Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Polyphyly of Asian Tree Toads, Genus Pedostibes Günther, 1876 (Anura: Bufonidae), and the Description of a New Genus from Southeast Asia

  • Kin Onn Chan ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Kin Onn Chan, Robin Kurian Abraham

    chankinonn@gmail.com

    Affiliation: Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America

  • L. Lee Grismer ,

    Affiliation: Department of Biology, La Sierra University, 4500 Riverwalk Parkway, Riverside, California, United States of America

    ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

  • Anil Zachariah,

    Affiliation: Beagle, Chandakunnu, Wayanad, Kerala, India

  • Rafe M. Brown ,

    Affiliation: Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America

    ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

  • Robin Kurian Abraham

    Contributed equally to this work with: Kin Onn Chan, Robin Kurian Abraham

    Affiliation: Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America

Polyphyly of Asian Tree Toads, Genus Pedostibes Günther, 1876 (Anura: Bufonidae), and the Description of a New Genus from Southeast Asia

  • Kin Onn Chan, 
  • L. Lee Grismer, 
  • Anil Zachariah, 
  • Rafe M. Brown, 
  • Robin Kurian Abraham
PLOS
x

Abstract

The Asian Tree Toad genus Pedostibes, as currently understood, exhibits a conspicuously disjunct distribution, posing several immediate questions relating to the biogeography and taxonomy of this poorly known group. The type species, P. tuberculosus and P. kempi, are known only from India, whereas P. hosii, P. rugosus, and P. everetti are restricted to Southeast Asia. Several studies have shown that these allopatric groups are polyphyletic, with the Indian Pedostibes embedded within a primarily South Asian clade of toads, containing the genera Adenomus, Xanthophryne, and Duttaphrynus. Southeast Asian Pedostibes on the other hand, are nested within a Southeast Asian clade, which is the sister lineage to the Southeast Asian river toad genus Phrynoidis. We demonstrate that Indian and Southeast Asian Pedostibes are not only allopatric and polyphyletic, but also exhibit significant differences in morphology and reproductive mode, indicating that the Southeast Asian species’ are not congeneric with the true Pedostibes of India. As a taxonomic solution, we describe a new genus, Rentapia gen. nov. to accommodate the Southeast Asian species.

Introduction

Asian Tree Toads of the genus Pedostibes Günther, 1876 comprise five allopatric species, with P. tuberculosus restricted to the Western Ghats of India [1] and P. kempi, known only from the Garo Hills in the northeastern part of the Indian subcontinent. Three others, P. hosii, P. rugosus, and P. everetti, are known from Southeast Asia. Pedostibes hosii occurs in the Thai-Malay Peninsula from the Isthmus of Kra, southwards to Sumatra and Borneo [2], whereas P. rugosus, and P. everetti, are restricted to the island of Borneo [35](Fig 1). Pedostibes hosii and P. everetti were originally allocated to the African genus Nectophryne [6,7] but were subsequently re-assigned to the genus Pedostibes [8]. This re-allocation was justified on the basis of the presence of eight pre-sacral vertebrae and in possessing the coccy articulated by two small, but distinctly separated condyles, which was found common to the Indian P. tuberculosus and the Southeast Asian species [8].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Map showing distribution of species of Pedostibes and Rentapia gen. nov.

Reprinted from http://treehouse-maps.com/ under the CC BY license, with permission from Treehouse Maps, original copyright 2014.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.g001

The type species, P. tuberculosus is small in size, with females exhibiting a maximum body size of 41.5 mm, (maximum male body size 38.2 mm; this study). The other Indian species, P. kempi, is known only from the type series, with a reported body size of 34.0 mm [9], and has not been encountered since its original description. The Southeast Asian species, in contrast, are substantially larger, with female P. hosii reaching a maximum body size of 104.8 mm (males 79.6 mm) and female P. rugosus having body sizes up to 95.0 mm (males 76.8 mm). No adult specimens of P. everetti have ever been reported [35].

Several recent phylogenetic studies have demonstrated that Indian and Southeast Asian Pedostibes are polyphyletic, with the type species, P. tuberculosus being part of a clade comprising the South Asian toad genera such as Duttaphrynus, Xanthophryne, and Adenomus, whereas the Southeast Asian species are nested within a Southeast Asian radiation and is the sister lineage to the genus Phrynoidis [1015]. Based on these results, we re-examined the taxonomic status of Southeast Asian Pedostibes to determine if their polyphyletic relationships, and presumed distinctiveness, can be corroborated with other lines of evidence. We demonstrate that in addition to being allopatric and polyphyletic with respect to the Indian taxa, the Southeast Asian species, P. hosii and P. rugosus (and presumably, by implication, also P. everetti) exhibit significant differences in morphology and reproductive strategies. The combination of these findings supports the hypothesis that the Southeast Asian and Indian species are not congeneric. Here, we define a new genus that better reflects the taxonomic placement and unique evolutionary history of the Southeast Asian taxa.

Materials and Methods

Morphological analysis

The following measurements (defined in [16]) were measured with a Mitutoyo digital caliper (to the nearest 0.1 mm) on the left side of the body: snout-vent length (SVL), snout length (SNL), head length (HL), head width (HW), tympanum diameter (TD), forearm length (FAL), third finger length (Fin3L), third finger disc width (Fin3DW), femur length (FL) tibia length (TBL), inner metatarsal tubercle length (MTTL). List of specimens examined are provided in S1 Table. For consistency, only male specimens of Pedostibes tuberculosus, P. hosii and P. rugosus were included in analyses (specimens of P. kempi and P. everetti were unavailable for examination). All measurements were corrected for proportional variance (due to large differences in body size) by individually dividing each character by the specimen’s SVL. Subsequent analyses were conducted on these adjusted measurements using the statistical software environment R v.3.1.2 [17]. Data were initially explored with simple mensural comparisons undertaken by plotting each character against its adjusted measurement. A principal component analysis (PCA) was then performed to find the best low-dimensional representation of morphological variation in the data and to further determine whether continuous morphological variation could form the basis of statistically detectable group structure. Principal components with eigenvalues of 1.0 or more were retained in accordance to Kaiser’s criterion [18]. To characterize clustering and distance in morphospace, a discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) was performed to find the linear combinations of morphological variables that have the largest between-group variance and the smallest within-group variance. DAPC relies on data transformation using PCA as a prior step to discriminant analysis (DA), ensuring that variables included in the DA are uncorrelated and number fewer than the sample size [19]. The DAPC analysis was performed using the R package “adegenet 2.0.0” [20].

Phylogenetic analysis

We sampled one species from each major South and Southeast Asian bufonid genera that were shown from previous studies to form well-resolved, monophyletic clades [12, 14, 15]. Sequences for one mitochondrial (16S) and two nuclear markers (CXCR4, NCX1) were obtained from Genbank (Table 1) and aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm implemented in the program Geneious v 5.3.6 [21]. Open reading frames of protein-coding genes were manually inspected by eye and concatenated for subsequent analysis. The final concatenated alignment consisted of 3,375 base pairs, 711 patterns and 395 informative sites. We used the program PartitionFinder [22] to select the best-fit partitioning schemes and nucleotide substitution models under the Bayesian Information Criterion (Table 2). A partitioned maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis was performed with the program RAxML [23] using the GTR + Γ nucleotide substitution model. Node support was assessed with 500 bootstrap replicates using the rapid hill-climbing algorithm. A Bayesian analysis was implemented in the program MrBayes 3.2.6 [24] using two independent runs (four chains each) with a MCMC chain length of 50,000,000 generations per run. Parameter and tree convergence were assessed using the program Tracer v.1.6 [25]. The MrBayes analysis was performed through the CIPRES Science Gateway [26]. Uncorrected pairwise p-distances were calculated in PAUP* [27] and visualized as a heatmap using R. Variation in male body size (SVL) was mapped onto the phylogeny using the R package ‘phytools’ [28].

thumbnail
Table 2. Best-fit partitioning schemes and nucleotide substation models under the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.t002

Nomenclatural Acts

The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix "http://zoobank.org/". The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1FE81DD3-BC81-4822-B50B-27240B125153. The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS.

Results

Analysis of morphological variation

Bivariate plots show clear and complete separation between Pedostibes tuberculosus and ‘Pedostibes’ hosii + ‘P’. rugosus for every morphological variable (Fig 2). The first four principal components had eigenvalues of more than 1.0 and accounted for 90% of the total variance. These were retained for the DAPC analysis. The first principal component (PC1) had strong loadings on the characters HW, FAL, FL, and Fin3L, indicating that these characters explained most of the variation along the PC1 axis. The second component (PC2) possessed heavy loadings for Fin3DW and FL (Table 3). Ordination of the first two principal components shows complete separation between P. tuberculosus and ‘P’. hosii + ‘P’. rugosus along both axes (Fig 3A). Results of the DAPC analysis show exclusive clustering between all three species and a minimum-spanning tree based on the squared distances between populations demonstrate a substantial distance in morphospace between P. tuberculosus from India and ‘P’. hosii + ‘P’. rugosus from southeast Asia (Fig 3B).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Scatterplots of continuous morphological characters against their adjusted measurements.

Squares = Pedostibes tuberculosus; circles = ‘P’. hosii; triangles = ‘P’. rugosus

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.g002

thumbnail
Table 3. Summary statistics and loadings of the principal component analysis (PCA).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.t003

thumbnail
Fig 3. PCA and DAPC plots.

(A) PCA plot for the first two principal components. (B) Scatterplot from the DAPC analysis. Lines from the centroid of the clusters represent a minimum-spanning tree based on the squared distances between species. Inset shows the cumulated variance along PCA axes. Squares = Pedostibes tuberculosus; circles = ‘P’. hosii; triangles = ‘P’. rugosus

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.g003

Phylogenetic analysis

Both ML and Bayesian phylogenies recovered similar topologies, with the ML tree providing better resolution at deeper nodes. Pedostibes tuberculosus was recovered as part of a primarily South Asian monophyletic clade, where it forms a sister lineage relationship to the clade that contains the genera Adenomus, Xanthophryne, and Duttaphrynus (Pedostibes + (Adenomus + (Xanthophryne + Duttaphrynus))). Males from this clade tend to be small in size with the exception of the genus Duttaphrynus. Southeast Asian ‘Pedostibes’ were reciprocally monophyletic with the genus Phrynoidis and represent a clade that exhibits the largest body size among all South and Southeast Asian toads (Fig 4; S2 Table). Uncorrected p-distances calculated from the mitochondrial alignment demonstrate that Southeast Asian ‘Pedostibes’ are 13–14% divergent from P. tuberculosus and 12–13% divergent from the genus Phrynoidis. These levels of divergences are consistent with other generic level divergences among South Asian, and Southeast Asian bufonids (Fig 5; S3 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Maximum likelihood phylogeny showing the polyphyletic relationship of Pedostibes and the proposed new genus among the South & Southeast Asian Bufonids.

Node support values are Bayesian posterior probabilities followed by maximum likelihood bootstrap values. Trait values denote maximum male SVL in mm. Images of specimens are scaled to relative body size.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. Heatmap of pairwise uncorrected p-distances.

The colors red to blue indicate low to high divergences.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.g005

Natural history

Both South Asian and Southeast Asian Pedostibes are forest stream-associated taxa. Males vocalize (Fig 6D) from low foliage, elevated banks or branches of mid-story riparian vegetation along small to medium-sized forest streams. ‘Pedostibes’ hosii is primarily a lowland frog (20–525 m a.s.l; [3]), while P. tuberculosus is a mid- to high-elevation species (300–1400 m a.s.l). The breeding activity of P. tuberculosus commences in the pre-monsoon season between late April and late May. Females respond to vocalizing males by approaching their perch. Axillary amplexus is assumed (Fig 6E), after which the amplectic pair descends to the relatively dry streambed, where oviposition occurs in stagnant, rocky pools. Pigmented eggs are laid as films [29] with an average of ~1100 eggs/clutch, which float beneath the surface of the water in the pool (Fig 6F). Each egg is of an average of 1.1 mm in diameter. For ‘P’. hosii, breeding is similar to P. tuberculosus in that amplexus is axillary (Fig 6B). However, the oviposition mode is different in that the eggs are laid as long strings (Fig 6C) with an average of ~4000 eggs/clutch, typical of many other large bodied bufonids [30]. Egg size is approximately 1.2 mm in diameter. Reproductive behavior of P. kempi, ‘P’. rugosus and ‘P’. everetti are unknown.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Color pattern and reproductive comparisons between Pedostibes tuberculosus from India and ‘P’. hosii from Southeast Asia.

(A) ‘Pedostibes’. hosii female from Peninsular Malaysia; inset = vocalizing male from Borneo. (B) Amplectic pair of ‘P’, hosii from Peninsular Malaysia. (C) ‘P’. hosii from Peninsular Malaysia showing oviposition of clutch as strings. (D) Vocalizing male of P. tuberculosus from India. (E) Amplectic pair of P. tuberculosus engaged in oviposition. (F) Film of eggs of P. tuberculosus floating in a stream pool. Fig 6C reprinted from JoshFrogs.com under a CC BY license, with permission from JoshFrogs, original copyright 2014.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.g006

Systematics

Distribution, morphological, natural history, phylogenetic relationships and genetic divergences and genetic data do not support the current taxonomy that unites South Asian and Southeast Asian tree toads under the common genus Pedostibes. Because the Indian species P. tuberculosus has priority as the type species, we propose that the Southeast Asian lineages (‘P’. hosii, and ‘P’. rugosus) be recognized as a separate genus. One remaining, unresolved issue concerns the generic status of P. kempi and ‘P.’ everetti. Pedostibes kempi has not been collected since its original description and no modern specimens or genetic samples are available for study. ‘Pedostibes’ everetti is phenotypically similar to ‘P’. rugosus and the only discrete morphological character differentiating ‘P’. everetti from ‘P’ rugosus is the absence (vs. presence) of a tarsal ridge [3]. Furthermore, ‘P’. everetti is only known from one juvenile specimen. Based on these limited data, the taxonomic status of these species remains uncertain and additional data will be required to resolve their taxonomic placement. Thus, based on distribution, we tentatively assign P. kempi to the genus Pedostibes and ‘P.’ everetti to the new genus named below, with the caveat that these relationships may need to be re-evaluated when additional data become available. Because the earliest species description of the Southeast Asian group is ‘P.’ hosii, and its only generic synonym, Nectophryne is occupied by a distinct African tree toad lineage [14,31], we define and diagnose a new genus for the Southeast Asian clade as follows:

Description of New Genus

Rentapia gen. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B692321E-96EF-496E-973B-2348FF22764C

Type species: Nectophryne hosii Boulenger, 1892; Holotype: BMNH 92.6.3.19

Diagnosis.

Large-bodied toads with a movable coccyx, eight pre-sacral vertebrae, a complete quadratojugal, and small, pigmented ova [3,8] laid as strings. Interorbital cranial crests absent. Parotoid glands large, distinct; oval, circular or triangular in dorsal view. Fingers webbed at base, tips expanded into flat discs. Feet fully webbed on all toes except fourth. Nuptial pads present in males. Adults are primarily arboreal and inhabit riparian vegetation around small- to moderately-sized forest streams.

Phylogenetic definition.

Rentapia is a node-based name that refers to the clade originating from the most recent common ancestor of ‘Pedostibes(Rentapia) hosii and ‘P.’ rugosus (Fig 4).

Content.

The allopatric species of Pedostibes of Southeast Asia from the Isthmus of Kra, Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra, and Borneo: Rentapia hosii and R. rugosus. We also tentatively place ‘P.’ everetti in Rentapia because of its close geographic proximity with the two Southeast Asian taxa, as well as the character state similarities it shares with R. rugosus (webbed hands and feet, finger and toe tips dilated into truncate disks, movable coccyx, eight pre-sacral vertebrae, complete quadratojugal).

Etymology.

The Iban are a subgroup of the indigenous peoples of Borneo (collectively known as the Dayaks) and form the main ethnic group in the Malaysian state of Sarawak. The generic epithet is selected to honor the legendary Iban warrior Libau Rentap, a great war chief, freedom fighter, and Malaysian national hero. Renowned for headhunting, the Iban were subjugated in Sarawak by the White Rajahs (English monarchy), who sought to confiscate land and impose taxes. Libau Rentap rose against the first of the White Rajahs, James Brooke, initiating a rebellion that eventually returned power to the people of Sarawak. The rule of the White Rajahs lasted from 1841 to 1946.

Discussion

Pedostibes is small in size and deposits medium-sized clutches of eggs that are laid as films. The combination of these traits differentiates it from Rentapia gen. nov., which is diagnosed by its larger body size and an oviposition mode characterized by a large clutch of eggs laid as strings. Given that individual egg sizes in both genera are comparatively similar, this agrees with past studies that show a close correlation of clutch size to female body size [32]. There are also differences in sexually dimorphic traits. Both male and female Pedostibes have the same color pattern, whereas Rentapia hosii females are vividly colored with bright markings, as compared to the duller, uniformly colored males (Fig 6A–6C). However, this color dimorphism has so far been observed only in R. hosii and we do not have evidence for either R. rugosus or R. everetti having such color dimorphism.

The most widespread Rentapia, R. hosii exhibits marked geographically based variation in female color pattern at different localities across its known distribution. Our analyses inferred a strongly supported genetic split between R. hosii populations from Peninsular Malaysia and those from Borneo. Additionally, females from these populations are phenotypically distinct. Females from Peninsular Malaysia are light green (dark gray when handled or stressed) with large, sparse, irregular yellow spots (Fig 6A–6C), whereas females from Borneo are purplish with yellow vermiculation or uniformly brown. Furthermore, a population from Danum Valley, Sabah, exhibits a phenotype that is distinct from populations from Peninsular Malaysia and the rest of Borneo. Females from Danum Valley have more dense dorsal vermiculations and broad, light-colored marbling on the flanks and posterior region of the thigh. The venter shows faint but distinct marbling whereas the venters of the former two populations are immaculate. However, the genetic divergences between Peninsular Malaysian and Bornean populations are low (2.6%) and more data are required to determine whether these populations represent distinct species.

Since several recent studies have shown Pedostibes sensu lato to be a non-monophyletic genus within the family Bufonidae, [13] suggested uniting Rentapia with its sister genus, the terrestrial river toad Phrynoidis, as a taxonomic solution. Although this suggestion would resolve the issue of monophyly, we find the recognition of the new genus to be a preferable solution based on several lines of reasoning. First, Rentapia and Phrynoidis exhibit striking morphological differences: Rentapia has expanded and flat finger discs (dilated into keratinized, bulbous tips in Phrynoidis); is considerably smaller in size (female Phrynoidis range from 120 mm to more than 200 mm SVL; [3]); lacks supernumerary palmar tubercles (present in Phrynoidis); possesses basal interphalangeal finger webbing (webbing absent in Phrynoidis); and the oral disk of Rentapia tadpoles is half the maximum width of the body [3] (extends the entire width of the body in Phrynoidis [5]). Striking ecological differences are equally apparent. Rentapia is an arboreal habitat specialist, whereas Phrynoidis are terrestrial riparian habitat generalists [3], that oviposits enormous clutches with an average size of 12,792 eggs per clutch [33]; Finally, we note that genetic divergences of >12.0% (Fig 5) is consistent with other inter-generic divergences within Bufonidae [14,15], suggesting that our proposition is not discordant with other, accepted taxonomic arrangements. Although merging Rentapia and Phrynoidis would remedy the polyphyly of Pedostibes sensu lato, the preponderance of differences in morphology, reproductive characteristics, ecology, and molecular characters is best acknowledged by considering these two lineages as separate genera.

Supporting Information

S1 Appendix. Copyright permission for Fig 1.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Appendix. Copyright permission for Fig 6C.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.s002

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Maximum likelihood phylogeny.

Node support values represent bootstrap support values.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.s003

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Bayesian phylogeny.

Node support values represent posterior probabilities.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.s004

(PDF)

S1 Table. Specimens examined.

Museum abbreviations: FMNH = Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago; TNHM = Natural History Museum, Trivandrum, India.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.s005

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Maximum male and female SVL.

[3436]

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.s006

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Pairwise uncorrected p-distances calculated from the 16S mitochondrial gene.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145903.s007

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ramprasad Rao for help with fieldwork in India. We thank Alan Resetar, of the Field Museum, for specimen loans. We also thank the commercial breeder, JoshFrogs for providing information on reproduction and a photograph, and ‘treehouse-maps’ for the background template of the distribution map.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KOC RKA. Performed the experiments: KOC. Analyzed the data: KOC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KOC. Wrote the paper: KOC RKA LLG RMB. Collected specimens and provided morphological data: AZ.

References

  1. 1. Dinesh KP, Radhakrishnan C. Description of tadpole stages of the Malabar Tree Toad Pedostibes tuberculosus Günther, 1875 (Anura: Bufonidae). J Threat Taxa. 2013;5(14):4910–2. doi: 10.11609/jott.o3398.4910-2
  2. 2. Frost DR. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0 (accessed 10 Oct 2015). Available: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. 2015.
  3. 3. Inger RF. The Systematics and Zoogeography of the Amphibia of Borneo. Fieldiana (Zool). 1966;52:1–402. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.3147
  4. 4. Manthey U, Grossmann W. Amphibien & Reptilien Südostasiens. Münster: Natur-und-Tier-Verlag; 1997. p. 512.
  5. 5. Malkmus R, Manthey U, Vogel G, Hoffmann P, Kosuch J. Amphibians & Reptiles of Mount Kinabalu (North Borneo). Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books; 2002. 424 p.
  6. 6. Boulenger GA. An account of the reptiles and batrachians collected by Mr. C. Hose on Mt. Dulit, Borneo. Proc Zool Soc London. 1892;505–8.
  7. 7. Boulenger GA. Descriptions of two new batrachians obtained by Mr. A. Everett on Mount Kina Balu, North Borneo. Ann Mag Nat Hist Ser 6. 1896;17:449–450. doi: 10.1080/00222939608680396
  8. 8. Barbour T. Notes on Nectophryne. Proc Biol Soc Washingt. 1938;51:191–6.
  9. 9. Boulenger GA. Descriptions of three new batrachians from the Garo Hills, Assam. Rec Indian Museum. 1919;16:207–8. doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.25921
  10. 10. Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, et al. the Amphibian Tree of Life. Bull Am Museum Nat Hist. 2006;297(297):1–291. doi: 10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:tatol]2.0.co;2
  11. 11. Matsui M, Yambun P, Sudin A. Taxonomic relationships of Ansonia anotis Inger, Tan, and Yambun, 2001 and Pedostibes maculatus (Mocquard, 1890), with a description of a new genus (Amphibia, Bufonidae). Zoolog Sci. 2007;24(11):1159–66. doi: 10.2108/zsj.24.1159. pmid:18348617
  12. 12. Alexander Pyron R, Wiens JJ. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011;61(2):543–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.012. pmid:21723399
  13. 13. Ron SR, Mueses-Cisneros JJ, Gutiérrez-Cárdenas PDA, Rojas-Rivera A, Lynch RL, Rocha CFD, et al. Systematics of the endangered toad genus Andinophryne (Anura: Bufonidae): phylogenetic position and synonymy under the genus Rhaebo. 2015;3947(3):347–66. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3947.3.3
  14. 14. Van Bocxlaer I, Loader SP, Roelants K, Biju SD, Menegon M, Bossuyt F. Gradual Adaptation Toward a Range-Expansion Phenotype Initiated the Global Radiation of Toads. Science (80-). 2010;327(February):679–82. doi: 10.1126/science.1181707
  15. 15. Van Bocxlaer I, Biju SD, Loader SP, Bossuyt F. Toad radiation reveals into-India dispersal as a source of endemism in the Western Ghats-Sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-131. pmid:19519901
  16. 16. Chan KO, Grismer LL, Brown RM. Reappraisal of the Javanese Bullfrog complex, Kaloula baleata (Müller, 1836) (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae), reveals a new species from Peninsular Malaysia. 2014;3900(4):569–80. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3900.4.7
  17. 17. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2014.
  18. 18. Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:141–51. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116
  19. 19. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet [Internet]. BioMed Central Ltd; 2010;11(1):94. Available: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/11/94
  20. 20. Jombart T. Adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(11):1403–5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129. pmid:18397895
  21. 21. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2012;28(12):1647–9. Available: http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/12/1647.short
  22. 22. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S. PartitionFinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(6):1695–701. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss020. pmid:22319168
  23. 23. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. pmid:24451623
  24. 24. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Syst Biol [Internet]. 2012;61(3):539–42. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  25. 25. Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ. Tracer v1.6. 2014.
  26. 26. Miller M, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 Gatew Comput Environ Work GCE 2010. 2010;1–8. doi: 10.1109/gce.2010.5676129
  27. 27. Swofford DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates; 2002.
  28. 28. Revell LJ. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol [Internet]. 2012;3(2):217–23. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00169.x
  29. 29. Altig R, McDiarmid RW. Morphological Diversity and Evolution of Egg and Clutch Structure in Amphibians. Herpetol Monogr. 2007;21(1):1. doi: 10.1655/06-005.1
  30. 30. Duellman WE, Trueb L. Biology of Amphibians. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill; 1986. 677 p.
  31. 31. Peters WCH. Über die von Hrn. Professor Dr. R. Buchholz in Westafrika gesammelten Amphibien. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preuss Akad des Wissenschaften zu Berlin. 1875;196–212.
  32. 32. Tejedo M. Effects of body size and timing of reproduction on reproductive seccess in female Natterjack Toads (Bufo calamita). J Zool. 1992;228:545–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1992.tb04454.x
  33. 33. Inger RF, Bacon JJP. Annual reproduction and clutch size in rain forest frogs from Sarawak. Copeia. 1968;602–6. doi: 10.2307/1442031
  34. 34. Biju SD, Van Bocxlaer I, Giri VB, Loader SP, Bossuyt F. Two new endemic genera and a new species of toad (Anura: Bufonidae) from the Western Ghats of India. BMC Res Notes. 2009;6:1–6. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-241
  35. 35. Manamendra-Arachchi K, Pethiyagoda R. A synopsis of the Sri Lankan Bufonidae (Amphibia: Anura), with description of two new species. J South Asian Nat Hist. 1998;3(1):213–46.
  36. 36. Ngo B V, Ngo DN. Reproductive activity and advertisement calls of the Asian common toad Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Amphibia, Anura, Bufonidae) from Bach Ma National Park, Vietnam. Zool Stud. 2013;52:12. doi: 10.1186/1810-522x-52-12