization of synthetic hexaploid wheat with rye. Li et al.  developed two hexaploid triticales with great morphologic divergence derived from common wheat cultivar M8003 × Austrian rye, which contained the whole A, B, and R genome chromosomes. Kwiatek et al.  successfully obtained hexaploid triticale carrying leaf rust resistance gene Lr32 via crossing triticale with the Aegilops tauschii–rye amphiploid.
We previously reported that the trigeneric germplasms involving Triticum, Psathyrostachys and Secale were successfully created by crossing wheat–Psathyrostachys huashanica amphiploid (PHW-SA, 2n = 8x = 56, AABBDDNsNs) with triticale (Zhongsi828, 2n = 6x = 42, AABBRR) . While these observations suggest that trigeneric hybridization may be useful for triticale development, its effectiveness needs to be further evaluated . The objectives of this study were to characterize the chromosome constitution of six hexaploid derivatives of wheat—rye–P. huashanica trigeneric hybrids expressing high stripe rust resistance and diverse high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) compositions by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and biochemical marker.
Materials and Methods
A hexaploid triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack, 2n = 6x = 42, AABBRR) line Zhongsi828, with the characteristics of large spike and grain, cold tolerance, lodging resistance, and high resistance to rust and powdery mildew, was kindly provided by Dr. LQ Zhang, Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, China. A wheat–P. huashanica amphiploid PHW-SA (2n = 8x = 56, AABBDDNsNs) was originally produced in our laboratory [34–35]. PHW-SA and Zhongsi828 were crossed in 2008 . Then seeds selected from the F1 plants were bulked and advanced to the F6 generation by single seed descent. Six derivative lines K14-488-1, K14-489-2, K14-491-2, K14-493-1, K14-545-2, and K14-547-1, with phenotypic divergence and high resistance to stripe rust over two years of observation, were isolated from the F6 generation. Wheat line SY95-71 was used as a susceptible check in the tests to determine stripe rust resistance. For GISH analysis, wheat cultivar J-11 (2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD) was used as blocking DNA, and the entire genomic DNA of Chinese rye landrace “Qinling” was used as a probe.
Meiotic pairing analysis
Meiotic pairing analysis followed the procedures described by Kang et al. . Young spikes at metaphase I (MI) stage were fixed in Carnoy’s fixative (ethanol: chloroform: glacial acetic acid, 6:3:1, v/v/v) for 24 h and stored at 70% ethanol until use. The macerated root tips and anthers were squashed in 1% acetocarmine. At least 50 pollen mother cells (PMCs) were observed for each plant.
GISH and FISH analysis
Total genomic DNA of rye landrace “Qinling” was isolated using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method . Rye genomic DNA was labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP by a nick translation mix (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and used as a probe in GISH. Chromosome spreads of materials, probe labeling, and in situ hybridization were carried out as previously described by Han et al. , with slight modifications. A total volume of 30 μL denatured hybridization solution, containing 2 × SSC, 10% dextran sulphate, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulphate, and 1 ng/μL labeled probe DNA together with the competitor DNA, was loaded per slide and incubated for 12 h at 37°C. Finally, the chromosomes were counterstained with the propidium iodide (PI) solution (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, USA). The in situ hybridization images were visualized using an Olympus BX-51 microscope coupled to a Photometric SenSys Olympus DP70 CCD camera.
FISH analysis was subsequently used to identify the chromosome constitution of six derivative lines, using pSc119.2 and pTa535 as probes. Probe pSc119.2 from rye repetitive sequences was used to determine the B genome chromosomes of wheat and R-genome chromosomes of rye . Probe pTa535 from wheat repetitive sequences hybridizes preferentially to A and D genome chromosomes . The two oligonucleotide probes were synthesized by Shanghai Invitrogen Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Probe labeling was operated according to Tang et al. . The FISH procedure was performed as described by Han et al. , with minor modifications. The probe mixture (4 ng/μL of each probe in 2 × SSC and 1 × TE buffer) and chromosomes were denatured together by heating for 5 min at 80°C. The chromosomes were finally counterstained with DAPI (4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) solution (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, USA). The detection and visualization of FISH patterns were the same as the aforementioned GISH protocol.
Seed storage protein electrophoresis
HMW-GS and Low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GS) compositions of the six derivative lines were determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) following the procedure described by Yan et al. . The parents PHW-SA and Zhongsi828 were used as controls in the SDS-PAGE.
Stripe rust resistance screening
Six derivative lines, the parental species PHW-SA and Zhongsi828, and SY95-71 were evaluated for seedling and adult plant responses to stripe rust at the experimental station of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Individual plants of each line were grown rows at 10-cm space in 30-cm wide beds and 2-m in length. The plots were surrounded by the susceptible wheat line SY95-71. Artificial inoculation was made by spraying the SY95-71 rows at the two-leaf stage with a mixture of Pst races CYR-32, CYR-33, V26/Gui22-9, V26/Gui22-14, Su4, and Su5 suspended in light weight mineral oil. The Pst races were supplied by Dr. QZ Jia, Plant Protection Institute of Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Gansu, China. Stripe rust infection type (IT) was scored based on a scale of 0, 0;, 1, 2, 3, and 4, where 0 = immunity, 0; = necrotic flecks, and 1–4 = increasing sporulation and decreasing necrosis or chlorosis. The plants scored with IT 2 or lower were considered as resistant while the plants with ITs 3 and 4 were considered as susceptible. The ITs were recorded three times when uniform severity levels were observed on susceptible check SY95-71 at booting, flowering, and milky stages .
Meiotic behavior of hexaploid triticale lines
Six stable derivative lines with great phenotypic divergence were obtained in 2014, namely K14-488-1, K14-489-2, K14-491-2, K14-493-1, K14-545-2, and K14-547-1. The plants of these lines grew vigorously and had a high level of seed set. These lines were selected to observe chromosome behaviors at meiotic MI, and data on chromosome pairing frequency was presented in Table 1. The results showed that all the lines with 2n = 42, the average pairing configuration was 0.94 univalents, 16.51 ring bivalents, 3.99 rod bivalents, and 0.02 trivalents per PMC. The mean number of univalents varied from 0.12 to 1.76. The number of bivalents varied from 18 to 21, and averaged 20.50 per cell (Fig 1a–1c). Trivalents were found in only one line, K14-547-1 (Fig 1d). No lagging chromosomes or chromosome bridges were observed at anaphase I and II. This indicated that the six triticale lines presented normal meiotic behavior, and they were cytologically stable.
(a) Line K14-488-1, 2n = 42 = 1 II (rod) + 20 II (ring). (b) Line K14-489-2, 2n = 42 = 2 I + 4 II (rod) + 16 II (ring). (c) Line K14-491-2, 2n = 42 = 4 I + 3 II (rod) + 16 II (ring). (d) Line K14-547-1, 2n = 42 = 1 I + 1 II (rod) + 18 II (ring) + 1III (arrow).
GISH and FISH analysis
The GISH analysis was performed to determine the chromosome constitution of six derivatives using total genomic DNA of rye as the probe and J-11 total genomic DNA as the block. Lines K14-488-1, K14-493-1, K14-545-2, and K14-547-1 were found to have 14 rye chromosomes (Table 2, Fig 2a), and other lines K14-489-2 and K14-491-2 carried 12 rye chromosomes (Fig 2b and 2c). At meiosis, all these lines always contained six or seven pairs of bivalents with hybridization signals (Fig 2d and 2e), and regular segregation of each bivalent at anaphase I was also found (Fig 2f). It seems that the behavior of rye chromosomes was normal during meiosis.
The rye genomic DNA was used as probes for in situ hybridization. Chromosomes in red and yellow-green are wheat and rye chromosomes, respectively. (a) Line K14-488-1, 2n = 42 = 14R +28W. (b) Line K14-489-2, 2n = 42 = 12R +30W. (c) Line K14-491-2, 2n = 42 = 12R +30W. (d) Line K14-493-1, 2n = 42 = 14R +28W, rye chromosomes with 1 rod and 6 ring bivalents were labeled. (e) Line K14-489-2, 2n = 42 = 12R +30W, rye chromosomes with 4 rod and 2 ring bivalents were labeled. (f) Line K14-491-2, rye chromosomes showed regular segregation at anaphase I.
Further FISH analysis showed that these derivatives could be grouped into four types with respect to their chromosome constitutions. Three lines K14-488-1, K14-493-1, and K14-545-2 displayed similar chromosome constitutions (28A/B and 14R chromosomes) as the primary hexaploid triticale between T. turgidum and rye (Fig 3a, 3d and 3e). Consequently, all the D and Ns genome chromosomes were completely eliminated during the derivation of the three hexaploid triticale lines. Line K14-489-2 consisted of six pairs of rye chromosomes and one pair of D genome chromosomes in addition to the complete A and B genomes (Fig 3b). Assuming that the FISH pattern of Chinese Spring using pSc119.2 and pTa535 as probes corresponds to the wheat cultivar used in this work, the D genome chromosomes was identified as 1D, which presented faint pTa535 signals in the terminal regions of both arms. FISH with pSc119.2 demonstrated that rye chromosomes 1R were absent in this line. More interestingly, line K14-491-2 comprised twelve rye chromosomes (Fig 2c). Reprobing with pSc119.2 and pTa535 indicated that it carried 26 A and B genome chromosomes and two pairs of D genome chromosomes (Fig 3c). One of the D genome chromosomes was identified as 1D, and another chromosome seemed to be 3D because it carried strong pTa535 signals at the terminal region of the short arm, and faint pTa535 signals in terminal region of the long arm. Probing with pSc119.2 and pTa535 revealed that rye chromosomes 4R and wheat chromosomes 7A were not included in this type (Fig 3c). Additionally, Line K14-547-1 had 14A (1A-7A), 12B (1B-5B, 7B), and 14R chromosomes, plus one pair of centric 6BL/2DS translocations (Fig 3f). Furthermore, the PMCs of lines K14-489-2, K14-491-2, and K14-547-1 showed normal meiotic behavior, possessing approximately 21 bivalents (Table 1).
Probes pSc119.2 and pTa535 signals were pseudo-colored as green and red in the FISH patterns, respectively. (a) Line K14-488-1 had complete 28 A/B and 14 R chromosomes. (b) Line K14-489-2 had complete 28A/B and 1D (arrows), 2R, 3R, 4R, 5R, 6R and 7R chromosomes. (c) Line K14-491-2 had 12 A (1A-6A), 14 B (1B-7B), 12 R (1R-3R, 5R-7R), and 1D and 3D (arrows) chromosomes. (d) Line K14-493-1 had complete 28 A/B and 14 R chromosomes. (e) Line K14-545-2 had complete 28 A/B and 14 R chromosomes. (f) Line K14-547-1 had 14 A (1A-7A), 12 B (1B-5B, 7B), 14 R, and a pair of 6BL/2DS translocation chromosomes (arrows).
Storage protein variations detected in hexaploid triticale lines
The HMW-GS compositions of the six hexaploid triticale lines together with their donor parents were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. As illustrated in Fig 4, six completely different HMW-GS variations were observed in these triticales. 1Dx2+1Dy12 encoded by 1D chromosome was detected in two lines K14-489-2 and K14-491-2 owing to the presence of 1D chromosome. This finding was in agreement with the FISH analyses described above. 1Bx7+1By8 encoded by 1B chromosome, which derived from the parent PHW-SA, were present at all triticale lines. In addition, not all the HMW-GS of the parent Zhongsi828 were simultaneously expressed. A single but inconsistent band was inherited in K14-488-1, K14-491-2, K14-545-2, and K14-547-1, respectively (Fig 4, indicated by black arrows), and a specific band was only expressed in K14-488-1 (Fig 4, indicated by red arrow). An exception to this was that in lines K14-493-1 and K14-489-2, all HMW-GS of the Zhongsi828 was absent. Similarly, polymorphic bands were also distinguished at these triticales in the LMW-GS region. Above results implied that multiple HMW-GS variations were discriminated in these six hexaploid triticale lines and differential expression of HMW-GS could result from mutation or expression silencing of this locus.
1 Zhongsi828, 2 PHW-SA, 3 K14-488-1, 4 K14-491-2, 5 K14-493-1, 6 K14-545-2, 7 K14-547-1, 8 K14-489-2. Black arrows indicate position of inherited HMW-GS subunit of Zhongsi828. Red arrow indicates a specific band was only expressed in K14-488-1.
Stripe rust resistance evaluation
Six hexaploid triticale lines, PHW-SA, Zhongsi828, and SY95-71were evaluated stripe rust resistance with mixture of Pst races CYR-32, CYR-33, V26/Gui22-9, V26/Gui22-14, Su4, and Su5 at Chengdu, Sichuan, China. At seedling and adult plant stages, Zhongsi828 and SY95-71 were susceptible to these races, showing infection types 4, respectively. PHW-SA, K14-488-1, K14-489-2, K14-491-2, K14-493-1, K14-545-2, and K14-547-1 were highly resistant to the races, all showing 0 infection type (Table 3).
Development of hexaploid triticale by loss of most D genome chromosomes
The primary objective of this work was production of diverse chromosome constitutions (AABBDDRR, AABBRR, AABBDDNsNs, or AABBNsNs) and introgression of rye and P. huashanica chromatins into common wheat background by crossing a wheat–P. huashanica amphiploid (PHW-SA, 2n = 8x = 56, AABBDDNsNs) with hexaploid triticale (Zhongsi828, 2n = 6x = 42, AABBRR). However, after selfed generations, Xie et al.  found that the rye chromosome number of F3 lines with 2n = 41–44 ranged from 12 to 14, and only 1–2 P. huashanica chromosomes were observed in three lines (20%). In F4 progenies, GISH results illustrated that 21 lines of 2n = 42 (91.3%) had 12 or 14 rye chromosomes exhibiting complete pairing, and no P. huashanica chromosomes were detected. Therefore, these lines were cytologically stable during meiosis and may therefore be considered as new hexaploid triticale (unpublished data). This present study demonstrated that no octoploid triticale was found, and instead hexaploid triticale was obtained. In addition, our results revealed that these lines retained the most chromosomes of the A, B, and R genomes, while most of the D and Ns genome chromosomes were eliminated. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that some octoploid triticale was formed in F2 plants , the typically abnormal behavior of rye and wheat chromosomes of F3 plants must have led to their elimination during production of the subsequent generations . It is known that octoploid triticale shows meiotic instability and high aneuploid frequency  because chromosomes from rye and wheat were eliminated [44–45]. Such chromosome loss in octoploid triticale may result in hexaploid triticale, with the retention of most of A, B, and R genome chromosomes and the elimination of most of the D genome chromosomes [26–28,46]. To date, some genetic mechanisms involved in chromosome elimination, including cytomixis-like fashion chromatin elimination from PMCs, unequal chromosome division in somatic cell, centromere loss of chromosome fragments, and chromosomal variations and asynchronous chromosome-division, were reported in octoploid triticale [29–30,45,47]. Xie et al.  indicated that chromosome elimination in early progenies of PHW-SA/Zhongsi828 may associate with chromatid lagging, fragmentation and micronucleation, or the immobilization of certain univalents during meiosis instead of mitosis in the relatively advanced generations. Therefore, this mechanism permitted the generation of various hexaploid triticale lines in this study.
D genome chromosomes can be stably incorporated into the hexaploid triticale
Although the stability of the D genome is more strongly affected by the R genome in the octoploid triticale, comparing to the A and B genomes of common wheat, the more researches suggested that hexaploid triticale contained D genome chromosomes in lower frequency. Lukaszewski and Gustafson [22,48] reported very frequent 2D (2R) substitution in secondary hexaploid triticale produced by crosses between hexaploid triticale and hexaploid wheat. Tams et al.  and Leonova et al.  demonstrated that chromosomes 2D and 7D were detected in some European hexaploid triticale by SSR markers. Using FISH to characterize the chromosome constitution of 14 hexaploid lines derived from octoploid triticale, Dou et al.  revealed that all of the lines showed 2D (2R) substitution, and additionally two showed 1D (1R) and one showed 6D (6R). Since 1D, 2D, 6D, and 7D were found in these hexaploid triticale, Dou et al.  concluded that genes on chromosomes 3D, 4D, and 5D may promote the instability of the R genome, and the D genome and R genome are incompatible in the common wheat genetic background. However, the present study indicated that the composite genome of the line K14-489-2 consisted of complete A and B genomes and chromosomes 1D, 2R, 3R, 4R, 5R, 6R, and 7R, that of line K14-491-2 was 12 A genome (1A-6A), 14 B genome (1B-7B), 12 R genome (1R-3R, 5R-7R), and chromosomes 1D and 3D, and that of the line K14-547-1 had 26A/B and 14R chromosomes, and one pair of centric 6BL/2DS translocations. Moreover, the PMCs of lines K14-489-2, K14-491-2 and K14-547-1 showed stable cytology, possessing approximately 21 bivalents, with chromosome pairing configurations of 0.58 I + 3.63 II (rod) + 17.08 II (ring), 1.76 I + 5.92 II (rod) + 14.20 II (ring), and 1.04 I + 3.93 II (rod) + 16.40 II (ring) + 0.10 III, respectively. Recently, chromosomes 2D, 5D, and 7D from the wild species Ae. tauschii were involved in the hexaploid triticale using a synthetic hexaploid wheat—rye hybrid method . Kwiatek et al.  successfully transferred the 3D genome chromatin carrying leaf rust resistance gene Lr32 into hexaploid triticale by crossing triticale with the Ae. tauschii–rye amphiploid. It was formerly reported that 3DS promotes homoeologous chromosome pairing, and 5D carries a promoter on each arm [51–52]. Accordingly, all these findings imply that genes on chromosomes 4D may promote the instability of the R genome, and some of D genome chromosomes can be spontaneously and stably incorporated into the hexaploid triticale. The stability of D genome chromosomes in hexaploid triticale may be affected by common wheat genetic background, rye genetic composition as well as their interaction.
The potential value of the new hexaploid triticale for wheat improvement
The present results suggest that complete and substituted hexaploid triticale can be produced using the wheat—rye–P. huashanica trigeneric hybrid method. It is believed that one of the main breeding strategies for triticale improvement was to introduce D genome chromosomes into hexaploid triticale [22,27,29,31]. Here, we developed three hexaploid triticale lines that carried 1D, 2D, and 3D chromosomes, respectively. It is known that chromosome 1D carries the Glu-D1 locus, which plays a major role in the bread-making quality of bread wheat . The dwarfing gene Rht8 and the photoperiodic insensitivity gene Ppd-D1 are linked on the short arm of chromosome 2D of bread wheat and play an important role in determining the geographic adaptation of modern wheat varieties . The homoeologous chromosome pairing gene Ph2 on 3DS is one of the critical genes for maintaining genetic stability in the transfer of alien genes to wheat [51,55]. Furthermore, a number of important traits are known to be controlled by loci on these chromosomes, including grain yield and seed weight, seed dormancy, glume blotch resistance, stripe rust resistance, stem rust resistance, and leaf rust resistance . Besides, a variety of HMW-GS variations were detected in these hexaploid triticale lines comparing with their recurrent triticale parent Zhongsi828. Similar phenomenon occurred in recent studies of new synthesized hexaploid triticale and hexaploid trititrigias derived from Triticum durum and Thinopyrum elongatum [21,30]. Differential expression of HMW-GS could result from gene silencing or mutation of this locus occurred among the derivatives of wheat—rye–P. huashanica trigeneric hybrids. Although these triticales were derived from the same pedigree, great morphological divergences were displayed in these lines (unpublished data). Thus, these lines might be potential materials for further quality and yield improvement of hexaploid triticale.
The occurrence of new virulent stripe rust races, such as V26/Gui 22, which are effective against all previously identified Pst races and have been deployed in commercial cultivars to fight predominant races of the fungus in China, represents a destructive serious threat to wheat production in the Sichuan Basin and potentially in other regions of China . It is, therefore, urgent to search for and transfer novel sources of resistance and to use more effective genes to counterbalance the continuous evolution of rust pathogens in wheat breeding programs. In our work, six hexaploid triticale lines were selected and identified from PHW-SA/Zhongsi828 F6 generation. Compared with the parent Zhongsi828, these lines were highly resistant to prevalent Chinese Pst races, including V26/Gui 22. Consequently, the new triticale lines provide novel and valuable bridge resources for improving stripe rust resistance in wheat.
We thank Dr. ZX Tang (Sichuan Agricultural University, China) for technical guidance in FISH analysis. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their very useful comments on the manuscript.
Conceived and designed the experiments: HYK YHZ. Performed the experiments: HYK HW JH YJW. Analyzed the data: HYK DYL CDD WZ YT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YW XF JZ LLX LNS HQZ. Wrote the paper: HYK HW.
- 1. Varughese G, Pfeiffer WH, Peña RJ. Triticale: a reappraisal; 1997. http://www.worldbank.org/html/cgiar/newsletter/april97/8tritic.html. Accessed 5 Nov 2012.
- 2. Bender DA. Benders’ Dictionary of Nutrition and Food Technology, eighth ed. Woodhead Publishing, Abington, Massachusetts; 2006. pp. 480.
- 3. Schinkel B. Triticale—still a healthy crop? In: Arseniuk E, Osin’ski R, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Triticale Symposium, Radzików, Poland; 2002. pp. 157–162.
- 4. Kuleung C, Baenziger PS, Dweikat I. Transferability of SSR markers among wheat, rye, and triticale. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 108: 1147–1150. pmid:15067402
- 5. Oettler G, Tams SH, Utz HF, Bauer E, Melchinger AE. Prospects for hybrid breeding in winter triticale: I. Heterosis and combining ability for agronomic traits in European elite germplasm. Crop Sci. 2005; 45: 1476–1482.
- 6. Troch V, Audenaert K, Vanheule A, Bekaert B, Höfte M, Haesaert G. Evaluation of resistance to powdery mildew in triticale seedlings and adult plants. Plant Dis. 2013; 97: 410–417.
- 7. Audenaert K, Troch V, Landschoot S, Haesaert G. Biotic stresses in the anthropogenic hybrid triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack): current knowledge and breeding challenges. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2014; 140: 615–630.
- 8. McKevith B. Nutritional aspects of cereals. Nutr Bull. 2004; 29: 111–142.
- 9. Mcgoverin CM, Snyders F, Muller N, Botes W, Fox G, Manley M. A review of triticale uses and the effect of growth environment on grain quality. J Sci Food Agric. 2011; 91: 1155–1165. pmid:21433010
- 10. Mergoum M, Pfeiffer WH, Peña RJ, Ammar K, Rajaram S. Triticale crop improvement: the CIMMYT programme. In: Mergoum M, Gómez-Macpherson H, editors, Triticale Improvement and Production. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 179; 2004. pp. 11–22.
- 11. Martinek P, Vinterová M, Burešová I, Vyhnánek T. Agronomic and quality characteristics of triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) with HMW glutenin subunits 5+10. J Cereal Sci. 2008; 47: 68–78.
- 12. Bassu S, Asseng S, Richards R. Yield benefits of triticale traits for wheat under current and future climates. Field Crop Res. 2011; 124: 14–24.
- 13. Pronyk C, Mazza G. Optimization of processing conditions for the fractionation of triticale straw using pressurized low polarity water. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102: 2016–2025. pmid:20933393
- 14. Estrada-Campuzano G, Slafer GA, Mirallesa DJ. Differences in yield, biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments. Field Crop Res. 2012; 128: 167–179.
- 15. Glatthar J, Heinisch JJ, Senn T. Unmalted triticale cultivars as brewing adjuncts: effects of enzyme activities and composition on beer wort quality. J Sci Food Agric. 2005; 85: 647–654.
- 16. Rakha A, Åman P, Andersson R. Dietary fiber in triticale grain: variation in content, composition, and molecular weight distribution of extractable components. J Cereal Sci. 2011; 54: 324–331.
- 17. Wilson AS. Wheat and rye hybrids. Edinb Bat Sac Trans. 1876; 12: 286–288.
- 18. Müntzing A. Studies on the properties and the ways of production of rye-wheat amphidiploids. Hereditas. 1939; 25: 387–430.
- 19. Bernard S, Bernard M. Creating new forms 4×, 6× and 8× primary Triticale associating both complete R and D genomes. Theor Appl Genet. 1987; 74:.55–59. pmid:24241456
- 20. Hammer K, Filatenko AA, Pistrick K. Taxonomic remarks on Triticum L. and 9 Triticosecale Wittm. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2011; 58: 3–10.
- 21. Guo X, Shi QH, Wang J, Hou YL, Wang YH, Han FP. Characterization and genome changes of new amphiploids from wheat wide hybridization. J Genet Genomics. 2015; 42 (8): 459–461. pmid:26336803
- 22. Lukaszewski AJ, Gustafson JP. Cytogenetics of triticale. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol 5. AVI Publishing, New York; 1987. pp. 41–93.
- 23. Fox PN, Skovmand B, Thompson BK, Braun HJ, Cormier R. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica. 1990; 47: 57–64.
- 24. Cheng ZJ, Murata M. Loss of chromosomes 2R and 5RS in octoploid triticale selected for agronomic traits. Genes Genet Syst. 2002; 77: 23–29. pmid:12036101
- 25. Ma XF, Gustafson JP. Allopolyploidization-accommodated genomic sequence changes in triticale. Ann Bot. 2008; 101: 825–832. pmid:18252766
- 26. Nakata N, Sasaki M, Mochida M, Kishii Y, Yasumuro Y. Genome composition of 42-chromosme lines spontaneously derived from octoploid triticales. J Fac Agric Tottori Univ. 1984; 19: 1–7.
- 27. Dou QW, Tanaka H, Nakata N, Tsujimoto H. Molecular cytogenetic analyses of hexaploid lines spontaneously appearing in octoploid Triticale. Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 114: 41–47. pmid:17016687
- 28. Zhou J, Zhang H, Yang Z, Li G, Hu L, Lei M, et al. Characterization of a new T2DS.2DL-?R translocation triticale ZH-1 with multiple resistances to diseases. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2012; 59: 1161–1168.
- 29. Hao M, Luo JT, Zhang LQ, Yuan ZW, Yang YW, Wu M, et al. Production of hexaploid triticale by a synthetic hexaploid wheat-rye hybrid method. Euphytica. 2013; 193: 347–357.
- 30. Li H, Guo X, Wang C, Ji W. Spontaneous and divergent hexaploid Triticales derived from common wheat × rye by complete elimination of D-genome chromosomes. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(3): e0120421. pmid:25781330
- 31. Kwiatek M, Majka M, Wiśniewska H, Apolinarska B, Belter J. Effective transfer of chromosomes carrying leaf rust resistance genes from Aegilops tauschii Coss. into hexaploid triticale (× Triticosecale Witt.) using Ae. tauschii × Secale cereal amphiploid forms. J Appl Genetics. 2015; 56: 163–168.
- 32. Kang HY, Zhong MY, Xie Q, Zhang HQ, Fan X, Sha LN, et al. Production and cytogenetics of trigeneric hybrid involving Triticum, Psathyrostachys and Secale. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2012; 59: 445–453.
- 33. Xie Q, Kang HY, Tao S, Sparkes DL, Fan XM, Cui ZG, et al. Wheat lines derived from trigeneric hybrids of wheat-rye-Psathyrostachys huashanica, the potential resources for grain weight improvement. Aust J Crop Sci. 2012; 6: 1550–1557.
- 34. Kang HY, Wang Y, Sun GL, Zhang HQ, Fan X, Zhou YH. Production and characterization of an amphiploid between common wheat and Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng ex Kuo. Plant Breed. 2009; 128 (1): 36–40.
- 35. Kang HY, Chen Q, Wang Y, Zhong MY, Zhang HQ, Zhou YH. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the amphiploid between bread wheat and Psathyrostachys huashanica. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2010; 57 (1): 111–118.
- 36. Allen GC, Flores-Vergara MA, Krasynanski S, Kumar S, Thompson WF. A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nat Protoc. 2006; 1: 2320–2325. pmid:17406474
- 37. Han F, Liu B, Fedak G, Liu Z. Genomic constitution and variation in five partial amphiploids of wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium as revealed by GISH, multicolor GISH and seed storage protein analysis. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 109: 1070–1076. pmid:15197444
- 38. McIntyre C, Pereira S, Moran L, Appels R. New Secale cereale (rye) DNA derivatives for the detection of rye chromosome segments in wheat. Genome. 1990; 33: 635–640. pmid:2262137
- 39. Komuro S, Endo R, Shikata K, Kato A. Genomic and chromosomal distribution patterns of various repeated DNA sequences in wheat revealed by a fluorescence in situ hybridization procedure. Genome. 2013; 56: 131–137. pmid:23659696
- 40. Tang ZX, Yang ZJ, Fu SL. Oligonucleotides replacing the roles of repetitive sequences pAs1, pSc119.2, pTa-535, pTa71, CCS1, and pAWRC.1 for FISH analysis. J Appl Genet. 2014; 55: 313–318. pmid:24782110
- 41. Yan ZH, Wan YF, Liu KF, Zheng YL, Wang DW. Identification of a novel HMW glutenin subunit and comparison of its amino acid sequence with those of homologous subunits. Chinese Sci Bull. 2002; 47(3): 222–226.
- 42. Liu XK. Study on the yellow rust resistance to common wheat (T. aestivum). Plant Prot. 1988; 15: 33–39.
- 43. Xie Q, Kang HY, Sparkes DL, Tao S, Fan XM, Xu LL, et al. Mitotic and meiotic behavior of rye chromosomes in wheat—Psathyrostachys huashanica amphiploid × triticale progeny. Genet Mol Res. 2013; 12 (3): 2537–2548. pmid:23315875
- 44. Weimarck A. Elimination of wheat and rye chromosomes in a strain of octoploid triticale as revealed by giemsa banding technique. Hereditas. 1974; 77: 281–286. pmid:4141348
- 45. Tang Z, Fu S, Yang B, Zhang H, Ren Z. Unequal chromosome division and inter-genomic translocation occurred in somatic cells of wheat-rye allopolyploid. J Plant Res. 2012; 125: 283–290. pmid:21643833
- 46. Sasaki M, Yasumuro Y, Nakata N. Development of chromosome substitution triticale lines and their utility value as feed. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Grassland Congress, Kyoto; 1985. pp. 253–255.
- 47. Kalinka A, Achrem M, Rogalska SM. Cytomixis-like chromosomes/chromatin elimination from pollen mother cells (PMCs) in wheat-rye allopolyploids. Nucleus. 2010; 53: 69–83.
- 48. Lukaszewski AJ, Gustafson JP. The effect of rye chromosomes on heading date of Triticale × wheat hybrids. Z Pflanzenzücht. 1984; 93: 246–250.
- 49. Tams SH, Bauer E, Oettler G, Melchinger AE. Genetic diversity in European winter Triticale determined with SSR markers and coancestry coefficient. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 108: 1385–1391. pmid:14760487
- 50. Leonova IN, Dobrovolskaya OB, Kaminskaya LN, Adonina IG, Koren LV, Khotyljova LV, et al. Molecular analysis of the Triticale lines with different Vrn gene systems using microsatellite markers and hybridization in situ. Russ J Genet. 2005; 41(9): 1014–1020.
- 51. Driscoll CJ. Genetic suppression of homologous chromosome pairing in hexaploid wheat. Can J Genet Cytol. 1972; 14: 39–42.
- 52. Feldman M. Regulation of somatic association and meiotic pairing in common wheat. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Australian Academic Science; 1968. pp. 31–40.
- 53. Payne PI, Lawrence GJ. Genetics of wheat storage proteins and the effect of allelic variation on bread making quality. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1987; 38:141–153.
- 54. Worland AJ, Korzun V, Röder MS, Ganal MW, Law CN. Genetic analysis of the dwarfing gene (Rht8) in wheat. Part II. The distribution and adaptive significance of allelic variants at the Rht8 locus of wheat as revealed by microsatellite screening. Theor Appl Genet. 1998; 96: 1110–1120.
- 55. Mello-Sampayo T. Genetic regulation of meiotic chromosome pairing by chromosome 3D of Triticum aestivum. Nature new biology. 1971; 230: 22–23. pmid:5283628
- 56. McIntosh RA, Yamazaki Y, Dubcovsky J, Rogers J, Morris C, Appels R, et al. Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. (http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/wheat/komugi/genes/download.jsp. Accessed 3 April 2014). Committee for the National BioResource Project (NBRP)/KOMUGI, Japan; 2013.
- 57. Han DJ, Wang QL, Chen XM, Zeng QD, Wu JH, Xue WB, et al. Emerging Yr26-virulent races of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici are threatening wheat production in the Sichuan Basin, China. Plant Dis. 2015; 99: 754–760.