Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Risk Factors for Enterovirus A71 Seropositivity in Rural Indigenous Populations in West Malaysia

  • NMN NikNadia,

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • I-Ching Sam,

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Nasibah Khaidir,

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Romano Ngui,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Yvonne A. L. Lim,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Xiang Ting Goh,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Seow Huey Choy,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Yoke Fun Chan

    chanyf@um.edu.my

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71), which is transmitted by the fecal-oral route, causes hand, foot and mouth disease and, rarely, severe neurological complications. In Malaysia, the indigenous rural community (Orang Asli) has a high prevalence of parasitic diseases due to poor sanitation, water supply and hygiene practices. This cross-sectional study compared the seroepidemiology of EV-A71 among rural Orang Asli and urban Kuala Lumpur populations in West Malaysia, and determined the risk factors associated with EV-A71 seropositivity in rural Orang Asli. Seropositive rates were determined by neutralization assay. EV-A71 seropositivity was strongly associated with increasing age in both populations. Rural Orang Asli children ≤12 years had significantly higher EV-A71 seropositivity rates than urban Kuala Lumpur children (95.5% vs 57.6%, P < 0.001), and also higher rates in the age groups of 1–3, 4–6 and 7–12 years. Multivariate analysis confirmed that age ≤12 years (adjusted OR 8.1, 95% CI 3.2–20.7, P < 0.001) and using untreated water (adjusted OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.3–16.6, P < 0.001) were independently associated with EV-A71 seropositivity in the Orang Asli population. Supply of clean drinking water may reduce the risk of EV-A71 infection. With significantly higher EV-A71 seropositive rates, younger rural children should be a priority target for future vaccination programs in Malaysia.

Introduction

Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is a self-limiting disease which mainly affects children. It is characterized by vesicles on the hands and feet, and ulcers in the mouth. Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) is one of the major causes of HFMD together with coxsackievirus A16 (CVA-16) and coxsackievirus A6 (CVA-6) [1]. EV-A71 is a positive-sense RNA virus belonging to the genus Enterovirus of the family Picornaviridae. It is mainly transmitted by the fecal-oral route, and also through direct contact with saliva, vesicle fluid, or respiratory droplets, and humans are the only known natural host [2]. Apart from outbreaks of HFMD and herpangina, EV-A71 is occasionally associated with severe complications including aseptic meningitis, encephalitis and pulmonary edema [3].

Seroepidemiology studies of EV-A71 reveal that the infection predominantly affects susceptible young children under 5 years of age [46]. It is important to understand the factors contributing to EV-A71 infection, especially as the disease is a target for future vaccination programs [7]. Increasing population density, urbanization, and congregation of children in childcare centers or nurseries are recognized as contributing factors to increasing EV-A71 transmission among preschool age groups [8,9]. However, many of these studies were conducted in urban settings.

In Malaysia, urban areas are defined as gazetted areas and their adjoining built-up areas with a combined population of more than 10,000 persons, of which >60% of those aged ≥10 years are engaged in non-agricultural activities and have modern toilet facilities [10,11]. By 2010, 70% of Malaysia's population were in urban areas [11]. Some rural and remote areas which do not fulfil these criteria are populated by indigenous communities, or Orang Asli [12]. In West Malaysia, the Orang Asli comprise 18 ethnic subgroups classified under three main groups, the Negrito, Senoi and Proto-Malay [13]. Despite socioeconomic assistance provided by the Malaysian government, indigenous communities remain impoverished and marginalized, with substantially reduced life expectancy and higher infant mortality rates [14]. They live in rural areas with low levels of education, poor environmental sanitation, and lack of access to clean water [12,15], contributing to a high prevalence of fecal-orally transmitted parasitic infections [12,1618]. However, the prevalence of fecal-orally transmitted viral infections such as EV-A71 in the indigenous community remains unknown.

In this study, we compared the seroprevalence of EV-A71 infection among the rural Orang Asli population with that of an urban Kuala Lumpur (KL) population. With the demographic data available, we also determined the risk factors contributing to EV-A71 seropositivity in the rural Orang Asli population.

Materials and Methods

Serum samples

The urban samples were randomly selected from residual sera archived in the Diagnostic Virology Laboratory, University of Malaya Medical Centre, in Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia. A total of 460 urban serum samples collected between 2010 and 2012 from patients aged 1 to 85 years were used. As this study aimed to measure background seroprevalence of EV-A71 infection, samples from patients suspected with HFMD were excluded to prevent bias as these samples are more likely be seropositive; this exclusion criterion has been previously used by several similar studies [5,1921].

A total of 298 rural serum samples were used, which had been previously collected from Orang Asli aged 1 to 90 years, between 2010 and 2012, to study prevalence of intestinal parasites. The sampled rural populations were from 14 Orang Asli villages in West Malaysia, located in the states of Selangor, Pahang, Perak, Malacca, and Negeri Sembilan [12,1517]. None of the sampled individuals had active HFMD. Samples were divided into six age groups for analysis: 1–3 years, 4–6 years, 7–12 years, 13–17 years, 18–49 years and ≥50 years.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the University Malaya Medical Center's medical ethics committee (reference numbers 872.7 and 709.2). Our institution ethics committee does not require informed consent for retrospective studies of archived and anonymised samples.

EV-A71 neutralization assay

All sera were heat-inactivated at 56°C for 30 minutes and stored at 4°C prior to testing. A neutralization assay was performed as previously described, with modifications, to measure EV-A71 neutralizing titre [19]. The EV-A71 strain used in this study was strain UH1/PM/97 (GenBank accession number AM396587) from subgenotype B4. Briefly, two-fold dilutions of the sera were performed from 1:8 to 1:32. An equal volume of diluted serum and 1000 tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) of virus were mixed and incubated at 37°C for 2 hours in 5% CO2. Each serum-virus mixture was assayed in triplicate in 96-well plates. Then, 100 μl of 1 x 104 rhabdomyosarcoma cells (RD, ATCC no. CRL-2061) were added to each well. Reproducibility of positive titers was considered acceptable if there was a difference of less than one dilution with the same titer obtained on most assays [22]. Wells containing pooled positive sera of known titer, diluted serum, virus alone, and uninfected RD cells were also included as controls. The plates were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 and examined for cytopathic effects after 5 days. The neutralizing antibody titer was the highest dilution preventing the development of CPE in 50% of the inoculated cells. A sample was considered positive if the neutralizing titer was ≥1:8 [22].

Cross-reactivity of serum against EV-A71 of different subgenotypes has been previously shown [2326], although neutralization titres may vary. Nevertheless, we also determined the appropriateness of using a single strain UH1/PM/97 (subgenotype B4) for neutralization in this study. Using serum samples from children ≤3 years collected in 2013, we verified concordance of neutralization titers against UH1/PM/97 with neutralization titers against a clinical virus isolate from subgenotype B5 cultured in 2006 (39 samples).The B5 subgenotype has previously circulated widely in Malaysia [27].

Statistical analyses

Fisher’s exact test was used to compare differences in total and age group-specific seropositive rates between urban KL and rural Orang Asli populations. Independent-samples t-test was also used to compare the difference in mean ages between the urban and Orang Asli samples. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to correlate age and EV-A71 seropositivity.

Regression analysis was also used to determine risk factors for EV-A71 seropositivity in the rural subjects for whom data was available. Independent variables were chosen based on previous literature and biological plausibility consistent with known transmission routes. In the initial univariate analysis, independent variables included age, gender, and factors relating to socioeconomic status, hygiene and living conditions. Household income is reported in Malaysian ringgit (MYR). All variables determined from the univariate analysis with P-values ≤0.25 were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis using the forward elimination model. Independent risk factors with P-values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Odds ratios (OR) were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). To assess the final model, the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was performed, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22 (IBM SPSS Software, USA), and graphs were drawn using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, USA).

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of urban KL and Orang Asli subjects

For the urban KL population, only age and gender data were available as the serum samples were selected from archived residual sera. For the 460 urban KL subjects, the mean age was 27.8 ± 22.5 years; 170 (37.0%) were ≤12 years, and 199 (43.3%) were female. Multivariate analysis was performed with age and gender as the predictors of the seropositivity to EV-A71 in the urban KL population. The result confirmed that age ≤12 years (adjusted OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.90–4.37, P < 0.001) was a predictor for the EV-A71 seropositivity, but not gender (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.76–1.76, P = 0.507). For the 298 Orang Asli subjects, the mean age was 19.0 ± 17.4 years; 177 (59.4%) were ≤12 years, and 163 (54.7%) were female. As there were significant differences in age and gender between the urban and Orang Asli populations (mean age, P < 0.001; age ≤12 years, P < 0.001; and gender, P = 0.0023), further comparisons were only made between the same age groups of the two populations.

Full sociodemographic data was available for 248/298 (83.2%) Orang Asli subjects (Table 1), who were from the Proto-Malay ethnic group (Temuan subgroup, 74.8%) and Senoi group (Semai, 18.1%; Semoq Beri, 3.7%; and Jah Hut subgroups, 3.4%). Findings for key socioeconomic indicators include 151/248 (60.9%) living in households with income <MYR 500/month (USD 123; in Malaysia, 0.5% of households are within this income class [28]), 131/248 (52.8%) with untreated water supply, and 190/248 (76.6%) who do not use a water-flush toilet for defecation (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Risk factors associated with EV-A71 seropositivity in Orang Asli populations (n = 248).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148767.t001

Comparison of age-specific seropositivity rates of EV-A71 infection between urban KL and Orang Asli populations

Seropositivity was measured with neutralization test. A subset of serum samples were tested against UH1/PM/97 (subgenotype B4) and a subgenotype B5 virus. There was high concordance in seropositive/seronegative status between UH1/PM/97 and the B5 virus (95%, 37/39 sera). These results support our use of the B4 virus alone for all the neutralization assays.

Overall, a strong association between EV-A71 seropositivity and increasing age was seen in both urban KL (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03; P = 0.001) and Orang Asli (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05; P < 0.001) populations (Fig 1). For the urban KL population, the EV-A71 seropositivity rates increased gradually from 47.1% (95% CI 35.9–58.7%) in the youngest age group (1–3 years) to 84.2% (95% CI 78.0–88.9%) in the 18–49 years group, before declining significantly at the age of 50 years and older to 72.0% (95% CI 62.2–80.2%; P = 0.025). Seropositive rates for the rural Orang Asli population showed a different trend, with very high rates in the youngest age groups, 1–3 years (81.8%, 95% CI 51.2–96.0), 4–6 years (97.1%, 95% CI 83.8–99.9%) and 7–12 years (96.2%, 95% CI 91.2–98.6). The seropositivity rates decreased, but not significantly, to 70–75% as age increased. The seropositivity rates of children in the 1–3, 4–6, and 7–12 years age groups were significantly higher in the Orang Asli population than in the urban KL population, while seropositivity of those aged >12 years were similar in both populations.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Comparison of EV-A71 seropositivity rates between urban KL and Orang Asli rural populations.

The asterisks indicate significant differences in seropositive rates between the two populations by Fisher’s exact test (P < 0.05*; P < 0.001***).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148767.g001

Overall, Orang Asli children ≤12 years had significantly higher seropositive rates than urban children (95.5% vs. 57.6%, P < 0.001).

Risk factors for EV-A71 infection in Orang Asli populations

To determine sociodemographic, hygiene and lifestyle risk factors for EV-A71 seropositivity among the rural Orang Asli, univariate analysis was first performed (Table 1). The analysis identified six risk factors with P values <0.25: age ≤12 years, the states in which the Orang Asli villages are located, occupation of child/student, using untreated water supply (such as rivers or wells), defecating in places other than a water-flush toilet (such as non-flush toilets or in the open), and not washing hands before eating. Multivariate analysis confirmed two independent risk factors for EV-A71 seropositivity: age ≤12 years (adjusted OR 8.1, 95% CI 3.2–20.7, P < 0.001) and using untreated water (adjusted OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.3–16.6, P < 0.001). The final model had satisfactory fit and discrimination (goodness-of-fit, P = 0.54; area under the curve = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70–0.89, P < 0.001).

Discussion

EV-A71 infection remains a major public health problem in Malaysia and Asia Pacific, following large outbreaks of EV-A71-associated HFMD and neurological disease since 1997. As many previous studies of risk factors for EV-A71 were in urban settings [9,29], we were interested to determine the risk factors for seropositivity among rural Orang Asli communities, particularly hygiene and lifestyle factors which may facilitate the main route of fecal-oral transmission of the virus. We measured neutralizing serum antibodies, which are likely to be important for life-long protection against EV-A71 [20,30].

To our knowledge this is the first serological survey of EV-A71 in rural Malaysian children conducted to date. The seropositive rates of Orang Asli children aged ≤12 years overall and within each childhood age group of 1–3, 4–6, and 7–12 years were considerably higher than that of urban KL children. The pattern of increasing seropositivity also differed; while the seropositivity of Orang Asli was already high at 81.8% by 1–3 years, seropositivity in urban KL children rose gradually from 47.1% at 1–3 years to 75% at 13–17 years. This suggests that the majority of Orang Asli children are infected at a much younger age, while urban KL children are infected not only in pre-school, but also in primary and secondary school; a similar trend of acquisition was seen in urban Singaporean children [19]. Young age, mainly younger than 4 years old, has been reported as one of the risk factors for EV-A71 infection [4,31,32].

In our study, as most individuals in both urban and Orang Asli populations have been exposed to EV-A71 by 13 years, seropositivity rates of the two populations become similar from this point. In comparison to childhood seropositivity rates, rates in adolescents/adults began to level off or drop. This has also been described in studies in Taiwan [33], Germany [20], Vietnam [34] and Thailand [35]. The most likely explanation is the waning of measurable antibodies due to less exposure to EV-A71 in adults. It is not known if natural immunity is life-long. However, as EV-A71 infections are rare in adults [4,19], it is likely that they are protected by long-lasting, specific immunity even if detectable antibodies wane [20,33]. A similar phenomenon is seen in individuals with hepatitis B vaccine-induced antibodies [36].

The higher seropositive rate in the young rural Orang Asli is most likely due to their poor living conditions and lifestyles compared to urban residents. The Orang Asli population in Malaysia live in poverty, with lower levels of education, poor healthcare and sanitation [37]. These are associated with high infection rates of parasitic diseases which are transmitted fecal-orally, such as intestinal helminthiasis, giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis [17,37,38]. Two independent risk factors for EV-A71 seropositivity were identified in this study. Age ≤12 years is a recognized risk for this childhood disease, as hygiene practices in children are usually poor. In a previous study in this population, younger children were also more likely than older children to have intestinal polyparasitism, likely due to poor personal hygiene [18]. Using untreated water from rivers and wells is also an independent risk factor for EV-A71 seropositivity, as well as other fecal-orally acquired pathogens such as intestinal parasites [12,18,39,40]. Orang Asli communities are usually located close to rivers, which are essential for their daily activities, including washing, bathing, playing and swimming [39]. In these rural communities, children in particular were noted to prefer defecating in rivers rather than toilets, and this would result in higher risk of using contaminated water [12,18,39,40]. The higher seropositivity rates in Orang Asli children compared to adults may also be due to differences in exposure to untreated water, for example children may play and swim more in rivers.

Living in rural areas was also found to be a risk factor for EV-A71 and HFMD infection in Taiwan [4] and China [41,42], and this was suggested to be due to similar contributory factors such as poorer public health conditions and lower socioeconomic status. Furthermore, severe EV-A71 infection in China has also been associated with rural residence [41,42] and, for children hospitalized in urban settings, having rural-to-urban migrant worker parents [29]. This may be due to lower parental awareness of the need for medical attention, or poorer access to medical services.

Important strategies to prevent fecal-oral parasitic infections in Orang Asli have been suggested, which would also prevent enteroviral infections, including the provision of proper sanitation facilities and safe water supplies, and health education regarding good personal hygiene and good sanitary practices [39,40]. Orang Asli communities appear to have low levels of health education, with only 16% aware of the preventive measures against helminth infections [43]. Good hand hygiene has been shown to significantly reduce EV-A71 transmission [44,45]. This would be an important preventive strategy, as 42.3% of Orang Asli do not wash their hands prior to eating (this study), and in a separate study, 37.7% reported not washing their hands after defecation [43]. However, the preventive impact of hand-washing would be reduced if unclean water is used. Thus, teaching preventive measures for HFMD in health education campaigns should be accompanied by improvements in infrastructure. Parents should also be educated to recognize signs and symptoms of a very ill child, so they will seek healthcare at an early stage.

Promising EV-A71 vaccines have been recently reported, notably an inactivated vaccine which showed good efficacy, immunogenicity and safety in a phase 3 trial [46]. The formulation of an effective vaccine programme depends on understanding of the epidemiology of the disease, which will vary between populations within a country. It has been suggested that children should be vaccinated against EV-A71 at 6 months, before maternal antibody starts to wane, and at a time when the risk of severe disease is highest [7,46]. This study provides data which will aid planning of future EV-A71 vaccine programs in Malaysia, as we have identified Orang Asli children as a rural population at particularly high risk of infection. Targeting rural children as a priority for vaccination may also impact urban transmission, in view of the increasing global trends of migration from rural to urban areas [29], which is also occurring in Malaysia [11]. Rural children may also need to be vaccinated at an earlier age than urban children. A similar strategy is used for measles in Sabah, Malaysia, where a higher incidence of measles has led to a policy of earlier initial vaccination at 6 months, compared to vaccination at 12 months in other states [47,48]. As HFMD and EV-A71 are undoubtedly under-recognized in rural areas, more epidemiological studies are needed in rural infants and children, to determine an appropriate age for vaccination.

In conclusion, rural Orang Asli children had significantly higher seropositivity rates to EV-A71 than urban KL children. Untreated water supplies, poor hygiene practices and lack of adequate sanitary infrastructure are likely to play roles in the spread of the virus among this community, and these require further study. Increasing awareness of EV-A71 infection should be included alongside other parasitic infections as an important disease prevention strategy. Similar seroprevalence and epidemiological studies are needed in a wider range of urban and rural populations nationwide to fully define the risk factors for EV-A71 infection.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Diagnostic Virology Laboratory of University Malaya Medical Centre for providing the serum samples.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NN ICS YFC. Performed the experiments: NK NN RN XTG SHC. Analyzed the data: NN NK ICS YFC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ICS YAL YFC. Wrote the paper: NN ICS YAL YFC.

References

  1. 1. Xing W, Liao Q, Viboud C, Zhang J, Sun J, Wu JT, et al. (2014) Hand, foot, and mouth disease in China, 2008–12: an epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 14: 308–318. pmid:24485991.
  2. 2. Chan YF, Sam IC, Wee KL, AbuBakar S (2011) Enterovirus 71 in Malaysia: a decade later. Neurology Asia 16: 1–15.
  3. 3. Huang HI, Weng KF, Shih SR (2012) Viral and host factors that contribute to pathogenicity of enterovirus 71. Future Microbiol 7: 467–479. pmid:22439724.
  4. 4. Chang LY, King CC, Hsu KH, Ning HC, Tsao KC, Li CC, et al. (2002) Risk factors of enterovirus 71 infection and associated hand, foot, and mouth disease/herpangina in children during an epidemic in Taiwan. Pediatrics 109: e88. pmid:12042582.
  5. 5. Ooi EE, Phoon MC, Ishak B, Chan SH (2002) Seroepidemiology of human enterovirus 71, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis 8: 995–997. pmid:12194783.
  6. 6. Yu H, Wang M, Chang H, Lu J, Lu B, Li J, et al. (2011) Prevalence of antibodies against enterovirus 71 in children from Lu'an City in Central China. Jpn J Infect Dis 64: 528–532. pmid:22116336.
  7. 7. Li L, Yin H, An Z, Feng Z (2015) Considerations for developing an immunization strategy with enterovirus 71 vaccine. Vaccine 33: 1107–1112. pmid:25444807.
  8. 8. Chua KB, Kasri AR (2011) Hand, foot and mouth disease due to enterovirus 71 in Malaysia. Virol Sinica 26: 221–228. pmid:21847753.
  9. 9. Ang LW, Koh BKW, Chan KP, Chua LT, James L, Goh KT (2009) Epidemiology and control of hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore, 2001–2007. Ann Acad Med Singapore 38: 106–112. pmid:19271036.
  10. 10. Jaafar J (2004) Emerging trends of urbanization in Malaysia. J Dep Stat Malays 1: 43–54.
  11. 11. Masron T, Yaakob U, Ayob NM, Mokhtar AS (2012) Population and spatial distribution of urbanization of Peninsular Malaysia 1957–2000. Geogr Malays J Soc Space 8: 20–29.
  12. 12. Ngui R, Ishak S, Chuen CS, Mahmud R, Lim YAL (2011) Prevalence and risk factors of intestinal parasitism in rural and remote West Malaysia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e974. pmid:21390157.
  13. 13. Mohd Noor MA, 2012. Advancing the Orang Asli through Malaysia’s clusters of excellence policy. J Int Comp Educ 1: 90–103.
  14. 14. Bedford J. Perceptions of leprosy in the Orang Asli (indigenous minority) of Peninsular Malaysia. In: Banwell C, Ulijaszek S, Dixon J, editors. When culture impacts health–Global lessons for effective health research. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2013. p. 193–203.
  15. 15. Lim YAL, Romano N, Colin N, Chow SL, Smith HV (2009) Intestinal parasitic infections amongst Orang Asli (indigenous) in Malaysia: has socioeconomic development alleviated the problem? Trop Biomed 26: 110–122. pmid:19901897.
  16. 16. Al-Mekhlafi HM, Johari S, Atiya AS, Ariffin WA, Mohammed Mahdy AK, Che Abdullah H (2008) Pattern and predictors of soil-transmitted helminth reinfection among aboriginal school children in rural Peninsular Malaysia. Acta Tropica 107: 200–204. pmid:18582430.
  17. 17. Al-Mekhlafi HM, Al-Maktari MT, Jani R, Ahmed A, Anuar TS, Moktar N, et al. (2013) Burden of Giardia duodenalis infection and its adverse effects on growth of schoolchildren in Rural Malaysia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7: e2516. pmid:24205426.
  18. 18. Al-Delaimy AK, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Nasr NA, Sady H, Atroosh WM, Nashiry M, et al. (2014) Epidemiology of intestinal polyparasitism among Orang Asli school children in Rural Malaysia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8: e3074. pmid:25144662.
  19. 19. Ang LW, Phoon MC, Wu Y, Cutter J, James L, Chow VT (2011) The changing seroepidemiology of enterovirus 71 infection among children and adolescents in Singapore. BMC Infect Dis 11: 270. pmid:21988931.
  20. 20. Rabenau HF, Richter M, Doerr HW (2010) Hand, foot and mouth disease: seroprevalence of coxsackie A16 and enterovirus 71 in Germany. Med Microbiol Immunol 199: 45–51. pmid:19941005.
  21. 21. Li W, Yi L, Su J, Lu J, Zeng H, Guan D, et al. (2013) Seroepidemiology of human enterovirus71 and coxsackievirusA16 among childrenin Guandong province, China. BMC Infect Dis 13: 322. pmid:23855481.
  22. 22. Ji H, Li L, Liu Y, Ge H, Wang X, Hu J, et al. (2012) Seroepidemiology of human enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 in Jiangsu province, China. Virol J 9: 248. pmid:23102275.
  23. 23. Huang KY, Lin JJ, Chiu CH, Yang S, Tsao KC, Huang YC, et al. (2015) A potent virus-specific antibody-secreting cell response to acute enterovirus 71 infection in children. J Infect Dis pmid:25712974.
  24. 24. Chang J, Li J, Liu X, Liu G, Yang J, Wei W, et al. (2015) Broad protection with an inactivated vaccine against primary-isolated lethal enterovirus 71 infection in newborn mice. BMC Microbiol 15: 139. pmid:26169371.
  25. 25. Lim PY, Hickey AC, Jamiluddin MF, Hamid S, Kramer J, Santos R, et al. (2015) Immunogenicity and performance of an enterovirus 71 virus-like-particle vaccine in nonhuman primates. Vaccine pii: S0264-410X(15)01118-4. pmid:26271825.
  26. 26. Liu L, Mo Z, Liang Z, Zhang Y, Li R, Ong KC, et al. (2015) Immunity and clinical efficacy of an inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in healthy Chinese children: a report of further observations. BMC Med 13: 226. pmid:26381232.
  27. 27. Chan YF, Wee KL, Chiam CW, Khor CS, Chan SY, Amalina WMZ, et al. (2012) Comparative genetic analysis of VP4, VP1 and 3D gene regions of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 circulating in Malaysia between 1997–2008. Trop Biomed 29: 451–466. pmid:23018509.
  28. 28. Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia (9 Sep 2013) Percentage distribution of households by income class, Malaysia, 1970–2012. Available: http://www.epu.gov.my/en/household-income-poverty. Accessed August 16 2015.
  29. 29. Zeng M, Pu D, Mo X, Zhu C, Gong S, Xu Y, et al. (2013) Children of rural-to-urban migrant workers in China are at a higher risk of contracting severe hand, foot and mouth disease and EV71 infection: a hospital-based study. Emerg Microbes Infect 2: e72. pmid:26038441.
  30. 30. Yang C, Deng C, Wan J, Zhu L, Leng Q (2011) Neutralizing antibody response in the patients with hand, foot and mouth disease to enterovirus 71 and its clinical implications. Virol J 8: 306. pmid:21679417.
  31. 31. Li W, Teng G, Tong H, Jiao Y, Zhang T, Chen H, et al. (2013) Study on risk factors for severe hand, foot and mouth disease in China. PLoS ONE 9: e87603. pmid:24489943.
  32. 32. Ang LW, Tay J, Phoon MC, Hsu JP, Cutter J, James L, et al. (2015) Seroepidemiology of coxsackievirus A6, coxsackievirus A16, and enterovirus 71 infections among children and adolescents in Singapore, 2008–2010. PLoS ONE 10: e0127999. pmid:26011735.
  33. 33. Wang SM, Ho TS, Lin HC, Lei HY, Wang JR, Liu CC (2012) Reemerging of enterovirus 71 in Taiwan: the age impact on disease severity. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31: 1219–1224. pmid:21983920.
  34. 34. Tran CB, Nguyen HT, Phan HT, Tran NV, Wills B, Farrar J, et al. (2011) The seropevalence and seroincidence of enterovirus71 infection in infants and children in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. PLoS ONE 6: e21116. pmid:21765891.
  35. 35. Linsuwanon P, Puenpa J, Huang SW, Wang YF, Mauleekoonphairoj J, Wang JR, et al. (2014) Epidemiology and seroepidemiology of human enterovirus 71 among Thai populations. J Biomed Sci 21: 16. pmid:24548776.
  36. 36. Leuridan E, Van Damme P (2011) Hepatitis B and the need for a booster dose. Clin Infect Dis 53: 68–75. pmid:21653306.
  37. 37. Ahmed A, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Al-Adhroey AH, Ithoi I, Abdulsalam AM, Surin J (2012) The nutritional impacts of soil-transmitted helminths infections among Orang Asli schoolchildren in rural Malaysia. Parasit Vectors 5: 119. pmid:22704549.
  38. 38. Al-Mekhlafi HM, Mahdy MAK, Azlin MY, Fatmah MS, Norhayati M (2011) Childhood Cryptosporidium infection among aboriginal communities in Peninsular Malaysia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 105: 135–143. pmid:21396250.
  39. 39. Ahmed A, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Choy SH, Ithoi I, Al-Adhroey AH, Abdulsalam AM, et al. (2011) The burden of moderate-to-heavy soil-transmitted helminth infections among rural Malaysian aborigines: an urgent need for an integrated control programme. Parasit Vectors 4: 242. pmid:22208559.
  40. 40. Nasr NA, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Ahmed A, Roslan MA, Bulgiba A (2013) Towards an effective control programme of soil-transmitted helminth infections among Orang Asli in rural Malaysia. Part 1: Prevalence and associated key factors. Parasit Vectors 6: 27. pmid:23356952.
  41. 41. Fang Q, Ju X, Liang I, Xu A (2013) Epidemiology and etiological characteristics of hand, foot and mouth disease in Huizhou City between 2008 and 2011. Arch Virol 158: 895–899. pmid:23229012.
  42. 42. Mao LX, Wu B, Bao WX, Han F, Xu L, Ge QJ, et al. (2010) Epidemology of hand, foot, and mouth disease and genotype characterization of enterovirus 71 in Jiangsu, China. J Clin Virol 49: 100–104. pmid:20719557.
  43. 43. Nasr NA, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Ahmed A, Roslan MA, Bulgiba A (2013) Towards an effective control programme of soil-transmitted helminth infections among Orang Asli in rural Malaysia. Part 2: Knowledge, attitude, and practices. Parasit Vectors 6: 28. pmid:23356968.
  44. 44. Xie YH, Chongsuvivatwong V, Tan Y, Tang Zh-Zh, Sornsrivichai V, McNeil EB (2015) Important roles of public playgrounds in the transmission of hand, foot, and mouth disease. Epidemiol Infect 143: 1432–1441. pmid:25170900.
  45. 45. Huang WC, Shih WL, Yang SC, Yen TY, Lee JT, Huang YC, et al. (2014) Predicting severe enterovirus 71 infection: Age, comorbidity, and parental behavior matter. J Microbiol Immunol Infect pii: S1684-1182(14)00243-6. pmid:25678038.
  46. 46. Zhu FC, Meng FY, Li JX, Li XL, Mao QY, Tao H, et al. (2013) Efficacy, safety and immunology of an inactivated alum-adjuvant enterovirus 71 vaccine in children in China: a multicentere, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381: 2024–2032. pmid:23726161.
  47. 47. The Government of Malaysia’s Official Portal. Immunization schedule. Available: https://kempas.malaysia.gov.my/en/citizen?articleId=266541&subCatId=293775&categoryId=126085. Accessed August 16 2015.
  48. 48. Peng LH, Kasim MS (1997) Current trends in morbidity and mortality of children in Malaysia. Malays J Child Health 9: 104–132.