Targeted Delivery of Amoxicillin to C. trachomatis by the Transferrin Iron Acquisition Pathway

Jun Hai; Nawal Serradji; Ludovic Mouton; Virginie Redeker; David Cornu; Jean-Michel El Hage Chahine; Philippe Verbeke; Miryana Hémadi

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150031

Abstract

Weak intracellular penetration of antibiotics makes some infections difficult to treat. The Trojan horse strategy for targeted drug delivery is among the interesting routes being explored to overcome this therapeutic difficulty. Chlamydia trachomatis, as an obligate intracellular human pathogen, is responsible for both trachoma and sexually transmitted diseases. Chlamydia develops in a vacuole and is therefore protected by four membranes (plasma membrane, bacterial inclusion membrane, and bacterial membranes). In this work, the iron-transport protein, human serum-transferrin, was used as a Trojan horse for antibiotic delivery into the bacterial vacuole. Amoxicillin was grafted onto transferrin. The transferrin-amoxicillin construct was characterized by mass spectrometry and absorption spectroscopy. Its affinity for transferrin receptor 1, determined by fluorescence emission titration [K_affTf-amox = (1.3 ± 1.0) x 10⁸], is very close to that of transferrin [4.3 x 10⁸]. Transmission electron and confocal microscopies showed a co-localization of transferrin with the bacteria in the vacuole and were also used to evaluate the antibiotic capability of the construct. It is significantly more effective than amoxicillin alone. These promising results demonstrate targeted delivery of amoxicillin to suppress Chlamydia and are of interest for Chlamydiaceae and maybe other intracellular bacteria therapies.

Citation: Hai J, Serradji N, Mouton L, Redeker V, Cornu D, El Hage Chahine J-M, et al. (2016) Targeted Delivery of Amoxicillin to C. trachomatis by the Transferrin Iron Acquisition Pathway. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0150031. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031

Editor: Marcia Edilaine Lopes Consolaro, State University of Maringá/Universidade Estadual de Maringá, BRAZIL

Received: August 13, 2015; Accepted: February 8, 2016; Published: February 26, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Hai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis), as an obligate intracellular human pathogen of the Chlamydiaceae family, is responsible for the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infection and is the leading cause of preventable blindness [1]. Chlamydia genital infection is very common in sexually active young people. When not treated, it can lead to severe complications including endometriosis, salpingitis, pelvic inflammatory syndromes, pelvic pain and chronic ectopic pregnancies [2–4]. Chlamydiaceae are Gram-negative intracellular bacteria that grow and multiply in a parasitophorous vacuole during a two-phase developmental cycle [5]. Infection is initiated by the binding of elementary bodies (EBs) to eukaryotic host cells. A few hours after their internalization, a parasitophorous vacuole forms near the nucleus of the host cell. Metabolically inactive EBs differentiate into reticulate bodies (RBs), non-infectious but metabolically active forms of Chlamydiaceae. RBs replicate before then re-differentiating to EBs. The inclusion expands and bursts, releasing the EBs that go on to infect other surrounding cells [5,6]. The infectious EBs are metabolically inert, unable to replicate DNA, to transcribe RNA or to translate proteins. Thus, unlike RB, EB is not affected by antibiotics targeting either bacterial DNA synthesis (fluoroquinolone) or protein translation (macrolides, tetracycline) processes. Therefore, only antibiotics that penetrate cells will be effective against C. trachomatis [7]. However, RB is protected within the host cell by four lipid bilayers (the plasma membrane, the inclusion membrane and the double membrane of the bacterium). This low accessibility to RB and the low hydrophobicity of certain antibiotics may explain the partial ineffectiveness of antibiotic therapy [8,9,10] and, unfortunately, no anti-Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine is yet available. To prevent infection relapses, new anti-chlamydial drugs and/or efficient drug carriers are needed.

Iron is essential for the growth and development of both animal cells and prokaryotes. Apotransferrin (ApoTf) is a bilobal (N- and C-lobes) single chain of about 700 amino acids that binds two molecules of Fe³⁺ with high affinity (K_aff = 10²³) [11]. In the bloodstream of mammals, the iron-loaded form of transferrin (holotransferrin, Tf) binds to transferrin receptor 1 (R1). R1 is a 190 kDa homodimeric protein arranged in two subunits linked by two disulfide bridges. It has two domains: an ectodomain directed toward the biological fluid and an endodomain anchored in the plasma membrane [12,13]. Tf interacts with the ectodomain of R1 to form an adduct, Tf-R1, which is internalized in the cytoplasm through clathrin-mediated endocytosis [14]. The endosomes containing Tf are gradually acidified, which leads to iron release; iron is reduced and transferred from the endosome to the cytosol by specialized divalent-metal transporters [15]. The ApoTf-R1 adduct is afterwards recycled back to the plasma membrane [15] where ApoTf is released into the biological fluid, ready for another iron-transport cycle. The entire process occurs in a few minutes. Therefore, Tf can be considered as a potentially important vehicle to deliver specific agents and to target practically all tissues, even across the blood-brain barrier [16–20]. The efficiency of this pathway in the targeted delivery of drugs, radionucleides, peptides, proteins and nanocarriers containing DNA vectors has been widely investigated, especially in tumor cells, where R1 is overexpressed [16–18,21].

In contrast to mammalian cells, in order to capture iron, bacteria synthesize and secrete mainly low-molecular-weight iron-specific chelating agents called siderophores [22]. These have very high affinities for iron (10²⁰ ~ 10⁴⁰ M^-1). These bacteria can thus deprive other biological systems of iron [23–25]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the C. trachomatis genome does not encode for any known bacterial siderophore or siderophore receptor [26]. In vitro, in the absence of iron, Chlamydiaceae remain viable but not cultivable, in a persistent state, in which the RB is enlarged and non-infectious. As soon as iron is added to the culture medium, Chlamdiaceae growth resumes. Although the iron-acquisition system of Chlamydiaceae is not well understood, it was shown that in some cases Tf-R1-enriched vacuoles can fuse with the Chlamydiaceae inclusions [27–29], which may thus involve transferrin.

In this work, we attempt to use Tf as a Trojan horse to deliver antibiotics to C. trachomatis. We first found that, in HeLa cells, rhodamine-labeled Tf (Tf-RhB) quickly colocalizes with C. trachomatis in the bacterial inclusion. This led us to covalently graft amoxicillin onto Tf to produce a Tf-amoxicillin construct which we then tested in vitro and in cellulo as a potential vehicle capable of delivering antibiotics into the parasitophorous vacuole.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Gynecology Obstetric Service at the Antoine Béclère Hospital and the Chemistry Department at the University Paris Diderot, placentae were collected from healthy post-partum women (HIV-screened and hepatitis-C-free) from the maternity ward of the hospital. All participants were given a full explanation of the study and their written consent was obtained.

Materials

All chemicals were of the purest available grade. They were purchased from Merck, Sigma Aldrich, Fluka, Acros and VWR. Water and glassware were prepared as described previously [12,30].

Stock solutions

The HEPES concentration in neutral buffers was 50 mM. Final pHs were continuously measured and adjusted to between 7.2 and 8.6 with microquantities of concentrated HCl or NaOH. Tf and R1 concentrations were checked both by Bio-Rad protein assay and spectrophotometrically [12,30]. Final solutions were diluted to the required concentrations in the final buffers. All final ionic strengths were adjusted to 0.2 M with KCl [12,30]. The R1 solutions contained 10 mM CHAPS (3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate).

Purification of transferrin and receptor

At least 98%-pure human-serum apotransferrin (Sigma) was further purified according to published procedures [12,30]; its purity was checked both spectrophotometrically and by urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [31]. Holotransferrin (Tf), was prepared and purified as described elsewhere [30]. R1 was extracted from human placenta and purified according to published procedures [32,33]. Purity was checked by gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [33,34]. R1 was used intact without cleavage of the endo-domain. Protein concentrations were determined both spectrophotometrically and by Bio-Rad protein assay [12]. The final receptor yields varied from 3 to 5 mg per placenta.

Fluorescent Labeling

For fluorescence microscopy assays, human transferrin was labeled by lissamine rhodamine sulfonyl chloride (RhB), as previously published [35]. Fluoresceinamine (FNH₂) was grafted onto amoxicillin via an amide bond. The carboxylic group of the amoxicillin, which is close to the beta-lactam ring, was activated by adding microvolumes of N-hydroxysuccinamide (NHS, final concentration: 3.75 mM) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiamide (EDC, final concentration: 1.5 mM). The final solution was stirred for 1 h at 5°C and then added to a large excess of FNH₂ in HEPES buffer (50 mM) at pH 9. The mixture was then separated on permeation gel G-10 to remove the excess of both free FNH₂ and amoxicillin.

Grafting amoxicillin onto transferrin

To activate the carboxylic groups of Tf, microvolumes of NHS (final concentration: 3.75 mM) and EDC (final concentration: 1.5 mM) were added to 1 mL of a solution of Tf (100 μM) in 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES, 100 mM, pH 6). The final solution was stirred for 30 min at room temperature (RT). Amoxicillin (10 mM) was dispersed in NaHCO₃ (0.25 M) at pH 9 and then added to the protein mixture. The mixture was stirred at RT for 4 h; amide bonds were formed between the carboxylic groups in holotransferrin and the amine group of amoxicillin. Permeation gel G-50 was then used to remove the excess amoxicillin. The concentration of holotransferrin was determined both by absorption spectroscopy at 280 nm and by protein assays. Mass spectrometry was used to check the covalent bonding of amoxicillin to Tf.

Spectrophotometric measurements

Absorption measurements were performed at 37 ± 0.5°C on a Cary 4000 spectrophotometer equipped with Peltier-thermostated cell-carriers. Fluorimetric measurements were performed at 37 ± 0.5°C on a Fluorolog 3, Horiba Jobin Yvon spectrometer equipped with a thermostated cell-carrier. Emission spectra were measured in the 300–400 nm range for an excitation wavelength (λ_ex) of 280 nm [32]. For Tf-amox-FNH₂, the excitation wavelength was set to 490 nm, and the emission was measured between 500 and 600 nm (λ_em = 523 nm). The spectra used for the static determination of the equilibrium constants were recorded at the final equilibrated state.

Mass spectrometry

Mass spectrometry (MS) measurements were performed with an electrospray Q/TOF mass spectrometer (Q/TOF Premier, Waters) equipped with the Nanomate device (Advion). The HD_A_384 chip (5 μm I.D. nozzle chip, flow-rate range 100−500 nL/min) was calibrated before use. The Q/TOF instrument was operated in the RF quadrupole mode and data were acquired in the 400–3990 m/z range. Collision energy was set to 6 eV and argon was used as collision gas. Mass spectrometry of the intact proteins was performed after 5 min denaturation in 50% acetonitrile and 1% formic acid. Acquisition and data processing were performed with Mass Lynx 4.1 software. Deconvolution of multiply charged ions was performed by applying the MaxEnt1 algorithm. The average protein masses are annotated in the spectra, and the estimated mass accuracy is ± 2 Da. External calibration was performed with NaI clusters (2 μg/μL in 50/50 v/v isopropanol/water) in the same m/z range.

Bacteria, cell culture and biological reagents

HeLa cells were obtained and cultured as recommended by ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA), in 75 cm² tissue culture flasks for maintenance and in 24-well, 48-well or 96 well- plates for assays. C. trachomatis LGV (serovar L2) was obtained from ATCC. A stock of bacteria was prepared in HeLa cells as previously described, and stored at -80°C in sucrose-phosphate-glutamic acid (SPG) buffer (10 mM sodium phosphate [8 mM Na₂HPO₄ + 2 mM NaH₂PO₄], 220 mM sucrose, 0.50 mM L-glutamic acid) for later use [36]. Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) and fetal calf serum were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-Chlamydia genus antibody was from Argene (Argen Biosoft 12–114, Varhilles, France). Cell Tracker Blue CMAC (7-amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin) was obtained from Life Technologies (Saint Aubin, France).

Localization of Tf-RhB, amox-Tf-RhB and Tf-amox-FNH₂ in C. trachomatis-infected cells

HeLa cells were grown on coverslips for 24 h and were either infected or not with the serovar L2 of C. trachomatis at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.5. After 24 h, cells were incubated for different times and at different temperatures with Tf-RhB or amox-Tf-RhB and CMAC before being fixed in 4% neutral-buffered paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 1 h. Cells were permeabilized using methanol/ethanol (v/v) for 10 min, and coverslips were washed three times with PBS. FITC-conjugated anti-chlamydia genus antibodies were incubated for 45 min at RT in the dark. Following immunostaining, coverslips were washed three times with PBS, and subsequently counterstained for 5 min with Hoechst. Images were collected by confocal microscopy at ImagoSeine (Institut Jacques Monod, France) and further processed with Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, CA, USA) or with Fiji freeware for quantitative analysis of fluorescence. For such analysis, the fluorescence of at least 30 individual cells of each group was measured.

Treatment of C. trachomatis-infected cells by Tf-amox

HeLa cells were infected with the serovar L2 of C. trachomatis at a MOI 0.5–1 and cultured in the presence of Tf-amox at different concentrations. Cells were PFA-fixed at 24 h post-infection (P. I.) or 48 h P. I. and processed either for immunofluorescence, as described above, using an epifluorescence microscope (Leica DR) equipped with a digital camera (ORCA ER, Hamamatsu) or by transmission electron microscopy, as described below.

Titration of infectivity

To examine the bactericidal effects of different molecules on Chlamydia trachomatis infectivity, we measured the infectious potential of the progeny grown in the presence of different concentrations of such molecules. Briefly, HeLa cells were cultured in 48-well plates until 70% confluence was reached. Cells were infected at a MOI of 1, for 1 hour at 37°C. After washing, the molecules (Tf, Tf-RhB, Tf-amox, Tf-amox-FNH₂, amox) tested were added to the culture medium at different concentrations. At 48 h P.I, the cultures were harvested for measurements of progeny infectivity, as previously described [37]. This experiment was repeated three times.

Transmission electron microscopy

HeLa cells infected with the serovar L2 of C. trachomatis (MOI 0.5–1) were fixed at the indicated time points in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer at room temperature for 1 h. After fixation, cells were rinsed in 0.15 M sodium cacodylate buffer containing 3 mM CaCl₂ (pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 400 g for 10 min. The pellets were re-suspended and post-fixed in 0.5% osmium tetroxide in 0.07 M sodium cacodylate buffer containing 1.5 mM CaCl₂ (pH 7.4) at RT for 1 h, dehydrated in ethanol, and embedded in Spurr resin. Ultrathin sections were obtained using a Reicherd-Young Ultracut microtome (Leica). Sections were contrasted with 4% uranyl acetate followed by Reynold’s lead citrate and examined using a Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope set to 80 kV and equipped with a 1k × 1k Keen View camera.

Statistical analysis

In quantitative analyses, data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of experiments, and p values were calculated using a Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test.

Results

Transferrin colocalizes within the Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion

In order to investigate the eventual involvement of transferrin in the development of bacterial inclusions, HeLa cells which were either uninfected or which had been infected with the serovar L2 of C. trachomatis for 24 h, were incubated with Rhodamine B-labeled-transferrin (Tf-RhB) for 1 h. The cells were then fixed, stained with FITC-conjugated anti-chlamydia genus antibody, counterstained with Hoechst and visualized by confocal microscopy. The results show that the transferrin is concentrated in the chlamydial inclusion in the infected cells and spreads all over the cytoplasm in uninfected cells (Fig 1). We have also determined whether the endocytosis of Tf-RhB in uninfected cells depends on the temperature. As expected, we do not observe any internalization of Tf-RhB at 4°C where endocytosis is blocked (S1A Fig). On the other hand, when HeLa cells are incubated with free Rhodamine B (RhB) at 37°C, nonspecific internalization of RhB is observed in the cytosol of the host cells (S1B Fig).

Download:

Fig 1. Co-localization of the transferrin and the chlamydial inclusion.

C. trachomatis serovar L2-infected HeLa cells were incubated with Tf-RhB (red) for 1 h before fixation at 24 h P.I. Chlamydia were stained by FITC-conjugated anti-Chlamydia antibody (green) and host cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). Uninfected cells were seeded, processed and fixed at the same time as the infected cells. Images were collected by immunofluorescence microscopy and further processed with Adobe Photoshop.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.g001

Cells were infected at a MOI of 0.5 for 24 h which leads to a cell infection ratio of about 35% (S2 Fig). The cells were then incubated with Tf-RhB for different time lapses (5 min– 2 h) (S2 Fig). In this case and mainly in uninfected cells, transferrin co-localized within 5 min at the perinuclear region near the microtubule organization center (MTOC). In infected cells, Tf-RhB was essentially concentrated between the nucleus and the bacterial inclusion which may be due to the compression of the nucleus and the MTOC area by the inclusion (S2 Fig). A pulse-chase experiment shows that Tf-RhB recycling is significantly delayed in C. trachomatis-infected HeLa cells (Fig 2B and 2C). Indeed, after 30 or 60 min of chase (Fig 2A), infected cells (arrows) retain more Tf-RhB than uninfected cells (arrowheads). This suggests that transferrin is rapidly transported into the cytosol of the infected cells and/or recycled.

Download:

Fig 2. Tf-RhB recycling is delayed in C. trachomatis-infected HeLa cells.

(A) HeLa cells were infected with the serovar L2 of C. trachomatis for 24 h and incubated with Tf-RhB for 1 h. Cells were allowed to recycle the Tf-RhB for 0, 30 and 60 min in the presence of unlabeled Tf before fixing and staining using anti-Chlamydia-FITC and Hoechst; observed under confocal microscopy (scale bar = 20 μM). (B-C) Red fluorescence (Tf-RhB) has been quantified in both infected and uninfected cells at different time of chase. Then, fluorescence intensity was related to either the number of pixels (B) or to the cell (C). *** P <0.001 vs. uninfected cells at the time of chase. Infected cells (arrows) retain more Tf-RhB than uninfected cells (arrowheads).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.g002

Conjugation of amoxicillin onto transferrin

In order to use Tf as a carrier for targeted antibiotic delivery into the inclusion of C. trachomatis, amoxicillin was covalently grafted onto Tf. The grafting efficiency was measured by mass spectroscopy (Fig 3A and 3B). Deconvoluted electrospray mass spectra of transferrin before and after covalent cross-linking to amoxicillin are presented in Fig 3C and 3D, respectively. The presence of a mass increment of (346 ± 2) Da measured for Tf-amoxicillin (Tf-amox) is consistent with the covalent binding of one molecule of amoxicillin to one transferrin with the loss of one molecule of water and its corresponding calculated mass increment of 347 Da (Fig 3D). Relative abundance of Tf-amox to Tf was calculated by the integration of the area under the respective mass peaks. Tf-amox produced in this work represented about 20% of the overall concentration of Tf. Because the similarity of their masses (~ 79570/79917) did not permit the separation of Tf-amox from Tf, we performed all the reported experiments with a mixture of 80% Tf and 20% of Tf-amox.

Download:

Fig 3. Mass spectra of Tf and Tf-amox.

(A-B) Zooms of the electrospray mass spectra of transferrin before and after grafting of amoxicillin are shown in (A) and (B), respectively. Charge states z and m/z values are indicated for each peak. Mass spectra of Tf before (C) and after bonding to amoxicillin (D) obtained after deconvolution of the 400 to 3990 m/z range. Peaks with an asterisk correspond to amoxicillin covalently bound to transferrin (Tf-amox). In (D), the mass increment of (346 ± 2) Da measured for Tf-amox corresponds to the covalent binding of one amoxicillin to one transferrin. Relative abundances of Tf/Tf-amox were calculated from the ratio of the respective mass peak intensities, which were measured by integration of the peak areas under the signal curve, using the perpendicular drop method (integrated areas under peaks are depicted). Tf-amox was estimated to represent 20% of the overall protein concentration.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.g003

Interaction of Tf-amox with R1: Thermodynamic approach

In neutral media, holotransferrin interacts extremely well with R1. The mechanism of this interaction and the equilibrium and kinetic constants involved have been established by fluorimetric titration and chemical relaxation techniques [12]. Fluorimetric titration is a very sensitive method and is used here to analyze the interaction of Tf-amox with R1 aggregates in purely aqueous media [38]. Our experiments were, therefore, performed in the presence of CHAPS micelles where R1 is in a monomolecular form [12,32].

The addition of iron-loaded transferrin (Tf) to a solution of R1 leads to modifications in the emission spectra of the protein. This allows the measurement of the affinity constant of Tf-R1 as well as that of the Tf-RhB-R1 protein-protein adducts [12,32]. However, as shown by mass spectrometry, the concentration of Tf-amox, c₂, is a fifth of the overall Tf concentration c₁. Therefore, if the same conditions as those used in the literature are applied [12,32], the determination of the dissociation constant related to the interaction of Tf-amox with R1 will not be possible because c₂ << c₁.

The excitation maximum (λ_ex) of FNH₂ is at 488 nm with an emission maximum at 500 nm, whereas that of Tf-amoxicillin-fluoresceinamine (Tf-amox-FNH₂) is about 496 nm with an emission maximum of 523 nm. The excitation maxima of Tf and R1 are 280 nm, with an emission spectrum in the 300 to 400 nm region [12,32]. Therefore, when the excitation wavelength is set at 496 nm, the observed emission is only related to the Tf-amox-FNH₂ and Tf-amox-FNH₂-R1 species. Adding Tf-amox-FNH₂ to R1, in the presence of 10 mM CHAPS, leads to an increase in fluorescence intensity in the 523 nm region (Fig 4A). We ascribe this variation to the molecular interaction of the receptor with Tf-amox-FNH₂ and therefore the affinity constant between these proteins could be determined. R1 consists of two identical subunits (R), each of which interacts with Tf in its deprotonated form (Eq 1). We shall consider here the interaction of the receptor subunit (R) and Tf (Eq 2) and also that of R and Tf-amox-FNH₂ (Eq 3) with unknown charges (Eqs 2 and 3): (1) (2) (3) with deprotonation constant, , the dissociation constant of free Tf, [12,32] and the dissociation constant of Tf-amox, .

Download:

Fig 4.

A. Fluorescence emission spectra of Tf-amox-FNH₂, R1 and R1 in the presence of Tf-amox-FNH₂ after subtraction of the emission contribution of the solvent. Values reported for an excitation wavelength λ_ex of 496 nm and an emission wavelength λ_em of 523 nm in the presence of 10 mM CHAPS with c₀ = 2 × 10⁻⁷ M and c₁ = 1 × 10⁻⁷ M at 37 ± 0.1°C, μ = 0.2 and pH = 7.40. B. Plot of against 1/[R]; slope, 7.9 ± 0.2 M with c₀ = 2 × 10⁻⁷ M and 0 ≤ c₁ ≤ 1 × 10⁻⁷ M and , [CHAPS] = 10 mM, and μ = 0.2 at 37 ± 0.1°C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.g004

Conservation of mass gives Eqs 4–6: (4) (5) (6)

The fluorescence intensity can then be expressed as: (7) where f₁ and f₂ are experimental parameters that relate the contributions of the Tf-amox-FNH₂ and R-Tf-amox-FNH₂ species to their fluorescence intensities, respectively.

Since under our experimental conditions , Tf-amox-FNH₂ and R-Tf-amox-FNH₂ can be neglected, and Eqs 8, 9 and 10 can be derived from Eqs 1 to 7: (8) (9) (10) Where . [R] is the positive solution of the quadratic, Eq 11: (11)

A good linear least-squares regression of against is obtained (Fig 4B): slope, K_DTf-amox = 7.9 ± 0.2 nM; the uncertainty on the intercept is much too high to allow its determination. This K_DTf-amox value underlines a very good affinity between R and Tf-amox and is slightly higher than that obtained for free holotransferrin (2.3 nM). Therefore, in vitro, the Tf-amox keeps its targeting ability to deliver amoxicillin inside the bacterial inclusion.

Tf-amox modifies the phenotype of C. trachomatis and alters the development of the bacterial inclusion

The C. trachomatis development cycle is characterized by the differentiation of EBs into RBs a few hours after infection, by the exponential multiplication of RB and finally the conversion of RB into virulent EB. C. trachomatis-infected HeLa cells were incubated with different concentrations of Tf-amox, fixed at 24 h P.I. and processed for confocal microscopy analysis. We observed a Tf-amox concentration-dependent decrease in the inclusion size (Fig 5). We also observed a modification of the phenotype of the bacterial bodies starting at 0.1 μM. Such a phenotype (presence of a few swollen RB) is typical in beta-lactam (BL) treatment of Chlamydiaceae [39]. At higher Tf-amox concentration (0.1–1 μM), the size of the chlamydial inclusion and the number of bacteria per inclusion dramatically decrease as compared to controls (Fig 5). In another experiment, amoxicillin was grafted onto RhB-labeled transferrin (Tf-RhB) and infected cells were treated using the protocol described above. The results showed a localization of amox-Tf-RhB on the periphery as well as in the inclusion. This can be due to transferrin recycling which is required for iron uptake by the cell and therefore for its survival. However, the appearance of the BL phenotype of the bacteria implies that the Tf-grafted antibiotic is targeted towards the inclusion (S3 Fig). Moreover, electron microscopy analysis performed at 30 h P.I. confirmed the abnormal swelling of RB and the appearance of membranous vesicles free of biological material in the inclusions of the infected cells treated with at least 0.1 μM of Tf-amox (Fig 6). At 1 μM of Tf-amox, the inclusions become very small and contain one or two dilated bacteria.

Download:

Fig 5. Tf-amox modifies the phenotype of C. trachomatis and alters the development of the inclusion.

C. trachomatis serovar L2-infected HeLa cells were incubated with different concentrations of Tf-amox immediately after infection and were fixed at 24 h P.I. Chlamydia were detected using anti-Chlamydia-genus followed by FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (green). Cell nuclei were visualized using Hoechst (blue). Bar = 40 μM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.g005

Download:

Fig 6. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of Chlamydial inclusions treated with Tf-amox.

HeLa cells were infected with the serovar L2 of C. trachomatis and incubated with different concentrations of Tf-amox. At 30 h P. I., infected cells were processed for electron microscopy analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.g006

Tf-amox has a bactericidal effect on C. trachomatis at lower concentration than free amoxicillin

Since Tf-amox shows an effect on the phenotype of C. trachomatis and on the size of the inclusion, we measured the bactericidal effect of this molecule on C. trachomatis as compared to free amoxicillin, Tf-amox-FNH₂ (beta lactam ring blocked), Tf and Tf-RhB (Fig 7). We showed that, at the lower concentrations tested (40–200 nM), the anti-chlamydial effect of Tf-amox was significantly stronger than that of free amoxicillin. We also showed that the bactericidal activity of Tf-amox is reached at between 100 and 200 nM, whereas this effect is reached at between 200 and 500 nM for free amoxicillin.

Download:

Fig 7. Inhibitory effects of Holotransferrin (Tf), Tf-RhB, Tf-amox, Tf-amox-FNH₂ and amoxcillin on C. trachomatis infectious capacity in cellulo.

Statistically significant differences are noted as follows: **p = 0.002 compared to Tf-amox-FNH₂, ^##p = 0.002 compared to amoxicillin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.g007

Overall, we can conclude that part of the cellular Tf is addressed to the Chlamydial inclusion and that Tf-amox is targeted towards the inclusion where it has a bactericidal effect at lower dosage than free amoxicillin. All these results suggest that transferrin can be used as an effective carrier for targeted antibiotic delivery to Chlamydiaceae and maybe other intracellular bacteria.

Discussion

Chlamydia trachomatis development is highly dependent on iron. It is well established that this bacterium enters a persistent state when infected cells are incubated with an iron chelator, such as desferroxamine [39]. The withdrawal of the chelator leads to resumption of the bacterial cycle. However, iron-acquisition pathways of C. trachomatis are not well understood. Indeed, the genome of C. trachomatis does not contain genes encoding for the enzymes required for siderophore synthesis and/or those required for receptors of eukaryotic iron-binding proteins [40]. It would appear that the iron requirements of Chlamydiaceae are fulfilled through highly effective strategies in which the bacterium highjacks iron from the biosynthetic pathways, the organelles and the traffic vesicles of the host cell [41]. Among the latter, it has often been shown that vesicles bearing R1 are located in the vicinity of or inside the inclusion of the Chlamydia species. This is the case of the monocytic cell Thp1 infected with C. psitacci [42]. The receptor was also shown to be at least partly localized in the inclusions of L2-infected HeLa cells [27]. In 1999 and 2001, Al Younes et al. showed a localization of R1 in a Chlamydia pneumoniae inclusion at both 20 h P.I. and 40 h P.I. but not at 70 h P. I. This specific localization is stronger in iron-starved infected cells than in uninfected controls [28,43]. Furthermore, although the expression of R1 does not appear to be modulated by Chlamydia infection, it seems that the fusion of bacterial inclusions with the vesicles carrying R1 is required for bacterial development [29,43,44]. However, there is no direct evidence for Tf delivery into the chlamydial inclusion.

Our in cellulo study shows that Tf-RhB is endocytosed within minutes into HeLa cells infected by the serovar L2 of C. trachomatis; it accumulates in 30 minutes within the bacterial inclusion and seems to be co-localized with the bacteria.

These results might seem at odds with other studies in which Tf was excluded from the chlamydial inclusion. In 1996 and 2003, Scidmore et al., incubated Chlamydia L2-infected HeLa cells for 15 minutes with Tf-HRP in a serum-free medium before fixation. The labeling observed by transmission electron microscopy was predominantly outside the inclusion but, nevertheless, a few labeled vesicles were also localized inside [44,45]. Another study, dealing with HeLa cells infected with the serovar E of C. trachomatis for 24 h and afterwards incubated with Tf-HRP for 1 h, showed weak staining inside the inclusion. However, in this study Tf-HRP was used at a concentration of 10⁻⁸ M (about 800 μg.L^-1) [46]. Using fluorescent transferrin, Rzomp et al. showed a fusion of Rab1-, Rab4- and Rab11-positive vesicles with the inclusion of the serovar L2 of Chlamydia trachomatis at 18 h. P.I. but failed to detect Tf in the inclusion [47].

The discrepancies between these results and ours may be due to the fact that our experiments were performed with a higher concentration of Tf-RhB. Nevertheless, this concentration (250 μg.mL^-1) is still 10 times lower than that of serum transferrin in the bloodstream (about 2.5 g.L^-1) [48]. The differences may also be the result of the incubation time with the fluorescent probe before fixation. In our work, it was rare to observe Tf staining inside the bacterial inclusion before 30 min P. I. with Tf-RhB. Finally, the differences may also arise from the Chlamydiaceae species used (Chlamydia pneumoniae or a serovar of C. trachomatis) and/or from the post-infection time at which the infected cells were incubated with Tf-RhB. On the other hand, Chlamydiaceae may acquire iron in a narrow P. I. time window. In our study, we confirmed the pulse-chase experiments of Van Ooij et al., showing that Tf recycling is delayed in HeLa cells infected by the serovar L2 of C. trachomatis [27]. This recycling rate has been correlated with the development and growth of the bacterial inclusion [29].

Transferrin receptor-mediated endocytosis has been widely used for the delivery of anticancer drugs and therapeutic genes, primarily for targeting proliferating malignant cells overexpressing R1 [49]. Antibacterial effects of antibiotics in non-covalent interaction with ovotransferrin have also been investigated with a certain degree of success [50]. In our case, the antibiotic chosen was amoxicillin. Amoxicillin is not very commonly used for the treatment of Chlamydia (except in pregnant women), but, as a beta-lactam, it induces a particular phenotype of the bacteria, easily identifiable in microscopy [39]. In Tf-amox, the antibiotic is covalently bound to the protein with, a ratio of Tf-amox/Tf ≈ 0.2. On the other hand, we showed that the affinity of Tf-amox for R1 is practically identical to that of Tf, which implies the recognition of Tf-amox by the receptor and its internalization by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Again, as Tf-amox represents only 20% of the overall transferrin concentration, its scarcity should limit its internalization as compared to Tf. Nevertheless, Tf-amox was found to have significantly higher bactericidal activity on C. trachomatis than free amoxicillin.

The co-localization of Tf with C. trachomatis in the bacterial inclusion led us to envisage that R1-mediated iron acquisition constitutes a possible pathway for the delivery of drugs, such as antibiotics. We, therefore, assume that Tf facilitates the delivery of amoxicillin from the bulk to the bacteria. Indeed, the targets of the BL are the bacterial enzymes responsible for the synthesis of a peptidoglycan-like-molecule involved in bacterial division [51,52], Our results show that Tf probably routes grafted amoxicillin into the bacteria and that this amoxicillin keeps its antibiotic activity by inhibiting the enzymes involved in the peptidoglycan-like-molecule synthesis.

Conclusion

Our work suggests that Tf could be involved in the acquisition of iron by C. trachomatis. Thus, the Tf-R1 iron-acquisition pathway can be envisaged to specifically target Chlamydia inside the infected cell. Grafting an antibiotic, such as amoxicillin, onto transferrin does not interfere with the recognition of the protein by its receptor. Despite the rather low grafting yield (20%), Tf-amox undergoes efficient internalization by receptor-mediated endocytosis, which allows the antibiotic to reach the bacteria and to have higher anti-Chlamydia effect than free amoxicillin.

These results show for the first time that the iron-acquisition pathway of mammals can be efficiently used in the treatment of Chlamydia. To further complete these findings, antibiotic grafting should be improved and other antibiotics should be tested. We also hope that this will provide a new approach to avoid multidrug resistance in cancers and intracellular bacterial infections [9].

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Localization of the Tf-RhB (A) and RhB (B) in HeLa cells incubated at 37°C and 4°C.

HeLa cells were seeded for 24 h and incubated for different times and at different temperatures with either Tf-RhB (A) or RhB (B) and with Cell Tracker Blue CMAC (7-amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin). Cells were fixed after 15 min, 30 min or 60 min before being stained with Hoechst (blue). Images were collected by confocal microscopy and further processed with Adobe Photoshop.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Time-dependent localization of transferrin in Chlamydia-infected- and uninfected cells.

At 24h P.I., C. trachomatis serovar L2-infected HeLa cells were incubated with Tf-RhB (red) for different times and with Cell Tracker Blue CMAC. Cells were fixed and stained using a FITC-conjugated anti-Chlamydia genus antibody (green) and with Hoechst (blue). Uninfected cells were seeded and fixed at the same time as the infected cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Localization of amox-Tf-RhB into the chlamydial inclusion.

C. trachomatis serovar L2-infected HeLa cells were incubated with amox-Tf-RhB and CMAC and fixed at 24 h P. I. Chlamydia were stained using FITC-conjugated anti-Chlamydia genus antibody (green); the host cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). Bar = 40 μM. Arrows show amox-Tf-RhB in swollen bacteria. The bottom figure shows an enlargement of the top panel. The periphery of the chlamydial inclusions is drawn in white. Bar = 10 μM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150031.s003

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. J. S. Lomas and Dr. M. Kirkpatrick for constructive discussion, to Prof. E Gautier from the Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS), and to Prof. A. Bénachi and Dr. A.G. Cordier from the Antoine Béclère Hospital (Clamart) for the placentas. We also thank X. Baudin and R. Leborgne for their technical assistance in confocal and transmission electron microscopies and the ImagoSeine Facility of the Institute Jacques Monod, Paris, France.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JH MH JEHC PV. Performed the experiments: JH MH JEHC PV NS DC VR LM. Analyzed the data: JH MH JEHC PV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NS. Wrote the paper: JH MH JEHC PV.

References

1. Hu VH, Holland MJ, Burton MJ (2013) Trachoma: protective and pathogenic ocular immune responses to Chlamydia trachomatis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases 7: e2020. pmid:23457650
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Pungetti D, Calderara MA, Panozzo M, Pignataro R, Selleri MC, Travisani D et al. (1988) The incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis-induced infection in women suffering from cervicovaginitis. Acta Europaea fertilitatis 19: 93–97. pmid:3066089
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Brizzolara SS, Kosasa TS, Uemura HS (1990) Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection related to selected signs and symptoms of lower genital tract infections in women. Hawaii medical journal 49: 332, 335–336 339. pmid:2246123
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. el-Shourbagy M, Abd-el-Maeboud K, Diab KM, el-Ghannam A, Nabegh L, Ammar S (1996) Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Egyptian women: incidence among different clinical risk groups. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 22: 467–472. pmid:8987330
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Abdelrahman YM, Belland RJ (2005) The chlamydial developmental cycle. FEMS microbiology reviews 29: 949–959. pmid:16043254
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Belland RJ, Zhong G, Crane DD, Hogan D, Sturdevant D, Sharma J et al. (2003) Genomic transcriptional profiling of the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 8478–8483. pmid:12815105
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Schachter J. Chlamydiae. In: Balows A, Hausler WJ Jr, Hermann KL, Isenberg HD, Shadomy HJ, eds. Manual of clinical microbiology. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press, 1991:1045–53
8. Whittington WL, Kent C, Kissinger P, Oh MK, Fortenberry JD, Hillis SE, et al. (2001) Determinants of persistent and recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: results of a multicenter cohort study. Sexually transmitted diseases 28: 117–123. pmid:11234786
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Somani J, Bhullar VB, Workowski KA, Farshy CE, Black CM (2000) Multiple drug-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis associated with clinical treatment failure. The Journal of infectious diseases 181: 1421–1427. pmid:10762573
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Mpiga P, Ravaoarinoro M (2006) Chlamydia trachomatis persistence: an update. Microbiological research 161: 9–19. pmid:16338585
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Pakdaman R, El Hage Chahine JM (1996) A mechanism for iron uptake by transferrin. Eur J Biochem 236: 922–931. pmid:8665914
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Hemadi M, Kahn PH, Miquel G, El Hage Chahine JM (2004) Transferrin's mechanism of interaction with receptor 1. Biochemistry-Us 43: 1736–1745.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Cheng Y, Zak O, Aisen P, Harrison SC, Walz T (2004) Structure of the human transferrin receptor-transferrin complex. Cell 116: 565–576. pmid:14980223
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. El Hage Chahine JM, Hemadi M, Ha-Duong NT (2012) Uptake and release of metal ions by transferrin and interaction with receptor 1. Biochim Biophys Acta 1820: 334–347. pmid:21872645
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Hemadi M, Ha-Duong NT, El Hage Chahine JM (2006) The mechanism of iron release from the transferrin-receptor 1 adduct. J Mol Biol 358: 1125–1136. pmid:16564538
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Hogemann-Savellano D, Bos E, Blondet C, Sato F, Abe T, Josephson L, et al. (2003) The transferrin receptor: a potential molecular imaging marker for human cancer. Neoplasia 5: 495–506. pmid:14965443
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Daniels TR, Delgado T, Helguera G, Penichet ML (2006) The transferrin receptor part II: targeted delivery of therapeutic agents into cancer cells. Clinical immunology 121: 159–176. pmid:16920030
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Qian ZM, Li H, Sun H, Ho K (2002) Targeted drug delivery via the transferrin receptor-mediated endocytosis pathway. Pharmacological reviews 54: 561–587. pmid:12429868
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Moos T, Rosengren Nielsen T, Skjorringe T, Morgan EH (2007) Iron trafficking inside the brain. Journal of neurochemistry 103: 1730–1740. pmid:17953660
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Widera A, Norouziyan F, Shen WC (2003) Mechanisms of TfR-mediated transcytosis and sorting in epithelial cells and applications toward drug delivery. Advanced drug delivery reviews 55: 1439–1466. pmid:14597140
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Krishna AD, Mandraju RK, Kishore G, Kondapi AK (2009) An efficient targeted drug delivery through apotransferrin loaded nanoparticles. Plos One 4: e7240. pmid:19806207
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Saha R, Saha N, Donofrio RS, Bestervelt LL (2013) Microbial siderophores: a mini review. Journal of basic microbiology 53: 303–317. pmid:22733623
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Neilands JB (1981) Microbial iron compounds. Annual review of biochemistry 50: 715–731. pmid:6455965
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Crosa JH (1989) Genetics and molecular biology of siderophore-mediated iron transport in bacteria. Microbiological reviews 53: 517–530. pmid:2531838
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Skaar EP (2010) The battle for iron between bacterial pathogens and their vertebrate hosts. PLoS pathogens 6: e1000949. pmid:20711357
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Stephens RS, Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Martathe R, Aravind L et al. (1998) Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science 282: 754–763. pmid:9784136
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. van Ooij C, Apodaca G, Engel J (1997) Characterization of the Chlamydia trachomatis vacuole and its interaction with the host endocytic pathway in HeLa cells. Infection and immunity 65: 758–766. pmid:9009339
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Al-Younes HM, Rudel T, Meyer TF (1999) Characterization and intracellular trafficking pattern of vacuoles containing Chlamydia pneumoniae in human epithelial cells. Cellular microbiology 1: 237–247. pmid:11207556
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Ouellette SP, Carabeo RA (2010) A Functional Slow Recycling Pathway of Transferrin is Required for Growth of Chlamydia. Frontiers in microbiology 1: 112. pmid:21607082
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Pakdaman R, Abdallah FB, El Hage Chahine JM (1999) Transferrin, is a mixed chelate-protein ternary complex involved in the mechanism of iron uptake by serum-transferrin in vitro? J Mol Biol 293: 1273–1284. pmid:10547300
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Makey DG, Seal US (1976) The detection of four molecular forms of human transferrin during the iron binding process. Biochim Biophys Acta 453: 250–256. pmid:999884
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Hemadi M, Miquel G, Kahn PH, El Hage Chahine JM (2003) Aluminum exchange between citrate and human serum transferrin and interaction with transferrin receptor 1. Biochemistry-Us 42: 3120–3130.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Turkewitz AP, Amatruda JF, Borhani D, Harrison SC, Schwartz AL (1988) A high yield purification of the human transferrin receptor and properties of its major extracellular fragment. J Biol Chem 263: 8318–8325. pmid:3372526
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Bali PK, Zak O, Aisen P (1991) A new role for the transferrin receptor in the release of iron from transferrin. Biochemistry-Us 30: 324–328.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Piraux H, Hai J, Verbeke P, Serradji N, Ammar S, Losno R, et al. (2013) Transferrin receptor-1 iron-acquisition pathway—synthesis, kinetics, thermodynamics and rapid cellular internalization of a holotransferrin-maghemite nanoparticle construct. Biochim Biophys Acta 1830: 4254–4264. pmid:23648413
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Scidmore MA (2005) Cultivation and Laboratory Maintenance of Chlamydia trachomatis. Current protocols in microbiology Chapter 11: Unit 11A 11.
37. Dumoux M, Le Gall SM, Habbeddine M, Delarbre C, Hayward RD, Kanellopoulos-Langevin C et al. (2013) Penicillin kills Chlamydia following the fusion of bacteria with lysosomes and prevents genital inflammatory lesions in C. muridarum-infected mice. PLoS One 8(12):e83511. pmid:24376710
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Schuler J, Frank J, Saenger W, Georgalis Y (1999) Thermally induced aggregation of human transferrin receptor studied by light-scattering techniques. Biophysical journal 77: 1117–1125. pmid:10423456
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Wyrick PB (2010) Chlamydia trachomatis persistence in vitro: an overview. The Journal of infectious diseases 201 Suppl 2: S88–95. pmid:20470046
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Marathe R, Aravind L, Mitchell W, et al. (1998) Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science 282: 754–759. pmid:9784136
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Saka HA, Valdivia RH (2010) Acquisition of nutrients by Chlamydiae: unique challenges of living in an intracellular compartment. Current opinion in microbiology 13: 4–10. pmid:20006538
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Ojcius DM, Hellio R, Dautry-Varsat A (1997) Distribution of endosomal, lysosomal, and major histocompatability complex markers in a monocytic cell line infected with Chlamydia psittaci. Infection and immunity 65: 2437–2442. pmid:9169786
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Al-Younes HM, Rudel T, Brinkmann V, Szczepek AJ, Meyer TF (2001) Low iron availability modulates the course of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Cellular microbiology 3: 427–437. pmid:11422085
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Scidmore MA, Fischer ER, Hackstadt T (1996) Sphingolipids and glycoproteins are differentially trafficked to the Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion. The Journal of cell biology 134: 363–374. pmid:8707822
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Scidmore MA, Fischer ER, Hackstadt T (2003) Restricted fusion of Chlamydia trachomatis vesicles with endocytic compartments during the initial stages of infection. Infection and immunity 71: 973–984. pmid:12540580
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Taraska T, Ward DM, Ajioka RS, Wyrick PB, Davis-Kaplan SR, Davis CH et al. (1996) The late chlamydial inclusion membrane is not derived from the endocytic pathway and is relatively deficient in host proteins. Infection and immunity 64: 3713–3727. pmid:8751921
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Rzomp KA, Scholtes LD, Briggs BJ, Whittaker GR, Scidmore MA (2003) Rab GTPases are recruited to chlamydial inclusions in both a species-dependent and species-independent manner. Infection and immunity 71: 5855–5870. pmid:14500507
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Kakuta K, Orino K, Yamamoto S, Watanabe K (1997) High levels of ferritin and its iron in fetal bovine serum. Comparative biochemistry and physiology Part A, Physiology 118: 165–169. pmid:9243818
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Yewale C, Baradia D, Vhora I, Misra A (2013) Proteins: emerging carrier for delivery of cancer therapeutics. Expert opinion on drug delivery 10: 1429–1448. pmid:23789923
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Ibrahim HR, Tatsumoto S, Hajime O, van Immerseel F, Raspoet R, Miyata T (2014) A novel antibiotic-delivery system by using ovotransferrin as targeting molecule. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences: official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences 66C: 59–69.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Klockner A, Otten C, Derouaux A, Vollmer W, Buhl H, De Benedetti S, et al. (2014) AmiA is a penicillin target enzyme with dual activity in the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae. Nature communications 5: 4201. pmid:24953137
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Jacquier N, Viollier PH, Greub G (2015) The role of peptidoglycan in chlamydial cell division: towards resolving the chlamydial anomaly. FEMS microbiology reviews 39: 262–275. pmid:25670734
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Hu VH, Holland MJ, Burton MJ (2013) Trachoma: protective and pathogenic ocular immune responses to Chlamydia trachomatis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases 7: e2020. pmid:23457650
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Pungetti D, Calderara MA, Panozzo M, Pignataro R, Selleri MC, Travisani D et al. (1988) The incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis-induced infection in women suffering from cervicovaginitis. Acta Europaea fertilitatis 19: 93–97. pmid:3066089
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Brizzolara SS, Kosasa TS, Uemura HS (1990) Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection related to selected signs and symptoms of lower genital tract infections in women. Hawaii medical journal 49: 332, 335–336 339. pmid:2246123
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. el-Shourbagy M, Abd-el-Maeboud K, Diab KM, el-Ghannam A, Nabegh L, Ammar S (1996) Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Egyptian women: incidence among different clinical risk groups. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 22: 467–472. pmid:8987330
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Abdelrahman YM, Belland RJ (2005) The chlamydial developmental cycle. FEMS microbiology reviews 29: 949–959. pmid:16043254
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Belland RJ, Zhong G, Crane DD, Hogan D, Sturdevant D, Sharma J et al. (2003) Genomic transcriptional profiling of the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 8478–8483. pmid:12815105
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Schachter J. Chlamydiae. In: Balows A, Hausler WJ Jr, Hermann KL, Isenberg HD, Shadomy HJ, eds. Manual of clinical microbiology. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press, 1991:1045–53

[ref8] 8. Whittington WL, Kent C, Kissinger P, Oh MK, Fortenberry JD, Hillis SE, et al. (2001) Determinants of persistent and recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: results of a multicenter cohort study. Sexually transmitted diseases 28: 117–123. pmid:11234786
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Somani J, Bhullar VB, Workowski KA, Farshy CE, Black CM (2000) Multiple drug-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis associated with clinical treatment failure. The Journal of infectious diseases 181: 1421–1427. pmid:10762573
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Mpiga P, Ravaoarinoro M (2006) Chlamydia trachomatis persistence: an update. Microbiological research 161: 9–19. pmid:16338585
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Pakdaman R, El Hage Chahine JM (1996) A mechanism for iron uptake by transferrin. Eur J Biochem 236: 922–931. pmid:8665914
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Hemadi M, Kahn PH, Miquel G, El Hage Chahine JM (2004) Transferrin's mechanism of interaction with receptor 1. Biochemistry-Us 43: 1736–1745.
View Article
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Cheng Y, Zak O, Aisen P, Harrison SC, Walz T (2004) Structure of the human transferrin receptor-transferrin complex. Cell 116: 565–576. pmid:14980223
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. El Hage Chahine JM, Hemadi M, Ha-Duong NT (2012) Uptake and release of metal ions by transferrin and interaction with receptor 1. Biochim Biophys Acta 1820: 334–347. pmid:21872645
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Hemadi M, Ha-Duong NT, El Hage Chahine JM (2006) The mechanism of iron release from the transferrin-receptor 1 adduct. J Mol Biol 358: 1125–1136. pmid:16564538
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Hogemann-Savellano D, Bos E, Blondet C, Sato F, Abe T, Josephson L, et al. (2003) The transferrin receptor: a potential molecular imaging marker for human cancer. Neoplasia 5: 495–506. pmid:14965443
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Daniels TR, Delgado T, Helguera G, Penichet ML (2006) The transferrin receptor part II: targeted delivery of therapeutic agents into cancer cells. Clinical immunology 121: 159–176. pmid:16920030
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Qian ZM, Li H, Sun H, Ho K (2002) Targeted drug delivery via the transferrin receptor-mediated endocytosis pathway. Pharmacological reviews 54: 561–587. pmid:12429868
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Moos T, Rosengren Nielsen T, Skjorringe T, Morgan EH (2007) Iron trafficking inside the brain. Journal of neurochemistry 103: 1730–1740. pmid:17953660
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Widera A, Norouziyan F, Shen WC (2003) Mechanisms of TfR-mediated transcytosis and sorting in epithelial cells and applications toward drug delivery. Advanced drug delivery reviews 55: 1439–1466. pmid:14597140
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Krishna AD, Mandraju RK, Kishore G, Kondapi AK (2009) An efficient targeted drug delivery through apotransferrin loaded nanoparticles. Plos One 4: e7240. pmid:19806207
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Saha R, Saha N, Donofrio RS, Bestervelt LL (2013) Microbial siderophores: a mini review. Journal of basic microbiology 53: 303–317. pmid:22733623
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Neilands JB (1981) Microbial iron compounds. Annual review of biochemistry 50: 715–731. pmid:6455965
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Crosa JH (1989) Genetics and molecular biology of siderophore-mediated iron transport in bacteria. Microbiological reviews 53: 517–530. pmid:2531838
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Skaar EP (2010) The battle for iron between bacterial pathogens and their vertebrate hosts. PLoS pathogens 6: e1000949. pmid:20711357
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Stephens RS, Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Martathe R, Aravind L et al. (1998) Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science 282: 754–763. pmid:9784136
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. van Ooij C, Apodaca G, Engel J (1997) Characterization of the Chlamydia trachomatis vacuole and its interaction with the host endocytic pathway in HeLa cells. Infection and immunity 65: 758–766. pmid:9009339
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Al-Younes HM, Rudel T, Meyer TF (1999) Characterization and intracellular trafficking pattern of vacuoles containing Chlamydia pneumoniae in human epithelial cells. Cellular microbiology 1: 237–247. pmid:11207556
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Ouellette SP, Carabeo RA (2010) A Functional Slow Recycling Pathway of Transferrin is Required for Growth of Chlamydia. Frontiers in microbiology 1: 112. pmid:21607082
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Pakdaman R, Abdallah FB, El Hage Chahine JM (1999) Transferrin, is a mixed chelate-protein ternary complex involved in the mechanism of iron uptake by serum-transferrin in vitro? J Mol Biol 293: 1273–1284. pmid:10547300
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Makey DG, Seal US (1976) The detection of four molecular forms of human transferrin during the iron binding process. Biochim Biophys Acta 453: 250–256. pmid:999884
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Hemadi M, Miquel G, Kahn PH, El Hage Chahine JM (2003) Aluminum exchange between citrate and human serum transferrin and interaction with transferrin receptor 1. Biochemistry-Us 42: 3120–3130.
View Article
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Turkewitz AP, Amatruda JF, Borhani D, Harrison SC, Schwartz AL (1988) A high yield purification of the human transferrin receptor and properties of its major extracellular fragment. J Biol Chem 263: 8318–8325. pmid:3372526
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Bali PK, Zak O, Aisen P (1991) A new role for the transferrin receptor in the release of iron from transferrin. Biochemistry-Us 30: 324–328.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Piraux H, Hai J, Verbeke P, Serradji N, Ammar S, Losno R, et al. (2013) Transferrin receptor-1 iron-acquisition pathway—synthesis, kinetics, thermodynamics and rapid cellular internalization of a holotransferrin-maghemite nanoparticle construct. Biochim Biophys Acta 1830: 4254–4264. pmid:23648413
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Scidmore MA (2005) Cultivation and Laboratory Maintenance of Chlamydia trachomatis. Current protocols in microbiology Chapter 11: Unit 11A 11.

[ref37] 37. Dumoux M, Le Gall SM, Habbeddine M, Delarbre C, Hayward RD, Kanellopoulos-Langevin C et al. (2013) Penicillin kills Chlamydia following the fusion of bacteria with lysosomes and prevents genital inflammatory lesions in C. muridarum-infected mice. PLoS One 8(12):e83511. pmid:24376710
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Schuler J, Frank J, Saenger W, Georgalis Y (1999) Thermally induced aggregation of human transferrin receptor studied by light-scattering techniques. Biophysical journal 77: 1117–1125. pmid:10423456
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Wyrick PB (2010) Chlamydia trachomatis persistence in vitro: an overview. The Journal of infectious diseases 201 Suppl 2: S88–95. pmid:20470046
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Marathe R, Aravind L, Mitchell W, et al. (1998) Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science 282: 754–759. pmid:9784136
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Saka HA, Valdivia RH (2010) Acquisition of nutrients by Chlamydiae: unique challenges of living in an intracellular compartment. Current opinion in microbiology 13: 4–10. pmid:20006538
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Ojcius DM, Hellio R, Dautry-Varsat A (1997) Distribution of endosomal, lysosomal, and major histocompatability complex markers in a monocytic cell line infected with Chlamydia psittaci. Infection and immunity 65: 2437–2442. pmid:9169786
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] PubMed/NCBI

[159] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Al-Younes HM, Rudel T, Brinkmann V, Szczepek AJ, Meyer TF (2001) Low iron availability modulates the course of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Cellular microbiology 3: 427–437. pmid:11422085
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Scidmore MA, Fischer ER, Hackstadt T (1996) Sphingolipids and glycoproteins are differentially trafficked to the Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion. The Journal of cell biology 134: 363–374. pmid:8707822
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Scidmore MA, Fischer ER, Hackstadt T (2003) Restricted fusion of Chlamydia trachomatis vesicles with endocytic compartments during the initial stages of infection. Infection and immunity 71: 973–984. pmid:12540580
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] PubMed/NCBI

[171] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Taraska T, Ward DM, Ajioka RS, Wyrick PB, Davis-Kaplan SR, Davis CH et al. (1996) The late chlamydial inclusion membrane is not derived from the endocytic pathway and is relatively deficient in host proteins. Infection and immunity 64: 3713–3727. pmid:8751921
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[173] View Article

[174] PubMed/NCBI

[175] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Rzomp KA, Scholtes LD, Briggs BJ, Whittaker GR, Scidmore MA (2003) Rab GTPases are recruited to chlamydial inclusions in both a species-dependent and species-independent manner. Infection and immunity 71: 5855–5870. pmid:14500507
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] PubMed/NCBI

[179] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Kakuta K, Orino K, Yamamoto S, Watanabe K (1997) High levels of ferritin and its iron in fetal bovine serum. Comparative biochemistry and physiology Part A, Physiology 118: 165–169. pmid:9243818
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] PubMed/NCBI

[183] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Yewale C, Baradia D, Vhora I, Misra A (2013) Proteins: emerging carrier for delivery of cancer therapeutics. Expert opinion on drug delivery 10: 1429–1448. pmid:23789923
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] PubMed/NCBI

[187] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Ibrahim HR, Tatsumoto S, Hajime O, van Immerseel F, Raspoet R, Miyata T (2014) A novel antibiotic-delivery system by using ovotransferrin as targeting molecule. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences: official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences 66C: 59–69.
View Article
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Klockner A, Otten C, Derouaux A, Vollmer W, Buhl H, De Benedetti S, et al. (2014) AmiA is a penicillin target enzyme with dual activity in the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae. Nature communications 5: 4201. pmid:24953137
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] PubMed/NCBI

[194] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Jacquier N, Viollier PH, Greub G (2015) The role of peptidoglycan in chlamydial cell division: towards resolving the chlamydial anomaly. FEMS microbiology reviews 39: 262–275. pmid:25670734
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Materials

Stock solutions

Purification of transferrin and receptor

Fluorescent Labeling

Grafting amoxicillin onto transferrin

Spectrophotometric measurements

Mass spectrometry

Bacteria, cell culture and biological reagents

Localization of Tf-RhB, amox-Tf-RhB and Tf-amox-FNH2 in C. trachomatis-infected cells

Treatment of C. trachomatis-infected cells by Tf-amox

Titration of infectivity

Transmission electron microscopy

Statistical analysis

Results

Transferrin colocalizes within the Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion

Conjugation of amoxicillin onto transferrin

Interaction of Tf-amox with R1: Thermodynamic approach

Tf-amox modifies the phenotype of C. trachomatis and alters the development of the bacterial inclusion

Tf-amox has a bactericidal effect on C. trachomatis at lower concentration than free amoxicillin

Discussion

Conclusion

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Localization of the Tf-RhB (A) and RhB (B) in HeLa cells incubated at 37°C and 4°C.

S2 Fig. Time-dependent localization of transferrin in Chlamydia-infected- and uninfected cells.

S3 Fig. Localization of amox-Tf-RhB into the chlamydial inclusion.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Localization of Tf-RhB, amox-Tf-RhB and Tf-amox-FNH₂ in C. trachomatis-infected cells