Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Systematic Investigation into Aging Related Genes in Brain and Their Relationship with Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Guofeng Meng,

    Affiliation Computational Modeling Sciences, Platform Technologies and Science, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development, Shanghai, China

  • Xiaoyan Zhong,

    Affiliation Neurodegeneration DPU, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development, Shanghai, China

  • Hongkang Mei

    Affiliation Computational Modeling Sciences, Platform Technologies and Science, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development, Shanghai, China

A Systematic Investigation into Aging Related Genes in Brain and Their Relationship with Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Guofeng Meng, 
  • Xiaoyan Zhong, 
  • Hongkang Mei


Aging, as a complex biological process, is accompanied by the accumulation of functional loses at different levels, which makes age to be the biggest risk factor to many neurological diseases. Even following decades of investigation, the process of aging is still far from being fully understood, especially at a systematic level. In this study, we identified aging related genes in brain by collecting the ones with sustained and consistent gene expression or DNA methylation changes in the aging process. Functional analysis with Gene Ontology to these genes suggested transcriptional regulators to be the most affected genes in the aging process. Transcription regulation analysis found some transcription factors, especially Specificity Protein 1 (SP1), to play important roles in regulating aging related gene expression. Module-based functional analysis indicated these genes to be associated with many well-known aging related pathways, supporting the validity of our approach to select aging related genes. Finally, we investigated the roles of aging related genes on Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). We found that aging and AD related genes both involved some common pathways, which provided a possible explanation why aging made the brain more vulnerable to Alzheimer’s Disease.


Aging is a natural biological process for all the species. It is associated with degenerative loss of tissue or cellular functions in the brain [1, 2], which increases the risk for neurological diseases, such as Parkinson’s Disease (PD), Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and many other conditions [3]. With the increasing percentage of older people in the population and the resulting huge expenditure on age related diseases [4], studies on aging and these related diseases have drawn increasing attention.

Aging is viewed as a complex biological process [5]. Many reviews have summarized the factors that regulate the aging process [69]. In GenAge database [10], 298 genes have been collected from published works for their relationship with aging. Even with such knowledge, the mechanisms of aging are still far from fully understood. On one hand, aging is a progressive process and it is a considerable challenge to study the dynamic changes that occur during a complete lifespan in human. On the other hand, aging is a synergistic process resulting from the combined effects of a series of biological alterations [2]. It is impossible to fully recover the mechanism of the aging process by manipulation to few genes. These challenges make it necessary to perform systematic investigations at a genomic level.

Using high throughput gene expression or DNA methylation data, an opportunity for systematic investigation exists at the transcriptomics and epigenetics level. Many studies have reported effects of aging on DNA methylation and gene expression [11, 12] and even successfully used that information to predict the age of individuals [13, 14]. Those studies support the idea that DNA methylation and gene expression play important roles in the aging process. Systematic investigation of aging related gene expression or DNA methylation will help to uncover the synergistic effects of different regulatory mechanisms and is also useful for finding the connections between aging and age related diseases [15].

In this work, we define aging related genes as the genes with sustained and consistent changes occurring in the aging process. We identify these genes in the brain by selecting the ones that have expression or DNA methylation profiles, which correlate with the age of healthy people. Functional annotation of these genes suggests that transcription factors are the most affected genes in the aging process. Thus, we studied their regulation by enrichment analysis using motifs and literature reports. Transcription factor Specificity Protein 1 (SP1), which also has an age-correlated expression profile, is suggested to take regulatory roles for aging related genes. To further understand the function of aging related genes, we performed module-based functional analysis and confirmed these genes to be involved in aging related biological processes or pathways. Finally, aging related genes were investigated for their relationship with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). We found both aging and AD related genes to be involved in the same pathways and the shared pathways were supported by published works to associate with both AD and the aging process. Our results suggest that aging and AD involve alterations to the same biological processes and that the progress of aging makes the brain more vulnerable to Alzheimer’s Disease.

Materials and Methods

Aging related genes in brain

Genes with sustained and consistent changes in the aging process, are supposed to be aging related genes. To find such genes in brain, we collected two sets of microarray data: GSE15745 [16] and GSE30272 [17], in which 147 and 269 healthy participants were measured for both gene expression and DNA methylation. In both data sets, the age of participants covered a long life span from young (15 years) to old age (101 years). The normalized data were downloaded from GEO database ( The quality of microarray data was evaluated by hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis to remove outliers. Three vectors were constructed, which respectively recorded the information of normalized gene expression, the beta values of the DNA methylation and the age of the participants. Then gene expression and DNA methylation were analyzed for their profile similarity with age using Spearman’s correlation.

To determine the correlation cutoff, we performed shuffling by assigning age to random samples and new correlations were calculated. In each iteration of simulation, we found the minimum and maximum correlation values, which defined the range of random correlations. After 1000 rounds of shuffling, the correlation cutoff was determined by choosing a range so that more than 95% of random correlation were within such a range. We also transformed the random correlation by Fisher’s transformation and calculated their means and standard deviations. Z-score based P-value was used to describe the significance of the selected correlation cutoff. In this process, positive and negative correlations were both considered.

Enrichment analysis

We performed enrichment analysis to find the regulators or functional annotation for a group of co-expressed genes. For k input genes, the number of genes with functional annotation or regulators is x. For n whole genomic genes, the number of genes with functional annotation or regulators is p. We used Fisher’s exact test to evaluate if the observed x genes resulted from random occurrences. We used the following R codes to calculate the p-value:

  1. >. m = matrix(c(x, k-x, p-x, n-k), ncol = 2, byrow = T)
  2. >. p = fisher.test(m, alternative = “greater”)$p.value

Transcription regulation analysis

Based on an assumption that the co-expressed genes are co-regulated, we performed transcriptional regulation analysis to predict the regulators for co-expressed genes. In this analysis, two strategies were applied: (1) motif-based over-representation analysis; (2) literature reports-based enrichment analysis.

Motif-based over-representation analysis (ORA) is used to recover the enriched regulatory motifs from a group of co-expressed genes. We used oPOSSUM (Version 3.0) [18] as the implementation. In our previous work [19], we have evaluated the performance of oPOSSUM with differentially expressed genes from transcription factor manipulated microarray experiments and optimized parameter setting of oPOSSUM as following: promoter length (from −2000 to +2000 bp), sequence conservation (top 30%), input gene number (200). In a case, when the input gene number exceeded 200, we ranked genes based on their correlation with age and chose the top 200 ones for ORA. The enriched transcription factor (TF) binding motifs were selected at a cutoff of z > 20 and Fisher’s p < 10.

Literature reports about TF-target regulation were also used for enrichment analysis. In this step, the annotated transcription regulation including “transcription regulation” and “influence gene expression”, were selected from MetaBase ( The input genes were evaluated for the enrichment of annotated regulators. If any regulator was significantly enriched, it would be predicted to regulate the expression of the input genes.

To find the gene-specific regulators, we applied the method CSTP [20] to construct a transcriptional regulatory network. The assumption of this analysis is that the regulators of one gene can be recovered by analysis to the genes with similar expression profiles. In this step, gene expression data of all samples were used as input matrix for CSTP. All the aging related transcription factor genes were predicted for their transcription regulators. As results, a regulatory network could be constructed by connecting the predicted regulators and their targets.

Gene functional analysis with Gene Ontology and pathway annotation

We performed Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis using David [21] to computationally annotate the functions of a group of genes. Using the genomic genes as the background, genes was evaluated for enrichment of GO biological process terms. If a significant p-value was observed (e.g. p < 0.01), the genes were considered to be related to the enriched biological process.

The same functional analysis could be performed using pathway genes. We collected the pathway genes by combining the pathway annotation from Metabase (, GenMapP (, Biocarta ( and Gene Ontology. For a list of input genes, we evaluate their enrichment of pathway genes using Fisher’s exact test. If significant p-values were observed, pathways were assumed to regulate the input genes.

Functional module analysis to aging genes

The assumption for this analysis is that genes with similar expression profiles involve in the same pathways or biological processes. We clustered the aging related genes into different modules based on the similarity of their gene expression profiles. The functional annotation of each module was performed by enrichment analysis to Gene Ontology annotations. The gene expression similarities of gene pairs were described by the correlation distance (1-r) across all the samples. R package WGCNA [22] was used to find the gene modules. We displayed the module genes using hierarchical clustering with different colors to label the memberships to the modules. The functional and pathway enrichment analyses were performed for each of the modules.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) related genes

AD related genes were collected in two ways. Firstly, expression experiments were identified where the AD patients and controls were both measured for genomic genes. In this step, we found three microarray experiments with good quality: GSE5281 [23], GSE26972 [24], GSE48350 [25]. After removing the irrelevant samples e.g. samples with young age, we performed differential expression analysis and utilized meta-analysis to find genes shared by these three experiments. Another method was from text mining of the published works. In this process, the annotation for AD from IPA ( and DisGeNet ( were used. We filtered the low-confident genes by manually removing the ones with only evidences of expression or those not supported by independent evidences.


Aging related genes in brain

We defined the aging related genes as the ones with sustained and consistent expression or DNA methylation changes in the aging process. To find such genes, we calculated Spearman’s correlation between DNA methylation or gene expression and age. Based on simulation results, we used |r| > 0.3 as the cutoff to select aging related DNA methylation sites and genes. Analysis of GSE15745 [16] suggested genes or sites to have age-correlated profiles in four brain regions (see Table 1). Taking the frontal cortex (FCTX) as an example, we observed 2097 positively and 276 negatively correlated DNA methylation sites. The maximum positive correlation r = 0.85 was observed with a site located in the upstream CpG island of RUNX3 gene (see Fig 1(a)). On the contrary, the minimum correlation r = −0.63 was observed with C10orf10 gene (see Fig 1(b)). A similar analysis using expression data also suggested genes to have aging related profiles (see Table 1). Considering the conservation of the aging process [26, 27], we assumed the aging related genes to be shared by different brain regions. Therefore, we collected aging related DNA methylation sites and genes by checking their overlaps across four brain regions. We observed 1243 DNA methylation sites and 2743 genes to be shared by at least three regions at a cutoff of |r| > 0.3 (see Table 1 and S1 Table). These genes were defined as aging related genes and they were used for next analysis step.

Fig 1. Aging related genes and DNA methylation sites.

(a)RUNX3, positively correlated with age; (b)C10orf10, negatively correlated with age; (c) overlap of genes with aging related expression and DNA methylation and genes from the GenAge database.

Next, we evaluated the reliability of aging related genes by performing the same analyses in an independent experiment GSE30272 [17]. The results from two data sets were compared and the overlapping results were showed in S1 Fig. In the FCTX region, we found 1297 DNA methylation sites, about > 50% of aging related sites in GSE15745, to be observed in GSE30272 (p < 2.2e − 16). The same comparison was performed for genes with aging related expression profiles. 474 genes, about 23.4% of total aging related genes, were shared by two datasets with a significance at p < 0.01. This result indicated that both aging related DNA methylation and gene expression had consistent profiles in independent experiments. However, more overlap was observed with DNA methylation, which suggested DNA methylation profiles to be more stable in the aging process.

In the GenAge database [10], 298 aging related genes have been identified from published works. Different from our definition, those genes were determined by manipulation experiments in model animals or by association studies in human. In Fig 1(c), we show the overlap of GenAge genes with our genes. We observed 56 GenAge genes to have aging related expression profiles and 25 genes to have aging related DNA methylation profiles. Fisher’s exact test suggests shared genes to be significantly enriched at p < 0.0077 and p < 0.03, respectively.

Considering the roles of DNA methylation in gene expression regulation [28], we checked whether aging related DNA methylation was the causal reason for aging related gene expression. As shown in Fig 1(c), there are only 145 aging related genes having aging related DNA methylation sites, which covers about 5.2% of aging related genes. Fisher’s exact test fails to support this overlap to be significant at p < 0.05. This result suggests that DNA methylation is not the causal reason for aging related gene expression and there may be transcriptional regulation at other levels which involves the gene expression regulation in the aging process.

Transcription regulatory genes are most affected in the aging process

We performed functional annotation of the aging related genes with David [21]. By mapping the aging related DNA methylation sites to nearby genes, 1099 aging related genes were selected. Analysis of the 1099 genes suggested “transcriptional regulation” to be the most enriched term. 153 genes, 13.9% of the 1099 input genes had transcription regulatory activity (p < 2.7e − 27) and 231 genes had DNA binding activities (p < 8.0e−14), which were also the most enriched term. The same analysis was performed for genes with aging related expression profiles. Among 1265 positively correlated genes, 158 genes were annotated to have transcription factor binding activity (p < 1.4e − 8), which was the most enriched term. However, these transcription related terms were not enriched with the negatively correlated genes. Overall, this analysis suggests that transcription regulators are the most affected genes at both DNA methylation and gene expression levels in the aging process.

Transcription regulation of aging related genes

We performed motif-based over-representation analysis (ORA) to recover the enriched motifs for aging related genes. Taking genes from FCTX as an example, 5 TFs, including KLF15 (p < 7.9e − 22), SP1 (p < 3.2e − 24), INSM1 (p < 2.8e − 23), PLAG1 (p < 3.6e − 21) and PPARG (p < 3.1e − 8), were predicted to be significantly enriched among positively correlated genes (Fig 2(a)). To improve confidence, ORA was also performed in three other regions and found 7 TFs to be shared by at least three regions: KLF15, SP1, EGR1, IMSM1, ZFX, PLAG1 and GABPA. These TFs were potential regulators of aging related genes. Next, we checked the percentage of genes with predicted TF binding sites and found that, except for PLAG1, all the TFs bound to the promoters of more than 50% of input genes, which suggested that they were more likely to be regulators for the aging related genes. The same analysis was performed with negative correlated genes. However, we failed to find any motifs shared by at least three regions (see S2 Table).

Fig 2.

Enriched transcription factors using (a) the motif-based over-representation analysis and (b) literature reports-based enrichment analysis.

Besides motif-based analysis, we also performed literature-reports based enrichment analysis. Three TFs were found to be significantly enriched, including SOX2 (p < 4.18e − 6), SP1 (p < 1.94e − 5) and ESR1 (p < 1.73e − 5) (see Fig 2(b)). These three TFs were also annotated to regulate more than 50% of aging related genes. Compared to the results from motif based enrichment analysis, different TFs were reported. However, SP1 was shared by both analyses, which further supports SP1 to be a regulator of aging related genes.

In the above analyses, we have predicted 9 TFs by motif and literature reports-based enrichment analysis. We also checked the gene expression profiles of predicted TFs in the aging process. We found SP1, KLF15, EGR1 and SOX2 to have aging related expression profiles at a cutoff of |r| > 0.3 (see Table 2). Expression of SP1, KLF15 and SOX2 were positively correlated while EGR1 was negatively correlated. Considering the fact that aging related genes were selected by choosing genes that had correlated profiles with age, we expected their regulators to have aging related profiles. Therefore, SP1, KLF15 and SOX2 and EGR1 were predicted to be more likely to be a transcriptional regulator of aging related genes.

To validate the results of enrichment analysis, we used the SP1 binding sites determined by ChIP-sep from ENCODE Project ( and checked their enrichment in the promoter regions of aging related genes. Among 2743 aging related genes, we found 60.2% of them to be associated with at least one SP1 binding site at their promoter region in a range from −2000bp to 2000bp. This observation was further evaluated by randomly chosen genes. There were only 37.4% of random genes having SP1 binding sites and the significance for observed enrichment was p < 2.23e − 16. This observation confirms the results from enrichment analysis.

As the only transcription factor recovered by both motifs and literature reports-based enrichment analysis, SP1 has also been reported for its important roles in the aging process. In the GenAge database (, SP1 is annotated to be relevant to the human aging process based on evidence that links SP1 to the regulation of aging related genes. In Ryu et. al’s work [29], SP1 was reported to be an induced transcription factor in response to oxidative stress and the regulation of neuronal survival. In S.Y. Kim et. al’s work [30], SP1 was reported to be related to aging-dependent nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. In addition, Kumazaki [31] reported SP1 to have altered TF binding activities in the aging process. SP1 has also been widely reported to be associated with aging by its involvement in the regulation of apoptosis [3235].

Regulator Network of transcription factors in aging process

As presented in above section, transcription regulators are the most affected genes in the aging process. The complexity of transcription regulation makes it necessary to investigate their regulatory network. We applied a method, CSTP, to recover the transcription regulation for each of the aging related TF genes [20]. Using the gene expression data from GSE15745 [16], we found the co-expressed genes for each TF and the regulators of TF genes were recovered by enrichment analysis of the co-expressed genes with binding motifs and literature reports. The results were shown in S2 Fig. Motif enrichment analysis confirmed SP1 to be the most important regulator, which was predicted to regulate the greatest number of TF genes (68 out of 244 TF genes). Another enriched TF was KLF15, which regulated 62 TF genes. The enrichment analysis with literature reports suggested SOX2 and SP1 to be the key regulators, which regulated 105 and 94 TF genes, respectively. In the above section, we observed other significantly enriched TFs but they failed to be recovered by CSTP. By connecting SP1, KLF15 and SOX2 to their target genes, we constructed a regulatory network (see Fig 3). In this network, 179 TF genes were predicted with transcription regulators. Among them, 79 genes were regulated by only one of three TFs while 72 genes were regulated by two and 28 genes could be regulated by all three TFs. In this network, there were a total of 307 predicted regulations. Among them, 161 predicted regulations were observed both by enrichment to motifs and literature reports.

Next, we investigated the transcription regulation of SP1. CSTP suggested 8 TFs to regulate SP1 expression, including ESR1, RBPJ, WT1, NFKB1, FOXA1, RUNX3, IRF8 and ATOH1. However, none of them had strong correlation between their expression profiles and age. Therefore, these TFs were not supposed to be the only transcription regulators for SP1. Further investigation or more complex models is necessary to uncover the regulation of SP1.

Functional Module analysis of the aging process

To fully understand the roles of the aging related genes, we performed functional module analysis with WGCNA [22]. Fig 4(a) shows the WGCNA analysis results. 2743 genes that had aging related expression profiles, were clustered into 12 modules (see S3 Table) and each module was computationally investigated for functional annotation.

Fig 4. Network analysis of aging associated genes.

(a)aging related genes were clustered into 12 modules based on their expression similarity; (b)each module was annotated for enriched pathways.

As shown in Fig 4(b), 12 modules were predicted to involve different aging related biological processes. Aging is accompanied with accumulated cellular damage, especially to DNA [36]. In M2, we observed DNA repair-associated terms to be enriched. Cellular damage can block the cell cycle and cell proliferation [37, 38] (see M2, M6, M9, M11). Impaired functional loss and increasing vulnerability can result in apoptosis [39], which is a protective mechanism to avoid uncontrolled propagation of damaged cells [40] (see M4, M7). Many factors can lead to cellular damage. One important way is from the mitochondrial ATP synthesis process. The oxidative micro-environment of mitochondria leads to mtDNA damage and mitochondria deterioration [41] (see M5). Imbalance or loss of homeostasis and metabolism is an important feature of the aging process, which can lead to functional decline and increased risk of diseases [4244] (see M1, M3, M8). Aging is characterized by dysregulated nutrient sensing [45]. In M1, we observed insulin signaling pathways to be enriched with aging related genes [46] (see M11). The roles of metabolic processes in the aging process can be confirmed by the relationship between longevity and calorie restriction [46]. Dysregulation of inflammatory senescent cells tends to lead to the secretion pre-inflammatory cytokines, which can affect many pathways and regulators in the aging process [47] (see M1, M4, M6, M10). The inter-cellular communication and cell-matrix interaction are widely reported to be involved in the aging process [4850] (see M4, M7, M9, M10 and M12). Progressive loss of telomeres explains the limited proliferation ability of most cultured cells and it also is believed to be a causal mechanism of the aging process [51]. In M2, telomere maintenance associated terms are enriched. We observed many neuronal development associated terms, which may suggest that aging affects normal function of the neuron (see M1, M11, M12).

Overall, module analysis clustered the aging related genes into different modules and functional enrichment analysis indicated different module genes to be involved in different biological processes. By checking the published works, most of biological processes have been widely reported for association with the aging process. This result suggests that computational analysis to sustained and consistently changed genes can re-discover the known regulation of the aging process. This is also evidence for selected genes to be related to the aging process.

Aging and Alzheimer’s disease

As one of diseases prevalent in older people, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is generally believed to be related to the aging process. It is necessary to investigate the roles of aging related genes in the genesis of AD. We collected 1311 AD related genes by differential expression analysis of AD patients and 523 genes from published literature reports (see S4 Table). For the aging process, 3698 genes that had aging related expression or DNA methylation profiles, were selected as aging related genes (see S1 Table). We found 300 differentially expressed genes and 126 literature reported genes to be shared between AD and aging. Statistical evaluation with Fisher’s exact test suggested this overlap to be significant at p < 4.3e − 4 and p < 9.0e − 6 (see S2 Fig).

Next, we checked whether aging and AD related genes involved the same pathways. We applied a method introduced in previous work [52] and predicted the pathways enriched by both AD and aging related genes. Fig 5 showed the shared pathways. Based on functional similarity, the enriched pathways were clustered into four groups, which were tagged with four colors. In the black group (left 1), we observed pathways associated with apoptosis and cell proliferation to be enriched by both AD and the aging process. In AD, neuronal loss has been widely observed and reported [53]. Even though many reports suggest normal aging has less neuronal loss [54, 55], we observed cell death related terms to be enriched in aging related genes. Similarly, some pathways were observed to be enriched in the green group (left 3). Among them, the EGFR pathway [56], VEGF activation [57, 58], TGF-beta signaling pathway [59, 60], Hedgehog signaling pathway [61], Wnt signaling pathway [62], NGF signaling pathway [63] and GnRH signaling pathway [64] have been reported to be related to both AD and the aging process. From published reports collected in the ALZpathway database [65], it is found that most of these pathways have been annotated for their association with AD. In the blue group (left 4), we observed terms related to cellular interaction and metabolic processes. These two processes have been widely studied for their critical roles in both aging and AD [50, 66]. In the red group (left 2), there are terms associated with neuronal development and nerve impulse transmission. In AD and the aging process, brain aging is characterized by loss of neural circuits and plasticity, which is in line with the enrichment analysis results [67, 68].

Overall, we found pathways enriched by both AD and aging. Text mining analysis confirmed most of the shared pathways to be associated with both AD and aging. This result suggests that the aging genes are involved in the genesis of AD by affecting the AD-related pathways described above. This result also provides a possible explanation for why age is the biggest risk factor for age related neurological diseases.

Fig 5. Pathway analysis for AD and the aging process.

The shared pathways and processes from enrichment analysis of AD and aging related genes.


In this work, we performed a computational study of the genes that had sustained and consistent expression or DNA methylation changes in the aging process of the brain. Our analyses confirmed these genes to be related to the aging process by involving many aging related pathways. Therefore, we called these genes as aging related genes, which could be either upstream regulators or downstream targets of the aging process. However, this is not exactly the same definitions used in many published works. For example, the genes from GenAge database are mostly determined by selecting ones where their experimental manipulation will delay or accelerate the aging process [10]. Other examples are from genome-wide differential expression analysis of the samples at different age [11, 69, 70]. The difference in definition mainly reflect the different emphasis for finding the aging related genes. The genes from this work give a new source for investigation to the aging process and age related neurological diseases.

Enrichment analysis of aging related genes suggested SP1 to be one of the most enriched TFs. One possible problem is the bias of the computational tool for some TFs, especially SP1. To remove this risk, we evaluated performance of oPOSSUM with randomly selected human genomic genes. We repeated it for 1000 iterations to check the distribution of z-scores and Fisher’s scores for all the TFs. The results are available in S3 Fig. We observed that the distribution of both z-scores and Fisher’s scores were within a small range, which did not exceed the significance threshold. This simulation result suggests that predicted TFs do not result from tool bias. Next, we checked whether oPOSSUM was powerful enough to recover the SP1 binding sites in real experimental data. We used one SP1 manipulated dataset from GSE37935 [71], where SP1 was the only manipulated regulator. Using the same parameter setting, we performed ORA to the differentially expressed genes and observed SP1 to be one of the most enriched TFs (see S3 Fig). This result suggests that SP1 can be recovered by ORA when it takes regulator roles in a biological process. Overall, our evaluation with simulated data and real data supports ORA to have good performance for both specificity and sensitivity.

With our analysss, we predicted some TFs, especially SP1, to transcriptionally regulate aging related genes. However, we observed relatively low correlation between SP1 expression and age. Therefore, it is unrealistic to expect SP1 or any other TFs to explain all the aging related gene expression. As observed in gene functional module analysis, aging related genes can be regulated by different TFs and pathways. To fully understand the transcription regulation of the aging process, systematic investigation with synergy of different TFs or pathways is imperative. This work only reveals limited information for the aging process and there is still a long way to understand the whole process.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Consistence of aging related expression and DNA methylation profiles in experiment replicates.

The Aging related gene expression and DNA methylation profiles are compared between the results from two experiments: GSE15745 and GSE30272.



S2 Fig. Overlap of aging related genes and AD related genes.

The Aging related genes and AD related genes are compared for gene overlaps.



S3 Fig. Evaluation of motif-based over-representation analysis.

To check if there is any bias from over-representation analysis, we performed ORA to randomly chosen genes. This figure shows the results. We can see that the distribution of scores is within a small range, which does not exceed the significance threshold. Another analysis is over-representation analysis to GSE37935, where we found SP1 to be one of the significantly enriched TFs in the over-representation analysis.



S1 Table. The list for aging related genes.

The aging related genes were determined by finding genes with age-correlated gene expression and DNA methylation.



S2 Table. The results of enrichment analysis for negatively correlated aging related genes.

The negatively correlated genes from four tissues were studied for transcriptional regulators using enrichment analysis.



S3 Table. Module genes in module analysis.

The aging related genes are clustered into different modules where the colors indicate the membership in Fig 1.



S4 Table. Alzheimer’s disease related genes.

The AD related genes are determined by differential expression analysis and text-mining annotation.




We thank Dr. Ruping Sun for reading manuscript and giving us many useful suggestions. We are grateful to Dr. David Tattersall for his review of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GM HM. Analyzed the data: GM. Wrote the paper: GM HM. Performed annotation collection for diseases and aging: XZ.


  1. 1. Bowen RL, Atwood CS. Living and dying for sex. A theory of aging based on the modulation of cell cycle signaling by reproductive hormones. Gerontology. 2004;50(5):265–290. Available from: doi: 10.1159/000079125. pmid:15331856
  2. 2. Weinert BT, Timiras PS. Invited review: Theories of aging. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Oct;95(4):1706–1716. Available from: doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00288.2003.
  3. 3. Dillin A, Gottschling DE, Nyström T. The good and the bad of being connected: the integrons of aging. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014 Feb;26:107–112. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ pmid:24529252
  4. 4. Feng Z, Liu C, Guan X, Mor V. China’s rapidly aging population creates policy challenges in shaping a viable long-term care system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2764–2773. Available from: doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0535.
  5. 5. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013 Jun;153(6):1194–1217. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039. pmid:23746838
  6. 6. Campisi J. Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:685–705. Available from: doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183653. pmid:23140366
  7. 7. Sahin E, Depinho RA. Linking functional decline of telomeres, mitochondria and stem cells during ageing. Nature. 2010 Mar;464(7288):520–528. Available from: doi: 10.1038/nature08982. pmid:20336134
  8. 8. Bishop NA, Lu T, Yankner BA. Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline. Nature. 2010 Mar;464(7288):529–535. Available from: doi: 10.1038/nature08983. pmid:20336135
  9. 9. Kenyon CJ. The genetics of ageing. Nature. 2010 Mar;464(7288):504–512. Available from: doi: 10.1038/nature08980. pmid:20336132
  10. 10. Tacutu R, Craig T, Budovsky A, Wuttke D, Lehmann G, Taranukha D, et al. Human Ageing Genomic Resources: integrated databases and tools for the biology and genetics of ageing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D1027–D1033. Available from: doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1155. pmid:23193293
  11. 11. Glass D, Viñuela A, Davies MN, Ramasamy A, Parts L, Knowles D, et al. Gene expression changes with age in skin, adipose tissue, blood and brain. Genome Biol. 2013;14(7):R75. Available from: pmid:23889843
  12. 12. Reynolds LM, Taylor JR, Ding J, Lohman K, Johnson C, Siscovick D, et al. Age-related variations in the methylome associated with gene expression in human monocytes and T cells. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5366. Available from: doi: 10.1038/ncomms6366. pmid:25404168
  13. 13. Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115. Available from: doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. pmid:24138928
  14. 14. Bocklandt S, Lin W, Sehl ME, Sánchez FJ, Sinsheimer JS, Horvath S, et al. Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e14821. Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014821. pmid:21731603
  15. 15. Sprott RL. Biomarkers of aging and disease: introduction and definitions. Experimental gerontology. 2010;45(1):2–4. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2009.07.008. pmid:19651201
  16. 16. Gibbs JR, van der Brug MP, Hernandez DG, Traynor BJ, Nalls MA, Lai SL, et al. Abundant quantitative trait loci exist for DNA methylation and gene expression in human brain. PLoS genetics. 2010;6(5):e1000952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000952. pmid:20485568
  17. 17. Colantuoni C, Lipska BK, Ye T, Hyde TM, Tao R, Leek JT, et al. Temporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex. Nature. 2011;478(7370):519–523. doi: 10.1038/nature10524. pmid:22031444
  18. 18. Kwon AT, Arenillas DJ, Worsley Hunt R, Wasserman WW. oPOSSUM-3: advanced analysis of regulatory motif over-representation across genes or ChIP-Seq datasets. G3 (Bethesda). 2012 Sep;2(9):987–1002. Available from: doi: 10.1534/g3.112.003202.
  19. 19. Meng G, Mosig A, Vingron M. A computational evaluation of over-representation of regulatory motifs in the promoter regions of differentially expressed genes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:267. Available from: doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-267. pmid:20487530
  20. 20. Meng G, Vingron M. Condition-specific target prediction from motifs and expression. Bioinformatics. 2014 Jun;30(12):1643–1650. Available from: doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu066. pmid:24532727
  21. 21. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57. Available from: doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211.
  22. 22. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559. Available from: doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. pmid:19114008
  23. 23. Liang WS, Reiman EM, Valla J, Dunckley T, Beach TG, Grover A, et al. Alzheimer’s disease is associated with reduced expression of energy metabolism genes in posterior cingulate neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar;105(11):4441–4446. Available from: doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709259105. pmid:18332434
  24. 24. Berson A, Barbash S, Shaltiel G, Goll Y, Hanin G, Greenberg DS, et al. Cholinergic-associated loss of hnRNP-A/B in Alzheimer’s disease impairs cortical splicing and cognitive function in mice. EMBO Mol Med. 2012 Aug;4(8):730–742. Available from: doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100995. pmid:22628224
  25. 25. Blair LJ, Nordhues BA, Hill SE, Scaglione KM, O’Leary JC 3rd, Fontaine SN, et al. Accelerated neurodegeneration through chaperone-mediated oligomerization of tau. J Clin Invest. 2013 Oct;123(10):4158–4169. Available from: doi: 10.1172/JCI69003. pmid:23999428
  26. 26. McElwee JJ, Schuster E, Blanc E, Piper MD, Thomas JH, Patel DS, et al. Evolutionary conservation of regulated longevity assurance mechanisms. Genome Biol. 2007;8(7):R132. Available from: pmid:17612391
  27. 27. Partridge L, Gems D. Mechanisms of ageing: public or private? Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Mar;3(3):165–175. Available from: doi: 10.1038/nrg753. pmid:11972154
  28. 28. Tate PH, Bird AP. Effects of DNA methylation on DNA-binding proteins and gene expression. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Apr;3(2):226–231. doi: 10.1016/0959-437X(93)90027-M. pmid:8504247
  29. 29. Ryu H, Lee J, Zaman K, Kubilis J, Ferrante RJ, Ross BD, et al. Sp1 and Sp3 are oxidative stress-inducible, antideath transcription factors in cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 2003 May;23(9):3597–3606. pmid:12736330
  30. 30. Kim SY, Kang HT, Han JA, Park SC. The transcription factor Sp1 is responsible for aging-dependent altered nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. Aging cell. 2012;11(6):1102–1109. doi: 10.1111/acel.12012. pmid:23013401
  31. 31. Kumazaki T, Mitsui Y. Alterations in transcription factor-binding activities to fibronectin promoter during aging of vascular endothelial cells. Mech Ageing Dev. 1996 Jul;88(1-2):111–124. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(96)01712-5. pmid:8803927
  32. 32. Dasari A, Bartholomew JN, Volonte D, Galbiati F. Oxidative stress induces premature senescence by stimulating caveolin-1 gene transcription through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/Sp1-mediated activation of two GC-rich promoter elements. Cancer Res. 2006 Nov;66(22):10805–10814. Available from: doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1236. pmid:17108117
  33. 33. Oh JE, Han JA, Hwang ES. Downregulation of transcription factor, Sp1, during cellular senescence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Feb;353(1):86–91. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.118. pmid:17161377
  34. 34. Kim HS, Heo JI, Park SH, Shin JY, Kang HJ, Kim MJ, et al. Transcriptional activation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) is mediated by increased DNA binding activity and increased interaction between p53 and Sp1 via phosphorylation during replicative senescence of human embryonic fibroblasts. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(4):2397–2408. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3094-9. pmid:24445528
  35. 35. Huang MH, Lin SZ, Lin PC, Chiou TW, Harn YW, Ho LI, et al. Brain tumor senescence might be mediated by downregulation of S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 via butylidenephthalide leading to decreased cell viability. Tumour Biol. 2014 May;35(5):4875–4884. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1639-0. pmid:24464249
  36. 36. Moskalev AA, Shaposhnikov MV, Plyusnina EN, Zhavoronkov A, Budovsky A, Yanai H, et al. The role of DNA damage and repair in aging through the prism of Koch-like criteria. Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Mar;12(2):661–684. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2012.02.001. pmid:22353384
  37. 37. Atwood CS, Bowen RL. The reproductive-cell cycle theory of aging: an update. Exp Gerontol. 2011;46(2-3):100–107. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2010.09.007. pmid:20851172
  38. 38. Chandler H, Peters G. Stressing the cell cycle in senescence and aging. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013 Dec;25(6):765–771. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ pmid:23916530
  39. 39. Collado M, Blasco MA, Serrano M. Cellular senescence in cancer and aging. Cell. 2007 Jul;130(2):223–233. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.003. pmid:17662938
  40. 40. Campisi J. Cellular senescence as a tumor-suppressor mechanism. Trends Cell Biol. 2001 Nov;11(11):S27–S31. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)82148-6. pmid:11684439
  41. 41. Green DR, Galluzzi L, Kroemer G. Mitochondria and the autophagy—inflammation—cell death axis in organismal aging. Science. 2011;333(6046):1109–1112. doi: 10.1126/science.1201940. pmid:21868666
  42. 42. Barzilai N, Huffman DM, Muzumdar RH, Bartke A. The critical role of metabolic pathways in aging. Diabetes. 2012 Jun;61(6):1315–1322. Available from: doi: 10.2337/db11-1300. pmid:22618766
  43. 43. Gray DA, Woulfe J. Structural disorder and the loss of RNA homeostasis in aging and neurodegenerative disease. Frontiers in genetics. 2013;4. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00149. pmid:23967011
  44. 44. MAKRIDES SC. Protein synthesis and degradation during aging and senescence. Biological Reviews. 1983;58(3):343–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1983.tb00394.x. pmid:6354285
  45. 45. Brown-Borg H, Anderson R, McCarter R, Morley J, Musi N, Olshansky SJ, et al. Nutrition in aging and disease: update on biological sciences. Aging Health. 2012;8(1):13–16. doi: 10.2217/ahe.11.88.
  46. 46. Fontana L, Partridge L, Longo VD. Extending healthy life span—from yeast to humans. science. 2010;328(5976):321–326. doi: 10.1126/science.1172539. pmid:20395504
  47. 47. Salminen A, Kaarniranta K, Kauppinen A. Inflammaging: disturbed interplay between autophagy and inflammasomes. Aging (Albany NY). 2012 Mar;4(3):166–175.
  48. 48. Jacob MP. Extracellular matrix remodeling and matrix metalloproteinases in the vascular wall during aging and in pathological conditions. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy. 2003;57(5):195–202. doi: 10.1016/S0753-3322(03)00065-9.
  49. 49. Zhang G, Li J, Purkayastha S, Tang Y, Zhang H, Yin Y, et al. Hypothalamic programming of systemic ageing involving IKK-[bgr], NF-[kgr] B and GnRH. Nature. 2013;497(7448):211–216. doi: 10.1038/nature12143. pmid:23636330
  50. 50. Bondareff W, Geinisman Y. Loss of synapses in the dentate gyrus of the senescent rat. Am J Anat. 1976 Jan;145(1):129–136. Available from: doi: 10.1002/aja.1001450110. pmid:1246966
  51. 51. Blackburn EH, Greider CW, Szostak JW. Telomeres and telomerase: the path from maize, Tetrahymena and yeast to human cancer and aging. Nature medicine. 2006;12(10):1133–1138. doi: 10.1038/nm1006-1133. pmid:17024208
  52. 52. Mei H, Xia T, Feng G, Zhu J, Lin SM, Qiu Y. Opportunities in systems biology to discover mechanisms and repurpose drugs for CNS diseases. Drug Discov Today. 2012 Nov;17(21-22):1208–1216. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.06.015. pmid:22750722
  53. 53. Donev R, Kolev M, Millet B, Thome J. Neuronal death in Alzheimer’s disease and therapeutic opportunities. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(11-12):4329–4348. Available from: doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00889.x. pmid:19725918
  54. 54. Wickelgren I. The aging brain: for the cortex, neuron loss may be less than thought. Science. 1996;273(5271):48–48.
  55. 55. Merrill DA, Chiba AA, Tuszynski MH. Conservation of neuronal number and size in the entorhinal cortex of behaviorally characterized aged rats. J Comp Neurol. 2001 Oct;438(4):445–456. doi: 10.1002/cne.1327. pmid:11559900
  56. 56. Siddiqui S, Fang M, Ni B, Lu D, Martin B, Maudsley S. Central role of the EGF receptor in neurometabolic aging. Int J Endocrinol. 2012;2012:739428. Available from: doi: 10.1155/2012/739428. pmid:22754566
  57. 57. Religa P, Cao R, Religa D, Xue Y, Bogdanovic N, Westaway D, et al. VEGF significantly restores impaired memory behavior in Alzheimer’s mice by improvement of vascular survival. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2053. Available from: doi: 10.1038/srep02053. pmid:23792494
  58. 58. Busse S, Steiner J, Micheel J, Dobrowolny H, Mawrin C, Krause TJ, et al. Age-related increase of VGF-expression in T lymphocytes. Aging (Albany NY). 2014 Jun;6(6):440–453.
  59. 59. Bhadra R, Moretto MM, Castillo JC, Petrovas C, Ferrando-Martinez S, Shokal U, et al. Intrinsic TGF-β signaling promotes age-dependent CD8+ T cell polyfunctionality attrition. J Clin Invest. 2014 Jun;124(6):2441–2455. Available from: doi: 10.1172/JCI70522. pmid:24762437
  60. 60. Wyss-Coray T. TGF-β pathway as a potential target in neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s. Current Alzheimer Research. 2006;3(3):191–195. pmid:16842094
  61. 61. Dashti M, Peppelenbosch MP, Rezaee F. Hedgehog signalling as an antagonist of ageing and its associated diseases. Bioessays. 2012 Oct;34(10):849–856. Available from: doi: 10.1002/bies.201200049. pmid:22903465
  62. 62. Inestrosa NC, et al. Wnt signaling function in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain research reviews. 2000;33(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(00)00021-7. pmid:10967351
  63. 63. Aloe L, Rocco ML, Bianchi P, Manni L. Nerve growth factor: from the early discoveries to the potential clinical use. J Transl Med. 2012;10(239):239. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-239. pmid:23190582
  64. 64. Zhang G, Li J, Purkayastha S, Tang Y, Zhang H, Yin Y, et al. Hypothalamic programming of systemic ageing involving IKK-[bgr], NF-[kgr] B and GnRH. Nature. 2013 May;497(7448):211–216. Available from: doi: 10.1038/nature12143. pmid:23636330
  65. 65. Mizuno S, Iijima R, Ogishima S, Kikuchi M, Matsuoka Y, Ghosh S, et al. AlzPathway: a comprehensive map of signaling pathways of Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Syst Biol. 2012;6:52. Available from: doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-52. pmid:22647208
  66. 66. Houtkooper RH, Williams RW, Auwerx J. Metabolic networks of longevity. Cell. 2010 Jul;142(1):9–14. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.029. pmid:20603007
  67. 67. Burke SN, Barnes CA. Neural plasticity in the ageing brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2006;7(1):30–40. doi: 10.1038/nrn1809. pmid:16371948
  68. 68. Pannese E. Morphological changes in nerve cells during normal aging. Brain Struct Funct. 2011 Jun;216(2):85–89. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s00429-011-0308-y. pmid:21431333
  69. 69. Jiang CH, Tsien JZ, Schultz PG, Hu Y. The effects of aging on gene expression in the hypothalamus and cortex of mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98(4):1930–1934. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1930.
  70. 70. Bucala R, Model P, Cerami A. Modification of DNA by reducing sugars: a possible mechanism for nucleic acid aging and age-related dysfunction in gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1984;81(1):105–109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.105.
  71. 71. Oleaga C, Welten S, Belloc A, Solé A, Rodriguez L, Mencia N, et al. Identification of novel Sp1 targets involved in proliferation and cancer by functional genomics. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012 Dec;84(12):1581–1591. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.09.014. pmid:23018034