Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Unaltered Prion Pathogenesis in a Mouse Model of High-Fat Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance

Unaltered Prion Pathogenesis in a Mouse Model of High-Fat Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance

  • Caihong Zhu, 
  • Petra Schwarz, 
  • Irina Abakumova, 
  • Adriano Aguzzi
PLOS
x

Abstract

Epidemiological, clinical, and experimental animal studies suggest a strong correlation between insulin resistance and Alzheimer’s disease. In fact, type-2 diabetes is considered an important risk factor of developing Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, impaired insulin signaling in the Alzheimer’s disease brain may promote Aβ production, impair Aβ clearance and induce tau hyperphosphorylation, thereby leading to deterioration of the disease. The pathological prion protein, PrPSc, deposits in the form of extracellular aggregates and leads to dementia, raising the question as to whether prion pathogenesis may also be affected by insulin resistance. We therefore established high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance in tga20 mice, which overexpress the prion protein. We then inoculated the insulin-resistant mice with prions. We found that insulin resistance in tga20 mice did not affect prion disease progression, PrPSc deposition, astrogliosis or microglial activation, and had no effect on survival. Our study demonstrates that in a mouse model, insulin resistance does not significantly contribute to prion pathogenesis.

Introduction

Type-2 Diabetes (T2D) represents one of the top threats to human health, and currently afflicts hundreds of millions of people worldwide (http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/update-2014). Diet-induced obesity is thought to be the primary cause of T2D, and insulin resistance is considered the central clinical characteristic of what has been called the "metabolic syndrome" [1]. Impaired insulin responsiveness in fat, muscle, and liver cells leads to failure of glucose absorption despite excessive insulin secretion, resulting in hyperglycemia and associated organ damage in T2D patients.

Intriguingly, T2D is also associated with changes in learning, memory, cognitive flexibility and processing speed [2]. Peripheral insulin resistance has been reported to go along with impaired glucose metabolism in the brain [36]. Unequivocal evidence from epidemiological studies indicates that T2D and insulin resistance are linked to an increased risk of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most prevalent form of dementia affecting the elderly [712]. In addition, impaired insulin signaling in the brain has been observed in both AD patients and animal models of AD [1320]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the connection between insulin resistance and dementia are far from understood.

Extensive studies have been carried out in animal models to delineate the role of insulin resistance in AD pathogenesis. High-fat diet-induced dysfunction of insulin signaling in rats reduces expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and leads to cognitive impairment [21]. Wild-type C57BL/6 mice fed with high-fat diet develop insulin resistance in the brain, associated with increased tau phosphorylation, reduced post-synaptic protein PSD95 and cognitive impairment [22, 23]. Additional mouse models have suggested that defective brain insulin signaling can accelerate or exacerbate AD pathology by increasing Aβ deposition (through promotion of its production and/or impairment of its clearance) and inducing tau hyperphosphorylation, [2430]. In cynomolgus monkeys, T2D accelerates Aβ pathology by exacerbating endocytic malfunction [31]. Conversely, Aβ oligomers that accumulate in AD brains have been reported to inhibit autophosphorylation of insulin receptor, reduce insulin receptors on plasma membranes, and decrease insulin signaling in neuronal cells [32, 33]. Furthermore, cerebrally derived Aβ can be transported and accumulated in pancreatic β-cells, thereby triggering islet degeneration and impairing insulin production [28]. Accordingly, the interaction between AD and insulin resistance may be reciprocal and bidirectional.

Prion diseases are a group of fatal neurodegenerative disorders comprising various veterinary diseases (scrapie, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, chronic wasting disease), as well as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, kuru, Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease and fatal familiar insomnia in humans [34]. Prion diseases are characterized by the extracellular deposition of PrPSc, an abnormal isoform of the cellular prion protein (PrPC) [35]. Many observations suggest a possible association between insulin signaling and prion disease. For one, insulin treatment enhances PrPC expression in neuronal cell lines, and PrP deficiency results in insulin signaling impairment and glucose-intolerance [3638]. Moreover, aberrant insulin receptor processing and function was observed in prion-infected neuroblastoma cells [39, 40]. Recently, it has been reported that prion infection also reduces cell surface expression of insulin receptor and weakens insulin signaling in neuronal cells [41]. Finally, in an animal model of high-fructose diet-induced insulin resistance, PrPC expression is downregulated [42].

The above studies are tantalizing, but they do not prove a cross-talk between impaired glucose metabolism and the pathogenesis of prion disease. Therefore, we examined the effect of high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance on prion pathogenesis. We first established insulin resistance by feeding mice with a high-fat diet for 4 weeks followed by intracerebral inoculation with prions. Prion pathogenesis in mice suffering from high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance was indistinguishable from that of control mice on a normal diet in all investigated parameters, suggesting that insulin resistance does not significantly affect prion pathogenesis.

Material and Methods

Animals & ethical statement

Female tga20 mice were maintained in high hygienic grade facility and housed 3 mice per cage under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (from 7 am to 7 pm) at 21±1°C, and fed with either high fat diet (Research Diets, #D12492) or normal diet and water ad libitum. HFD were changed twice a week to avoid oily fur or bedding. Body weights were measured weekly. All animal experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the Rules and Regulations for the Protection of Animal Rights (Tierschutzgesetz and Tierschutzverordnung) of the Swiss Bundesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit und Veterinärwesen and were preemptively approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of the Canton of Zürich (permit # 41/2012).

Fasting blood glucose and plasma insulin measurement

Mice were first fasted for 6 hours. Before retro-orbital bleeding, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. Blood glucose levels were measured by Accu-Chek Aviva test stripes. To test plasma insulin level, plasma were prepared from the blood and a Rat/Mouse Insulin ELISA kit (Millipore AG, EZRMI-13K) was used to determine the plasma insulin level according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

Glucose and insulin tolerance tests

Glucose and insulin tolerance tests were performed according to published guidelines[43]. To test intraperitoneal glucose tolerance, tga20 mice were first fasted for 6 hours. Mice were then intraperitoneally injected with glucose 1g/kg (Sigma). Blood glucose levels were measured from the tail vein at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 min after glucose injection. Insulin tolerance tests were performed similarly with a dose 1 IU/kg of human insulin (Sigma). Blood glucose levels from the tail vein were measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 min after insulin injection.

RML6 inoculation

Mice were inoculated intracerebrally (i.c) with 30 μl of brain homogenate diluted in PBS with 5% BSA and containing 3 x 5 log LD50 units of the Rocky Mountain Laboratories scrapie strain (passage 6, thus called RML6). Mice were monitored and actions were taken to minimize animal suffering and distress according to the details described in S1 Table. Scrapie was diagnosed according to clinical criteria (ataxia, limb weakness, front leg paresis and rolling). Mice were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation on the day of appearance of terminal clinical signs of scrapie (specific criteria in S1 Table), organs were taken and then were either snap-frozen for biochemical analysis or fixed in 4% formalin for histological assessment. The time elapsed from prion inoculation to the terminal stage of disease was defined as incubation time for the survival study.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA from each brain was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The quality of RNA was analyzed by Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies), RNAs with RIN>7 were used for cDNA synthesis. cDNA were synthesized from ~1 μg total RNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Roche) on a ViiA7 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Expression levels were normalized using Gapdh. The sequence of qRT-PCR primers are: Gapdh sense, 5´-CCA CCC CAG CAA GGA GAC T-3´;antisense, 5´-GAA ATT GTG AGG GAG ATG CT-3´. Prnp sense, 5´-GCC AGT GGA TCA GTA CAG CA-3´; antisense, 5´-ATC CCA CGA TCA GGA AGA TG-3´. TNFα sense, 5´-ACT TCG GGG TGA TCG GTC CCC-3´; antisense, 5´-TGG TTT GCT ACG ACG TGG GCT AC-3´. IL-6 sense, 5´-TCC AAT GCT CTC CTA ACA GAT AAG-3´; antisense, 5´-CAA GAT GAA TTG GAT GGT CTT G-3´.; IL-1β sense, 5´-TGC AGC TGG AGA GTG TGG ATC CC-3´; antisense, 5´-TGT GCT CTG CTT GTG AGG TGC TG-3´.

Western blot analysis

To detect PrPC in the mouse brains, one hemisphere of each brain was homogenized with buffer PBS containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40 and 0.5%CHAPSO. Total protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce). ~8 ug proteins were loaded and separated on a 12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel (NuPAGE, Invitrogen) and then blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% wt/vol Topblock (LuBioScience) in PBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20 (vol/vol) and incubated with primary antibodies POM1 in 1% Topblock (400 ng ml−1) overnight. After washing, the membranes were then incubated with secondary antibody horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated rabbit anti–mouse IgG1 (1:10,000, Zymed). Blots were developed using Luminata Crescendo Western HRP substrate (Millipore) and visualized using the Stella system (model 3000, Bio-Rad). To avoid variation in loading, the same blots were striped and incubated with anti-actin antibody (1:10,000, Millipore). The PrPC signals were normalized to actin as a loading control. Similar protocol was used for Western blot to detect pSer473-Akt and total Akt, pSer9-GSK3β and total GSK3β. The primary antibodies used were Phospho-Akt (Ser473) (D9E) XP® Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, 4060), Akt (pan) (11E7) Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, 4685), Phospho-GSK-3-beta (Ser9) (D3A4) Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, 9322), GSK3β (27C10) Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, 9315). The secondary antibody used was HRP-conjugated goat anti–rabbit IgG1 (1:10,000, Jackson ImmunoResearch, 115-035-045)

To detect PrPSc, prion infected forebrains were homogenized in sterile 0.32 M sucrose in PBS. Total protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce). Samples were adjusted to 20 μg protein in 20 μl and digested with 50 μg ml−1 proteinase K in digestion buffer (PBS containing 0.5% wt/vol sodium deoxycholate and 0.5% vol/vol Nonidet P-40) for 45 min at 37°C. PK digestion was stopped by adding loading buffer (Invitrogen) and boiling samples at 95°C for 5 min. Proteins were then separated on a 12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel (NuPAGE, Invitrogen) and blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. POM1 and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated rabbit anti–mouse IgG1 were used as primary and secondary antibodies, respectively. Blots were developed using Luminata Crescendo Western HRP substrate (Millipore) and visualized using the FUJIFILM LAS-3000 system. To detect IBA-1 and GFAP in prion-infected brains by Western blot, 20 μg of total brain protein were loaded and anti-IBA-1 antibody (1:1000; Wako Chemicals GmbH, Germany) anti-GFAP antibody (D1F4Q) XP® Rabbit mAb (1:3000; Cell Signaling Technology, 12389) were used. Actin was used as loading control.

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

PrPC in ND- or HFD- fed mouse brains was quantified by sandwich ELISA as described previously[44]. Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with 400ng/ml of purified POM1 antibodies overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed with PBS containing 0.1% (vol/vol) Tween 20 (PBST), and blocked with 5% TopBlock for 2hrs at room temperature. After washing, plates were incubated with 50 ul of serially diluted samples in PBST containing 1% TopBlock, starting from a 50ug/ml dilution. After 2hrs at room temperature, plates were washed extensively and then probed with biotinylated POM2 at a concentration of 200ng/ml in PBST containing 1% TopBlock for 1hr at room temperature. Subsequently, plates were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated Avidin (1:1000 dilution, Pharmingen No. 554058) for 1hr at room temperature. Plates were developed with TMB (3,3', 5,5;-tetramethylbenzidine) for 15–30min and stopped by adding 0.5M H2SO4, and optical density was measured at 405nm. Titer was defined as the highest dilution showing an OD more than two times the technical background, which was calculated as the average of uncoated wells.

Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed tissues were treated with concentrated formic acid for 60 min to inactivate prion infectivity and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (2mm) of brains were stained with hematoxylin/eosin (HE). After deparaffinization through graded alcohols, antibodies GFAP (1:300; DAKO, Carpinteris, CA) for astrocytes were applied and visualized using standard methods, IBA-1 (1:1000; Wako Chemicals GmbH, Germany) was used for highlighting activated microglial cells. Stainings were visualized using DAB (Sigma-Aldrich), with a hematoxylin counterstain applied subsequently. For partially protease K-resistant prion protein deposition staining, deparaffinized sections were incubated for 6 min in 98% formic acid and washed in distilled water for 30 min. Sections were incubated in Ventana buffer and stains were performed on a NEXEX immunohistochemistry robot (Ventana instruments, Switzerland) using an IVIEW DAB Detection Kit (Ventana). After incubation with protease 1 (Ventana) for 16 min, sections were incubated with anti-PrP SAF-84 (SPI bio, A03208, 1:200) for 32 min. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Sections were imaged using a Zeiss Axiophot light microscope.

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as the mean of replicas ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance between experimental groups was assessed using an unpaired Student’s t-Test or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Incubation times were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the logrank test. p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

High-fat diet-induced insulin resistance in tga20 mice

High-fat diet (HFD) induced insulin resistance has been well-established in various inbred mouse strains [4548]. The success of insulin resistance induction by diet is highly dependent on the mouse genetic background [46, 47]. In order to induce insulin resistance in tga20 mice, a transgenic line that overexpress prion protein and was generated on a 129Sv x C57BL/6 genetic background [49], 6–8 weeks old female tga20 mice were fed with either a HFD containing 60% kcal from fat, or with a normal diet (ND) consisting of 10% kcal from fat (n = 6 per group). Body weight was measured weekly. After 4 weeks, the HFD treated group showed significantly higher body weights than ND group, and HFD fed mice show obesity (Fig 1A). Fasting blood glucose and plasma insulin levels were also compared between HFD and ND groups. While fasting glucose level was not obviously different between these two groups, fasting insulin level was significantly increased in HFD group (Fig 1B), indicating that hyperinsulinemia had been attained in tga20 mice after 4 weeks of treatment.

thumbnail
Fig 1. High-fat diet induced insulin resistance in tga20 mice.

(A) Left: Body weight of tga20 mice fed with either high-fat diet (HFD) or normal diet (ND). After 4 weeks, HFD-fed mice gained significantly more body weight than ND-fed mice after 4 weeks. (n = 6; ***: p<0.001). Right: appearance of mice fed with ND or HFD for 4 weeks. (B) Fasting glucose and insulin level in HFD-fed and ND-fed mice. HFD-fed mice had similar levels of fasting glucose, but showed significantly higher fasting insulin levels. (n = 6; n.s: p>0.05; **: p<0.01). (C) glucose tolerance test and (D) insulin tolerance test of HFD-fed and ND-fed mice. HFD-fed mice showed impaired response to intraperitoneally injected glucose and insulin (n = 6; ***: p<0.001; ****: p<0.0001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144983.g001

We next performed intraperitoneal glucose and insulin tolerance tests on tga20 mice after 4 weeks of a HFD or ND. The HFD-treated tga20 mice showed impaired glucose and insulin tolerance compared to mice fed with a ND (Fig 1C and 1D). Therefore, 4 weeks of HFD feeding is sufficient to induce insulin resistance in tga20 mice. Taken together, these data indicate that HFD treatment on tga20 mice for 4 weeks resulted in obesity, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance.

Dysregulated insulin signaling but unchanged PrPC expression in the brains of tga20 mice on a high-fat diet

Peripheral insulin resistance is often associated with impaired insulin signaling and dysregulated glucose metabolism in the brain [36]. We therefore sought to determine whether HFD feeding led to dysregulation of insulin signaling in tga20 mouse brain. We first assessed the levels of Ser473-phosphorylated Akt (pSer473-Akt) which is downstream of insulin signaling and phosphorylated by PI3K. We found that the level of pSer473-Akt was significantly lower (*, p = 0.028) in HFD group, suggesting an impairment of insulin signaling in HFD brains (Fig 2A and S1 Fig). We also measured the level of pSer9-GSK3β, a form of GSK3β phosphorylated by activated Akt. We observed a trend of reduced level of pSer9-GSK3β (n.s, p = 0.0890) in the HFD group (Fig 2B and S2 Fig), suggesting that insulin signaling in HFD fed mouse brain was indeed impaired.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Dysregulated insulin signaling but unchanged PrPC expression in HFD-fed mouse brains.

(A) Left: Western blot of pSer473-Akt and total Akt in ND- or HFD-fed mouse brains. Right: densitometric quantification of the Western blot showed significantly lower pSer473-Akt/Akt ratio in HFD-fed mouse brains (n = 3, *, p = 0.0280) (B) Left: Western blot of pSer9-GSK3β and total GSK3β in ND- or HFD-fed mouse brains. Right: densitometric quantification of the Western blot revealed a trend of reduced lower pSer9-GSK3β/ GSK3β ratio in HFD-fed mouse brains (n = 3, n.s p = 0.0890). (C) qRT-PCR of Prnp expression in HFD-fed and ND-fed mouse brains showed similar levels of Prnp mRNA (n = 3, n.s p>0.05). (D) Left: Western blot of PrPC in HFD-fed and ND-fed mouse brains. Right: densitometric quantification of the Western blot demonstrated a similar level of PrPC expression (n = 3, n.s p>0.05). (E) ELISA of PrPC showed similar level of PrPC expression in HFD-fed and ND-fed mouse brains (n = 3, n.s p>0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144983.g002

The level of cellular prion protein (PrPC) is the main determinant of the speed of prion pathogenesis. A 50% reduction of PrPC expression, e.g. brought about by hemizygosity in the Prnp gene, conspicuously prolongs prion incubation time [50]. Conversely, overexpression of PrPC remarkably accelerates prion progression [49]. It was reported that high-fructose diet-induced insulin resistance reduces PrPC expression in rats [42]. We therefore assessed whether HFD treatment affects PrPC expression. However, qRT-PCR for Prnp transcripts, Western blot and ELISA for PrPC altogether showed that PrPC expression was not changed by HFD treatment (Fig 2C–2E).

Unaltered prion pathogenesis in insulin resistant tga20 mice

Having established insulin resistance in tga20 mice, we further evaluated the effect of insulin resistance on prion pathogenesis. Tga20 mice were first fed with HFD for 4 weeks to induce insulin resistance. Next, HFD-fed or ND-fed control tga20 mice were inoculated intracerebrally (i.c) with RML6. The ND vs. HFD feeding was maintained in the respective groups throughout the entire experimental period. The incubation time was defined as the time elapsed from prion inoculation to the terminal stage of disease (the day on which mice showed severe scrapie symptoms requiring euthanasia). We found that both HFD and ND fed groups succumbed to prion disease with similar incubation times (ND: median survival = 63 dpi, HFD: median survival = 65.5 dpi; p = 0.307) (Fig 3A), suggesting that HFD-induced insulin resistance does not significantly contribute to the prion progression. No unexpected death was observed in this study.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Unaltered prion pathogenesis in HFD-fed tga20 mice.

(A) Survival curve of HFD-fed and ND-fed tga20 mice intracerebrally inoculated with RML6. There was no significant difference in survival between the two groups (n = 6 per group; n.s.: p>0.05). (B) Left: Western blot for proteinase K resistant PrPSc in terminally sick mouse brains. Right: densitometric quantification of the Western blot revealed no significant difference between HFD-fed and ND-fed tga20 mouse brains (n = 3, n.s p>0.05). (C) Representative histology of terminally sick HFD-fed and ND-fed tga20 mouse brains stained for H&E and SAF84. There was no obvious difference between the two groups in lesion pattern, vacuolation, and PrPSc deposition. Scale bar = 200μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144983.g003

Next, we assessed proteinase K-resistant PrPSc deposition in terminally sick mouse brains. Western blots revealed that there were similar PrPSc levels in the HFD and ND groups (Fig 3B). Histological analysis of terminally sick mouse brains also demonstrated that HFD treatment does not alter prion pathology, as spongiform changes were qualitatively similar in the two groups (Fig 3C).

Astrogliosis and microglial activation are both associated with prion pathogenesis. Immunohistochemical staining of the astrocyte marker GFAP and microglial marker Iba1 showed similar levels of astrogliosis and microglial activation in terminally sick mice fed witht HFD or ND (Fig 4A). The latter findings were further confirmed by Western blot of GFAP and Iba1 for brains from terminally sick HFD- and ND-fed mice (Fig 4B and 4C). Cytokine profiling of terminally sick mouse brains also failed to reveal an obvious difference between HFD and ND groups (Fig 4D). Overall, we conclude that insulin resistance does not alter prion progression, PrPSc deposition, astrogliosis and microglial activation.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Similar level of astrogliosis and microglial activation in terminally sick HFD- and ND-fed tga20 mice.

(A) Representative immunohistochemical staining for GFAP and Iba1 in brains of terminally sick HFD-fed and ND-fed tga20 mice. There was no detectable difference between the two groups in astrogliosis or microglial activation. Scale bar = 100μm. (B) Left: Western blot for Iba1 in terminally sick mouse brains. Right: densitometric quantification of the Western blot revealed no significant difference of Iba1 levels between HFD-fed and ND-fed tga20 mouse brains (n = 3; n.s.: p>0.05). (C) Left: Western blot for GFAP in terminally sick mouse brains. Right: densitometric quantification of the Western blot showed no significant difference of GFAP levels between HFD-fed and ND-fed tga20 mouse brains (n = 3; n.s.: p>0.05). (D) qRT-PCR of cytokines TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1β expression revealed similar expression levels of these cytokines in terminally sick HFD-fed and ND-fed mouse brains (n = 3; n.s.: p>0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144983.g004

Discussion

Increasing evidence from epidemiological and clinical studies suggests that impaired insulin signaling is linked to neurodegeneration [712]. Specifically, reduced insulin level and insulin activity may contribute to the pathological processes associated with AD. Experimental studies using mouse models of AD and diet-induced insulin resistance suggest several molecular pathways by which insulin resistance may aggravate AD pathology [2430]. Therefore, supplementation of insulin to the brain may provide therapeutic potential benefits to AD patients. Indeed, intranasal administration of insulin to AD patients has been shown to modulate plasma Aβ levels, enhance memory and improve cognition [5155]. These encouraging results prompted us to explore whether insulin administration could also benefit other neurodegenerative diseases. We therefore aimed to determine the effect of insulin resistance in prion pathogenesis.

We first introduced a high-fat diet regime, which is well-established and widely used to induce insulin resistance in rodents, to tga20 mice, a transgenic mouse line overexpressing PrPC that reliably experiences prion pathogenesis with rapid progression upon infection. Four weeks of high-fat diet is sufficient to induce insulin resistance, as evidenced by obesity, hyperinsulinemia and impaired glucose and insulin tolerance. The extent of insulin resistance in the model established here was not qualitatively different from other models using wild-type mice [22, 23]. In line with previous reports [2430], HFD-induced insulin resistance was also associated with impaired insulin signaling in the brain. We then inoculated the insulin resistant tga20 mice with prions. Interestingly, high-fat diet-fed tga20 mice displayed similar prion progression and pathogenesis to that of normal diet-fed tga20 mice, suggesting insulin resistance does not alter prion-induced neurotoxicity, PrPSc deposition and neuroinflammation. The absence of an effect of insulin resistance on prion pathogenesis also indicates that distinct cellular and molecular pathways are employed by PrPSc and Aβ for accumulation and clearance.

The use of tga20 transgenic mice may be viewed as a possible limitation of the present study. These mice ovexpress the prion protein and experience a much more rapid pathogenesis of scrapie than wild-type mice. However, it is conceivable that the natural course of scrapie in tga20 mice may differ from that of wild-type mice. We deem the use of tga20 mice justifiable and informative in this context for several reasons. Firstly, a wealth of studies with tga20 mice has failed to uncover any relevant deviation from wild-type mice in pathogenesis, except for the vastly shortened incubation times [49, 5661]. Secondly, the susceptibility of tga20 mice to prions and even their prion titers at the terminal stage of disease are similar to those of wild-type mice[49, 62]. Thirdly, both a hemizygous Prnp allele and the tga20 transgene was found to suppress both the granule-cell degeneration of Dpl-overexpressing mice and the chronic demyelinating peripheral neuropathy of Prnp-/- mice[63, 64], indicating that the tga20 allele is functionally indistinguishable from its wild-type counterpart. The only deviation that was recorded in tga20 mice is a lack of PrPC expression in cerebellar Purkinje cells[49, 63, 65], possibly due to the absence of a relevant intragenic promoter element (a phenomenon that is not expected to play a role in the studies presented here).

We have found that transcription of the Prnp transgene was unaffected by the high-fat diet. This finding is at odds with a previous study using rats subjected to a high-fructose diet [42]. This discrepancy may be due to different diet regimes or to the different animal species. Additionally, the tga20 allele is controlled by a Prnp minigene that does not contain the entirety of the endogenous Prnp regulatory sequences, and reverberations of impaired insulin signaling onto the transcription of endogenous Prnp may lead to effects undetectable in the experiments described here. However, such a scenario would not apply to modulation of PrPSc aggregation and/or clearance. Therefore, despite this caveat, our study demonstrates that in contrast to AD or mouse models of AD, insulin resistance does not obviously affect prion pathogenesis. These results indicate that the relationship of insulin resistance between to prions is much blander than that to AD, and are in line with the absence of obvious epidemiological evidence of predisposition to prion disease in T2D patients. Conversely, these data should not be taken to suggest that targeting certain pleiotropic components associated with insulin pathway, such as mTOR and AMPK, would necessarily exert no effects on the pathogenesis of prion diseases.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. (A) Left: Original uncropped Western blots of pSer473-Akt in ND- or HFD-fed mouse brains. Arrow indicates the specific pSer473-Akt band, unspecific bands are indicated as *. Right: Western blot of Actin for loading control. (B) Left: Original uncropped Western blots of total Akt in ND- or HFD-fed mouse brains.

Right: Western blot of Actin for loading control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144983.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. (A) Left: Original uncropped Western blots of pSer9-GSK3β in ND- or HFD-fed mouse brains. Arrow indicates the specific pSer9-GSK3β band, unspecific bands are indicated as *. Right: Western blot of Actin for loading control. (B) Left: Original uncropped Western blot of total GSK3β in ND- or HFD-fed mouse brains.

Right: Western blot of Actin for loading control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144983.s002

(TIF)

S1 Table. Clinical assessment and scoring of tga20 mice inoculated with RML6.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144983.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the team of the Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Zurich, and in particular R. Moos, M. Delic and M. König for technical assistance. We also thank Elisabeth J Rushing for critically reading and editing the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AA CZ. Performed the experiments: CZ PS IA. Analyzed the data: CZ AA. Wrote the paper: CZ AA.

References

  1. 1. Goldstein BJ. Insulin resistance as the core defect in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(5A):3G–10G. pmid:12231073.
  2. 2. Biessels GJ, Staekenborg S, Brunner E, Brayne C, Scheltens P. Risk of dementia in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(1):64–74. pmid:16361024.
  3. 3. Baker LD, Cross DJ, Minoshima S, Belongia D, Watson GS, Craft S. Insulin resistance and Alzheimer-like reductions in regional cerebral glucose metabolism for cognitively normal adults with prediabetes or early type 2 diabetes. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(1):51–7. pmid:20837822; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3023149.
  4. 4. Tan ZS, Beiser AS, Fox CS, Au R, Himali JJ, Debette S, et al. Association of metabolic dysregulation with volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging and cognitive markers of subclinical brain aging in middle-aged adults: the Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(8):1766–70. pmid:21680719; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3142014.
  5. 5. Willette AA, Xu G, Johnson SC, Birdsill AC, Jonaitis EM, Sager MA, et al. Insulin resistance, brain atrophy, and cognitive performance in late middle-aged adults. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(2):443–9. pmid:23069842; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3554303.
  6. 6. Willette AA, Bendlin BB, Starks EJ, Birdsill AC, Johnson SC, Christian BT, et al. Association of Insulin Resistance With Cerebral Glucose Uptake in Late Middle-Aged Adults at Risk for Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol. 2015. pmid:26214150.
  7. 7. Ott A, Stolk RP, van Harskamp F, Pols HA, Hofman A, Breteler MM. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of dementia: The Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 1999;53(9):1937–42. pmid:10599761.
  8. 8. Schrijvers EM, Witteman JC, Sijbrands EJ, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Insulin metabolism and the risk of Alzheimer disease: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2010;75(22):1982–7. pmid:21115952; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3014236.
  9. 9. Ahtiluoto S, Polvikoski T, Peltonen M, Solomon A, Tuomilehto J, Winblad B, et al. Diabetes, Alzheimer disease, and vascular dementia: a population-based neuropathologic study. Neurology. 2010;75(13):1195–202. pmid:20739645.
  10. 10. Profenno LA, Porsteinsson AP, Faraone SV. Meta-analysis of Alzheimer's disease risk with obesity, diabetes, and related disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67(6):505–12. pmid:19358976.
  11. 11. Ohara T, Doi Y, Ninomiya T, Hirakawa Y, Hata J, Iwaki T, et al. Glucose tolerance status and risk of dementia in the community: the Hisayama study. Neurology. 2011;77(12):1126–34. pmid:21931106.
  12. 12. Willette AA, Johnson SC, Birdsill AC, Sager MA, Christian B, Baker LD, et al. Insulin resistance predicts brain amyloid deposition in late middle-aged adults. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(5):504–10 e1. pmid:25043908; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4297592.
  13. 13. Steen E, Terry BM, Rivera EJ, Cannon JL, Neely TR, Tavares R, et al. Impaired insulin and insulin-like growth factor expression and signaling mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease—is this type 3 diabetes? J Alzheimers Dis. 2005;7(1):63–80. pmid:15750215.
  14. 14. Rivera EJ, Goldin A, Fulmer N, Tavares R, Wands JR, de la Monte SM. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor expression and function deteriorate with progression of Alzheimer's disease: link to brain reductions in acetylcholine. J Alzheimers Dis. 2005;8(3):247–68. pmid:16340083.
  15. 15. Griffin RJ, Moloney A, Kelliher M, Johnston JA, Ravid R, Dockery P, et al. Activation of Akt/PKB, increased phosphorylation of Akt substrates and loss and altered distribution of Akt and PTEN are features of Alzheimer's disease pathology. J Neurochem. 2005;93(1):105–17. pmid:15773910.
  16. 16. Ma QL, Yang F, Rosario ER, Ubeda OJ, Beech W, Gant DJ, et al. Beta-amyloid oligomers induce phosphorylation of tau and inactivation of insulin receptor substrate via c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling: suppression by omega-3 fatty acids and curcumin. J Neurosci. 2009;29(28):9078–89. pmid:19605645; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3849615.
  17. 17. Moloney AM, Griffin RJ, Timmons S, O'Connor R, Ravid R, O'Neill C. Defects in IGF-1 receptor, insulin receptor and IRS-1/2 in Alzheimer's disease indicate possible resistance to IGF-1 and insulin signalling. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(2):224–43. pmid:18479783.
  18. 18. Liu Y, Liu F, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K, Gong CX. Deficient brain insulin signalling pathway in Alzheimer's disease and diabetes. J Pathol. 2011;225(1):54–62. pmid:21598254; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4484598.
  19. 19. Talbot K, Wang HY, Kazi H, Han LY, Bakshi KP, Stucky A, et al. Demonstrated brain insulin resistance in Alzheimer's disease patients is associated with IGF-1 resistance, IRS-1 dysregulation, and cognitive decline. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(4):1316–38. pmid:22476197; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3314463.
  20. 20. Bedse G, Di Domenico F, Serviddio G, Cassano T. Aberrant insulin signaling in Alzheimer's disease: current knowledge. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:204. pmid:26136647; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4468388.
  21. 21. Molteni R, Barnard RJ, Ying Z, Roberts CK, Gomez-Pinilla F. A high-fat, refined sugar diet reduces hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neuronal plasticity, and learning. Neuroscience. 2002;112(4):803–14. pmid:12088740.
  22. 22. Bhat NR, Thirumangalakudi L. Increased tau phosphorylation and impaired brain insulin/IGF signaling in mice fed a high fat/high cholesterol diet. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;36(4):781–9. pmid:23703152; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4445975.
  23. 23. Arnold SE, Lucki I, Brookshire BR, Carlson GC, Browne CA, Kazi H, et al. High fat diet produces brain insulin resistance, synaptodendritic abnormalities and altered behavior in mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;67:79–87. pmid:24686304; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4083060.
  24. 24. Ho L, Qin W, Pompl PN, Xiang Z, Wang J, Zhao Z, et al. Diet-induced insulin resistance promotes amyloidosis in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J. 2004;18(7):902–4. pmid:15033922.
  25. 25. Julien C, Tremblay C, Phivilay A, Berthiaume L, Emond V, Julien P, et al. High-fat diet aggravates amyloid-beta and tau pathologies in the 3xTg-AD mouse model. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(9):1516–31. pmid:18926603.
  26. 26. Takeda S, Sato N, Uchio-Yamada K, Sawada K, Kunieda T, Takeuchi D, et al. Diabetes-accelerated memory dysfunction via cerebrovascular inflammation and Abeta deposition in an Alzheimer mouse model with diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(15):7036–41. pmid:20231468; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2872449.
  27. 27. Yamamoto N, Matsubara T, Sobue K, Tanida M, Kasahara R, Naruse K, et al. Brain insulin resistance accelerates Abeta fibrillogenesis by inducing GM1 ganglioside clustering in the presynaptic membranes. J Neurochem. 2012;121(4):619–28. pmid:22260232.
  28. 28. Vandal M, White PJ, Tremblay C, St-Amour I, Chevrier G, Emond V, et al. Insulin reverses the high-fat diet-induced increase in brain Abeta and improves memory in an animal model of Alzheimer disease. Diabetes. 2014;63(12):4291–301. pmid:25008180.
  29. 29. Mehla J, Chauhan BC, Chauhan NB. Experimental induction of type 2 diabetes in aging-accelerated mice triggered Alzheimer-like pathology and memory deficits. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;39(1):145–62. pmid:24121970; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3941701.
  30. 30. Petrov D, Pedros I, Artiach G, Sureda FX, Barroso E, Pallas M, et al. High-fat diet-induced deregulation of hippocampal insulin signaling and mitochondrial homeostasis deficiences contribute to Alzheimer disease pathology in rodents. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(9):1687–99. pmid:26003667.
  31. 31. Okabayashi S, Shimozawa N, Yasutomi Y, Yanagisawa K, Kimura N. Diabetes mellitus accelerates Abeta pathology in brain accompanied by enhanced GAbeta generation in nonhuman primates. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117362. pmid:25675436; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4326359.
  32. 32. Ling X, Martins RN, Racchi M, Craft S, Helmerhorst E. Amyloid beta antagonizes insulin promoted secretion of the amyloid beta protein precursor. J Alzheimers Dis. 2002;4(5):369–74. pmid:12446969.
  33. 33. Zhao WQ, De Felice FG, Fernandez S, Chen H, Lambert MP, Quon MJ, et al. Amyloid beta oligomers induce impairment of neuronal insulin receptors. FASEB J. 2008;22(1):246–60. pmid:17720802.
  34. 34. Aguzzi A, Zhu C. Five questions on prion diseases. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(5):e1002651. pmid:22570608; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3342938.
  35. 35. Aguzzi A, Nuvolone M, Zhu C. The immunobiology of prion diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(12):888–902. pmid:24189576.
  36. 36. Kuwahara C, Kubosaki A, Nishimura T, Nasu Y, Nakamura Y, Saeki K, et al. Enhanced expression of cellular prion protein gene by insulin or nerve growth factor in immortalized mouse neuronal precursor cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;268(3):763–6. pmid:10679279.
  37. 37. Satoh J, Kuroda Y, Katamine S. Gene expression profile in prion protein-deficient fibroblasts in culture. Am J Pathol. 2000;157(1):59–68. pmid:10880376; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1850192.
  38. 38. Strom A, Wang GS, Scott FW. Impaired glucose tolerance in mice lacking cellular prion protein. Pancreas. 2011;40(2):229–32. pmid:21847793.
  39. 39. Ostlund P, Lindegren H, Pettersson C, Bedecs K. Altered insulin receptor processing and function in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cell lines. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001;97(2):161–70. pmid:11750072.
  40. 40. Nielsen D, Gyllberg H, Ostlund P, Bergman T, Bedecs K. Increased levels of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 hybrid receptors and decreased glycosylation of the insulin receptor alpha- and beta-subunits in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma N2a cells. Biochem J. 2004;380(Pt 2):571–9. pmid:15025560; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1224193.
  41. 41. Uchiyama K, Muramatsu N, Yano M, Usui T, Miyata H, Sakaguchi S. Prions disturb post-Golgi trafficking of membrane proteins. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1846. pmid:23673631.
  42. 42. Pham N, Dhar A, Khalaj S, Desai K, Taghibiglou C. Down regulation of brain cellular prion protein in an animal model of insulin resistance: possible implication in increased prevalence of stroke in pre-diabetics/diabetics. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;448(2):151–6. pmid:24780399.
  43. 43. Ayala JE, Samuel VT, Morton GJ, Obici S, Croniger CM, Shulman GI, et al. Standard operating procedures for describing and performing metabolic tests of glucose homeostasis in mice. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3(9–10):525–34. pmid:20713647; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2938392.
  44. 44. Polymenidou M, Moos R, Scott M, Sigurdson C, Shi YZ, Yajima B, et al. The POM monoclonals: a comprehensive set of antibodies to non-overlapping prion protein epitopes. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3872. pmid:19060956; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2592702.
  45. 45. Surwit RS, Kuhn CM, Cochrane C, McCubbin JA, Feinglos MN. Diet-induced type II diabetes in C57BL/6J mice. Diabetes. 1988;37(9):1163–7. pmid:3044882.
  46. 46. West DB, Boozer CN, Moody DL, Atkinson RL. Dietary obesity in nine inbred mouse strains. Am J Physiol. 1992;262(6 Pt 2):R1025–32. pmid:1621856.
  47. 47. Surwit RS, Feinglos MN, Rodin J, Sutherland A, Petro AE, Opara EC, et al. Differential effects of fat and sucrose on the development of obesity and diabetes in C57BL/6J and A/J mice. Metabolism. 1995;44(5):645–51. pmid:7752914.
  48. 48. Winzell MS, Ahren B. The high-fat diet-fed mouse: a model for studying mechanisms and treatment of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53 Suppl 3:S215–9. pmid:15561913.
  49. 49. Fischer M, Rulicke T, Raeber A, Sailer A, Moser M, Oesch B, et al. Prion protein (PrP) with amino-proximal deletions restoring susceptibility of PrP knockout mice to scrapie. EMBO J. 1996;15(6):1255–64. pmid:8635458; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC450028.
  50. 50. Bueler H, Aguzzi A, Sailer A, Greiner RA, Autenried P, Aguet M, et al. Mice devoid of PrP are resistant to scrapie. Cell. 1993;73(7):1339–47. pmid:8100741.
  51. 51. Reger MA, Watson GS, Frey WH 2nd, Baker LD, Cholerton B, Keeling ML, et al. Effects of intranasal insulin on cognition in memory-impaired older adults: modulation by APOE genotype. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27(3):451–8. pmid:15964100.
  52. 52. Reger MA, Watson GS, Green PS, Wilkinson CW, Baker LD, Cholerton B, et al. Intranasal insulin improves cognition and modulates beta-amyloid in early AD. Neurology. 2008;70(6):440–8. pmid:17942819.
  53. 53. Reger MA, Watson GS, Green PS, Baker LD, Cholerton B, Fishel MA, et al. Intranasal insulin administration dose-dependently modulates verbal memory and plasma amyloid-beta in memory-impaired older adults. J Alzheimers Dis. 2008;13(3):323–31. pmid:18430999; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2804944.
  54. 54. Craft S, Baker LD, Montine TJ, Minoshima S, Watson GS, Claxton A, et al. Intranasal insulin therapy for Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a pilot clinical trial. Arch Neurol. 2012;69(1):29–38. pmid:21911655; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3260944.
  55. 55. Claxton A, Baker LD, Hanson A, Trittschuh EH, Cholerton B, Morgan A, et al. Long-acting intranasal insulin detemir improves cognition for adults with mild cognitive impairment or early-stage Alzheimer's disease dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(3):897–906. pmid:25374101.
  56. 56. Shmerling D, Hegyi I, Fischer M, Blattler T, Brandner S, Gotz J, et al. Expression of amino-terminally truncated PrP in the mouse leading to ataxia and specific cerebellar lesions. Cell. 1998;93(2):203–14. pmid:9568713.
  57. 57. Flechsig E, Shmerling D, Hegyi I, Raeber AJ, Fischer M, Cozzio A, et al. Prion protein devoid of the octapeptide repeat region restores susceptibility to scrapie in PrP knockout mice. Neuron. 2000;27(2):399–408. pmid:10985358.
  58. 58. Karapetyan YE, Saa P, Mahal SP, Sferrazza GF, Sherman A, Sales N, et al. Prion strain discrimination based on rapid in vivo amplification and analysis by the cell panel assay. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5730. pmid:19478942; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2684634.
  59. 59. Falsig J, Sonati T, Herrmann US, Saban D, Li B, Arroyo K, et al. Prion pathogenesis is faithfully reproduced in cerebellar organotypic slice cultures. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(11):e1002985. pmid:23133383; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3486912.
  60. 60. Sonati T, Reimann RR, Falsig J, Baral PK, O'Connor T, Hornemann S, et al. The toxicity of antiprion antibodies is mediated by the flexible tail of the prion protein. Nature. 2013;501(7465):102–6. pmid:23903654.
  61. 61. Herrmann US, Schutz AK, Shirani H, Huang D, Saban D, Nuvolone M, et al. Structure-based drug design identifies polythiophenes as antiprion compounds. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(299):299ra123. pmid:26246168.
  62. 62. Brandner S, Isenmann S, Raeber A, Fischer M, Sailer A, Kobayashi Y, et al. Normal host prion protein necessary for scrapie-induced neurotoxicity. Nature. 1996;379(6563):339–43. pmid:8552188.
  63. 63. Rossi D, Cozzio A, Flechsig E, Klein MA, Rulicke T, Aguzzi A, et al. Onset of ataxia and Purkinje cell loss in PrP null mice inversely correlated with Dpl level in brain. EMBO J. 2001;20(4):694–702. pmid:11179214; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC145426.
  64. 64. Bremer J, Baumann F, Tiberi C, Wessig C, Fischer H, Schwarz P, et al. Axonal prion protein is required for peripheral myelin maintenance. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(3):310–8. pmid:20098419.
  65. 65. Flechsig E, Hegyi I, Leimeroth R, Zuniga A, Rossi D, Cozzio A, et al. Expression of truncated PrP targeted to Purkinje cells of PrP knockout mice causes Purkinje cell death and ataxia. EMBO J. 2003;22(12):3095–101. pmid:12805223; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC162137.