Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Hepatitis E Virus Genotype 3 in Colombia: Survey in Patients with Clinical Diagnosis of Viral Hepatitis

  • Julio Rendon,

    Affiliation Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia

  • Maria Cristina Hoyos,

    Affiliation Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia

  • Diana di Filippo,

    Affiliation Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia

  • Fabian Cortes-Mancera,

    Affiliations Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia, Grupo de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica GI2B, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Aplicadas, Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano, Medellin, Colombia

  • Carolina Mantilla,

    Affiliation Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia

  • Maria Mercedes Velasquez,

    Affiliation Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia

  • Maria Elsy Sepulveda,

    Affiliations Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia, Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe, Medellin, Colombia

  • Juan Carlos Restrepo,

    Affiliations Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia, Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe, Medellin, Colombia

  • Sergio Jaramillo,

    Affiliation Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe, Medellin, Colombia

  • Maria Patricia Arbelaez,

    Affiliation Grupo de Epidemiología. Facultad Nacional de Salud Publica, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia

  • Gonzalo Correa,

    Affiliation Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia

  • Maria-Cristina Navas

    maria.navas@udea.edu.co

    Affiliation Grupo de Gastrohepatologia. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia

Hepatitis E Virus Genotype 3 in Colombia: Survey in Patients with Clinical Diagnosis of Viral Hepatitis

  • Julio Rendon, 
  • Maria Cristina Hoyos, 
  • Diana di Filippo, 
  • Fabian Cortes-Mancera, 
  • Carolina Mantilla, 
  • Maria Mercedes Velasquez, 
  • Maria Elsy Sepulveda, 
  • Juan Carlos Restrepo, 
  • Sergio Jaramillo, 
  • Maria Patricia Arbelaez
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis E virus is a major cause of outbreaks as well as sporadic hepatitis cases worldwide. The epidemiology of this enterically transmitted infection differs between developing and developed countries. The aims of this study were to describe HEV infection in Colombian patients and to characterize the genotype.

Methods

A prospective study was carried out on 40 patients aged over 15 with a clinical diagnosis of viral hepatitis, recruited from five primary health units in the city of Medellin, Colombia. Fecal samples obtained from the 40 consecutives cases were analyzed for HEV RNA using nested reverse transcription PCR for both ORF1 and ORF2-3. The amplicons were sequenced for phylogenetic analyses.

Results

Nine (22.5%) cases of HEV infection were identified in the study population. Three HEV strains obtained from patients were classified as genotype 3. No significant association was found between cases of Hepatitis E and the variables water drinking source, garbage collection system and contact with pigs.

Conclusions

This is the first prospective study of hepatitis E in Colombian patients. The circulation of the genotype 3 in this population is predictable considering the reports of the region and the identification of this genotype from pigs in the state of Antioquia, of which Medellin is the capital. Further studies are necessary to establish whether zoonotic transmission of HEV is important in Colombia.

Introduction

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a waterborne agent and a major cause of hepatitis worldwide. It is estimated that 20 million HEV cases occur each year, including 3 million symptomatic cases, 56,000 fatalities and 3,000 abortions [1].

HEV is the most important etiologic agent of acute hepatitis epidemics related to contaminated drinking water in Asia and Africa [2]. Sporadic cases are associated with contaminated water and ingestion of raw or undercooked meat in developed countries but also in some developing nations [1, 3, 4].

HEV infection is usually an acute, self-limiting illness [4, 5]. However, severe hepatitis has been described in pregnant women and chronic HEV infection in immunocompromised patients [68]. Interestingly, some cases present extrahepatic manifestations, including neurological pathologies, impaired renal function, acute pancreatitis and hematological disorders [9].

HEV is a single-stranded, positive sense RNA virus, classified in the genus Orthohepevirus, family Hepeviridae [10]. The genome of 7.2 Kb contains three open reading frames (ORFs) and two 5’ and 3’ non-translated regions [11]. Four genotypes have been identified based on the molecular characterization of mammalian HEV sequences. Genotypes 1 and 2 are restricted to humans and frequently associated with epidemic hepatitis E. Genotypes 3 and 4 have been isolated from sporadic cases of hepatitis in humans but also identified in samples from a number of species including pigs [1214].

In Latin America, the first report of HEV infection was documented in Mexico during outbreaks between 1986 and 1987; HEV Genotype 2 was identified from these cases [15]. However, no other outbreaks have since been described from the region; although many epidemiological variations have been reported [16], including the epidemiological pattern, seropositivity among different populations and the circulating genotype. Although HEV 3 is the predominant genotype in Central and South America [1722], a few cases of HEV 1 infection have also been identified from Cuba, Venezuela and Uruguay [18, 22, 23]. Two recent retrospective studies of sera obtained from Colombian patients indicated anti-HEV IgG antibody prevalences of 7.5% (26/344) and 31.2% (342/1097) [24, 25].

The purpose of the present study was to carry out a prospective study of HEV infection in Colombian patients with a clinical diagnosis of viral hepatitis and to characterize the genotype involved.

Methods

Study population

A cross-sectional study was carried out in a cohort of 40 consecutives patients with clinical diagnosis of viral hepatitis, recruited when reporting for medical consultation in five public primary health units between April 2008 and July 2009. The units, located in the Medellin comunas of Santo Domingo, Santa Cruz, San Cristobal, Buenos Aires and Castilla serve low income populations from these neighborhoods. Moreover, these comunas showed the highest incidence of Hepatitis A virus infection in Medellin, second largest city in Colombia and capital of the state of Antioquia in the NW of the country [26].

The objectives of the project were discussed with the medical staff of these units who were then instructed to explain the study to the patients. An informed consent form was signed by each patient. In those under 18 years old, the need for informed consent was explained by a physician to each patient whose mother or father then signed it in on his/her behalf.

Patients older than 15 years old with jaundice, fever, vomiting, nausea and/or abdominal pain, presenting epidemiological characteristics consistent with a clinical diagnosis of viral hepatitis and able to provide a fecal sample were recruited to the study. Following recruitment, socio-demographic and clinical data were obtained from clinical reports and interviews of the patients carried out by one of the researchers. These socio-demographic characteristics included number of people living at home per room, type of floor, presence of domestic animals in the house (pets and pigs), source of drinking water and system of garbage collection.

Approximately 2–3 weeks later, all the patients were contacted again by phone in order to record any symptoms manifested since recruitment. Subsequently, two cases with diagnoses other than viral hepatitis were identified, one patient presenting autoimmune hepatitis and the other cholelithiasis. These two cases were excluded from the study.

Specimen collection and testing

A fecal sample was obtained from each of the 40 patients, one or two days after the consultation. These samples were stored at -70°C until analyses could be carried out.

Total RNA was extracted from fecal samples using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen, USA). To avoid cross-contamination, RNA extraction was carried out in sets of 10 samples under sterile procedures.

Two sets of degenerate primers targeting the regions ORF1 (12–359 nt) and ORF2-3 (5235–5398 nt) were used to amplify the viral genome [27, 28]. Reverse transcription was done using total RNA in sets of five samples using sterile filter pipette tips. Positive (pig fecal sample) and negative (sterile distilled water) controls were included in each RT-PCR assay.

The retrotranscription reaction was performed at 42°C for 50 min with SuperScript II (Invitrogen, USA) using the primers ORF1R (taccaccgctgracrtc, 343–359 nt) or HE364 (ctgggmytggtcdcgccaag, 5380–5398 nt) for ORF1 and ORF2/3, respectively.

The PCR of ORF1 was performed on 5 μL of cDNA using a final reaction mix (25 μL) containing buffer reaction 1X, MgCl2 2.2 mM, dNTPs 0.2 mM, primers 2.0 μM ORF1R, ORF1F (ccaycagttyathaaggctcc, 12–32 nt) and 1.25 U Biolase DNA Polymerase (Bioline, USA) using sterile filter pipette tips. The PCR consisted of a 3 min step at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 45°C for 30 s and 72°C for 40 s and an extension step at 72°C for 5 min.

The PCR of ORF2-3 was carried out on 2 μL of cDNA in a final reaction mix of 25 μL containing buffer reaction 1X, MgCl2 2.0 mM, dNTPs 0.2 mM, primers 0.2 μM HE364, HE361 (gcrgtggtttctggggtgac, 5235–5254 nt) and 1U Biolase DNA Polymerase (Bioline, USA) using sterile filter pipette tips. PCR cycling conditions consisted of a touchdown PCR: initial step 3 min at 95°C, cycling steps (x20) of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing temperature starting at 60°C for 30 s (decreasing by 0.5°C/1 cycle) and extension at 72°C for 20 s; followed by 20 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 59°C for 30 s, 72°C for 20 s and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min.

Nested amplification of ORF1 and ORF2-3 was performed using sterile filter pipette tips on 2 μl of the first round PCR product under the same conditions using the primers ORF1FN (ctcctggcrtyacwactgc, 29–47 nt), ORF1RN (ggrtgrttccaiarvacytc, 181–200 nt) and HE363 (gmytggtcdcgccaaghgga, 5375–5394 nt), HE366 (gytgattctcagcccttcgc, 5258–5277 nt), respectively. Four other previously published RT-PCR strategies were tested but the results were not reproducible [27, 29, 30].

The PCR products were run in 2% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.

Nucleotide sequences of amplicons were determined by automated dideoxy-sequencing (Macrogen, Inc. Seoul, Korea). Phylogenetic tree was constructed based on a combination of the ORF 1 (47–181 nt) and ORF 2–3 (5277–5375) sequences considering the limited size of the fragments amplified. The sequences were aligned with 47 prototype sequences of genotype 1–4 HEV available in GenBank database (National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health). Sequences were assembled with the Vector NTI software (Invitrogen, USA) and were aligned using the Clustal W Multiple Alignment application of BioEdit 7.0.5.3 [31]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed with the MEGA 6.06v program (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis) according to the Neighbor-Joining method with genetic distances evaluated with the Kimura 2 parameter corrections. Reliability of the trees was evaluated statistically by bootstrap analyses of 1000 replicates.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Ethic Committees of the Universidad de Antioquia (N.125, SIU, Universidad de Antioquia) and the Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe (N. 01–2008, HPTU). The informed consent procedure was approved by the respective ethics committees of the two institutions. The research adhered to conditions in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 18 and EPIDAT version 4. Significant differences between the frequencies were assessed by Chi-Square test. A P value <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

The study population consisted of a cohort of 40 patients with a clinical diagnosis of viral hepatitis, attending five public primary health units in low socio-economic level neighborhoods of Medellin between April 2008 and July 2009. Based on the epidemiological data, these 40 cases of sporadic viral hepatitis were otherwise unrelated. Twenty-three patients were males (57.5%) and 17 were females (42.5%). None of the female patients was pregnant. The median age of patients was 27 years (interquartile ranging 18–34.5 years). The average period between symptom onset and consultation at the health unit was 6.2 days (interquartile range 3–8 days). The most important sign and symptoms of the patients were jaundice (92.5%), choluria (82.5%), fever (77.5%), abdominal pain (52.5%) and nausea (47.5%). Mean levels of serum Bilirrubin, Aspartate Transaminase and Alanine Transaminase were 6.5 ± 5.6 mg/dL, 324 ± 253 IU/L and 537.4 ± 544 IU/L, respectively. These data were obtained from 23/40 patients.

With respect to serological markers of viral hepatitis, 40% (16/40) of patients were positive for anti-Hepatitis A Virus IgM and 10% (4/40) positive for anti-HBc IgM and HBsAg. None of the samples was positive for anti-HCV.

The drinking water source for 31 patients (77.5%) was the city of Medellin’s water supply, the remaining nine (22.5%) using local piped water supplies. Despite the low socio-economic level of most of the patients (38/40, 95%), a garbage collection system was available for almost all the study population (38/40, 95%) and all but one dwelling (97.5%) had ceramic tile floors. With respect to the other socio-demographic characteristics, 6/40 patients were living in overcrowded conditions (15%) and only one patient (2.5%) reported being in contact with pigs (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Analysis of variables and HEV infection of patients with a clinical diagnosis of viral hepatitis in the city of Medellin.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148417.t001

The viral genome regions ORF1 and ORF 2–3 were detected in 9/40 of fecal samples. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on a combination of the ORF 1 and ORF 2–3 sequences by the neighbor-joining method. Only three sequences were included in this analysis because of technical problems with the RT-PCR efficiency and quality of some sequences obtained in different assays. The distance matrix analysis showed that the 3 Colombian sequences are not identical and are different from the sequences included in the phylogenetic analysis (data not shown).

The sequences Colombia/VHE5, Colombia/VHE37 and Colombia/VHE48 clustered in genotype 3 (Fig 1). The characterization of the subtype was not available considering the limited size of the HEV PCR products (ORF1 134nt, ORF2-3 98nt) obtained in this study.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Phylogenetic analysis of HEV strains.

Phylogenetic tree of partial ORF1 (47–181 nt) and ORF 2–3 (5277–5375 nt) HEV sequences derived from patients with a clinical diagnosis of viral hepatitis generated using the neighbor-joining method. The reference strains are identified with GenBank accession number, species (H: human, S: swine and WB: wild Boar), country and genotype. Colombian strains (VHE5, VHE37, VHE48) are shown with black circle. Numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap percentages over 1000 replicates (only values > 70% are shown).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148417.g001

HEV sequences obtained from other Latin American countries were not included in this analysis, given that the viral genome regions used for phylogenetic analysis in those studies were different from the sequences analyzed in this study. Unfortunately, the other RT-PCR strategies previously published did not yield results [27, 29, 30].

The sequence Colombia/VHE5 was detected in a patient (female, 38 years old) with jaundice, fever, abdominal pain, vomit, nausea, hepatomegaly and choluria. Her fecal samples were obtained eight days after onset of the symptoms. The patient was negative for serological markers of Hepatitis A virus (HAV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV). She resided in a very low socio-economic level neighborhood with no garbage collection system and obtained her drinking water from a local supply rather than that of the city of Medellin (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Demographic and clinical data for Hepatitis E Virus infection among patients with clinical diagnoses of viral hepatitis in Medellin.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148417.t002

The sequence Colombia/VHE37 was detected in a patient (male, 40 years old) with jaundice, fever, choluria and a sevenfold increase of ALT and AST levels. The patient was positive for serological markers of HBV (HBsAg, anti-HBc IgM) and negative for HAV and HCV. His fecal samples were obtained nine days after onset of the symptoms. He also resided in a low socio-economic level neighborhood, although with a garbage collection system and access to drinking water from the Medellin supply (Table 2).

The sequence Colombia/VHE48 was detected in a patient (male, 34 years old) with jaundice, fever, abdominal pain and choluria. This patient was negative for serological markers of HAV, HBV and HCV. His fecal samples were obtained eight days after the onset of the symptoms. He resided in a median socio-economic level neighborhood with a garbage collection system and access to drinking water from the Medellin supply (Table 2). None of these three patients declared having been in contact with farm animals.

HEV infection was more frequent in patients aged 34–40 (66%, 6/9) and in male patients (66%, 6/9). With regard to the other socio-demographic characteristics of the study population, the variables local water supply, garbage collection system not available, pigs in the house and type of household flooring were not significantly associated with HEV cases (Table 1).

Discussion

The diagnosis of HEV infection is not currently included in the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of viral hepatitis used by health authorities in Colombia. However, identification of these cases is important given the risk of hepatic failure, chronic infection, neurological syndromes and renal injury; in addition, this infection could be also related to autoimmune hepatitis [32].

Although cases of Hepatitis E have never been reported in Colombia, four studies have recently been carried out on samples from different populations showing the seroprevalence of HEV infection [24, 25, 33, 34]. These studies present data of seroprevalence from pig farm workers (11.25% and 15.7% anti-HEV), people living with workers who have occupational exposure (5.9% anti-HEV) and the general population (7.2% anti-HEV) of Antioquia [33, 34]. Antioquia is the predominant region for commercial pig production farming in Colombia [35].

Further, two retrospective studies of seroprevalence have been carried out with serum samples from patients. In the first study, 8.7% of 344 samples analyzed were positive for anti-HEV (IgM/IgG). All serum samples included in this study were negative for serologic markers of HBV and HCV infection while 8.4% of samples were positive for anti-HAV IgM [24]. In the second retrospective study, 1097 samples positive for anti-HAV IgM, anti-HCV or HBsAg were selected to determine anti-HEV prevalence; 31.2% were positive for anti-HEV IgG and 11.5% for anti-HEV IgM [25].

The present study is the first prospective one of HEV infection carried out in Colombia. Forty patients aged over 15 years old with a clinical diagnosis of viral hepatitis were recruited in health centers located in five representative low socio-economic level neighborhoods of Medellin. Nine cases of HEV infection were identified in this study, constituting 22.5% of the study population. Diagnosis of hepatitis E was based on HEV-RNA positivity in fecal samples as well as clinical and epidemiological data of the patients.

Presence of viral RNA in stools could provide a good marker of HEV infection in the first days of infection, as in the present study where the average period between symptom onset and consultation was 6.2 days (interquartile range 3–8 days), particularly given the variable performance of the commercial ELISA tests available [8, 9, 36]. Indeed, in sporadic acute hepatitis E and in cases occurring during an outbreak fecal shedding of virus has been demonstrated within a week of the onset of symptoms and up to one month afterwards [36, 37].

None of the socio-demographic variables was associated with hepatitis E cases in the study population. In other studies carried out in Latin America, HEV seropositivity has been associated with consumption of untreated water [38]. In the present study, all patients had access to piped drinking water from Medellin or local (San Cristobal) supplies.

Dual infection with HEV and HAV was identified in 3/9 patients. Simultaneous infection of these enterically transmitted viruses resulting in acute viral hepatitis has already been described in patients from developing countries such as Cuba (12.8%), India (11.5%) and Egypt (4.5%) [3941].

One patient was positive for HEV RNA and the acute infection markers of HBV. Although this coinfection is less common, a study of 162 children with sporadic acute hepatitis in Egypt and a recent study carried out with 1097 serum samples from patients in Colombia did find both hepatotropic viruses together [25, 39].

The viral genome (ORF 1 and ORF 2/3) was amplified in 22.5% (9/40) of the fecal samples obtained from the patients. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on ORF 1 and ORF 2–3 sequences and genotype 3 was identified in the samples. The report of HEV genotype 3 in Colombia is in agreement with the results of a recent study carried out on pig farms in Antioquia [42, 43]. Unfortunately, the data available for the HEV strains obtained from patients in this study and those identified in pigs is too incomplete to establish a genetic relationship and support the hypothesis of zoonotic transmission. Further studies are necessary to demonstrate whether the HEV strains circulating among pigs and humans are closely related, particularly in Colombian states such as Antioquia where there is extensive commercial pig production [35].

The circulation of this genotype in Colombia is to be expected, given the numerous reports of HEV genotype 3 in patients and pigs from other countries of the region. HEV 3 is the currently the most important genotype in the Americas [1822, 4447].

The first study of HEV in pigs in the region was carried out in Argentina [48]. HEV genotype 3 strains obtained from piglets were found to be closely related to strains isolated from patients with hepatitis E cases from that country [46]. Another study carried out in Brazil confirmed the close relationship between the HEV strains circulating in pigs and in humans [47, 49]. Several reports of HEV infection in Mexico [50, 51], Chile [52], Costa Rica [53] and Bolivia [21] also demonstrated the circulation of HEV genotype 3 in pigs.

Despite the fact that there have been several reports of HEV infection in human and pigs in the region, there is currently insufficient evidence for zoonotic transmission in some countries of South America. Indeed, the subtypes of HEV genotype 3, 3b, 3c and 3f, have been characterized in strains from pigs in Brazil [17, 49, 54, 55] and 3i from Bolivia [21, 56] while circulation of HEV subtypes 3a, 3b, 3e and 3h has been reported in patients in Argentina, Bolivia and Uruguay [18, 20, 21, 45, 56]. However, identification of subtypes 3f, 3c and 3e in both human and pig populations and the close relationship among HEV strains in France demonstrated zoonotic transmission of HEV through the consumption of raw or undercooked pork and pig products [9, 57].

Some limitations of the present study have to be considered. Cases were diagnosed by medical doctors during consultations based on symptoms and epidemiological patterns but before obtaining AST, ALT and Bilirrubin serum level data. Moreover, these data were obtained from only 23 of the 40 patients. After notification of viral hepatitis at the five health units, sampling was carried out over a period of one year in the expectation of obtaining approximately 100 samples; however, availability of fecal samples from patients reduced the sample size to 40. Finally, technical problems and the size of the fragments amplified did not allow the analysis to include HEV strains from countries of the region.

In conclusion, this prospective study of sporadic acute hepatitis cases is the first one among Colombian patients to provide data on viral genome detection in fecal samples and the characterization of genotype 3. The socio-demographic variables selected were not associated with hepatitis E cases in this population. Circulation of this genotype in Colombia is predictable based on existing epidemiological reports from the region and the identification of this genotype in pigs in Antioquia. The current impact of HEV infection and risk of zoonotic transmission in Colombia deserves further investigation at the national level given the importance of commercial pig production in this country.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Maria Silvina Munne, from the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas “Carlos G. Malbran”, Argentina, for providing the pig fecal sample and for discussion of the results, and Dr. Anne Lise Haenni from the Institut Jacques Monod for revision of the manuscript. The authors also acknowledge Dr. Paula Baez and Dr. Francisco Javier Diaz from the Universidad de Antioquia, Dr. Rita Almanza from the Secretaria de Salud de Medellin, Dr. Piedad Toro from the Unidad de Atencion Santo Domingo, Dr. Fanor Mejia from the Unidad de Atencion Castilla and Dr. Irene Correa from the Unidad de Atencion San Cristobal.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MCN FCM GC JR. Performed the experiments: JR DdF MMV CM. Analyzed the data: MCN MCH MPA DdF JR FCM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SJ MES JCR. Wrote the paper: MCN CM.

References

  1. 1. WHO. Hepatitis E. Fact sheet No 280 Updated June 2014. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs280/en/.
  2. 2. Kmush B, Wierzba T, Krain L, Nelson K, Labrique AB. Epidemiology of hepatitis E in low- and middle-income countries of Asia and Africa. Semin Liver Dis. 2013;33(1):15–29. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1338111. pmid:23564386
  3. 3. Rein DB, Stevens GA, Theaker J, Wittenborn JS, Wiersma ST. The global burden of hepatitis E virus genotypes 1 and 2 in 2005. Hepatology. 2012;55(4):988–97. doi: 10.1002/hep.25505. pmid:22121109
  4. 4. Kamar N, Bendall R, Legrand-Abravanel F, Xia NS, Ijaz S, Izopet J, et al. Hepatitis E. Lancet. 2012;379(9835):2477–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61849-7. pmid:22549046
  5. 5. Aggarwal R, Jameel S. Hepatitis E. Hepatology. 2011;54(6):2218–26. doi: 10.1002/hep.24674. pmid:21932388
  6. 6. Rasheeda CA, Navaneethan U, Jayanthi V. Liver disease in pregnancy and its influence on maternal and fetal mortality: a prospective study from Chennai, Southern India. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20(4):362–4. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f246d6. pmid:18334884
  7. 7. Haagsma EB, van den Berg AP, Porte RJ, Benne CA, Vennema H, Reimerink JH, et al. Chronic hepatitis E virus infection in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2008;14(4):547–53. doi: 10.1002/lt.21480. pmid:18383084
  8. 8. Krain LJ, Nelson KE, Labrique AB. Host immune status and response to hepatitis E virus infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(1):139–65. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00062-13. pmid:24396140
  9. 9. Kamar N, Dalton HR, Abravanel F, Izopet J. Hepatitis E virus infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(1):116–38. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00057-13. pmid:24396139
  10. 10. Meng X, Anderson D, Arankalle V. Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses. Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Hepeviridae. In King AMQ AM, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ (ed), editor: Elsevier, London, United Kingdom; 2012.
  11. 11. Tam AW, Smith MM, Guerra ME, Huang CC, Bradley DW, Fry KE, et al. Hepatitis E virus (HEV): molecular cloning and sequencing of the full-length viral genome. Virology. 1991;185(1):120–31. 0042-6822(91)90760-9 [pii]. pmid:1926770
  12. 12. Meng XJ. From barnyard to food table: the omnipresence of hepatitis E virus and risk for zoonotic infection and food safety. Virus Res. 2011;161(1):23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.01.016. pmid:21316404
  13. 13. Hakze-van der Honing RW, van Coillie E, Antonis AF, van der Poel WH. First isolation of hepatitis E virus genotype 4 in Europe through swine surveillance in the Netherlands and Belgium. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022673. pmid:21829641
  14. 14. Tessé S, Lioure B, Fornecker L, Wendling MJ, Stoll-Keller F, Bigaillon C, et al. Circulation of genotype 4 hepatitis E virus in Europe: first autochthonous hepatitis E infection in France. J Clin Virol. 2012;54(2):197–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.02.007. pmid:22405947
  15. 15. Velázquez O, Stetler HC, Avila C, Ornelas G, Alvarez C, Hadler SC, et al. Epidemic transmission of enterically transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis in Mexico, 1986–1987. JAMA. 1990;263(24):3281–5. pmid:2112204
  16. 16. Echevarría JM, González JE, Lewis-Ximenez LL, Dos Santos DR, Munné MS, Pinto MA, et al. Hepatitis E virus infection in Latin America: a review. J Med Virol. 2013;85(6):1037–45. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23526. pmid:23588729
  17. 17. dos Santos DR, Vitral CL, de Paula VS, Marchevsky RS, Lopes JF, Gaspar AM, et al. Serological and molecular evidence of hepatitis E virus in swine in Brazil. Vet J. 2009;182(3):474–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.08.001. pmid:18805029
  18. 18. Munné MS, Altabert NR, Vladimirsky SN, Moreiro R, Mares LO, Soto SS, et al. Identifications of polyphyletic variants in acute hepatitis suggest an underdiagnosed circulation of hepatitis E virus in Argentina. J Clin Virol. 2011;52(2):138–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.06.015. pmid:21795113
  19. 19. Mirazo S, Ramos N, Russi JC, Gagliano G, Arbiza J. Detection and molecular characterization of sporadic cases of acute human hepatitis E virus infection in Uruguay. Arch Virol. 2011;156(8):1451–4. doi: 10.1007/s00705-011-0991-2. pmid:21465084
  20. 20. Mirazo S, Ramos N, Russi JC, Arbiza J. Genetic heterogeneity and subtyping of human Hepatitis E virus isolates from Uruguay. Virus Res. 2013;173(2):364–70. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.01.005. pmid:23339897
  21. 21. Dell'Amico MC, Cavallo A, Gonzales JL, Bonelli SI, Valda Y, Pieri A, et al. Hepatitis E virus genotype 3 in humans and Swine, Bolivia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(8):1488–90. doi: 10.3201/eid1708.100769. pmid:21801630
  22. 22. García CG, Sánchez D, Villalba MC, Pujol FH, de Los Ángeles Rodríguez Lay L, Pinto B, et al. Molecular characterization of hepatitis E virus in patients with acute hepatitis in Venezuela. J Med Virol. 2012;84(7):1025–9. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23277. pmid:22585718
  23. 23. Mirazo S, Mainardi V, Ramos N, Gerona S, Rocca A, Arbiza J. Indigenous hepatitis E virus genotype 1 infection, Uruguay. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(1):171–3. doi: 10.3201/eid2001.131471. pmid:24378037
  24. 24. Peláez D, Hoyos MC, Rendón JC, Mantilla C, Ospina MC, Cortés-Mancera F, Perez OL, Contreras L, et al. Infección por el virus de la Hepatitis E en pacientes con diagnóstico clínico de hepatitis viral en Colombia. Biomédica. 2014;34(3):354–65.
  25. 25. Martinez-Vargas D, Usme-Ciro J, Escalante MP, Palacios-Viveros M, Contreras-Gomez L, Pelaez-Carvajal D. Infección concomitante con el virus de la hepatitis E y otros agentes de hepatitis virales en Colombia. VI Simposio Colombiano de Virologia: Biomedica; 2015. p. 41–2.
  26. 26. Dirección Seccional de Salud de Antioquia (Gobernación de Antioquia). Indicadores Básicos 2006.
  27. 27. Fogeda M, Avellón A, Cilla CG, Echevarría JM. Imported and autochthonous hepatitis E virus strains in Spain. J Med Virol. 2009;81(10):1743–9. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21564. pmid:19697406
  28. 28. Inoue J, Takahashi M, Yazaki Y, Tsuda F, Okamoto H. Development and validation of an improved RT-PCR assay with nested universal primers for detection of hepatitis E virus strains with significant sequence divergence. J Virol Methods. 2006;137(2):325–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.07.004. pmid:16901555
  29. 29. Zhai L, Dai X, Meng J. Hepatitis E virus genotyping based on full-length genome and partial genomic regions. Virus Res. 2006;120(1–2):57–69. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.013. pmid:16472882
  30. 30. Inoue J, Ueno Y, Nagasaki F, Akahane T, Fukushima K, Kogure T, et al. Sporadic acute hepatitis E occurred constantly during the last decade in northeast Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(4):329–37. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0012-3. pmid:19271116
  31. 31. Hall T. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999;41:95–8.
  32. 32. Pischke S, Gisa A, Suneetha PV, Wiegand SB, Taubert R, Schlue J, et al. Increased HEV seroprevalence in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085330. pmid:24465537
  33. 33. Gutiérrez-Vergara CC, Rodríguez B, Parra-Suescún J, Correa-Londoño G, López-López L, López-Herrera A, et al. Determination of total (IgG/IgM) and specific (IgM) antibodies to Hepatitis E Virus and molecular detection of the virus in feces of humans with or without occupational exposure to pigs in 10 municipalities of Antioquia, Colombia. Iatreia. 2015;28(3):248–58. doi: 10.17533/udea.iatreia.v28n3a03.
  34. 34. Betancur CA, Mejía MV, Portillo S. Seroprevalencia de hepatitis E en trabajadores de fincas porcícolas del Valle de Aburrá 2011–2012. Acta Medica Colombiana. 2013;38:68–70.
  35. 35. National Department of Statistics. Ficha técnica del censo de la actividad porcícola tecnificada en Colombia 2003. Available: https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/agropecuario/enda/ena/I-Censo_Porcicola_2003.pdf.
  36. 36. Chandra NS, Sharma A, Malhotra B, Rai RR. Dynamics of HEV viremia, fecal shedding and its relationship with transaminases and antibody response in patients with sporadic acute hepatitis E. Virol J. 2010;7:213. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-213. pmid:20815928
  37. 37. Aggarwal R, Kini D, Sofat S, Naik SR, Krawczynski K. Duration of viraemia and faecal viral excretion in acute hepatitis E. Lancet. 2000a;356(9235):1081–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02737-9.
  38. 38. Alvarado-Esquivel C, Sanchez-Anguiano LF, Hernandez-Tinoco J. Seroepidemiology of hepatitis e virus infection in general population in rural durango, Mexico. Hepat Mon. 2014;14(6):e16876. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.16876. pmid:24976837
  39. 39. Rodriguez Lay Lde L, Quintana A, Villalba MC, Lemos G, Corredor MB, Moreno AG, et al. Dual infection with hepatitis A and E viruses in outbreaks and in sporadic clinical cases: Cuba 1998–2003. J Med Virol. 2008;80(5):798–802. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21147. pmid:18360913
  40. 40. Joon A, Rao P, Shenoy SM, Baliga S. Prevalence of Hepatitis A virus (HAV) and Hepatitis E virus (HEV) in the patients presenting with acute viral hepatitis. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015;33 Suppl:102–5. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.150908. pmid:25657123
  41. 41. Zaki MlS, Salama OS, Mansour FA, Hossein S. Hepatitis E virus coinfection with hepatotropic viruses in Egyptian children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008;41(3):254–8. pmid:18629421
  42. 42. Gutiérrez-Vergara C, Quintero J, Duarte JF, Suescún JP, López-Herrera A. Detection of hepatitis E virus genome in pig livers in Antioquia, Colombia. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(1):2890–9. doi: 10.4238/2015.March.31.20. pmid:25867439
  43. 43. Forero JE, Parra JE, López A. Detección del genoma del Virus De La Hepatitis E (VHE) en muestras de heces de cerdos en plantas de beneficio de Antioquia, Colombia. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia. 2014;61(3):221–7.
  44. 44. Schlauder GG, Dawson GJ, Erker JC, Kwo PY, Knigge MF, Smalley DL, et al. The sequence and phylogenetic analysis of a novel hepatitis E virus isolated from a patient with acute hepatitis reported in the United States. J Gen Virol. 1998;79 (Pt 3):447–56. pmid:9519822
  45. 45. Munné MS, Altabert NR, Otegui MLO, Vladimirsky SN, Moreiro R, Espul MP, et al. Updating the knowledge of hepatitis E: new variants and higher prevalence of anti-HEV in Argentina. Ann Hepatol. 2014;13(5):496–502. pmid:25152981
  46. 46. Munné MS, Vladimirsky S, Otegui L, Brajterman L, Castro R, Soto S, et al. Molecular characterization of hepatitis E virus in three acute liver failure cases in children in Argentina. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2006;36(3):125–30. pmid:17407988
  47. 47. Lopes Dos Santos DR, Lewis-Ximenez LL, da Silva MF, de Sousa PS, Gaspar AM, Pinto MA. First report of a human autochthonous hepatitis E virus infection in Brazil. J Clin Virol. 2010;47(3):276–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.12.021. pmid:20116328
  48. 48. Munne MS, Vladimirsky S, Otegui L, Castro R, Brajterman L, Soto S, et al. Identification of the first strain of swine hepatitis E virus in South America and prevalence of anti-HEV antibodies in swine in Argentina. J Med Virol. 2006;78(12):1579–83. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20741. pmid:17063523
  49. 49. dos Santos DR, de Paula VS, de Oliveira JM, Marchevsky RS, Pinto MA. Hepatitis E virus in swine and effluent samples from slaughterhouses in Brazil. Vet Microbiol. 2011;149(1–2):236–41. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.10.024. pmid:21129863
  50. 50. Cooper K, Huang FF, Batista L, Rayo CD, Bezanilla JC, Toth TE, et al. Identification of genotype 3 hepatitis E virus (HEV) in serum and fecal samples from pigs in Thailand and Mexico, where genotype 1 and 2 HEV strains are prevalent in the respective human populations. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(4):1684–8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.43.4.1684-1688.2005. pmid:15814985
  51. 51. Cantú-Martínez MA, Roig-Sagués AX, Cedillo-Rosales S, Zamora-Ávila DE, Avalos-Ramírez R. Molecular detection of hepatitis E virus in pig livers destined for human consumption in the state of Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(2):193–5. pmid:23546411
  52. 52. Ibarra VH, Riedemann GS, Reinhardt VG, Calvo AM. Presencia de anti-VHE en un estudio de cohorte de porcinos ¿reservorio animal de hepatitis E en Chile? Revista médica de Chile. 2007;135:997–1001. pmid:17989856
  53. 53. Kase JA, Correa MT, Luna C, Sobsey MD. Isolation, detection and characterization of swine hepatitis E virus from herds in Costa Rica. Int J Environ Health Res. 2008;18(3):165–76. doi: 10.1080/09603120701498311. pmid:18569145
  54. 54. da Costa Lana MV, Gardinali NR, da Cruz RA, Lopes LL, Silva GS, Caramori Júnior JG, et al. Evaluation of hepatitis E virus infection between different production systems of pigs in Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2014;46(2):399–404. doi: 10.1007/s11250-013-0503-3. pmid:24272392
  55. 55. de Souza AJ, Gomes-Gouvêa MS, Soares MoC, Pinho JR, Malheiros AP, Carneiro LA, et al. HEV infection in swine from Eastern Brazilian Amazon: evidence of co-infection by different subtypes. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;35(5):477–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2012.04.004. pmid:22579295
  56. 56. Purdy MA, Dell'Amico MC, Gonzales JL, Segundo H, Tolari F, Mazzei M, et al. Human and porcine hepatitis E viruses, southeastern Bolivia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(2):339–40. doi: 10.3201/eid1802.111453. pmid:22305048
  57. 57. Bouquet J, Tessé S, Lunazzi A, Eloit M, Rose N, Nicand E, et al. Close similarity between sequences of hepatitis E virus recovered from humans and swine, France, 2008–2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(11):2018–25. doi: 10.3201/eid1711.110616. pmid:22099089