Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comparative Analysis of Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi Gene Expression during Symbiotic Persistence in the Host Nematode

  • Ruisheng An,

    Affiliation Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, 2505 E. J. Chapman Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996, United States of America

  • Parwinder S. Grewal

    pgrewal@utk.edu

    Affiliation Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, 2505 E. J. Chapman Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996, United States of America

Comparative Analysis of Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi Gene Expression during Symbiotic Persistence in the Host Nematode

  • Ruisheng An, 
  • Parwinder S. Grewal
PLOS
x

Abstract

Species of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria form mutualistic associations with Steinernema and Heterorhabditis nematodes, respectively and serve as model systems for studying microbe-animal symbioses. Here, we profiled gene expression of Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi during their symbiotic persistence in the newly formed infective juveniles of the host nematode Steinernema scarabaei through the selective capture of transcribed sequences (SCOTS). The obtained gene expression profile was then compared with other nematode-bacteria partnerships represented by Steinernema carpocapsae—Xenorhabdus nematophila and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora—Photorhabdus temperata. A total of 29 distinct genes were identified to be up-regulated and 53 were down-regulated in X. koppenhoeferi while in S. scarabaei infective juveniles. Of the identified genes, 8 of the up-regulated and 14 of the down-regulated genes were similarly expressed in X. nematophila during persistence in its host nematode S. carpocapsae. However, only one from each of these up- and down-regulated genes was common to the mutualistic partnership between the bacterium P. temperata and the nematode H. bacteriophora. Interactive network analysis of the shared genes between X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila demonstrated that the up-regulated genes were mainly involved in bacterial survival and the down-regulated genes were more related to bacterial virulence and active growth. Disruption of two selected genes pta (coding phosphotransacetylase) and acnB (coding aconitate hydratase) in X. nematophila with shared expression signature with X. koppenhoeferi confirmed that these genes are important for bacterial persistence in the nematode host. The results of our comparative analyses show that the two Xenorhabdus species share a little more than a quarter of the transcriptional mechanisms during persistence in their nematode hosts but these features are quite different from those used by P. temperata bacteria in their nematode host H. bacteriophora.

Introduction

Mutualistic associations between entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema and Heterorhabditis spp. and their symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp. represent one of the best-developed systems for the study of animal-microbe symbiosis [13]. Photorhabdus cells colonize the proximal region of the gut of Heterorhabditis infective juvenile [4], but colonization of Xenorhabdus bacteria in Steinernema infective juveniles is restricted to a specialized intestinal receptacle [57]. Although Heterorhabditis and Steinernema belong to phylogenetically distant nematode clades, their symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus are more closely related to each other [8] and share very similar life histories [9]. The bacteria promote their own transmission among insects by using the nematode infective juvenile as a vector whereas the nematode uses the bacteria as food source [1012]. When the infective juveniles invade a susceptible insect host, they migrate into the hemolymph to release the symbiotic bacteria. The bacteria appear to be defecated from the anal opening in the case of Steinernema [13] and regurgitated from the mouth of Heterorhabditis infective juvenile [14]. The bacteria multiply in the hemolymph and produce a plethora of biomolecules [15,16], killing the insect and converting the cadaver into a food source suitable for nematode growth and reproduction. After depleting the insect cadaver the bacteria recolonize the developing infective juveniles that exit the depleted cadaver in search of a new host, thus ensuring their own transmission to a new insect host using the nematode as a vector [1].

Previous investigation of Photorhabdus luminescens suggests that the mutualism is initiated when the bacteria express maternal adhesion fimbriae and adhere to the nematode intestine [17]. The bacteria are maternally transmitted to infective juveniles developing inside the mother’s body through a series of steps involving invasion and intracellular growth [18]. In this process, Photorhabdus bacteria switch from pathogenic variants to small-cell variants during initiation of the mutualism and then switch back to pathogenic form in the infective juvenile intestine to arm the nematodes for the next infection cycle [18]. In the SteinernemaXenorhabdus symbiosis, it appears that a few bacterial cells initially colonize and remain in the nematode pharyngeal-intestinal valve before finally occupying and filling the vesicle according to a study of X. nematohila [19]. Nil factors A, B and C encoded on a symbiosis region specific to X. nematophila are independently necessary for this initiation process [19,20]. This symbiosis region seems also sufficient to confer entry into the nematode vesicle on otherwise non-colonizing Xenorhabdus species, albeit with lower levels of colonization than X. nematophila [19,21].

Mutualistic association protects the bacteria from the external environment while the host infective juveniles endure in soil without feeding for several months in search of a suitable insect host [22]. Fitness costs may be incurred by the nematode due to the provision of nutrition to the bacteria considering that axenic infective juveniles survive longer than colonized ones [23] and that bacterial mutants defective in the synthesis of some essential amino acids (e.g. histidine and serine) exhibited normal colonization efficiency in the infective juveniles [24,25]. Nevertheless, the stored energy reserves of infective juveniles are limited [22], and the number of bacterial cells in the nematode decreases progressively over time [2527]. Therefore, both players need to evolve some kind of strategies to reduce the nutritional dependence of the bacteria on the nematode for better survival of the partnership before a suitable insect host is found. Recent evidence shows that carrying an intermediate number of bacterial cells maximizes their survivorship in the infective juveniles although carrying more provides higher parasitic success for the nematode [28]. It is further believed that such evolutionary trade-offs could be governed by molecular underpinning [28]. In fact, we previously discovered that Photorhabdus temperata cells slow down their growth and metabolism during persistence in the nematode partner H. bacteriophora compared to that in culture based on the changes in the bacterial transcriptional profile [27]. The term "persistence" used here refers to a survival strategy or phenotype wherein at least a small population of the symbiotic bacteria is maintained in the enduring nematode infective juvenile [29].

Comparative analysis displays genomic convergence in Xenorhabdus species and divergence between Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus [30]. The molecular and genetic divergence is underscored by the differences in sites of bacterial transmission and colonization in the infective juvenile nematodes between the Photorhabdus-Heterorhabditis and Xenorhabdus-Steinernema systems [30]. So far, no overlap in genetic determinants essential for colonization of their nematode hosts has been observed between the two bacterial genera [30]. Therefore, we hypothesized that Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus have independently evolved mutualistic associations with nematodes and they use different molecular mechanisms to persist in their respective nematode hosts. To test this hypothesis we first assessed gene expression of Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi in Steinernema scarabaei infective juveniles and then compared it to other bacterial transcriptional profiles in the more widely studied mutualistic relationships of X. nematophilaS. carpocapsae and P. temperataH. bacteriophora. Data for this comparison were obtained for X. nematophila also by SCOTS procedure in this study and for P. temperata from our previous study [27]. This led to the identification of gene expression signatures shared by these bacteria during persistence in their nematode hosts. Through mutational analyses, we further characterized the role of the shared gene-expression signature in the persistence of Xenorhabdus in the enduring Steinernema infective juveniles.

Materials and Methods

Nematodes and bacteria

The nematode Steinernema scarabaei strain AMK001 was originally obtained from Dr. Albrecht M. Koppenhöfer (Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey) and Steinernema carpocapsae strain All was obtained from Biosys (Palo Alto, California). The nematodes were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen as described previously [31,32]. For the experiments in this study, the nematodes were cultured at 25°C by infecting the last instars of the Japanese beetle Popillia japonica (in case of S. scarabaei) or last instars of the wax worm Galleria mellonella (in case of S. carpocapsae). The bacteria X. koppenhoeferi (the symbiont of S. scarabaei) and X. nematophila (the symbiont of S. carpocapsae) were isolated from their host nematodes following the protocol described by Akhurst [33]. As X. koppenhoeferi could not be grown on the regular media like LB and Nutrient, the bacteria were routinely cultured in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) medium at 25°C unless otherwise mentioned. To support S. carpocapsae growth, the bacteria X. nematophila were also grown on lipid agar (0.8% nutrient broth, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.2% MgCl2, 0.7% corn syrup, 0.4% corn oil, and 1.5% Bacto Agar) and incubated for 24 h before addition of nematodes [34]. M9 minimal medium [35] [12.8 g/L Na2HPO4∙7H2O, 3.0 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L NaCl, 1.0 g/L NH4Cl, 2.6 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 1.0 mM MgSO4, 100 μM CaCl2, 3 nM (NH4)6Mo7O24∙4H2O, 0.4 mM H3BO3, 30 nM CoCl2∙6H2O, 10 nM CuSO4∙5H2O, 80 nM MnCl2∙4H2O, 10 nM ZnSO4∙7H2O and 5 nM FeSO4∙7H2O] was used for phenotypic characterization of the bacterial mutants. Glucose (25 mM) or acetate (25 mM) was used as carbon source for the minimal medium with an attempt to understand the relevance and importance of certain genes identified in this study to the bacterial central metabolism. For anaerobic growth, the media were additionally supplemented with 50 mM fumarate as an electron acceptor, boiled to drive off oxygen, covered with sterilized mineral oil, and cooled down 30 min before inoculation of the bacterial cells [36]. All the bacterial cultures and growth were maintained in dark throughout the study.

Selective capture and enrichment of differentially transcribed sequences

Gene expression of X. koppenhoeferi in the infective juvenile of S. scarabaei was profiled through selective capture of transcribed sequences (SCOTS) procedure as described in our previous study [27]. In short, total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) from over-night cultured X. koppenhoeferi cells grown in BHI broth at 25°C and from surface-sterilized freshly produced S. scarabaei infective juveniles that were collected from the nematode-infected P. japonica cadavers using White traps [37] held at 25°C for 15–16 days. Since the White traps were observed every other day, the infective juveniles were collected between 3 and 5 days of the initiation of emergence. The total RNAs were first converted to single-stranded cDNAs by random priming with 5'-end tagged primers ST0N (for RNA samples from over-night cultured cells) and ST18N (for RNA samples from infective juveniles) (See S1 Table for the primer sequences) and then made double-stranded with Klenow fragment (NEB, Beverly, MA) as previously described [38]. After amplification with the respective tag sequences ST0 and ST18, the cDNAs were normalized by hybridization to biotin-labeled X. koppenhoeferi genomic DNA that had been blocked beforehand with an amplified bacterial rRNA operon. Bacterial cDNAs that hybridized to biotin-labeled genomic DNA were retained by binding hybrids to streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Dynal, Bethlehem, PA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This normalization step resulted in bacterial cDNAs (representing the bacterial mRNA transcripts) being exclusively captured from the cDNA mixture and more details about this normalization step had been described in previous reports [27,3941]. Three independent cDNA samples from the over-night cultured cells or infective juveniles were normalized separately, pooled and considered as bacterial in vitro or in vivo cDNA libraries. Purification of the bacterial cDNAs apart from the nematode cDNAs after each cycle of normalization was monitored through PCR detection of the eukaryotic 18S rRNA gene with primers 18SF and 18SR [27]. The bacterial genes preferentially up-regulated in the infective juvenile relative to the in vitro culture were enriched by subtractive hybridization of the normalized in vivo cDNAs to the biotin-labeled bacterial genomic DNA that had been pre-hybridized with the rRNA operon and the normalized in vitro cDNAs. Vice versa, bacterial genes specifically down-regulated in the infective juvenile were enriched by subtractive hybridization of the normalized in vitro cDNAs to the biotin-labeled bacterial genomic DNA that had been pre-hybridized with the rRNA operon and the normalized in vivo cDNAs. The prokaryotic housekeeping gene gyrase A (gyrA) was used as a control to ensure that only differentially expressed genes were captured after enrichment. This was done through PCR detection of the gyrA genes with primers gyrAF and gyrAR after each cycle of enrichment [27]. The enriched bacterial cDNAs were cloned into an original TA cloning vector to construct libraries representing bacterial genes up- or down-regulated in the infective juvenile relative to the in vitro culture.

Analysis of bacterial genes differentially expressed in the nematode host

A total of 360 clones were randomly selected from the constructed libraries for Southern dot-blot screening which has been used as a confirmatory test in most SCOTS-based research [39,42]. Individual clones from the enriched libraries were PCR amplified by M13 primers and hybridized with the probes made from the normalized cDNAs using PCR DIG Probe Synthesis kit (Roche). Successful hybridization was detected using anti-digoxigenin-HRP conjugate and Amersham ECL Plus western blotting detection reagents (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp). Individual clones that hybridized to either the probe made from the normalized in vivo cDNAs or the probe made from the normalized in vitro cDNAs were sequenced. The resulting sequences were analyzed by BLAST algorithms in GenBank. Average number of clones for each identical gene was expected to occur at least twice in the sequenced samples. Rarefaction analysis was used to estimate coverage of the enriched cDNA libraries for the identified genes as described previously [27,43]. In case of low coverage, more clones would be selected from the enriched libraries for Southern dot-blot screening and sequencing analysis. Functions of the identified genes were predicted and assigned using BioCyc databases [44]. The gene expression profile generated by the SCOTS approach was validated through Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) on the representative genes which were randomly selected but based on the success of primer design from the identified sequences. Relative fold change of gene expression was calculated from ΔΔCt using 16s rRNA gene as an internal control as previously described [45].

Screening of starvation response genes

Since food may be limited for the bacteria during persistence in the non-feeding nematode infective juvenile, we distinguished bacterial genes which were differentially regulated due to general starvation. The above identified bacterial transcripts were screened with a stationary-phase cDNA library by Southern dot-blot hybridization. In brief, anaerobic and starvation conditions that may exist within the infective juvenile were simulated by culturing the bacteria under static growth conditions for 30 days at 25°C in sealed test tubes to reach a nutrient-depleted stationary phase [27,46]. Subsequently, total RNA was isolated and stationary-phase cDNA library was constructed with primers SCOT110N and SCOT110 following the SCOTS procedure. The DIG-labeled probe was prepared from the normalized stationary-phase cDNA library and used to screen the above identified bacterial transcripts by Southern dot-blot hybridization as described above.

Cross-species comparative hybridization

We previously profiled gene expression of the bacteria P. temperata in the nematode host H. bacteriophora [27]. With the data obtained from X. koppenhoeferi in this study, we further compared gene expression between these two bacteria. Cross-species comparative hybridization as described by An et al. [16] was applied to determine how the gene expression was shared between P. temperata and X. koppenhoeferi or specific to either species. We first assessed genomic presence of the differentially expressed transcripts in the two bacteria. Transcripts identified from one bacterium were individually screened by hybridization to the sonicated biotin-labeled genomic DNA of the other, and the genomic presence was detected by a positive PCR amplification using the tag sequence as described above. The transcripts with sequences present in both bacterial genomes were singled out to evaluate the exclusivity of gene expression to X. koppenhoeferi or P. temperata. The selected transcripts differentially expressed in one bacterium were individually screened by hybridization to the sonicated biotin-labeled genomic DNA of the other that had been pre-hybridized with the respective rRNA operon and normalized in vitro cDNAs. A shared gene expression signature was indicated by a positive PCR amplification of the hybrids using the tag sequence.

Shared gene expression signature

In addition, we were interested in the gene expression signature shared by different Xenorhabdus species during persistence in their respective nematode hosts. We first examined whether the identified X. koppenhoeferi genes were present in other Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus genomes. Each identified X. koppenhoeferi gene sequence was analyzed by a blastn search against currently available genomes of Xenorhabdus nematophila, Xenorhabdus bovienii, Photorhabdus luminescens, and Photorhabdus asymbiotica. The discontiguous megablast for more dissimilar sequences was used in the blastn search with default general parameters of expect threshold (10), match/mismatch scores (2,-3), and gap costs (existence: 5; Extension: 2). Gene sequences present in the X. nematophila genome were selected for screening to detect expression signatures shared with X. koppenhoeferi during persistence in the host nematode. Following the selective capture and enrichment of differentially transcribed sequences procedure described above X. nematophila in vivo and in vitro cDNA libraries representing up- and down-regulated genes during persistence in the S. carpocapsae infective juvenile were prepared. Clones of the selected genes based on the genomic presence were individually screened by dot-blot hybridization to digoxigenin-labeled probes made from the X. nematophila cDNA libraries. The probes made from the in vivo and in vitro cDNA libraries were used to screen the selected genes up- and down-regulated in X. koppenhoeferi, respectively. The hybridization between the probes and the selected genes was performed at 65°C for 24 h. The positive hybridization indicating a shared gene expression signature between the two bacterial species was detected by anti-digoxigenin-HRP conjugate and Amersham ECL Plus western blotting reagents.

Network analysis of the genes with shared expression signature

Functional annotation networks were produced using Pathway Studio software (Ariadne Genomics Inc., Rockville, MD) to predict the biological processes involved with the shared gene expression signature. This software uses MedScan, a literature mining program based on Natural Language Processing Technology to extract connectivity or relationships (binding, regulation, transportation or modification, etc.) among genes and delineate functionally-related networks from the published literature. By default, each relationship between the genes in the network is supported by at least one reference, and the created network can demonstrate various cellular processes and pathways in which the gene products are involved [47]. Here, the network was generated initially using the genes with shared expression signature, and then expanded with other relevant genes that are connected to the initial genes.

Construction of deletion mutants

The insertion-deletion mutants of two selected genes (pta and acnB) with a shared expression signature were generated in X. nematophila to investigate their relevance to the symbiotic association of Xenorhabdus bacteria with Steinernema nematodes. The mutants were constructed in X. nematophila rather than in X. koppenhoeferi for two reasons. First, according to a previous report [48] and our preliminary tests, mass production of S. scarabaei is inconsistent on its symbiotic bacteria X. koppenhoeferi and in insects (the tested insects included European chafer Rhizotrogus majalis, Japanese beetle P. japonica, Masked chafer Cyclocephala borealis, and wax moth G. mellonella). Thus, it was deemed to be unreliable to use X. koppenhoeferi—S. scarabaei partnership for in vitro studies. Second, the nematode S. carpocapsae can be easily cultured in vitro with X. nematophila cells and gene knockouts and subsequent in vitro symbiosis assays had been successfully performed in this species [49]. To make the insertion-deletion mutation, a CmR-cassette obtained from a template plasmid pAKCYC184 (BioLabs) was inserted through fusion PCR into the target gene of X. nematophila [18]. The used primers are listed in S1 Table in which P1 and P2 were for amplification of the upstream fragment of the target gene, P5 and P6 were for amplification of downstream fragment of the target gene, and P3 and P4 were used to amplify the insertion CmR-cassette. The fused product was introduced into electrocompetent X. nematophila cells that had been engineered with a Red helper plasmid pKD119 (Yale Genetic Stock Center) to increase homologous recombination efficiency [50]. The electrocompetent Xenorhabdus cells were prepared freshly from fast growing culture as described earlier [51,52]. Briefly, 100 ml LB medium supplemented with 0.1% L-arabinose was inoculated with 100 μl over-night cultured X. nematophila cells and incubated at 25°C with shaking to early exponential phase (OD600 = 0.4). Bacterial growth was quickly stopped by chilling the culture flask in ice for 1 h. Bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. The pellets were re-suspended and sequentially washed three times at low temperature in freshly prepared ice-cold SH buffer (5% sucrose and 10mM HEPES in MilliQ water). The pellets were finally re-suspended in 500 μl SH buffer and stored on ice. For electroporation, the spliced DNA product as prepared above was mixed with 50 μl of freshly prepared ice-cold electrocompetent cells in a 0.2 cm cuvette (Bio-Rad) and pulsed at 2.5 kV with a MicroPulser (Bio-Rad). The desired recombinant was selected on LB antibiotic agar plate with chloramphenicol (34 μg/ml) and confirmed with PCR amplification.

Complementation of the created mutants

To complement the gene mutation, the full length of the target gene containing its predicted native promoters was amplified with the primers listed in S1 Table (pta-FFL and pta-RFL for pta gene; acnB-FFL and acnB-RFL for acnB gene). The amplified products were digested with BamHI and XbaI restriction enzymes, followed by ligation into a mobile plasmid pJB861 (NBRP). To avoid the frequency of pulsed electrical stimulations which may cause potential damage to the created mutants, the pJB861 plasmid vectoring the target gene was chemically transformed into E. coli S-17.1 and conjugated into the desired X. nematophila mutant according to the method described previously [52]. The conjugant was selected on the antibiotic LB agar plate with kanamycin (50 mM), chloramphenicol (34 μg/ml) and 3-mythylbenzoic acid (2 mM), and confirmed with catalase reaction and PCR amplification.

In vitro phenotypic characterization of the mutants

Cultural properties of the mutants were observed for possible phenotypic defects. The examined phenotypic traits included biofilm formation, motility, cell growth, survival and viability as these properties have been suggested to be important to the bacteria during persistence with their nematode partner [27,36]. Biofilm formation was assayed by the ability of the bacterial cells adhering to the wells of the polystyrene micro-plates as described in our previous study [36]. The bacterial motility was examined by cell diffusion in semi-solid motility test medium (per 1 L distilled water: 18.5 g BHI, 3 g agar, and 0.04 g 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride). The bacterial growth was measured by optical density of the cell suspension at 600 nm (OD 600). The bacterial viability was evaluated by plating the serial dilution of cells on BHI agar, counting the colonies after 24-h incubation at 25°C, and then calculating the colony-forming units (CFU). All assays were performed in triplicate using three independent cultures of the test bacteria for a minimum of two times. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and significant differences were determined by multiple t tests at p < 0.05 with comparison to the wild-type strain.

Nematode colonization assays

Effects of mutations on symbiotic interactions between X. nematophila and S. carpocapsae were assessed through the ability of the bacteria in colonizing the infective juveniles. Each X. nematophila strain was grown on lipid agar plate at 25°C for 24 h [34]. In the meantime axenic S. carpocapsae eggs were isolated from adult female nematodes according to a previously described procedure [53]. Approximately 100 axenic nematode eggs were propagated on each bacterial plate and incubated at 25°C. Nematode development was monitored daily until the production of the infective juveniles. The number of bacterial cells in the infective juveniles was determined following a previously described grinding procedure with some modifications [54]. Briefly, about 1000 infective juveniles sterilized with 0.1% merthiolate solution were crushed using an autoclaved micro pestle. The serial dilutions were spread on BHI agar, and bacterial colonies were counted following incubation at 25°C for 3 days. The assays were performed in triplicate and the data were subjected to analysis of variance with significant difference tests at p = 0.05.

Results

X. koppenhoeferi genes differentially regulated in the nematode host

To identify X. koppenhoeferi genes significantly up- or down-regulated in the nematode's intestinal vesicle, the bacteria-nematode cDNA mixture was normalized by the SCOTS approach resulting in separation of bacterial mRNA transcripts from the ribosomal and nematode transcripts. Detection of the eukaryotic 18S rRNA gene in the in vivo cDNA population before but not after normalization suggested that bacterial cDNAs were successfully purified from the nematode cDNAs. Detection of the prokaryotic gyrA gene in all other cDNA populations except the enriched cDNAs indicated that only differentially expressed transcripts were isolated after enrichment. Among the 360 randomly screened clones, 150 out of 192 from the up-regulated library and 147 out of 168 from the down-regulated library produced strong hybridization signals in Southern dot blot analysis. The clones with strong signals were considered to be reliable transcripts specifically regulated in X. koppenhoeferi during persistence in S. scarabaei infective juveniles. Sequencing of the clones with strong signals identified 82 distinct transcripts including 29 up-regulated and 53 down-regulated genes (Table 1). These gene sequences were deposited into the GenBank/NCBI with the accession numbers of JZ717596-JZ717677. During sequencing, each up- or down-regulated gene was identified at least twice from the clones. According to the rarefaction curves (S1 Fig), saturation was achieved for both the enriched in vivo and in vitro cDNA libraries. This indicated that the randomly selected clones represented the enriched cDNA libraries and most of the genes in the constructed libraries had been identified. Screening with the normalized cDNA library prepared from the bacteria grown in vitro under stationary-phase starvation conditions suggested that almost half of the identified genes (11 up- and 26 down-regulated) were differentially regulated due to general starvation and thus the rest of the genes were regulated specifically in response to the vesicle environment in the infective juvenile (Table 1). The patterns of gene expression determined by SCOTS were further validated by the qPCR analysis which showed consistent results on the 14 selected representative genes in X. koppenhoeferi (S2 Fig).

thumbnail
Table 1. Differentially expressed Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi genes in Steinernema scarabaei infective juveniles.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.t001

Significance of the differentially expressed genes in X. koppenhoeferi

Homology searches divided the identified genes into several functional groups (S3 Fig): cell surface structure, regulation, stress response, nucleic acid modification, transport, metabolism, and unknown transcripts. Specifically, for metabolic adaptation, gene acnB involved in both TCA cycle and glyoxylate pathway was up-regulated whereas sucA required in TCA cycle was down-regulated. Genes involved in amino acid metabolism (e.g. pheA required for aromatic amino acid biosynthesis) were down-regulated, and genes corresponding to nutrient or growth factor uptake (e.g. potD) were also down-regulated. For transport systems, genes involved in proton uptake were up-regulated (kefC) but those for proton export (cyoD, nqrC and nqrF) were down-regulated. Genes required for cell motility and biofilm formation were down-regulated (pilT, flhA, ppiD, fld, glmU and tldD). Other changes in bacterial gene expression included those (such as transcriptional regulators and transposases) involved in replication, transcription and translation processes. In addition to the genes with annotated functions, 9 transcriptional sequences were totally new sharing no similarity to any gene or protein in current GenBank database. These differentially expressed unknown sequences may be specific to X. koppenhoeferiS. scarabaei association and further investigations may provide clues to the determinants of specificity in nematode-bacteria symbiosis.

Specificity and signature of the identified X. koppenhoeferi genes in other bacteria

Our previous study [27] identified 106 P. temperata genes differentially expressed during persistence in H. bacteriophora relative to growth in the nutrient medium. Comparative analysis with the 82 X. koppenhoeferi genes identified in this study showed that 27 out of the 106 and 29 out of the 82 gene sequences were specific to the respective bacterial genomes (Tables 2 and 3). Although the rest of the gene sequences were present in the genomes of both P. temperata and X. koppenhoeferi, only secD (down-regulated) and xpsD (up-regulated) had the same expression pattern in the two bacteria. More gene expression features were shared among Xenorhabdus species than those shared between Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus (Fig 1). Out of the 82 genes identified in X. koppenhoeferi, 22 (8 up-regulated and 14 down-regulated) were found to be up-/down-regulated in the same direction in X. nematophila during persistence in S. carpocapsae (Table 4). The up-regulated genes included flhC, hpcR, iscR, deaD, kefC, acnB, pta, and xpsD and the down-regulated genes were pilT, lepA, tldD, cutC, secD, accC, coaA, gidA, glmU, purA, sucA, yqjE, XK_scots21 and XK_scots23. Such shared expression signature was also verified via qPCR analysis of the relative changes in the gene expression in X. nematophila (S4 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 1. The number and distribution of SCOTS identified genes in Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi during persistence in Steinernema scarabaei.

The Venn diagram shows the proportion of up- (blue color) and down-regulated (olive green) genes unique to X. koppenhoeferi (X.k.) or common to the bacteria Xenorhabdus nematophila (X.n.) and Photorhbdus temperata (P.t.) during persistence in their nematode hosts.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.g001

thumbnail
Table 2. Genomic presence of the identified up-regulated Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi sequences in other nematode-symbiotic bacteria.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Genomic presence of the identified down-regulated Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi sequences in other nematode-symbiotic bacteria.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Gene expression signature shared between X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila during persistence in their respective nematode hosts S. scarabaei and S. carpocapsae.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.t004

Network analysis and biological interpretation of gene expression signature

Using the PathwayStudio program, we were able to elucidate how the shared gene expression signatures between X. nematophila and X. koppenhoeferi while persisting in their respective host S. carpocapsae and S. scarabaei may influence other genes to drive or participate in the biological processes in the interactive network. The shared up-regulated genes were associated with five biological processes: "growth rate", "DNA fragmentation", "DNA damage recognition", "cell survival" and "excretion". The shared down-regulated genes were associated with eight processes: "DNA replication", "differentiation", "sporulation", "transduction", "motility", "biofilm", "secretion" and "virulence" (Fig 2). The up-regulated genes were mostly associated with bacterial survival and down-regulated genes were more related to bacterial virulence and active growth. These features shared by X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila were in accordance with our previous conclusions that Photorhabdus bacteria use a strategy of "cooperative endurance" by switching their metabolic activities to a survival mode in the nematode host [27]. As reducing metabolic activities appears to be a strategy shared by Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus bacteria during living in their nematode hosts, we considered acnB (encoding a key enzyme in glyoxylate cycle) and pta (encoding a key enzyme in acetate switch) genes particularly interesting for further mutagenesis studies as they are directly involved in the metabolic adaptations.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Pathway diagram of genes with expression patterns shared by X. nematophila and X. koppenhoeferi during persistence in their respective host nematode S. carpocapsae and S. scarabaei.

Direct-connection networks for the genes with shared expression signatures were built in PathwayStudio by leveraging databases of currently published literatures. The genes are represented by red, blue or green ovals, where red ovals represent genes in the database of the PathwayStudio program with direct connection to the shared up- (green in panel A) and down-regulated (blue in panel B) genes identified in this study. Connecting lines between the gene symbols indicate interactions and different types of interactions are denoted by symbols on the lines. Purple square indicates binding; blue square, expression; grey square, regulation.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.g002

Impact of gene disruption on bacterial phenotype

Colony morphology, motility, biofilm formation, cell growth, survival and viability were examined for phenotypic changes in X. nematophila mutants compared to the wild-type strain. Colony color, size, motility, and biofilm formation were not affected by the tested mutations (S2 Table). Compared with the wild-type strain, the pta mutant exhibited reduced growth and viability over time under anaerobic conditions while its aerobic growth and viability remained normal in BHI and glucose minimal medium (Fig 3). In acetate minimal medium, aerobic growth of the pta mutant within 48 h was similar to the wild-type strain, but its viability after 14 days was as low as the mutant cells incubated under anaerobic condition. Over a period of 14 days of anaerobic incubation, viable cell number of the pta mutant decreased dramatically compared to the wild-type cells during the same period (Fig 3). Bacterial growth and survival were also impaired by the mutation in acnB gene (Fig 3). Although the acnB mutant grew as well as the wild-type strain in BHI medium under aerobic condition, its anaerobic growth in BHI and growth in the glucose minimal medium were limited and the mutant failed to grow with acetate as a sole carbon source. Similar to the pta mutation, the acnB disruption also led to poor survival and viability of the mutant over time. The observed growth and viability defects in the mutants were fully restored by genetic complementation with trans-expression of the respective gene pta or acnB (Fig 3). Together, these results suggest that both pta and acnB are needed by X. nematophila to utilize acetate and survive better under anaerobic conditions.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Growth and survival of Xenorhabdus nematophila wild-type, pta and acnB mutant cells in vitro.

The bacteria were incubated aerobically or anaerobically at 25°C in the BHI broth, M9 minimal medium, and M9 minimal medium with acetate for up to 14 days. The relative extents of growth (A and C: aerobic growth; B and D: anaerobic growth) were recorded at 48 h by measuring OD 600 and viability (E) at 14 d by plating on BHI agar. WT represents the wild-type strain of X. nematophila, Δpta denotes the mutant of the pta gene (encoding phosphotransacetylase), CΔpta is the genetically complemented pta+ strain, ΔacnB denotes the mutant of the acnB gene (encoding aconitate hydratase), CΔacnB is the genetically complemented acnB+ strain, and pJB861 indicates the mutants carrying the empty vector pJB861. Results (E) are shown as mean ± SEM from two independent experiments with three replicates per treatment, and the error bars (A, B, C, D) represent the standard error of the mean. Star symbol (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05) with comparison to the wild-type strain in each growth medium in the multiple t tests.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.g003

Effect of gene disruption on bacteria-nematode interaction

Nematode growth and reproduction appeared normal on both pta and acnB mutants as compared with the wild-type X. nematophila cells. Adult nematodes developed in 4–5 days after inoculation of eggs on the bacterial lawns and the next generation infective juveniles developed within 2 weeks. However, ability of the bacteria to persist in the infective juvenile was drastically reduced in both pta and acnB mutants and the number of viable cells in the nematode decreased much more rapidly in the mutants compared with the wild type (Fig 4). The mean number of bacterial cells in a newly produced infective juvenile was slightly lower for the pta mutant but almost half for the acnB mutant, compared to the wild-type bacteria. Only 4 (±1) pta mutant cells and no acnB mutant cells per infective juvenile were detected 30 days post inoculation of the eggs, which were significantly lower than the number of wild-type cells (131 ± 21) retained by each infective juvenile (Fig 4). No pta mutant cells were detected in the infective juveniles 45 days post inoculation of the eggs in contrast to 23 ± 5 wild-type cells still retained per infective juvenile. These differences were significant (two-way ANOVA; p < 0.0001) for both the day and strain factors. Ectopic expression of the gene pta or acnB complemented the colonization defect in the respective mutants (Fig 4). These results suggest that both pta and acnB genes are required for Xenorhabdus cells to survive in the infective juvenile vesicle.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Persistence of the bacteria Xenorhabdus nematophila in the infective juvenile stage of nematode host Steinernema carpocapsae.

The data shown are the mean (± SEM) number of the pta mutant (A: Δpta denotes the pta mutant; CΔpta is the genetically complemented pta+ strain; pJB861 indicates the pta mutant with the control vector pJB861), acnB mutant (B: ΔacnB denotes the acnB mutant; CΔacnB is the genetically complemented acnB+ strain; pJB861 indicates the acnB mutant with the control vector pJB861) or wild-type (WT) bacterial cells persisting in an infective juvenile at 14, 30 and 45 days post-inoculation of the nematode eggs on the respective bacterial lawn. Star symbol (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05) with comparison to the wild-type strain in the multiple t tests.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.g004

Discussion

Understanding molecular basis of fitness traits is of fundamental importance in symbiosis studies. Our in vivo gene expression analysis indicates key molecular features adopted by Xenorhabdus bacteria while in mutualism with their nematode partner. Almost half of the genes differentially expressed by X. koppenhoeferi appear to be involved in adaptation to general starvation, and such a pattern has also been observed in Photorhabdus during their persistence in Heterorhabditis infective juveniles [27]. The starvation transcriptional profile could be a result of the bacterial response to nutrient deprivation or active down-regulation of metabolism to avoid over-taxing the nematode partner. In either scenario, it emphasizes that the bacteria tend to reduce their nutritional dependence on the nematode partner thus enhancing the couple's longevity during their search for a suitable insect host.

Our gene expression data suggest that the bacteria X. koppenhoeferi make large metabolic adaptations to persist in the nematode intestinal vesicle compared to growth in the nutrient medium. Unlike the utilization of pentose phosphate pathway by P. temperata [27], Xenorhabdus spp may enter into the glyoxylate pathway bypassing TCA cycle in the infective juvenile as indicated by the down-regulation of a key TCA cycle gene sucA and up-regulation of glyoxylate pathway gene acnB in both X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila. Also, the gene coaA encoding pantothenate kinase responsible for the biosynthesis of CoA, a coenzyme notable for its role in the oxidation of pyruvate in TCA cycle, was down-regulated in both Xenorhabdus bacteria. Instead, the CoA pool could be possibly maintained by recycling through the glyoxylate pathway [55]. In fact, metabolic change can be a critical component of survival responses and is often coordinated with the changes in lifestyles as cells must switch from a physiological state that permits rapid growth in the presence of abundant nutrients to one that enhances survival under famine [55,56]. In P. luminescens, the lifestyle shift was suggested to be triggered by a metabolic switch closely linked to the TCA cycle, but not by the well-known acetate switch [57]. It could be a different story in Xenorhabdus bacteria as indicated by the up-regulation of gene pta encoding phosphotransacetylase, a crucial enzyme in acetate switch, in both X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila. Previous studies suggest that the glyoxylate pathway allows some bacteria to grow and persist on acetate or other compounds that yield acetyl-CoA as a replenishing source for carbon in the synthesis of glucose and other important reactions [56,58]. Our mutagenesis experiments confirm that both acnB and pta genes are critical to X. nematophila for a prolonged growth with acetate in vitro and persistence in the infective juvenile of S. carpocapsae. Therefore, we suggest that the acetate switch most likely plays a major role in mediating lifestyle shifts in Xenorhabdus bacteria. The acetate switch has also been reported to affect the symbiosis of Vibrio fischeri with squid through a metabolic connection between acetate utilization and bacterial cell density [59].

Along with central metabolic pathways, the bacteria also appear to alter metabolism of other substances like fatty acids and amino acids. While the most important function of acetyl-CoA carboxylase is to provide the malonyl-CoA substrate for the biosynthesis of fatty acids through irreversible carboxylation of acetyl-CoA [60,61], down-regulation of its corresponding gene accC in both X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila may indicate the reduced demand for fatty acids by these bacteria during persistence in the nematode vesicle. In P. temperata, we discovered that up-regulation of homoserine biosynthesis gene metL was essential for bacterial persistence in its nematode partner [27]. In X. nematophila, threonine and methionine were found to be required for colonization of the vesicle of S. carpocapsae infective juveniles [24]. Down-regulation of lysine and leucine biosynthesis genes (dapF and leuC) in X. koppenhoeferi therefore may suggest that these two amino acids are either not needed by the bacteria for persistence in the nematode or are provided by the host nematode. But these two genes were not found to be down-regulated in X. nematophila during persistence in S. carpocapsae, reflecting the different requirements for amino acids in the two species. In P. temperata, aromatic amino acid biosynthesis is possibly reduced due to the down-regulation of gene aroG [27], and X. koppenhoeferi may share this feature as the necessary gene pheA is down-regulated. This is also another example of different requirements for amino acids between Xenorhabdus species since pheA gene was not detected to be down-regulated in X. nematophila.

In the P. temperataH. bacteriophora interaction, intracellular acidification is important for the bacteria to persist in the nematode partner [27]. This intriguing cellular process seems to be also induced by X. koppenhoeferi in the host nematode as indicated by the up-regulation of proton importer gene (kefC) and down-regulation of proton exporter genes (cyoD, nqrC and nqrF). Notably, we found that kefC gene was also up-regulated in X. nematophila during persistence in its nematode partner S. carpocapsae. Studies of other bacteria [6265] have suggested that intracellular acidification occurs due to the differential regulation of proton transporter genes. Cellular acidification has the potential to control cell growth and protect bacteria from electrophile toxicity as noted in Escherichia coli [66]. This process may benefit Xenorhabdus by inhibiting the cell growth during persistence in the nematode. Such an assumption is consistent with the finding that Xenorhabdus fitness is maximized when nematodes carry intermediate but not higher numbers of bacterial cells [28].

Besides cellular acidification, several other down-regulated genes may also indicate limited bacterial growth inside the nematode. Amongst these, down-regulation of the polyamine importer gene potD in X. koppenhoeferi may result in retarded bacterial growth considering the importance of polyamines in initiating and maintaining cell growth in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes [67]. Down-regulation of the gene lepA in both X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila may result in a decreased rate of protein synthesis because the elongation factor LepA increases the rate of protein synthesis under certain stress conditions [68]. As a null mutation of gidA in E. coli leads to a reduced growth rate [69], down-regulation of this gene in both X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila may also reduce their growth rate and maximize fitness in the nematode infective juvenile.

Biofilm formation is suggested to be crucial in Photorhabdus during persistence in H. bacteriophora infective juvenile [17,18,27,36], which is likely not the case in Xenorhabdus bacteria. A number of genes (pilT, flhA, ppiD, fld, glmU, purA and tldD) involved in biofilm formation or cell motility were down-regulated in X. koppenhoeferi, and four of them (pilT, glmU, purA and tldD) shared expression signature with X. nematophila during persistence in the host nematode. Among these genes, fld has been shown to be important in translocation of enteric bacteria during infection [70,71]; glmU activity has been reported to be required by E. coli for biofilm formation [72] which can be activated by tldD gene product [73]; pilT, flhA and ppiD genes are usually needed for surface motility and biofilm formation in gram-negative bacteria [7476]. Purine biosynthesis has been previously speculated to play a key role in biofilm formation in non-streptococcal species [77], thus up-regulation of the purine biosynthesis gene in P. temperata (purL) [27,36] but down-regulation in X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila (purA) supports the different status of biofilm development in the two bacterial genera. In addition, down-regulation of a Type IV pilus gene in X. koppenhoeferi further points to the lack of biofilm development. Overall, our results suggest that Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus have different requirement for biofilm formation during persistence in their host nematodes. This is interesting as the two bacteria also occupy different niches in their host nematodes: Photorhabdus colonizes the entire intestine of Heterorhabditis but Xenorhabdus is restricted to the specialized vesicle in Steinernema.

Expression of factors necessary to colonize and persist in the host is often orchestrated by complex regulatory networks. Changes in bacterial gene expression may be linked with differential regulation of factors involved in replication, transcription and translation processes. Up-regulation of gene hpcR which negatively regulates activity of aromatic catabolism [78,79] in both X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila indicates that aromatic catabolism may be reduced in Xenorhabdus bacteria during persistence in Steinernema infective juveniles. This is consistent with the identification of the aromatic amino acids biosynthesis gene pheA being down-regulated in X. koppenhoeferi. A similar pattern exists in P. temperata as well: the padR gene which encodes a negative regulator of aromatic catabolism was up-regulated and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis genes were correspondingly down-regulated during persistence in H. bacteriophora infective juveniles [27]. Another important regulator identified in this study is IscR, an iron-dependent transcriptional regulator for a host of genes in response to changes in cellular Fe-S cluster status [80]. Up-regulation of iscR in both X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila may suggest important biology of Fe-S cluster synthesis in Xenorhabdus in Steinernema infective juveniles. A previous investigation of X. nematophila showed that disruption of isc operon prevented colonization of S. carpocapsae nematodes [81]. In E. coli, IscR seems to be a key iron regulator to control biofilm formation in response to changes in cellular Fe-S homeostasis, and this regulation leads to decreased surface attachment and biofilm dispersal under iron-limiting conditions [82]. Studies on Erwinia chrysanthemi have also predicted the remarkable role of IscR in the colonization of bacteria in a wide array of plant species [83]. Among the other regulators shared by X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila, TldD suppresses the inhibitory activity of a carbon storage regulator [84,85]. The carbon storage regulator is believed to control a variety of physiological traits such as biofilm formation and regulation of 'switches' between different physiological states in many pathogenic bacteria [86]. Thus, down-regulation of tldD gene in both X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila may be a necessity for the carbon storage regulator to play a role in coordinating physiological traits that are relevant to lifestyle switching in Xenorhabdus.

A number of transposase linked genes were up- or down-regulated in P. temperata [27] and X. koppenhoeferi while persisting in their respective host nematode H. bacteriophora and S. scarabaei. In fact, differential expression of genes related to transposases might be particularly linked with stress responses in organisms [87]. Increase in transposition activity contributes to genetic variability possibly for better adaptation and survival of bacterial species under stressful conditions such as acid, reduced nutrients, etc. [8890]. Generally, stress is recognized as any environmental change that reduces the fitness of an organism, and it can be further separated into two classes according to the response of the organism: those evoking a physiological response and those evoking a phenotypic and/or a genetic response [87]. In line with this, the bacteria are definitely stressed during persistence in the host nematode since the number of the colonizing bacteria is restricted and the bacteria change into smaller-size phenotype in the nematode [18]. Here, we speculate that differential expression of the transposition related genes may also contribute to genetic variability for better adaptation and survival of the symbiotic bacteria in response to the changed environment from active growth in vitro or in insect hemolymph to reduced growth in the enduring nematode infective juveniles. One of these genes, deaD, shares the expression signature between X. koppenhoeferi and X. nematophila while persisting in their host nematode. Notably, this gene has been suggested to be critical for bacteria to adapt to a variety of stresses and survive under severe conditions according to a study of Caulobacter crescentus, a bacterium with a remarkable ability to grow at low temperatures [91]. Compared to P. temperata, more transposition involved genes encoding insertion sequence elements, resolvases, helicases, and recombinases were found to be differentially regulated in X. koppenhoeferi, and such expression signature may be attributed to Xenorhabdus genomes which harbor larger numbers of IS elements [30]. While the relationship between the IS elements and the occurrence of genome rearrangements in Xenorhabdus is yet unexplored [30], the differential expression of a number of these elements in X. koppenhoeferi in this study suggests that some of these may be relevant to symbiosis and deserve additional investigation.

In conclusion, both Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus appear to reduce their growth and metabolism while living in the host nematode, which is attributed to the cellular acidification through regulation of proton transport systems, the down-regulation of genes required for active growth, and the switching of pathways for adaptive metabolic changes. The glyoxylate pathway is likely preferred by Xenorhabdus, whereas Photorhabdus utilizes the pentose phosphate pathway. Although both bacteria retain the ability to produce flagella, biofilms appear to be developed only in Photorhabdus. Further, X. koppenhoeferi shows up-regulation of a smaller set of genes compared to P. temperata. We detected very little overlap in the gene expression profiles between the two bacterial genera but a considerable similarity between the two Xenorhabdus species. Such distinction of gene expression between the two bacterial genera supports the independent evolution of symbiosis in the two systems [8,9,12]. Overall, this study has generated new information on the transcriptional mechanisms by which bacteria persist in mutualism with their nematode partners. It provides a genetic basis for exploring the recently available X. nematophila and Xenorhabdus bovienii genomes as well as a useful paradigm for investigating other symbiotic systems. It should be noted that the present findings are based on the comparative study of bacterial transcriptional levels between the in vivo and in vitro states on a single time point–freshly-produced infective juveniles that are between 3–5 days old. Given the possibility of changes in gene expression over time in the enduring nematode infective juveniles, transcriptional profiles on more time points facilitated with additional functional analyses in the future would be useful for even a more comprehensive mechanistic understanding of the nematode-bacterial symbiotic interactions.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Rarefaction analysis curves demonstrating coverage of cDNA libraries for genes identified from bacteria Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi during colonization of the nematode host Steinernema scarabaei.

The redundancy (or the colony counts) of each identified gene was counted cumulatively and the library coverage was calculated using Analytic Rarefaction program.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Fold changes in the expression of selected Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi genes identified by SCOTS in the nematode host Steinernema scarabaei.

Quantitative real-time PCR was used to evaluate the expression level of the SCOTS identified X. koppenhoeferi genes during colonization in the nematode host relative to growth in the artificial media. Error bars indicate the standard error of mean from three replications.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Classification of SCOTS identified up- and down-regulated genes in Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi during persistence in Steinernema scarabaei.

The numbers of genes involved in cell surface (e.g. pilin and outer membrane protein), regulation (regulatory genes controlling the expression of one or more other genes), stress response, nucleic acid modification (e.g. transposase and recombinase), transport (e.g. proton transporter), intracellular metabolism, and genes with unknown function or without similarity to known genes are presented.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Fold changes in the expression of selected Xenorhabdus nematophila genes during colonization of the nematode host Steinernema carpocapsae.

These genes were identified by SCOTS procedure to be similarly expressed in X. nematophila and X. koppenhoeferi during colonization of their respective host nematode relative to growth in the artificial media. The shared gene expression signature in X. nematophila was verified via the quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Error bars indicate the standard error of mean from three replications.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.s004

(TIF)

S1 Table. Primer sequences used in this study.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.s005

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Phenotypic characters of the wild-type, pta mutant and acnB mutant strains of Xenorhabdus nematophila.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145739.s006

(DOCX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RA PSG. Performed the experiments: RA. Analyzed the data: RA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PSG. Wrote the paper: RA PSG.

References

  1. 1. Goodrich-Blair H, Clarke DJ (2007) Mutualism and pathogenesis in Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus: two roads to the same destination. Mol Microbiol 64: 260–268. pmid:17493120
  2. 2. Ruby EG (2008) Symbiotic conversations are revealed under genetic interrogation. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 752–762. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1958. pmid:18794913
  3. 3. Stock SP, Goodrich-Blair H (2008) Nematode-bacterium symbioses: Crossing kingdom and disciplinary boundaries. Symbiosis 46: 61–64.
  4. 4. ffrench-Constant R, Waterfield N, Daborn P, Joyce S, Bennett H, Au C, et al. (2003) Photorhabdus: towards a functional genomic analysis of a symbiont and pathogen. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26: 433–456. pmid:12586390
  5. 5. Bird AF, Akhurst RJ (1983) The nature of the intestinal vesicle in nematodes of the family Steinernematidae. Int J Parasitol 13: 599–606.
  6. 6. Snyder H, Stock SP, Kim SK, Flores-Lara Y, Forst S (2007) New insights into the colonization and release processes of Xenorhabdus nematophila and the morphology and ultrastructure of the bacterial receptacle of its nematode host, Steinernema carpocapsae. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 5338–5346. pmid:17526783
  7. 7. Kim SK, Flores-Lara Y, Stock SP (2012) Morphology and ultrastructure of the bacterial receptacle in Steinernema nematodes (Nematoda: Steinernematidae). J Invertebr Pathol 110: 366–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.04.011. pmid:22564260
  8. 8. Adams BJ, Fodor A, Koppenhöfer HS, Stackebrandt E, Stock SP, Klein MG (2006) Biodiversity and systematics of nematode—bacterium entomopathogens. Biol Contr 37: 32–49.
  9. 9. Poinar GO (1993) Origins and phylogenetic relationships of the entomophilic rhabditis, Heterorhabditis and Steinernema. Fundam Appl Nematol 16: 333–338.
  10. 10. Gaugler R (2002) Entomopathogenic Nematology. New York: CABI Publishing.
  11. 11. Poinar G, Thomas GM (1966) Significance of Achromobacter nematophilus Poinar and Thomas (Achromobacteriaceae: Eubacteriales) in the development of the nematode, DD-136 (Neoplectana sp. Steinernematidae). Parasitology 56: 385–390. pmid:4960247
  12. 12. Boemare N (2002) Interactions between the partners of the entomopathogenic bacterium nematode complexes, Steinernema-Xenorhabdus and Heterorhabditis-Photorhabdus. Nematology 4: 601–603.
  13. 13. Martens EC, Goodrich-Blair H (2005) The Steinernema carpocapsae intestinal vesicle contains a subcellular structure with which Xenorhabdus nematophila associates during colonization initiation. Cell Microbiol 7: 1723–1735. pmid:16309459
  14. 14. Ciche TA, Ensign JC (2003) For the insect pathogen Photorhabdus luminescens, which end of a nematode is out? Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 1890–1897. pmid:12676661
  15. 15. Morgan JA, Sergeant M, Ellis D, Ousley M, Jarrett P (2001) Sequence analysis of insecticidal genes from Xenorhabdus nematophilus PMFI296. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 2062–2069. pmid:11319082
  16. 16. An R, Sreevatsan S, Grewal PS (2009) Comparative in vivo gene expression of the closely related bacteria Photorhabdus temperata and Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferi upon infection of the same insect host, Rhizotrogus majalis. BMC Genomics 10: 433. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-433. pmid:19754939
  17. 17. Somvanshi VS, Kaufmann-Daszczuk B, Kim KS, Mallon S, Ciche TA (2010) Photorhabdus phase variants express a novel fimbrial locus, mad, essential for symbiosis. Mol Microbiol 77: 1021–1038. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07270.x. pmid:20572934
  18. 18. Somvanshi VS, Sloup RE, Crawford JM, Martin AR, Heidt AJ, Kim K-s, et al. (2012) A single promoter inversion switches Photorhabdus between pathogenic and mutualistic states. Science 337: 88–93. doi: 10.1126/science.1216641. pmid:22767929
  19. 19. Chaston JM, Murfin KE, Heath-Heckman EA, Goodrich-Blair H (2013) Previously unrecognized stages of species-specific colonization in the mutualism between Xenorhabdus bacteria and Steinernema nematodes. Cell Microbiol 15: 1545–1559. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12134. pmid:23480552
  20. 20. Heungens K, Cowles CE, Goodrich-Blair H (2002) Identification of Xenorhabdus nematophila genes required for mutualistic colonization of Steinernema carpocapsae nematodes. Mol Microbiol 45: 1337–1353. pmid:12207701
  21. 21. Cowles CE, Goodrich-Blair H (2008) The Xenorhabdus nematophila nilABC genes confer the ability of Xenorhabdus spp. to colonize Steinernema carpocapase nematodes. J Bacteriol 190: 4121–4128. doi: 10.1128/JB.00123-08. pmid:18390667
  22. 22. Grewal PS, Bai X, Jagdale GB (2011) Longevity and stress tolerance of entomopathogenic nematodes. In: Perry RN, Wharton D, editors. Molecular and Physiological Basis of Nematode Survival. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing. pp. 157–181.
  23. 23. Mitani DK, Kaya HK, Goodrich-Blair H (2004) Comparative study of the entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema carpocapsae, reared on mutant and wild-type Xenorhabdus nematophila. Biol Contr 29: 382–391.
  24. 24. Martens EC, Russell FM, Goodrich-Blair H (2005) Analysis of Xenorhabdus nematophila metabolic mutants yields insight into stages of Steinernema carpocapsae nematode intestinal colonization. Mol Microbiol 58: 28–45. pmid:16164547
  25. 25. Flores-Lara Y, Renneckar D, Forst S, Goodrich-Blair H, Stock P (2007) Influence of nematode age and culture conditions on morphological and physiological parameters in the bacterial vesicle of Steinernema carpocapsae (Nematoda: Steinernematidae). J Invertebr Pathol 95: 110–118. pmid:17376477
  26. 26. Goetsch M, Owen H, Goldman B, Forst S (2006) Analysis of the PixA inclusion body protein of Xenorhabdus nematophila. J Bacteriol 188: 2706–2710. pmid:16547059
  27. 27. An R, Grewal PS (2010) Molecular mechanisms of persistence of mutualistic bacteria Photorhabdus in the entomopathogenic nematode host. PLoS ONE 5: e13154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013154. pmid:20957199
  28. 28. Chapuis E, Arnal A, Ferdy JB (2012) Trade-offs shape the evolution of the vector-borne insect pathogen Xenorhabdus nematophila. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 279: 2672–2680.
  29. 29. Kussell E, Kishony R, Balaban NQ, Leibler S (2005) Bacterial persistence: a model of survival in changing environments. Genetics 169: 1807–1814. pmid:15687275
  30. 30. Chaston JM, Suen G, Tucker SL, Andersen AW, Bhasin A, Bode E, et al. (2011) The entomopathogenic bacterial endosymbionts Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus: convergent lifestyles from divergent genomes. PLoS ONE 6: e27909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027909. pmid:22125637
  31. 31. Popiel I, Vasquez EM (1991) Cryopreservation of Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. J Nematol 23: 432–437. pmid:19283150
  32. 32. Curran J, Gilbert C, Butler K (1992) Routine cryopreservation of isolates of Steinernema and Heterorhabditis spp. J Nematol 24: 269–270. pmid:19282994
  33. 33. Akhurst RJ (1980) Morphological and functional dimorphism in Xenorhabdus spp., bacteria symbiotically associated with the insect pathogenic nematodes, Neoaplectana and Heterorhabditis. J Gen Microbiol 121: 303–309.
  34. 34. Vivas EI, Goodrich-Blair H (2001) Xenorhabdus nematophilus as a model for host-bacterium interactions: rpoS is necessary for mutualism with nematodes. J Bacteriol 183: 4687–4693. pmid:11466270
  35. 35. Sambrook J, Russell DW, Russell D (2000) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  36. 36. An R, Grewal PS (2011) purL gene expression affects biofilm formation and symbiotic persistence of Photorhabdus temperata in the nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. Microbiology 157: 2595–2603. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.048959-0. pmid:21700665
  37. 37. White GF (1927) A method for obtaining infective nematode larvae from cultures. Science 66: 302–303.
  38. 38. Froussard P (1992) A random-PCR method (rPCR) to construct whole cDNA library from low amounts of RNA. Nucl Acids Res 20: 2900. pmid:1614887
  39. 39. Graham JE, Clark-Curtiss JE (1999) Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNAs synthesized in response to phagocytosis by human macrophages by selective capture of transcribed sequences (SCOTS). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 11554–11559. pmid:10500215
  40. 40. Faucher SP, Porwollik S, Dozois CM, McClelland M, Daigle F (2006) Transcriptome of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi within macrophages revealed through the selective capture of transcribed sequences. PNAS 103: 1906–1911. pmid:16443683
  41. 41. Dozois CM, Daigle F, Curtiss R 3rd (2003) Identification of pathogen-specific and conserved genes expressed in vivo by an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 247–252. pmid:12506201
  42. 42. Haydel SE, Benjamin WH Jr., Dunlap NE, Clark-Curtiss JE (2002) Expression, autoregulation, and DNA binding properties of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis TrcR response regulator. J Bacteriol 184: 2192–2203. pmid:11914351
  43. 43. Zhu X, Tu ZJ, Coussens PM, Kapur V, Janagama H, Naser S, et al. (2008) Transcriptional analysis of diverse strains Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in primary bovine monocyte derived macrophages. Microb Infect 10: 1274–1282.
  44. 44. Karp PD, Ouzounis CA, Moore-Kochlacs C, Goldovsky L, Kaipa P, Ahren D, et al. (2005) Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 6083–6089. pmid:16246909
  45. 45. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 25: 402–408. pmid:11846609
  46. 46. Schellhorn HE, Audia JP, Wei LIC, Chang L (1998) Identification of conserved, RpoS-dependent stationary-phase genes of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 180: 6283–6291. pmid:9829938
  47. 47. Nikitin A, Egorov S, Daraselia N, Mazo I (2003) Pathway studio—the analysis and navigation of molecular networks. Bioinformatics 19: 2155–2157. pmid:14594725
  48. 48. Koppenhöfer AM, Fuzy EM (2009) Long-term effects and persistence of Steinernema scarabaei applied for suppression of Anomala orientalis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Biol Contr 48: 63–72.
  49. 49. Richards GR, Goodrich-Blair H (2010) Examination of Xenorhabdus nematophila lipases in pathogenic and mutualistic host interactions reveals a role for xlpA in nematode progeny production. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 221–229. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01715-09. pmid:19880652
  50. 50. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 6640–6645. pmid:10829079
  51. 51. Bennett HP, Clarke DJ (2005) The pbgPE operon in Photorhabdus luminescens is required for pathogenicity and symbiosis. J Bacteriol 187: 77–84. pmid:15601690
  52. 52. Chandra H, Khandelwal P, Khattri A, Banerjee N (2008) Type 1 fimbriae of insecticidal bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila is necessary for growth and colonization of its symbiotic host nematode Steinernema carpocapsiae. Environ Microbiol 10: 1285–1295. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01542.x. pmid:18279345
  53. 53. Cowles CE, Goodrich-Blair H (2004) Characterization of a lipoprotein, NilC, required by Xenorhabdus nematophila for mutualism with its nematode host. Mol Microbiol 54: 464–477. pmid:15469517
  54. 54. Goetsch M, Owen H, Goldman B, Forst S (2006) Analysis of the PixA inclusion body protein of Xenorhabdus nematophila. J Bacteriol 188: 2706–2710. pmid:16547059
  55. 55. Wolfe AJ (2005) The acetate switch. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69: 12–50. pmid:15755952
  56. 56. Ensign SA (2011) Another microbial pathway for acetate assimilation. Science 331: 294–295. doi: 10.1126/science.1201252. pmid:21252338
  57. 57. Lango L, Clarke DJ (2010) A metabolic switch is involved in lifestyle decisions in Photorhabdus luminescens. Mol Microbiol 77: 1394–1405. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07300.x. pmid:20662779
  58. 58. Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L (2002) The glyoxylate cycle enables plants and bacteria to grow on acetate. Biochemistry (Mosc). 5th ed. New York: W H Freeman Publisher. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22383/.
  59. 59. Studer SV, Mandel MJ, Ruby EG (2008) AinS quorum sensing regulates the Vibrio fischeri acetate switch. J Bacteriol 190: 5915–5923. doi: 10.1128/JB.00148-08. pmid:18487321
  60. 60. Davis MS, Solbiati J, Cronan JE (2000) Overproduction of acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity increases the rate of fatty acid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 275: 28593–28598. pmid:10893421
  61. 61. Tong L (2005) Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase: crucial metabolic enzyme and attractive target for drug discovery. Cell Mol Life Sci 62: 1784–1803. pmid:15968460
  62. 62. Pinner E, Kotler Y, Padan E, Schuldiner S (1993) Physiological-role of NhaB, a specific Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 268: 1729–1734. pmid:8093613
  63. 63. Inaba K, Kuroda T, Shimamoto T, Kayahara T, Tsuda M, Tsuchiya T (1994) Lithium toxicity and Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. Biol Pharm Bull 17: 395–398. pmid:8019504
  64. 64. Ferguson GP, Mclaggan D, Booth IR (1995) Potassium channel activation by glutathione-S-conjugates in Escherichia coli—Protection against methylglyoxal is mediated by cytoplasmic acidification. Mol Microbiol 17: 1025–1033. pmid:8594323
  65. 65. Ferguson GP, Nikolaev Y, McLaggan D, Maclean M, Booth IR (1997) Survival during exposure to the electrophilic reagent N-ethylmaleimide in Escherichia coli: role of KefB and KefC potassium channels. J Bacteriol 179: 1007–1012. pmid:9023177
  66. 66. Ferguson GP, Battista JR, Lee AT, Booth IR (2000) Protection of the DNA during the exposure of Escherichia coli cells to a toxic metabolite: the role of the KefB and KefC potassium channels. Mol Microbiol 35: 113–122. pmid:10632882
  67. 67. Wang CJ, Delcros JG, Cannon L, Konate F, Carias H, Biggerstaff J, et al. (2003) Defining the molecular requirements for the selective delivery of polyamine conjugates into cells containing active polyamine transporters. J Med Chem 46: 5129–5138. pmid:14613316
  68. 68. Pech M, Karim Z, Yamamoto H, Kitakawa M, Qin Y, Nierhaus KH (2011) Elongation factor 4 (EF4/LepA) accelerates protein synthesis at increased Mg2+ concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 3199–3203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012994108. pmid:21300907
  69. 69. Yim L, Moukadiri I, Bjork GR, Armengod ME (2006) Further insights into the tRNA modification process controlled by proteins MnmE and GidA of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 5892–5905. pmid:17062623
  70. 70. Cevikel MH, Ozgun H, Boylu S, Demirkiran AE, Sakarya S, Culhaci N (2003) Nitric oxide regulates bacterial translocation in experimental acute edematous pancreatitis. Pancreatology 3: 329–335. pmid:12890996
  71. 71. Wang ZQ, Lawson RJ, Buddha MR, Wei CC, Crane BR, Munro AW, et al. (2007) Bacterial flavodoxins support nitric oxide production by Bacillus subtilis nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem 282: 2196–2202. pmid:17127770
  72. 72. Burton E, Gawande PV, Yakandawala N, LoVetri K, Zhanel GG, Romeo T, et al. (2006) Antibiofilm activity of GlmU enzyme inhibitors against catheter-associated uropathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 1835–1840. pmid:16641457
  73. 73. Jackson DW, Suzuki K, Oakford L, Simecka JW, Hart ME, Romeo T (2002) Biofilm formation and dispersal under the influence of the global regulator CsrA of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 184: 290–301. pmid:11741870
  74. 74. O'Toole GA, Kolter R (1998) Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Microbiol 30: 295–304. pmid:9791175
  75. 75. Merz AJ, So M, Sheetz MP (2000) Pilus retraction powers bacterial twitching motility. Nature 407: 98–102. pmid:10993081
  76. 76. Justice SS, Hunstad DA, Harper JR, Duguay AR, Pinkner JS, Bann J, et al. (2005) Periplasmic peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerases are not essential for viability, but SurA is required for pilus biogenesis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 187: 7680–7686. pmid:16267292
  77. 77. Ge XC, Kitten T, Chen ZM, Lee SP, Munro CL, Xu P (2008) Identification of Streptococcus sanguinis genes required for biofilm formation and examination of their role in endocarditis virulence. Infect Immun 76: 2551–2559. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00338-08. pmid:18390999
  78. 78. Tropel D, van der Meer JR (2004) Bacterial transcriptional regulators for degradation pathways of aromatic compounds. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 474–500. pmid:15353566
  79. 79. Gury K, Barthelmebs L, Tran NP, Divies C, Cavin JF (2004) Cloning, deletion, and characterization of PadR, the transcriptional repressor of the phenolic acid decarboxylase-encoding padA gene of Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 2146–2153. pmid:15066807
  80. 80. Schwartz CJ, Giel JL, Patschkowski T, Luther C, Ruzicka FJ, Beinert H, et al. (2001) IscR, an Fe-S cluster-containing transcription factor, represses expression of Escherichia coli genes encoding Fe-S cluster assembly proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 14895–14900. pmid:11742080
  81. 81. Martens EC, Gawronski-Salerno J, Vokal DL, Pellitteri MC, Menard ML, Goodrich-Blair H (2003) Xenorhabdus nematophila requires an intact iscRSUA-hscBA-fdx operon to colonize Steinernema carpocapsae nematodes. J Bacteriol 185: 3678–3682. pmid:12775707
  82. 82. Wu Y, Outten FW (2009) IscR controls iron-dependent biofilm formation in Escherichia coli by regulating type I fimbria expression. J Bacteriol 191: 1248–1257. doi: 10.1128/JB.01086-08. pmid:19074392
  83. 83. Rincon-Enriquez G, Crete P, Barras F, Py B (2008) Biogenesis of Fe/S proteins and pathogenicity: IscR plays a key role in allowing Erwinia chrysanthemi to adapt to hostile conditions. Mol Microbiol 67: 1257–1273. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06118.x. pmid:18284573
  84. 84. Rawlings ND, Salvesen GS (2012) Rawlings N.D. and Salvesen G.S. Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, Elsevier Ltd. 4094 p.
  85. 85. Murayama N, Shimizu H, Takiguchi S, Baba Y, Amino H, Horiuchi T, et al. (1996) Evidence for involvement of Escherichia coli genes pmbA, csrA and a previously unrecognized gene tldD, in the control of DNA gyrase by letD (ccdB) of sex factor F. J Mol Biol 256: 483–502. pmid:8604133
  86. 86. Lucchetti-Miganeh C, Burrowes E, Baysse C, Ermel G (2008) The post-transcriptional regulator CsrA plays a central role in the adaptation of bacterial pathogens to different stages of infection in animal hosts. Microbiology 154: 16–29. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/012286-0. pmid:18174122
  87. 87. Capy P, Gasperi G, Biémont C, Bazin C (2000) Stress and transposable elements: co-evolution or useful parasites? Heredity 85: 101–106. pmid:11012710
  88. 88. Rediers H, Rainey PB, Vanderleyden J, De Mot R (2005) Unraveling the secret lives of bacteria: use of in vivo expression technology and differential fluorescence induction promoter traps as tools for exploring niche-specific gene expression. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69: 217–261. pmid:15944455
  89. 89. Broadbent JR, Larsen RL, Deibel V, Steele JL (2010) Physiological and transcriptional response of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 to acid stress. J Bacteriol 192: 2445–2458. doi: 10.1128/JB.01618-09. pmid:20207759
  90. 90. Steffen MM, Dearth SP, Dill BD, Li Z, Larsen KM, Campagna SR, et al. (2014) Nutrients drive transcriptional changes that maintain metabolic homeostasis but alter genome architecture in Microcystis. The ISME Journal 8: 2080–2092. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.78. pmid:24858783
  91. 91. Mazzon RR, Lang EAS, Braz VS, Marques MV (2008) Characterization of Caulobacter crescentus response to low temperature and identification of genes involved in freezing resistance. FEMS Microbiol Lett 288: 178–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01337.x. pmid:18801049