Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Generalization of the Right Acute Stroke Prevention Strategies in Reducing in-Hospital Delays

  • Qiang Huang ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Qiang Huang, Hai-qing Song

    Current address: Department of neurology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Medical Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

  • Hai-qing Song ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Qiang Huang, Hai-qing Song

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

  • Xun-ming Ji,

    Affiliation Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

  • Wei-yang Cheng,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

  • Juan Feng,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

  • Jian Wu ,

    m.qingfeng@163.com(QM); wujianxuanwu@126.com (JW)

    Affiliation Department of neurology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Medical Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

  • Qing-feng Ma

    m.qingfeng@163.com(QM); wujianxuanwu@126.com (JW)

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Abstract

The aim of this study was to reduce the door-to-needle (DTN) time of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) through a comprehensive, hospital-based implementation strategy. The intervention involved a systemic literature review, identifying barriers to rapid IVT treatment at our hospital, setting target DTN time intervals, and building an evolving model for IVT candidate selection. The rate of non-in-hospital delay (DTN time ≤ 60 min) was set as the primary endpoint. A total of 348 IVT cases were enrolled in the study (202 and 146 in the pre- and post-intervention group, respectively). The median age was 61 years in both groups; 25.2% and 26.7% of patients in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively, were female. The post-intervention group had higher rates of dyslipidemia and minor stroke [defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤ 3]; less frequent atrial fibrillation; higher numbers of current smokers, heavy drinkers, referrals, and multi-model head imaging cases; and lower NIHSS scores and blood sugar level (all P < 0.05). All parameters including DTN, door-to-examination, door-to-imaging, door-to-laboratory, and final-test-to-needle times were improved post-intervention (all P < 0.05), with net reductions of 63, 2, 4, 28, and 23 min, respectively. The rates of DTN time ≤ 60 min and onset-to-needle time ≤ 180 min were significantly improved by the intervention (pre: 9.9% vs. post: 60.3%; P < 0.001 and pre: 23.3% vs. post: 53.4%; P < 0.001, respectively), which was accompanied by an increase in the rate of neurological improvement (pre: 45.5% vs. post: 59.6%; P = 0.010), while there was no change in incidence of mortality or systemic intracranial hemorrhage at discharge (both P > 0.05). These findings indicate that it is possible to achieve a DTN time ≤ 60 min for up to 60% of hospitals in the current Chinese system, and that this logistical change can yield a notable improvement in the outcome of IVT patients.

Introduction

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is one of the most efficacious treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), for which therapeutic intervention is highly time-sensitive [1,2,3]. Less than half of American [4] and even fewer Chinese [5,6] patients with AIS are treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within the time frame recommended by the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association [door-to-needle (DTN) time ≤ 60 min] [7], which has been validated by the Get With The Guidelines—Stroke program [8]. Facilitating the process of IVT may improve the rate of DTN time ≤ 60 min and consequently, IVT patient prognosis [4,9,10,11,12].

Although strategies for reducing in-hospital delays of IVT administration have been implemented in many Western institutions [4,9,10,11,12] and the median DTN time has been reduced to < 20 min in at least one stroke center [10], this has not been the case in most Chinese hospitals [5,6], which may be attributed to differences between the Chinese healthcare system and those of Western countries [13]. Our previous study showed that the main causes of delays in DTN time were the time taken for decision-making and laboratory tests [6]. In the present historical controlled study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of various strategies for reducing DTN time at a tertiary hospital in China.

Methods

Ethics statement

The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Xuanwu Hospital, and conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written, informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Participant eligibility and enrollment

The Generalization of the Right Acute Stroke Prevention Strategies (GRASPs) program for reducing in-hospital delay was initiated at the end of 2014. The main items of this program included a systematic literature review, analysis of factors contributing to in-hospital delays at our hospital, and a multilevel implementation strategy that integrated currently available resources and methods for selecting IVT candidates (Fig 1). The following primary data from the literature review were noted: improvements related to emergency medical services [4,9,10,11,14], emergency departments [4,9,10], radiology departments [4,9,10,14,15], and laboratories [10,16]; public education programs [17]; and other organizational changes in the stroke treatment protocol [4,10,12,18,19]. Existing features at our hospital included a neurological unit inside the emergency department, a stroke team and stroke unit on call 24/7, and protocols for emergency endovascular treatment, critical care, and rehabilitation of AIS patients.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flow chart of the GRASPs study for reducing in-hospital delays.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154972.g001

AIS patients who visited our hospital through 2015 were recruited as the post-intervention group after the improvement program was implemented in January 2015. The published data for patients enrolled between March 2011 and December 2014 was taken as a historical control (pre-intervention group). And all the AIS cases treated with IVT in 2015 were collected prospectively as the post-intervention group [6]. AIS diagnostic and treatment protocols have been previously described in detail [6], and were slightly modified after the April 2015 update of Chinese guidelines for the care for AIS [20]. In short, the limit of upper age (80 years) and mild stroke severity were removed from exclusions of IVT in the updated guideline [20]. Conferences were held weekly in order to monitor the efficiency of the stroke treatment protocol. The STROBE Statement that should be included in reports of cohort studies was followed (S1 STROBE Checklist).

Explanatory and outcome variables

Information such as demographic data, stroke severity [as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)], baseline blood pressure and sugar level, medical history of vascular diseases, smoking and drinking status, drug history, and additional factors that were likely to be associated with in-hospital delays [pre-notification from emergency system, urgent blood pressure management, multi-model head imaging, concurrent transient ischemic attack (TIA) or rapidly improving symptoms (RIS)], lesion sites (classified as anterior and posterior circulation according to magnetic resonance imaging results), and admission date and hour were noted [6]. Mild stroke (including RIS) were defined as baseline NIHSS ≤ 3. Outcomes such as neurological improvement (measured as NIHSS), mortality, and systemic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) at discharge were also recorded. Adverse events related to rapid administration of alteplase, serious bleeding complications for not waiting laboratory results, and erroneous thrombolytics administration for stroke mimics were also recorded. Neurological improvement (NI) at discharge was defined as NIHSS = 0 from a mild baseline (score ≤ 3), improvement by ≥ 4 from a moderate baseline NIHSS (score of 4–9), or improvement by ≥ 8 from a severe baseline NIHSS (score ≥ 10). SICH was defined as any clinical deterioration in NIHSS accompanied by hemorrhage in the 24–36 h after a computed tomography (CT) scan following IVT.

The rate of DTN time ≤ 60 min was set as the primary endpoint, consistent with criteria of the American Stroke Association Target—Stroke initiative [4]. Changes in other parameters, including onset-to-door (OTD), door-to-examination (DTE), door-to-imaging (DTI), door-to-laboratory (DTL), and final-test-to-needle (FTN) times, rates of onset-to-needle (OTN) time ≤ 180 min, and NI at discharge (measured as NIHSS) were set as secondary outcomes. FTN was used to identify the time interval from the last screening test to the needle time of IVT, which included the communication process for IVT decision-making and was equal to 0 when the decision was made before the last test was completed. Mortality and SICH at discharge served as safety indicators.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS v.17.0 software. Continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR), and categorical data as percentage (%). The Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests were used to compare related variables between groups, and a two-tailed P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed in order to identify factors contributing to DTN time > 60 min in the post-intervention group, in which variables were selected from the univariate analysis at a significance level ≤ 0.20.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 348 IVT cases (202 and 146 in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively) were recruited for the study. The median age was 61 years (IQR: 52–68 years), and 25.2 and 26.7% of patients were female in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. Demographic and other characteristics of the two groups are shown in Table 1. The post-intervention group showed higher rates of dyslipidemia and minor stroke (defined as NIHSS ≤ 3) and less frequent atrial fibrillation; had a greater number of current smokers, heavy drinkers, referrals, and cases that required multi-model head imaging (all P < 0.05); and lower median NIHSS (score = 4 vs. 9; P < 0.001) and blood sugar level (6.4 vs. 6.9 mmol/l; P = 0.020). The differences in rates among older patients (age ≥ 80 years) did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.878). In 17/146 (11.6%) of IVT cases, pre-notification signals were sent prior to patient admission.

thumbnail
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of cases included in this study*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154972.t001

All time intervals except OTD were reduced by the intervention (P < 0.05); the net improvement for DTN, DTE, DTI, DTL, and FTN were 63, 2, 4, 28, and 23 min, respectively (Table 2). Improvements were observed in the rates of DTN time ≤ 60 min (pre: 9.9% vs. post: 60.3%; P < 0.001) and OTN time ≤ 180 min (pre: 23.3% vs. post: 53.4%; P < 0.001). Only 33/146 (22.6%) achieved a DTN time ≤ 40 min. The post-intervention group also showed a higher rate of NI (pre: 45.5% vs. post: 59.6%; P = 0.010), but there were no differences in SICH (P = 0.091) or mortality (P = 0.875) at discharge. One case with symptoms that mimicked those of stroke was thrombolyzed, with a final diagnosis of acute clozapine poisoning. There were no serious hemorrhagic complications as a result of not waiting for time-consuming laboratory tests.

thumbnail
Table 2. Time intervals and outcomes of cases included in this study*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154972.t002

There were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics in the post-intervention group, except for the rate of cases with multi-model head imaging between subgroups with or without in-hospital delay (S1 Table). All six cases (4.1%) with multi-model head imaging experienced in-hospital delays, while 17 (11.6%) with pre-notification before admission were treated by IVT without in-hospital delays. Significant improvements in time intervals (DTE, DTI, DTL, and FTN) were also observed in the subgroup without in-hospital delays, although there was no statistical significance in outcome measures (Table 3). Six variables (OTD, DTE, DTI, DTL, FTN, and multi-model imaging) with P ≤ 0.20 in the univariate analysis (S2 Table) were included in multivariate linear regression models, of which FTN (P < 0.001), DTL (P < 0.001), and with multi-model imaging (P = 0.032) were significantly associated with in-hospital delays post-intervention (Table 4). Details of factors influencing in-hospital delays post-intervention are shown in Fig 1.

thumbnail
Table 3. Time intervals and outcomes of cases in the post-intervention group*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154972.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Multivariate linear regression analysis of independent variables affecting in-hospital delays post-intervention*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154972.t004

Discussion

It is important to design a multi-level implementation strategy for reducing in-hospital delays of IVT administration that fits the specific organization. To our best knowledge, this is the first report that incorporates experiences from more advanced institutions and progressive self-reform in Chinese hospitals. Our study showed that it is possible to achieve a DTN time of ≤ 60 min at as many as 60% of hospitals in the Chinese healthcare system—and thereby improve the short-term prognosis of IVT cases—by implementing organizational changes.

Reducing delays in DTL and FTN times contributed the most to the improvement in DTN time at our hospital. We identified specific factors causing time delays and limiting accessibility to IVT in our earlier studies [6,21], which allowed us to target our improvement efforts. The best practices from other studies [14,22,23] as well as from our own previous work [6] included simplifying as much as possible the items in screening tests (including simplified blood biochemical tests and a single CT scan for head imaging), not waiting for formal laboratory reports for patients without related history, and negotiating with IVT candidates using reserve protocols and tools (e.g., informed outcome diagrams for IVT). As highlighted in the TARGET: STROKE trial protocol [24], implementing organizational changes requires highly coordinated, multilevel, and focused effort. The success of GRASPs was also attributed to the coordinated efforts of all related departments, including but not limited to the neurology and neurosurgery departments. A clear target in the DTN time frame and a prompt data feedback system were invaluable in facilitating cooperation in the IVT candidate selection protocol.

However, there remain shortcomings in the Chinese hospital network as compared to more advanced institutions [9,10,14]. The main problems were difficulty in implementing a round-the-clock point-of-care laboratory test with sufficient staff and other resources, a low rate of pre-notifications from EMS, and delayed activation of the system for fully loaded neurologists and nurses in the emergency department. Less familiarity with stroke symptoms, especially in cases of mild stroke, may have contributed to DTI time delays in our study; to this end, training programs in stroke symptom recognition for emergency physicians, nurses, and radiologists could be helpful [13]. However, even well-designed randomized controlled trials with a fixed implementation strategy may achieve only mild-to-moderate progress in promoting IVT for AIS [25,26]. Modern guidelines with detailed recommendations for reducing IVT time delays, national stroke initiative programs (e.g., the TARGET: STROKE trial [4,24]), and effective monitoring protocols for stroke care are still needed in China.

Recently, programs for reducing in-hospital delays were explored in highly developed hospitals equipped with the modern technologies and skilled staff. Mobile stroke treatment units are now available in Germany and the USA [27,28], which could potentially minimize in-hospital delays for IVT candidates. However, due to the unavailability of specialized equipment and other problems unique to the Chinese healthcare system [13], such units may not be realistic for most of Chinese hospitals at present. On the other hand, pre-hospital factors merit greater attention [29] and may also contribute to the reduction in IVT treatment time delays [18].

Our study had some limitations. Firstly, the experiences of a single hospital may not apply to other institutions. However, the positive results of the GRASPs study provide a basis for self-reform at other hospitals. Moreover, we were unable to draw a firm conclusion such as that of the Target: Stroke initiative [4], since not all endpoints (e.g., mortality and SICH) were improved following the intervention, possibly due to the relatively small sample size.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated favorable results in GRASPs for reducing in-hospital delays in IVT treatment. Organizational changes were accompanied by significant improvements in patient outcome.

Supporting Information

S1 STROBE Checklist. STROBE Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cohort studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154972.s001

(DOC)

S1 Table. Baseline characteristics of cases in the post-intervention group.

*Unless otherwise stated, continuous data are presented as median (IQR); P-values were calculated with the Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. AC, anterior circulation; AF, atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CHD, coronary heart disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; EMS, emergency medical service; IQR, interquartile range; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154972.s002

(DOC)

S2 Table. Univariate linear regression analysis for identification of independent variables influencing in-hospital delays post-intervention.

*In-hospital delay was defined as DTN time > 60 min. AC, anterior circulation; EMS, emergency medical service; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154972.s003

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants of the GRASPs program.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: QH HS QM JW. Performed the experiments: QH QM HS XJ JF WC JW. Analyzed the data: QH QM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: QH QM JW HS XJ. Wrote the paper: QH QM.

References

  1. 1. Ahmed N, Kellert L, Lees KR, Mikulik R, Tatlisumak T, Toni D, et al. (2013) Results of intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 to 6 hours and updated results within 3 to 4.5 hours of onset of acute ischemic stroke recorded in the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR): an observational study. JAMA Neurol 70: 837–844. pmid:23689267
  2. 2. Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Pan W, et al. (2013) Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke. JAMA 309: 2480–2488. pmid:23780461
  3. 3. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. (2014) Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 384: 1929–1935. pmid:25106063
  4. 4. Fonarow GC, Zhao X, Smith EE, Saver JL, Reeves MJ, Bhatt DL, et al. (2014) Door-to-needle times for tissue plasminogen activator administration and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before and after a quality improvement initiative. JAMA 311: 1632–1640. pmid:24756513
  5. 5. Wang Y, Liao X, Zhao X, Wang DZ, Wang C, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. (2011) Using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to treat acute ischemic stroke in China: analysis of the results from the Chinese National Stroke Registry (CNSR). Stroke 42: 1658–1664. pmid:21512182
  6. 6. Huang Q, Ma QF, Feng J, Cheng WY, Jia JP, Song HQ, et al. (2015) Factors Associated with In-Hospital Delay in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Lessons from China. PLoS One 10: e143145.
  7. 7. Adams HJ, Del ZG, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, et al. (2007) Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 38: 1655–1711. pmid:17431204
  8. 8. Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL, Reeves MJ, Bhatt DL, Grau-Sepulveda MV, et al. (2011) Timeliness of tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy in acute ischemic stroke: patient characteristics, hospital factors, and outcomes associated with door-to-needle times within 60 minutes. Circulation 123: 750–758. pmid:21311083
  9. 9. Thortveit ET, Boe MG, Ljostad U, Mygland A, Tveiten A (2014) Organizational changes aiming to reduce iv tPA door-to-needle time. Acta Neurol Scand 130: 248–252. pmid:24256431
  10. 10. Meretoja A, Strbian D, Mustanoja S, Tatlisumak T, Lindsberg PJ, Kaste M. (2012) Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis. Neurology 79: 306–313. pmid:22622858
  11. 11. Casolla B, Bodenant M, Girot M, Cordonnier C, Pruvo JP, Wiel E, et al. (2013) Intra-hospital delays in stroke patients treated with rt-PA: impact of preadmission notification. J Neurol 260: 635–639. pmid:23052603
  12. 12. Ferrari J, Seyfang L, Lang W (2013) Can online benchmarking increase rates of thrombolysis? Data from the Austrian stroke unit registry. J Neurol 260: 2271–2278. pmid:23749292
  13. 13. Blumenthal D, Hsiao W (2015) Lessons from the East—China's rapidly evolving health care system. N Engl J Med 372: 1281–1285. pmid:25830419
  14. 14. Sauser K, Levine DA, Nickles AV, Reeves MJ (2014) Hospital variation in thrombolysis times among patients with acute ischemic stroke: the contributions of door-to-imaging time and imaging-to-needle time. JAMA Neurol 71: 1155–1161. pmid:25023407
  15. 15. Nolte CH, Malzahn U, Kuhnle Y, Ploner CJ, Muller-Nordhorn J, Möckel M. (2013) Improvement of door-to-imaging time in acute stroke patients by implementation of an all-points alarm. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 22: 149–153. pmid:21903419
  16. 16. Breuer L, Huttner HB, Kiphuth IC, Ringwald J, Hilz MJ, Schwab S, et al. (2013) Waiting for platelet counts causes unsubstantiated delay of thrombolysis therapy. Eur Neurol 69: 317–320. pmid:23548890
  17. 17. Soulleihet V, Nicoli F, Trouve J, Girard N, Jacquin L (2014) Optimized acute stroke pathway using medical advanced regulation for stroke and repeated public awareness campaigns. Am J Emerg Med 32: 225–232. pmid:24361139
  18. 18. Lahr MM, van der Zee DJ, Vroomen PC, Luijckx GJ, Buskens E (2013) Thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a simulation study to improve pre- and in-hospital delays in community hospitals. PLoS One 8: e79049. pmid:24260151
  19. 19. Rudd M, Rodgers H, Curless R, Sudlow M, Huntley S, Madhava B, et al. (2012) Remote specialist assessment for intravenous thrombolysis of acute ischaemic stroke by telephone. Emerg Med J 29: 704–708. pmid:22034529
  20. 20. Liu Ming, He Mao-lin, Pu Chuan-qiang, Cui Li-ying, Jia Jian-ping, Rao Ming-li, et al. (2015) Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and management of acute ischemic stroke 2014. Chinese journal of neurology 48: 246–257.
  21. 21. Huang Qiang, Ma Qing-feng, Feng Juan, Dong-dong Zhang, Chang Hong, Wu Jian. (2016) Influencing factors of intravenous thrombolysis decision for acute ischemic stroke. chinese journal cerebrovascular disease 13: 13–16.
  22. 22. Breuer L, Huttner HB, Kiphuth IC, Ringwald J, Hilz MJ, Schwab S, et al. (2013) Waiting for platelet counts causes unsubstantiated delay of thrombolysis therapy. Eur Neurol 69: 317–320. pmid:23548890
  23. 23. Gadhia J, Starkman S, Ovbiagele B, Ali L, Liebeskind D, Saver JL. (2010) Assessment and improvement of figures to visually convey benefit and risk of stroke thrombolysis. Stroke 41: 300–306. pmid:20056928
  24. 24. Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL, Reeves MJ, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, et al. (2011) Improving door-to-needle times in acute ischemic stroke: the design and rationale for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association's Target: Stroke initiative. Stroke 42: 2983–2989. pmid:21885841
  25. 25. Scott PA, Meurer WJ, Frederiksen SM, Kalbfleisch JD, Xu Z, Haan MN, et al. (2013) A multilevel intervention to increase community hospital use of alteplase for acute stroke (INSTINCT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 12: 139–148. pmid:23260188
  26. 26. Dirks M, Niessen LW, van Wijngaarden JD, Koudstaal PJ, Franke CL, van Oostenbrugge RJ, et al. (2011) Promoting thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 42: 1325–1330. pmid:21393587
  27. 27. Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M, Weber JE, Waldschmidt C, Rozanski M, et al. (2014) Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 311: 1622–1631. pmid:24756512
  28. 28. Itrat A, Taqui A, Cerejo R, Briggs F, Cho SM, Organek N, et al. (2015) Telemedicine in Prehospital Stroke Evaluation and Thrombolysis: Taking Stroke Treatment to the Doorstep. JAMA Neurol: 1–7.
  29. 29. Huang Q, Ma QF, Jia JP, Feng J, Cheng WY, Chang H, et al. (2015) Referral leads to prehospital delay of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in Beijing. Int J Stroke 10: E80–E81. pmid:26404886