Total antigens from Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes, solubilized with sodium cholate (dsLp), were formulated within ultradeformable nanovesicles (dsLp-ultradeformable archaeosomes, (dsLp-UDA), and dsLp-ultradeformable liposomes (dsLp-UDL)) and topically administered to Balb/c mice. Ultradeformable nanovesicles can penetrate the intact stratum corneum up to the viable epidermis, with no aid of classical permeation enhancers that can damage the barrier function of the skin. Briefly, 100 nm unilamellar dsLp-UDA (soybean phosphatidylcholine: Halorubrum tebenquichense total polar lipids (TPL): sodium cholate, 3:3:1 w:w) of -31.45 mV Z potential, containing 4.84 ± 0.53% w/w protein/lipid dsLp, 235 KPa Young modulus were prepared. In vitro, dsLp-UDA was extensively taken up by J774A1 and bone marrow derive cells, and the only that induced an immediate secretion of IL-6, IL-12p40 and TNF-α, followed by IL-1β, by J774A1 cells. Such extensive uptake is a key feature of UDA ascribed to the highly negatively charged archaeolipids of the TPL, which are recognized by a receptor specialized in uptake and not involved in downstream signaling. Despite dsLp alone was also immunostimulatory on J774A1 cells, applied twice a week on consecutive days along 7 weeks on Balb/c mice, it raised no measurable response unless associated to UDL or UDA. The highest systemic response, IgGa2 mediated, 1 log lower than im dsLp Al2O3, was elicited by dsLp-UDA. Such findings suggest that in vivo, UDL and UDA acted as penetration enhancers for dsLp, but only dsLp-UDA, owed to its pronounced uptake by APC, succeeded as topical adjuvants. The actual TPL composition, fully made of sn2,3 ether linked saturated archaeolipids, gives the UDA bilayer resistance against chemical, physical and enzymatic attacks that destroy ordinary phospholipids bilayers. Together, these properties make UDA a promising platform for topical drug targeted delivery and vaccination, that may be of help for countries with a deficient healthcare system.
Citation: Higa LH, Arnal L, Vermeulen M, Perez AP, Schilrreff P, Mundiña-Weilenmann C, et al. (2016) Ultradeformable Archaeosomes for Needle Free Nanovaccination with Leishmania braziliensis Antigens. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0150185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150185
Editor: Bhaskar Saha, National Center for Cell Science, INDIA
Received: November 2, 2015; Accepted: February 10, 2016; Published: March 2, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Higa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by PIP 2010-893, PICT 2011-2402, Secretaria de Investigaciones, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. PS has a fellowship from National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Vaccination is considered the best hope for control of all forms of leishmania diseases, and the development of a safe, effective and affordable antileishmanial vaccine is a critical global public-health priority . Nanovaccination, an approach relying on the higher uptake of nanoparticles compared to that of soluble material by antigen presenting cells (APC), results in enhanced antigen processing, lymphocyte priming and subsequent adaptive immune response. A growing number of ad-hoc designed nanoparticles is being tested as first (soluble or nanoparticle associated antigens without immunomodulatory activity) or second (nanoparticle associated antigens with immunomodulatory activity) generation adjuvants , entering clinical trials and commercialization . The nanovaccination approach offers a new portfolio of adjuvants, which may help to overcome the challenges of vaccinating in countries of poor sanitary infrastructure, lacking of trained personnel, cold chain maintenance, proper waste management, syringes sterilization.
Probably because of its character of neglected disease, up to the moment no commercial vaccine is available to prevent the muco-cutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL), a highly morbid, inflammatory and disfiguring infection, mostly prevalent in Southamerica . One of the factors contributing to slow down its development is the important genetic and biological divergence amongst L. major /L. infantum and L. braziliensis , which demands that polyvalent vaccines include a critical fragment of L. braziliensis antigens [6–8]. The recombinant antigens LEISH F1, is a protein comprised of three fragments conserved across various Leishmania species including L. donovani, and L. chagasi, causative agents of New World visceral leishmaniasis, and L. braziliensis [9, 10]. A vaccine in development by the Infectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI, Seattle, WA) and currently in phase I and II clinical trials combines LEISHF1 with the powerful adjuvants MPL-SE. The last consists of the TLR4 ligand Monophosphoryl Lipid A, an attenuated form of Lipid A from Salmonella Minnesota R595 (GSK), in a stable oil-in-water emulsion (made of squalene, Pluronic F68, glycerol, α-tocopherol and phospholipids). Squalene emulsions adjuvanted vaccines, although used against life threatening infections, have raised a number of concerns; are said for instance, to be excellent for priming, but not to boost pre existing immune responses well , other have been associated with narcolepsy in children and adolescents in northern European countries . Emulsion adjuvants in general can bring also stability challenges for many antigens, particularly if a single dose liquid vial is preferred . Whereas the overall risk benefit in prophylactic vaccination against pandemic and prepandemic lethal viral fevers was declared positive by the WHO , the use of squalene emulsions to adjuvant vaccines against a disease caused by a non lethal protozoan parasite is at least uncertain.
In this scenario, developing adjuvants different from squalene-containing o/w emulsions for vaccination against protozoan becomes an attractive subject to address. For instance, an initial study performed in our laboratory using for the first time archaeosomes, nanovesicles made of total polar lipids (TPL) from the hyperhalophile archaea Halorubrum tebenquichense, to immunize C3H/HeN mice against the model antigen bovine serum albumin, showed these archaeosomes recalled antigen specific Th1 biased and memory responses . Later, we found that 3 sc doses of Trypanosoma cruzi (a protozoan trypanosomatide parasite close to Leishmania) total antigens adjuvanted with the same archaeosomes, were sufficient to protect Balb c mice from a lethal challenge with trypomastigotes of the Tulahuen strain . These result encouraged us to test novel adjuvants containing TPL from H. tebenquichense, to elicit protective responses against protozoan parasites by non parenteral route. Topical and mucosal vaccines offer several advantages over injectables: are easier to administer, carry less risk of transmitting infections, and could simplify the manufacture process, thereby facilitating vaccine production and mass deployment . Because of this, the present proof of concept is aimed to test the immune response by topical nanovaccination on Balb/c mice, to proteins extracted from Leishmania braziliensis. To that aim the proteins were loaded within nanovesicles having the same TPL than original archaeosomes, plus an edge activator that decreases the Young modulus of the bilayer, named ultradeformable archaeosomes (UDA). More specifically, the UDA are ultradeformable nanovesicles made of soybean phosphatidylcholine (SPC): sodium cholate (NaChol) and TPL at 3: 1: 3 w: w. The actual TPL composition, fully made of sn 2,3 ether linked saturated archaeolipids, gives the archaeosomes bilayer resistance against chemical, physical and enzymatic attacks that destroy ordinary phospholipids bilayers . The same as archaeosomes, UDA display higher chemical and colloidal stability than the so called ultradeformable liposomes (UDL, nanovesicles made of SPC:NaChol 6:1 w:w), (unpublished results). The same as UDL, upon topically applied under non occlusive conditions, the UDA can penetrate the intact stratum corneum up to the viable epidermis, with no aid of classical permeation enhancers that can damage the barrier function of the skin. The TPL content of UDA is responsible for its much more pronounced capture by phagocytic /immature antigen presenting cells than UDL . Such properties, together with higher physic-chemical and colloidal stability make UDA a promising platform for topical drug targeted delivery and adjuvancy, that may be of help for countries with a deficient healthcare system. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report proposing a needle free vaccination strategy against CL from a New World leishmania specie.
Materials and Methods
Soybean phosphatidylcholine (SPC) (phospholipon 90 G, purity >90%) was a gift from Phospholipid/Natterman, Germany. Sodium cholate (NaChol), 1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(Lissamine™ rhodamine B sulfonyl) (Rh-PE), Sephadex G-75, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), aluminiumnitrat nonahydrat (Al(NO3)3 x 9H2O), 2,2'-Azino-bis(3-Ethylbenzthiazoline-6-Sulfonic Acid) (ABTS), Lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli (LPS) and horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse IgA antibody were from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Anti-mouse IgG1 and IgG2a were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse IgG was from Chemicon International Millipore. Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 and modified Eagle’s medium (MEM) were from Gibco®, Life Technologies (New York, USA). Fetal calf serum (FCS), antibiotic/antimycotic solution (penicillin 10,000 IU/ml, streptomycin sulfate 10 mg/mL, amphotericin B 25 μg/ml), glutamine, and trypsin/ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid were from PAA Laboratories GmbH (Pasching, Austria). Complete RPMI (comp-RPMI) was prepared with RPMI 1640, 10% FCS, 5.5×10−5 M β-mercaptoethanol from Sigma-Aldrich, and antibiotic/antimycotic solution. Dendritic cell RPMI (DC-RPMI) was prepared with comp-RPMI plus 100 IU/ml of murine recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rmGM-CSF) (Pepro Tech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade.
Archaebacteria growth, extraction and characterization of total polar lipids
Halorubrum tebenquichense archaeas, isolated from soil samples of Salina Chica, Península de Valdés, Chubut, Argentina were grown in 8 L batch cultures in basal medium supplemented with yeast extract and glucose . Cultures were monitored by absorbance at 660 nm and harvested in late stationary phase for storage as frozen cell pastes.
Total lipids were extracted from frozen and thawed biomass using the Bligh and Dyer method modified for extreme halophiles and the Total Polar Lipid (TPL) fraction was collected by precipitation from cold acetone . Between 90 and 120 mg TPL were isolated from each culture batch. The reproducibility of each TPL extract´s composition was routinely screened by phosphate content  and electro spray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) as described in Higa et al. 2012 .
Keratinocytes and macrophages.
Human keratinocytes (HaCaT cells) were supplied by Dr. Salvatierra of Fundación Instituto Leloir (Buenos Aires, Argentina) and murine macrophages (J774A.1 cells) were supplied by Dr. Ugalde from Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad de San Martin (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Cells were routinely cultured in MEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% antibiotic/antimycotic and 2 mM glutamine, at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 95% humidity.
Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes (strain HOM/BR75/M2903) supplied by Dr. Fragueiro and Dr. Luna from Instituto Nacional de Parasitología Dr Mario Fatala Chaben were cultured at 26°C in Schneider culture medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 2 mM glutamine. Promastigotes were harvested from stationary phase cultures by centrifugation, washed three times with 10 mM Tris buffer plus 0.9% w/v NaCl, pH 7.4 (Tris buffer) and frozen at -20°C prior to use.
Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs).
Six-month old Balb/c mice were used as bone marrow donors. BMDCs were generated as described previously . Briefly, after all muscle tissues were removed from the femurs, the bones were washed twice with phosphate-buffer saline (pH 7.4) (PBS) and transferred into a fresh dish with RPMI 1640 medium. Both ends of the bones were cut with scissors in the dish. Then the marrow was flushed out using 2 ml of RPMI 1640 with a syringe and 25-gauge needle. The tissue was suspended and passed through a 100 μm cell strainer (BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) to remove small pieces of bone and debris. Red cells were lysed with 0.45 M ammonium chloride, and the remaining cells were washed, and suspended at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml in DC-RPMI medium with two additional supplementation of medium containing rmGM-CSF in 100 mm Petri dishes (5 x106 cells/dish). After 9 days of culture, approximately 80% of the harvested cells expressed MHC class II and CD11c.
Preparation of detergent-solubilized L. braziliensis proteins
A whole-cell extract was prepared as described by Santos et al., 2006. Briefly, stationary phase promastigotes were washed three times in Tris buffer (5 min centrifuged at 250 g) disrupted by 10 freeze and thaw cycles, and submitted to probe-type ultrasonication (Sonics Vibra cell) at 50% amplitude (130 Watts), for 10 min in an ice bath. The protein concentration in the whole-cell extract was estimated by Bradford using ovalbumin as standard .
To obtain the detergent-solubilized L. braziliensis proteins (dsLp), the whole-cell extract of L. braziliensis was incubated with 10, 5 or 1.25% w/v NaChol for 45 min at 4°C; the resultant dsLp was recovered from filtration through 0.45 μm pores nylon filter.
Whole-cell extract and dsLp were run by electrophoresis in 7.5–15% linear gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE) . Briefly, the samples were mixed with 62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8; 2% w/v SDS, 10% v/v glycerol, 5% v/v β-mercaptoethanol and 0.001% w/v bromophenol blue and heated at 95°C for 5 min prior electrophoresis. Proteins were separated at a constant voltage of 100 V, using a running buffer containing 0.025 M Tris, 0.192 M glycine pH 8.3 and 0.1% w/v SDS. The staining was performed with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 followed by silver staining. The ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) was used to scan the 63 kDa band of the dsLp, and to quantify the amount of dsLp associated to UDA or UDL. To that aim, a plot of the signal of growing amounts of dsLp protein vs mass protein (5–30 μg) was fitted by linear regression. Then the dsLp signal in UDA or UDL was extrapolated to render the actual protein mass associated to each nanovesicle.
Preparation and characterization of nanovesicles
Empty nanovesicles: ultradeformable archaeosomes (UDA, made of TPL:SPC:NaChol, 3:3:1 w:w), ultradeformable liposomes (UDL, made of SPC:NaChol, 6:1 w:w) and conventional liposomes (L, fully made of SPC); and dsLp-containing nanovesicles: dsLp-containing UDA (dsLp-UDA) and dsLp-containing UDL (dsLp-UDL), were prepared by the thin film hydration method.
Empty nanovesicles: appropriate amounts of SPC in chloroform, and TPL and NaChol in chloroform: methanol (1:1, v/v), were mixed in round bottom flasks. Solvents were rotary evaporated at 40°C until elimination, the lipid films were flushed with N2 and hydrated with aqueous phase (Tris-HCl buffer) up to a final concentration of 43 mg of phospholipids/ml followed by extrusion.
dsLp-containing nanovesicles: the lipid films were prepared as detailed above, but hydrated with dsLp having NaChol at 10, 5 and 1.25% w/v in Tris-HCl buffer) up to 43 mg of phospholipids/ml. The resultant suspensions were sonicated (45 minutes with a bath-type sonicator 80 W, 40 KHz) and extruded 15 times through three stacked 0.2–0.1- and 0.1-μm pore size polycarbonate filters using a 100 ml Thermobarrel extruder (Northern Lipids, Vancouver, Canada). After extrusion, nanovesicles were submitted to five freeze-thaw cycles between −70°C and 40°C. Finally, nanovesicles were separated from free dsLp by gel filtration on Sephadex G-75 using the minicolumn centrifugation technique .
Rh-PE-labelled vesicles: Rh-PE was dissolved in chloroform and 12.5 nmol was added to the organic solution of lipids (nearly 2800:1 w:w phospholipids:Rh-PE); nanovesicles were prepared as detailed above.
Phospholipids were quantified by Bötcher microassay . The dsLp proteins associated to UDA or UDL was quantified as stated in Preparation of detergent-solubilized L. braziliensis proteins.
Size and Z potential.
Size and Zeta potential were determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and phase analysis light scattering (PALS) respectively, using a nanoZsizer apparatus (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, United Kingdom).
Aliquots of nanovesicles were dropped on a standard carbon-coated cooper transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grid and then air-dried at room temperature overnight. TEM images were obtained with a JEM 1011 (Jeol, New York, NY) electron microscope at 80 kV.
Aliquots of nanovesicles diluted in Tris buffer with 10 mM CaCl2 were dropped on mica as the substrate. Vesicles were stood for 15 min to be washed with 1 ml of Milli-Q water. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were obtained with a Multimode Scanning Probe Microscope (Veeco, Santa Barbara, CA) equipped with a Nanoscope V controller operating in tapping mode at room temperature.
The nanovesicles deformability (D) was calculated according to Van den Bergh , having D = J(rv/rp)2, where J is the rate of penetration through a permeability barrier, rv is the size of nanovesicles after extrusion, and rp is the pore size of the barrier. To measure J, nanovesicles were extruded through two stacked 50 nm (rp) membranes at 0.8 MPa using a Thermobarrel extruder. Extruded volume was collected along 15 min, each fraction was quantified for phospholipids, and J calculated as the area under the curve of the plot of recovered phospholipids as a function of time. The average vesicle diameter after extrusion (rv) was measured by DLS.
Young Modulus determination through Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
Sample preparation and Force Curves acquisition.
The mechanical properties of conventional, non ultradeformable (SPC), empty (UDA, UDL) and dsLp nanovesicles were determined as described by Arnal et al. 2012 . All the measurements were done using a Multimode Scanning Probe Microscope (Veeco, Santa Barbara, CA) equipped with a Nanoscope V controller. The nanovesicles were electrostatically immobilized onto polyethyleneimine (0.1% w/v) pre-incubated glass slides and immediately mounted in the AFM liquid chamber. Fifty microliters of PBS were added to the chamber in order to maintain the samples hydrated during the course of the experiments. The measurements were done using contact sharpened silicon nitride probes (NP-10, Veeco) with a nominal tip radius between 20–60 nm. The cantilever spring constant (Kc) was determined for every probe before starting the measurements using the Thermal Tune method and flat muscovite mica (SPI V-1 grade) as a flat rigid surface for photodetector sensitivity calibration, the experimental Kc values were between 0.08 and 0.13 N/m. To acquire the Force vs. Distances curves on the surface of nanovesicles the Force Volume (FV) tool with a routine of 32 x 32 force curves at a scan rate of 1Hz was used. Note that different scan rates within 0.1 and 2 produced similar results. A limit in the highest applied force (10 nN) was established in order not to damage the samples during the FV acquisition.
Force curves analysis and Young Modulus determination.
The nanoindentation analysis was done using in house developed software  following previously described procedures [28–30]. First we determined the contact point of the force curves; which was done manually by determining the exact point were the curves begin to lift from the noncontact baseline. Then the approximation segment of the Force vs. Distance curves were transformed into Force vs. Indentation curves by subtracting at constant loading force the Z-displacement measured in a vesicle and the respective Z-displacement measured on a hard surface (clean flat mica). All the resulting Force vs. Indentation curves showed a non-linear behaviour at low force, which were fitted using a Hertz model to determine the Young Modulus. The selected Hertz model was the one that considers a conical tip shape since it was the model that bests fitted our experimental data. The equation for the Hertz model [31, 32] is the following: F = 2E tanα δ2/π (1-ν2); where F is force, E is the Young Modulus, α is the half opening angle of the conical indenter (53°; based in geometrical characteristics of the tip and scanning electron microscopy observations), δ is the indentation and ν is the Poisson radius which for soft biological samples is assumed to be 0.5 [33, 34].
Viability of keratinocytes, macrophages and bone marrow-derived dendritic cells
HaCaT, J774A.1 cells and BMDCs were seeded at a density of 5 x 104 and 9 x 104 cells per well, respectively, onto 96-well flat-bottom plates and grown for 24 h at 37°C. Then, the medium was replaced by 100 μL of fresh medium with 5% FCS containing decreasing concentrations of empty UDA/UDL or dsLp- UDA/UDL in a half-fold dilution series (1.6 to 0.2 mg/ml of phospholipids, corresponding to 72 to 9 μg/ml of dsLp in UDL and 56 to 7 μg/ml of dsLp in UDA) or dsLp alone (200 to 50 μg/ml) and cells were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After that, the medium was removed and replaced by 0.5 mg/ml of MTT. After 3 hours of incubation, the MTT solution was removed, the insoluble formazan crystals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, and absorbance was measured at 570 nm in a microplate reader (Dynex Technologies, MRX tc, Chantilly, Virginia). The cell viability was expressed as a percentage of the viability of cells grown in medium.
Pro-inflammatory cytokine production
J774A.1 and BMDCs were seeded at a density of 5 x 104 cells per well onto 24-well plates and grown for 24 h at 37°C. Then, the medium was replaced by fresh medium with 5% FCS containing: empty UDA and UDL, dsLp-UDA and dsLp-UDL (0.8 mg/ml phospholipids), dsLp alone (10 and 50 μg/ml) and LPS (1 μg/ml). Supernatants were collected at 14 h and 48 h and TNF-α, IL12p40, IL 6 and IL1-β production were measured by ELISA using a BD Kit.
Nanovesicles uptake by BMDC
The uptake of Rh-PE-labeled nanovesicles by BMDCs was determined by flow cytometry. BMCDs cells seeded at a density of 3.5×105 cells per well onto 6-well microplates were grown for 24 h at 37°C. The medium was replaced with fresh RPMI with 5% FCS containing Rh-PE-labeled nanovesicles, UDA and UDL at 0.8 mg/ml phospholipids, and cells were incubated for 1, 3, and 5 h at 37°C. After incubation, the supernatant was removed and loose cells were washed with PBS. Cells were suspended in PBS, and a total of 1 x 105 cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (BD FACSCalibur™; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Data were analyzed using WinMDI 2.9 software (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).
Male 6-8-week-old Balb/c mice were obtained from Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Mice were housed 5 per cage and keep in a ventilated room under controlled conditions at constant room temperature 22°C, with 12/12 h light-dark cycle and free access to food and water. All procedures requiring animals were performed in agreement with institutional guidelines and were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the National University of Quilmes, Argentina. All animals were treated in a humance way, following the guidelines listed in “Guide for the Humance Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (NIH publication). Five mice per group were immunized according to the schemes shown in Table 1. Topical samples were dropped on manually trimmed hair, intact back skin surface of each mouse over an area of 2 cm2. Mice were kept in individual cages for 30 min until drops had dried. At the end of experimentation (3 months) animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation.
Blood was collected from the tail veins at weekly intervals up to 8 weeks. Salivary washes were collected at 0, 35 and 49 days. To that aim, 100 μl of pilocarpine-HCl (1mg/ml in PBS) were i.p injected and after 1 min, the saliva was collected with a micropipette without damaging the gingival tissue. The samples were kept frozen at -20°C until use.
IgG antibody and isotypes in blood samples and IgA antibody in salivary washes samples were analyzed by ELISA. Briefly, microtiter plates were coated overnight at 4°C with 45 μg/ml dsLp in 0.1 M carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) and then blocked with PBS containing 0.2% Tween 20 (0.2% PBST) for 1 h at 37°C after washing with 0.05% PBST. After another washing, 100 μL of three-fold dilutions of individual sera in 0.05% PBST was added. After 2 h at 37°C and further washing, the plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG diluted 1:2000 in 0.025% PBST. To determine the antibody isotyping, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgG1 or IgG2a revealing antisera, diluted 1:1000, were used. The plates were further washed and incubated with ABTS for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. The absorbance was measured at 405 nm using a microplate reader. Antibody titers were represented as end-point dilutions exhibiting an optical density of 0.3 units above background.
The IgA titers of salivary washes were determined in the same fashion.
Characterization of nanovesicles containing detergent-solubilized leishmania proteins
Both the whole-cell extract of leishmania promastigotes and its supernatant have been indistinctly used as antigenic material in in vitro tests and as pre-clinical and clinical vaccine candidates [35–37]. Besides, it has been observed that detergent-solubilized proteins of a crude extract of L. amazonensis amastigotes reconstituted in dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine: dipalmitoylphosphatidylserine: cholesterol nanovesicles, produce protein specific antibodies and partially protects Balb/c mice to infection with L. amazonensis promastigotes . Moreover, the centrifugation pellet of the whole-cell extract from L. amazonensis and L. braziliensis promastigotes was reported to be more antigenic than the supernatant .
Formulating voluminous antigens higher than small model proteins within UD nanovesicles however, proved complex. For instance, attempts to solubilize the lipid film with whole-cell extract-containing buffer (or its centrifugation pellet) led to macroscopic precipitate (data not shown). To overcome such drawback, the whole cell extract was solubilized as smaller mixed micelles, which could be fully suspended in aqueous media, making feasible their trapping within the inner space of nanovesicles. The whole-cell extract of leishmania promastigotes can be solubilized employing different hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance and critical micellar concentration (cmc) detergents, such as sodium deoxycholate, NaChol, sodium dodecylsulphate or octylglucopiranoside [38–41]. We chose NaChol because it forms part of UDL and UDA bilayers as the edge activator and because of its non denaturing character. The cmc of NaChol is 0.6–0.7% w/v; above that limit, micelles of 14 nm size are formed; at 1% w/v, NaChol is known to solubilize more than 90% axonal membrane proteins of bovine brain . We found that 1.25% w/v NaChol solubilized the whole-cell extract as 25 nm mixed micelles (dsLp) of 4.8 mg/ml proteins and 3.3 mg/ml phosphate. The SDS-PAGE of the whole-cell extract and of dsLp showed a similar band pattern (Fig 1A and 1B) (meaning that most of the proteins were solubilized within mixed micelles), dominated by a highly intense 63 KDa band accompanied by heavy proteins and less intense lighter bands. The 63 KDa band could correspond to the GP65 promastigote surface glycoprotein, already described in several species of leishmania [43, 44]. Since the presence of NaChol interferes with protein colorimeric methods, the densitometric intensity of the 63 KDa band was used to estimate the minimal protein content in dsLp and in nanovesicles. Structural properties of empty and dsLp-loaded nanonanovesicles are shown in Table 2.
(A) Gradient (7.5%-15%) PAGE of whole-cell extract (5 to 30 μg, lanes 1 to 4) and dsLp (5 to 30 μg, lanes 6 to 9) from L. braziliensis, separated by molecular mass markers (lane 5). (B) Calibration curve PAGE for dsLp (5–30 μg, lanes 1 to 4); molecular mass marker (lane 5); dsLp-UDA (20 μl, lanes 6 and 7); dsLp-UDL (20 μl, lanes 8 and 9). (C) A plot of phospholipids from nanovesicles extruded across 50 nm pore size membranes versus time. Values represented mean ± SD. (D) Hydrodynamic diameter of dsLp and dsLp- nanovesicles measured by dynamic light scattering expressed in intensity, volume and number mode. The percentages indicated the proportion of each structure.
dsLp-UDA and dsLp-UDL resulted to be ∼100 nm diameter nanovesicles, the same size order of UDA and UDL. The potential structural destabilization on nanovesicles induced by dsLp, was assessed by determining their size by DLS after 24 h; the presence of unilamellar nanovesicles was further confirmed by TEM (Fig 2A and 2C) and by AFM (Fig 2B and 2D). By DLS, the occurrence of heterogeneous populations having 15–25 nm diameter micelles growing at expenses of higher sized nanovesicles in particular for dsLp-UDA, was revealed. The size heterogeneity of nanovesicles was less pronounced for films suspended with dsLp 1.25% w/v NaChol (Fig 1D); for that reason, dsLp-nanovesicles were prepared with dsLp 1.25% w/v NaChol. By AFM the dsLp-UDA–despite of its high Z potential-, appeared as aggregated nanovesicles, probably because of ionic bridging with CaCl2 employed to fix the nanovesicles to the mica substrate.
(A and B) dsLp-UDA. (C and D) dsLp-UDL. (A and C) TEM images (30000 X). (B and D) Three-dimensional AFM scans.
The plot of phospholipids crossing a nanoporous barrier as a function of time is shown in Fig 1C. The calculated D of dsLp-nanovesicles was reduced nearly 3.5 folds as compared to empty nanovesicles, and nearly four folds above that of conventional non ultradeformable nanovesicles (Table 2).
Young Modulus determination through AFM
The Young´s modulus (E) or longitudinal elastic modulus is the ratio between the increased tension applied by traction (in the zone of elastic behavior of the material) (dσ) and the resultant increased relative deformation (dε) (E: dσ/dε). E is a measure of a material rigidity: the higher the elastic modulus is the more rigid material.
AFM is a growingly used technique to acquire soft matter images, such as molecular crystals, proteins and live cells . AFM is a well-suited technique for studying structural features of nanovesicles enabling the simultaneous nanoscale analysis of shape and mechanical properties of the bilayers. It allows picking up surface topographical images with a space resolution close to 1 Å and force vs. distance curves with a detection limit close to 10−12 N.
Our results showed in first place that E values for conventional nanovesicles are coincident with bibliographic data (1.97 ± 0.75 x 106 Pa for adsorbed EggPC nanovesicles . The Young´s modulus for UDL and UDA were between 3 and 4 folds lower than that of conventional nanovesicles. The difference was coincident with the higher D of UDA and UDL as compared to conventional non ultradeformable nanovesicles determined by the Van der Berg method. The Young´s module for dsLp- nanovesicles was in the order of the corresponding to empty ultradeformable nanovesicles (Table 2).
Neither the empty or dsLp- nanovesicles nor dsLp in the range of tested concentrations were cytotoxic to macrophages, keratinocytes or BMDC (Fig 3).
Pro-inflammatory cytokines induction on BMDC and J774A1 cells and uptake by BMDC
In (Fig 4A–4D) the cytokine levels on J774A1 macrophages supernatants induced by dsLp and dsLp-nanovesicles are depicted. Neither UDL, UDA nor dsLp-UDL induced pro inflammatory cytokines. dsLp alone, at 50 μg/ml induced an early onset of IL-12p40 followed by high level of IL-6; no TNF-α or IL-1 β induction was registered. dsLp-UDA however, was the only to induce an early onset of IL-6, IL-12p40 and TNF- α, followed 34 h later by high IL-1 β titers.
Cells were incubated along 14 and 48 h with UDA, UDL, dsLp-UDA, dsLp-UDL, dsLp alone and LPS (TLR4 agonist) as positive control. The absorbance of the basal condition (non-stimulated cells, incubated with culture media as negative control) was subtracted to that of each cytokine concentration. Each point represents the media of n = 3 and its corresponding SD. ** denotes p < 0.01, *** denotes p < 0.001; n.s. not significant. (A) TNF- α levels in J774A1 supernatants. (B) IL-12p40 levels in J774A1 supernatants. (C) IL-6 levels in J774A1 supernatants. (D) IL-1β levels in J774A1 supernatants. (E) IL-12p40 levels in BMDC supernatants. (F) IL-6 levels in BMDC supernatants.
The cytokine response of BMDC to dsLp-UDA however, was milder and transient than in J774A1cells: no IL1-β or TNF-α were detected, low and transient titers of IL-6 and IL-12p40, this last fading after 48h (Fig 4E and 4F).
In Fig 5, the uptake of empty nanovesicles by BMDC is shown; a nearly eightfold higher uptake of UDA compared to UDL is observed.
Values represent mean ± SD, ** denotes p < 0.01
Fluorescently labeled UDA or UDL were incubated 1, 3 or 5 h with BMCD at 37°C. The cells fluorescence resulting from internalized nanovesicles was quantified by flow cytometry.
The humoral immune response generated after topical weekly applications of dsLp-nanovesicles was compared to that generated after topical dsLp and by i.m. alum adsorbed dsLp, as a positive control of dsLp immunogenicity. The titers rose by topical dsLp-UDA were 1 log higher than those of dsLp-UDL. The response remained constant up to the day 49, while that of dsLp-UDL faded rapidly within 3 weeks (Fig 6A). The topical application of dsLp did not raise measurable IgG titers. None of the topical administrations induced IgA titers in salivary washes.
In mice, IgG2a produced from Th1 cells indicates cell-mediated immunity, and IgG1 produced from Th2 cells indicates humoral immunity. Therefore, the balance between Th1 and Th2 cells (Th1/Th2 ratio) can be represented as the IgG2a/IgG1 ratio. The isotype analysis of samples taken the 49 day showed that i.m alum adsorbed dsLp raised a mixed isotype profile with IgG1/IgG2a ~1. In contrast, dsLp-UDA induced preferentially the IgG2a isotype, suggesting a Th1 polarized response (Fig 6B).
The success of needle free vaccination largely depends on counting on carriers ultradeformable enough to efficiently penetrate the intact stratum corneum to bring their payload across the skin. In a previous work, we found that UDA carrying ovalbumin (ova, a 42.7 KDa, 6 nm diameter globular protein) (ova-UDA) raised an IgG2a-biased anti-ova systemic response ten folds higher than ova-UDL, after topical application on Balb/c mice . The immune response to topical stimulus was enabled by the ultradeformable nanovesicles delivering ova across and beyond the stratum corneum, presumably through the lipid canyons that separate keratinocyte clusters of the skin upper layers [. Such canyons occasionally extend down to depths comparable to that of the dermal–epidermal junction below the flat surface regions in porcine and human skin [48, 49].Upon topical non-occlusive application, the fluorescence of Alexa Fluor 647 labeled ova within UDL or UDA, allows to indirectly estimate a rough canyons thickness of 50–100 μm . This is in good agreement with the 10–25 μm width canyons separating keratinocyte clusters of 100–250 μm diameter, recently assessed by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy [. Canyons, despite of being wide enough so as to allow the passage of 100 nm diameter nanovesicles, are filled with lipids enclosing water nanochannels, that nanovesicles are thought to penetrate . However, these extremely thin pathways [48, 52]. scarcely distributed across the canyons, together with the impaired material diffusion through the lipid filling organized in orthorhombic lateral packing lamellas , and the intercellular unions (corneo-desmosomes in stratum corneum, tight junctions in upper viable epidermis) , may constitute a physical constraint to the penetration of bulky structures carried by UDL or UDA  (Fig 7).
Scheme depicting the main structural sections of the skin: stratum corneum (SC), viable epidermis and dermis, and barriers to permeation-penetration (not a scale): The diffusive pathway across the lipids of the SC is mediated by disordered bilayers, represented by the X-ray diffraction pattern corresponding to the lateral packing in liquid phase of bilayers shown in a) (distance between planes ∼0.46 nm). Bilayers b) and c) with more organized lateral packing (distance between planes 0.41 and 0.41–0.37 nm, respectively), not involved in diffusion across the skin. The interaction between ultradeformable nanovesicles (UDN), conventional liposomes, hydrophilic solutes and lipids at the SC surface is also represented. Ultradeformable nanovesicles and hydrophilic solutes penetrate across hydrophilic leads in the canyons in-between corneocyte clusters. A scheme of ultradeformable nanovesicles and associated cargo crossing an hydrophilic channel in the SC. The colloidal structure is lost below the surface. The associated cargo penetrates along with the lipid bilayers. No endocytic uptake occurs at I and II levels since the SC is made of dead corneocytes. Below 10 μm depth, endocytic uptake of material penetrating across hydrophilic channels accessing the viable epidermis may occur. Epidermis: stratum basale (SB), stratum spinosum (SS), stratum granulosum (SG). (Dermo epidermal basal membrane is represented as black line and the reticular capillary plexus in the dermis as red dots)
An interesting example is constituted by aqueous suspension of Quantum Dots (QDots, pegylated CdSe/ZnS core/shell 12 nm x 6 nm ellipsoidal bulky stiff nanoparticles), that upon topical application do penetrate the skin up to the viable epidermis. When loaded within ultradeformable nanovesicles however, the QDots remain stacked at the first layers of the stratum corneum and do not penetrate . Such observation challenges the notion of needing ultradeformable nanovesicles to grant the penetration of particulate cargo. It suggests also that factors such as size, shape and even stiffness of particulate cargo may account for its penetration, beyond the simple association to ultradeformable nanovesicles (Fig 7). According to this view, the dsLp used in this work, of size in the range of a QD (nearly 3 folds higher than ovalbumin), were good candidates to stack on the first stratum corneum layers despite of loaded within ultradeformable nanovesicles. Indeed, such phenomenon was suspected while estimating bilayer deformability at the first steps of dsLp-nanovesicles structural characterization. When the deformability (D, a parameter inversely proportional to the Young modulus (E)) of dsLp- nanovesicles was measured by the Van der Bergh method, we found it lower than that of empty ones. On the contrary, the deformability of dsLp-nanovesicles determined by AFM was similar to that of empty ones. This apparent discrepancy would obey to a stacking of the oversized (~ 25 nm) dsLp mixed micelles during extrusion, which caused a reduced phospholipid flux. The calculated D would result from a steric hindrance caused by packing constraints of cargo and not from reduced bilayer deformability. Since the second method measures the cantilever deflection on surface patches of individual nanovesicles, the AFM is thus a more realistic determination of nanovesicles deformability carrying oversized cargoes. As indicated above, the physical constraint imposed by dsLp to nanovesicles extruded across 50 nm filter pores, suggested that in vivo the dsLp- ultradeformable nanovesicles could end up stacked within the stratum corneum the same as QD-UDL, thus spoiling the topical immunization. In our experimental setting however, after dropping a weekly dosage of dsLp-nanovesicles on the intact skin of Balb/c mice, dsLp and dsLp-UDL failed at inducing systemic IgG titers, but dsLp-UDA was the only topical formulation that successfully raised a sustained systemic antigen specific response. Despite of its low protein/lipid ratio (3.5% vs 12.5% for ova-UDA), dsLp-UDA induced 1 log lower serum titers than i.m. dsLp-alum adsorbed, but was tenfold more immunogenic than ova-UDA (that rendered 2 log lower serum titers than i.m. ova-alum adsorbed ). Topical dsLp-UDA induced IgG2a only (which in mice suggests a Th1 biased response, as required for vaccination against Leishmania) , whereas the response to i.m. dsLp alum-adsorbed was a mixed IgG isotype.
As previously determined in ., J774A1 macrophages capture empty UDA much more extensively than UDL. UDA in other words is a more efficient carrier for material delivery to phagocytic cells than UDL. Here UDA and UDL showed to be were non immunogenic, since no pro inflammatory cytokines were detected in macrophages supernatants; instead, macrophages responded only to dsLp and dsLp-nanovesicles. The immune responses to dsLp-UDL, however were of low intensity and faded soon. DsLp-UDA was the only capable of inducing an immediate secretion of IL-6, IL-12p40 and TNF-α, followed by high TNF-α and IL-1β titers in J774A1 cells. The response was aroused with lower amounts of proteins (28 μg/ml dsLp as dsLp-UDA vs 50 μg/ml dsLp alone), suggesting that UDA may enhance the immunogenicity of dsLp.
In particular, TNF-α level raised by dsLp-UDA was not only higher than the induced by dsLp alone, but also by the classical TLR4 ligand LPS (the source of the potent MPLA, a well-known immunostimulatory adjuvant present in commercial emulsions such as AS04). Interestingly, dsLp-UDA was the only stimulus that induced a remarkable elevation of IL-1β. Similar to TNF-α, IL-1β is a major pro-inflammatory cytokine considered as an alarm signal secreted by macrophages. IL-1β initiates and propagates inflammation by inducing the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells and leukocytes [57, 58]. This cytokine was reported to be involved in a protective immune response against Leishmania spp. IL-1β affects the pathogenicity of leishmania by generating an inflammatory response in afflicted tissues and by modulating adaptive T cell mediated immune responses, which act to limit parasite dissemination [59, 60]. Substantive experimental evidence suggests that the MyD88-dependent Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalling, a classical recognition pathway for macrophage activation, is bypassed by the immunologically silent Leishmania spp. [61–66]. Instead, IL-1β has recently been described as initiator of the protective immune response. In particular, the NLRP3 (a member of the Nod-like receptor (NLR) family that senses microbes and cell damage) mediated activation of the inflammasome and subsequent induction of IL-1β signalling, was found to play a key role in host resistance to MCL . The inflammasome are multimeric complexes of proteins, assembled in the host cell cytoplasm in response to specific stress signals or contamination of the cytoplasm by microbial molecules. The canonical inflammasomes are composed of at least three main components: an inflammatory caspase (caspase-1, caspase-11), an adapter molecule (such as ASC), and a sensor protein (such as the NLR family members NLRP1, NLRP3, NLRP12; also NAIP1, NAIP2, NAIP5, or AIM2 [68, 69]. Once activated, caspase-1 induces processing and secretion of IL-1β, which is transcriptionally regulated when microbial components are sensed by pattern recognition receptors . Notably, the activation of the inflammasome leads to autonomous macrophage mechanisms that culminate with the restriction of intracellular parasite replication. These processes involve the regulation of IFN-γ and processing of IL-1β, which facilitates the expression of NOS2, an enzyme that is required for NO-mediated restriction of Leishmania replication in macrophages [71–73]. The fact that IL-1β signalling is crucial for the determination of the severity of disease in humans, underscores an important role for the inflammasome-dependent restriction of Leishmania spp. replication [74, 75].
Unpublished research from our laboratory  suggests that one or more archaeolipids present in the total polar lipids of UDA-presumably the main component PGP Me- are ligand of the Scavenger Receptor Class A I/II (SRAI/II). The SRAI/II is a pattern recognition receptor mainly expressed by macrophages, vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells, primarily involved in endocytic uptake of particulate material (lysosomal enzymes, oxidised acetylated lipoproteins, LPS, bacteria) . Since UDA is pronouncedly captured by macrophages upon SRAI/II recognition, the amount of dsLp antigens available to interact with NLRP3– a cytoplasmic receptor- would be higher if delivered as dsLp-UDA, than as dsLp alone or dsLp-UDL. This may account for the increase of IL-1β induced on J774A1 cells by dsLp-UDA.
On the other hand, the expression of SR A by BMCD is highly dependent on the isolation protocol employed [78, 79]. BMDC were also reported to display NLRP3 mediated inflammasome activation in front to several stimuli [80, 81]. If well the expression of SRA was not screened here, the BMDC have the potential to react similar to macrophages in front to UDA/dsLp-UDA. An extensive uptake of UDA however, was the only response recorded by BMDC. Less likely, a concomitant production of pro inflammatory cytokines to dsLp-UDA may have occurred in a temporal pattern different to that recorded at 14 or 48 h. These findings suggest the cells involved in an in vitro primary response to dsLp-UDA were the macrophages. In vivo, the proteins in dsLp alone were reported to induce IL-12 cytokines . Overall, this first approach showed that the topical Balb/c mice immunization with dsLp-UDA generated a Th1 biased response, as determined by the serum isotypes of dsLp-specific IgG. Further insights are needed to find out if the high UDA-mediated dsLp delivery that led to macrophages secretion of IL-1β, may contribute to an in vivo lethal response to leishmania parasites.
PS has a fellowship from National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET). APP, LHH, ELR and MJM are members of the Research Career Program from CONICET.
Conceived and designed the experiments: MJM ELR. Performed the experiments: LHH LA APP PS CMW MV. Analyzed the data: MEV ELR MJM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MV CMW OY ELR. Wrote the paper: ELR MJM.
- 1. Kedzierski L. Leishmaniasis vaccine: Where are we today? J Global Infect Dis. 2010; 2: 177–85.
- 2. O’Hagan DT, de Gregorio E. The path to a successful vaccine adjuvant -The long and winding road. Drug Discov Today. 2009; 14: 541–51. pmid:19508916
- 3. Zhao L, Seth A, Wibowo N, Zhao CX, Mitter N, Yu C, et al. Nanoparticle vaccines. Vaccine. 2014; 32: 327–37. pmid:24295808
- 4. Ronet C, Beverley SM, Fasel N. Muco-cutaneous leishmaniasis in the New World The ultimate subversion. Virulence. 2011; 2: 547–52. pmid:21971185
- 5. Smith DF, Peacock CS, Cruz AK. Comparative genomics: from genotype to disease phenotype in the leishmaniases. Int J Parasitol. 2007; 37: 1173–86. pmid:17645880
- 6. de Oliveira CI, Nascimento IP, Barral A, Soto M, Barral-Netto M. Challenges and perspectives in vaccination against leishmaniasis. Parasitol Int. 2009; 58: 319–24. pmid:19698801
- 7. Kumar R, Engwerda C. Vaccines to prevent leishmaniasis. Clin Trans Immunol. 2014; 3: e13 eCollection 2014.
- 8. Badiee A, HeraviShargh V, Khamesipour A, Jaafari MR. Micro/nanoparticle adjuvants for antileishmanial vaccines: Present and future trends. Vaccine. 2013; 31: 735–49 pmid:23219436
- 9. Beaumier CM, Gillespie PM, Hotez PJ, Bottazzi ME. New vaccines for neglected parasitic diseases and dengue. Transl Res. 2013; 162(3):144–55. pmid:23578479
- 10. Chakravarty J, Kumar S, Trivedi S, Rai VK, Singh A, Ashman JA. A clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the LEISHF1+MPL-SE vaccine for use in the prevention of visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2011; 29(19): 3531–7. pmid:21414377
- 11. Frey S., Poland G., Percell S, Podda A. Comparison of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a MF59- adjuvanted influenza vaccine and a non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in non-elderly adults. Vaccine 2003; 21: 4234–7 pmid:14505903
- 12. Tsai TF, Crucitti A, Nacci P, Nicolay U, Della Cioppa G, Ferguson J, et al. Explorations of clinical trials and pharmacovigilance databases of MF59(R)- adjuvanted influenza vaccines for associated cases of narcolepsy. Scand. J Infect Dis. 2011; 43: 702–6.
- 13. Brito LA, Malyala P, O’Hagan DT. Vaccine adjuvant formulations: A pharmaceutical perspective. Semin Immunol. 2013; 25: 130–45 pmid:23850011
- 14. http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/reports/Jun_2006/en/
- 15. Gonzalez RO, Higa LH, Cutrullis RA, Bilen M, Morelli I, Roncaglia DI, et al. Archaeosomes made of Halorubrum tebenquichense total polar lipids: A new source of adjuvancy. BMC Biotechnology. 2008; 9:71
- 16. Higa LH, Corral RS, Morilla MJ, Romero EL, Petray PB. Archaeosomes display immunoadjuvant potential for a vaccine against Chagas disease. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013; 9: 409–12. pmid:23291939
- 17. Czerkinsky C, Holmgren J. Topical immunization strategies. Nature. Mucosal Immunol. 2010; 3: 545–555
- 18. Sprott GD. Archaeal Membrane Lipids and Applications. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; Chichester; 2011. pp 1–12
- 19. Higa LH, Schilrreff P, Perez AP, Iriarte MA, Roncaglia DI, Morilla MJ, et al. Ultradeformable archaeosomes as new topical adjuvants. Nanomedicine. 2012; 8: 1319–28 pmid:22366598
- 20. Kates M, Kushwaha SC. Isoprenoids and polar lipids of extreme halophiles. In: Dassarma S, Fleischman EM, editors. Archaea: A Laboratory Manual, Halophiles. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1995. pp 35–54.
- 21. Bötcher CJF, Van Gent CM, Pries C. A rapid and sensitive sub-micro phosphorus determination. Anal Chim Acta. 1961; 24: 203–4
- 22. Inaba K, Inaba M, Romani N, Aya H, Deguchi M, Ikehara S, et al. Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Exp Med. 1992; 176(6): 1693–702. pmid:1460426
- 23. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of micro gram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254 pmid:942051
- 24. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227: 680. pmid:5432063
- 25. Fry DW, White JC, Goldman ID. Rapid separation of low molecular weight solutes from liposomes without dilution. Anal Biochem. 1978; 90: 809. pmid:727510
- 26. Van den Bergh BA, Wertz PW, Junginger HE, Bouwstra JA. Elasticity of vesicles assessed by electron spin resonance, electron microscopy and extrusion measurements. Int J Pharm. 2001; 217: 13–24 pmid:11292538
- 27. Arnal L, Serra DO, Cattelan N, Castez MF, Vazquez L, Salvarezza RC, et al. Adhesin contribution to nanomechanical properties of the virulent Bordetella pertussis envelope. Langmuir. 2012; 28: 7461–9 pmid:22515332
- 28. Radmacher M, Fritz M, Cleveland JP, Walters DA, Hansma PK. Imaging adhesion forces and elasticity of lysozyme adsorbed on mica with the atomic force microscope. Langmuir. 1994; 10: 3809–14
- 29. Touhami A, Nysten BB, Dufrêne YF. Nanoscale mapping of the elasticity of microbial cells by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir. 2003; 19: 4539–43
- 30. Polyakov P, Soussen C, Duan J, Duval JF, Brie D, Francius G. Automated force volume image processing for biological samples. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18887 pmid:21559483
- 31. Gaboriaud F, Bailet S, Dague E, Jorand F. Surface structure and nanomechanical properties of Shewanella putrefaciens bacteria at two pH values (4 and 10) determined by atomic force microscopy. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187: 3864–8 pmid:15901713
- 32. Velegol SB, Logan BE. Contributions of bacterial surface polymers, electrostatics, and cell elasticity to the shape of AFM force curves. Langmuir. 2002; 18: 5256–62
- 33. Hassan AE, Heinz WF, Antonik MD, D'Costa NP, Nageswaran S, Schoenenberger CA, et al. Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J. 1998; 74: 1564–78 pmid:9512052
- 34. Pinzón-Arango PA, Nagarajan R, Camesano TA. Effects of L-alanine and inosine germinants on the elasticity of Bacillus anthracisspores. Langmuir. 2010; 26: 6535–41. pmid:20095533
- 35. De Luca PM, Mayrink W, Pinto JÁ, Coutinho SG, Santiago MA, Toledo VP, et al. A randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of a candidate vaccine against American tegumentary leishmaniasis. Acta Trop. 2001; 80: 251–60. pmid:11700183
- 36. Velez ID, Gilchrist K, Arbelaez MP, Rojas CA, Puerta JA, Antunes CM, et al. Failure of a killed Leishmania amazonensis vaccine against American cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005; 99: 593–98 pmid:15893351
- 37. Azeredo-Coutinho RBG, Matos DCS, Armôa GGR, Maia RM, Schubach A, Mayrink W, et al. Contrasting human cytokine responses to promastigote whole-cell extract and the Leishmania analogue receptor for activated C kinase antigen of L. amazonensis in natural infection versus immunization. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008; 153: 369–75. pmid:18627399
- 38. Telino E, De Luca PM, Matos DCS, Azeredo-Coutinho RB, Meirelles MN, Conceição-Silva F, et al. In vitro responses of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells to whole-cell, particulate and soluble extracts of Leishmania promastigotes. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005; 143: 338–44.
- 39. Santos FR, Ferraz DB, Daghastanli KRP, Ramalho-Pinto FJ, Ciancaglini P. Mimetic membrane system to carry multiple antigenic proteins from Leishmania amazonensis. J Membrane Biol. 2006; 210:173–81.
- 40. Daghastanli KRP, Ferreira RB, Thedei G Jr, Maggio B, Ciancaglini P. Lipid composition-dependent incorporation of multiple membrane proteins into nanovesicles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2004; 36: 127–37. pmid:15276628
- 41. de Lima Santos H, Ciancaglini P. A practical approach to the choice of a suitable detergent and optimal conditions for solubilizing a membrane protein. Biochem Educ. 2000; 28: 178–82. pmid:10878320
- 42. Grennberg M, Tsong TY. Detergent solubilization and affinity purification of a local anesthetic binding protein from mammalian axonal membranes. J Biol Chem. 1984; 259: 13241–5. pmid:6490653
- 43. Goncalves CC, Reiche EM, de Abreu F, Silveira TG, Felizardo TC, Maia KR, et al. Evaluation of antigens from various leishmania species in a western blot for diagnosis of american tegumentary leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002; 66: 91–102. pmid:12135276
- 44. Kweider M, Lemesre JL, Darcy F, Kusnierz JP, Capron A, Santoro F. Infectivity of Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes is dependent on the increasing expression of a 65,000-dalton surface antigen. J Immunol. 1987; 138: 299–05. pmid:3782801
- 45. Kasas S, Longo G, Dietler G. Mechanical properties of biological specimens explored by atomic force microscopy. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2013; 46: 133001.
- 46. Guangzhao M, Xuemei L, Simon KY. Direct force measurement of nanovesicles by atomic force microscopy, Dekker Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2004; 933.
- 47. Carrer DC, Higa LH, Defain Tesoriero MV, Morilla MJ, Roncaglia DI, Romero EL. Structural features of ultradeformable archaeosomes for topical delivery of ovalbumin. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014; 122: 281–89.
- 48. Cevc G, Vierl U. Nanotechnology and the transdermal route. A state of the art review and critical appraisal. J Control Release. 2010; 141: 277–99. pmid:19850095
- 49. Carrer DC, Vermehren C, Bagatolli LA. Pig skin structure and transdermal delivery of liposomes: a two photon microscopy study. J Control Release. 2008; 132(1): 12–20 pmid:18761045
- 50. Drutis DM, Hancewicz TM, Pashkovski E, Feng L, Mihalov D, Holtom G, et al. Three-dimensional chemical imaging of skin using stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. J Biomed Opt. 2014; 19(11): 111604. pmid:24858033
- 51. Schätzlein A, Cevc G. Non-uniform cellular packing of the stratum corneum and permeability barrier function of intact skin: a high-resolution confocal laser scanning microscopy study using highly ultradeformable vesicles (Transfersomes). Br J Dermatol. 1998; 138: 583–92. pmid:9640361
- 52. Mitragotri S. Breaking the skin barrier. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004; 56: 555–6. pmid:15019744
- 53. Bouwstra JA, Gooris GS. The lipid organisation in human stratum corneum and model systems. Open Dermatol J. 2010; 4: 10–3.
- 54. Brandner JM, Haftek M, Niessen CM. Adherens junctions, desmosomes and tight junctions in epidermal barrier function. Open Dermatol J. 2010; 4: 14–20.
- 55. Montanari J, Maidana C, Esteva MI, Salomon C, Morilla MJ, Romero EL. Sunlight triggered photodynamic ultradeformable liposomes against Leishmania braziliensis are also leishmanicidal in the dark. J Controlled Rel. 2010; 147: 368–76.
- 56. Perez AP, Casasco A, Defain Tesoriero MV, Pappalardo JS, Altube MJ, Duempelmann L, et al. Enhanced photodynamic leishmanicidal activity of hydrophobic zinc phthalocyanine within archaeolipids containing liposomes. Int J Nanomed. 2014; 9: 3335–45.
- 57. Sallusto F, Cella M, Danieli C, Lanzavecchia A. Dendritic cells use macropinocytosis and the mannose receptor to concentrate macromolecules in the major histocompatibility complex class II compartment: down regulation by cytokines and bacterial products. J Exp Med. 1995; 182: 389–400 pmid:7629501
- 58. Borges MM, Campos-Neto A, Sleath P, Grabstein KH, Morrissey PJ, Skeiky YA, et al. Potent stimulation of the innate immune system by a Leishmania braziliensis recombinant protein. Infect Immun. 2001; 69: 5270–77. pmid:11500395
- 59. Kostka SL, Knop J, Konur A, Udey MC, von Stebut E. Distinct roles for IL-1 receptor type I signaling in early versus established Leishmania major infections. J Invest Dermatol. 2006; 126: 1582–9. pmid:16645594
- 60. Von Stebut E, Ehrchen JM, Belkaid Y, Kostka SL, Molle K, Knop J, et al. Interleukin 1alpha promotes Th1 differentiation and inhibits disease progression in Leishmania major-susceptible BALB/c mice. J Exp Med. 2003; 198: 191–9. pmid:12860932
- 61. Debus A, Glasner J, Rollinghoff M, Gessner A. High levels of susceptibility and T helper 2 response in MyD88-deficient mice infected with Leishmania major are interleukin-4 dependent. Infect Immun. 2003; 71: 7215–18. pmid:14638820
- 62. Muraille E, De Trez C, Brait M, De Baetselier P, Leo O, Carlier Y. Genetically resistant mice lacking MyD88-adapter protein display a high susceptibility to Leishmania major infection associated with a polarized Th2 response. J Immunol. 2003; 170: 4237–41. pmid:12682257
- 63. Gregory DJ, Olivier M. Subversion of host cell signalling by the protozoan parasite Leishmania. Parasitology 2005; 130 (suppl.): S27–S35. pmid:16281989
- 64. Shio MT, Hassani K, Isnard A, Ralph B, Contreras I, Gomez MA, et al. Host cell signalling and Leishmania mechanisms of evasion. J Trop Med. 2012; 819512 pmid:22131998
- 65. Soong L. Modulation of dendritic cell function by Leishmania parasites. J Immunol. 2008; 180: 4355–60. pmid:18354154
- 66. Xin L, Li K, Soong L. Down-regulation of dendritic cell signaling pathways by Leishmania amazonensis amastigotes. Mol Immunol. 2008; 45: 3371–82. pmid:18538399
- 67. Lima-Junior DS, Costa DL, Carregaro V, Cunha LD, Silva ALN, Mineo TW, et al. Inflammasome-derived IL-1β production induces nitric oxide–mediated resistance to Leishmania. Nat Med. 2013; 19: 909–15. pmid:23749230
- 68. Chen G, Shaw MH, Kim YG, Nunez G. NOD-like receptors: role in innate immunity and inflammatory disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009; 4: 365–98. pmid:18928408
- 69. Martinon F, Mayor A, Tschopp J. The inflammasomes: guardians of the body. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009; 27: 229–65. pmid:19302040
- 70. Mariathasan S, Weiss DS, Newton K, McBride J, O'Rourke K, Roose-Girma M, et al. Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature 2006; 440: 228–32. pmid:16407890
- 71. Green SJ, Crawford RM, Hockmeyer JT, Meltzer MS, Nacy CA. Leishmania major amastigotes initiate the l-arginine–dependent killing mechanism in IFN-(–stimulated macrophages by induction of tumor necrosis factor-α. J Immunol. 1990; 145: 4290–97. pmid:2124240
- 72. Green SJ, Meltzer MS, Hibbs JB Jr, Nacy CA. Activated macrophages destroy intracellular Leishmania major amastigotes by an l-arginine–dependent killing mechanism. J Immunol. 1990; 144: 278–83. pmid:2104889
- 73. Mukbel RM, Patten C Jr, Gibson K, Ghosh M, Petersen C, Jones DE. Macrophage killing of Leishmania amazonensis amastigotes requires both nitric oxide and superoxide. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007; 76: 669–75. pmid:17426168
- 74. Fernandez-Figueroa EA, Rangel-Escareño C, Espinosa-Mateos V, Carrillo-Sánchez K, Salaiza-Suazo N, Carrada-Figueroa G, et al. Disease severity in patients infected with Leishmania mexicana relates to IL-1β. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012; 6: e1533. pmid:22629474
- 75. Moravej A, Rasouli M, Kalani M, Asaei S, Kiany S, Najafipour S, et al. IL-1β (–511T/C) gene polymorphism not IL-1β (+3953T/C) and LT-α (+252A/G) gene variants confers susceptibility to visceral leishmaniasis. Mol Biol Rep. 2012; 39: 6907–14. pmid:22311026
- 76. Altube J, Seltzer S. Morilla MJ and Romero EL. pH-sensitive nano-halosomes for lung delivery of dexamethasone. Acta Biomaterialia, submitted January 2016.
- 77. Stephen SL, Freestone K, Dunn S, Twigg MW, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Walker JH, et al. Scavenger receptors and their potential as therapeutic targets in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Int J Hypertens. 2010; 646929. pmid:20981357
- 78. Becker M, Cotena A, Gordon S, Platt N. Expression of the class A macrophage scavenger receptor on specific subpopulations of murine dendritic cells limits their endotoxin response. Eur J Immunol. 2006; 36: 950–60. pmid:16552714
- 79. Amie E, Nicholson-Dykstra S, Walters JJ, Higgs H, Berwin B. Scavenger receptor-A functions in phagocytosis of E. coli by bone marrow dendritic cells. Exp Cell Res. 2007; 313(7): 1438–48. pmid:17362929
- 80. Harshyne LA, Zimmer MI, Watkins SC, Barratt-Boyes SM. A role for class A scavenger receptor in dendritic cell nibbling from live cells. J Immunol. 2003; 170: 2302–9. pmid:12594251
- 81. Ghiringhelli F, Apetoh L, Tesniere A, Aymeric L, Ma Y, Ortiz C, et al. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in dendritic cells induces IL-1beta-dependent adaptive immunity against tumors. Nat Med. 2009;15(10):1170–8. pmid:19767732