Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Prawn Shell Chitosan Exhibits Anti-Obesogenic Potential through Alterations to Appetite, Affecting Feeding Behaviour and Satiety Signals In Vivo

Prawn Shell Chitosan Exhibits Anti-Obesogenic Potential through Alterations to Appetite, Affecting Feeding Behaviour and Satiety Signals In Vivo

  • Áine M. Egan, 
  • John V. O’Doherty, 
  • Stafford Vigors, 
  • Torres Sweeney


The crustacean shells-derived polysaccharide chitosan has received much attention for its anti-obesity potential. Dietary supplementation of chitosan has been linked with reductions in feed intake, suggesting a potential link between chitosan and appetite control. Hence the objective of this experiment was to investigate the appetite suppressing potential of prawn shell derived chitosan in a pig model. Pigs (70 ± 0.90 kg, 125 days of age, SD 2.0) were fed either T1) basal diet or T2) basal diet plus 1000 ppm chitosan (n = 20 gilts per group) for 63 days. The parameter categories which were assessed included performance, feeding behaviour, serum leptin concentrations and expression of genes influencing feeding behaviour in the small intestine, hypothalamus and adipose tissue. Pigs offered chitosan visited the feeder less times per day (P<0.001), had lower intake per visit (P<0.001), spent less time eating per day (P<0.001), had a lower eating rate (P<0.01) and had reduced feed intake and final body weight (P< 0.001) compared to animals offered the basal diet. There was a treatment (P<0.05) and time effect (P<0.05) on serum leptin concentrations in animals offered the chitosan diet compared to animals offered the basal diet. Pigs receiving dietary chitosan had an up-regulation in gene expression of growth hormone receptor (P<0.05), Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (P<0.01), neuromedin B (P<0.05), neuropeptide Y receptor 5 (P<0.05) in hypothalamic nuclei and neuropeptide Y (P<0.05) in the jejunum. Animals consuming chitosan had increased leptin expression in adipose tissue compared to pigs offered the basal diet (P<0.05). In conclusion, these data support the hypothesis that dietary prawn shell chitosan exhibits anti-obesogenic potential through alterations to appetite, and feeding behaviour affecting satiety signals in vivo.


Obesity and obesity-related disorders are reaching epidemic proportions worldwide. The potential of natural products to prevent obesity have been highlighted [1]. There is increasing interest in the use of natural resources as protective agents against obesity because of some harmful side-effects of synthetic compounds [2] Chitosan is a non-toxic nutritional supplement generally regarded as a safe compound [3]. Chitosan is a natural polysaccharide, comprising copolymers of glucosamine (β (1–4)-linked 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose) and N-acetyl glucosamine, (2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucose) which can be derived by partial deacetylation of chitin [4]. Recently chitosan has been shown to improve growth performance in young animals [5]. In contrast chitosan has also received much attention for its anti-obesity potential [6, 7], with dietary supplementation reducing feed intake in both mice [8] and pigs [7]. Ingestion of this natural polysaccharide increased serum leptin, a hormone which plays a key role in appetite suppression, suggesting a potential link between chitosan and appetite control [9].

Feeding behaviour influences energy intake and is itself influenced by appetite-related neuropeptides produced in the central hypothalamus. Within the hypothalamus several nuclei exist which integrate peripheral signals. The main neural pathways involved in appetite control are the orexigenic neuropeptide Y/Agouti-related protein (NPY/AgRp) and the anorexigenic pro-opiomelanocortin/cocaine- and amphetamine-related transcript (POMC/CART) neurons. Signals within these pathways modulate food intake and energy expenditure [10], subsequently regulating pathways within the central nervous system including signals from the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [11]. The GIT synthesises appetite inducing hormones which are suppressed following food consumption and appetite suppressing hormones which are increased in circulation following food consumption. These include hormones such as peptide YY (PYY), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and cholecystokinin (CCK), ghrelin, insulin, melanocortin and orexin. These hormones act on the hypothalamus, inducing sensations of either hunger or satiety [12]. Meal anticipation and the presence of food in the upper gastrointestinal tract stimulate the release of both gut hormones and neurotransmitters [13]. These signals are involved in the initiation and maintenance of food intake as well as the termination of meals. This system of negative feedback within the gut-brain axis is crucial to appetite regulation and subsequent feeding behaviour [14].

Accumulating evidence suggests that the communication pathways linking the brain, gut and adipose tissue might be promising intervention points for metabolic disorders [15]. The potential of dietary chitosan to modulate the gut-brain-adipose tissue axis in favour of reduced appetite may be contributing to chitosans ability to reduce food intake and body weight gain in vivo. Hence, the objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of dietary supplementation of chitosan on feeding behaviour, appetite regulation in the hypothalamus, adipose tissue and intestine, feed intake, body weight gain and serum leptin concentrations. The hypothesis being tested is that dietary supplementation of chitosan would decrease appetite through modulation of hypothalamic, intestinal and adipose tissue regulators of appetite thus reducing feed intake and body weight gain in the pig.

Materials and Methods

All experimental procedures described in this experiment were conducted under experimental license from the Irish Department of Health in accordance with the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876 and the European Communities (Amendments of the Cruelty to Animals Act, 1876) Regulations (1994). An experimental license (AREC-09-31-O’Doherty) was obtained from the Animal Research Ethics Subcommittee University College Dublin.

Generation of chitosan from chitin

The chitosan was generated from prawn (Nephrops norvegicus) shell sourced from Spiddal Co. Galway, Ireland. Prawn shell was collected on five different occasions before extraction of chitosan. The prawn shell was heated in boiling sodium chloride (4% NaCl) for 10 minutes and cooled in tap water to remove excess prawn protein material. The shell was washed extensively and freeze-dried. Clean, dry shell was milled, sieved and subsequently demineralised and deproteinised using a BioFlo 110 Modular Bioreactor (New Brunswick Scientific, USA). Following this, HCL (0.25 M) was added to the prawn shell material at a ratio of 1:40 weight/volume to demineralise the shell and remove the minerals from the dry shell. The temperature of the reaction was maintained at 40°C for 6 h. The shell material was subsequently drained, washed until a neutral pH was obtained, then frozen and freeze-dried to obtain a demineralised shell powder. The demineralised shell powder was then deproteinised using 0.25 M NaOH using a shell to solvent ratio of 1:40 w/v at 70°C for 6 h. The chitosan was washed until a neutral pH was reached, then freeze-dried and subsequently milled to obtain chitosan powder.

Characterisation of chitosan

The molecular weight data for the generated chitosan was analysed using the SEDFIT-MSTAR. The degree of acetylation was determined by analysis of the 1H proton spectrum following the method of [16].

Animals and management

The experiment was a complete randomised design. Forty females pigs (Large White x Landrace genetic lines, Hermitage, Co. Kilkenny, Ireland), with average body weight of 70 kg (SD = 0.9), (125 days of age, SD = 2.0) were randomly assigned to one of two dietary treatments (20 animals/treatment): (T1) basal diet (control) and (T2) basal diet plus 1g/kg chitosan. Diets were offered ad libitum for 63 days. Female pigs were used because of their higher back fat deposition relative to male pigs [17]. The concentration of chitosan used in the present study was based on previous work by Walsh et al. [7]. The diets were provided ad libitum in a meal form from single space computerised feeders (Mastleistungsprufung MLP-RAP; Schauer Agrotronic AG, Sursee, Switzerland). Water was available ad libitum from nipple drinkers. The diets were formulated to have similar digestible energy (14 MJ/kg) and standardised ileal digestible lysine (8.5 g/kg) contents. All amino acid requirements were met relative to lysine [18]. Detailed ingredient composition and chemical analysis of the diets are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Diet composition and chemical analysis (g/kg, unless otherwise indicated).

The animals were penned in four groups of ten with a space allowance of 0.75m2 per pig. The pens were equipped with single space computerised feeders (Mastleistungsprufung MLP-RAP; Schauer Agrotronic AG, Sursee, Switzerland), as described by Varley et al. [19] and Walsh et al. [7] which allowed individual ad libitum feeding and daily recording of dietary intake. Briefly, when the animal entered the feeder, it was recognised by the electronic system (MLP-Manager 1.2; Schauer Maschinenfabrik Ges.m.b.H and CoKG, Prambachkirchen, Austria). Each animal was ear-tagged with a uniquely coded transponder and the identification circuit recorded the number of the animal. When the animal finished feeding and withdrew from the trough, the electronic system recorded the difference between the pre- and post-visit trough weight and the data was stored in a file with the number of identification of the animal, the date, and the time of entry and exit. The animals were weighed at the beginning of the experiment (day 0) and every two weeks up to slaughter (day 63).

Blood sample collection

Blood samples (10 ml) were collected from each animal (n = 10) from the vena jugularis by puncture into vacutainers (Becton, Dickinson, Drogheda, Ireland) on day 0 (prior to commencing of the experiment), day 14, 28, 37, 49 and 63 to facilitate leptin quantification. Blood samples were allowed to clot at 4°C and serum was collected after centrifugation (1,500 × g for 15 min at 4°C). Serum samples were stored at -20°C until analysis.

Post slaughter sample collection

On day 63, all animals were slaughtered after stunning with an electrical bolt and the entire intestinal tract and brain were removed by blunt dissection. Three regions of the brain were dissected from the hypothalamus to collect; the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), arcuate nucleus (ARC) and the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) to accommodate gene expression analysis of hypothalamic regulators of appetite and feeding behaviour: Neuropeptide Y (NPY), Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC), Agouti related protein (AgRp) and Cocaine amphetamine regulated transcript (CART), Orexin (HCRT) and Neuromedin (NMB), Growth hormone receptor (GHR), Insulin receptor (INSR) and Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARG). Brain tissue samples were stored in RNAlater solution (Ambion Inc, Austin, TX) overnight at 4°C. Tissue samples from the jejunum (60 cm from the stomach) and ileum (10 cm from the ileo-cecal valve) were collected to analyse the gene expression of appetite gut hormones: Cholecystokinin (CCK), Peptide YY (PYY) Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and Neuropeptide Y (NPY). Intestinal tissue samples were emptied and cleaned by dissecting along the mesentery and rinsing using sterile PBS (Oxoid) as described previously [21, 22]. Tissue sections of 1 cm2, which had been stripped of the overlying smooth muscle were cut from the tissue and stored in RNAlater solution (Ambion Inc, Austin, TX) overnight at 4°C. The RNAlater™ was then removed from brain and intestinal tissue samples and samples were stored at -70°C until RNA extraction. Adipose tissue was collected from the mid-region of the back and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and transported to the laboratory and stored at -70°C until RNA extraction. Adipose tissue samples were collected to analyse the gene expression of leptin.

Laboratory Analysis

Leptin quantification—ELISA

Serum leptin was quantified by using a specific pig leptin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit from Life Science Inc. (Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sensitivity of the assay was 0.114 pg/ml, and intra-assay coefficient of variation was < 12%. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm against 570 nm for each assay by using the ELISA plate reader. All samples were assayed in triplicate in the same assay.

RNA extraction, complementary DNA synthesis and quantitative PCR

Total RNA was purified using the trizol extraction method. Total RNA was extracted from approximately 50 mg of adipose tissue and small intestinal samples and from the entire brain tissue sample using the GenElute™ Mammalian Total RNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich,Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA samples were treated with DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich). Total RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop-ND1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). RNA integrity was assessed on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyze version A.02.12 (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) and all RNA integrity number values were > 8.9. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesised from 1 μg of total RNA using the Superscript™ III First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific) and oligo (dt) primers following the manufacturer's instructions. The final reaction volume of 20 μl was then adjusted to 120 μl using nuclease-free water. The quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay mixtures were prepared in a total volume of 20 μl, containing 10 μl Fast SYBR PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 1.8 μl forward and reverse primer mix (300 nm), 5.7 μl nuclease-free water and 2.5 μl cDNA. The RT-qPCR was carried out in duplicate on the 7500 ABI Prism Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Thermocycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min for one cycle, followed by 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min for forty cycles. Dissociation analyses of the QPCR products confirmed the specificity of all targets. All primers for the selected genes: NPY, POMC, AgRp, CART, HCRT, NMB, GHR, PPARG, INSR, CCK, GLP-1, PYY and leptin are presented in Table 2. All primers were designed using the Primer ExpressTM Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and synthesised by MWG Biotech (Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, UK). Dissociation analyses of the QPCR products were carried out to confirm the specificity of the resulting QPCR products. All samples were prepared in duplicate. The mean cycle threshold values of duplicates of each sample were used for calculations. The optimal number of reference targets were identified using the geNorm application within the qbase PLUS software package (Biogazelle, Zwijnaarde, Belgium). Briefly, the geNorm algorithm on the qbase+ package (Biogazelle, Gent, Belgium) calculated the expression stability factor (M). From this the optimal combination of reference genes required for normalisation were selected. Using this algorithm, reference genes are ranked based on their M values. In brief, geNorm calculates the stability measure M for a reference gene as the average pairwise variation (V) for that gene with all other tested reference genes. A Vn/n+1 value is calculated for every comparison between two consecutive numbers (n and n+1) of candidate reference genes. Following the stepwise exclusion of the least stable reference genes, by the geNorm program, M values were re-calculated and the stability series obtained. Finally, the NF was calculated, as the geometric mean of the most stable reference genes, and the normalised relative quantity (NRQ) of the target genes obtained as the ratio between the relative quantities and the sample specific NF. The basic formula for relative quantification (RQ = 2^ddCt) assumes 100% amplification efficiency (E = 2). The most stable housekeeping genes selected for the ARC were; Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS), PVN; Beta actin (ACTB) and Peptidylprolyl isomerase A (PPIA), LHA; hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS) and Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and adipose tissue; Peptidylprolyl isomerase A (PPIA) and HMBS, ileum and jejunum; PPIA and HMBS.

Table 2. Swine-specific primers used for brain, intestinal and adipose tissue real-time PCR.

Statistical analysis

The growth performance was analysed by repeated measures analysis using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS [23]. The model included pen and animal within pen as random effects. The fixed effects were: treatment, time and interaction between treatment and time. The carcass data was analysed using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS. The model used included pen and animal within pen as random effects. The fixed effect was treatment. The leptin data was analysed by repeated measures analysis using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS [23]. The model used included the pig as a random effect. The fixed effects were: treatment, time of sampling and the associated two way interaction between treatment and time of sampling. The data on adipose tissue, brain and small intestinal gene expression were analysed using the general linear model procedure of the Statistical Analysis Systems Institute [24]. The model used included the effect of treatment. Feeding behaviour data was analysed by repeated measures analysis using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS. The model used included the effect of treatment. The probability level that denotes significance is P< 0.05, while P values between 0.05 and 0.1 are considered numerical tendencies. Data are presented as least-square means with their standard errors.


Characterisation of chitosan

The degree of acetylation obtained was 15%. The molecular weight of the prawn shell chitosan was 124,000 ± 10,000 g/mol.

Feed intake and body weight

The effect of chitosan supplementation on body weight and feed intake over time are presented in Figs 1 and 2 while the effect of chitosan supplementation on pig performance and carcass characteristics are presented in Table 3. There was a time x treatment interaction (P< 0.01) on body weight, where chitosan supplemented pigs had a lower body weight on day 56 (P<0.01) and day 63 (P<0.001) compared to the control group. There was a treatment effect (P< 0.001) and time effect (P< 0.001) on feed intake. Pigs offered the chitosan diet had lower feed intake (P< 0.01) and body weight gain (P< 0.05) during the experiment (days 0–63) (P< 0.01), and lower final body weight (P< 0.05) compared with basal diet fed pigs. Pigs receiving chitosan had lower carcass fat content compared to basal diet fed pigs (P< 0.05).

Fig 1. Effect of dietary supplementation on body weight over time at days 0, 14, 28, 42, 56 and 63.

*P<0.05 **P<0.001. Treatment effect P< 0.001. Time effect P< 0.001. Time x treatment effect P< 0.01. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars.

Fig 2. Effect of dietary supplementation on feed intake over time at days 0, 14, 28, 42, 56 and 63.

Treatment effect P<0.001. Time effect P<0.001. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars.

Table 3. Effect of dietary supplementation on growth performance and carcass characteristics (least-square means and SEM).

Feeding behaviour

The effect of dietary supplementation of chitosan on feeding behaviour is shown in Table 4. Pigs offered the chitosan diet ate less per visit (P <0.001), had a lower number of visits per day (P <0.001), spent less time eating per day (P <0.001) and had a lower eating rate (P <0.01) when compared to the control group.

Table 4. Effect of prawn shell chitosan on feeding behaviour (D0-63) (least square means and SEM).

Serum leptin

There was a time effect (P<0.05) and treatment effect (P<0.05) on serum leptin concentrations. Serum leptin concentrations were increased in animals offered the chitosan diet compared with the control group (P< 0.05) (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Effect of dietary supplementation on serum leptin levels over time at days 0, 14, 28, 37, 49 and 63.

Treatment effect (P<0.05). Time effect (P<0.05). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars.

Hypothalamic regulators of appetite

The effects of dietary supplementation of chitosan on hypothalamic regulators of appetite are shown in Table 5. Dietary chitosan up-regulated GHR gene expression (P <0.05) and down-regulated HCRT expression in the ARC (P<0.05) when compared to the control group. Dietary chitosan resulted in an up-regulation of PPARG (P<0.01) NMB and NPY5R (P<0.05) gene expression in the PVN when compared to the control animals. Dietary chitosan had a tendency to up-regulate INSR (P = 0.07) in the PVN when compared to the control group. There was no effect of diet on hypothalamic regulators of appetite in the LHA (P>0.05).

Table 5. Effect of dietary treatment on hypothalamic regulators of appetite in the ARC, PVN and LHA (least square means and SEM).

Gene expression of gut and adipose tissue appetite hormones

The effect of chitosan supplementation on small intestinal appetite gene expression is presented in Table 6. Dietary supplementation of chitosan down-regulated NPY gene expression in the jejunum when compared to the control group (P<0.05). There was no effect of dietary supplementation of chitosan on the remaining genes analysed (P >0.05). Animals offered the chitosan diet had an up-regulation of leptin gene expression in adipose tissue compared to the control group (P<0.05).

Table 6. Effect of dietary treatment on small intestine and adipose tissue regulators of appetite gene expression (least square means and SEM).


The polysaccharide chitosan has anti-obesogenic effects in vivo [6, 7]; however the anti-obesogenic mode of action of chitosan is poorly understood. The present study hypothesised that dietary supplementation of chitosan would decrease appetite through modulation of hypothalamic, intestinal and adipose tissue regulators of appetite, thus reducing feed intake and body weight gain in the pig. The responses observed in animals offered chitosan support this hypothesis. These responses included down-regulation of orexigenic genes in the small intestine and hypothalamus, reduced feed intake and weight gain, increased serum leptin and up-regulated leptin expression in adipose tissue.

In order to maintain body weight, the brain must tightly monitor the peripheral energy state. This is governed by genes influencing appetite and feeding behaviour. Two major groups of metabolic inputs inform the brain about the peripheral energy state: short-term signals produced by the gut system and long-term signals produced by adipose tissue. After central integration of these inputs, the brain generates neuronal and hormonal outputs to balance energy intake with expenditure. The brain continually monitors the systemic metabolic state and adjusts behaviour, as well as humoral and neuronal outputs to peripheral organs, to maintain body weight and avoid excess weight loss or gain. The potential of dietary chitosan to modulate the gut-brain-adipose tissue axis in favour of reduced appetite may be contributing to chitosans ability to reduce food intake and body weight gain in vivo. Information about energy stores and recent food intake is communicated between the hypothalamus and intestine ultimately influencing the perception of hunger, satiety and satiation [25]. In the present study, chitosan supplemented animals had down regulated NPY gene expression in the jejunum. Neuropeptide Y is found in both the brain and nervous system [26]. With regard to appetite stimulation, NPY is a potent peptide which increases food intake [27, 28]. The down-regulation of NPY gene expression in the jejunum of chitosan supplemented animals may have contributed to the decrease in feed intake observed in the present study. This may be explained by the fact that the hypothalamus receives neural and endocrine signals from the gut in response to food intake. These signals are integrated, interpreted and directed to other centres in the brain and peripheral organs to orchestrate energy homeostasis. Furthermore, analysis of hypothalamic gene expression identified that chitosan supplemented animals exhibited a down-regulation of Orexin/HCRT gene expression in the arcuate nucleus. The hypothalamic neuropeptide orexin regulated appetite through successful stimulation of food intake in weanling pigs [29]. The down-regulation of orexin gene expression in the ARC in the present study may have resulted in the chitosan supplemented animals having altered feeding behaviour. Animals receiving dietary chitosan had reduced feed intake; subsequently this group of animals had reduced body weight gain. Reduced dietary energy consumption is positively related to reduction in body weight gain [30]. Additionally, chitosan supplemented animals expressed more NMB (Neuromedin B) in the paraventricular nucleus. A member of the bombesin family, NMB reduced food intake when administered systemically in humans and animals [31, 32]. Neuromedin B has a role in the short-term control of food intake, reducing the quantity of food consumed at any given meal and increasing both satiety and satiation. This was evident in this study as supplementation with chitosan resulted in the animals engaging in less visits to the feeder, consuming less feed per visit while also reducing the feeding rate. When administered between meals, NMB increases the amount of time between meals [33, 34]. Furthermore, in the present study we observed an up-regulation of GHR gene expression in the arcuate nucleus of chitosan supplemented animals while NPY5R was also up-regulated in the paraventricular nucleus. Growth hormone, a protein released into the circulation from the anterior pituitary increases food intake [35]. Similarly, neuropeptide Y, a well characterised potent peptide also increases food intake [36]. Studies have demonstrated that NPY stimulates the release of GH and restores appetite [37, 38]. As NPY and GH are involved in increasing appetite, it may be postulated that the gene expressions of both receptors were up-regulated in an attempt to restore appetite. However, restoration of appetite did not appear to ensue as chitosan supplemented animals had lower feed intake when compared to the control animals. Although indeterminate, these findings may be attributed to negative feedback loops; whereby receptors sense changes in function and initiate the body's homeostatic response [39]. For instance, when adiposity levels increase or decrease, the brain triggers physiological homoeostatic mechanisms which resist weight change through compensatory changes in appetite [40, 41].

Obesity is frequently associated with diabetes mellitus, a group of metabolic diseases characterised by hyperglycaemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Insulin receptors are widely expressed in the brain, particularly in hypothalamic nuclei, which are involved in control of food intake [42]. The main activity of the insulin receptor is the induction of glucose uptake. Insulin insensitivity, or decreases in insulin receptor signalling, leads to diabetes mellitus type 2. In the present study, chitosan supplemented animals had a tendency for up-regulated INSR gene expression in the paraventricular nucleus. This observation suggests that dietary chitosan may have the potential to improve insulin sensitivity in vivo and is consistent with previous studies which have demonstrated that chitosan increases glucose tolerance and insulin secretion making it a potential antidiabetic agent [43, 44]. Similar to this, in the present study PPARγ expression was up-regulated in the paraventricular nucleus of chitosan supplemented animals. The PPAR activation in type 2 diabetic patients results in a marked improvement in insulin and glucose parameters, resulting from an improvement of whole-body insulin sensitivity [45]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is a nuclear receptor that regulates an array of diverse functions such as growth and differentiation in a variety of cell types [46].While PPARγ is predominantly expressed in adipose tissue it is also expressed/present in neurons [47]. Disruption of PPARγ predisposes mice to the development of diet-induced obesity, insulin resistance, and glucose intolerance [48], whereas activation of PPARγ within macrophages promotes lipid efflux [49]. Furthermore, while PPARγ is associated with adipogenesis [46], chitosan supplemented animals had a lower carcass fat content when compared to the control group. This is an interesting observation as studies have suggested that the up-regulation of PPARγ could potentially up-regulate lipid efflux [50]. This is an interesting theory as it has been generally accepted that the anti-obesity effects of chitosan originate from its unique fat-binding properties, which interferes with the absorption of dietary lipids from the gastrointestinal tract [51, 52].

Energy homeostasis is governed by a complex neuroendocrine system including adipocyte-derived peripheral signals such as leptin [53]. Leptin informs the brain about whole-body long-term energy-storage status, and adipose tissue drives the brains control of energy balance and the long-term regulation of body weight [15]. The ability of leptin to regulate appetite and energy expenditure in rodents with subsequent loss of adipose tissue has led to leptin being termed the anti-obesity hormone [54]. In the present experiment, leptin gene expression was up-regulated in the adipose tissue of the chitosan supplemented animals. Furthermore serum leptin concentrations were higher in chitosan supplemented animals. This rise in the circulation of leptin may have communicated feelings of increased satiety to the brain of animals receiving dietary chitosan. Leptin administration to both wild-type and ob/ob mice reduces food intake and body weight significantly [55]. While the rate of leptin production is related to adiposity [56], it appears dietary chitosan had a direct effect on both leptin production and circulation, as leptin concentration appeared to be independent of level of adiposity. In support of this, chitosan supplemented animals had a lower body weight and carcass fat content compared to the control animals. Furthermore, it has been reported that exposure of human adipose tissue to glucosamine increased leptin release in culture medium [57]. The findings of the aforementioned study demonstrate that adipocytes (isolated from morbidly obese subjects) significantly increase leptin release in the presence of glucosamine. Similarly, the addition of glucosamine to adipocytes from lean subjects also resulted in a significant increase in leptin release [57]. This is interesting as chitin and chitosan are polymers of N-acetyl glucosamine and glucosamine units, respectively [58].

Chitosan has been shown to exert minimal to significant anti-obesogenic effects [59, 60]. The likely rationale behind these variable results is unclear and may be related to body weight of the animals at supplementation. Interestingly, dietary chitosan reduced feed intake in pigs after 100kg body weight was attained, while no response was observed in pigs weighing less than 100kg [7]. Previously, appetite of animals was found to be suppressed only by feeding an excessive amount of chitooligosaccharide (COS) for a long term (189 days) [61]. Interestingly, the present study using medium molecular weight chitosan (124,000 ± 10,000 g/mol) identified reductions in feed intake throughout the entire experiment (63 days) where chitosan was included at a rate of 1.0g/kg. The biological effects of chitosan are highly dependent on its molecular weight, solubility and deacetylation percentage, with low molecular weight chitosan readily absorbed by intestinal cells in vitro and in vivo [62, 63].

In summary, while chitosan has been shown to exert anti-obesogenic potential (Walsh et al., 2013), the present study identified novel mechanisms through which chitosan alters appetite and feeding behaviour in a pig model. These mechanisms included alterations to genes influencing both appetite and feeding behaviour within the brain (HCRT, INSR, NMB, GHR, PPARG, NPY5R), small intestine (NPY) and adipose tissue (Leptin). This is subsequently followed by the animals exhibiting altered feeding behaviour. The alterations to feeding behaviour show evidence of reduced appetite as the pigs visit the feeders less per day and subsequently consume less feed. This reduction in daily consumption then leads to reduced body weight gain thus lower body weights. The findings of this study suggest that chitosan may be an effective anti-obesogenic agent for inclusion in the human diet.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TS JVOD. Performed the experiments: ÁME. Analyzed the data: JVOD SV. Wrote the paper: ÁME TS JVOD.


  1. 1. Yun JW. Possible anti-obesity therapeutics from nature- A review. Phytochemistry. 2010;71(14–15):1625–41. pmid:20732701
  2. 2. Bray GA. A concise review on the therapeutics of obesity. Nutrition. 2000;16(10):953–60. pmid:11054601
  3. 3. Thanou M, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE. Oral drug absorption enhancement by chitosan and its derivatives. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2001;52(2):117–26. pmid:11718935
  4. 4. Baldrick P. The safety of chitosan as a pharmaceutical excipient. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2010;56(3):290–9. pmid:19788905
  5. 5. Swiatkiewicz S, Swiatkiewicz M, Arczewska-Wlosek A, Jozefiak D. Chitosan and its oligosaccharide derivatives (chito-oligosaccharides) as feed supplements in poultry and swine nutrition. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2015;99(1):1–12. pmid:25041091
  6. 6. Sumiyoshi M, Kimura Y. Low molecular weight chitosan inhibits obesity induced by feeding a high-fat diet long-term in mice. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2006;58(2):201–7. pmid:16451748
  7. 7. Walsh AM, Sweeney T, Bahar B, O’Doherty JV. Multi-Functional Roles of Chitosan as a Potential Protective Agent against Obesity. Plos One. 2013;8(1):e53828. pmid:23342013
  8. 8. Kumar SG, Rahman MA, Lee SH, Hwang HS, Kim HA, Yun JW. Plasma proteome analysis for anti-obesity and anti-diabetic potentials of chitosan oligosaccharides in ob/ob mice. PROTEOMICS. 2009;9(8):2149–62. pmid:19296549
  9. 9. Klok MD, Jakobsdottir S, Drent ML. The role of leptin and ghrelin in the regulation of food intake and body weight in humans: a review. Obesity Reviews. 2007;8(1):21–34. pmid:17212793
  10. 10. Suzuki K, Jayasena CN, Bloom SR. Obesity and appetite control. Experimental diabetes research. 2012;2012.
  11. 11. Simpson KA, Martin NM, R. Bloom S. Hypothalamic regulation of food intake and clinical therapeutic applications. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia. 2009;53:120–8.
  12. 12. Chaudhri OB, Wynne K, Bloom SR. Can Gut Hormones Control Appetite and Prevent Obesity? Diabetes Care. 2008;31(Supplement 2):S284–S9.
  13. 13. Rehfeld JF. The new biology of gastrointestinal hormones. Physiological reviews. 1998;78(4):1087–108. pmid:9790570
  14. 14. Ahima RS, Antwi DA. Brain regulation of appetite and satiety. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. 2008;37(4):811–23. pmid:PMC2710609.
  15. 15. Yi C-X, Tschöp MH. Brain–gut–adipose-tissue communication pathways at a glance. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2012;5(5):583–7. pmid:PMC3424454.
  16. 16. Muzzarelli RA, Rocchetti R. Determination of the degree of acetylation of chitosans by first derivative ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Carbohydrate Polymers. 1985;5(6):461–72.
  17. 17. Campbell R, Taverner M. Genotype and sex effects on the relationship between energy intake and protein deposition in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 1988;66(3):676–86. pmid:3378925
  18. 18. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Swine: Eleventh Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012. 400 p.
  19. 19. Varley PF, Sweeney T, Ryan MT, O'Doherty JV. The effect of phosphorus restriction during the weaner-grower phase on compensatory growth, serum osteocalcin and bone mineralization in gilts. Livestock Science. 2011;135(2–3):282–8.
  20. 20. Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G. Table of composition and nutritional value of feed materials. Pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses, fish.: Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands; 2004.
  21. 21. Sweeney T, Collins C, Reilly P, Pierce K, Ryan M, O'Doherty J. Effect of purified β-glucans derived from Laminaria digitata, Laminaria hyperborea and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on piglet performance, selected bacterial populations, volatile fatty acids and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. British Journal of Nutrition. 2012;108(07):1226–34.
  22. 22. Heim G, Walsh A, Sweeney T, Doyle D, O'Shea C, Ryan M, et al. Effect of seaweed-derived laminarin and fucoidan and zinc oxide on gut morphology, nutrient transporters, nutrient digestibility, growth performance and selected microbial populations in weaned pigs. The British journal of nutrition. 2014:1–9.
  23. 23. Littell R, Miliken G, Stroup W, Wolfinger R. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institue Cary, NC. 1996.
  24. 24. SAS. SAS users guide. 9.1.2 ed. Cary, N.C: SAS Institue Inc.; 2004.
  25. 25. Schwartz MW, Woods SC, Porte D Jr, Seeley RJ, Baskin DG. Central nervous system control of food intake. Nature. 2000;404(6778):661–71. pmid:10766253
  26. 26. Tatemoto K. Neuropeptide Y: complete amino acid sequence of the brain peptide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1982;79(18):5485–9. pmid:PMC346928.
  27. 27. Morley JE, Hernandez EN, Flood JF. Neuropeptide Y increases food intake in mice1987 1987-09-01 00:00:00. R516-R22 p.
  28. 28. Geerling JJ, Wang Y, Havekes LM, Romijn JA, Rensen PCN. Acute Central Neuropeptide Y Administration Increases Food Intake but Does Not Affect Hepatic Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (Vldl) Production in Mice. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e55217. pmid:23460782
  29. 29. Dyer C, Touchette K, Carroll J, Allee G, Matteri R. Cloning of porcine prepro-orexin cDNA and effects of an intramuscular injection of synthetic porcine orexin-B on feed intake in young pigs. Domestic animal endocrinology. 1999;16(3):145–8. pmid:10343916
  30. 30. Vernarelli JA, Mitchell DC, Hartman TJ, Rolls BJ. Dietary Energy Density Is Associated with Body Weight Status and Vegetable Intake in U.S. Children. The Journal of Nutrition. 2011;141(12):2204–10. pmid:PMC3223877.
  31. 31. Muurahainen NE, Kissileff HR, Pi-Sunyer FX. Intravenous infusion of bombesin reduces food intake in humans1993 1993-02-01 00:00:00. R350-R4 p.
  32. 32. Stein LJ, Woods SC. Gastrin releasing peptide reduces meal size in rats. Peptides. 1982;3(5):833–5. pmid:7177926
  33. 33. Stuckey J, Gibbs J, Smith G. Neural disconnection of gut from brain blocks bombesin-induced satiety. Peptides. 1985;6(6):1249–52. pmid:3834417
  34. 34. Washington MC, Salyer S, Aglan AH, Sayegh AI. Intravenous infusion of gastrin-releasing peptide-27 and bombesin in rats reveals differential effects on meal size and intermeal interval length. Peptides. 2014;51:145–9. pmid:24291388
  35. 35. Støving R, Hangaard J, Hansen-Nord M, Hagen C. A review of endocrine changes in anorexia nervosa. Journal of psychiatric research. 1999;33(2):139–52. pmid:10221746
  36. 36. Herzog H. Neuropeptide Y and energy homeostasis: insights from Y receptor knockout models. European journal of pharmacology. 2003;480(1):21–9.
  37. 37. McMahon C, Buxton D, Elsasser T, Gunter D, Sanders L, Steele B, et al. Neuropeptide Y restores appetite and alters concentrations of GH after central administration to endotoxic sheep. Journal of Endocrinology. 1999;161(2):333–9. pmid:10320832
  38. 38. Peng C, Chang JP, Yu KL, Wong AO, Goor FV, Peter RE, et al. Neuropeptide-Y stimulates growth hormone and gonadotropin-II secretion in the goldfish pituitary: involvement of both presynaptic and pituitary cell actions. Endocrinology. 1993;132(4):1820–9. pmid:8462479.
  39. 39. Skorupski P, Vescovi P, Bush B. INTEGRATION OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE FEEDBACK LOOPS IN A CRAYFISH MUSCLE. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 1994;187(1):305–13. pmid:9317858
  40. 40. Leibel RL, Rosenbaum M, Hirsch J. Changes in energy expenditure resulting from altered body weight. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(10):621–8. pmid:7632212
  41. 41. Brady LS, Smith MA, Gold PW, Herkenham M. Altered expression of hypothalamic neuropeptide mRNAs in food-restricted and food-deprived rats. Neuroendocrinology. 1990;52(5):441–7. pmid:2177853
  42. 42. Hopkins DFC, Williams G. Insulin receptors are widely distributed in human brain and bind human and porcine insulin with equal affinity. Diabetic Medicine. 1997;14(12):1044–50. pmid:9455932
  43. 43. Lee H-W, Park Y-S, Choi J-W, Yi S-y, Shin W-S. Antidiabetic effects of chitosan oligosaccharides in neonatal streptozotocin-induced noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in rats. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2003;26(8):1100–3. pmid:12913258
  44. 44. Liu S-H, Chang Y-H, Chiang M-T. Chitosan Reduces Gluconeogenesis and Increases Glucose Uptake in Skeletal Muscle in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010;58(9):5795–800. pmid:20397731
  45. 45. Leonardini A, Laviola L, Perrini S, Natalicchio A, Giorgino F. Cross-Talk between PPAR and Insulin Signaling and Modulation of Insulin Sensitivity. PPAR Research. 2009;2009:12.
  46. 46. Farmer SR. Regulation of PPAR[gamma] activity during adipogenesis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2005;29(S1):S13–S6.
  47. 47. Sarruf DA, Yu F, Nguyen HT, Williams DL, Printz RL, Niswender KD, et al. Expression of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ in Key Neuronal Subsets Regulating Glucose Metabolism and Energy Homeostasis. Endocrinology. 2009;150(2):707–12. pmid:18845632.
  48. 48. Odegaard JI, Ricardo-Gonzalez RR, Goforth MH, Morel CR, Subramanian V, Mukundan L, et al. Macrophage-specific PPAR[ggr] controls alternative activation and improves insulin resistance. Nature. 2007;447(7148):1116–20. pmid:17515919
  49. 49. Chawla A, Boisvert WA, Lee C-H, Laffitte BA, Barak Y, Joseph SB, et al. A PPARγ-LXR-ABCA1 Pathway in Macrophages Is Involved in Cholesterol Efflux and Atherogenesis. Molecular Cell. 7(1):161–71. pmid:11172721
  50. 50. Soumian S, Gibbs R, Davies A, Albrecht C. mRNA expression of genes involved in lipid efflux and matrix degradation in occlusive and ectatic atherosclerotic disease. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2005;58(12):1255–60. pmid:16311343
  51. 51. Gades MD, Stern JS. Chitosan Supplementation and Fecal Fat Excretion in Men. Obesity Research. 2003;11(5):683–8. pmid:12740459
  52. 52. Zhang J, Liu J, Li L, Xia W. Dietary chitosan improves hypercholesterolemia in rats fed high-fat diets. Nutrition Research. 2008;28(6):383–90. pmid:19083436
  53. 53. Zhang W, Cline MA, Gilbert ER. Hypothalamus-adipose tissue crosstalk: neuropeptide Y and the regulation of energy metabolism. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2014;11:27.
  54. 54. Houseknecht KL, Spurlock ME. Leptin regulation of lipid homeostasis: Dietary and metabolic implications. Nutrition Research Reviews. 2003;16(01):83–96.
  55. 55. Pelleymounter M, Cullen M, Baker M, Hecht R, Winters D, Boone T, et al. Effects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob mice. Science. 1995;269(5223):540–3. pmid:7624776
  56. 56. JÉQuier E. Leptin Signaling, Adiposity, and Energy Balance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2002;967(1):379–88.
  57. 57. Considine RV, Cooksey RC, Williams LB, Fawcett RL, Zhang P, Ambrosius WT, et al. Hexosamines regulate leptin production in human subcutaneous adipocytes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2000;85(10):3551–6.
  58. 58. Munro C, Gow N. Chitin synthesis in human pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology. 2001;39(1):41–53.
  59. 59. Mhurchu CN, Dunshea-Mooij C, Bennett D, Rodgers A. Effect of chitosan on weight loss in overweight and obese individuals: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Obesity Reviews. 2005;6(1):35–42. pmid:15655037
  60. 60. Huang L, Chen J, Cao P, Pan H, Ding C, Xiao T, et al. Anti-Obese Effect of Glucosamine and Chitosan Oligosaccharide in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Rats. Marine Drugs. 2015;13(5):2732–56. pmid:PMC4446603.
  61. 61. Hirano S, Itakura C, Seino H, Akiyama Y, Nonaka I, Kanbara N, et al. Chitosan as an ingredient for domestic animal feeds. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 1990;38(5):1214–7.
  62. 62. Zeng L, Qin C, Wang W, Chi W, Li W. Absorption and distribution of chitosan in mice after oral administration. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2008;71(3):435–40.
  63. 63. Hajji S, Younes I, Rinaudo M, Jellouli K, Nasri M. Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation of Cytotoxicity, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Chitosans Extracted from Three Different Marine Sources. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;177(1):18–35. pmid:26150381