Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Free-Living Species of Carnivorous Mammals in Poland: Red Fox, Beech Marten, and Raccoon as a Potential Reservoir of Salmonella, Yersinia, Listeria spp. and Coagulase-Positive Staphylococcus

  • Aneta Nowakiewicz ,

    anowakiewicz@gmail.com

    Affiliation Sub-Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland

  • Przemysław Zięba,

    Affiliation State Veterinary Laboratory, Lublin, Poland

  • Grażyna Ziółkowska,

    Affiliation Sub-Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland

  • Sebastian Gnat,

    Affiliation Sub-Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland

  • Marta Muszyńska,

    Affiliation State Veterinary Laboratory, Lublin, Poland

  • Krzysztof Tomczuk,

    Affiliation Sub-Department of Parasitology and Invasive Diseases, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland

  • Barbara Majer Dziedzic,

    Affiliation Sub-Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland

  • Łukasz Ulbrych,

    Affiliation Warta Mouth National Park, Górzyca, Poland

  • Aleksandra Trościańczyk

    Affiliation Sub-Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland

Free-Living Species of Carnivorous Mammals in Poland: Red Fox, Beech Marten, and Raccoon as a Potential Reservoir of Salmonella, Yersinia, Listeria spp. and Coagulase-Positive Staphylococcus

  • Aneta Nowakiewicz, 
  • Przemysław Zięba, 
  • Grażyna Ziółkowska, 
  • Sebastian Gnat, 
  • Marta Muszyńska, 
  • Krzysztof Tomczuk, 
  • Barbara Majer Dziedzic, 
  • Łukasz Ulbrych, 
  • Aleksandra Trościańczyk
PLOS
x

Abstract

The objective of the study was to examine a population of free-living carnivorous mammals most commonly found in Poland (red fox, beech marten, and raccoon) for the occurrence of bacteria that are potentially pathogenic for humans and other animal species and to determine their virulence potential (the presence of selected virulence genes). From the total pool of isolates obtained (n = 328), we selected 90 belonging to species that pose the greatest potential threat to human health: Salmonella spp. (n = 19; 4.51%), Yersinia enterocolitica (n = 10; 2.37%), Listeria monocytogenes and L. ivanovii (n = 21), and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 40; 9.5%). The Salmonella spp. isolates represented three different subspecies; S. enterica subsp. enterica accounted for a significant proportion (15/19), and most of the serotypes isolated (S. Typhimurium, S. Infantis, S. Newport and S. Enteritidis) were among the 10 non-typhoidal Salmonella serotypes that are most often responsible for infections in Europe, including Poland. Y. enterococlitica was detected in the smallest percentage of animals, but 60% of strains among the isolates tested possessed the ail gene, which is responsible for attachment and invasion. Potentially pathogenic Listeria species were isolated from approx. 5% of the animals. The presence of all tested virulence genes was shown in 35% of L. monocytogenes strains, while in the case of the other strains, the genes occurred in varying numbers and configurations. The presence of the inlA, inlC, hlyA, and iap genes was noted in all strains, whereas the genes encoding PI-PLC, actin, and internalin Imo2821 were present in varying percentages (from 80% to 55%). S. aureus was obtained from 40 individuals. Most isolates possessed the hla, hld (95% for each), and hlb (32.5%) genes encoding hemolysins as well as the gene encoding leukotoxin lukED (70%). In a similar percentage of strains (77.5%), the presence of at least one gene encoding enterotoxin was found, with 12.5% exhibiting the presence of egc-like variants. In two animals, we also noted the gene encoding the TSST-1 toxin. The results of the study showed that free-living animals may be a significant reservoir of bacteria that are potentially pathogenic for humans. The results of the statistical analysis revealed that, among the animals species studied, the red fox constitutes the most important source of infections.

Introduction

Free-living animals have always been a significant source of infectious diseases transmitted to humans. Zoonoses whose reservoir is this group of animals are currently a serious problem [1], particularly as an increasing number of pathogens appear to be of animal origin. Free-living carnivorous animals are a permanent biocoenotic element that is highly diverse in terms of adaptation to the environment; in general, they have outstanding migratory potential associated with an active search for food. These predators not only live in environments without people, but also appear in areas populated by humans, particularly in the winter or spring when there is considerably less available food [2]. Species such as the red fox, beech marten, or raccoon constitute a relatively large percentage of the population of free-living carnivorous animals in Poland. The red fox Vulpes vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758) is a common species all over Europe and its population in Poland is estimated at 200,000–250,000 individuals [3]. Its high level of synanthropization, manifested as gradual colonization of suburban and urban areas, may significantly increase the possibility of contact with humans and thus the probability of transfer of pathogenic agents onto both humans and other domesticated animals [4,5]. The beech marten Martes foina (Erxleben, 1777) inhabits most regions of Europe and is found all over Poland, where its population is difficult to estimate, but it is probably approx. 100,000. The species is closely associated with environments populated by humans [6]. Both the red fox and the beech marten are common in Europe. In Poland, they have a status of game species with a closed period [6]. The raccoon Procyon lotor (Linnaeus, 1758) is the most recently recorded alien species in Poland. It originally lived in North America. In 1934, raccoons were introduced in Germany and the first record of the presence of the raccoon in Poland dates back to 1970. Since then, the raccoon population has grown fairly rapidly, particularly in northern and western Poland. Raccoons are now a permanent component of both the natural environment [7] and urban areas (large and smaller cities) in this part of the country [8], but research conducted in 2005–2009 also showed isolated cases of the presence of individuals of this species in other regions of Poland. The most serious problem is their invasion into protected natural areas, which is one of the reasons why raccoons are game animals that can be hunted year round with no closed season.

A characteristic trait of these species of free-living animals is a broad-spectrum diet, including all vertebrates, numerous invertebrates, and carrion. Carnivorous animals at the top of the food chain can therefore become carriers of a broad spectrum of microbes that are potentially pathogenic for humans. The clear tendency towards synanthropization in these species suggests the possibility of direct contact with the living environment of humans, which may increase the likelihood of transmission and spread of microbes, including those posing a threat to public health [5,9]

Analysis of these species in terms of carriage of zoonotic diseases in Poland primarily focuses on detection of the rabies virus. Monitoring for this virus, particularly in foxes, which are its main reservoir in Europe [10], is legally sanctioned. The importance of these animals as a potential source of parasitoses of animal origin, such as Echinococcus multilocularis in foxes [1, 11] and Baylisascaris procyonis in raccoons [12] has also been confirmed.

Data on the occurrence and isolation of other microorganisms in wildlife animals are fragmentary and either concern single cases of isolation or occurrence in other free-living animals species, e.g. isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from wild boar [13], prevalence of Salmonella in free-living birds [14], or detection of the HEV virus in wild boar [15].

The objective of the study was to examine red fox, beech marten, and raccoon populations for the occurrence of bacteria that may be potentially pathogenic agents for humans and for other animal species and to determine their virulence potential.

Material and Methods

Animals used in the study and sample collection

Samples in the form of rectal swabs were collected from May 2011 to April 2015 in western Poland (52.593333, 14.748333) and in southern and south-eastern Poland (51.216667, 22.9) from the following free-living species: the red fox Vulpes vulpes (n = 286), beech marten Martes foina (n = 65), and raccoon Procyon lotor (n = 70). The samples were taken from foxes that were killed under a program monitoring the effectiveness of rabies vaccination [16] and from martens supplied to the laboratory due to suspected infection of rabies, according to regulations on combating infectious diseases in animals. The animals were not sacrificed solely for the sake of the sampling for the research conducted in this study. Since cases of rabies in animals are still detected in Poland, in the case of suspected symptoms of rabies, free-living animals, including foxes and martens, shall be subject to diagnostics observation by qualified veterinary staff and, in the case of death during the observation, these animals are transferred for rabies testing to an official laboratory. In addition, in the case of foxes, there is mandatory assessment of the effectiveness of the vaccination against rabies and, therefore, every year a certain number of animals must be shot by hunters and delivered to an official laboratory for appropriate tests [16]. Because the material was obtained from dead animals analyzed at the State Veterinary Laboratory on the basis of the Act on protection of animal health and combating infectious diseases in animals (Dz.U. [Journal of Laws] 2004 no. 69 item 625), no approval of the ethics commission was required.

Bacteriological examination of the samples was performed only after virological tests had been completed with negative results. Until that time, they were stored at -80°C for maximum 30 days.

Samples from the raccoons were taken from individuals captured in the environment (Warta Mouth National Park) in restraining traps and then the animals were subjected to euthanasia by qualified veterinary staff (prior pharmacological premedication) under the project LIFE+ No: LIFE09 NAT/PL/000263 entitled ‘Protection of water and marsh birds in five National Parks–reconstructing habitats and curbing the influence of invasive species’ [17]. As an invasive species in Poland, the raccoon may pose a threat to native species in some specific areas (e.g. national parks or nature reserves) and a specified part of the invasive animal population need to be caught and euthanized for biodiversity conservation. The material was collected in sterile conditions at the State Veterinary Laboratory immediately after the dead animals were delivered, and bacteriological analysis was performed within 24 h.

The direction of the research was chosen on the basis of the available literature on potential bacterial threats to human health in the environment [18, 19, 20].

The samples were initially incubated in 2 mL of buffered peptone water (24 h at 37°C). Salmonella were isolated according to the Polish standard [21]. Five typical colonies were selected from each culture for further identification. Bacterial species were confirmed using a commercial test (ENTEROtest 24N, Erba Lachema, Brno, Czech Republic) and serotyping was performed using commercial sera for O and H antigens (SIFIN, Berlin, Germany), according to the Kauffman-White classification [22].

Listeria spp. were isolated according to the Polish standard [23]. One typical colony was selected from each culture for further identification. Species identification was based on PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism according to Paillard et al. [24]. All isolates of L. monocytogenes were tested by PCR for the presence of the following virulence genes: inlA, inlC, inlJ (internalins), iap (protein p60), hlyA (listeriolysin O—LLO), plcA (phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C–PI-PLC), actA (surface protein ActA), and prfA (virulence regulator PrfA). PCR primers and conditions followed those described in previously established protocols [25].

The Yersinia spp. isolation procedure consisted in cold incubation at 5°C for 7 d in Tripticase Soy Broth (Biocorp, Warsaw, Poland) followed by inoculation on Yersinia CIN Lab Agar (Biocorp, Warsaw, Poland) at 25°C for 24 h. Colonies that were morphologically similar to Yersinia spp. were subcultured for biochemical examination with the commercial test ENTEROtest 24N (Erba Lachema, Brno, Czech Republic). Genotypic species identification (based on analysis of the 16S rRNA gene) and the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica strains (the presence of the ail gene) were determined by duplex PCR according to Wannet et al. [26].

Staphylococcus spp. were isolated according to the Polish standard [27]. One typical colony was selected from each culture for further identification. Species identification of isolates was carried out with the commercial kit STAPHYtest 24 (Erba Lachema, Brno, Czech Republic). Species identification of coagulase-positive isolates was confirmed according to Sasaki et al. [28]. In addition, tests were performed for the presence of coagulase (using rabbit coagulase plasma, Biocorp, Warsaw, Poland) and for the presence of DNAse (DNA-se test Lab Agar Biocorp, Warsaw Poland). All S. aureus isolates were tested by PCR for the presence of genes coding for staphylococcal enterotoxins (sea, seb, sec, sed, see, seg, seh, sei, sej, sen, seo, and sem) [29], leukocidin genes (lukS/F-PV and lukM), leukotoxin genes lukE/D [29], hemolysin genes (hla, hlb and hld) [29], and the tst gene encoding toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1) [30].

Statistical analysis was performed in R (ver. 3.1.1; Vienna, Austria). Confidence intervals (95%) for individual groups of microorganisms and animal species and analysis of statistical significance were performed using Student’s T-test. The degree of variation in the frequency of appearance of potentially pathogenic bacteria with respect to the total number of isolates in each group of animals was tested by ANOVA. Statistical comparison of the potential epidemiological threat presented by individuals of different species was tested by Tukey’s HSD test. In both cases, the null and alternative hypotheses were based on average numbers of pathogenic bacteria in the analyzed groups of animal species.

Results

The tests conducted on 421 animals made it possible to distinguish 328 isolates belonging to the genera Salmonella, Staphylococcus, Listeria, and Yersinia (Table 1).

The percentages of individual genera and groups of bacteria in the biota of the animals were varied and the samples isolated from each animal were positive for no more than three different bacterial species. The coagulase-positive Staphylococcus spp. were isolated most frequently (60.33%; CI: 27.8–35.53), while the presence of the other bacteria was detected in a smaller number of animals: Listeria spp. 7, 36%; (CI: 4.71–5.65), Yersinia spp. 5.7% (CI: 3.12–5.58), and Salmonella spp. 4.51% (CI: 1.31–6.2) (Table 1).

Of the total pool of 328 isolates, 90 isolates (21.34%) belonging to taxa posing the greatest potential threat to human health (considered mainly as foodborne pathogens) were selected for further analysis, including statistical analysis. This group included the following isolates: Salmonella spp. (n = 19), Listeria monocytogenes and L. ivanovii (n = 21), Yersinia enterocolitica (n = 10), and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 40). Irrespective of the animal species, S. aureus was isolated most frequently, accounting for 44.4% (CI: 42.23–46.57); Listeria monocytogenes and L. ivanovii (23.3%; CI: 22.83–23.77) and Salmonella spp. (21.11%; CI: 17.86–24.36) were isolated less frequently. Y. enterocolitica was the least frequent from the selected species of bacteria, accounting for 11.1% (CI: 10.71–11.5) of potentially pathogenic isolates. In general, one potentially pathogenic species was isolated from a single individual, except for 10 animals (6 foxes, 3 martens, and 1 raccoon), which were carriers of two different potentially pathogenic bacterial species at the same time. In most cases, the presence of S. aureus (80%; 8/10) was accompanied by Salmonella spp. (40%; 4/10), L. monocytogenes (10%; 1/10), or Y. enterocolitica (10%; 1/10). In one case, L. monocytogenes and Y. enterococlitica were isolated from a single individual (a fox) and, in another case, two different subspecies of Salmonella (S. subsp. enterica and S. subsp. houtenae) were isolated from a raccoon (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Distribution of potentially pathogenic bacteria in the free-living animal species studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155533.t002

Taking into account the differences in the sizes of the samples from the different animal species (Student’s T-test; p < 0.05), we showed that on average for the entire group of animals (n = 421) the percentage of carriage of potentially pathogenic bacteria was 6.33%. The percentage of animals in which the presence of potentially pathogenic isolates was noted varied in the different groups; the highest percentage of individuals was noted in the group of foxes (n = 51; 12.11%; CI: 10.17–14.06), but it was much lower, i.e. 4.27% (CI: 2.93–5.15) and 2.85% (CI: 2.08–3.62), in the martens (n = 18) and raccoons (n = 12) (Table 2).

In the next stage of the study, the potential virulence of the isolates tested (L. monocytogenes, S. aureus and Y. enterocolitica) was analyzed on the basis of selected genes characteristic for a given bacterial species. The profiles of the virulence genes tested within the individual bacterial species were highly heterogeneous; 8 different profiles were found in the case of L. monocytogenes and 20 for S. aureus (Tables 3 and 4).

thumbnail
Table 3. Virulence profiles of L. monocytogenes isolated from free-living animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155533.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Virulence profiles of S. aureus isolated from free-living animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155533.t004

The distribution of the particular virulence genes in the pool of 20 isolates of L. monocytogenes was varied, both quantitatively and qualitatively; the presence of all genes tested (inlA, inlC, inlJ, hlyA, iap, plcA, prfA and actA) was noted in 35% of the isolates, while the number of genes in the other isolates ranged from 5 to 7. The inlA, inlC, hlyA and iap genes were present in all the tested isolates of L. monocytogenes, while genes inlJ, plcA, prfA and actA occurred with varying frequency: 80% (CI: 78.23–81.77), 55% (CI: 53.31–59.69), 70% (CI: 68.65–71.35), and 80% (CI: 78.51–81.49), respectively. The virulence profiles of the 40 S. aureus isolates were determined on the basis of the presence of toxin-encoding genes (Table 4).

Most of the isolates (95%; CI: 93.41–96.59) contained hemolysin-encoding genes hla and hld, whereas gene hlb was noted in only 32.5% (CI: 30.27–34.73) of the isolates. The lukED gene encoding bicomponent leucotoxins was detected in 70% (CI: 68.29–71.71) of S. aureus isolates. Two strains, from a fox and a marten, showed the presence of the gene encoding TSST-1. Genes encoding enterotoxins were detected in 77.5% (CI: 79.88–79.12) of the isolates, including five (12.5%) with egc-like variants (Table 4). No genes encoding leukocidins (lukS/F-PV and lukM) were observed in any of the S. aureus isolates.

In the case of Y. enterocolitica, the presence of the ail gene was found in 60% of isolates (Table 5); only isolates from martens were all positive for this gene.

thumbnail
Table 5. Number and prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in free-living animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155533.t005

Discussion

Free-living animals, particularly predatory species, are a significant link in the epidemiological chain of most zoonoses, mainly as a reservoir for transmission of zoonotic agents to humans and domestic animals [1]. In Poland, there has been little comprehensive research of this issue; more extensive research has been conducted only in a deer population [31]. Our analysis focused on evaluating the degree of carriage of potentially pathogenic bacteria of the genera Salmonella, Yersinia, and Listeria as well as coagulase–positive Staphylococcus in three most common carnivorous animal species in Poland.

Foxes, which constituted the largest group of animals in the present study, belong to species with a strong focus on synanthropization. Due to the fact that intensive vaccination against rabies used in the recent years led to a significant increase in their population, the animals began to change their habitat and move to regions populated by humans more densely (high availability of food resources). A significant percentage of the samples (40%) were taken from foxes suspected of having rabies, and the animals came mainly from urban and suburban areas, where the human population density ranged from 200 to 2000 persons/km2. The other samples came from foxes culled as part of monitoring tests, and these animals were obtained from rural areas (with a density of 20–100 persons/km2) and uninhabited or sparsely populated areas with a density of less than 20 persons/km2.

In the case of the marten, all animals were from both rural and urban areas inhabited by humans (including urban green areas such as parks and gardens). This is not a surprising phenomenon, because the beech marten is closely related to the human environment, nesting in places such as farm buildings and houses. Although raccoons have been caught in the National Park, it should be emphasized that this area is directly adjacent to the urban area (e.g. Kostrzyn city). Analysis of the direct impact of this species of animals on humans should take into account the fact that raccoons, as synanthropic animals, strongly penetrate the direct human environment [32,33] and have a very high potential of migration and a very dynamic growth of the population size [34].

The presence of these animals in the human environments is not only connected with the possibility of transferring microorganisms by direct contact, both in urban and rural human populations as well as in groups of increased risk (forest guards, veterinary staff, hunters, wildlife officers), but also by indirect contamination of the environment by feces. Pathogens found in feces can contaminate water and soil, and in this way they can contaminate the food of plant origin (e.g. raw fruit and vegetables) [35]. According to the report of the European Commission of Health and Consumer Protection [36], all bacterial species examined in this study as potential foodborne pathogens can contaminate agricultural produce and have a capacity to cause outbreaks.

The considerable percentage of the positive isolations of Salmonella spp. (4.51%) was generally consistent with the results of studies carried out in similar animal populations in Italy, Spain, Norway, the USA, and Japan, which suggests the need for international monitoring of free-living animals in this regard. In the case of detection of Salmonella carriage, continual monitoring is currently only required for farm animals [37], while research on other groups of animals is fragmentary; in Poland, it has concerned mainly living birds and cold-blooded vertebrates [14, 38].

The degree of Salmonella spp. carriage is varied and depends in part on the host species (host-restricted, host-adapted, and ubiquitous). In the pool of the animals analyzed, the highest percentage of positive isolations was obtained in the martens (9.2%). Similar results were noted in Italy [39], whereas in Spain [40] no positive isolations of Salmonella were found in this species. In the case of foxes, the frequency of Salmonella isolation was lower than that reported by other authors (5.2% to 12.5%) [39, 40, 41], which may be linked to a certain seasonality of Salmonella occurrence in foxes [42] and to climatic determinants influencing the survival and distribution of these bacteria in the environment [43].

As a reservoir of Salmonella spp., the raccoon ranked between the two species discussed above; the percentage of positive isolates was 5.7%, which was consistent with other research [32, 44]. It is interesting that two subspecies of Salmonella, S. enterica subsp. enterica and S. enterica subsp. houtenae, were both present in the biota of the digestive tract of a single individual. A similar phenomenon was observed in a previous study [38], which clearly suggests the need to include more than one colony isolated from a given sample in the isolation and identification of Salmonella. Among the six S. enterica subsp. enterica serotypes isolated in our study, four (S. Typhimurium, S. Infantis, S. Newport, and S. Enteritidis) are included among the 10 serotypes of non-typhoidal Salmonella, which are most often responsible for infections in humans in Europe, including Poland [45]. In Poland, Salmonella Typhimurium is the second most frequently isolated serotype in cases of salmonellosis in humans [46] and carriage in farm animals [47] and free-living birds [14]; as shown in the present study, it is also the most frequently isolated serotype among S. enterica subsp. enterica in free-living carnivorous animals.

Due to the fact that Salmonella is a multi-host pathogen and can persist in the environment for long periods, there are only a few cases documenting a direct relationship between the wildlife source and the occurrence of salmonellosis in humans [48, 49] or livestock [5], similar to the documented cases of direct contamination of fresh produce by free-living animals [49].

However, the possibility of Salmonella circulation between humans and free-living animals (or livestock as an indirect link) is very complex, and in many stages both direct and indirect contact can lead to transmission of Salmonella [35]. Likewise, the source of contamination of the free-living animals analyzed in the present study is not exactly known. Probably, the carriage may be linked to the type of animal diet covering e.g. small rodents or free-living birds. Many authors have shown a significant role of mice, rats, hedgehogs, amphibians, reptiles, and free-living birds as a reservoir of Salmonella [14, 50, 51].

Another group of bacteria with considerable zoonotic potential that was isolated from carnivorous species of free-living animals was Yersinia spp. (5.7%). According to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control [37], Y. enterocolitica is the cause of 96.5% of cases of yersiniosis in humans, while the second pathogenic species belonging to this genus, Y. pseudotuberculosis, is responsible for only 1.9% of infections. The main route of infection is foodborne transmission. Infection may also occasionally result from indirect contact with infected animals, including free-living animals (e.g. via water, soil, and vegetables contaminated by such animals) [52]. Most studies on the occurrence of Yersinia spp. among free-living animals have concerned wild boars as a potential (analogously to the pig) reservoir of Y. enterocolitica [53, 54]. Other species of free-living animals have rarely been studied and these have usually been small groups of animals [55, 56]. An exception is a study by Lee et al. [32] carried out in a raccoon population, in which Y. pseudotuberculosis was found to be the dominant isolated species. In our study, the degree of carriage of Yersinia spp., irrespective of the host species (fox, marten, or raccoon), was similar, i.e. 5.7%, and 41.6% of all Yersinia isolates were Y. enterocolitica. The other species, Y. kristensenii and Y. frederiksenii, accounted for 4.2% and 54.1% of all Yersinia isolates. As their role in the pathogenesis of infections has not been established [52], they were not included in further analyses. Detection of the presence of the ail gene, responsible for attachment and invasion, in 60% of the Y. enterocolitica isolates confirms the potential health risk for humans and animals posed by the presence of these bacteria in the digestive tract of these carnivorous animal species. Direct contact with infected (carrier) individuals or the environment contaminated these bacteria may be an important element of the epidemiological chain, not only in the case of yersiniosis but also listeriosis [57, 58].

Among all species of Listeria spp., mainly Listeria monocytogenes and L. ivanovii are regarded as potentially pathogenic, with the latter species primarily associated with infections in animals [25, 59, 60]. Among all the strains of Listeria isolated in the present study, L. monocytogenes comprised the largest group (20/31), and the overall percentage of isolation was similar to results obtained by other authors in wildlife animals [61, 62]. L. monocytogenes is pathogenic for human population groups, but poses the greatest threat to infants, pregnant women, and elderly immunosuppressed individuals [63]. Pathogenic strains must be differentiated from non-pathogenic ones, particularly in the case of isolation from the environment. Virulence and pathogenicity factors of L. monocytogenes strains, such as internalin, listeriolysin O, actin, phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C, IAP proteins associated with invasiveness, and virulence regulators have been found both among strains isolated from disease cases, such as miscarriage in women [64], and in environmental strains [25]. Markers identifying strains as virulent include the presence of the gene encoding internalin lmo2821 (inlJ), which is a marker differentiating virulent strains causing mouse mortality from non-virulent strains [65]. This gene was found in 80% of L. monocytogenes isolates from the animals in our study. The gene encoding phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C (PI-PLC), which has been detected only in pathogenic strains of L. monocytogenes and L. ivanovii [64], seems to be equally significant. In the present study, the gene encoding PI-PLC was present in 55% of L. monocytogenes isolates—only those from foxes and martens. The other virulence genes identified (inlA, inlC, prfA, actA, hlyA, and iap) occurred in varying numbers and configurations in all strains from which L. monocytogenes was isolated (8 separate profiles), with the full panel of virulence genes noted in 7 of the 20 isolates. These results indicate that these isolates possess all the properties of a virulent strain and are very likely to pose a direct threat to the health of humans and animals (including livestock).

The most frequently isolated group of bacteria in the pool of the animals studied was coagulase-positive Staphylococcus (60.33%). These are commonly occurring bacteria colonizing the bodies of humans and animals, and their interaction with the host can be either commensal or opportunistic [66]. S. aureus is responsible for most infections induced by this group of bacteria in humans [67] and constitutes one of the important causes of foodborne diseases [68, 69, 70]. Among all coagulase-positive Staphylococcus species, S. aureus is the main described cause of staphylococcal foodborne outbreaks [70]. Other species, especially belonging to the Staphylococcus intermedius group, have low enterotoxigenic potential and only occasionally induce cases of disease [71]. S. aureus compared with other genera, i.e. Salmonella, Campylobacter, or Shigella, seems to account for a small percentage among documented bacterial causes of foodborne diseases reported to public health agencies, but the true number of cases of S. aureus foodborne disease may be much higher for various reasons, most often associated with a lack of laboratory confirmation of the presence of SEs in clinical stool samples [68]. Therefore, S. aureus should also be included in analysis of the presence of potential pathogens in free-living animals. A broad and diverse panel of factors allowing S. aureus to adapt particularly well to the human body [72] by colonizing and/or infecting it may also be active in the case of other mammalian hosts [73]. In our study, S. aureus was isolated at a similar level from all the animal species and, as in studies by other authors [74, 75, 76], it was not a dominant species among coagulase-positive Staphylococcus spp. The vast majority of isolates (38/40) had genes encoding virulence factors occurring in varying configurations (number/type of gene). Among the 40 S. aureus isolated in this study, 31 were characterized by the presence of genes encoding at least one type of enterotoxin (SEs). Enterotoxins belonging to the family of pyrogenic toxin superantigens (PTSAg) have been linked to food poisoning and, as superantigens (SAg), can lead to potentially lethal toxic shock syndrome [70]. In five strains, there were also enterotoxin gene cluster (egc) or egc-like variants, which were detected in over half of all S. aureus strains, both commensal and invasive [77]. Novrousian et al. [77] demonstrated that the presence of an egc locus can facilitate colonization by S. aureus of mucosal surfaces and increase weight loss in an experimental model of S. aureus infection. The hla and hld genes encoding hemolysins α and δ, leukotoxin LukE-LukD (30/40), and hemolysin β (11/40) were noted most frequently. The virulence factors such as leucotoxins have been demonstrated to kill human neutrophils, but only LukE-LukD leucotoxin exhibited lytic activity against red blood cells [78]. Genes encoding leukotoxin LukE-LukD were present in most S. aureus strains isolated from cases of mastitis in cows [79] and in blood isolated from humans with S. aureus bacteremia [80]. Hemolysins, especially α-hemolysin, are important virulence factors in several animal models of infection, including pneumonia and mastitis [81] The presence of the hla, hld, and hlb genes and the enterotoxin gene cluster has also been shown in S. aureus strains from cases of mastitis in cows in Poland [82, 83].

The presence of the tst gene encoding toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) in two (5%) strains isolated from a fox and a marten in the present study is noteworthy. TSST-1 has also properties of a superantigen and its presence is connected with toxic shock syndrome (TSS), a rare but important cause of morbidity and mortality [84]. The presence of this toxin is also related to the etiology of many other diseases or syndromes in humans [73]. The tst gene has not been detected so far in isolates from companion animals and livestock (dogs, cats, pigs, or chickens) in Poland [82], but it has been present in isolates from neonatal intensive care units in Polish hospitals, usually in combination with the enterotoxin gene cluster (egc) and egc-like variants [85]. This phenomenon may indicate that the presence of S. aureus tst gene positive strains in free-living animals may be associated rather with their exposure to direct human sources (e.g. sewage, waste from hospitals), as in the case of our previous studies on isolation of a community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) strain from a marten [86].

In the case of free-living animals, the level of carriage of specific microbes is most often analyzed [41, 53, 86, 87, 88]. Confirmed cases of illness are noted less frequently (salmonellosis, listeriosis, yersiniosis, or local and generalized S. aureus infection) [33, 48, 89, 90] and the primary source of infection/carriage of these animals is analyzed extremely rarely [91]. Due to their varied diet, carnivorous animals may constitute an accumulation vector by eating small mammals, birds, and even insects that may be carriers of pathogens and transmit them in contact with humans or domestic animals. Most animals (foxes and martens), in the present study came from areas that include provinces with the largest number of farms producing organic food, including farm animal. One of the requirements for organic farming is to keep farm animals with outdoor access, which greatly increases the possibility of contact of free-living animals with farm animals and, thus, the potential transmission of pathogens [35].

Apart from the transfer from free-living animals to humans, a reverse phenomenon can occur. As a result of increasing anthropogenic changes in the environment leading to greater interpenetration of communities of humans and free-living animals, exposure of animals to pathogens that are present in the human environment or livestock (waste, manure from farm animals) can occur. Messenger et al. [92] showed that 50% of all recorded infections in animals related to reverse zoonosis apply to free living animals, where direct contact was suggested as the most frequent transmission route.

The present study showed that predatory species of free-living animals can be a significant reservoir of potentially pathogenic bacteria. Among the species analyzed (the red fox, beech marten, and raccoon), the fox may pose the greatest threat, due to its continually growing population size and occurrence all over Poland, as well as the statistically significantly higher frequency of isolation of bacteria that are potentially pathogenic for humans and other animals. To analyze the importance and participation of free-living carnivorous animals in the chain of transmission and spread of the microorganisms analyzed in the present study, additional research should be carried out covering the lower floors of the food chain (small mammals and birds, amphibians, reptiles, insects) and the natural habitat of carnivorous animals (water, soil, plants). Moreover, given the virulence potential of the isolated strains (the presence of virulence genes), it is clear that expanding epidemiological monitoring to include free-living animals must be considered.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AN PZ GZ SG KT ŁU MM BMD AT. Performed the experiments: AN PZ GZ SG KT ŁU MM BMD AT. Analyzed the data: AN PZ GZ SG KT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AN PZ GZ SG KT ŁU MM BMD AT. Wrote the paper: AN PZ GZ SG KT ŁU MM BMD AT.

References

  1. 1. Kruse H, Kirkemo AM, Handeland K. Wildlife as source of zoonotic infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004; 10: 2067–2072. pmid:15663840
  2. 2. Wereszczuk A. Occurrence of wild mammals and birds in villages–the use of camera traps in the evaluation of species composition. Chrońmy Przyr Ojcz. 2015; 71: 9–16.
  3. 3. Kamieniarz R, Panek M. Game animals in Poland at the turn of the 20th and 21st century. The research Station in Czempiń– OHZ PZŁ. Raport Game Animals in Poland. 2008. (In Polish with English summary) Available: http://www.czempin.pzlow.pl/palio/html.wmedia?_Instance=pzl_www&_Connector=palio&_ID=3991&_CheckSum=-1363983456
  4. 4. Duscher GG, Leschnik M, Fuehrer H-P, Joachim A. Wildlife reservoirs for vector-borne canine, feline and zoonotic infections in Austria. Int J Parasitol. 2015; 4: 88–96.
  5. 5. Navarro-Gonzalez N, Casas-Díaz E, Porrero CM, Mateos A, Domínguez L, Lavín S, et al. Food-borne zoonotic pathogens and antimicrobial resistance of indicator bacteria in urban wild boars in Barcelona, Spain. Vet Microbiol. 2013; 167: 686–689 pmid:23992794
  6. 6. Sumiński P, Goszczyński J, Romanowski J. Ssaki drapieżne Europy. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne; 1993.
  7. 7. Gabryś G, Nowaczyk J, Ważna A, Kościelska A, Nowakowska K, Cichocki J. Expansion of the raccoon Procyon lotor in Poland. Acta Biol. 2014; 21: 169–181.
  8. 8. Bartoszewicz M, Okarma H, Szczęsna J, Zalewski A. Ecology of raccoon (Procyon lotor L. 1758) from western Poland. Ann Zool Fenn. 2008; 45: 291–298.
  9. 9. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. Wildlife ecology—emerging infectious diseases of wildlife—threats to biodiversity and human health. Science. 2000; 287: 443–449 pmid:10642539
  10. 10. European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General: Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare: The oral vaccination of foxes against rabies. 2002.
  11. 11. Karamon J, Kochanowski M, Sroka J, Cencek T, Różycki M, Chmurzyńska E, et al. The prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis in red foxes in Poland—current results (2009–2013). Parasitol Res. 2014; 113: 317–322 pmid:24221887
  12. 12. Karamon J, Kochanowski M, Cencek T, Bartoszewicz M, Kusyk P. Gastrointestinal helminths of raccoons (Procyon lotor) in western Poland (Lubuskie province)—with particular regard to Baylisascaris procyonis. B Vet I Pulawy. 2014; 58: 547–552.
  13. 13. Krajewska M, Lipiec M, Zabost A, Augustynowicz-Kopeć E, Szulowski K. Bovine tuberculosis in a wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Poland. J Wild Dis. 2014; 50: 1001–1002.
  14. 14. Krawiec M, Kuczkowski M, Kruszewicz AG, Wieliczko A. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Salmonella in free-living birds in Poland. BMC Vet Res. 2015; 11: 15. pmid:25636375
  15. 15. Larska M, Krzysiak MK, Jabłoński A, Kęsik J, Bednarski M, Rola J. Hepatitis E virus antibody prevalence in wildlife in Poland. Zoonoses and Public Health. 2015; 62: 105–110. pmid:24655475
  16. 16. Polish Veterinary Inspection. Animal Health–Regulatory Committee-presentations: Rabies–Poland, 09–10 Sept. 2015. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/health/regulatory_committee/presentations_en.htm
  17. 17. Zalewski A. Protection of water and marsh birds in five national parks—reconstructing habitats and curbing the influence of invasive species. Project LIFE09 NAT/PL/000263. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.dspPage&n_proj_id=3868
  18. 18. EFSA and ECDC (European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control): The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2013. EFSA J. 2015; 13: 162
  19. 19. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Annual epidemiological report 2014 Food- and waterborne diseases and zoonoses. Available: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/surveillance_reports/annual_epidemiological_report/Pages/epi_index.aspx
  20. 20. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo RJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson M-A, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States—Major Pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17
  21. 21. Polish Committee for Standardization: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. PN-EN ISO 6579:2003. Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, Poland, 2003.
  22. 22. Popoff M, Le Minor L. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella. Institut Pasteur, Paris, France, 2001.
  23. 23. Polish Committee for Standardization: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for detecting the presence and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes. PNEN ISO 11290–1:1999. Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, Poland, 1999.
  24. 24. Paillard D, Dubois V, Duran R, Nathier F, Guittet C, Caumette P, et al. Rapid identification of Listeria species by using restriction fragment length polymorphism of PCR-amplified 23S rRNA gene fragments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69: 6386–6392. pmid:14602590
  25. 25. Soni DK, Singh RK, Singh DV, Dubey SK. Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from Ganges water, human clinical and milk samples at Varanasi, India. Infect Genet Evol. 2013: 14: 83–91. pmid:23201044
  26. 26. Wannet WJB, Reessink M, Brunings HA, Maas HME. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by a rapid and sensitive duplex PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39: 4483–4486. pmid:11724866
  27. 27. Polish Committee for Standardization: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species)—Part 1: Method Rusing Baird-Parker agar. PN-EN ISO 6888–1:2001. Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, Poland, 2001.
  28. 28. Sasaki T, Tsubakishita S, Tanaka Y, Sakusabe A, Ohtsuka M, Hirotaki S, et al. Multiplex-PCR method for species identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2010; 48: 765–769. pmid:20053855
  29. 29. Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, et al. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun. 2002; 70: 631–641. pmid:11796592
  30. 30. Hwang SY, Kim SH, Jang EJ, Kwon NH, Park YK, Koo HC, et al. Novel multiplex PCR for the detection of the Staphylococcus aureus superantigen and its application to raw meat isolates in Korea. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 117: 99–105. pmid:17439826
  31. 31. Gnat S, Trościańczyk A, Nowakiewicz A, Majer-Dziedzic B, Ziółkowska G, Dziedzic R, et al. Experimental studies of microbial populations and incidence of zoonotic pathogens in the faeces of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015; 61: 446–452. pmid:26222832
  32. 32. Lee K, Iwata T, Nakadai A, Kato T, Hayama S, Taniguchi T, et al. Prevalence of Salmonella, Yersinia and Campylobacter spp. in feral raccoons (Procyon lotor) and masked palm civets (Paguma larvata) in Japan. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011; 58: 424–431. pmid:21824337
  33. 33. Hamir AN. Systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection in a free-ranging raccoon (Procyon lotor). J Wildlife Dis. 2010; 46: 665–668
  34. 34. Bartoszewicz, M. 2011 [cited 11 April 2016]. In: NOBANIS–Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet–Procyon lotor–Online Database of the European Network on Invasive Alien Species. Available: https://www.nobanis.org/fact-sheets/ NOBANIS)
  35. 35. Hilbert F, Smulders FJM, Chopra-Dewasthaly R, Paulsen P. Salmonella in the wildlife-human interface. Food Res Int. 2012; 45: 603–608
  36. 36. European Commision of Health and Consumer Protection. Report of the Scientific Committee on Food: Risk profile on the microbiological contamination of fruits and vegetables eaten raw 2002. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scf/out125_en.pdf
  37. 37. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Annual epidemiological report 2014 –food- and waterborne diseases and zoonoses. Stockholm, ECDC, 2014.
  38. 38. Nowakiewicz A, Ziółkowska G, Zięba P, Stępniewska K, Tokarzewski S. Russian tortoises (Agrionemys horsfieldi) as a potential reservoir for Salmonella spp. Res Vet Sci. 2012; 92: 187–190. pmid:21486674
  39. 39. Botti V, Navillod FV, Domenis L, Orusa R, Pepe E, Robetto S, et al. Salmonella spp. and antibiotic-resistant strains in wild mammals and birds in north-western Italy from 2002 to 2010. Veter Ital. 2013; 49: 195–202.
  40. 40. Millán J, Aduriz G, Moreno B, Juste RA, Barral M. Salmonella isolates from wild birds and mammals in the Basque country (Spain). Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz. 2004; 23: 905–911.
  41. 41. Chiari M, Ferrari N, Giardiello D, Lanfranchi P, Zanoni M, Lavazza A, et al. Isolation and identification of Salmonella spp. from red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and badgers (Meles meles) in northern Italy. Acta Vet Scand. 2014; 56: 86. pmid:25492524
  42. 42. Handeland K, Nesse LL, Lillehaug A, Vikøren T, Djønne B, Bergsjø B. Natural and experimental Salmonella Typhimurium infections in foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Vet Microbiol. 2008; 132: 129–134. pmid:18547749
  43. 43. Maurer JJ, Martin G, Hernandez S, Cheng Y, Gerner-Smidt P, Hise KB, et al. Diversity and persistence of Salmonella enterica strains in rural landscapes in the Southeastern United States. Plos Med. 2015.
  44. 44. Compton JA, Baney JA, Donaldson SC, Houser BA, Julian GJ, Yahner RH, et al. Salmonella infections in the common raccoon (Procyon lotor) in Western Pennsylvania. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46: 3084–3086. pmid:18596136
  45. 45. Hendriksen R S, Vieira AR, Karlsmose S, Lo Fo Wong DMA, Jensen AB, Wegener HC, et al. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank: results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011; 8,
  46. 46. Hoszowski A, Samcik I, Lalak A, Skarżyńska M, Wnuk D, Zając M, et al. Charakterystyka jednofazowych izolatów Salmonella enterica serowar Typhimurium (1,4,[5],12:i:-). Med Weter. 2014; 70: 117–121.
  47. 47. Hoszowski A, Wasyl D. Salmonella serovars found in animals and feeding stuffs in 2001 and their antimicrobial resistance. B Vet I Pulawy 2002; 46: 165–178.
  48. 48. Simpson VR. Wild animals as reservoirs of infectious diseases in the UK. Vet J. 2002; 163: 128146. pmid:12093188
  49. 49. Jay-Russell MT. What is the risk from wild animals in food-borne pathogen contamination of plants? CAB Rev. 2013; 8; 040. Available: http://www.wifss.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/documents/foodSafety/CABReviewWildlife.pdf
  50. 50. Keymer IF, Gibson EA, Reynolds DJ. Zoonoses and other findings in hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus): a survey of mortality and review of the literature. Vet Rec. 1991; 128: 245–249 pmid:2035215
  51. 51. Wales AD, Carrique-Mas JJ, Rankin M, Bell B, Thind BB, Davies RH. Review of the carriage of zoonotic bacteria by arthropods with special reference to Salmonella in mites, flies and litter beetles. Zoonoses Public Health. 2010; 57: 299–314. pmid:19486496
  52. 52. Sabina Y, Rahman A, Ray RC, Montet D Yersinia enterocolitica: mode of transmission, molecular insights of virulence, and pathogenesis of infection. J Pathog. 2011,
  53. 53. Bancerz-Kisiel A, Szczerba-Turek A, Platt-Samoraj A, Socha P, Szweda W. Application of multiplex PCR for the evaluation of the occurrence of ail, ystA, and ystB genes in Yersinia enterocolitica strains isolated from wild boars (Sus scrofa). B Vet I Pulawy. 2009; 53: 351–355.
  54. 54. Sannö A, Aspán A, Hestvik G, Jacobson M. Presence of Salmonella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in wild boars. Epidemiol Infect. 2014; 142: 2542–2547. pmid:24512817
  55. 55. Kaneko KI, Hashimoto N. Occurrence of Yersinia enterocolitica in wild animals. Appl Environ Microb. 1981; 41: 635–638.
  56. 56. Nikolova S, Tzvetkov Y, Najdenski H, Vesselinova A. Isolation of pathogenic yersiniae from wild animals in Bulgaria. J Vet Med B. 2001; 48: 203–209.
  57. 57. Zadernowska A, Chajęcka-Wierzchowska W, Łaniewska-Trokenheim Ł. Yersinia enterocolitica: a dangerous, but often ignored, foodborne pathogen. Food Rev Int. 2014; 30: 53–70.
  58. 58. Vackachan MB, Latha C, Sunil B, Menon VK. Prevalence of Listeria spp. in soils of central Kerala, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015; 4: 938–943.
  59. 59. Orsi RH, den Bakker HC, Wiedmann M. Listeria monocytogenes lineages: Genomics, evolution, ecology, and phenotypic characteristics. Int J Med Microbiol. 2011; 301: 79–96 pmid:20708964
  60. 60. Jadhav S, Bhave M, Palombo EA. Methods used for the detection and subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes. See comment in PubMed Commons belowJ Microbiol Methods. 2012; 88: 327–341 pmid:22261140
  61. 61. Yoshida T, Sugimoto T, Sato M, Hirai K. Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in wild animals in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2000; 62: 673–675. pmid:10907701
  62. 62. Lyautey E, Hartmann A, Pagotto F, Tyler K, Lapen DR, Wilkes G et al. Characteristics and frequency of detection of fecal Listeria monocytogenes shed by livestock, wildlife, and humans. See comment in PubMed Commons belowCan J Microbiol. 2007; 53: 1158–67.
  63. 63. Liu D, Lawrence ML, Ainsworth AJ, Austin FW. Toward an improved laboratory definition of Listeria monocytogenes virulence. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 118: 101–115. pmid:17727992
  64. 64. Kaur S, Malik SVS, Vaidya VM, Barbuddhe SB. Listeria monocytogenes in spontaneous abortions in humans and its detection by multiplex PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 2007; 103: 1889–1896. pmid:17953598
  65. 65. Liu D, Lawrence M, Austin FW, Ainsworth AJ. A multiplex PCR for species- and virulence-specific determination of Listeria monocytogenes. J Microbiol Meth. 2007; 71: 133–140.
  66. 66. Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Weese JS. Coagulase positive staphylococcal colonization of humans and their household pets. Can Vet J. 2009; 50: 954–958. pmid:19949556
  67. 67. Liu GY. Molecular pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infection. Pediatr Res. 2009; 65: 71–77.
  68. 68. Kadariya J, Smith TC, Thapaliya D. Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal food-borne disease: an ongoing challenge in public health. BioMed Res Int. 2014; Available online:
  69. 69. Sofos JN. Bacterial Foodborne Diseases. Proceedings, The 15th Congress of FAVA. FAVA -OIE Joint Symposium on Emerging Diseases 2008
  70. 70. Hennekinne JA, De Buyser ML, Dragacci S. Staphylococcus aureus and its food poisoning toxins: characterization and outbreak investigation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012; 36: 815–36 pmid:22091892
  71. 71. Bennett RW. Atypical toxigenic Staphylococcus and non-Staphylococcus aureus species on the horizon? An update. J Food Protect. 1996; 59: 1123–1126.
  72. 72. Murugaiyan J, Walther B, Stamm I Abou-Elnaga Y, Brueggemann-Schwarze S, Vincze S, et al. Species differentiation within the Staphylococcus intermedius group using a refined MALDI-TOF MS database. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014; 20: 1007–1014. pmid:24807701
  73. 73. Dinges MM, Orwin PM, Schlievert PM. Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000; 13: 16–34. pmid:10627489
  74. 74. Gomez-Sanz E, Torres C, Lozano C, Zarazaga M. High diversity of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius lineages and toxigenic traits in healthy pet-owning household members. Underestimating normal household contact? Comp Immunol Microb. 2013; 36: 83–94.
  75. 75. Porrero CM, Mentaberre G, Sanchez S, Fernandez Llario P, Gomez-Barrero S, Navarro-Gonzalez N, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage in different free-living animals species in Spain. Vet J. 2013; 198: 127–130. pmid:23846031
  76. 76. Gomez P, Gonzalez-Barrio D, Benito D, Garcia JT, Vinuela J, Zarazaga M, et al. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying the mecC gene in wild small mammals in Spain. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2014; 69: 2061–2064.
  77. 77. Nowrouzian FL, Ali A, Badiou C, Dauwalder O, Lina G, Josefsson E. Impacts of enterotoxin gene cluster-encoded superantigens on local and systemic experimental Staphylococcus aureus infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015; 34:1443–1449 pmid:25864191
  78. 78. Yoong P, Torres VJ. The effects of Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxins on the host: cell lysis and beyond. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013; 16: 63–69. pmid:23466211
  79. 79. Fueyo JM, Mendoza MC, Rodicio MR, Muniz J, Alvarez MA, Martın MC. Cytotoxin and pyrogenic toxin superantigen gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus associated with subclinical mastitis in dairy cows and relationships with macrorestriction genomic profiles. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43: 1278–1284. pmid:15750096
  80. 80. Eiff C, Friedrichb AW, Petersa G, Beckera K. Prevalence of genes encoding for members of the staphylococcal leukotoxin family among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Diag Micr Infec Dis. 2004; 49: 157–162.
  81. 81. Schwan WR, Langhorne MH, Ritchie HD, Stover CK. Loss of hemolysin expression in Staphylococcus aureus agr mutants correlates with selective survival during mixed infections in murine abscesses and wounds. FEMS Immunol Med. Mic. 2003; 38: 23–28
  82. 82. Garbacz K, Piechowicz L, Mroczkowska A. Distribution of toxin genes among different spa types and phage types of animal Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Microbiol. 2015; 197: 935–940. pmid:26108193
  83. 83. Puacz E, Ilczyszyn WM, Kosecka M, Buda A, Dudziak W, Polakowska K, et al. Clustering of Staphylococcus aureus bovine mastitis strains from regions of Central-Eastern Poland based on their biochemical and genetic characteristics. Pol J Ve. Sci. 2015; 18: 333–342.
  84. 84. Murray RJ. Recognition and management of Staphylococcus aureus toxin-mediated disease. See comment in PubMed Commons belowIntern Med J. 2005; 35 Suppl 2: 106–119.
  85. 85. Romaniszyn D, Różańska A, Wójkowska-Mach J, Chmielarczyk A, Pobiega M, Adamski P, et al. Epidemiology, antibiotic consumption and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus infections–data from the Polish Neonatology Surveillance Network, 2009–2012. BMC Infect Dis. 2015; 15: 169. pmid:25888217
  86. 86. Nowakiewicz A, Ziółkowska G, Zięba P, Gnat S, Wojtanowicz-Markiewicz K, Trościańczyk A. Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus isolated from wildlife: Identification, molecular characterization and evaluation of resistance profiles with focus on a methicillin-resistant strain. Comp Immunol Microb. 2016; 44: 21–28
  87. 87. Zaytseva E, Ermolaeva S, Somov GP. Low genetic diversity and epidemiological significance of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from wild animals in the far east of Russia. Infect Genet Evol. 2007;7: 736–742 pmid:17716956
  88. 88. Hoelzer K, Moreno Switt AI, Wiedmann M. Animal contact as a source of human non-typhoidal salmonellosis Vet Res. 2011; 42: 34 pmid:21324103
  89. 89. Hamir AN, Mattson DE, Sonn RJ, Stasko J, Habecker PL. Concurrent candidiasis, listeriosis and adenovirus infections in a raccoon (Procyon lotor). Vet Rec. 2000; 146: 320–322 pmid:10766117
  90. 90. Rothenburger JL, Bennett KR, Bryan L, Bollinger TK. Septicemic listeriosis in wild hares from Saskatchewan, Canada. J Wildlife Dis. 2015; 51: 503–508.
  91. 91. Tizard I. Salmonellosis in wild birds. Seminars in Avian and Exotic Pet Medicine. 2004; 13: 50–66
  92. 92. Messenger AM, Barnes AN, Gray GC. Reverse zoonotic disease transmission (zooanthroponosis): A systematic review of seldom- documented human biological threats to animals. PLoS One 2014; 9: e89055 pmid:24586500