Heterologous Expression of Mannanase and Developing a New Reporter Gene System in Lactobacillus casei and Escherichia coli

Jinzhong Lin; Yexia Zou; Chengjie Ma; Qunxin She; Yunxiang Liang; Zhengjun Chen; Xiangyang Ge

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142886

Abstract

Reporter gene systems are useful for studying bacterial molecular biology, including the regulation of gene expression and the histochemical analysis of protein products. Here, two genes, β-1,4-mannanase (manB) from Bacillus pumilus and β-glucuronidase (gusA) from Escherichia coli K12, were cloned into the expression vector pELX1. The expression patterns of these reporter genes in Lactobacillus casei were investigated by measuring their enzymatic activities and estimating their recombinant protein yields using western blot analysis. Whereas mannanase activity was positively correlated with the accumulation of ManB during growth, GusA activity was not; western blot analysis indicated that while the amount of GusA protein increased during later growth stages, GusA activity gradually decreased, indicating that the enzyme was inactive during cell growth. A similar trend was observed in E. coli JM109. We chose to use the more stable mannanase gene as the reporter to test secretion expression in L. casei. Two pELX1-based secretion vectors were constructed: one carried the signal peptide of the unknown secretion protein Usp45 from Lactococcus lactis (pELSH), and the other contained the full-length SlpA protein from the S-layer of L. acidophilus (pELWH). The secretion of ManB was detected in the supernatant of the pELSH-ManB transformants and in the S-layer of the cell surface of the pELWH-ManB transformants. This is the first report demonstrating that the B. pumilus manB gene is a useful reporter gene in L. casei and E.coli.

Citation: Lin J, Zou Y, Ma C, She Q, Liang Y, Chen Z, et al. (2015) Heterologous Expression of Mannanase and Developing a New Reporter Gene System in Lactobacillus casei and Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0142886. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886

Editor: Patrick C. Cirino, University of Houston, UNITED STATES

Received: June 15, 2015; Accepted: October 28, 2015; Published: November 12, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31128011, URL of funder: http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/), and Bright Dairy & Food Co., Ltd. Both funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funder (Bright Dairy & Food Co., Ltd) provided support in the form of salaries for authors JL and CM, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.

Competing interests: The authors have the following interests: This study was funded in part by Bright Dairy & Food Co., Ltd. Authors Jinzhong Lin and Chengjie Ma are employed by Bright Dairy & Food Co., Ltd. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) utilize a mixed variety of sugars to produce lactic acid by facultative anaerobic fermentation. These bacteria are widespread in various natural environments including foods, fermentation products, human and animal gastrointestinal tracts and plant surfaces. LAB have served as traditional industrial bacteria and are widely used in the processing of various foods, such as dairy, meat and pickles [1]. Furthermore, LAB represent one of the dominant groups of microorganisms in the human gastrointestinal tract and play important roles in this ecosystem, including improving lactose digestion, reducing gastrointestinal disorders, and enhancing cellular immunity, thereby facilitating the cure of some human diseases [2,3]. For these reasons, some LAB strains have been used as probiotic bacteria [4]. LAB are organisms generally regarded as safe and have been used widespread in food and feedstock industries, and LAB have the potential prospect to be live vehicles for mucosal delivery of health promoting molecules [5–7].

Since the 1990s, much research has been devoted to developing gene expression systems for LAB. Lactococcus (especially Lc. lactis), Lactobacillus and Streptococcus have all been developed into useful cell factories for producing recombinant proteins [8]. However, the known LAB protein expression systems usually confer only a low level of recombinant protein expression. In order to test the efficiency of different LAB expression systems, a suitable reporter gene system is required.

Several genes are used as reporter genes in LAB bacterial genetics, such as those encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat-194 from Staphylococcus aureus and cat-86 from B. pumilus) [9,10], the B. licheniformis α-amylase [11], the Vibrio fischeri luciferase [12], the E. coli β-glucuronidase [13], the Leuconostoc mesenteroides β-galactosidase [14], and the S. aureus nuclease [15]. Moreover, green fluorescent protein (GFP) from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria [16] has been exploited as a reporter and used successfully in a variety of bacteria including different LAB organisms [17–19].

Here, we investigated the usefulness of a known reporter gene, the E. coli β-glucuronidase gene, and another heterologous gene, the B. pumilus β-1,4-mannanase gene, in Lactobacillus casei using the L. casei expression vector pELX1 derived from the naturally occurring pMC11 plasmid [20]. Furthermore, the signal peptide for the secreted protein Usp45 from Lc. lactis [21] and the full-length SlpA protein from the S-layer of L. acidophilus NCFM [22] were tested for their capacity to drive the secretion of heterologous proteins in L. casei. Our results indicate that whereas the β-1,4-mannanase is a highly stable enzyme, the β-glucuronidase protein was gradually inactivated during bacterial growth.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. L. casei strains were grown in MRS broth (OXOID, Hampshire, England) at 30°C without shaking. E. coli JM109 was propagated in Luria-Bertani medium (Thermo Scientific Molecular Biology, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37°C with moderate shaking. Antibiotics were used as follows: ampicillin (100 μg·ml^-1, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for E. coli strains and erythromycin (10 μg·ml^-1, Sigma) for L. casei strains.

Download:

Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids utilized in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.t001

DNA Manipulations

Standard molecular cloning techniques were performed [23]. Total DNA was extracted from Lactobacillus cells according to a previously described method [20]. Plasmid DNA was isolated from E. coli using an Omega Plasmid Mini-Preparation Kit (OMEGA bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA), and PCR products were purified with an Omega Cycle-Pure Kit (OMEGA bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA). Pfu and Taq polymerases were purchased from Transgen (Beijing Transgen Co. Ltd., Beijing, China), and DNA restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from Fermentas (Thermo Scientific Molecular Biology). All enzymes were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Construction of plasmids for recombinant protein expression

DNA fragment encoding the mature peptide of B. pumilus manB was PCR amplified with the primers NcoI-manB-F and KpnI-manB-R (Table 2) using the total DNA extracted from B. pumilus as template. The PCR product was digested with the restriction enzymes (REs) NcoI and KpnI and ligated to plasmid vector pELX1 pre-linearized with the same REs, yielding pELX1-ManB. Using the same strategy, the E. coli gusA was obtained by PCR, and the resulting PCR product was cloned into pELX1 to generate the other expression plasmid, pELX1-GusA.

Download:

Table 2. Primers utilized in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.t002

For protein secretion, the DNA fragment encoding the signal peptide of secreted protein Usp45 in Lc. lactis was amplified using the primers SOE-SP_Usp45-F and XhoI-SP_Usp45-R. The promoter fragment of the L. acidophilus S-layer protein precursor-encoding gene (P_SlpA) was amplified with the primers EcoRI-P_SlpA-F and P_SlpA-R. Then, the two PCR products were fused together by splicing by overlap extension PCR [24]. The resulting fragment was then digested with EcoRI and XhoI. The DNA fragment including a sequence coding for a 6×His-tag, a multiple cloning site and a transcriptional terminator was amplified from plasmid pELX1 using the primers XhoI-MCS-F and BamHI-T-R and subsequently digested with BamHI and XhoI. After the digestion of pEL5.6 (Table 1) with EcoRI and BamHI, the three DNA fragments were ligated together in a triple ligation, yielding the secreted expression vector pELSH. To construct the secretion vector, the full-length L. acidophilus slpA gene with native promoter, was amplified from L. acidophilus NCFM genomic DNA using the primers EcoRI-P_SlpA-F and XhoI-SlpApro-R. The resulting DNA fragment was digested with EcoRI and XhoI and inserted into pELSH at the EcoRI and XhoI sites, generating the secretion expression vector pELWH. Finally, the manB gene was cloned into the vectors pELSH and pELWH using the same strategy as for pELX1-ManB, yielding pELSH-ManB and pELWH-ManB, respectively. All constructs were verified by restriction analysis and sequencing.

Electroporation transformation

Electroporation transformation of L. casei was performed according to previously reported [20] using a Multiporator (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and the transformants were screened on MRS agar plates containing erythromycin.

Detection of target proteins in lactobacilli cells

For intracellular expression, 500 ml MRS broth was inoculated with a L. casei transformant culture grown overnight (1%, v/v), 20 ml fractions of the culture were taken every 1 hours to measure the OD₆₀₀ (optical density at 600 nm), and cells were then collected by centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 5 min. Whole cell proteins (WCP) were prepared from cells of L. casei transformants using a high-pressure homogenizer (Siemens, Munich, Germany) and then the WCP was determined for ManB or GusA activity and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) by an electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), which was performed on a 10% (w/v) running gel. For secretory expression, cells were collected by centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was filtered by 0.22 μm filter membrane, then the effluent was determined for ManB activity and western blot analysis.

For western blot analysis, the procedure was performed according to previously reported [20], the primary antibody was mouse antibody against His-tag (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and the second antibody was HRP-labeled goat antibody IgG against mouse IgG (Goat Anti-Mouse IgG/HRP, Beijing Biosynthesis Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China), the membrane was stained with the HRP Substrate (Western ECL Substrate, Bio-Rad) to reveal the presence of the target proteins.

Enzyme assay

β-1,4-mannanase activity was determined using the substrate glucomannan, which was purified from tubers of the traditional food plant Amorphophallus konjac (Kevin Food Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, China). The reaction mixture contained 2 ml of a diluted enzyme sample and 2 ml of a 0.5% (w/v) solution of the substrate in 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5), both of which were pre-warmed to 50°C. The mixture was then incubated for 30 min, and the reaction was stopped by adding 5 ml of 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) [25]. After boiled for 10 min, the final volume was adjusted to 25 ml, and the concentration of the mannose-oligosaccharides reducing ends was estimated by measuring the absorbance at 540 nm using a spectrophotometer DU730 (Beckman, Brea, CA, USA). Serving as a negative control, another sample was prepared identically except the enzyme was added to the reaction after the DNS reagent. For S-layer-bound mannanase activity, a culture aliquot containing 1×10¹⁰ cfu was applied as crude extract in each reaction tube. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme needed to liberate reducing sugars equivalent to 1 μmol of D-mannose in 1 min at 50°C at pH 5.5.

β-glucuronidase activity was determined as previously described [13] using 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucuronide (Sigma) as the substrate. The reaction mixture containing 0.5 ml of the enzyme sample and 0.5 ml of a 1 mM 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucuronide solution in GUS buffer (0.05 M sodium phosphate [pH 7.0], 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA [ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid], 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100) was prepared and incubated at 37°C for 10 min. After incubation, the reaction was stopped by adding 0.1 ml of 0.4 M sodium hydroxide. The enzyme activity was estimated by measuring the absorbance of the sample at 420 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT, USA). Reaction rates were quantified using 4-nitrophenol release (with a molar extinction coefficient of 18,400 L·mol^-1·cm^-1 at OD₄₀₁). One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme necessary to liberate 1 nmol of 4-nitrophenol in 1 min at 37°C at pH 7.0.

The concentration of WCP was measured according to the Bradford method [26] using the Bio-Rad protein assay with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

S-layer protein electrophoresis

Extracellular proteins were extracted from Lactobacillus cells on the method as described by Hagen et al. [27]. Samples of the S-layer proteins were prepared as follows: a total of 2 ml of L. casei transformants were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 min, washed twice with 2 ml PBS buffer, resuspended in 80 μl double-distilled water, and then mixed with 20 μl 5× Laemmli sample buffer (300 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 10% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate, 50% (v/v) glycerol, 25% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol, 0.05% (w/v) bromophenol blue). After boiling for 10 min, the mixture was centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 min, and 20 μl sample of the supernatant (the cell surface-associated proteins) was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blot.

Statistical analysis

All physicochemical experiments were carried out in triplicate and each value was calculated with the mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2010 (Redmond, WA, USA).

Results

L. acidophilus P_SlpA mediates protein expression in both E. coli and L. casei

Previously, we showed that the slpA promoter of L. acidophilus (P_SlpA) allowed expression of the enhanced green fluorescence protein (eGFP) in both E. coli and L. casei, suggesting that P_SlpA functioned as a bifunctional promoter [20]. Here, we further tested P_SlpA-driven expression in these organisms with manB from B. pumilus (encoding β-1,4-mannanase) and gusA from E. coli (encoding β-glucuronidase), the latter of which is a common reporter gene in bacterial genetics. The coding sequence of each gene was cloned downstream of P_SlpA in pELX1, yielding the expression plasmids pELX1-ManB and pELX1-GusA, which were transformed into E. coli JM109. The E. coli transformants were grown in LB broth and sampled for SDS-PAGE analysis of their total proteins. Both recombinant proteins formed discrete protein bands, suggesting that the lactobacilli promoter P_SlpA conferred a high-level of recombinant protein expression in E. coli (S1 Fig).

These expression plasmids were then introduced into L. casei MCJΔ1 by electroporation, and the transformants were grown in MRS broth. Analysis of the total proteins prepared from the L. casei cultures failed to reveal any discrete bands of recombinant protein (Fig 1A), but the recombinant proteins were readily identified by western blot analysis using antisera against the His epitope (Fig 1B). These results suggest that P_SlpA did not function as a strong promoter in L. casei, although P_SlpA has been shown in several reports to function as a strong promoter in different LAB strains [28,29].

Download:

Fig 1. SDS-PAGE and western blot of His-tagged recombinant proteins in L. casei MCJΔ1.

(A) SDS-PAGE analysis. Lane M, marker. Lanes 1–3, whole protein extracts of the pELX1, pELX1-ManB and pELX1-GusA transformants. (B) Western blot analysis, which suggested that both recombinant proteins were expressed. Lane M, marker. Lanes 1–3, whole protein extracts of the pELX1, pELX1-ManB and pELX1-GusA transformants. The protein concentrations of all samples were normalized to 3 mg·ml^-1, and the sample volume loaded was15 μl in both the SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.g001

To investigate the detailed activities of this promoter in E. coli and in L. casei, cell extracts were prepared from exponential growth-phase cultures of both bacterial transformants and tested for the specific activity of each enzyme. The specific activity of ManB was high and remained proportional to cell mass throughout the growth of E. coli; therefore, we concluded that P_SlpA conferred a continuously high level of gene expression in E. coli. However, GusA activity in E. coli decreased severely in the late exponential growth phase and stabilized in the stationary phase (Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Expression of ManB and GusA in E. coli JM109.

The specific activity of ManB was high and remained proportional to cell mass throughout growth, whereas GusA activity decreased severely in the late exponential growth phase (from 450 U·mg^-1 WCP to 180 U·mg^-1 WCP in 1.5 h) and stabilized in the stationary phase (130–180 U·mg^-1 WCP). In the growth curve, there were no significant difference between the negative control E. coli JM109 pELX1 transformant, the E. coli JM109 ManB transformant and the E. coli JM109 GusA transformant. Error bars represent standard errors from three replicate experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.g002

In the growth curves, E. coli showed exponential growth when OD₆₀₀<1.0, whereas L. casei maintained exponential growth until OD₆₀₀ = 1.8 (Fig 3). We found that both reporters showed distinctive changes in L. casei during growth. The specific activity of ManB only increased in the exponential growth phase until the OD₆₀₀ of the culture reached 1.8 (23 U·mg^-1 WCP). Then, ManB activity decreased gradually to 15 U·mg^-1 WCP in the late growth phase before remaining relatively constant (Fig 3). However, the specific activity of GusA peaked during the exponential growth phase (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0, 75 U·mg^-1 WCP) before dropping ca. 60% from the exponential growth phase to the stationary growth phase (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0 versus 4.6) (Fig 3). The much higher expression levels of recombinant ManB and GusA in E. coli than those in L. casei are not due to P_SlpA simply functioning as a stronger promoter in E. coli than in L. casei because the plasmid copy number of pELX1 was different in these two organisms. Whereas the E. coli plasmid backbone has a copy number of 500–700 [30], pELX1 has ~5 copies per cell in L. casei [20].

Download:

Fig 3. Expression of ManB and GusA in L. casei MCJΔ1.

In the growth curves, L. casei MCJΔ1 showed exponential growth until OD₆₀₀ = 1.8, and the stationary phase was from OD₆₀₀ = 1.8 to 6.8. In the growth curve, there were no significant difference between the negative control L. casei MCJΔ1 pELX1 transformant, the L. casei MCJΔ1 ManB transformant and the L. casei MCJΔ1 GusA transformant. the OD₆₀₀ in the activity curve of L. casei MCJΔ1/pELX1-ManB transformant were 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.8, 2.9, 4.3, 5.0 and 6.7, and those of L. casei MCJΔ1/pELX1-GusA transformant were 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.2, 3.6, 4.6, 5.8 and 6.6, respectively. The specific activity of ManB increased in the exponential growth phase until the OD₆₀₀ of the culture reached 1.8 (23 U·mg^-1 WCP). Then, ManB activity decreased gradually to 15 U·mg^-1 WCP in the late growth phase before remaining relatively constant. The specific activity of GusA peaked during the exponential growth phase (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0, 75 U·mg^-1 WCP) before decreasing rapidly in the late growth phase by more than 60% (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0 versus 4.6). Error bars represent standard errors from three replicate experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.g003

As the negative control, the L. casei MCJΔ1 pELX1 transformant and the E. coli JM109 pELX1 transformant exhibited no detectable ManB activity, and the expression of ManB did not impede the growth of L. casei MCJΔ1 and E. coli JM109 hosts, thus the manB functioned as a good reporter gene in both bacteria. On the other hand, the L. casei MCJΔ1 pELX1 transformant exhibited no detectable GusA activity but in view of the rapid change of GusA activity during growth, which could create another layer of uncertainty in research results, thus the gusA maybe not a suitable reporter gene in some experiments which require enzyme assays to be performed at the exact same growth phases for all samples.

The ManB activity and cell biomass increased in early growth stages and decreased gradually in later growth stages (Fig 3). These results suggest that P_SlpA confers a high level of ManB expression in the exponential growth phase of L. casei. Furthermore, we also observed that ManB activity continuously increased throughout the growth of E. coli (Fig 2). Altogether, these results suggest that the P_SlpA promoter conferred different target gene expression levels in the two bacteria, whereas the expression from the promoter should be under stringent control in L. casei such that it might confer very low expression in the late growth phases of this bacterium, expression from this promoter in E. coli should not be inhibited.

Protein stability and enzymatic activity of β-1,4-mannanase and β-glucuronidase in L. casei

To illustrate whether enzymatic activity reflects the level of recombinant enzyme in L. casei, cell extracts were prepared from different culture time points and used to assay ManB or GusA specific activity. Western blot analysis was also performed on these samples using antisera raised against the His epitope to estimate the amount of recombinant protein. Western blot analysis indicated similar increases in the amount of ManB protein and corresponding activity in the exponential growth phase (until OD₆₀₀ = 1.8, Fig 4A), which suggested that the recombinant ManB was highly stable in L. casei. Furthermore, ManB activity was positively correlated with the accumulation of interest protein during cell growth (Figs 3 and 4A). These results suggest that the specific activity of ManB decreased gradually during late exponential growth because the P_SlpA promoter conferred low target gene expression; mild protein degradation in this growth phase may also have been a contributing factor.

Download:

Fig 4. Western blot detection of ManB and GusA in L. casei.

The final concentration of all the WCP samples were adjusted to 0.2 mg·ml^-1 for ManB samples and 0.1 mg·ml^-1 for GusA samples, and 10-μl aliquots were added in each lane of the electrophoresis gels. (A) Western blot of His-tagged ManB from the L. casei MCJΔ1 transformant. These results show a similar increase in the amount of ManB protein and ManB activity during early exponential growth (until OD₆₀₀ = 1.8). Lane M, marker. Lanes 1–6, ManB from the L. casei MCJΔ1 transformant at different cell densities (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0, 1.8, 2.9, 4.3, 5.0 and 6.7). (B) Western blot of His-tagged GusA from the L. casei MCJΔ1 transformant. These results show that although GusA activity decreased rapidly from the exponential growth phase to the stationary growth phase, the western blot analysis of GusA revealed large amounts of this protein in late growth-phase cell samples, when the specific activity of the enzyme dropped markedly. Lane M, marker. Lanes 1–6, GusA of the L. casei MCJΔ1 transformant at different cell densities (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0, 2.2, 3.6, 4.6, 5.8 and 6.6).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.g004

Next, we performed similar experiments with the pELX1-GusA transformants and found that although GusA activity decreased rapidly from the exponential growth phase to the stationary growth phase, a western blot analysis of GusA revealed large amounts of this protein accumulated in late growth-phase cell samples, while the specific activity of the enzyme dropped markedly (Figs 3 and 4B). These results suggest that there may be an inactive form of GusA in L. casei. Our results revealed different properties between the common GusA reporter enzyme and ManB, indicating that manB is a more suitable reporter gene for studying the expression of secreted proteins in L. casei due to the high stability of its gene product, whereas gusA may be more useful in characterizing inducible gene expression due to the unstable feature of this enzyme in bacterial cells.

Characterization the secretion of ManB in L. casei

ManB was employed as a reporter to study the expression of secreted protein in L. casei. manB was cloned into secretion expression vectors pELSH and pELWH (Fig 5) to yield pELSH-ManB and pELWH-ManB. Both secretion expression plasmids were introduced into L. casei MCJΔ1, yielding pELSH-ManB and pELWH-ManB transformants (L. casei MCJΔ1/pELSH-ManB and L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH-ManB). These transformants were used to investigate the efficiency of these secretory elements in secreting ManB in L. casei.

Download:

Fig 5. Expression cassette of related expression vectors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.g005

The secretion of ManB reached 8.85 U·ml^-1 in supernatant during the exponential growth phase of L. casei MCJΔ1/pELSH-ManB and remained relatively constant above 8 U·ml^-1 in supernatant throughout the late growth phase between OD₆₀₀ = 1.9 to 4.8 (Fig 6A). Western blot analysis clearly showed that mannanase activity was correlated with the secretion of ManB during cell growth (Fig 6B). The L. casei MCJΔ1/pELX1-ManB transformant was precessed by the same method, but no ManB activity and recombinant ManB protein were detected. These results togetherly indicated ManB is secreted using the SP_Usp45 as secretion signal in L. casei MCJΔ1.

Download:

Fig 6. Expression and secretion of ManB in L. casei MCJΔ1/pELSH-ManB.

(A) ManB activity in the supernatant. ManB activity reached 8.85 U·ml^-1 during the exponential growth phase of L. casei MCJΔ1/pELSH-ManB and remained relatively constant above 8 U·ml^-1 throughout the late growth phase (between OD₆₀₀ = 1.9 to 4.8) before decreasing. (B) Western blot of His-tagged ManB in the supernatant. Aliquots of 10 μl were added in each lane of the electrophoresis gels. These results clearly showed that secreted mannanase activity was correlated with the accumulation of ManB during cell growth. Lane M, marker. Lanes 1–8, ManB of the L. casei MCJΔ1 transformant at different cell densities (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5, 0.9, 1.9, 2.8, 3.4, 4.8, 5.8 and 6.2). Error bars represent standard errors from three replicate experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.g006

For the L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH-ManB transformant, as expected, ManB activity was detected on the cell surface of contact bacteria. This activity peaked at OD₆₀₀ = 3.7 with an activity of 28.4 mU·5×10⁹ cfu^-1 (Fig 7A). Furthermore, the S-layer proteins of L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH-ManB were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blot, using L. casei MCJΔ1 and L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH as controls. A considerable amount of SlpA accumulated in the S-layer of L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH (Fig 7B, Lanes 2 and 5). In contrast, the fusion protein was barely detectable in L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH-ManB (Fig 7B, Lane 6), as reflected by a very low mannanase activity on the cell surface.

Download:

Fig 7. Expression and secretion of the ManB-SlpA fusion protein in L. casei MCJΔ1/ pELWH-ManB.

(A) S-layer-bound mannanase activity from the functional fusion protein on the cell surface of L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH-ManB. The mannanase activity increased during the early growth phase, peaking at OD₆₀₀ = 3.7 with an activity of 28.4 mU·5×10⁹ cfu^-1, and then decreased. (B) SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis of the composition of the S-layer proteins. L. casei MCJΔ1 and L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH were used as controls (the OD₆₀₀ of all cell samples was 3.0). The fusion protein was barely detectable in L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH-ManB (Lane 6), as reflected by a very low mannanase activity on the cell surface. Lane M, Marker. Lanes 1–3, SDS-PAGE-analyzed S-layer proteins from L. casei MCJΔ1, L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH and L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH-ManB. Lanes 4–6, western blot of His-tagged target proteins from the S-layer proteins of L. casei MCJΔ1, L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH and L. casei MCJΔ1/pELWH-ManB. The red arrow represents the target proteins. Error bars represent standard errors from three replicate experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.g007

Discussion

LAB exhibit several advantages over other microorganisms as microbial hosts for heterologous gene expression. LAB are usually regarded as GRAS organisms, and they have a long history of sustainable, stable and generally safe use in the production of fermented food. Some of them are considered to be beneficial probiotic bacteria [31], thus making them ideal hosts for food-grade gene expression. However, the low protein expression efficiency of known LAB expression systems is a major bottleneck for this application. While a common approach for increasing the yield of recombinant proteins is to identify promoters of high efficiency, very few studies have pursued this approach in LAB. One of the main reasons accounting for this lack of research is the paucity of known LAB reporter gene systems. Here we tested two bacterial genes as reporters in L. casei and investigated their expression driven by the lactobacilli slpA gene promoter in an expression vector recently developed by our laboratory. We found both genes, B. pumilus manB and E. coli gusA, could be used as reporter genes in both L. casei and E. coli. We also found that the two reporter genes exhibit distinct properties: GusA accumulates in an inactive form by a yet unknown mechanism, whereas ManB is highly active and only becomes inactivated by protein degradation.

Several other genes have been used as reporters in LAB genetics. For example, eGFP was used as a reporter gene in L. casei [18,32]. However, although the detection of protein in this reporter system is simple, requiring only irradiation with blue light and analysis by fluorescence microscopy, the system is not suitable for studying promoter activities because protein quantification is technically difficult [19]. E. coli gusA provides an alternative approach. However, the rapid change of reporter gene activity during growth requires enzyme assays to be performed at the exact same growth phases for all samples, which could create another layer of uncertainty in research results. For example, a previous study indicated that the level of GusA activity was ten-fold higher in exponential-phase cultures than in stationary-phase cultures when expressed from six constitutive promoters in both L. casei and Lc. lactis [33].

Here we report that ManB functions as a good gene reporter in L. casei and E. coli systems. The gene codes for a β-1,4-mannanase that catalyzes mannan hydrolysis, releasing manno-oligosaccharides. Many microorganisms can utilize mannan as a carbon source, including Bacillus spp. Neither E. coli JM109 nor L. casei MCJΔ1 showed detectable mannanase activity; therefore, manB can function as a reporter gene in these organisms to reveal promoters with low activities. Furthermore, the ManB protein is very stable and maintains its active form in vivo, which is consistent with reports showing that the protein is highly active and remarkably thermostable at 60°C [34–36]. Here, we further show that manB is stable after secretion into the culture medium and is only subjected to degradation in the stationary growth phase. Therefore, manB constitutes a good reporter gene for studying the expression of secreted proteins in L. casei.

Furthermore, our work also indicates that the lactobacilli P_SlpA promoter confers different expression levels in L. casei and E. coli. The most likely interpretation of these results is that this promoter directs stringent growth phase-dependent expression in homologous hosts but becomes a constitutive promoter in E. coli. This conclusion may indicate the requirement of a transcriptional repressor that is common in homologous hosts but absent from E. coli. This finding has two implications for LAB research. First, previously identified strong bacterial promoters should be assayed in LAB to examine their activities. Second, as E. coli genetics is more straightforward, preliminary screening in E. coli, followed by re-testing the best candidates in other bacteria, may facilitate more efficient research. Finally, we have demonstrated that manB is a more robust reporter gene than gusA for L. casei genetic applications, and this reporter also shows great potential for use in the molecular genetics of other bacteria.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. SDS-PAGE analysis of ManB and GusA protein expression by E. coli JM109.

Lane M, marker. Lanes 1–3, whole protein lysates of pELX1, pELX1-ManB and pELX1-GusA transformants. Lane 4, nickel-affinity purification of His-tagged ManB with 200 mM imidazole. Lane 5, nickel-affinity purification of His-tagged GusA with 200 mM imidazole. The red arrow represents the target proteins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142886.s001

(TIF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JL ZC XG. Performed the experiments: JL YZ CM. Analyzed the data: JL QS YL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JL YZ. Wrote the paper: JL ZC XG.

References

1. Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LPS, Spier MR, Medeiros ABP, Yamaguishi CT, Lindner JDD, et al. The Potential of Probiotics: A Review. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2010; 48(4):413–434
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Davidson LE, Fiorino AM, Snydman DR, Hibberd PL. Lactobacillus GG as an immune adjuvant for live-attenuated influenza vaccine in healthy adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011; 65(4): 501–507. pmid:21285968
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Singh VP, Sharma J, Babu S, Rizwanulla , Singla A. Role of probiotics in health and disease: A review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013; 63(2):253–257 pmid:23894906
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Sanders ME, Klaenhammer TR. Invited review: the scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. J Dairy Sci. 2001; 84(2): 319–331. pmid:11233016
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Adachi K, Kawana K, Yokoyama T, Fujii T, Tomio A, Miura S, et al. Oral immunization with a Lactobacillus casei vaccine expressing human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E7 is an effective strategy to induce mucosal cytotoxic lymphocytes against HPV16 E7. Vaccine. 2010; 28(16): 2810–2817. pmid:20170766
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Moeini H, Rahim RA, Omar AR, Shafee N, Yusoff K. Lactobacillus acidophilus as a live vehicle for oral immunization against chicken anemia virus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 90(1):77–88. pmid:21181148
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Stoeker L, Nordone S, Gunderson S, Zhang L, Kajikawa A, LaVoy A, et al. Assessment of Lactobacillus gasseri as a candidate oral vaccine vector. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011; 18(11): 1834–1844. pmid:21900526
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Peterbauer C, Maischberger T, Haltrich D. Food-grade gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. Biotechnol J. 2011; 6(9): 1147–1161. pmid:21858927
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Achen MG, Davidson BE, Hillier AJ. Construction of plasmid vectors for the detection of streptococcal promoters. Gene. 1986; 45(1): 45–49. pmid:3536665
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Harwood CR, Williams DM, Lovett PS. Nucleotide sequence of a Bacillus pumilus gene specifying chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. Gene. 1983; 24(2–3): 163–169. pmid:6315534
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Hols P, Baulard A, Garmyn D, Delplace B, Hogan S, Delcour J. Isolation and characterization of genetic expression and secretion signals from Enterococcus faecalis through the use of broad-host-range alpha-amylase probe vectors. Gene. 1992; 118(1): 21–30. pmid:1511881
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Eaton TJ, Shearman CA, Gasson MJ. The use of bacterial luciferase genes as reporter genes in Lactococcus: regulation of the Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis lactose genes. J Gen Microbiol. 1993; 139(7): 1495–1501. pmid:8371112
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Platteeuw C, Simons G, de Vos WM. Use of the Escherichia coli beta-glucuronidase (gusA) gene as a reporter gene for analyzing promoters in lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994; 60(2): 587–593. pmid:8135517
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Israelsen H, Madsen SM, Vrang A, Hansen EB, Johansen E. Cloning and partial characterization of regulated promoters from Lactococcus lactis Tn917-lacZ integrants with the new promoter probe vector, pAK80. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995; 61(7): 2540–2547. pmid:7618865
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Poquet I, Ehrlich SD, Gruss A. An export-specific reporter designed for gram-positive bacteria: application to Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 1998; 180(7): 1904–1912. pmid:9537391
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science. 1994; 263(5148): 802–805. pmid:8303295
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Geoffroy MC, Guyard C, Quatannens B, Pavan S, Lange M, Mercenier A. Use of green fluorescent protein to tag lactic acid bacterium strains under development as live vaccine vectors. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000; 66(1): 383–391. pmid:10618252
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Gory L, Montel MC, Zagorec M. Use of green fluorescent protein to monitor Lactobacillus sakei in fermented meat products. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001; 194(2): 127–133. pmid:11164296
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Perez-Arellano I, Perez-Martinez G. Optimization of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression from a lactose-inducible promoter in Lactobacillus casei. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003; 222(1): 123–127. pmid:12757955
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Chen Z, Lin J, Ma C, Zhao S, She Q, Liang Y. Characterization of pMC11, a plasmid with dual origins of replication isolated from Lactobacillus casei MCJ and construction of shuttle vectors with each replicon. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98(13): 5977–5989. pmid:24652065
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Borrero J, Jimenez JJ, Gutiez L, Herranz C, Cintas LM, Hernandez PE. Use of the usp45 lactococcal secretion signal sequence to drive the secretion and functional expression of enterococcal bacteriocins in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 89(1): 131–143. pmid:20842358
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Altermann E, Russell WM, Azcarate-Peril MA, Barrangou R, Buck BL, McAuliffe O, et al. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(11): 3906–3912. pmid:15671160
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. NewYork: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001
24. Heckman KL, Pease LR. Gene splicing and mutagenesis by PCR-driven overlap extension. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2(4): 924–932 pmid:17446874
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Gusakov AV, Kondratyeva EG, Sinitsyn AP. Comparison of two methods for assaying reducing sugars in the determination of carbohydrase activities. Int J Anal Chem 2011: 283658. pmid:21647284
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248–254. pmid:942051
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Hagen KE, Guan LL, Tannock GW, Korver DR, Allison GE. Detection, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo expression of genes encoding S-proteins in Lactobacillus gallinarum strains isolated from chicken crops. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71: 6633–6643. pmid:16269691
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. McCracken A, Turner MS, Giffard P, Hafner LM, Timms P. Analysis of promoter sequences from Lactobacillus and Lactococcus and their activity in several Lactobacillus species. Arch Microbiol. 2000; 173(5–6):383–389. pmid:10896218
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Boot HJ, Kolen CP, Andreadaki FJ, Leer RJ, Pouwels PH. The Lactobacillus acidophilus S-layer protein gene expression site comprises two consensus promoter sequences, one of which directs transcription of stable mRNA. J Bacteriol. 1996; 178(18): 5388–5394. pmid:8808926
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985; 33(1): 103–119. pmid:2985470
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Saad N, Delattre C, Urdaci M, Schmitter JM, Bressollier P. An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field. Lwt-Food Sci Technol. 2013; 50(1):1–16.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Yu QH, Dong SM, Zhu WY, Yang Q. Use of green fluorescent protein to monitor Lactobacillus in the gastro-intestinal tract of chicken. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007; 275(2): 207–213. pmid:17714484
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Chen YS, Steele JL. Analysis of promoter sequences from Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32 and their activity in other lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2005; 98(1): 64–72. pmid:15610418
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Araujo A, Ward OP. Mannanase Components from Bacillus pumilus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990; 56(6): 1954–1956. pmid:16348230
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Li YN, Meng K, Wang YR, Yao B. A beta-mannanase from Bacillus subtilis B36: purification, properties, sequencing, gene cloning and expression in Escherichia coli. Z Naturforsch C. 2006; 61(11–12): 840–846. pmid:17294696
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Bai X, Hu H, Chen H, Wei Q, Yang Z, Huang Q. Expression of a beta-mannosidase from Paenibacillus polymyxa A-8 in Escherichia coli and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(11): e111622. pmid:25423086
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LPS, Spier MR, Medeiros ABP, Yamaguishi CT, Lindner JDD, et al. The Potential of Probiotics: A Review. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2010; 48(4):413–434
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Davidson LE, Fiorino AM, Snydman DR, Hibberd PL. Lactobacillus GG as an immune adjuvant for live-attenuated influenza vaccine in healthy adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011; 65(4): 501–507. pmid:21285968
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] PubMed/NCBI

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Singh VP, Sharma J, Babu S, Rizwanulla , Singla A. Role of probiotics in health and disease: A review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013; 63(2):253–257 pmid:23894906
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] PubMed/NCBI

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Sanders ME, Klaenhammer TR. Invited review: the scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. J Dairy Sci. 2001; 84(2): 319–331. pmid:11233016
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] PubMed/NCBI

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Adachi K, Kawana K, Yokoyama T, Fujii T, Tomio A, Miura S, et al. Oral immunization with a Lactobacillus casei vaccine expressing human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E7 is an effective strategy to induce mucosal cytotoxic lymphocytes against HPV16 E7. Vaccine. 2010; 28(16): 2810–2817. pmid:20170766
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Moeini H, Rahim RA, Omar AR, Shafee N, Yusoff K. Lactobacillus acidophilus as a live vehicle for oral immunization against chicken anemia virus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 90(1):77–88. pmid:21181148
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Stoeker L, Nordone S, Gunderson S, Zhang L, Kajikawa A, LaVoy A, et al. Assessment of Lactobacillus gasseri as a candidate oral vaccine vector. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011; 18(11): 1834–1844. pmid:21900526
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Peterbauer C, Maischberger T, Haltrich D. Food-grade gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. Biotechnol J. 2011; 6(9): 1147–1161. pmid:21858927
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Achen MG, Davidson BE, Hillier AJ. Construction of plasmid vectors for the detection of streptococcal promoters. Gene. 1986; 45(1): 45–49. pmid:3536665
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Harwood CR, Williams DM, Lovett PS. Nucleotide sequence of a Bacillus pumilus gene specifying chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. Gene. 1983; 24(2–3): 163–169. pmid:6315534
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Hols P, Baulard A, Garmyn D, Delplace B, Hogan S, Delcour J. Isolation and characterization of genetic expression and secretion signals from Enterococcus faecalis through the use of broad-host-range alpha-amylase probe vectors. Gene. 1992; 118(1): 21–30. pmid:1511881
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Eaton TJ, Shearman CA, Gasson MJ. The use of bacterial luciferase genes as reporter genes in Lactococcus: regulation of the Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis lactose genes. J Gen Microbiol. 1993; 139(7): 1495–1501. pmid:8371112
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Platteeuw C, Simons G, de Vos WM. Use of the Escherichia coli beta-glucuronidase (gusA) gene as a reporter gene for analyzing promoters in lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994; 60(2): 587–593. pmid:8135517
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Israelsen H, Madsen SM, Vrang A, Hansen EB, Johansen E. Cloning and partial characterization of regulated promoters from Lactococcus lactis Tn917-lacZ integrants with the new promoter probe vector, pAK80. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995; 61(7): 2540–2547. pmid:7618865
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Poquet I, Ehrlich SD, Gruss A. An export-specific reporter designed for gram-positive bacteria: application to Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 1998; 180(7): 1904–1912. pmid:9537391
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science. 1994; 263(5148): 802–805. pmid:8303295
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Geoffroy MC, Guyard C, Quatannens B, Pavan S, Lange M, Mercenier A. Use of green fluorescent protein to tag lactic acid bacterium strains under development as live vaccine vectors. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000; 66(1): 383–391. pmid:10618252
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Gory L, Montel MC, Zagorec M. Use of green fluorescent protein to monitor Lactobacillus sakei in fermented meat products. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001; 194(2): 127–133. pmid:11164296
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Perez-Arellano I, Perez-Martinez G. Optimization of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression from a lactose-inducible promoter in Lactobacillus casei. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003; 222(1): 123–127. pmid:12757955
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Chen Z, Lin J, Ma C, Zhao S, She Q, Liang Y. Characterization of pMC11, a plasmid with dual origins of replication isolated from Lactobacillus casei MCJ and construction of shuttle vectors with each replicon. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98(13): 5977–5989. pmid:24652065
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Borrero J, Jimenez JJ, Gutiez L, Herranz C, Cintas LM, Hernandez PE. Use of the usp45 lactococcal secretion signal sequence to drive the secretion and functional expression of enterococcal bacteriocins in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 89(1): 131–143. pmid:20842358
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Altermann E, Russell WM, Azcarate-Peril MA, Barrangou R, Buck BL, McAuliffe O, et al. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(11): 3906–3912. pmid:15671160
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. NewYork: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001

[ref24] 24. Heckman KL, Pease LR. Gene splicing and mutagenesis by PCR-driven overlap extension. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2(4): 924–932 pmid:17446874
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Gusakov AV, Kondratyeva EG, Sinitsyn AP. Comparison of two methods for assaying reducing sugars in the determination of carbohydrase activities. Int J Anal Chem 2011: 283658. pmid:21647284
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248–254. pmid:942051
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Hagen KE, Guan LL, Tannock GW, Korver DR, Allison GE. Detection, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo expression of genes encoding S-proteins in Lactobacillus gallinarum strains isolated from chicken crops. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71: 6633–6643. pmid:16269691
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. McCracken A, Turner MS, Giffard P, Hafner LM, Timms P. Analysis of promoter sequences from Lactobacillus and Lactococcus and their activity in several Lactobacillus species. Arch Microbiol. 2000; 173(5–6):383–389. pmid:10896218
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Boot HJ, Kolen CP, Andreadaki FJ, Leer RJ, Pouwels PH. The Lactobacillus acidophilus S-layer protein gene expression site comprises two consensus promoter sequences, one of which directs transcription of stable mRNA. J Bacteriol. 1996; 178(18): 5388–5394. pmid:8808926
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985; 33(1): 103–119. pmid:2985470
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Saad N, Delattre C, Urdaci M, Schmitter JM, Bressollier P. An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field. Lwt-Food Sci Technol. 2013; 50(1):1–16.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Yu QH, Dong SM, Zhu WY, Yang Q. Use of green fluorescent protein to monitor Lactobacillus in the gastro-intestinal tract of chicken. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007; 275(2): 207–213. pmid:17714484
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Chen YS, Steele JL. Analysis of promoter sequences from Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32 and their activity in other lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2005; 98(1): 64–72. pmid:15610418
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Araujo A, Ward OP. Mannanase Components from Bacillus pumilus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990; 56(6): 1954–1956. pmid:16348230
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Li YN, Meng K, Wang YR, Yao B. A beta-mannanase from Bacillus subtilis B36: purification, properties, sequencing, gene cloning and expression in Escherichia coli. Z Naturforsch C. 2006; 61(11–12): 840–846. pmid:17294696
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Bai X, Hu H, Chen H, Wei Q, Yang Z, Huang Q. Expression of a beta-mannosidase from Paenibacillus polymyxa A-8 in Escherichia coli and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(11): e111622. pmid:25423086
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

DNA Manipulations

Construction of plasmids for recombinant protein expression

Electroporation transformation

Detection of target proteins in lactobacilli cells

Enzyme assay

S-layer protein electrophoresis

Statistical analysis

Results

L. acidophilus PSlpA mediates protein expression in both E. coli and L. casei

Protein stability and enzymatic activity of β-1,4-mannanase and β-glucuronidase in L. casei

Characterization the secretion of ManB in L. casei

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. SDS-PAGE analysis of ManB and GusA protein expression by E. coli JM109.

Author Contributions

References

L. acidophilus P_SlpA mediates protein expression in both E. coli and L. casei