Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Cryptosporidium Species in Dairy Calves in Central Ethiopia

Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Cryptosporidium Species in Dairy Calves in Central Ethiopia

  • Teklu Wegayehu, 
  • Robiul Karim, 
  • Manyazewal Anberber, 
  • Haileeyesus Adamu, 
  • Berhanu Erko, 
  • Longxian Zhang, 
  • Getachew Tilahun
PLOS
x

Abstract

The burden of cryptosporidiosis due to Cryptosporidium parvum is well documented in HIV-positive patients in Ethiopia. However, the role of animals in zoonotic transmission of the disease is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and genotypes of Cryptosporidium species in dairy calves; to assess the role of cattle in zoonotic transmission in central Ethiopia. A total of 449 fecal samples were collected and screened using modified Ziehl-Neelson staining method and PCR targeting the small-subunit (SSU) rRNA gene. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium was 9.4% (42/449) and 15.8% (71/449) as detected by microscopy and nested PCR, respectively. The prevalence of infection varied significantly across the study areas with the higher prevalence being observed in Chancho 25.4% (30/118). Crossbred calves had significantly higher prevalence of Cryptosporidium than indigenous zebu. Genotyping results revealed the presence of C. andersoni (76.1%), C. bovis (19.7%) and C. ryanae (4.2%). The occurrence of these Cryptosporidium species appeared to be age-related. C. andersoni constituted 92.1% of the Cryptosporidium infection in calves older than 3 months. Sequence analysis also showed the existence of intra-species variation at SSU rRNA gene. Findings of the current study indicate that cattle may not be an important source of zoonotic cryptosporidiosis in central Ethiopia. Further molecular studies are needed to support this observation from other part of the country.

Introduction

Cryptosporidiosis is predominantly a gastrointestinal disease of humans and other animals, caused by various species of protozoan parasites representing the genus Cryptosporidium [1]. Once thought to be a parasite of veterinary importance, Cryptosporidium has emerged as an important human pathogen, especially in pediatric, geriatric and immune-compromised patients where a fulminating infection may be life threatening [2]. Although human can get infection through several routes [3], the zoonotic transmission with respect to contact with cattle and other livestock has generated considerable interest in the epidemiology of the disease [46]. The vast majority of human cases are caused by Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum) and C. hominis [7,8].

Studies have indicated that cattle are commonly infected with four major Cryptosporidium species, namely: C. parvum, C. bovis, C. andersoni and C. ryanae [916]. The occurrence of the four species in cattle has shown to be age-related [9, 13, 17]. Thus, the zoonotic species (C. parvum) is mainly found in pre-weaned calves. C. bovis and C. ryanae usually infect weaned calves with C. bovis being more prevalent than C. ryanae. On the other hand, C. andersoni is commonly seen in yearlings and adult cattle. In addition, sporadic infection with C. felis, C. hominis, C. suis, C. suis-like genotype and Cryptosporidium pig genotype II have been reported in cattle [1821].

The widespread use of molecular diagnostic tools has enabled us to understand the existence of genetic variation within Cryptosporidium. So far, more than 26 named Cryptosporidium species and over 70 genotypes have been described [3, 22]. Based on 60-kDa glycoprotein (gp60) gene data, at least 10 subtype families of C. parvum and numerous subtypes have been described from humans and other mammals [3, 23]. Of the 10 described C. parvum gp60 subtype families, IIa and IId have been reported from both human and non-human hosts and are found to be zoonotic [23].

The role of cattle in the zoonotic transmission of cryptosporidiosis is poorly understood in Ethiopia. This is due to the fact that studies on cryptosporidiosis in cattle were based on microscopy [24, 25] which does not enable accurate identification of the species encountered. Conversely, molecular studies conducted in humans identified C. parvum zoonotic subtype family IIa as the major cause of human cryptosporidiosis and suggest a zoonotic transmission of the disease in country [26, 27]. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to identify the species of Cryptosporidium present in dairy calves; and to assess their role in zoonotic cycle of the disease.

Materials and Methods

Study area

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Oromia Special Zone, central Ethiopia between January and June 2014. The Special Zone has an estimated 4,800 km2 which accounts for 1.5% of the total area of the Oromia Regional State. The zone borders with the capital, Addis Ababa, in all directions. Based on the available climatological data, the mean annual rainfall varies from 700 mm to 1400 mm in lowlands and highlands, respectively. The mean annual temperature of the Zone ranges between 20–25°C in the lowlands and 10–15°C in the highlands. The Special Zone has six districts and eight major towns of which Holetta, Sendafa and Chancho were selected for this study because of existence of large dairy farms and cattle populations.

The study animals

The target population of this study was indigenous zebu and crossbred (Holstein Friesian X indigenous zebu) dairy calves. The indigenous zebu was widespread and owned by farmers in small number, on average 5 cattle per household. The crossbred, on the other hand, was mainly owned by private smallholder dairy farms and stratified into three categories based on the herd size as: small (<100), medium (100–200) and large (>200) (25). The weaning age of the indigenous zebu and crossbred was also different. The majority (85%) of the sampled calves were pre-weaned. A total of 449 dairy calves, age younger than five months, were included in this study.

Specimen collection

Fresh fecal specimen was collected from each calf in sterilized stool container. The specimens were taken directly from the rectum of each calf or immediately after defecation using disposable gloves. Identification number, sex, age and breed of calves were recorded during sample collection. The specimens were transported to the Animal Health Parasitology Laboratory, Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology (ALIPB) at ambient temperature using cool box. A portion of the specimens was used for microscopy and the remaining was preserved with 2.5% potassium dichromate solution in 1:1 ratio and stored at 4°C prior to DNA extraction.

Microscopy

Thin smears were prepared from sediments of formol-ether concentrated stool samples and stained with modified Ziehl-Neelson staining method [28]. Briefly, air-dried thin smears were fixed with absolute methanol for 5 minutes, air-dried and stained with carbol-fuchsin for 30 minutes. Smears were washed with tap water and decolorized with 1% acid-alcohol (1 ml HCl and 99 ml of 96% ethanol) for 2 minutes; washed with tap water and counterstained with 1% methylene blue for another 2 minutes, rinsed again in tap water and air-dried. The stained smears were examined by microscope using an oil immersion objective to screen oocysts of Cryptosporidium.

DNA extraction

The preserved fecal specimens were washed with deionized water until the potassium dichromate was removed. Genomic DNA was extracted from each fecal sample using the E.Z.N.A.® Stool DNA kit (Omega Biotek Inc., Norcross, USA). Briefly, about 50–100 mg of fecal specimen was added in a 2 ml centrifuge tube containing 200 mg of glass beads and placed on ice. Following, 300 μl buffer SP1 and proteinase K were added into the above mix, and incubated at 70°C for 10 minutes. Subsequently, all the procedures outline in product manual were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Finally, DNA was eluted in 200 μl of elution buffer and the extract was stored at -20°C until PCR.

Genotyping of Cryptosporidium

An approximately 830 bp fragment of the small-subunit (SSU) rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium was amplified by nested PCR as previously described [29]. The PCR was done in a 25 μl reaction volume containing 24 μl mixes and 1 μl DNA template. Amplification was performed using an Applied Biosystems Thermal Cycler version 2.09. The reaction mixture was initially incubated at 94°C for 5 minutes for initial denaturation and then a total of 35 reaction cycles were performed with denaturation at 94°C for 45 seconds, primer annealing at 55°C for 45 seconds and strand extension at 72°C for 1 minute. The final extension was done at 72°C for 10 minutes followed by cooling at 4°C.

The secondary PCR reactions were similar to the primary PCR with the exception that 2 μl of the primary PCR product was used as a template. In addition, the annealing temperature was raised from 55°C to 58°C for 45 seconds. Both positive and negative controls were included in each round of PCR to validate results. The amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and visualized under a trans-illuminator after staining with ethidium bromide. The PCR was conducted at the International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases at Henan Agricultural University, China.

DNA sequence analysis

All positive PCR products were purified using Montage PCR filters (Millipore, Bedford, MA) and sequenced using an ABI BigDye Terminator v. 3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) on an ABI 3100 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Sequence accuracy was confirmed by sequencing both directions with primers used for the secondary PCRs. The raw nucleotide sequences and chromatograms of both forward and reverse directions were viewed using the EditSeq 5.0 and Chromas 2.4 programs, respectively. The nucleotide sequences were aligned and analyzed using ClustalX software. Consensus sequences were then compared to homologous sequences in GenBank using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) to determine the species of Cryptosporidium. The nucleotide sequences generated in this study were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers: KT922228 to KT922235.

Statistical analysis

Data were computerized using EpiData version 3.1 and transferred to STATA Software for analysis. Chi square test was used to verify possible association of Cryptosporidium infections with sex, age and breed of the calves. Values were considered to be statistically significant when the p value was < 0.05.

Ethics Statement

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of ALIPB, Addis Ababa University and the National Health Research Ethics Review Committee. Support letters were obtained from Oromia Special Zone Animal Health Office and Agriculture Offices at community level. The objectives of the study were explained to owners of the calves before the collection of the specimens and permission was obtained.

Results

From the total of 449 dairy calves, 153, 176 and 120 were sampled from Holetta, Sendafa and Chancho areas, respectively. Of these, 200 were male and 249 were female calves with male to female ratio of 1:1.2. The mean age of the calves were 2.5 months (ranged: 0.1 to 5 months). Furthermore, the calves were stratified in three age groups: < 1 month, 1–3 months and > 3 months making 113 (25.2%), 152 (33.9%) and 184 (41.0%) of the calves, respectively. The study calves were apparently healthy except few cases of watery diarrhea during sample collection.

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium

Microscopic analysis using acid-fast staining showed that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves was 9.4% (42/449). On the other hand, PCR analysis identified Cryptosporidium in 15.8% (71/449) (Table 1). All microscopy positive specimens were also found positive by PCR. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium detected by the two methods was significantly different (χ2 = 8.1532; p = 0.004).

thumbnail
Table 1. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium in dairy calves as detected by microscopy and PCR in central Ethiopia (January—June, 2014).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154647.t001

The PCR based prevalence of Cryptosporidium varied across the study areas with higher prevalence recorded in Chancho (25.0%) (Table 2). Similarly, as noted from Table 2, calves older than 3 months had a higher prevalence of Cryptosporidium (20.7%) than younger calves (p = 0.025). Likewise, the infection rate of Cryptosporidium in the crossbred (24.1%) was higher than that of the indigenous zebu (7.9%), and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.00).

thumbnail
Table 2. PCR based prevalence of Cryptosporidium in dairy calves by study area, sex, age and breed groups in central Ethiopia (January—June, 2014).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154647.t002

Occurrence of Cryptosporidium species

The entire 71 samples which were positive by PCR amplification of SSU rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium were successfully sequenced. The genotyping results revealed the presence of three Cryptosporidium species, namely C. andersoni, C. bovis and C. ryanae (Table 3). C. andersoni was the most prevalent species being detected in 76.1% (54/71), followed by C. bovis 19.7% (14/71) and C. ryanae 4.2% (3/71). C. parvum was not detected in dairy calves in this study.

thumbnail
Table 3. Age-related distribution of Cryptosporidium species in calves in central Ethiopia (January—June, 2014).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154647.t003

There was age-related distribution of Cryptosporidium species among the calves (Table 3). C. bovis was the dominant species (70.0%) in calves younger than 1 month of age, whereas C. andersoni was the dominant species (92.1%) in calves older than 3 months. Although C. ryanae was occurred in calves younger than 3 months, the age-related distribution was not clear given that only three samples were positive.

Genetic characterization

Sequence analysis showed intra-species variations at the SSU rRNA gene. Analysis of 54 C. andersoni isolates revealed the presence of three distinct variant copies of the gene, named as Type Ia, Type IIa, and Type IIIa for a convenient description (Table 4). Forty eight nucleotide sequences identified as Type Ia were identical to each other and had a 100% similarity with the reference sequence in the GenBank (accession number AB922119). Type IIa contained five isolates and showed 100% similarity to GenBank accession number KF826314. Type IIIa had 100% similar with the C. andersoni isolated from the dairy calves in Egypt (accession number AB513869). Both Type IIa and Type IIIa showed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at position 431 and 57 respectively as compared to the reference AB922119.

thumbnail
Table 4. Intra-species variations at the SSU rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium species in central Ethiopia (January—June, 2014).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154647.t004

Sequence analysis also revealed the presence of two distinct gene variant of C. bovis, named as Type Ib and Type IIb (Table 4). Of 14 nucleotide sequences identified as C. bovis, 9 were Type Ib and 100% identical to nucleotide sequences derived from dairy calves from China (GenBank Accession number JX515546). Five sequences assigned as Type IIb were 100% identical to isolates deposited in GenBank with accession number KF128742, but had one SNP as compared to the reference sequence.

Three of C. ryanae gene variants, Type I, Type II and Type III, were 100% similar to isolates of dairy calves with reference sequences deposited in the GenBank with accession numbers HQ179574, JX515550 and KP793011 respectively. Both Type II and Type III showed single SNP as compared to HQ179574 (Table 4).

Discussion

The present study determines the prevalence and genotypes of Cryptosporidium species among dairy calves in three districts in Oromia Special Zone, central Ethiopia. Fecal specimens collected from calves were screened by microscopy using Ziehl-Neelson staining technique and nested PCR. Although microscopy is cheaper to perform and only method to indicates active infection, higher prevalence of Cryptosporidium was recorded by the PCR in this study. The superior sensitivity of PCR in detecting Cryptosporidium infection has been shown earlier clinical trial [30] and in patients from Northern India and South Africa [31, 32]. Thus, repeated microscopic examinations could reduce the discrepancy between PCR and microscopy in clinical setup.

The overall prevalence of bovine cryptosporidiosis in diary calves in this study was 15.8%. This finding was comparable with the 17.6% infection prevalence reported from selected dairy farms in central Ethiopia [25] and 16.0% reported from Kaduna State, Nigeria [33]. However, the prevalence was higher than the 7.8% reported from cattle of different age groups in Ethiopia by Wegayehu et al. [24] and 6.3% reported from traditionally reared calves younger than 3 months in Zambia by Geurden et al. [21]. On the other hand, the infection rate was lower than the 23.4% reported in 3–6 months age cattle in South Western Nigeria [34]. The disparities could be attributed to differences in management systems, age and breed of cattle, the sampling method and sample size, as well as diagnostic techniques employed in different study localities.

The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection was significantly varied across the investigation areas. The highest prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection (25.0%) was recorded in Chancho. Although, many of the risk factors such as age, nursing conditions, husbandry and management system were roughly similar in the study areas, the hygienic conditions inside and around the farms might be responsible for the observed differences in the prevalence. Some of these factors may act individually or collectively to increase the risk factors associated with transmission and prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection between calves [35].

The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in crossbred was significantly higher than the indigenous zebu. This could be explained by the fact that management differences observed between the two breeds. One of the observed differences is that the crossbred was managed in farms in large herd size than the indigenous zebu. An association between large herd size and the risk of infection with Cryptosporidium has been reported in earlier studies [36, 37]. Large herds may have a heavier pathogen load because of increased density of animals that favors infection of great number of calves, which in turn, contaminate their surrounding environment.

The results of the current molecular study showed the presence of three major Cryptosporidium species in calves. The most prevalent was C. andersoni (76.1%). Our finding was in agreement with the previous report from central Ethiopia in dairy calves where Abebe et al. (25) presumed the species to be C. andersoni. The finding of the present study was also in agreement with the results from India [38, 39], the Czech Republic [40], Japan [41], Viet Nam [42] and Denmark [43]. C. andersoni was also reported as the second most prevalent species in pre-weaned calves in China (16). However, it was identified as less prevalent species in calves younger than 5 months in other studies [9, 33, 35, 44, 45]. The other two Cryptosporidium species identified from the calves were C. bovis and C. ryanae with C. bovis being more prevalent. The occurrence of these two species in dairy calves was well documented in previous studies [1016, 45].

The zoonotic species, C. parvum, was not detected in calves irrespective of the age of calves in the present study. The absence of C. parvum has also been reported in early study conducted on agents associated with neonatal diarrhea in dairy farms in Ethiopia [46]. This was in agreement with the situation in Nigeria [33, 34], Zambia [21] and Japan [47]. Our findings suggest that cattle may not be important in the epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis in Ethiopia. However, most of the earlier reports from different parts of the world [9, 11, 12, 15, 45] showed that C. parvum was the predominant species in pre-weaned calves which is in contrast to the present findings. The accurate reason for the absence of C. parvum remains unclear. Further molecular studies are needed to clarify the role of calves in epidemiology cryptosporidiosis in the country.

In this study, age-associated occurrence of Cryptosporidium species was seen in calves. Unlike the distribution in developed countries where C. parvum was mainly associated with calves younger than 2 months of age [9, 13], there was an early occurrence of C. bovis and C. ryanae in calves younger than 3 months. The finding was consistent with the previous report in native breeds of cattle in Kaduna State, Nigeria [33]. In addition, all five genetically characterized specimens from traditionally reared calves younger than three months in Zambia also belonged to C. bovis [21]. This findings might support the notion that in cattle reared in traditional husbandry systems in developing countries, C. bovis and C. ryanae appear early in calves in the absence of C. parvum.

C. andersoni is more frequently found in yearling and adult cattle [9, 11, 20]. However, the occurrence of C. andersoni in pre-weaned calves was also demonstrated [48]. In addition, an increase in occurrence of C. andersoni with increase in age of the animals was reported in previous studies in dairy and beef cattle [9, 13]. In our study, it was seen that there is a steadily increase in prevalence beginning from 20.0% in calves younger than 1 month, to 74.0% in calves age between 1–3 months, and thereafter 92.1% in calves older than 3 months. The highest prevalence of C. andersoni, though with a similar age related trend, was reported from the Czech Republic [48].

DNA sequence analysis also revealed intra-species variations within C. andersoni, C. bovis and C. ryanae at the partial SSU rRNA gene. Three distinct variant copies of the gene were obtained from 54 C. andersoni isolates with Type Ia being more prevalent. Likewise, one of the two distinct gene variant of C. bovis identified from 14 isolates, Type Ib was more prevalent. Similar intra-species variations were recently reported in C. bovis by Zhang et al. (16) in pre-weaned dairy calves in Northeastern China, Heilongjiang Province. Although three of the C. ryanae isolates showed 100% similarity to sequences deposited in the GenBank database, they had SNPs at positions 69 and 407. The findings might show genetic diversity within Cryptosporidium species in dairy calves in the study areas. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first molecular report of cryptosporidiosis in dairy calves from Ethiopia.

In conclusion, the results of the present study have provided useful information on the epidemiology of bovine cryptosporidiosis in central Ethiopia. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of C. andersoni, C. bovis and C. ryanae infection in varying magnitudes in the study area. The absence of the zoonotic species, C. parvum, in the calves suggests that cattle may not be important in the epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis in the country. Nevertheless, this observation needs supports from additional studies from multiple regions, preferably involving larger sample size for a better understanding of the epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in Ethiopia.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to colleagues of International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Henan Agricultural University (China) for their technical assistance during the molecular work. Our special thanks go to Dr. Tesfaye Habtemariam for language edition.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TW HA BE GT. Performed the experiments: TW MRK MA. Analyzed the data: TW MA LZ GT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TW MRK HA BE LZ GT. Wrote the paper: TW MRK BE LZ GT. Sample collection: TW MA.

References

  1. 1. Jex AR, Smith HV, Monis PT, Campbell BE, Gasser RB. Cryptosporidium-biotechnological advances in the detection, diagnosis and analysis of genetic variation. Biotechnol Adv. 2008; 26: 304–317. pmid:18430539
  2. 2. Fayer R. Cryptosporidium: a water-borne zoonotic parasite. Vet Parasitol. 2004; 126: 37–56. pmid:15567578
  3. 3. Xiao L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: An update. Exper Parasitol. 2010; 124: 80–89.
  4. 4. Xiao L, Feng Y. Zoonotic cryptosporidiosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008; 52: 309–323. pmid:18205803
  5. 5. Caccio SM, Thompson RCA, McLauchlin J, Smith HV. Unravelling Cryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology. Trends Parasitol. 2005; 21: 430–437. pmid:16046184
  6. 6. Feltus DC, Giddings CW, Schneck BL, Monson T, Warshauer D, McIvor JM. Evidence supporting zoonotic transmission of Cryptosporidium spp. in Wisconsin. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44: 4303–4308. pmid:17005736
  7. 7. Xiao L, Ryan U. Cryptosporidiosis: an update in molecular epidemiology. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004; 17: 483–490. pmid:15353969
  8. 8. Caccio SM. Molecular epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis. Parassitologia. 2005; 47(2):185–92 pmid:16252472
  9. 9. Santin M, Trout JM, Xiao L, Zhou L, Greiner E, Fayer R. Prevalence and age related variation of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in dairy calves. Vet Parasitol. 2004; 122: 103–117. pmid:15177715
  10. 10. Starkey SR, Zeigler PE, Wade SE, Schaaf SL, Mohammed HO. Factors associated with shedding of Cryptosporidium parvum versus Cryptosporidium bovis among dairy cattle in New York State. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006; 229: 1623–1626. pmid:17107320
  11. 11. Feng Y, Ortega Y, He G, Das P, Xu M, Zhang X, et al. Wide geographic distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis and the deer-like genotype in bovines. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 144: 1–9. pmid:17097231
  12. 12. Thompson HP, Dooley JS, Kenny J, McCoy M, Lowery CJ, Moore JE, et al. Genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium species in neonatal calves in Northern Ireland. Parasitol Res. 2007; 100: 619–624. pmid:17031699
  13. 13. Fayer R, Santin M, Trout JM. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in mature dairy cattle on farms in eastern United States compared with younger cattle from the same locations. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 145: 260–266. pmid:17287086
  14. 14. Fayer R, Santin M, Trout JM. Cryptosporidium ryanae n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in cattle (Bos taurus). Vet Parasitol. 2008; 156: 191–198. pmid:18583057
  15. 15. Brook EJ, Anthony C, French NP, Christley RM. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium subtypes in cattle in England. Vet J. 2009; 179: 378–382. pmid:18083583
  16. 16. Zhang W, Wang R, Yang F, Zhang L, Cao J, Zhang X, et al. Distribution and Genetic Characterizations of Cryptosporidium spp. in Pre-Weaned Dairy Calves in Northeastern China’s Heilongjiang Province. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e54857. pmid:23372782
  17. 17. Trout JM, Santin M. Livestock. In: Fayer R, Xiao L, editors. Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis. CRC Press and IWA Publishing, Boca Raton, FL; 2008. pp. 451–483.
  18. 18. Bornay-Llinares FJ, da Silva AJ, Moura IN, Myjak P, Pietkiewicz H, Kruminis- Lozowska W, et al. Identification of Cryptosporidium felis in a cow by morphologic and molecular methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65: 1455–1458. pmid:10103236
  19. 19. Smith HV, Nichols RA, Mallon M, Macleod A, Tait A, Reilly WJ, et al. Natural Cryptosporidium hominis infections in Scottish cattle. Vet Rec. 2005; 156: 710–711. pmid:15923554
  20. 20. Fayer R, Santin M, Trout JM, Greiner E. Prevalence of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium found in 1-2-year-old dairy cattle in the eastern United States. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 135: 105–112. pmid:16159697
  21. 21. Geurden T, Goma FY, Siwila J, Phiri IGK, Mwanza AM, Gabriel S, et al. Prevalence and genotyping of Cryptosporidium in three cattle husbandry systems in Zambia. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 138: 217–222. pmid:16546321
  22. 22. Fayer R. Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium. Experimental Parasitol. 2010; 124: 90–97.
  23. 23. Jex AR, Gasser RB. Genetic richness and diversity in Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum reveals major knowledge gaps and a need for the application of ‘‘next generation” technologies-research review. Biotechnol Adv. 2010; 28: 17–26. pmid:19699288
  24. 24. Wegayehu T, Adamu H, Petros B. Prevalence of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium species infections among children and cattle in North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2013; 13: 419–426. pmid:24010794
  25. 25. Abebe R, Wossene A, Kumsa B. An epidemiological study of Cryptosporidium infection in dairy calves on selected dairy farms of central Ethiopia. Rev Med Vet. 2008; 159: 107–111.
  26. 26. Adamu H, Petros P, Hailu A, Petry F. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans in Ethiopia. Acta Tropica. 2010; 115: 77–83. pmid:20206592
  27. 27. Adamu H, Petros B, Zhang G, Kassa H, Amer S, Ye J, et al. Distribution and Clinical Manifestations of Cryptosporidium Species and Subtypes in HIV/AIDS Patients in Ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2014; 8(4): e2831. pmid:24743521
  28. 28. Henriksen SA, Pohlenz JF. Staining of Cryptosporidia by a modified Ziehl- Neelsen technique. Acta Vet Scand. 1981; 22: 594–596. pmid:6178277
  29. 29. Xiao L, Singh A, Limor J, Graczyk TK, Gradus S, Lal A. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium oocysts in samples of raw surface water and wastewater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001; 67: 1097–1101. pmid:11229897
  30. 30. Morgan UM, Pallant L, Dwyer BW, Forbes DA, Rich G, Thompson RCA. Comparison of PCR and microscopy for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in human fecal specimens: clinical trial,” J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36: 995–998. pmid:9542924
  31. 31. Uppal B, Singh O, Chadha S, Jha AK. A Comparison of Nested PCR assay with conventional techniques for diagnosis of intestinal cryptosporidiosis in AIDS Cases from Northern India. J Parasitol Res. 2014.
  32. 32. Omoruyi BE, Nwodo UU, Udem CS, Okonkwo FO. Comparative diagnostic techniques for Cryptosporidium infection. Molecules. 2014; 19: 2674–2683. pmid:24566329
  33. 33. Maikai BV, Umoh JU, Kwaga JKP, Lawal IA, Maikai VA, Camae V, et al. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in native breeds of cattle in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Vet Parasitol. 2011: 178: 241–245. pmid:21277091
  34. 34. Ayinmode AB, Olakunle FB, Xiao L. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in native calves in Nigeria. Parasitol Res. 2010; 107: 1019–1021. pmid:20644959
  35. 35. Amer S, Honma H, Ikarashi M, Tada C, Fukuda Y, Suyama Y, et al. Cryptosporidium genotypes and subtypes in dairy calves in Egypt. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 169: 382–386. pmid:20193982
  36. 36. Garber LP, Salman MD, Hurd HS, Keefe T, Schlater JL. Potential risk factors of Cryptosporidium infection in dairy calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1994; 205: 86–90. pmid:7928557
  37. 37. Mohammed HO, Wade SE, Schaaf S. Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium parvum infection in dairy cattle in southeastern New York State. Vet Parasitol. 1999; 83: 1–13. pmid:10392763
  38. 38. Paul S, Chandra D, Tewari AK, Banerjee PS, Ray DD, Raina OK, et al. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium andersoni: a molecular epidemiological survey among cattle in India. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 161: 31–35. pmid:19185428
  39. 39. Venu R, Latha BR, Basith S Abdul, Raj G Dhinakar, Sreekumar C, et al. Molecular prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy calves in Southern states of India. Vet Parasitol. 2012; 188: 19–24. pmid:22459107
  40. 40. Ondrackova Z, Kvac M, Sak B, Kvetonova D, Rost M. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in South Bohemia, the Czech Republic. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 165: 141–144. pmid:19616383
  41. 41. Nagano S, Matsubayashi M, Kita T, Narushima T, Kimata I, Iseki M, et al. Detection of a mixed infection of a novel Cryptosporidium andersoni and its sub genotype in Japanese cattle. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 149: 213–218. pmid:17825491
  42. 42. Nguyen ST, Nguyen DT, Le DQ, Hua LNL, Nguyen TV, Honma H, et al. Prevalence and first genetic identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in central Viet Nam. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 150: 357–361. pmid:17964078
  43. 43. Enemark HL, Ahrens F, Lowery CJ, Thamsborg SM, Enemark JM, Bille-Hansen V, et al. Cryptosporidium andersoni from a Danish cattle herd: identification and preliminary characterization. Vet Parasitol. 2002; 102: 37–49.
  44. 44. Silverlas C, Naslund K, Björkman C, Mattsson JG. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from Swedish dairy cattle in relation to age, diarrhoea and region. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 169: 289–295. pmid:20138705
  45. 45. Wang R, Wang H, Sun Y, Zhang L, Jian F, Qi M, et al. Characteristics of Cryptosporidium Transmission in Pre-weaned Dairy Cattle in Henan, China. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49 1077–1082. pmid:21177898
  46. 46. Abraham G, Roeder OT, Roman Z. Agents associated with Neonatal diarrhea in Ethiopian dairy farms. Trop Anim Hlth Prod. 1992; 24: 74–80.
  47. 47. Murakoshia F, Xiao L, Matsubaraa R, Sato R, Kato Y, Sasaki T, et al. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in grazing beef cattle in Japan. Vet Parasitol. 2012; 187: 123–128. pmid:22265080
  48. 48. Kvac M, Kouba M, Vitovec J. Age-related and housing dependence of Cryptosporidium infection of calves from dairy and beef herds in South Bohemia, Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol. 2006; 137: 202–209. pmid:16488542