Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Keeping It Local: Dispersal Limitations of Coral Larvae to the High Latitude Coral Reefs of the Houtman Abrolhos Islands

  • Kathryn L. Markey,

    Affiliation Marine Ecology and Monitoring Section, Biodiversity and Biosecurity Branch, Department of Fisheries, Government of Western Australia, PO Box 20, North Beach, WA 6920, Australia

  • Dave A. Abdo ,

    dave.abdo@fish.wa.gov.au

    Affiliation Marine Ecology and Monitoring Section, Biodiversity and Biosecurity Branch, Department of Fisheries, Government of Western Australia, PO Box 20, North Beach, WA 6920, Australia

  • Scott N. Evans,

    Affiliation Marine Ecology and Monitoring Section, Biodiversity and Biosecurity Branch, Department of Fisheries, Government of Western Australia, PO Box 20, North Beach, WA 6920, Australia

  • Cyprien Bosserelle

    Affiliation Geoscience Division, Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Private Mail Bag, GPO, Suva, Fiji Islands

Keeping It Local: Dispersal Limitations of Coral Larvae to the High Latitude Coral Reefs of the Houtman Abrolhos Islands

  • Kathryn L. Markey, 
  • Dave A. Abdo, 
  • Scott N. Evans, 
  • Cyprien Bosserelle
PLOS
x

Abstract

In 2011 the first recorded bleaching event for the high latitude Houtman Abrolhos Islands (HAI) coral communities was documented. This bleaching event highlighted the question of whether a supply of ‘heat tolerant’ coral recruits from the tropical north would be sufficient to provide a level of resistance for these reefs to future warming events. Using Lagrangian modelling we showed that due to its regional isolation, large-scale larval input from potential tropical northern source populations to the HAI is unlikely, despite the southward flowing Leeuwin current. Successful recruitment to artificial substrates was recorded following the bleaching event. However, this was negligible (0.4 ± 0.1 recruits per tile) compared to 2013 post impact recruitment (128.8 ± 15.8 recruits per tile). Our data therefore provides preliminary evidence suggesting that the connectivity of the HAI with coral communities in the north is limited, and population maintenance and recovery is likely driven primarily by self-recruitment. Given the low thermal tolerance of the HAI coral communities, the dominance of Acropora, and the apparent reliance on self-recruitment, an increased frequency of thermally anomalous conditions at the HAI (such as experienced in 2011) has the potential to reduce the long-term stability of the HAI coral populations and species that depend upon them.

Introduction

Coral reef communities have shown incredible persistence in taxonomic composition and diversity during multiple episodes of global climate change [1]. Despite this long-term resilience, there has been an unprecedented decline and change in the comparative constancy in coral community composition in the past few decades [2]. This has been attributed to multiple causes including warming sea temperatures. Increasing sea temperatures have been directly linked to the occurrence of coral bleaching, and thermal bleaching events have resulted in significant mortality and dramatic shifts in coral community structure [3]. However, the majority of high latitude coral reefs (>26° latitude), such as those at the Houtman Abrolhos Islands (HAI), have been less affected by thermal bleaching compared to their tropical counterparts [46], leading to suggestions that they may be important refugia for tropical species in periods of warming [7, 8].

In Western Australia (WA), coral reef taxa (over geological time scales) have responded to a warming climate [7], with reefs at the edge of their distributions (e.g. high latitude reefs) suggested to have adapted to climate-induced increases in temperature [9]. On a more contemporary scale, a significant shift in the WA marine climate has been documented, with warmer water reaching further south [10], which has seen tropicalisation of the sub tropics and temperate reefs through changes to the range limits of species [11]. The capacity of the HAI to act as a coral refuge will depend on the stability of its coral population under future changes to the WA marine climate and its connectivity to the northern reef systems. An extremely strong La Niña event during the 2010/11 summer resulted in a record-strength poleward movement of warm tropical waters by the Leeuwin Current [12] and significant coral bleaching was recorded for the first time at the HAI in 2011 (~50% coral mortality across nine sites) [13]. The supply of recruits from the tropical north, which originate from warmer temperatures than found at the HAI (hereafter referred to as ‘heat tolerant’), may serve to improve the resistance of the HAI coral communities to increased temperatures. However, the increasing trend of warmer water at the HAI may further increase the possibility of thermal anomalies and subsequent bleaching [13]. The question is therefore raised as to whether a supply of ‘heat tolerant’ recruits from the tropical north will be sufficient to overcome the warming marine climate at the HAI, and hence provide an adaptive capacity to a changing climate.

At present, the extent of physical and ecological connectivity among WA reefs is unknown, but as the majority of coral larvae generally settle within one week of spawning [14, 15], Underwood et al. [16] hypothesised that coral systems in north-west Australia will be primarily replenished each generation by recruits that are produced locally, with coral dispersal distances ranging from ~10 km to ~50 km. This has also been observed along the eastern seaboard (e.g. between the Great Barrier Reef and higher latitude reefs like Lord Howe Island) where evidence of local recruitment has been observed [17, 18]. Given the isolated nature of the HAI, being ~240 km south from its nearest reported coral reef community neighbour (i.e. Shark Bay) [19], and a maximum reported larval competency period of up to 110 days (e.g. Acropora valida, see Table 1), it is predicted that localised production of coral recruits will be extremely important for replenishment of HAI coral communities. To test this, we used standard Lagrangian modelling to examine the likelihood of larval input to the HAI from external sources. The model was run over two years to represent normal Leeuwin Current conditions (Austral summer 2009/2010) and strengthened Leeuwin Current conditions (Austral summer 2010/2011). In addition, we recorded coral settlement rates on artificial substrates in 2011–2013 to quantify the number of recruits settling at the HAI [20]. The objective of the study was to use a combination of modelled dispersal patterns and empirical recruitment data to understand connectivity between the HAI with its northern counterparts, in a preliminary effort to estimate the potential resistance of the HAI coral communities to any future warming events.

Materials and Methods

Study location

The HAI are located on the edge of the WA continental shelf between 28°16’S and 29°00’S, in the pathway of the warm poleward flowing Leeuwin Current (Fig 1). Due to the influence of the Leeuwin Current transporting tropical marine fauna southwards, the HAI has an exceptional range of marine diversity (including 184 coral species from 42 genera), with tropical species co-existing with temperate species including habitat structuring alga [21].

thumbnail
Fig 1. a) Location of potential northern seeding reefs and the HAI used in the dispersal modelling b) Simulated larval arrivals from the potential northern seeding reefs to the HAI in 2010 and in c) 2011.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147628.g001

Particle dispersal model

Particle dispersal modelling was undertaken for 2010 (considered a ‘normal’ year) and 2011 (considered an ‘anomalous’ year). In this model, coral larvae were assumed to be passive neutrally buoyant particles. The dispersal model used a standard Lagrangian formulation [22, 23] of displacement that can be written as: Eq (1) where x is the particle position along a given axis (Latitude and longitude in our case) and Δx is the particle displacement during a time step Δt. Here the time step was chosen as 600 seconds. Up is the surface current speed at the location of the particle and K is the diffusivity that takes account of the random displacement of the particle due to turbulent eddies at a scale smaller than the hydrodynamics model resolution.

The eddy diffusivity can be calculated using the eq. proposed by Viikmae et al. [24] Eq (2) where Ehis an horizontal turbulent diffusion coefficient. Δtis the model time step (here 3600 seconds) RNA and RNB are normally distributed random numbers. The horizontal turbulent diffusion coefficient is unknown but is assumed to be 1m2s-1. The surface current speed (Up) is calculated by interpolating the velocity from the hydrodynamics model both in space and in time. The interpolation is first on the particle position using a bi-linear interpolation of the gridded surface currents. Only the surface currents are taken into account in the interpolation and vertical movement along with settling and resuspension of larvae is not considered here. The particle age is kept and increases with the model progression. To allow a delayed released, particles are given a negative age and are only allowed to move according to Eq (1) when their age becomes positive.

This particle model was driven by current velocity output from hydrodynamic numerical models WASA for WA (for 2010) and OzROMS for Australia (for 2011) with a daily output on a curvilinear grid with resolution between 2–4 km [25, 26]. The hydrodynamic model simulates the full 3 dimension of the water column. However, only the surface layer was used to drive the dispersal model.

To determine potential seeding locations, the model was run backwards and areas of significant coral cover within the path of the released backwards-flowing particles within 250 days were considered potential seeding locations. At each of the potential seeding locations (Dampier Archipelago, Barrow Island group, Flat Island group, Ningaloo Reef, Shark Bay) 256,000 particles were seeded every day for 5 days following the 31st March (total 1,280,000 particles per location). The number of particles to reach the HAI area was then recorded over the following 250 days. While the exact coral spawning dates for 2010 and 2011 differed (30th March 2010 and 18th March 2011, respectively), for model consistency, the particle release time was kept constant to allow for exact comparison of the output.

Recruitment tiles

Corals in WA are known to have a major spawning event in Austral autumn (March—April) [27], which coincides with a strengthening of the Leeuwin Current. As such, standard terracota recruitment tiles (12 x 12 x 1 cm) were deployed in January of 2011, 2012, and 2013 at 3 sites at the HAI following standard methodologies [28]. At each site, three replicate sets of tiles (5 tiles per replicate) were deployed just off the sea floor at between 8–10 m depth. Each year, the tiles deployed in January were retrieved in May, bleached, and transported to the laboratory. Newly settled corals were analysed using a binocular microscope examining the top and bottom surfaces of the tiles, and identified as Acroporidae, Pocilloporidae, Poritidae and other [29]. The recruitment data were Log (x+1) transformed prior to analysis, and a resemblance matrix of similarities was calculated using Euclidean distance. To examine changes in the number of recruits, a Permutational Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) [30] was performed with Year as a fixed factor, followed by pair-wise post-hoc tests. Sea surface temperature data was obtained from 4 January 2010 to 30 December 2013 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric (NOAA) HAI virtual station at 28.5°S 114.0°E [31].

Results and Discussion

Under normal Leeuwin Current conditions (as per 2010 in our model), the first of the simulated propagules arrived at the HAI from its nearest neighbour Shark Bay after 57 days (Fig 1B). However, this only represented <0.01% of the propagules received from Shark Bay. The next phase of arrivals from Shark Bay occurred at 76 days, and coincided with the first arrivals from Ningaloo at 77 days (Fig 1B). Fifty percent of arrivals had occurred after 138 days and 141 days after release from Shark Bay and Ningaloo, respectively, although the rate of arrivals was 125% greater from Ningaloo compared to Shark Bay (Fig 1B). The first of the simulated propagules arrived at the HAI from the Barrow Island group after 81 days (Fig 1B), but again only represented <0.01% of the propagules received from the Barrow Island group. The next phase of arrivals from the Barrow Island group occurred at 104 days, and coincided with the first arrivals from the Dampier Archipelago and the Flat Island Group at 105 days (Fig 1B). The simulated propagules from the Flat Island group, the Barrow Island group, and the Dampier Archipelago were bimodal, peaking at ~140 days and ~160 days from release (Fig 1B).

During 2011, the Leeuwin Current was at a record strength associated with a strong La Niña event during the 2010/11 summer [12]. Under these conditions, the simulated propagules starting arriving at the HAI from Shark Bay at 56 days, with the peak arrival between 65–80 days (Fig 1C). There were no simulated propagule arrivals from any of the other four potential source locations under the strengthened Leeuwin Current conditions for the full 250 days of the model (Fig 1C).

While some coral species have larvae that are reported to survive for up to 200 days [32] and complete metamorphosis up to 100 days after spawning under laboratory conditions [33], the simulated propagule arrival times of between 80–180 days in our models is beyond the upper competency periods of most coral species [32, 34]. Moreover, the basic Lagrangian simulations used did not allow for particle dilution or mortality, which has been shown to reduce larval (simulated particle) movement by up to 9-fold [35]. Entrapment and early settlement on natal or nearby reefs [16, 36], mortality, predation and dilution prevent much long distance larval transport [37], and the ecological likelihood of external recruitment from sources beyond 50 km is expected to be limited [38]. Studies using genetic, oceanographic, or modelling techniques to infer coral dispersal distances have found that larvae routinely disperse ≤10s of kms, with dispersal >50–100s of kms generally restricted to occasional genetic connections (see summary in Jones et al. 2009). Given that our models represent an overestimation of the connectivity between the HAI and its northern neighbours >240km away, the capacity of the northern source locations to supply ‘heat tolerant’ recruits to the HAI, or sufficient larvae to facilitate recovery following significant mortality of the local population is likely to be limited.

The results of our model outputs therefore suggest that the population dynamics of the coral communities of the HAI are largely driven by self-recruitment rather than frequent input of larvae from external northern population sources. This reinforces a study on the population genetic structure of Pocillopora damicornis at the HAI that indicated that the populations were primarily self-seeding [39]. Further, a recent study by Thomas et al. (2015) found a complex localised genetic structure within Acropora spicifera populations at HAI, suggesting isolated local populations and enhanced self-recruitment within the island groups at HAI [40]. The Acroporidae largely dominate the coral community of the HAI [41] and this was reflected in the recruitment data, where >95% of the recruits that settled on the artificial tiles were Acroporidae. The recorded recruitment rates differed significantly among all years (Table 2). During the anomalous summer 2010/2011, where temperatures reached up to 5°C above long-term seasonal averages [12] (Fig 2B), there was almost complete recruitment failure on the artificial tiles in 2011 (0.4 ± 0.1 recruits per tile; Fig 2B). The number of recruits per tile increased in 2012 (19.5 ± 4.2 recruits per tile; Fig 2B), with the highest number of recruits per tile recorded in 2013 (128.8 ± 15.8 recruits per tile; Fig 2B).

thumbnail
Fig 2. a) NOAA Sea surface temperature data from 2010–2013. Note 2010 represents a typical temperature profile for HAI, unlike the anomalous temperatures seen in 2011. b) Average number of coral recruits tile-1 (± Standard Error) at the HAI following the autumn mass spawning from 2011–2013.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147628.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Permutational Analysis of Variance for coral recruits tile-1 at the HAI following the autumn mass spawning from 2011–2013.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147628.t002

The anomalous temperatures recorded in the summer 2010/2011 that resulted in bleaching and ~50% mortality of the adult coral population at the HAI [13] was likely to be a factor in the poor recruitment recorded in 2011. The loss of adult brood stock has been shown to disproportionately affect recruitment success on isolated reefs [42], and coral larval survival [43], recruitment, and post settlement survival [44] can be negatively affected by increased temperatures. Coral bleaching has also been shown to reduce coral fecundity in some species [4547]. Thus, the lower recruitment rates in 2012 may also be related to reduced reproductive output following the bleaching in the previous year, and/or due to temperature-related effects on the larvae as the sea surface temperatures in 2012 were also above seasonal averages prior to and including the spawning period (Fig 2A).

In contrast to the low rates of recruitment in 2011 and 2012, the 2013 recruitment rate (equivalent to 3832 recruits m-2 year-1) was higher than that reported for sub-tropical reefs [48] and more akin to rates recorded on the well connected central Great Barrier Reef [4951]. Interestingly, during the 2013 spawning period, the Leeuwin current was at a relatively low strength associated with a neutral ENSO, whereas in 2011 (strong La Niña) and 2012 (moderate La Niña) the Leeuwin Current flowed strongly past the HAI. A strong southerly current through the HAI during spawning time (as experienced in 2011 and 2012) could potentially lessen the residence time of locally produced larvae, which may serve to reduce self-recruitment if the larvae are swept off their natal reefs before settlement competency is reached [52]. Such an effect may help in partly explain the low recruitment seen in 2011 and 2012. However, increased water temperatures have recently been shown to speed up competency in some coral species [53] which could help to counter the effect of decreased residence times. Strong La Niña events and associated strong Leeuwin currents therefore appear to have the potential to result in both thermal stress to the adult coral community and a reduction of larval retention at the HAI. Additional years of recruitment analysis and modelling of larval residence times at the HAI would be necessary to fully elucidate this pattern.

The recovery of the HAI coral population following the 2011 bleaching may therefore be longer than would have initially been expected due to the limited connectivity with the northern reef systems and localised genetic patchiness [40], the potential reduction of recruitment rates due to thermal stress on the adults, and/or the variable oceanographic conditions. This is of particular importance for populations in the Pelsaert Group, which appear to be isolated from the other island groups at the HAI [40]. The stability of the HAI coral population is therefore likely to depend on the frequency of future disturbances, as well as the survival and growth of the adult population following disturbance and sufficient successful recruitment. The HAI coral communities are largely comprised of branching Acropora, an important component of the structural complexity and reef building capacity of the HAI [54, 55]. Adult Acropora are extremely fecund [56] and grow rapidly [57]. However, they are also known to be particularly thermally sensitive [58, 59], and the HAI coral communities have recently been shown to have a low bleaching threshold [13]. With the documented trend of increasing marine temperatures it is likely that future bleaching will be recorded at the HAI, and as recruitment rates are reduced when the proportion of the population fecund falls below 80% [49], significant bleaching-associated mortality in the future has the potential to reduce local larval supply at the HAI. Moreover, given the location of the HAI in a tropical/temperate mixture zone, competition with coexisting macroalgal communities following disturbance could decrease suitable settlement substrate and post settlement survival [8, 60].

The results presented here suggest that the connectivity of the HAI to coral communities to the north is limited, and that self-recruitment among the island groups of HAI is is likely the primary source of coral recruits. The limited input of ‘heat tolerant’ recruits into the HAI coral population is unlikely to provide an increased resistance to future thermal stress, and if temperature pulses akin to those experienced in the summer 2010/2011 increase in frequency, future coral bleaching events are likely. Future bleaching events have the potential to result in reduced coral cover and abundance and a decreased supply of new recruits from natal sources. Given the dominance of Acropora and the apparent reliance on self-recruitment of the HAI coral communities, an increased frequency of thermally anomalous conditions at the HAI has the potential to reduce the long term stability (i.e. community structure, hard coral cover) of the HAI coral populations.

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the Department of Fisheries, Government of Western Australia. The authors would like to thank Tyrone Ridgway for helpful discussions and editing earlier versions of this manuscript and Joshua Dornan and Nick Konzewistch for field and laboratory assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DA. Performed the experiments: KM DA CB SE. Analyzed the data: KM DA CB SE. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KM DA CB SE. Wrote the paper: KM DA CB.

References

  1. 1. Pandolfi JM. Coral community dynamics at multiple scales. Coral Reefs. 2002;21(1):13–23. pmid:WOS:000175608200004.
  2. 2. Pandolfi JM, Bradbury RH, Sala E, Hughes TP, Bjorndal KA, Cooke RG, et al. Global trajectories of the long-term decline of coral reef ecosystems. Science. 2003;301(5635):955. pmid:12920296
  3. 3. Oliver JK, Berkelmans R, Eakin CM. Coral beaching in space and time. In: M.J.H. vO , J.M. L , editors. Coral bleaching: Patterns, process, causes and consequences. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009. p. 21–39.
  4. 4. Celliers L, Schleyer MH. Coral bleaching on high-latitude marginal reefs at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2002;44(12):1380–7. pmid:WOS:000179929100022.
  5. 5. McClanahan TR, Ateweberhan M, Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Sebastian CR, Guillaume MMM, et al. Western Indian Ocean coral communities: Bleaching responses and susceptibility to extinction. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007;337:1–13. pmid:WOS:000247105100001.
  6. 6. Harrison PL, Dalton SJ, Carroll AG. Extensive coral bleaching on the world’s southernmost coral reef at Lord Howe Island, Australia. Coral Reefs. 2011;30(3):775.
  7. 7. Greenstein BJ, Pandolfi JM. Escaping the heat: Range shifts of reef coral taxa in coastal Western Australia. Global Change Biology. 2008;14(3):513–28. pmid:WOS:000252929900006.
  8. 8. Hoey AS, Pratchett MS, Cvitanovic C. High macroalgal cover and low coral recruitment undermines the potential resilience of the world's southernmost coral reef assemblages. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):1–9.
  9. 9. Cooper TF O'Leary RA, Lough JM. Growth of Western Australian corals in the anthropocene. Science. 2012;335(6068):593–6. pmid:WOS:000299769200046.
  10. 10. Lough JM. Shifting climate zones for australia's tropical marine ecosystems. Geophysical Research Letters. 2008;35(14). L14708 pmid:WOS:000258149000007.
  11. 11. Vergés A, Steinberg PD, Hay ME, Poore AGB, Campbell AH, Ballesteros E, et al. The tropicalization of temperate marine ecosystems: Climate-mediated changes in herbivory and community phase shifts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014;281(1789):20140846. pmid:PMC4100510.
  12. 12. Pearce AF, Feng M. The rise and fall of the "marine heat wave" off Western Australia during the summer of 2010/2011. Journal of Marine Systems. 2013;111:139–56. pmid:WOS:000314375500012.
  13. 13. Abdo DA, Bellchambers LM, Evans SN. Turning up the heat: Increasing temperature and coral bleaching at the high latitude coral reefs of the Houtman Abrolhos Islands. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):11. e43878 pmid:WOS:000308206000057.
  14. 14. Miller K, Mundy C. Rapid settlement in broadcast spawning corals: Implications for larval dispersal. Coral Reefs. 2003;22(2):99–106.
  15. 15. Baird AH. The ecology of coral larvae: Settlement patterns, habitat selection and the length of the larval phase. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales. 2004;137:43.
  16. 16. Underwood JN, Wilson SK, Ludgerus L, Evans RD. Integrating connectivity science and spatial conservation management of coral reefs in North-West Australia. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2013;21(3):163–72. pmid:WOS:000317274600005.
  17. 17. Miller KJ, Ayre DJ. Protection of genetic diversity and maintenance of connectivity among reef corals within marine protected areas. Conservation Biology. 2008;22(5):1245–54. pmid:18637917
  18. 18. Noreen AME, Harrison PL, Van Oppen MJH. Genetic diversity and connectivity in a brooding reef coral at the limit of its distribution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;276(1675):3927–35. pmid:19710055
  19. 19. Shedrawi G. Coral reef communities. In: Bancroft K, editor. Western australian marine monitoring program: Annual marine protected area biodiversity assets and social values report: Shark Bay marine park and Hamelin Pool marine nature reserve, 2011–2012: Department of Parks and Wildlife; 2013. p. 63–74.
  20. 20. Rosser NL, Gilmour JP. New insights into patterns of coral spawning on Western Australian reefs. Coral Reefs. 2008;27(2):345–9. pmid:WOS:000255191100014.
  21. 21. Wells F. The marine flora and fauna of the Houtman Abrolhos Islands, Western Australia. Perth: Western Australian Museum; 1997. 253 p.
  22. 22. Black K, Gay S, Andrews J. Residence times of neutrally-buoyant matter such as larvae, sewage or nutrients on coral reefs. Coral Reefs. 1990;9(3):105–14.
  23. 23. Siegel D, Kinlan B, Gaylord B, Gaines S. Lagrangian descriptions of marine larval dispersion. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2003;260:83–96.
  24. 24. Viikmäe B, Torsvik T, Soomere T. Impact of horizontal eddy diffusivity on lagrangian statistics for coastal pollution from a major marine fairway. Ocean Dynamics. 2013;63(5):589–97.
  25. 25. Wijeratne EMS, Pattiaratchi C, Proctor R. Modelling meso-scale dynamics along western and southern australian shelf and slopes: A rom modelling approach. 2012.
  26. 26. Wijeratne EMS, Pattiaratchi C, Proctor R. Estimates of alongshore and cross-shelf transports around australia. Australian Coastal and Oceans Modelling and Observations Workshop (ACOMO); Canberra, 2014.
  27. 27. Rosser NL. Biannual coral spawning decreases at higher latitudes on Western Australian reefs. Coral Reefs. 2012;32(2):455–60. pmid:WOS:000318567900015.
  28. 28. English S, Wilkinson C, Baker V. Survey manual for tropical marine resources 2nd ed. 2nd ed. Townsville, Australia 4810: ASEAN-Australia Marine Science Project: Living Coastal Resources, Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No. 3; 1997. 390p.
  29. 29. Babcock RC, Baird AH, Piromvaragorn S, Thomson DP, Willis BL. Identification of scleractinian coral recruits from indo-pacific reefs. Zoological Studies. 2003;42(1):211–26. pmid:WOS:000181513300013.
  30. 30. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clark KR. Permanova+ for primer: Guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth, United Kingdom: PRIMER-E Ltd; 2008.
  31. 31. Watch NCR. Noaa coral reef watch daily global 50-km satellite virtual station time series data for Houtman Abrolhos Islands. College Park, Maryland, USA: NOAA Coral Reef Watch; 2014. Available from: http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/vs/index.php.
  32. 32. Graham E, Baird A, Connolly S. Survival dynamics of scleractinian coral larvae and implications for dispersal. Coral Reefs. 2008;27(3):529–39.
  33. 33. Connolly SR, Baird AH. Estimating dispersal potential for marine larvae: Dynamic models applied to scleractinian corals. Ecology. 2010;91(12):3572–83. pmid:21302829
  34. 34. Gilmour JP, Smith LD, Brinkman RM. Biannual spawning, rapid larval development and evidence of self-seeding for scleractinian corals at an isolated system of reefs. Marine Biology. 2009;156(6):1297–309. pmid:WOS:000264873800019.
  35. 35. Cowen RK, Lwiza KMM, Sponaugle S, Paris CB, Olson DB. Connectivity of marine populations: Open or closed? Science. 2000;287(5454):857–9. pmid:10657300
  36. 36. Black KP, Moran PJ, Hammond LS. Numerical-models show coral reefs can be self-seeding. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1991;74(1):1–11. pmid:WOS:A1991FY63900001.
  37. 37. Hughes TP, Baird AH, Dinsdale EA, Harriott VJ, Moltschaniwskyj NA, Pratchett MS, et al. Detecting regional variation using meta-analysis and large-scale sampling: Latitudinal patterns in recruitment. Ecology. 2002;83(2):436–51. pmid:WOS:000173538800013.
  38. 38. Graham NA, Nash KL, Kool JT. Coral reef recovery dynamics in a changing world. Coral Reefs. 2011;30(2):283–94.
  39. 39. Whitaker K. Genetic evidence for mixed modes of reproduction in the coral Pocillopora damicornis and its effect on population structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2006;306:115–24. pmid:WOS:000235518100010.
  40. 40. Thomas L, Kennington WJ, Stat M, Wilkinson SP, Kool JT, Kendrick GA. Isolation by resistance across a complex coral reef seascape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015;282(1812).
  41. 41. Smith S. The houtman abrolhos islands: Carbon metabolism of coral reefs at high latitude. Limnology and Oceanography. 1981;26(4):612–21.
  42. 42. Gilmour JP, Smith LD, Heyward AJ, Baird AH, Pratchett MS. Recovery of an isolated coral reef system following severe disturbance. Science. 2013;340(6128):69–71. pmid:WOS:000317061100046.
  43. 43. Woolsey ES, Byrne M, Baird AH. The effects of temperature on embryonic development and larval survival in two scleractinian corals. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2013;493:179–84. pmid:WOS:000327197700016.
  44. 44. Ross C, Ritson-Williams R, Olsen K, Paul VJ. Short-term and latent post-settlement effects associated with elevated temperature and oxidative stress on larvae from the coral Porites astreoides. Coral Reefs. 2013;32(1):71–9. pmid:WOS:000316018600009.
  45. 45. Szmant AM, Gassman NJ. The effects of prolonged bleaching on the tissue biomass and reproduction of the reef coral Montastrea annularis. Coral Reefs. 1990;8(4):217–24. pmid:WOS:A1990DD30700010.
  46. 46. Baird AH, Marshall PA. Mortality, growth and reproduction in scleractinian corals following bleaching on the great barrier reef. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2002;237:133–41. pmid:WOS:000177535300012.
  47. 47. Sudek M, Aeby GS, Davy SK. Localized bleaching in hawaii causes tissue loss and a reduction in the number of gametes in Porites compressa. Coral Reefs. 2012;31(2):351–5. pmid:WOS:000303450100005.
  48. 48. Ho M-J, Dai C-F. Coral recruitment of a subtropical coral community at Yenliao Bay, Northern Taiwan. Zoological Studies. 2014;53. 5 pmid:WOS:000331833200005.
  49. 49. Hughes TP, Baird AH, Dinsdale EA, Moltschaniwskyj NA, Pratchett MS, Tanner JE, et al. Supply-side ecology works both ways: The link between benthic adults, fecundity, and larval recruits. Ecology. 2000;81(8):2241–9. pmid:WOS:000088888900017.
  50. 50. Glassom D, Zakai D, Chadwick-Furman NE. Coral recruitment: A spatio-temporal analysis along the coastline of eilat, northern red sea. Marine Biology. 2004;144(4):641–51. pmid:WOS:000220560600003.
  51. 51. Sammarco PW, Andrews JC, Risk MJ. Coral-reef geomorphology as a function of seasonal prevailing currents and larval dispersal. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology. 1991;88(1–2):1–12. pmid:WOS:A1991GW85600001.
  52. 52. Andutta FP, Kingsford MJ, Wolanski E. 'Sticky water' enables the retention of larvae in a reef mosaic. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science. 2012;101:54–63. pmid:WOS:000303032400006.
  53. 53. Figueiredo J, Baird AH, Harii S, Connolly SR. Increased local retention of reef coral larvae as a result of ocean warming. Nature Clim Change. 2014;4(6):498–502.
  54. 54. Smith SV. The Houtman Abrolhos Islands—carbon metabolism of coral reefs at high-latitude. Limnology and Oceanography. 1981;26(4):612–21. pmid:WOS:A1981MB81000002.
  55. 55. Harriott VJ, Banks SA. Latitudinal variation in coral communities in eastern australia: A qualitative biophysical model of factors regulating coral reefs. Coral Reefs. 2002;21(1):83–94. pmid:WOS:000175608200012.
  56. 56. Wallace CC. Reproduction, recruitment and fragmentation in 9 sympatric species of coral of the coral genus Acropora. Marine Biology. 1985;88(3):217–33. pmid:WOS:A1985ARB8800001.
  57. 57. Dullo WC. Coral growth and reef growth: A brief review. Facies. 2005;51:33–48.
  58. 58. Marshall PA, Baird AH. Bleaching of corals on the great barrier reef: Differential susceptibilities among taxa. Coral Reefs. 2000;19(2):155–63. pmid:WOS:000088614000007.
  59. 59. Depczynski M, Gilmour JP, Ridgway T, Barnes H, Heyward AJ, Holmes TH, et al. Bleaching, coral mortality and subsequent survivorship on a West Australian fringing reef. Coral Reefs. 2013;32(1):233–8. pmid:WOS:000316018600028.
  60. 60. Hughes TP, Bellwood DR, Folke CS, McCook LJ, Pandolfi JM. No-take areas, herbivory and coral reef resilience. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2007;22(1):1–3. pmid:17070963
  61. 61. Veron JEN, Marsh LM. Hermatypic corals of western australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum. 1988; Supplement 29.
  62. 62. Wilson JR, Harrison PL. Settlement-competency periods of larvae of three species of scleractinian corals. Marine Biology. 1998;131(2):339–45. pmid:WOS:000074174600016.
  63. 63. Nishikawa A, Sakai K. Settlement-competency period of planulae and genetic differentiation of the scleractinian coral Acropora digitifera. Zoological Science. 2005;22(4):391–9. pmid:WOS:000237651700002.
  64. 64. Harrison PL, Babcock RC, Bull GD, Oliver JK, Wallace CC, Willis BL. Mass spawning in tropical reef corals. Science (New York, NY). 1984;223(4641):1186–9.
  65. 65. Baird AH. The ecology of coral larvae: Settlement patterns, habitat selection and the length of the larval phase: James Cook University; 2001.
  66. 66. Nozawa Y, Okubo N. Survival dynamics of reef coral larvae with special consideration of larval size and the genus Acropora. Biological Bulletin. 2011;220(1):15–22. pmid:WOS:000288300100003.
  67. 67. Nozawa Y, Harrison PL. Temporal patterns of larval settlement and survivorship of two broadcast-spawning acroporid corals. Marine Biology. 2008;155(3):347–51. pmid:WOS:000258576500010.
  68. 68. Nishikawa A, Katoh M, Sakai K. Larval settlement rates and gene flow of broadcast-spawning (Acropora tenuis) and planula-brooding (Stylophora pistillata) corals. Marine Ecology-Progress Series. 2003;256:87–97. pmid:WOS:000184808900008.
  69. 69. Ben-David-Zaslow R, Benayahu Y. Competence and longevity in planulae of several species of soft corals. Marine Ecology-Progress Series. 1998;163:235–43. pmid:WOS:000073032800022.
  70. 70. Dahan M, Benayahu Y. Embryogenesis, planulae longevity, and competence in the octocoral Dendronephthya hemprichi. Invertebrate Biology. 1998;117(4):271–80. pmid:WOS:000077451200002.
  71. 71. Babcock R. Reproduction and distribution of two species of Goniastrea (scleractinia) from the great barrier reef province. Coral Reefs. 1984;2(4):187–95.
  72. 72. Harii S, Kayanne H, Takigawa H, Hayashibara T, Yamamoto M. Larval survivorship, competency periods and settlement of two brooding corals, Heliopora coerulea and pocillopora damicornis. Marine Biology. 2002;141(1):39–46. pmid:WOS:000177239300005.
  73. 73. Ben-David-Zaslow RBD, Benayahu Y. Longevity, competence and energetic content in planulae of the soft coral Heteroxenia fuscescens. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1996;206(1–2):55–68. pmid:WOS:A1996VV64500004.
  74. 74. Nozawa Y, Harrison PL, editors. Larval settlement patterns, dispersal potential, and the effect of temperature on settlement of larvae of the reef coral, Platygyra daedalea, from the great barrier reef. Proceedings 9th International Coral Reef Symposium; 2000; Bali, Indonesia.
  75. 75. Tay YC, Guest JR, Chou LM, Todd PA. Vertical distribution and settlement competencies in broadcast spawning coral larvae: Implications for dispersal models. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2011;409(1–2):324–30. pmid:WOS:000298363100042.
  76. 76. Richmond RH. Energetics, competency, and long-distance dispersal of planula larvae of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Marine Biology. 1987;93(4):527–33.