Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The First Comprehensive Phylogeny of Coptis (Ranunculaceae) and Its Implications for Character Evolution and Classification

  • Kun-Li Xiang,

    Affiliations State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

  • Sheng-Dan Wu,

    Affiliation College of Life Sciences, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen, 041004, China

  • Sheng-Xian Yu,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China

  • Yang Liu,

    Affiliation Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, 06269–3043, United States of America

  • Florian Jabbour,

    Affiliation Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, UMR 7205 ISYEB MNHN/CNRS/UPMC/EPHE, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France

  • Andrey S. Erst,

    Affiliations Central Siberian Botanical Garden of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Zolotodolinskaya str. 101, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia, Laboratory of Systematics and Phylogeny of Plants, National Research Tomsk State University, prospekt Lenina 36, Tomsk, 634050, Russia

  • Liang Zhao,

    Affiliation College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China

  • Wei Wang ,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China

  • Zhi-Duan Chen

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China

The First Comprehensive Phylogeny of Coptis (Ranunculaceae) and Its Implications for Character Evolution and Classification

  • Kun-Li Xiang, 
  • Sheng-Dan Wu, 
  • Sheng-Xian Yu, 
  • Yang Liu, 
  • Florian Jabbour, 
  • Andrey S. Erst, 
  • Liang Zhao, 
  • Wei Wang, 
  • Zhi-Duan Chen


Coptis (Ranunculaceae) contains 15 species and is one of the pharmaceutically most important plant genera in eastern Asia. Understanding of the evolution of morphological characters and phylogenetic relationships within the genus is very limited. Here, we present the first comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of the genus based on two plastid and one nuclear markers. The phylogeny was reconstructed using Bayesian inference, as well as maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods. The Swofford-Olsen-Waddell-Hillis and Bayesian tests were used to assess the strength of the conflicts between traditional taxonomic units and those suggested by the phylogenetic inferences. Evolution of morphological characters was inferred using Bayesian method to identify synapomorphies for the infrageneric lineages. Our data recognize two strongly supported clades within Coptis. The first clade contains subgenus Coptis and section Japonocoptis of subgenus Metacoptis, supported by morphological characters, such as traits of the central leaflet base, petal color, and petal shape. The second clade consists of section Japonocoptis of subgenus Metacoptis. Coptis morii is not united with C. quinquefolia, in contrast with the view that C. morii is a synonym of C. quinquefolia. Two varieties of C. chinensis do not cluster together. Coptis groenlandica and C. lutescens are reduced to C. trifolia and C. japonica, respectively. Central leaflet base, sepal shape, and petal blade carry a strong phylogenetic signal in Coptis, while leaf type, sepal and petal color, and petal shape exhibit relatively higher levels of evolutionary flexibility.


Coptis (Ranunculaceae) is one of the pharmaceutically most important plant genera in eastern Asia. Dried rhizomes of Coptis plants are utilized for Rhizoma Coptidis (RC), a traditional Chinese medicine famous for its functions of clearing heat, dispelling dampness, and purging fire toxins [1]. Coptis plants were for the first time recorded in the earliest monograph on Chinese material medica, Sheng Nong’s Herbal Classic, in the eastern Han dynasty (25–220 AD), and they have been used in many Chinese herbal medicines for more than two thousand years. Coptis chinensis (Fig 1A) has been widely cultivated in China and its rhizomes (Fig 1B) are largely exported to other countries. In Korea and Japan, the rhizomes of C. japonica are sometimes used as a substitute to that of C. chinensis [2]. Since the 18th century, Native Americans have used the rhizome of C. trifolia to treat mouth sores, poor digestion and infections [3]. Phytochemical and pharmacological studies on Coptis plants indicate that they contain a number of alkaloids, such as berberine, palmatine, jatrorrhizine, coptisine, columbamine, and epiberberine [4,5]. RC has been shown to have various clinical effects, such as suppression of fever, cessation of dampness, detoxification [6], and antibacterial, antiviral, antiinflammatory, and antihyperglycemic activities [79]. Recent studies have also indicated that berberine and jatrorrhizine extracted from RC have potential therapeutic implications for the treatments of obesity [10] and hypercholesterolemia [11], respectively. In marked contrast to the extensive knowledge about the pharmacological properties of Coptis, understanding of the evolution of morphological characters and phylogenetic relationships within the genus is extremely limited.

Fig 1. Coptis chinensis.

A, plants; B, dried rhizome (Rhizoma Coptidis); C, carpels.

Coptis is characterized by a whorl of stipitate carpels that are not totally closed at the apex ([12]; Fig 1C) and double median bundles in the petioles, petiolules and laminae midribs [13]. In addition, Coptis plants lack cauline leaves (Fig 1A). Although the monophyly of Coptis is not disputed, the circumscription of some species remains problematic, namely C. morii, C. groenlandica, and C. lutescens. The individuals of Coptis endemic to Taiwan were first described as C. morii by Hayata [14]. Yoshimatsu and Yamamoto subsequently considered C. morii to be synonymous to Japanese C. quinquefolia [15]. Chinese authors accepted this synonymy [1618], but Japanese authors still supported the separate species status of C. morii [19,20]. Coptis groenlandica was published by Fernald for individuals from Greenland and eastern North America [21]. Hultén treated the species as a subspecies of C. trifolia from Alaska and eastern Asia, C. trifolia subsp. groenlandica [22]. Later, Hultén farther synonymised it under C. trifolia [23], which was accepted by most authors [19,24]. The description of C. lutescens highlighted many morphological similarities with C. japonica [25]. The latter contains three to four varieties [26,27]. In the most recent worldwide monograph of Ranunculaceae [19], the genus consists of 15 species, of which six occur in China, six in Japan and Far Eastern Siberia, and four in North America (Table 1). Due to overharvesting and/or loss of habitat caused by human activities, many species in Coptis have become endangered or their population sizes have declined. For example, wild Coptis plants are scarce in Mainland China, and all five species and one variety in Mainland China are listed in the national key preserved wild plants [28].

Table 1. Summary of the taxonomic history of Coptis, showing the main systems of classification.

The taxonomy of Coptis has traditionally been based on vegetative (leaf type and shape; Fig 2) and reproductive (flower number, color and shape of sepals and petals, and beak length; Fig 3) characters. Several local or worldwide infrageneric classifications have been proposed for Coptis based on morphological characters (Table 1). Torrey and Gray classified American species of Coptis into three sections, namely Chryza, Chrysocoptis and Pterophyllum [29]. Satake revised the Japanese species and classified them into two subgenera, Chryza and Metacoptis (including two sections, Chrysocoptis and Japonocoptis) [30]. Integrating the above two classifications, Tamura put forward the first worldwide classification of this genus, in which Coptis was subdivided into two subgenera, Coptis (= Chryza sensu Torrey and Gray) and Metacoptis, with the latter further subdivided into three sections [31]. Tamura merged section Pterophyllum into section Chrysocoptis [19]. However, the infrageneric classification of Coptis has not been evaluated in a phylogenetic context so far.

Fig 2. Leaf diversity of Coptis.

A. C. trifolia; B. C. morii; C. C. chinensis; D. C. laciniata; E. C. aspleniifolia; F. C. japonica.

Fig 3. Floral diversity of Coptis.

A. C. trifolia; B. C. quinquefolia; C. C. morii; D. C. asplenifolia; E. C. laciniata; F. C. japonica; G. C. chinensis; H. C. deltoidea; I. C. omeiensis.

Phylogenetic studies of Ranunculaceae [3236] resulted in the recognition of the monophyletic Coptidoideae comprising Coptis and the monotypic genus Xanthorhiza. Recently, a molecular study of Coptis has been published, in which 13 Coptis species and two outgroup taxa from Ranunculoideae were included, and only four species, sampled from Chinese Mainland, were sequenced for six plastid regions, whereas all others were sequenced for the plastid rbcL gene only [37]. This study led to the conclusion that the four species of Mainland China formed a clade, but provided no insights into the phylogeny of the genus as a whole.

In our study, two plastid (trnL-F and trnH-psbA spacers) and one nuclear (ITS) DNA regions were used. Our aims are (1) to provide the first comprehensive molecular phylogenetic framework for Coptis containing all 15 species recognized by Tamura [19]; (2) to test the monophyly of infrageneric groupings recognized in classifications of Coptis; (3) to clarify the systematic status of C. morii, C. groenlandica, and C. lutescens; and (4) to interpret evolution of key morphological characters in a phylogenetic context.


Ethics statement

This study did not require any special permits because all collecting was performed by researchers located at institutes with the permits required such as IBCAS (Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences) in Beijing. One plant sample was collected in Mt. Poluo, Yilan county, Taiwan, in the company of the staff of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute (SWC). Eight are herborized materials deposited in the Herbarium, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (PE).

Taxon sampling and DNA sequencing

A total of 21 individuals were sampled, representing all 15 Coptis species recognized by Tamura [19] and C. groenlandica. We selected Xanthorhiza simplicissima as an outgroup because it was recognized as sister to Coptis by previous studies [33,36,38]. The outgroups also included Megaleranthis saniculifolia from the Ranunculoideae, related to the Coptidoideae [36]. Vouchers and GenBank accession numbers are listed in S1 Table.

Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh silica gel-dried leaves or herbarium specimens using DNeasy Mini Plant Kits (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) following the manufacturers’ protocol. The selected DNA regions were amplified with standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The trnL-F spacer was amplified using the e and f primers of Taberlet et al. [39] and PCR conditions described by Li et al. [40]. The trnH-psbA spacer was amplified using the primers and PCR conditions recommended by Shaw et al. [41]. For the ITS region, we used the same primers and conditions as Chen and Li [42]. All PCR products were purified using the Tian quick Midi Purification Kit (Tiangen Biotech) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Sanger sequencing was conducted on an ABI 3730xl DNA sequencer. Geneious v6.0 [43] was used to edit chromatograms and contigs.

Phylogenetic analysis

The resulting sequences were initially subjected to a BLAST search against GenBank database ( to test for potential contamination and to confirm the targeted markers. Sequences were aligned using Clustal X v1.83 [44] and manually adjusted with BioEdit v7.0 [45]. Three poly T regions in the trnL-F matrix (encompassing 28 positions) and one poly T region in the trnH-psbA matrix (12 positions) were excluded from the analyses.

Phylogenetic analyses of the plastid (trnL-F and trnH-psbA), ITS, and combined plastid and ITS datasets were carried out using Bayesian inference (BI) method in MrBayes v3.2.5 [46]. For all Bayesian analyses, each DNA region was assigned its own model of nucleotide substitution, as determined by the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) via jModeltest v2.1.4 [47]. Four Markov Chain Monte Carlo chains (three incrementally heated and one cold) were independently run twice, sampling one tree every 1000 generations for 50 million generations, starting with a random tree. Completion was determined by the average standard deviation of split frequencies falling below 0.01. The stationarity of the runs was assessed using Tracer v1.5 [48]. Majority rule (>50%) consensus trees were constructed after removing the burn-in period samples (the first 25% of sampled trees). The posterior probability (PP) values were calculated using the default procedure and were used as an estimate of nodal robustness. For the purpose of comparison and confirmation, we also performed phylogenetic analyses using maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods in PAUP* v4.0b10 [49] and RAxML v7.0.4 [50], respectively. Nodes with PP ≥ 0.95 [51] and BS ≥ 70% [52] were considered to be well supported.

Additionally, we calculated sequence divergence in each molecular dataset by Kimura’s 2-parameter method [53] in MEGA v6.06 [54]. Outgroups were deleted in this analysis.

Alternative hypothesis test

We used two methods, the Swofford-Olsen-Waddell-Hillis (SOWH) test [55] and the Bayesian test [56], to assess the strength of the conflicts between the traditional taxonomic units and those recognized by the phylogenetic inferences. The alternative hypotheses are: 1) subgenus Metacoptis is monophyletic, 2) C. japonica is monophyletic, and 3) C. chinensis is monophyletic. For the SOWH test, we first constrained the tree such that a specific group as monophyletic, and optimized the tree topology, branch lengths and tree scores using RAxML v7.0.4 [50] from the original data (GTR + Γ model and partitioned by DNA region). We then simulated 100 replicate datasets using Seq-Gen v1.3.2 [57]. For each simulated dataset, ML searches were conducted under “optimal constrained” and “optimal unconstrained” conditions. The distribution of log likelihood differences (ΔlnL) was used to evaluate the significance of the difference between the unconstrained tree and the constrained hypothetical tree [58].

The Bayesian test was performed by following the approach of Kass and Raftery [56]. We first run Bayesian analyses in MrBayes v3.2.5 [46], with each hypothetical topology constrained. Convergence to stable values was checked in Tracer v1.5 [48] and the effective sample size (ESS) value of each parameter was greater than 200 (after excluding a burn-in fraction of 25%). The harmonic mean marginal likelihood was obtained from each constrained analysis, and compared to the one obtained from the optimal analysis. The Bayes Factor (BF) is calculated as the twice difference between optimal and constrained harmonic means. We used the thresholds of Kass and Raftery [56], 2ln BF > 2, as an indication of significant difference between the constrained and unconstrained trees.

Morphological characters

The distribution of 19 discrete vegetative and reproductive characters, on which the taxonomy of Coptis has been mostly based, is indicated in S2 Table. Information on morphological features was extracted from basic floras [16,24,27] and was completed by personal observations. For the 2- to 4-ternate and pinnate compound leaves, lateral leaflet base was only scored for the first leaflet. Information on some characters is missing for some species and we consequently inferred the evolution of two vegetative (leaf type and type of central leaflet base) and six floral (color and shape of sepals and petals, petal number, and type of petal blade) characters with the aim of illustrating these morphological context underlying the phylogenetic hypothesis presented here. In this analysis, we used Xanthorhiza as an outgroup, owing to its sister relationship to Coptis. The inference of character evolution was performed using a series of Bayesian reversible-jump hyperprior (RJHP) MCMC analyses [59] in BayesTraits v2.0 [60] on 1000 randomly chosen posterior trees. All Bayesian analyses used 25 million generations, with sampling every 1000 generations. The stationarity of the runs was assessed using Tracer v1.5 [48] and the first 25% generations were discarded.

We also tested for correlated evolution between each pair of characters using BayesTraits v2.0 [60] using RJHP MCMC with the same methods just described. The ESS values for all other parameters are greater than 200 except for the ESS of the harmonic mean (< 100). We implemented the independent contrast module, which investigates correlated evolution between a pair of traits by comparing the harmonic mean marginal likelihood of two models for independent vs. dependent evolution of traits. The BF is calculated as the twice difference between dependent and independent harmonic means. When 2ln BF < 2, the pair of characters is weakly correlated; 2ln BF > 2 represents positive correlation [56].


Characteristics of trnL-F, trnH-psbA, and ITS sequences

The aligned trnL-F, trnH-psbA, and ITS matrices included 449, 360, and 700 characters, respectively. The characteristics of the three molecular datasets are summarized in Table 2. Within Coptis, trnL-F sequence divergence ranges from 0.0% to 2.5% (S3 Table); trnH-psbA sequence divergence ranges from 0.0% to 4.5% (S4 Table); and ITS sequence divergence ranges from 0.0% to 13.5% (S5 Table).

Phylogenetic analyses

No conflicting nodes with strong support (≥ 70% BS and ≥ 0.95 PP) were found between the plastid and ITS trees (S1 and S2 Figs). The combined plastid and ITS dataset consisted of 1509 characters. BI and ML analyses resulted in identical trees that were congruent with the MP trees except that one node was collapsed in the consensus tree (Fig 4; S3 Fig). The tree based on the combined plastid and ITS dataset is highly congruent with the plastid and ITS trees, and shows higher internal nodal supports. All further discussion will be based on the combined plastid and ITS phylogenetic hypothesis (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Bayesian phylogram inferred from the combined plastid DNA and ITS data.

Numbers above the branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities. Tamura’s [19] classification is shown on the right.

Coptis is strongly supported as monophyletic (PP = 0.99). Within Coptis, two major clades (I and II) are identified. Clade I consists of subgenus Coptis and section Japonocoptis of subgenus Metacoptis (PP = 0.95). Within section Japonocoptis, C. morii is sister to the remainder (PP = 0.78). Coptis groenlandica and the two C. trifolia accessions formed a polytomy. Clade II consists of section Chrysocoptis of subgenus Metacoptis. Within clade II, three North American species form the earliest-diverging lineage (PP = 1.0), followed by C. quinquesecta (PP = 1.0). Coptis lutescens is nested in C. japonica and is grouped with C. japonica var. japonica and C. japonica var. dissecta (PP = 0.84). Coptis chinensis var. chinensis is sister to the subclade containing C. chinensis var. brevisepala, C. omeiensis and C. deltoidea (PP = 0.96).

Alternative hypothesis test

The results of the SOWH tests for three alternative hypotheses are shown in Fig 5. Constraining C. japonica as monophyletic yielded a ln-likelihood that is 4.8 units worse than the unconstrained optimal tree. This difference is significant at the 0.01 level (4.0 units), the monophyly of C. japonica should thus be rejected. The monophyly of C. chinensis is also rejected by the SOWH test (3.1 vs. 2.4 at the 0.05 level). The monophyly of subgenus Metacoptis could not be rejected by the SOWH test (2.0 < 2.8 at the 0.05 level). Similarly, the Bayesian tests rejected the monophyly of C. japonica and C. chinensis, but not of subgenus Metacoptis (Table 3).

Fig 5. The distributions for the SOWH test of the three alternative topologies.

The histogram shows the distribution of 100 replicates. The 1%, 5% significance levels and the observed log-likelihood difference are shown for each hypothesis in the chart (See text for details).

Reconstruction of character evolution

Evolutionary reconstructions of eight characters were indicated in Fig 6. Leaf type, sepal color, and petal color and shape are homoplastic in Coptis. For example, white sepals occur in two unrelated lineages, Clade I and C. japonica of Clade II. Petal number has an increment from 5 to approximately 10. Central leaflet base, sepal shape, and petal blade correlate well with the phylogeny generated from the combined plastid and ITS dataset.

Fig 6. The evolutionary reconstruction of selected morphological characters in Coptis.

Color-coded pie diagrams at each node show the relative probabilities of alternative ancestral states.

The results of the tests of correlated evolution for these eight characters are listed in Table 4. The majority of the associations between pairs of the eight morphological characters are not statistically correlated. However, leaf type exhibits an unexpected pattern of correlated evolution with number of petals (2ln BF = 3.34). Petal color shows positively correlated with sepal color and petal shape and blade. In addition, central leaflet base shows positive patterns of correlated evolution with sepal shape.

Table 4. Probability of observed pattern of correlated evolution between pairs of characters.


Major clades of Coptis

Coptis was traditionally first subdivided into two groups, namely C. subgen. Coptis and subgen. Metacoptis, based on the veins of the fruit lateral faces and beak length (Table 1). In subgenus Coptis, follicles have a longitudinal vein on each lateral face and a long beak, whereas in subgenus Metacoptis, as well as Xanthorhiza, follicles lack a longitudinal vein on each lateral face and have a relatively short beak [19,31]. Our phylogenetic analyses strongly suggest that subgenus Coptis is embedded in subgenus Metacoptis and is sister to section Japonocoptis, although the SOWH and Bayesian tests do not reject the monophyly of subgenus Metacoptis. Subgenus Coptis shares many morphological characters with section Japonocoptis, such as sessile central leaflets (Fig 2A and 2B), elliptic sepals, petals non-concolorous with sepals (Fig 3A–3C), and cup-shaped petals (Fig 6).

The monophyly of section Chrysocoptis (clade II) is strongly supported (Fig 4); it is characterized by petiolate central leaflets (Fig 2C–2F), lanceolate to linear sepals (Fig 3D–3I), and epeltate petals (Fig 6). Torrey and Gray erected the section Pterophyllum for C. aspleniifolia [29], whose petals are dilated and cucullate in the middle (Fig 3D). This section was first accepted by Tamura [31], and then rejected [19]. Our analyses strongly support that C. aspleniifolia is grouped with C. occidentalis and C. laciniata of section Chrysocoptis (Fig 4). These three species share some morphological characters, such as pale brown rhizomes, central and lateral leaflets with distinct petiolates, and petals filiformly attenuate upwards. Moreover, floral characters of C. laciniata (Fig 3E) are very similar with those of C. aspleniifolia.

The taxonomic states of C. morii, C. groenlandica, C. lutescens, and C. chinensis var. brevisepala

Based on the collections of U. Mori at Taiwan, Mt. Rontabunzan (Hehuan) in April 1910, Hayata published C. morii and considered that this species was similar to the Japanese C. quinquefolia, but quite distinguishable from the latter by its much larger leaves [14]. Yoshimatsu and Yamamoto treated C. morii as a synonym of C. quinquefolia without any explanation [15], which was followed by Chinese authors [1618]. Based on a comparative study, Tamura suggested that C. morii differs from C. quinquefolia in having branched scapes (vs. not) and stolons (vs. lacking), and differs from C. ramosa in leaf characters [61]. Currently, C. morii is considered a distinct species by Japanese authors [19,20]. Our analyses indicate that in section Japonocoptis, C. morii is early diverging, whereas C. quinquefolia is sister to C. ramosa-C. trifoliolata. The trnH-psbA sequence divergence is 1.5% between C. morii and C. quinquefolia, which is higher than that of 21 species pairs, such as C. quinquefolia-C. ramosa (0.7%), C. quinquefolia-C. trifoliolata (0.0%), and C. quinquefolia-C. trifolia (0.7%) (S4 Table). The ITS sequence divergence resulted in similar results (S5 Table). In this study, we also show that C. morii markedly differs from C. quinquefolia in flower number (4 vs. 1), bract shape (lanceolate vs. elliptic), and bract margin (acute serrate vs. entire). Therefore, our data support the species C. morii as segregate from the other species in section Japonocoptis.

In 1929, Fernald described individuals from Alaska and eastern Asia as C. trifolia and those from Greenland and eastern North America as C. groenlandica. Hultén treated them as subspecies, C. trifolia subsp. trifolia and C. trifolia subsp. groenlandica [22]. Seven years later, Hultén further synonymised C. groenlandica under C. trifolia [23]. However, Taylor and Mulligan considered that the two subspecies could be different in sepals and seed shape [62]. Based on a detailed comparative study of individuals from eastern Asia and North America, Ford suggested that no clear distinction could be made between the two taxa [24]. Comparing the trnL-F and ITS sequences, we did not find any divergence between C. groenlandica and the two accessions of C. trifolia. This result supports the hypothesis that both names are synonymous and designate the same species.

Tamura published C. lutescens and considered that it was distinguishable from C. japonica by yellowish flowers (vs. white) and narrower and acuminate sepals, and grows on mossy ground under subalpine or upper temperate conifer forests [25]. However, white flowers sometimes appear in populations of C. lutescens (S1 Table). The species in section Chrysocoptis have lanceolate to linear sepals and preferably grow on coniferous forest floors [16,27]. In our study, phylogenetic analyses indicate that C. lutescens is nested within C. japonica (Fig 4; S1S3 Figs). The SOWH and Bayesian tests strongly reject the monophyly of C. japonica (Fig 5; Table 3). The trnH-psbA sequence divergence between C. lutescens-C. japonica var. anemonifolia (0.0%) is equal or inferior to the sequence divergence among the four varieties of C. japonica (S4 Table). Similarly, the ITS sequence divergence between C. lutescens-C. japonica var. japonica (0.0%) is lower than the sequence divergence among the four varieties of C. japonica (0.4%-1.6%) (S5 Table). Thus, our analyses support the inclusion of C. lutescens within C. japonica. To clarify that C. lutescens is a synonym or variety of C. japonica, further study at the population level is needed.

Our phylogenetic analyses do not group C. chinensis var. chinensis and C. chinensis var. brevisepala (Fig 4; S1S3 Figs). The monophyletic C. chinensis is also rejected by the SOWH and Bayesian tests (Fig 5; Table 3). The ITS sequence divergence between C. chinensis var. chinensis-C. chinensis var. brevisepala (0.63%) is higher than the sequence divergence between C. chinensis var. brevisepala-C. omeiensis (0.28%), C. chinensis var. brevisepala-C. deltoidea (0.28%), and C. omeiensi -C. deltoidea (0.32%) (S5 Table). Coptis chinensis var. brevisepala differs from C. chinensis var. chinensis in sepal length and distribution [16,18]. The former has sepals slightly longer than petals (~ 6.5 mm), and is distributed in southern China, whereas the latter has sepals twice as long as petals (9–13 mm) and is found in central China. Therefore, our data suggest that C. chinensis var. brevisepala should be elevated to the species rank.

Evolution of morphological characters

Leaf and flower characters have traditionally played a role in the taxonomy of Coptis. Here we discuss the implications of the molecular tree for their evolution (Fig 6; S2 Table).

Leaf morphology in Coptis is diverse, including leaf type and central leaflet base (Fig 2). Our data suggest that ternate compound leaf could be a synapomorphy of the genus (Fig 6A), and multi-ternate compound leaves appear in C. japonica (including C. lutescens), C. laciniata (sometimes 1-ternate), and C. aspleniifolia (mainly 2- to 3-pinnate). Pedate leaves occur in two different clades, section Japonocoptis and C. quinquesecta of section Chrysocoptis. Within a certain species, leaf type is sometimes variable, such as in C. aspleniifolia (S2 Table). In C. morii, leaves are usually described as pedate and have five leaflets (Fig 2E). Checking herbarium specimens in National Taiwan University, Taiwan, we also found one individual whose two lateral leaflets did not split entirely (Collect No. 2629), just like in C. chinensis (Fig 2F). Central leaflet base correlates well with our tree (Fig 6B). In clade I (including section Japonocoptis and subgenus Coptis), central leaflets are sessile, whereas in clade II (section Chrysocoptis) central leaflets have distinct petiolules. In Coptis, compound leaves occur, but leaflets lack petiolules or petiolules have no ventral bundle, which suggests that the compound leaves of Coptis are not well constituted [13].

The distribution of sepal and petal colors is partially coherent agreement with our phylogenetic hypothesis: clade I (including section Japonocoptis and subgenus Coptis) and C. japonica of clade II (section Chrysocoptis) have white sepals and yellow petals, whereas the remaining members of clade II have greenish white or greenish yellow sepals and petals (Fig 6C and 6F). Elliptic sepals and peltate petals are plesiomorphic in the genus, which occur in clade I and Xanthorhiza, whereas clade II has linear-lanceolate sepals or epeltate petals (Fig 6D and 6G). Species from clade I and Xanthorhiza have five petals, whereas in clade II, the earliest diverging lineage containing three North American species has 5–7 petals, and the remaining taxa have about 10 petals. Our data thus suggests an increment of petal number in a unidirectional manner (Fig 6E). Cup-shaped petals occur in clade I, whereas members of clade II have linear-lanceolate petals except C. teeta and C. japonica (including C. lutescens) which have spatulate petals (Fig 6H).

Our inferences of character evolution therefore indicate that morphological synapomorphies for subgenus Coptis and section Japonocoptis of subgenus Metacoptis (clade I) include epetiolate central leaflets and yellow and cup-shaped petals. The tests of correlated evolution shows the associations between pairs of these three characters are not positive (Table 4). The synapomorphies for section Chrysocoptis of subgenus Metacoptis (clade II) include lanceolate to linear sepals and epeltate petals. Sepal shape does not exhibit positively correlated with petal blade (Table 4). Based on these identified synapomorphies, the below adjustments for Coptis classification would thus be credible.

Coptis classification

The most recent subgeneric and sectional classification of Coptis ([19]; Table 1) is partly supported by our plastid and ITS data, which recover the two sections of subgenus Metacoptis exactly as circumscribed by Tamura [19]. Subgenus Coptis, however, is embedded in subgenus Metacoptis and will need to be adjusted, while subgenus Metacoptis also needs adjustment to attain monophyly (namely the removal of section Japonocoptis). Additionally, C. morii is a species in its own right and C. chinensis var. brevisepala should be elevated to a species rank, whereas C. groenlandica and C. lutescens need to be abandoned.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. ML inferred from the plastid DNA data.

The results of MP and ML bootstrap analyses are shown above the branches, whereas the values below the branches result from Bayesian analysis. “*” indicates the nodes not found in the strict consensus tree. Tamura’s [19] classification is shown on the right.


S2 Fig. ML inferred from the ITS data.

The results of MP and ML bootstrap analyses are shown above the branches, whereas the values below the branches result from Bayesian analysis. “*” indicates the node not found in the strict consensus tree. Tamura’s [19] classification is shown on the right.


S3 Fig. ML tree inferred from the combined plastid DNA and ITS data.

The results of MP and ML bootstrap analyses are shown above and below the branches, respectively. “*” indicates the node not found in the strict consensus tree. Tamura’s [19] classification is shown on the right.


S1 Table. Taxa, voucher identification, locality, and GenBank accession numbers for molecular analyses of the genus Coptis.

“–” indicates data not available. “*” means newly generated sequences in this study.


S2 Table. Morphological characters and states on which the taxonomy of Coptis has been mostly based.


S3 Table. Pairwise divergence of trnL-F sequences from Coptis.


S4 Table. Pairwise divergence of trnH-psbA sequences from Coptis.


S5 Table. Pairwise divergence of ITS sequences from Coptis.



We two anonymous reviewers for help comments on the manuscript. WW also thank Xiao-Guo Xiang for data analyses and carefully reading an early draft of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WW. Performed the experiments: KLX SDW. Analyzed the data: KLX SXY YL WW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KLX SXY YL. Wrote the paper: KLX FJ ASE LZ WW ZDC.


  1. 1. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission (2010) Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, 1st ed. Beijing: China Medical Science Press.
  2. 2. Doh EJ, Lee MY, Ko BS, Oh SE (2014) Differentiating Coptis chinensis from Coptis japonica and other Coptis species used in Coptidis Rhizoma based on partial trnL-F intergenic spacer sequences. Genes Genom 36: 345–354.
  3. 3. Kamath S, Skeels M, Pai A (2009) Significant differences in alkaloid content of Coptis chinensis (Huanglian), from its related American species. Chin Med 4: 17. pmid:19703289
  4. 4. Kuang HX (2000) Chinese medicine chemistry. Beijing: China Press of Traditional Chinese medicine.
  5. 5. Qiao YL, Sheng YX, Wang LA, Zhang JL (2009) Development of a rapid resolution liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous analysis of four alkaloids in Rhizoma Coptidis under different cultivation conditions. J AOAC Int 92: 663–671. pmid:19485228
  6. 6. Chen J, Zhao H, Wang X, Lee FS, Yang H, Zheng L (2008) Analysis of major alkaloids in Rhizoma coptidis by capillary electrophoresis electrospray time of flightmass spectrometry with different background electrolytes. Electrophoresis 29: 2135–2147. pmid:18425753
  7. 7. Lee DU, Kang YJ, Park MK, Lee YS, Seo HG, Kim TS, et al. (2003) Effects of 13-alkyl-substituted berberine alkaloids on the expression of COX-II, TNF-alpha, iNOS, and IL-12 production in LPS-stimulated macrophages. Life Sci 73: 1401–1412. pmid:12850501
  8. 8. Li CY, Tsai SI, Damu AG, Wu TS (2009) A rapid and simple determination of protoberberine alkaloids in Rhizoma Coptidis by 1H NMR and its application for quality control of commercial prescriptions. J Pharm Biomed Anal 49: 1272–1276. pmid:19345543
  9. 9. Wang H, Mu W, Shang HC, Lin J, Xiang L (2014) The antihyperglycemic effects of Rhizoma Coptidis and mechanism of actions: A review of systematic reviews and pharmacological research. BioMed Res Int 2014: 798093. pmid:24818152
  10. 10. Zhang ZG, Zhang HZ, Li B, Meng XJ, Wang JQ, Zhang YF, et al. (2014) Berberine activates thermogenesis in white and brown adipose tissue. Nat Commun 5: 5493. pmid:25423280
  11. 11. Wu H, He K, Wang Y, Xue D, Ning N, Zou Z, et al. (2014) The antihypercholesterolemic effect of jatrorrhizine isolated from Rhizoma Coptidis. Phytomedicine 21: 1373–1381. pmid:24894270
  12. 12. Gu TQ, Ren Y. (2007) Floral morphogenesis of Coptis (Ranunculaceae). Chinese Bull Bot 24: 80–86.
  13. 13. Tamura M (1981) Morphology of Coptis japonica and its meaning in phylogeny. Bot Mag Tokyo 94: 165176.
  14. 14. Hayata B (1913) Coptis. Icon. Pl. Formosan, vol. 3. Taihoku: Bureau of Productive Industries, pp. 910.
  15. 15. Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto T (1927) Supplementa iconum plantarum Formosanarum. 3: 25.
  16. 16. Hsiao PG (1979) Coptis. In: [no editor given] Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 27. Beijing: Science Press, pp. 592–598.
  17. 17. Yang KC, Huang TC (1996) Coptis. In: Huang TC, Bufford DE, Hsieh CF, Ohashi H, Yang YP, Lu SY (eds). Flora of Taiwan, 2nd ed., vol. 2. Taipei, Taiwan: Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, pp. 545–546.
  18. 18. Fu DZ, Robinson OR (2001) Coptis. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH (eds). Flora of China, vol. 6. Beijing; Science Press; St. Louis; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, pp. 309–311.
  19. 19. Tamura M (1995) Coptis. In: Hiepko P (ed). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed., vol. 17a IV. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, pp. 444–449.
  20. 20. Kadota Y (2004) Coptis Sect. Metacoptis Subsect. Japanocoptis (Ranunculaceae), with description of a new species and a new variety from Japan. J Jap Bot 79: 311–321.
  21. 21. Fernald ML (1929) Coptis trifolia and its eastern American representative. Rhodora 31: 136–142.
  22. 22. Hultén E (1937) Flora of the Aleutian Islands and westernmost Alaska Pensinsula with notes on the Flora of Commander Islands. Stockholm: Bokförlags aktiebolaget Thule, p. 397.
  23. 23. Hultén E (1944) Flora of Alaska and Yukon, vol 4. Lund, Sweden: C.W.K. Gleerup.
  24. 24. Ford BA (1996) Coptis. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds). Flora of North America, vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–245.
  25. 25. Tamura M (1978) A new species of Coptis in Japan. J Geobot 26: 2–5.
  26. 26. Tamura M (1982) Coptis. In: Satake Y, Ohwi J, Kitamura S, Watari S, Tominari T (eds). Wild Flowers of Japan, vol. 2. Tokyo: Heibonsha Ltd., pp. 86–87.
  27. 27. Kadota Y (2006) Coptis. In: Iwatsuki K, David E, Boufford DE, Ohba H (eds). Flora of Japan, vol. IIa. Tokyo: Kodansha Ltd., pp. 323–326.
  28. 28. Yu YF(1999) The national key protected wild plants in China. Plants 151: 3–11.
  29. 29. Torrey J, Gray A (1838). Flora of North America, vol. 1. New York: Wiley and Putnam.
  30. 30. Satake Y (1949) A note on the Coptis of Japan. J Jap Bot 24: 69–74.
  31. 31. Tamura M (1968) Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae VIII. Sci Rep Coll Gen Educ Osaka Univ 17: 41–56.
  32. 32. Jensen U, Hoot SB, Johansson JT, Kosuge K (1995) Systematics and pholygeny of the Ranunclaceae–a revised family concept on the basis of molecular data. Plant Syst Evol [Suppl] 9: 273–280.
  33. 33. Ro KE, Keener CS, Mcpheron BA (1997) Molecular phylogenetic study of the Ranunculaceae: utility of the nuclear 26S Ribosomal DNA in inferring intrafamilial relationships. Mol Phylogenet Evol 8: 117–127. pmid:9299218
  34. 34. Wang W, Hu H, Xiang XG, Yu SX, Chen ZD (2010) Phylogenetic placements of Calathodes and Megaleranthis (Ranunculaceae): Evidence from molecular and morphological data. Taxon 59: 1712–1720.
  35. 35. Wang W, Li RQ, Chen ZD (2005) Systematic position of Asteropyrum (Ranunculaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear sequences. Plant Syst Evol 255: 41–54.
  36. 36. Wang W, Lu AM, Ren Y, Endress ME, Chen ZD (2009) Phylogeny and classification of Ranunculales: Evidence from four molecular loci and morphological data. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 11: 81–110.
  37. 37. He Y, Hou P, Fan G, Arain S, Peng C (2014) Comprehensive analyses of molecular phylogeny and main alkaloids for Coptis (Ranunculaceae) species identification. Biochem Syst Ecol 56: 8894.
  38. 38. Hoot SB (1995) Phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae based on atpB, rbcL and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data. Plant Syst Evol [Suppl] 9: 241–251.
  39. 39. Taberlet P, Gielly G, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 717: 1105–1109.
  40. 40. Li RQ, Chen ZD, Lu AM, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Manos PS (2004) Phylogenetic relationships in Fagales based on DNA sequences from three genomes. Int J Plant Sci 165: 311–324.
  41. 41. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Beck JT, Famer SB, Liu W, Miller J, et al. (2005) The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am J Bot 92: 142–166. pmid:21652394
  42. 42. Chen ZD, Li JH (2004) Phylogenetics and biogeography of Alnus (Betulaceae) inferred from sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS region. Int J Plant Sci 165: 325–335.
  43. 43. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. (2012) Geneious basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. pmid:22543367
  44. 44. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 4876–4882. pmid:9396791
  45. 45. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41: 95–98.
  46. 46. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61: 539–542. pmid:22357727
  47. 47. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1253–1256. pmid:18397919
  48. 48. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2009) Tracer v1.5. Available: Accessed 10 June 2015.
  49. 49. Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
  50. 50. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690. pmid:16928733
  51. 51. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. pmid:12912839
  52. 52. Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42: 182–192.
  53. 53. Kimura M (1980) Simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120. pmid:7463489
  54. 54. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2725–2729. pmid:24132122
  55. 55. Goldman N, Anderson JP, Rodrigo AG (2000) Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst Biol 49: 652–670. pmid:12116432
  56. 56. Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes factors. J Am Stat Ass 90: 773–795.
  57. 57. Rambaut A, Grassly NC (1997) Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput Appl Biosci 13: 235–238. pmid:9183526
  58. 58. Liu Y, Budke JM, Goffinet B (2012) Phylogenetic inference rejects sporophyte based classification of the Funariaceae (Bryophyta): Rapid radiation suggests rampant homoplasy in sporophyte evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 62: 130–145. pmid:21971055
  59. 59. Pagel M, Meade A (2006) Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am Nat 167: 808–825. pmid:16685633
  60. 60. Pagel M, Meade A (2014) BayesTraits v. 2.0. Reading: University of Reading. Available: Accessed 2 November 2015.
  61. 61. Tamura M (1958) Notulae novae ad Ranunculaceas Asiae orientalis 2. Acta Phytotax Geobot 17: 114–119.
  62. 62. Taylor RL, Mulligan GA (1968) Flora of the Queen Charlotte Islands, Part 2. Cytological aspects of the vascular plants. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer, p. 148.