Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Heat- and Shake-Induced Injury in the Rat Small Intestine

  • Peng Yin,

    Affiliation CAU-BUA TCVM Teaching and Researching Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing, PR China

  • Jianqin Xu,

    Affiliation CAU-BUA TCVM Teaching and Researching Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing, PR China

  • Shasha He,

    Affiliation CAU-BUA TCVM Teaching and Researching Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing, PR China

  • Fenghua Liu ,

    zhaofeixiacau@126.com (ZX); yinyulong@isa.ac.cn (YY); liufenghua1209@126.com (FL)

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Beijing University of Agriculture (BUA), Beijing, PR China

  • Jie Yin,

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, 410125, Hunan, China

  • Changrong Wan,

    Affiliation CAU-BUA TCVM Teaching and Researching Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing, PR China

  • Chen mei,

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Beijing University of Agriculture (BUA), Beijing, PR China

  • Yulong Yin ,

    zhaofeixiacau@126.com (ZX); yinyulong@isa.ac.cn (YY); liufenghua1209@126.com (FL)

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, 410125, Hunan, China

  • Xiaolong Xu,

    Affiliation CAU-BUA TCVM Teaching and Researching Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing, PR China

  • Zhaofei Xia

    zhaofeixiacau@126.com (ZX); yinyulong@isa.ac.cn (YY); liufenghua1209@126.com (FL)

    Affiliation CAU-BUA TCVM Teaching and Researching Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing, PR China

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Heat- and Shake-Induced Injury in the Rat Small Intestine

  • Peng Yin, 
  • Jianqin Xu, 
  • Shasha He, 
  • Fenghua Liu, 
  • Jie Yin, 
  • Changrong Wan, 
  • Chen mei, 
  • Yulong Yin, 
  • Xiaolong Xu, 
  • Zhaofei Xia
PLOS
x

Abstract

We investigated the mechanisms underlying damage to rat small intestine in heat- and shake-induced stress. Eighteen Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into a control group and a 3-day stressed group treated 2 h daily for 3 days on a rotary platform at 35°C and 60 r/min. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained paraffin sections of the jejunum following stress revealed shedding of the villus tip epithelial cells and lamina propria exposure. Apoptosis increased at the villus tip and extended to the basement membrane. Photomicrographs revealed that the microvilli were shorter and sparser; the nuclear envelope invaginated and gaps in the karyolemma increased; and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) swelled significantly. Gene microarray analysis assessed 93 differentially expressed genes associated with apoptosis, ER stress, and autophagy. Relevant genes were compiled from the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases. Forty-one genes were involved in the regulation of apoptosis, fifteen were related to autophagy, and eleven responded to ER stress. According to KEGG, the apoptosis pathways, mitogen-activated protein kinase(MAPK) signaling pathway, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, and regulation of autophagy were involved. Caspase3 (Casp3), caspase12 (Casp12), and microtubule-associate proteins 1 light chain 3(LC3) increased significantly at the villus tip while mTOR decreased; phosphorylated-AKT (P-AKT) decreased. ER stress was involved and induced autophagy and apoptosis in rat intestinal damage following heat and shake stress. Bioinformatic analysis will help determine the underlying mechanisms in stress-induced damage in the small intestine.

Introduction

Severe physical stress can cause gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and pathology, including stress ulcers, multiple organ dysfunction, and increased intestinal permeability [1]. High temperature and shaking, as two important stimuli, have significant effects on humans and animals, especially in summer. Studies have reported that peripheral blood flow increases to dissipate internal body heat, resulting in a significant reduction in blood flow to the small intestine during heat stress [2]. This results in intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction and induced ischemia at the villus tip [35]. Ischemia of the small intestine has been found to promote formation of reactive oxygen species [6] and high levels of free radicals lead to oxygen radical damage at the intestinal mucosa [7]. Heat stress-related oxidative stress causes apoptosis in the rat small intestine [8], also seen with simultaneous heat and shaking in rats [911].

The process of protein folding is particularly sensitive to stress, either endogenous or exogenous. The accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER causes ER stress and induces the unfolded protein response (UPR), which alleviates stress by up-regulating protein folding and degradation pathways in the ER inhibiting protein synthesis [1214]. Ischemia of the intestinal villus leads to oxidative stress and insufficient exogenous blood supply, resulting in limited nutrient delivery, and could induce further ER stress. Activation of the UPR on exposure to oxidative stress is an adaptive mechanism to preserve cell function and survival. Calcium and free radicals are essential mediators linking ER stress to metabolic processes [15] and caspase 12 (Casp12) is thought to be a key mediator of ER stress-induced apoptosis [16, 17]. Also, ER stress inhibits serine/threonine protein kinase (AKT) phosphorylation through the up-regulation of telomere repeat binding factor 3 (TRB3), and induces apoptosis through a mechanism requiring phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway [18].

ER stress stimulates the assembly of pre-autophagosomal structures [19]. The autophagy system is activated as a cell survival signaling pathway in response to ER stress [20]; however, if these mechanisms do not remedy the stress situation, persistent oxidative stress and protein misfolding initiate apoptotic cascades, presumably to eliminate unhealthy cells [13, 21, 22]. Autophagy and apoptosis are two distinct processes that play seemingly opposite biological roles in response to stress [23]. If protein aggregation is persistent and the stress cannot be resolved, signaling switches from pro-survival to pro-apoptotic [21]. In this case, UPR and ER stress may play critical roles in determining cell survival or cell death, which could reveal the underlying injury mechanisms induced by heat and shake stress.

Autophagy is a type of stress response [19, 24]. It provides the necessary amino acids [25, 26], eliminates a specific species of misfolded procollagen, and plays a protective role in cell survival in ER stress [27]. An accumulation of autophagosomes could reflect induction of autophagy [28]. mTOR adaptors were required in leucine-mediated autophagy inhibition [29] and ER stress negatively regulates the AKT/ tuberous sclerosis (TSC)/mTOR pathway to enhance autophagy [30]. If we hope to use autophagy to relieve intestinal damage caused by stress, it will be crucial to understand the details of its regulatory processes.

We questioned how autophagy and apoptosis genes functionally interact in ER stress, and how they are regulated to achieve synergy and flexibility in response to the damage induced by diverse stresses in rat small intestine; however, these questions are quite complicated, and have not been well elucidated. Gene expression profile analysis could provide more information on the relevant mechanisms. We describe our findings from a systems biology approach to reveal potential mechanisms in heat- and shake stress-induced rat small intestine injury, especially on the third day after stress. (Our previous work showed that the rat intestine suffered most on the third day after heat and shake stress.) We also report the findings of a morphological study as part of this research.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Groups

Eighteen male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200 ± 20 g (Beijing Vital River Laboratory, Animal Technology Co., Beijing, P. R. China) were housed at 25°C and 60% relative humidity for 1 week under a 12-h light/dark (19:00–07:00 h) cycle. On the eighth day, the rats were randomly divided into the following three groups: control (C), 1-day stress (S1d), and 3day stress (S3d) groups. Our previous study concluded that the day 2 stress group findings were not significantly different from the day 3 stress group results. Six rats in each group were housed in plastic cages (400 mm × 300 mm × 180 mm) with a layer of aspen shavings and provided free access to food and water. Additional data from rats subjected to the treatment protocol described below have been previously published [9].

Animals from the source colony were tested and found to be free of a list of pathogens and adventitious agents on arrival; details may be found at [http://www.vitalriver.com.cn/en/index_en.html]. All procedures performed on the animals were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University (CAU) (permit number: 20121209–1). We followed the guidelines of the CAU Animal Care and Use Committee in handling the experimental animals during this study. The abbreviations of groups were listed in Table 1.

Treatment and Sampling

The conditions of the treatment were as follows: 35°C with a vibration of 0.1 × g (relative centrifugal force) from 09:00–11:00 daily for 1 or 3 days, Sd1 and Sd3 groups, respectively. Rats’ rectal temperature and body weight were recorded daily before and after stress. On the first and third days, rats from each group were anesthetized by ether inhalational anesthesia (diethylether, PR China), exsanguinated immediately after anesthesia, and then sacrificed. Sections of the jejunum were rapidly excised and preserved as follows: (1) 1-cm sections were fixed for 48 h in 10% buffered formalin phosphate for later embedding in paraffin; (2) 1 mm3 samples were fixed for 48 h in 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for electron microscopy; and (3) 3-cm sections were washed using physiological saline (0.9%), then minced and separated into four sample tubes, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C for DNA microarray and molecular biology experiments. Because the jejunum was the most severely injured in the S3d group, DNA microarray analysis was performed on tissues from this group. Rats’ rectal temperature, body weight, and HSPs were also determined.

Morphological Analysis

Formalin-fixed samples were embedded in paraffin and transversely sectioned (5 μm thickness) then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) after deparaffinization and dehydration [31]. The jejunal microstructures were examined using a BH2 Olympus microscope (DP71, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed using the Olympus Image Analysis System (version 6.0, Olympus). Additional paraffin sections were prepared for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) fluorescein assay, (Roche, version 16.0, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and observed under fluorescence microscopy using an excitation wavelength of 450–500 nm and detection from 515–65 nm (green) (DP71, Olympus). Samples fixed using glutaraldehyde were washed in the same buffer and fixed for 1 h in cold 1% osmium tetroxide in cacodylate buffer. After graded ethanol solution dehydration, samples were embedded in araldite (EPON812, Emicron, Shanghai, PR China) and ultra-thin sections were made and stained with saturated uranyl acetate in 50% ethanol and lead citrate, then examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, 1230, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Immunohistochemistry

Intestinal sections were incubated for 15 min in 3% hydrogen peroxide/methanol to stop endogenous peroxidase activity, and then rinsed for 20 min with phosphate- buffered saline solution (PBS). The sections were then incubated in 5% goat serum in PBS for 30 min (#KGSP04 Histostain-plus kit, KeyGen Biotech, Nanjing, China). The antibodies included Casp3, 1:800, Casp12, 1:100, and mTOR (1:100), (#9664, #2202, #2983, respectively, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), and LC3 (L8918, Sigma, 1:200). Antibodies were pre-diluted, stored in PBS containing bovine serum albumin and 0.05% sodium azide, then applied to sections and incubated for 2 h at 37°C in a moist chamber, and subsequently treated with a secondary antibody for 30 min. Immune complexes were detected using streptavidin-peroxidase (#KGSP04 Histostainplus kit, KeyGen Biotech) for 30 min at room temperature. After three washes in PBS, immunoreactivity was determined using 0.1% 3,3-diaminobenzidine and 0.02% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min DAB substrate kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Finally, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin after rinsing in distilled water.

Western Blot Analysis

Protein was extracted from rat small intestine using a total protein extraction kit (#K3011010, Biochain, Hayward, CA, USA), and the concentration determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay (#23225, Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). A 30-μg sample of total protein was electrophoresed for 120 min at 100 V, before being transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (#88585, Pierce). Membranes were blocked overnight at 48°C in SuperBlock T20 blocking buffer (#37536, Pierce). AKT, p-AKT, and GAPDH (#4685, #4060, #5174, respectively, CST, MA, USA), and LC3 (L8918, Sigma) antibodies were added to the blocking buffer (diluted according to the instruction manual) and incubated for 2 h under agitation. Blots were washed in PBS/tween-20 (T20) for 5 min with shaking. Blots were incubated with the secondary antibody (926–32211, IRDye 800CW goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L). Proteins were detected using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Quantification of digitized images of western blot bands from three biological replicates was performed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, New York, NY, USA).

Total RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription

Total RNA was isolated from the jejunum using a phenol and guanidine isothiocyanate-based TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity were assessed by a spectrophotometer (SmartSpec plus, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) based on the OD260/OD280 ratio [32].

Total RNA was reverse transcribed as follows: 2.0 μg RNA isolated from each tissue sample was added to 25 μL reaction solution containing 2.0 μL oligo-dT18, 5.0 μL deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), 1.0 μL RNase inhibitor, 1.0 μL Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) transcriptase, 5.0 μL M-MLV reverse transcriptase reaction buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and RNase-free water. The reverse-transcription procedure was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega) as follows: 70°C for 5 min and 42°C for 1 h. The reverse transcriptase products (cDNA) were stored at −20°C.

Gene mRNA Expression Analysis by Real-Time PCR

The gene expression levels were determined by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis. Quantitative PCR analysis was carried out using the DNA Engine Mx3000P® (Stratagene, La Jolla, California, USA) fluorescence detection system against a double-stranded DNA-specific fluorescent dye (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) according to optimized PCR protocols. β-actin was amplified in parallel with the target genes and used as a normalization control [33, 34]. The protocol was as follows: 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 60 s. For the dissociation curve, we incubated the amplified products at 95°C for 1 min and lowered the temperature to 55°C at a rate of 0.2°C/s while continuously measuring the fluorescence levels. Expression levels were determined using the relative threshold cycle (CT) method as described by the manufacturer (Stratagene). Each gene was calculated by evaluating the expression of 2−ΔΔCT, where ΔΔCT is the result of the following: [CTgene − CTβ-actin] (stress) − [CTgene − CTβ-actin] (control). The cDNA of each sample was subjected to RT-PCR using the primer pairs listed in Table 2. The PCR reaction (20 μL) contained 10 μL of SYBR Green PCR mix (Invitrogen), 0.3 μL of reference dye, 1 μL of each primer (both 10 μmol/L), and 1 μL of cDNA template.

DNA Microarray and Data Analysis

RNA Extraction, Target Labeling, Hybridization, Scanning, data processing and value definition.

All data and protocols were assigned GEO accession numbers as appended below: (GSE61498, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE61498) All steps from RNA amplification to the final scanner output were conducted by a private contractor (Biochip, Shanghai, China). The main gene symbols and gene descriptions were listed in Table 1.

Microarray Data Analysis.

Bioinformatic analyses including molecular function, biological processes, cellular components, and KEGG pathway were conducted using MAS 3.0 molecule annotation system, DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7, Amigo, GeneInfoViz Constructing and Visualizing Gene Relation Networks, and SBC analysis system [9, 35]

Statistical Analysis

All results are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., an IBM Company, Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Assessment of the Stress Model

The small intestine tissue (jejunum) obtained from rats on the first and third day of treatment was used for the molecular experiments. The rectal temperatures of rats were significantly increased after the stress. The body weights were decreased notably compared with the control group. Moreover, the mRNA expression levels of Hsp27 and Hsp70 were significantly increased compared with the control, (P < 0.01; Fig 1A)

thumbnail
Fig 1. Heat- and shake-induced stress response in rats.

(A) Heat- and shake-induced stress response in rats. (A) Stress induced temperature and weight changes (n = 6), and the level of HSP27 and 70 (n = 3) detected by RT-PCR in rats. Values represent the mean ± SD rats for each group. (B) Quantification of western blot determination of P-AKT, AKT, cleaved Casp3 and LC3; (C) mRNA expression levels of Casp12, Casp8, Casp9, Atf4, Atf6, Lcn2, Dap, Zbtb16, Herpud1, and mTOR in the rat jejunum were quantified by real-time PCR. Sections of small intestine were collected from control, 1-day, or 3-day stressed rats. P-AKT and AKT were significantly decreased after 1-day or 3-day stress. Casp12, Casp8, Casp9, Atf4, Atf6, Lcn2, Dap, Zbtb16, and Atf6 levels were significantly increased, while Herpud1 and mTOR levels were decreased. Values are expressed as a percentage of control. Data are mean ± SE, n = 3 rats for each group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with control; t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.g001

Pathological and Histological Changes in the Small Intestine after Stress in Rats

Heat- and Shake- stress led to a series of clinical symptoms including fatigue and diarrhea. The rats’ hair was wet and unkempt because rats don’t sweat. They coated themselves in saliva in response to heat stress and attempt to cool themselves down. Necropsy showed that the serosa was hyperemic with intestinal vascular engorgement after simulated stress. To study the morphological changes, paraffin sections of jejunum were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The epithelial cells at the villus tip were shedding and the lamina propria was exposed in the two stress groups, most severely in the S3d group, which suffered more stress than in the other groups (Fig 2A). To further study the ultrastructural changes, the jejunum of the S3d group was examined using transmission electron microscopy (Fig 2B). TUNEL staining showed increased positive substances, which indicated that apoptosis increased at the top of the jejunal villi and transferred to the basement membrane in the stress groups (Fig 2C). The results of the immunohistochemistry tests also showed the structure damage at the top of jejunal villi. Besides, Casp3, Casp12, LC3 and mTOR were changed at the villus tips (Fig 3). Photomicrographs revealed that the microvilli of the intestinal epithelium were atrophying and became shorter and sparser after the stress. The nuclei of the columnar epithelial cells in the stress groups were morphologically abnormal. The nuclear envelope invaginated in a serrated shape, and gaps in the karyolemma increased, revealing early symptoms of apoptosis and necrosis. The ER swelled significantly, indicating ER stress in the cells. These results indicated that the stress caused severe jejunal damage.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Histological changes in the small intestine following transport-associated stress.

(A) Photomicrographs of H&E-stained sections of rat jejunum from the control, 1-day, and 3-day stress groups. (B) Morphological alterations in the ultrastructure of rat jejunal epithelium following treatment in the 3-day stress group. (C) Fluorescent microscopic images of TUNEL-stained sections of rat jejunum from the control, 1-day, and 3-day stress groups. The negative control was incubated without the TUNEL reaction mixture. The positive control was incubated with micrococcal nuclease to induce DNA breaks prior to the labeling procedures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. ER stress and autophagy activity in rat intestine.

(A): LC3, (B): Casp3, (C): mTOR and (D): Casp12 expression in the small intestine (jejunal villus) of rats subjected to 3 days of stress treatment or control conditions. LC3, Casp3, and Casp12 levels increased while mTOR levels decreased (brown stain; sections counterstained with hematoxylin, light purple) in response to heat treatment above control levels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.g003

mRNA Expression Profiling and Bioinformatics Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes Related to Apoptosis and Autophagy

Gene expression profiling of the rats’ jejunum was performed by DNA microarrays using samples from the Sd3 group and controls. More than 41 000 rat genes and transcripts were investigated. Because apoptosis and autophagy induced by ER stress may be the potential mechanism of jejunal injury in the stress, 93 apoptosis or autophagy-related differentially expressed genes were selected (Table 3) and 67 genes such as Os9, Casp12, Atf4, Col4a3bp, Ddit3, Atg10, and Scamp5 in ER unfolded protein response (GO:0030968) were up-regulated, suggesting that ER stress was activated. At the same time, Atg4b, Wipi1, Arsa, Atg7, Atg10, Lamp1, Map1lc3b, Ctsd, Atg5, Tm9sf1, and Irgm in autophagy (GO:0006914) increased, also suggesting that autophagy was activated. Thirty-one genes including Bcl2ls, Eif2s, mTOR (P<0.01 and fold-change ≥ 1.5) were down-regulated, potentially indicating that a related signaling pathway may be involved in the stress response.

The 93 differentially expressed genes were analyzed by a Molecule Annotation System, MAS 3.0, GeneInfoViz and DAVID, and were classified into GO slim terms. Table 3 shows these differentially expressed genes in more detail. Heat map was conducted showed visualize differentially expressed genes between the control group and S3d the (Fig 4A) The distribution in three major gene ontologies: biological processes, cellular components, and molecular function were showed. Eighty-five differentially expressed genes were related to 267 chart records in biological processes, 41 genes were enriched in the regulation of apoptosis (GO:0042981, GO:0043067, GO:0010941), and half were related to the positive regulation of apoptosis (GO:0043065, GO:0043068, GO:0010942). Another 19 genes each for negative regulation (GO:0043066, GO:0043069, GO:0060548). Also, 15 genes were related to autophagy (GO:0006914), 23 to the cellular response to stress (GO:0033554), and 11 to the response to endoplasmic reticulum stress (GO:0034976) (Fig 5B). Sixty-eight differentially expressed genes were related to 39 chart records in cellular components, mainly enriched in the GO related to the cell membranes, such as the organelle membrane, organelle envelope, membrane-enclosed lumen, ER, cytoplasmic vesicle, autophagic vacuole and others (GO:0031090, GO:0031967, GO:0031974, GO:0005783, GO:0031410, and GO:0005776, respectively) (Fig 5A). There were also 22 chart records in molecular function, mainly enriched in the GO related to protein binding and calcium ion binding (Fig 5C). Some of the altered GO are listed in Table 4. In GO cluster analysis, the black squares represented gene-term associations not yet reported, suggesting a potential new gene-term for differentially expressed genes in the stress. In the analysis of the comparison of the network graph of proteins and GO (Fig 6A) and the gene pathway network graph (Fig 6B), AKT1, TSC1/2, Casp9, Fas, Bcl2s, Bcl2ls, Eif-2s, Mmp9, Zbtb16, and others were important. The 2-D view module functional annotation clustering graphic presentations helped to understand the common biology among related genes in the anti-apoptosis related GO; enrichment score is 12.29. (Fig 7A), autophagy related GO; enrichment score is 5.44. (Fig 7B), ER stress related GO; enrichment score is 6.75 (Fig 7C) and autophagic vacuole related GO; enrichment score is 4.04 (Fig 7D) related GO. Also, the analysis pinpointed the key biological differences among related genes, providing links to detailed resources for drill-down analysis. To define the biological pathways related to Heat- and Shake- stress in rat jejunum, we used MAS 3.0 (http://bioinfo.capitalbio.com/mas3/) and a Molecule Annotation System (http://sas.ebioservice.com/uiframe.firstpage.do) and KEGG pathway analysis revealed that 14 genes were in the apoptosis pathway, nine were in the p53 signaling pathway, five were involved in the regulation of autophagy, nine in the MAPK signaling pathway, and three in the mTOR signaling pathway (Table 5).

thumbnail
Fig 4. (A) The heat map shows differentially expressed genes in the control and 3-day stress groups. Three samples were included in each group and the gene expression profiles are shown in rows. Red and green in the heat map represent up-regulation and down-regulation relative to the control, respectively. (B) Gene interaction network map of ER stress-related molecules including mTOR, Tnf, Casp12, Bcl2ls, Slc2a4 and others using MAS 3.0 based on the database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. GO term enrichment graph, construction and dynamic visualization of the gene relation network.

(A) Cellular Components; 68 differentially expressed genes were related to 39 chart records in cellular components, mainly enriched in the GO related to the cell membranes, such as the organelle membrane, organelle envelope, membrane-enclosed lumen, ER, cytoplasmic vesicle, and autophagic vacuole (B) Biological Processes; 15 genes were related to autophagy, 24 to the cellular response to stress, and 11 to the response to endoplasmic reticulum stress (C) Molecular Function. There were also 22 chart records in molecular function, mainly enriched in the GO related to protein binding and calcium ion binding.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6. The network graph of proteins and GO, and the gene pathway network graph

(A) GO protein network graph of the biological processes using MAS 3.0. (B) Gene pathway network graph of the biological processes based on KEGG using MAS 3.0.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. 2D view of the functional annotation clustering using DAVID software

(A) Cluster of anti-apoptosis-related GO (B) Cluster of autophagy-related GO; (C) Cluster of ER stress-related GO (D) Cluster of autophagic vacuole-related GO.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.g007

We predicted that the interaction of molecules related to ER stress, apoptosis, and autophagy detected in the current study would provide insight into the possible mechanisms of heat and shaking stress-induced cellular damage. The key molecules may include mTOR, Tnf, Casp12, Bcl2ls, Slc2a4 and others (Fig 4B). The mTOR signaling pathway may be a response to heat and shake stress, because mTOR and eukaryotic translation initiation factor-2s (Eif2s) decreased while TSC1 and TSC2 increased, which may be negatively regulated by ER stress, a potential mechanism of enhanced autophagy.

Casp12, Casp8, Casp9, Atf4, Lcn2, Dap, Zbtb16, Atf6, Herpud1, and mTOR were detected by real-time PCR to verify differentially expressed genes in the gene microarray analysis. The mRNA expression levels of mTOR and Herpud1 were significantly down-regulated and the other genes were up-regulated in the rat jejunum after stress (P < 0.05; Fig 1C). The changes in gene expression closely correlated with the corresponding microarray data, although the exact fold-change differed between the two assays.

Heat- and Shake- Stress Triggered ER Stress, Apoptosis, and Autophagy at the Top of the Rat Jejunal Villi

ER stress may induce apoptosis or autophagy during the stress process. The results of the immunohistochemistry tests showed that at the top of jejunal villi, Casp3, Casp12, and LC3 significantly increased while mTOR decreased (Figs 1 and 3). The western blot tests used whole jejunal tissue and revealed the level of proteins including AKT and P-AKT decreased compared with the control group (P < 0.05; Fig 1B). These results indicated that rat jejunum in the stress suffered ER stress and autophagy, especially at the top of the villi, and that apoptosis may concentrate at the top of the villi, rather than throughout the jejunal tissue.

Discussion

Heat- and Shake- Stress Induced Significant Damage to the Rat Jejunum

Heat stress occurs frequently in the summer, and shaking increases body temperature during transport. Both have effects in animals and humans, potentially leading to irritable bowel syndrome. The model in this study was applied to rats that were treated as follows: shaking at 0.1 × g to simulate shaking stress, a 35°C ambient temperature on a constant temperature shaker, for 2 h/d for 1 or 3 days, according to the group. The observed significant decreases in body weight and increases in rectal temperature, and transcription of hsp27/70confirmed successful stress responses in the rats. Small intestine tissue (jejunum) obtained from rats on the first and third day of treatment was used for molecular biology experiments and gene microarray.

The effects of stress resulting from transport and handling during shipping have been shown to impair the intestinal barrier [36]. In heat stress, compensatory mechanisms are activated to protect vital organs and dissipate internal heat at the body surface, reducing blood flow to the GI tract [2], leading to significant mucosal injury in the small intestine [37]. The abnormal clinical behavior we saw in this study reflected the rats’ physiological stress. The state of the intestine in the S3d group at necropsy showed a redistribution of blood flow. The intestinal barrier protects the body from pathogens and cytotoxic chemicals and because the epithelial cells at the villus tip were shedding and the lamina propria was exposed in the stressed rats, the competence of the intestinal barrier disintegrated (Fig 2A), leading to intestinal barrier dysfunction. We investigated the potential underlying mechanism, and found that the microstructural changes in the epithelial cells revealed apoptosis, seen as nuclear envelopes invaginating in a serrated pattern, increased gaps in the karyolemma, significant ER swelling, and nuclear pyknosis. These results were verified by TUNEL staining (Fig 2C). Apoptosis at the tip of villus increased and extended to the basement membrane of the villus. These results indicated that heat and shake stress induced significant damage to the rat jejunum, and may lead to diarrhea, inflammation, infection by microorganisms, or other GI disorders.

Heat and Shake Stress Triggers ER Stress and Induced Apoptosis and Autophagy of the Rat Jejunum

Because of blood redistribution, ischemia of the intestine leads to reduced blood glucose in the jejunum [9]. Energy may then become limited for protein folding in the ER and therefore activate UPR [38]. Accumulation of misfolded proteins under stress also causes ER stress [39]. Swelling of the ER was seen in transmission electron microscopy in our study, indicating ER stress in rat jejunal epithelial cells after stress (Fig 2B).

In this study, whole jejunum tissues were used as the material for the gene microarray. In order to elucidate the stress response mechanism in vivo, Figs 5 and 6 were drawn to show the relationship between differentially expressed genes and the relevant GO and pathways. These results showed that ER stress, autophagy, apoptosis and other cellular functions are trigged in rat small intestine. The membrane is the main component of the ER and autophagy. According to GO term enrichment graph (Fig 5A) and Table 4, we found that differentially expressed genes were enriched in both the ER(GO:0005783) and autophagic vacuoles (GO:0005776) by the stress. They were also enriched in protein binding and calcium ion binding, which is the main function of the ER. ER stress triggers autophagy in mild stress [19]. However, if the stress is prolonged, or the adaptive response fails, ER stress triggers and initiates apoptosis [21]. Overall, our results indicated that ER stress plays a key role in heat and shake stress.

KEGG pathway analysis revealed that apoptosis, the p53 signaling pathway, autophagy, the MAPK signaling pathway, and the mTOR signaling pathway were involved in the mechanism of rat intestinal damage induced by heat and shake stress.

Our previous studies have shown that growth-related molecule expression was involved in heat stress-induced damage in rat jejunum based on gene microarray [5]. Oxidative stress and MAPK pathways were involved as well [8, 40]. Recently, several studies provided new insights into the function of the MAPK pathway in the control of the balance of autophagy and apoptosis in response to genotoxic stress [23]. Research has also shown that autophagy was involved in oxidative stress or simultaneously existed in certain pathological processes [41]. Oxidative stress and increased generation of ROS have been reported to serve as important stimuli of autophagy during periods of nutrient deprivation, ischemia/reperfusion, and in response to cell stress [42, 43]. Oxidative stress and MAPK signaling pathways were shown to be involved in heat stress-induced injury in the rat jejunum.

Autophagy is a method of cell survival and it plays an important role during the stress response. In nutrient limitation, ER stress, starvation, or other pathological conditions, autophagy breaks down unnecessary macromolecules and provides the intermediate metabolites of catabolism and anabolism [4446]. During autophagy, the body must synthesize proteins with limited resources inside the cell; autophagy aids this by recycling nutrients. Therefore, autophagy is a basic means of cell survival in stress. In this study, LC3 significantly increased at the villus tip in the jejunum (Figs 1B and 3A), and in gene microarray analysis, approximately 10 differentially expressed genes involved in autophagy, including Atg4b, Arsa, Atg7, Atg10, Lamp1, Map1lc3b, Ctsd, Atg5, and others, were up-regulated. These results showed that autophagy increased in heat and shake stress. ER stress negatively regulates the AKT/TSC/mTOR pathway to enhance autophagy [30]. AKT, a serine/threonine-specific protein kinase, plays a fundamental role in cell survival and apoptosis [47]. mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates AKT in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) cells [48]. Activation of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase/AKT/mTOR pathway causes an mTOR-dependent loss in insulin receptor substrate-1 expression leading to feedback down-regulation of the signaling that occurs through this pathway [49]. Rapamycin inhibits AKT/PKB signaling in cells by decreasing the levels of intact mTORC2 below those needed to maintain the phosphorylation of S473 of AKT/PKB [50]. In the gene microarray analysis in our study, the level of mTOR decreased, and TSC increased. Because P-AKT was decreased (Fig 1B), AKT/TSC/mTOR pathway may also be involved in autophagy induced by heat and shake stress.

Severe or prolonged ER stress induces activation of unique pathways that lead to cell death through apoptosis [51, 52]. Casp12, IRE1/PERK/JNK, and p53 signaling pathways have been directly implicated in ER stress-induced apoptosis [5355]. The data showed that Casp12 was increased and that the p53 signaling pathway was activated in gene microarray analysis. Especially at the tip of jejunal villi in our study, Casp12 and Casp3 increased (Figs 1B and 3), which may indicate that ER stress-induced apoptosis occurred in response to the stress, suggesting that ER stress may induce autophagy through the AKT/TSC/mTOR pathway, with apoptosis simultaneously mediated by Casp12 or p53 signaling pathways.

In the analysis of the comparison of the network graph of proteins and GO (Fig 6A) and the gene pathway network graph (Fig 6B), AKT1, TSC1/2, Casp9, Fas, Bcl2s, Bcl2ls, Eif-2s, Mmp9, Zbtb16, and others were important. Results of RT-PCR were consistent with the gene microarray analysis and verified the data. In GO cluster analysis, the 2-D view module functional annotation clustering graphic presentations helped predict the possible functions of genes related to ER stress-induced apoptosis and autophagy, and provided new insight into gene function research.

In conclusion, the present study investigated the effects of heat and shake stress on the morphology, differential gene expression, and the level of related proteins in rat jejunum. Stress induced significant morphological damage to the small intestinal epithelium. Fifty-three differentially expressed genes related to apoptosis and autophagy were selected from the gene microarray data. Related proteins such as LC3, Casp12, mTOR, Casp3, and others were also detected. The changes in gene expression provided the potential biological pathways that occur in response to stress. Based on the gene expression analysis, damage to the rat small intestine may be related to apoptosis induced by ER stress at the tip of the jejunal villus, and autophagy also induced by ER stress may be a potential cell survival mechanism in the heat and shake stress response during summer. The AKT/TSC/mTOR pathway may also be involved in this autophagy mechanism. In this study, the relationship between ER stress, apoptosis, and autophagy may provide new perspectives for stress research. Our results also provide a theoretical basis for the mechanisms underlying rat small intestine injury in stress stimulated by simultaneous heat and shake.

Supporting Information

S1 Dataset. Body weight, body temperature(°C) and the level of HSP27 and 70 in Control, S1d and S3d.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Dataset. Quantification of western blot determination of P-AKT, AKT, cleaved Casp3 and LC3 in Control, S1d and S3d.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Dataset. The RNA expression levels of Zbtb16, Dap, Herpud1, mTOR, Lcn2, Atf6, Casp9, Casp12, Casp8, and Atf4 in Control, S1d and S3d.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143922.s003

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are thankful for the help from the members of CAU-BUA TCVM teaching & research team.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PY ZX FL. Performed the experiments: PY. Analyzed the data: PY CW CM. Wrote the paper: PY. Interpreted results of experiments: SH. Prepared figures: SH XX. Edited and revised manuscript: JX YY FL JY. Approved final version of manuscript: ZX JX.

References

  1. 1. Söderholm JD PM. Stress and intestinal barrier function. American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2001;280 (1):7–13.
  2. 2. Kregel KC, Wall PT, Gisolfi CV. Peripheral vascular responses to hyperthermia in the rat. Journal of applied physiology. 1988;64(6):2582–8. pmid:3403442.
  3. 3. . . Hyperthermia and heatstroke. Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1994;29(8):73,8–80.
  4. 4. Hall DM, Buettner GR, Oberley LW, Xu LJ, Matthes RD, Gisolfi CV. Mechanisms of circulatory and intestinal barrier dysfunction during whole body hyperthermia. Am J Physiol-Heart C. 2001;280(2):H509–H21. pmid:WOS:000166492400002.
  5. 5. Yu Jin, Yin Peng, Yin Jingdong, Liu Fenghua, Zhu Xiaoyu, Cheng Guiling, et al. Involvement of ERK12 signalling and growth-related molecules expression in response to heat stress-induced damage in rat jejunum and IEC-6 cells. International Journal of Hyperthermia. 2010;26(6):538–55. pmid:20707649
  6. 6. Moriwaki Y KH, Hashimoto K, Ichikawa Y, Sugiyama M. The worsening of tissue damage due to the transient release during the ischemia of rat small intestine—the relation with reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993;94(9):1017–21. pmid:8246865
  7. 7. Wiseman H, Halliwell B. Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: Role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer. Biochemical Journal. 1996;313:17–29. pmid:WOS:A1996TN89000001.
  8. 8. Yu J, Liu F, Yin P, Zhao H, Luan W, Hou X, et al. Involvement of oxidative stress and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in heat stress-induced injury in the rat small intestine. Stress. 2013;16(1):99–113. pmid:22452662.
  9. 9. Wan C, Yin P, Xu X, Liu M, He S, Song S, et al. Effect of simulated transport stress on the rat small intestine: A morphological and gene expression study. Research in veterinary science. 2014;96(2):355–64. pmid:24560020.
  10. 10. Shu B. Transportation stress cause rats’ jejunum injure which associate with oxidative stress and the activation of MAPKs (in chinese). Thesis for Master’s Degree Northwest A&F University 2013;UDC: 636.09
  11. 11. Yin Peng, Wan Changrong, He Shasha, Xu Xiaolong, Liu Mingjiang, Song Shixiu, et al. Transport stress causes damage in rats' liver and triggers liver autophagy. BioTechnology: An Indian Journal. 2013;8(11):1561–6.
  12. 12. Rutkowski DT, Kaufman RJ. A trip to the ER: coping with stress. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14(1):20–8. pmid:14729177.
  13. 13. Schroder M, Kaufman RJ. ER stress and the unfolded protein response. Mutation research. 2005;569(1–2):29–63. pmid:15603751.
  14. 14. Ron D. Translational control in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2002;110(10):1383–8. pmid:12438433; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC151821.
  15. 15. Zhang K. Integration of ER stress, oxidative stress and the inflammatory response in health and disease. International journal of clinical and experimental medicine. 2010;3(1):33–40. pmid:20369038; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2848304.
  16. 16. Szegezdi E FU, Samali A. Caspase-12 and ER-stress-mediated apoptosis: the story so far. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;1010:186–94. pmid:15033718
  17. 17. Nakagawa T, Zhu H, Morishima N, Li E, Xu J, Yankner BA, et al. Caspase-12 mediates endoplasmic-reticulum-specific apoptosis and cytotoxicity by amyloid-beta. Nature. 2000;403(6765):98–103. pmid:10638761.
  18. 18. Zou CG, Cao XZ, Zhao YS, Gao SY, Li SD, Liu XY, et al. The molecular mechanism of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis in PC-12 neuronal cells: the protective effect of insulin-like growth factor I. Endocrinology. 2009;150(1):277–85. pmid:18801901.
  19. 19. Yorimitsu T, Nair U, Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Endoplasmic reticulum stress triggers autophagy. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281(40):30299–304. pmid:16901900; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1828866.
  20. 20. Ogata M, Hino S, Saito A, Morikawa K, Kondo S, Kanemoto S, et al. Autophagy is activated for cell survival after endoplasmic reticulum stress. Molecular and cellular biology. 2006;26(24):9220–31. pmid:17030611; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1698520.
  21. 21. Szegezdi E, Logue SE, Gorman AM, Samali A. Mediators of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. EMBO reports. 2006;7(9):880–5. pmid:16953201; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1559676.
  22. 22. Malhotra JD, Kaufman RJ. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress: a vicious cycle or a double-edged sword? Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9(12):2277–93. pmid:17979528.
  23. 23. Sui X, Kong N, Ye L, Han W, Zhou J, Zhang Q, et al. p38 and JNK MAPK pathways control the balance of apoptosis and autophagy in response to chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer letters. 2014;344(2):174–9. pmid:24333738.
  24. 24. Yin J, Duan J, Cui Z, Ren W, Li T, Yin Y. Hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress activates NF-[small kappa]B and Nrf2/Keap1 signals and triggers autophagy in piglets. RSC Advances. 2015;5(20):15479–86.
  25. 25. Cuervo AM, Knecht E, Terlecky SR, Dice JF. Activation of a selective pathway of lysosomal proteolysis in rat liver by prolonged starvation. Am J Physiol. 1995;269(5 Pt 1):C1200–8. pmid:7491910.
  26. 26. Klionsky DJ. The molecular machinery of autophagy: unanswered questions. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(Pt 1):7–18. pmid:15615779; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1828869.
  27. 27. Ishida Y, Yamamoto A, Kitamura A, Lamande SR, Yoshimori T, Bateman JF, et al. Autophagic elimination of misfolded procollagen aggregates in the endoplasmic reticulum as a means of cell protection. Molecular biology of the cell. 2009;20(11):2744–54. pmid:19357194; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2688553.
  28. 28. Klionsky DJ, Abdalla FC, Abeliovich H, Abraham RT, Acevedo-Arozena A, Adeli K, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8(4):445–544. pmid:22966490
  29. 29. Yan Xianghua, Sun Qiming, Ji Jian, Zhu Yaqin, Liu Zhengfei, Zhong Q. Reconstitution of leucine-mediated autophagy via the mTORC1-Barkor pathway in vitro. Autophagy. 2012;8(2):213–21. pmid:22258093
  30. 30. Qin L, Wang Z, Tao LY, Wang Y. ER stress negatively regulates AKT/TSC/mTOR pathway to enhance autophagy. Autophagy. 2010;6(2):239–47. pmid:WOS:000276198100005.
  31. 31. Yin J, Ren W, Duan J, Wu L, Chen S, Li T, et al. Dietary arginine supplementation enhances intestinal expression of SLC7A7 and SLC7A1 and ameliorates growth depression in mycotoxin-challenged pigs. Amino acids. 2014;46(4):883–92. pmid:24368521.
  32. 32. Yin J, Liu M, Ren W, Duan J, Yang G, Zhao Y, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation with glutamate and aspartate on diquat-induced oxidative stress in piglets. PloS one. 2015;10(4):e0122893. pmid:25875335; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4398417.
  33. 33. Yin J, Ren W, Liu G, Duan J, Yang G, Wu L, et al. Birth oxidative stress and the development of an antioxidant system in newborn piglets. Free radical research. 2013;47(12):1027–35. pmid:24074241.
  34. 34. Yin J, Wu MM, Xiao H, Ren WK, Duan JL, Yang G, et al. Development of an antioxidant system after early weaning in piglets. Journal of animal science. 2014;92(2):612–9. pmid:24352957.
  35. 35. Yu J, Yin P, Liu F, Cheng G, Guo K, Lu A, et al. Effect of heat stress on the porcine small intestine: a morphological and gene expression study. Comparative biochemistry and physiology Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology. 2010;156(1):119–28. pmid:20096800.
  36. 36. Meddings JB, Swain MG. Environmental stress-induced gastrointestinal permeability is mediated by endogenous glucocorticoids in the rat. Gastroenterology. 2000;119(4):1019–28. pmid:WOS:000089847800017.
  37. 37. Novosad VL, Richards JL, Phillips NA, King MA, Clanton TL. Regional susceptibility to stress-induced intestinal injury in the mouse. Am J Physiol-Gastr L. 2013;305(6):G418–G26. pmid:WOS:000324754400004.
  38. 38. Kaufman RJ. Orchestrating the unfolded protein response in health and disease. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2002;110(10):1389–98. pmid:12438434; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC151822.
  39. 39. Patil C, Walter P. Intracellular signaling from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus: the unfolded protein response in yeast and mammals. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2001;13(3):349–56. pmid:WOS:000168752900013.
  40. 40. Yin J, Ren WK, Wu XS, Yang G, Wang J, Li TJ, et al. Oxidative stress-mediated signaling pathways: A review. J Food Agric Environ. 2013;11(2):132–9. pmid:WOS:000321912100001.
  41. 41. Kiffin R, Bandyopadhyay U, Cuervo AM. Oxidative stress and autophagy. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2006;8(1–2):152–62. pmid:WOS:000236964000016.
  42. 42. Essick EE, Sam F. Oxidative stress and autophagy in cardiac disease, neurological disorders, aging and cancer. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2010;3(3):168–77. pmid:WOS:000282040600002.
  43. 43. Wu HH, Hsiao TY, Chien CT, Lai MK. Ischemic conditioning by short periods of reperfusion attenuates renal ischemia/reperfusion induced apoptosis and autophagy in the rat. Journal of biomedical science. 2009;16:19. pmid:19272187; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2653526.
  44. 44. Klionsky DJ, Abeliovich H, Agostinis P, Agrawal DK, Aliev G, Askew DS, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes. Autophagy. 2008;4(2):151–75. pmid:18188003
  45. 45. Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008;451(7182):1069–75. pmid:18305538; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2670399.
  46. 46. Kadowaki M, Karim MR, Carpi A, Miotto G. Nutrient control of macroautophagy in mammalian cells. Molecular aspects of medicine. 2006;27(5–6):426–43. pmid:16999992.
  47. 47. Chalhoub N, Zhu G, Zhu X, Baker SJ. Cell type specificity of PI3K signaling in Pdk1- and Pten-deficient brains. Genes & Development. 2009;23(14):1619–24.
  48. 48. Hay N. The Akt-mTOR tango and its relevance to cancer. Cancer Cell. 2005;8(3):179–83. pmid:16169463.
  49. 49. O'Reilly KE, Rojo F, She QB, Solit D, Mills GB, Smith D, et al. mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt. Cancer research. 2006;66(3):1500–8. pmid:16452206; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3193604.
  50. 50. Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Sengupta S, Sheen JH, Hsu PP, Bagley AF, et al. Prolonged rapamycin treatment inhibits mTORC2 assembly and Akt/PKB. Molecular cell. 2006;22(2):159–68. pmid:16603397.
  51. 51. Lin JH, Walter P, Yen TS. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in disease pathogenesis. Annual review of pathology. 2008;3:399–425. pmid:18039139; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3653419.
  52. 52. Lin WC, Chuang YC, Chang YS, Lai MD, Teng YN, Su IJ, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress stimulates p53 expression through NF-kappaB activation. PloS one. 2012;7(7):e39120. pmid:22859938; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3408479.
  53. 53. Nakagawa T, Yuan JY. Cross-talk between two cysteine protease families: Activation of caspase-12 by calpain in apoptosis. J Cell Biol. 2000;150(4):887–94. pmid:WOS:000088952500018.
  54. 54. Li J, Lee B, Lee AS. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis: multiple pathways and activation of p53-up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and NOXA by p53. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281(11):7260–70. pmid:16407291.
  55. 55. Urano F, Wang X, Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Chung P, Harding HP, et al. Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science. 2000;287(5453):664–6. pmid:10650002.